WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en 00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:02.470 align:start position:0% this<00:00:00.359> video<00:00:00.799> contains<00:00:01.240> every<00:00:01.480> Spanish<00:00:01.920> idea 00:00:02.470 --> 00:00:02.480 align:start position:0% this video contains every Spanish idea 00:00:02.480 --> 00:00:04.630 align:start position:0% this video contains every Spanish idea principle<00:00:02.960> and<00:00:03.159> fundamental<00:00:03.959> that<00:00:04.080> you<00:00:04.240> need 00:00:04.630 --> 00:00:04.640 align:start position:0% principle and fundamental that you need 00:00:04.640 --> 00:00:06.309 align:start position:0% principle and fundamental that you need in<00:00:04.759> order<00:00:04.960> to<00:00:05.400> understand<00:00:05.680> how<00:00:05.879> Spanish 00:00:06.309 --> 00:00:06.319 align:start position:0% in order to understand how Spanish 00:00:06.319 --> 00:00:08.190 align:start position:0% in order to understand how Spanish operates<00:00:06.839> as<00:00:06.960> a<00:00:07.120> language<00:00:07.600> after<00:00:07.799> watching 00:00:08.190 --> 00:00:08.200 align:start position:0% operates as a language after watching 00:00:08.200 --> 00:00:09.870 align:start position:0% operates as a language after watching this<00:00:08.360> video<00:00:08.679> you<00:00:08.800> will<00:00:08.960> have<00:00:09.040> a<00:00:09.160> clear<00:00:09.440> basis 00:00:09.870 --> 00:00:09.880 align:start position:0% this video you will have a clear basis 00:00:09.880 --> 00:00:11.669 align:start position:0% this video you will have a clear basis of<00:00:10.080> Spanish<00:00:10.599> and<00:00:11.000> understand<00:00:11.120> how<00:00:11.240> to<00:00:11.360> use<00:00:11.480> its 00:00:11.669 --> 00:00:11.679 align:start position:0% of Spanish and understand how to use its 00:00:11.679 --> 00:00:13.950 align:start position:0% of Spanish and understand how to use its ideas<00:00:12.080> properly<00:00:12.599> in<00:00:12.759> essence<00:00:13.320> this<00:00:13.480> video<00:00:13.839> is 00:00:13.950 --> 00:00:13.960 align:start position:0% ideas properly in essence this video is 00:00:13.960 --> 00:00:15.669 align:start position:0% ideas properly in essence this video is a<00:00:14.080> long<00:00:14.360> collection<00:00:14.839> of<00:00:15.000> all<00:00:15.120> of<00:00:15.240> my<00:00:15.400> previous 00:00:15.669 --> 00:00:15.679 align:start position:0% a long collection of all of my previous 00:00:15.679 --> 00:00:17.710 align:start position:0% a long collection of all of my previous videos<00:00:16.080> combined<00:00:16.600> that<00:00:16.760> show<00:00:17.039> and<00:00:17.240> explain 00:00:17.710 --> 00:00:17.720 align:start position:0% videos combined that show and explain 00:00:17.720 --> 00:00:19.870 align:start position:0% videos combined that show and explain each<00:00:17.880> Spanish<00:00:18.320> concept<00:00:18.840> individually<00:00:19.600> so 00:00:19.870 --> 00:00:19.880 align:start position:0% each Spanish concept individually so 00:00:19.880 --> 00:00:21.470 align:start position:0% each Spanish concept individually so that<00:00:20.039> way<00:00:20.320> you<00:00:20.439> don't<00:00:20.640> have<00:00:20.760> to<00:00:20.840> search<00:00:21.240> each 00:00:21.470 --> 00:00:21.480 align:start position:0% that way you don't have to search each 00:00:21.480 --> 00:00:22.990 align:start position:0% that way you don't have to search each concept<00:00:21.880> on<00:00:22.039> its<00:00:22.199> own<00:00:22.519> everything<00:00:22.800> that<00:00:22.880> you 00:00:22.990 --> 00:00:23.000 align:start position:0% concept on its own everything that you 00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:24.950 align:start position:0% concept on its own everything that you need<00:00:23.160> in<00:00:23.320> Spanish<00:00:23.840> is<00:00:24.000> in<00:00:24.160> this<00:00:24.320> video<00:00:24.720> aside 00:00:24.950 --> 00:00:24.960 align:start position:0% need in Spanish is in this video aside 00:00:24.960 --> 00:00:26.630 align:start position:0% need in Spanish is in this video aside from<00:00:25.160> verbs<00:00:25.439> like<00:00:25.640> gust<00:00:26.080> and<00:00:26.199> the<00:00:26.320> difference 00:00:26.630 --> 00:00:26.640 align:start position:0% from verbs like gust and the difference 00:00:26.640 --> 00:00:28.669 align:start position:0% from verbs like gust and the difference between<00:00:27.039> K<00:00:27.320> and<00:00:27.519> qu<00:00:27.880> I've<00:00:28.039> decided<00:00:28.320> to<00:00:28.480> not 00:00:28.669 --> 00:00:28.679 align:start position:0% between K and qu I've decided to not 00:00:28.679 --> 00:00:30.310 align:start position:0% between K and qu I've decided to not describe<00:00:29.119> them<00:00:29.359> because<00:00:29.599> these<00:00:29.679> are<00:00:30.000> Spanish 00:00:30.310 --> 00:00:30.320 align:start position:0% describe them because these are Spanish 00:00:30.320 --> 00:00:31.990 align:start position:0% describe them because these are Spanish Concepts<00:00:30.840> that<00:00:30.960> do<00:00:31.080> not<00:00:31.279> need<00:00:31.599> thorough 00:00:31.990 --> 00:00:32.000 align:start position:0% Concepts that do not need thorough 00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:34.030 align:start position:0% Concepts that do not need thorough explanations<00:00:32.800> aside<00:00:33.079> from<00:00:33.320> that<00:00:33.680> everything 00:00:34.030 --> 00:00:34.040 align:start position:0% explanations aside from that everything 00:00:34.040 --> 00:00:36.110 align:start position:0% explanations aside from that everything else<00:00:34.399> is<00:00:34.520> in<00:00:34.680> this<00:00:34.879> video<00:00:35.200> some<00:00:35.440> moments<00:00:35.920> will 00:00:36.110 --> 00:00:36.120 align:start position:0% else is in this video some moments will 00:00:36.120 --> 00:00:38.350 align:start position:0% else is in this video some moments will have<00:00:36.280> weird<00:00:36.600> sentences<00:00:37.360> like<00:00:37.680> this<00:00:37.960> concept 00:00:38.350 --> 00:00:38.360 align:start position:0% have weird sentences like this concept 00:00:38.360 --> 00:00:39.910 align:start position:0% have weird sentences like this concept is<00:00:38.480> for<00:00:38.600> a<00:00:38.719> future<00:00:39.079> video<00:00:39.480> but<00:00:39.640> that<00:00:39.760> is 00:00:39.910 --> 00:00:39.920 align:start position:0% is for a future video but that is 00:00:39.920 --> 00:00:42.069 align:start position:0% is for a future video but that is because<00:00:40.320> all<00:00:40.440> of<00:00:40.559> my<00:00:40.760> videos<00:00:41.120> are<00:00:41.320> edited<00:00:41.840> into 00:00:42.069 --> 00:00:42.079 align:start position:0% because all of my videos are edited into 00:00:42.079 --> 00:00:44.310 align:start position:0% because all of my videos are edited into one<00:00:42.280> long<00:00:42.559> video<00:00:43.000> some<00:00:43.239> parts<00:00:43.559> will<00:00:43.719> be<00:00:43.840> slower 00:00:44.310 --> 00:00:44.320 align:start position:0% one long video some parts will be slower 00:00:44.320 --> 00:00:45.990 align:start position:0% one long video some parts will be slower quieter<00:00:44.760> and<00:00:44.920> maybe<00:00:45.200> even<00:00:45.440> faster<00:00:45.760> than 00:00:45.990 --> 00:00:46.000 align:start position:0% quieter and maybe even faster than 00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:47.910 align:start position:0% quieter and maybe even faster than others<00:00:46.399> and<00:00:46.520> I<00:00:46.600> do<00:00:46.840> apologize<00:00:47.440> for<00:00:47.719> these 00:00:47.910 --> 00:00:47.920 align:start position:0% others and I do apologize for these 00:00:47.920 --> 00:00:49.389 align:start position:0% others and I do apologize for these moments<00:00:48.399> like<00:00:48.520> I<00:00:48.600> said<00:00:48.760> at<00:00:48.879> the<00:00:49.000> beginning 00:00:49.389 --> 00:00:49.399 align:start position:0% moments like I said at the beginning 00:00:49.399 --> 00:00:51.069 align:start position:0% moments like I said at the beginning this<00:00:49.520> is<00:00:49.600> a<00:00:49.719> simple<00:00:50.039> collection<00:00:50.559> of<00:00:50.719> all<00:00:50.920> my 00:00:51.069 --> 00:00:51.079 align:start position:0% this is a simple collection of all my 00:00:51.079 --> 00:00:52.990 align:start position:0% this is a simple collection of all my previous<00:00:51.399> videos<00:00:51.719> combined<00:00:52.160> so<00:00:52.399> therefore<00:00:52.879> I 00:00:52.990 --> 00:00:53.000 align:start position:0% previous videos combined so therefore I 00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:54.830 align:start position:0% previous videos combined so therefore I cannot<00:00:53.320> go<00:00:53.520> back<00:00:53.800> and<00:00:53.960> change<00:00:54.239> them<00:00:54.440> in<00:00:54.600> any 00:00:54.830 --> 00:00:54.840 align:start position:0% cannot go back and change them in any 00:00:54.840 --> 00:00:56.950 align:start position:0% cannot go back and change them in any way<00:00:55.160> what's<00:00:55.359> in<00:00:55.559> this<00:00:55.760> video<00:00:56.160> is<00:00:56.359> the<00:00:56.520> same 00:00:56.950 --> 00:00:56.960 align:start position:0% way what's in this video is the same 00:00:56.960 --> 00:00:58.670 align:start position:0% way what's in this video is the same across<00:00:57.280> all<00:00:57.440> of<00:00:57.559> my<00:00:57.680> previous<00:00:58.000> videos<00:00:58.440> and<00:00:58.600> I 00:00:58.670 --> 00:00:58.680 align:start position:0% across all of my previous videos and I 00:00:58.680 --> 00:01:00.189 align:start position:0% across all of my previous videos and I will<00:00:58.840> end<00:00:59.079> the<00:00:59.239> video<00:00:59.559> with<00:00:59.719> a<00:00:59.960> short 00:01:00.189 --> 00:01:00.199 align:start position:0% will end the video with a short 00:01:00.199 --> 00:01:02.069 align:start position:0% will end the video with a short conclusion<00:01:00.800> explaining<00:01:01.280> why<00:01:01.440> I<00:01:01.519> showed<00:01:01.879> these 00:01:02.069 --> 00:01:02.079 align:start position:0% conclusion explaining why I showed these 00:01:02.079 --> 00:01:04.990 align:start position:0% conclusion explaining why I showed these ideas<00:01:02.600> as<00:01:02.760> they<00:01:02.920> are<00:01:03.440> anyhow<00:01:04.040> enjoy<00:01:04.760> this<00:01:04.839> is 00:01:04.990 --> 00:01:05.000 align:start position:0% ideas as they are anyhow enjoy this is 00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:06.830 align:start position:0% ideas as they are anyhow enjoy this is my<00:01:05.159> first<00:01:05.400> official<00:01:05.799> video<00:01:06.119> on<00:01:06.280> my<00:01:06.479> channel 00:01:06.830 --> 00:01:06.840 align:start position:0% my first official video on my channel 00:01:06.840 --> 00:01:08.190 align:start position:0% my first official video on my channel that's<00:01:07.000> going<00:01:07.080> to<00:01:07.240> go<00:01:07.360> in<00:01:07.520> depth<00:01:07.880> with<00:01:08.040> the 00:01:08.190 --> 00:01:08.200 align:start position:0% that's going to go in depth with the 00:01:08.200 --> 00:01:09.510 align:start position:0% that's going to go in depth with the aspects<00:01:08.560> of<00:01:08.680> a<00:01:08.799> language<00:01:09.159> that<00:01:09.280> you<00:01:09.400> would 00:01:09.510 --> 00:01:09.520 align:start position:0% aspects of a language that you would 00:01:09.520 --> 00:01:11.469 align:start position:0% aspects of a language that you would need<00:01:09.640> to<00:01:09.799> know<00:01:10.080> to<00:01:10.240> speak<00:01:10.720> I<00:01:10.799> chose<00:01:11.040> to<00:01:11.159> go<00:01:11.320> with 00:01:11.469 --> 00:01:11.479 align:start position:0% need to know to speak I chose to go with 00:01:11.479 --> 00:01:12.910 align:start position:0% need to know to speak I chose to go with Spanish<00:01:11.840> first<00:01:12.159> because<00:01:12.320> I'm<00:01:12.439> learning<00:01:12.680> it 00:01:12.910 --> 00:01:12.920 align:start position:0% Spanish first because I'm learning it 00:01:12.920 --> 00:01:14.230 align:start position:0% Spanish first because I'm learning it right<00:01:13.080> now<00:01:13.360> and<00:01:13.439> I<00:01:13.520> would<00:01:13.680> even<00:01:13.840> say<00:01:14.040> that<00:01:14.119> I 00:01:14.230 --> 00:01:14.240 align:start position:0% right now and I would even say that I 00:01:14.240 --> 00:01:15.870 align:start position:0% right now and I would even say that I have<00:01:14.360> an<00:01:14.560> intermediate<00:01:15.159> to<00:01:15.320> an<00:01:15.479> advanced 00:01:15.870 --> 00:01:15.880 align:start position:0% have an intermediate to an advanced 00:01:15.880 --> 00:01:17.510 align:start position:0% have an intermediate to an advanced level<00:01:16.080> of<00:01:16.200> Spanish<00:01:16.640> in<00:01:16.759> all<00:01:17.040> aspects<00:01:17.360> of 00:01:17.510 --> 00:01:17.520 align:start position:0% level of Spanish in all aspects of 00:01:17.520 --> 00:01:19.230 align:start position:0% level of Spanish in all aspects of reading<00:01:17.759> and<00:01:17.920> writing<00:01:18.439> moderate<00:01:18.840> speaking 00:01:19.230 --> 00:01:19.240 align:start position:0% reading and writing moderate speaking 00:01:19.240 --> 00:01:20.670 align:start position:0% reading and writing moderate speaking and<00:01:19.360> a<00:01:19.439> bit<00:01:19.560> of<00:01:19.680> listening<00:01:20.200> though<00:01:20.360> I'm<00:01:20.439> not<00:01:20.560> a 00:01:20.670 --> 00:01:20.680 align:start position:0% and a bit of listening though I'm not a 00:01:20.680 --> 00:01:22.230 align:start position:0% and a bit of listening though I'm not a native<00:01:20.960> Spanish<00:01:21.280> speaker<00:01:21.799> I<00:01:21.880> do<00:01:22.000> have<00:01:22.119> a 00:01:22.230 --> 00:01:22.240 align:start position:0% native Spanish speaker I do have a 00:01:22.240 --> 00:01:23.550 align:start position:0% native Spanish speaker I do have a substantial<00:01:22.720> amount<00:01:22.920> of<00:01:23.040> knowledge<00:01:23.360> when<00:01:23.439> it 00:01:23.550 --> 00:01:23.560 align:start position:0% substantial amount of knowledge when it 00:01:23.560 --> 00:01:25.069 align:start position:0% substantial amount of knowledge when it comes<00:01:23.720> down<00:01:23.880> to<00:01:24.040> the<00:01:24.159> fundamentals<00:01:24.840> of<00:01:24.960> the 00:01:25.069 --> 00:01:25.079 align:start position:0% comes down to the fundamentals of the 00:01:25.079 --> 00:01:26.870 align:start position:0% comes down to the fundamentals of the language<00:01:25.479> and<00:01:25.600> by<00:01:25.759> fundamentals<00:01:26.479> I<00:01:26.560> mean<00:01:26.759> the 00:01:26.870 --> 00:01:26.880 align:start position:0% language and by fundamentals I mean the 00:01:26.880 --> 00:01:28.950 align:start position:0% language and by fundamentals I mean the first<00:01:27.200> words<00:01:27.640> phrases<00:01:28.119> and<00:01:28.280> sentences<00:01:28.840> that 00:01:28.950 --> 00:01:28.960 align:start position:0% first words phrases and sentences that 00:01:28.960 --> 00:01:30.069 align:start position:0% first words phrases and sentences that you<00:01:29.040> would<00:01:29.200> need<00:01:29.320> to<00:01:29.400> know<00:01:29.560> to<00:01:29.680> start<00:01:29.880> start 00:01:30.069 --> 00:01:30.079 align:start position:0% you would need to know to start start 00:01:30.079 --> 00:01:31.830 align:start position:0% you would need to know to start start speaking<00:01:30.360> Spanish<00:01:30.720> on<00:01:30.840> a<00:01:30.960> beginner<00:01:31.400> level 00:01:31.830 --> 00:01:31.840 align:start position:0% speaking Spanish on a beginner level 00:01:31.840 --> 00:01:33.190 align:start position:0% speaking Spanish on a beginner level everybody<00:01:32.399> has<00:01:32.560> to<00:01:32.680> start<00:01:32.960> with<00:01:33.079> the 00:01:33.190 --> 00:01:33.200 align:start position:0% everybody has to start with the 00:01:33.200 --> 00:01:34.789 align:start position:0% everybody has to start with the fundamentals<00:01:33.880> of<00:01:34.000> the<00:01:34.159> language 00:01:34.789 --> 00:01:34.799 align:start position:0% fundamentals of the language 00:01:34.799 --> 00:01:36.109 align:start position:0% fundamentals of the language understanding<00:01:35.040> the<00:01:35.159> basic<00:01:35.479> syntax<00:01:35.880> of<00:01:36.000> the 00:01:36.109 --> 00:01:36.119 align:start position:0% understanding the basic syntax of the 00:01:36.119 --> 00:01:38.590 align:start position:0% understanding the basic syntax of the language<00:01:36.600> the<00:01:36.720> alphabet<00:01:37.399> words<00:01:38.040> verbs 00:01:38.590 --> 00:01:38.600 align:start position:0% language the alphabet words verbs 00:01:38.600 --> 00:01:40.149 align:start position:0% language the alphabet words verbs phrases<00:01:39.040> and<00:01:39.200> everything<00:01:39.439> in<00:01:39.600> between<00:01:40.079> the 00:01:40.149 --> 00:01:40.159 align:start position:0% phrases and everything in between the 00:01:40.159 --> 00:01:41.389 align:start position:0% phrases and everything in between the Spanish<00:01:40.520> alphabet<00:01:40.880> is<00:01:41.000> actually<00:01:41.240> no 00:01:41.389 --> 00:01:41.399 align:start position:0% Spanish alphabet is actually no 00:01:41.399 --> 00:01:42.630 align:start position:0% Spanish alphabet is actually no different<00:01:41.640> than<00:01:41.759> the<00:01:41.880> English<00:01:42.200> alphabet 00:01:42.630 --> 00:01:42.640 align:start position:0% different than the English alphabet 00:01:42.640 --> 00:01:44.069 align:start position:0% different than the English alphabet following<00:01:43.000> the<00:01:43.119> same<00:01:43.320> letters<00:01:43.720> but<00:01:43.840> there<00:01:43.960> are 00:01:44.069 --> 00:01:44.079 align:start position:0% following the same letters but there are 00:01:44.079 --> 00:01:45.990 align:start position:0% following the same letters but there are a<00:01:44.200> few<00:01:44.360> differences<00:01:44.880> like<00:01:45.040> having<00:01:45.240> an<00:01:45.439> in 00:01:45.990 --> 00:01:46.000 align:start position:0% a few differences like having an in 00:01:46.000 --> 00:01:47.830 align:start position:0% a few differences like having an in which<00:01:46.119> is<00:01:46.200> an<00:01:46.360> N<00:01:46.719> with<00:01:46.840> a<00:01:46.920> squiggle<00:01:47.360> over<00:01:47.520> it 00:01:47.830 --> 00:01:47.840 align:start position:0% which is an N with a squiggle over it 00:01:47.840 --> 00:01:50.270 align:start position:0% which is an N with a squiggle over it having<00:01:48.079> 27<00:01:48.560> letters<00:01:48.920> instead<00:01:49.200> of<00:01:49.360> 26<00:01:50.000> like<00:01:50.119> in 00:01:50.270 --> 00:01:50.280 align:start position:0% having 27 letters instead of 26 like in 00:01:50.280 --> 00:01:52.230 align:start position:0% having 27 letters instead of 26 like in English<00:01:50.799> and<00:01:51.000> also<00:01:51.520> every<00:01:51.759> letter<00:01:52.079> is 00:01:52.230 --> 00:01:52.240 align:start position:0% English and also every letter is 00:01:52.240 --> 00:01:53.709 align:start position:0% English and also every letter is pronounced<00:01:52.680> differently<00:01:53.200> as<00:01:53.320> someone<00:01:53.560> who's 00:01:53.709 --> 00:01:53.719 align:start position:0% pronounced differently as someone who's 00:01:53.719 --> 00:01:55.310 align:start position:0% pronounced differently as someone who's learning<00:01:54.079> Spanish<00:01:54.560> you<00:01:54.640> don't<00:01:54.880> necessarily 00:01:55.310 --> 00:01:55.320 align:start position:0% learning Spanish you don't necessarily 00:01:55.320 --> 00:01:56.630 align:start position:0% learning Spanish you don't necessarily need<00:01:55.479> to<00:01:55.600> learn<00:01:55.799> how<00:01:55.920> to<00:01:56.079> pronounce<00:01:56.439> every 00:01:56.630 --> 00:01:56.640 align:start position:0% need to learn how to pronounce every 00:01:56.640 --> 00:01:58.230 align:start position:0% need to learn how to pronounce every letter<00:01:56.880> of<00:01:57.000> the<00:01:57.119> alphabet<00:01:57.759> what<00:01:57.840> you<00:01:57.960> do<00:01:58.079> need 00:01:58.230 --> 00:01:58.240 align:start position:0% letter of the alphabet what you do need 00:01:58.240 --> 00:01:59.950 align:start position:0% letter of the alphabet what you do need to<00:01:58.360> learn<00:01:58.680> is<00:01:58.799> how<00:01:58.880> to<00:01:59.000> use<00:01:59.200> these<00:01:59.360> letters<00:01:59.600> in 00:01:59.950 --> 00:01:59.960 align:start position:0% to learn is how to use these letters in 00:01:59.960 --> 00:02:01.910 align:start position:0% to learn is how to use these letters in context<00:02:00.759> however<00:02:01.159> I<00:02:01.240> will<00:02:01.360> still<00:02:01.600> pronounce 00:02:01.910 --> 00:02:01.920 align:start position:0% context however I will still pronounce 00:02:01.920 --> 00:02:03.310 align:start position:0% context however I will still pronounce them<00:02:02.079> for<00:02:02.240> you<00:02:02.479> so<00:02:02.640> that<00:02:02.759> you<00:02:02.840> can<00:02:03.200> understand 00:02:03.310 --> 00:02:03.320 align:start position:0% them for you so that you can understand 00:02:03.320 --> 00:02:13.070 align:start position:0% them for you so that you can understand how<00:02:03.439> the<00:02:03.560> language<00:02:03.840> is<00:02:03.960> spoken<00:02:04.920> a<00:02:05.439> b<00:02:05.960> c<00:02:06.479> d<00:02:07.119> e 00:02:13.070 --> 00:02:13.080 align:start position:0% 00:02:13.080 --> 00:02:21.430 align:start position:0% f 00:02:21.430 --> 00:02:21.440 align:start position:0% 00:02:21.440 --> 00:02:23.589 align:start position:0% o<00:02:22.440> That's<00:02:22.599> How<00:02:22.720> The<00:02:22.840> Language<00:02:23.160> sounds<00:02:23.440> like 00:02:23.589 --> 00:02:23.599 align:start position:0% o That's How The Language sounds like 00:02:23.599 --> 00:02:25.470 align:start position:0% o That's How The Language sounds like one<00:02:23.840> spoken<00:02:24.360> as<00:02:24.440> a<00:02:24.599> side<00:02:24.840> note<00:02:25.120> people 00:02:25.470 --> 00:02:25.480 align:start position:0% one spoken as a side note people 00:02:25.480 --> 00:02:27.070 align:start position:0% one spoken as a side note people sometimes<00:02:25.680> like<00:02:25.840> to<00:02:25.959> include<00:02:26.200> the<00:02:26.319> letters<00:02:26.640> CH 00:02:27.070 --> 00:02:27.080 align:start position:0% sometimes like to include the letters CH 00:02:27.080 --> 00:02:29.030 align:start position:0% sometimes like to include the letters CH and<00:02:27.319> Y<00:02:27.720> making<00:02:28.000> the<00:02:28.080> alphabet<00:02:28.480> have<00:02:28.599> 29 00:02:29.030 --> 00:02:29.040 align:start position:0% and Y making the alphabet have 29 00:02:29.040 --> 00:02:30.390 align:start position:0% and Y making the alphabet have 29 letters<00:02:29.400> but<00:02:29.519> these<00:02:29.599> are<00:02:29.879> mainly<00:02:30.120> sound 00:02:30.390 --> 00:02:30.400 align:start position:0% letters but these are mainly sound 00:02:30.400 --> 00:02:32.270 align:start position:0% letters but these are mainly sound letters<00:02:30.800> that<00:02:30.879> are<00:02:31.040> used<00:02:31.319> a<00:02:31.440> lot<00:02:31.720> less<00:02:32.160> and 00:02:32.270 --> 00:02:32.280 align:start position:0% letters that are used a lot less and 00:02:32.280 --> 00:02:33.430 align:start position:0% letters that are used a lot less and something<00:02:32.560> important<00:02:32.840> to<00:02:32.959> say<00:02:33.120> about<00:02:33.319> the 00:02:33.430 --> 00:02:33.440 align:start position:0% something important to say about the 00:02:33.440 --> 00:02:35.309 align:start position:0% something important to say about the sound<00:02:34.120> yeah<00:02:34.440> typically<00:02:34.760> speaking<00:02:35.040> if<00:02:35.160> you're 00:02:35.309 --> 00:02:35.319 align:start position:0% sound yeah typically speaking if you're 00:02:35.319 --> 00:02:36.949 align:start position:0% sound yeah typically speaking if you're someone<00:02:35.560> who<00:02:35.680> is<00:02:35.800> not<00:02:35.959> of<00:02:36.080> Spanish<00:02:36.480> Heritage 00:02:36.949 --> 00:02:36.959 align:start position:0% someone who is not of Spanish Heritage 00:02:36.959 --> 00:02:39.229 align:start position:0% someone who is not of Spanish Heritage you<00:02:37.080> will<00:02:37.239> pronounce<00:02:37.599> the<00:02:37.800> sound<00:02:38.319> as<00:02:38.560> yeah<00:02:38.879> two 00:02:39.229 --> 00:02:39.239 align:start position:0% you will pronounce the sound as yeah two 00:02:39.239 --> 00:02:42.470 align:start position:0% you will pronounce the sound as yeah two L's<00:02:39.920> make<00:02:40.120> a<00:02:40.519> ye<00:02:40.800> sound<00:02:41.319> like<00:02:41.680> yav<00:02:42.239> which<00:02:42.360> is 00:02:42.470 --> 00:02:42.480 align:start position:0% L's make a ye sound like yav which is 00:02:42.480 --> 00:02:44.350 align:start position:0% L's make a ye sound like yav which is Spanish<00:02:42.800> for<00:02:43.040> key<00:02:43.560> now<00:02:43.920> I<00:02:44.000> would<00:02:44.120> like<00:02:44.239> to 00:02:44.350 --> 00:02:44.360 align:start position:0% Spanish for key now I would like to 00:02:44.360 --> 00:02:45.509 align:start position:0% Spanish for key now I would like to speak<00:02:44.560> about<00:02:44.760> the<00:02:44.879> words<00:02:45.159> that<00:02:45.280> you<00:02:45.360> would 00:02:45.509 --> 00:02:45.519 align:start position:0% speak about the words that you would 00:02:45.519 --> 00:02:46.990 align:start position:0% speak about the words that you would need<00:02:45.599> to<00:02:45.720> know<00:02:45.920> to<00:02:46.040> say<00:02:46.239> daily<00:02:46.599> if<00:02:46.680> you<00:02:46.760> want<00:02:46.879> to 00:02:46.990 --> 00:02:47.000 align:start position:0% need to know to say daily if you want to 00:02:47.000 --> 00:02:48.990 align:start position:0% need to know to say daily if you want to speak<00:02:47.200> Spanish<00:02:47.760> for<00:02:47.959> now<00:02:48.280> the<00:02:48.400> biggest<00:02:48.720> advice 00:02:48.990 --> 00:02:49.000 align:start position:0% speak Spanish for now the biggest advice 00:02:49.000 --> 00:02:50.470 align:start position:0% speak Spanish for now the biggest advice that<00:02:49.120> I<00:02:49.200> can<00:02:49.400> give<00:02:49.640> is<00:02:49.720> to<00:02:49.879> just<00:02:50.000> memorize 00:02:50.470 --> 00:02:50.480 align:start position:0% that I can give is to just memorize 00:02:50.480 --> 00:02:51.869 align:start position:0% that I can give is to just memorize these<00:02:50.640> words<00:02:50.959> and<00:02:51.080> keep<00:02:51.280> them<00:02:51.400> locked<00:02:51.640> in<00:02:51.760> your 00:02:51.869 --> 00:02:51.879 align:start position:0% these words and keep them locked in your 00:02:51.879 --> 00:02:53.670 align:start position:0% these words and keep them locked in your mind<00:02:52.159> and<00:02:52.239> whenever<00:02:52.519> I<00:02:52.599> say<00:02:52.800> memorize<00:02:53.319> this<00:02:53.519> or 00:02:53.670 --> 00:02:53.680 align:start position:0% mind and whenever I say memorize this or 00:02:53.680 --> 00:02:55.350 align:start position:0% mind and whenever I say memorize this or memorize<00:02:54.200> that<00:02:54.480> it<00:02:54.599> basically<00:02:54.920> means<00:02:55.120> that<00:02:55.239> I 00:02:55.350 --> 00:02:55.360 align:start position:0% memorize that it basically means that I 00:02:55.360 --> 00:02:57.149 align:start position:0% memorize that it basically means that I simplified<00:02:55.879> the<00:02:56.000> context<00:02:56.480> to<00:02:56.640> its<00:02:56.800> easiest 00:02:57.149 --> 00:02:57.159 align:start position:0% simplified the context to its easiest 00:02:57.159 --> 00:02:59.350 align:start position:0% simplified the context to its easiest form<00:02:57.640> it<00:02:57.800> cannot<00:02:58.120> get<00:02:58.360> any<00:02:58.560> easier<00:02:58.959> than<00:02:59.159> this 00:02:59.350 --> 00:02:59.360 align:start position:0% form it cannot get any easier than this 00:02:59.360 --> 00:03:00.430 align:start position:0% form it cannot get any easier than this so<00:02:59.519> it's<00:02:59.599> not<00:02:59.760> not<00:02:59.840> going<00:02:59.920> to<00:03:00.000> be<00:03:00.239> difficult<00:03:00.319> to 00:03:00.430 --> 00:03:00.440 align:start position:0% so it's not not going to be difficult to 00:03:00.440 --> 00:03:01.710 align:start position:0% so it's not not going to be difficult to memorize<00:03:00.879> these<00:03:01.040> words<00:03:01.319> and<00:03:01.440> have<00:03:01.560> them 00:03:01.710 --> 00:03:01.720 align:start position:0% memorize these words and have them 00:03:01.720 --> 00:03:03.030 align:start position:0% memorize these words and have them locked<00:03:01.959> in<00:03:02.080> your<00:03:02.200> memory<00:03:02.640> here's<00:03:02.800> what<00:03:02.920> I'm 00:03:03.030 --> 00:03:03.040 align:start position:0% locked in your memory here's what I'm 00:03:03.040 --> 00:03:05.110 align:start position:0% locked in your memory here's what I'm going<00:03:03.200> to<00:03:03.319> begin<00:03:03.599> with<00:03:04.159> accents<00:03:04.760> question 00:03:05.110 --> 00:03:05.120 align:start position:0% going to begin with accents question 00:03:05.120 --> 00:03:07.229 align:start position:0% going to begin with accents question words<00:03:05.599> prepositional<00:03:06.120> words<00:03:06.319> and<00:03:06.519> adverbs 00:03:07.229 --> 00:03:07.239 align:start position:0% words prepositional words and adverbs 00:03:07.239 --> 00:03:10.270 align:start position:0% words prepositional words and adverbs pronouns<00:03:08.080> days<00:03:08.239> of<00:03:08.360> the<00:03:08.519> week<00:03:08.959> months<00:03:09.599> Seasons 00:03:10.270 --> 00:03:10.280 align:start position:0% pronouns days of the week months Seasons 00:03:10.280 --> 00:03:12.550 align:start position:0% pronouns days of the week months Seasons time<00:03:10.519> words<00:03:11.000> and<00:03:11.159> numbers<00:03:11.760> number<00:03:12.040> one 00:03:12.550 --> 00:03:12.560 align:start position:0% time words and numbers number one 00:03:12.560 --> 00:03:14.430 align:start position:0% time words and numbers number one accents<00:03:13.200> accents<00:03:13.519> in<00:03:13.680> Spanish<00:03:14.080> essentially 00:03:14.430 --> 00:03:14.440 align:start position:0% accents accents in Spanish essentially 00:03:14.440 --> 00:03:15.990 align:start position:0% accents accents in Spanish essentially help<00:03:14.640> to<00:03:14.799> indicate<00:03:15.239> which<00:03:15.360> syllable<00:03:15.799> of<00:03:15.879> a 00:03:15.990 --> 00:03:16.000 align:start position:0% help to indicate which syllable of a 00:03:16.000 --> 00:03:17.470 align:start position:0% help to indicate which syllable of a word<00:03:16.200> should<00:03:16.360> be<00:03:16.440> stressed<00:03:16.799> out<00:03:17.000> when<00:03:17.159> spoken 00:03:17.470 --> 00:03:17.480 align:start position:0% word should be stressed out when spoken 00:03:17.480 --> 00:03:19.110 align:start position:0% word should be stressed out when spoken out<00:03:17.720> loud<00:03:18.080> the<00:03:18.200> accents<00:03:18.480> are<00:03:18.599> placed<00:03:18.879> above 00:03:19.110 --> 00:03:19.120 align:start position:0% out loud the accents are placed above 00:03:19.120 --> 00:03:20.830 align:start position:0% out loud the accents are placed above vowels<00:03:19.560> and<00:03:19.720> whenever<00:03:19.959> you<00:03:20.120> say<00:03:20.319> them<00:03:20.560> you<00:03:20.680> put 00:03:20.830 --> 00:03:20.840 align:start position:0% vowels and whenever you say them you put 00:03:20.840 --> 00:03:22.789 align:start position:0% vowels and whenever you say them you put the<00:03:20.959> emphasis<00:03:21.440> of<00:03:21.599> the<00:03:21.720> sound<00:03:22.080> on<00:03:22.280> that<00:03:22.440> vowel 00:03:22.789 --> 00:03:22.799 align:start position:0% the emphasis of the sound on that vowel 00:03:22.799 --> 00:03:24.190 align:start position:0% the emphasis of the sound on that vowel here's<00:03:22.959> an<00:03:23.159> example<00:03:23.519> and<00:03:23.640> I'm<00:03:23.760> using<00:03:24.040> this 00:03:24.190 --> 00:03:24.200 align:start position:0% here's an example and I'm using this 00:03:24.200 --> 00:03:25.710 align:start position:0% here's an example and I'm using this example<00:03:24.640> as<00:03:24.720> an<00:03:24.920> example<00:03:25.280> you<00:03:25.360> don't<00:03:25.519> have<00:03:25.599> to 00:03:25.710 --> 00:03:25.720 align:start position:0% example as an example you don't have to 00:03:25.720 --> 00:03:28.070 align:start position:0% example as an example you don't have to know<00:03:25.840> the<00:03:25.959> rules<00:03:26.200> for<00:03:26.360> now<00:03:27.040> yo<00:03:27.319> ablo<00:03:27.879> in 00:03:28.070 --> 00:03:28.080 align:start position:0% know the rules for now yo ablo in 00:03:28.080 --> 00:03:30.350 align:start position:0% know the rules for now yo ablo in Spanish<00:03:28.599> means<00:03:29.000> I<00:03:29.200> speak<00:03:29.760> don't<00:03:29.959> worry<00:03:30.200> about 00:03:30.350 --> 00:03:30.360 align:start position:0% Spanish means I speak don't worry about 00:03:30.360 --> 00:03:32.589 align:start position:0% Spanish means I speak don't worry about the<00:03:30.480> conjugation<00:03:31.239> yo<00:03:32.200> that's<00:03:32.360> the 00:03:32.589 --> 00:03:32.599 align:start position:0% the conjugation yo that's the 00:03:32.599 --> 00:03:37.710 align:start position:0% the conjugation yo that's the pronunciation<00:03:33.799> yo<00:03:34.799> however<00:03:35.920> ELO<00:03:36.920> means<00:03:37.439> he 00:03:37.710 --> 00:03:37.720 align:start position:0% pronunciation yo however ELO means he 00:03:37.720 --> 00:03:40.350 align:start position:0% pronunciation yo however ELO means he spoke<00:03:38.200> L<00:03:38.599> with<00:03:38.720> an<00:03:38.879> accent<00:03:39.159> mark<00:03:39.560> means<00:03:39.959> he 00:03:40.350 --> 00:03:40.360 align:start position:0% spoke L with an accent mark means he 00:03:40.360 --> 00:03:41.949 align:start position:0% spoke L with an accent mark means he because<00:03:40.640> without<00:03:40.879> the<00:03:41.080> accent<00:03:41.439> it<00:03:41.519> means<00:03:41.840> the 00:03:41.949 --> 00:03:41.959 align:start position:0% because without the accent it means the 00:03:41.959 --> 00:03:45.070 align:start position:0% because without the accent it means the article<00:03:42.640> the<00:03:43.159> masculine<00:03:43.799> and<00:03:43.959> also<00:03:44.519> H's<00:03:44.879> in 00:03:45.070 --> 00:03:45.080 align:start position:0% article the masculine and also H's in 00:03:45.080 --> 00:03:46.830 align:start position:0% article the masculine and also H's in Spanish<00:03:45.480> are<00:03:45.640> not<00:03:45.879> pronounced<00:03:46.439> so<00:03:46.599> whenever 00:03:46.830 --> 00:03:46.840 align:start position:0% Spanish are not pronounced so whenever 00:03:46.840 --> 00:03:49.110 align:start position:0% Spanish are not pronounced so whenever you<00:03:46.959> see<00:03:47.159> a<00:03:47.280> word<00:03:47.599> beginning<00:03:47.959> with<00:03:48.239> a<00:03:48.720> followed 00:03:49.110 --> 00:03:49.120 align:start position:0% you see a word beginning with a followed 00:03:49.120 --> 00:03:51.350 align:start position:0% you see a word beginning with a followed by<00:03:49.239> a<00:03:49.400> vowel<00:03:49.840> just<00:03:49.959> say<00:03:50.159> the<00:03:50.280> vowel<00:03:50.640> as<00:03:50.760> it<00:03:50.920> is 00:03:51.350 --> 00:03:51.360 align:start position:0% by a vowel just say the vowel as it is 00:03:51.360 --> 00:03:58.710 align:start position:0% by a vowel just say the vowel as it is it's<00:03:51.680> Noto<00:03:52.959> Oro<00:03:53.959> it's<00:03:54.400> ablo<00:03:55.640> ablo<00:03:56.720> ablo<00:03:57.720> ablo 00:03:58.710 --> 00:03:58.720 align:start position:0% it's Noto Oro it's ablo ablo ablo ablo 00:03:58.720 --> 00:04:01.229 align:start position:0% it's Noto Oro it's ablo ablo ablo ablo that's<00:03:59.000> Accents<00:03:59.360> in<00:03:59.680> Spanish<00:04:00.280> number<00:04:00.560> two 00:04:01.229 --> 00:04:01.239 align:start position:0% that's Accents in Spanish number two 00:04:01.239 --> 00:04:03.190 align:start position:0% that's Accents in Spanish number two question<00:04:01.599> words<00:04:02.159> the<00:04:02.280> best<00:04:02.519> advice<00:04:02.799> for<00:04:03.040> these 00:04:03.190 --> 00:04:03.200 align:start position:0% question words the best advice for these 00:04:03.200 --> 00:04:05.309 align:start position:0% question words the best advice for these words<00:04:03.560> is<00:04:03.760> again<00:04:04.079> just<00:04:04.319> memorize<00:04:04.760> them<00:04:05.159> these 00:04:05.309 --> 00:04:05.319 align:start position:0% words is again just memorize them these 00:04:05.319 --> 00:04:06.949 align:start position:0% words is again just memorize them these are<00:04:05.480> the<00:04:05.640> question<00:04:05.920> words<00:04:06.280> and<00:04:06.400> in<00:04:06.560> Spanish 00:04:06.949 --> 00:04:06.959 align:start position:0% are the question words and in Spanish 00:04:06.959 --> 00:04:10.789 align:start position:0% are the question words and in Spanish they<00:04:07.079> look<00:04:07.280> like<00:04:07.439> this<00:04:08.200> where<00:04:08.599> is<00:04:09.000> d<00:04:09.920> when<00:04:10.319> is 00:04:10.789 --> 00:04:10.799 align:start position:0% they look like this where is d when is 00:04:10.799 --> 00:04:17.430 align:start position:0% they look like this where is d when is quando<00:04:11.799> what<00:04:12.159> is<00:04:12.560> K<00:04:13.480> why<00:04:13.840> is<00:04:14.439> for<00:04:15.439> who<00:04:15.959> is<00:04:16.440> Ken 00:04:17.430 --> 00:04:17.440 align:start position:0% quando what is K why is for who is Ken 00:04:17.440 --> 00:04:21.949 align:start position:0% quando what is K why is for who is Ken which<00:04:17.799> is<00:04:18.120> kual<00:04:19.079> how<00:04:19.840> is<00:04:20.840> and<00:04:21.040> how<00:04:21.280> much<00:04:21.560> or<00:04:21.799> how 00:04:21.949 --> 00:04:21.959 align:start position:0% which is kual how is and how much or how 00:04:21.959 --> 00:04:25.790 align:start position:0% which is kual how is and how much or how many<00:04:22.520> is<00:04:22.759> Quanto<00:04:23.520> quanta<00:04:24.280> quantos<00:04:25.040> Quantas 00:04:25.790 --> 00:04:25.800 align:start position:0% many is Quanto quanta quantos Quantas 00:04:25.800 --> 00:04:27.150 align:start position:0% many is Quanto quanta quantos Quantas and<00:04:25.960> also<00:04:26.240> whenever<00:04:26.479> you<00:04:26.600> write<00:04:26.800> a<00:04:26.919> question 00:04:27.150 --> 00:04:27.160 align:start position:0% and also whenever you write a question 00:04:27.160 --> 00:04:28.590 align:start position:0% and also whenever you write a question with<00:04:27.360> them<00:04:27.600> you<00:04:27.680> have<00:04:27.759> to<00:04:27.880> put<00:04:28.000> an<00:04:28.120> upside<00:04:28.440> down 00:04:28.590 --> 00:04:28.600 align:start position:0% with them you have to put an upside down 00:04:28.600 --> 00:04:30.110 align:start position:0% with them you have to put an upside down question<00:04:28.840> mark<00:04:29.080> in<00:04:29.199> the<00:04:29.280> beginning<00:04:29.759> this<00:04:29.880> is<00:04:29.960> a 00:04:30.110 --> 00:04:30.120 align:start position:0% question mark in the beginning this is a 00:04:30.120 --> 00:04:31.390 align:start position:0% question mark in the beginning this is a rule<00:04:30.360> in<00:04:30.440> the<00:04:30.600> language<00:04:31.080> and<00:04:31.199> this<00:04:31.280> is 00:04:31.390 --> 00:04:31.400 align:start position:0% rule in the language and this is 00:04:31.400 --> 00:04:32.830 align:start position:0% rule in the language and this is something<00:04:31.680> good<00:04:31.800> to<00:04:31.960> remember<00:04:32.440> if<00:04:32.520> you<00:04:32.600> see 00:04:32.830 --> 00:04:32.840 align:start position:0% something good to remember if you see 00:04:32.840 --> 00:04:34.430 align:start position:0% something good to remember if you see these<00:04:33.000> words<00:04:33.280> with<00:04:33.520> accents<00:04:34.000> the<00:04:34.120> words<00:04:34.320> are 00:04:34.430 --> 00:04:34.440 align:start position:0% these words with accents the words are 00:04:34.440 --> 00:04:36.990 align:start position:0% these words with accents the words are used<00:04:34.680> as<00:04:34.840> literal<00:04:35.280> questions<00:04:36.120> sometimes<00:04:36.520> K 00:04:36.990 --> 00:04:37.000 align:start position:0% used as literal questions sometimes K 00:04:37.000 --> 00:04:39.670 align:start position:0% used as literal questions sometimes K without<00:04:37.240> an<00:04:37.479> accent<00:04:37.840> mark<00:04:38.320> can<00:04:38.479> mean<00:04:39.039> that<00:04:39.520> as 00:04:39.670 --> 00:04:39.680 align:start position:0% without an accent mark can mean that as 00:04:39.680 --> 00:04:41.909 align:start position:0% without an accent mark can mean that as in<00:04:39.840> the<00:04:39.960> sentence<00:04:40.600> I<00:04:40.680> wanted<00:04:40.960> to<00:04:41.120> tell<00:04:41.320> you 00:04:41.909 --> 00:04:41.919 align:start position:0% in the sentence I wanted to tell you 00:04:41.919 --> 00:04:44.510 align:start position:0% in the sentence I wanted to tell you that<00:04:42.240> I'm<00:04:42.479> happy<00:04:43.120> sometimes<00:04:43.440> D<00:04:44.120> without<00:04:44.320> an 00:04:44.510 --> 00:04:44.520 align:start position:0% that I'm happy sometimes D without an 00:04:44.520 --> 00:04:46.990 align:start position:0% that I'm happy sometimes D without an accent<00:04:44.800> mark<00:04:45.240> can<00:04:45.360> mean<00:04:45.960> where<00:04:46.199> I<00:04:46.400> came<00:04:46.639> from 00:04:46.990 --> 00:04:47.000 align:start position:0% accent mark can mean where I came from 00:04:47.000 --> 00:04:48.909 align:start position:0% accent mark can mean where I came from I'm<00:04:47.120> not<00:04:47.280> using<00:04:47.560> it<00:04:47.720> as<00:04:47.840> a<00:04:48.039> question<00:04:48.520> I'm<00:04:48.639> using 00:04:48.909 --> 00:04:48.919 align:start position:0% I'm not using it as a question I'm using 00:04:48.919 --> 00:04:51.990 align:start position:0% I'm not using it as a question I'm using it<00:04:49.120> as<00:04:49.199> a<00:04:49.400> location<00:04:50.000> additionally<00:04:50.880> p<00:04:51.560> means 00:04:51.990 --> 00:04:52.000 align:start position:0% it as a location additionally p means 00:04:52.000 --> 00:04:53.430 align:start position:0% it as a location additionally p means why<00:04:52.320> because<00:04:52.520> you<00:04:52.600> can<00:04:52.720> see<00:04:52.919> the<00:04:53.039> word<00:04:53.240> being 00:04:53.430 --> 00:04:53.440 align:start position:0% why because you can see the word being 00:04:53.440 --> 00:04:55.469 align:start position:0% why because you can see the word being split<00:04:54.039> and<00:04:54.160> the<00:04:54.240> emphasis<00:04:54.639> is<00:04:54.759> put<00:04:54.919> on<00:04:55.080> the<00:04:55.240> K 00:04:55.469 --> 00:04:55.479 align:start position:0% split and the emphasis is put on the K 00:04:55.479 --> 00:04:57.550 align:start position:0% split and the emphasis is put on the K part<00:04:56.039> however<00:04:56.479> if<00:04:56.560> you<00:04:56.680> were<00:04:56.800> to<00:04:56.960> combine<00:04:57.240> them 00:04:57.550 --> 00:04:57.560 align:start position:0% part however if you were to combine them 00:04:57.560 --> 00:05:00.230 align:start position:0% part however if you were to combine them together<00:04:58.039> pronounced<00:04:58.720> por<00:04:59.280> this<00:04:59.639> word<00:04:59.880> means 00:05:00.230 --> 00:05:00.240 align:start position:0% together pronounced por this word means 00:05:00.240 --> 00:05:03.990 align:start position:0% together pronounced por this word means because<00:05:00.919> por<00:05:01.600> is<00:05:01.919> why<00:05:02.479> por<00:05:03.120> is<00:05:03.320> because<00:05:03.840> the 00:05:03.990 --> 00:05:04.000 align:start position:0% because por is why por is because the 00:05:04.000 --> 00:05:05.550 align:start position:0% because por is why por is because the last<00:05:04.160> thing<00:05:04.320> to<00:05:04.440> note<00:05:04.800> is<00:05:04.919> that<00:05:05.039> some<00:05:05.240> question 00:05:05.550 --> 00:05:05.560 align:start position:0% last thing to note is that some question 00:05:05.560 --> 00:05:07.510 align:start position:0% last thing to note is that some question words<00:05:05.919> have<00:05:06.080> genders<00:05:06.479> and<00:05:06.639> plurality<00:05:07.240> for 00:05:07.510 --> 00:05:07.520 align:start position:0% words have genders and plurality for 00:05:07.520 --> 00:05:10.189 align:start position:0% words have genders and plurality for example<00:05:08.039> if<00:05:08.160> I<00:05:08.360> ask<00:05:08.800> kenes<00:05:09.479> I'm<00:05:09.639> asking<00:05:09.880> about 00:05:10.189 --> 00:05:10.199 align:start position:0% example if I ask kenes I'm asking about 00:05:10.199 --> 00:05:12.189 align:start position:0% example if I ask kenes I'm asking about who<00:05:10.520> as<00:05:10.639> in<00:05:10.800> multiple<00:05:11.240> people<00:05:11.600> instead<00:05:11.880> of<00:05:12.000> one 00:05:12.189 --> 00:05:12.199 align:start position:0% who as in multiple people instead of one 00:05:12.199 --> 00:05:14.550 align:start position:0% who as in multiple people instead of one person<00:05:12.560> another<00:05:12.880> example<00:05:13.320> is<00:05:13.520> how<00:05:13.720> many<00:05:14.280> if<00:05:14.400> I 00:05:14.550 --> 00:05:14.560 align:start position:0% person another example is how many if I 00:05:14.560 --> 00:05:17.350 align:start position:0% person another example is how many if I say<00:05:15.039> Quantas<00:05:15.919> I'm<00:05:16.039> saying<00:05:16.280> how<00:05:16.440> many<00:05:16.680> for<00:05:16.919> them 00:05:17.350 --> 00:05:17.360 align:start position:0% say Quantas I'm saying how many for them 00:05:17.360 --> 00:05:19.590 align:start position:0% say Quantas I'm saying how many for them feminine<00:05:17.880> because<00:05:18.120> the<00:05:18.199> ending<00:05:18.639> ah<00:05:19.199> is<00:05:19.440> most 00:05:19.590 --> 00:05:19.600 align:start position:0% feminine because the ending ah is most 00:05:19.600 --> 00:05:22.150 align:start position:0% feminine because the ending ah is most of<00:05:19.759> the<00:05:19.919> time<00:05:20.360> feminine<00:05:20.840> in<00:05:21.039> Spanish<00:05:21.600> if<00:05:21.680> I<00:05:21.800> say 00:05:22.150 --> 00:05:22.160 align:start position:0% of the time feminine in Spanish if I say 00:05:22.160 --> 00:05:24.749 align:start position:0% of the time feminine in Spanish if I say quantos<00:05:23.080> I'm<00:05:23.160> saying<00:05:23.520> how<00:05:23.720> many<00:05:24.039> for<00:05:24.319> them 00:05:24.749 --> 00:05:24.759 align:start position:0% quantos I'm saying how many for them 00:05:24.759 --> 00:05:26.870 align:start position:0% quantos I'm saying how many for them masculine<00:05:25.319> because<00:05:25.560> the<00:05:25.639> ending<00:05:26.000> o<00:05:26.479> is<00:05:26.680> most 00:05:26.870 --> 00:05:26.880 align:start position:0% masculine because the ending o is most 00:05:26.880 --> 00:05:29.270 align:start position:0% masculine because the ending o is most of<00:05:27.000> the<00:05:27.160> time<00:05:27.639> masculine<00:05:28.199> in<00:05:28.360> Spanish<00:05:29.039> number 00:05:29.270 --> 00:05:29.280 align:start position:0% of the time masculine in Spanish number 00:05:29.280 --> 00:05:31.430 align:start position:0% of the time masculine in Spanish number three<00:05:29.800> prepositional<00:05:30.319> words<00:05:30.639> and<00:05:30.800> adverbs 00:05:31.430 --> 00:05:31.440 align:start position:0% three prepositional words and adverbs 00:05:31.440 --> 00:05:33.510 align:start position:0% three prepositional words and adverbs prepositional<00:05:32.000> words<00:05:32.360> can<00:05:32.479> be<00:05:32.639> Fanboys<00:05:33.360> such 00:05:33.510 --> 00:05:33.520 align:start position:0% prepositional words can be Fanboys such 00:05:33.520 --> 00:05:36.189 align:start position:0% prepositional words can be Fanboys such as<00:05:33.720> for<00:05:34.000> and<00:05:34.199> nor<00:05:34.639> but<00:05:34.840> or<00:05:35.120> yet<00:05:35.319> so<00:05:35.800> and<00:05:35.960> as<00:05:36.039> a 00:05:36.189 --> 00:05:36.199 align:start position:0% as for and nor but or yet so and as a 00:05:36.199 --> 00:05:42.749 align:start position:0% as for and nor but or yet so and as a bonus<00:05:36.800> by<00:05:37.639> for<00:05:38.160> is<00:05:38.560> para<00:05:39.440> and<00:05:39.919> is<00:05:40.280> e<00:05:41.080> nor<00:05:41.560> is<00:05:41.919> NI 00:05:42.749 --> 00:05:42.759 align:start position:0% bonus by for is para and is e nor is NI 00:05:42.759 --> 00:05:45.270 align:start position:0% bonus by for is para and is e nor is NI but<00:05:43.160> is<00:05:43.520> per<00:05:43.960> make<00:05:44.080> sure<00:05:44.280> that<00:05:44.360> you<00:05:44.520> have<00:05:44.680> one<00:05:44.880> R 00:05:45.270 --> 00:05:45.280 align:start position:0% but is per make sure that you have one R 00:05:45.280 --> 00:05:47.990 align:start position:0% but is per make sure that you have one R because<00:05:45.680> two<00:05:45.919> RS<00:05:46.520> per<00:05:47.199> this<00:05:47.280> would<00:05:47.440> be<00:05:47.600> Spanish 00:05:47.990 --> 00:05:48.000 align:start position:0% because two RS per this would be Spanish 00:05:48.000 --> 00:05:52.830 align:start position:0% because two RS per this would be Spanish for<00:05:48.160> dog<00:05:48.840> or<00:05:49.520> is<00:05:49.840> O<00:05:50.639> yet<00:05:51.160> is<00:05:51.400> used<00:05:51.840> as<00:05:52.039> still<00:05:52.720> as 00:05:52.830 --> 00:05:52.840 align:start position:0% for dog or is O yet is used as still as 00:05:52.840 --> 00:05:55.189 align:start position:0% for dog or is O yet is used as still as in<00:05:53.000> the<00:05:53.120> sentence<00:05:53.680> I<00:05:53.800> studied<00:05:54.199> for<00:05:54.400> my<00:05:54.600> test 00:05:55.189 --> 00:05:55.199 align:start position:0% in the sentence I studied for my test 00:05:55.199 --> 00:05:57.510 align:start position:0% in the sentence I studied for my test yet<00:05:55.400> I<00:05:55.560> failed<00:05:56.120> I<00:05:56.199> studied<00:05:56.520> for<00:05:56.720> my<00:05:56.880> test<00:05:57.280> but 00:05:57.510 --> 00:05:57.520 align:start position:0% yet I failed I studied for my test but 00:05:57.520 --> 00:05:59.790 align:start position:0% yet I failed I studied for my test but still<00:05:57.919> I<00:05:58.080> failed<00:05:58.840> this<00:05:59.039> word<00:05:59.280> is<00:05:59.479> is<00:05:59.600> actually 00:05:59.790 --> 00:05:59.800 align:start position:0% still I failed this word is is actually 00:05:59.800 --> 00:06:01.710 align:start position:0% still I failed this word is is actually used<00:06:00.199> as 00:06:01.710 --> 00:06:01.720 align:start position:0% used as 00:06:01.720 --> 00:06:06.749 align:start position:0% used as Oro<00:06:02.720> so<00:06:03.759> is<00:06:04.759> and<00:06:05.039> by<00:06:05.440> is<00:06:06.120> now<00:06:06.280> we<00:06:06.400> have<00:06:06.520> some 00:06:06.749 --> 00:06:06.759 align:start position:0% Oro so is and by is now we have some 00:06:06.759 --> 00:06:09.870 align:start position:0% Oro so is and by is now we have some adverbs<00:06:07.479> if<00:06:07.960> is<00:06:08.280> C<00:06:08.840> no<00:06:09.120> accent<00:06:09.520> because<00:06:09.759> with 00:06:09.870 --> 00:06:09.880 align:start position:0% adverbs if is C no accent because with 00:06:09.880 --> 00:06:12.469 align:start position:0% adverbs if is C no accent because with an<00:06:10.080> accent<00:06:10.440> you<00:06:10.599> have<00:06:10.840> C<00:06:11.319> which<00:06:11.440> means<00:06:11.840> yes 00:06:12.469 --> 00:06:12.479 align:start position:0% an accent you have C which means yes 00:06:12.479 --> 00:06:16.629 align:start position:0% an accent you have C which means yes then<00:06:12.880> is<00:06:13.160> Inon<00:06:14.160> also<00:06:14.680> Isen<00:06:15.680> of<00:06:15.880> and<00:06:16.039> from<00:06:16.440> both 00:06:16.629 --> 00:06:16.639 align:start position:0% then is Inon also Isen of and from both 00:06:16.639 --> 00:06:18.230 align:start position:0% then is Inon also Isen of and from both mean<00:06:16.960> de<00:06:17.240> but<00:06:17.360> the<00:06:17.440> meaning<00:06:17.680> changes<00:06:18.039> in 00:06:18.230 --> 00:06:18.240 align:start position:0% mean de but the meaning changes in 00:06:18.240 --> 00:06:23.990 align:start position:0% mean de but the meaning changes in context<00:06:19.199> with<00:06:19.599> is<00:06:19.880> Con<00:06:20.680> to<00:06:21.360> is<00:06:21.720> a<00:06:22.520> in<00:06:22.960> and<00:06:23.199> on<00:06:23.759> is 00:06:23.990 --> 00:06:24.000 align:start position:0% context with is Con to is a in and on is 00:06:24.000 --> 00:06:26.550 align:start position:0% context with is Con to is a in and on is n<00:06:24.800> and<00:06:25.000> each<00:06:25.360> is<00:06:25.599> kada<00:06:26.039> just<00:06:26.160> make<00:06:26.280> sure<00:06:26.440> you 00:06:26.550 --> 00:06:26.560 align:start position:0% n and each is kada just make sure you 00:06:26.560 --> 00:06:28.430 align:start position:0% n and each is kada just make sure you know<00:06:26.720> this<00:06:26.880> information<00:06:27.520> number<00:06:27.759> four 00:06:28.430 --> 00:06:28.440 align:start position:0% know this information number four 00:06:28.440 --> 00:06:30.390 align:start position:0% know this information number four pronouns<00:06:29.039> I'll<00:06:29.160> use<00:06:29.520> this<00:06:29.599> 2<00:06:29.759> X3<00:06:30.039> chart<00:06:30.280> to 00:06:30.390 --> 00:06:30.400 align:start position:0% pronouns I'll use this 2 X3 chart to 00:06:30.400 --> 00:06:32.110 align:start position:0% pronouns I'll use this 2 X3 chart to First<00:06:30.599> explain<00:06:30.880> their<00:06:31.039> position<00:06:31.319> of<00:06:31.479> order<00:06:31.919> in 00:06:32.110 --> 00:06:32.120 align:start position:0% First explain their position of order in 00:06:32.120 --> 00:06:36.070 align:start position:0% First explain their position of order in English<00:06:32.680> in<00:06:32.840> English<00:06:33.319> you<00:06:33.520> have<00:06:34.000> I<00:06:34.720> you<00:06:35.560> he<00:06:36.000> you 00:06:36.070 --> 00:06:36.080 align:start position:0% English in English you have I you he you 00:06:36.080 --> 00:06:38.110 align:start position:0% English in English you have I you he you can<00:06:36.240> also<00:06:36.440> include<00:06:36.759> she<00:06:37.160> but<00:06:37.280> I'll<00:06:37.520> say<00:06:37.800> he 00:06:38.110 --> 00:06:38.120 align:start position:0% can also include she but I'll say he 00:06:38.120 --> 00:06:40.550 align:start position:0% can also include she but I'll say he just<00:06:38.240> to<00:06:38.360> put<00:06:38.520> up<00:06:38.639> some<00:06:38.840> space<00:06:39.440> we<00:06:40.000> the<00:06:40.160> pronoun 00:06:40.550 --> 00:06:40.560 align:start position:0% just to put up some space we the pronoun 00:06:40.560 --> 00:06:42.230 align:start position:0% just to put up some space we the pronoun in<00:06:40.680> the<00:06:40.800> fifth<00:06:41.080> position<00:06:41.560> is<00:06:41.720> actually<00:06:42.000> you 00:06:42.230 --> 00:06:42.240 align:start position:0% in the fifth position is actually you 00:06:42.240 --> 00:06:44.309 align:start position:0% in the fifth position is actually you all<00:06:42.639> or<00:06:42.919> y'all<00:06:43.400> English<00:06:43.720> doesn't<00:06:44.000> have<00:06:44.160> this 00:06:44.309 --> 00:06:44.319 align:start position:0% all or y'all English doesn't have this 00:06:44.319 --> 00:06:45.710 align:start position:0% all or y'all English doesn't have this pronoun<00:06:44.759> but<00:06:44.880> I<00:06:44.960> will<00:06:45.080> still<00:06:45.280> included 00:06:45.710 --> 00:06:45.720 align:start position:0% pronoun but I will still included 00:06:45.720 --> 00:06:48.110 align:start position:0% pronoun but I will still included because<00:06:45.960> Spanish<00:06:46.319> has<00:06:46.440> it<00:06:46.720> and<00:06:46.880> finally<00:06:47.639> they 00:06:48.110 --> 00:06:48.120 align:start position:0% because Spanish has it and finally they 00:06:48.120 --> 00:06:51.309 align:start position:0% because Spanish has it and finally they these<00:06:48.280> are<00:06:48.440> the<00:06:48.599> pronouns<00:06:49.120> in<00:06:49.319> Spanish<00:06:50.120> yo<00:06:50.880> to 00:06:51.309 --> 00:06:51.319 align:start position:0% these are the pronouns in Spanish yo to 00:06:51.319 --> 00:06:52.830 align:start position:0% these are the pronouns in Spanish yo to with<00:06:51.440> an<00:06:51.639> accent<00:06:52.120> because<00:06:52.400> without<00:06:52.639> the 00:06:52.830 --> 00:06:52.840 align:start position:0% with an accent because without the 00:06:52.840 --> 00:06:55.869 align:start position:0% with an accent because without the accent<00:06:53.199> it<00:06:53.319> means<00:06:53.639> to<00:06:54.120> which<00:06:54.240> is<00:06:54.520> your<00:06:55.400> L<00:06:55.800> you 00:06:55.869 --> 00:06:55.879 align:start position:0% accent it means to which is your L you 00:06:55.879 --> 00:06:59.390 align:start position:0% accent it means to which is your L you can<00:06:56.039> also<00:06:56.280> say<00:06:56.599> a<00:06:57.160> or<00:06:58.160> andad<00:06:58.759> actually<00:06:58.960> means 00:06:59.390 --> 00:06:59.400 align:start position:0% can also say a or andad actually means 00:06:59.400 --> 00:07:01.110 align:start position:0% can also say a or andad actually means you<00:06:59.639> formal<00:07:00.160> like<00:07:00.280> when<00:07:00.400> you're<00:07:00.599> talking<00:07:00.840> to<00:07:00.960> a 00:07:01.110 --> 00:07:01.120 align:start position:0% you formal like when you're talking to a 00:07:01.120 --> 00:07:04.110 align:start position:0% you formal like when you're talking to a professional<00:07:01.599> person<00:07:02.440> noos<00:07:03.240> is<00:07:03.479> masculine 00:07:04.110 --> 00:07:04.120 align:start position:0% professional person noos is masculine 00:07:04.120 --> 00:07:06.670 align:start position:0% professional person noos is masculine and<00:07:04.280> noas<00:07:05.080> is<00:07:05.240> feminine<00:07:05.919> these<00:07:06.120> pronouns<00:07:06.520> have 00:07:06.670 --> 00:07:06.680 align:start position:0% and noas is feminine these pronouns have 00:07:06.680 --> 00:07:09.350 align:start position:0% and noas is feminine these pronouns have genders<00:07:07.240> votos<00:07:07.919> is<00:07:08.080> you<00:07:08.280> all<00:07:08.560> masculine<00:07:09.160> and 00:07:09.350 --> 00:07:09.360 align:start position:0% genders votos is you all masculine and 00:07:09.360 --> 00:07:11.830 align:start position:0% genders votos is you all masculine and votas<00:07:10.000> is<00:07:10.120> you<00:07:10.280> all<00:07:10.520> feminine<00:07:11.039> and<00:07:11.240> AOS<00:07:11.639> is 00:07:11.830 --> 00:07:11.840 align:start position:0% votas is you all feminine and AOS is 00:07:11.840 --> 00:07:14.110 align:start position:0% votas is you all feminine and AOS is they<00:07:12.039> masculine<00:07:12.759> AAS<00:07:13.199> is<00:07:13.400> they<00:07:13.560> feminine 00:07:14.110 --> 00:07:14.120 align:start position:0% they masculine AAS is they feminine 00:07:14.120 --> 00:07:16.830 align:start position:0% they masculine AAS is they feminine andus<00:07:14.840> is<00:07:14.960> you<00:07:15.160> all<00:07:15.560> formal<00:07:16.120> try<00:07:16.319> not<00:07:16.479> focusing 00:07:16.830 --> 00:07:16.840 align:start position:0% andus is you all formal try not focusing 00:07:16.840 --> 00:07:18.150 align:start position:0% andus is you all formal try not focusing on<00:07:17.000> these<00:07:17.199> pronouns<00:07:17.720> because<00:07:17.879> you<00:07:17.960> will 00:07:18.150 --> 00:07:18.160 align:start position:0% on these pronouns because you will 00:07:18.160 --> 00:07:19.670 align:start position:0% on these pronouns because you will rarely<00:07:18.440> use<00:07:18.639> them<00:07:18.759> in<00:07:18.919> conversation<00:07:19.560> make 00:07:19.670 --> 00:07:19.680 align:start position:0% rarely use them in conversation make 00:07:19.680 --> 00:07:22.309 align:start position:0% rarely use them in conversation make sure<00:07:19.800> you<00:07:19.919> know<00:07:20.080> the<00:07:20.199> main<00:07:20.400> ones<00:07:20.840> like<00:07:21.120> yo<00:07:21.680> to 00:07:22.309 --> 00:07:22.319 align:start position:0% sure you know the main ones like yo to 00:07:22.319 --> 00:07:25.230 align:start position:0% sure you know the main ones like yo to El<00:07:22.680> andos<00:07:23.560> number<00:07:23.879> five<00:07:24.319> days<00:07:24.520> of<00:07:24.639> the<00:07:24.759> week 00:07:25.230 --> 00:07:25.240 align:start position:0% El andos number five days of the week 00:07:25.240 --> 00:07:28.150 align:start position:0% El andos number five days of the week Monday<00:07:25.680> is<00:07:25.919> Lunes<00:07:26.720> Tuesday<00:07:27.199> is<00:07:27.400> mares 00:07:28.150 --> 00:07:28.160 align:start position:0% Monday is Lunes Tuesday is mares 00:07:28.160 --> 00:07:29.990 align:start position:0% Monday is Lunes Tuesday is mares Wednesday<00:07:28.560> is<00:07:28.840> m 00:07:29.990 --> 00:07:30.000 align:start position:0% Wednesday is m 00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:31.550 align:start position:0% Wednesday is m Thursday 00:07:31.550 --> 00:07:31.560 align:start position:0% Thursday 00:07:31.560 --> 00:07:34.350 align:start position:0% Thursday is<00:07:32.560> Sab<00:07:33.319> Domingo<00:07:33.840> you<00:07:33.960> don't<00:07:34.120> have<00:07:34.240> to 00:07:34.350 --> 00:07:34.360 align:start position:0% is Sab Domingo you don't have to 00:07:34.360 --> 00:07:36.150 align:start position:0% is Sab Domingo you don't have to capitalize<00:07:34.879> these<00:07:35.000> words<00:07:35.280> in<00:07:35.440> Spanish<00:07:35.919> as<00:07:36.039> you 00:07:36.150 --> 00:07:36.160 align:start position:0% capitalize these words in Spanish as you 00:07:36.160 --> 00:07:38.869 align:start position:0% capitalize these words in Spanish as you do<00:07:36.280> in<00:07:36.400> English<00:07:36.919> number<00:07:37.160> six<00:07:37.919> months<00:07:38.639> once 00:07:38.869 --> 00:07:38.879 align:start position:0% do in English number six months once 00:07:38.879 --> 00:07:40.110 align:start position:0% do in English number six months once again<00:07:39.080> you<00:07:39.199> don't<00:07:39.319> have<00:07:39.440> to<00:07:39.560> capitalize<00:07:39.960> these 00:07:40.110 --> 00:07:40.120 align:start position:0% again you don't have to capitalize these 00:07:40.120 --> 00:07:40.749 align:start position:0% again you don't have to capitalize these in 00:07:40.749 --> 00:07:40.759 align:start position:0% in 00:07:40.759 --> 00:07:42.790 align:start position:0% in Spanish 00:07:42.790 --> 00:07:42.800 align:start position:0% Spanish 00:07:42.800 --> 00:07:45.670 align:start position:0% Spanish feo<00:07:43.840> abil 00:07:45.670 --> 00:07:45.680 align:start position:0% feo abil 00:07:45.680 --> 00:07:51.469 align:start position:0% feo abil Mayo<00:07:46.680> jul<00:07:47.599> AO<00:07:48.520> sept 00:07:51.469 --> 00:07:51.479 align:start position:0% Mayo jul AO sept 00:07:51.479 --> 00:07:55.430 align:start position:0% Mayo jul AO sept OCT<00:07:52.479> number<00:07:52.759> seven<00:07:53.560> seasons 00:07:55.430 --> 00:07:55.440 align:start position:0% OCT number seven seasons 00:07:55.440 --> 00:07:59.830 align:start position:0% OCT number seven seasons Verano<00:07:56.440> in<00:07:57.440> Prima<00:07:58.280> number<00:07:58.560> eight<00:07:59.000> time<00:07:59.440> words 00:07:59.830 --> 00:07:59.840 align:start position:0% Verano in Prima number eight time words 00:07:59.840 --> 00:08:01.869 align:start position:0% Verano in Prima number eight time words and<00:08:00.000> some<00:08:00.120> of<00:08:00.280> these<00:08:00.440> have<00:08:00.560> genders<00:08:01.199> such<00:08:01.440> as 00:08:01.869 --> 00:08:01.879 align:start position:0% and some of these have genders such as 00:08:01.879 --> 00:08:05.990 align:start position:0% and some of these have genders such as second<00:08:02.520> which<00:08:03.039> ISO<00:08:04.199> Ora<00:08:05.199> this<00:08:05.319> can<00:08:05.520> also<00:08:05.680> mean 00:08:05.990 --> 00:08:06.000 align:start position:0% second which ISO Ora this can also mean 00:08:06.000 --> 00:08:08.390 align:start position:0% second which ISO Ora this can also mean second<00:08:06.520> as<00:08:06.639> an<00:08:06.759> a<00:08:06.960> position<00:08:07.599> I'm<00:08:07.840> in<00:08:08.000> second 00:08:08.390 --> 00:08:08.400 align:start position:0% second as an a position I'm in second 00:08:08.400 --> 00:08:10.550 align:start position:0% second as an a position I'm in second place<00:08:08.800> but<00:08:08.919> the<00:08:09.039> meaning<00:08:09.280> changes<00:08:09.599> in<00:08:09.840> context 00:08:10.550 --> 00:08:10.560 align:start position:0% place but the meaning changes in context 00:08:10.560 --> 00:08:15.950 align:start position:0% place but the meaning changes in context minute<00:08:11.120> which<00:08:11.560> is<00:08:12.680> or<00:08:13.680> you<00:08:13.800> can<00:08:13.960> say<00:08:14.479> Unos<00:08:15.479> or 00:08:15.950 --> 00:08:15.960 align:start position:0% minute which is or you can say Unos or 00:08:15.960 --> 00:08:18.790 align:start position:0% minute which is or you can say Unos or unas<00:08:16.960> which<00:08:17.159> both<00:08:17.360> mean<00:08:17.919> some<00:08:18.280> or<00:08:18.479> a<00:08:18.599> few 00:08:18.790 --> 00:08:18.800 align:start position:0% unas which both mean some or a few 00:08:18.800 --> 00:08:24.070 align:start position:0% unas which both mean some or a few minutes<00:08:19.479> hour<00:08:19.960> is<00:08:20.240> a<00:08:21.039> week<00:08:21.520> is<00:08:22.520> month<00:08:22.960> is<00:08:23.280> mes 00:08:24.070 --> 00:08:24.080 align:start position:0% minutes hour is a week is month is mes 00:08:24.080 --> 00:08:26.909 align:start position:0% minutes hour is a week is month is mes year<00:08:24.599> is<00:08:24.960> ano<00:08:25.520> make<00:08:25.639> sure<00:08:25.800> you<00:08:25.960> put<00:08:26.159> the 00:08:26.909 --> 00:08:26.919 align:start position:0% year is ano make sure you put the 00:08:26.919 --> 00:08:28.869 align:start position:0% year is ano make sure you put the because<00:08:27.199> without<00:08:27.440> it<00:08:27.680> you<00:08:27.840> have<00:08:28.120> ano<00:08:28.599> which<00:08:28.680> is 00:08:28.869 --> 00:08:28.879 align:start position:0% because without it you have ano which is 00:08:28.879 --> 00:08:32.750 align:start position:0% because without it you have ano which is anus<00:08:29.520> yesterday<00:08:30.199> is<00:08:30.479> a<00:08:31.199> today<00:08:31.720> is<00:08:32.039> oi<00:08:32.599> and 00:08:32.750 --> 00:08:32.760 align:start position:0% anus yesterday is a today is oi and 00:08:32.760 --> 00:08:35.110 align:start position:0% anus yesterday is a today is oi and tomorrow<00:08:33.360> is<00:08:33.560> Manana<00:08:34.159> Manana<00:08:34.599> can<00:08:34.719> also<00:08:34.919> mean 00:08:35.110 --> 00:08:35.120 align:start position:0% tomorrow is Manana Manana can also mean 00:08:35.120 --> 00:08:36.509 align:start position:0% tomorrow is Manana Manana can also mean morning<00:08:35.560> but<00:08:35.680> the<00:08:35.760> meaning<00:08:36.000> changes<00:08:36.320> in 00:08:36.509 --> 00:08:36.519 align:start position:0% morning but the meaning changes in 00:08:36.519 --> 00:08:39.870 align:start position:0% morning but the meaning changes in context<00:08:37.120> and<00:08:37.320> last<00:08:37.560> one<00:08:37.959> number<00:08:38.240> nine<00:08:39.039> numbers 00:08:39.870 --> 00:08:39.880 align:start position:0% context and last one number nine numbers 00:08:39.880 --> 00:08:41.389 align:start position:0% context and last one number nine numbers now<00:08:40.120> I'm<00:08:40.240> not<00:08:40.399> going<00:08:40.519> to<00:08:40.680> write<00:08:40.919> every<00:08:41.120> single 00:08:41.389 --> 00:08:41.399 align:start position:0% now I'm not going to write every single 00:08:41.399 --> 00:08:42.949 align:start position:0% now I'm not going to write every single number<00:08:41.680> down<00:08:42.000> because<00:08:42.200> this<00:08:42.320> will<00:08:42.479> be<00:08:42.599> a<00:08:42.719> long 00:08:42.949 --> 00:08:42.959 align:start position:0% number down because this will be a long 00:08:42.959 --> 00:08:44.790 align:start position:0% number down because this will be a long video<00:08:43.360> but<00:08:43.479> I'll<00:08:43.680> give<00:08:43.839> the<00:08:43.959> syntax<00:08:44.399> of<00:08:44.560> how<00:08:44.640> to 00:08:44.790 --> 00:08:44.800 align:start position:0% video but I'll give the syntax of how to 00:08:44.800 --> 00:08:46.550 align:start position:0% video but I'll give the syntax of how to say<00:08:45.000> numbers<00:08:45.519> and<00:08:45.680> from<00:08:45.920> there<00:08:46.120> you<00:08:46.240> can<00:08:46.360> say 00:08:46.550 --> 00:08:46.560 align:start position:0% say numbers and from there you can say 00:08:46.560 --> 00:08:58.190 align:start position:0% say numbers and from there you can say numbers<00:08:46.839> on<00:08:46.959> your<00:08:47.120> own 00:08:58.190 --> 00:08:58.200 align:start position:0% 00:08:58.200 --> 00:09:06.030 align:start position:0% un 00:09:06.030 --> 00:09:06.040 align:start position:0% 00:09:06.040 --> 00:09:07.389 align:start position:0% there<00:09:06.160> is<00:09:06.320> no<00:09:06.480> point<00:09:06.640> of<00:09:06.720> listing<00:09:07.000> numbers 00:09:07.389 --> 00:09:07.399 align:start position:0% there is no point of listing numbers 00:09:07.399 --> 00:09:09.710 align:start position:0% there is no point of listing numbers past<00:09:07.600> 20<00:09:08.040> because<00:09:08.240> all<00:09:08.360> you<00:09:08.480> do<00:09:08.640> is<00:09:08.800> take<00:09:09.079> V<00:09:09.640> and 00:09:09.710 --> 00:09:09.720 align:start position:0% past 20 because all you do is take V and 00:09:09.720 --> 00:09:11.269 align:start position:0% past 20 because all you do is take V and then<00:09:09.920> add<00:09:10.160> any<00:09:10.360> number<00:09:10.600> you<00:09:10.720> want<00:09:10.880> to<00:09:11.000> it<00:09:11.160> but 00:09:11.269 --> 00:09:11.279 align:start position:0% then add any number you want to it but 00:09:11.279 --> 00:09:14.150 align:start position:0% then add any number you want to it but it<00:09:11.360> has<00:09:11.440> to<00:09:11.519> be<00:09:11.640> written<00:09:11.920> as<00:09:12.040> one<00:09:12.279> word<00:09:12.839> like<00:09:13.160> V 00:09:14.150 --> 00:09:14.160 align:start position:0% it has to be written as one word like V 00:09:14.160 --> 00:09:18.630 align:start position:0% it has to be written as one word like V or<00:09:14.480> V<00:09:15.320> and<00:09:15.480> so<00:09:15.640> on<00:09:16.200> 30<00:09:16.880> is<00:09:17.200> TR<00:09:17.880> e<00:09:18.200> and<00:09:18.360> whatever 00:09:18.630 --> 00:09:18.640 align:start position:0% or V and so on 30 is TR e and whatever 00:09:18.640 --> 00:09:20.230 align:start position:0% or V and so on 30 is TR e and whatever number<00:09:18.880> you<00:09:19.040> want<00:09:19.480> like 00:09:20.230 --> 00:09:20.240 align:start position:0% number you want like 00:09:20.240 --> 00:09:26.350 align:start position:0% number you want like tros<00:09:21.240> 40 00:09:26.350 --> 00:09:26.360 align:start position:0% 00:09:26.360 --> 00:09:31.030 align:start position:0% is<00:09:27.680> o<00:09:28.680> no 00:09:31.030 --> 00:09:31.040 align:start position:0% is o no 00:09:31.040 --> 00:09:34.550 align:start position:0% is o no mil<00:09:31.720> and<00:09:31.880> 1<00:09:32.519> million<00:09:33.519> the<00:09:33.680> last<00:09:33.920> concept<00:09:34.360> is 00:09:34.550 --> 00:09:34.560 align:start position:0% mil and 1 million the last concept is 00:09:34.560 --> 00:09:36.069 align:start position:0% mil and 1 million the last concept is positions<00:09:34.920> of<00:09:35.079> numbers<00:09:35.560> and<00:09:35.720> these<00:09:35.920> have 00:09:36.069 --> 00:09:36.079 align:start position:0% positions of numbers and these have 00:09:36.079 --> 00:09:39.829 align:start position:0% positions of numbers and these have genders<00:09:36.760> first<00:09:37.279> is<00:09:37.480> primo<00:09:38.160> or<00:09:38.480> Prima<00:09:39.399> second 00:09:39.829 --> 00:09:39.839 align:start position:0% genders first is primo or Prima second 00:09:39.839 --> 00:09:43.670 align:start position:0% genders first is primo or Prima second is<00:09:40.200> SEO<00:09:41.200> Ora<00:09:42.200> it<00:09:42.320> can<00:09:42.480> also<00:09:42.640> mean<00:09:42.920> second<00:09:43.320> as<00:09:43.440> in 00:09:43.670 --> 00:09:43.680 align:start position:0% is SEO Ora it can also mean second as in 00:09:43.680 --> 00:09:48.350 align:start position:0% is SEO Ora it can also mean second as in time<00:09:44.040> I<00:09:44.120> already<00:09:44.399> covered 00:09:48.350 --> 00:09:48.360 align:start position:0% 00:09:48.360 --> 00:09:51.430 align:start position:0% thatto<00:09:49.360> also<00:09:49.920> quto<00:09:50.480> can<00:09:50.640> mean<00:09:50.880> room<00:09:51.240> or 00:09:51.430 --> 00:09:51.440 align:start position:0% thatto also quto can mean room or 00:09:51.440 --> 00:09:52.990 align:start position:0% thatto also quto can mean room or quarter<00:09:51.800> of<00:09:51.920> the<00:09:52.120> time<00:09:52.480> but<00:09:52.600> the<00:09:52.720> meaning 00:09:52.990 --> 00:09:53.000 align:start position:0% quarter of the time but the meaning 00:09:53.000 --> 00:09:55.350 align:start position:0% quarter of the time but the meaning again<00:09:53.320> changes<00:09:53.680> in<00:09:53.880> context 00:09:55.350 --> 00:09:55.360 align:start position:0% again changes in context 00:09:55.360 --> 00:10:02.230 align:start position:0% again changes in context kto<00:09:56.360> SE<00:09:57.279> SE<00:09:58.279> septimo<00:09:59.320> Septima<00:10:00.320> octavo<00:10:01.240> octava 00:10:02.230 --> 00:10:02.240 align:start