Trey t
|
6426c0cacd
|
docs(01): capture phase context
Phase 01: Semantic Position Model
- Implementation decisions documented
- Phase boundary established
|
2026-01-18 13:35:11 -06:00 |
|
Trey t
|
36544b86d0
|
docs: create roadmap (4 phases)
Phases:
1. Semantic Position Model: DATA-*, PERS-* (foundation)
2. Constraint Validation: CONS-* (rules engine)
3. Visual Flattening: FLAT-* (display bridge)
4. Drag Interaction: DRAG-* (UI layer)
All 23 v1 requirements mapped to phases.
|
2026-01-18 13:24:27 -06:00 |
|
Trey t
|
13742540f9
|
docs: define v1 requirements
23 requirements across 5 categories (Data Model, Constraints, Flattening, Drag, Persistence)
5 requirements deferred to v2 (Accessibility, External Drops)
|
2026-01-18 13:21:45 -06:00 |
|
Trey t
|
6f09c0abcb
|
docs: complete project research for itinerary editor
Files:
- STACK.md - UITableView drag-drop APIs, SwiftUI bridging patterns
- FEATURES.md - Table stakes UX (lift, insertion line, haptics), polish features
- ARCHITECTURE.md - 5-layer semantic positioning architecture
- PITFALLS.md - Critical pitfalls (row vs semantic, travel as structural)
- SUMMARY.md - Executive synthesis with roadmap implications
Key findings:
- Stack: UITableView + UIHostingConfiguration (existing pattern validated)
- Architecture: Semantic (day, sortOrder) model, not row indices
- Critical pitfall: Row indices are ephemeral; semantic positions are truth
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
2026-01-18 13:16:07 -06:00 |
|
Trey t
|
fc6943a6f9
|
chore: add project config
Mode: yolo
Depth: quick
Parallelization: enabled
|
2026-01-18 13:08:48 -06:00 |
|
Trey t
|
98941a3b4d
|
docs: initialize project
Interactive drag-and-drop itinerary editor with semantic positioning
|
2026-01-18 13:08:13 -06:00 |
|