position:0% kto SE SE septimo Septima octavo octava 00:10:02.240 --> 00:10:06.069 align:start position:0% kto SE SE septimo Septima octavo octava noen<00:10:03.200> noena<00:10:04.200> deimo<00:10:05.079> deima<00:10:05.519> there<00:10:05.640> is<00:10:05.800> no<00:10:05.920> point 00:10:06.069 --> 00:10:06.079 align:start position:0% noen noena deimo deima there is no point 00:10:06.079 --> 00:10:07.630 align:start position:0% noen noena deimo deima there is no point of<00:10:06.160> learning<00:10:06.440> numbers<00:10:06.760> beyond<00:10:07.079> that<00:10:07.360> and<00:10:07.480> it's 00:10:07.630 --> 00:10:07.640 align:start position:0% of learning numbers beyond that and it's 00:10:07.640 --> 00:10:08.750 align:start position:0% of learning numbers beyond that and it's actually<00:10:07.839> a<00:10:07.959> concept<00:10:08.279> I'll<00:10:08.399> cover<00:10:08.600> in<00:10:08.680> a 00:10:08.750 --> 00:10:08.760 align:start position:0% actually a concept I'll cover in a 00:10:08.760 --> 00:10:10.630 align:start position:0% actually a concept I'll cover in a future<00:10:09.040> video<00:10:09.519> so<00:10:09.680> for<00:10:09.839> now<00:10:10.160> I<00:10:10.240> want<00:10:10.360> to<00:10:10.480> say 00:10:10.630 --> 00:10:10.640 align:start position:0% future video so for now I want to say 00:10:10.640 --> 00:10:12.269 align:start position:0% future video so for now I want to say that<00:10:10.800> this<00:10:10.880> is<00:10:11.040> it<00:10:11.200> for<00:10:11.440> this<00:10:11.600> video<00:10:12.000> what<00:10:12.120> I 00:10:12.269 --> 00:10:12.279 align:start position:0% that this is it for this video what I 00:10:12.279 --> 00:10:13.509 align:start position:0% that this is it for this video what I covered<00:10:12.560> in<00:10:12.720> this<00:10:12.880> video<00:10:13.200> is<00:10:13.360> the 00:10:13.509 --> 00:10:13.519 align:start position:0% covered in this video is the 00:10:13.519 --> 00:10:14.750 align:start position:0% covered in this video is the fundamentals<00:10:14.160> that<00:10:14.279> you<00:10:14.399> would<00:10:14.519> need<00:10:14.640> to 00:10:14.750 --> 00:10:14.760 align:start position:0% fundamentals that you would need to 00:10:14.760 --> 00:10:17.030 align:start position:0% fundamentals that you would need to start<00:10:15.079> speaking<00:10:15.399> Spanish<00:10:16.040> they<00:10:16.200> all<00:10:16.519> begin 00:10:17.030 --> 00:10:17.040 align:start position:0% start speaking Spanish they all begin 00:10:17.040 --> 00:10:18.790 align:start position:0% start speaking Spanish they all begin here<00:10:17.399> and<00:10:17.560> of<00:10:17.720> course<00:10:18.000> if<00:10:18.079> you<00:10:18.160> don't<00:10:18.360> memorize 00:10:18.790 --> 00:10:18.800 align:start position:0% here and of course if you don't memorize 00:10:18.800 --> 00:10:19.990 align:start position:0% here and of course if you don't memorize all<00:10:18.920> of<00:10:19.040> them<00:10:19.240> you<00:10:19.360> can<00:10:19.480> always<00:10:19.680> use<00:10:19.839> a 00:10:19.990 --> 00:10:20.000 align:start position:0% all of them you can always use a 00:10:20.000 --> 00:10:21.430 align:start position:0% all of them you can always use a translator<00:10:20.519> to<00:10:20.680> translate<00:10:21.079> the<00:10:21.160> word<00:10:21.360> that 00:10:21.430 --> 00:10:21.440 align:start position:0% translator to translate the word that 00:10:21.440 --> 00:10:23.310 align:start position:0% translator to translate the word that you<00:10:21.560> forgot<00:10:22.079> and<00:10:22.240> then<00:10:22.560> it<00:10:22.680> will<00:10:22.800> be<00:10:22.920> locked<00:10:23.240> in 00:10:23.310 --> 00:10:23.320 align:start position:0% you forgot and then it will be locked in 00:10:23.320 --> 00:10:25.870 align:start position:0% you forgot and then it will be locked in your<00:10:23.519> mind<00:10:24.120> accents<00:10:24.959> question<00:10:25.320> words 00:10:25.870 --> 00:10:25.880 align:start position:0% your mind accents question words 00:10:25.880 --> 00:10:28.509 align:start position:0% your mind accents question words prepositional<00:10:26.440> words<00:10:26.680> and<00:10:26.880> adverbs<00:10:27.680> pronouns 00:10:28.509 --> 00:10:28.519 align:start position:0% prepositional words and adverbs pronouns 00:10:28.519 --> 00:10:29.710 align:start position:0% prepositional words and adverbs pronouns days<00:10:28.680> of<00:10:28.800> the<00:10:28.880> week 00:10:29.710 --> 00:10:29.720 align:start position:0% days of the week 00:10:29.720 --> 00:10:32.710 align:start position:0% days of the week months<00:10:30.519> Seasons<00:10:31.399> time<00:10:31.640> words<00:10:32.079> and<00:10:32.200> numbers 00:10:32.710 --> 00:10:32.720 align:start position:0% months Seasons time words and numbers 00:10:32.720 --> 00:10:34.310 align:start position:0% months Seasons time words and numbers Spanish<00:10:33.120> has<00:10:33.240> a<00:10:33.320> lot<00:10:33.440> of<00:10:33.519> verbs<00:10:33.839> and<00:10:33.959> a<00:10:34.040> lot<00:10:34.160> of 00:10:34.310 --> 00:10:34.320 align:start position:0% Spanish has a lot of verbs and a lot of 00:10:34.320 --> 00:10:36.150 align:start position:0% Spanish has a lot of verbs and a lot of conjugation<00:10:34.839> for<00:10:35.120> those<00:10:35.320> verbs<00:10:35.720> and<00:10:35.839> in<00:10:36.000> this 00:10:36.150 --> 00:10:36.160 align:start position:0% conjugation for those verbs and in this 00:10:36.160 --> 00:10:37.829 align:start position:0% conjugation for those verbs and in this video<00:10:36.480> I'll<00:10:36.680> go<00:10:36.800> in<00:10:36.959> depth<00:10:37.240> and<00:10:37.399> explain<00:10:37.680> how 00:10:37.829 --> 00:10:37.839 align:start position:0% video I'll go in depth and explain how 00:10:37.839 --> 00:10:39.750 align:start position:0% video I'll go in depth and explain how this<00:10:38.000> fundamental<00:10:38.639> actually<00:10:39.000> works<00:10:39.519> I<00:10:39.600> like 00:10:39.750 --> 00:10:39.760 align:start position:0% this fundamental actually works I like 00:10:39.760 --> 00:10:41.269 align:start position:0% this fundamental actually works I like to<00:10:39.880> call<00:10:40.040> this<00:10:40.160> the<00:10:40.320> primary<00:10:40.639> fundamental<00:10:41.120> of 00:10:41.269 --> 00:10:41.279 align:start position:0% to call this the primary fundamental of 00:10:41.279 --> 00:10:42.710 align:start position:0% to call this the primary fundamental of Spanish<00:10:41.760> because<00:10:41.920> it's<00:10:42.079> the<00:10:42.160> first<00:10:42.360> system<00:10:42.639> of 00:10:42.710 --> 00:10:42.720 align:start position:0% Spanish because it's the first system of 00:10:42.720 --> 00:10:44.190 align:start position:0% Spanish because it's the first system of the<00:10:42.920> language<00:10:43.320> where<00:10:43.440> you'll<00:10:43.600> need<00:10:43.760> to<00:10:43.920> think 00:10:44.190 --> 00:10:44.200 align:start position:0% the language where you'll need to think 00:10:44.200 --> 00:10:45.750 align:start position:0% the language where you'll need to think in<00:10:44.279> terms<00:10:44.519> of<00:10:44.680> translation<00:10:45.440> unlike 00:10:45.750 --> 00:10:45.760 align:start position:0% in terms of translation unlike 00:10:45.760 --> 00:10:47.310 align:start position:0% in terms of translation unlike memorization<00:10:46.320> from<00:10:46.480> the<00:10:46.600> previous<00:10:46.920> video 00:10:47.310 --> 00:10:47.320 align:start position:0% memorization from the previous video 00:10:47.320 --> 00:10:48.829 align:start position:0% memorization from the previous video conjugation<00:10:47.959> basically<00:10:48.279> means<00:10:48.560> that<00:10:48.680> you're 00:10:48.829 --> 00:10:48.839 align:start position:0% conjugation basically means that you're 00:10:48.839 --> 00:10:50.389 align:start position:0% conjugation basically means that you're modifying<00:10:49.240> a<00:10:49.360> verb<00:10:49.639> so<00:10:49.760> that<00:10:49.880> it<00:10:49.959> fits<00:10:50.240> the 00:10:50.389 --> 00:10:50.399 align:start position:0% modifying a verb so that it fits the 00:10:50.399 --> 00:10:51.750 align:start position:0% modifying a verb so that it fits the pronoun<00:10:50.839> that<00:10:50.959> you're<00:10:51.120> writing<00:10:51.399> the<00:10:51.519> verb 00:10:51.750 --> 00:10:51.760 align:start position:0% pronoun that you're writing the verb 00:10:51.760 --> 00:10:53.590 align:start position:0% pronoun that you're writing the verb into<00:10:52.279> and<00:10:52.399> speaking<00:10:52.680> of<00:10:52.800> pronouns<00:10:53.360> here's 00:10:53.590 --> 00:10:53.600 align:start position:0% into and speaking of pronouns here's 00:10:53.600 --> 00:10:55.190 align:start position:0% into and speaking of pronouns here's their<00:10:53.800> syntax<00:10:54.279> in<00:10:54.399> case<00:10:54.560> you<00:10:54.639> forgot<00:10:54.959> from<00:10:55.079> the 00:10:55.190 --> 00:10:55.200 align:start position:0% their syntax in case you forgot from the 00:10:55.200 --> 00:10:56.710 align:start position:0% their syntax in case you forgot from the previous<00:10:55.480> video<00:10:55.800> I'd<00:10:55.959> also<00:10:56.160> like<00:10:56.279> to<00:10:56.440> focus 00:10:56.710 --> 00:10:56.720 align:start position:0% previous video I'd also like to focus 00:10:56.720 --> 00:10:58.110 align:start position:0% previous video I'd also like to focus not<00:10:56.920> just<00:10:57.040> on<00:10:57.240> important<00:10:57.600> verbs<00:10:57.880> that<00:10:57.959> you 00:10:58.110 --> 00:10:58.120 align:start position:0% not just on important verbs that you 00:10:58.120 --> 00:10:59.710 align:start position:0% not just on important verbs that you have<00:10:58.200> to<00:10:58.360> know<00:10:58.560> and<00:10:58.680> how<00:10:58.760> to<00:10:59.040> conjugate<00:10:59.560> but 00:10:59.710 --> 00:10:59.720 align:start position:0% have to know and how to conjugate but 00:10:59.720 --> 00:11:01.750 align:start position:0% have to know and how to conjugate but also<00:10:59.959> on<00:11:00.160> which<00:11:00.360> pronouns<00:11:00.800> to<00:11:01.000> concentrate<00:11:01.519> on 00:11:01.750 --> 00:11:01.760 align:start position:0% also on which pronouns to concentrate on 00:11:01.760 --> 00:11:03.550 align:start position:0% also on which pronouns to concentrate on the<00:11:01.880> most<00:11:02.200> because<00:11:02.399> some<00:11:02.600> pronouns<00:11:03.079> are<00:11:03.200> used 00:11:03.550 --> 00:11:03.560 align:start position:0% the most because some pronouns are used 00:11:03.560 --> 00:11:05.910 align:start position:0% the most because some pronouns are used way<00:11:03.720> more<00:11:03.959> often<00:11:04.240> than<00:11:04.440> others<00:11:04.880> like<00:11:05.120> yo<00:11:05.560> to 00:11:05.910 --> 00:11:05.920 align:start position:0% way more often than others like yo to 00:11:05.920 --> 00:11:08.590 align:start position:0% way more often than others like yo to and<00:11:06.160> L<00:11:06.519> are<00:11:06.680> used<00:11:07.000> way<00:11:07.200> more<00:11:07.399> often<00:11:07.720> than<00:11:07.880> noos 00:11:08.590 --> 00:11:08.600 align:start position:0% and L are used way more often than noos 00:11:08.600 --> 00:11:10.910 align:start position:0% and L are used way more often than noos Vos<00:11:09.240> and<00:11:09.440> AOS<00:11:10.000> I'd<00:11:10.160> first<00:11:10.320> like<00:11:10.480> to<00:11:10.600> present 00:11:10.910 --> 00:11:10.920 align:start position:0% Vos and AOS I'd first like to present 00:11:10.920 --> 00:11:12.310 align:start position:0% Vos and AOS I'd first like to present what<00:11:11.040> the<00:11:11.120> idea<00:11:11.360> of<00:11:11.440> verb<00:11:11.680> conjugation<00:11:12.160> looks 00:11:12.310 --> 00:11:12.320 align:start position:0% what the idea of verb conjugation looks 00:11:12.320 --> 00:11:13.829 align:start position:0% what the idea of verb conjugation looks like<00:11:12.480> in<00:11:12.639> English<00:11:13.040> to<00:11:13.200> give<00:11:13.320> you<00:11:13.399> a<00:11:13.519> base<00:11:13.760> that 00:11:13.829 --> 00:11:13.839 align:start position:0% like in English to give you a base that 00:11:13.839 --> 00:11:15.350 align:start position:0% like in English to give you a base that you<00:11:13.959> can<00:11:14.079> relate<00:11:14.320> to<00:11:14.560> the<00:11:14.639> reason<00:11:14.880> why<00:11:15.079> English 00:11:15.350 --> 00:11:15.360 align:start position:0% you can relate to the reason why English 00:11:15.360 --> 00:11:16.910 align:start position:0% you can relate to the reason why English is<00:11:15.480> a<00:11:15.600> very<00:11:15.800> easy<00:11:16.079> language<00:11:16.519> is<00:11:16.639> because<00:11:16.800> it 00:11:16.910 --> 00:11:16.920 align:start position:0% is a very easy language is because it 00:11:16.920 --> 00:11:18.550 align:start position:0% is a very easy language is because it has<00:11:17.000> a<00:11:17.120> very<00:11:17.279> minimal<00:11:17.680> syntax<00:11:18.120> and<00:11:18.240> it<00:11:18.320> doesn't 00:11:18.550 --> 00:11:18.560 align:start position:0% has a very minimal syntax and it doesn't 00:11:18.560 --> 00:11:19.990 align:start position:0% has a very minimal syntax and it doesn't really<00:11:18.720> have<00:11:18.839> a<00:11:18.920> lot<00:11:19.040> of<00:11:19.200> variety<00:11:19.560> in<00:11:19.639> terms<00:11:19.839> of 00:11:19.990 --> 00:11:20.000 align:start position:0% really have a lot of variety in terms of 00:11:20.000 --> 00:11:21.670 align:start position:0% really have a lot of variety in terms of conjugation<00:11:20.639> if<00:11:20.760> I<00:11:20.839> want<00:11:20.959> to<00:11:21.040> use<00:11:21.200> the<00:11:21.320> verb<00:11:21.519> to 00:11:21.670 --> 00:11:21.680 align:start position:0% conjugation if I want to use the verb to 00:11:21.680 --> 00:11:23.470 align:start position:0% conjugation if I want to use the verb to eat<00:11:22.040> it<00:11:22.120> will<00:11:22.279> look<00:11:22.480> like<00:11:22.680> this<00:11:22.920> in<00:11:23.079> English 00:11:23.470 --> 00:11:23.480 align:start position:0% eat it will look like this in English 00:11:23.480 --> 00:11:24.710 align:start position:0% eat it will look like this in English and<00:11:23.639> keep<00:11:23.760> in<00:11:23.880> mind<00:11:24.079> that<00:11:24.200> this<00:11:24.320> is<00:11:24.440> just<00:11:24.560> a 00:11:24.710 --> 00:11:24.720 align:start position:0% and keep in mind that this is just a 00:11:24.720 --> 00:11:26.269 align:start position:0% and keep in mind that this is just a present<00:11:25.000> form<00:11:25.399> and<00:11:25.560> also<00:11:25.800> that<00:11:25.959> the<00:11:26.040> way<00:11:26.160> you 00:11:26.269 --> 00:11:26.279 align:start position:0% present form and also that the way you 00:11:26.279 --> 00:11:28.030 align:start position:0% present form and also that the way you figure<00:11:26.560> out<00:11:26.760> verbs<00:11:27.000> in<00:11:27.160> English<00:11:27.560> is<00:11:27.720> by<00:11:27.880> the 00:11:28.030 --> 00:11:28.040 align:start position:0% figure out verbs in English is by the 00:11:28.040 --> 00:11:30.629 align:start position:0% figure out verbs in English is by the preposition<00:11:28.600> to<00:11:29.079> to<00:11:29.240> eat<00:11:29.560> to<00:11:29.760> walk<00:11:30.040> to<00:11:30.200> tell<00:11:30.480> to 00:11:30.629 --> 00:11:30.639 align:start position:0% preposition to to eat to walk to tell to 00:11:30.639 --> 00:11:32.870 align:start position:0% preposition to to eat to walk to tell to do<00:11:31.040> whatever<00:11:31.519> but<00:11:31.680> in<00:11:31.800> Spanish<00:11:32.360> in<00:11:32.480> order<00:11:32.720> to 00:11:32.870 --> 00:11:32.880 align:start position:0% do whatever but in Spanish in order to 00:11:32.880 --> 00:11:34.829 align:start position:0% do whatever but in Spanish in order to determine<00:11:33.240> if<00:11:33.360> a<00:11:33.480> word<00:11:33.680> is<00:11:33.800> a<00:11:33.920> verb<00:11:34.360> it<00:11:34.519> has<00:11:34.680> to 00:11:34.829 --> 00:11:34.839 align:start position:0% determine if a word is a verb it has to 00:11:34.839 --> 00:11:37.910 align:start position:0% determine if a word is a verb it has to end<00:11:35.079> in<00:11:35.279> a<00:11:35.480> r<00:11:35.920> e<00:11:36.120> r<00:11:36.440> or<00:11:36.720> I<00:11:37.279> but<00:11:37.399> let's<00:11:37.560> focus<00:11:37.760> on 00:11:37.910 --> 00:11:37.920 align:start position:0% end in a r e r or I but let's focus on 00:11:37.920 --> 00:11:40.269 align:start position:0% end in a r e r or I but let's focus on English<00:11:38.200> for<00:11:38.320> a<00:11:38.440> second<00:11:38.839> in<00:11:39.000> English<00:11:39.560> you<00:11:39.720> say 00:11:40.269 --> 00:11:40.279 align:start position:0% English for a second in English you say 00:11:40.279 --> 00:11:43.509 align:start position:0% English for a second in English you say I<00:11:40.480> eat<00:11:41.120> you<00:11:41.320> eat<00:11:42.120> he<00:11:42.360> eats<00:11:42.880> you<00:11:43.000> can<00:11:43.160> also<00:11:43.320> say 00:11:43.509 --> 00:11:43.519 align:start position:0% I eat you eat he eats you can also say 00:11:43.519 --> 00:11:45.269 align:start position:0% I eat you eat he eats you can also say she<00:11:43.800> or<00:11:44.000> it<00:11:44.160> eats<00:11:44.519> but<00:11:44.600> we're<00:11:44.760> focusing<00:11:45.120> on 00:11:45.269 --> 00:11:45.279 align:start position:0% she or it eats but we're focusing on 00:11:45.279 --> 00:11:46.230 align:start position:0% she or it eats but we're focusing on pronouns<00:11:45.680> that<00:11:45.760> you<00:11:45.839> would<00:11:46.000> use 00:11:46.230 --> 00:11:46.240 align:start position:0% pronouns that you would use 00:11:46.240 --> 00:11:48.870 align:start position:0% pronouns that you would use realistically<00:11:47.160> we<00:11:47.360> eat<00:11:47.959> you<00:11:48.200> all<00:11:48.440> eat<00:11:48.760> there 00:11:48.870 --> 00:11:48.880 align:start position:0% realistically we eat you all eat there 00:11:48.880 --> 00:11:50.389 align:start position:0% realistically we eat you all eat there reason<00:11:49.079> no<00:11:49.240> you<00:11:49.360> all<00:11:49.560> in<00:11:49.680> English<00:11:50.040> but<00:11:50.160> I<00:11:50.240> will 00:11:50.389 --> 00:11:50.399 align:start position:0% reason no you all in English but I will 00:11:50.399 --> 00:11:51.990 align:start position:0% reason no you all in English but I will still<00:11:50.600> include<00:11:50.880> it<00:11:51.000> because<00:11:51.240> Spanish<00:11:51.560> has<00:11:51.680> it 00:11:51.990 --> 00:11:52.000 align:start position:0% still include it because Spanish has it 00:11:52.000 --> 00:11:54.110 align:start position:0% still include it because Spanish has it and<00:11:52.160> then<00:11:52.560> they<00:11:52.720> eat<00:11:53.160> looking<00:11:53.360> at<00:11:53.480> the<00:11:53.639> syntax 00:11:54.110 --> 00:11:54.120 align:start position:0% and then they eat looking at the syntax 00:11:54.120 --> 00:11:55.230 align:start position:0% and then they eat looking at the syntax there's<00:11:54.279> really<00:11:54.440> n<00:11:54.639> much<00:11:54.800> in<00:11:54.880> terms<00:11:55.079> of 00:11:55.230 --> 00:11:55.240 align:start position:0% there's really n much in terms of 00:11:55.240 --> 00:11:57.310 align:start position:0% there's really n much in terms of conjugation<00:11:55.959> because<00:11:56.240> eat<00:11:56.519> stays<00:11:56.920> eat<00:11:57.200> for 00:11:57.310 --> 00:11:57.320 align:start position:0% conjugation because eat stays eat for 00:11:57.320 --> 00:11:59.550 align:start position:0% conjugation because eat stays eat for 80%<00:11:57.839> of<00:11:57.920> the<00:11:58.079> pronouns<00:11:58.600> and<00:11:58.680> you<00:11:59.000> only<00:11:59.200> add<00:11:59.360> an 00:11:59.550 --> 00:11:59.560 align:start position:0% 80% of the pronouns and you only add an 00:11:59.560 --> 00:12:01.750 align:start position:0% 80% of the pronouns and you only add an s<00:11:59.959> in<00:12:00.120> the<00:12:00.360> he<00:12:00.639> pronoun<00:12:01.200> because<00:12:01.440> that's<00:12:01.600> the 00:12:01.750 --> 00:12:01.760 align:start position:0% s in the he pronoun because that's the 00:12:01.760 --> 00:12:03.790 align:start position:0% s in the he pronoun because that's the syntax<00:12:02.240> of<00:12:02.360> the<00:12:02.480> language<00:12:03.079> in<00:12:03.200> Spanish<00:12:03.680> there 00:12:03.790 --> 00:12:03.800 align:start position:0% syntax of the language in Spanish there 00:12:03.800 --> 00:12:06.990 align:start position:0% syntax of the language in Spanish there are<00:12:04.040> verbs<00:12:04.320> ending<00:12:04.600> in<00:12:04.760> a<00:12:04.959> r<00:12:05.240> e<00:12:05.440> r<00:12:05.800> and<00:12:06.040> I<00:12:06.600> like 00:12:06.990 --> 00:12:07.000 align:start position:0% are verbs ending in a r e r and I like 00:12:07.000 --> 00:12:09.710 align:start position:0% are verbs ending in a r e r and I like abl<00:12:08.000> and<00:12:08.240> V<00:12:08.720> here<00:12:08.839> are<00:12:09.079> the<00:12:09.160> meanings<00:12:09.639> and 00:12:09.710 --> 00:12:09.720 align:start position:0% abl and V here are the meanings and 00:12:09.720 --> 00:12:11.590 align:start position:0% abl and V here are the meanings and let's<00:12:09.920> start<00:12:10.120> with<00:12:10.279> verbs<00:12:10.560> ending<00:12:10.800> in<00:12:10.959> a<00:12:11.160> r<00:12:11.519> the 00:12:11.590 --> 00:12:11.600 align:start position:0% let's start with verbs ending in a r the 00:12:11.600 --> 00:12:13.389 align:start position:0% let's start with verbs ending in a r the way<00:12:11.760> that<00:12:11.920> conjugation<00:12:12.440> Works<00:12:12.680> in<00:12:12.839> Spanish<00:12:13.279> is 00:12:13.389 --> 00:12:13.399 align:start position:0% way that conjugation Works in Spanish is 00:12:13.399 --> 00:12:15.150 align:start position:0% way that conjugation Works in Spanish is by<00:12:13.560> dropping<00:12:13.880> off<00:12:14.040> the<00:12:14.160> ending<00:12:14.440> of<00:12:14.560> the<00:12:14.680> verb 00:12:15.150 --> 00:12:15.160 align:start position:0% by dropping off the ending of the verb 00:12:15.160 --> 00:12:16.870 align:start position:0% by dropping off the ending of the verb like<00:12:15.399> abl<00:12:16.000> and<00:12:16.160> then<00:12:16.440> you<00:12:16.600> add<00:12:16.760> the 00:12:16.870 --> 00:12:16.880 align:start position:0% like abl and then you add the 00:12:16.880 --> 00:12:18.550 align:start position:0% like abl and then you add the corresponding<00:12:17.480> conjugation<00:12:18.040> that<00:12:18.160> fits<00:12:18.440> the 00:12:18.550 --> 00:12:18.560 align:start position:0% corresponding conjugation that fits the 00:12:18.560 --> 00:12:20.310 align:start position:0% corresponding conjugation that fits the pronoun<00:12:19.079> unlike<00:12:19.360> the<00:12:19.480> two<00:12:19.639> conjugations<00:12:20.199> that 00:12:20.310 --> 00:12:20.320 align:start position:0% pronoun unlike the two conjugations that 00:12:20.320 --> 00:12:22.150 align:start position:0% pronoun unlike the two conjugations that you<00:12:20.399> have<00:12:20.560> in<00:12:20.680> English<00:12:21.240> Spanish<00:12:21.600> has<00:12:21.760> six<00:12:22.000> of 00:12:22.150 --> 00:12:22.160 align:start position:0% you have in English Spanish has six of 00:12:22.160 --> 00:12:23.870 align:start position:0% you have in English Spanish has six of them<00:12:22.399> to<00:12:22.519> conjugate<00:12:22.959> simple<00:12:23.199> verbs<00:12:23.480> ending<00:12:23.720> in 00:12:23.870 --> 00:12:23.880 align:start position:0% them to conjugate simple verbs ending in 00:12:23.880 --> 00:12:25.710 align:start position:0% them to conjugate simple verbs ending in a<00:12:24.079> r<00:12:24.399> you<00:12:24.560> first<00:12:24.800> drop<00:12:25.079> the<00:12:25.160> ending<00:12:25.440> of<00:12:25.560> the 00:12:25.710 --> 00:12:25.720 align:start position:0% a r you first drop the ending of the 00:12:25.720 --> 00:12:27.110 align:start position:0% a r you first drop the ending of the verb<00:12:26.000> and<00:12:26.120> then<00:12:26.279> apply<00:12:26.560> the<00:12:26.680> ending<00:12:26.959> that 00:12:27.110 --> 00:12:27.120 align:start position:0% verb and then apply the ending that 00:12:27.120 --> 00:12:29.470 align:start position:0% verb and then apply the ending that corresponds<00:12:27.600> with<00:12:27.720> the<00:12:27.839> pronoun<00:12:28.440> for<00:12:28.639> y<00:12:29.279> you 00:12:29.470 --> 00:12:29.480 align:start position:0% corresponds with the pronoun for y you 00:12:29.480 --> 00:12:35.030 align:start position:0% corresponds with the pronoun for y you put<00:12:29.880> o<00:12:30.600> for<00:12:30.920> to<00:12:31.680> you<00:12:31.880> put<00:12:32.279> as<00:12:33.000> for<00:12:33.279> l<00:12:33.680> or<00:12:33.959> aad<00:12:34.880> you 00:12:35.030 --> 00:12:35.040 align:start position:0% put o for to you put as for l or aad you 00:12:35.040 --> 00:12:38.430 align:start position:0% put o for to you put as for l or aad you put<00:12:35.399> a<00:12:35.920> for<00:12:36.120> noos<00:12:37.000> or<00:12:37.360> noas<00:12:38.000> but<00:12:38.120> again<00:12:38.240> we're 00:12:38.430 --> 00:12:38.440 align:start position:0% put a for noos or noas but again we're 00:12:38.440 --> 00:12:39.829 align:start position:0% put a for noos or noas but again we're focusing<00:12:38.760> on<00:12:38.880> the<00:12:39.000> pronouns<00:12:39.360> you'll<00:12:39.519> use<00:12:39.760> the 00:12:39.829 --> 00:12:39.839 align:start position:0% focusing on the pronouns you'll use the 00:12:39.839 --> 00:12:42.189 align:start position:0% focusing on the pronouns you'll use the most<00:12:40.040> when<00:12:40.240> speaking<00:12:40.680> so<00:12:40.839> for<00:12:41.079> noos<00:12:41.720> you<00:12:41.880> put 00:12:42.189 --> 00:12:42.199 align:start position:0% most when speaking so for noos you put 00:12:42.199 --> 00:12:45.590 align:start position:0% most when speaking so for noos you put Amos<00:12:43.000> for<00:12:43.279> Vos<00:12:44.160> you<00:12:44.320> put<00:12:44.720> ice<00:12:45.320> with<00:12:45.440> an 00:12:45.590 --> 00:12:45.600 align:start position:0% Amos for Vos you put ice with an 00:12:45.600 --> 00:12:48.870 align:start position:0% Amos for Vos you put ice with an emphasis<00:12:46.000> on<00:12:46.199> the<00:12:46.399> a<00:12:47.120> ice<00:12:47.800> and<00:12:47.920> for<00:12:48.160> AOS<00:12:48.720> you 00:12:48.870 --> 00:12:48.880 align:start position:0% emphasis on the a ice and for AOS you 00:12:48.880 --> 00:12:50.829 align:start position:0% emphasis on the a ice and for AOS you put<00:12:49.120> an<00:12:49.440> let's<00:12:49.600> use<00:12:49.800> the<00:12:49.880> verb<00:12:50.120> abl<00:12:50.560> which<00:12:50.680> is<00:12:50.760> a 00:12:50.829 --> 00:12:50.839 align:start position:0% put an let's use the verb abl which is a 00:12:50.839 --> 00:12:52.389 align:start position:0% put an let's use the verb abl which is a verb<00:12:51.040> you<00:12:51.199> use<00:12:51.360> a<00:12:51.480> lot<00:12:51.680> when<00:12:51.800> you<00:12:51.880> speak<00:12:52.279> how 00:12:52.389 --> 00:12:52.399 align:start position:0% verb you use a lot when you speak how 00:12:52.399 --> 00:12:53.990 align:start position:0% verb you use a lot when you speak how would<00:12:52.519> you<00:12:52.600> conjugate<00:12:53.000> the<00:12:53.079> verb<00:12:53.320> abl<00:12:53.760> in<00:12:53.839> the 00:12:53.990 --> 00:12:54.000 align:start position:0% would you conjugate the verb abl in the 00:12:54.000 --> 00:12:56.870 align:start position:0% would you conjugate the verb abl in the yo<00:12:54.199> form<00:12:54.600> you<00:12:54.760> take<00:12:54.959> a<00:12:55.720> drop<00:12:56.000> the<00:12:56.120> ending<00:12:56.760> and 00:12:56.870 --> 00:12:56.880 align:start position:0% yo form you take a drop the ending and 00:12:56.880 --> 00:12:58.990 align:start position:0% yo form you take a drop the ending and you<00:12:57.040> add<00:12:57.279> o<00:12:57.720> so<00:12:57.880> you<00:12:58.000> get<00:12:58.240> ablo<00:12:58.639> the<00:12:58.800> the<00:12:58.880> more 00:12:58.990 --> 00:12:59.000 align:start position:0% you add o so you get ablo the the more 00:12:59.000 --> 00:13:00.350 align:start position:0% you add o so you get ablo the the more you<00:12:59.079> try<00:12:59.279> this<00:12:59.440> concept<00:12:59.760> the<00:12:59.880> faster<00:13:00.120> you'll 00:13:00.350 --> 00:13:00.360 align:start position:0% you try this concept the faster you'll 00:13:00.360 --> 00:13:05.110 align:start position:0% you try this concept the faster you'll get<00:13:00.480> it<00:13:00.839> for<00:13:01.079> two<00:13:01.720> you<00:13:01.880> get<00:13:02.199> AAS<00:13:03.120> for<00:13:03.440> l<00:13:03.839> or<00:13:04.120> a 00:13:05.110 --> 00:13:05.120 align:start position:0% get it for two you get AAS for l or a 00:13:05.120 --> 00:13:09.350 align:start position:0% get it for two you get AAS for l or a you<00:13:05.320> get<00:13:05.560> abla<00:13:06.360> for<00:13:06.639> noos<00:13:07.639> you<00:13:07.839> get<00:13:08.120> aamos<00:13:09.120> for 00:13:09.350 --> 00:13:09.360 align:start position:0% you get abla for noos you get aamos for 00:13:09.360 --> 00:13:12.829 align:start position:0% you get abla for noos you get aamos for votos<00:13:10.199> you<00:13:10.399> get<00:13:10.720> abl<00:13:11.600> and<00:13:11.720> for<00:13:11.959> AOS<00:13:12.480> you<00:13:12.639> get 00:13:12.829 --> 00:13:12.839 align:start position:0% votos you get abl and for AOS you get 00:13:12.839 --> 00:13:14.790 align:start position:0% votos you get abl and for AOS you get ablan<00:13:13.360> try<00:13:13.560> not<00:13:13.800> concentrating<00:13:14.320> on<00:13:14.480> these 00:13:14.790 --> 00:13:14.800 align:start position:0% ablan try not concentrating on these 00:13:14.800 --> 00:13:16.189 align:start position:0% ablan try not concentrating on these pronouns<00:13:15.240> because<00:13:15.440> the<00:13:15.560> sentences<00:13:16.000> that<00:13:16.120> you 00:13:16.189 --> 00:13:16.199 align:start position:0% pronouns because the sentences that you 00:13:16.199 --> 00:13:17.750 align:start position:0% pronouns because the sentences that you can<00:13:16.360> make<00:13:16.519> with<00:13:16.639> them<00:13:16.800> are<00:13:16.959> very<00:13:17.160> minimal<00:13:17.639> all 00:13:17.750 --> 00:13:17.760 align:start position:0% can make with them are very minimal all 00:13:17.760 --> 00:13:18.990 align:start position:0% can make with them are very minimal all we<00:13:17.880> have<00:13:18.000> to<00:13:18.120> know<00:13:18.240> for<00:13:18.440> now<00:13:18.639> is<00:13:18.760> how<00:13:18.839> to 00:13:18.990 --> 00:13:19.000 align:start position:0% we have to know for now is how to 00:13:19.000 --> 00:13:20.829 align:start position:0% we have to know for now is how to conjugate<00:13:19.399> verbs<00:13:19.639> ending<00:13:19.880> in<00:13:20.040> a<00:13:20.199> r<00:13:20.519> using 00:13:20.829 --> 00:13:20.839 align:start position:0% conjugate verbs ending in a r using 00:13:20.839 --> 00:13:22.269 align:start position:0% conjugate verbs ending in a r using every<00:13:21.040> pronoun<00:13:21.480> but<00:13:21.600> you<00:13:21.680> don't<00:13:21.880> necessarily 00:13:22.269 --> 00:13:22.279 align:start position:0% every pronoun but you don't necessarily 00:13:22.279 --> 00:13:23.750 align:start position:0% every pronoun but you don't necessarily need<00:13:22.440> to<00:13:22.519> make<00:13:22.639> a<00:13:22.800> thousand<00:13:23.120> sentences<00:13:23.600> with 00:13:23.750 --> 00:13:23.760 align:start position:0% need to make a thousand sentences with 00:13:23.760 --> 00:13:25.470 align:start position:0% need to make a thousand sentences with them<00:13:24.079> if<00:13:24.160> you<00:13:24.240> were<00:13:24.399> to<00:13:24.519> make<00:13:24.680> phrases<00:13:25.240> as 00:13:25.470 --> 00:13:25.480 align:start position:0% them if you were to make phrases as 00:13:25.480 --> 00:13:27.189 align:start position:0% them if you were to make phrases as examples<00:13:26.040> try<00:13:26.279> focusing<00:13:26.680> more<00:13:26.800> on<00:13:27.000> these 00:13:27.189 --> 00:13:27.199 align:start position:0% examples try focusing more on these 00:13:27.199 --> 00:13:28.910 align:start position:0% examples try focusing more on these pronouns<00:13:27.720> one<00:13:27.880> important<00:13:28.199> thing<00:13:28.320> to<00:13:28.440> note<00:13:28.839> is 00:13:28.910 --> 00:13:28.920 align:start position:0% pronouns one important thing to note is 00:13:28.920 --> 00:13:30.550 align:start position:0% pronouns one important thing to note is that<00:13:29.079> the<00:13:29.160> same<00:13:29.399> system<00:13:29.639> for<00:13:29.839> conjugation 00:13:30.550 --> 00:13:30.560 align:start position:0% that the same system for conjugation 00:13:30.560 --> 00:13:33.150 align:start position:0% that the same system for conjugation works<00:13:30.800> for<00:13:31.120> almost<00:13:31.600> every<00:13:31.880> AR<00:13:32.399> verb<00:13:32.720> out<00:13:32.920> there 00:13:33.150 --> 00:13:33.160 align:start position:0% works for almost every AR verb out there 00:13:33.160 --> 00:13:34.550 align:start position:0% works for almost every AR verb out there but<00:13:33.279> I<00:13:33.360> will<00:13:33.480> not<00:13:33.639> focus<00:13:33.880> on<00:13:34.040> all<00:13:34.199> of<00:13:34.320> them 00:13:34.550 --> 00:13:34.560 align:start position:0% but I will not focus on all of them 00:13:34.560 --> 00:13:36.350 align:start position:0% but I will not focus on all of them because<00:13:34.760> there<00:13:34.880> is<00:13:35.000> no<00:13:35.199> point<00:13:35.680> plus<00:13:36.000> there<00:13:36.120> are 00:13:36.350 --> 00:13:36.360 align:start position:0% because there is no point plus there are 00:13:36.360 --> 00:13:38.590 align:start position:0% because there is no point plus there are verbs<00:13:36.639> like<00:13:36.920> gustar<00:13:37.560> and<00:13:37.760> pensar<00:13:38.279> that<00:13:38.399> are 00:13:38.590 --> 00:13:38.600 align:start position:0% verbs like gustar and pensar that are 00:13:38.600 --> 00:13:40.590 align:start position:0% verbs like gustar and pensar that are topics<00:13:38.839> for<00:13:39.000> future<00:13:39.320> videos<00:13:39.839> and<00:13:40.040> also<00:13:40.519> I 00:13:40.590 --> 00:13:40.600 align:start position:0% topics for future videos and also I 00:13:40.600 --> 00:13:41.910 align:start position:0% topics for future videos and also I don't<00:13:40.720> like<00:13:40.880> giving<00:13:41.199> examples<00:13:41.600> whenever<00:13:41.839> I 00:13:41.910 --> 00:13:41.920 align:start position:0% don't like giving examples whenever I 00:13:41.920 --> 00:13:43.389 align:start position:0% don't like giving examples whenever I show<00:13:42.120> the<00:13:42.199> First<00:13:42.399> Fundamental<00:13:42.839> of<00:13:43.000> Spanish 00:13:43.389 --> 00:13:43.399 align:start position:0% show the First Fundamental of Spanish 00:13:43.399 --> 00:13:44.550 align:start position:0% show the First Fundamental of Spanish because<00:13:43.680> I<00:13:43.839> believe<00:13:44.199> that<00:13:44.320> when<00:13:44.399> you're 00:13:44.550 --> 00:13:44.560 align:start position:0% because I believe that when you're 00:13:44.560 --> 00:13:46.110 align:start position:0% because I believe that when you're learning<00:13:44.880> the<00:13:45.000> beginning<00:13:45.440> you<00:13:45.560> can<00:13:45.720> generate 00:13:46.110 --> 00:13:46.120 align:start position:0% learning the beginning you can generate 00:13:46.120 --> 00:13:47.629 align:start position:0% learning the beginning you can generate examples<00:13:46.639> on<00:13:46.760> your<00:13:46.920> own<00:13:47.240> by<00:13:47.360> simply 00:13:47.629 --> 00:13:47.639 align:start position:0% examples on your own by simply 00:13:47.639 --> 00:13:49.069 align:start position:0% examples on your own by simply translating<00:13:48.120> new<00:13:48.360> vocabulary<00:13:48.839> that<00:13:48.959> you 00:13:49.069 --> 00:13:49.079 align:start position:0% translating new vocabulary that you 00:13:49.079 --> 00:13:50.949 align:start position:0% translating new vocabulary that you encounter<00:13:49.440> in<00:13:49.519> your<00:13:49.680> personal<00:13:50.079> life<00:13:50.480> plus<00:13:50.839> as 00:13:50.949 --> 00:13:50.959 align:start position:0% encounter in your personal life plus as 00:13:50.959 --> 00:13:52.269 align:start position:0% encounter in your personal life plus as I<00:13:51.079> said<00:13:51.440> as<00:13:51.560> long<00:13:51.720> as<00:13:51.800> you<00:13:51.880> know<00:13:52.040> how<00:13:52.120> to 00:13:52.269 --> 00:13:52.279 align:start position:0% I said as long as you know how to 00:13:52.279 --> 00:13:53.949 align:start position:0% I said as long as you know how to conjugate<00:13:52.800> verbs<00:13:53.160> you're<00:13:53.320> good<00:13:53.480> to<00:13:53.639> go 00:13:53.949 --> 00:13:53.959 align:start position:0% conjugate verbs you're good to go 00:13:53.959 --> 00:13:55.670 align:start position:0% conjugate verbs you're good to go because<00:13:54.160> by<00:13:54.279> learning<00:13:54.560> how<00:13:54.639> to<00:13:54.759> say<00:13:55.000> yo<00:13:55.240> ablo 00:13:55.670 --> 00:13:55.680 align:start position:0% because by learning how to say yo ablo 00:13:55.680 --> 00:13:57.710 align:start position:0% because by learning how to say yo ablo you<00:13:55.800> can<00:13:55.959> already<00:13:56.199> say<00:13:56.440> many<00:13:56.639> sentences<00:13:57.360> like 00:13:57.710 --> 00:13:57.720 align:start position:0% you can already say many sentences like 00:13:57.720 --> 00:13:59.350 align:start position:0% you can already say many sentences like yo<00:13:57.959> ablo<00:13:58.279> Espanol 00:13:59.350 --> 00:13:59.360 align:start position:0% yo ablo Espanol 00:13:59.360 --> 00:14:02.990 align:start position:0% yo ablo Espanol y<00:14:00.720> or<00:14:01.720> you<00:14:01.839> already<00:14:02.040> said<00:14:02.279> a<00:14:02.360> few<00:14:02.519> sentences 00:14:02.990 --> 00:14:03.000 align:start position:0% y or you already said a few sentences 00:14:03.000 --> 00:14:04.870 align:start position:0% y or you already said a few sentences with<00:14:03.120> the<00:14:03.240> words<00:14:03.639> yo<00:14:04.240> and<00:14:04.320> you<00:14:04.399> can<00:14:04.600> probably 00:14:04.870 --> 00:14:04.880 align:start position:0% with the words yo and you can probably 00:14:04.880 --> 00:14:06.310 align:start position:0% with the words yo and you can probably say<00:14:05.079> more<00:14:05.399> based<00:14:05.600> on<00:14:05.720> whatever<00:14:05.959> you<00:14:06.079> want<00:14:06.160> to 00:14:06.310 --> 00:14:06.320 align:start position:0% say more based on whatever you want to 00:14:06.320 --> 00:14:08.269 align:start position:0% say more based on whatever you want to say<00:14:06.759> next<00:14:07.000> up<00:14:07.279> there<00:14:07.399> are<00:14:07.600> verbs<00:14:07.880> ending<00:14:08.120> in 00:14:08.269 --> 00:14:08.279 align:start position:0% say next up there are verbs ending in 00:14:08.279 --> 00:14:10.189 align:start position:0% say next up there are verbs ending in eer<00:14:08.920> and<00:14:09.079> these<00:14:09.240> verbs<00:14:09.480> follow<00:14:09.720> a<00:14:09.839> similar 00:14:10.189 --> 00:14:10.199 align:start position:0% eer and these verbs follow a similar 00:14:10.199 --> 00:14:12.910 align:start position:0% eer and these verbs follow a similar syntax<00:14:10.639> as<00:14:10.800> verbs<00:14:11.079> ending<00:14:11.360> with<00:14:11.519> a<00:14:11.680> r<00:14:12.199> for<00:14:12.480> y 00:14:12.910 --> 00:14:12.920 align:start position:0% syntax as verbs ending with a r for y 00:14:12.920 --> 00:14:14.550 align:start position:0% syntax as verbs ending with a r for y you<00:14:13.079> drop<00:14:13.360> the<00:14:13.440> ending<00:14:13.720> of<00:14:13.839> the<00:14:14.000> verb<00:14:14.320> and<00:14:14.440> you 00:14:14.550 --> 00:14:14.560 align:start position:0% you drop the ending of the verb and you 00:14:14.560 --> 00:14:19.269 align:start position:0% you drop the ending of the verb and you put<00:14:15.000> o<00:14:15.480> for<00:14:15.759> to<00:14:16.160> you<00:14:16.320> put<00:14:16.680> s<00:14:17.279> for<00:14:17.600> l<00:14:17.920> or<00:14:18.160> a<00:14:19.120> you 00:14:19.269 --> 00:14:19.279 align:start position:0% put o for to you put s for l or a you 00:14:19.279 --> 00:14:23.710 align:start position:0% put o for to you put s for l or a you put<00:14:19.639> e<00:14:20.040> for<00:14:20.279> noos<00:14:21.120> you<00:14:21.279> put<00:14:21.560> Emos<00:14:22.560> foros<00:14:23.560> you 00:14:23.710 --> 00:14:23.720 align:start position:0% put e for noos you put Emos foros you 00:14:23.720 --> 00:14:27.030 align:start position:0% put e for noos you put Emos foros you put<00:14:24.120> Ace<00:14:24.600> with<00:14:24.720> an<00:14:24.880> emphasis<00:14:25.279> on<00:14:25.519> the<00:14:25.800> E<00:14:26.560> Ace 00:14:27.030 --> 00:14:27.040 align:start position:0% put Ace with an emphasis on the E Ace 00:14:27.040 --> 00:14:29.949 align:start position:0% put Ace with an emphasis on the E Ace and<00:14:27.160> for<00:14:27.399> AOS<00:14:27.920> you<00:14:28.079> put<00:14:28.320> n<00:14:28.759> using<00:14:29.040> the<00:14:29.160> verb<00:14:29.440> K 00:14:29.949 --> 00:14:29.959 align:start position:0% and for AOS you put n using the verb K 00:14:29.959 --> 00:14:31.509 align:start position:0% and for AOS you put n using the verb K as<00:14:30.040> an<00:14:30.240> example<00:14:30.759> how<00:14:30.880> would<00:14:31.000> you<00:14:31.120> conjugate 00:14:31.509 --> 00:14:31.519 align:start position:0% as an example how would you conjugate 00:14:31.519 --> 00:14:34.430 align:start position:0% as an example how would you conjugate the<00:14:31.600> verb<00:14:31.839> K<00:14:32.240> in<00:14:32.360> the<00:14:32.480> Y<00:14:32.720> form<00:14:33.079> you<00:14:33.240> take<00:14:33.440> K<00:14:34.120> drop 00:14:34.430 --> 00:14:34.440 align:start position:0% the verb K in the Y form you take K drop 00:14:34.440 --> 00:14:37.430 align:start position:0% the verb K in the Y form you take K drop the<00:14:34.560> ending<00:14:35.199> and<00:14:35.440> add<00:14:35.720> o<00:14:36.079> so<00:14:36.199> you<00:14:36.360> get<00:14:36.720> KO<00:14:37.279> this 00:14:37.430 --> 00:14:37.440 align:start position:0% the ending and add o so you get KO this 00:14:37.440 --> 00:14:39.150 align:start position:0% the ending and add o so you get KO this word<00:14:37.680> can<00:14:37.839> also<00:14:38.040> mean<00:14:38.320> like<00:14:38.720> as<00:14:38.880> in<00:14:39.000> the 00:14:39.150 --> 00:14:39.160 align:start position:0% word can also mean like as in the 00:14:39.160 --> 00:14:41.389 align:start position:0% word can also mean like as in the sentence<00:14:39.800> like<00:14:40.040> I<00:14:40.160> told<00:14:40.440> him<00:14:40.759> yesterday<00:14:41.320> but 00:14:41.389 --> 00:14:41.399 align:start position:0% sentence like I told him yesterday but 00:14:41.399 --> 00:14:43.910 align:start position:0% sentence like I told him yesterday but the<00:14:41.519> meaning<00:14:41.720> changes<00:14:42.079> in<00:14:42.279> context<00:14:42.959> for<00:14:43.279> two 00:14:43.910 --> 00:14:43.920 align:start position:0% the meaning changes in context for two 00:14:43.920 --> 00:14:51.230 align:start position:0% the meaning changes in context for two you<00:14:44.120> get<00:14:44.399> k<00:14:45.240> for<00:14:45.560> L<00:14:46.120> you<00:14:46.320> get<00:14:46.560> k<00:14:47.399> for<00:14:47.800> noos<00:14:48.880> Kos 00:14:51.230 --> 00:14:51.240 align:start position:0% you get k for L you get k for noos Kos 00:14:51.240 --> 00:14:54.910 align:start position:0% you get k for L you get k for noos Kos foros<00:14:52.240> and<00:14:52.480> AOS<00:14:53.320> com<00:14:53.959> as<00:14:54.040> I<00:14:54.160> said<00:14:54.399> again<00:14:54.720> try 00:14:54.910 --> 00:14:54.920 align:start position:0% foros and AOS com as I said again try 00:14:54.920 --> 00:14:56.430 align:start position:0% foros and AOS com as I said again try not<00:14:55.120> concentrating<00:14:55.600> on<00:14:55.759> these<00:14:55.920> pronouns 00:14:56.430 --> 00:14:56.440 align:start position:0% not concentrating on these pronouns 00:14:56.440 --> 00:14:57.550 align:start position:0% not concentrating on these pronouns because<00:14:56.600> the<00:14:56.720> phrases<00:14:57.040> that<00:14:57.160> you<00:14:57.240> can<00:14:57.399> make 00:14:57.550 --> 00:14:57.560 align:start position:0% because the phrases that you can make 00:14:57.560 --> 00:14:59.110 align:start position:0% because the phrases that you can make with<00:14:57.680> them<00:14:57.880> are<00:14:58.040> mainly<00:14:58.320> pointless<00:14:58.880> there<00:14:59.000> is 00:14:59.110 --> 00:14:59.120 align:start position:0% with them are mainly pointless there is 00:14:59.120 --> 00:15:00.509 align:start position:0% with them are mainly pointless there is no<00:14:59.279> point<00:14:59.440> in<00:14:59.519> knowing<00:14:59.759> how<00:14:59.880> to<00:15:00.000> conjugate 00:15:00.509 --> 00:15:00.519 align:start position:0% no point in knowing how to conjugate 00:15:00.519 --> 00:15:02.389 align:start position:0% no point in knowing how to conjugate every<00:15:00.720> single<00:15:01.040> e<00:15:01.480> verb<00:15:01.839> because<00:15:02.000> you'll<00:15:02.199> never 00:15:02.389 --> 00:15:02.399 align:start position:0% every single e verb because you'll never 00:15:02.399 --> 00:15:04.150 align:start position:0% every single e verb because you'll never use<00:15:02.639> all<00:15:02.759> of<00:15:02.920> them<00:15:03.240> I'm<00:15:03.320> just<00:15:03.440> using<00:15:03.680> a<00:15:03.800> useful 00:15:04.150 --> 00:15:04.160 align:start position:0% use all of them I'm just using a useful 00:15:04.160 --> 00:15:05.910 align:start position:0% use all of them I'm just using a useful verb<00:15:04.440> like<00:15:05.000> in<00:15:05.079> order<00:15:05.320> to<00:15:05.399> show<00:15:05.600> you<00:15:05.720> how<00:15:05.800> to 00:15:05.910 --> 00:15:05.920 align:start position:0% verb like in order to show you how to 00:15:05.920 --> 00:15:08.230 align:start position:0% verb like in order to show you how to conjugate<00:15:06.399> regular<00:15:06.839> e<00:15:07.320> verbs<00:15:07.839> the<00:15:08.000> last 00:15:08.230 --> 00:15:08.240 align:start position:0% conjugate regular e verbs the last 00:15:08.240 --> 00:15:10.829 align:start position:0% conjugate regular e verbs the last concept<00:15:08.639> is<00:15:08.759> verbs<00:15:09.040> ending<00:15:09.279> in<00:15:09.440> IR<00:15:10.079> for<00:15:10.320> yo<00:15:10.680> you 00:15:10.829 --> 00:15:10.839 align:start position:0% concept is verbs ending in IR for yo you 00:15:10.839 --> 00:15:13.150 align:start position:0% concept is verbs ending in IR for yo you drop<00:15:11.120> the<00:15:11.199> ending<00:15:11.480> of<00:15:11.600> the<00:15:11.759> verb<00:15:12.079> and<00:15:12.240> put<00:15:12.519> o 00:15:13.150 --> 00:15:13.160 align:start position:0% drop the ending of the verb and put o 00:15:13.160 --> 00:15:17.550 align:start position:0% drop the ending of the verb and put o for<00:15:13.440> to<00:15:14.000> you<00:15:14.160> put<00:15:14.440> s<00:15:15.279> for<00:15:15.560> L<00:15:16.160> you<00:15:16.360> put<00:15:16.680> e<00:15:17.320> for 00:15:17.550 --> 00:15:17.560 align:start position:0% for to you put s for L you put e for 00:15:17.560 --> 00:15:21.949 align:start position:0% for to you put s for L you put e for noos<00:15:18.440> you<00:15:18.639> put<00:15:19.040> imos<00:15:19.920> for<00:15:20.199> votos<00:15:20.959> you<00:15:21.120> put<00:15:21.480> is 00:15:21.949 --> 00:15:21.959 align:start position:0% noos you put imos for votos you put is 00:15:21.959 --> 00:15:25.590 align:start position:0% noos you put imos for votos you put is with<00:15:22.079> an<00:15:22.240> emphasis<00:15:22.639> on<00:15:22.880> the<00:15:23.160> E<00:15:23.959> is<00:15:24.600> and<00:15:24.720> for<00:15:24.959> AOS 00:15:25.590 --> 00:15:25.600 align:start position:0% with an emphasis on the E is and for AOS 00:15:25.600 --> 00:15:27.509 align:start position:0% with an emphasis on the E is and for AOS you<00:15:25.759> put<00:15:25.959> n<00:15:26.279> you<00:15:26.399> might<00:15:26.600> also<00:15:26.839> notice<00:15:27.240> that<00:15:27.360> the 00:15:27.509 --> 00:15:27.519 align:start position:0% you put n you might also notice that the 00:15:27.519 --> 00:15:30.910 align:start position:0% you put n you might also notice that the pronouns<00:15:28.160> y<00:15:28.720> to<00:15:29.120> L<00:15:29.440> and<00:15:29.680> AOS<00:15:30.160> all<00:15:30.319> use<00:15:30.560> the<00:15:30.680> same 00:15:30.910 --> 00:15:30.920 align:start position:0% pronouns y to L and AOS all use the same 00:15:30.920 --> 00:15:33.030 align:start position:0% pronouns y to L and AOS all use the same syntax<00:15:31.399> as<00:15:31.560> verbs<00:15:31.800> ending<00:15:32.040> in<00:15:32.240> e<00:15:32.720> which<00:15:32.880> makes 00:15:33.030 --> 00:15:33.040 align:start position:0% syntax as verbs ending in e which makes 00:15:33.040 --> 00:15:34.749 align:start position:0% syntax as verbs ending in e which makes the<00:15:33.199> language<00:15:33.480> more<00:15:33.680> convenient<00:15:34.360> using<00:15:34.639> the 00:15:34.749 --> 00:15:34.759 align:start position:0% the language more convenient using the 00:15:34.759 --> 00:15:37.430 align:start position:0% the language more convenient using the verb<00:15:35.000> VI<00:15:35.519> as<00:15:35.639> an<00:15:35.839> example<00:15:36.319> for<00:15:36.519> the<00:15:36.680> Y<00:15:36.959> pronoun 00:15:37.430 --> 00:15:37.440 align:start position:0% verb VI as an example for the Y pronoun 00:15:37.440 --> 00:15:40.550 align:start position:0% verb VI as an example for the Y pronoun you<00:15:37.600> take<00:15:37.880> VI<00:15:38.519> drop<00:15:38.800> the<00:15:38.920> ending<00:15:39.440> and<00:15:39.680> add<00:15:39.959> o<00:15:40.399> so 00:15:40.550 --> 00:15:40.560 align:start position:0% you take VI drop the ending and add o so 00:15:40.560 --> 00:15:44.710 align:start position:0% you take VI drop the ending and add o so you<00:15:40.680> get<00:15:40.880> Vivo<00:15:41.680> for<00:15:41.920> two<00:15:42.440> you<00:15:42.600> get<00:15:42.839> Viv<00:15:43.720> for<00:15:44.040> L 00:15:44.710 --> 00:15:44.720 align:start position:0% you get Vivo for two you get Viv for L 00:15:44.720 --> 00:15:50.710 align:start position:0% you get Vivo for two you get Viv for L you<00:15:44.880> get<00:15:45.079> VI<00:15:45.759> for<00:15:46.040> noos<00:15:46.880> you<00:15:47.079> get<00:15:47.560> Vios<00:15:48.560> Vos<00:15:49.720> VI 00:15:50.710 --> 00:15:50.720 align:start position:0% you get VI for noos you get Vios Vos VI 00:15:50.720 --> 00:15:53.309 align:start position:0% you get VI for noos you get Vios Vos VI AOS<00:15:51.480> VI<00:15:51.959> as<00:15:52.079> I<00:15:52.199> said<00:15:52.399> again<00:15:52.720> there<00:15:52.839> is<00:15:53.000> no<00:15:53.160> point 00:15:53.309 --> 00:15:53.319 align:start position:0% AOS VI as I said again there is no point 00:15:53.319 --> 00:15:54.790 align:start position:0% AOS VI as I said again there is no point in<00:15:53.440> knowing<00:15:53.680> how<00:15:53.759> to<00:15:53.920> conjugate<00:15:54.360> every<00:15:54.519> single 00:15:54.790 --> 00:15:54.800 align:start position:0% in knowing how to conjugate every single 00:15:54.800 --> 00:15:56.550 align:start position:0% in knowing how to conjugate every single IR<00:15:55.199> verb<00:15:55.560> because<00:15:55.720> you'll<00:15:55.880> never<00:15:56.079> use<00:15:56.279> all<00:15:56.440> of 00:15:56.550 --> 00:15:56.560 align:start position:0% IR verb because you'll never use all of 00:15:56.560 --> 00:15:58.189 align:start position:0% IR verb because you'll never use all of them<00:15:56.920> so<00:15:57.079> for<00:15:57.240> now<00:15:57.480> I<00:15:57.560> want<00:15:57.680> to<00:15:57.800> say<00:15:57.959> that<00:15:58.120> this 00:15:58.189 --> 00:15:58.199 align:start position:0% them so for now I want to say that this 00:15:58.199 --> 00:15:59.710 align:start position:0% them so for now I want to say that this is<00:15:58.319> it<00:15:58.600> for<00:15:58.759> this<00:15:58.920> video<00:15:59.279> I<00:15:59.360> could<00:15:59.480> have<00:15:59.600> made 00:15:59.710 --> 00:15:59.720 align:start position:0% is it for this video I could have made 00:15:59.720 --> 00:16:01.550 align:start position:0% is it for this video I could have made it<00:15:59.839> a<00:15:59.959> longer<00:16:00.279> video<00:16:00.600> where<00:16:00.720> I<00:16:00.839> gave<00:16:01.120> examples 00:16:01.550 --> 00:16:01.560 align:start position:0% it a longer video where I gave examples 00:16:01.560 --> 00:16:02.749 align:start position:0% it a longer video where I gave examples and<00:16:01.680> maybe<00:16:01.880> quizzed<00:16:02.199> you<00:16:02.279> on<00:16:02.399> some<00:16:02.519> of<00:16:02.639> the 00:16:02.749 --> 00:16:02.759 align:start position:0% and maybe quizzed you on some of the 00:16:02.759 --> 00:16:04.350 align:start position:0% and maybe quizzed you on some of the topics<00:16:03.040> that<00:16:03.160> I<00:16:03.199> show<00:16:03.480> today<00:16:03.839> but<00:16:03.959> I<00:16:04.079> prefer 00:16:04.350 --> 00:16:04.360 align:start position:0% topics that I show today but I prefer 00:16:04.360 --> 00:16:06.309 align:start position:0% topics that I show today but I prefer not<00:16:04.480> to<00:16:04.800> I<00:16:04.880> choose<00:16:05.120> to<00:16:05.240> end<00:16:05.440> the<00:16:05.600> concept<00:16:05.959> here 00:16:06.309 --> 00:16:06.319 align:start position:0% not to I choose to end the concept here 00:16:06.319 --> 00:16:07.550 align:start position:0% not to I choose to end the concept here because<00:16:06.680> I<00:16:06.800> believe<00:16:07.079> that<00:16:07.199> this<00:16:07.279> is<00:16:07.399> a 00:16:07.550 --> 00:16:07.560 align:start position:0% because I believe that this is a 00:16:07.560 --> 00:16:08.829 align:start position:0% because I believe that this is a sufficient<00:16:07.880> amount<00:16:08.079> of<00:16:08.240> information<00:16:08.720> that 00:16:08.829 --> 00:16:08.839 align:start position:0% sufficient amount of information that 00:16:08.839 --> 00:16:10.550 align:start position:0% sufficient amount of information that one<00:16:09.000> would<00:16:09.160> need<00:16:09.319> to<00:16:09.440> know<00:16:09.839> in<00:16:09.959> order<00:16:10.199> to 00:16:10.550 --> 00:16:10.560 align:start position:0% one would need to know in order to 00:16:10.560 --> 00:16:12.309 align:start position:0% one would need to know in order to understand<00:16:10.759> verbs<00:16:11.120> better<00:16:11.519> in<00:16:11.680> this<00:16:11.839> video<00:16:12.199> I 00:16:12.309 --> 00:16:12.319 align:start position:0% understand verbs better in this video I 00:16:12.319 --> 00:16:14.550 align:start position:0% understand verbs better in this video I just<00:16:12.519> explained<00:16:12.880> the<00:16:13.000> fundamental<00:16:13.680> of<00:16:13.839> a<00:16:14.040> r<00:16:14.319> ER 00:16:14.550 --> 00:16:14.560 align:start position:0% just explained the fundamental of a r ER 00:16:14.560 --> 00:16:17.069 align:start position:0% just explained the fundamental of a r ER R<00:16:14.800> and<00:16:15.040> IR<00:16:15.440> verb<00:16:15.759> conjugation<00:16:16.480> later<00:16:16.839> you<00:16:16.920> can 00:16:17.069 --> 00:16:17.079 align:start position:0% R and IR verb conjugation later you can 00:16:17.079 --> 00:16:18.710 align:start position:0% R and IR verb conjugation later you can start<00:16:17.279> making<00:16:17.560> sentences<00:16:18.160> using<00:16:18.480> different 00:16:18.710 --> 00:16:18.720 align:start position:0% start making sentences using different 00:16:18.720 --> 00:16:20.110 align:start position:0% start making sentences using different verbs<00:16:19.040> and<00:16:19.199> expressing<00:16:19.600> any<00:16:19.800> thought<00:16:20.040> that 00:16:20.110 --> 00:16:20.120 align:start position:0% verbs and expressing any thought that 00:16:20.120 --> 00:16:21.990 align:start position:0% verbs and expressing any thought that you<00:16:20.240> have<00:16:20.360> in<00:16:20.519> mind<00:16:20.839> in<00:16:21.000> Spanish<00:16:21.600> this<00:16:21.759> is<00:16:21.880> the 00:16:21.990 --> 00:16:22.000 align:start position:0% you have in mind in Spanish this is the 00:16:22.000 --> 00:16:24.150 align:start position:0% you have in mind in Spanish this is the main<00:16:22.199> fundamental<00:16:22.800> of<00:16:22.959> Spanish<00:16:23.600> Spanish<00:16:24.000> has 00:16:24.150 --> 00:16:24.160 align:start position:0% main fundamental of Spanish Spanish has 00:16:24.160 --> 00:16:25.790 align:start position:0% main fundamental of Spanish Spanish has two<00:16:24.319> types<00:16:24.519> of<00:16:24.639> Articles<00:16:25.240> definite<00:16:25.639> and 00:16:25.790 --> 00:16:25.800 align:start position:0% two types of Articles definite and 00:16:25.800 --> 00:16:27.629 align:start position:0% two types of Articles definite and indefinite<00:16:26.319> articles<00:16:26.839> definite<00:16:27.199> articles 00:16:27.629 --> 00:16:27.639 align:start position:0% indefinite articles definite articles 00:16:27.639 --> 00:16:29.550 align:start position:0% indefinite articles definite articles speak<00:16:27.880> of<00:16:28.000> the<00:16:28.079> articles<00:16:28.639> the<00:16:28.880> in<00:16:29.040> English<00:16:29.480> and 00:16:29.550 --> 00:16:29.560 align:start position:0% speak of the articles the in English and 00:16:29.560 --> 00:16:30.990 align:start position:0% speak of the articles the in English and it's<00:16:29.759> also<00:16:29.959> known<00:16:30.160> as<00:16:30.279> the<00:16:30.399> article<00:16:30.839> that 00:16:30.990 --> 00:16:31.000 align:start position:0% it's also known as the article that 00:16:31.000 --> 00:16:33.069 align:start position:0% it's also known as the article that specifies<00:16:31.480> something<00:16:32.000> such<00:16:32.199> as<00:16:32.519> the<00:16:32.680> book 00:16:33.069 --> 00:16:33.079 align:start position:0% specifies something such as the book 00:16:33.079 --> 00:16:35.389 align:start position:0% specifies something such as the book indefinite<00:16:33.560> articles<00:16:34.000> speak<00:16:34.279> of<00:16:34.480> a<00:16:34.800> and<00:16:35.079> or 00:16:35.389 --> 00:16:35.399 align:start position:0% indefinite articles speak of a and or 00:16:35.399 --> 00:16:37.030 align:start position:0% indefinite articles speak of a and or some<00:16:35.880> also<00:16:36.040> known<00:16:36.240> as<00:16:36.399> articles<00:16:36.880> that 00:16:37.030 --> 00:16:37.040 align:start position:0% some also known as articles that 00:16:37.040 --> 00:16:39.629 align:start position:0% some also known as articles that generalize<00:16:37.639> things<00:16:38.199> like<00:16:38.440> a<00:16:38.680> book<00:16:39.000> in<00:16:39.120> Spanish 00:16:39.629 --> 00:16:39.639 align:start position:0% generalize things like a book in Spanish 00:16:39.639 --> 00:16:41.470 align:start position:0% generalize things like a book in Spanish both<00:16:39.880> types<00:16:40.079> of<00:16:40.240> Articles<00:16:40.759> have<00:16:40.920> gender<00:16:41.319> and 00:16:41.470 --> 00:16:41.480 align:start position:0% both types of Articles have gender and 00:16:41.480 --> 00:16:43.389 align:start position:0% both types of Articles have gender and plurality<00:16:42.040> the<00:16:42.160> definite<00:16:42.480> article<00:16:42.920> the<00:16:43.240> in 00:16:43.389 --> 00:16:43.399 align:start position:0% plurality the definite article the in 00:16:43.399 --> 00:16:46.350 align:start position:0% plurality the definite article the in Spanish<00:16:43.920> is<00:16:44.279> L<00:16:44.800> the<00:16:45.160> masculine<00:16:45.560> and<00:16:45.759> singular 00:16:46.350 --> 00:16:46.360 align:start position:0% Spanish is L the masculine and singular 00:16:46.360 --> 00:16:48.949 align:start position:0% Spanish is L the masculine and singular and<00:16:46.600> La<00:16:47.120> feminine<00:16:47.560> and<00:16:47.759> singular<00:16:48.279> a<00:16:48.440> Libro 00:16:48.949 --> 00:16:48.959 align:start position:0% and La feminine and singular a Libro 00:16:48.959 --> 00:16:50.350 align:start position:0% and La feminine and singular a Libro means<00:16:49.319> the<00:16:49.480> book<00:16:49.759> and<00:16:49.839> we<00:16:49.959> know<00:16:50.120> that<00:16:50.240> this 00:16:50.350 --> 00:16:50.360 align:start position:0% means the book and we know that this 00:16:50.360 --> 00:16:51.990 align:start position:0% means the book and we know that this article<00:16:50.680> is<00:16:50.839> masculine<00:16:51.440> because<00:16:51.639> the<00:16:51.759> ending 00:16:51.990 --> 00:16:52.000 align:start position:0% article is masculine because the ending 00:16:52.000 --> 00:16:53.670 align:start position:0% article is masculine because the ending of<00:16:52.120> the<00:16:52.240> noun<00:16:52.519> that<00:16:52.600> follows<00:16:52.920> the<00:16:53.000> article<00:16:53.480> is 00:16:53.670 --> 00:16:53.680 align:start position:0% of the noun that follows the article is 00:16:53.680 --> 00:16:55.629 align:start position:0% of the noun that follows the article is masculine<00:16:54.240> most<00:16:54.480> nouns<00:16:54.759> in<00:16:54.880> Spanish<00:16:55.240> that<00:16:55.440> end 00:16:55.629 --> 00:16:55.639 align:start position:0% masculine most nouns in Spanish that end 00:16:55.639 --> 00:16:57.550 align:start position:0% masculine most nouns in Spanish that end in<00:16:55.839> o<00:16:56.240> tend<00:16:56.440> to<00:16:56.560> be<00:16:56.720> masculine<00:16:57.160> so<00:16:57.279> we<00:16:57.399> have<00:16:57.480> to 00:16:57.550 --> 00:16:57.560 align:start position:0% in o tend to be masculine so we have to 00:16:57.560 --> 00:16:59.629 align:start position:0% in o tend to be masculine so we have to put<00:16:57.680> the<00:16:57.800> masculine<00:16:58.160> definite<00:16:58.560> article<00:16:59.160> L 00:16:59.629 --> 00:16:59.639 align:start position:0% put the masculine definite article L 00:16:59.639 --> 00:17:00.790 align:start position:0% put the masculine definite article L likewise<00:17:00.079> we<00:17:00.199> do<00:17:00.360> the<00:17:00.480> same<00:17:00.600> with<00:17:00.720> the 00:17:00.790 --> 00:17:00.800 align:start position:0% likewise we do the same with the 00:17:00.800 --> 00:17:03.590 align:start position:0% likewise we do the same with the feminine<00:17:01.160> article<00:17:01.680> Laina<00:17:02.560> means<00:17:02.959> the<00:17:03.120> pool<00:17:03.480> we 00:17:03.590 --> 00:17:03.600 align:start position:0% feminine article Laina means the pool we 00:17:03.600 --> 00:17:05.069 align:start position:0% feminine article Laina means the pool we know<00:17:03.759> this<00:17:03.880> article<00:17:04.160> is<00:17:04.319> feminine<00:17:04.760> because<00:17:04.959> it 00:17:05.069 --> 00:17:05.079 align:start position:0% know this article is feminine because it 00:17:05.079 --> 00:17:06.710 align:start position:0% know this article is feminine because it corresponds<00:17:05.600> with<00:17:05.679> the<00:17:05.799> noun<00:17:06.120> after<00:17:06.319> it<00:17:06.600> which 00:17:06.710 --> 00:17:06.720 align:start position:0% corresponds with the noun after it which 00:17:06.720 --> 00:17:08.510 align:start position:0% corresponds with the noun after it which is<00:17:06.839> feminine<00:17:07.319> most<00:17:07.480> souns<00:17:07.760> in<00:17:07.919> Spanish<00:17:08.319> that 00:17:08.510 --> 00:17:08.520 align:start position:0% is feminine most souns in Spanish that 00:17:08.520 --> 00:17:10.390 align:start position:0% is feminine most souns in Spanish that end<00:17:08.720> in<00:17:09.000> a<00:17:09.319> tend<00:17:09.520> to<00:17:09.600> be<00:17:09.720> feminine<00:17:10.079> so<00:17:10.199> we<00:17:10.319> have 00:17:10.390 --> 00:17:10.400 align:start position:0% end in a tend to be feminine so we have 00:17:10.400 --> 00:17:12.309 align:start position:0% end in a tend to be feminine so we have to<00:17:10.520> put<00:17:10.640> the<00:17:10.720> feminine<00:17:11.039> definite<00:17:11.400> article<00:17:12.000> La 00:17:12.309 --> 00:17:12.319 align:start position:0% to put the feminine definite article La 00:17:12.319 --> 00:17:14.230 align:start position:0% to put the feminine definite article La if<00:17:12.400> we<00:17:12.520> want<00:17:12.640> to<00:17:12.760> pluralize<00:17:13.240> the<00:17:13.360> Articles<00:17:13.919> L 00:17:14.230 --> 00:17:14.240 align:start position:0% if we want to pluralize the Articles L 00:17:14.240 --> 00:17:17.150 align:start position:0% if we want to pluralize the Articles L becomes<00:17:14.679> Los<00:17:15.240> and<00:17:15.480> La<00:17:15.919> becomes<00:17:16.319> l<00:17:16.679> so<00:17:16.880> Los 00:17:17.150 --> 00:17:17.160 align:start position:0% becomes Los and La becomes l so Los 00:17:17.160 --> 00:17:20.309 align:start position:0% becomes Los and La becomes l so Los libros<00:17:17.799> would<00:17:18.000> be<00:17:18.360> the<00:17:18.520> books<00:17:19.000> and<00:17:19.199> Nas<00:17:20.160> would 00:17:20.309 --> 00:17:20.319 align:start position:0% libros would be the books and Nas would 00:17:20.319 --> 00:17:22.429 align:start position:0% libros would be the books and Nas would be<00:17:20.600> the<00:17:20.720> pools<00:17:21.199> indefinite<00:17:21.720> articles<00:17:22.160> look 00:17:22.429 --> 00:17:22.439 align:start position:0% be the pools indefinite articles look 00:17:22.439 --> 00:17:25.189 align:start position:0% be the pools indefinite articles look like<00:17:22.600> this<00:17:22.720> in<00:17:22.880> Spanish<00:17:23.439> un<00:17:24.000> is<00:17:24.280> a<00:17:24.520> or<00:17:24.760> n 00:17:25.189 --> 00:17:25.199 align:start position:0% like this in Spanish un is a or n 00:17:25.199 --> 00:17:28.510 align:start position:0% like this in Spanish un is a or n masculine<00:17:25.640> and<00:17:25.799> singular<00:17:26.480> and<00:17:26.760> una<00:17:27.280> is<00:17:27.559> a<00:17:27.799> or<00:17:28.000> n 00:17:28.510 --> 00:17:28.520 align:start position:0% masculine and singular and una is a or n 00:17:28.520 --> 00:17:30.630 align:start position:0% masculine and singular and una is a or n feminine<00:17:28.880> and<00:17:29.039> singular<00:17:29.559> un<00:17:29.799> Libro<00:17:30.280> would<00:17:30.400> be 00:17:30.630 --> 00:17:30.640 align:start position:0% feminine and singular un Libro would be 00:17:30.640 --> 00:17:33.870 align:start position:0% feminine and singular un Libro would be a<00:17:30.799> book<00:17:31.240> and<00:17:31.480> una<00:17:31.840> Pina<00:17:32.400> would<00:17:32.559> be<00:17:32.840> a<00:17:33.000> pool<00:17:33.480> also 00:17:33.870 --> 00:17:33.880 align:start position:0% a book and una Pina would be a pool also 00:17:33.880 --> 00:17:35.909 align:start position:0% a book and una Pina would be a pool also it's<00:17:34.039> really<00:17:34.280> important<00:17:34.840> not<00:17:35.039> to<00:17:35.200> say<00:17:35.559> uno 00:17:35.909 --> 00:17:35.919 align:start position:0% it's really important not to say uno 00:17:35.919 --> 00:17:37.549 align:start position:0% it's really important not to say uno Libro<00:17:36.360> because<00:17:36.640> if<00:17:36.760> we<00:17:36.880> say<00:17:37.120> that<00:17:37.360> we're 00:17:37.549 --> 00:17:37.559 align:start position:0% Libro because if we say that we're 00:17:37.559 --> 00:17:39.470 align:start position:0% Libro because if we say that we're saying<00:17:37.880> one<00:17:38.120> book<00:17:38.440> instead<00:17:38.679> of<00:17:38.880> a<00:17:39.080> book<00:17:39.320> we're 00:17:39.470 --> 00:17:39.480 align:start position:0% saying one book instead of a book we're 00:17:39.480 --> 00:17:41.789 align:start position:0% saying one book instead of a book we're working<00:17:39.799> with<00:17:39.960> articles<00:17:40.520> not<00:17:40.760> numbers<00:17:41.400> so<00:17:41.720> if 00:17:41.789 --> 00:17:41.799 align:start position:0% working with articles not numbers so if 00:17:41.799 --> 00:17:43.870 align:start position:0% working with articles not numbers so if we<00:17:41.919> want<00:17:42.039> to<00:17:42.160> pluralize<00:17:42.720> them<00:17:43.000> we<00:17:43.160> say<00:17:43.480> Unos 00:17:43.870 --> 00:17:43.880 align:start position:0% we want to pluralize them we say Unos 00:17:43.880 --> 00:17:47.190 align:start position:0% we want to pluralize them we say Unos lios<00:17:44.559> some<00:17:44.799> books<00:17:45.240> and<00:17:45.440> unas<00:17:46.440> some<00:17:46.679> pools 00:17:47.190 --> 00:17:47.200 align:start position:0% lios some books and unas some pools 00:17:47.200 --> 00:17:48.830 align:start position:0% lios some books and unas some pools there<00:17:47.320> are<00:17:47.679> however<00:17:47.840> a<00:17:47.919> few<00:17:48.120> strange<00:17:48.440> words<00:17:48.679> in 00:17:48.830 --> 00:17:48.840 align:start position:0% there are however a few strange words in 00:17:48.840 --> 00:17:50.430 align:start position:0% there are however a few strange words in Spanish<00:17:49.240> and<00:17:49.320> we<00:17:49.440> need<00:17:49.559> to<00:17:49.640> cover<00:17:49.919> those<00:17:50.080> to 00:17:50.430 --> 00:17:50.440 align:start position:0% Spanish and we need to cover those to 00:17:50.440 --> 00:17:53.230 align:start position:0% Spanish and we need to cover those to such<00:17:50.640> as<00:17:50.919> class<00:17:51.600> and<00:17:51.960> car<00:17:52.440> they<00:17:52.559> both<00:17:52.720> end<00:17:53.000> with 00:17:53.230 --> 00:17:53.240 align:start position:0% such as class and car they both end with 00:17:53.240 --> 00:17:54.789 align:start position:0% such as class and car they both end with e<00:17:53.640> but<00:17:53.760> they<00:17:53.919> actually<00:17:54.120> use<00:17:54.320> the<00:17:54.440> feminine 00:17:54.789 --> 00:17:54.799 align:start position:0% e but they actually use the feminine 00:17:54.799 --> 00:17:57.669 align:start position:0% e but they actually use the feminine article<00:17:55.400> La<00:17:55.760> so<00:17:55.960> la<00:17:56.200> class<00:17:56.679> is<00:17:56.799> the<00:17:57.039> class<00:17:57.520> and 00:17:57.669 --> 00:17:57.679 align:start position:0% article La so la class is the class and 00:17:57.679 --> 00:18:00.310 align:start position:0% article La so la class is the class and La<00:17:57.919> car<00:17:58.480> is<00:17:58.679> the<00:17:58.799> meat<00:17:59.280> other<00:17:59.480> words<00:17:59.880> may<00:18:00.120> end 00:18:00.310 --> 00:18:00.320 align:start position:0% La car is the meat other words may end 00:18:00.320 --> 00:18:04.070 align:start position:0% La car is the meat other words may end in<00:18:00.600> D<00:18:00.919> such<00:18:01.200> Asad<00:18:02.200> and<00:18:02.440> unad<00:18:03.280> and<00:18:03.440> those<00:18:03.720> also 00:18:04.070 --> 00:18:04.080 align:start position:0% in D such Asad and unad and those also 00:18:04.080 --> 00:18:07.070 align:start position:0% in D such Asad and unad and those also use<00:18:04.360> the<00:18:04.480> feminine<00:18:04.840> article<00:18:05.480> La<00:18:05.799> soad<00:18:06.799> is<00:18:06.919> the 00:18:07.070 --> 00:18:07.080 align:start position:0% use the feminine article La soad is the 00:18:07.080 --> 00:18:08.909 align:start position:0% use the feminine article La soad is the City<00:18:07.480> and<00:18:07.640> LA<00:18:07.880> Universidad<00:18:08.679> is<00:18:08.760> the 00:18:08.909 --> 00:18:08.919 align:start position:0% City and LA Universidad is the 00:18:08.919 --> 00:18:10.549 align:start position:0% City and LA Universidad is the University<00:18:09.520> you<00:18:09.640> might<00:18:09.840> also<00:18:10.080> find<00:18:10.280> words 00:18:10.549 --> 00:18:10.559 align:start position:0% University you might also find words 00:18:10.559 --> 00:18:12.070 align:start position:0% University you might also find words ending<00:18:10.799> inion<00:18:11.480> which<00:18:11.600> is<00:18:11.679> the<00:18:11.799> English 00:18:12.070 --> 00:18:12.080 align:start position:0% ending inion which is the English 00:18:12.080 --> 00:18:14.190 align:start position:0% ending inion which is the English version<00:18:12.360> of<00:18:12.480> words<00:18:12.720> ending<00:18:12.960> in<00:18:13.080> t<00:18:13.559> n<00:18:13.919> and<00:18:14.039> these 00:18:14.190 --> 00:18:14.200 align:start position:0% version of words ending in t n and these 00:18:14.200 --> 00:18:15.950 align:start position:0% version of words ending in t n and these words<00:18:14.720> also<00:18:15.000> tend<00:18:15.200> to<00:18:15.320> use<00:18:15.480> the<00:18:15.600> feminine 00:18:15.950 --> 00:18:15.960 align:start position:0% words also tend to use the feminine 00:18:15.960 --> 00:18:18.830 align:start position:0% words also tend to use the feminine article<00:18:16.480> La<00:18:16.799> so<00:18:17.039> la<00:18:17.280> Aion<00:18:17.880> is<00:18:18.039> the<00:18:18.240> action<00:18:18.679> at 00:18:18.830 --> 00:18:18.840 align:start position:0% article La so la Aion is the action at 00:18:18.840 --> 00:18:20.710 align:start position:0% article La so la Aion is the action at last<00:18:19.240> you<00:18:19.400> might<00:18:19.600> find<00:18:19.799> a<00:18:19.919> few<00:18:20.120> exceptions 00:18:20.710 --> 00:18:20.720 align:start position:0% last you might find a few exceptions 00:18:20.720 --> 00:18:23.029 align:start position:0% last you might find a few exceptions like<00:18:20.960> prma<00:18:21.600> and<00:18:21.799> prog<00:18:22.520> and<00:18:22.640> you<00:18:22.720> would<00:18:22.880> think 00:18:23.029 --> 00:18:23.039 align:start position:0% like prma and prog and you would think 00:18:23.039 --> 00:18:24.549 align:start position:0% like prma and prog and you would think that<00:18:23.200> these<00:18:23.360> words<00:18:23.559> are<00:18:23.760> feminine<00:18:24.280> because 00:18:24.549 --> 00:18:24.559 align:start position:0% that these words are feminine because 00:18:24.559 --> 00:18:26.789 align:start position:0% that these words are feminine because they<00:18:24.679> end<00:18:24.919> in<00:18:25.120> a<00:18:25.480> but<00:18:25.720> actually<00:18:26.280> they<00:18:26.400> end<00:18:26.640> in 00:18:26.789 --> 00:18:26.799 align:start position:0% they end in a but actually they end in 00:18:26.799 --> 00:18:28.909 align:start position:0% they end in a but actually they end in Ma<00:18:27.080> and<00:18:27.200> words<00:18:27.480> that<00:18:27.600> end<00:18:27.799> in<00:18:27.960> MA<00:18:28.400> in<00:18:28.520> Spanish 00:18:28.909 --> 00:18:28.919 align:start position:0% Ma and words that end in MA in Spanish 00:18:28.919 --> 00:18:31.990 align:start position:0% Ma and words that end in MA in Spanish use<00:18:29.159> the<00:18:29.320> masculine<00:18:29.720> article<00:18:30.320> L<00:18:30.720> Elma<00:18:31.640> is<00:18:31.799> the 00:18:31.990 --> 00:18:32.000 align:start position:0% use the masculine article L Elma is the 00:18:32.000 --> 00:18:34.549 align:start position:0% use the masculine article L Elma is the problem<00:18:32.520> and<00:18:32.679> El<00:18:32.919> prog<00:18:33.640> is<00:18:33.760> the<00:18:33.919> program<00:18:34.360> two 00:18:34.549 --> 00:18:34.559 align:start position:0% problem and El prog is the program two 00:18:34.559 --> 00:18:36.909 align:start position:0% problem and El prog is the program two more<00:18:34.799> common<00:18:35.080> words<00:18:35.480> is<00:18:35.760> Dia<00:18:36.159> and<00:18:36.400> AUA<00:18:36.799> and<00:18:36.880> you 00:18:36.909 --> 00:18:36.919 align:start position:0% more common words is Dia and AUA and you 00:18:36.919 --> 00:18:38.190 align:start position:0% more common words is Dia and AUA and you want<00:18:37.039> to<00:18:37.159> say<00:18:37.280> that<00:18:37.440> those<00:18:37.559> are<00:18:37.720> feminine 00:18:38.190 --> 00:18:38.200 align:start position:0% want to say that those are feminine 00:18:38.200 --> 00:18:39.830 align:start position:0% want to say that those are feminine because<00:18:38.440> they<00:18:38.600> end<00:18:38.799> in<00:18:39.000> a<00:18:39.320> but<00:18:39.440> they<00:18:39.600> actually 00:18:39.830 --> 00:18:39.840 align:start position:0% because they end in a but they actually 00:18:39.840 --> 00:18:42.870 align:start position:0% because they end in a but they actually use<00:18:40.080> the<00:18:40.200> masculine<00:18:40.640> article<00:18:41.159> l<00:18:41.520> l<00:18:42.159> is<00:18:42.280> the<00:18:42.480> day 00:18:42.870 --> 00:18:42.880 align:start position:0% use the masculine article l l is the day 00:18:42.880 --> 00:18:45.190 align:start position:0% use the masculine article l l is the day and<00:18:43.039> L<00:18:43.280> AUA<00:18:43.760> is<00:18:43.880> the<00:18:44.039> water<00:18:44.440> there's<00:18:44.720> also<00:18:45.039> this 00:18:45.190 --> 00:18:45.200 align:start position:0% and L AUA is the water there's also this 00:18:45.200 --> 00:18:47.350 align:start position:0% and L AUA is the water there's also this word<00:18:45.640> photo<00:18:46.280> and<00:18:46.440> this<00:18:46.559> word<00:18:46.840> actually<00:18:47.039> uses 00:18:47.350 --> 00:18:47.360 align:start position:0% word photo and this word actually uses 00:18:47.360 --> 00:18:49.750 align:start position:0% word photo and this word actually uses the<00:18:47.480> feminine<00:18:47.840> article<00:18:48.440> LA<00:18:48.919> because<00:18:49.159> photo<00:18:49.640> is 00:18:49.750 --> 00:18:49.760 align:start position:0% the feminine article LA because photo is 00:18:49.760 --> 00:18:52.390 align:start position:0% the feminine article LA because photo is short<00:18:50.039> for<00:18:50.480> photographia<00:18:51.360> it<00:18:51.480> ends<00:18:51.720> in<00:18:51.919> a<00:18:52.240> so 00:18:52.390 --> 00:18:52.400 align:start position:0% short for photographia it ends in a so 00:18:52.400 --> 00:18:54.110 align:start position:0% short for photographia it ends in a so you<00:18:52.520> want<00:18:52.600> to<00:18:52.720> put<00:18:52.919> La<00:18:53.240> in<00:18:53.360> the<00:18:53.480> beginning<00:18:54.000> the 00:18:54.110 --> 00:18:54.120 align:start position:0% you want to put La in the beginning the 00:18:54.120 --> 00:18:56.590 align:start position:0% you want to put La in the beginning the verb<00:18:54.440> s<00:18:54.880> in<00:18:55.080> Spanish<00:18:55.480> means<00:18:55.760> to<00:18:55.919> be<00:18:56.280> as<00:18:56.400> in 00:18:56.590 --> 00:18:56.600 align:start position:0% verb s in Spanish means to be as in 00:18:56.600 --> 00:18:58.630 align:start position:0% verb s in Spanish means to be as in being<00:18:56.919> or<00:18:57.159> existing<00:18:57.600> and<00:18:57.720> it<00:18:57.880> syntax<00:18:58.440> looks 00:18:58.630 --> 00:18:58.640 align:start position:0% being or existing and it syntax looks 00:18:58.640 --> 00:19:01.830 align:start position:0% being or existing and it syntax looks like<00:18:58.840> this<00:18:59.039> in<00:18:59.159> English<00:18:59.679> I<00:18:59.840> am<00:19:00.320> you<00:19:00.520> are<00:19:01.159> he<00:19:01.600> or 00:19:01.830 --> 00:19:01.840 align:start position:0% like this in English I am you are he or 00:19:01.840 --> 00:19:04.830 align:start position:0% like this in English I am you are he or she<00:19:02.200> it<00:19:02.520> is<00:19:03.080> we<00:19:03.320> are<00:19:03.840> yall<00:19:04.159> are<00:19:04.520> English 00:19:04.830 --> 00:19:04.840 align:start position:0% she it is we are yall are English 00:19:04.840 --> 00:19:06.270 align:start position:0% she it is we are yall are English doesn't<00:19:05.080> have<00:19:05.240> this<00:19:05.400> pronoun<00:19:05.799> but<00:19:05.919> I'm<00:19:06.000> still 00:19:06.270 --> 00:19:06.280 align:start position:0% doesn't have this pronoun but I'm still 00:19:06.280 --> 00:19:07.870 align:start position:0% doesn't have this pronoun but I'm still including<00:19:06.600> it<00:19:06.760> because<00:19:06.960> Spanish<00:19:07.320> has<00:19:07.440> it<00:19:07.720> and 00:19:07.870 --> 00:19:07.880 align:start position:0% including it because Spanish has it and 00:19:07.880 --> 00:19:09.270 align:start position:0% including it because Spanish has it and they<00:19:08.039> are<00:19:08.280> part<00:19:08.400> of<00:19:08.520> the<00:19:08.640> reason<00:19:08.880> why<00:19:09.039> English 00:19:09.270 --> 00:19:09.280 align:start position:0% they are part of the reason why English 00:19:09.280 --> 00:19:10.669 align:start position:0% they are part of the reason why English is<00:19:09.400> an<00:19:09.559> easy<00:19:09.840> language<00:19:10.240> is<00:19:10.360> because<00:19:10.559> the 00:19:10.669 --> 00:19:10.679 align:start position:0% is an easy language is because the 00:19:10.679 --> 00:19:12.270 align:start position:0% is an easy language is because the conjugation<00:19:11.159> of<00:19:11.320> these<00:19:11.480> verbs<00:19:11.840> stays<00:19:12.159> the 00:19:12.270 --> 00:19:12.280 align:start position:0% conjugation of these verbs stays the 00:19:12.280 --> 00:19:14.630 align:start position:0% conjugation of these verbs stays the same<00:19:12.440> for<00:19:12.640> most<00:19:12.880> pronouns<00:19:13.480> R<00:19:13.919> is<00:19:14.080> the<00:19:14.200> same<00:19:14.440> for 00:19:14.630 --> 00:19:14.640 align:start position:0% same for most pronouns R is the same for 00:19:14.640 --> 00:19:16.990 align:start position:0% same for most pronouns R is the same for we<00:19:15.120> they<00:19:15.400> and<00:19:15.559> you<00:19:15.919> but<00:19:16.039> they<00:19:16.159> change<00:19:16.440> for<00:19:16.720> I 00:19:16.990 --> 00:19:17.000 align:start position:0% we they and you but they change for I 00:19:17.000 --> 00:19:19.110 align:start position:0% we they and you but they change for I and<00:19:17.200> he<00:19:17.600> in<00:19:17.760> Spanish<00:19:18.320> however<00:19:18.600> you<00:19:18.720> have<00:19:18.880> six 00:19:19.110 --> 00:19:19.120 align:start position:0% and he in Spanish however you have six 00:19:19.120 --> 00:19:20.909 align:start position:0% and he in Spanish however you have six different<00:19:19.360> conjugations<00:19:19.960> for<00:19:20.200> each<00:19:20.400> pronoun 00:19:20.909 --> 00:19:20.919 align:start position:0% different conjugations for each pronoun 00:19:20.919 --> 00:19:22.830 align:start position:0% different conjugations for each pronoun and<00:19:21.120> actually<00:19:21.600> the<00:19:21.760> verb<00:19:22.039> said<00:19:22.520> is<00:19:22.640> an 00:19:22.830 --> 00:19:22.840 align:start position:0% and actually the verb said is an 00:19:22.840 --> 00:19:24.470 align:start position:0% and actually the verb said is an irregular<00:19:23.400> verb<00:19:23.720> meaning<00:19:24.000> that<00:19:24.120> you<00:19:24.200> cannot 00:19:24.470 --> 00:19:24.480 align:start position:0% irregular verb meaning that you cannot 00:19:24.480 --> 00:19:26.190 align:start position:0% irregular verb meaning that you cannot conjugate<00:19:24.880> it<00:19:25.039> like<00:19:25.200> regular<00:19:25.559> verbs<00:19:25.919> and<00:19:26.039> its 00:19:26.190 --> 00:19:26.200 align:start position:0% conjugate it like regular verbs and its 00:19:26.200 --> 00:19:27.630 align:start position:0% conjugate it like regular verbs and its syntax<00:19:26.679> completely<00:19:27.000> changes<00:19:27.320> in<00:19:27.440> every 00:19:27.630 --> 00:19:27.640 align:start position:0% syntax completely changes in every 00:19:27.640 --> 00:19:35.470 align:start position:0% syntax completely changes in every pronoun<00:19:28.000> it<00:19:28.080> looks<00:19:28.440> like<00:19:28.559> this<00:19:28.640> in 00:19:35.470 --> 00:19:35.480 align:start position:0% 00:19:35.480 --> 00:19:38.350 align:start position:0% Spanish<00:19:36.480> and<00:19:36.760> AOS<00:19:37.200> son<00:19:37.679> the<00:19:37.799> best<00:19:37.960> advice<00:19:38.240> that 00:19:38.350 --> 00:19:38.360 align:start position:0% Spanish and AOS son the best advice that 00:19:38.360 --> 00:19:39.750 align:start position:0% Spanish and AOS son the best advice that I<00:19:38.480> can<00:19:38.600> give<00:19:38.760> is<00:19:38.880> to<00:19:39.000> just<00:19:39.159> memorize<00:19:39.600> these 00:19:39.750 --> 00:19:39.760 align:start position:0% I can give is to just memorize these 00:19:39.760 --> 00:19:41.029 align:start position:0% I can give is to just memorize these conjugations<00:19:40.440> because<00:19:40.640> there<00:19:40.760> is<00:19:40.880> no 00:19:41.029 --> 00:19:41.039 align:start position:0% conjugations because there is no 00:19:41.039 --> 00:19:42.630 align:start position:0% conjugations because there is no conjugation<00:19:41.559> pattern<00:19:41.840> to<00:19:41.960> follow<00:19:42.240> with<00:19:42.400> them 00:19:42.630 --> 00:19:42.640 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern to follow with them 00:19:42.640 --> 00:19:44.029 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern to follow with them but<00:19:42.760> also<00:19:42.960> try<00:19:43.159> not<00:19:43.360> focusing<00:19:43.679> on<00:19:43.840> these 00:19:44.029 --> 00:19:44.039 align:start position:0% but also try not focusing on these 00:19:44.039 --> 00:19:45.470 align:start position:0% but also try not focusing on these pronouns<00:19:44.559> because<00:19:44.720> they're<00:19:44.919> not<00:19:45.039> used<00:19:45.320> as 00:19:45.470 --> 00:19:45.480 align:start position:0% pronouns because they're not used as 00:19:45.480 --> 00:19:47.430 align:start position:0% pronouns because they're not used as often<00:19:45.760> as<00:19:45.880> the<00:19:46.039> other<00:19:46.200> ones<00:19:46.440> in<00:19:46.640> conversation 00:19:47.430 --> 00:19:47.440 align:start position:0% often as the other ones in conversation 00:19:47.440 --> 00:19:49.870 align:start position:0% often as the other ones in conversation however<00:19:47.840> s<00:19:48.480> is<00:19:48.640> not<00:19:48.840> used<00:19:49.159> the<00:19:49.320> same<00:19:49.600> as<00:19:49.760> it's 00:19:49.870 --> 00:19:49.880 align:start position:0% however s is not used the same as it's 00:19:49.880 --> 00:19:51.350 align:start position:0% however s is not used the same as it's used<00:19:50.120> in<00:19:50.240> English<00:19:50.720> you<00:19:50.840> might<00:19:51.000> have<00:19:51.159> heard 00:19:51.350 --> 00:19:51.360 align:start position:0% used in English you might have heard 00:19:51.360 --> 00:19:53.270 align:start position:0% used in English you might have heard teachers<00:19:51.720> use<00:19:51.919> nursery<00:19:52.360> rhymes<00:19:52.720> to<00:19:52.919> describe 00:19:53.270 --> 00:19:53.280 align:start position:0% teachers use nursery rhymes to describe 00:19:53.280 --> 00:19:55.230 align:start position:0% teachers use nursery rhymes to describe this<00:19:53.440> verb<00:19:53.760> saying<00:19:54.280> who<00:19:54.440> are<00:19:54.640> you<00:19:54.840> and<00:19:55.000> from 00:19:55.230 --> 00:19:55.240 align:start position:0% this verb saying who are you and from 00:19:55.240 --> 00:19:57.149 align:start position:0% this verb saying who are you and from where<00:19:55.600> always<00:19:55.840> use<00:19:56.080> the<00:19:56.200> verb<00:19:56.440> said<00:19:56.880> or<00:19:57.000> some 00:19:57.149 --> 00:19:57.159 align:start position:0% where always use the verb said or some 00:19:57.159 --> 00:19:58.549 align:start position:0% where always use the verb said or some teachers<00:19:57.520> might<00:19:57.679> also<00:19:57.880> say<00:19:58.039> that<00:19:58.240> the<00:19:58.360> verb 00:19:58.549 --> 00:19:58.559 align:start position:0% teachers might also say that the verb 00:19:58.559 --> 00:20:00.149 align:start position:0% teachers might also say that the verb said<00:19:58.880> is<00:19:59.039> applied<00:19:59.320> for<00:19:59.480> permanent<00:19:59.799> traits 00:20:00.149 --> 00:20:00.159 align:start position:0% said is applied for permanent traits 00:20:00.159 --> 00:20:02.390 align:start position:0% said is applied for permanent traits about<00:20:00.440> oneself<00:20:01.200> I<00:20:01.480> however<00:20:01.760> don't<00:20:01.960> like<00:20:02.200> these 00:20:02.390 --> 00:20:02.400 align:start position:0% about oneself I however don't like these 00:20:02.400 --> 00:20:03.909 align:start position:0% about oneself I however don't like these explanations<00:20:03.039> whatsoever<00:20:03.600> because<00:20:03.799> they 00:20:03.909 --> 00:20:03.919 align:start position:0% explanations whatsoever because they 00:20:03.919 --> 00:20:05.270 align:start position:0% explanations whatsoever because they tend<00:20:04.080> to<00:20:04.200> confuse<00:20:04.520> students<00:20:04.919> rather<00:20:05.120> than 00:20:05.270 --> 00:20:05.280 align:start position:0% tend to confuse students rather than 00:20:05.280 --> 00:20:06.710 align:start position:0% tend to confuse students rather than make<00:20:05.400> them<00:20:05.799> understand<00:20:05.919> the<00:20:06.080> subject<00:20:06.400> matter 00:20:06.710 --> 00:20:06.720 align:start position:0% make them understand the subject matter 00:20:06.720 --> 00:20:08.070 align:start position:0% make them understand the subject matter properly<00:20:07.200> so<00:20:07.360> this<00:20:07.440> is<00:20:07.559> going<00:20:07.720> to<00:20:07.840> be<00:20:07.960> an 00:20:08.070 --> 00:20:08.080 align:start position:0% properly so this is going to be an 00:20:08.080 --> 00:20:09.909 align:start position:0% properly so this is going to be an easier<00:20:08.480> explanation<00:20:09.039> of<00:20:09.240> what<00:20:09.320> to<00:20:09.480> do<00:20:09.799> with 00:20:09.909 --> 00:20:09.919 align:start position:0% easier explanation of what to do with 00:20:09.919 --> 00:20:12.630 align:start position:0% easier explanation of what to do with the<00:20:10.080> verb<00:20:10.320> s<00:20:10.760> the<00:20:10.880> verb<00:20:11.120> s<00:20:11.640> mainly<00:20:12.000> applies<00:20:12.440> to 00:20:12.630 --> 00:20:12.640 align:start position:0% the verb s the verb s mainly applies to 00:20:12.640 --> 00:20:14.669 align:start position:0% the verb s the verb s mainly applies to these<00:20:12.840> uses<00:20:13.320> your<00:20:13.480> name<00:20:13.880> nationality<00:20:14.480> and 00:20:14.669 --> 00:20:14.679 align:start position:0% these uses your name nationality and 00:20:14.679 --> 00:20:16.630 align:start position:0% these uses your name nationality and place<00:20:14.840> of<00:20:15.000> origin<00:20:15.600> occupation<00:20:16.320> physical 00:20:16.630 --> 00:20:16.640 align:start position:0% place of origin occupation physical 00:20:16.640 --> 00:20:18.710 align:start position:0% place of origin occupation physical traits<00:20:17.200> generalizations<00:20:18.200> when<00:20:18.360> and<00:20:18.559> where 00:20:18.710 --> 00:20:18.720 align:start position:0% traits generalizations when and where 00:20:18.720 --> 00:20:20.390 align:start position:0% traits generalizations when and where are<00:20:18.919> events<00:20:19.240> taking<00:20:19.520> place<00:20:19.880> and<00:20:20.080> time<00:20:20.240> and 00:20:20.390 --> 00:20:20.400 align:start position:0% are events taking place and time and 00:20:20.400 --> 00:20:22.669 align:start position:0% are events taking place and time and date<00:20:20.799> number<00:20:21.080> one<00:20:21.440> your<00:20:21.640> name<00:20:22.000> nationality 00:20:22.669 --> 00:20:22.679 align:start position:0% date number one your name nationality 00:20:22.679 --> 00:20:24.070 align:start position:0% date number one your name nationality and<00:20:22.840> place<00:20:23.000> of<00:20:23.159> origin<00:20:23.559> if<00:20:23.640> you<00:20:23.720> want<00:20:23.840> to<00:20:23.919> say 00:20:24.070 --> 00:20:24.080 align:start position:0% and place of origin if you want to say 00:20:24.080 --> 00:20:26.390 align:start position:0% and place of origin if you want to say your<00:20:24.200> name<00:20:24.360> in<00:20:24.520> Spanish<00:20:25.000> you<00:20:25.080> will<00:20:25.280> say<00:20:25.720> yoy 00:20:26.390 --> 00:20:26.400 align:start position:0% your name in Spanish you will say yoy 00:20:26.400 --> 00:20:27.549 align:start position:0% your name in Spanish you will say yoy and<00:20:26.520> then<00:20:26.640> your<00:20:26.799> name<00:20:27.080> if<00:20:27.159> you<00:20:27.240> want<00:20:27.320> to<00:20:27.400> say 00:20:27.549 --> 00:20:27.559 align:start position:0% and then your name if you want to say 00:20:27.559 --> 00:20:29.510 align:start position:0% and then your name if you want to say your<00:20:27.760> Spanish<00:20:28.240> and<00:20:28.400> you<00:20:28.480> are<00:20:28.679> from<00:20:28.919> Spain<00:20:29.440> you 00:20:29.510 --> 00:20:29.520 align:start position:0% your Spanish and you are from Spain you 00:20:29.520 --> 00:20:31.470 align:start position:0% your Spanish and you are from Spain you will 00:20:31.470 --> 00:20:31.480 align:start position:0% will 00:20:31.480 --> 00:20:34.270 align:start position:0% will say<00:20:32.480> the<00:20:32.600> conjugation<00:20:33.159> so<00:20:33.520> is<00:20:33.679> used<00:20:34.039> here 00:20:34.270 --> 00:20:34.280 align:start position:0% say the conjugation so is used here 00:20:34.280 --> 00:20:35.630 align:start position:0% say the conjugation so is used here because<00:20:34.480> you're<00:20:34.679> talking<00:20:34.919> about<00:20:35.159> yourself 00:20:35.630 --> 00:20:35.640 align:start position:0% because you're talking about yourself 00:20:35.640 --> 00:20:36.870 align:start position:0% because you're talking about yourself and<00:20:35.720> the<00:20:35.799> same<00:20:36.000> principle<00:20:36.400> applies<00:20:36.679> to<00:20:36.799> the 00:20:36.870 --> 00:20:36.880 align:start position:0% and the same principle applies to the 00:20:36.880 --> 00:20:38.390 align:start position:0% and the same principle applies to the rest<00:20:37.039> of<00:20:37.120> the<00:20:37.280> pronouns<00:20:37.720> based<00:20:37.919> on<00:20:38.080> whichever 00:20:38.390 --> 00:20:38.400 align:start position:0% rest of the pronouns based on whichever 00:20:38.400 --> 00:20:39.909 align:start position:0% rest of the pronouns based on whichever conjugation<00:20:38.840> you<00:20:38.919> want<00:20:39.039> to<00:20:39.159> work<00:20:39.400> with<00:20:39.679> number 00:20:39.909 --> 00:20:39.919 align:start position:0% conjugation you want to work with number 00:20:39.919 --> 00:20:41.710 align:start position:0% conjugation you want to work with number two<00:20:40.360> occupation<00:20:40.960> if<00:20:41.080> you<00:20:41.159> want<00:20:41.240> to<00:20:41.360> say<00:20:41.559> that 00:20:41.710 --> 00:20:41.720 align:start position:0% two occupation if you want to say that 00:20:41.720 --> 00:20:44.190 align:start position:0% two occupation if you want to say that he<00:20:41.880> is<00:20:42.039> a<00:20:42.240> professor<00:20:42.840> you<00:20:42.960> would<00:20:43.120> say<00:20:43.520> LS 00:20:44.190 --> 00:20:44.200 align:start position:0% he is a professor you would say LS 00:20:44.200 --> 00:20:45.990 align:start position:0% he is a professor you would say LS Professor<00:20:44.880> also<00:20:45.159> you<00:20:45.280> don't<00:20:45.440> have<00:20:45.520> to<00:20:45.640> put<00:20:45.799> an 00:20:45.990 --> 00:20:46.000 align:start position:0% Professor also you don't have to put an 00:20:46.000 --> 00:20:48.190 align:start position:0% Professor also you don't have to put an indefinite<00:20:46.480> article<00:20:47.080> like<00:20:47.400> un<00:20:47.840> before 00:20:48.190 --> 00:20:48.200 align:start position:0% indefinite article like un before 00:20:48.200 --> 00:20:50.029 align:start position:0% indefinite article like un before Professor<00:20:48.840> because<00:20:49.000> it's<00:20:49.120> a<00:20:49.240> rule<00:20:49.440> in<00:20:49.600> Spanish 00:20:50.029 --> 00:20:50.039 align:start position:0% Professor because it's a rule in Spanish 00:20:50.039 --> 00:20:52.630 align:start position:0% Professor because it's a rule in Spanish so<00:20:50.159> you<00:20:50.240> would<00:20:50.440> just<00:20:50.600> say<00:20:51.080> LS<00:20:51.640> Professor<00:20:52.280> he<00:20:52.440> is 00:20:52.630 --> 00:20:52.640 align:start position:0% so you would just say LS Professor he is 00:20:52.640 --> 00:20:54.190 align:start position:0% so you would just say LS Professor he is a<00:20:52.840> professor<00:20:53.280> the<00:20:53.360> same<00:20:53.559> principle<00:20:53.919> applies 00:20:54.190 --> 00:20:54.200 align:start position:0% a professor the same principle applies 00:20:54.200 --> 00:20:55.590 align:start position:0% a professor the same principle applies to<00:20:54.320> the<00:20:54.440> rest<00:20:54.559> of<00:20:54.640> the<00:20:54.799> conjugations<00:20:55.440> and 00:20:55.590 --> 00:20:55.600 align:start position:0% to the rest of the conjugations and 00:20:55.600 --> 00:20:57.270 align:start position:0% to the rest of the conjugations and whichever<00:20:55.960> occupation<00:20:56.400> you<00:20:56.559> decide<00:20:56.840> to<00:20:56.960> say 00:20:57.270 --> 00:20:57.280 align:start position:0% whichever occupation you decide to say 00:20:57.280 --> 00:20:58.950 align:start position:0% whichever occupation you decide to say number<00:20:57.520> three<00:20:57.799> physical<00:20:58.080> iCal<00:20:58.320> traits<00:20:58.799> if<00:20:58.880> you 00:20:58.950 --> 00:20:58.960 align:start position:0% number three physical iCal traits if you 00:20:58.960 --> 00:21:00.870 align:start position:0% number three physical iCal traits if you want<00:20:59.039> to<00:20:59.240> say<00:20:59.559> you<00:20:59.720> are<00:21:00.000> beautiful<00:21:00.600> you<00:21:00.679> will 00:21:00.870 --> 00:21:00.880 align:start position:0% want to say you are beautiful you will 00:21:00.880 --> 00:21:03.950 align:start position:0% want to say you are beautiful you will say<00:21:01.200> toes<00:21:01.880> Bonito<00:21:02.600> or<00:21:02.919> Bonita<00:21:03.520> depending<00:21:03.840> on 00:21:03.950 --> 00:21:03.960 align:start position:0% say toes Bonito or Bonita depending on 00:21:03.960 --> 00:21:05.590 align:start position:0% say toes Bonito or Bonita depending on the<00:21:04.080> person<00:21:04.400> and<00:21:04.480> the<00:21:04.600> reason<00:21:04.799> you<00:21:04.919> use<00:21:05.200> said 00:21:05.590 --> 00:21:05.600 align:start position:0% the person and the reason you use said 00:21:05.600 --> 00:21:07.029 align:start position:0% the person and the reason you use said is<00:21:05.760> because<00:21:05.960> it's<00:21:06.080> a<00:21:06.200> trait<00:21:06.480> that<00:21:06.600> applies<00:21:06.880> to 00:21:07.029 --> 00:21:07.039 align:start position:0% is because it's a trait that applies to 00:21:07.039 --> 00:21:08.669 align:start position:0% is because it's a trait that applies to the<00:21:07.200> person<00:21:07.559> all<00:21:07.720> the<00:21:07.880> time<00:21:08.159> by<00:21:08.280> saying<00:21:08.559> you 00:21:08.669 --> 00:21:08.679 align:start position:0% the person all the time by saying you 00:21:08.679 --> 00:21:10.710 align:start position:0% the person all the time by saying you are<00:21:08.880> beautiful<00:21:09.360> to<00:21:09.640> Edis<00:21:09.960> Bonito<00:21:10.559> you're 00:21:10.710 --> 00:21:10.720 align:start position:0% are beautiful to Edis Bonito you're 00:21:10.720 --> 00:21:12.029 align:start position:0% are beautiful to Edis Bonito you're saying<00:21:10.960> that<00:21:11.080> the<00:21:11.200> person<00:21:11.440> is<00:21:11.559> beautiful 00:21:12.029 --> 00:21:12.039 align:start position:0% saying that the person is beautiful 00:21:12.039 --> 00:21:13.710 align:start position:0% saying that the person is beautiful always<00:21:12.520> he<00:21:12.640> was<00:21:12.760> born<00:21:13.039> beautiful<00:21:13.559> he's 00:21:13.710 --> 00:21:13.720 align:start position:0% always he was born beautiful he's 00:21:13.720 --> 00:21:15.590 align:start position:0% always he was born beautiful he's beautiful<00:21:14.159> now<00:21:14.520> and<00:21:14.640> he<00:21:14.720> will<00:21:14.880> die<00:21:15.080> beautiful 00:21:15.590 --> 00:21:15.600 align:start position:0% beautiful now and he will die beautiful 00:21:15.600 --> 00:21:17.510 align:start position:0% beautiful now and he will die beautiful number<00:21:15.840> four<00:21:16.240> generalizations<00:21:17.240> if<00:21:17.320> you<00:21:17.400> want 00:21:17.510 --> 00:21:17.520 align:start position:0% number four generalizations if you want 00:21:17.520 --> 00:21:20.630 align:start position:0% number four generalizations if you want to<00:21:17.679> say<00:21:18.000> it<00:21:18.120> is<00:21:18.360> important<00:21:18.760> to<00:21:18.960> work<00:21:19.440> you<00:21:19.520> would 00:21:20.630 --> 00:21:20.640 align:start position:0% to say it is important to work you would 00:21:20.640 --> 00:21:22.990 align:start position:0% to say it is important to work you would say<00:21:21.640> in<00:21:21.760> Spanish<00:21:22.200> there<00:21:22.320> is<00:21:22.440> no<00:21:22.640> notion<00:21:22.880> of 00:21:22.990 --> 00:21:23.000 align:start position:0% say in Spanish there is no notion of 00:21:23.000 --> 00:21:24.669 align:start position:0% say in Spanish there is no notion of starting<00:21:23.279> a<00:21:23.400> sentence<00:21:23.720> with<00:21:23.840> the<00:21:23.960> word<00:21:24.240> it<00:21:24.559> so 00:21:24.669 --> 00:21:24.679 align:start position:0% starting a sentence with the word it so 00:21:24.679 --> 00:21:26.669 align:start position:0% starting a sentence with the word it so you'll<00:21:24.919> immediately<00:21:25.360> start<00:21:25.559> it<00:21:25.720> with<00:21:25.919> is<00:21:26.400> s 00:21:26.669 --> 00:21:26.679 align:start position:0% you'll immediately start it with is s 00:21:26.679 --> 00:21:29.230 align:start position:0% you'll immediately start it with is s important<00:21:27.679> number<00:21:27.880> five<00:21:28.480> when<00:21:28.640> and<00:21:28.840> where<00:21:29.000> are 00:21:29.230 --> 00:21:29.240 align:start position:0% important number five when and where are 00:21:29.240 --> 00:21:30.710 align:start position:0% important number five when and where are events<00:21:29.559> taking<00:21:29.840> place<00:21:30.200> if<00:21:30.279> you<00:21:30.360> want<00:21:30.440> to<00:21:30.559> say 00:21:30.710 --> 00:21:30.720 align:start position:0% events taking place if you want to say 00:21:30.720 --> 00:21:32.549 align:start position:0% events taking place if you want to say the<00:21:30.880> party<00:21:31.120> is<00:21:31.240> in<00:21:31.360> the<00:21:31.520> club<00:21:31.919> you<00:21:32.000> would<00:21:32.159> say 00:21:32.549 --> 00:21:32.559 align:start position:0% the party is in the club you would say 00:21:32.559 --> 00:21:35.070 align:start position:0% the party is in the club you would say La<00:21:32.760> Festa<00:21:33.360> is<00:21:33.480> in<00:21:33.799> club<00:21:34.200> similarly<00:21:34.840> you<00:21:34.919> can 00:21:35.070 --> 00:21:35.080 align:start position:0% La Festa is in club similarly you can 00:21:35.080 --> 00:21:37.269 align:start position:0% La Festa is in club similarly you can say<00:21:35.360> the<00:21:35.480> party<00:21:35.760> is<00:21:35.880> at<00:21:36.159> six<00:21:36.600> which<00:21:36.720> would<00:21:36.880> be 00:21:37.269 --> 00:21:37.279 align:start position:0% say the party is at six which would be 00:21:37.279 --> 00:21:40.149 align:start position:0% say the party is at six which would be La<00:21:37.480> Festa<00:21:38.039> is<00:21:39.039> the<00:21:39.120> rule<00:21:39.440> here<00:21:39.600> is<00:21:39.720> to<00:21:39.880> always 00:21:40.149 --> 00:21:40.159 align:start position:0% La Festa is the rule here is to always 00:21:40.159 --> 00:21:42.310 align:start position:0% La Festa is the rule here is to always include<00:21:40.640> alas<00:21:41.200> if<00:21:41.279> the<00:21:41.400> number<00:21:41.600> is<00:21:41.760> plural<00:21:42.159> or 00:21:42.310 --> 00:21:42.320 align:start position:0% include alas if the number is plural or 00:21:42.320 --> 00:21:43.990 align:start position:0% include alas if the number is plural or more<00:21:42.520> than<00:21:42.679> one<00:21:43.000> and<00:21:43.120> speaking<00:21:43.360> of<00:21:43.559> time<00:21:43.840> it's 00:21:43.990 --> 00:21:44.000 align:start position:0% more than one and speaking of time it's 00:21:44.000 --> 00:21:45.549 align:start position:0% more than one and speaking of time it's the<00:21:44.159> last<00:21:44.360> most<00:21:44.559> important<00:21:44.880> use<00:21:45.080> of<00:21:45.200> the<00:21:45.320> verb 00:21:45.549 --> 00:21:45.559 align:start position:0% the last most important use of the verb 00:21:45.559 --> 00:21:47.350 align:start position:0% the last most important use of the verb said<00:21:46.000> time<00:21:46.200> and<00:21:46.360> date<00:21:46.640> you<00:21:46.720> can<00:21:46.840> say<00:21:47.000> a<00:21:47.080> simple 00:21:47.350 --> 00:21:47.360 align:start position:0% said time and date you can say a simple 00:21:47.360 --> 00:21:49.190 align:start position:0% said time and date you can say a simple sentence<00:21:47.840> like<00:21:48.039> it's<00:21:48.279> Friday<00:21:48.840> which<00:21:48.960> would<00:21:49.080> be 00:21:49.190 --> 00:21:49.200 align:start position:0% sentence like it's Friday which would be 00:21:49.200 --> 00:21:51.190 align:start position:0% sentence like it's Friday which would be a<00:21:49.320> generalization<00:21:50.159> and<00:21:50.440> time<00:21:50.799> and<00:21:50.919> it<00:21:51.039> would 00:21:51.190 --> 00:21:51.200 align:start position:0% a generalization and time and it would 00:21:51.200 --> 00:21:53.430 align:start position:0% a generalization and time and it would be<00:21:51.640> svetness<00:21:52.640> however<00:21:52.919> when<00:21:53.000> you<00:21:53.120> start<00:21:53.279> to 00:21:53.430 --> 00:21:53.440 align:start position:0% be svetness however when you start to 00:21:53.440 --> 00:21:55.269 align:start position:0% be svetness however when you start to speak<00:21:53.640> of<00:21:53.840> time<00:21:54.159> as<00:21:54.279> in<00:21:54.400> a<00:21:54.600> clock<00:21:55.039> this<00:21:55.120> is 00:21:55.269 --> 00:21:55.279 align:start position:0% speak of time as in a clock this is 00:21:55.279 --> 00:21:57.230 align:start position:0% speak of time as in a clock this is where<00:21:55.440> the<00:21:55.600> syntax<00:21:56.120> gets<00:21:56.320> slightly<00:21:56.679> tricky<00:21:57.120> if 00:21:57.230 --> 00:21:57.240 align:start position:0% where the syntax gets slightly tricky if 00:21:57.240 --> 00:21:59.269 align:start position:0% where the syntax gets slightly tricky if you<00:21:57.320> want<00:21:57.440> to<00:21:57.559> say<00:21:57.760> it's<00:21:58.080> 1<00:21:58.320> p.m.<00:21:58.799> the<00:21:58.919> sentence 00:21:59.269 --> 00:21:59.279 align:start position:0% you want to say it's 1 p.m. the sentence 00:21:59.279 --> 00:22:02.750 align:start position:0% you want to say it's 1 p.m. the sentence would<00:21:59.720> be<00:22:00.720> de<00:22:01.440> it<00:22:01.520> begins<00:22:01.840> with<00:22:02.080> s<00:22:02.400> but<00:22:02.520> throws 00:22:02.750 --> 00:22:02.760 align:start position:0% would be de it begins with s but throws 00:22:02.760 --> 00:22:04.750 align:start position:0% would be de it begins with s but throws the<00:22:02.919> definite<00:22:03.240> article<00:22:03.640> LA<00:22:04.039> because<00:22:04.200> it<00:22:04.320> uses 00:22:04.750 --> 00:22:04.760 align:start position:0% the definite article LA because it uses 00:22:04.760 --> 00:22:07.190 align:start position:0% the definite article LA because it uses una<00:22:05.320> as<00:22:05.400> a<00:22:05.559> feminine<00:22:06.039> number<00:22:06.440> so<00:22:06.600> it's<00:22:06.760> the<00:22:06.919> one 00:22:07.190 --> 00:22:07.200 align:start position:0% una as a feminine number so it's the one 00:22:07.200 --> 00:22:09.510 align:start position:0% una as a feminine number so it's the one in<00:22:07.360> the<00:22:07.559> afternoon<00:22:08.159> or<00:22:08.600> of<00:22:08.799> the<00:22:08.960> afternoon 00:22:09.510 --> 00:22:09.520 align:start position:0% in the afternoon or of the afternoon 00:22:09.520 --> 00:22:10.909 align:start position:0% in the afternoon or of the afternoon make<00:22:09.679> sure<00:22:09.840> that<00:22:09.960> you<00:22:10.080> include<00:22:10.400> the<00:22:10.520> article 00:22:10.909 --> 00:22:10.919 align:start position:0% make sure that you include the article 00:22:10.919 --> 00:22:12.909 align:start position:0% make sure that you include the article LA<00:22:11.279> but<00:22:11.480> primarily<00:22:11.919> focus<00:22:12.200> on<00:22:12.320> the<00:22:12.440> S<00:22:12.760> because 00:22:12.909 --> 00:22:12.919 align:start position:0% LA but primarily focus on the S because 00:22:12.919 --> 00:22:14.110 align:start position:0% LA but primarily focus on the S because when<00:22:13.039> you<00:22:13.120> include<00:22:13.400> numbers<00:22:13.679> that<00:22:13.760> are<00:22:13.880> more 00:22:14.110 --> 00:22:14.120 align:start position:0% when you include numbers that are more 00:22:14.120 --> 00:22:15.830 align:start position:0% when you include numbers that are more than<00:22:14.279> one<00:22:14.600> the<00:22:14.720> amount<00:22:14.919> of<00:22:15.120> time<00:22:15.440> becomes 00:22:15.830 --> 00:22:15.840 align:start position:0% than one the amount of time becomes 00:22:15.840 --> 00:22:17.750 align:start position:0% than one the amount of time becomes plural<00:22:16.240> if<00:22:16.320> you<00:22:16.440> want<00:22:16.520> to<00:22:16.640> say<00:22:16.799> it's<00:22:16.960> 2<00:22:17.240> p.m. 00:22:17.750 --> 00:22:17.760 align:start position:0% plural if you want to say it's 2 p.m. 00:22:17.760 --> 00:22:19.029 align:start position:0% plural if you want to say it's 2 p.m. you<00:22:17.840> would 00:22:19.029 --> 00:22:19.039 align:start position:0% you would 00:22:19.039 --> 00:22:21.750 align:start position:0% you would say<00:22:20.039> because<00:22:20.240> now<00:22:20.360> we<00:22:20.480> have<00:22:20.679> plurality<00:22:21.440> now 00:22:21.750 --> 00:22:21.760 align:start position:0% say because now we have plurality now 00:22:21.760 --> 00:22:23.390 align:start position:0% say because now we have plurality now the<00:22:22.000> sentence<00:22:22.279> is<00:22:22.400> in<00:22:22.559> plural<00:22:23.080> because<00:22:23.240> we 00:22:23.390 --> 00:22:23.400 align:start position:0% the sentence is in plural because we 00:22:23.400 --> 00:22:25.430 align:start position:0% the sentence is in plural because we have<00:22:23.480> a<00:22:23.640> non-<00:22:24.000> singular<00:22:24.480> digit<00:22:24.919> so<00:22:25.039> instead<00:22:25.320> of 00:22:25.430 --> 00:22:25.440 align:start position:0% have a non- singular digit so instead of 00:22:25.440 --> 00:22:28.029 align:start position:0% have a non- singular digit so instead of saying<00:22:25.799> s<00:22:26.080> for<00:22:26.320> one<00:22:26.760> you<00:22:26.840> would<00:22:27.039> say<00:22:27.400> son<00:22:27.799> for 00:22:28.029 --> 00:22:28.039 align:start position:0% saying s for one you would say son for 00:22:28.039 --> 00:22:30.269 align:start position:0% saying s for one you would say son for for<00:22:28.159> two<00:22:28.440> and<00:22:28.600> pluralize<00:22:29.200> La<00:22:29.400> for<00:22:29.679> last<00:22:30.120> and 00:22:30.269 --> 00:22:30.279 align:start position:0% for two and pluralize La for last and 00:22:30.279 --> 00:22:31.470 align:start position:0% for two and pluralize La for last and then<00:22:30.559> you'd 00:22:31.470 --> 00:22:31.480 align:start position:0% then you'd 00:22:31.480 --> 00:22:33.830 align:start position:0% then you'd say<00:22:32.480> it's<00:22:32.600> the<00:22:32.720> two<00:22:32.960> in<00:22:33.080> the<00:22:33.200> afternoon<00:22:33.720> the 00:22:33.830 --> 00:22:33.840 align:start position:0% say it's the two in the afternoon the 00:22:33.840 --> 00:22:35.430 align:start position:0% say it's the two in the afternoon the same<00:22:34.039> principle<00:22:34.480> applies<00:22:34.760> to<00:22:34.919> other<00:22:35.120> numbers 00:22:35.430 --> 00:22:35.440 align:start position:0% same principle applies to other numbers 00:22:35.440 --> 00:22:39.870 align:start position:0% same principle applies to other numbers of<00:22:35.600> time<00:22:35.880> such<00:22:36.440> as<00:22:37.600> or<00:22:38.600> de<00:22:39.240> so<00:22:39.440> these<00:22:39.559> are<00:22:39.760> the 00:22:39.870 --> 00:22:39.880 align:start position:0% of time such as or de so these are the 00:22:39.880 --> 00:22:42.190 align:start position:0% of time such as or de so these are the uses<00:22:40.279> of<00:22:40.440> the<00:22:40.600> verb<00:22:41.279> in<00:22:41.400> Spanish<00:22:41.840> and<00:22:42.000> as<00:22:42.080> a 00:22:42.190 --> 00:22:42.200 align:start position:0% uses of the verb in Spanish and as a 00:22:42.200 --> 00:22:43.590 align:start position:0% uses of the verb in Spanish and as a matter<00:22:42.400> of<00:22:42.520> fact<00:22:42.840> the<00:22:42.960> easiest<00:22:43.320> way<00:22:43.440> to 00:22:43.590 --> 00:22:43.600 align:start position:0% matter of fact the easiest way to 00:22:43.600 --> 00:22:45.470 align:start position:0% matter of fact the easiest way to remember<00:22:44.039> them<00:22:44.320> is<00:22:44.400> to<00:22:44.600> always<00:22:44.919> remember<00:22:45.360> that 00:22:45.470 --> 00:22:45.480 align:start position:0% remember them is to always remember that 00:22:45.480 --> 00:22:47.470 align:start position:0% remember them is to always remember that the<00:22:45.640> verb<00:22:45.880> said<00:22:46.440> applies<00:22:46.760> to<00:22:47.039> factual 00:22:47.470 --> 00:22:47.480 align:start position:0% the verb said applies to factual 00:22:47.480 --> 00:22:49.190 align:start position:0% the verb said applies to factual statements<00:22:48.039> about<00:22:48.320> oneself<00:22:48.840> in<00:22:48.960> case<00:22:49.120> you 00:22:49.190 --> 00:22:49.200 align:start position:0% statements about oneself in case you 00:22:49.200 --> 00:22:50.470 align:start position:0% statements about oneself in case you weren't<00:22:49.480> paying<00:22:49.720> close<00:22:49.960> attention 00:22:50.470 --> 00:22:50.480 align:start position:0% weren't paying close attention 00:22:50.480 --> 00:22:51.590 align:start position:0% weren't paying close attention everything<00:22:50.720> that<00:22:50.840> I've<00:22:51.000> listed<00:22:51.279> in<00:22:51.440> this 00:22:51.590 --> 00:22:51.600 align:start position:0% everything that I've listed in this 00:22:51.600 --> 00:22:53.630 align:start position:0% everything that I've listed in this video<00:22:52.000> were<00:22:52.240> examples<00:22:52.640> that<00:22:52.799> apply<00:22:53.159> factually 00:22:53.630 --> 00:22:53.640 align:start position:0% video were examples that apply factually 00:22:53.640 --> 00:22:55.990 align:start position:0% video were examples that apply factually about<00:22:53.919> yourself<00:22:54.480> by<00:22:54.600> saying<00:22:54.919> so<00:22:55.360> Alex<00:22:55.799> I'm 00:22:55.990 --> 00:22:56.000 align:start position:0% about yourself by saying so Alex I'm 00:22:56.000 --> 00:22:57.590 align:start position:0% about yourself by saying so Alex I'm factually<00:22:56.360> stating<00:22:56.679> that<00:22:56.799> my<00:22:56.919> name<00:22:57.080> is<00:22:57.240> Alex 00:22:57.590 --> 00:22:57.600 align:start position:0% factually stating that my name is Alex 00:22:57.600 --> 00:22:59.549 align:start position:0% factually stating that my name is Alex and<00:22:57.679> I<00:22:57.760> can<00:22:58.039> not<00:22:58.159> change<00:22:58.440> that<00:22:58.640> fact<00:22:58.960> if<00:22:59.080> I<00:22:59.240> say 00:22:59.549 --> 00:22:59.559 align:start position:0% and I can not change that fact if I say 00:22:59.559 --> 00:23:01.549 align:start position:0% and I can not change that fact if I say soy<00:22:59.919> Bonito<00:23:00.520> I'm<00:23:00.720> factually<00:23:01.159> stating<00:23:01.440> that 00:23:01.549 --> 00:23:01.559 align:start position:0% soy Bonito I'm factually stating that 00:23:01.559 --> 00:23:03.190 align:start position:0% soy Bonito I'm factually stating that I'm<00:23:01.679> a<00:23:01.799> beautiful<00:23:02.159> person<00:23:02.480> in<00:23:02.640> general<00:23:03.080> by 00:23:03.190 --> 00:23:03.200 align:start position:0% I'm a beautiful person in general by 00:23:03.200 --> 00:23:05.230 align:start position:0% I'm a beautiful person in general by saying<00:23:03.600> es<00:23:03.840> Lunes<00:23:04.360> I'm<00:23:04.520> factually<00:23:04.919> stating 00:23:05.230 --> 00:23:05.240 align:start position:0% saying es Lunes I'm factually stating 00:23:05.240 --> 00:23:06.870 align:start position:0% saying es Lunes I'm factually stating that<00:23:05.360> it's<00:23:05.480> manday<00:23:05.840> today<00:23:06.159> by 00:23:06.870 --> 00:23:06.880 align:start position:0% that it's manday today by 00:23:06.880 --> 00:23:09.350 align:start position:0% that it's manday today by saying<00:23:07.880> I'm<00:23:08.080> factually<00:23:08.520> stating<00:23:08.880> that<00:23:09.000> it's<00:23:09.120> 2 00:23:09.350 --> 00:23:09.360 align:start position:0% saying I'm factually stating that it's 2 00:23:09.360 --> 00:23:10.909 align:start position:0% saying I'm factually stating that it's 2 in<00:23:09.480> the<00:23:09.600> afternoon<00:23:10.120> right<00:23:10.240> now<00:23:10.640> everything 00:23:10.909 --> 00:23:10.919 align:start position:0% in the afternoon right now everything 00:23:10.919 --> 00:23:12.350 align:start position:0% in the afternoon right now everything that<00:23:11.039> I've<00:23:11.200> listed<00:23:11.480> in<00:23:11.640> this<00:23:11.799> video<00:23:12.080> were 00:23:12.350 --> 00:23:12.360 align:start position:0% that I've listed in this video were 00:23:12.360 --> 00:23:13.750 align:start position:0% that I've listed in this video were factual<00:23:12.720> statements<00:23:13.200> and<00:23:13.320> now<00:23:13.440> you 00:23:13.750 --> 00:23:13.760 align:start position:0% factual statements and now you 00:23:13.760 --> 00:23:15.149 align:start position:0% factual statements and now you understand<00:23:13.960> why<00:23:14.120> some<00:23:14.240> teachers<00:23:14.640> in<00:23:14.760> schools 00:23:15.149 --> 00:23:15.159 align:start position:0% understand why some teachers in schools 00:23:15.159 --> 00:23:16.710 align:start position:0% understand why some teachers in schools say<00:23:15.400> that<00:23:15.520> the<00:23:15.600> verb<00:23:15.840> said<00:23:16.320> applies<00:23:16.600> to 00:23:16.710 --> 00:23:16.720 align:start position:0% say that the verb said applies to 00:23:16.720 --> 00:23:18.190 align:start position:0% say that the verb said applies to permanent<00:23:17.039> traits<00:23:17.440> because<00:23:17.679> these<00:23:17.799> are<00:23:17.960> all 00:23:18.190 --> 00:23:18.200 align:start position:0% permanent traits because these are all 00:23:18.200 --> 00:23:19.470 align:start position:0% permanent traits because these are all factual<00:23:18.559> statements<00:23:19.080> the<00:23:19.200> present 00:23:19.470 --> 00:23:19.480 align:start position:0% factual statements the present 00:23:19.480 --> 00:23:20.990 align:start position:0% factual statements the present progressive<00:23:19.880> in<00:23:20.000> Spanish<00:23:20.440> is<00:23:20.559> the<00:23:20.679> English 00:23:20.990 --> 00:23:21.000 align:start position:0% progressive in Spanish is the English 00:23:21.000 --> 00:23:23.029 align:start position:0% progressive in Spanish is the English version<00:23:21.279> of<00:23:21.400> verbs<00:23:21.640> ending<00:23:21.960> in<00:23:22.159> ing<00:23:22.760> or<00:23:22.919> as 00:23:23.029 --> 00:23:23.039 align:start position:0% version of verbs ending in ing or as 00:23:23.039 --> 00:23:24.710 align:start position:0% version of verbs ending in ing or as they're<00:23:23.240> formally<00:23:23.640> called<00:23:24.039> infinitives 00:23:24.710 --> 00:23:24.720 align:start position:0% they're formally called infinitives 00:23:24.720 --> 00:23:26.390 align:start position:0% they're formally called infinitives infinitives<00:23:25.320> are<00:23:25.480> verbs<00:23:25.760> that<00:23:25.880> are<00:23:26.039> placed 00:23:26.390 --> 00:23:26.400 align:start position:0% infinitives are verbs that are placed 00:23:26.400 --> 00:23:28.390 align:start position:0% infinitives are verbs that are placed after<00:23:26.720> already<00:23:27.120> conjugated<00:23:27.600> verbs<00:23:28.080> and<00:23:28.200> so 00:23:28.390 --> 00:23:28.400 align:start position:0% after already conjugated verbs and so 00:23:28.400 --> 00:23:29.830 align:start position:0% after already conjugated verbs and so they<00:23:28.520> don't<00:23:28.760> change<00:23:29.080> or<00:23:29.279> slightly<00:23:29.679> get 00:23:29.830 --> 00:23:29.840 align:start position:0% they don't change or slightly get 00:23:29.840 --> 00:23:31.549 align:start position:0% they don't change or slightly get modified<00:23:30.360> with<00:23:30.480> the<00:23:30.600> present<00:23:30.880> progressive<00:23:31.480> if 00:23:31.549 --> 00:23:31.559 align:start position:0% modified with the present progressive if 00:23:31.559 --> 00:23:33.190 align:start position:0% modified with the present progressive if you<00:23:31.679> want<00:23:31.799> to<00:23:31.919> use<00:23:32.080> the<00:23:32.200> verb<00:23:32.440> to<00:23:32.640> talk<00:23:33.080> you 00:23:33.190 --> 00:23:33.200 align:start position:0% you want to use the verb to talk you 00:23:33.200 --> 00:23:35.630 align:start position:0% you want to use the verb to talk you would<00:23:33.360> say<00:23:33.760> I<00:23:33.919> am<00:23:34.240> talking<00:23:34.679> by<00:23:34.799> adding<00:23:35.039> an<00:23:35.240> ing 00:23:35.630 --> 00:23:35.640 align:start position:0% would say I am talking by adding an ing 00:23:35.640 --> 00:23:38.110 align:start position:0% would say I am talking by adding an ing to<00:23:35.799> the<00:23:35.960> infinitive<00:23:36.640> I<00:23:36.880> is<00:23:37.039> the<00:23:37.240> subject<00:23:37.720> m<00:23:38.000> is 00:23:38.110 --> 00:23:38.120 align:start position:0% to the infinitive I is the subject m is 00:23:38.120 --> 00:23:39.990 align:start position:0% to the infinitive I is the subject m is the<00:23:38.240> conjugated<00:23:38.760> verb<00:23:39.000> to<00:23:39.159> be<00:23:39.400> for<00:23:39.600> the<00:23:39.760> I 00:23:39.990 --> 00:23:40.000 align:start position:0% the conjugated verb to be for the I 00:23:40.000 --> 00:23:41.789 align:start position:0% the conjugated verb to be for the I pronoun<00:23:40.520> and<00:23:40.679> talking<00:23:41.080> is<00:23:41.200> the<00:23:41.360> infinitive 00:23:41.789 --> 00:23:41.799 align:start position:0% pronoun and talking is the infinitive 00:23:41.799 --> 00:23:43.789 align:start position:0% pronoun and talking is the infinitive that<00:23:41.960> gets<00:23:42.159> the<00:23:42.320> ing<00:23:42.760> added<00:23:43.000> to<00:23:43.159> it<00:23:43.480> both<00:23:43.640> in 00:23:43.789 --> 00:23:43.799 align:start position:0% that gets the ing added to it both in 00:23:43.799 --> 00:23:45.190 align:start position:0% that gets the ing added to it both in English<00:23:44.080> and<00:23:44.279> Spanish<00:23:44.720> the<00:23:44.880> present 00:23:45.190 --> 00:23:45.200 align:start position:0% English and Spanish the present 00:23:45.200 --> 00:23:46.990 align:start position:0% English and Spanish the present progressive<00:23:45.799> indicates<00:23:46.240> that<00:23:46.360> an<00:23:46.559> action<00:23:46.840> is 00:23:46.990 --> 00:23:47.000 align:start position:0% progressive indicates that an action is 00:23:47.000 --> 00:23:48.390 align:start position:0% progressive indicates that an action is being<00:23:47.200> done<00:23:47.480> right<00:23:47.640> now<00:23:48.000> which<00:23:48.120> means<00:23:48.279> that 00:23:48.390 --> 00:23:48.400 align:start position:0% being done right now which means that 00:23:48.400 --> 00:23:49.750 align:start position:0% being done right now which means that there's<00:23:48.679> progress<00:23:49.120> happening<00:23:49.480> in<00:23:49.600> the 00:23:49.750 --> 00:23:49.760 align:start position:0% there's progress happening in the 00:23:49.760 --> 00:23:51.710 align:start position:0% there's progress happening in the present<00:23:50.400> however<00:23:50.760> the<00:23:50.919> ing<00:23:51.320> version<00:23:51.600> of 00:23:51.710 --> 00:23:51.720 align:start position:0% present however the ing version of 00:23:51.720 --> 00:23:53.590 align:start position:0% present however the ing version of English<00:23:52.120> looks<00:23:52.400> different<00:23:52.679> in<00:23:52.840> Spanish<00:23:53.440> at 00:23:53.590 --> 00:23:53.600 align:start position:0% English looks different in Spanish at 00:23:53.600 --> 00:23:55.029 align:start position:0% English looks different in Spanish at first<00:23:53.880> if<00:23:53.960> you<00:23:54.080> want<00:23:54.159> to<00:23:54.279> start<00:23:54.480> a<00:23:54.600> sentence<00:23:54.919> in 00:23:55.029 --> 00:23:55.039 align:start position:0% first if you want to start a sentence in 00:23:55.039 --> 00:23:56.630 align:start position:0% first if you want to start a sentence in the<00:23:55.159> present<00:23:55.440> progressive<00:23:55.840> in<00:23:56.000> Spanish<00:23:56.559> you 00:23:56.630 --> 00:23:56.640 align:start position:0% the present progressive in Spanish you 00:23:56.640 --> 00:23:58.590 align:start position:0% the present progressive in Spanish you would<00:23:56.840> begin<00:23:57.080> by<00:23:57.240> saying<00:23:57.600> your<00:23:58.039> esto<00:23:58.480> which 00:23:58.590 --> 00:23:58.600 align:start position:0% would begin by saying your esto which 00:23:58.600 --> 00:24:01.269 align:start position:0% would begin by saying your esto which means<00:23:58.919> I<00:23:59.039> am<00:23:59.440> esto<00:24:00.000> is<00:24:00.240> actually<00:24:00.559> an<00:24:00.720> irregular 00:24:01.269 --> 00:24:01.279 align:start position:0% means I am esto is actually an irregular 00:24:01.279 --> 00:24:03.190 align:start position:0% means I am esto is actually an irregular conjugation<00:24:01.799> of<00:24:01.960> the<00:24:02.120> yo<00:24:02.360> pronoun<00:24:02.799> said<00:24:03.039> from 00:24:03.190 --> 00:24:03.200 align:start position:0% conjugation of the yo pronoun said from 00:24:03.200 --> 00:24:05.070 align:start position:0% conjugation of the yo pronoun said from the<00:24:03.320> verb<00:24:03.600> estar<00:24:04.120> which<00:24:04.240> means<00:24:04.480> to<00:24:04.640> be<00:24:04.960> there 00:24:05.070 --> 00:24:05.080 align:start position:0% the verb estar which means to be there 00:24:05.080 --> 00:24:06.669 align:start position:0% the verb estar which means to be there are<00:24:05.279> different<00:24:05.520> conjugations<00:24:06.039> for<00:24:06.240> this<00:24:06.400> verb 00:24:06.669 --> 00:24:06.679 align:start position:0% are different conjugations for this verb 00:24:06.679 --> 00:24:08.310 align:start position:0% are different conjugations for this verb with<00:24:06.840> different<00:24:07.120> pronouns<00:24:07.640> but<00:24:07.760> the<00:24:07.919> topic<00:24:08.159> of 00:24:08.310 --> 00:24:08.320 align:start position:0% with different pronouns but the topic of 00:24:08.320 --> 00:24:09.909 align:start position:0% with different pronouns but the topic of this<00:24:08.480> verb<00:24:08.720> is<00:24:08.840> for<00:24:08.960> a<00:24:09.039> future<00:24:09.360> video<00:24:09.760> in 00:24:09.909 --> 00:24:09.919 align:start position:0% this verb is for a future video in 00:24:09.919 --> 00:24:12.190 align:start position:0% this verb is for a future video in Spanish<00:24:10.279> you<00:24:10.440> have<00:24:10.559> verbs<00:24:10.799> ending<00:24:11.080> in<00:24:11.240> a<00:24:11.400> r<00:24:11.679> e<00:24:11.880> r 00:24:12.190 --> 00:24:12.200 align:start position:0% Spanish you have verbs ending in a r e r 00:24:12.200 --> 00:24:14.149 align:start position:0% Spanish you have verbs ending in a r e r and<00:24:12.480> I<00:24:13.000> but<00:24:13.120> their<00:24:13.320> infinitive<00:24:13.720> version<00:24:14.039> of 00:24:14.149 --> 00:24:14.159 align:start position:0% and I but their infinitive version of 00:24:14.159 --> 00:24:15.630 align:start position:0% and I but their infinitive version of the<00:24:14.240> present<00:24:14.559> progressive<00:24:15.080> is<00:24:15.279> actually 00:24:15.630 --> 00:24:15.640 align:start position:0% the present progressive is actually 00:24:15.640 --> 00:24:17.430 align:start position:0% the present progressive is actually quite<00:24:15.880> easy<00:24:16.120> to<00:24:16.320> remember<00:24:16.760> for<00:24:16.919> verbs<00:24:17.200> ending 00:24:17.430 --> 00:24:17.440 align:start position:0% quite easy to remember for verbs ending 00:24:17.440 --> 00:24:19.149 align:start position:0% quite easy to remember for verbs ending in<00:24:17.600> AR<00:24:18.200> you<00:24:18.320> would<00:24:18.480> want<00:24:18.600> to<00:24:18.760> remove<00:24:19.039> the 00:24:19.149 --> 00:24:19.159 align:start position:0% in AR you would want to remove the 00:24:19.159 --> 00:24:20.590 align:start position:0% in AR you would want to remove the ending<00:24:19.440> of<00:24:19.559> the<00:24:19.679> verb<00:24:20.000> and<00:24:20.120> then<00:24:20.320> add<00:24:20.480> the 00:24:20.590 --> 00:24:20.600 align:start position:0% ending of the verb and then add the 00:24:20.600 --> 00:24:22.990 align:start position:0% ending of the verb and then add the ending<00:24:21.120> Ando<00:24:21.600> using<00:24:21.880> the<00:24:22.000> verb<00:24:22.279> abl<00:24:22.760> in<00:24:22.880> the 00:24:22.990 --> 00:24:23.000 align:start position:0% ending Ando using the verb abl in the 00:24:23.000 --> 00:24:25.710 align:start position:0% ending Ando using the verb abl in the present<00:24:23.279> progressive<00:24:23.919> you<00:24:24.039> would<00:24:24.200> say<00:24:24.720> youro 00:24:25.710 --> 00:24:25.720 align:start position:0% present progressive you would say youro 00:24:25.720 --> 00:24:27.909 align:start position:0% present progressive you would say youro remove<00:24:26.039> the<00:24:26.159> ending<00:24:26.600> and<00:24:26.760> then<00:24:26.960> add<00:24:27.240> Ando<00:24:27.640> as 00:24:27.909 --> 00:24:27.919 align:start position:0% remove the ending and then add Ando as 00:24:27.919 --> 00:24:29.590 align:start position:0% remove the ending and then add Ando as the<00:24:28.000> ending<00:24:28.240> of<00:24:28.360> the<00:24:28.480> infinitive<00:24:28.960> so<00:24:29.159> this<00:24:29.320> way 00:24:29.590 --> 00:24:29.600 align:start position:0% the ending of the infinitive so this way 00:24:29.600 --> 00:24:32.870 align:start position:0% the ending of the infinitive so this way you<00:24:29.799> get<00:24:30.480> EST<00:24:31.480> which<00:24:31.600> means<00:24:32.039> I<00:24:32.159> am<00:24:32.399> speaking 00:24:32.870 --> 00:24:32.880 align:start position:0% you get EST which means I am speaking 00:24:32.880 --> 00:24:34.149 align:start position:0% you get EST which means I am speaking the<00:24:32.960> same<00:24:33.159> principle<00:24:33.520> applies<00:24:33.799> to<00:24:33.919> the<00:24:34.039> rest 00:24:34.149 --> 00:24:34.159 align:start position:0% the same principle applies to the rest 00:24:34.159 --> 00:24:35.789 align:start position:0% the same principle applies to the rest of<00:24:34.279> the<00:24:34.399> pronouns<00:24:34.840> in<00:24:35.000> any<00:24:35.200> infinitive<00:24:35.640> that 00:24:35.789 --> 00:24:35.799 align:start position:0% of the pronouns in any infinitive that 00:24:35.799 --> 00:24:37.230 align:start position:0% of the pronouns in any infinitive that you<00:24:35.880> want<00:24:36.039> to<00:24:36.159> use<00:24:36.520> but<00:24:36.679> keep<00:24:36.840> in<00:24:36.960> mind<00:24:37.120> that 00:24:37.230 --> 00:24:37.240 align:start position:0% you want to use but keep in mind that 00:24:37.240 --> 00:24:38.710 align:start position:0% you want to use but keep in mind that there<00:24:37.360> are<00:24:37.520> six<00:24:37.760> different<00:24:38.000> conjugations<00:24:38.559> for 00:24:38.710 --> 00:24:38.720 align:start position:0% there are six different conjugations for 00:24:38.720 --> 00:24:40.190 align:start position:0% there are six different conjugations for the<00:24:38.840> verb<00:24:39.120> estar<00:24:39.559> which<00:24:39.679> apply<00:24:39.919> to<00:24:40.039> their 00:24:40.190 --> 00:24:40.200 align:start position:0% the verb estar which apply to their 00:24:40.200 --> 00:24:41.830 align:start position:0% the verb estar which apply to their corresponding<00:24:40.760> pronouns<00:24:41.279> and<00:24:41.399> as<00:24:41.520> I<00:24:41.600> said 00:24:41.830 --> 00:24:41.840 align:start position:0% corresponding pronouns and as I said 00:24:41.840 --> 00:24:43.630 align:start position:0% corresponding pronouns and as I said again<00:24:42.159> the<00:24:42.279> verb<00:24:42.559> estar<00:24:43.000> is<00:24:43.120> for<00:24:43.240> a<00:24:43.320> future 00:24:43.630 --> 00:24:43.640 align:start position:0% again the verb estar is for a future 00:24:43.640 --> 00:24:46.110 align:start position:0% again the verb estar is for a future video<00:24:44.000> for<00:24:44.159> verbs<00:24:44.399> ending<00:24:44.679> in<00:24:44.880> e<00:24:45.039> r<00:24:45.320> and<00:24:45.600> I 00:24:46.110 --> 00:24:46.120 align:start position:0% video for verbs ending in e r and I 00:24:46.120 --> 00:24:47.710 align:start position:0% video for verbs ending in e r and I remove<00:24:46.440> the<00:24:46.559> ending<00:24:46.840> of<00:24:46.960> the<00:24:47.080> verb<00:24:47.440> and<00:24:47.559> then 00:24:47.710 --> 00:24:47.720 align:start position:0% remove the ending of the verb and then 00:24:47.720 --> 00:24:50.630 align:start position:0% remove the ending of the verb and then add<00:24:47.880> the<00:24:48.000> ending<00:24:48.520> e<00:24:48.679> Endo<00:24:49.120> using<00:24:49.840> and<00:24:50.440> in<00:24:50.520> the 00:24:50.630 --> 00:24:50.640 align:start position:0% add the ending e Endo using and in the 00:24:50.640 --> 00:24:53.789 align:start position:0% add the ending e Endo using and in the present<00:24:50.960> progressive<00:24:51.520> you<00:24:51.640> would<00:24:51.880> say<00:24:52.799> esto 00:24:53.789 --> 00:24:53.799 align:start position:0% present progressive you would say esto 00:24:53.799 --> 00:24:56.630 align:start position:0% present progressive you would say esto and<00:24:54.159> Y<00:24:54.360> EST<00:24:54.840> viendo<00:24:55.520> which<00:24:55.640> is<00:24:55.919> I<00:24:56.000> am<00:24:56.200> eating 00:24:56.630 --> 00:24:56.640 align:start position:0% and Y EST viendo which is I am eating 00:24:56.640 --> 00:24:58.190 align:start position:0% and Y EST viendo which is I am eating and<00:24:56.840> I<00:24:56.960> am<00:24:57.080> living<00:24:57.480> the<00:24:57.559> same<00:24:57.880> principle 00:24:58.190 --> 00:24:58.200 align:start position:0% and I am living the same principle 00:24:58.200 --> 00:24:59.549 align:start position:0% and I am living the same principle applies<00:24:58.440> to<00:24:58.559> the<00:24:58.640> rest<00:24:58.760> of<00:24:58.880> the<00:24:58.960> pronouns<00:24:59.399> and 00:24:59.549 --> 00:24:59.559 align:start position:0% applies to the rest of the pronouns and 00:24:59.559 --> 00:25:01.149 align:start position:0% applies to the rest of the pronouns and any<00:24:59.760> infinitive<00:25:00.200> that<00:25:00.279> you<00:25:00.399> want<00:25:00.520> to<00:25:00.640> use<00:25:01.000> but 00:25:01.149 --> 00:25:01.159 align:start position:0% any infinitive that you want to use but 00:25:01.159 --> 00:25:02.750 align:start position:0% any infinitive that you want to use but once<00:25:01.399> again<00:25:01.799> remember<00:25:02.080> to<00:25:02.240> use<00:25:02.440> the<00:25:02.559> right 00:25:02.750 --> 00:25:02.760 align:start position:0% once again remember to use the right 00:25:02.760 --> 00:25:04.549 align:start position:0% once again remember to use the right conjugation<00:25:03.240> of<00:25:03.399> each<00:25:03.559> pronoun<00:25:04.039> at<00:25:04.240> last<00:25:04.440> you 00:25:04.549 --> 00:25:04.559 align:start position:0% conjugation of each pronoun at last you 00:25:04.559 --> 00:25:05.830 align:start position:0% conjugation of each pronoun at last you might<00:25:04.720> encounter<00:25:05.080> a<00:25:05.159> few<00:25:05.320> exceptions<00:25:05.720> in 00:25:05.830 --> 00:25:05.840 align:start position:0% might encounter a few exceptions in 00:25:05.840 --> 00:25:07.630 align:start position:0% might encounter a few exceptions in Spanish<00:25:06.240> where<00:25:06.399> modifying<00:25:06.840> some<00:25:07.039> infinitives 00:25:07.630 --> 00:25:07.640 align:start position:0% Spanish where modifying some infinitives 00:25:07.640 --> 00:25:09.430 align:start position:0% Spanish where modifying some infinitives might<00:25:07.880> require<00:25:08.200> a<00:25:08.320> bit<00:25:08.440> more<00:25:08.640> modification<00:25:09.279> to 00:25:09.430 --> 00:25:09.440 align:start position:0% might require a bit more modification to 00:25:09.440 --> 00:25:11.110 align:start position:0% might require a bit more modification to make<00:25:09.559> the<00:25:09.679> verb<00:25:09.919> sound<00:25:10.200> better<00:25:10.440> when<00:25:10.600> spoken 00:25:11.110 --> 00:25:11.120 align:start position:0% make the verb sound better when spoken 00:25:11.120 --> 00:25:13.230 align:start position:0% make the verb sound better when spoken for<00:25:11.320> instance<00:25:11.760> you<00:25:11.880> might<00:25:12.039> see<00:25:12.279> the<00:25:12.399> verb 00:25:13.230 --> 00:25:13.240 align:start position:0% for instance you might see the verb 00:25:13.240 --> 00:25:14.590 align:start position:0% for instance you might see the verb which<00:25:13.320> means<00:25:13.559> to<00:25:13.840> read<00:25:14.159> and<00:25:14.240> you<00:25:14.320> would<00:25:14.480> want 00:25:14.590 --> 00:25:14.600 align:start position:0% which means to read and you would want 00:25:14.600 --> 00:25:15.669 align:start position:0% which means to read and you would want to 00:25:15.669 --> 00:25:15.679 align:start position:0% to 00:25:15.679 --> 00:25:17.710 align:start position:0% to say<00:25:16.679> but<00:25:16.799> this<00:25:16.880> would<00:25:17.039> be<00:25:17.120> a<00:25:17.279> mistake<00:25:17.559> in 00:25:17.710 --> 00:25:17.720 align:start position:0% say but this would be a mistake in 00:25:17.720 --> 00:25:19.230 align:start position:0% say but this would be a mistake in Spanish<00:25:18.120> because<00:25:18.320> Spanish<00:25:18.640> has<00:25:18.760> a<00:25:18.880> rule<00:25:19.120> that 00:25:19.230 --> 00:25:19.240 align:start position:0% Spanish because Spanish has a rule that 00:25:19.240 --> 00:25:20.669 align:start position:0% Spanish because Spanish has a rule that says<00:25:19.399> you<00:25:19.520> cannot<00:25:19.760> have<00:25:19.919> three<00:25:20.120> vowels<00:25:20.480> next 00:25:20.669 --> 00:25:20.679 align:start position:0% says you cannot have three vowels next 00:25:20.679 --> 00:25:22.230 align:start position:0% says you cannot have three vowels next to<00:25:20.799> each<00:25:20.919> other<00:25:21.240> so<00:25:21.360> you<00:25:21.480> have<00:25:21.559> to<00:25:21.720> modify<00:25:22.120> one 00:25:22.230 --> 00:25:22.240 align:start position:0% to each other so you have to modify one 00:25:22.240 --> 00:25:23.710 align:start position:0% to each other so you have to modify one of<00:25:22.360> them<00:25:22.520> with<00:25:22.600> a<00:25:22.760> consonant<00:25:23.240> to<00:25:23.360> eliminate 00:25:23.710 --> 00:25:23.720 align:start position:0% of them with a consonant to eliminate 00:25:23.720 --> 00:25:25.310 align:start position:0% of them with a consonant to eliminate the<00:25:23.880> repetitive<00:25:24.360> pronunciation<00:25:25.080> when<00:25:25.200> the 00:25:25.310 --> 00:25:25.320 align:start position:0% the repetitive pronunciation when the 00:25:25.320 --> 00:25:27.070 align:start position:0% the repetitive pronunciation when the word<00:25:25.480> is<00:25:25.600> said<00:25:25.919> so<00:25:26.039> instead<00:25:26.279> of<00:25:26.399> saying<00:25:26.760> Le 00:25:27.070 --> 00:25:27.080 align:start position:0% word is said so instead of saying Le 00:25:27.080 --> 00:25:28.430 align:start position:0% word is said so instead of saying Le Endo<00:25:27.399> you<00:25:27.480> would 00:25:28.430 --> 00:25:28.440 align:start position:0% Endo you would 00:25:28.440 --> 00:25:30.870 align:start position:0% Endo you would say<00:25:29.440> which<00:25:29.559> means<00:25:29.919> I<00:25:30.039> am<00:25:30.200> reading<00:25:30.640> and<00:25:30.760> the 00:25:30.870 --> 00:25:30.880 align:start position:0% say which means I am reading and the 00:25:30.880 --> 00:25:32.430 align:start position:0% say which means I am reading and the same<00:25:31.080> concept<00:25:31.440> applies<00:25:31.720> to<00:25:31.840> any<00:25:32.039> pronoun<00:25:32.360> you 00:25:32.430 --> 00:25:32.440 align:start position:0% same concept applies to any pronoun you 00:25:32.440 --> 00:25:34.029 align:start position:0% same concept applies to any pronoun you want<00:25:32.559> to<00:25:32.679> use<00:25:33.000> you<00:25:33.120> might<00:25:33.320> also<00:25:33.559> find<00:25:33.840> this 00:25:34.029 --> 00:25:34.039 align:start position:0% want to use you might also find this 00:25:34.039 --> 00:25:35.950 align:start position:0% want to use you might also find this verb<00:25:34.440> D<00:25:35.000> which<00:25:35.120> means<00:25:35.320> to<00:25:35.440> sleep<00:25:35.799> and<00:25:35.880> you 00:25:35.950 --> 00:25:35.960 align:start position:0% verb D which means to sleep and you 00:25:35.960 --> 00:25:38.630 align:start position:0% verb D which means to sleep and you would<00:25:36.120> want<00:25:36.240> to<00:25:36.399> say<00:25:36.760> y<00:25:37.240> esto<00:25:38.240> but<00:25:38.360> because 00:25:38.630 --> 00:25:38.640 align:start position:0% would want to say y esto but because 00:25:38.640 --> 00:25:40.350 align:start position:0% would want to say y esto but because dormir<00:25:39.000> is<00:25:39.080> a<00:25:39.240> stem<00:25:39.440> changing<00:25:39.799> verb<00:25:40.120> you<00:25:40.240> have 00:25:40.350 --> 00:25:40.360 align:start position:0% dormir is a stem changing verb you have 00:25:40.360 --> 00:25:42.029 align:start position:0% dormir is a stem changing verb you have to<00:25:40.480> change<00:25:40.760> the<00:25:40.880> stem<00:25:41.240> of<00:25:41.360> the<00:25:41.480> verb<00:25:41.760> to<00:25:41.919> make 00:25:42.029 --> 00:25:42.039 align:start position:0% to change the stem of the verb to make 00:25:42.039 --> 00:25:43.590 align:start position:0% to change the stem of the verb to make its<00:25:42.240> pronunciation<00:25:42.840> sound<00:25:43.159> better<00:25:43.440> so 00:25:43.590 --> 00:25:43.600 align:start position:0% its pronunciation sound better so 00:25:43.600 --> 00:25:46.950 align:start position:0% its pronunciation sound better so instead<00:25:43.880> of<00:25:43.960> saying<00:25:44.720> yo<00:25:45.720> you<00:25:45.840> would 00:25:46.950 --> 00:25:46.960 align:start position:0% instead of saying yo you would 00:25:46.960 --> 00:25:49.190 align:start position:0% instead of saying yo you would Sayo<00:25:47.960> which<00:25:48.080> means<00:25:48.360> I<00:25:48.440> am<00:25:48.559> sleeping<00:25:49.000> and<00:25:49.120> the 00:25:49.190 --> 00:25:49.200 align:start position:0% Sayo which means I am sleeping and the 00:25:49.200 --> 00:25:50.549 align:start position:0% Sayo which means I am sleeping and the same<00:25:49.440> idea<00:25:49.760> applies<00:25:50.039> to<00:25:50.159> the<00:25:50.240> rest<00:25:50.360> of<00:25:50.480> the 00:25:50.549 --> 00:25:50.559 align:start position:0% same idea applies to the rest of the 00:25:50.559 --> 00:25:52.310 align:start position:0% same idea applies to the rest of the pronouns<00:25:51.039> there<00:25:51.159> is<00:25:51.480> however<00:25:51.760> another<00:25:52.039> stem 00:25:52.310 --> 00:25:52.320 align:start position:0% pronouns there is however another stem 00:25:52.320 --> 00:25:54.549 align:start position:0% pronouns there is however another stem changing<00:25:52.640> verb<00:25:52.840> in<00:25:52.960> Spanish<00:25:53.520> like<00:25:54.480> which 00:25:54.549 --> 00:25:54.559 align:start position:0% changing verb in Spanish like which 00:25:54.559 --> 00:25:57.430 align:start position:0% changing verb in Spanish like which means<00:25:54.799> to<00:25:55.000> say<00:25:55.279> you<00:25:55.399> would<00:25:55.600> want<00:25:55.720> to<00:25:56.320> Sayo<00:25:57.320> but 00:25:57.430 --> 00:25:57.440 align:start position:0% means to say you would want to Sayo but 00:25:57.440 --> 00:25:58.830 align:start position:0% means to say you would want to Sayo but Spanish<00:25:57.880> says<00:25:58.039> that<00:25:58.120> you<00:25:58.240> have<00:25:58.320> to<00:25:58.440> change<00:25:58.720> the 00:25:58.830 --> 00:25:58.840 align:start position:0% Spanish says that you have to change the 00:25:58.840 --> 00:26:00.510 align:start position:0% Spanish says that you have to change the stem<00:25:59.080> of<00:25:59.159> the<00:25:59.279> verb<00:25:59.559> to<00:25:59.679> make<00:25:59.799> it<00:25:59.960> sound<00:26:00.240> better 00:26:00.510 --> 00:26:00.520 align:start position:0% stem of the verb to make it sound better 00:26:00.520 --> 00:26:03.430 align:start position:0% stem of the verb to make it sound better so<00:26:00.640> instead<00:26:00.880> of<00:26:01.000> saying<00:26:01.760> Endo<00:26:02.240> you<00:26:02.360> would 00:26:03.430 --> 00:26:03.440 align:start position:0% so instead of saying Endo you would 00:26:03.440 --> 00:26:05.870 align:start position:0% so instead of saying Endo you would Sayo<00:26:04.440> which<00:26:04.559> would<00:26:04.720> mean<00:26:05.039> I<00:26:05.159> am<00:26:05.320> saying<00:26:05.720> and 00:26:05.870 --> 00:26:05.880 align:start position:0% Sayo which would mean I am saying and 00:26:05.880 --> 00:26:07.350 align:start position:0% Sayo which would mean I am saying and once<00:26:06.080> again<00:26:06.320> the<00:26:06.440> same<00:26:06.640> principle<00:26:06.960> applies<00:26:07.240> to 00:26:07.350 --> 00:26:07.360 align:start position:0% once again the same principle applies to 00:26:07.360 --> 00:26:09.230 align:start position:0% once again the same principle applies to the<00:26:07.440> rest<00:26:07.600> of<00:26:07.679> the<00:26:07.799> pronouns<00:26:08.320> the<00:26:08.440> verb<00:26:08.760> estar 00:26:09.230 --> 00:26:09.240 align:start position:0% the rest of the pronouns the verb estar 00:26:09.240 --> 00:26:11.430 align:start position:0% the rest of the pronouns the verb estar in<00:26:09.399> Spanish<00:26:09.840> means<00:26:10.080> to<00:26:10.279> be<00:26:10.559> as<00:26:10.679> in<00:26:10.880> being<00:26:11.200> or 00:26:11.430 --> 00:26:11.440 align:start position:0% in Spanish means to be as in being or 00:26:11.440 --> 00:26:13.110 align:start position:0% in Spanish means to be as in being or existing<00:26:11.919> unlike<00:26:12.200> the<00:26:12.320> weird<00:26:12.559> conjugations 00:26:13.110 --> 00:26:13.120 align:start position:0% existing unlike the weird conjugations 00:26:13.120 --> 00:26:15.350 align:start position:0% existing unlike the weird conjugations with<00:26:13.240> the<00:26:13.320> verb<00:26:14.039> the<00:26:14.159> verb<00:26:14.480> EST<00:26:15.080> actually 00:26:15.350 --> 00:26:15.360 align:start position:0% with the verb the verb EST actually 00:26:15.360 --> 00:26:17.149 align:start position:0% with the verb the verb EST actually follows<00:26:15.679> the<00:26:15.799> normal<00:26:16.120> syntax<00:26:16.559> of<00:26:16.679> conjugating 00:26:17.149 --> 00:26:17.159 align:start position:0% follows the normal syntax of conjugating 00:26:17.159 --> 00:26:19.070 align:start position:0% follows the normal syntax of conjugating regular<00:26:17.559> ar<00:26:18.039> verbs<00:26:18.399> and<00:26:18.480> it<00:26:18.600> looks<00:26:18.799> like<00:26:18.960> this 00:26:19.070 --> 00:26:19.080 align:start position:0% regular ar verbs and it looks like this 00:26:19.080 --> 00:26:25.470 align:start position:0% regular ar verbs and it looks like this in<00:26:19.720> Spanish<00:26:20.720> to<00:26:21.520> EST<00:26:22.520> or<00:26:23.840> EST 00:26:25.470 --> 00:26:25.480 align:start position:0% in Spanish to EST or EST 00:26:25.480 --> 00:26:28.230 align:start position:0% in Spanish to EST or EST EST<00:26:26.480> EST<00:26:27.279> and 00:26:28.230 --> 00:26:28.240 align:start position:0% EST EST and 00:26:28.240 --> 00:26:30.230 align:start position:0% EST EST and estan<00:26:28.840> before<00:26:29.039> I<00:26:29.200> explain<00:26:29.480> the<00:26:29.640> primary<00:26:29.960> uses 00:26:30.230 --> 00:26:30.240 align:start position:0% estan before I explain the primary uses 00:26:30.240 --> 00:26:31.870 align:start position:0% estan before I explain the primary uses of<00:26:30.320> the<00:26:30.440> verb<00:26:30.679> EST<00:26:31.120> I<00:26:31.200> first<00:26:31.320> need<00:26:31.480> to<00:26:31.559> note<00:26:31.760> a 00:26:31.870 --> 00:26:31.880 align:start position:0% of the verb EST I first need to note a 00:26:31.880 --> 00:26:33.350 align:start position:0% of the verb EST I first need to note a few<00:26:32.039> important<00:26:32.399> things<00:26:32.640> about<00:26:32.880> this<00:26:33.000> verb 00:26:33.350 --> 00:26:33.360 align:start position:0% few important things about this verb 00:26:33.360 --> 00:26:34.990 align:start position:0% few important things about this verb just<00:26:33.520> visually<00:26:33.919> looking<00:26:34.159> at<00:26:34.279> its<00:26:34.440> syntax<00:26:34.919> you 00:26:34.990 --> 00:26:35.000 align:start position:0% just visually looking at its syntax you 00:26:35.000 --> 00:26:36.350 align:start position:0% just visually looking at its syntax you can<00:26:35.159> probably<00:26:35.440> tell<00:26:35.679> that<00:26:35.799> the<00:26:35.919> conjugation 00:26:36.350 --> 00:26:36.360 align:start position:0% can probably tell that the conjugation 00:26:36.360 --> 00:26:38.430 align:start position:0% can probably tell that the conjugation for<00:26:36.559> the<00:26:36.679> yo<00:26:36.919> pronoun<00:26:37.360> is<00:26:37.559> irregular<00:26:38.240> because 00:26:38.430 --> 00:26:38.440 align:start position:0% for the yo pronoun is irregular because 00:26:38.440 --> 00:26:40.070 align:start position:0% for the yo pronoun is irregular because it<00:26:38.559> ends<00:26:38.919> with<00:26:39.039> a<00:26:39.240> Y<00:26:39.520> and<00:26:39.640> this<00:26:39.720> is<00:26:39.840> done 00:26:40.070 --> 00:26:40.080 align:start position:0% it ends with a Y and this is done 00:26:40.080 --> 00:26:41.750 align:start position:0% it ends with a Y and this is done specifically<00:26:40.600> to<00:26:40.760> not<00:26:40.919> get<00:26:41.039> it<00:26:41.200> confused<00:26:41.640> with 00:26:41.750 --> 00:26:41.760 align:start position:0% specifically to not get it confused with 00:26:41.760 --> 00:26:44.029 align:start position:0% specifically to not get it confused with the<00:26:41.880> demonstrative<00:26:42.480> adjective<00:26:42.960> esto<00:26:43.520> esto 00:26:44.029 --> 00:26:44.039 align:start position:0% the demonstrative adjective esto esto 00:26:44.039 --> 00:26:46.110 align:start position:0% the demonstrative adjective esto esto means<00:26:44.520> this<00:26:44.880> in<00:26:45.000> the<00:26:45.120> neutral<00:26:45.520> form<00:26:45.840> whenever 00:26:46.110 --> 00:26:46.120 align:start position:0% means this in the neutral form whenever 00:26:46.120 --> 00:26:47.230 align:start position:0% means this in the neutral form whenever you're<00:26:46.279> referring<00:26:46.640> to<00:26:46.760> something<00:26:47.039> and<00:26:47.120> you 00:26:47.230 --> 00:26:47.240 align:start position:0% you're referring to something and you 00:26:47.240 --> 00:26:48.630 align:start position:0% you're referring to something and you don't<00:26:47.360> know<00:26:47.559> what<00:26:47.640> it<00:26:47.760> is<00:26:48.080> you<00:26:48.159> will<00:26:48.360> always 00:26:48.630 --> 00:26:48.640 align:start position:0% don't know what it is you will always 00:26:48.640 --> 00:26:50.909 align:start position:0% don't know what it is you will always say<00:26:49.039> kesto<00:26:49.760> indicating<00:26:50.279> what<00:26:50.399> is<00:26:50.600> this 00:26:50.909 --> 00:26:50.919 align:start position:0% say kesto indicating what is this 00:26:50.919 --> 00:26:52.310 align:start position:0% say kesto indicating what is this without<00:26:51.159> knowing<00:26:51.440> if<00:26:51.640> the<00:26:51.840> object<00:26:52.159> you're 00:26:52.310 --> 00:26:52.320 align:start position:0% without knowing if the object you're 00:26:52.320 --> 00:26:54.310 align:start position:0% without knowing if the object you're referring<00:26:52.720> to<00:26:53.000> is<00:26:53.240> masculine<00:26:53.679> or<00:26:53.840> feminine 00:26:54.310 --> 00:26:54.320 align:start position:0% referring to is masculine or feminine 00:26:54.320 --> 00:26:55.669 align:start position:0% referring to is masculine or feminine another<00:26:54.640> important<00:26:54.960> thing<00:26:55.120> to<00:26:55.240> note<00:26:55.480> with 00:26:55.669 --> 00:26:55.679 align:start position:0% another important thing to note with 00:26:55.679 --> 00:26:58.510 align:start position:0% another important thing to note with estar<00:26:56.159> is<00:26:56.279> that<00:26:56.399> the<00:26:56.559> pronouns<00:26:57.039> to<00:26:57.600> L<00:26:57.840> and<00:26:58.039> AOS 00:26:58.510 --> 00:26:58.520 align:start position:0% estar is that the pronouns to L and AOS 00:26:58.520 --> 00:27:00.630 align:start position:0% estar is that the pronouns to L and AOS all<00:26:58.720> have<00:26:59.039> accents<00:26:59.559> on<00:26:59.760> the<00:26:59.960> A<00:27:00.279> and<00:27:00.399> this<00:27:00.520> is 00:27:00.630 --> 00:27:00.640 align:start position:0% all have accents on the A and this is 00:27:00.640 --> 00:27:02.190 align:start position:0% all have accents on the A and this is also<00:27:00.840> done<00:27:01.039> on<00:27:01.240> purpose<00:27:01.679> because<00:27:01.880> if<00:27:01.960> you<00:27:02.039> were 00:27:02.190 --> 00:27:02.200 align:start position:0% also done on purpose because if you were 00:27:02.200 --> 00:27:03.669 align:start position:0% also done on purpose because if you were to<00:27:02.320> remove<00:27:02.640> the<00:27:02.799> accents<00:27:03.200> you<00:27:03.320> would<00:27:03.480> have 00:27:03.669 --> 00:27:03.679 align:start position:0% to remove the accents you would have 00:27:03.679 --> 00:27:05.710 align:start position:0% to remove the accents you would have different<00:27:03.960> words<00:27:04.440> these<00:27:04.640> words<00:27:05.080> pronounced 00:27:05.710 --> 00:27:05.720 align:start position:0% different words these words pronounced 00:27:05.720 --> 00:27:08.909 align:start position:0% different words these words pronounced estas<00:27:06.440> and<00:27:06.799> esta<00:27:07.399> mean<00:27:07.880> these<00:27:08.360> and<00:27:08.600> this 00:27:08.909 --> 00:27:08.919 align:start position:0% estas and esta mean these and this 00:27:08.919 --> 00:27:10.950 align:start position:0% estas and esta mean these and this feminine<00:27:09.440> but<00:27:09.640> with<00:27:09.760> the<00:27:10.000> accent<00:27:10.520> they<00:27:10.640> mean 00:27:10.950 --> 00:27:10.960 align:start position:0% feminine but with the accent they mean 00:27:10.960 --> 00:27:13.269 align:start position:0% feminine but with the accent they mean you<00:27:11.159> are<00:27:11.520> and<00:27:11.760> he<00:27:12.039> or<00:27:12.240> she<00:27:12.559> is<00:27:12.880> so<00:27:13.000> it's<00:27:13.120> really 00:27:13.269 --> 00:27:13.279 align:start position:0% you are and he or she is so it's really 00:27:13.279 --> 00:27:14.909 align:start position:0% you are and he or she is so it's really important<00:27:13.559> to<00:27:13.679> put<00:27:13.880> accents<00:27:14.240> on<00:27:14.399> them<00:27:14.640> and<00:27:14.760> put 00:27:14.909 --> 00:27:14.919 align:start position:0% important to put accents on them and put 00:27:14.919 --> 00:27:17.190 align:start position:0% important to put accents on them and put the<00:27:15.039> emphasis<00:27:15.480> on<00:27:15.640> the<00:27:15.840> a<00:27:16.279> as<00:27:16.440> always<00:27:16.840> try<00:27:17.039> not 00:27:17.190 --> 00:27:17.200 align:start position:0% the emphasis on the a as always try not 00:27:17.200 --> 00:27:18.710 align:start position:0% the emphasis on the a as always try not focusing<00:27:17.559> on<00:27:17.720> these<00:27:17.880> conjugations<00:27:18.520> because 00:27:18.710 --> 00:27:18.720 align:start position:0% focusing on these conjugations because 00:27:18.720 --> 00:27:20.230 align:start position:0% focusing on these conjugations because they're<00:27:18.880> not<00:27:19.080> used<00:27:19.399> as<00:27:19.559> often<00:27:19.840> as<00:27:19.960> the<00:27:20.080> other 00:27:20.230 --> 00:27:20.240 align:start position:0% they're not used as often as the other 00:27:20.240 --> 00:27:22.230 align:start position:0% they're not used as often as the other ones<00:27:20.480> in<00:27:20.640> conversation<00:27:21.399> now<00:27:21.799> the<00:27:21.960> most 00:27:22.230 --> 00:27:22.240 align:start position:0% ones in conversation now the most 00:27:22.240 --> 00:27:23.830 align:start position:0% ones in conversation now the most important<00:27:22.600> thing<00:27:22.799> to<00:27:22.919> note<00:27:23.240> about<00:27:23.399> the<00:27:23.520> verb 00:27:23.830 --> 00:27:23.840 align:start position:0% important thing to note about the verb 00:27:23.840 --> 00:27:25.630 align:start position:0% important thing to note about the verb estar<00:27:24.279> is<00:27:24.399> that<00:27:24.559> even<00:27:24.760> though<00:27:24.880> it<00:27:24.960> means<00:27:25.200> to<00:27:25.360> be 00:27:25.630 --> 00:27:25.640 align:start position:0% estar is that even though it means to be 00:27:25.640 --> 00:27:27.710 align:start position:0% estar is that even though it means to be as<00:27:25.760> in<00:27:25.960> being<00:27:26.440> its<00:27:26.600> uses<00:27:26.960> are<00:27:27.120> completely 00:27:27.710 --> 00:27:27.720 align:start position:0% as in being its uses are completely 00:27:27.720 --> 00:27:29.190 align:start position:0% as in being its uses are completely different<00:27:27.960> from<00:27:28.120> the<00:27:28.240> verb<00:27:28.520> s<00:27:28.960> which<00:27:29.080> I 00:27:29.190 --> 00:27:29.200 align:start position:0% different from the verb s which I 00:27:29.200 --> 00:27:30.669 align:start position:0% different from the verb s which I explained<00:27:29.520> in<00:27:29.640> one<00:27:29.720> of<00:27:29.840> my<00:27:29.960> previous<00:27:30.279> videos 00:27:30.669 --> 00:27:30.679 align:start position:0% explained in one of my previous videos 00:27:30.679 --> 00:27:32.590 align:start position:0% explained in one of my previous videos the<00:27:30.799> verb<00:27:31.080> estar<00:27:31.559> mainly<00:27:31.880> applies<00:27:32.240> to<00:27:32.440> these 00:27:32.590 --> 00:27:32.600 align:start position:0% the verb estar mainly applies to these 00:27:32.600 --> 00:27:34.909 align:start position:0% the verb estar mainly applies to these uses<00:27:33.080> the<00:27:33.240> present<00:27:33.520> progressive<00:27:34.200> location 00:27:34.909 --> 00:27:34.919 align:start position:0% uses the present progressive location 00:27:34.919 --> 00:27:36.710 align:start position:0% uses the present progressive location and<00:27:35.120> health<00:27:35.679> conditions<00:27:35.919> and<00:27:36.080> emotions 00:27:36.710 --> 00:27:36.720 align:start position:0% and health conditions and emotions 00:27:36.720 --> 00:27:38.269 align:start position:0% and health conditions and emotions number<00:27:36.960> one<00:27:37.320> the<00:27:37.440> present<00:27:37.720> progressive<00:27:38.200> the 00:27:38.269 --> 00:27:38.279 align:start position:0% number one the present progressive the 00:27:38.279 --> 00:27:39.470 align:start position:0% number one the present progressive the present<00:27:38.520> progressive<00:27:38.919> is<00:27:39.000> something<00:27:39.240> that<00:27:39.360> I 00:27:39.470 --> 00:27:39.480 align:start position:0% present progressive is something that I 00:27:39.480 --> 00:27:40.830 align:start position:0% present progressive is something that I explained<00:27:39.799> in<00:27:39.880> the<00:27:40.000> video<00:27:40.240> before<00:27:40.519> this<00:27:40.640> one 00:27:40.830 --> 00:27:40.840 align:start position:0% explained in the video before this one 00:27:40.840 --> 00:27:41.990 align:start position:0% explained in the video before this one so<00:27:40.960> you<00:27:41.039> should<00:27:41.200> be<00:27:41.360> familiar<00:27:41.760> with<00:27:41.880> the 00:27:41.990 --> 00:27:42.000 align:start position:0% so you should be familiar with the 00:27:42.000 --> 00:27:43.669 align:start position:0% so you should be familiar with the syntax<00:27:42.559> but<00:27:42.720> now<00:27:43.039> this<00:27:43.159> is<00:27:43.279> where<00:27:43.440> we<00:27:43.559> can 00:27:43.669 --> 00:27:43.679 align:start position:0% syntax but now this is where we can 00:27:43.679 --> 00:27:45.350 align:start position:0% syntax but now this is where we can start<00:27:43.880> using<00:27:44.200> the<00:27:44.320> conjugations<00:27:44.919> that<00:27:45.080> apply 00:27:45.350 --> 00:27:45.360 align:start position:0% start using the conjugations that apply 00:27:45.360 --> 00:27:47.190 align:start position:0% start using the conjugations that apply to<00:27:45.519> other<00:27:45.760> pronouns<00:27:46.320> for<00:27:46.519> instance<00:27:47.000> if<00:27:47.080> you 00:27:47.190 --> 00:27:47.200 align:start position:0% to other pronouns for instance if you 00:27:47.200 --> 00:27:48.830 align:start position:0% to other pronouns for instance if you want<00:27:47.279> to<00:27:47.440> say<00:27:47.600> that<00:27:47.799> he<00:27:48.000> is<00:27:48.159> running<00:27:48.600> you<00:27:48.679> would 00:27:48.830 --> 00:27:48.840 align:start position:0% want to say that he is running you would 00:27:48.840 --> 00:27:51.070 align:start position:0% want to say that he is running you would use<00:27:49.039> the<00:27:49.200> conjugated<00:27:49.720> verb<00:27:50.039> estar<00:27:50.480> for<00:27:50.679> the<00:27:50.840> he 00:27:51.070 --> 00:27:51.080 align:start position:0% use the conjugated verb estar for the he 00:27:51.080 --> 00:27:52.710 align:start position:0% use the conjugated verb estar for the he pronoun<00:27:51.600> which<00:27:51.760> would 00:27:52.710 --> 00:27:52.720 align:start position:0% pronoun which would 00:27:52.720 --> 00:27:55.269 align:start position:0% pronoun which would be<00:27:53.720> if<00:27:53.799> you<00:27:53.919> want<00:27:54.000> to<00:27:54.120> say<00:27:54.320> you<00:27:54.480> are<00:27:54.760> thinking 00:27:55.269 --> 00:27:55.279 align:start position:0% be if you want to say you are thinking 00:27:55.279 --> 00:27:58.549 align:start position:0% be if you want to say you are thinking you<00:27:55.360> would<00:27:55.559> say<00:27:56.039> to<00:27:56.519> EST<00:27:57.880> both<00:27:58.000> of<00:27:58.120> these<00:27:58.279> verbs 00:27:58.549 --> 00:27:58.559 align:start position:0% you would say to EST both of these verbs 00:27:58.559 --> 00:28:00.310 align:start position:0% you would say to EST both of these verbs are<00:27:58.840> actions<00:27:59.200> that<00:27:59.320> are<00:27:59.480> happening<00:27:59.880> right<00:28:00.039> now 00:28:00.310 --> 00:28:00.320 align:start position:0% are actions that are happening right now 00:28:00.320 --> 00:28:02.269 align:start position:0% are actions that are happening right now which<00:28:00.480> explains<00:28:00.880> why<00:28:01.000> the<00:28:01.120> verb<00:28:01.399> EST<00:28:01.880> is<00:28:01.960> used 00:28:02.269 --> 00:28:02.279 align:start position:0% which explains why the verb EST is used 00:28:02.279 --> 00:28:03.710 align:start position:0% which explains why the verb EST is used here<00:28:02.480> and<00:28:02.559> the<00:28:02.679> same<00:28:02.880> principle<00:28:03.279> applies<00:28:03.559> to 00:28:03.710 --> 00:28:03.720 align:start position:0% here and the same principle applies to 00:28:03.720 --> 00:28:05.190 align:start position:0% here and the same principle applies to any<00:28:03.919> pronoun<00:28:04.360> and<00:28:04.519> verb<00:28:04.760> that<00:28:04.840> you<00:28:04.919> want<00:28:05.039> to 00:28:05.190 --> 00:28:05.200 align:start position:0% any pronoun and verb that you want to 00:28:05.200 --> 00:28:06.830 align:start position:0% any pronoun and verb that you want to use<00:28:05.480> in<00:28:05.559> the<00:28:05.679> present<00:28:05.919> progressive<00:28:06.559> number 00:28:06.830 --> 00:28:06.840 align:start position:0% use in the present progressive number 00:28:06.840 --> 00:28:08.630 align:start position:0% use in the present progressive number two<00:28:07.240> location<00:28:07.760> and<00:28:07.880> whenever<00:28:08.159> I<00:28:08.279> speak<00:28:08.480> of 00:28:08.630 --> 00:28:08.640 align:start position:0% two location and whenever I speak of 00:28:08.640 --> 00:28:10.110 align:start position:0% two location and whenever I speak of location<00:28:09.159> I<00:28:09.279> speak<00:28:09.480> of<00:28:09.640> spatial 00:28:10.110 --> 00:28:10.120 align:start position:0% location I speak of spatial 00:28:10.120 --> 00:28:11.750 align:start position:0% location I speak of spatial relationships<00:28:11.000> relative<00:28:11.360> to<00:28:11.559> where 00:28:11.750 --> 00:28:11.760 align:start position:0% relationships relative to where 00:28:11.760 --> 00:28:13.630 align:start position:0% relationships relative to where something<00:28:12.240> or<00:28:12.440> someone<00:28:12.840> is<00:28:13.120> as<00:28:13.240> of<00:28:13.480> this 00:28:13.630 --> 00:28:13.640 align:start position:0% something or someone is as of this 00:28:13.640 --> 00:28:15.230 align:start position:0% something or someone is as of this moment<00:28:14.039> you<00:28:14.159> might<00:28:14.320> have<00:28:14.440> heard<00:28:14.600> the<00:28:14.760> saying 00:28:15.230 --> 00:28:15.240 align:start position:0% moment you might have heard the saying 00:28:15.240 --> 00:28:17.470 align:start position:0% moment you might have heard the saying don't<00:28:15.679> EST<00:28:16.440> which<00:28:16.559> means<00:28:16.880> where<00:28:17.039> are<00:28:17.200> you<00:28:17.399> the 00:28:17.470 --> 00:28:17.480 align:start position:0% don't EST which means where are you the 00:28:17.480 --> 00:28:19.509 align:start position:0% don't EST which means where are you the reason<00:28:17.720> why<00:28:17.840> the<00:28:17.960> verb<00:28:18.240> EST<00:28:18.640> is<00:28:18.760> used<00:28:19.080> here<00:28:19.360> is 00:28:19.509 --> 00:28:19.519 align:start position:0% reason why the verb EST is used here is 00:28:19.519 --> 00:28:21.230 align:start position:0% reason why the verb EST is used here is because<00:28:19.720> the<00:28:19.840> question<00:28:20.200> is<00:28:20.440> asking<00:28:20.799> where<00:28:21.000> one 00:28:21.230 --> 00:28:21.240 align:start position:0% because the question is asking where one 00:28:21.240 --> 00:28:22.590 align:start position:0% because the question is asking where one is<00:28:21.480> right<00:28:21.679> now<00:28:21.880> and<00:28:22.000> if<00:28:22.080> you're<00:28:22.200> answering 00:28:22.590 --> 00:28:22.600 align:start position:0% is right now and if you're answering 00:28:22.600 --> 00:28:24.149 align:start position:0% is right now and if you're answering this<00:28:22.799> question<00:28:23.200> you<00:28:23.279> will<00:28:23.480> likewise<00:28:23.840> use<00:28:24.039> the 00:28:24.149 --> 00:28:24.159 align:start position:0% this question you will likewise use the 00:28:24.159 --> 00:28:26.269 align:start position:0% this question you will likewise use the verb<00:28:24.440> estar<00:28:24.919> by<00:28:25.039> saying<00:28:25.519> yo<00:28:25.720> esto<00:28:26.159> in 00:28:26.269 --> 00:28:26.279 align:start position:0% verb estar by saying yo esto in 00:28:26.279 --> 00:28:27.710 align:start position:0% verb estar by saying yo esto in whichever<00:28:26.600> location<00:28:26.919> you<00:28:27.000> want<00:28:27.080> to<00:28:27.200> say<00:28:27.480> using 00:28:27.710 --> 00:28:27.720 align:start position:0% whichever location you want to say using 00:28:27.720 --> 00:28:29.950 align:start position:0% whichever location you want to say using location<00:28:28.159> with<00:28:28.360> a<00:28:28.840> can<00:28:29.000> also<00:28:29.279> indicate<00:28:29.720> where 00:28:29.950 --> 00:28:29.960 align:start position:0% location with a can also indicate where 00:28:29.960 --> 00:28:31.830 align:start position:0% location with a can also indicate where something<00:28:30.399> or<00:28:30.600> someone<00:28:30.960> is<00:28:31.240> relative<00:28:31.559> to<00:28:31.679> a 00:28:31.830 --> 00:28:31.840 align:start position:0% something or someone is relative to a 00:28:31.840 --> 00:28:34.310 align:start position:0% something or someone is relative to a different<00:28:32.159> object<00:28:32.600> when<00:28:32.799> asking<00:28:33.159> don't<00:28:33.559> EST 00:28:34.310 --> 00:28:34.320 align:start position:0% different object when asking don't EST 00:28:34.320 --> 00:28:36.389 align:start position:0% different object when asking don't EST you<00:28:34.399> can<00:28:34.600> also<00:28:34.799> reply 00:28:36.389 --> 00:28:36.399 align:start position:0% you can also reply 00:28:36.399 --> 00:28:38.870 align:start position:0% you can also reply with<00:28:37.399> which<00:28:37.519> would<00:28:37.640> mean<00:28:38.000> I<00:28:38.120> am<00:28:38.360> next<00:28:38.559> to<00:28:38.720> the 00:28:38.870 --> 00:28:38.880 align:start position:0% with which would mean I am next to the 00:28:38.880 --> 00:28:40.990 align:start position:0% with which would mean I am next to the house<00:28:39.200> or<00:28:39.399> to<00:28:39.640> the<00:28:39.840> next<00:28:40.120> of<00:28:40.320> the<00:28:40.480> house<00:28:40.880> and 00:28:40.990 --> 00:28:41.000 align:start position:0% house or to the next of the house and 00:28:41.000 --> 00:28:42.789 align:start position:0% house or to the next of the house and the<00:28:41.080> reason<00:28:41.360> why<00:28:41.600> St<00:28:41.919> is<00:28:42.080> used<00:28:42.399> here<00:28:42.640> is 00:28:42.789 --> 00:28:42.799 align:start position:0% the reason why St is used here is 00:28:42.799 --> 00:28:44.630 align:start position:0% the reason why St is used here is because<00:28:43.000> it<00:28:43.120> uses<00:28:43.480> a<00:28:43.640> location<00:28:44.120> in<00:28:44.279> relation 00:28:44.630 --> 00:28:44.640 align:start position:0% because it uses a location in relation 00:28:44.640 --> 00:28:46.269 align:start position:0% because it uses a location in relation to<00:28:44.799> something<00:28:45.080> else<00:28:45.480> the<00:28:45.600> same<00:28:45.799> principle 00:28:46.269 --> 00:28:46.279 align:start position:0% to something else the same principle 00:28:46.279 --> 00:28:48.190 align:start position:0% to something else the same principle applies<00:28:46.559> to<00:28:46.720> any<00:28:46.919> pronoun<00:28:47.440> verb<00:28:47.720> and<00:28:47.880> location 00:28:48.190 --> 00:28:48.200 align:start position:0% applies to any pronoun verb and location 00:28:48.200 --> 00:28:49.830 align:start position:0% applies to any pronoun verb and location you<00:28:48.320> want<00:28:48.440> to<00:28:48.559> use<00:28:48.880> and<00:28:48.960> the<00:28:49.120> last<00:28:49.320> usage<00:28:49.679> to 00:28:49.830 --> 00:28:49.840 align:start position:0% you want to use and the last usage to 00:28:49.840 --> 00:28:51.870 align:start position:0% you want to use and the last usage to know<00:28:50.039> what<00:28:50.159> the<00:28:50.240> verb<00:28:50.519> estar<00:28:51.039> is<00:28:51.200> health 00:28:51.870 --> 00:28:51.880 align:start position:0% know what the verb estar is health 00:28:51.880 --> 00:28:53.310 align:start position:0% know what the verb estar is health conditions<00:28:52.159> and<00:28:52.320> emotions<00:28:52.799> and<00:28:52.919> this<00:28:53.039> is<00:28:53.200> by 00:28:53.310 --> 00:28:53.320 align:start position:0% conditions and emotions and this is by 00:28:53.320 --> 00:28:55.269 align:start position:0% conditions and emotions and this is by far<00:28:53.519> the<00:28:53.640> trickiest<00:28:54.080> use<00:28:54.320> of<00:28:54.440> the<00:28:54.559> verb<00:28:54.799> estar 00:28:55.269 --> 00:28:55.279 align:start position:0% far the trickiest use of the verb estar 00:28:55.279 --> 00:28:56.669 align:start position:0% far the trickiest use of the verb estar because<00:28:55.440> it's<00:28:55.600> the<00:28:55.720> number<00:28:55.960> one<00:28:56.200> concept<00:28:56.559> that 00:28:56.669 --> 00:28:56.679 align:start position:0% because it's the number one concept that 00:28:56.679 --> 00:28:57.669 align:start position:0% because it's the number one concept that most<00:28:56.840> students<00:28:57.080> struggle<00:28:57.320> with<00:28:57.519> with 00:28:57.669 --> 00:28:57.679 align:start position:0% most students struggle with with 00:28:57.679 --> 00:28:59.110 align:start position:0% most students struggle with with whenever<00:28:57.960> I<00:28:58.080> refer<00:28:58.360> to<00:28:58.679> conditions<00:28:58.960> and 00:28:59.110 --> 00:28:59.120 align:start position:0% whenever I refer to conditions and 00:28:59.120 --> 00:29:01.029 align:start position:0% whenever I refer to conditions and emotions<00:28:59.679> I'm<00:28:59.840> talking<00:29:00.120> about<00:29:00.440> adjectives 00:29:01.029 --> 00:29:01.039 align:start position:0% emotions I'm talking about adjectives 00:29:01.039 --> 00:29:02.909 align:start position:0% emotions I'm talking about adjectives that<00:29:01.200> people<00:29:01.480> use<00:29:01.840> to<00:29:02.000> refer<00:29:02.279> to<00:29:02.519> something 00:29:02.909 --> 00:29:02.919 align:start position:0% that people use to refer to something 00:29:02.919 --> 00:29:04.990 align:start position:0% that people use to refer to something that<00:29:03.080> they<00:29:03.240> feel<00:29:03.720> right<00:29:03.880> now<00:29:04.240> and<00:29:04.480> not<00:29:04.840> a 00:29:04.990 --> 00:29:05.000 align:start position:0% that they feel right now and not a 00:29:05.000 --> 00:29:06.430 align:start position:0% that they feel right now and not a physical<00:29:05.399> trait<00:29:05.720> you<00:29:05.840> might<00:29:06.039> remember<00:29:06.320> me 00:29:06.430 --> 00:29:06.440 align:start position:0% physical trait you might remember me 00:29:06.440 --> 00:29:08.029 align:start position:0% physical trait you might remember me saying<00:29:06.679> that<00:29:06.799> the<00:29:06.919> verb<00:29:07.120> said<00:29:07.480> is<00:29:07.600> used<00:29:07.840> for 00:29:08.029 --> 00:29:08.039 align:start position:0% saying that the verb said is used for 00:29:08.039 --> 00:29:09.870 align:start position:0% saying that the verb said is used for physical<00:29:08.360> traits<00:29:08.760> and<00:29:08.960> while<00:29:09.240> that's<00:29:09.480> true 00:29:09.870 --> 00:29:09.880 align:start position:0% physical traits and while that's true 00:29:09.880 --> 00:29:11.430 align:start position:0% physical traits and while that's true the<00:29:10.120> conditions<00:29:10.320> and<00:29:10.480> emotions<00:29:10.880> of<00:29:11.080> people 00:29:11.430 --> 00:29:11.440 align:start position:0% the conditions and emotions of people 00:29:11.440 --> 00:29:13.710 align:start position:0% the conditions and emotions of people and<00:29:11.760> sometimes<00:29:12.120> objects<00:29:12.679> primarily<00:29:13.120> refer<00:29:13.519> to 00:29:13.710 --> 00:29:13.720 align:start position:0% and sometimes objects primarily refer to 00:29:13.720 --> 00:29:15.350 align:start position:0% and sometimes objects primarily refer to something<00:29:14.039> that<00:29:14.200> somebody<00:29:14.519> feels<00:29:15.120> rather 00:29:15.350 --> 00:29:15.360 align:start position:0% something that somebody feels rather 00:29:15.360 --> 00:29:16.909 align:start position:0% something that somebody feels rather than<00:29:15.519> being<00:29:15.760> a<00:29:15.919> factual<00:29:16.279> statement<00:29:16.720> looking 00:29:16.909 --> 00:29:16.919 align:start position:0% than being a factual statement looking 00:29:16.919 --> 00:29:19.350 align:start position:0% than being a factual statement looking at<00:29:17.080> this<00:29:17.279> example<00:29:17.880> both<00:29:18.120> the<00:29:18.240> words<00:29:18.640> Alto<00:29:19.159> and 00:29:19.350 --> 00:29:19.360 align:start position:0% at this example both the words Alto and 00:29:19.360 --> 00:29:21.190 align:start position:0% at this example both the words Alto and Feliz<00:29:19.840> are<00:29:20.080> adjectives<00:29:20.640> but<00:29:20.799> one<00:29:20.919> is<00:29:21.039> a 00:29:21.190 --> 00:29:21.200 align:start position:0% Feliz are adjectives but one is a 00:29:21.200 --> 00:29:22.710 align:start position:0% Feliz are adjectives but one is a factual<00:29:21.519> and<00:29:21.679> physical<00:29:22.000> trait<00:29:22.440> while<00:29:22.600> the 00:29:22.710 --> 00:29:22.720 align:start position:0% factual and physical trait while the 00:29:22.720 --> 00:29:24.430 align:start position:0% factual and physical trait while the other<00:29:22.919> is<00:29:23.039> an<00:29:23.200> emotion<00:29:23.640> that<00:29:23.760> changes<00:29:24.159> over 00:29:24.430 --> 00:29:24.440 align:start position:0% other is an emotion that changes over 00:29:24.440 --> 00:29:26.350 align:start position:0% other is an emotion that changes over time<00:29:24.840> while<00:29:25.039> the<00:29:25.159> verb<00:29:25.399> said<00:29:25.840> refers<00:29:26.120> to 00:29:26.350 --> 00:29:26.360 align:start position:0% time while the verb said refers to 00:29:26.360 --> 00:29:27.669 align:start position:0% time while the verb said refers to factual<00:29:26.679> statements<00:29:27.159> part<00:29:27.480> of<00:29:27.559> which 00:29:27.669 --> 00:29:27.679 align:start position:0% factual statements part of which 00:29:27.679 --> 00:29:28.950 align:start position:0% factual statements part of which includes<00:29:28.039> physical<00:29:28.320> traits<00:29:28.679> which<00:29:28.760> are 00:29:28.950 --> 00:29:28.960 align:start position:0% includes physical traits which are 00:29:28.960 --> 00:29:30.870 align:start position:0% includes physical traits which are factual<00:29:29.320> about<00:29:29.559> oneself<00:29:30.159> the<00:29:30.320> adjective<00:29:30.720> is 00:29:30.870 --> 00:29:30.880 align:start position:0% factual about oneself the adjective is 00:29:30.880 --> 00:29:33.070 align:start position:0% factual about oneself the adjective is using<00:29:31.200> the<00:29:31.360> conjugation<00:29:31.960> s<00:29:32.440> because<00:29:32.679> the<00:29:32.799> verb 00:29:33.070 --> 00:29:33.080 align:start position:0% using the conjugation s because the verb 00:29:33.080 --> 00:29:35.509 align:start position:0% using the conjugation s because the verb said<00:29:33.480> refers<00:29:33.799> to<00:29:34.039> factual<00:29:34.399> statements<00:29:35.000> LS 00:29:35.509 --> 00:29:35.519 align:start position:0% said refers to factual statements LS 00:29:35.519 --> 00:29:37.909 align:start position:0% said refers to factual statements LS Alto<00:29:36.080> he<00:29:36.240> is<00:29:36.480> tall<00:29:36.880> is<00:29:36.960> a<00:29:37.120> factual<00:29:37.480> statement 00:29:37.909 --> 00:29:37.919 align:start position:0% Alto he is tall is a factual statement 00:29:37.919 --> 00:29:39.509 align:start position:0% Alto he is tall is a factual statement because<00:29:38.120> you<00:29:38.200> cannot<00:29:38.440> change<00:29:38.799> that<00:29:39.000> fact 00:29:39.509 --> 00:29:39.519 align:start position:0% because you cannot change that fact 00:29:39.519 --> 00:29:40.630 align:start position:0% because you cannot change that fact however<00:29:39.799> once<00:29:39.919> you<00:29:40.039> start<00:29:40.240> including 00:29:40.630 --> 00:29:40.640 align:start position:0% however once you start including 00:29:40.640 --> 00:29:42.029 align:start position:0% however once you start including emotions<00:29:41.200> this<00:29:41.279> is<00:29:41.440> where<00:29:41.559> you<00:29:41.640> need<00:29:41.799> to<00:29:41.919> have 00:29:42.029 --> 00:29:42.039 align:start position:0% emotions this is where you need to have 00:29:42.039 --> 00:29:43.549 align:start position:0% emotions this is where you need to have a<00:29:42.200> different<00:29:42.440> sense<00:29:42.640> of<00:29:42.799> being<00:29:43.200> because<00:29:43.480> by 00:29:43.549 --> 00:29:43.559 align:start position:0% a different sense of being because by 00:29:43.559 --> 00:29:46.430 align:start position:0% a different sense of being because by saying<00:29:44.039> yiz<00:29:45.039> I<00:29:45.120> am<00:29:45.320> happy<00:29:45.799> I'm<00:29:45.919> indicating 00:29:46.430 --> 00:29:46.440 align:start position:0% saying yiz I am happy I'm indicating 00:29:46.440 --> 00:29:48.070 align:start position:0% saying yiz I am happy I'm indicating that<00:29:46.559> I'm<00:29:46.760> feeling<00:29:47.200> happy<00:29:47.640> and<00:29:47.760> that<00:29:47.919> my 00:29:48.070 --> 00:29:48.080 align:start position:0% that I'm feeling happy and that my 00:29:48.080 --> 00:29:49.909 align:start position:0% that I'm feeling happy and that my feeling<00:29:48.440> will<00:29:48.640> change<00:29:48.919> in<00:29:49.120> time<00:29:49.519> rather<00:29:49.760> than 00:29:49.909 --> 00:29:49.919 align:start position:0% feeling will change in time rather than 00:29:49.919 --> 00:29:51.389 align:start position:0% feeling will change in time rather than this<00:29:50.039> being<00:29:50.200> a<00:29:50.360> factual<00:29:50.640> statement<00:29:51.039> about<00:29:51.240> me 00:29:51.389 --> 00:29:51.399 align:start position:0% this being a factual statement about me 00:29:51.399 --> 00:29:53.070 align:start position:0% this being a factual statement about me if<00:29:51.480> you<00:29:51.559> were<00:29:51.720> to<00:29:51.840> switch<00:29:52.159> them<00:29:52.399> and 00:29:53.070 --> 00:29:53.080 align:start position:0% if you were to switch them and 00:29:53.080 --> 00:29:56.029 align:start position:0% if you were to switch them and say<00:29:54.159> and<00:29:55.159> this<00:29:55.240> is<00:29:55.360> where<00:29:55.480> the<00:29:55.600> meaning<00:29:55.840> in 00:29:56.029 --> 00:29:56.039 align:start position:0% say and this is where the meaning in 00:29:56.039 --> 00:29:57.710 align:start position:0% say and this is where the meaning in both<00:29:56.200> sentences<00:29:56.760> completely<00:29:57.080> Chang<00:29:57.320> changes 00:29:57.710 --> 00:29:57.720 align:start position:0% both sentences completely Chang changes 00:29:57.720 --> 00:30:00.070 align:start position:0% both sentences completely Chang changes by<00:29:57.840> saying<00:29:58.799> Alto<00:29:59.240> you're<00:29:59.440> basically<00:29:59.799> saying 00:30:00.070 --> 00:30:00.080 align:start position:0% by saying Alto you're basically saying 00:30:00.080 --> 00:30:02.149 align:start position:0% by saying Alto you're basically saying that<00:30:00.240> he<00:30:00.399> is<00:30:00.559> feeling<00:30:01.000> tall<00:30:01.480> rather<00:30:01.720> than<00:30:01.919> him 00:30:02.149 --> 00:30:02.159 align:start position:0% that he is feeling tall rather than him 00:30:02.159 --> 00:30:03.710 align:start position:0% that he is feeling tall rather than him factually<00:30:02.600> being<00:30:02.840> tall<00:30:03.200> which<00:30:03.279> would<00:30:03.440> be<00:30:03.559> an 00:30:03.710 --> 00:30:03.720 align:start position:0% factually being tall which would be an 00:30:03.720 --> 00:30:05.630 align:start position:0% factually being tall which would be an incorrect<00:30:04.200> use<00:30:04.440> of<00:30:04.559> the<00:30:04.640> verb<00:30:04.919> EST<00:30:05.440> because 00:30:05.630 --> 00:30:05.640 align:start position:0% incorrect use of the verb EST because 00:30:05.640 --> 00:30:07.549 align:start position:0% incorrect use of the verb EST because the<00:30:05.760> verb<00:30:06.080> estar<00:30:06.559> refers<00:30:06.840> to<00:30:07.159> conditions<00:30:07.399> and 00:30:07.549 --> 00:30:07.559 align:start position:0% the verb estar refers to conditions and 00:30:07.559 --> 00:30:09.669 align:start position:0% the verb estar refers to conditions and emotions<00:30:08.039> that<00:30:08.240> actively<00:30:08.600> change<00:30:09.000> over<00:30:09.240> time 00:30:09.669 --> 00:30:09.679 align:start position:0% emotions that actively change over time 00:30:09.679 --> 00:30:11.710 align:start position:0% emotions that actively change over time Alto<00:30:10.120> means<00:30:10.399> tall<00:30:10.679> and<00:30:10.880> masculine<00:30:11.519> which<00:30:11.640> is 00:30:11.710 --> 00:30:11.720 align:start position:0% Alto means tall and masculine which is 00:30:11.720 --> 00:30:13.389 align:start position:0% Alto means tall and masculine which is an<00:30:11.919> adjective<00:30:12.320> that<00:30:12.440> refers<00:30:12.720> to<00:30:12.840> a<00:30:12.960> physical 00:30:13.389 --> 00:30:13.399 align:start position:0% an adjective that refers to a physical 00:30:13.399 --> 00:30:15.430 align:start position:0% an adjective that refers to a physical and<00:30:13.600> factual<00:30:14.000> trait<00:30:14.399> about<00:30:14.679> oneself<00:30:15.240> rather 00:30:15.430 --> 00:30:15.440 align:start position:0% and factual trait about oneself rather 00:30:15.440 --> 00:30:17.509 align:start position:0% and factual trait about oneself rather than<00:30:15.559> a<00:30:15.679> Feeling<00:30:16.080> by<00:30:16.159> saying<00:30:16.480> y<00:30:16.919> fiz<00:30:17.399> I'm 00:30:17.509 --> 00:30:17.519 align:start position:0% than a Feeling by saying y fiz I'm 00:30:17.519 --> 00:30:19.590 align:start position:0% than a Feeling by saying y fiz I'm saying<00:30:17.840> that<00:30:18.039> I<00:30:18.120> am<00:30:18.360> happy<00:30:18.799> as<00:30:18.919> in<00:30:19.200> I<00:30:19.279> am<00:30:19.399> a 00:30:19.590 --> 00:30:19.600 align:start position:0% saying that I am happy as in I am a 00:30:19.600 --> 00:30:21.750 align:start position:0% saying that I am happy as in I am a happy<00:30:19.919> person<00:30:20.279> in<00:30:20.440> general<00:30:20.840> I<00:30:20.919> was<00:30:21.039> born<00:30:21.399> happy 00:30:21.750 --> 00:30:21.760 align:start position:0% happy person in general I was born happy 00:30:21.760 --> 00:30:23.789 align:start position:0% happy person in general I was born happy I'm<00:30:21.960> happy<00:30:22.240> now<00:30:22.559> and<00:30:22.679> I<00:30:22.799> will<00:30:23.000> die<00:30:23.240> happy<00:30:23.679> all 00:30:23.789 --> 00:30:23.799 align:start position:0% I'm happy now and I will die happy all 00:30:23.799 --> 00:30:25.669 align:start position:0% I'm happy now and I will die happy all of<00:30:23.960> this<00:30:24.120> being<00:30:24.320> a<00:30:24.480> false<00:30:24.799> statement<00:30:25.399> because 00:30:25.669 --> 00:30:25.679 align:start position:0% of this being a false statement because 00:30:25.679 --> 00:30:27.430 align:start position:0% of this being a false statement because happiness<00:30:26.080> is<00:30:26.159> a<00:30:26.279> feeling<00:30:26.559> that<00:30:26.679> changes<00:30:26.960> over 00:30:27.430 --> 00:30:27.440 align:start position:0% happiness is a feeling that changes over 00:30:27.440 --> 00:30:29.110 align:start position:0% happiness is a feeling that changes over time<00:30:27.679> it<00:30:27.799> doesn't<00:30:28.080> allow<00:30:28.320> the<00:30:28.440> verb<00:30:28.679> said<00:30:29.000> to 00:30:29.110 --> 00:30:29.120 align:start position:0% time it doesn't allow the verb said to 00:30:29.120 --> 00:30:30.750 align:start position:0% time it doesn't allow the verb said to be<00:30:29.240> used<00:30:29.559> here<00:30:29.799> so<00:30:29.960> instead<00:30:30.399> you<00:30:30.519> would<00:30:30.640> want 00:30:30.750 --> 00:30:30.760 align:start position:0% be used here so instead you would want 00:30:30.760 --> 00:30:32.110 align:start position:0% be used here so instead you would want to<00:30:30.919> look<00:30:31.080> carefully<00:30:31.519> at<00:30:31.640> the<00:30:31.799> difference 00:30:32.110 --> 00:30:32.120 align:start position:0% to look carefully at the difference 00:30:32.120 --> 00:30:33.710 align:start position:0% to look carefully at the difference between<00:30:32.440> physical<00:30:32.840> and<00:30:33.000> factual<00:30:33.360> traits 00:30:33.710 --> 00:30:33.720 align:start position:0% between physical and factual traits 00:30:33.720 --> 00:30:35.149 align:start position:0% between physical and factual traits about<00:30:33.960> oneself<00:30:34.519> and<00:30:34.799> conditions<00:30:35.000> and 00:30:35.149 --> 00:30:35.159 align:start position:0% about oneself and conditions and 00:30:35.159 --> 00:30:36.909 align:start position:0% about oneself and conditions and emotions<00:30:35.559> that<00:30:35.720> change<00:30:36.000> over<00:30:36.279> time<00:30:36.559> and<00:30:36.640> with 00:30:36.909 --> 00:30:36.919 align:start position:0% emotions that change over time and with 00:30:36.919 --> 00:30:38.470 align:start position:0% emotions that change over time and with conditions<00:30:37.159> and<00:30:37.320> emotions<00:30:37.840> you<00:30:37.960> might<00:30:38.159> find 00:30:38.470 --> 00:30:38.480 align:start position:0% conditions and emotions you might find 00:30:38.480 --> 00:30:40.149 align:start position:0% conditions and emotions you might find these<00:30:38.679> phrases<00:30:39.080> and<00:30:39.240> adjectives<00:30:39.760> to<00:30:39.880> be<00:30:40.039> the 00:30:40.149 --> 00:30:40.159 align:start position:0% these phrases and adjectives to be the 00:30:40.159 --> 00:30:42.350 align:start position:0% these phrases and adjectives to be the most<00:30:40.399> practical<00:30:40.919> and<00:30:41.039> 99%<00:30:41.679> of<00:30:41.799> the<00:30:41.960> time<00:30:42.240> they 00:30:42.350 --> 00:30:42.360 align:start position:0% most practical and 99% of the time they 00:30:42.360 --> 00:30:44.029 align:start position:0% most practical and 99% of the time they all<00:30:42.480> use<00:30:42.679> the<00:30:42.799> verb<00:30:43.039> estar<00:30:43.519> because<00:30:43.760> all<00:30:43.880> of 00:30:44.029 --> 00:30:44.039 align:start position:0% all use the verb estar because all of 00:30:44.039 --> 00:30:45.430 align:start position:0% all use the verb estar because all of these<00:30:44.360> conditions<00:30:44.640> are<00:30:44.840> emotions<00:30:45.320> that 00:30:45.430 --> 00:30:45.440 align:start position:0% these conditions are emotions that 00:30:45.440 --> 00:30:47.190 align:start position:0% these conditions are emotions that change<00:30:45.799> over<00:30:46.080> time<00:30:46.399> and<00:30:46.519> don't<00:30:46.919> remain 00:30:47.190 --> 00:30:47.200 align:start position:0% change over time and don't remain 00:30:47.200 --> 00:30:49.990 align:start position:0% change over time and don't remain factual<00:30:47.720> I<00:30:47.840> am<00:30:48.080> good<00:30:48.519> esto<00:30:48.919> BN<00:30:49.440> indicates<00:30:49.880> that 00:30:49.990 --> 00:30:50.000 align:start position:0% factual I am good esto BN indicates that 00:30:50.000 --> 00:30:51.870 align:start position:0% factual I am good esto BN indicates that I'm<00:30:50.159> feeling<00:30:50.559> good<00:30:50.960> rather<00:30:51.200> than<00:30:51.360> me<00:30:51.559> being<00:30:51.760> a 00:30:51.870 --> 00:30:51.880 align:start position:0% I'm feeling good rather than me being a 00:30:51.880 --> 00:30:53.830 align:start position:0% I'm feeling good rather than me being a good<00:30:52.080> person<00:30:52.320> in<00:30:52.440> general<00:30:52.919> you<00:30:53.080> are<00:30:53.360> busy 00:30:53.830 --> 00:30:53.840 align:start position:0% good person in general you are busy 00:30:53.840 --> 00:30:56.310 align:start position:0% good person in general you are busy estas<00:30:54.440> okup<00:30:55.159> indicates<00:30:55.559> that<00:30:55.679> you<00:30:55.760> are<00:30:55.960> busy 00:30:56.310 --> 00:30:56.320 align:start position:0% estas okup indicates that you are busy 00:30:56.320 --> 00:30:57.710 align:start position:0% estas okup indicates that you are busy as<00:30:56.440> of<00:30:56.639> this<00:30:56.760> moment<00:30:57.039> and<00:30:57.240> you<00:30:57.320> will<00:30:57.440> not<00:30:57.600> be 00:30:57.710 --> 00:30:57.720 align:start position:0% as of this moment and you will not be 00:30:57.720 --> 00:30:59.350 align:start position:0% as of this moment and you will not be busy<00:30:58.039> in<00:30:58.120> the<00:30:58.240> future<00:30:58.720> which<00:30:58.840> doesn't<00:30:59.120> allow 00:30:59.350 --> 00:30:59.360 align:start position:0% busy in the future which doesn't allow 00:30:59.360 --> 00:31:00.950 align:start position:0% busy in the future which doesn't allow the<00:30:59.480> statement<00:30:59.799> to<00:30:59.919> be<00:31:00.080> factual<00:31:00.480> about<00:31:00.679> you 00:31:00.950 --> 00:31:00.960 align:start position:0% the statement to be factual about you 00:31:00.960 --> 00:31:04.870 align:start position:0% the statement to be factual about you hence<00:31:01.320> EST<00:31:01.799> is<00:31:01.960> used<00:31:02.399> the<00:31:02.519> doors<00:31:02.760> are 00:31:04.870 --> 00:31:04.880 align:start position:0% hence EST is used the doors are 00:31:04.880 --> 00:31:07.190 align:start position:0% hence EST is used the doors are open<00:31:05.880> this<00:31:06.000> means<00:31:06.240> that<00:31:06.360> the<00:31:06.480> doors<00:31:06.679> are<00:31:06.880> open 00:31:07.190 --> 00:31:07.200 align:start position:0% open this means that the doors are open 00:31:07.200 --> 00:31:08.629 align:start position:0% open this means that the doors are open now<00:31:07.480> but<00:31:07.600> the<00:31:07.720> recondition<00:31:08.200> will<00:31:08.360> probably 00:31:08.629 --> 00:31:08.639 align:start position:0% now but the recondition will probably 00:31:08.639 --> 00:31:10.190 align:start position:0% now but the recondition will probably change<00:31:08.840> in<00:31:08.960> the<00:31:09.080> future<00:31:09.480> and<00:31:09.639> also<00:31:09.960> you<00:31:10.080> might 00:31:10.190 --> 00:31:10.200 align:start position:0% change in the future and also you might 00:31:10.200 --> 00:31:11.430 align:start position:0% change in the future and also you might have<00:31:10.320> noticed<00:31:10.639> that<00:31:10.720> the<00:31:10.799> ending<00:31:11.039> of<00:31:11.200> some<00:31:11.320> of 00:31:11.430 --> 00:31:11.440 align:start position:0% have noticed that the ending of some of 00:31:11.440 --> 00:31:13.750 align:start position:0% have noticed that the ending of some of these<00:31:11.639> adjectives<00:31:12.120> end<00:31:12.320> in<00:31:12.519> o<00:31:12.880> or<00:31:13.200> as<00:31:13.559> and<00:31:13.679> that 00:31:13.750 --> 00:31:13.760 align:start position:0% these adjectives end in o or as and that 00:31:13.760 --> 00:31:15.269 align:start position:0% these adjectives end in o or as and that is<00:31:13.919> because<00:31:14.240> adjectives<00:31:14.639> in<00:31:14.760> Spanish<00:31:15.159> have 00:31:15.269 --> 00:31:15.279 align:start position:0% is because adjectives in Spanish have 00:31:15.279 --> 00:31:17.029 align:start position:0% is because adjectives in Spanish have gender<00:31:15.600> and<00:31:15.760> plurality<00:31:16.360> and<00:31:16.480> as<00:31:16.600> a<00:31:16.720> matter<00:31:16.919> of 00:31:17.029 --> 00:31:17.039 align:start position:0% gender and plurality and as a matter of 00:31:17.039 --> 00:31:18.430 align:start position:0% gender and plurality and as a matter of fact<00:31:17.279> I<00:31:17.360> will<00:31:17.519> describe<00:31:17.840> the<00:31:17.960> concept<00:31:18.279> of 00:31:18.430 --> 00:31:18.440 align:start position:0% fact I will describe the concept of 00:31:18.440 --> 00:31:20.110 align:start position:0% fact I will describe the concept of adjectives<00:31:18.880> in<00:31:19.000> the<00:31:19.120> video<00:31:19.399> after<00:31:19.639> this<00:31:19.760> one 00:31:20.110 --> 00:31:20.120 align:start position:0% adjectives in the video after this one 00:31:20.120 --> 00:31:21.990 align:start position:0% adjectives in the video after this one hopefully<00:31:20.639> I'm<00:31:20.760> making<00:31:21.000> myself<00:31:21.399> as<00:31:21.559> clear<00:31:21.799> as 00:31:21.990 --> 00:31:22.000 align:start position:0% hopefully I'm making myself as clear as 00:31:22.000 --> 00:31:23.350 align:start position:0% hopefully I'm making myself as clear as possible<00:31:22.440> with<00:31:22.559> what<00:31:22.679> to<00:31:22.760> do<00:31:22.919> with<00:31:23.039> the<00:31:23.120> verb 00:31:23.350 --> 00:31:23.360 align:start position:0% possible with what to do with the verb 00:31:23.360 --> 00:31:24.909 align:start position:0% possible with what to do with the verb estar<00:31:23.799> and<00:31:23.880> in<00:31:24.000> case<00:31:24.159> you<00:31:24.279> still<00:31:24.440> don't 00:31:24.909 --> 00:31:24.919 align:start position:0% estar and in case you still don't 00:31:24.919 --> 00:31:26.470 align:start position:0% estar and in case you still don't understand<00:31:25.080> the<00:31:25.200> concept<00:31:25.639> the<00:31:25.760> verb<00:31:26.000> estar 00:31:26.470 --> 00:31:26.480 align:start position:0% understand the concept the verb estar 00:31:26.480 --> 00:31:27.950 align:start position:0% understand the concept the verb estar mainly<00:31:26.760> applies<00:31:27.039> to<00:31:27.320> uses<00:31:27.679> that<00:31:27.760> are 00:31:27.950 --> 00:31:27.960 align:start position:0% mainly applies to uses that are 00:31:27.960 --> 00:31:29.789 align:start position:0% mainly applies to uses that are happening<00:31:28.480> right<00:31:28.679> now<00:31:29.000> at<00:31:29.159> this<00:31:29.320> moment<00:31:29.679> and 00:31:29.789 --> 00:31:29.799 align:start position:0% happening right now at this moment and 00:31:29.799 --> 00:31:30.990 align:start position:0% happening right now at this moment and they're<00:31:30.000> most<00:31:30.159> likely<00:31:30.399> to<00:31:30.519> change<00:31:30.799> in<00:31:30.880> the 00:31:30.990 --> 00:31:31.000 align:start position:0% they're most likely to change in the 00:31:31.000 --> 00:31:32.789 align:start position:0% they're most likely to change in the future<00:31:31.399> just<00:31:31.519> like<00:31:31.679> I<00:31:31.760> listed<00:31:32.120> examples<00:31:32.519> in<00:31:32.639> my 00:31:32.789 --> 00:31:32.799 align:start position:0% future just like I listed examples in my 00:31:32.799 --> 00:31:34.909 align:start position:0% future just like I listed examples in my set<00:31:33.120> video<00:31:33.519> the<00:31:33.639> uses<00:31:33.919> of<00:31:34.039> the<00:31:34.159> verb<00:31:34.440> estar 00:31:34.909 --> 00:31:34.919 align:start position:0% set video the uses of the verb estar 00:31:34.919 --> 00:31:36.470 align:start position:0% set video the uses of the verb estar likewise<00:31:35.360> have<00:31:35.480> a<00:31:35.600> connective<00:31:36.039> pattern 00:31:36.470 --> 00:31:36.480 align:start position:0% likewise have a connective pattern 00:31:36.480 --> 00:31:38.029 align:start position:0% likewise have a connective pattern across<00:31:36.799> all<00:31:37.000> examples<00:31:37.440> that<00:31:37.519> are<00:31:37.679> used<00:31:37.919> in 00:31:38.029 --> 00:31:38.039 align:start position:0% across all examples that are used in 00:31:38.039 --> 00:31:39.710 align:start position:0% across all examples that are used in this<00:31:38.200> video<00:31:38.559> there<00:31:38.679> are<00:31:38.919> other<00:31:39.159> uses<00:31:39.480> of<00:31:39.600> the 00:31:39.710 --> 00:31:39.720 align:start position:0% this video there are other uses of the 00:31:39.720 --> 00:31:41.629 align:start position:0% this video there are other uses of the verb<00:31:39.960> estar<00:31:40.480> like<00:31:40.639> weather<00:31:40.960> expressions<00:31:41.559> but 00:31:41.629 --> 00:31:41.639 align:start position:0% verb estar like weather expressions but 00:31:41.639 --> 00:31:43.190 align:start position:0% verb estar like weather expressions but they're<00:31:41.840> not<00:31:42.039> as<00:31:42.240> important<00:31:42.559> as<00:31:42.679> the<00:31:42.840> primary 00:31:43.190 --> 00:31:43.200 align:start position:0% they're not as important as the primary 00:31:43.200 --> 00:31:44.629 align:start position:0% they're not as important as the primary uses<00:31:43.519> in<00:31:43.679> this<00:31:43.840> video<00:31:44.240> the<00:31:44.360> present 00:31:44.629 --> 00:31:44.639 align:start position:0% uses in this video the present 00:31:44.639 --> 00:31:46.509 align:start position:0% uses in this video the present progressive<00:31:45.279> location<00:31:45.840> and<00:31:46.159> conditions<00:31:46.360> and 00:31:46.509 --> 00:31:46.519 align:start position:0% progressive location and conditions and 00:31:46.519 --> 00:31:48.310 align:start position:0% progressive location and conditions and emotions<00:31:47.000> are<00:31:47.159> the<00:31:47.320> primary<00:31:47.679> uses<00:31:48.039> of<00:31:48.200> the 00:31:48.310 --> 00:31:48.320 align:start position:0% emotions are the primary uses of the 00:31:48.320 --> 00:31:50.190 align:start position:0% emotions are the primary uses of the verb<00:31:48.559> estop<00:31:48.960> and<00:31:49.080> all<00:31:49.200> of<00:31:49.360> these<00:31:49.559> uses<00:31:49.960> have<00:31:50.080> a 00:31:50.190 --> 00:31:50.200 align:start position:0% verb estop and all of these uses have a 00:31:50.200 --> 00:31:51.710 align:start position:0% verb estop and all of these uses have a connection<00:31:50.720> and<00:31:50.840> that<00:31:50.960> is<00:31:51.080> they're<00:31:51.320> happening 00:31:51.710 --> 00:31:51.720 align:start position:0% connection and that is they're happening 00:31:51.720 --> 00:31:54.310 align:start position:0% connection and that is they're happening right<00:31:51.880> now<00:31:52.240> by<00:31:52.360> saying<00:31:52.960> eloro<00:31:53.960> I'm<00:31:54.039> saying 00:31:54.310 --> 00:31:54.320 align:start position:0% right now by saying eloro I'm saying 00:31:54.320 --> 00:31:56.029 align:start position:0% right now by saying eloro I'm saying that<00:31:54.440> he<00:31:54.559> is<00:31:54.720> running<00:31:55.159> right<00:31:55.320> now<00:31:55.639> but<00:31:55.799> he<00:31:55.880> will 00:31:56.029 --> 00:31:56.039 align:start position:0% that he is running right now but he will 00:31:56.039 --> 00:31:58.190 align:start position:0% that he is running right now but he will not<00:31:56.159> be<00:31:56.279> running<00:31:56.639> in<00:31:56.720> the<00:31:56.840> future<00:31:57.320> by<00:31:57.440> saying<00:31:57.840> y 00:31:58.190 --> 00:31:58.200 align:start position:0% not be running in the future by saying y 00:31:58.200 --> 00:32:00.389 align:start position:0% not be running in the future by saying y esta<00:31:59.200> I'm<00:31:59.320> saying<00:31:59.559> that<00:31:59.679> I'm<00:31:59.840> in<00:31:59.960> the<00:32:00.080> house 00:32:00.389 --> 00:32:00.399 align:start position:0% esta I'm saying that I'm in the house 00:32:00.399 --> 00:32:01.990 align:start position:0% esta I'm saying that I'm in the house right<00:32:00.559> now<00:32:00.960> but<00:32:01.120> I<00:32:01.200> will<00:32:01.360> not<00:32:01.559> be<00:32:01.799> in<00:32:01.880> the 00:32:01.990 --> 00:32:02.000 align:start position:0% right now but I will not be in the 00:32:02.000 --> 00:32:04.669 align:start position:0% right now but I will not be in the future<00:32:02.480> by<00:32:02.600> saying<00:32:03.000> to<00:32:03.240> EST<00:32:03.679> ok<00:32:04.360> I'm<00:32:04.480> saying 00:32:04.669 --> 00:32:04.679 align:start position:0% future by saying to EST ok I'm saying 00:32:04.679 --> 00:32:06.430 align:start position:0% future by saying to EST ok I'm saying that<00:32:04.799> you<00:32:04.919> are<00:32:05.159> busy<00:32:05.600> right<00:32:05.760> now<00:32:06.080> but<00:32:06.200> you<00:32:06.320> will 00:32:06.430 --> 00:32:06.440 align:start position:0% that you are busy right now but you will 00:32:06.440 --> 00:32:07.870 align:start position:0% that you are busy right now but you will not<00:32:06.639> be<00:32:06.840> in<00:32:06.960> the<00:32:07.080> future<00:32:07.480> when<00:32:07.559> you<00:32:07.679> really 00:32:07.870 --> 00:32:07.880 align:start position:0% not be in the future when you really 00:32:07.880 --> 00:32:09.190 align:start position:0% not be in the future when you really think<00:32:08.080> about<00:32:08.279> it<00:32:08.480> it<00:32:08.600> makes<00:32:08.799> sense<00:32:09.039> why 00:32:09.190 --> 00:32:09.200 align:start position:0% think about it it makes sense why 00:32:09.200 --> 00:32:11.350 align:start position:0% think about it it makes sense why Spanish<00:32:09.559> has<00:32:09.679> two<00:32:09.880> verbs<00:32:10.120> for<00:32:10.320> being<00:32:10.679> or<00:32:10.840> to<00:32:11.039> be 00:32:11.350 --> 00:32:11.360 align:start position:0% Spanish has two verbs for being or to be 00:32:11.360 --> 00:32:12.909 align:start position:0% Spanish has two verbs for being or to be because<00:32:11.639> half<00:32:11.799> the<00:32:11.960> time<00:32:12.120> you<00:32:12.240> utilize<00:32:12.679> verbs 00:32:12.909 --> 00:32:12.919 align:start position:0% because half the time you utilize verbs 00:32:12.919 --> 00:32:14.350 align:start position:0% because half the time you utilize verbs that<00:32:13.120> describe<00:32:13.399> you<00:32:13.519> factually<00:32:14.080> and<00:32:14.200> these 00:32:14.350 --> 00:32:14.360 align:start position:0% that describe you factually and these 00:32:14.360 --> 00:32:15.950 align:start position:0% that describe you factually and these can<00:32:14.519> never<00:32:14.760> change<00:32:15.200> but<00:32:15.320> on<00:32:15.440> the<00:32:15.559> other<00:32:15.799> half 00:32:15.950 --> 00:32:15.960 align:start position:0% can never change but on the other half 00:32:15.960 --> 00:32:17.310 align:start position:0% can never change but on the other half of<00:32:16.039> the<00:32:16.200> time<00:32:16.440> you're<00:32:16.639> describing<00:32:17.039> yourself 00:32:17.310 --> 00:32:17.320 align:start position:0% of the time you're describing yourself 00:32:17.320 --> 00:32:18.909 align:start position:0% of the time you're describing yourself using<00:32:17.559> traits<00:32:17.919> that<00:32:18.039> apply<00:32:18.279> for<00:32:18.440> the<00:32:18.519> moment 00:32:18.909 --> 00:32:18.919 align:start position:0% using traits that apply for the moment 00:32:18.919 --> 00:32:20.230 align:start position:0% using traits that apply for the moment and<00:32:19.080> now<00:32:19.240> you<00:32:19.360> might<00:32:19.559> also<00:32:19.960> understand<00:32:20.120> why 00:32:20.230 --> 00:32:20.240 align:start position:0% and now you might also understand why 00:32:20.240 --> 00:32:21.669 align:start position:0% and now you might also understand why some<00:32:20.399> teachers<00:32:20.720> say<00:32:20.919> that<00:32:21.120> the<00:32:21.200> verb<00:32:21.399> said 00:32:21.669 --> 00:32:21.679 align:start position:0% some teachers say that the verb said 00:32:21.679 --> 00:32:23.629 align:start position:0% some teachers say that the verb said applies<00:32:21.960> to<00:32:22.120> permanent<00:32:22.440> traits<00:32:22.919> while<00:32:23.159> estar 00:32:23.629 --> 00:32:23.639 align:start position:0% applies to permanent traits while estar 00:32:23.639 --> 00:32:25.549 align:start position:0% applies to permanent traits while estar refers<00:32:23.919> to<00:32:24.120> Temporary<00:32:24.559> traits<00:32:25.000> because<00:32:25.200> some 00:32:25.549 --> 00:32:25.559 align:start position:0% refers to Temporary traits because some 00:32:25.559 --> 00:32:27.230 align:start position:0% refers to Temporary traits because some conditions<00:32:25.880> last<00:32:26.120> forever<00:32:26.639> while<00:32:26.799> other 00:32:27.230 --> 00:32:27.240 align:start position:0% conditions last forever while other 00:32:27.240 --> 00:32:28.590 align:start position:0% conditions last forever while other happen<00:32:27.519> right<00:32:27.639> now<00:32:27.880> Spanish<00:32:28.240> has<00:32:28.399> many 00:32:28.590 --> 00:32:28.600 align:start position:0% happen right now Spanish has many 00:32:28.600 --> 00:32:29.990 align:start position:0% happen right now Spanish has many different<00:32:28.840> types<00:32:29.039> of<00:32:29.200> adjectives<00:32:29.720> and<00:32:29.840> in 00:32:29.990 --> 00:32:30.000 align:start position:0% different types of adjectives and in 00:32:30.000 --> 00:32:31.389 align:start position:0% different types of adjectives and in this<00:32:30.159> video<00:32:30.519> I<00:32:30.600> would<00:32:30.720> like<00:32:30.840> to<00:32:30.960> explain<00:32:31.240> how 00:32:31.389 --> 00:32:31.399 align:start position:0% this video I would like to explain how 00:32:31.399 --> 00:32:33.350 align:start position:0% this video I would like to explain how descriptive<00:32:31.880> adjectives<00:32:32.399> work<00:32:32.600> in<00:32:32.840> context 00:32:33.350 --> 00:32:33.360 align:start position:0% descriptive adjectives work in context 00:32:33.360 --> 00:32:34.909 align:start position:0% descriptive adjectives work in context and<00:32:33.480> by<00:32:33.600> descriptive<00:32:34.039> adjectives<00:32:34.559> I<00:32:34.639> mean 00:32:34.909 --> 00:32:34.919 align:start position:0% and by descriptive adjectives I mean 00:32:34.919 --> 00:32:36.350 align:start position:0% and by descriptive adjectives I mean adjectives<00:32:35.399> that<00:32:35.559> physically<00:32:36.000> or 00:32:36.350 --> 00:32:36.360 align:start position:0% adjectives that physically or 00:32:36.360 --> 00:32:37.750 align:start position:0% adjectives that physically or conditionally<00:32:36.799> describe<00:32:37.200> something<00:32:37.519> or 00:32:37.750 --> 00:32:37.760 align:start position:0% conditionally describe something or 00:32:37.760 --> 00:32:39.590 align:start position:0% conditionally describe something or someone<00:32:38.279> in<00:32:38.440> Spanish<00:32:38.799> all<00:32:39.039> adjectives<00:32:39.480> have 00:32:39.590 --> 00:32:39.600 align:start position:0% someone in Spanish all adjectives have 00:32:39.600 --> 00:32:41.269 align:start position:0% someone in Spanish all adjectives have gender<00:32:39.880> and<00:32:40.039> plurality<00:32:40.639> with<00:32:40.760> the<00:32:40.919> exceptions 00:32:41.269 --> 00:32:41.279 align:start position:0% gender and plurality with the exceptions 00:32:41.279 --> 00:32:42.669 align:start position:0% gender and plurality with the exceptions of<00:32:41.399> a<00:32:41.519> few<00:32:41.679> words<00:32:42.000> that<00:32:42.120> have<00:32:42.240> a<00:32:42.320> neutral 00:32:42.669 --> 00:32:42.679 align:start position:0% of a few words that have a neutral 00:32:42.679 --> 00:32:44.430 align:start position:0% of a few words that have a neutral ending<00:32:43.159> but<00:32:43.279> still<00:32:43.480> follow<00:32:43.799> plurality 00:32:44.430 --> 00:32:44.440 align:start position:0% ending but still follow plurality 00:32:44.440 --> 00:32:46.509 align:start position:0% ending but still follow plurality adjectives<00:32:44.880> ending<00:32:45.120> in<00:32:45.320> O<00:32:45.720> are<00:32:45.960> masculine 00:32:46.509 --> 00:32:46.519 align:start position:0% adjectives ending in O are masculine 00:32:46.519 --> 00:32:48.389 align:start position:0% adjectives ending in O are masculine adjectives<00:32:46.919> ending<00:32:47.159> in<00:32:47.360> a<00:32:47.639> are<00:32:47.799> feminine<00:32:48.279> and 00:32:48.389 --> 00:32:48.399 align:start position:0% adjectives ending in a are feminine and 00:32:48.399 --> 00:32:50.310 align:start position:0% adjectives ending in a are feminine and neutral<00:32:48.799> adjectives<00:32:49.360> vary<00:32:49.639> based<00:32:49.840> on<00:32:49.960> whoever 00:32:50.310 --> 00:32:50.320 align:start position:0% neutral adjectives vary based on whoever 00:32:50.320 --> 00:32:51.750 align:start position:0% neutral adjectives vary based on whoever the<00:32:50.440> subject<00:32:50.720> is<00:32:50.840> of<00:32:51.000> the<00:32:51.120> sentence<00:32:51.600> if<00:32:51.679> you 00:32:51.750 --> 00:32:51.760 align:start position:0% the subject is of the sentence if you 00:32:51.760 --> 00:32:53.149 align:start position:0% the subject is of the sentence if you want<00:32:51.919> to<00:32:52.039> say<00:32:52.240> that<00:32:52.360> you<00:32:52.480> are<00:32:52.679> tall<00:32:53.000> and 00:32:53.149 --> 00:32:53.159 align:start position:0% want to say that you are tall and 00:32:53.159 --> 00:32:56.110 align:start position:0% want to say that you are tall and beautiful<00:32:53.760> you<00:32:53.880> would<00:32:54.080> say<00:32:54.480> y<00:32:54.960> Alto<00:32:55.399> I<00:32:55.559> Bonito 00:32:56.110 --> 00:32:56.120 align:start position:0% beautiful you would say y Alto I Bonito 00:32:56.120 --> 00:32:57.310 align:start position:0% beautiful you would say y Alto I Bonito if<00:32:56.200> you're<00:32:56.399> referring<00:32:56.679> to<00:32:56.760> someone<00:32:57.159> that's 00:32:57.310 --> 00:32:57.320 align:start position:0% if you're referring to someone that's 00:32:57.320 --> 00:32:59.590 align:start position:0% if you're referring to someone that's masculine<00:32:57.799> and<00:32:58.000> ala<00:32:58.480> ionita<00:32:59.080> would<00:32:59.240> refer<00:32:59.480> to 00:32:59.590 --> 00:32:59.600 align:start position:0% masculine and ala ionita would refer to 00:32:59.600 --> 00:33:00.830 align:start position:0% masculine and ala ionita would refer to someone<00:32:59.799> who<00:32:59.919> is<00:33:00.039> feminine<00:33:00.399> if<00:33:00.480> you<00:33:00.559> were<00:33:00.720> to 00:33:00.830 --> 00:33:00.840 align:start position:0% someone who is feminine if you were to 00:33:00.840 --> 00:33:02.909 align:start position:0% someone who is feminine if you were to say<00:33:01.000> that<00:33:01.159> they<00:33:01.279> are<00:33:01.519> ugly<00:33:02.000> and<00:33:02.200> masculine<00:33:02.799> you 00:33:02.909 --> 00:33:02.919 align:start position:0% say that they are ugly and masculine you 00:33:02.919 --> 00:33:05.310 align:start position:0% say that they are ugly and masculine you would<00:33:03.120> say<00:33:03.559> AOS<00:33:04.200> fos<00:33:04.679> because<00:33:04.840> now<00:33:05.080> there<00:33:05.159> are 00:33:05.310 --> 00:33:05.320 align:start position:0% would say AOS fos because now there are 00:33:05.320 --> 00:33:06.549 align:start position:0% would say AOS fos because now there are multiple<00:33:05.679> people<00:33:06.000> which<00:33:06.159> generates 00:33:06.549 --> 00:33:06.559 align:start position:0% multiple people which generates 00:33:06.559 --> 00:33:07.990 align:start position:0% multiple people which generates plurality<00:33:07.200> if<00:33:07.320> you<00:33:07.399> were<00:33:07.519> to<00:33:07.679> work<00:33:07.840> with 00:33:07.990 --> 00:33:08.000 align:start position:0% plurality if you were to work with 00:33:08.000 --> 00:33:09.430 align:start position:0% plurality if you were to work with adjectives<00:33:08.399> that<00:33:08.519> have<00:33:08.600> a<00:33:08.720> neutral<00:33:09.080> ending 00:33:09.430 --> 00:33:09.440 align:start position:0% adjectives that have a neutral ending 00:33:09.440 --> 00:33:11.070 align:start position:0% adjectives that have a neutral ending and<00:33:09.559> say<00:33:09.720> a<00:33:09.840> sentence<00:33:10.240> like<00:33:10.519> these<00:33:10.760> classes 00:33:11.070 --> 00:33:11.080 align:start position:0% and say a sentence like these classes 00:33:11.080 --> 00:33:14.070 align:start position:0% and say a sentence like these classes are<00:33:11.320> easy<00:33:11.799> you<00:33:11.880> would<00:33:12.080> say<00:33:12.399> estas<00:33:12.799> classes<00:33:13.600> fil 00:33:14.070 --> 00:33:14.080 align:start position:0% are easy you would say estas classes fil 00:33:14.080 --> 00:33:15.430 align:start position:0% are easy you would say estas classes fil by<00:33:14.200> adding<00:33:14.399> an<00:33:14.559> Es<00:33:14.880> at<00:33:15.000> the<00:33:15.080> end<00:33:15.200> of<00:33:15.320> the 00:33:15.430 --> 00:33:15.440 align:start position:0% by adding an Es at the end of the 00:33:15.440 --> 00:33:16.990 align:start position:0% by adding an Es at the end of the adjective<00:33:15.880> to<00:33:16.000> fit<00:33:16.200> the<00:33:16.320> plurality<00:33:16.799> of<00:33:16.880> the 00:33:16.990 --> 00:33:17.000 align:start position:0% adjective to fit the plurality of the 00:33:17.000 --> 00:33:18.629 align:start position:0% adjective to fit the plurality of the sentence<00:33:17.519> if<00:33:17.600> you<00:33:17.679> were<00:33:17.840> to<00:33:17.960> say<00:33:18.240> we<00:33:18.360> are 00:33:18.629 --> 00:33:18.639 align:start position:0% sentence if you were to say we are 00:33:18.639 --> 00:33:21.870 align:start position:0% sentence if you were to say we are intelligent<00:33:19.279> you<00:33:19.360> would<00:33:19.559> say<00:33:20.039> no<00:33:21.039> intentes 00:33:21.870 --> 00:33:21.880 align:start position:0% intelligent you would say no intentes 00:33:21.880 --> 00:33:23.070 align:start position:0% intelligent you would say no intentes because<00:33:22.080> the<00:33:22.200> ending<00:33:22.440> of<00:33:22.559> the<00:33:22.720> adjective 00:33:23.070 --> 00:33:23.080 align:start position:0% because the ending of the adjective 00:33:23.080 --> 00:33:24.590 align:start position:0% because the ending of the adjective matches<00:33:23.399> the<00:33:23.519> plurality<00:33:23.960> of<00:33:24.080> the<00:33:24.159> sentence 00:33:24.590 --> 00:33:24.600 align:start position:0% matches the plurality of the sentence 00:33:24.600 --> 00:33:26.029 align:start position:0% matches the plurality of the sentence the<00:33:24.679> same<00:33:24.880> exact<00:33:25.159> principle<00:33:25.480> applies<00:33:25.760> to<00:33:25.880> any 00:33:26.029 --> 00:33:26.039 align:start position:0% the same exact principle applies to any 00:33:26.039 --> 00:33:27.509 align:start position:0% the same exact principle applies to any pronoun<00:33:26.399> and<00:33:26.600> adjective<00:33:27.039> you<00:33:27.120> would<00:33:27.279> like<00:33:27.399> to 00:33:27.509 --> 00:33:27.519 align:start position:0% pronoun and adjective you would like to 00:33:27.519 --> 00:33:30.070 align:start position:0% pronoun and adjective you would like to use<00:33:28.120> however<00:33:28.519> taking<00:33:28.840> simple<00:33:29.159> sentences<00:33:29.799> like 00:33:30.070 --> 00:33:30.080 align:start position:0% use however taking simple sentences like 00:33:30.080 --> 00:33:33.070 align:start position:0% use however taking simple sentences like the<00:33:30.240> boy<00:33:30.480> is<00:33:30.760> smar<00:33:31.760> in<00:33:32.440> might<00:33:32.639> make<00:33:32.760> learning 00:33:33.070 --> 00:33:33.080 align:start position:0% the boy is smar in might make learning 00:33:33.080 --> 00:33:34.350 align:start position:0% the boy is smar in might make learning too<00:33:33.320> impractical<00:33:34.000> because<00:33:34.159> you're 00:33:34.350 --> 00:33:34.360 align:start position:0% too impractical because you're 00:33:34.360 --> 00:33:35.950 align:start position:0% too impractical because you're generating<00:33:34.799> sentences<00:33:35.279> that<00:33:35.399> are<00:33:35.559> too<00:33:35.720> easy 00:33:35.950 --> 00:33:35.960 align:start position:0% generating sentences that are too easy 00:33:35.960 --> 00:33:37.870 align:start position:0% generating sentences that are too easy to<00:33:36.120> say<00:33:36.440> or<00:33:36.600> sentences<00:33:37.039> that<00:33:37.159> are<00:33:37.279> not<00:33:37.440> said<00:33:37.720> as 00:33:37.870 --> 00:33:37.880 align:start position:0% to say or sentences that are not said as 00:33:37.880 --> 00:33:39.590 align:start position:0% to say or sentences that are not said as often<00:33:38.159> as<00:33:38.320> others<00:33:38.760> if<00:33:38.840> you<00:33:38.960> were<00:33:39.120> to<00:33:39.279> instead 00:33:39.590 --> 00:33:39.600 align:start position:0% often as others if you were to instead 00:33:39.600 --> 00:33:41.549 align:start position:0% often as others if you were to instead say<00:33:40.000> the<00:33:40.159> smart<00:33:40.559> boy<00:33:41.039> this<00:33:41.120> is<00:33:41.240> where<00:33:41.399> the 00:33:41.549 --> 00:33:41.559 align:start position:0% say the smart boy this is where the 00:33:41.559 --> 00:33:43.230 align:start position:0% say the smart boy this is where the syntax<00:33:41.960> would<00:33:42.120> start<00:33:42.279> changing<00:33:42.679> positions<00:33:43.159> in 00:33:43.230 --> 00:33:43.240 align:start position:0% syntax would start changing positions in 00:33:43.240 --> 00:33:44.990 align:start position:0% syntax would start changing positions in the<00:33:43.360> sentence<00:33:43.799> you<00:33:43.880> would<00:33:44.080> want<00:33:44.159> to<00:33:44.360> say<00:33:44.720> El 00:33:44.990 --> 00:33:45.000 align:start position:0% the sentence you would want to say El 00:33:45.000 --> 00:33:47.430 align:start position:0% the sentence you would want to say El intell<00:33:45.720> Cho<00:33:46.200> the<00:33:46.360> smart<00:33:46.679> boy<00:33:47.080> but<00:33:47.200> this<00:33:47.320> would 00:33:47.430 --> 00:33:47.440 align:start position:0% intell Cho the smart boy but this would 00:33:47.440 --> 00:33:49.070 align:start position:0% intell Cho the smart boy but this would be<00:33:47.559> a<00:33:47.679> mistake<00:33:47.960> in<00:33:48.120> Spanish<00:33:48.559> because<00:33:48.760> Spanish 00:33:49.070 --> 00:33:49.080 align:start position:0% be a mistake in Spanish because Spanish 00:33:49.080 --> 00:33:50.190 align:start position:0% be a mistake in Spanish because Spanish has<00:33:49.159> a<00:33:49.279> rule<00:33:49.440> that<00:33:49.559> says<00:33:49.720> you<00:33:49.799> have<00:33:49.919> to<00:33:50.039> put 00:33:50.190 --> 00:33:50.200 align:start position:0% has a rule that says you have to put 00:33:50.200 --> 00:33:51.870 align:start position:0% has a rule that says you have to put nouns<00:33:50.519> before<00:33:50.799> adjectives<00:33:51.399> in<00:33:51.480> order<00:33:51.720> to 00:33:51.870 --> 00:33:51.880 align:start position:0% nouns before adjectives in order to 00:33:51.880 --> 00:33:53.149 align:start position:0% nouns before adjectives in order to determine<00:33:52.240> the<00:33:52.399> subject<00:33:52.679> from<00:33:52.880> something 00:33:53.149 --> 00:33:53.159 align:start position:0% determine the subject from something 00:33:53.159 --> 00:33:55.990 align:start position:0% determine the subject from something else<00:33:53.600> so<00:33:53.840> instead<00:33:54.080> of<00:33:54.200> saying<00:33:54.559> El<00:33:54.799> int<00:33:55.399> Cho<00:33:55.880> you 00:33:55.990 --> 00:33:56.000 align:start position:0% else so instead of saying El int Cho you 00:33:56.000 --> 00:33:58.350 align:start position:0% else so instead of saying El int Cho you would<00:33:56.159> say<00:33:56.480> El<00:33:56.639> Cho<00:33:57.200> int<00:33:57.880> which<00:33:58.000> technically 00:33:58.350 --> 00:33:58.360 align:start position:0% would say El Cho int which technically 00:33:58.360 --> 00:34:00.070 align:start position:0% would say El Cho int which technically would<00:33:58.519> translate<00:33:59.000> as<00:33:59.159> the<00:33:59.320> boy<00:33:59.519> smart<00:33:59.960> but 00:34:00.070 --> 00:34:00.080 align:start position:0% would translate as the boy smart but 00:34:00.080 --> 00:34:01.870 align:start position:0% would translate as the boy smart but logically<00:34:00.480> speaking<00:34:01.000> it<00:34:01.080> means<00:34:01.360> the<00:34:01.519> boy<00:34:01.760> that 00:34:01.870 --> 00:34:01.880 align:start position:0% logically speaking it means the boy that 00:34:01.880 --> 00:34:03.470 align:start position:0% logically speaking it means the boy that is<00:34:02.000> smart<00:34:02.440> but<00:34:02.559> this<00:34:02.639> is<00:34:02.760> not<00:34:02.919> included<00:34:03.279> in 00:34:03.470 --> 00:34:03.480 align:start position:0% is smart but this is not included in 00:34:03.480 --> 00:34:04.990 align:start position:0% is smart but this is not included in Spanish<00:34:03.919> because<00:34:04.120> it<00:34:04.240> doesn't<00:34:04.440> need<00:34:04.600> to<00:34:04.840> in 00:34:04.990 --> 00:34:05.000 align:start position:0% Spanish because it doesn't need to in 00:34:05.000 --> 00:34:06.230 align:start position:0% Spanish because it doesn't need to in English<00:34:05.360> whenever<00:34:05.600> you're<00:34:05.799> describing 00:34:06.230 --> 00:34:06.240 align:start position:0% English whenever you're describing 00:34:06.240 --> 00:34:08.349 align:start position:0% English whenever you're describing subjects<00:34:06.720> you<00:34:06.840> put<00:34:07.080> adjectives<00:34:07.600> before<00:34:07.880> nouns 00:34:08.349 --> 00:34:08.359 align:start position:0% subjects you put adjectives before nouns 00:34:08.359 --> 00:34:09.349 align:start position:0% subjects you put adjectives before nouns but<00:34:08.480> in<00:34:08.560> Spanish<00:34:08.879> you<00:34:08.960> have<00:34:09.040> to<00:34:09.159> put 00:34:09.349 --> 00:34:09.359 align:start position:0% but in Spanish you have to put 00:34:09.359 --> 00:34:10.950 align:start position:0% but in Spanish you have to put adjectives<00:34:09.879> after<00:34:10.159> nouns<00:34:10.599> because<00:34:10.760> it's<00:34:10.879> a 00:34:10.950 --> 00:34:10.960 align:start position:0% adjectives after nouns because it's a 00:34:10.960 --> 00:34:12.510 align:start position:0% adjectives after nouns because it's a rule<00:34:11.159> in<00:34:11.280> the<00:34:11.399> language<00:34:11.800> and<00:34:11.960> once<00:34:12.159> again<00:34:12.440> the 00:34:12.510 --> 00:34:12.520 align:start position:0% rule in the language and once again the 00:34:12.520 --> 00:34:14.270 align:start position:0% rule in the language and once again the same<00:34:12.720> principle<00:34:13.159> applies<00:34:13.480> to<00:34:13.599> any<00:34:13.800> noun<00:34:14.079> and 00:34:14.270 --> 00:34:14.280 align:start position:0% same principle applies to any noun and 00:34:14.280 --> 00:34:15.750 align:start position:0% same principle applies to any noun and adjective<00:34:14.639> you<00:34:14.720> want<00:34:14.839> to<00:34:14.960> use<00:34:15.320> there<00:34:15.480> is 00:34:15.750 --> 00:34:15.760 align:start position:0% adjective you want to use there is 00:34:15.760 --> 00:34:17.109 align:start position:0% adjective you want to use there is however<00:34:16.000> an<00:34:16.119> important<00:34:16.440> rule<00:34:16.639> to<00:34:16.760> consider 00:34:17.109 --> 00:34:17.119 align:start position:0% however an important rule to consider 00:34:17.119 --> 00:34:18.430 align:start position:0% however an important rule to consider whenever<00:34:17.399> you're<00:34:17.560> referring<00:34:17.839> to<00:34:18.040> adjectives 00:34:18.430 --> 00:34:18.440 align:start position:0% whenever you're referring to adjectives 00:34:18.440 --> 00:34:19.869 align:start position:0% whenever you're referring to adjectives that<00:34:18.560> are<00:34:18.639> used<00:34:18.960> factually<00:34:19.359> and<00:34:19.520> physically 00:34:19.869 --> 00:34:19.879 align:start position:0% that are used factually and physically 00:34:19.879 --> 00:34:21.790 align:start position:0% that are used factually and physically about<00:34:20.119> oneself<00:34:20.639> and<00:34:20.760> an<00:34:20.919> adjective<00:34:21.280> that<00:34:21.399> is<00:34:21.480> a 00:34:21.790 --> 00:34:21.800 align:start position:0% about oneself and an adjective that is a 00:34:21.800 --> 00:34:23.349 align:start position:0% about oneself and an adjective that is a condition<00:34:22.079> that<00:34:22.200> changes<00:34:22.599> over<00:34:22.879> time<00:34:23.240> in 00:34:23.349 --> 00:34:23.359 align:start position:0% condition that changes over time in 00:34:23.359 --> 00:34:25.190 align:start position:0% condition that changes over time in English<00:34:23.760> you<00:34:23.839> may<00:34:24.040> have<00:34:24.159> sentences<00:34:24.720> like<00:34:24.960> I<00:34:25.079> am 00:34:25.190 --> 00:34:25.200 align:start position:0% English you may have sentences like I am 00:34:25.200 --> 00:34:27.109 align:start position:0% English you may have sentences like I am short<00:34:25.639> and<00:34:25.839> I<00:34:25.919> am<00:34:26.119> tired<00:34:26.480> and<00:34:26.599> both<00:34:26.720> of<00:34:26.960> these 00:34:27.109 --> 00:34:27.119 align:start position:0% short and I am tired and both of these 00:34:27.119 --> 00:34:28.710 align:start position:0% short and I am tired and both of these sentences<00:34:27.480> use<00:34:27.679> the<00:34:27.760> same<00:34:28.000> conjugated<00:34:28.480> form 00:34:28.710 --> 00:34:28.720 align:start position:0% sentences use the same conjugated form 00:34:28.720 --> 00:34:30.790 align:start position:0% sentences use the same conjugated form of<00:34:28.800> the<00:34:28.919> verb<00:34:29.159> to<00:34:29.280> be<00:34:29.639> in<00:34:29.800> this<00:34:29.960> case<00:34:30.280> I<00:34:30.440> am 00:34:30.790 --> 00:34:30.800 align:start position:0% of the verb to be in this case I am 00:34:30.800 --> 00:34:32.149 align:start position:0% of the verb to be in this case I am because<00:34:31.000> in<00:34:31.159> English<00:34:31.599> we<00:34:31.679> don't<00:34:31.839> care<00:34:32.000> about 00:34:32.149 --> 00:34:32.159 align:start position:0% because in English we don't care about 00:34:32.159 --> 00:34:33.750 align:start position:0% because in English we don't care about the<00:34:32.320> continuation<00:34:32.839> of<00:34:32.960> the<00:34:33.079> sentence<00:34:33.520> as<00:34:33.639> long 00:34:33.750 --> 00:34:33.760 align:start position:0% the continuation of the sentence as long 00:34:33.760 --> 00:34:35.270 align:start position:0% the continuation of the sentence as long as<00:34:33.879> we<00:34:33.960> use<00:34:34.119> the<00:34:34.280> properly<00:34:34.599> conjugated<00:34:35.079> form 00:34:35.270 --> 00:34:35.280 align:start position:0% as we use the properly conjugated form 00:34:35.280 --> 00:34:36.750 align:start position:0% as we use the properly conjugated form of<00:34:35.399> to<00:34:35.560> be<00:34:35.800> to<00:34:35.919> match<00:34:36.079> the<00:34:36.240> corresponding 00:34:36.750 --> 00:34:36.760 align:start position:0% of to be to match the corresponding 00:34:36.760 --> 00:34:38.389 align:start position:0% of to be to match the corresponding pronoun<00:34:37.200> in<00:34:37.320> Spanish<00:34:37.800> however<00:34:38.000> you<00:34:38.119> have<00:34:38.240> to 00:34:38.389 --> 00:34:38.399 align:start position:0% pronoun in Spanish however you have to 00:34:38.399 --> 00:34:39.790 align:start position:0% pronoun in Spanish however you have to watch<00:34:38.520> out<00:34:38.679> for<00:34:38.879> these<00:34:39.040> things<00:34:39.399> because<00:34:39.639> these 00:34:39.790 --> 00:34:39.800 align:start position:0% watch out for these things because these 00:34:39.800 --> 00:34:41.389 align:start position:0% watch out for these things because these sentences<00:34:40.200> contain<00:34:40.520> two<00:34:40.639> senses<00:34:40.960> of<00:34:41.079> being 00:34:41.389 --> 00:34:41.399 align:start position:0% sentences contain two senses of being 00:34:41.399 --> 00:34:42.950 align:start position:0% sentences contain two senses of being one<00:34:41.520> using<00:34:41.760> a<00:34:41.879> physical<00:34:42.200> and<00:34:42.359> factual<00:34:42.679> trait 00:34:42.950 --> 00:34:42.960 align:start position:0% one using a physical and factual trait 00:34:42.960 --> 00:34:44.389 align:start position:0% one using a physical and factual trait about<00:34:43.159> yourself<00:34:43.599> while<00:34:43.760> the<00:34:43.879> other<00:34:44.079> expresses 00:34:44.389 --> 00:34:44.399 align:start position:0% about yourself while the other expresses 00:34:44.399 --> 00:34:45.710 align:start position:0% about yourself while the other expresses an<00:34:44.560> emotion<00:34:44.839> that<00:34:44.960> you<00:34:45.040> feel<00:34:45.399> which<00:34:45.560> will 00:34:45.710 --> 00:34:45.720 align:start position:0% an emotion that you feel which will 00:34:45.720 --> 00:34:46.790 align:start position:0% an emotion that you feel which will change<00:34:45.960> in<00:34:46.040> the<00:34:46.159> future<00:34:46.520> and<00:34:46.639> with 00:34:46.790 --> 00:34:46.800 align:start position:0% change in the future and with 00:34:46.800 --> 00:34:48.310 align:start position:0% change in the future and with descriptive<00:34:47.320> adjectives<00:34:47.839> the<00:34:47.919> same<00:34:48.079> rule 00:34:48.310 --> 00:34:48.320 align:start position:0% descriptive adjectives the same rule 00:34:48.320 --> 00:34:49.909 align:start position:0% descriptive adjectives the same rule applies<00:34:48.639> for<00:34:48.839> both<00:34:49.079> adjectives<00:34:49.480> that<00:34:49.639> apply 00:34:49.909 --> 00:34:49.919 align:start position:0% applies for both adjectives that apply 00:34:49.919 --> 00:34:51.550 align:start position:0% applies for both adjectives that apply factually<00:34:50.520> and<00:34:50.839> conditionally<00:34:51.240> the<00:34:51.359> only 00:34:51.550 --> 00:34:51.560 align:start position:0% factually and conditionally the only 00:34:51.560 --> 00:34:53.069 align:start position:0% factually and conditionally the only challenge<00:34:51.839> is<00:34:51.960> figuring<00:34:52.320> out<00:34:52.520> whether<00:34:52.679> to<00:34:52.839> use 00:34:53.069 --> 00:34:53.079 align:start position:0% challenge is figuring out whether to use 00:34:53.079 --> 00:34:55.310 align:start position:0% challenge is figuring out whether to use S<00:34:53.480> or<00:34:53.720> estar<00:34:54.200> with<00:34:54.359> physical<00:34:54.679> traits<00:34:55.040> and 00:34:55.310 --> 00:34:55.320 align:start position:0% S or estar with physical traits and 00:34:55.320 --> 00:34:57.630 align:start position:0% S or estar with physical traits and conditions<00:34:55.520> and<00:34:55.679> emotions<00:34:56.280> la<00:34:56.919> Osa<00:34:57.560> the 00:34:57.630 --> 00:34:57.640 align:start position:0% conditions and emotions la Osa the 00:34:57.640 --> 00:35:00.030 align:start position:0% conditions and emotions la Osa the beautiful<00:34:58.040> girl<00:34:58.440> can<00:34:58.599> also<00:34:58.839> be<00:34:59.000> said 00:35:00.030 --> 00:35:00.040 align:start position:0% beautiful girl can also be said 00:35:00.040 --> 00:35:02.790 align:start position:0% beautiful girl can also be said asosa<00:35:01.040> the<00:35:01.160> girl<00:35:01.400> is<00:35:01.599> beautiful<00:35:02.200> which<00:35:02.320> uses 00:35:02.790 --> 00:35:02.800 align:start position:0% asosa the girl is beautiful which uses 00:35:02.800 --> 00:35:04.950 align:start position:0% asosa the girl is beautiful which uses said<00:35:03.119> to<00:35:03.320> factually<00:35:03.720> describe<00:35:04.040> the 00:35:04.950 --> 00:35:04.960 align:start position:0% said to factually describe the 00:35:04.960 --> 00:35:07.589 align:start position:0% said to factually describe the subject<00:35:05.960> the<00:35:06.119> relaxed<00:35:06.640> man<00:35:07.000> can<00:35:07.200> also<00:35:07.400> be 00:35:07.589 --> 00:35:07.599 align:start position:0% subject the relaxed man can also be 00:35:07.599 --> 00:35:09.270 align:start position:0% subject the relaxed man can also be rephrased 00:35:09.270 --> 00:35:09.280 align:start position:0% rephrased 00:35:09.280 --> 00:35:11.870 align:start position:0% rephrased as<00:35:10.280> the<00:35:10.400> man<00:35:10.640> is<00:35:10.839> relaxed<00:35:11.359> which<00:35:11.520> uses<00:35:11.760> the 00:35:11.870 --> 00:35:11.880 align:start position:0% as the man is relaxed which uses the 00:35:11.880 --> 00:35:14.030 align:start position:0% as the man is relaxed which uses the verb<00:35:12.599> to<00:35:12.800> express<00:35:13.119> the<00:35:13.240> emotional<00:35:13.839> condition 00:35:14.030 --> 00:35:14.040 align:start position:0% verb to express the emotional condition 00:35:14.040 --> 00:35:15.310 align:start position:0% verb to express the emotional condition of<00:35:14.160> the<00:35:14.280> subject<00:35:14.680> and<00:35:14.800> with<00:35:14.920> these<00:35:15.079> being 00:35:15.310 --> 00:35:15.320 align:start position:0% of the subject and with these being 00:35:15.320 --> 00:35:16.990 align:start position:0% of the subject and with these being physical<00:35:15.640> traits<00:35:15.960> that<00:35:16.079> are<00:35:16.160> used<00:35:16.440> with<00:35:16.599> s<00:35:16.880> and 00:35:16.990 --> 00:35:17.000 align:start position:0% physical traits that are used with s and 00:35:17.000 --> 00:35:18.270 align:start position:0% physical traits that are used with s and these<00:35:17.160> being<00:35:17.560> conditions<00:35:17.839> that<00:35:17.920> are<00:35:18.040> used 00:35:18.270 --> 00:35:18.280 align:start position:0% these being conditions that are used 00:35:18.280 --> 00:35:19.990 align:start position:0% these being conditions that are used with<00:35:18.480> estar<00:35:19.000> these<00:35:19.079> are<00:35:19.240> all<00:35:19.440> commonly<00:35:19.760> used 00:35:19.990 --> 00:35:20.000 align:start position:0% with estar these are all commonly used 00:35:20.000 --> 00:35:21.510 align:start position:0% with estar these are all commonly used descriptive<00:35:20.480> adjectives<00:35:21.040> that<00:35:21.119> you<00:35:21.200> can<00:35:21.359> use 00:35:21.510 --> 00:35:21.520 align:start position:0% descriptive adjectives that you can use 00:35:21.520 --> 00:35:23.510 align:start position:0% descriptive adjectives that you can use to<00:35:21.640> construct<00:35:22.040> sentences<00:35:22.520> on<00:35:22.640> a<00:35:22.760> daily<00:35:23.079> basis 00:35:23.510 --> 00:35:23.520 align:start position:0% to construct sentences on a daily basis 00:35:23.520 --> 00:35:25.349 align:start position:0% to construct sentences on a daily basis all<00:35:23.680> you<00:35:23.839> simply<00:35:24.119> do<00:35:24.440> is<00:35:24.560> choose<00:35:24.839> any<00:35:25.040> pronoun 00:35:25.349 --> 00:35:25.359 align:start position:0% all you simply do is choose any pronoun 00:35:25.359 --> 00:35:27.430 align:start position:0% all you simply do is choose any pronoun you<00:35:25.480> want<00:35:25.560> to<00:35:25.720> use<00:35:26.040> select<00:35:26.359> any<00:35:26.520> AD<00:35:27.160> and<00:35:27.280> then 00:35:27.430 --> 00:35:27.440 align:start position:0% you want to use select any AD and then 00:35:27.440 --> 00:35:28.670 align:start position:0% you want to use select any AD and then remember<00:35:27.800> which<00:35:27.960> verb<00:35:28.200> to<00:35:28.320> use<00:35:28.560> when 00:35:28.670 --> 00:35:28.680 align:start position:0% remember which verb to use when 00:35:28.680 --> 00:35:30.390 align:start position:0% remember which verb to use when describing<00:35:29.160> something<00:35:29.480> or<00:35:29.640> somebody<00:35:30.200> for 00:35:30.390 --> 00:35:30.400 align:start position:0% describing something or somebody for 00:35:30.400 --> 00:35:31.910 align:start position:0% describing something or somebody for example<00:35:30.920> if<00:35:31.000> you<00:35:31.079> want<00:35:31.200> to<00:35:31.320> say<00:35:31.480> that<00:35:31.640> he<00:35:31.800> is 00:35:31.910 --> 00:35:31.920 align:start position:0% example if you want to say that he is 00:35:31.920 --> 00:35:34.150 align:start position:0% example if you want to say that he is smart<00:35:32.320> you<00:35:32.400> would<00:35:32.560> say<00:35:32.800> LS<00:35:33.200> intell<00:35:33.960> because 00:35:34.150 --> 00:35:34.160 align:start position:0% smart you would say LS intell because 00:35:34.160 --> 00:35:35.910 align:start position:0% smart you would say LS intell because the<00:35:34.280> word<00:35:34.560> s<00:35:34.920> is<00:35:35.000> the<00:35:35.119> correctly<00:35:35.480> conjugated 00:35:35.910 --> 00:35:35.920 align:start position:0% the word s is the correctly conjugated 00:35:35.920 --> 00:35:37.790 align:start position:0% the word s is the correctly conjugated form<00:35:36.160> of<00:35:36.280> said<00:35:36.680> of<00:35:36.800> the<00:35:36.920> he<00:35:37.160> pronoun<00:35:37.599> being 00:35:37.790 --> 00:35:37.800 align:start position:0% form of said of the he pronoun being 00:35:37.800 --> 00:35:39.430 align:start position:0% form of said of the he pronoun being used<00:35:38.040> to<00:35:38.200> express<00:35:38.440> a<00:35:38.599> factual<00:35:38.920> statement 00:35:39.430 --> 00:35:39.440 align:start position:0% used to express a factual statement 00:35:39.440 --> 00:35:41.510 align:start position:0% used to express a factual statement likewise<00:35:39.920> if<00:35:40.000> you<00:35:40.079> want<00:35:40.200> to<00:35:40.359> say<00:35:40.720> we<00:35:40.880> are<00:35:41.119> sad 00:35:41.510 --> 00:35:41.520 align:start position:0% likewise if you want to say we are sad 00:35:41.520 --> 00:35:44.109 align:start position:0% likewise if you want to say we are sad you<00:35:41.640> would<00:35:41.800> say<00:35:42.160> noos<00:35:42.839> estamos<00:35:43.440> tristes<00:35:44.040> and 00:35:44.109 --> 00:35:44.119 align:start position:0% you would say noos estamos tristes and 00:35:44.119 --> 00:35:45.990 align:start position:0% you would say noos estamos tristes and you<00:35:44.200> would<00:35:44.359> use<00:35:44.599> EST<00:35:45.079> as<00:35:45.160> the<00:35:45.320> conjugated<00:35:45.760> form 00:35:45.990 --> 00:35:46.000 align:start position:0% you would use EST as the conjugated form 00:35:46.000 --> 00:35:48.030 align:start position:0% you would use EST as the conjugated form of<00:35:46.119> the<00:35:46.240> wi<00:35:46.480> pronoun<00:35:46.960> because<00:35:47.240> EST<00:35:47.720> is<00:35:47.800> used 00:35:48.030 --> 00:35:48.040 align:start position:0% of the wi pronoun because EST is used 00:35:48.040 --> 00:35:49.589 align:start position:0% of the wi pronoun because EST is used for<00:35:48.200> emotions<00:35:48.640> that<00:35:48.760> change<00:35:49.040> over<00:35:49.280> time<00:35:49.520> and 00:35:49.589 --> 00:35:49.599 align:start position:0% for emotions that change over time and 00:35:49.599 --> 00:35:51.190 align:start position:0% for emotions that change over time and you<00:35:49.680> would<00:35:49.839> also<00:35:50.040> pluralize<00:35:50.520> trist<00:35:51.079> because 00:35:51.190 --> 00:35:51.200 align:start position:0% you would also pluralize trist because 00:35:51.200 --> 00:35:52.630 align:start position:0% you would also pluralize trist because you<00:35:51.319> have<00:35:51.440> plurality<00:35:51.960> in<00:35:52.040> the<00:35:52.160> sentence 00:35:52.630 --> 00:35:52.640 align:start position:0% you have plurality in the sentence 00:35:52.640 --> 00:35:53.990 align:start position:0% you have plurality in the sentence possessive<00:35:53.040> adjectives<00:35:53.440> in<00:35:53.599> Spanish 00:35:53.990 --> 00:35:54.000 align:start position:0% possessive adjectives in Spanish 00:35:54.000 --> 00:35:55.030 align:start position:0% possessive adjectives in Spanish indicate<00:35:54.359> that<00:35:54.480> something<00:35:54.720> is<00:35:54.839> being 00:35:55.030 --> 00:35:55.040 align:start position:0% indicate that something is being 00:35:55.040 --> 00:35:56.550 align:start position:0% indicate that something is being possessed<00:35:55.440> by<00:35:55.560> somebody<00:35:55.920> or<00:35:56.079> is<00:35:56.160> in<00:35:56.280> the<00:35:56.400> own 00:35:56.550 --> 00:35:56.560 align:start position:0% possessed by somebody or is in the own 00:35:56.560 --> 00:35:58.190 align:start position:0% possessed by somebody or is in the own hands<00:35:56.880> of<00:35:57.000> somebody<00:35:57.400> the<00:35:57.520> English<00:35:57.800> version<00:35:58.040> of 00:35:58.190 --> 00:35:58.200 align:start position:0% hands of somebody the English version of 00:35:58.200 --> 00:36:02.230 align:start position:0% hands of somebody the English version of this<00:35:58.400> would<00:35:58.599> be<00:35:58.960> my<00:35:59.480> your<00:36:00.119> his<00:36:00.480> her<00:36:00.839> or<00:36:01.119> it<00:36:01.640> our 00:36:02.230 --> 00:36:02.240 align:start position:0% this would be my your his her or it our 00:36:02.240 --> 00:36:04.069 align:start position:0% this would be my your his her or it our Ys<00:36:02.839> English<00:36:03.119> doesn't<00:36:03.359> have<00:36:03.520> this<00:36:03.680> adjective 00:36:04.069 --> 00:36:04.079 align:start position:0% Ys English doesn't have this adjective 00:36:04.079 --> 00:36:05.150 align:start position:0% Ys English doesn't have this adjective but<00:36:04.200> I'm<00:36:04.319> still<00:36:04.480> including<00:36:04.839> it<00:36:04.960> because 00:36:05.150 --> 00:36:05.160 align:start position:0% but I'm still including it because 00:36:05.160 --> 00:36:07.030 align:start position:0% but I'm still including it because Spanish<00:36:05.480> has<00:36:05.599> it<00:36:05.800> and<00:36:05.920> finally<00:36:06.520> there<00:36:06.880> in 00:36:07.030 --> 00:36:07.040 align:start position:0% Spanish has it and finally there in 00:36:07.040 --> 00:36:08.829 align:start position:0% Spanish has it and finally there in Spanish<00:36:07.520> these<00:36:07.720> possessive<00:36:08.160> adjectives<00:36:08.640> look 00:36:08.829 --> 00:36:08.839 align:start position:0% Spanish these possessive adjectives look 00:36:08.839 --> 00:36:11.150 align:start position:0% Spanish these possessive adjectives look like<00:36:09.079> this<00:36:09.400> me<00:36:09.839> with<00:36:10.000> no<00:36:10.280> accent<00:36:10.760> because<00:36:11.000> with 00:36:11.150 --> 00:36:11.160 align:start position:0% like this me with no accent because with 00:36:11.160 --> 00:36:12.750 align:start position:0% like this me with no accent because with the<00:36:11.400> accent<00:36:11.800> you'll<00:36:12.000> have<00:36:12.079> a<00:36:12.200> direct<00:36:12.440> object 00:36:12.750 --> 00:36:12.760 align:start position:0% the accent you'll have a direct object 00:36:12.760 --> 00:36:15.390 align:start position:0% the accent you'll have a direct object pronoun<00:36:13.319> me<00:36:13.720> to<00:36:14.240> with<00:36:14.400> no<00:36:14.680> accent<00:36:15.160> because 00:36:15.390 --> 00:36:15.400 align:start position:0% pronoun me to with no accent because 00:36:15.400 --> 00:36:17.430 align:start position:0% pronoun me to with no accent because with<00:36:15.560> the<00:36:15.760> accent<00:36:16.160> you<00:36:16.280> have<00:36:16.440> the<00:36:16.560> pronoun<00:36:17.040> you 00:36:17.430 --> 00:36:17.440 align:start position:0% with the accent you have the pronoun you 00:36:17.440 --> 00:36:19.510 align:start position:0% with the accent you have the pronoun you Su<00:36:17.920> and<00:36:18.079> this<00:36:18.240> adjective<00:36:18.640> can<00:36:18.839> simultaneously 00:36:19.510 --> 00:36:19.520 align:start position:0% Su and this adjective can simultaneously 00:36:19.520 --> 00:36:21.790 align:start position:0% Su and this adjective can simultaneously mean<00:36:19.960> his<00:36:20.319> her<00:36:20.599> or<00:36:21.000> there<00:36:21.319> and<00:36:21.440> you<00:36:21.520> can<00:36:21.640> only 00:36:21.790 --> 00:36:21.800 align:start position:0% mean his her or there and you can only 00:36:21.800 --> 00:36:22.990 align:start position:0% mean his her or there and you can only tell<00:36:21.960> the<00:36:22.079> difference<00:36:22.400> between<00:36:22.640> them<00:36:22.800> in 00:36:22.990 --> 00:36:23.000 align:start position:0% tell the difference between them in 00:36:23.000 --> 00:36:26.510 align:start position:0% tell the difference between them in context<00:36:23.599> and<00:36:23.760> finally<00:36:24.480> noest<00:36:25.480> vestro<00:36:26.040> VRA 00:36:26.510 --> 00:36:26.520 align:start position:0% context and finally noest vestro VRA 00:36:26.520 --> 00:36:27.630 align:start position:0% context and finally noest vestro VRA when<00:36:26.880> the<00:36:26.920> interesting<00:36:27.240> things<00:36:27.440> about 00:36:27.630 --> 00:36:27.640 align:start position:0% when the interesting things about 00:36:27.640 --> 00:36:29.150 align:start position:0% when the interesting things about possessive<00:36:28.040> adjectives<00:36:28.400> in<00:36:28.520> Spanish<00:36:28.920> is<00:36:29.040> that 00:36:29.150 --> 00:36:29.160 align:start position:0% possessive adjectives in Spanish is that 00:36:29.160 --> 00:36:31.230 align:start position:0% possessive adjectives in Spanish is that the<00:36:29.280> adjectives<00:36:29.680> nestro<00:36:30.240> and<00:36:30.400> vestro<00:36:31.000> are<00:36:31.119> the 00:36:31.230 --> 00:36:31.240 align:start position:0% the adjectives nestro and vestro are the 00:36:31.240 --> 00:36:32.589 align:start position:0% the adjectives nestro and vestro are the only<00:36:31.480> adjectives<00:36:31.880> that<00:36:32.000> have<00:36:32.160> gender<00:36:32.560> if 00:36:32.589 --> 00:36:32.599 align:start position:0% only adjectives that have gender if 00:36:32.599 --> 00:36:33.790 align:start position:0% only adjectives that have gender if you're<00:36:32.760> referring<00:36:33.040> to<00:36:33.160> something<00:36:33.400> masculine 00:36:33.790 --> 00:36:33.800 align:start position:0% you're referring to something masculine 00:36:33.800 --> 00:36:35.349 align:start position:0% you're referring to something masculine in<00:36:33.920> Spanish<00:36:34.280> and<00:36:34.359> you<00:36:34.440> want<00:36:34.520> to<00:36:34.640> use<00:36:34.839> the<00:36:34.960> hour 00:36:35.349 --> 00:36:35.359 align:start position:0% in Spanish and you want to use the hour 00:36:35.359 --> 00:36:37.309 align:start position:0% in Spanish and you want to use the hour adjective<00:36:35.839> you<00:36:35.960> would<00:36:36.119> say<00:36:36.440> nestro<00:36:37.079> and<00:36:37.160> then 00:36:37.309 --> 00:36:37.319 align:start position:0% adjective you would say nestro and then 00:36:37.319 --> 00:36:38.710 align:start position:0% adjective you would say nestro and then whatever<00:36:37.560> the<00:36:37.640> follow-up<00:36:38.040> is<00:36:38.280> you<00:36:38.359> can<00:36:38.480> do<00:36:38.599> the 00:36:38.710 --> 00:36:38.720 align:start position:0% whatever the follow-up is you can do the 00:36:38.720 --> 00:36:40.750 align:start position:0% whatever the follow-up is you can do the same<00:36:38.880> with<00:36:39.000> nestra<00:36:39.680> using<00:36:40.000> feminine<00:36:40.359> words 00:36:40.750 --> 00:36:40.760 align:start position:0% same with nestra using feminine words 00:36:40.760 --> 00:36:42.230 align:start position:0% same with nestra using feminine words and<00:36:40.880> you<00:36:40.920> can<00:36:41.079> replicate<00:36:41.520> this<00:36:41.680> concept<00:36:42.000> using 00:36:42.230 --> 00:36:42.240 align:start position:0% and you can replicate this concept using 00:36:42.240 --> 00:36:44.349 align:start position:0% and you can replicate this concept using the<00:36:42.359> vestro<00:36:42.839> adjective<00:36:43.480> however<00:36:43.839> I<00:36:43.960> recommend 00:36:44.349 --> 00:36:44.359 align:start position:0% the vestro adjective however I recommend 00:36:44.359 --> 00:36:45.870 align:start position:0% the vestro adjective however I recommend not<00:36:44.520> focusing<00:36:44.880> on<00:36:45.040> these<00:36:45.240> adjectives<00:36:45.720> because 00:36:45.870 --> 00:36:45.880 align:start position:0% not focusing on these adjectives because 00:36:45.880 --> 00:36:47.270 align:start position:0% not focusing on these adjectives because they're<00:36:46.040> not<00:36:46.200> used<00:36:46.440> as<00:36:46.599> often<00:36:46.839> as<00:36:47.000> the<00:36:47.119> other 00:36:47.270 --> 00:36:47.280 align:start position:0% they're not used as often as the other 00:36:47.280 --> 00:36:48.910 align:start position:0% they're not used as often as the other ones<00:36:47.440> in<00:36:47.599> Spanish<00:36:48.079> and<00:36:48.240> also<00:36:48.520> all<00:36:48.640> of<00:36:48.760> these 00:36:48.910 --> 00:36:48.920 align:start position:0% ones in Spanish and also all of these 00:36:48.920 --> 00:36:50.589 align:start position:0% ones in Spanish and also all of these possessive<00:36:49.319> adjectives<00:36:49.760> have<00:36:49.960> plurality<00:36:50.480> and 00:36:50.589 --> 00:36:50.599 align:start position:0% possessive adjectives have plurality and 00:36:50.599 --> 00:36:51.910 align:start position:0% possessive adjectives have plurality and the<00:36:50.720> way<00:36:50.839> that<00:36:50.920> you<00:36:51.000> pluralize<00:36:51.480> them<00:36:51.680> is<00:36:51.800> by 00:36:51.910 --> 00:36:51.920 align:start position:0% the way that you pluralize them is by 00:36:51.920 --> 00:36:53.630 align:start position:0% the way that you pluralize them is by simply<00:36:52.200> adding<00:36:52.440> an<00:36:52.599> S<00:36:52.920> at<00:36:53.040> the<00:36:53.119> end<00:36:53.280> of<00:36:53.400> every 00:36:53.630 --> 00:36:53.640 align:start position:0% simply adding an S at the end of every 00:36:53.640 --> 00:36:55.230 align:start position:0% simply adding an S at the end of every adjective<00:36:54.040> and<00:36:54.160> with<00:36:54.319> plurality<00:36:55.000> you<00:36:55.079> can 00:36:55.230 --> 00:36:55.240 align:start position:0% adjective and with plurality you can 00:36:55.240 --> 00:36:56.430 align:start position:0% adjective and with plurality you can only<00:36:55.440> use<00:36:55.599> it<00:36:55.760> when<00:36:55.839> you're<00:36:56.000> referring<00:36:56.280> to 00:36:56.430 --> 00:36:56.440 align:start position:0% only use it when you're referring to 00:36:56.440 --> 00:36:58.630 align:start position:0% only use it when you're referring to noun<00:36:56.880> that<00:36:57.000> are<00:36:57.119> not<00:36:57.359> singular<00:36:57.920> for<00:36:58.119> example 00:36:58.630 --> 00:36:58.640 align:start position:0% noun that are not singular for example 00:36:58.640 --> 00:37:00.470 align:start position:0% noun that are not singular for example if<00:36:58.720> you<00:36:58.800> want<00:36:58.920> to<00:36:59.040> say<00:36:59.280> my<00:36:59.520> car<00:36:59.880> you<00:36:59.960> would<00:37:00.160> say 00:37:00.470 --> 00:37:00.480 align:start position:0% if you want to say my car you would say 00:37:00.480 --> 00:37:02.990 align:start position:0% if you want to say my car you would say m<00:37:00.720> cooche<00:37:01.119> but<00:37:01.240> saying<00:37:01.560> my<00:37:01.800> cars<00:37:02.280> would<00:37:02.400> be<00:37:02.680> M 00:37:02.990 --> 00:37:03.000 align:start position:0% m cooche but saying my cars would be M 00:37:03.000 --> 00:37:04.829 align:start position:0% m cooche but saying my cars would be M cooches<00:37:03.480> if<00:37:03.560> you<00:37:03.640> want<00:37:03.720> to<00:37:03.839> say<00:37:04.040> your<00:37:04.319> dog<00:37:04.760> you 00:37:04.829 --> 00:37:04.839 align:start position:0% cooches if you want to say your dog you 00:37:04.839 --> 00:37:07.190 align:start position:0% cooches if you want to say your dog you would<00:37:05.000> say<00:37:05.359> two<00:37:05.640> perro<00:37:06.040> and<00:37:06.160> saying<00:37:06.480> your<00:37:06.720> dogs 00:37:07.190 --> 00:37:07.200 align:start position:0% would say two perro and saying your dogs 00:37:07.200 --> 00:37:09.750 align:start position:0% would say two perro and saying your dogs would<00:37:07.359> be<00:37:07.720> twoos<00:37:08.720> however<00:37:08.960> using<00:37:09.280> the<00:37:09.400> Sue 00:37:09.750 --> 00:37:09.760 align:start position:0% would be twoos however using the Sue 00:37:09.760 --> 00:37:11.430 align:start position:0% would be twoos however using the Sue adjective<00:37:10.200> is<00:37:10.319> where<00:37:10.480> the<00:37:10.599> syntax<00:37:11.040> gets<00:37:11.200> a<00:37:11.319> bit 00:37:11.430 --> 00:37:11.440 align:start position:0% adjective is where the syntax gets a bit 00:37:11.440 --> 00:37:12.870 align:start position:0% adjective is where the syntax gets a bit tricky<00:37:11.800> and<00:37:11.920> like<00:37:12.040> I<00:37:12.119> said<00:37:12.319> again<00:37:12.680> this 00:37:12.870 --> 00:37:12.880 align:start position:0% tricky and like I said again this 00:37:12.880 --> 00:37:15.030 align:start position:0% tricky and like I said again this adjective<00:37:13.240> can<00:37:13.359> mean<00:37:13.680> his<00:37:13.960> her<00:37:14.319> and<00:37:14.560> there<00:37:14.960> it 00:37:15.030 --> 00:37:15.040 align:start position:0% adjective can mean his her and there it 00:37:15.040 --> 00:37:16.589 align:start position:0% adjective can mean his her and there it can<00:37:15.160> be<00:37:15.319> pluralized<00:37:15.960> and<00:37:16.079> you<00:37:16.160> can<00:37:16.280> only<00:37:16.440> tell 00:37:16.589 --> 00:37:16.599 align:start position:0% can be pluralized and you can only tell 00:37:16.599 --> 00:37:18.309 align:start position:0% can be pluralized and you can only tell the<00:37:16.720> difference<00:37:17.040> between<00:37:17.359> them<00:37:17.560> in<00:37:17.760> context 00:37:18.309 --> 00:37:18.319 align:start position:0% the difference between them in context 00:37:18.319 --> 00:37:19.790 align:start position:0% the difference between them in context you<00:37:18.400> can<00:37:18.520> have<00:37:18.599> a<00:37:18.720> sentence<00:37:19.000> in<00:37:19.160> English<00:37:19.520> like 00:37:19.790 --> 00:37:19.800 align:start position:0% you can have a sentence in English like 00:37:19.800 --> 00:37:21.550 align:start position:0% you can have a sentence in English like I<00:37:19.920> talk<00:37:20.200> with<00:37:20.359> his<00:37:20.520> friend<00:37:20.960> and<00:37:21.040> in<00:37:21.200> Spanish 00:37:21.550 --> 00:37:21.560 align:start position:0% I talk with his friend and in Spanish 00:37:21.560 --> 00:37:24.190 align:start position:0% I talk with his friend and in Spanish the<00:37:21.680> sentence<00:37:22.040> would<00:37:22.200> be<00:37:22.640> Yu<00:37:23.640> Amigo<00:37:24.079> in 00:37:24.190 --> 00:37:24.200 align:start position:0% the sentence would be Yu Amigo in 00:37:24.200 --> 00:37:25.790 align:start position:0% the sentence would be Yu Amigo in English<00:37:24.880> understanding<00:37:25.119> the<00:37:25.240> adjective<00:37:25.640> is 00:37:25.790 --> 00:37:25.800 align:start position:0% English understanding the adjective is 00:37:25.800 --> 00:37:27.349 align:start position:0% English understanding the adjective is very<00:37:26.000> easy<00:37:26.319> because<00:37:26.680> who<00:37:26.800> have<00:37:26.880> an<00:37:27.000> adjective 00:37:27.349 --> 00:37:27.359 align:start position:0% very easy because who have an adjective 00:37:27.359 --> 00:37:29.030 align:start position:0% very easy because who have an adjective that<00:37:27.480> specifies<00:37:27.960> who<00:37:28.119> it<00:37:28.240> is<00:37:28.520> in<00:37:28.640> this<00:37:28.800> case 00:37:29.030 --> 00:37:29.040 align:start position:0% that specifies who it is in this case 00:37:29.040 --> 00:37:30.670 align:start position:0% that specifies who it is in this case it's<00:37:29.240> masculine<00:37:29.720> in<00:37:29.880> Spanish<00:37:30.359> however<00:37:30.599> it 00:37:30.670 --> 00:37:30.680 align:start position:0% it's masculine in Spanish however it 00:37:30.680 --> 00:37:32.589 align:start position:0% it's masculine in Spanish however it would<00:37:30.800> be<00:37:31.119> difficult<00:37:31.240> to<00:37:31.359> tell<00:37:31.640> if<00:37:31.800> Su<00:37:32.280> refers 00:37:32.589 --> 00:37:32.599 align:start position:0% would be difficult to tell if Su refers 00:37:32.599 --> 00:37:34.829 align:start position:0% would be difficult to tell if Su refers to<00:37:32.880> his<00:37:33.240> her<00:37:33.560> or<00:37:33.800> their<00:37:34.119> a<00:37:34.280> tip<00:37:34.440> that<00:37:34.560> I<00:37:34.680> can 00:37:34.829 --> 00:37:34.839 align:start position:0% to his her or their a tip that I can 00:37:34.839 --> 00:37:36.390 align:start position:0% to his her or their a tip that I can give<00:37:35.040> to<00:37:35.160> not<00:37:35.319> get<00:37:35.480> these<00:37:35.680> confused<00:37:36.160> is<00:37:36.240> to 00:37:36.390 --> 00:37:36.400 align:start position:0% give to not get these confused is to 00:37:36.400 --> 00:37:38.109 align:start position:0% give to not get these confused is to always<00:37:36.680> specify<00:37:37.119> who<00:37:37.240> is<00:37:37.400> the<00:37:37.520> subject<00:37:37.920> within 00:37:38.109 --> 00:37:38.119 align:start position:0% always specify who is the subject within 00:37:38.119 --> 00:37:39.390 align:start position:0% always specify who is the subject within the<00:37:38.240> sentence<00:37:38.560> that<00:37:38.680> you're<00:37:38.800> saying<00:37:39.200> you<00:37:39.280> can 00:37:39.390 --> 00:37:39.400 align:start position:0% the sentence that you're saying you can 00:37:39.400 --> 00:37:41.390 align:start position:0% the sentence that you're saying you can say<00:37:39.560> a<00:37:39.640> sentence<00:37:40.040> like<00:37:40.280> I<00:37:40.400> talk<00:37:40.640> with<00:37:40.800> Jon<00:37:41.240> and 00:37:41.390 --> 00:37:41.400 align:start position:0% say a sentence like I talk with Jon and 00:37:41.400 --> 00:37:43.030 align:start position:0% say a sentence like I talk with Jon and with<00:37:41.560> his<00:37:41.760> father<00:37:42.160> and<00:37:42.280> in<00:37:42.440> Spanish<00:37:42.960> the 00:37:43.030 --> 00:37:43.040 align:start position:0% with his father and in Spanish the 00:37:43.040 --> 00:37:44.670 align:start position:0% with his father and in Spanish the sentence<00:37:43.400> would 00:37:44.670 --> 00:37:44.680 align:start position:0% sentence would 00:37:44.680 --> 00:37:46.990 align:start position:0% sentence would be<00:37:45.680> and<00:37:45.760> in<00:37:45.920> this<00:37:46.119> context<00:37:46.560> you<00:37:46.640> would<00:37:46.800> know 00:37:46.990 --> 00:37:47.000 align:start position:0% be and in this context you would know 00:37:47.000 --> 00:37:48.750 align:start position:0% be and in this context you would know that<00:37:47.119> the<00:37:47.240> adjective<00:37:47.640> Su<00:37:48.000> is<00:37:48.160> masculine<00:37:48.640> and 00:37:48.750 --> 00:37:48.760 align:start position:0% that the adjective Su is masculine and 00:37:48.760 --> 00:37:50.550 align:start position:0% that the adjective Su is masculine and indicates<00:37:49.240> his<00:37:49.560> because<00:37:49.760> JN<00:37:50.000> is<00:37:50.079> a<00:37:50.200> masculine 00:37:50.550 --> 00:37:50.560 align:start position:0% indicates his because JN is a masculine 00:37:50.560 --> 00:37:52.190 align:start position:0% indicates his because JN is a masculine name<00:37:50.880> likewise<00:37:51.359> you<00:37:51.440> can<00:37:51.599> have<00:37:51.680> a<00:37:51.800> sentence 00:37:52.190 --> 00:37:52.200 align:start position:0% name likewise you can have a sentence 00:37:52.200 --> 00:37:53.910 align:start position:0% name likewise you can have a sentence like<00:37:52.440> I<00:37:52.599> talk<00:37:52.839> with<00:37:53.040> Emma<00:37:53.440> and<00:37:53.599> with<00:37:53.760> her 00:37:53.910 --> 00:37:53.920 align:start position:0% like I talk with Emma and with her 00:37:53.920 --> 00:37:55.470 align:start position:0% like I talk with Emma and with her mother<00:37:54.319> and<00:37:54.440> in<00:37:54.560> Spanish<00:37:54.960> the<00:37:55.040> sentence<00:37:55.359> would 00:37:55.470 --> 00:37:55.480 align:start position:0% mother and in Spanish the sentence would 00:37:55.480 --> 00:37:57.710 align:start position:0% mother and in Spanish the sentence would be<00:37:55.800> you<00:37:56.400> Emma 00:37:57.710 --> 00:37:57.720 align:start position:0% be you Emma 00:37:57.720 --> 00:37:59.430 align:start position:0% be you Emma and<00:37:57.800> in<00:37:57.960> this<00:37:58.160> context<00:37:58.560> we<00:37:58.680> know<00:37:58.839> that<00:37:59.000> Su<00:37:59.319> is 00:37:59.430 --> 00:37:59.440 align:start position:0% and in this context we know that Su is 00:37:59.440 --> 00:38:01.430 align:start position:0% and in this context we know that Su is feminine<00:37:59.839> and<00:37:59.960> indicates<00:38:00.440> her<00:38:00.800> because<00:38:01.079> Emma 00:38:01.430 --> 00:38:01.440 align:start position:0% feminine and indicates her because Emma 00:38:01.440 --> 00:38:02.829 align:start position:0% feminine and indicates her because Emma is<00:38:01.560> feminine<00:38:02.040> at<00:38:02.200> last<00:38:02.400> you<00:38:02.480> can<00:38:02.640> have<00:38:02.720> a 00:38:02.829 --> 00:38:02.839 align:start position:0% is feminine at last you can have a 00:38:02.839 --> 00:38:04.430 align:start position:0% is feminine at last you can have a sentence<00:38:03.160> that<00:38:03.280> utilizes<00:38:03.839> two<00:38:04.040> adjectives 00:38:04.430 --> 00:38:04.440 align:start position:0% sentence that utilizes two adjectives 00:38:04.440 --> 00:38:06.230 align:start position:0% sentence that utilizes two adjectives and<00:38:04.560> you<00:38:04.640> can<00:38:04.760> pluralize<00:38:05.240> them<00:38:05.400> both<00:38:05.839> like<00:38:06.119> I 00:38:06.230 --> 00:38:06.240 align:start position:0% and you can pluralize them both like I 00:38:06.240 --> 00:38:07.790 align:start position:0% and you can pluralize them both like I talk<00:38:06.520> with<00:38:06.680> my<00:38:06.839> parents<00:38:07.240> and<00:38:07.400> with<00:38:07.560> their 00:38:07.790 --> 00:38:07.800 align:start position:0% talk with my parents and with their 00:38:07.800 --> 00:38:11.150 align:start position:0% talk with my parents and with their friends<00:38:08.240> and<00:38:08.359> in<00:38:08.520> Spanish<00:38:08.920> it<00:38:09.000> would 00:38:11.150 --> 00:38:11.160 align:start position:0% friends and in Spanish it would 00:38:11.160 --> 00:38:13.870 align:start position:0% friends and in Spanish it would be<00:38:12.160> is<00:38:12.280> pluralized<00:38:13.000> because<00:38:13.280> padis<00:38:13.680> is<00:38:13.760> a 00:38:13.870 --> 00:38:13.880 align:start position:0% be is pluralized because padis is a 00:38:13.880 --> 00:38:15.990 align:start position:0% be is pluralized because padis is a plural<00:38:14.240> noun<00:38:14.599> and<00:38:14.720> sus<00:38:15.040> is<00:38:15.200> also<00:38:15.440> pluralized 00:38:15.990 --> 00:38:16.000 align:start position:0% plural noun and sus is also pluralized 00:38:16.000 --> 00:38:17.670 align:start position:0% plural noun and sus is also pluralized because<00:38:16.160> of<00:38:16.319> Amigos<00:38:16.880> but<00:38:16.960> it<00:38:17.079> mainly<00:38:17.359> refers 00:38:17.670 --> 00:38:17.680 align:start position:0% because of Amigos but it mainly refers 00:38:17.680 --> 00:38:19.349 align:start position:0% because of Amigos but it mainly refers to<00:38:17.800> the<00:38:17.920> adjective<00:38:18.400> there<00:38:18.800> because<00:38:19.000> of<00:38:19.160> my 00:38:19.349 --> 00:38:19.359 align:start position:0% to the adjective there because of my 00:38:19.359 --> 00:38:21.390 align:start position:0% to the adjective there because of my parents's<00:38:19.839> friends<00:38:20.319> which<00:38:20.400> is<00:38:20.680> they<00:38:20.960> friends 00:38:21.390 --> 00:38:21.400 align:start position:0% parents's friends which is they friends 00:38:21.400 --> 00:38:22.710 align:start position:0% parents's friends which is they friends using<00:38:21.680> the<00:38:21.839> system<00:38:22.160> is<00:38:22.319> actually<00:38:22.520> quite 00:38:22.710 --> 00:38:22.720 align:start position:0% using the system is actually quite 00:38:22.720 --> 00:38:23.829 align:start position:0% using the system is actually quite useful<00:38:23.040> to<00:38:23.160> keep<00:38:23.319> these<00:38:23.440> possessive 00:38:23.829 --> 00:38:23.839 align:start position:0% useful to keep these possessive 00:38:23.839 --> 00:38:25.109 align:start position:0% useful to keep these possessive adjectives<00:38:24.200> in<00:38:24.280> the<00:38:24.400> back<00:38:24.520> of<00:38:24.599> your<00:38:24.760> mind 00:38:25.109 --> 00:38:25.119 align:start position:0% adjectives in the back of your mind 00:38:25.119 --> 00:38:26.270 align:start position:0% adjectives in the back of your mind because<00:38:25.319> the<00:38:25.440> sentences<00:38:25.839> that<00:38:25.920> you<00:38:26.000> can<00:38:26.119> make 00:38:26.270 --> 00:38:26.280 align:start position:0% because the sentences that you can make 00:38:26.280 --> 00:38:28.109 align:start position:0% because the sentences that you can make with<00:38:26.400> them<00:38:26.760> are<00:38:26.920> practical<00:38:27.359> and<00:38:27.520> Limitless 00:38:28.109 --> 00:38:28.119 align:start position:0% with them are practical and Limitless 00:38:28.119 --> 00:38:29.390 align:start position:0% with them are practical and Limitless and<00:38:28.280> once<00:38:28.480> again<00:38:28.720> the<00:38:28.839> same<00:38:29.040> principle 00:38:29.390 --> 00:38:29.400 align:start position:0% and once again the same principle 00:38:29.400 --> 00:38:30.910 align:start position:0% and once again the same principle applies<00:38:29.680> to<00:38:29.839> any<00:38:30.000> sentence<00:38:30.319> you<00:38:30.440> want<00:38:30.560> to<00:38:30.680> say 00:38:30.910 --> 00:38:30.920 align:start position:0% applies to any sentence you want to say 00:38:30.920 --> 00:38:32.550 align:start position:0% applies to any sentence you want to say using<00:38:31.240> these<00:38:31.440> adjectives<00:38:31.920> demonstra<00:38:32.440> of 00:38:32.550 --> 00:38:32.560 align:start position:0% using these adjectives demonstra of 00:38:32.560 --> 00:38:33.990 align:start position:0% using these adjectives demonstra of adjectives<00:38:32.880> in<00:38:33.040> Spanish<00:38:33.359> are<00:38:33.599> adjectives 00:38:33.990 --> 00:38:34.000 align:start position:0% adjectives in Spanish are adjectives 00:38:34.000 --> 00:38:35.270 align:start position:0% adjectives in Spanish are adjectives that<00:38:34.079> are<00:38:34.160> used<00:38:34.359> to<00:38:34.440> indicate<00:38:34.800> a<00:38:34.920> specific 00:38:35.270 --> 00:38:35.280 align:start position:0% that are used to indicate a specific 00:38:35.280 --> 00:38:36.710 align:start position:0% that are used to indicate a specific word<00:38:35.560> or<00:38:35.800> precisely<00:38:36.200> determine<00:38:36.599> what 00:38:36.710 --> 00:38:36.720 align:start position:0% word or precisely determine what 00:38:36.720 --> 00:38:38.349 align:start position:0% word or precisely determine what something<00:38:37.000> is<00:38:37.280> in<00:38:37.440> English<00:38:37.800> it's<00:38:37.960> very<00:38:38.119> easy 00:38:38.349 --> 00:38:38.359 align:start position:0% something is in English it's very easy 00:38:38.359 --> 00:38:39.750 align:start position:0% something is in English it's very easy to<00:38:38.480> decide<00:38:38.720> on<00:38:38.880> these<00:38:39.079> adjectives<00:38:39.599> because 00:38:39.750 --> 00:38:39.760 align:start position:0% to decide on these adjectives because 00:38:39.760 --> 00:38:41.390 align:start position:0% to decide on these adjectives because you<00:38:39.920> have<00:38:40.119> only<00:38:40.359> two<00:38:40.640> primary<00:38:41.000> words<00:38:41.280> that 00:38:41.390 --> 00:38:41.400 align:start position:0% you have only two primary words that 00:38:41.400 --> 00:38:43.150 align:start position:0% you have only two primary words that determine<00:38:41.800> something<00:38:42.160> and<00:38:42.319> these<00:38:42.560> words<00:38:42.839> are 00:38:43.150 --> 00:38:43.160 align:start position:0% determine something and these words are 00:38:43.160 --> 00:38:44.430 align:start position:0% determine something and these words are this<00:38:43.560> and<00:38:43.760> that<00:38:44.000> and<00:38:44.079> if<00:38:44.160> you<00:38:44.240> want<00:38:44.319> to 00:38:44.430 --> 00:38:44.440 align:start position:0% this and that and if you want to 00:38:44.440 --> 00:38:46.829 align:start position:0% this and that and if you want to pluralize<00:38:44.920> them<00:38:45.280> this<00:38:45.640> becomes<00:38:46.119> these<00:38:46.599> and 00:38:46.829 --> 00:38:46.839 align:start position:0% pluralize them this becomes these and 00:38:46.839 --> 00:38:48.750 align:start position:0% pluralize them this becomes these and that<00:38:47.160> becomes<00:38:47.599> those<00:38:48.079> in<00:38:48.200> Spanish<00:38:48.520> you<00:38:48.640> have 00:38:48.750 --> 00:38:48.760 align:start position:0% that becomes those in Spanish you have 00:38:48.760 --> 00:38:50.309 align:start position:0% that becomes those in Spanish you have the<00:38:48.880> same<00:38:49.119> concept<00:38:49.560> along<00:38:49.760> with<00:38:49.880> a<00:38:50.000> bit<00:38:50.160> more 00:38:50.309 --> 00:38:50.319 align:start position:0% the same concept along with a bit more 00:38:50.319 --> 00:38:52.829 align:start position:0% the same concept along with a bit more variety<00:38:50.960> gender<00:38:51.319> and<00:38:51.480> plurality<00:38:52.079> in<00:38:52.240> Spanish 00:38:52.829 --> 00:38:52.839 align:start position:0% variety gender and plurality in Spanish 00:38:52.839 --> 00:38:55.910 align:start position:0% variety gender and plurality in Spanish this<00:38:53.160> would<00:38:53.359> be<00:38:53.720> Estee<00:38:54.359> masculine<00:38:55.079> and<00:38:55.359> esta 00:38:55.910 --> 00:38:55.920 align:start position:0% this would be Estee masculine and esta 00:38:55.920 --> 00:38:58.870 align:start position:0% this would be Estee masculine and esta feminine<00:38:56.640> and<00:38:56.839> that<00:38:57.160> would<00:38:57.319> be<00:38:57.760> ESS<00:38:58.280> masculine 00:38:58.870 --> 00:38:58.880 align:start position:0% feminine and that would be ESS masculine 00:38:58.880 --> 00:39:00.829 align:start position:0% feminine and that would be ESS masculine and<00:38:59.160> Essa<00:38:59.640> feminine<00:39:00.160> it's<00:39:00.280> really<00:39:00.480> tempting 00:39:00.829 --> 00:39:00.839 align:start position:0% and Essa feminine it's really tempting 00:39:00.839 --> 00:39:03.470 align:start position:0% and Essa feminine it's really tempting to<00:39:00.960> say<00:39:01.359> esto<00:39:02.000> or<00:39:02.319> ESO<00:39:02.800> because<00:39:03.000> the<00:39:03.119> feminine 00:39:03.470 --> 00:39:03.480 align:start position:0% to say esto or ESO because the feminine 00:39:03.480 --> 00:39:05.390 align:start position:0% to say esto or ESO because the feminine version<00:39:03.800> ends<00:39:04.040> in<00:39:04.240> a<00:39:04.599> so<00:39:04.720> you<00:39:04.839> want<00:39:04.920> to<00:39:05.079> put<00:39:05.200> an 00:39:05.390 --> 00:39:05.400 align:start position:0% version ends in a so you want to put an 00:39:05.400 --> 00:39:07.470 align:start position:0% version ends in a so you want to put an O<00:39:05.680> for<00:39:05.839> the<00:39:06.000> masculine<00:39:06.440> adjectives<00:39:07.200> however 00:39:07.470 --> 00:39:07.480 align:start position:0% O for the masculine adjectives however 00:39:07.480 --> 00:39:09.670 align:start position:0% O for the masculine adjectives however Spanish<00:39:07.839> does<00:39:08.079> have<00:39:08.280> these<00:39:08.440> words<00:39:08.920> esto<00:39:09.440> and 00:39:09.670 --> 00:39:09.680 align:start position:0% Spanish does have these words esto and 00:39:09.680 --> 00:39:11.309 align:start position:0% Spanish does have these words esto and ESO<00:39:10.240> but<00:39:10.359> these<00:39:10.480> are<00:39:10.680> adjectives<00:39:11.119> that<00:39:11.240> have 00:39:11.309 --> 00:39:11.319 align:start position:0% ESO but these are adjectives that have 00:39:11.319 --> 00:39:12.750 align:start position:0% ESO but these are adjectives that have the<00:39:11.440> neuter<00:39:11.760> gender<00:39:12.079> meaning<00:39:12.359> that<00:39:12.480> you<00:39:12.599> don't 00:39:12.750 --> 00:39:12.760 align:start position:0% the neuter gender meaning that you don't 00:39:12.760 --> 00:39:14.230 align:start position:0% the neuter gender meaning that you don't know<00:39:12.920> if<00:39:13.079> these<00:39:13.280> adjectives<00:39:13.800> refer<00:39:14.119> to 00:39:14.230 --> 00:39:14.240 align:start position:0% know if these adjectives refer to 00:39:14.240 --> 00:39:15.870 align:start position:0% know if these adjectives refer to something<00:39:14.560> masculine<00:39:15.000> or<00:39:15.200> feminine<00:39:15.640> roughly 00:39:15.870 --> 00:39:15.880 align:start position:0% something masculine or feminine roughly 00:39:15.880 --> 00:39:17.630 align:start position:0% something masculine or feminine roughly 80%<00:39:16.359> of<00:39:16.480> the<00:39:16.640> time<00:39:16.920> you<00:39:17.040> would<00:39:17.200> use<00:39:17.440> these 00:39:17.630 --> 00:39:17.640 align:start position:0% 80% of the time you would use these 00:39:17.640 --> 00:39:20.870 align:start position:0% 80% of the time you would use these words<00:39:17.920> in<00:39:18.079> sentences<00:39:18.599> like<00:39:18.960> kesto<00:39:19.839> or<00:39:20.240> keso 00:39:20.870 --> 00:39:20.880 align:start position:0% words in sentences like kesto or keso 00:39:20.880 --> 00:39:22.790 align:start position:0% words in sentences like kesto or keso meaning<00:39:21.280> what<00:39:21.400> is<00:39:21.599> this<00:39:21.920> or<00:39:22.200> what<00:39:22.319> is<00:39:22.520> that 00:39:22.790 --> 00:39:22.800 align:start position:0% meaning what is this or what is that 00:39:22.800 --> 00:39:24.270 align:start position:0% meaning what is this or what is that these<00:39:22.920> are<00:39:23.079> simple<00:39:23.319> sentences<00:39:23.720> to<00:39:23.880> remember 00:39:24.270 --> 00:39:24.280 align:start position:0% these are simple sentences to remember 00:39:24.280 --> 00:39:25.750 align:start position:0% these are simple sentences to remember whenever<00:39:24.560> you<00:39:24.680> decide<00:39:24.920> to<00:39:25.000> speak<00:39:25.240> Spanish 00:39:25.750 --> 00:39:25.760 align:start position:0% whenever you decide to speak Spanish 00:39:25.760 --> 00:39:26.990 align:start position:0% whenever you decide to speak Spanish Additionally<00:39:26.160> you<00:39:26.280> could<00:39:26.520> also<00:39:26.680> use<00:39:26.880> these 00:39:26.990 --> 00:39:27.000 align:start position:0% Additionally you could also use these 00:39:27.000 --> 00:39:28.430 align:start position:0% Additionally you could also use these words<00:39:27.280> for<00:39:27.440> making<00:39:27.720> sentences<00:39:28.160> that<00:39:28.280> have 00:39:28.430 --> 00:39:28.440 align:start position:0% words for making sentences that have 00:39:28.440 --> 00:39:30.390 align:start position:0% words for making sentences that have generalizations<00:39:29.359> such<00:39:29.599> as<00:39:29.920> this<00:39:30.040> is<00:39:30.160> for 00:39:30.390 --> 00:39:30.400 align:start position:0% generalizations such as this is for 00:39:30.400 --> 00:39:32.950 align:start position:0% generalizations such as this is for everybody<00:39:31.040> EST<00:39:31.440> esos<00:39:32.240> and<00:39:32.319> the<00:39:32.440> same<00:39:32.640> concept 00:39:32.950 --> 00:39:32.960 align:start position:0% everybody EST esos and the same concept 00:39:32.960 --> 00:39:34.870 align:start position:0% everybody EST esos and the same concept applies<00:39:33.240> to<00:39:33.440> ESO<00:39:33.880> in<00:39:34.040> any<00:39:34.240> continuation<00:39:34.760> that 00:39:34.870 --> 00:39:34.880 align:start position:0% applies to ESO in any continuation that 00:39:34.880 --> 00:39:36.550 align:start position:0% applies to ESO in any continuation that you<00:39:34.960> want<00:39:35.079> to<00:39:35.160> say<00:39:35.520> overall<00:39:36.000> you<00:39:36.160> just<00:39:36.280> have<00:39:36.400> to 00:39:36.550 --> 00:39:36.560 align:start position:0% you want to say overall you just have to 00:39:36.560 --> 00:39:39.109 align:start position:0% you want to say overall you just have to remember<00:39:36.920> that<00:39:37.200> Estee<00:39:37.680> and<00:39:38.240> are<00:39:38.480> masculine 00:39:39.109 --> 00:39:39.119 align:start position:0% remember that Estee and are masculine 00:39:39.119 --> 00:39:41.270 align:start position:0% remember that Estee and are masculine and<00:39:39.359> esta<00:39:39.920> Anda<00:39:40.480> are<00:39:40.640> feminine<00:39:41.040> if<00:39:41.119> you<00:39:41.200> want 00:39:41.270 --> 00:39:41.280 align:start position:0% and esta Anda are feminine if you want 00:39:41.280 --> 00:39:43.829 align:start position:0% and esta Anda are feminine if you want to<00:39:41.400> pluralize<00:39:41.960> them<00:39:42.160> both<00:39:42.599> EST<00:39:43.079> and<00:39:43.319> esta 00:39:43.829 --> 00:39:43.839 align:start position:0% to pluralize them both EST and esta 00:39:43.839 --> 00:39:47.109 align:start position:0% to pluralize them both EST and esta become<00:39:44.280> estos<00:39:44.839> and<00:39:45.079> estas<00:39:45.720> and<00:39:46.319> and<00:39:46.560> Esa 00:39:47.109 --> 00:39:47.119 align:start position:0% become estos and estas and and Esa 00:39:47.119 --> 00:39:49.550 align:start position:0% become estos and estas and and Esa become<00:39:47.640> esos<00:39:48.119> and<00:39:48.359> esas<00:39:48.839> Visually<00:39:49.200> looking<00:39:49.440> at 00:39:49.550 --> 00:39:49.560 align:start position:0% become esos and esas Visually looking at 00:39:49.560 --> 00:39:51.750 align:start position:0% become esos and esas Visually looking at the<00:39:49.720> syntax<00:39:50.200> the<00:39:50.440> plurality<00:39:50.839> for<00:39:51.119> esta<00:39:51.560> and 00:39:51.750 --> 00:39:51.760 align:start position:0% the syntax the plurality for esta and 00:39:51.760 --> 00:39:53.670 align:start position:0% the syntax the plurality for esta and Esa<00:39:52.160> is<00:39:52.319> very<00:39:52.520> simple<00:39:52.960> because<00:39:53.200> all<00:39:53.319> you<00:39:53.400> do<00:39:53.560> is 00:39:53.670 --> 00:39:53.680 align:start position:0% Esa is very simple because all you do is 00:39:53.680 --> 00:39:55.349 align:start position:0% Esa is very simple because all you do is put<00:39:53.839> an<00:39:54.000> S<00:39:54.240> at<00:39:54.319> the<00:39:54.400> end<00:39:54.520> of<00:39:54.640> the<00:39:54.760> adjectives 00:39:55.349 --> 00:39:55.359 align:start position:0% put an S at the end of the adjectives 00:39:55.359 --> 00:39:56.910 align:start position:0% put an S at the end of the adjectives but<00:39:55.480> for<00:39:55.760> Estee<00:39:56.079> and 00:39:56.910 --> 00:39:56.920 align:start position:0% but for Estee and 00:39:56.920 --> 00:39:59.230 align:start position:0% but for Estee and the<00:39:57.000> ending<00:39:57.280> changes<00:39:57.720> to<00:39:57.960> estos<00:39:58.480> and<00:39:58.680> esos<00:39:59.160> and 00:39:59.230 --> 00:39:59.240 align:start position:0% the ending changes to estos and esos and 00:39:59.240 --> 00:40:00.710 align:start position:0% the ending changes to estos and esos and that's<00:39:59.400> the<00:39:59.520> only<00:39:59.720> tough<00:39:59.920> part<00:40:00.079> to<00:40:00.240> remember 00:40:00.710 --> 00:40:00.720 align:start position:0% that's the only tough part to remember 00:40:00.720 --> 00:40:02.750 align:start position:0% that's the only tough part to remember and<00:40:00.880> also<00:40:01.200> remember<00:40:01.480> to<00:40:01.640> not<00:40:01.839> put<00:40:02.079> accents<00:40:02.520> on 00:40:02.750 --> 00:40:02.760 align:start position:0% and also remember to not put accents on 00:40:02.760 --> 00:40:04.910 align:start position:0% and also remember to not put accents on esta<00:40:03.240> and<00:40:03.480> estas<00:40:04.079> because<00:40:04.319> if<00:40:04.480> you<00:40:04.560> do<00:40:04.800> you 00:40:04.910 --> 00:40:04.920 align:start position:0% esta and estas because if you do you 00:40:04.920 --> 00:40:06.589 align:start position:0% esta and estas because if you do you will<00:40:05.079> have<00:40:05.240> different<00:40:05.520> words<00:40:06.000> additionally 00:40:06.589 --> 00:40:06.599 align:start position:0% will have different words additionally 00:40:06.599 --> 00:40:09.510 align:start position:0% will have different words additionally Spanish<00:40:07.000> also<00:40:07.240> has<00:40:07.480> these<00:40:07.680> words<00:40:08.200> AEL<00:40:08.680> and<00:40:08.920> AA 00:40:09.510 --> 00:40:09.520 align:start position:0% Spanish also has these words AEL and AA 00:40:09.520 --> 00:40:11.230 align:start position:0% Spanish also has these words AEL and AA both<00:40:09.680> of<00:40:09.800> which<00:40:09.960> mean<00:40:10.280> that<00:40:10.599> as<00:40:10.720> in<00:40:10.920> something 00:40:11.230 --> 00:40:11.240 align:start position:0% both of which mean that as in something 00:40:11.240 --> 00:40:12.390 align:start position:0% both of which mean that as in something that's<00:40:11.440> over<00:40:11.720> there<00:40:12.000> if<00:40:12.079> you<00:40:12.160> want<00:40:12.240> to 00:40:12.390 --> 00:40:12.400 align:start position:0% that's over there if you want to 00:40:12.400 --> 00:40:15.790 align:start position:0% that's over there if you want to pluralize<00:40:12.960> them<00:40:13.319> AEL<00:40:13.800> becomes<00:40:14.200> AOS<00:40:14.920> and<00:40:15.160> AA 00:40:15.790 --> 00:40:15.800 align:start position:0% pluralize them AEL becomes AOS and AA 00:40:15.800 --> 00:40:17.430 align:start position:0% pluralize them AEL becomes AOS and AA becomes<00:40:16.240> AAS<00:40:16.920> even<00:40:17.119> though<00:40:17.280> this 00:40:17.430 --> 00:40:17.440 align:start position:0% becomes AAS even though this 00:40:17.440 --> 00:40:18.990 align:start position:0% becomes AAS even though this demonstrative<00:40:17.960> adjective<00:40:18.400> is<00:40:18.520> used<00:40:18.800> less 00:40:18.990 --> 00:40:19.000 align:start position:0% demonstrative adjective is used less 00:40:19.000 --> 00:40:20.750 align:start position:0% demonstrative adjective is used less than<00:40:19.160> the<00:40:19.280> others<00:40:19.680> it's<00:40:19.880> actually<00:40:20.160> helpful<00:40:20.599> to 00:40:20.750 --> 00:40:20.760 align:start position:0% than the others it's actually helpful to 00:40:20.760 --> 00:40:22.550 align:start position:0% than the others it's actually helpful to say<00:40:20.960> in<00:40:21.079> some<00:40:21.319> cases<00:40:21.720> but<00:40:21.839> moreover<00:40:22.440> it's 00:40:22.550 --> 00:40:22.560 align:start position:0% say in some cases but moreover it's 00:40:22.560 --> 00:40:24.309 align:start position:0% say in some cases but moreover it's important<00:40:22.880> to<00:40:23.000> just<00:40:23.119> know<00:40:23.400> these<00:40:23.560> words<00:40:23.920> and 00:40:24.309 --> 00:40:24.319 align:start position:0% important to just know these words and 00:40:24.319 --> 00:40:25.670 align:start position:0% important to just know these words and understand<00:40:24.520> when<00:40:24.640> to<00:40:24.760> use<00:40:24.960> them<00:40:25.240> regarding 00:40:25.670 --> 00:40:25.680 align:start position:0% understand when to use them regarding 00:40:25.680 --> 00:40:27.710 align:start position:0% understand when to use them regarding examples<00:40:26.160> you<00:40:26.359> you<00:40:26.440> can<00:40:26.520> use<00:40:26.800> Estee<00:40:27.200> and<00:40:27.400> ESS 00:40:27.710 --> 00:40:27.720 align:start position:0% examples you you can use Estee and ESS 00:40:27.720 --> 00:40:29.910 align:start position:0% examples you you can use Estee and ESS with<00:40:27.880> masculine<00:40:28.280> nouns<00:40:28.800> like<00:40:29.040> Estee<00:40:29.400> Libro 00:40:29.910 --> 00:40:29.920 align:start position:0% with masculine nouns like Estee Libro 00:40:29.920 --> 00:40:32.510 align:start position:0% with masculine nouns like Estee Libro and<00:40:30.119> esta<00:40:30.960> you<00:40:31.079> can<00:40:31.200> use<00:40:31.480> ESS<00:40:31.839> and<00:40:32.040> Essa<00:40:32.400> with 00:40:32.510 --> 00:40:32.520 align:start position:0% and esta you can use ESS and Essa with 00:40:32.520 --> 00:40:35.829 align:start position:0% and esta you can use ESS and Essa with feminine<00:40:32.839> nouns<00:40:33.560> likeo<00:40:34.560> and<00:40:34.800> esaa<00:40:35.599> and<00:40:35.680> if<00:40:35.760> you 00:40:35.829 --> 00:40:35.839 align:start position:0% feminine nouns likeo and esaa and if you 00:40:35.839 --> 00:40:37.430 align:start position:0% feminine nouns likeo and esaa and if you want<00:40:35.960> to<00:40:36.079> pluralize<00:40:36.599> any<00:40:36.720> of<00:40:36.880> them<00:40:37.119> you<00:40:37.240> would 00:40:37.430 --> 00:40:37.440 align:start position:0% want to pluralize any of them you would 00:40:37.440 --> 00:40:40.870 align:start position:0% want to pluralize any of them you would have<00:40:37.760> estos<00:40:38.160> libros<00:40:38.839> estas<00:40:39.319> kasas<00:40:39.920> esos<00:40:40.319> csos 00:40:40.870 --> 00:40:40.880 align:start position:0% have estos libros estas kasas esos csos 00:40:40.880 --> 00:40:42.910 align:start position:0% have estos libros estas kasas esos csos and<00:40:41.119> esas<00:40:41.520> mesas<00:40:41.920> using<00:40:42.200> these<00:40:42.400> demonstrative 00:40:42.910 --> 00:40:42.920 align:start position:0% and esas mesas using these demonstrative 00:40:42.920 --> 00:40:44.190 align:start position:0% and esas mesas using these demonstrative adjectives<00:40:43.400> you<00:40:43.480> can<00:40:43.640> actually<00:40:43.800> make<00:40:44.000> many 00:40:44.190 --> 00:40:44.200 align:start position:0% adjectives you can actually make many 00:40:44.200 --> 00:40:45.510 align:start position:0% adjectives you can actually make many sentences<00:40:44.680> with<00:40:44.839> them<00:40:45.119> especially<00:40:45.400> when 00:40:45.510 --> 00:40:45.520 align:start position:0% sentences with them especially when 00:40:45.520 --> 00:40:46.829 align:start position:0% sentences with them especially when you're<00:40:45.599> trying<00:40:45.800> to<00:40:45.920> determine<00:40:46.319> something<00:40:46.720> and 00:40:46.829 --> 00:40:46.839 align:start position:0% you're trying to determine something and 00:40:46.839 --> 00:40:48.190 align:start position:0% you're trying to determine something and once<00:40:46.960> you<00:40:47.079> have<00:40:47.240> enough<00:40:47.520> practice<00:40:48.000> you'll 00:40:48.190 --> 00:40:48.200 align:start position:0% once you have enough practice you'll 00:40:48.200 --> 00:40:49.710 align:start position:0% once you have enough practice you'll find<00:40:48.400> these<00:40:48.560> words<00:40:48.760> to<00:40:48.839> be<00:40:49.000> very<00:40:49.160> useful<00:40:49.520> and 00:40:49.710 --> 00:40:49.720 align:start position:0% find these words to be very useful and 00:40:49.720 --> 00:40:51.109 align:start position:0% find these words to be very useful and practical<00:40:50.160> you've<00:40:50.400> probably<00:40:50.680> heard<00:40:50.920> many 00:40:51.109 --> 00:40:51.119 align:start position:0% practical you've probably heard many 00:40:51.119 --> 00:40:52.910 align:start position:0% practical you've probably heard many phrases<00:40:51.440> in<00:40:51.640> Spanish<00:40:52.079> used<00:40:52.319> for<00:40:52.480> greetings 00:40:52.910 --> 00:40:52.920 align:start position:0% phrases in Spanish used for greetings 00:40:52.920 --> 00:40:54.670 align:start position:0% phrases in Spanish used for greetings and<00:40:53.079> farewells<00:40:53.720> some<00:40:53.839> of<00:40:53.960> which<00:40:54.079> are<00:40:54.240> useful 00:40:54.670 --> 00:40:54.680 align:start position:0% and farewells some of which are useful 00:40:54.680 --> 00:40:56.109 align:start position:0% and farewells some of which are useful and<00:40:54.839> some<00:40:55.000> of<00:40:55.119> which<00:40:55.280> are<00:40:55.440> kind<00:40:55.599> of<00:40:55.720> pointless 00:40:56.109 --> 00:40:56.119 align:start position:0% and some of which are kind of pointless 00:40:56.119 --> 00:40:57.710 align:start position:0% and some of which are kind of pointless and<00:40:56.359> in<00:40:56.480> this<00:40:56.640> video<00:40:56.960> I'd<00:40:57.079> like<00:40:57.240> to<00:40:57.359> present<00:40:57.599> to 00:40:57.710 --> 00:40:57.720 align:start position:0% and in this video I'd like to present to 00:40:57.720 --> 00:40:59.470 align:start position:0% and in this video I'd like to present to you<00:40:57.960> what<00:40:58.119> phrases<00:40:58.480> are<00:40:58.680> the<00:40:58.839> best<00:40:59.000> to<00:40:59.160> use 00:40:59.470 --> 00:40:59.480 align:start position:0% you what phrases are the best to use 00:40:59.480 --> 00:41:01.109 align:start position:0% you what phrases are the best to use when<00:40:59.599> saying<00:40:59.880> greetings<00:41:00.280> and<00:41:00.440> farewells<00:41:00.960> in 00:41:01.109 --> 00:41:01.119 align:start position:0% when saying greetings and farewells in 00:41:01.119 --> 00:41:03.309 align:start position:0% when saying greetings and farewells in Spanish<00:41:01.640> bi<00:41:01.920> Veno<00:41:02.480> is<00:41:02.640> probably<00:41:02.960> the<00:41:03.119> most 00:41:03.309 --> 00:41:03.319 align:start position:0% Spanish bi Veno is probably the most 00:41:03.319 --> 00:41:04.710 align:start position:0% Spanish bi Veno is probably the most popular<00:41:03.599> greeting<00:41:03.960> there<00:41:04.079> is<00:41:04.480> which 00:41:04.710 --> 00:41:04.720 align:start position:0% popular greeting there is which 00:41:04.720 --> 00:41:06.750 align:start position:0% popular greeting there is which literally<00:41:05.160> translates<00:41:05.760> as<00:41:06.079> welcome<00:41:06.560> if<00:41:06.640> you 00:41:06.750 --> 00:41:06.760 align:start position:0% literally translates as welcome if you 00:41:06.760 --> 00:41:08.910 align:start position:0% literally translates as welcome if you break<00:41:07.000> the<00:41:07.119> word<00:41:07.359> apart<00:41:07.720> you'll<00:41:07.960> get<00:41:08.160> bienn<00:41:08.640> in 00:41:08.910 --> 00:41:08.920 align:start position:0% break the word apart you'll get bienn in 00:41:08.920 --> 00:41:11.470 align:start position:0% break the word apart you'll get bienn in venido<00:41:09.400> bienn<00:41:09.800> means<00:41:10.119> well<00:41:10.480> and<00:41:10.680> venido<00:41:11.160> means 00:41:11.470 --> 00:41:11.480 align:start position:0% venido bienn means well and venido means 00:41:11.480 --> 00:41:12.990 align:start position:0% venido bienn means well and venido means come<00:41:11.880> which<00:41:11.960> is<00:41:12.040> a<00:41:12.160> form<00:41:12.359> of<00:41:12.520> speech<00:41:12.760> taken 00:41:12.990 --> 00:41:13.000 align:start position:0% come which is a form of speech taken 00:41:13.000 --> 00:41:15.270 align:start position:0% come which is a form of speech taken from<00:41:13.160> the<00:41:13.280> present<00:41:13.560> perfect<00:41:14.119> Abed<00:41:14.560> Veno<00:41:15.040> to 00:41:15.270 --> 00:41:15.280 align:start position:0% from the present perfect Abed Veno to 00:41:15.280 --> 00:41:17.510 align:start position:0% from the present perfect Abed Veno to have<00:41:15.480> come<00:41:15.720> and<00:41:15.839> if<00:41:15.920> you<00:41:16.079> take<00:41:16.280> that<00:41:16.440> word<00:41:16.920> Veno 00:41:17.510 --> 00:41:17.520 align:start position:0% have come and if you take that word Veno 00:41:17.520 --> 00:41:20.190 align:start position:0% have come and if you take that word Veno and<00:41:17.720> combine<00:41:18.040> it<00:41:18.200> with<00:41:18.400> B<00:41:18.880> you<00:41:19.040> get<00:41:19.359> bi<00:41:19.800> Veno 00:41:20.190 --> 00:41:20.200 align:start position:0% and combine it with B you get bi Veno 00:41:20.200 --> 00:41:22.230 align:start position:0% and combine it with B you get bi Veno it's<00:41:20.359> well<00:41:20.520> to<00:41:20.680> have<00:41:20.880> come<00:41:21.240> or<00:41:21.520> wellcome<00:41:22.119> and 00:41:22.230 --> 00:41:22.240 align:start position:0% it's well to have come or wellcome and 00:41:22.240 --> 00:41:23.470 align:start position:0% it's well to have come or wellcome and if<00:41:22.319> you're<00:41:22.480> referring<00:41:22.800> to<00:41:22.920> more<00:41:23.079> than<00:41:23.240> one 00:41:23.470 --> 00:41:23.480 align:start position:0% if you're referring to more than one 00:41:23.480 --> 00:41:26.309 align:start position:0% if you're referring to more than one person<00:41:23.920> you<00:41:24.040> can<00:41:24.200> also<00:41:24.440> say<00:41:24.880> bi<00:41:25.240> venos<00:41:25.839> buenos 00:41:26.309 --> 00:41:26.319 align:start position:0% person you can also say bi venos buenos 00:41:26.319 --> 00:41:28.990 align:start position:0% person you can also say bi venos buenos Das<00:41:26.800> literally<00:41:27.200> translat<00:41:27.760> as<00:41:28.160> good<00:41:28.400> days<00:41:28.880> and 00:41:28.990 --> 00:41:29.000 align:start position:0% Das literally translat as good days and 00:41:29.000 --> 00:41:30.430 align:start position:0% Das literally translat as good days and the<00:41:29.079> ending<00:41:29.359> of<00:41:29.520> Buenos<00:41:30.040> perfectly 00:41:30.430 --> 00:41:30.440 align:start position:0% the ending of Buenos perfectly 00:41:30.440 --> 00:41:32.109 align:start position:0% the ending of Buenos perfectly corresponds<00:41:30.880> to<00:41:31.000> the<00:41:31.079> ending<00:41:31.319> of<00:41:31.480> Das<00:41:31.920> because 00:41:32.109 --> 00:41:32.119 align:start position:0% corresponds to the ending of Das because 00:41:32.119 --> 00:41:33.910 align:start position:0% corresponds to the ending of Das because it's<00:41:32.280> pluralized<00:41:32.839> in<00:41:33.000> masculine<00:41:33.520> but<00:41:33.599> mainly 00:41:33.910 --> 00:41:33.920 align:start position:0% it's pluralized in masculine but mainly 00:41:33.920 --> 00:41:36.230 align:start position:0% it's pluralized in masculine but mainly speaking<00:41:34.440> buenos<00:41:34.880> dias<00:41:35.319> is<00:41:35.440> used<00:41:35.720> more<00:41:36.040> as 00:41:36.230 --> 00:41:36.240 align:start position:0% speaking buenos dias is used more as 00:41:36.240 --> 00:41:38.190 align:start position:0% speaking buenos dias is used more as good<00:41:36.400> morning<00:41:36.880> rather<00:41:37.160> than<00:41:37.440> good<00:41:37.680> days<00:41:38.040> you 00:41:38.190 --> 00:41:38.200 align:start position:0% good morning rather than good days you 00:41:38.200 --> 00:41:40.349 align:start position:0% good morning rather than good days you also<00:41:38.400> have<00:41:38.599> this<00:41:38.760> phrase<00:41:39.160> bu<00:41:39.599> noes<00:41:40.079> which<00:41:40.200> is 00:41:40.349 --> 00:41:40.359 align:start position:0% also have this phrase bu noes which is 00:41:40.359 --> 00:41:42.550 align:start position:0% also have this phrase bu noes which is literally<00:41:40.920> good<00:41:41.160> nights<00:41:41.520> or<00:41:41.800> good<00:41:42.040> night<00:41:42.400> when 00:41:42.550 --> 00:41:42.560 align:start position:0% literally good nights or good night when 00:41:42.560 --> 00:41:44.230 align:start position:0% literally good nights or good night when beginning<00:41:42.839> a<00:41:43.000> conversation<00:41:43.480> in<00:41:43.640> Spanish<00:41:44.119> a 00:41:44.230 --> 00:41:44.240 align:start position:0% beginning a conversation in Spanish a 00:41:44.240 --> 00:41:45.870 align:start position:0% beginning a conversation in Spanish a person<00:41:44.520> might<00:41:44.680> begin<00:41:44.920> the<00:41:45.079> conversation<00:41:45.720> by 00:41:45.870 --> 00:41:45.880 align:start position:0% person might begin the conversation by 00:41:45.880 --> 00:41:47.790 align:start position:0% person might begin the conversation by immediately<00:41:46.359> saying<00:41:46.839> kapasa<00:41:47.640> which 00:41:47.790 --> 00:41:47.800 align:start position:0% immediately saying kapasa which 00:41:47.800 --> 00:41:49.630 align:start position:0% immediately saying kapasa which translates<00:41:48.319> as<00:41:48.599> what's<00:41:48.839> going<00:41:49.040> on<00:41:49.359> because 00:41:49.630 --> 00:41:49.640 align:start position:0% translates as what's going on because 00:41:49.640 --> 00:41:51.790 align:start position:0% translates as what's going on because the<00:41:49.760> verb<00:41:50.040> Pasar<00:41:50.520> can<00:41:50.760> actually<00:41:51.040> mean<00:41:51.280> to<00:41:51.480> go 00:41:51.790 --> 00:41:51.800 align:start position:0% the verb Pasar can actually mean to go 00:41:51.800 --> 00:41:53.630 align:start position:0% the verb Pasar can actually mean to go or<00:41:52.000> to<00:41:52.240> happen<00:41:52.680> whenever<00:41:53.000> somebody<00:41:53.280> says 00:41:53.630 --> 00:41:53.640 align:start position:0% or to happen whenever somebody says 00:41:53.640 --> 00:41:55.550 align:start position:0% or to happen whenever somebody says kasasa<00:41:54.280> they're<00:41:54.480> literally<00:41:54.880> saying<00:41:55.319> what's 00:41:55.550 --> 00:41:55.560 align:start position:0% kasasa they're literally saying what's 00:41:55.560 --> 00:41:57.190 align:start position:0% kasasa they're literally saying what's going<00:41:55.720> on<00:41:55.960> or<00:41:56.280> what's<00:41:56.480> happening<00:41:56.960> what's 00:41:57.190 --> 00:41:57.200 align:start position:0% going on or what's happening what's 00:41:57.200 --> 00:42:00.390 align:start position:0% going on or what's happening what's happening<00:41:57.640> can<00:41:57.800> also<00:41:58.000> be<00:41:58.200> rephrased<00:41:59.400> asando 00:42:00.390 --> 00:42:00.400 align:start position:0% happening can also be rephrased asando 00:42:00.400 --> 00:42:01.710 align:start position:0% happening can also be rephrased asando using<00:42:00.640> the<00:42:00.760> present<00:42:01.040> progressive<00:42:01.520> and<00:42:01.640> we 00:42:01.710 --> 00:42:01.720 align:start position:0% using the present progressive and we 00:42:01.720 --> 00:42:03.109 align:start position:0% using the present progressive and we know<00:42:01.880> that<00:42:02.000> it's<00:42:02.119> the<00:42:02.240> present<00:42:02.520> progressive 00:42:03.109 --> 00:42:03.119 align:start position:0% know that it's the present progressive 00:42:03.119 --> 00:42:05.230 align:start position:0% know that it's the present progressive because<00:42:03.319> it's<00:42:03.440> using<00:42:03.720> a<00:42:03.839> conjugation<00:42:04.440> of<00:42:04.720> EST 00:42:05.230 --> 00:42:05.240 align:start position:0% because it's using a conjugation of EST 00:42:05.240 --> 00:42:06.630 align:start position:0% because it's using a conjugation of EST and<00:42:05.400> adds<00:42:05.720> Ando<00:42:06.119> at<00:42:06.200> the<00:42:06.319> end<00:42:06.440> of<00:42:06.520> the 00:42:06.630 --> 00:42:06.640 align:start position:0% and adds Ando at the end of the 00:42:06.640 --> 00:42:08.270 align:start position:0% and adds Ando at the end of the infinitive<00:42:07.119> and<00:42:07.240> as<00:42:07.359> a<00:42:07.480> matter<00:42:07.680> of<00:42:07.839> fact<00:42:08.079> it's 00:42:08.270 --> 00:42:08.280 align:start position:0% infinitive and as a matter of fact it's 00:42:08.280 --> 00:42:09.670 align:start position:0% infinitive and as a matter of fact it's the<00:42:08.400> same<00:42:08.640> way<00:42:08.839> the<00:42:08.960> sentence<00:42:09.280> Works<00:42:09.520> in 00:42:09.670 --> 00:42:09.680 align:start position:0% the same way the sentence Works in 00:42:09.680 --> 00:42:11.630 align:start position:0% the same way the sentence Works in English<00:42:10.079> you<00:42:10.160> can 00:42:11.630 --> 00:42:11.640 align:start position:0% English you can 00:42:11.640 --> 00:42:14.150 align:start position:0% English you can say<00:42:12.640> or<00:42:12.800> maybe<00:42:13.079> if<00:42:13.160> you<00:42:13.280> want<00:42:13.359> to<00:42:13.480> get<00:42:13.680> fancy 00:42:14.150 --> 00:42:14.160 align:start position:0% say or maybe if you want to get fancy 00:42:14.160 --> 00:42:16.950 align:start position:0% say or maybe if you want to get fancy you<00:42:14.280> can<00:42:14.440> sayal<00:42:15.440> ketal<00:42:15.960> literally<00:42:16.400> translates 00:42:16.950 --> 00:42:16.960 align:start position:0% you can sayal ketal literally translates 00:42:16.960 --> 00:42:18.870 align:start position:0% you can sayal ketal literally translates as<00:42:17.319> what's<00:42:17.560> such<00:42:17.880> or<00:42:18.079> what's<00:42:18.280> the<00:42:18.400> matter<00:42:18.760> but 00:42:18.870 --> 00:42:18.880 align:start position:0% as what's such or what's the matter but 00:42:18.880 --> 00:42:20.549 align:start position:0% as what's such or what's the matter but the<00:42:18.960> meaning<00:42:19.319> is<00:42:19.440> mainly<00:42:19.880> how<00:42:20.000> are<00:42:20.200> you<00:42:20.440> and 00:42:20.549 --> 00:42:20.559 align:start position:0% the meaning is mainly how are you and 00:42:20.559 --> 00:42:21.870 align:start position:0% the meaning is mainly how are you and the<00:42:20.680> number<00:42:20.880> one<00:42:21.079> phrase<00:42:21.359> that<00:42:21.520> probably 00:42:21.870 --> 00:42:21.880 align:start position:0% the number one phrase that probably 00:42:21.880 --> 00:42:23.750 align:start position:0% the number one phrase that probably everybody<00:42:22.200> heard<00:42:22.520> when<00:42:22.640> learning<00:42:23.000> Spanish<00:42:23.480> is 00:42:23.750 --> 00:42:23.760 align:start position:0% everybody heard when learning Spanish is 00:42:23.760 --> 00:42:26.950 align:start position:0% everybody heard when learning Spanish is K<00:42:24.119> estas<00:42:24.680> or<00:42:24.880> KO<00:42:25.200> estas<00:42:25.839> which<00:42:26.200> Lally<00:42:26.480> translat 00:42:26.950 --> 00:42:26.960 align:start position:0% K estas or KO estas which Lally translat 00:42:26.960 --> 00:42:28.790 align:start position:0% K estas or KO estas which Lally translat as<00:42:27.240> how<00:42:27.400> are<00:42:27.559> you<00:42:27.800> and<00:42:27.920> with<00:42:28.119> this<00:42:28.280> phrase<00:42:28.680> we 00:42:28.790 --> 00:42:28.800 align:start position:0% as how are you and with this phrase we 00:42:28.800 --> 00:42:30.549 align:start position:0% as how are you and with this phrase we know<00:42:28.960> to<00:42:29.119> use<00:42:29.280> the<00:42:29.400> verb<00:42:29.680> estar<00:42:30.160> to<00:42:30.359> ask 00:42:30.549 --> 00:42:30.559 align:start position:0% know to use the verb estar to ask 00:42:30.559 --> 00:42:31.950 align:start position:0% know to use the verb estar to ask someone<00:42:30.839> about<00:42:31.040> their<00:42:31.200> well-being<00:42:31.760> because 00:42:31.950 --> 00:42:31.960 align:start position:0% someone about their well-being because 00:42:31.960 --> 00:42:33.950 align:start position:0% someone about their well-being because the<00:42:32.040> verb<00:42:32.319> estar<00:42:32.800> mainly<00:42:33.160> applies<00:42:33.480> to<00:42:33.680> actions 00:42:33.950 --> 00:42:33.960 align:start position:0% the verb estar mainly applies to actions 00:42:33.960 --> 00:42:35.390 align:start position:0% the verb estar mainly applies to actions and<00:42:34.119> emotions<00:42:34.559> that<00:42:34.640> are<00:42:34.800> happening<00:42:35.240> right 00:42:35.390 --> 00:42:35.400 align:start position:0% and emotions that are happening right 00:42:35.400 --> 00:42:36.990 align:start position:0% and emotions that are happening right now<00:42:35.760> and<00:42:35.839> so<00:42:36.000> they're<00:42:36.200> most<00:42:36.359> likely<00:42:36.599> to<00:42:36.720> change 00:42:36.990 --> 00:42:37.000 align:start position:0% now and so they're most likely to change 00:42:37.000 --> 00:42:38.710 align:start position:0% now and so they're most likely to change in<00:42:37.079> the<00:42:37.200> future<00:42:37.559> by<00:42:37.720> answering<00:42:38.079> this<00:42:38.280> question 00:42:38.710 --> 00:42:38.720 align:start position:0% in the future by answering this question 00:42:38.720 --> 00:42:40.549 align:start position:0% in the future by answering this question you<00:42:38.800> would<00:42:38.960> say<00:42:39.119> something<00:42:39.440> like<00:42:39.680> esto 00:42:40.549 --> 00:42:40.559 align:start position:0% you would say something like esto 00:42:40.559 --> 00:42:41.589 align:start position:0% you would say something like esto because<00:42:40.760> you're<00:42:40.960> indicating<00:42:41.359> that<00:42:41.480> you're 00:42:41.589 --> 00:42:41.599 align:start position:0% because you're indicating that you're 00:42:41.599 --> 00:42:43.230 align:start position:0% because you're indicating that you're feeling<00:42:41.920> good<00:42:42.200> or<00:42:42.319> feeling<00:42:42.680> well<00:42:43.119> which 00:42:43.230 --> 00:42:43.240 align:start position:0% feeling good or feeling well which 00:42:43.240 --> 00:42:44.990 align:start position:0% feeling good or feeling well which explains<00:42:43.640> why<00:42:43.760> your<00:42:43.920> answer<00:42:44.240> will<00:42:44.480> also<00:42:44.680> use<00:42:44.839> a 00:42:44.990 --> 00:42:45.000 align:start position:0% explains why your answer will also use a 00:42:45.000 --> 00:42:47.230 align:start position:0% explains why your answer will also use a conjugation<00:42:45.559> of<00:42:45.800> estar<00:42:46.359> at<00:42:46.559> last<00:42:46.880> there's 00:42:47.230 --> 00:42:47.240 align:start position:0% conjugation of estar at last there's 00:42:47.240 --> 00:42:49.870 align:start position:0% conjugation of estar at last there's gracias<00:42:47.960> or<00:42:48.280> muchas<00:42:48.720> gracias<00:42:49.400> which<00:42:49.520> means 00:42:49.870 --> 00:42:49.880 align:start position:0% gracias or muchas gracias which means 00:42:49.880 --> 00:42:51.549 align:start position:0% gracias or muchas gracias which means thanks<00:42:50.280> or<00:42:50.480> thank<00:42:50.640> you<00:42:50.839> very<00:42:51.000> much<00:42:51.319> and<00:42:51.440> if<00:42:51.480> you 00:42:51.549 --> 00:42:51.559 align:start position:0% thanks or thank you very much and if you 00:42:51.559 --> 00:42:53.309 align:start position:0% thanks or thank you very much and if you want<00:42:51.680> to<00:42:51.800> sound<00:42:52.040> polite<00:42:52.440> you'll<00:42:52.640> reply<00:42:53.040> with 00:42:53.309 --> 00:42:53.319 align:start position:0% want to sound polite you'll reply with 00:42:53.319 --> 00:42:55.510 align:start position:0% want to sound polite you'll reply with Danada<00:42:53.920> which<00:42:54.040> means<00:42:54.400> of<00:42:54.599> nothing<00:42:55.000> indicating 00:42:55.510 --> 00:42:55.520 align:start position:0% Danada which means of nothing indicating 00:42:55.520 --> 00:42:57.390 align:start position:0% Danada which means of nothing indicating thank<00:42:55.680> you<00:42:55.800> very<00:42:55.960> much<00:42:56.440> and<00:42:56.559> there<00:42:56.680> is<00:42:56.880> no<00:42:57.040> need 00:42:57.390 --> 00:42:57.400 align:start position:0% thank you very much and there is no need 00:42:57.400 --> 00:42:59.910 align:start position:0% thank you very much and there is no need to<00:42:57.599> thank<00:42:57.800> me<00:42:58.079> but<00:42:58.280> overall<00:42:58.800> denada<00:42:59.480> is<00:42:59.599> mainly 00:42:59.910 --> 00:42:59.920 align:start position:0% to thank me but overall denada is mainly 00:42:59.920 --> 00:43:01.750 align:start position:0% to thank me but overall denada is mainly used<00:43:00.280> as<00:43:00.599> you're<00:43:00.839> welcome<00:43:01.240> if<00:43:01.319> you're<00:43:01.480> leaving 00:43:01.750 --> 00:43:01.760 align:start position:0% used as you're welcome if you're leaving 00:43:01.760 --> 00:43:03.430 align:start position:0% used as you're welcome if you're leaving the<00:43:01.920> conversation<00:43:02.640> you<00:43:02.760> might<00:43:02.920> say<00:43:03.119> something 00:43:03.430 --> 00:43:03.440 align:start position:0% the conversation you might say something 00:43:03.440 --> 00:43:06.109 align:start position:0% the conversation you might say something like<00:43:03.760> adios<00:43:04.480> or<00:43:04.800> chiao<00:43:05.319> both<00:43:05.480> of<00:43:05.640> which<00:43:05.800> mean 00:43:06.109 --> 00:43:06.119 align:start position:0% like adios or chiao both of which mean 00:43:06.119 --> 00:43:08.750 align:start position:0% like adios or chiao both of which mean by<00:43:06.480> or<00:43:06.760> goodbye<00:43:07.319> but<00:43:07.440> the<00:43:07.520> word<00:43:07.839> adios<00:43:08.520> can 00:43:08.750 --> 00:43:08.760 align:start position:0% by or goodbye but the word adios can 00:43:08.760 --> 00:43:11.030 align:start position:0% by or goodbye but the word adios can actually<00:43:09.040> be<00:43:09.240> broken<00:43:09.599> down<00:43:09.880> into<00:43:10.079> two<00:43:10.280> words<00:43:10.760> a 00:43:11.030 --> 00:43:11.040 align:start position:0% actually be broken down into two words a 00:43:11.040 --> 00:43:13.109 align:start position:0% actually be broken down into two words a and<00:43:11.240> dios<00:43:11.680> which<00:43:11.839> literally<00:43:12.280> translates<00:43:12.839> as 00:43:13.109 --> 00:43:13.119 align:start position:0% and dios which literally translates as 00:43:13.119 --> 00:43:14.470 align:start position:0% and dios which literally translates as to<00:43:13.400> God<00:43:13.680> when<00:43:13.839> Spanish<00:43:14.160> was<00:43:14.280> first 00:43:14.470 --> 00:43:14.480 align:start position:0% to God when Spanish was first 00:43:14.480 --> 00:43:16.309 align:start position:0% to God when Spanish was first originating<00:43:15.000> as<00:43:15.119> a<00:43:15.280> language<00:43:15.760> the<00:43:15.880> expression 00:43:16.309 --> 00:43:16.319 align:start position:0% originating as a language the expression 00:43:16.319 --> 00:43:18.549 align:start position:0% originating as a language the expression to<00:43:16.599> God<00:43:16.920> meant<00:43:17.200> to<00:43:17.359> have<00:43:17.480> a<00:43:17.640> good<00:43:17.800> farewell<00:43:18.400> as 00:43:18.549 --> 00:43:18.559 align:start position:0% to God meant to have a good farewell as 00:43:18.559 --> 00:43:20.829 align:start position:0% to God meant to have a good farewell as in<00:43:18.960> to<00:43:19.240> God<00:43:19.520> you<00:43:19.720> go<00:43:20.000> but<00:43:20.119> the<00:43:20.200> meaning<00:43:20.440> changed 00:43:20.829 --> 00:43:20.839 align:start position:0% in to God you go but the meaning changed 00:43:20.839 --> 00:43:22.630 align:start position:0% in to God you go but the meaning changed over<00:43:21.079> time<00:43:21.480> which<00:43:21.640> resulted<00:43:22.079> simply<00:43:22.440> in 00:43:22.630 --> 00:43:22.640 align:start position:0% over time which resulted simply in 00:43:22.640 --> 00:43:25.309 align:start position:0% over time which resulted simply in goodbye<00:43:23.200> there's<00:43:23.440> also<00:43:23.760> this<00:43:23.920> phrase<00:43:24.400> aista 00:43:25.309 --> 00:43:25.319 align:start position:0% goodbye there's also this phrase aista 00:43:25.319 --> 00:43:27.150 align:start position:0% goodbye there's also this phrase aista which<00:43:25.440> is<00:43:25.559> constructed<00:43:26.160> using<00:43:26.400> a<00:43:26.520> preposition 00:43:27.150 --> 00:43:27.160 align:start position:0% which is constructed using a preposition 00:43:27.160 --> 00:43:28.910 align:start position:0% which is constructed using a preposition article<00:43:27.599> and<00:43:27.760> a<00:43:27.880> noun<00:43:28.319> and<00:43:28.440> it<00:43:28.559> literally 00:43:28.910 --> 00:43:28.920 align:start position:0% article and a noun and it literally 00:43:28.920 --> 00:43:31.270 align:start position:0% article and a noun and it literally translates<00:43:29.480> as<00:43:29.800> until<00:43:30.119> the<00:43:30.280> view<00:43:30.680> or<00:43:30.960> until 00:43:31.270 --> 00:43:31.280 align:start position:0% translates as until the view or until 00:43:31.280 --> 00:43:32.910 align:start position:0% translates as until the view or until the<00:43:31.440> next<00:43:31.640> time<00:43:31.800> I<00:43:31.920> see<00:43:32.119> you<00:43:32.400> or<00:43:32.559> more<00:43:32.680> of<00:43:32.760> a 00:43:32.910 --> 00:43:32.920 align:start position:0% the next time I see you or more of a 00:43:32.920 --> 00:43:34.390 align:start position:0% the next time I see you or more of a sophisticated<00:43:33.440> and<00:43:33.599> modern<00:43:33.880> meaning<00:43:34.240> would 00:43:34.390 --> 00:43:34.400 align:start position:0% sophisticated and modern meaning would 00:43:34.400 --> 00:43:36.549 align:start position:0% sophisticated and modern meaning would be<00:43:34.680> see<00:43:34.920> you<00:43:35.079> later<00:43:35.440> see<00:43:35.640> you<00:43:35.800> later<00:43:36.160> can<00:43:36.359> also 00:43:36.549 --> 00:43:36.559 align:start position:0% be see you later see you later can also 00:43:36.559 --> 00:43:39.150 align:start position:0% be see you later see you later can also be<00:43:36.680> said<00:43:37.000> as<00:43:37.319> aao<00:43:38.160> which<00:43:38.359> actually<00:43:38.599> translates 00:43:39.150 --> 00:43:39.160 align:start position:0% be said as aao which actually translates 00:43:39.160 --> 00:43:40.910 align:start position:0% be said as aao which actually translates as<00:43:39.400> until<00:43:39.720> later<00:43:40.079> you<00:43:40.200> might<00:43:40.319> have<00:43:40.480> also<00:43:40.599> seen 00:43:40.910 --> 00:43:40.920 align:start position:0% as until later you might have also seen 00:43:40.920 --> 00:43:43.150 align:start position:0% as until later you might have also seen this<00:43:41.079> phrase<00:43:41.640> ASA<00:43:41.960> Pronto<00:43:42.520> which<00:43:42.640> translates 00:43:43.150 --> 00:43:43.160 align:start position:0% this phrase ASA Pronto which translates 00:43:43.160 --> 00:43:44.790 align:start position:0% this phrase ASA Pronto which translates as<00:43:43.440> until<00:43:43.800> soon<00:43:44.160> but<00:43:44.280> its<00:43:44.440> Advanced 00:43:44.790 --> 00:43:44.800 align:start position:0% as until soon but its Advanced 00:43:44.800 --> 00:43:46.750 align:start position:0% as until soon but its Advanced definition<00:43:45.440> means<00:43:45.839> see<00:43:46.079> you<00:43:46.200> soon<00:43:46.599> and 00:43:46.750 --> 00:43:46.760 align:start position:0% definition means see you soon and 00:43:46.760 --> 00:43:49.829 align:start position:0% definition means see you soon and finally<00:43:47.240> hola<00:43:47.640> means<00:43:47.960> hello<00:43:48.280> or<00:43:48.520> hi<00:43:48.880> po<00:43:49.520> means 00:43:49.829 --> 00:43:49.839 align:start position:0% finally hola means hello or hi po means 00:43:49.839 --> 00:43:51.829 align:start position:0% finally hola means hello or hi po means please<00:43:50.240> and<00:43:50.440> pdon<00:43:51.000> is<00:43:51.119> a<00:43:51.240> polite<00:43:51.559> way<00:43:51.680> of 00:43:51.829 --> 00:43:51.839 align:start position:0% please and pdon is a polite way of 00:43:51.839 --> 00:43:54.430 align:start position:0% please and pdon is a polite way of saying<00:43:52.280> I'm<00:43:52.440> sorry<00:43:52.960> the<00:43:53.079> verb<00:43:53.359> p<00:43:53.839> in<00:43:54.000> Spanish 00:43:54.430 --> 00:43:54.440 align:start position:0% saying I'm sorry the verb p in Spanish 00:43:54.440 --> 00:43:56.390 align:start position:0% saying I'm sorry the verb p in Spanish means<00:43:54.680> to<00:43:54.880> can<00:43:55.119> or<00:43:55.280> to<00:43:55.440> be<00:43:55.559> able<00:43:55.800> to<00:43:56.160> but<00:43:56.280> it's 00:43:56.390 --> 00:43:56.400 align:start position:0% means to can or to be able to but it's 00:43:56.400 --> 00:43:58.510 align:start position:0% means to can or to be able to but it's mainly<00:43:56.680> used<00:43:56.960> as<00:43:57.160> to<00:43:57.400> can<00:43:57.800> in<00:43:57.960> English<00:43:58.400> the 00:43:58.510 --> 00:43:58.520 align:start position:0% mainly used as to can in English the 00:43:58.520 --> 00:44:00.150 align:start position:0% mainly used as to can in English the syntax<00:43:58.880> of<00:43:59.000> this<00:43:59.160> verb<00:43:59.400> is<00:43:59.559> very<00:43:59.760> easy<00:43:59.960> to 00:44:00.150 --> 00:44:00.160 align:start position:0% syntax of this verb is very easy to 00:44:00.160 --> 00:44:02.430 align:start position:0% syntax of this verb is very easy to remember<00:44:00.680> because<00:44:00.960> can<00:44:01.319> literally<00:44:01.720> stays<00:44:02.160> can 00:44:02.430 --> 00:44:02.440 align:start position:0% remember because can literally stays can 00:44:02.440 --> 00:44:04.109 align:start position:0% remember because can literally stays can for<00:44:02.640> the<00:44:02.720> following<00:44:03.079> six<00:44:03.359> pronouns<00:44:03.920> in 00:44:04.109 --> 00:44:04.119 align:start position:0% for the following six pronouns in 00:44:04.119 --> 00:44:05.589 align:start position:0% for the following six pronouns in Spanish<00:44:04.559> however<00:44:04.800> you<00:44:04.960> have<00:44:05.119> six<00:44:05.319> different 00:44:05.589 --> 00:44:05.599 align:start position:0% Spanish however you have six different 00:44:05.599 --> 00:44:07.190 align:start position:0% Spanish however you have six different conjugations<00:44:06.119> for<00:44:06.280> this<00:44:06.440> verb<00:44:06.760> and<00:44:06.880> it<00:44:07.000> also 00:44:07.190 --> 00:44:07.200 align:start position:0% conjugations for this verb and it also 00:44:07.200 --> 00:44:09.069 align:start position:0% conjugations for this verb and it also falls<00:44:07.520> into<00:44:07.720> the<00:44:07.920> category<00:44:08.319> of<00:44:08.480> stem<00:44:08.720> changing 00:44:09.069 --> 00:44:09.079 align:start position:0% falls into the category of stem changing 00:44:09.079 --> 00:44:11.030 align:start position:0% falls into the category of stem changing verbs<00:44:09.480> stem<00:44:09.720> changing<00:44:10.040> verbs<00:44:10.280> in<00:44:10.440> Spanish<00:44:10.839> is 00:44:11.030 --> 00:44:11.040 align:start position:0% verbs stem changing verbs in Spanish is 00:44:11.040 --> 00:44:12.589 align:start position:0% verbs stem changing verbs in Spanish is actually<00:44:11.240> a<00:44:11.400> topic<00:44:11.599> for<00:44:11.680> a<00:44:11.800> future<00:44:12.119> video<00:44:12.480> but 00:44:12.589 --> 00:44:12.599 align:start position:0% actually a topic for a future video but 00:44:12.599 --> 00:44:14.390 align:start position:0% actually a topic for a future video but as<00:44:12.680> far<00:44:12.839> as<00:44:12.960> the<00:44:13.040> verb<00:44:13.280> ped<00:44:13.720> goes<00:44:14.079> stem 00:44:14.390 --> 00:44:14.400 align:start position:0% as far as the verb ped goes stem 00:44:14.400 --> 00:44:15.790 align:start position:0% as far as the verb ped goes stem changing<00:44:14.960> basically<00:44:15.240> means<00:44:15.480> that<00:44:15.599> you<00:44:15.680> have 00:44:15.790 --> 00:44:15.800 align:start position:0% changing basically means that you have 00:44:15.800 --> 00:44:17.349 align:start position:0% changing basically means that you have to<00:44:15.880> take<00:44:16.040> the<00:44:16.119> stem<00:44:16.359> of<00:44:16.480> the<00:44:16.559> verb<00:44:16.880> and<00:44:17.000> modify 00:44:17.349 --> 00:44:17.359 align:start position:0% to take the stem of the verb and modify 00:44:17.359 --> 00:44:18.910 align:start position:0% to take the stem of the verb and modify it<00:44:17.480> in<00:44:17.559> a<00:44:17.720> way<00:44:17.960> so<00:44:18.079> that<00:44:18.200> it<00:44:18.280> sounds<00:44:18.640> better 00:44:18.910 --> 00:44:18.920 align:start position:0% it in a way so that it sounds better 00:44:18.920 --> 00:44:20.589 align:start position:0% it in a way so that it sounds better when<00:44:19.079> the<00:44:19.160> word<00:44:19.319> is<00:44:19.440> said<00:44:19.640> out<00:44:19.880> loud<00:44:20.200> the<00:44:20.319> verb 00:44:20.589 --> 00:44:20.599 align:start position:0% when the word is said out loud the verb 00:44:20.599 --> 00:44:24.150 align:start position:0% when the word is said out loud the verb P<00:44:21.040> falls<00:44:21.440> into<00:44:21.680> the<00:44:21.960> o<00:44:22.400> to<00:44:22.880> U<00:44:23.520> category<00:44:24.079> which 00:44:24.150 --> 00:44:24.160 align:start position:0% P falls into the o to U category which 00:44:24.160 --> 00:44:26.309 align:start position:0% P falls into the o to U category which means<00:44:24.359> that<00:44:24.480> you'll<00:44:24.640> take<00:44:24.760> the<00:44:24.880> stem<00:44:25.079> of<00:44:25.280> p<00:44:25.800> po 00:44:26.309 --> 00:44:26.319 align:start position:0% means that you'll take the stem of p po 00:44:26.319 --> 00:44:28.470 align:start position:0% means that you'll take the stem of p po and<00:44:26.440> then<00:44:26.559> change<00:44:26.800> it<00:44:27.040> to<00:44:27.319> pu<00:44:27.960> however<00:44:28.319> this 00:44:28.470 --> 00:44:28.480 align:start position:0% and then change it to pu however this 00:44:28.480 --> 00:44:31.030 align:start position:0% and then change it to pu however this principle<00:44:28.880> only<00:44:29.160> applies<00:44:29.520> to<00:44:29.720> the<00:44:29.880> yo<00:44:30.280> to<00:44:30.760> L 00:44:31.030 --> 00:44:31.040 align:start position:0% principle only applies to the yo to L 00:44:31.040 --> 00:44:32.829 align:start position:0% principle only applies to the yo to L and<00:44:31.240> AOS<00:44:31.599> pronouns<00:44:32.079> and<00:44:32.200> the<00:44:32.280> ending<00:44:32.559> of<00:44:32.720> all 00:44:32.829 --> 00:44:32.839 align:start position:0% and AOS pronouns and the ending of all 00:44:32.839 --> 00:44:34.230 align:start position:0% and AOS pronouns and the ending of all of<00:44:32.960> them<00:44:33.119> correctly<00:44:33.480> follows<00:44:33.760> the<00:44:33.880> regular 00:44:34.230 --> 00:44:34.240 align:start position:0% of them correctly follows the regular 00:44:34.240 --> 00:44:36.309 align:start position:0% of them correctly follows the regular syntax<00:44:34.640> of<00:44:34.800> verbs<00:44:35.040> ending<00:44:35.280> in<00:44:35.440> erer<00:44:35.960> for<00:44:36.160> the 00:44:36.309 --> 00:44:36.319 align:start position:0% syntax of verbs ending in erer for the 00:44:36.319 --> 00:44:38.829 align:start position:0% syntax of verbs ending in erer for the noos<00:44:37.160> and<00:44:37.440> votos<00:44:38.040> pronouns<00:44:38.520> the<00:44:38.640> stem 00:44:38.829 --> 00:44:38.839 align:start position:0% noos and votos pronouns the stem 00:44:38.839 --> 00:44:40.270 align:start position:0% noos and votos pronouns the stem changing<00:44:39.119> rule<00:44:39.319> does<00:44:39.440> not<00:44:39.640> apply<00:44:40.040> because 00:44:40.270 --> 00:44:40.280 align:start position:0% changing rule does not apply because 00:44:40.280 --> 00:44:41.829 align:start position:0% changing rule does not apply because Spanish<00:44:40.599> says<00:44:40.800> that<00:44:40.960> these<00:44:41.160> pronouns<00:44:41.559> sound 00:44:41.829 --> 00:44:41.839 align:start position:0% Spanish says that these pronouns sound 00:44:41.839 --> 00:44:43.030 align:start position:0% Spanish says that these pronouns sound good<00:44:42.119> enough<00:44:42.359> when<00:44:42.480> they're<00:44:42.640> normally 00:44:43.030 --> 00:44:43.040 align:start position:0% good enough when they're normally 00:44:43.040 --> 00:44:44.910 align:start position:0% good enough when they're normally conjugated<00:44:43.680> overall<00:44:44.160> you<00:44:44.319> just<00:44:44.440> have<00:44:44.559> to<00:44:44.680> know 00:44:44.910 --> 00:44:44.920 align:start position:0% conjugated overall you just have to know 00:44:44.920 --> 00:44:46.470 align:start position:0% conjugated overall you just have to know that<00:44:45.040> the<00:44:45.119> stem<00:44:45.319> changing<00:44:45.640> rule<00:44:46.000> applies<00:44:46.280> to 00:44:46.470 --> 00:44:46.480 align:start position:0% that the stem changing rule applies to 00:44:46.480 --> 00:44:49.190 align:start position:0% that the stem changing rule applies to the<00:44:46.640> Y<00:44:46.960> to<00:44:47.440> L<00:44:47.720> and<00:44:47.920> AOS<00:44:48.280> pronouns<00:44:48.839> another<00:44:49.079> way 00:44:49.190 --> 00:44:49.200 align:start position:0% the Y to L and AOS pronouns another way 00:44:49.200 --> 00:44:50.670 align:start position:0% the Y to L and AOS pronouns another way to<00:44:49.359> remember<00:44:49.760> this<00:44:50.000> is<00:44:50.119> by<00:44:50.240> looking<00:44:50.480> at<00:44:50.559> the 00:44:50.670 --> 00:44:50.680 align:start position:0% to remember this is by looking at the 00:44:50.680 --> 00:44:52.349 align:start position:0% to remember this is by looking at the shape<00:44:50.880> of<00:44:50.960> the<00:44:51.040> 2x3<00:44:51.559> chart<00:44:51.880> and<00:44:52.000> seeing<00:44:52.240> that 00:44:52.349 --> 00:44:52.359 align:start position:0% shape of the 2x3 chart and seeing that 00:44:52.359 --> 00:44:53.829 align:start position:0% shape of the 2x3 chart and seeing that it's<00:44:52.480> shaped<00:44:52.720> like<00:44:52.839> a<00:44:52.920> boot<00:44:53.280> and<00:44:53.359> so<00:44:53.559> only 00:44:53.829 --> 00:44:53.839 align:start position:0% it's shaped like a boot and so only 00:44:53.839 --> 00:44:55.470 align:start position:0% it's shaped like a boot and so only pronouns<00:44:54.359> within<00:44:54.559> the<00:44:54.680> boot<00:44:55.000> will<00:44:55.160> apply<00:44:55.400> to 00:44:55.470 --> 00:44:55.480 align:start position:0% pronouns within the boot will apply to 00:44:55.480 --> 00:44:57.190 align:start position:0% pronouns within the boot will apply to the<00:44:55.599> stem<00:44:55.800> ch<00:44:55.960> changing<00:44:56.200> rule<00:44:56.599> anything<00:44:56.880> else 00:44:57.190 --> 00:44:57.200 align:start position:0% the stem ch changing rule anything else 00:44:57.200 --> 00:44:58.670 align:start position:0% the stem ch changing rule anything else outside<00:44:57.520> of<00:44:57.640> the<00:44:57.720> boot<00:44:58.040> will<00:44:58.200> not<00:44:58.359> use<00:44:58.559> the 00:44:58.670 --> 00:44:58.680 align:start position:0% outside of the boot will not use the 00:44:58.680 --> 00:45:00.069 align:start position:0% outside of the boot will not use the stem<00:44:58.880> changing<00:44:59.200> Rule<00:44:59.520> and<00:44:59.680> every<00:44:59.839> stem 00:45:00.069 --> 00:45:00.079 align:start position:0% stem changing Rule and every stem 00:45:00.079 --> 00:45:01.230 align:start position:0% stem changing Rule and every stem changing<00:45:00.359> verb<00:45:00.599> that<00:45:00.680> you<00:45:00.760> will<00:45:00.920> encounter 00:45:01.230 --> 00:45:01.240 align:start position:0% changing verb that you will encounter 00:45:01.240 --> 00:45:02.829 align:start position:0% changing verb that you will encounter when<00:45:01.359> learning<00:45:01.680> Spanish<00:45:02.119> will<00:45:02.319> almost<00:45:02.599> never 00:45:02.829 --> 00:45:02.839 align:start position:0% when learning Spanish will almost never 00:45:02.839 --> 00:45:04.990 align:start position:0% when learning Spanish will almost never use<00:45:03.040> the<00:45:03.119> stem<00:45:03.359> changing<00:45:03.640> rule<00:45:04.000> for<00:45:04.160> the<00:45:04.359> noos 00:45:04.990 --> 00:45:05.000 align:start position:0% use the stem changing rule for the noos 00:45:05.000 --> 00:45:07.390 align:start position:0% use the stem changing rule for the noos and<00:45:05.280> Vos<00:45:05.839> pronouns<00:45:06.400> the<00:45:06.520> pronunciation<00:45:07.160> goes 00:45:07.390 --> 00:45:07.400 align:start position:0% and Vos pronouns the pronunciation goes 00:45:07.400 --> 00:45:13.870 align:start position:0% and Vos pronouns the pronunciation goes as<00:45:07.559> follows<00:45:08.200> y<00:45:08.559> PUO<00:45:09.359> I<00:45:09.599> can<00:45:10.200> to<00:45:10.680> pues<00:45:11.480> you 00:45:13.870 --> 00:45:13.880 align:start position:0% 00:45:13.880 --> 00:45:16.549 align:start position:0% can 00:45:16.549 --> 00:45:16.559 align:start position:0% can 00:45:16.559 --> 00:45:19.190 align:start position:0% can he 00:45:19.190 --> 00:45:19.200 align:start position:0% he 00:45:19.200 --> 00:45:23.510 align:start position:0% he we<00:45:20.200> can<00:45:20.640> and<00:45:21.200> AOS<00:45:22.200> they<00:45:22.359> can<00:45:22.760> as<00:45:22.920> always<00:45:23.319> try 00:45:23.510 --> 00:45:23.520 align:start position:0% we can and AOS they can as always try 00:45:23.520 --> 00:45:24.990 align:start position:0% we can and AOS they can as always try not<00:45:23.680> focusing<00:45:24.000> on<00:45:24.160> these<00:45:24.359> pronouns<00:45:24.839> because 00:45:24.990 --> 00:45:25.000 align:start position:0% not focusing on these pronouns because 00:45:25.000 --> 00:45:26.270 align:start position:0% not focusing on these pronouns because the<00:45:25.119> phrases<00:45:25.400> that<00:45:25.480> you<00:45:25.559> can<00:45:25.680> make<00:45:26.000> with<00:45:26.119> them 00:45:26.270 --> 00:45:26.280 align:start position:0% the phrases that you can make with them 00:45:26.280 --> 00:45:27.589 align:start position:0% the phrases that you can make with them are<00:45:26.400> not<00:45:26.599> that<00:45:26.760> useful<00:45:27.160> the<00:45:27.240> only<00:45:27.400> thing<00:45:27.520> you 00:45:27.589 --> 00:45:27.599 align:start position:0% are not that useful the only thing you 00:45:27.599 --> 00:45:28.670 align:start position:0% are not that useful the only thing you should<00:45:27.760> know<00:45:27.920> about<00:45:28.160> them<00:45:28.359> is<00:45:28.480> that<00:45:28.599> they 00:45:28.670 --> 00:45:28.680 align:start position:0% should know about them is that they 00:45:28.680 --> 00:45:30.069 align:start position:0% should know about them is that they don't<00:45:28.839> apply<00:45:29.079> the<00:45:29.160> stem<00:45:29.400> changing<00:45:29.680> rule 00:45:30.069 --> 00:45:30.079 align:start position:0% don't apply the stem changing rule 00:45:30.079 --> 00:45:32.430 align:start position:0% don't apply the stem changing rule fundamentally<00:45:30.920> the<00:45:31.040> verb<00:45:31.319> p<00:45:31.760> in<00:45:31.880> Spanish<00:45:32.319> is 00:45:32.430 --> 00:45:32.440 align:start position:0% fundamentally the verb p in Spanish is 00:45:32.440 --> 00:45:33.670 align:start position:0% fundamentally the verb p in Spanish is actually<00:45:32.640> one<00:45:32.760> of<00:45:32.839> the<00:45:32.960> most<00:45:33.119> useful<00:45:33.480> and 00:45:33.670 --> 00:45:33.680 align:start position:0% actually one of the most useful and 00:45:33.680 --> 00:45:35.030 align:start position:0% actually one of the most useful and practical<00:45:34.079> verbs<00:45:34.319> that<00:45:34.480> there<00:45:34.599> are<00:45:34.839> because 00:45:35.030 --> 00:45:35.040 align:start position:0% practical verbs that there are because 00:45:35.040 --> 00:45:36.270 align:start position:0% practical verbs that there are because it's<00:45:35.160> a<00:45:35.280> universal<00:45:35.720> verb<00:45:36.000> that<00:45:36.119> we 00:45:36.270 --> 00:45:36.280 align:start position:0% it's a universal verb that we 00:45:36.280 --> 00:45:38.069 align:start position:0% it's a universal verb that we subconsciously<00:45:36.839> use<00:45:37.040> in<00:45:37.200> many<00:45:37.440> sentences 00:45:38.069 --> 00:45:38.079 align:start position:0% subconsciously use in many sentences 00:45:38.079 --> 00:45:39.950 align:start position:0% subconsciously use in many sentences typically<00:45:38.640> the<00:45:38.760> way<00:45:38.920> the<00:45:39.040> verb<00:45:39.359> to<00:45:39.599> can<00:45:39.839> is 00:45:39.950 --> 00:45:39.960 align:start position:0% typically the way the verb to can is 00:45:39.960 --> 00:45:41.430 align:start position:0% typically the way the verb to can is used<00:45:40.200> in<00:45:40.359> English<00:45:40.760> is<00:45:40.880> by<00:45:41.000> starting<00:45:41.280> a 00:45:41.430 --> 00:45:41.440 align:start position:0% used in English is by starting a 00:45:41.440 --> 00:45:44.109 align:start position:0% used in English is by starting a sentence<00:45:41.760> with<00:45:41.920> a<00:45:42.040> pronoun<00:45:42.599> and<00:45:42.839> can<00:45:43.440> such<00:45:43.640> as 00:45:44.109 --> 00:45:44.119 align:start position:0% sentence with a pronoun and can such as 00:45:44.119 --> 00:45:45.829 align:start position:0% sentence with a pronoun and can such as I<00:45:44.359> can<00:45:44.720> and<00:45:44.839> then<00:45:44.960> we<00:45:45.079> immediately<00:45:45.440> follow<00:45:45.720> it 00:45:45.829 --> 00:45:45.839 align:start position:0% I can and then we immediately follow it 00:45:45.839 --> 00:45:47.349 align:start position:0% I can and then we immediately follow it up<00:45:45.960> with<00:45:46.079> an<00:45:46.240> infinitive<00:45:46.760> in<00:45:46.880> case<00:45:47.040> you<00:45:47.119> don't 00:45:47.349 --> 00:45:47.359 align:start position:0% up with an infinitive in case you don't 00:45:47.359 --> 00:45:49.190 align:start position:0% up with an infinitive in case you don't remember<00:45:47.800> an<00:45:48.000> infinitive<00:45:48.559> is<00:45:48.680> a<00:45:48.800> verb<00:45:49.040> that's 00:45:49.190 --> 00:45:49.200 align:start position:0% remember an infinitive is a verb that's 00:45:49.200 --> 00:45:51.109 align:start position:0% remember an infinitive is a verb that's placed<00:45:49.520> after<00:45:49.720> an<00:45:49.920> already<00:45:50.280> conjugated<00:45:50.760> verb 00:45:51.109 --> 00:45:51.119 align:start position:0% placed after an already conjugated verb 00:45:51.119 --> 00:45:52.589 align:start position:0% placed after an already conjugated verb that<00:45:51.240> doesn't<00:45:51.520> change<00:45:51.880> or<00:45:52.040> slightly<00:45:52.400> gets 00:45:52.589 --> 00:45:52.599 align:start position:0% that doesn't change or slightly gets 00:45:52.599 --> 00:45:54.309 align:start position:0% that doesn't change or slightly gets modified<00:45:53.160> in<00:45:53.280> this<00:45:53.480> case<00:45:53.800> we<00:45:53.880> can<00:45:54.000> say<00:45:54.200> a 00:45:54.309 --> 00:45:54.319 align:start position:0% modified in this case we can say a 00:45:54.319 --> 00:45:56.349 align:start position:0% modified in this case we can say a sentence<00:45:54.720> like<00:45:55.079> I<00:45:55.200> can't<00:45:55.400> speak<00:45:55.640> span<00:45:55.880> Spanish 00:45:56.349 --> 00:45:56.359 align:start position:0% sentence like I can't speak span Spanish 00:45:56.359 --> 00:45:58.750 align:start position:0% sentence like I can't speak span Spanish which<00:45:56.480> will<00:45:56.680> use<00:45:57.040> I<00:45:57.599> can<00:45:58.079> and<00:45:58.200> then<00:45:58.319> speak<00:45:58.640> will 00:45:58.750 --> 00:45:58.760 align:start position:0% which will use I can and then speak will 00:45:58.760 --> 00:46:00.589 align:start position:0% which will use I can and then speak will be<00:45:58.880> the<00:45:59.000> infinitive<00:45:59.480> that's<00:45:59.680> left<00:45:59.920> untouched 00:46:00.589 --> 00:46:00.599 align:start position:0% be the infinitive that's left untouched 00:46:00.599 --> 00:46:02.150 align:start position:0% be the infinitive that's left untouched and<00:46:00.760> then<00:46:01.040> you<00:46:01.119> can<00:46:01.280> plug<00:46:01.480> in<00:46:01.680> any<00:46:01.839> language 00:46:02.150 --> 00:46:02.160 align:start position:0% and then you can plug in any language 00:46:02.160 --> 00:46:03.630 align:start position:0% and then you can plug in any language you<00:46:02.240> want<00:46:02.440> in<00:46:02.640> the<00:46:02.720> end<00:46:03.000> and<00:46:03.079> in<00:46:03.240> this<00:46:03.359> sentence 00:46:03.630 --> 00:46:03.640 align:start position:0% you want in the end and in this sentence 00:46:03.640 --> 00:46:05.870 align:start position:0% you want in the end and in this sentence alone<00:46:04.119> I've<00:46:04.319> used<00:46:04.680> can<00:46:05.000> three<00:46:05.240> times<00:46:05.640> we<00:46:05.760> can 00:46:05.870 --> 00:46:05.880 align:start position:0% alone I've used can three times we can 00:46:05.880 --> 00:46:08.030 align:start position:0% alone I've used can three times we can say<00:46:06.079> a<00:46:06.200> sentence<00:46:06.640> like<00:46:06.960> I<00:46:07.040> can<00:46:07.200> speak<00:46:07.480> Spanish 00:46:08.030 --> 00:46:08.040 align:start position:0% say a sentence like I can speak Spanish 00:46:08.040 --> 00:46:09.549 align:start position:0% say a sentence like I can speak Spanish and<00:46:08.160> you<00:46:08.240> can<00:46:08.400> plug<00:46:08.599> in<00:46:08.760> any<00:46:08.960> language<00:46:09.440> in 00:46:09.549 --> 00:46:09.559 align:start position:0% and you can plug in any language in 00:46:09.559 --> 00:46:13.349 align:start position:0% and you can plug in any language in Spanish<00:46:10.119> I<00:46:10.240> can<00:46:10.400> speak<00:46:10.680> Spanish<00:46:11.200> would<00:46:11.400> be<00:46:12.359> y 00:46:13.349 --> 00:46:13.359 align:start position:0% Spanish I can speak Spanish would be y 00:46:13.359 --> 00:46:15.670 align:start position:0% Spanish I can speak Spanish would be y ESP<00:46:13.960> PUO<00:46:14.359> is<00:46:14.480> the<00:46:14.559> correctly<00:46:14.920> conjugated<00:46:15.400> form 00:46:15.670 --> 00:46:15.680 align:start position:0% ESP PUO is the correctly conjugated form 00:46:15.680 --> 00:46:18.670 align:start position:0% ESP PUO is the correctly conjugated form of<00:46:16.400> of<00:46:16.520> the<00:46:16.680> yo<00:46:16.920> pronoun<00:46:17.480> a<00:46:18.000> is<00:46:18.119> the<00:46:18.240> infinitive 00:46:18.670 --> 00:46:18.680 align:start position:0% of of the yo pronoun a is the infinitive 00:46:18.680 --> 00:46:20.829 align:start position:0% of of the yo pronoun a is the infinitive that<00:46:18.800> doesn't<00:46:19.040> change<00:46:19.359> form<00:46:19.880> in<00:46:20.040> espol<00:46:20.599> is<00:46:20.720> the 00:46:20.829 --> 00:46:20.839 align:start position:0% that doesn't change form in espol is the 00:46:20.839 --> 00:46:23.750 align:start position:0% that doesn't change form in espol is the language<00:46:21.160> at<00:46:21.280> the<00:46:21.400> end<00:46:21.680> of<00:46:21.800> course<00:46:22.280> saying<00:46:22.760> y 00:46:23.750 --> 00:46:23.760 align:start position:0% language at the end of course saying y 00:46:23.760 --> 00:46:25.390 align:start position:0% language at the end of course saying y ESP<00:46:24.359> doesn't<00:46:24.680> actually<00:46:24.920> mean<00:46:25.119> that<00:46:25.200> you<00:46:25.280> can 00:46:25.390 --> 00:46:25.400 align:start position:0% ESP doesn't actually mean that you can 00:46:25.400 --> 00:46:27.150 align:start position:0% ESP doesn't actually mean that you can speak<00:46:26.200> because<00:46:26.400> saying<00:46:26.599> one<00:46:26.800> phrase<00:46:27.000> from 00:46:27.150 --> 00:46:27.160 align:start position:0% speak because saying one phrase from 00:46:27.160 --> 00:46:28.710 align:start position:0% speak because saying one phrase from memorization<00:46:27.880> does<00:46:28.040> not<00:46:28.280> indicate<00:46:28.640> that 00:46:28.710 --> 00:46:28.720 align:start position:0% memorization does not indicate that 00:46:28.720 --> 00:46:30.150 align:start position:0% memorization does not indicate that you've<00:46:28.920> mastered<00:46:29.240> the<00:46:29.359> language<00:46:29.839> in<00:46:29.920> order 00:46:30.150 --> 00:46:30.160 align:start position:0% you've mastered the language in order 00:46:30.160 --> 00:46:31.589 align:start position:0% you've mastered the language in order for<00:46:30.280> you<00:46:30.400> to<00:46:30.559> get<00:46:30.720> better<00:46:31.119> you<00:46:31.240> can<00:46:31.400> actually 00:46:31.589 --> 00:46:31.599 align:start position:0% for you to get better you can actually 00:46:31.599 --> 00:46:33.510 align:start position:0% for you to get better you can actually use<00:46:31.800> the<00:46:31.920> verb<00:46:32.200> P<00:46:32.559> to<00:46:32.680> make<00:46:32.839> many<00:46:33.079> sentences 00:46:33.510 --> 00:46:33.520 align:start position:0% use the verb P to make many sentences 00:46:33.520 --> 00:46:34.910 align:start position:0% use the verb P to make many sentences that<00:46:33.599> don't<00:46:33.839> necessarily<00:46:34.319> have<00:46:34.440> to<00:46:34.559> relate<00:46:34.800> to 00:46:34.910 --> 00:46:34.920 align:start position:0% that don't necessarily have to relate to 00:46:34.920 --> 00:46:36.470 align:start position:0% that don't necessarily have to relate to languages<00:46:35.440> if<00:46:35.559> you<00:46:35.640> want<00:46:35.720> to<00:46:35.839> say<00:46:35.960> a<00:46:36.079> sentence 00:46:36.470 --> 00:46:36.480 align:start position:0% languages if you want to say a sentence 00:46:36.480 --> 00:46:39.829 align:start position:0% languages if you want to say a sentence like<00:46:36.720> you<00:46:36.839> can<00:46:37.000> learn<00:46:37.319> English<00:46:37.880> you<00:46:37.960> will 00:46:39.829 --> 00:46:39.839 align:start position:0% like you can learn English you will 00:46:39.839 --> 00:46:42.150 align:start position:0% like you can learn English you will say<00:46:40.839> if<00:46:40.920> you<00:46:41.000> want<00:46:41.079> to<00:46:41.200> say<00:46:41.359> a<00:46:41.440> sentence<00:46:41.839> like 00:46:42.150 --> 00:46:42.160 align:start position:0% say if you want to say a sentence like 00:46:42.160 --> 00:46:45.390 align:start position:0% say if you want to say a sentence like they<00:46:42.280> can<00:46:42.440> call<00:46:42.720> by<00:46:42.880> phone<00:46:43.400> you<00:46:43.480> will 00:46:45.390 --> 00:46:45.400 align:start position:0% they can call by phone you will 00:46:45.400 --> 00:46:48.349 align:start position:0% they can call by phone you will say<00:46:46.440> overall<00:46:47.440> is<00:46:47.559> probably<00:46:47.839> one<00:46:47.960> of<00:46:48.040> the<00:46:48.160> most 00:46:48.349 --> 00:46:48.359 align:start position:0% say overall is probably one of the most 00:46:48.359 --> 00:46:50.069 align:start position:0% say overall is probably one of the most convenient<00:46:48.800> and<00:46:48.920> helpful<00:46:49.319> verbs<00:46:49.599> there<00:46:49.720> is 00:46:50.069 --> 00:46:50.079 align:start position:0% convenient and helpful verbs there is 00:46:50.079 --> 00:46:51.630 align:start position:0% convenient and helpful verbs there is not<00:46:50.240> only<00:46:50.440> in<00:46:50.599> Spanish<00:46:50.880> and<00:46:51.040> English<00:46:51.400> but<00:46:51.520> in 00:46:51.630 --> 00:46:51.640 align:start position:0% not only in Spanish and English but in 00:46:51.640 --> 00:46:53.150 align:start position:0% not only in Spanish and English but in other<00:46:51.880> languages<00:46:52.280> in<00:46:52.400> general<00:46:52.800> by 00:46:53.150 --> 00:46:53.160 align:start position:0% other languages in general by 00:46:53.160 --> 00:46:54.589 align:start position:0% other languages in general by understanding<00:46:53.359> how<00:46:53.480> to<00:46:53.640> conjugate<00:46:54.119> pod<00:46:54.520> and 00:46:54.589 --> 00:46:54.599 align:start position:0% understanding how to conjugate pod and 00:46:54.599 --> 00:46:55.910 align:start position:0% understanding how to conjugate pod and knowing<00:46:54.839> what<00:46:54.960> phrases<00:46:55.280> to<00:46:55.400> use<00:46:55.520> it<00:46:55.640> with 00:46:55.910 --> 00:46:55.920 align:start position:0% knowing what phrases to use it with 00:46:55.920 --> 00:46:57.230 align:start position:0% knowing what phrases to use it with you'll<00:46:56.079> be<00:46:56.160> able<00:46:56.319> to<00:46:56.440> generate<00:46:56.800> any<00:46:56.920> phrase 00:46:57.230 --> 00:46:57.240 align:start position:0% you'll be able to generate any phrase 00:46:57.240 --> 00:46:59.069 align:start position:0% you'll be able to generate any phrase that<00:46:57.319> you<00:46:57.440> want<00:46:57.760> almost<00:46:58.119> instantly<00:46:58.760> but<00:46:58.920> this 00:46:59.069 --> 00:46:59.079 align:start position:0% that you want almost instantly but this 00:46:59.079 --> 00:47:00.910 align:start position:0% that you want almost instantly but this of<00:46:59.240> course<00:46:59.599> requires<00:46:59.960> a<00:47:00.079> bit<00:47:00.240> more<00:47:00.520> practice 00:47:00.910 --> 00:47:00.920 align:start position:0% of course requires a bit more practice 00:47:00.920 --> 00:47:02.309 align:start position:0% of course requires a bit more practice and<00:47:01.079> examples<00:47:01.440> that<00:47:01.559> you<00:47:01.640> can<00:47:01.800> generate<00:47:02.160> on 00:47:02.309 --> 00:47:02.319 align:start position:0% and examples that you can generate on 00:47:02.319 --> 00:47:04.430 align:start position:0% and examples that you can generate on your<00:47:02.480> way<00:47:02.800> the<00:47:02.920> verb<00:47:03.240> ear<00:47:03.559> in<00:47:03.760> Spanish<00:47:04.160> means 00:47:04.430 --> 00:47:04.440 align:start position:0% your way the verb ear in Spanish means 00:47:04.440 --> 00:47:05.630 align:start position:0% your way the verb ear in Spanish means to<00:47:04.599> go<00:47:04.880> which<00:47:05.000> is<00:47:05.119> actually<00:47:05.319> one<00:47:05.440> of<00:47:05.520> the 00:47:05.630 --> 00:47:05.640 align:start position:0% to go which is actually one of the 00:47:05.640 --> 00:47:07.309 align:start position:0% to go which is actually one of the trickiest<00:47:06.040> and<00:47:06.200> hardest<00:47:06.480> verbs<00:47:06.720> to<00:47:06.839> work<00:47:07.079> with 00:47:07.309 --> 00:47:07.319 align:start position:0% trickiest and hardest verbs to work with 00:47:07.319 --> 00:47:08.710 align:start position:0% trickiest and hardest verbs to work with but<00:47:07.440> in<00:47:07.599> this<00:47:07.760> video<00:47:08.040> I'll<00:47:08.200> simplify<00:47:08.559> its 00:47:08.710 --> 00:47:08.720 align:start position:0% but in this video I'll simplify its 00:47:08.720 --> 00:47:10.430 align:start position:0% but in this video I'll simplify its principle<00:47:09.040> to<00:47:09.200> its<00:47:09.319> most<00:47:09.760> understandable<00:47:10.119> way 00:47:10.430 --> 00:47:10.440 align:start position:0% principle to its most understandable way 00:47:10.440 --> 00:47:11.790 align:start position:0% principle to its most understandable way at<00:47:10.599> first<00:47:10.920> there<00:47:11.040> are<00:47:11.160> a<00:47:11.240> few<00:47:11.400> rules<00:47:11.680> you 00:47:11.790 --> 00:47:11.800 align:start position:0% at first there are a few rules you 00:47:11.800 --> 00:47:12.950 align:start position:0% at first there are a few rules you should<00:47:11.960> know<00:47:12.079> about<00:47:12.240> the<00:47:12.359> verb<00:47:12.520> to<00:47:12.680> go<00:47:12.839> in 00:47:12.950 --> 00:47:12.960 align:start position:0% should know about the verb to go in 00:47:12.960 --> 00:47:14.349 align:start position:0% should know about the verb to go in English<00:47:13.359> so<00:47:13.520> that<00:47:13.640> you<00:47:13.720> can<00:47:13.839> utilize<00:47:14.200> its 00:47:14.349 --> 00:47:14.359 align:start position:0% English so that you can utilize its 00:47:14.359 --> 00:47:15.829 align:start position:0% English so that you can utilize its principle<00:47:14.760> and<00:47:14.880> apply<00:47:15.119> it<00:47:15.200> to<00:47:15.319> Spanish<00:47:15.760> the 00:47:15.829 --> 00:47:15.839 align:start position:0% principle and apply it to Spanish the 00:47:15.839 --> 00:47:16.790 align:start position:0% principle and apply it to Spanish the very<00:47:16.000> first<00:47:16.160> thing<00:47:16.280> you<00:47:16.359> should<00:47:16.520> know<00:47:16.640> about 00:47:16.790 --> 00:47:16.800 align:start position:0% very first thing you should know about 00:47:16.800 --> 00:47:18.230 align:start position:0% very first thing you should know about the<00:47:16.880> verb<00:47:17.079> to<00:47:17.240> go<00:47:17.480> is<00:47:17.599> that<00:47:17.720> it<00:47:17.800> can<00:47:17.920> use<00:47:18.079> the 00:47:18.230 --> 00:47:18.240 align:start position:0% the verb to go is that it can use the 00:47:18.240 --> 00:47:19.470 align:start position:0% the verb to go is that it can use the present<00:47:18.480> simple<00:47:19.000> and<00:47:19.119> the<00:47:19.240> present 00:47:19.470 --> 00:47:19.480 align:start position:0% present simple and the present 00:47:19.480 --> 00:47:21.069 align:start position:0% present simple and the present progressive<00:47:20.119> which<00:47:20.280> actually<00:47:20.520> generates<00:47:20.920> two 00:47:21.069 --> 00:47:21.079 align:start position:0% progressive which actually generates two 00:47:21.079 --> 00:47:22.589 align:start position:0% progressive which actually generates two different<00:47:21.280> meanings<00:47:21.559> in<00:47:21.800> context<00:47:22.359> for 00:47:22.589 --> 00:47:22.599 align:start position:0% different meanings in context for 00:47:22.599 --> 00:47:24.829 align:start position:0% different meanings in context for instance<00:47:23.200> saying<00:47:23.599> I<00:47:23.839> go<00:47:24.200> indicates<00:47:24.599> that<00:47:24.720> I'm 00:47:24.829 --> 00:47:24.839 align:start position:0% instance saying I go indicates that I'm 00:47:24.839 --> 00:47:26.390 align:start position:0% instance saying I go indicates that I'm a<00:47:24.960> person<00:47:25.160> who<00:47:25.280> likes<00:47:25.480> to<00:47:25.599> go<00:47:25.880> in<00:47:25.960> general 00:47:26.390 --> 00:47:26.400 align:start position:0% a person who likes to go in general 00:47:26.400 --> 00:47:28.390 align:start position:0% a person who likes to go in general whereas<00:47:26.839> saying<00:47:27.200> I'm<00:47:27.440> going<00:47:27.800> means<00:47:28.079> that<00:47:28.240> I'm 00:47:28.390 --> 00:47:28.400 align:start position:0% whereas saying I'm going means that I'm 00:47:28.400 --> 00:47:30.030 align:start position:0% whereas saying I'm going means that I'm going<00:47:28.720> right<00:47:28.880> now<00:47:29.160> and<00:47:29.240> so<00:47:29.400> my<00:47:29.599> action<00:47:29.839> will 00:47:30.030 --> 00:47:30.040 align:start position:0% going right now and so my action will 00:47:30.040 --> 00:47:31.390 align:start position:0% going right now and so my action will change<00:47:30.280> in<00:47:30.400> the<00:47:30.520> future<00:47:30.880> the<00:47:30.960> reason<00:47:31.200> why<00:47:31.319> I'm 00:47:31.390 --> 00:47:31.400 align:start position:0% change in the future the reason why I'm 00:47:31.400 --> 00:47:32.990 align:start position:0% change in the future the reason why I'm mentioning<00:47:31.839> this<00:47:32.079> is<00:47:32.200> because<00:47:32.400> in<00:47:32.520> English 00:47:32.990 --> 00:47:33.000 align:start position:0% mentioning this is because in English 00:47:33.000 --> 00:47:34.549 align:start position:0% mentioning this is because in English these<00:47:33.160> two<00:47:33.359> phrases<00:47:33.800> generate<00:47:34.200> completely 00:47:34.549 --> 00:47:34.559 align:start position:0% these two phrases generate completely 00:47:34.559 --> 00:47:36.069 align:start position:0% these two phrases generate completely different<00:47:34.760> meanings<00:47:35.400> however<00:47:35.680> because<00:47:35.920> the 00:47:36.069 --> 00:47:36.079 align:start position:0% different meanings however because the 00:47:36.079 --> 00:47:38.270 align:start position:0% different meanings however because the verb<00:47:36.400> IR<00:47:36.720> is<00:47:36.880> irregular<00:47:37.400> in<00:47:37.559> Spanish<00:47:38.040> it<00:47:38.119> does 00:47:38.270 --> 00:47:38.280 align:start position:0% verb IR is irregular in Spanish it does 00:47:38.280 --> 00:47:39.390 align:start position:0% verb IR is irregular in Spanish it does not<00:47:38.400> have<00:47:38.480> a<00:47:38.599> notion<00:47:38.880> of<00:47:39.000> the<00:47:39.119> present 00:47:39.390 --> 00:47:39.400 align:start position:0% not have a notion of the present 00:47:39.400 --> 00:47:41.109 align:start position:0% not have a notion of the present progressive<00:47:39.960> and<00:47:40.160> therefore<00:47:40.599> its<00:47:40.760> principle 00:47:41.109 --> 00:47:41.119 align:start position:0% progressive and therefore its principle 00:47:41.119 --> 00:47:42.710 align:start position:0% progressive and therefore its principle uses<00:47:41.440> both<00:47:41.640> the<00:47:41.800> present<00:47:42.079> simple<00:47:42.480> and<00:47:42.599> the 00:47:42.710 --> 00:47:42.720 align:start position:0% uses both the present simple and the 00:47:42.720 --> 00:47:44.150 align:start position:0% uses both the present simple and the present<00:47:43.000> progressive<00:47:43.400> in<00:47:43.520> unison<00:47:43.960> and<00:47:44.040> it's 00:47:44.150 --> 00:47:44.160 align:start position:0% present progressive in unison and it's 00:47:44.160 --> 00:47:45.230 align:start position:0% present progressive in unison and it's something<00:47:44.359> I'll<00:47:44.520> cover<00:47:44.720> in<00:47:44.800> a<00:47:44.880> few<00:47:45.000> minutes 00:47:45.230 --> 00:47:45.240 align:start position:0% something I'll cover in a few minutes 00:47:45.240 --> 00:47:46.349 align:start position:0% something I'll cover in a few minutes from<00:47:45.359> now<00:47:45.680> the<00:47:45.800> second<00:47:46.000> thing<00:47:46.119> you<00:47:46.200> should 00:47:46.349 --> 00:47:46.359 align:start position:0% from now the second thing you should 00:47:46.359 --> 00:47:47.670 align:start position:0% from now the second thing you should know<00:47:46.480> about<00:47:46.680> the<00:47:46.800> verb<00:47:47.000> to<00:47:47.200> go<00:47:47.440> is<00:47:47.559> that 00:47:47.670 --> 00:47:47.680 align:start position:0% know about the verb to go is that 00:47:47.680 --> 00:47:48.990 align:start position:0% know about the verb to go is that there's<00:47:47.839> a<00:47:48.000> big<00:47:48.160> difference<00:47:48.480> between<00:47:48.720> using 00:47:48.990 --> 00:47:49.000 align:start position:0% there's a big difference between using 00:47:49.000 --> 00:47:52.230 align:start position:0% there's a big difference between using to<00:47:49.240> go<00:47:49.599> as<00:47:49.920> to<00:47:50.160> go<00:47:50.520> and<00:47:50.680> to<00:47:50.880> go<00:47:51.040> to<00:47:51.480> for<00:47:51.680> instance 00:47:52.230 --> 00:47:52.240 align:start position:0% to go as to go and to go to for instance 00:47:52.240 --> 00:47:54.589 align:start position:0% to go as to go and to go to for instance I<00:47:52.319> can<00:47:52.440> say<00:47:52.640> a<00:47:52.760> sentence<00:47:53.160> like<00:47:53.440> I<00:47:53.599> go<00:47:53.960> there<00:47:54.319> or 00:47:54.589 --> 00:47:54.599 align:start position:0% I can say a sentence like I go there or 00:47:54.599 --> 00:47:56.190 align:start position:0% I can say a sentence like I go there or I'm<00:47:54.800> going<00:47:55.119> with<00:47:55.280> my<00:47:55.400> friends<00:47:55.920> and<00:47:56.040> these 00:47:56.190 --> 00:47:56.200 align:start position:0% I'm going with my friends and these 00:47:56.200 --> 00:47:57.790 align:start position:0% I'm going with my friends and these phrases<00:47:56.520> don't<00:47:56.680> have<00:47:56.800> the<00:47:56.960> preposition<00:47:57.400> to 00:47:57.790 --> 00:47:57.800 align:start position:0% phrases don't have the preposition to 00:47:57.800 --> 00:47:59.190 align:start position:0% phrases don't have the preposition to because<00:47:58.000> these<00:47:58.119> are<00:47:58.280> generic<00:47:58.680> phrases<00:47:59.040> that 00:47:59.190 --> 00:47:59.200 align:start position:0% because these are generic phrases that 00:47:59.200 --> 00:48:01.109 align:start position:0% because these are generic phrases that Express<00:47:59.559> ambiguity<00:48:00.240> on<00:48:00.359> the<00:48:00.520> other<00:48:00.720> hand<00:48:01.040> I 00:48:01.109 --> 00:48:01.119 align:start position:0% Express ambiguity on the other hand I 00:48:01.119 --> 00:48:02.790 align:start position:0% Express ambiguity on the other hand I can<00:48:01.240> say<00:48:01.440> phrases<00:48:01.839> like<00:48:02.119> I'm<00:48:02.280> going<00:48:02.480> to<00:48:02.640> the 00:48:02.790 --> 00:48:02.800 align:start position:0% can say phrases like I'm going to the 00:48:02.800 --> 00:48:04.870 align:start position:0% can say phrases like I'm going to the store<00:48:03.240> or<00:48:03.480> I'm<00:48:03.680> going<00:48:03.880> to<00:48:04.040> the<00:48:04.240> class<00:48:04.720> which 00:48:04.870 --> 00:48:04.880 align:start position:0% store or I'm going to the class which 00:48:04.880 --> 00:48:06.829 align:start position:0% store or I'm going to the class which uses<00:48:05.160> the<00:48:05.319> preposition<00:48:05.760> two<00:48:06.160> to<00:48:06.319> indicate<00:48:06.680> a 00:48:06.829 --> 00:48:06.839 align:start position:0% uses the preposition two to indicate a 00:48:06.839 --> 00:48:08.510 align:start position:0% uses the preposition two to indicate a specific<00:48:07.200> destination<00:48:07.839> Additionally<00:48:08.400> you 00:48:08.510 --> 00:48:08.520 align:start position:0% specific destination Additionally you 00:48:08.520 --> 00:48:09.790 align:start position:0% specific destination Additionally you can<00:48:08.640> include<00:48:09.000> infinitives<00:48:09.559> with<00:48:09.680> the 00:48:09.790 --> 00:48:09.800 align:start position:0% can include infinitives with the 00:48:09.800 --> 00:48:11.510 align:start position:0% can include infinitives with the preposition<00:48:10.240> two<00:48:10.599> and<00:48:10.760> these<00:48:10.920> sentences<00:48:11.319> are 00:48:11.510 --> 00:48:11.520 align:start position:0% preposition two and these sentences are 00:48:11.520 --> 00:48:12.990 align:start position:0% preposition two and these sentences are actually<00:48:11.839> used<00:48:12.160> way<00:48:12.280> more<00:48:12.480> often<00:48:12.760> than<00:48:12.880> the 00:48:12.990 --> 00:48:13.000 align:start position:0% actually used way more often than the 00:48:13.000 --> 00:48:14.670 align:start position:0% actually used way more often than the other<00:48:13.160> ones<00:48:13.520> you<00:48:13.599> can<00:48:13.720> say<00:48:13.920> phrases<00:48:14.319> like<00:48:14.559> I'm 00:48:14.670 --> 00:48:14.680 align:start position:0% other ones you can say phrases like I'm 00:48:14.680 --> 00:48:16.589 align:start position:0% other ones you can say phrases like I'm going<00:48:14.839> to<00:48:15.000> do<00:48:15.160> my<00:48:15.319> homework<00:48:15.920> or<00:48:16.160> I'm<00:48:16.280> going<00:48:16.440> to 00:48:16.589 --> 00:48:16.599 align:start position:0% going to do my homework or I'm going to 00:48:16.599 --> 00:48:18.030 align:start position:0% going to do my homework or I'm going to read<00:48:16.839> this<00:48:17.040> book<00:48:17.359> which<00:48:17.520> utilize<00:48:17.920> the 00:48:18.030 --> 00:48:18.040 align:start position:0% read this book which utilize the 00:48:18.040 --> 00:48:19.870 align:start position:0% read this book which utilize the preposition<00:48:18.480> two<00:48:18.800> with<00:48:18.920> an<00:48:19.079> infinitive<00:48:19.760> which 00:48:19.870 --> 00:48:19.880 align:start position:0% preposition two with an infinitive which 00:48:19.880 --> 00:48:21.190 align:start position:0% preposition two with an infinitive which indicates<00:48:20.240> an<00:48:20.400> action<00:48:20.640> that<00:48:20.760> will<00:48:20.880> be<00:48:21.000> done<00:48:21.119> in 00:48:21.190 --> 00:48:21.200 align:start position:0% indicates an action that will be done in 00:48:21.200 --> 00:48:23.190 align:start position:0% indicates an action that will be done in the<00:48:21.319> close<00:48:21.559> future<00:48:22.000> overall<00:48:22.520> the<00:48:22.640> syntax<00:48:23.040> of 00:48:23.190 --> 00:48:23.200 align:start position:0% the close future overall the syntax of 00:48:23.200 --> 00:48:25.069 align:start position:0% the close future overall the syntax of to<00:48:23.400> go<00:48:23.640> is<00:48:23.800> easy<00:48:24.000> to<00:48:24.160> remember<00:48:24.480> in<00:48:24.640> English 00:48:25.069 --> 00:48:25.079 align:start position:0% to go is easy to remember in English 00:48:25.079 --> 00:48:27.190 align:start position:0% to go is easy to remember in English because<00:48:25.359> go<00:48:25.680> says<00:48:25.880> go<00:48:26.079> for<00:48:26.280> five<00:48:26.480> pronouns<00:48:27.040> and 00:48:27.190 --> 00:48:27.200 align:start position:0% because go says go for five pronouns and 00:48:27.200 --> 00:48:29.430 align:start position:0% because go says go for five pronouns and only<00:48:27.440> adds<00:48:27.640> an<00:48:27.800> es<00:48:28.000> s<00:48:28.240> for<00:48:28.480> the<00:48:28.720> he<00:48:28.960> she<00:48:29.240> it 00:48:29.430 --> 00:48:29.440 align:start position:0% only adds an es s for the he she it 00:48:29.440 --> 00:48:31.030 align:start position:0% only adds an es s for the he she it pronoun<00:48:30.040> however<00:48:30.280> learning<00:48:30.599> this<00:48:30.720> verb<00:48:30.920> in 00:48:31.030 --> 00:48:31.040 align:start position:0% pronoun however learning this verb in 00:48:31.040 --> 00:48:32.910 align:start position:0% pronoun however learning this verb in Spanish<00:48:31.480> requires<00:48:31.880> a<00:48:32.000> bit<00:48:32.160> more<00:48:32.400> thinking<00:48:32.720> and 00:48:32.910 --> 00:48:32.920 align:start position:0% Spanish requires a bit more thinking and 00:48:32.920 --> 00:48:35.069 align:start position:0% Spanish requires a bit more thinking and Analysis<00:48:33.520> I<00:48:33.720> first<00:48:34.160> the<00:48:34.240> verb<00:48:34.480> to<00:48:34.680> go<00:48:34.960> in 00:48:35.069 --> 00:48:35.079 align:start position:0% Analysis I first the verb to go in 00:48:35.079 --> 00:48:36.950 align:start position:0% Analysis I first the verb to go in Spanish<00:48:35.520> means<00:48:35.920> ir<00:48:36.240> and<00:48:36.359> it's<00:48:36.559> actually<00:48:36.800> a 00:48:36.950 --> 00:48:36.960 align:start position:0% Spanish means ir and it's actually a 00:48:36.960 --> 00:48:38.750 align:start position:0% Spanish means ir and it's actually a very<00:48:37.119> strange<00:48:37.520> an<00:48:37.760> irregular<00:48:38.240> verb<00:48:38.559> because 00:48:38.750 --> 00:48:38.760 align:start position:0% very strange an irregular verb because 00:48:38.760 --> 00:48:40.589 align:start position:0% very strange an irregular verb because it's<00:48:38.839> a<00:48:38.960> mono<00:48:39.240> cabric<00:48:39.680> verb<00:48:39.920> mono<00:48:40.200> cabric 00:48:40.589 --> 00:48:40.599 align:start position:0% it's a mono cabric verb mono cabric 00:48:40.599 --> 00:48:42.109 align:start position:0% it's a mono cabric verb mono cabric verbs<00:48:40.800> in<00:48:40.960> Spanish<00:48:41.440> basically<00:48:41.800> means<00:48:42.000> that 00:48:42.109 --> 00:48:42.119 align:start position:0% verbs in Spanish basically means that 00:48:42.119 --> 00:48:43.870 align:start position:0% verbs in Spanish basically means that the<00:48:42.240> word<00:48:42.440> has<00:48:42.640> only<00:48:42.839> one<00:48:43.040> syllable<00:48:43.599> and<00:48:43.680> so 00:48:43.870 --> 00:48:43.880 align:start position:0% the word has only one syllable and so 00:48:43.880 --> 00:48:45.270 align:start position:0% the word has only one syllable and so the<00:48:44.000> language<00:48:44.319> does<00:48:44.480> not<00:48:44.640> allow<00:48:44.839> a<00:48:44.960> normal 00:48:45.270 --> 00:48:45.280 align:start position:0% the language does not allow a normal 00:48:45.280 --> 00:48:46.790 align:start position:0% the language does not allow a normal conjugation<00:48:45.800> pattern<00:48:46.160> to<00:48:46.280> be<00:48:46.359> used<00:48:46.640> with 00:48:46.790 --> 00:48:46.800 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern to be used with 00:48:46.800 --> 00:48:48.230 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern to be used with these<00:48:46.960> words<00:48:47.359> if<00:48:47.440> you<00:48:47.559> want<00:48:47.640> to<00:48:47.760> conjugate<00:48:48.119> a 00:48:48.230 --> 00:48:48.240 align:start position:0% these words if you want to conjugate a 00:48:48.240 --> 00:48:50.910 align:start position:0% these words if you want to conjugate a verb<00:48:48.440> in<00:48:48.559> Spanish<00:48:49.040> it<00:48:49.200> has<00:48:49.319> to<00:48:49.480> end<00:48:49.720> in<00:48:49.920> a<00:48:50.119> r<00:48:50.400> e<00:48:50.599> r 00:48:50.910 --> 00:48:50.920 align:start position:0% verb in Spanish it has to end in a r e r 00:48:50.920 --> 00:48:52.950 align:start position:0% verb in Spanish it has to end in a r e r or<00:48:51.200> I<00:48:51.720> you<00:48:51.839> have<00:48:51.920> to<00:48:52.040> drop<00:48:52.319> the<00:48:52.440> ending<00:48:52.880> and 00:48:52.950 --> 00:48:52.960 align:start position:0% or I you have to drop the ending and 00:48:52.960 --> 00:48:54.430 align:start position:0% or I you have to drop the ending and then<00:48:53.119> add<00:48:53.319> the<00:48:53.400> ending<00:48:53.720> that<00:48:53.839> corresponds<00:48:54.319> to 00:48:54.430 --> 00:48:54.440 align:start position:0% then add the ending that corresponds to 00:48:54.440 --> 00:48:56.390 align:start position:0% then add the ending that corresponds to every<00:48:54.640> pronoun<00:48:55.119> similarly<00:48:55.839> the<00:48:55.960> same<00:48:56.160> can<00:48:56.280> be 00:48:56.390 --> 00:48:56.400 align:start position:0% every pronoun similarly the same can be 00:48:56.400 --> 00:48:57.950 align:start position:0% every pronoun similarly the same can be done<00:48:56.559> with<00:48:56.720> infinitives<00:48:57.319> that<00:48:57.440> slightly<00:48:57.799> get 00:48:57.950 --> 00:48:57.960 align:start position:0% done with infinitives that slightly get 00:48:57.960 --> 00:48:59.670 align:start position:0% done with infinitives that slightly get modified<00:48:58.400> in<00:48:58.480> the<00:48:58.599> present<00:48:58.920> progressive<00:48:59.480> such 00:48:59.670 --> 00:48:59.680 align:start position:0% modified in the present progressive such 00:48:59.680 --> 00:49:02.470 align:start position:0% modified in the present progressive such as<00:48:59.880> adding<00:49:00.280> Ando<00:49:00.799> if<00:49:00.880> a<00:49:01.000> verb<00:49:01.200> ends<00:49:01.400> in<00:49:01.559> a<00:49:01.720> r<00:49:02.200> or 00:49:02.470 --> 00:49:02.480 align:start position:0% as adding Ando if a verb ends in a r or 00:49:02.480 --> 00:49:05.430 align:start position:0% as adding Ando if a verb ends in a r or eendo<00:49:03.119> if<00:49:03.200> the<00:49:03.319> verb<00:49:03.559> ends<00:49:03.720> in<00:49:03.880> e<00:49:04.359> or<00:49:04.599> I<00:49:05.079> because 00:49:05.430 --> 00:49:05.440 align:start position:0% eendo if the verb ends in e or I because 00:49:05.440 --> 00:49:07.510 align:start position:0% eendo if the verb ends in e or I because IR<00:49:05.760> is<00:49:05.839> a<00:49:05.960> monosyllabic<00:49:06.640> verb<00:49:07.000> Spanish<00:49:07.400> does 00:49:07.510 --> 00:49:07.520 align:start position:0% IR is a monosyllabic verb Spanish does 00:49:07.520 --> 00:49:08.990 align:start position:0% IR is a monosyllabic verb Spanish does not<00:49:07.680> allow<00:49:07.920> this<00:49:08.079> verb<00:49:08.280> to<00:49:08.400> use<00:49:08.640> any<00:49:08.799> of<00:49:08.880> the 00:49:08.990 --> 00:49:09.000 align:start position:0% not allow this verb to use any of the 00:49:09.000 --> 00:49:10.549 align:start position:0% not allow this verb to use any of the following<00:49:09.319> principles<00:49:09.720> that<00:49:09.839> I<00:49:09.960> just<00:49:10.119> covered 00:49:10.549 --> 00:49:10.559 align:start position:0% following principles that I just covered 00:49:10.559 --> 00:49:12.150 align:start position:0% following principles that I just covered so<00:49:10.720> instead<00:49:11.160> it<00:49:11.280> decides<00:49:11.599> to<00:49:11.680> use<00:49:11.799> a<00:49:11.920> different 00:49:12.150 --> 00:49:12.160 align:start position:0% so instead it decides to use a different 00:49:12.160 --> 00:49:13.589 align:start position:0% so instead it decides to use a different modification<00:49:12.680> pattern<00:49:13.079> that<00:49:13.200> completely 00:49:13.589 --> 00:49:13.599 align:start position:0% modification pattern that completely 00:49:13.599 --> 00:49:15.069 align:start position:0% modification pattern that completely doesn't<00:49:13.839> correspond<00:49:14.240> with<00:49:14.359> the<00:49:14.440> verb<00:49:14.680> e 00:49:15.069 --> 00:49:15.079 align:start position:0% doesn't correspond with the verb e 00:49:15.079 --> 00:49:16.589 align:start position:0% doesn't correspond with the verb e itself<00:49:15.520> and<00:49:15.599> speaking<00:49:15.880> of<00:49:16.000> monosyllabic 00:49:16.589 --> 00:49:16.599 align:start position:0% itself and speaking of monosyllabic 00:49:16.599 --> 00:49:18.270 align:start position:0% itself and speaking of monosyllabic verbs<00:49:16.839> that<00:49:16.960> follow<00:49:17.240> irregular<00:49:17.760> patterns 00:49:18.270 --> 00:49:18.280 align:start position:0% verbs that follow irregular patterns 00:49:18.280 --> 00:49:19.630 align:start position:0% verbs that follow irregular patterns I've<00:49:18.440> actually<00:49:18.680> covered<00:49:18.960> a<00:49:19.040> verb<00:49:19.280> like<00:49:19.400> that 00:49:19.630 --> 00:49:19.640 align:start position:0% I've actually covered a verb like that 00:49:19.640 --> 00:49:21.230 align:start position:0% I've actually covered a verb like that in<00:49:19.760> one<00:49:19.880> of<00:49:19.960> my<00:49:20.160> previous<00:49:20.440> videos<00:49:20.880> and<00:49:21.000> that<00:49:21.119> is 00:49:21.230 --> 00:49:21.240 align:start position:0% in one of my previous videos and that is 00:49:21.240 --> 00:49:24.190 align:start position:0% in one of my previous videos and that is the<00:49:21.359> verb<00:49:21.640> s<00:49:22.079> the<00:49:22.200> verb<00:49:22.480> s<00:49:22.839> is<00:49:22.960> a<00:49:23.040> monic<00:49:23.720> verb<00:49:24.000> so 00:49:24.190 --> 00:49:24.200 align:start position:0% the verb s the verb s is a monic verb so 00:49:24.200 --> 00:49:25.990 align:start position:0% the verb s the verb s is a monic verb so it's<00:49:24.359> irregular<00:49:24.960> following<00:49:25.280> a<00:49:25.599> conjugation 00:49:25.990 --> 00:49:26.000 align:start position:0% it's irregular following a conjugation 00:49:26.000 --> 00:49:27.309 align:start position:0% it's irregular following a conjugation pattern<00:49:26.280> that<00:49:26.400> doesn't<00:49:26.599> relate<00:49:26.839> to<00:49:26.960> the<00:49:27.040> word 00:49:27.309 --> 00:49:27.319 align:start position:0% pattern that doesn't relate to the word 00:49:27.319 --> 00:49:29.630 align:start position:0% pattern that doesn't relate to the word s<00:49:27.799> itself<00:49:28.240> whereas<00:49:28.640> with<00:49:28.760> the<00:49:28.839> verb<00:49:29.119> estar<00:49:29.559> you 00:49:29.630 --> 00:49:29.640 align:start position:0% s itself whereas with the verb estar you 00:49:29.640 --> 00:49:30.990 align:start position:0% s itself whereas with the verb estar you do<00:49:29.799> have<00:49:29.960> conjugations<00:49:30.520> that<00:49:30.640> follow<00:49:30.920> the 00:49:30.990 --> 00:49:31.000 align:start position:0% do have conjugations that follow the 00:49:31.000 --> 00:49:32.870 align:start position:0% do have conjugations that follow the normal<00:49:31.319> syntax<00:49:31.680> of<00:49:31.799> verbs<00:49:32.040> ending<00:49:32.280> in<00:49:32.400> a<00:49:32.599> r 00:49:32.870 --> 00:49:32.880 align:start position:0% normal syntax of verbs ending in a r 00:49:32.880 --> 00:49:34.270 align:start position:0% normal syntax of verbs ending in a r that<00:49:33.000> drop<00:49:33.240> the<00:49:33.359> ending<00:49:33.799> and<00:49:33.880> then<00:49:34.040> add<00:49:34.200> the 00:49:34.270 --> 00:49:34.280 align:start position:0% that drop the ending and then add the 00:49:34.280 --> 00:49:35.789 align:start position:0% that drop the ending and then add the corresponding<00:49:34.760> ending<00:49:35.040> to<00:49:35.160> every<00:49:35.359> pronoun 00:49:35.789 --> 00:49:35.799 align:start position:0% corresponding ending to every pronoun 00:49:35.799 --> 00:49:37.710 align:start position:0% corresponding ending to every pronoun nonetheless<00:49:36.480> the<00:49:36.599> verb<00:49:37.280> has<00:49:37.400> the<00:49:37.520> same 00:49:37.710 --> 00:49:37.720 align:start position:0% nonetheless the verb has the same 00:49:37.720 --> 00:49:39.230 align:start position:0% nonetheless the verb has the same Principle<00:49:38.160> as<00:49:38.280> the<00:49:38.400> verb<00:49:38.640> s<00:49:38.960> where<00:49:39.079> its 00:49:39.230 --> 00:49:39.240 align:start position:0% Principle as the verb s where its 00:49:39.240 --> 00:49:40.910 align:start position:0% Principle as the verb s where its conjugations<00:49:39.760> don't<00:49:39.960> relate<00:49:40.200> to<00:49:40.280> the<00:49:40.400> verb 00:49:40.910 --> 00:49:40.920 align:start position:0% conjugations don't relate to the verb 00:49:40.920 --> 00:49:42.430 align:start position:0% conjugations don't relate to the verb technically<00:49:41.280> speaking<00:49:41.760> it<00:49:42.040> does<00:49:42.160> not<00:49:42.280> even 00:49:42.430 --> 00:49:42.440 align:start position:0% technically speaking it does not even 00:49:42.440 --> 00:49:44.030 align:start position:0% technically speaking it does not even have<00:49:42.559> an<00:49:42.720> ending<00:49:43.160> and<00:49:43.319> therefore<00:49:43.680> you<00:49:43.799> cannot 00:49:44.030 --> 00:49:44.040 align:start position:0% have an ending and therefore you cannot 00:49:44.040 --> 00:49:45.789 align:start position:0% have an ending and therefore you cannot drop<00:49:44.280> its<00:49:44.440> ending<00:49:44.880> or<00:49:45.079> add<00:49:45.240> endings<00:49:45.640> that 00:49:45.789 --> 00:49:45.799 align:start position:0% drop its ending or add endings that 00:49:45.799 --> 00:49:47.589 align:start position:0% drop its ending or add endings that correspond<00:49:46.200> to<00:49:46.359> every<00:49:46.599> pronoun<00:49:47.160> both<00:49:47.359> in<00:49:47.480> the 00:49:47.589 --> 00:49:47.599 align:start position:0% correspond to every pronoun both in the 00:49:47.599 --> 00:49:48.750 align:start position:0% correspond to every pronoun both in the present<00:49:47.880> simple<00:49:48.240> and<00:49:48.359> the<00:49:48.480> present 00:49:48.750 --> 00:49:48.760 align:start position:0% present simple and the present 00:49:48.760 --> 00:49:50.109 align:start position:0% present simple and the present progressive<00:49:49.319> which<00:49:49.480> might<00:49:49.680> explain<00:49:50.000> why 00:49:50.109 --> 00:49:50.119 align:start position:0% progressive which might explain why 00:49:50.119 --> 00:49:51.470 align:start position:0% progressive which might explain why Spanish<00:49:50.480> creates<00:49:50.720> a<00:49:50.839> completely<00:49:51.200> different 00:49:51.470 --> 00:49:51.480 align:start position:0% Spanish creates a completely different 00:49:51.480 --> 00:49:53.230 align:start position:0% Spanish creates a completely different syntax<00:49:51.960> for<00:49:52.119> this<00:49:52.280> verb<00:49:52.559> the<00:49:52.680> pronunciation 00:49:53.230 --> 00:49:53.240 align:start position:0% syntax for this verb the pronunciation 00:49:53.240 --> 00:49:57.309 align:start position:0% syntax for this verb the pronunciation goes<00:49:53.440> as<00:49:53.599> follows<00:49:54.040> yo<00:49:54.760> I<00:49:55.000> go<00:49:55.240> to<00:49:55.799> vas<00:49:56.240> you<00:49:56.520> go<00:49:56.920> l 00:49:57.309 --> 00:49:57.319 align:start position:0% goes as follows yo I go to vas you go l 00:49:57.319 --> 00:50:03.150 align:start position:0% goes as follows yo I go to vas you go l or<00:49:57.640> a<00:49:58.000> said<00:49:58.520> he<00:49:58.720> goes<00:49:59.240> noos<00:49:59.920> v<00:50:00.680> We<00:50:00.920> Go<00:50:01.400> Vos<00:50:02.200> v<00:50:02.799> y 00:50:03.150 --> 00:50:03.160 align:start position:0% or a said he goes noos v We Go Vos v y 00:50:03.160 --> 00:50:05.230 align:start position:0% or a said he goes noos v We Go Vos v y go<00:50:03.640> and<00:50:03.799> AOS<00:50:04.200> van<00:50:04.559> there<00:50:04.680> you<00:50:04.839> go<00:50:05.000> with<00:50:05.119> the 00:50:05.230 --> 00:50:05.240 align:start position:0% go and AOS van there you go with the 00:50:05.240 --> 00:50:06.710 align:start position:0% go and AOS van there you go with the verb<00:50:05.520> ear<00:50:05.839> I<00:50:05.920> recommend<00:50:06.280> that<00:50:06.359> you<00:50:06.520> actually 00:50:06.710 --> 00:50:06.720 align:start position:0% verb ear I recommend that you actually 00:50:06.720 --> 00:50:08.950 align:start position:0% verb ear I recommend that you actually focus<00:50:06.960> on<00:50:07.160> every<00:50:07.400> pronoun<00:50:07.920> besides<00:50:08.280> Vos 00:50:08.950 --> 00:50:08.960 align:start position:0% focus on every pronoun besides Vos 00:50:08.960 --> 00:50:10.030 align:start position:0% focus on every pronoun besides Vos because<00:50:09.119> the<00:50:09.240> phrases<00:50:09.559> that<00:50:09.680> you<00:50:09.760> can<00:50:09.880> make 00:50:10.030 --> 00:50:10.040 align:start position:0% because the phrases that you can make 00:50:10.040 --> 00:50:11.470 align:start position:0% because the phrases that you can make with<00:50:10.200> them<00:50:10.400> will<00:50:10.559> be<00:50:10.720> very<00:50:10.880> useful<00:50:11.280> and 00:50:11.470 --> 00:50:11.480 align:start position:0% with them will be very useful and 00:50:11.480 --> 00:50:12.670 align:start position:0% with them will be very useful and practical<00:50:11.960> the<00:50:12.040> first<00:50:12.240> rule<00:50:12.480> that<00:50:12.559> I've 00:50:12.670 --> 00:50:12.680 align:start position:0% practical the first rule that I've 00:50:12.680 --> 00:50:14.109 align:start position:0% practical the first rule that I've mentioned<00:50:13.000> with<00:50:13.160> to<00:50:13.319> go<00:50:13.520> in<00:50:13.599> the<00:50:13.720> beginning<00:50:14.000> of 00:50:14.109 --> 00:50:14.119 align:start position:0% mentioned with to go in the beginning of 00:50:14.119 --> 00:50:15.950 align:start position:0% mentioned with to go in the beginning of the<00:50:14.240> video<00:50:14.599> was<00:50:14.720> that<00:50:14.839> it<00:50:14.960> can<00:50:15.079> be<00:50:15.200> used<00:50:15.520> as<00:50:15.760> I 00:50:15.950 --> 00:50:15.960 align:start position:0% the video was that it can be used as I 00:50:15.960 --> 00:50:17.630 align:start position:0% the video was that it can be used as I go<00:50:16.359> and<00:50:16.559> I<00:50:16.680> am<00:50:16.839> going<00:50:17.200> which<00:50:17.319> creates 00:50:17.630 --> 00:50:17.640 align:start position:0% go and I am going which creates 00:50:17.640 --> 00:50:19.670 align:start position:0% go and I am going which creates different<00:50:17.839> meanings<00:50:18.160> in<00:50:18.359> context<00:50:19.119> however<00:50:19.559> as 00:50:19.670 --> 00:50:19.680 align:start position:0% different meanings in context however as 00:50:19.680 --> 00:50:21.390 align:start position:0% different meanings in context however as I<00:50:19.760> said<00:50:19.920> with<00:50:20.040> the<00:50:20.160> verb<00:50:20.440> ear<00:50:20.760> Spanish<00:50:21.160> doesn't 00:50:21.390 --> 00:50:21.400 align:start position:0% I said with the verb ear Spanish doesn't 00:50:21.400 --> 00:50:22.589 align:start position:0% I said with the verb ear Spanish doesn't allow<00:50:21.640> this<00:50:21.799> verb<00:50:22.000> to<00:50:22.079> be<00:50:22.160> used<00:50:22.400> in<00:50:22.480> the 00:50:22.589 --> 00:50:22.599 align:start position:0% allow this verb to be used in the 00:50:22.599 --> 00:50:23.910 align:start position:0% allow this verb to be used in the present<00:50:22.880> progressive<00:50:23.440> which<00:50:23.559> changes<00:50:23.839> the 00:50:23.910 --> 00:50:23.920 align:start position:0% present progressive which changes the 00:50:23.920 --> 00:50:25.710 align:start position:0% present progressive which changes the meaning<00:50:24.160> of<00:50:24.280> its<00:50:24.480> context<00:50:25.000> by<00:50:25.119> making<00:50:25.319> it<00:50:25.559> use 00:50:25.710 --> 00:50:25.720 align:start position:0% meaning of its context by making it use 00:50:25.720 --> 00:50:27.069 align:start position:0% meaning of its context by making it use the<00:50:25.839> present<00:50:26.079> simple<00:50:26.559> and<00:50:26.680> the<00:50:26.799> present 00:50:27.069 --> 00:50:27.079 align:start position:0% the present simple and the present 00:50:27.079 --> 00:50:28.589 align:start position:0% the present simple and the present progressive<00:50:27.599> at<00:50:27.720> the<00:50:27.799> same<00:50:28.000> time<00:50:28.280> in<00:50:28.440> other 00:50:28.589 --> 00:50:28.599 align:start position:0% progressive at the same time in other 00:50:28.599 --> 00:50:30.470 align:start position:0% progressive at the same time in other words<00:50:28.960> whenever<00:50:29.240> you<00:50:29.359> decide<00:50:29.599> to<00:50:29.720> use<00:50:30.000> IR<00:50:30.240> in<00:50:30.319> a 00:50:30.470 --> 00:50:30.480 align:start position:0% words whenever you decide to use IR in a 00:50:30.480 --> 00:50:32.910 align:start position:0% words whenever you decide to use IR in a sentence<00:50:31.000> like<00:50:31.160> saying<00:50:31.599> y<00:50:32.280> this<00:50:32.440> phrase 00:50:32.910 --> 00:50:32.920 align:start position:0% sentence like saying y this phrase 00:50:32.920 --> 00:50:35.589 align:start position:0% sentence like saying y this phrase simultaneously<00:50:33.680> means<00:50:34.160> I<00:50:34.319> go<00:50:34.720> and<00:50:34.960> I<00:50:35.040> am<00:50:35.200> going 00:50:35.589 --> 00:50:35.599 align:start position:0% simultaneously means I go and I am going 00:50:35.599 --> 00:50:36.750 align:start position:0% simultaneously means I go and I am going and<00:50:35.680> the<00:50:35.799> same<00:50:35.960> principle<00:50:36.280> applies<00:50:36.559> to<00:50:36.640> the 00:50:36.750 --> 00:50:36.760 align:start position:0% and the same principle applies to the 00:50:36.760 --> 00:50:38.549 align:start position:0% and the same principle applies to the rest<00:50:36.880> of<00:50:36.960> the<00:50:37.079> pronouns<00:50:37.599> in<00:50:37.799> English<00:50:38.359> both 00:50:38.549 --> 00:50:38.559 align:start position:0% rest of the pronouns in English both 00:50:38.559 --> 00:50:40.190 align:start position:0% rest of the pronouns in English both phrases<00:50:38.960> have<00:50:39.119> different<00:50:39.359> meanings<00:50:39.880> but<00:50:40.040> in 00:50:40.190 --> 00:50:40.200 align:start position:0% phrases have different meanings but in 00:50:40.200 --> 00:50:42.030 align:start position:0% phrases have different meanings but in Spanish<00:50:40.720> it<00:50:40.799> means<00:50:41.079> the<00:50:41.200> same<00:50:41.400> thing<00:50:41.799> which<00:50:41.880> is 00:50:42.030 --> 00:50:42.040 align:start position:0% Spanish it means the same thing which is 00:50:42.040 --> 00:50:43.430 align:start position:0% Spanish it means the same thing which is also<00:50:42.280> part<00:50:42.400> of<00:50:42.520> the<00:50:42.640> reason<00:50:43.000> why<00:50:43.119> Spanish 00:50:43.430 --> 00:50:43.440 align:start position:0% also part of the reason why Spanish 00:50:43.440 --> 00:50:44.589 align:start position:0% also part of the reason why Spanish students<00:50:43.720> struggle<00:50:44.040> with<00:50:44.160> this<00:50:44.319> verb 00:50:44.589 --> 00:50:44.599 align:start position:0% students struggle with this verb 00:50:44.599 --> 00:50:46.150 align:start position:0% students struggle with this verb whenever<00:50:44.880> they<00:50:45.000> learn<00:50:45.280> English<00:50:45.760> more<00:50:45.960> than 00:50:46.150 --> 00:50:46.160 align:start position:0% whenever they learn English more than 00:50:46.160 --> 00:50:47.710 align:start position:0% whenever they learn English more than less<00:50:46.559> I<00:50:46.720> am<00:50:46.880> going<00:50:47.240> is<00:50:47.400> more<00:50:47.520> of<00:50:47.599> a 00:50:47.710 --> 00:50:47.720 align:start position:0% less I am going is more of a 00:50:47.720 --> 00:50:49.670 align:start position:0% less I am going is more of a sophisticated<00:50:48.319> way<00:50:48.440> of<00:50:48.559> speaking<00:50:48.839> in<00:50:49.079> context 00:50:49.670 --> 00:50:49.680 align:start position:0% sophisticated way of speaking in context 00:50:49.680 --> 00:50:52.270 align:start position:0% sophisticated way of speaking in context so<00:50:49.880> basically<00:50:50.480> y<00:50:50.760> voy<00:50:51.079> is<00:50:51.200> used<00:50:51.520> more<00:50:51.839> as<00:50:52.079> I'm 00:50:52.270 --> 00:50:52.280 align:start position:0% so basically y voy is used more as I'm 00:50:52.280 --> 00:50:54.230 align:start position:0% so basically y voy is used more as I'm going<00:50:52.760> rather<00:50:53.000> than<00:50:53.280> I<00:50:53.480> go<00:50:53.799> and<00:50:53.880> you<00:50:53.960> can<00:50:54.079> make 00:50:54.230 --> 00:50:54.240 align:start position:0% going rather than I go and you can make 00:50:54.240 --> 00:50:56.430 align:start position:0% going rather than I go and you can make sentences<00:50:54.839> like<00:50:55.079> I<00:50:55.240> go<00:50:55.480> go<00:50:55.720> there<00:50:56.040> or<00:50:56.280> I'm 00:50:56.430 --> 00:50:56.440 align:start position:0% sentences like I go go there or I'm 00:50:56.440 --> 00:50:57.990 align:start position:0% sentences like I go go there or I'm going<00:50:56.680> with<00:50:56.839> my<00:50:57.000> friends<00:50:57.440> which<00:50:57.520> in<00:50:57.680> Spanish 00:50:57.990 --> 00:50:58.000 align:start position:0% going with my friends which in Spanish 00:50:58.000 --> 00:51:01.950 align:start position:0% going with my friends which in Spanish would<00:50:58.160> be<00:50:58.480> Y<00:50:59.480> and<00:51:00.000> yig<00:51:01.000> which<00:51:01.079> shows<00:51:01.400> that<00:51:01.640> vo 00:51:01.950 --> 00:51:01.960 align:start position:0% would be Y and yig which shows that vo 00:51:01.960 --> 00:51:04.109 align:start position:0% would be Y and yig which shows that vo stays<00:51:02.359> vo<00:51:02.680> in<00:51:02.839> both<00:51:03.040> sentences<00:51:03.480> in<00:51:03.640> Spanish 00:51:04.109 --> 00:51:04.119 align:start position:0% stays vo in both sentences in Spanish 00:51:04.119 --> 00:51:06.349 align:start position:0% stays vo in both sentences in Spanish but<00:51:04.240> in<00:51:04.440> English<00:51:04.880> you<00:51:05.079> have<00:51:05.359> I<00:51:05.559> go<00:51:05.920> and<00:51:06.119> I<00:51:06.200> am 00:51:06.349 --> 00:51:06.359 align:start position:0% but in English you have I go and I am 00:51:06.359 --> 00:51:07.630 align:start position:0% but in English you have I go and I am going<00:51:06.640> and<00:51:06.760> the<00:51:06.839> same<00:51:07.000> principle<00:51:07.280> applies<00:51:07.559> to 00:51:07.630 --> 00:51:07.640 align:start position:0% going and the same principle applies to 00:51:07.640 --> 00:51:09.230 align:start position:0% going and the same principle applies to the<00:51:07.760> rest<00:51:07.880> of<00:51:07.960> the<00:51:08.040> pronouns<00:51:08.559> and<00:51:08.760> here<00:51:09.000> we<00:51:09.119> get 00:51:09.230 --> 00:51:09.240 align:start position:0% the rest of the pronouns and here we get 00:51:09.240 --> 00:51:10.589 align:start position:0% the rest of the pronouns and here we get to<00:51:09.359> the<00:51:09.480> last<00:51:09.640> rule<00:51:09.880> of<00:51:10.040> ir<00:51:10.400> which<00:51:10.520> is 00:51:10.589 --> 00:51:10.599 align:start position:0% to the last rule of ir which is 00:51:10.599 --> 00:51:11.470 align:start position:0% to the last rule of ir which is something<00:51:10.839> I've<00:51:10.960> mentioned<00:51:11.240> at<00:51:11.359> the 00:51:11.470 --> 00:51:11.480 align:start position:0% something I've mentioned at the 00:51:11.480 --> 00:51:12.750 align:start position:0% something I've mentioned at the beginning<00:51:11.720> of<00:51:11.839> the<00:51:11.960> video<00:51:12.319> and<00:51:12.440> that<00:51:12.520> is<00:51:12.640> the 00:51:12.750 --> 00:51:12.760 align:start position:0% beginning of the video and that is the 00:51:12.760 --> 00:51:14.870 align:start position:0% beginning of the video and that is the difference<00:51:13.079> between<00:51:13.359> to<00:51:13.559> go<00:51:13.839> and<00:51:13.960> to<00:51:14.119> go<00:51:14.319> to<00:51:14.720> in 00:51:14.870 --> 00:51:14.880 align:start position:0% difference between to go and to go to in 00:51:14.880 --> 00:51:16.710 align:start position:0% difference between to go and to go to in English<00:51:15.359> you<00:51:15.480> can<00:51:15.640> have<00:51:15.799> phrases<00:51:16.240> like<00:51:16.559> I'm 00:51:16.710 --> 00:51:16.720 align:start position:0% English you can have phrases like I'm 00:51:16.720 --> 00:51:18.589 align:start position:0% English you can have phrases like I'm going<00:51:16.920> to<00:51:17.079> the<00:51:17.200> store<00:51:17.680> or<00:51:17.920> I'm<00:51:18.079> going<00:51:18.240> to<00:51:18.400> the 00:51:18.589 --> 00:51:18.599 align:start position:0% going to the store or I'm going to the 00:51:18.599 --> 00:51:20.270 align:start position:0% going to the store or I'm going to the class<00:51:19.040> both<00:51:19.200> of<00:51:19.400> which<00:51:19.520> use<00:51:19.720> the<00:51:19.880> preposition 00:51:20.270 --> 00:51:20.280 align:start position:0% class both of which use the preposition 00:51:20.280 --> 00:51:22.270 align:start position:0% class both of which use the preposition two<00:51:20.680> to<00:51:20.799> indicate<00:51:21.119> a<00:51:21.280> specific<00:51:21.599> destination 00:51:22.270 --> 00:51:22.280 align:start position:0% two to indicate a specific destination 00:51:22.280 --> 00:51:24.030 align:start position:0% two to indicate a specific destination likewise<00:51:22.760> you<00:51:22.839> can<00:51:22.960> use<00:51:23.119> the<00:51:23.280> preposition<00:51:23.680> two 00:51:24.030 --> 00:51:24.040 align:start position:0% likewise you can use the preposition two 00:51:24.040 --> 00:51:25.870 align:start position:0% likewise you can use the preposition two with<00:51:24.200> infinitives<00:51:24.880> like<00:51:25.040> I'm<00:51:25.160> going<00:51:25.559> to<00:51:25.640> do<00:51:25.720> my 00:51:25.870 --> 00:51:25.880 align:start position:0% with infinitives like I'm going to do my 00:51:25.880 --> 00:51:27.950 align:start position:0% with infinitives like I'm going to do my homework<00:51:26.480> or<00:51:26.799> I'm<00:51:26.960> going<00:51:27.119> to<00:51:27.280> read<00:51:27.480> this<00:51:27.640> book 00:51:27.950 --> 00:51:27.960 align:start position:0% homework or I'm going to read this book 00:51:27.960 --> 00:51:29.230 align:start position:0% homework or I'm going to read this book which<00:51:28.079> indicates<00:51:28.480> an<00:51:28.640> action<00:51:28.920> that<00:51:29.000> you<00:51:29.119> will 00:51:29.230 --> 00:51:29.240 align:start position:0% which indicates an action that you will 00:51:29.240 --> 00:51:30.470 align:start position:0% which indicates an action that you will do<00:51:29.480> eventually<00:51:30.000> the<00:51:30.119> way<00:51:30.240> that<00:51:30.359> this 00:51:30.470 --> 00:51:30.480 align:start position:0% do eventually the way that this 00:51:30.480 --> 00:51:32.190 align:start position:0% do eventually the way that this principle<00:51:30.839> Works<00:51:31.079> in<00:51:31.200> Spanish<00:51:31.640> is<00:51:31.760> by<00:51:31.880> using<00:51:32.079> a 00:51:32.190 --> 00:51:32.200 align:start position:0% principle Works in Spanish is by using a 00:51:32.200 --> 00:51:34.470 align:start position:0% principle Works in Spanish is by using a conjugation<00:51:32.640> of<00:51:32.839> ir<00:51:33.240> like<00:51:33.599> yoy<00:51:34.240> and<00:51:34.319> then 00:51:34.470 --> 00:51:34.480 align:start position:0% conjugation of ir like yoy and then 00:51:34.480 --> 00:51:36.630 align:start position:0% conjugation of ir like yoy and then adding<00:51:34.720> the<00:51:34.920> preposition<00:51:35.599> a<00:51:36.000> at<00:51:36.119> the<00:51:36.240> end 00:51:36.630 --> 00:51:36.640 align:start position:0% adding the preposition a at the end 00:51:36.640 --> 00:51:38.430 align:start position:0% adding the preposition a at the end which<00:51:36.799> literally<00:51:37.160> means<00:51:37.599> to<00:51:38.040> if<00:51:38.119> you<00:51:38.200> want<00:51:38.319> to 00:51:38.430 --> 00:51:38.440 align:start position:0% which literally means to if you want to 00:51:38.440 --> 00:51:40.510 align:start position:0% which literally means to if you want to say<00:51:38.720> I'm<00:51:38.880> going<00:51:39.079> to<00:51:39.240> the<00:51:39.359> store<00:51:39.880> or<00:51:40.160> I'm<00:51:40.319> going 00:51:40.510 --> 00:51:40.520 align:start position:0% say I'm going to the store or I'm going 00:51:40.520 --> 00:51:44.349 align:start position:0% say I'm going to the store or I'm going to<00:51:40.680> the<00:51:40.839> class<00:51:41.240> you<00:51:41.400> will<00:51:41.599> say<00:51:41.960> y<00:51:42.680> Al 00:51:44.349 --> 00:51:44.359 align:start position:0% to the class you will say y Al 00:51:44.359 --> 00:51:46.750 align:start position:0% to the class you will say y Al or<00:51:45.359> and<00:51:45.480> with<00:51:45.640> these<00:51:45.799> sentences<00:51:46.359> you're<00:51:46.520> using 00:51:46.750 --> 00:51:46.760 align:start position:0% or and with these sentences you're using 00:51:46.760 --> 00:51:48.309 align:start position:0% or and with these sentences you're using the<00:51:46.920> preposition<00:51:47.319> to<00:51:47.680> to<00:51:47.839> specify 00:51:48.309 --> 00:51:48.319 align:start position:0% the preposition to to specify 00:51:48.319 --> 00:51:50.030 align:start position:0% the preposition to to specify destination<00:51:48.920> on<00:51:49.040> the<00:51:49.160> other<00:51:49.359> hand<00:51:49.680> you<00:51:49.799> can<00:51:49.920> do 00:51:50.030 --> 00:51:50.040 align:start position:0% destination on the other hand you can do 00:51:50.040 --> 00:51:51.750 align:start position:0% destination on the other hand you can do the<00:51:50.119> same<00:51:50.280> with<00:51:50.440> infinitives<00:51:51.200> like<00:51:51.319> saying 00:51:51.750 --> 00:51:51.760 align:start position:0% the same with infinitives like saying 00:51:51.760 --> 00:51:53.630 align:start position:0% the same with infinitives like saying I'm<00:51:51.920> going<00:51:52.079> to<00:51:52.200> do<00:51:52.359> my<00:51:52.520> homework<00:51:53.119> or<00:51:53.359> I'm<00:51:53.480> going 00:51:53.630 --> 00:51:53.640 align:start position:0% I'm going to do my homework or I'm going 00:51:53.640 --> 00:51:57.910 align:start position:0% I'm going to do my homework or I'm going to<00:51:53.799> read<00:51:54.000> this<00:51:54.200> book<00:51:54.559> which<00:51:54.680> will<00:51:54.799> be<00:51:55.040> your 00:51:57.910 --> 00:51:57.920 align:start position:0% 00:51:57.920 --> 00:52:00.309 align:start position:0% or<00:51:58.920> with<00:51:59.079> these<00:51:59.240> sentences<00:51:59.760> you're<00:51:59.920> using<00:52:00.160> the 00:52:00.309 --> 00:52:00.319 align:start position:0% or with these sentences you're using the 00:52:00.319 --> 00:52:01.910 align:start position:0% or with these sentences you're using the preposition<00:52:00.720> to<00:52:01.160> by<00:52:01.280> applying<00:52:01.599> it<00:52:01.680> to<00:52:01.799> the 00:52:01.910 --> 00:52:01.920 align:start position:0% preposition to by applying it to the 00:52:01.920 --> 00:52:03.670 align:start position:0% preposition to by applying it to the verb<00:52:02.559> itself<00:52:02.960> and<00:52:03.040> the<00:52:03.119> same<00:52:03.359> principle 00:52:03.670 --> 00:52:03.680 align:start position:0% verb itself and the same principle 00:52:03.680 --> 00:52:05.230 align:start position:0% verb itself and the same principle applies<00:52:03.960> to<00:52:04.079> any<00:52:04.240> pronouns<00:52:04.640> you<00:52:04.720> want<00:52:04.799> to<00:52:04.920> use 00:52:05.230 --> 00:52:05.240 align:start position:0% applies to any pronouns you want to use 00:52:05.240 --> 00:52:06.470 align:start position:0% applies to any pronouns you want to use but<00:52:05.359> keep<00:52:05.520> in<00:52:05.599> mind<00:52:05.799> the<00:52:05.920> difference<00:52:06.240> between 00:52:06.470 --> 00:52:06.480 align:start position:0% but keep in mind the difference between 00:52:06.480 --> 00:52:08.230 align:start position:0% but keep in mind the difference between to<00:52:06.680> go<00:52:06.920> and<00:52:07.040> to<00:52:07.200> go<00:52:07.359> to<00:52:07.640> if<00:52:07.720> you<00:52:07.799> want<00:52:07.880> to<00:52:07.960> say<00:52:08.119> a 00:52:08.230 --> 00:52:08.240 align:start position:0% to go and to go to if you want to say a 00:52:08.240 --> 00:52:09.789 align:start position:0% to go and to go to if you want to say a phrase<00:52:08.520> like<00:52:08.760> you're<00:52:08.920> going<00:52:09.160> to<00:52:09.359> work<00:52:09.720> you 00:52:09.789 --> 00:52:09.799 align:start position:0% phrase like you're going to work you 00:52:09.799 --> 00:52:12.190 align:start position:0% phrase like you're going to work you will<00:52:10.000> say<00:52:10.640> to<00:52:11.640> which<00:52:11.760> will<00:52:11.880> use<00:52:12.040> the 00:52:12.190 --> 00:52:12.200 align:start position:0% will say to which will use the 00:52:12.200 --> 00:52:13.870 align:start position:0% will say to which will use the preposition<00:52:12.640> too<00:52:13.000> if<00:52:13.079> you<00:52:13.160> want<00:52:13.280> to<00:52:13.400> say<00:52:13.720> he 00:52:13.870 --> 00:52:13.880 align:start position:0% preposition too if you want to say he 00:52:13.880 --> 00:52:15.910 align:start position:0% preposition too if you want to say he goes<00:52:14.119> to<00:52:14.280> my<00:52:14.480> house<00:52:14.880> you<00:52:14.960> will 00:52:15.910 --> 00:52:15.920 align:start position:0% goes to my house you will 00:52:15.920 --> 00:52:18.190 align:start position:0% goes to my house you will say<00:52:16.920> if<00:52:17.000> you<00:52:17.079> want<00:52:17.160> to<00:52:17.240> say<00:52:17.400> a<00:52:17.480> sentence<00:52:17.920> like 00:52:18.190 --> 00:52:18.200 align:start position:0% say if you want to say a sentence like 00:52:18.200 --> 00:52:21.230 align:start position:0% say if you want to say a sentence like we<00:52:18.359> go<00:52:18.559> there<00:52:18.760> with<00:52:18.960> everybody<00:52:19.599> you'll 00:52:21.230 --> 00:52:21.240 align:start position:0% we go there with everybody you'll 00:52:21.240 --> 00:52:23.430 align:start position:0% we go there with everybody you'll say<00:52:22.240> which<00:52:22.400> does<00:52:22.559> not<00:52:22.680> use<00:52:22.839> the<00:52:23.040> preposition 00:52:23.430 --> 00:52:23.440 align:start position:0% say which does not use the preposition 00:52:23.440 --> 00:52:25.069 align:start position:0% say which does not use the preposition too<00:52:23.799> if<00:52:23.880> you<00:52:24.000> want<00:52:24.079> to<00:52:24.200> say<00:52:24.319> a<00:52:24.400> sentence<00:52:24.799> like 00:52:25.069 --> 00:52:25.079 align:start position:0% too if you want to say a sentence like 00:52:25.079 --> 00:52:27.829 align:start position:0% too if you want to say a sentence like the<00:52:25.400> going<00:52:25.559> to<00:52:25.640> the<00:52:25.799> university<00:52:26.480> you<00:52:26.599> will 00:52:27.829 --> 00:52:27.839 align:start position:0% the going to the university you will 00:52:27.839 --> 00:52:30.549 align:start position:0% the going to the university you will say<00:52:28.839> overall<00:52:29.359> I<00:52:29.440> would<00:52:29.559> say<00:52:29.720> that<00:52:29.839> the<00:52:29.920> verb<00:52:30.480> is 00:52:30.549 --> 00:52:30.559 align:start position:0% say overall I would say that the verb is 00:52:30.559 --> 00:52:32.430 align:start position:0% say overall I would say that the verb is an<00:52:30.680> extremely<00:52:31.040> useful<00:52:31.359> verb<00:52:31.599> in<00:52:31.760> Spanish<00:52:32.240> even 00:52:32.430 --> 00:52:32.440 align:start position:0% an extremely useful verb in Spanish even 00:52:32.440 --> 00:52:34.549 align:start position:0% an extremely useful verb in Spanish even more<00:52:32.599> so<00:52:32.799> than<00:52:33.400> and<00:52:33.640> AER<00:52:34.160> especially<00:52:34.480> when 00:52:34.549 --> 00:52:34.559 align:start position:0% more so than and AER especially when 00:52:34.559 --> 00:52:35.750 align:start position:0% more so than and AER especially when you're<00:52:34.680> trying<00:52:34.880> to<00:52:35.000> communicate<00:52:35.400> with<00:52:35.559> people 00:52:35.750 --> 00:52:35.760 align:start position:0% you're trying to communicate with people 00:52:35.760 --> 00:52:37.069 align:start position:0% you're trying to communicate with people who<00:52:35.880> speak<00:52:36.119> Spanish<00:52:36.559> and<00:52:36.640> tell<00:52:36.799> them<00:52:36.960> what 00:52:37.069 --> 00:52:37.079 align:start position:0% who speak Spanish and tell them what 00:52:37.079 --> 00:52:38.670 align:start position:0% who speak Spanish and tell them what you're<00:52:37.240> trying<00:52:37.440> to<00:52:37.559> do<00:52:37.880> or<00:52:38.040> where<00:52:38.160> you<00:52:38.319> go<00:52:38.559> the 00:52:38.670 --> 00:52:38.680 align:start position:0% you're trying to do or where you go the 00:52:38.680 --> 00:52:41.150 align:start position:0% you're trying to do or where you go the verb<00:52:38.960> T<00:52:39.480> in<00:52:39.640> Spanish<00:52:40.079> means<00:52:40.359> to<00:52:40.559> have<00:52:40.880> and<00:52:40.960> it's 00:52:41.150 --> 00:52:41.160 align:start position:0% verb T in Spanish means to have and it's 00:52:41.160 --> 00:52:42.589 align:start position:0% verb T in Spanish means to have and it's actually<00:52:41.400> a<00:52:41.480> handy<00:52:41.799> verb<00:52:42.000> to<00:52:42.079> use<00:52:42.319> both<00:52:42.480> in 00:52:42.589 --> 00:52:42.599 align:start position:0% actually a handy verb to use both in 00:52:42.599 --> 00:52:44.390 align:start position:0% actually a handy verb to use both in English<00:52:42.960> and<00:52:43.119> Spanish<00:52:43.599> but<00:52:43.720> its<00:52:43.920> concept<00:52:44.240> is<00:52:44.319> a 00:52:44.390 --> 00:52:44.400 align:start position:0% English and Spanish but its concept is a 00:52:44.400 --> 00:52:46.069 align:start position:0% English and Spanish but its concept is a bit<00:52:44.520> tricky<00:52:44.799> to<00:52:44.880> use<00:52:45.000> in<00:52:45.160> Spanish<00:52:45.640> and<00:52:45.760> in<00:52:45.920> this 00:52:46.069 --> 00:52:46.079 align:start position:0% bit tricky to use in Spanish and in this 00:52:46.079 --> 00:52:47.510 align:start position:0% bit tricky to use in Spanish and in this video<00:52:46.359> I'll<00:52:46.520> explain<00:52:46.839> this<00:52:47.040> verb<00:52:47.359> as 00:52:47.510 --> 00:52:47.520 align:start position:0% video I'll explain this verb as 00:52:47.520 --> 00:52:49.349 align:start position:0% video I'll explain this verb as efficiently<00:52:47.960> as<00:52:48.160> possible<00:52:48.599> in<00:52:48.760> English<00:52:49.200> the 00:52:49.349 --> 00:52:49.359 align:start position:0% efficiently as possible in English the 00:52:49.359 --> 00:52:51.309 align:start position:0% efficiently as possible in English the syntax<00:52:49.720> of<00:52:49.839> the<00:52:50.000> have<00:52:50.280> is<00:52:50.400> easy<00:52:50.640> to<00:52:50.799> remember 00:52:51.309 --> 00:52:51.319 align:start position:0% syntax of the have is easy to remember 00:52:51.319 --> 00:52:52.789 align:start position:0% syntax of the have is easy to remember because<00:52:51.640> have<00:52:51.839> stays<00:52:52.160> have<00:52:52.359> for<00:52:52.559> five 00:52:52.789 --> 00:52:52.799 align:start position:0% because have stays have for five 00:52:52.799 --> 00:52:54.829 align:start position:0% because have stays have for five pronouns<00:52:53.359> and<00:52:53.480> only<00:52:53.680> changes<00:52:54.040> to<00:52:54.280> has<00:52:54.559> in<00:52:54.680> the 00:52:54.829 --> 00:52:54.839 align:start position:0% pronouns and only changes to has in the 00:52:54.839 --> 00:52:56.549 align:start position:0% pronouns and only changes to has in the he<00:52:55.040> she<00:52:55.319> it<00:52:55.520> pronoun<00:52:55.920> so<00:52:56.079> that<00:52:56.160> it<00:52:56.280> sounds 00:52:56.549 --> 00:52:56.559 align:start position:0% he she it pronoun so that it sounds 00:52:56.559 --> 00:52:58.230 align:start position:0% he she it pronoun so that it sounds better<00:52:56.760> for<00:52:57.000> these<00:52:57.200> pronouns<00:52:57.760> like<00:52:57.880> I<00:52:57.960> said<00:52:58.119> in 00:52:58.230 --> 00:52:58.240 align:start position:0% better for these pronouns like I said in 00:52:58.240 --> 00:53:00.630 align:start position:0% better for these pronouns like I said in my<00:52:58.440> IR<00:52:58.720> video<00:52:59.119> the<00:52:59.240> verb<00:52:59.480> T<00:53:00.040> likewise<00:53:00.440> has 00:53:00.630 --> 00:53:00.640 align:start position:0% my IR video the verb T likewise has 00:53:00.640 --> 00:53:01.950 align:start position:0% my IR video the verb T likewise has tricky<00:53:00.960> uses<00:53:01.319> that<00:53:01.440> are<00:53:01.559> not<00:53:01.799> that 00:53:01.950 --> 00:53:01.960 align:start position:0% tricky uses that are not that 00:53:01.960 --> 00:53:03.630 align:start position:0% tricky uses that are not that complicated<00:53:02.599> with<00:53:02.799> ir<00:53:03.200> there's<00:53:03.319> a<00:53:03.440> big 00:53:03.630 --> 00:53:03.640 align:start position:0% complicated with ir there's a big 00:53:03.640 --> 00:53:05.230 align:start position:0% complicated with ir there's a big difference<00:53:03.920> between<00:53:04.200> saying<00:53:04.440> to<00:53:04.640> go<00:53:04.960> and<00:53:05.079> to 00:53:05.230 --> 00:53:05.240 align:start position:0% difference between saying to go and to 00:53:05.240 --> 00:53:07.349 align:start position:0% difference between saying to go and to go<00:53:05.400> to<00:53:05.760> to<00:53:05.960> go<00:53:06.240> means<00:53:06.480> to<00:53:06.640> go<00:53:06.839> somewhere<00:53:07.240> in 00:53:07.349 --> 00:53:07.359 align:start position:0% go to to go means to go somewhere in 00:53:07.359 --> 00:53:09.430 align:start position:0% go to to go means to go somewhere in general<00:53:07.920> whereas<00:53:08.240> to<00:53:08.400> go<00:53:08.559> to<00:53:08.880> indicates<00:53:09.280> that 00:53:09.430 --> 00:53:09.440 align:start position:0% general whereas to go to indicates that 00:53:09.440 --> 00:53:11.190 align:start position:0% general whereas to go to indicates that one<00:53:09.599> will<00:53:09.760> do<00:53:10.000> something<00:53:10.319> in<00:53:10.440> the<00:53:10.559> near<00:53:10.760> future 00:53:11.190 --> 00:53:11.200 align:start position:0% one will do something in the near future 00:53:11.200 --> 00:53:12.950 align:start position:0% one will do something in the near future the<00:53:11.319> verb<00:53:11.559> to<00:53:11.760> have<00:53:12.119> both<00:53:12.280> in<00:53:12.440> English<00:53:12.799> and 00:53:12.950 --> 00:53:12.960 align:start position:0% the verb to have both in English and 00:53:12.960 --> 00:53:15.030 align:start position:0% the verb to have both in English and Spanish<00:53:13.480> has<00:53:13.640> the<00:53:13.760> same<00:53:14.000> concept<00:53:14.400> of<00:53:14.559> to<00:53:14.760> have 00:53:15.030 --> 00:53:15.040 align:start position:0% Spanish has the same concept of to have 00:53:15.040 --> 00:53:16.910 align:start position:0% Spanish has the same concept of to have and<00:53:15.160> to<00:53:15.319> have<00:53:15.480> to<00:53:15.839> to<00:53:16.040> have<00:53:16.319> indicates<00:53:16.760> that 00:53:16.910 --> 00:53:16.920 align:start position:0% and to have to to have indicates that 00:53:16.920 --> 00:53:19.270 align:start position:0% and to have to to have indicates that one<00:53:17.160> owns<00:53:17.599> or<00:53:17.880> possesses<00:53:18.359> something<00:53:18.880> whereas 00:53:19.270 --> 00:53:19.280 align:start position:0% one owns or possesses something whereas 00:53:19.280 --> 00:53:20.990 align:start position:0% one owns or possesses something whereas to<00:53:19.440> have<00:53:19.599> two<00:53:20.000> demonstrates<00:53:20.440> that<00:53:20.599> one<00:53:20.760> has<00:53:20.880> to 00:53:20.990 --> 00:53:21.000 align:start position:0% to have two demonstrates that one has to 00:53:21.000 --> 00:53:22.589 align:start position:0% to have two demonstrates that one has to do<00:53:21.200> something<00:53:21.520> in<00:53:21.599> the<00:53:21.720> close<00:53:22.000> future<00:53:22.400> for 00:53:22.589 --> 00:53:22.599 align:start position:0% do something in the close future for 00:53:22.599 --> 00:53:24.390 align:start position:0% do something in the close future for instance<00:53:23.119> I<00:53:23.200> can<00:53:23.280> say<00:53:23.480> a<00:53:23.559> sentence<00:53:23.960> like<00:53:24.240> I 00:53:24.390 --> 00:53:24.400 align:start position:0% instance I can say a sentence like I 00:53:24.400 --> 00:53:25.829 align:start position:0% instance I can say a sentence like I have<00:53:24.520> a<00:53:24.680> dog<00:53:25.240> which<00:53:25.359> doesn't<00:53:25.559> use<00:53:25.680> the 00:53:25.829 --> 00:53:25.839 align:start position:0% have a dog which doesn't use the 00:53:25.839 --> 00:53:27.630 align:start position:0% have a dog which doesn't use the preposition<00:53:26.240> two<00:53:26.640> because<00:53:26.839> I<00:53:26.960> literally<00:53:27.319> own 00:53:27.630 --> 00:53:27.640 align:start position:0% preposition two because I literally own 00:53:27.640 --> 00:53:29.390 align:start position:0% preposition two because I literally own something<00:53:28.160> but<00:53:28.280> on<00:53:28.440> the<00:53:28.559> other<00:53:28.760> hand<00:53:29.160> I<00:53:29.240> can 00:53:29.390 --> 00:53:29.400 align:start position:0% something but on the other hand I can 00:53:29.400 --> 00:53:31.069 align:start position:0% something but on the other hand I can say<00:53:29.680> I<00:53:29.839> have<00:53:30.000> to<00:53:30.160> leave<00:53:30.520> which<00:53:30.640> uses<00:53:30.920> the 00:53:31.069 --> 00:53:31.079 align:start position:0% say I have to leave which uses the 00:53:31.079 --> 00:53:32.829 align:start position:0% say I have to leave which uses the preposition<00:53:31.520> two<00:53:31.920> because<00:53:32.119> it<00:53:32.240> indicates<00:53:32.640> an 00:53:32.829 --> 00:53:32.839 align:start position:0% preposition two because it indicates an 00:53:32.839 --> 00:53:34.510 align:start position:0% preposition two because it indicates an action<00:53:33.280> that<00:53:33.400> will<00:53:33.559> be<00:53:33.680> done<00:53:33.880> by<00:53:34.040> me<00:53:34.319> in<00:53:34.400> the 00:53:34.510 --> 00:53:34.520 align:start position:0% action that will be done by me in the 00:53:34.520 --> 00:53:35.990 align:start position:0% action that will be done by me in the close<00:53:34.760> future<00:53:35.160> with<00:53:35.280> the<00:53:35.400> addition<00:53:35.680> of<00:53:35.760> using 00:53:35.990 --> 00:53:36.000 align:start position:0% close future with the addition of using 00:53:36.000 --> 00:53:38.309 align:start position:0% close future with the addition of using an<00:53:36.160> infinitive<00:53:36.839> leave<00:53:37.359> after<00:53:37.640> two<00:53:38.040> and<00:53:38.160> in 00:53:38.309 --> 00:53:38.319 align:start position:0% an infinitive leave after two and in 00:53:38.319 --> 00:53:40.589 align:start position:0% an infinitive leave after two and in Spanish<00:53:38.760> the<00:53:38.880> verb<00:53:39.160> T<00:53:39.640> works<00:53:39.960> the<00:53:40.040> same<00:53:40.280> exact 00:53:40.589 --> 00:53:40.599 align:start position:0% Spanish the verb T works the same exact 00:53:40.599 --> 00:53:42.549 align:start position:0% Spanish the verb T works the same exact way<00:53:40.799> with<00:53:40.920> a<00:53:41.040> bit<00:53:41.200> more<00:53:41.400> variety<00:53:41.920> at<00:53:42.079> first<00:53:42.440> the 00:53:42.549 --> 00:53:42.559 align:start position:0% way with a bit more variety at first the 00:53:42.559 --> 00:53:44.589 align:start position:0% way with a bit more variety at first the verb<00:53:42.799> T<00:53:43.240> is<00:53:43.400> actually<00:53:43.599> a<00:53:43.720> stem<00:53:43.960> changing<00:53:44.319> verb 00:53:44.589 --> 00:53:44.599 align:start position:0% verb T is actually a stem changing verb 00:53:44.599 --> 00:53:45.870 align:start position:0% verb T is actually a stem changing verb meaning<00:53:44.839> that<00:53:44.960> you<00:53:45.040> have<00:53:45.160> to<00:53:45.280> change<00:53:45.520> the<00:53:45.640> stem 00:53:45.870 --> 00:53:45.880 align:start position:0% meaning that you have to change the stem 00:53:45.880 --> 00:53:47.470 align:start position:0% meaning that you have to change the stem of<00:53:46.000> the<00:53:46.119> verb<00:53:46.440> to<00:53:46.559> make<00:53:46.680> it<00:53:46.799> sound<00:53:47.079> better<00:53:47.319> when 00:53:47.470 --> 00:53:47.480 align:start position:0% of the verb to make it sound better when 00:53:47.480 --> 00:53:48.990 align:start position:0% of the verb to make it sound better when the<00:53:47.559> word<00:53:47.720> is<00:53:47.839> said<00:53:48.160> just<00:53:48.359> like<00:53:48.480> with<00:53:48.599> the<00:53:48.720> verb 00:53:48.990 --> 00:53:49.000 align:start position:0% the word is said just like with the verb 00:53:49.000 --> 00:53:51.069 align:start position:0% the word is said just like with the verb po<00:53:49.440> the<00:53:49.559> St<00:53:49.799> changing<00:53:50.079> rule<00:53:50.319> will<00:53:50.520> only<00:53:50.760> apply 00:53:51.069 --> 00:53:51.079 align:start position:0% po the St changing rule will only apply 00:53:51.079 --> 00:53:53.510 align:start position:0% po the St changing rule will only apply in<00:53:51.240> the<00:53:51.400> two<00:53:51.799> L<00:53:52.079> and<00:53:52.280> AOS<00:53:52.640> pronouns<00:53:53.200> in<00:53:53.359> this 00:53:53.510 --> 00:53:53.520 align:start position:0% in the two L and AOS pronouns in this 00:53:53.520 --> 00:53:56.870 align:start position:0% in the two L and AOS pronouns in this case<00:53:53.799> the<00:53:53.920> verb<00:53:54.200> T<00:53:54.599> falls<00:53:54.880> into<00:53:55.160> to<00:53:55.319> the<00:53:55.599> E<00:53:55.960> to<00:53:56.359> e 00:53:56.870 --> 00:53:56.880 align:start position:0% case the verb T falls into to the E to e 00:53:56.880 --> 00:53:58.710 align:start position:0% case the verb T falls into to the E to e category<00:53:57.400> meaning<00:53:57.680> that<00:53:57.799> you<00:53:57.960> take<00:53:58.240> T<00:53:58.599> and 00:53:58.710 --> 00:53:58.720 align:start position:0% category meaning that you take T and 00:53:58.720 --> 00:54:01.069 align:start position:0% category meaning that you take T and change<00:53:58.960> it<00:53:59.119> to<00:53:59.440> T<00:54:00.079> and<00:54:00.240> this<00:54:00.440> St<00:54:00.680> will<00:54:00.839> only 00:54:01.069 --> 00:54:01.079 align:start position:0% change it to T and this St will only 00:54:01.079 --> 00:54:04.069 align:start position:0% change it to T and this St will only apply<00:54:01.359> in<00:54:01.520> the<00:54:01.680> two<00:54:02.040> L<00:54:02.280> and<00:54:02.480> AOS<00:54:02.799> pronouns<00:54:03.319> noos 00:54:04.069 --> 00:54:04.079 align:start position:0% apply in the two L and AOS pronouns noos 00:54:04.079 --> 00:54:06.109 align:start position:0% apply in the two L and AOS pronouns noos and<00:54:04.280> votos<00:54:05.000> will<00:54:05.160> not<00:54:05.319> use<00:54:05.480> the<00:54:05.599> stem<00:54:05.839> changing 00:54:06.109 --> 00:54:06.119 align:start position:0% and votos will not use the stem changing 00:54:06.119 --> 00:54:07.430 align:start position:0% and votos will not use the stem changing rule<00:54:06.440> because<00:54:06.640> Spanish<00:54:06.960> says<00:54:07.119> that<00:54:07.280> these 00:54:07.430 --> 00:54:07.440 align:start position:0% rule because Spanish says that these 00:54:07.440 --> 00:54:08.589 align:start position:0% rule because Spanish says that these words<00:54:07.640> sound<00:54:07.880> good<00:54:08.079> enough<00:54:08.319> when<00:54:08.440> they're 00:54:08.589 --> 00:54:08.599 align:start position:0% words sound good enough when they're 00:54:08.599 --> 00:54:09.950 align:start position:0% words sound good enough when they're normally<00:54:08.920> said<00:54:09.280> the<00:54:09.359> ending<00:54:09.599> of<00:54:09.760> all 00:54:09.950 --> 00:54:09.960 align:start position:0% normally said the ending of all 00:54:09.960 --> 00:54:11.470 align:start position:0% normally said the ending of all conjugations<00:54:10.640> perfectly<00:54:10.960> follows<00:54:11.359> the 00:54:11.470 --> 00:54:11.480 align:start position:0% conjugations perfectly follows the 00:54:11.480 --> 00:54:13.270 align:start position:0% conjugations perfectly follows the syntax<00:54:11.839> of<00:54:11.960> verbs<00:54:12.200> ending<00:54:12.440> in<00:54:12.559> e<00:54:12.720> r<00:54:13.079> but<00:54:13.160> the 00:54:13.270 --> 00:54:13.280 align:start position:0% syntax of verbs ending in e r but the 00:54:13.280 --> 00:54:14.549 align:start position:0% syntax of verbs ending in e r but the trickiest<00:54:13.680> thing<00:54:13.799> to<00:54:13.960> remember<00:54:14.319> with<00:54:14.440> the 00:54:14.549 --> 00:54:14.559 align:start position:0% trickiest thing to remember with the 00:54:14.559 --> 00:54:16.829 align:start position:0% trickiest thing to remember with the conjugations<00:54:15.079> of<00:54:15.280> T<00:54:15.760> is<00:54:15.880> that<00:54:16.000> the<00:54:16.119> yo<00:54:16.359> pronoun 00:54:16.829 --> 00:54:16.839 align:start position:0% conjugations of T is that the yo pronoun 00:54:16.839 --> 00:54:18.870 align:start position:0% conjugations of T is that the yo pronoun is<00:54:16.960> also<00:54:17.280> irregular<00:54:17.920> by<00:54:18.079> technicality<00:54:18.799> you 00:54:18.870 --> 00:54:18.880 align:start position:0% is also irregular by technicality you 00:54:18.880 --> 00:54:21.390 align:start position:0% is also irregular by technicality you would<00:54:19.119> want<00:54:19.240> to<00:54:19.440> say<00:54:19.839> yo<00:54:20.760> but<00:54:20.880> Spanish<00:54:21.200> says 00:54:21.390 --> 00:54:21.400 align:start position:0% would want to say yo but Spanish says 00:54:21.400 --> 00:54:23.109 align:start position:0% would want to say yo but Spanish says that<00:54:21.559> this<00:54:21.680> word<00:54:21.880> sounds<00:54:22.200> bad<00:54:22.359> when<00:54:22.559> said<00:54:22.920> so 00:54:23.109 --> 00:54:23.119 align:start position:0% that this word sounds bad when said so 00:54:23.119 --> 00:54:26.390 align:start position:0% that this word sounds bad when said so instead<00:54:23.559> you<00:54:23.640> would<00:54:23.839> Sayo<00:54:24.839> y<00:54:25.240> Tango<00:54:25.799> means<00:54:26.240> I 00:54:26.390 --> 00:54:26.400 align:start position:0% instead you would Sayo y Tango means I 00:54:26.400 --> 00:54:27.910 align:start position:0% instead you would Sayo y Tango means I have<00:54:26.720> and<00:54:26.839> that's<00:54:26.960> the<00:54:27.119> syntax<00:54:27.480> of<00:54:27.559> the<00:54:27.720> yo 00:54:27.910 --> 00:54:27.920 align:start position:0% have and that's the syntax of the yo 00:54:27.920 --> 00:54:32.190 align:start position:0% have and that's the syntax of the yo pronoun<00:54:28.400> being<00:54:28.720> irregular<00:54:29.400> to<00:54:29.680> TS<00:54:30.440> you<00:54:30.680> have<00:54:31.200> L 00:54:32.190 --> 00:54:32.200 align:start position:0% pronoun being irregular to TS you have L 00:54:32.200 --> 00:54:33.549 align:start position:0% pronoun being irregular to TS you have L he<00:54:32.440> has 00:54:33.549 --> 00:54:33.559 align:start position:0% he has 00:54:33.559 --> 00:54:35.870 align:start position:0% he has noos<00:54:34.559> we<00:54:34.799> have 00:54:35.870 --> 00:54:35.880 align:start position:0% noos we have 00:54:35.880 --> 00:54:39.430 align:start position:0% noos we have Vos<00:54:36.880> y'all<00:54:37.200> have<00:54:37.680> and<00:54:37.920> AOS<00:54:38.920> they<00:54:39.079> have<00:54:39.319> with 00:54:39.430 --> 00:54:39.440 align:start position:0% Vos y'all have and AOS they have with 00:54:39.440 --> 00:54:41.230 align:start position:0% Vos y'all have and AOS they have with the<00:54:39.559> verb<00:54:39.799> ten<00:54:40.280> I<00:54:40.400> recommend<00:54:40.760> that<00:54:40.839> you<00:54:40.920> focus 00:54:41.230 --> 00:54:41.240 align:start position:0% the verb ten I recommend that you focus 00:54:41.240 --> 00:54:43.589 align:start position:0% the verb ten I recommend that you focus on<00:54:41.400> all<00:54:41.640> pronouns<00:54:42.240> except<00:54:42.559> votos<00:54:43.280> because<00:54:43.480> the 00:54:43.589 --> 00:54:43.599 align:start position:0% on all pronouns except votos because the 00:54:43.599 --> 00:54:44.870 align:start position:0% on all pronouns except votos because the sentences<00:54:44.000> that<00:54:44.079> you<00:54:44.200> can<00:54:44.319> make<00:54:44.480> with<00:54:44.640> them 00:54:44.870 --> 00:54:44.880 align:start position:0% sentences that you can make with them 00:54:44.880 --> 00:54:46.510 align:start position:0% sentences that you can make with them are<00:54:45.079> very<00:54:45.280> useful<00:54:45.799> just<00:54:45.920> like<00:54:46.079> I<00:54:46.160> said<00:54:46.319> in<00:54:46.400> the 00:54:46.510 --> 00:54:46.520 align:start position:0% are very useful just like I said in the 00:54:46.520 --> 00:54:47.829 align:start position:0% are very useful just like I said in the beginning<00:54:46.839> of<00:54:46.920> the<00:54:47.079> video<00:54:47.400> there's<00:54:47.559> a<00:54:47.680> big 00:54:47.829 --> 00:54:47.839 align:start position:0% beginning of the video there's a big 00:54:47.839 --> 00:54:49.710 align:start position:0% beginning of the video there's a big difference<00:54:48.119> between<00:54:48.359> using<00:54:48.640> to<00:54:48.839> have<00:54:49.280> as<00:54:49.480> to 00:54:49.710 --> 00:54:49.720 align:start position:0% difference between using to have as to 00:54:49.720 --> 00:54:51.670 align:start position:0% difference between using to have as to have<00:54:50.000> and<00:54:50.160> to<00:54:50.359> have<00:54:50.520> to<00:54:50.799> to<00:54:51.000> have<00:54:51.240> indicates 00:54:51.670 --> 00:54:51.680 align:start position:0% have and to have to to have indicates 00:54:51.680 --> 00:54:53.510 align:start position:0% have and to have to to have indicates that<00:54:51.799> one<00:54:52.000> possesses<00:54:52.440> something<00:54:53.040> like<00:54:53.280> I<00:54:53.400> have 00:54:53.510 --> 00:54:53.520 align:start position:0% that one possesses something like I have 00:54:53.520 --> 00:54:55.230 align:start position:0% that one possesses something like I have a<00:54:53.680> dog<00:54:54.000> and<00:54:54.119> to<00:54:54.280> have<00:54:54.440> two<00:54:54.720> means<00:54:54.960> that<00:54:55.079> said 00:54:55.230 --> 00:54:55.240 align:start position:0% a dog and to have two means that said 00:54:55.240 --> 00:54:56.950 align:start position:0% a dog and to have two means that said one<00:54:55.359> has<00:54:55.480> to<00:54:55.599> do<00:54:55.760> something<00:54:56.200> such<00:54:56.400> as<00:54:56.680> I<00:54:56.839> have 00:54:56.950 --> 00:54:56.960 align:start position:0% one has to do something such as I have 00:54:56.960 --> 00:54:58.630 align:start position:0% one has to do something such as I have to<00:54:57.119> leave<00:54:57.400> following<00:54:57.720> an<00:54:57.920> infinitive<00:54:58.440> after 00:54:58.630 --> 00:54:58.640 align:start position:0% to leave following an infinitive after 00:54:58.640 --> 00:55:00.030 align:start position:0% to leave following an infinitive after the<00:54:58.799> preposition<00:54:59.240> two<00:54:59.599> both<00:54:59.760> of<00:54:59.880> these 00:55:00.030 --> 00:55:00.040 align:start position:0% the preposition two both of these 00:55:00.040 --> 00:55:01.630 align:start position:0% the preposition two both of these sentences<00:55:00.559> work<00:55:00.799> the<00:55:00.880> same<00:55:01.119> exact<00:55:01.400> way<00:55:01.520> in 00:55:01.630 --> 00:55:01.640 align:start position:0% sentences work the same exact way in 00:55:01.640 --> 00:55:02.829 align:start position:0% sentences work the same exact way in Spanish<00:55:02.119> but<00:55:02.240> there's<00:55:02.400> one<00:55:02.559> slight 00:55:02.829 --> 00:55:02.839 align:start position:0% Spanish but there's one slight 00:55:02.839 --> 00:55:04.430 align:start position:0% Spanish but there's one slight difference<00:55:03.200> that<00:55:03.359> many<00:55:03.599> people<00:55:04.079> especially 00:55:04.430 --> 00:55:04.440 align:start position:0% difference that many people especially 00:55:04.440 --> 00:55:06.349 align:start position:0% difference that many people especially students<00:55:04.920> fail<00:55:05.200> to<00:55:05.400> acknowledge<00:55:05.960> and<00:55:06.119> that<00:55:06.200> is 00:55:06.349 --> 00:55:06.359 align:start position:0% students fail to acknowledge and that is 00:55:06.359 --> 00:55:07.829 align:start position:0% students fail to acknowledge and that is the<00:55:06.520> preposition<00:55:06.920> too<00:55:07.240> you<00:55:07.359> might<00:55:07.559> remember 00:55:07.829 --> 00:55:07.839 align:start position:0% the preposition too you might remember 00:55:07.839 --> 00:55:09.549 align:start position:0% the preposition too you might remember me<00:55:08.000> saying<00:55:08.240> that<00:55:08.400> with<00:55:08.520> the<00:55:08.640> verb<00:55:09.280> you'll<00:55:09.440> need 00:55:09.549 --> 00:55:09.559 align:start position:0% me saying that with the verb you'll need 00:55:09.559 --> 00:55:11.309 align:start position:0% me saying that with the verb you'll need to<00:55:09.680> put<00:55:09.839> the<00:55:10.000> preposition<00:55:10.599> a<00:55:10.960> after<00:55:11.200> a 00:55:11.309 --> 00:55:11.319 align:start position:0% to put the preposition a after a 00:55:11.319 --> 00:55:13.589 align:start position:0% to put the preposition a after a conjugation<00:55:11.799> of 00:55:13.589 --> 00:55:13.599 align:start position:0% conjugation of 00:55:13.599 --> 00:55:17.069 align:start position:0% conjugation of like<00:55:14.599> I'm<00:55:14.760> going<00:55:15.079> to<00:55:15.480> the<00:55:15.640> school<00:55:16.000> which<00:55:16.160> uses 00:55:17.069 --> 00:55:17.079 align:start position:0% like I'm going to the school which uses 00:55:17.079 --> 00:55:19.069 align:start position:0% like I'm going to the school which uses as<00:55:17.280> to<00:55:17.640> with<00:55:17.760> the<00:55:17.839> verb<00:55:18.520> you<00:55:18.640> might<00:55:18.760> think<00:55:18.920> the 00:55:19.069 --> 00:55:19.079 align:start position:0% as to with the verb you might think the 00:55:19.079 --> 00:55:22.069 align:start position:0% as to with the verb you might think the similarly<00:55:19.480> use<00:55:19.720> the<00:55:19.880> preposition<00:55:20.440> a<00:55:20.920> such 00:55:22.069 --> 00:55:22.079 align:start position:0% similarly use the preposition a such 00:55:22.079 --> 00:55:24.470 align:start position:0% similarly use the preposition a such as<00:55:23.079> I<00:55:23.200> have<00:55:23.319> to<00:55:23.480> leave<00:55:23.920> but<00:55:24.079> this<00:55:24.160> would<00:55:24.319> be 00:55:24.470 --> 00:55:24.480 align:start position:0% as I have to leave but this would be 00:55:24.480 --> 00:55:26.230 align:start position:0% as I have to leave but this would be wrong<00:55:24.760> in<00:55:25.079> Spanish<00:55:25.559> what<00:55:25.680> you<00:55:25.799> instead<00:55:26.119> have 00:55:26.230 --> 00:55:26.240 align:start position:0% wrong in Spanish what you instead have 00:55:26.240 --> 00:55:27.589 align:start position:0% wrong in Spanish what you instead have to<00:55:26.400> do<00:55:26.680> is<00:55:26.839> instead<00:55:27.079> of<00:55:27.200> using<00:55:27.440> the 00:55:27.589 --> 00:55:27.599 align:start position:0% to do is instead of using the 00:55:27.599 --> 00:55:30.510 align:start position:0% to do is instead of using the preposition<00:55:28.160> a<00:55:28.559> you<00:55:28.720> have<00:55:28.839> to<00:55:28.960> use<00:55:29.880> as<00:55:30.079> to 00:55:30.510 --> 00:55:30.520 align:start position:0% preposition a you have to use as to 00:55:30.520 --> 00:55:33.710 align:start position:0% preposition a you have to use as to instead<00:55:30.760> of<00:55:30.880> saying<00:55:31.480> yo<00:55:32.480> you<00:55:32.599> would 00:55:33.710 --> 00:55:33.720 align:start position:0% instead of saying yo you would 00:55:33.720 --> 00:55:36.270 align:start position:0% instead of saying yo you would say<00:55:34.720> which<00:55:34.839> would<00:55:35.000> mean<00:55:35.359> I<00:55:35.520> have<00:55:35.640> to<00:55:35.839> leave<00:55:36.160> I 00:55:36.270 --> 00:55:36.280 align:start position:0% say which would mean I have to leave I 00:55:36.280 --> 00:55:37.710 align:start position:0% say which would mean I have to leave I literally<00:55:36.599> don't<00:55:36.760> know<00:55:36.960> why<00:55:37.079> Spanish<00:55:37.440> does 00:55:37.710 --> 00:55:37.720 align:start position:0% literally don't know why Spanish does 00:55:37.720 --> 00:55:40.549 align:start position:0% literally don't know why Spanish does that<00:55:38.000> but<00:55:38.160> I<00:55:38.240> do<00:55:38.400> know<00:55:38.599> that<00:55:38.839> yo<00:55:39.839> I<00:55:40.000> have<00:55:40.160> to 00:55:40.549 --> 00:55:40.559 align:start position:0% that but I do know that yo I have to 00:55:40.559 --> 00:55:43.029 align:start position:0% that but I do know that yo I have to indicates<00:55:40.920> a<00:55:41.079> modern<00:55:41.400> meaning<00:55:41.880> like<00:55:42.240> I<00:55:42.440> must 00:55:43.029 --> 00:55:43.039 align:start position:0% indicates a modern meaning like I must 00:55:43.039 --> 00:55:45.190 align:start position:0% indicates a modern meaning like I must rather<00:55:43.319> than<00:55:43.599> I<00:55:43.720> have<00:55:43.880> to<00:55:44.160> so<00:55:44.280> whenever<00:55:44.559> you 00:55:45.190 --> 00:55:45.200 align:start position:0% rather than I have to so whenever you 00:55:45.200 --> 00:55:47.549 align:start position:0% rather than I have to so whenever you say<00:55:46.200> you're<00:55:46.400> basically<00:55:46.760> saying<00:55:47.119> I<00:55:47.280> have<00:55:47.400> to 00:55:47.549 --> 00:55:47.559 align:start position:0% say you're basically saying I have to 00:55:47.559 --> 00:55:49.309 align:start position:0% say you're basically saying I have to leave<00:55:48.000> or<00:55:48.280> I<00:55:48.400> must<00:55:48.640> leave<00:55:48.920> and<00:55:49.079> the<00:55:49.160> same 00:55:49.309 --> 00:55:49.319 align:start position:0% leave or I must leave and the same 00:55:49.319 --> 00:55:50.630 align:start position:0% leave or I must leave and the same principle<00:55:49.680> applies<00:55:49.960> to<00:55:50.079> any<00:55:50.240> pronoun<00:55:50.559> you 00:55:50.630 --> 00:55:50.640 align:start position:0% principle applies to any pronoun you 00:55:50.640 --> 00:55:52.510 align:start position:0% principle applies to any pronoun you want<00:55:50.760> to<00:55:50.880> use<00:55:51.200> with<00:55:51.319> the<00:55:51.400> verb<00:55:52.160> you<00:55:52.280> have<00:55:52.400> to 00:55:52.510 --> 00:55:52.520 align:start position:0% want to use with the verb you have to 00:55:52.520 --> 00:55:54.750 align:start position:0% want to use with the verb you have to use<00:55:53.359> as<00:55:53.559> two<00:55:53.960> in<00:55:54.079> order<00:55:54.319> to<00:55:54.440> indicate 00:55:54.750 --> 00:55:54.760 align:start position:0% use as two in order to indicate 00:55:54.760 --> 00:55:55.829 align:start position:0% use as two in order to indicate something<00:55:55.000> something<00:55:55.160> that<00:55:55.240> you<00:55:55.359> have<00:55:55.440> to<00:55:55.599> do 00:55:55.829 --> 00:55:55.839 align:start position:0% something something that you have to do 00:55:55.839 --> 00:55:57.270 align:start position:0% something something that you have to do with<00:55:55.960> the<00:55:56.039> verb<00:55:56.359> e<00:55:56.680> you<00:55:56.760> have<00:55:56.880> to<00:55:56.960> use<00:55:57.119> the 00:55:57.270 --> 00:55:57.280 align:start position:0% with the verb e you have to use the 00:55:57.280 --> 00:55:59.670 align:start position:0% with the verb e you have to use the preposition<00:55:57.920> a<00:55:58.319> as<00:55:58.480> to<00:55:58.839> in<00:55:58.920> order<00:55:59.160> to<00:55:59.280> indicate 00:55:59.670 --> 00:55:59.680 align:start position:0% preposition a as to in order to indicate 00:55:59.680 --> 00:56:00.910 align:start position:0% preposition a as to in order to indicate something<00:55:59.920> that<00:56:00.039> you're<00:56:00.200> going<00:56:00.400> to<00:56:00.559> do<00:56:00.799> in 00:56:00.910 --> 00:56:00.920 align:start position:0% something that you're going to do in 00:56:00.920 --> 00:56:02.549 align:start position:0% something that you're going to do in English<00:56:01.359> you<00:56:01.480> can<00:56:01.640> say<00:56:01.920> I<00:56:02.039> have<00:56:02.160> to<00:56:02.280> do<00:56:02.440> my 00:56:02.549 --> 00:56:02.559 align:start position:0% English you can say I have to do my 00:56:02.559 --> 00:56:04.910 align:start position:0% English you can say I have to do my homework<00:56:03.280> or<00:56:03.640> I'm<00:56:03.799> going<00:56:04.000> to<00:56:04.160> do<00:56:04.280> my<00:56:04.440> homework 00:56:04.910 --> 00:56:04.920 align:start position:0% homework or I'm going to do my homework 00:56:04.920 --> 00:56:06.910 align:start position:0% homework or I'm going to do my homework and<00:56:05.039> in<00:56:05.200> both<00:56:05.400> phrases<00:56:05.920> the<00:56:06.079> preposition<00:56:06.520> two 00:56:06.910 --> 00:56:06.920 align:start position:0% and in both phrases the preposition two 00:56:06.920 --> 00:56:08.829 align:start position:0% and in both phrases the preposition two stays<00:56:07.280> to<00:56:07.839> however<00:56:08.240> if<00:56:08.319> you<00:56:08.400> want<00:56:08.520> to<00:56:08.640> say 00:56:08.829 --> 00:56:08.839 align:start position:0% stays to however if you want to say 00:56:08.839 --> 00:56:11.430 align:start position:0% stays to however if you want to say these<00:56:09.000> phrases<00:56:09.319> in<00:56:09.480> Spanish<00:56:09.960> you<00:56:10.079> will<00:56:10.240> say 00:56:11.430 --> 00:56:11.440 align:start position:0% these phrases in Spanish you will say 00:56:11.440 --> 00:56:13.430 align:start position:0% these phrases in Spanish you will say y 00:56:13.430 --> 00:56:13.440 align:start position:0% y 00:56:13.440 --> 00:56:16.630 align:start position:0% y or<00:56:14.440> and<00:56:14.599> as<00:56:14.680> you<00:56:14.799> can<00:56:14.960> see<00:56:15.400> Spanish<00:56:15.760> uses<00:56:16.520> as 00:56:16.630 --> 00:56:16.640 align:start position:0% or and as you can see Spanish uses as 00:56:16.640 --> 00:56:19.150 align:start position:0% or and as you can see Spanish uses as the<00:56:16.799> preposition<00:56:17.200> to<00:56:17.440> with<00:56:17.520> the<00:56:17.640> verb<00:56:18.359> and<00:56:19.039> as 00:56:19.150 --> 00:56:19.160 align:start position:0% the preposition to with the verb and as 00:56:19.160 --> 00:56:21.109 align:start position:0% the preposition to with the verb and as the<00:56:19.280> preposition<00:56:19.720> to<00:56:20.119> with<00:56:20.240> the<00:56:20.359> verb<00:56:20.640> ear<00:56:20.960> in 00:56:21.109 --> 00:56:21.119 align:start position:0% the preposition to with the verb ear in 00:56:21.119 --> 00:56:23.150 align:start position:0% the preposition to with the verb ear in English<00:56:21.559> it<00:56:21.680> stays<00:56:22.000> the<00:56:22.119> same<00:56:22.440> but<00:56:22.559> in<00:56:22.720> Spanish 00:56:23.150 --> 00:56:23.160 align:start position:0% English it stays the same but in Spanish 00:56:23.160 --> 00:56:24.630 align:start position:0% English it stays the same but in Spanish it<00:56:23.240> changes<00:56:23.720> and<00:56:23.839> the<00:56:23.960> amazing<00:56:24.240> and<00:56:24.359> useful 00:56:24.630 --> 00:56:24.640 align:start position:0% it changes and the amazing and useful 00:56:24.640 --> 00:56:26.109 align:start position:0% it changes and the amazing and useful part<00:56:24.760> of<00:56:24.960> about<00:56:25.079> phrases<00:56:25.440> like<00:56:25.640> this<00:56:25.880> is<00:56:26.000> that 00:56:26.109 --> 00:56:26.119 align:start position:0% part of about phrases like this is that 00:56:26.119 --> 00:56:27.470 align:start position:0% part of about phrases like this is that if<00:56:26.200> you<00:56:26.280> forget<00:56:26.559> how<00:56:26.640> to<00:56:26.799> conjugate<00:56:27.240> one<00:56:27.359> of 00:56:27.470 --> 00:56:27.480 align:start position:0% if you forget how to conjugate one of 00:56:27.480 --> 00:56:29.029 align:start position:0% if you forget how to conjugate one of these<00:56:27.599> verbs<00:56:28.000> you<00:56:28.119> can<00:56:28.280> always<00:56:28.520> refer<00:56:28.760> to<00:56:28.920> the 00:56:29.029 --> 00:56:29.039 align:start position:0% these verbs you can always refer to the 00:56:29.039 --> 00:56:30.589 align:start position:0% these verbs you can always refer to the other<00:56:29.200> one<00:56:29.400> to<00:56:29.559> express<00:56:29.880> the<00:56:29.960> same<00:56:30.160> sentence 00:56:30.589 --> 00:56:30.599 align:start position:0% other one to express the same sentence 00:56:30.599 --> 00:56:31.910 align:start position:0% other one to express the same sentence and<00:56:30.720> that's<00:56:30.880> actually<00:56:31.039> a<00:56:31.160> very<00:56:31.319> skillful<00:56:31.720> hack 00:56:31.910 --> 00:56:31.920 align:start position:0% and that's actually a very skillful hack 00:56:31.920 --> 00:56:33.510 align:start position:0% and that's actually a very skillful hack to<00:56:32.079> remember<00:56:32.400> whenever<00:56:32.640> you<00:56:32.720> speak<00:56:33.039> Spanish 00:56:33.510 --> 00:56:33.520 align:start position:0% to remember whenever you speak Spanish 00:56:33.520 --> 00:56:35.230 align:start position:0% to remember whenever you speak Spanish just<00:56:33.680> know<00:56:33.920> that<00:56:34.039> if<00:56:34.119> you<00:56:34.240> see<00:56:34.559> K<00:56:34.920> after<00:56:35.079> a 00:56:35.230 --> 00:56:35.240 align:start position:0% just know that if you see K after a 00:56:35.240 --> 00:56:37.470 align:start position:0% just know that if you see K after a conjugation<00:56:35.680> of<00:56:36.359> it<00:56:36.440> means<00:56:36.680> to<00:56:36.880> have<00:56:37.039> to<00:56:37.359> and 00:56:37.470 --> 00:56:37.480 align:start position:0% conjugation of it means to have to and 00:56:37.480 --> 00:56:39.710 align:start position:0% conjugation of it means to have to and if<00:56:37.559> you<00:56:37.640> see<00:56:37.799> an<00:56:38.039> a<00:56:38.359> after<00:56:38.559> a<00:56:38.680> conjugation<00:56:39.160> of 00:56:39.710 --> 00:56:39.720 align:start position:0% if you see an a after a conjugation of 00:56:39.720 --> 00:56:41.349 align:start position:0% if you see an a after a conjugation of it<00:56:39.839> means<00:56:40.079> to<00:56:40.280> go<00:56:40.440> to<00:56:40.720> if<00:56:40.799> you<00:56:40.920> want<00:56:41.039> to<00:56:41.119> say<00:56:41.240> a 00:56:41.349 --> 00:56:41.359 align:start position:0% it means to go to if you want to say a 00:56:41.359 --> 00:56:43.950 align:start position:0% it means to go to if you want to say a sentence<00:56:41.760> like<00:56:42.039> you<00:56:42.240> have<00:56:42.400> to<00:56:42.640> pay<00:56:43.000> you<00:56:43.079> will 00:56:43.950 --> 00:56:43.960 align:start position:0% sentence like you have to pay you will 00:56:43.960 --> 00:56:46.349 align:start position:0% sentence like you have to pay you will say<00:56:44.960> using<00:56:45.200> the<00:56:45.359> KE<00:56:45.559> preposition<00:56:46.119> if<00:56:46.200> you<00:56:46.280> want 00:56:46.349 --> 00:56:46.359 align:start position:0% say using the KE preposition if you want 00:56:46.359 --> 00:56:48.910 align:start position:0% say using the KE preposition if you want to<00:56:46.480> say<00:56:46.880> he<00:56:47.079> has<00:56:47.240> a<00:56:47.440> cat<00:56:47.839> you<00:56:47.920> will 00:56:48.910 --> 00:56:48.920 align:start position:0% to say he has a cat you will 00:56:48.920 --> 00:56:51.430 align:start position:0% to say he has a cat you will say<00:56:49.920> without<00:56:50.160> adding<00:56:50.440> the<00:56:50.599> preposition<00:56:51.359> if 00:56:51.430 --> 00:56:51.440 align:start position:0% say without adding the preposition if 00:56:51.440 --> 00:56:53.109 align:start position:0% say without adding the preposition if you<00:56:51.520> want<00:56:51.599> to<00:56:51.760> say<00:56:51.960> we<00:56:52.079> have<00:56:52.200> a<00:56:52.359> class<00:56:52.640> tomorrow 00:56:53.109 --> 00:56:53.119 align:start position:0% you want to say we have a class tomorrow 00:56:53.119 --> 00:56:53.870 align:start position:0% you want to say we have a class tomorrow you'll 00:56:53.870 --> 00:56:53.880 align:start position:0% you'll 00:56:53.880 --> 00:56:55.750 align:start position:0% you'll say 00:56:55.750 --> 00:56:55.760 align:start position:0% say 00:56:55.760 --> 00:56:57.390 align:start position:0% say if<00:56:55.839> you<00:56:55.960> want<00:56:56.039> to<00:56:56.240> say<00:56:56.559> they<00:56:56.720> have<00:56:56.839> to<00:56:57.000> read<00:56:57.240> the 00:56:57.390 --> 00:56:57.400 align:start position:0% if you want to say they have to read the 00:56:57.400 --> 00:56:59.670 align:start position:0% if you want to say they have to read the books<00:56:57.839> you'll 00:56:59.670 --> 00:56:59.680 align:start position:0% books you'll 00:56:59.680 --> 00:57:01.710 align:start position:0% books you'll say<00:57:00.680> in<00:57:00.760> case<00:57:00.920> you<00:57:01.000> want<00:57:01.119> to<00:57:01.280> practice<00:57:01.559> with 00:57:01.710 --> 00:57:01.720 align:start position:0% say in case you want to practice with 00:57:01.720 --> 00:57:03.470 align:start position:0% say in case you want to practice with more<00:57:01.960> examples<00:57:02.559> I<00:57:02.680> recommend<00:57:03.079> that<00:57:03.200> you<00:57:03.319> also 00:57:03.470 --> 00:57:03.480 align:start position:0% more examples I recommend that you also 00:57:03.480 --> 00:57:05.430 align:start position:0% more examples I recommend that you also say<00:57:03.720> these<00:57:03.880> sentences<00:57:04.319> using<00:57:04.559> the<00:57:04.680> verb<00:57:05.280> so 00:57:05.430 --> 00:57:05.440 align:start position:0% say these sentences using the verb so 00:57:05.440 --> 00:57:07.029 align:start position:0% say these sentences using the verb so that<00:57:05.520> you<00:57:05.640> know<00:57:05.760> to<00:57:05.880> use<00:57:06.039> the<00:57:06.200> preposition<00:57:06.760> a 00:57:07.029 --> 00:57:07.039 align:start position:0% that you know to use the preposition a 00:57:07.039 --> 00:57:09.549 align:start position:0% that you know to use the preposition a with<00:57:07.680> and<00:57:08.200> with<00:57:08.760> the<00:57:08.839> more<00:57:09.000> you<00:57:09.079> try<00:57:09.359> this 00:57:09.549 --> 00:57:09.559 align:start position:0% with and with the more you try this 00:57:09.559 --> 00:57:10.950 align:start position:0% with and with the more you try this concept<00:57:10.000> the<00:57:10.119> faster<00:57:10.359> you'll<00:57:10.599> get<00:57:10.680> it 00:57:10.950 --> 00:57:10.960 align:start position:0% concept the faster you'll get it 00:57:10.960 --> 00:57:12.230 align:start position:0% concept the faster you'll get it especially<00:57:11.359> when<00:57:11.480> you<00:57:11.559> start<00:57:11.760> generating 00:57:12.230 --> 00:57:12.240 align:start position:0% especially when you start generating 00:57:12.240 --> 00:57:14.390 align:start position:0% especially when you start generating examples<00:57:12.640> on<00:57:12.799> your<00:57:12.920> own<00:57:13.280> so<00:57:13.520> overall<00:57:14.039> the<00:57:14.160> verb 00:57:14.390 --> 00:57:14.400 align:start position:0% examples on your own so overall the verb 00:57:14.400 --> 00:57:16.390 align:start position:0% examples on your own so overall the verb tet<00:57:14.839> is<00:57:14.920> a<00:57:15.039> very<00:57:15.240> useful<00:57:15.559> verb<00:57:15.760> in<00:57:15.880> Spanish 00:57:16.390 --> 00:57:16.400 align:start position:0% tet is a very useful verb in Spanish 00:57:16.400 --> 00:57:18.069 align:start position:0% tet is a very useful verb in Spanish both<00:57:16.559> in<00:57:16.680> terms<00:57:16.880> of<00:57:17.039> possession<00:57:17.520> and<00:57:17.680> future 00:57:18.069 --> 00:57:18.079 align:start position:0% both in terms of possession and future 00:57:18.079 --> 00:57:19.950 align:start position:0% both in terms of possession and future actions<00:57:18.559> before<00:57:18.839> I<00:57:18.960> end<00:57:19.160> the<00:57:19.319> video<00:57:19.720> I<00:57:19.799> would 00:57:19.950 --> 00:57:19.960 align:start position:0% actions before I end the video I would 00:57:19.960 --> 00:57:21.390 align:start position:0% actions before I end the video I would actually<00:57:20.119> like<00:57:20.280> to<00:57:20.400> cover<00:57:20.680> one<00:57:20.880> last<00:57:21.119> concept 00:57:21.390 --> 00:57:21.400 align:start position:0% actually like to cover one last concept 00:57:21.400 --> 00:57:22.710 align:start position:0% actually like to cover one last concept with<00:57:21.520> the<00:57:21.599> verb<00:57:21.839> T<00:57:22.280> and<00:57:22.359> that's<00:57:22.520> something 00:57:22.710 --> 00:57:22.720 align:start position:0% with the verb T and that's something 00:57:22.720 --> 00:57:24.230 align:start position:0% with the verb T and that's something that's<00:57:22.880> sound<00:57:23.119> very<00:57:23.359> practical<00:57:23.720> to<00:57:23.839> use<00:57:24.160> but 00:57:24.230 --> 00:57:24.240 align:start position:0% that's sound very practical to use but 00:57:24.240 --> 00:57:25.470 align:start position:0% that's sound very practical to use but it's<00:57:24.359> something<00:57:24.599> very<00:57:24.920> very<00:57:25.079> important<00:57:25.359> to 00:57:25.470 --> 00:57:25.480 align:start position:0% it's something very very important to 00:57:25.480 --> 00:57:27.270 align:start position:0% it's something very very important to know<00:57:25.720> and<00:57:25.839> that<00:57:25.960> is<00:57:26.079> that<00:57:26.200> the<00:57:26.280> verb<00:57:26.520> T<00:57:26.960> can 00:57:27.270 --> 00:57:27.280 align:start position:0% know and that is that the verb T can 00:57:27.280 --> 00:57:29.309 align:start position:0% know and that is that the verb T can sometimes<00:57:27.520> Express<00:57:27.839> sentences<00:57:28.480> with<00:57:28.680> beings 00:57:29.309 --> 00:57:29.319 align:start position:0% sometimes Express sentences with beings 00:57:29.319 --> 00:57:31.309 align:start position:0% sometimes Express sentences with beings as<00:57:29.440> in<00:57:29.720> to<00:57:29.960> be<00:57:30.200> you<00:57:30.319> might<00:57:30.480> remember<00:57:30.799> my<00:57:30.960> videos 00:57:31.309 --> 00:57:31.319 align:start position:0% as in to be you might remember my videos 00:57:31.319 --> 00:57:33.230 align:start position:0% as in to be you might remember my videos where<00:57:31.480> I<00:57:31.599> talked<00:57:31.799> about<00:57:32.000> the<00:57:32.119> verbs<00:57:32.520> s<00:57:33.000> and 00:57:33.230 --> 00:57:33.240 align:start position:0% where I talked about the verbs s and 00:57:33.240 --> 00:57:34.990 align:start position:0% where I talked about the verbs s and estar<00:57:33.799> both<00:57:33.960> of<00:57:34.079> which<00:57:34.240> express<00:57:34.640> permanent 00:57:34.990 --> 00:57:35.000 align:start position:0% estar both of which express permanent 00:57:35.000 --> 00:57:36.789 align:start position:0% estar both of which express permanent and<00:57:35.160> temporary<00:57:35.599> states<00:57:35.880> of<00:57:36.039> being<00:57:36.480> and<00:57:36.640> while 00:57:36.789 --> 00:57:36.799 align:start position:0% and temporary states of being and while 00:57:36.799 --> 00:57:38.390 align:start position:0% and temporary states of being and while I<00:57:36.960> did<00:57:37.160> those<00:57:37.359> videos<00:57:37.799> there<00:57:37.920> was<00:57:38.079> something 00:57:38.390 --> 00:57:38.400 align:start position:0% I did those videos there was something 00:57:38.400 --> 00:57:40.270 align:start position:0% I did those videos there was something very<00:57:38.640> specific<00:57:39.079> I<00:57:39.200> did<00:57:39.359> not<00:57:39.559> mention<00:57:39.960> in<00:57:40.119> both 00:57:40.270 --> 00:57:40.280 align:start position:0% very specific I did not mention in both 00:57:40.280 --> 00:57:42.230 align:start position:0% very specific I did not mention in both of<00:57:40.400> those<00:57:40.559> videos<00:57:41.079> such<00:57:41.280> as<00:57:41.520> expressions<00:57:42.039> with 00:57:42.230 --> 00:57:42.240 align:start position:0% of those videos such as expressions with 00:57:42.240 --> 00:57:44.190 align:start position:0% of those videos such as expressions with age<00:57:42.599> temperature<00:57:43.200> hunger<00:57:43.599> and<00:57:43.760> maybe<00:57:43.960> a<00:57:44.039> few 00:57:44.190 --> 00:57:44.200 align:start position:0% age temperature hunger and maybe a few 00:57:44.200 --> 00:57:45.950 align:start position:0% age temperature hunger and maybe a few more<00:57:44.559> as<00:57:44.640> a<00:57:44.799> reference<00:57:45.319> consider<00:57:45.720> these 00:57:45.950 --> 00:57:45.960 align:start position:0% more as a reference consider these 00:57:45.960 --> 00:57:48.390 align:start position:0% more as a reference consider these phrases<00:57:46.359> in<00:57:46.480> English<00:57:46.960> I<00:57:47.039> am<00:57:47.200> 19<00:57:47.559> years<00:57:47.799> old<00:57:48.280> I 00:57:48.390 --> 00:57:48.400 align:start position:0% phrases in English I am 19 years old I 00:57:48.400 --> 00:57:50.309 align:start position:0% phrases in English I am 19 years old I am<00:57:48.559> cold<00:57:49.000> and<00:57:49.160> I'm<00:57:49.319> hungry<00:57:49.760> if<00:57:49.839> I<00:57:49.920> were<00:57:50.079> to<00:57:50.200> tell 00:57:50.309 --> 00:57:50.319 align:start position:0% am cold and I'm hungry if I were to tell 00:57:50.319 --> 00:57:51.829 align:start position:0% am cold and I'm hungry if I were to tell you<00:57:50.400> to<00:57:50.520> say<00:57:50.720> these<00:57:50.839> phrases<00:57:51.160> in<00:57:51.280> Spanish<00:57:51.720> you 00:57:51.829 --> 00:57:51.839 align:start position:0% you to say these phrases in Spanish you 00:57:51.839 --> 00:57:55.069 align:start position:0% you to say these phrases in Spanish you would<00:57:52.039> probably<00:57:52.319> say<00:57:52.520> something<00:57:52.880> like<00:57:53.160> y<00:57:53.720> d<00:57:54.440> an 00:57:55.069 --> 00:57:55.079 align:start position:0% would probably say something like y d an 00:57:55.079 --> 00:57:58.990 align:start position:0% would probably say something like y d an y<00:57:55.319> EST<00:57:56.240> and<00:57:56.640> EST<00:57:57.440> and<00:57:57.559> that's<00:57:57.680> if<00:57:57.760> you<00:57:57.920> used<00:57:58.760> and 00:57:58.990 --> 00:57:59.000 align:start position:0% y EST and EST and that's if you used and 00:57:59.000 --> 00:58:00.829 align:start position:0% y EST and EST and that's if you used and EST<00:57:59.559> correctly<00:58:00.039> some<00:58:00.160> of<00:58:00.280> you<00:58:00.400> might<00:58:00.599> make 00:58:00.829 --> 00:58:00.839 align:start position:0% EST correctly some of you might make 00:58:00.839 --> 00:58:03.190 align:start position:0% EST correctly some of you might make arguments<00:58:01.400> that<00:58:01.559> using<00:58:02.280> and<00:58:02.440> EST<00:58:02.960> is<00:58:03.039> the 00:58:03.190 --> 00:58:03.200 align:start position:0% arguments that using and EST is the 00:58:03.200 --> 00:58:05.150 align:start position:0% arguments that using and EST is the right<00:58:03.359> way<00:58:03.480> to<00:58:03.640> go<00:58:04.000> because<00:58:04.200> by 00:58:05.150 --> 00:58:05.160 align:start position:0% right way to go because by 00:58:05.160 --> 00:58:07.549 align:start position:0% right way to go because by saying<00:58:06.160> I'm<00:58:06.359> factually<00:58:06.720> stating<00:58:07.079> this<00:58:07.280> about 00:58:07.549 --> 00:58:07.559 align:start position:0% saying I'm factually stating this about 00:58:07.559 --> 00:58:09.630 align:start position:0% saying I'm factually stating this about myself<00:58:08.000> which<00:58:08.119> is<00:58:08.319> why<00:58:08.880> is<00:58:09.000> used<00:58:09.359> and<00:58:09.440> for 00:58:09.630 --> 00:58:09.640 align:start position:0% myself which is why is used and for 00:58:09.640 --> 00:58:12.630 align:start position:0% myself which is why is used and for phrases<00:58:10.000> like<00:58:10.280> EST<00:58:11.119> or<00:58:11.400> esto<00:58:11.799> amre<00:58:12.280> I'm<00:58:12.359> using 00:58:12.630 --> 00:58:12.640 align:start position:0% phrases like EST or esto amre I'm using 00:58:12.640 --> 00:58:14.150 align:start position:0% phrases like EST or esto amre I'm using AAR<00:58:13.200> because<00:58:13.359> I'm<00:58:13.520> indicating<00:58:13.960> that<00:58:14.079> I'm 00:58:14.150 --> 00:58:14.160 align:start position:0% AAR because I'm indicating that I'm 00:58:14.160 --> 00:58:16.150 align:start position:0% AAR because I'm indicating that I'm feeling<00:58:14.480> cold<00:58:14.799> or<00:58:15.000> hungry<00:58:15.480> right<00:58:15.640> now<00:58:15.960> and<00:58:16.039> my 00:58:16.150 --> 00:58:16.160 align:start position:0% feeling cold or hungry right now and my 00:58:16.160 --> 00:58:17.549 align:start position:0% feeling cold or hungry right now and my feeling<00:58:16.440> will<00:58:16.599> change<00:58:16.839> in<00:58:16.920> the<00:58:17.039> future<00:58:17.440> as 00:58:17.549 --> 00:58:17.559 align:start position:0% feeling will change in the future as 00:58:17.559 --> 00:58:19.230 align:start position:0% feeling will change in the future as crazy<00:58:17.839> as<00:58:17.960> it<00:58:18.079> sounds<00:58:18.480> Spanish<00:58:18.839> says<00:58:19.039> that<00:58:19.119> you 00:58:19.230 --> 00:58:19.240 align:start position:0% crazy as it sounds Spanish says that you 00:58:19.240 --> 00:58:21.470 align:start position:0% crazy as it sounds Spanish says that you cannot<00:58:19.480> use<00:58:19.640> the<00:58:19.760> verbs<00:58:20.200> s<00:58:20.559> and<00:58:20.799> estar<00:58:21.280> because 00:58:21.470 --> 00:58:21.480 align:start position:0% cannot use the verbs s and estar because 00:58:21.480 --> 00:58:22.750 align:start position:0% cannot use the verbs s and estar because these<00:58:21.599> are<00:58:21.799> expressions<00:58:22.200> that<00:58:22.359> indicate 00:58:22.750 --> 00:58:22.760 align:start position:0% these are expressions that indicate 00:58:22.760 --> 00:58:24.829 align:start position:0% these are expressions that indicate having<00:58:22.960> a<00:58:23.160> fact<00:58:23.400> about<00:58:23.680> oneself<00:58:24.200> rather<00:58:24.400> than 00:58:24.829 --> 00:58:24.839 align:start position:0% having a fact about oneself rather than 00:58:24.839 --> 00:58:26.430 align:start position:0% having a fact about oneself rather than actually<00:58:25.079> being<00:58:25.400> that<00:58:25.559> one<00:58:25.799> self<00:58:26.119> instead<00:58:26.359> of 00:58:26.430 --> 00:58:26.440 align:start position:0% actually being that one self instead of 00:58:26.440 --> 00:58:28.950 align:start position:0% actually being that one self instead of using<00:58:26.799> soy<00:58:27.240> or<00:58:27.520> esto<00:58:27.960> with<00:58:28.119> these<00:58:28.319> Expressions 00:58:28.950 --> 00:58:28.960 align:start position:0% using soy or esto with these Expressions 00:58:28.960 --> 00:58:31.950 align:start position:0% using soy or esto with these Expressions you<00:58:29.039> will<00:58:29.200> need<00:58:29.319> to<00:58:29.480> use<00:58:30.319> and<00:58:30.440> in<00:58:30.640> this<00:58:30.799> case<00:58:31.280> yo 00:58:31.950 --> 00:58:31.960 align:start position:0% you will need to use and in this case yo 00:58:31.960 --> 00:58:34.789 align:start position:0% you will need to use and in this case yo instead<00:58:32.200> of<00:58:32.319> saying<00:58:32.720> EST<00:58:33.720> anos<00:58:34.200> you'll<00:58:34.440> say 00:58:34.789 --> 00:58:34.799 align:start position:0% instead of saying EST anos you'll say 00:58:34.799 --> 00:58:37.549 align:start position:0% instead of saying EST anos you'll say Tango<00:58:35.319> DS<00:58:36.039> anos<00:58:36.520> because<00:58:36.839> actually<00:58:37.400> I'm 00:58:37.549 --> 00:58:37.559 align:start position:0% Tango DS anos because actually I'm 00:58:37.559 --> 00:58:39.750 align:start position:0% Tango DS anos because actually I'm indicating<00:58:38.039> that<00:58:38.200> I<00:58:38.319> have<00:58:38.520> the<00:58:38.680> age<00:58:38.880> of<00:58:39.079> 19 00:58:39.750 --> 00:58:39.760 align:start position:0% indicating that I have the age of 19 00:58:39.760 --> 00:58:42.390 align:start position:0% indicating that I have the age of 19 rather<00:58:40.000> than<00:58:40.160> me<00:58:40.319> being<00:58:40.599> 19<00:58:41.160> by<00:58:41.280> saying<00:58:41.559> tangoo 00:58:42.390 --> 00:58:42.400 align:start position:0% rather than me being 19 by saying tangoo 00:58:42.400 --> 00:58:44.589 align:start position:0% rather than me being 19 by saying tangoo or<00:58:42.760> Tango<00:58:43.119> amre<00:58:43.640> I'm<00:58:43.799> indicating<00:58:44.240> that<00:58:44.359> I<00:58:44.480> have 00:58:44.589 --> 00:58:44.599 align:start position:0% or Tango amre I'm indicating that I have 00:58:44.599 --> 00:58:46.190 align:start position:0% or Tango amre I'm indicating that I have a<00:58:44.720> feeling<00:58:45.000> of<00:58:45.160> cold<00:58:45.559> and<00:58:45.680> I<00:58:45.760> have<00:58:45.880> a<00:58:45.960> feeling 00:58:46.190 --> 00:58:46.200 align:start position:0% a feeling of cold and I have a feeling 00:58:46.200 --> 00:58:47.870 align:start position:0% a feeling of cold and I have a feeling of<00:58:46.359> hunger<00:58:46.799> these<00:58:47.000> Expressions<00:58:47.520> technically 00:58:47.870 --> 00:58:47.880 align:start position:0% of hunger these Expressions technically 00:58:47.880 --> 00:58:49.829 align:start position:0% of hunger these Expressions technically are<00:58:48.039> not<00:58:48.240> permanent<00:58:48.760> nor<00:58:49.079> temporary<00:58:49.680> which 00:58:49.829 --> 00:58:49.839 align:start position:0% are not permanent nor temporary which 00:58:49.839 --> 00:58:51.510 align:start position:0% are not permanent nor temporary which doesn't<00:58:50.119> allow<00:58:50.359> you<00:58:50.440> to<00:58:50.559> use<00:58:50.760> the<00:58:50.880> verb<00:58:51.160> said 00:58:51.510 --> 00:58:51.520 align:start position:0% doesn't allow you to use the verb said 00:58:51.520 --> 00:58:53.549 align:start position:0% doesn't allow you to use the verb said or<00:58:51.799> EST<00:58:52.280> so<00:58:52.480> instead<00:58:52.920> you<00:58:53.119> have<00:58:53.359> these 00:58:53.549 --> 00:58:53.559 align:start position:0% or EST so instead you have these 00:58:53.559 --> 00:58:54.990 align:start position:0% or EST so instead you have these feelings<00:58:54.119> rather<00:58:54.319> than<00:58:54.480> being<00:58:54.720> being<00:58:54.880> in 00:58:54.990 --> 00:58:55.000 align:start position:0% feelings rather than being being in 00:58:55.000 --> 00:58:57.190 align:start position:0% feelings rather than being being in these<00:58:55.160> feelings<00:58:55.720> of<00:58:55.839> course<00:58:56.240> tet<00:58:56.640> uses<00:58:57.000> other 00:58:57.190 --> 00:58:57.200 align:start position:0% these feelings of course tet uses other 00:58:57.200 --> 00:58:58.950 align:start position:0% these feelings of course tet uses other feelings<00:58:57.720> like<00:58:57.920> these<00:58:58.119> ones<00:58:58.480> but<00:58:58.559> they're<00:58:58.760> not 00:58:58.950 --> 00:58:58.960 align:start position:0% feelings like these ones but they're not 00:58:58.960 --> 00:59:00.150 align:start position:0% feelings like these ones but they're not as<00:58:59.119> important<00:58:59.440> as<00:58:59.559> the<00:58:59.680> other<00:58:59.799> ones<00:58:59.960> in 00:59:00.150 --> 00:59:00.160 align:start position:0% as important as the other ones in 00:59:00.160 --> 00:59:01.390 align:start position:0% as important as the other ones in conversation<00:59:00.680> and<00:59:00.799> the<00:59:00.880> same<00:59:01.079> concept 00:59:01.390 --> 00:59:01.400 align:start position:0% conversation and the same concept 00:59:01.400 --> 00:59:02.829 align:start position:0% conversation and the same concept applies<00:59:01.640> to<00:59:01.760> any<00:59:01.920> pronouns<00:59:02.280> you<00:59:02.400> want<00:59:02.480> to<00:59:02.559> use 00:59:02.829 --> 00:59:02.839 align:start position:0% applies to any pronouns you want to use 00:59:02.839 --> 00:59:04.309 align:start position:0% applies to any pronouns you want to use Spanish<00:59:03.200> has<00:59:03.319> two<00:59:03.480> types<00:59:03.680> of<00:59:03.799> prepositional 00:59:04.309 --> 00:59:04.319 align:start position:0% Spanish has two types of prepositional 00:59:04.319 --> 00:59:06.150 align:start position:0% Spanish has two types of prepositional phrases<00:59:04.839> that<00:59:04.960> when<00:59:05.200> combined<00:59:05.720> eliminate 00:59:06.150 --> 00:59:06.160 align:start position:0% phrases that when combined eliminate 00:59:06.160 --> 00:59:08.270 align:start position:0% phrases that when combined eliminate repetition<00:59:06.520> of<00:59:06.640> sound<00:59:07.039> and<00:59:07.160> that<00:59:07.280> is<00:59:07.559> Al<00:59:08.039> and 00:59:08.270 --> 00:59:08.280 align:start position:0% repetition of sound and that is Al and 00:59:08.280 --> 00:59:10.510 align:start position:0% repetition of sound and that is Al and Del<00:59:08.640> Al<00:59:08.960> is<00:59:09.039> a<00:59:09.160> combination<00:59:09.559> of<00:59:09.720> the<00:59:09.799> words<00:59:10.240> A 00:59:10.510 --> 00:59:10.520 align:start position:0% Del Al is a combination of the words A 00:59:10.520 --> 00:59:13.390 align:start position:0% Del Al is a combination of the words A and<00:59:10.760> L<00:59:11.119> meaning<00:59:11.440> to<00:59:11.799> the<00:59:12.240> masculine<00:59:12.880> and<00:59:13.119> Del 00:59:13.390 --> 00:59:13.400 align:start position:0% and L meaning to the masculine and Del 00:59:13.400 --> 00:59:15.710 align:start position:0% and L meaning to the masculine and Del is<00:59:13.559> comprised<00:59:14.000> from<00:59:14.280> the<00:59:14.599> and<00:59:14.760> L<00:59:15.039> meaning<00:59:15.400> from 00:59:15.710 --> 00:59:15.720 align:start position:0% is comprised from the and L meaning from 00:59:15.720 --> 00:59:17.990 align:start position:0% is comprised from the and L meaning from the<00:59:16.000> or<00:59:16.280> of<00:59:16.520> the<00:59:16.799> masculine<00:59:17.319> Spanish<00:59:17.640> combines 00:59:17.990 --> 00:59:18.000 align:start position:0% the or of the masculine Spanish combines 00:59:18.000 --> 00:59:19.349 align:start position:0% the or of the masculine Spanish combines these<00:59:18.160> words<00:59:18.359> to<00:59:18.480> eliminate<00:59:18.839> the<00:59:18.920> Redundant 00:59:19.349 --> 00:59:19.359 align:start position:0% these words to eliminate the Redundant 00:59:19.359 --> 00:59:20.670 align:start position:0% these words to eliminate the Redundant sound<00:59:19.559> of<00:59:19.720> the<00:59:19.799> same<00:59:20.039> vowel<00:59:20.359> when<00:59:20.520> they're 00:59:20.670 --> 00:59:20.680 align:start position:0% sound of the same vowel when they're 00:59:20.680 --> 00:59:22.990 align:start position:0% sound of the same vowel when they're said<00:59:21.039> saying<00:59:21.480> a<00:59:21.960> sounds<00:59:22.240> a<00:59:22.359> bit<00:59:22.520> weird<00:59:22.839> so 00:59:22.990 --> 00:59:23.000 align:start position:0% said saying a sounds a bit weird so 00:59:23.000 --> 00:59:24.789 align:start position:0% said saying a sounds a bit weird so Spanish<00:59:23.319> combines<00:59:23.720> the<00:59:23.839> words<00:59:24.160> and<00:59:24.240> forms<00:59:24.520> the 00:59:24.789 --> 00:59:24.799 align:start position:0% Spanish combines the words and forms the 00:59:24.799 --> 00:59:26.349 align:start position:0% Spanish combines the words and forms the word<00:59:25.119> Al<00:59:25.400> and<00:59:25.480> that's<00:59:25.680> the<00:59:25.799> same<00:59:25.960> thing<00:59:26.119> with 00:59:26.349 --> 00:59:26.359 align:start position:0% word Al and that's the same thing with 00:59:26.359 --> 00:59:29.309 align:start position:0% word Al and that's the same thing with Del<00:59:26.720> because<00:59:26.960> saying<00:59:27.880> is<00:59:28.039> redundant<00:59:28.599> Al<00:59:28.880> and 00:59:29.309 --> 00:59:29.319 align:start position:0% Del because saying is redundant Al and 00:59:29.319 --> 00:59:30.990 align:start position:0% Del because saying is redundant Al and can<00:59:29.440> be<00:59:29.520> used<00:59:29.799> both<00:59:29.960> in<00:59:30.160> context<00:59:30.720> when<00:59:30.839> you're 00:59:30.990 --> 00:59:31.000 align:start position:0% can be used both in context when you're 00:59:31.000 --> 00:59:32.390 align:start position:0% can be used both in context when you're only<00:59:31.200> using<00:59:31.480> the<00:59:31.599> masculine<00:59:32.079> definite 00:59:32.390 --> 00:59:32.400 align:start position:0% only using the masculine definite 00:59:32.400 --> 00:59:33.990 align:start position:0% only using the masculine definite article<00:59:33.240> in<00:59:33.359> case<00:59:33.480> you<00:59:33.559> want<00:59:33.680> to<00:59:33.760> use<00:59:33.920> the 00:59:33.990 --> 00:59:34.000 align:start position:0% article in case you want to use the 00:59:34.000 --> 00:59:35.789 align:start position:0% article in case you want to use the feminine<00:59:34.319> definite<00:59:34.680> article<00:59:35.280> La<00:59:35.559> you<00:59:35.640> don't 00:59:35.789 --> 00:59:35.799 align:start position:0% feminine definite article La you don't 00:59:35.799 --> 00:59:37.390 align:start position:0% feminine definite article La you don't have<00:59:35.920> to<00:59:36.039> combine<00:59:36.359> the<00:59:36.440> words<00:59:36.839> together<00:59:37.240> so 00:59:37.390 --> 00:59:37.400 align:start position:0% have to combine the words together so 00:59:37.400 --> 00:59:40.190 align:start position:0% have to combine the words together so you'll<00:59:37.599> simply<00:59:37.960> say<00:59:38.440> Allah<00:59:39.079> or<00:59:39.440> de<00:59:39.920> as<00:59:40.000> an 00:59:40.190 --> 00:59:40.200 align:start position:0% you'll simply say Allah or de as an 00:59:40.200 --> 00:59:41.990 align:start position:0% you'll simply say Allah or de as an example<00:59:40.760> you<00:59:40.839> can<00:59:40.920> say<00:59:41.119> a<00:59:41.200> sentence<00:59:41.599> like<00:59:41.920> I 00:59:41.990 --> 00:59:42.000 align:start position:0% example you can say a sentence like I 00:59:42.000 --> 00:59:43.510 align:start position:0% example you can say a sentence like I want<00:59:42.200> to<00:59:42.319> go<00:59:42.480> to<00:59:42.599> the<00:59:42.760> bathroom<00:59:43.240> and<00:59:43.359> in 00:59:43.510 --> 00:59:43.520 align:start position:0% want to go to the bathroom and in 00:59:43.520 --> 00:59:45.750 align:start position:0% want to go to the bathroom and in Spanish<00:59:44.039> it<00:59:44.119> would 00:59:45.750 --> 00:59:45.760 align:start position:0% Spanish it would 00:59:45.760 --> 00:59:48.430 align:start position:0% Spanish it would be<00:59:46.760> but<00:59:46.880> because<00:59:47.200> Bo<00:59:47.520> is<00:59:47.559> a<00:59:47.720> masculine<00:59:48.119> word 00:59:48.430 --> 00:59:48.440 align:start position:0% be but because Bo is a masculine word 00:59:48.440 --> 00:59:49.990 align:start position:0% be but because Bo is a masculine word Spanish<00:59:48.799> has<00:59:48.960> to<00:59:49.119> combine<00:59:49.440> the<00:59:49.599> preposition 00:59:49.990 --> 00:59:50.000 align:start position:0% Spanish has to combine the preposition 00:59:50.000 --> 00:59:51.910 align:start position:0% Spanish has to combine the preposition two<00:59:50.400> with<00:59:50.520> the<00:59:50.640> masculine<00:59:51.079> article<00:59:51.599> so<00:59:51.760> you 00:59:51.910 --> 00:59:51.920 align:start position:0% two with the masculine article so you 00:59:51.920 --> 00:59:53.109 align:start position:0% two with the masculine article so you get 00:59:53.109 --> 00:59:53.119 align:start position:0% get 00:59:53.119 --> 00:59:56.069 align:start position:0% get Al<00:59:54.119> I<00:59:54.200> want<00:59:54.319> to<00:59:54.440> go<00:59:54.799> to<00:59:55.079> the<00:59:55.440> bathroom<00:59:55.880> if<00:59:55.960> you 00:59:56.069 --> 00:59:56.079 align:start position:0% Al I want to go to the bathroom if you 00:59:56.079 --> 00:59:58.589 align:start position:0% Al I want to go to the bathroom if you were<00:59:56.200> to<00:59:56.359> instead<00:59:56.599> use<00:59:56.720> a<00:59:56.839> feminine<00:59:57.200> word<00:59:57.680> like 00:59:58.589 --> 00:59:58.599 align:start position:0% were to instead use a feminine word like 00:59:58.599 --> 01:00:00.349 align:start position:0% were to instead use a feminine word like you<00:59:58.680> would<00:59:58.839> simply 01:00:00.349 --> 01:00:00.359 align:start position:0% you would simply 01:00:00.359 --> 01:00:02.390 align:start position:0% you would simply say<01:00:01.359> without<01:00:01.559> needing<01:00:01.799> to<01:00:01.960> combine<01:00:02.280> the 01:00:02.390 --> 01:00:02.400 align:start position:0% say without needing to combine the 01:00:02.400 --> 01:00:04.190 align:start position:0% say without needing to combine the preposition<01:00:02.880> with<01:00:03.000> the<01:00:03.079> article<01:00:03.640> likewise 01:00:04.190 --> 01:00:04.200 align:start position:0% preposition with the article likewise 01:00:04.200 --> 01:00:05.789 align:start position:0% preposition with the article likewise the<01:00:04.280> same<01:00:04.480> method<01:00:04.760> can<01:00:04.880> be<01:00:05.000> used<01:00:05.240> with<01:00:05.440> Del<01:00:05.720> if 01:00:05.789 --> 01:00:05.799 align:start position:0% the same method can be used with Del if 01:00:05.799 --> 01:00:07.910 align:start position:0% the same method can be used with Del if you<01:00:05.920> want<01:00:06.000> to<01:00:06.119> say<01:00:06.400> from<01:00:06.720> thee<01:00:06.960> or<01:00:07.200> of<01:00:07.440> thee<01:00:07.720> for 01:00:07.910 --> 01:00:07.920 align:start position:0% you want to say from thee or of thee for 01:00:07.920 --> 01:00:10.029 align:start position:0% you want to say from thee or of thee for instance<01:00:08.440> you<01:00:08.520> can<01:00:08.720> say<01:00:09.200> he<01:00:09.400> is<01:00:09.599> from<01:00:09.880> the 01:00:10.029 --> 01:00:10.039 align:start position:0% instance you can say he is from the 01:00:10.039 --> 01:00:13.270 align:start position:0% instance you can say he is from the market<01:00:10.520> which<01:00:10.720> would<01:00:10.880> be<01:00:11.599> LS<01:00:12.599> and<01:00:12.760> he<01:00:12.920> is<01:00:13.079> from 01:00:13.270 --> 01:00:13.280 align:start position:0% market which would be LS and he is from 01:00:13.280 --> 01:00:16.670 align:start position:0% market which would be LS and he is from the<01:00:13.480> class<01:00:13.920> would<01:00:14.079> simply<01:00:14.400> be<01:00:14.839> LS<01:00:15.480> de<01:00:16.480> if<01:00:16.559> you 01:00:16.670 --> 01:00:16.680 align:start position:0% the class would simply be LS de if you 01:00:16.680 --> 01:00:18.910 align:start position:0% the class would simply be LS de if you want<01:00:16.760> to<01:00:16.880> use<01:00:17.520> as<01:00:17.760> of<01:00:18.039> the<01:00:18.280> it<01:00:18.359> would<01:00:18.480> be<01:00:18.640> useful 01:00:18.910 --> 01:00:18.920 align:start position:0% want to use as of the it would be useful 01:00:18.920 --> 01:00:20.549 align:start position:0% want to use as of the it would be useful to<01:00:19.000> use<01:00:19.119> it<01:00:19.240> in<01:00:19.319> a<01:00:19.480> question<01:00:20.039> like<01:00:20.240> what<01:00:20.319> do<01:00:20.400> you 01:00:20.549 --> 01:00:20.559 align:start position:0% to use it in a question like what do you 01:00:20.559 --> 01:00:22.589 align:start position:0% to use it in a question like what do you suppose<01:00:21.039> of<01:00:21.240> the<01:00:21.359> market<01:00:21.799> and<01:00:21.920> in<01:00:22.119> Spanish<01:00:22.520> it 01:00:22.589 --> 01:00:22.599 align:start position:0% suppose of the market and in Spanish it 01:00:22.599 --> 01:00:23.549 align:start position:0% suppose of the market and in Spanish it would 01:00:23.549 --> 01:00:23.559 align:start position:0% would 01:00:23.559 --> 01:00:26.109 align:start position:0% would be<01:00:24.839> and<01:00:24.960> of<01:00:25.079> course<01:00:25.520> the<01:00:25.599> same<01:00:25.799> concept 01:00:26.109 --> 01:00:26.119 align:start position:0% be and of course the same concept 01:00:26.119 --> 01:00:27.349 align:start position:0% be and of course the same concept applies<01:00:26.359> to<01:00:26.480> any<01:00:26.640> sentence<01:00:26.920> you<01:00:27.039> want<01:00:27.119> to<01:00:27.200> say 01:00:27.349 --> 01:00:27.359 align:start position:0% applies to any sentence you want to say 01:00:27.359 --> 01:00:28.630 align:start position:0% applies to any sentence you want to say in<01:00:27.520> Spanish<01:00:27.960> but<01:00:28.079> keep<01:00:28.240> in<01:00:28.319> mind<01:00:28.520> that 01:00:28.630 --> 01:00:28.640 align:start position:0% in Spanish but keep in mind that 01:00:28.640 --> 01:00:30.710 align:start position:0% in Spanish but keep in mind that whenever<01:00:28.920> you<01:00:29.039> say<01:00:29.280> to<01:00:29.559> the<01:00:29.799> or<01:00:30.039> of<01:00:30.280> thee<01:00:30.599> you 01:00:30.710 --> 01:00:30.720 align:start position:0% whenever you say to the or of thee you 01:00:30.720 --> 01:00:32.270 align:start position:0% whenever you say to the or of thee you simply<01:00:31.000> have<01:00:31.079> to<01:00:31.240> combine<01:00:31.599> the<01:00:31.720> words<01:00:32.039> so<01:00:32.160> that 01:00:32.270 --> 01:00:32.280 align:start position:0% simply have to combine the words so that 01:00:32.280 --> 01:00:33.750 align:start position:0% simply have to combine the words so that they<01:00:32.400> sound<01:00:32.680> better<01:00:32.920> when<01:00:33.039> they're<01:00:33.160> said<01:00:33.520> Al 01:00:33.750 --> 01:00:33.760 align:start position:0% they sound better when they're said Al 01:00:33.760 --> 01:00:35.710 align:start position:0% they sound better when they're said Al and<01:00:34.359> now<01:00:34.640> there<01:00:34.760> are<01:00:35.000> pronouns<01:00:35.440> after 01:00:35.710 --> 01:00:35.720 align:start position:0% and now there are pronouns after 01:00:35.720 --> 01:00:37.309 align:start position:0% and now there are pronouns after prepositions<01:00:36.440> which<01:00:36.559> are<01:00:36.720> also<01:00:36.920> known<01:00:37.160> as 01:00:37.309 --> 01:00:37.319 align:start position:0% prepositions which are also known as 01:00:37.319 --> 01:00:38.910 align:start position:0% prepositions which are also known as prepositional<01:00:37.920> pronouns<01:00:38.440> and<01:00:38.520> they're<01:00:38.680> put 01:00:38.910 --> 01:00:38.920 align:start position:0% prepositional pronouns and they're put 01:00:38.920 --> 01:00:41.549 align:start position:0% prepositional pronouns and they're put after<01:00:39.200> prepositional<01:00:39.799> words<01:00:40.280> such<01:00:40.480> as<01:00:40.880> of<01:00:41.200> on 01:00:41.549 --> 01:00:41.559 align:start position:0% after prepositional words such as of on 01:00:41.559 --> 01:00:44.470 align:start position:0% after prepositional words such as of on from<01:00:41.960> to<01:00:42.359> for<01:00:42.839> with<01:00:43.119> and<01:00:43.280> more<01:00:43.720> and<01:00:43.839> in<01:00:44.000> English 01:00:44.470 --> 01:00:44.480 align:start position:0% from to for with and more and in English 01:00:44.480 --> 01:00:48.190 align:start position:0% from to for with and more and in English they<01:00:44.599> look<01:00:44.799> like<01:00:45.000> this<01:00:45.400> me<01:00:45.920> you<01:00:46.520> him<01:00:46.760> her<01:00:47.119> it<01:00:47.680> us 01:00:48.190 --> 01:00:48.200 align:start position:0% they look like this me you him her it us 01:00:48.200 --> 01:00:50.190 align:start position:0% they look like this me you him her it us all<01:00:48.359> of<01:00:48.559> you<01:00:48.920> and<01:00:49.119> them<01:00:49.400> in<01:00:49.559> English<01:00:49.960> there<01:00:50.079> is 01:00:50.190 --> 01:00:50.200 align:start position:0% all of you and them in English there is 01:00:50.200 --> 01:00:51.549 align:start position:0% all of you and them in English there is no<01:00:50.359> pattern<01:00:50.640> to<01:00:50.720> follow<01:00:50.960> with<01:00:51.119> any<01:00:51.240> of<01:00:51.359> these 01:00:51.549 --> 01:00:51.559 align:start position:0% no pattern to follow with any of these 01:00:51.559 --> 01:00:53.109 align:start position:0% no pattern to follow with any of these pronouns<01:00:52.119> because<01:00:52.319> some<01:00:52.480> of<01:00:52.559> them<01:00:52.720> completely 01:00:53.109 --> 01:00:53.119 align:start position:0% pronouns because some of them completely 01:00:53.119 --> 01:00:55.069 align:start position:0% pronouns because some of them completely change<01:00:53.559> while<01:00:53.799> some<01:00:54.000> stay<01:00:54.240> the<01:00:54.319> same<01:00:54.720> such<01:00:54.920> as 01:00:55.069 --> 01:00:55.079 align:start position:0% change while some stay the same such as 01:00:55.079 --> 01:00:56.950 align:start position:0% change while some stay the same such as you<01:00:55.359> keeping<01:00:55.640> the<01:00:55.760> same<01:00:55.960> form<01:00:56.319> as<01:00:56.440> the<01:00:56.599> regular 01:00:56.950 --> 01:00:56.960 align:start position:0% you keeping the same form as the regular 01:00:56.960 --> 01:00:58.990 align:start position:0% you keeping the same form as the regular pronoun<01:00:57.359> you<01:00:57.760> contextually<01:00:58.559> you<01:00:58.640> can<01:00:58.799> use 01:00:58.990 --> 01:00:59.000 align:start position:0% pronoun you contextually you can use 01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:00.510 align:start position:0% pronoun you contextually you can use these<01:00:59.160> prepositional<01:00:59.760> pronouns<01:01:00.240> and<01:01:00.359> put 01:01:00.510 --> 01:01:00.520 align:start position:0% these prepositional pronouns and put 01:01:00.520 --> 01:01:02.710 align:start position:0% these prepositional pronouns and put them<01:01:00.720> after<01:01:01.039> prepositions<01:01:01.880> like<01:01:02.160> what<01:01:02.359> about 01:01:02.710 --> 01:01:02.720 align:start position:0% them after prepositions like what about 01:01:02.720 --> 01:01:05.150 align:start position:0% them after prepositions like what about me<01:01:03.119> this<01:01:03.240> is<01:01:03.440> on<01:01:03.720> you<01:01:04.079> this<01:01:04.200> is<01:01:04.359> from<01:01:04.640> him<01:01:04.960> take 01:01:05.150 --> 01:01:05.160 align:start position:0% me this is on you this is from him take 01:01:05.160 --> 01:01:08.109 align:start position:0% me this is on you this is from him take it<01:01:05.319> to<01:01:05.599> her<01:01:06.079> this<01:01:06.200> is<01:01:06.359> for<01:01:06.720> us<01:01:07.119> we<01:01:07.319> go<01:01:07.599> with<01:01:07.839> them 01:01:08.109 --> 01:01:08.119 align:start position:0% it to her this is for us we go with them 01:01:08.119 --> 01:01:09.630 align:start position:0% it to her this is for us we go with them and<01:01:08.240> of<01:01:08.400> course<01:01:08.720> you<01:01:08.839> don't<01:01:09.039> necessarily<01:01:09.520> have 01:01:09.630 --> 01:01:09.640 align:start position:0% and of course you don't necessarily have 01:01:09.640 --> 01:01:11.589 align:start position:0% and of course you don't necessarily have to<01:01:09.760> use<01:01:10.000> these<01:01:10.119> phrases<01:01:10.640> in<01:01:10.760> Spanish<01:01:11.240> however 01:01:11.589 --> 01:01:11.599 align:start position:0% to use these phrases in Spanish however 01:01:11.599 --> 01:01:12.950 align:start position:0% to use these phrases in Spanish however the<01:01:11.720> same<01:01:11.960> idea<01:01:12.319> also<01:01:12.520> works<01:01:12.760> for 01:01:12.950 --> 01:01:12.960 align:start position:0% the same idea also works for 01:01:12.960 --> 01:01:14.789 align:start position:0% the same idea also works for prepositional<01:01:13.520> pronouns<01:01:14.119> and<01:01:14.359> actually 01:01:14.789 --> 01:01:14.799 align:start position:0% prepositional pronouns and actually 01:01:14.799 --> 01:01:16.430 align:start position:0% prepositional pronouns and actually their<01:01:15.000> syntax<01:01:15.400> is<01:01:15.520> a<01:01:15.599> lot<01:01:15.760> easier<01:01:16.039> to 01:01:16.430 --> 01:01:16.440 align:start position:0% their syntax is a lot easier to 01:01:16.440 --> 01:01:18.029 align:start position:0% their syntax is a lot easier to understand<01:01:16.640> in<01:01:16.799> Spanish<01:01:17.280> in<01:01:17.400> Spanish<01:01:17.880> you 01:01:18.029 --> 01:01:18.039 align:start position:0% understand in Spanish in Spanish you 01:01:18.039 --> 01:01:23.470 align:start position:0% understand in Spanish in Spanish you have<01:01:18.319> me<01:01:18.839> with<01:01:18.960> an<01:01:19.200> accent<01:01:19.799> t<01:01:20.400> l<01:01:20.760> or<01:01:21.079> a<01:01:21.799> noos<01:01:22.680> Vos 01:01:23.470 --> 01:01:23.480 align:start position:0% have me with an accent t l or a noos Vos 01:01:23.480 --> 01:01:26.109 align:start position:0% have me with an accent t l or a noos Vos and<01:01:23.760> AOS<01:01:24.079> or<01:01:24.839> just<01:01:25.000> by<01:01:25.119> looking<01:01:25.319> at<01:01:25.440> the<01:01:25.599> syntax 01:01:26.109 --> 01:01:26.119 align:start position:0% and AOS or just by looking at the syntax 01:01:26.119 --> 01:01:27.750 align:start position:0% and AOS or just by looking at the syntax you<01:01:26.280> probably<01:01:26.599> find<01:01:26.760> it<01:01:26.920> very<01:01:27.079> strange<01:01:27.599> that 01:01:27.750 --> 01:01:27.760 align:start position:0% you probably find it very strange that 01:01:27.760 --> 01:01:29.950 align:start position:0% you probably find it very strange that the<01:01:27.920> he<01:01:28.280> we<01:01:28.599> y'all<01:01:28.960> and<01:01:29.160> they<01:01:29.400> pronouns 01:01:29.950 --> 01:01:29.960 align:start position:0% the he we y'all and they pronouns 01:01:29.960 --> 01:01:31.549 align:start position:0% the he we y'all and they pronouns haven't<01:01:30.240> changed<01:01:30.760> because<01:01:30.960> when<01:01:31.119> compared<01:01:31.440> to 01:01:31.549 --> 01:01:31.559 align:start position:0% haven't changed because when compared to 01:01:31.559 --> 01:01:33.270 align:start position:0% haven't changed because when compared to their<01:01:31.720> normal<01:01:32.000> pronoun<01:01:32.480> form<01:01:32.839> they<01:01:32.960> stayed 01:01:33.270 --> 01:01:33.280 align:start position:0% their normal pronoun form they stayed 01:01:33.280 --> 01:01:34.750 align:start position:0% their normal pronoun form they stayed the<01:01:33.359> same<01:01:33.680> because<01:01:33.920> Spanish<01:01:34.240> decided<01:01:34.520> to<01:01:34.640> not 01:01:34.750 --> 01:01:34.760 align:start position:0% the same because Spanish decided to not 01:01:34.760 --> 01:01:36.510 align:start position:0% the same because Spanish decided to not change<01:01:35.039> their<01:01:35.240> form<01:01:35.599> and<01:01:35.760> keep<01:01:35.960> their<01:01:36.119> form<01:01:36.400> as 01:01:36.510 --> 01:01:36.520 align:start position:0% change their form and keep their form as 01:01:36.520 --> 01:01:38.510 align:start position:0% change their form and keep their form as their<01:01:36.760> regular<01:01:37.119> pronoun<01:01:37.480> form<01:01:37.920> aside<01:01:38.160> from<01:01:38.359> me 01:01:38.510 --> 01:01:38.520 align:start position:0% their regular pronoun form aside from me 01:01:38.520 --> 01:01:39.670 align:start position:0% their regular pronoun form aside from me and<01:01:38.680> you<01:01:38.960> and<01:01:39.039> telling<01:01:39.280> the<01:01:39.400> difference 01:01:39.670 --> 01:01:39.680 align:start position:0% and you and telling the difference 01:01:39.680 --> 01:01:41.270 align:start position:0% and you and telling the difference between<01:01:39.960> pronouns<01:01:40.480> and<01:01:40.640> prepositional 01:01:41.270 --> 01:01:41.280 align:start position:0% between pronouns and prepositional 01:01:41.280 --> 01:01:42.910 align:start position:0% between pronouns and prepositional pronouns<01:01:41.720> in<01:01:41.880> Spanish<01:01:42.359> can<01:01:42.480> be<01:01:42.599> done<01:01:42.760> by 01:01:42.910 --> 01:01:42.920 align:start position:0% pronouns in Spanish can be done by 01:01:42.920 --> 01:01:44.549 align:start position:0% pronouns in Spanish can be done by simply<01:01:43.240> looking<01:01:43.599> if<01:01:43.720> the<01:01:43.839> word<01:01:44.039> is<01:01:44.200> after<01:01:44.440> a 01:01:44.549 --> 01:01:44.559 align:start position:0% simply looking if the word is after a 01:01:44.559 --> 01:01:45.829 align:start position:0% simply looking if the word is after a preposition<01:01:45.079> you<01:01:45.200> can<01:01:45.319> have<01:01:45.440> a<01:01:45.520> simple 01:01:45.829 --> 01:01:45.839 align:start position:0% preposition you can have a simple 01:01:45.839 --> 01:01:47.950 align:start position:0% preposition you can have a simple sentence<01:01:46.280> like<01:01:46.680> this<01:01:46.799> is<01:01:46.960> for<01:01:47.319> us<01:01:47.680> and<01:01:47.799> in 01:01:47.950 --> 01:01:47.960 align:start position:0% sentence like this is for us and in 01:01:47.960 --> 01:01:50.950 align:start position:0% sentence like this is for us and in Spanish<01:01:48.520> the<01:01:48.640> phrase<01:01:48.880> would<01:01:49.039> be<01:01:49.400> EST<01:01:49.839> es<01:01:50.319> noos 01:01:50.950 --> 01:01:50.960 align:start position:0% Spanish the phrase would be EST es noos 01:01:50.960 --> 01:01:53.109 align:start position:0% Spanish the phrase would be EST es noos and<01:01:51.119> as<01:01:51.200> you<01:01:51.319> can<01:01:51.440> see<01:01:51.799> noos<01:01:52.400> is<01:01:52.520> placed<01:01:52.880> after 01:01:53.109 --> 01:01:53.119 align:start position:0% and as you can see noos is placed after 01:01:53.119 --> 01:01:54.910 align:start position:0% and as you can see noos is placed after the<01:01:53.279> preposition<01:01:53.799> para<01:01:54.160> keeping<01:01:54.559> its<01:01:54.680> form 01:01:54.910 --> 01:01:54.920 align:start position:0% the preposition para keeping its form 01:01:54.920 --> 01:01:56.589 align:start position:0% the preposition para keeping its form and<01:01:55.039> not<01:01:55.200> changing<01:01:55.680> unlike<01:01:56.039> English<01:01:56.480> which 01:01:56.589 --> 01:01:56.599 align:start position:0% and not changing unlike English which 01:01:56.599 --> 01:01:58.670 align:start position:0% and not changing unlike English which uses<01:01:57.039> us<01:01:57.440> and<01:01:57.599> completely<01:01:57.920> changes<01:01:58.240> the<01:01:58.359> form 01:01:58.670 --> 01:01:58.680 align:start position:0% uses us and completely changes the form 01:01:58.680 --> 01:02:00.510 align:start position:0% uses us and completely changes the form whereas<01:01:59.000> in<01:01:59.160> Spanish<01:01:59.640> it<01:01:59.760> stays<01:02:00.039> the<01:02:00.160> same<01:02:00.400> and 01:02:00.510 --> 01:02:00.520 align:start position:0% whereas in Spanish it stays the same and 01:02:00.520 --> 01:02:02.190 align:start position:0% whereas in Spanish it stays the same and simpler<01:02:00.880> to<01:02:01.279> understand<01:02:01.559> nonetheless<01:02:02.119> you 01:02:02.190 --> 01:02:02.200 align:start position:0% simpler to understand nonetheless you 01:02:02.200 --> 01:02:03.789 align:start position:0% simpler to understand nonetheless you can<01:02:02.559> sometimes<01:02:02.760> have<01:02:02.920> sentences<01:02:03.480> when<01:02:03.599> you'll 01:02:03.789 --> 01:02:03.799 align:start position:0% can sometimes have sentences when you'll 01:02:03.799 --> 01:02:05.510 align:start position:0% can sometimes have sentences when you'll have<01:02:03.960> the<01:02:04.039> same<01:02:04.240> pronoun<01:02:04.640> and<01:02:04.839> prepositional 01:02:05.510 --> 01:02:05.520 align:start position:0% have the same pronoun and prepositional 01:02:05.520 --> 01:02:07.789 align:start position:0% have the same pronoun and prepositional pronoun<01:02:06.079> like<01:02:06.440> they<01:02:06.640> go<01:02:06.960> with<01:02:07.240> them<01:02:07.640> which 01:02:07.789 --> 01:02:07.799 align:start position:0% pronoun like they go with them which 01:02:07.799 --> 01:02:10.589 align:start position:0% pronoun like they go with them which would<01:02:07.960> be<01:02:08.240> AOS<01:02:08.640> Vanos<01:02:09.640> and<01:02:09.799> at<01:02:09.960> first<01:02:10.400> looking 01:02:10.589 --> 01:02:10.599 align:start position:0% would be AOS Vanos and at first looking 01:02:10.599 --> 01:02:12.150 align:start position:0% would be AOS Vanos and at first looking at<01:02:10.720> this<01:02:10.880> phrase<01:02:11.119> is<01:02:11.279> very<01:02:11.440> weird<01:02:11.839> because<01:02:12.039> we 01:02:12.150 --> 01:02:12.160 align:start position:0% at this phrase is very weird because we 01:02:12.160 --> 01:02:14.150 align:start position:0% at this phrase is very weird because we have<01:02:12.279> the<01:02:12.359> word<01:02:12.640> AOS<01:02:12.960> not<01:02:13.119> changing<01:02:13.480> form<01:02:13.960> but 01:02:14.150 --> 01:02:14.160 align:start position:0% have the word AOS not changing form but 01:02:14.160 --> 01:02:16.349 align:start position:0% have the word AOS not changing form but actually<01:02:14.640> AOS<01:02:15.000> in<01:02:15.119> the<01:02:15.240> beginning<01:02:15.760> is<01:02:16.039> they 01:02:16.349 --> 01:02:16.359 align:start position:0% actually AOS in the beginning is they 01:02:16.359 --> 01:02:18.390 align:start position:0% actually AOS in the beginning is they and<01:02:16.520> AOS<01:02:16.880> in<01:02:17.000> the<01:02:17.119> end<01:02:17.440> is<01:02:17.680> them<01:02:18.039> because<01:02:18.200> it's 01:02:18.390 --> 01:02:18.400 align:start position:0% and AOS in the end is them because it's 01:02:18.400 --> 01:02:19.990 align:start position:0% and AOS in the end is them because it's place<01:02:18.680> after<01:02:18.920> the<01:02:19.079> preposition<01:02:19.559> with<01:02:19.839> but 01:02:19.990 --> 01:02:20.000 align:start position:0% place after the preposition with but 01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:21.430 align:start position:0% place after the preposition with but once<01:02:20.200> again<01:02:20.520> these<01:02:20.640> are<01:02:20.839> just<01:02:20.960> the<01:02:21.039> rules<01:02:21.279> of 01:02:21.430 --> 01:02:21.440 align:start position:0% once again these are just the rules of 01:02:21.440 --> 01:02:22.750 align:start position:0% once again these are just the rules of Spanish<01:02:21.880> and<01:02:21.960> you<01:02:22.039> can<01:02:22.160> make<01:02:22.359> many<01:02:22.520> more 01:02:22.750 --> 01:02:22.760 align:start position:0% Spanish and you can make many more 01:02:22.760 --> 01:02:26.390 align:start position:0% Spanish and you can make many more examples<01:02:23.480> like<01:02:23.839> life<01:02:24.079> is<01:02:24.480> easy<01:02:24.680> for 01:02:26.390 --> 01:02:26.400 align:start position:0% examples like life is easy for 01:02:26.400 --> 01:02:29.829 align:start position:0% examples like life is easy for her<01:02:27.400> or<01:02:27.799> you<01:02:27.920> can<01:02:28.119> go<01:02:28.359> with 01:02:29.829 --> 01:02:29.839 align:start position:0% her or you can go with 01:02:29.839 --> 01:02:32.710 align:start position:0% her or you can go with us<01:02:30.839> or<01:02:30.960> you<01:02:31.039> can<01:02:31.160> have<01:02:31.279> a<01:02:31.400> tricky<01:02:31.720> example<01:02:32.319> like 01:02:32.710 --> 01:02:32.720 align:start position:0% us or you can have a tricky example like 01:02:32.720 --> 01:02:35.829 align:start position:0% us or you can have a tricky example like this<01:02:32.960> gift<01:02:33.240> is<01:02:33.440> from<01:02:33.720> him<01:02:34.079> EST<01:02:34.920> is<01:02:35.640> with<01:02:35.760> the 01:02:35.829 --> 01:02:35.839 align:start position:0% this gift is from him EST is with the 01:02:35.839 --> 01:02:38.710 align:start position:0% this gift is from him EST is with the ending<01:02:36.200> being<01:02:37.039> not<01:02:37.200> to<01:02:37.319> be<01:02:37.520> confused<01:02:38.119> with 01:02:38.710 --> 01:02:38.720 align:start position:0% ending being not to be confused with 01:02:38.720 --> 01:02:39.870 align:start position:0% ending being not to be confused with like<01:02:38.839> I<01:02:38.960> said<01:02:39.079> in<01:02:39.240> the<01:02:39.359> beginning<01:02:39.640> of<01:02:39.760> the 01:02:39.870 --> 01:02:39.880 align:start position:0% like I said in the beginning of the 01:02:39.880 --> 01:02:42.269 align:start position:0% like I said in the beginning of the video<01:02:40.400> Del<01:02:40.760> is<01:02:41.000> of<01:02:41.240> the<01:02:41.480> or<01:02:41.680> from<01:02:42.000> the 01:02:42.269 --> 01:02:42.279 align:start position:0% video Del is of the or from the 01:02:42.279 --> 01:02:43.630 align:start position:0% video Del is of the or from the masculine<01:02:42.799> which<01:02:42.920> uses<01:02:43.160> the<01:02:43.279> definite 01:02:43.630 --> 01:02:43.640 align:start position:0% masculine which uses the definite 01:02:43.640 --> 01:02:46.349 align:start position:0% masculine which uses the definite article<01:02:44.240> L<01:02:44.640> but<01:02:44.920> the<01:02:45.079> L<01:02:45.480> means<01:02:45.760> from<01:02:46.039> him 01:02:46.349 --> 01:02:46.359 align:start position:0% article L but the L means from him 01:02:46.359 --> 01:02:47.950 align:start position:0% article L but the L means from him because<01:02:46.599> L<01:02:46.799> doesn't<01:02:47.039> change<01:02:47.240> in<01:02:47.440> Spanish<01:02:47.839> when 01:02:47.950 --> 01:02:47.960 align:start position:0% because L doesn't change in Spanish when 01:02:47.960 --> 01:02:49.510 align:start position:0% because L doesn't change in Spanish when it's<01:02:48.079> used<01:02:48.319> as<01:02:48.400> a<01:02:48.559> prepositional<01:02:49.079> pronoun 01:02:49.510 --> 01:02:49.520 align:start position:0% it's used as a prepositional pronoun 01:02:49.520 --> 01:02:51.029 align:start position:0% it's used as a prepositional pronoun even<01:02:49.720> though<01:02:49.839> it's<01:02:49.920> a<01:02:50.079> rare<01:02:50.319> instance<01:02:50.839> you<01:02:50.920> can 01:02:51.029 --> 01:02:51.039 align:start position:0% even though it's a rare instance you can 01:02:51.039 --> 01:02:52.309 align:start position:0% even though it's a rare instance you can still<01:02:51.240> encounter<01:02:51.720> these<01:02:51.880> things<01:02:52.119> when<01:02:52.200> you 01:02:52.309 --> 01:02:52.319 align:start position:0% still encounter these things when you 01:02:52.319 --> 01:02:54.190 align:start position:0% still encounter these things when you learn<01:02:52.599> Spanish<01:02:53.160> at<01:02:53.359> last<01:02:53.640> there's<01:02:53.839> one<01:02:54.000> rule 01:02:54.190 --> 01:02:54.200 align:start position:0% learn Spanish at last there's one rule 01:02:54.200 --> 01:02:55.190 align:start position:0% learn Spanish at last there's one rule that<01:02:54.400> you<01:02:54.480> have<01:02:54.559> to<01:02:54.680> remember<01:02:54.960> with<01:02:55.079> the 01:02:55.190 --> 01:02:55.200 align:start position:0% that you have to remember with the 01:02:55.200 --> 01:02:56.829 align:start position:0% that you have to remember with the prepositional<01:02:55.720> pronouns<01:02:56.119> in<01:02:56.279> Spanish 01:02:56.829 --> 01:02:56.839 align:start position:0% prepositional pronouns in Spanish 01:02:56.839 --> 01:02:58.470 align:start position:0% prepositional pronouns in Spanish specifically<01:02:57.319> relating<01:02:57.640> to<01:02:57.799> the<01:02:57.960> preposition 01:02:58.470 --> 01:02:58.480 align:start position:0% specifically relating to the preposition 01:02:58.480 --> 01:02:59.829 align:start position:0% specifically relating to the preposition con<01:02:58.839> which<01:02:58.920> is<01:02:59.119> with<01:02:59.400> it's<01:02:59.520> the<01:02:59.640> only 01:02:59.829 --> 01:02:59.839 align:start position:0% con which is with it's the only 01:02:59.839 --> 01:03:01.150 align:start position:0% con which is with it's the only preposition<01:03:00.279> in<01:03:00.440> Spanish<01:03:00.880> where<01:03:01.000> if<01:03:01.079> you 01:03:01.150 --> 01:03:01.160 align:start position:0% preposition in Spanish where if you 01:03:01.160 --> 01:03:02.950 align:start position:0% preposition in Spanish where if you place<01:03:01.440> these<01:03:01.640> prepositional<01:03:02.119> pronouns<01:03:02.640> after 01:03:02.950 --> 01:03:02.960 align:start position:0% place these prepositional pronouns after 01:03:02.960 --> 01:03:05.109 align:start position:0% place these prepositional pronouns after K<01:03:03.359> they<01:03:03.480> will<01:03:03.599> keep<01:03:03.799> their<01:03:03.960> form<01:03:04.359> but<01:03:04.559> with<01:03:04.760> me 01:03:05.109 --> 01:03:05.119 align:start position:0% K they will keep their form but with me 01:03:05.119 --> 01:03:07.190 align:start position:0% K they will keep their form but with me and<01:03:05.319> T<01:03:05.760> you<01:03:05.880> have<01:03:06.000> to<01:03:06.160> combine<01:03:06.559> K<01:03:06.920> with<01:03:07.039> the 01:03:07.190 --> 01:03:07.200 align:start position:0% and T you have to combine K with the 01:03:07.200 --> 01:03:10.029 align:start position:0% and T you have to combine K with the pronouns<01:03:07.799> which<01:03:07.920> would<01:03:08.079> be<01:03:08.359> kigo<01:03:09.119> and<01:03:09.359> kigo<01:03:09.920> so 01:03:10.029 --> 01:03:10.039 align:start position:0% pronouns which would be kigo and kigo so 01:03:10.039 --> 01:03:11.630 align:start position:0% pronouns which would be kigo and kigo so whenever<01:03:10.359> you<01:03:10.440> use<01:03:10.680> prepositional<01:03:11.200> pronouns 01:03:11.630 --> 01:03:11.640 align:start position:0% whenever you use prepositional pronouns 01:03:11.640 --> 01:03:13.750 align:start position:0% whenever you use prepositional pronouns with<01:03:11.839> K<01:03:12.319> like<01:03:12.520> do<01:03:12.640> you<01:03:12.760> want<01:03:12.920> to<01:03:13.119> go<01:03:13.319> with<01:03:13.480> me 01:03:13.750 --> 01:03:13.760 align:start position:0% with K like do you want to go with me 01:03:13.760 --> 01:03:14.750 align:start position:0% with K like do you want to go with me you<01:03:13.839> will 01:03:14.750 --> 01:03:14.760 align:start position:0% you will 01:03:14.760 --> 01:03:17.269 align:start position:0% you will sayig<01:03:15.760> and<01:03:15.839> you<01:03:15.920> can<01:03:16.119> reply<01:03:16.480> with<01:03:16.760> yes<01:03:17.039> I<01:03:17.119> do 01:03:17.269 --> 01:03:17.279 align:start position:0% sayig and you can reply with yes I do 01:03:17.279 --> 01:03:18.630 align:start position:0% sayig and you can reply with yes I do want<01:03:17.400> to<01:03:17.559> go<01:03:17.680> with<01:03:17.839> you 01:03:18.630 --> 01:03:18.640 align:start position:0% want to go with you 01:03:18.640 --> 01:03:20.589 align:start position:0% want to go with you see<01:03:19.640> and<01:03:19.720> in<01:03:19.799> case<01:03:19.960> you<01:03:20.039> use<01:03:20.240> the<01:03:20.359> other 01:03:20.589 --> 01:03:20.599 align:start position:0% see and in case you use the other 01:03:20.599 --> 01:03:22.109 align:start position:0% see and in case you use the other prepositions<01:03:21.119> with<01:03:21.319> K<01:03:21.599> you<01:03:21.720> don't<01:03:21.839> have<01:03:21.960> to 01:03:22.109 --> 01:03:22.119 align:start position:0% prepositions with K you don't have to 01:03:22.119 --> 01:03:24.349 align:start position:0% prepositions with K you don't have to modify<01:03:22.520> them<01:03:22.720> as<01:03:22.839> you<01:03:22.960> do<01:03:23.160> with<01:03:23.359> me<01:03:23.680> and<01:03:23.839> T<01:03:24.079> and 01:03:24.349 --> 01:03:24.359 align:start position:0% modify them as you do with me and T and 01:03:24.359 --> 01:03:25.510 align:start position:0% modify them as you do with me and T and that's<01:03:24.480> as<01:03:24.599> far<01:03:24.720> as<01:03:24.839> pronouns<01:03:25.240> after 01:03:25.510 --> 01:03:25.520 align:start position:0% that's as far as pronouns after 01:03:25.520 --> 01:03:27.230 align:start position:0% that's as far as pronouns after prepositions<01:03:26.039> go<01:03:26.319> direct<01:03:26.559> object<01:03:26.839> pronouns 01:03:27.230 --> 01:03:27.240 align:start position:0% prepositions go direct object pronouns 01:03:27.240 --> 01:03:28.670 align:start position:0% prepositions go direct object pronouns in<01:03:27.400> Spanish<01:03:27.799> are<01:03:28.000> pronouns<01:03:28.359> that<01:03:28.480> take<01:03:28.599> the 01:03:28.670 --> 01:03:28.680 align:start position:0% in Spanish are pronouns that take the 01:03:28.680 --> 01:03:30.309 align:start position:0% in Spanish are pronouns that take the form<01:03:28.880> of<01:03:28.960> a<01:03:29.119> direct<01:03:29.480> object<01:03:29.960> within<01:03:30.160> a 01:03:30.309 --> 01:03:30.319 align:start position:0% form of a direct object within a 01:03:30.319 --> 01:03:31.910 align:start position:0% form of a direct object within a sentence<01:03:30.799> in<01:03:30.920> order<01:03:31.119> to<01:03:31.240> avoid<01:03:31.480> repeating<01:03:31.839> a 01:03:31.910 --> 01:03:31.920 align:start position:0% sentence in order to avoid repeating a 01:03:31.920 --> 01:03:33.870 align:start position:0% sentence in order to avoid repeating a noun<01:03:32.240> in<01:03:32.400> the<01:03:32.559> sentence<01:03:33.000> as<01:03:33.119> an<01:03:33.279> example<01:03:33.760> take 01:03:33.870 --> 01:03:33.880 align:start position:0% noun in the sentence as an example take 01:03:33.880 --> 01:03:35.710 align:start position:0% noun in the sentence as an example take a<01:03:33.960> look<01:03:34.079> at<01:03:34.240> this<01:03:34.359> sentence<01:03:34.680> in<01:03:34.839> English<01:03:35.279> I<01:03:35.440> buy 01:03:35.710 --> 01:03:35.720 align:start position:0% a look at this sentence in English I buy 01:03:35.720 --> 01:03:38.190 align:start position:0% a look at this sentence in English I buy a<01:03:35.920> car<01:03:36.279> I<01:03:36.440> is<01:03:36.559> the<01:03:36.760> subject<01:03:37.240> buy<01:03:37.520> is<01:03:37.680> the<01:03:37.799> verb 01:03:38.190 --> 01:03:38.200 align:start position:0% a car I is the subject buy is the verb 01:03:38.200 --> 01:03:39.829 align:start position:0% a car I is the subject buy is the verb and<01:03:38.359> car<01:03:38.640> is<01:03:38.799> the<01:03:38.960> object<01:03:39.279> that's<01:03:39.480> directly 01:03:39.829 --> 01:03:39.839 align:start position:0% and car is the object that's directly 01:03:39.839 --> 01:03:41.829 align:start position:0% and car is the object that's directly stated<01:03:40.240> in<01:03:40.400> the<01:03:40.520> sentence<01:03:41.200> however<01:03:41.559> most<01:03:41.720> of 01:03:41.829 --> 01:03:41.839 align:start position:0% stated in the sentence however most of 01:03:41.839 --> 01:03:43.309 align:start position:0% stated in the sentence however most of the<01:03:42.000> time<01:03:42.200> we<01:03:42.359> change<01:03:42.599> the<01:03:42.760> object<01:03:43.079> from<01:03:43.200> a 01:03:43.309 --> 01:03:43.319 align:start position:0% the time we change the object from a 01:03:43.319 --> 01:03:45.150 align:start position:0% the time we change the object from a noun<01:03:43.559> to<01:03:43.720> a<01:03:43.880> pronoun<01:03:44.319> whenever<01:03:44.640> we<01:03:44.760> speak 01:03:45.150 --> 01:03:45.160 align:start position:0% noun to a pronoun whenever we speak 01:03:45.160 --> 01:03:47.549 align:start position:0% noun to a pronoun whenever we speak instead<01:03:45.440> of<01:03:45.520> saying<01:03:45.839> I<01:03:46.039> buy<01:03:46.279> a<01:03:46.480> car<01:03:46.920> we<01:03:47.039> can<01:03:47.200> say 01:03:47.549 --> 01:03:47.559 align:start position:0% instead of saying I buy a car we can say 01:03:47.559 --> 01:03:49.750 align:start position:0% instead of saying I buy a car we can say I<01:03:47.720> buy<01:03:48.039> it<01:03:48.400> and<01:03:48.559> now<01:03:48.799> it<01:03:49.119> becomes<01:03:49.359> a<01:03:49.480> direct 01:03:49.750 --> 01:03:49.760 align:start position:0% I buy it and now it becomes a direct 01:03:49.760 --> 01:03:51.230 align:start position:0% I buy it and now it becomes a direct object<01:03:50.000> pronoun<01:03:50.480> rather<01:03:50.680> than<01:03:50.799> a<01:03:50.960> direct 01:03:51.230 --> 01:03:51.240 align:start position:0% object pronoun rather than a direct 01:03:51.240 --> 01:03:52.710 align:start position:0% object pronoun rather than a direct object<01:03:51.520> noun<01:03:51.880> and<01:03:51.960> you<01:03:52.079> have<01:03:52.160> to<01:03:52.319> remember 01:03:52.710 --> 01:03:52.720 align:start position:0% object noun and you have to remember 01:03:52.720 --> 01:03:54.430 align:start position:0% object noun and you have to remember that<01:03:52.839> a<01:03:53.000> direct<01:03:53.240> object<01:03:53.520> pronoun<01:03:53.920> is<01:03:54.039> one<01:03:54.160> of<01:03:54.319> a 01:03:54.430 --> 01:03:54.440 align:start position:0% that a direct object pronoun is one of a 01:03:54.440 --> 01:03:56.430 align:start position:0% that a direct object pronoun is one of a sentence<01:03:54.960> has<01:03:55.160> only<01:03:55.400> one<01:03:55.599> direct<01:03:55.960> object 01:03:56.430 --> 01:03:56.440 align:start position:0% sentence has only one direct object 01:03:56.440 --> 01:03:57.589 align:start position:0% sentence has only one direct object typically<01:03:56.760> coming<01:03:57.079> right<01:03:57.240> after<01:03:57.480> a 01:03:57.589 --> 01:03:57.599 align:start position:0% typically coming right after a 01:03:57.599 --> 01:03:59.670 align:start position:0% typically coming right after a conjugative<01:03:58.119> verb<01:03:58.359> in<01:03:58.520> English<01:03:58.960> the<01:03:59.079> phrase<01:03:59.480> I 01:03:59.670 --> 01:03:59.680 align:start position:0% conjugative verb in English the phrase I 01:03:59.680 --> 01:04:02.109 align:start position:0% conjugative verb in English the phrase I buy<01:03:59.920> a<01:04:00.119> car<01:04:00.559> has<01:04:00.680> a<01:04:00.880> subject<01:04:01.359> a<01:04:01.480> verb<01:04:01.799> and<01:04:01.920> only 01:04:02.109 --> 01:04:02.119 align:start position:0% buy a car has a subject a verb and only 01:04:02.119 --> 01:04:03.789 align:start position:0% buy a car has a subject a verb and only one<01:04:02.400> direct<01:04:02.720> object<01:04:03.119> that's<01:04:03.240> a<01:04:03.359> noun<01:04:03.720> the 01:04:03.789 --> 01:04:03.799 align:start position:0% one direct object that's a noun the 01:04:03.799 --> 01:04:06.349 align:start position:0% one direct object that's a noun the phrase<01:04:04.200> I<01:04:04.440> by<01:04:04.680> it<01:04:05.039> likewise<01:04:05.440> has<01:04:05.559> a<01:04:05.720> subject<01:04:06.200> a 01:04:06.349 --> 01:04:06.359 align:start position:0% phrase I by it likewise has a subject a 01:04:06.359 --> 01:04:08.230 align:start position:0% phrase I by it likewise has a subject a verb<01:04:06.720> and<01:04:06.880> one<01:04:07.160> object<01:04:07.520> that's<01:04:07.640> a<01:04:07.760> pronoun<01:04:08.160> and 01:04:08.230 --> 01:04:08.240 align:start position:0% verb and one object that's a pronoun and 01:04:08.240 --> 01:04:09.549 align:start position:0% verb and one object that's a pronoun and this<01:04:08.319> is<01:04:08.440> where<01:04:08.559> you<01:04:08.640> get<01:04:08.760> the<01:04:08.880> name<01:04:09.279> direct 01:04:09.549 --> 01:04:09.559 align:start position:0% this is where you get the name direct 01:04:09.559 --> 01:04:11.069 align:start position:0% this is where you get the name direct object<01:04:09.839> pronoun<01:04:10.240> and<01:04:10.359> that's<01:04:10.559> basically<01:04:10.880> how 01:04:11.069 --> 01:04:11.079 align:start position:0% object pronoun and that's basically how 01:04:11.079 --> 01:04:12.950 align:start position:0% object pronoun and that's basically how direct<01:04:11.359> object<01:04:11.680> pronouns<01:04:12.200> work<01:04:12.400> in<01:04:12.559> English 01:04:12.950 --> 01:04:12.960 align:start position:0% direct object pronouns work in English 01:04:12.960 --> 01:04:14.549 align:start position:0% direct object pronouns work in English but<01:04:13.079> the<01:04:13.200> most<01:04:13.359> important<01:04:13.680> rule<01:04:13.880> to<01:04:14.079> remember 01:04:14.549 --> 01:04:14.559 align:start position:0% but the most important rule to remember 01:04:14.559 --> 01:04:16.150 align:start position:0% but the most important rule to remember is<01:04:14.640> that<01:04:14.799> a<01:04:14.880> sentence<01:04:15.240> has<01:04:15.359> to<01:04:15.559> have<01:04:15.720> only<01:04:15.920> one 01:04:16.150 --> 01:04:16.160 align:start position:0% is that a sentence has to have only one 01:04:16.160 --> 01:04:18.069 align:start position:0% is that a sentence has to have only one direct<01:04:16.559> object<01:04:17.039> typically<01:04:17.359> following<01:04:17.720> a<01:04:17.839> verb 01:04:18.069 --> 01:04:18.079 align:start position:0% direct object typically following a verb 01:04:18.079 --> 01:04:19.710 align:start position:0% direct object typically following a verb in<01:04:18.240> English<01:04:18.640> regardless<01:04:19.079> if<01:04:19.200> it's<01:04:19.359> singular 01:04:19.710 --> 01:04:19.720 align:start position:0% in English regardless if it's singular 01:04:19.720 --> 01:04:21.150 align:start position:0% in English regardless if it's singular or<01:04:19.920> plural<01:04:20.319> and<01:04:20.440> these<01:04:20.599> direct<01:04:20.880> object 01:04:21.150 --> 01:04:21.160 align:start position:0% or plural and these direct object 01:04:21.160 --> 01:04:23.349 align:start position:0% or plural and these direct object pronouns<01:04:21.640> look<01:04:21.839> like<01:04:22.000> this<01:04:22.119> in<01:04:22.279> English<01:04:22.799> me 01:04:23.349 --> 01:04:23.359 align:start position:0% pronouns look like this in English me 01:04:23.359 --> 01:04:26.870 align:start position:0% pronouns look like this in English me you<01:04:23.880> him<01:04:24.240> her<01:04:24.480> it<01:04:24.960> us<01:04:25.480> all<01:04:25.640> of<01:04:25.799> you<01:04:26.200> and<01:04:26.400> them<01:04:26.720> in 01:04:26.870 --> 01:04:26.880 align:start position:0% you him her it us all of you and them in 01:04:26.880 --> 01:04:28.910 align:start position:0% you him her it us all of you and them in Spanish<01:04:27.400> direct<01:04:27.720> object<01:04:28.039> pronouns<01:04:28.559> work<01:04:28.799> the 01:04:28.910 --> 01:04:28.920 align:start position:0% Spanish direct object pronouns work the 01:04:28.920 --> 01:04:30.789 align:start position:0% Spanish direct object pronouns work the same<01:04:29.160> exact<01:04:29.480> way<01:04:29.720> with<01:04:29.839> a<01:04:29.920> bit<01:04:30.079> more<01:04:30.279> variety 01:04:30.789 --> 01:04:30.799 align:start position:0% same exact way with a bit more variety 01:04:30.799 --> 01:04:32.309 align:start position:0% same exact way with a bit more variety and<01:04:30.920> they<01:04:31.039> all<01:04:31.160> share<01:04:31.480> one<01:04:31.640> rule<01:04:31.960> that<01:04:32.079> has<01:04:32.240> to 01:04:32.309 --> 01:04:32.319 align:start position:0% and they all share one rule that has to 01:04:32.319 --> 01:04:33.870 align:start position:0% and they all share one rule that has to be<01:04:32.440> applied<01:04:32.760> most<01:04:32.920> of<01:04:33.039> the<01:04:33.200> time<01:04:33.480> and<01:04:33.599> that<01:04:33.720> is 01:04:33.870 --> 01:04:33.880 align:start position:0% be applied most of the time and that is 01:04:33.880 --> 01:04:35.630 align:start position:0% be applied most of the time and that is direct<01:04:34.119> object<01:04:34.400> pronouns<01:04:34.760> in<01:04:34.920> Spanish<01:04:35.480> have 01:04:35.630 --> 01:04:35.640 align:start position:0% direct object pronouns in Spanish have 01:04:35.640 --> 01:04:37.670 align:start position:0% direct object pronouns in Spanish have to<01:04:35.799> come<01:04:36.039> before<01:04:36.319> a<01:04:36.480> verb<01:04:36.920> rather<01:04:37.160> than<01:04:37.440> after 01:04:37.670 --> 01:04:37.680 align:start position:0% to come before a verb rather than after 01:04:37.680 --> 01:04:39.710 align:start position:0% to come before a verb rather than after a<01:04:37.839> verb<01:04:38.160> in<01:04:38.279> Spanish<01:04:38.680> direct<01:04:38.960> object<01:04:39.240> pronouns 01:04:39.710 --> 01:04:39.720 align:start position:0% a verb in Spanish direct object pronouns 01:04:39.720 --> 01:04:41.269 align:start position:0% a verb in Spanish direct object pronouns look<01:04:39.920> like 01:04:41.269 --> 01:04:41.279 align:start position:0% look like 01:04:41.279 --> 01:04:46.870 align:start position:0% look like this<01:04:42.279> or<01:04:42.599> La<01:04:43.680> no<01:04:44.680> and<01:04:45.559> or<01:04:46.400> the<01:04:46.520> first<01:04:46.680> thing<01:04:46.799> you 01:04:46.870 --> 01:04:46.880 align:start position:0% this or La no and or the first thing you 01:04:46.880 --> 01:04:48.470 align:start position:0% this or La no and or the first thing you should<01:04:47.039> know<01:04:47.200> about<01:04:47.400> these<01:04:47.559> pronouns<01:04:48.119> is<01:04:48.279> that 01:04:48.470 --> 01:04:48.480 align:start position:0% should know about these pronouns is that 01:04:48.480 --> 01:04:51.309 align:start position:0% should know about these pronouns is that the<01:04:48.720> lo<01:04:49.240> la<01:04:49.720> Los<01:04:50.079> and<01:04:50.240> L<01:04:50.520> pronouns<01:04:51.079> are<01:04:51.240> the 01:04:51.309 --> 01:04:51.319 align:start position:0% the lo la Los and L pronouns are the 01:04:51.319 --> 01:04:52.829 align:start position:0% the lo la Los and L pronouns are the only<01:04:51.599> pronouns<01:04:51.960> that<01:04:52.119> have<01:04:52.279> gender<01:04:52.640> and 01:04:52.829 --> 01:04:52.839 align:start position:0% only pronouns that have gender and 01:04:52.839 --> 01:04:54.470 align:start position:0% only pronouns that have gender and plurality<01:04:53.440> while<01:04:53.599> the<01:04:53.720> other<01:04:53.880> pronoun<01:04:54.200> nouns 01:04:54.470 --> 01:04:54.480 align:start position:0% plurality while the other pronoun nouns 01:04:54.480 --> 01:04:57.630 align:start position:0% plurality while the other pronoun nouns May<01:04:54.640> refer<01:04:54.920> to<01:04:55.119> me<01:04:55.559> you<01:04:56.000> us<01:04:56.279> and<01:04:56.440> all<01:04:56.599> of<01:04:56.760> you<01:04:57.200> lo 01:04:57.630 --> 01:04:57.640 align:start position:0% May refer to me you us and all of you lo 01:04:57.640 --> 01:05:00.870 align:start position:0% May refer to me you us and all of you lo la<01:04:58.000> Los<01:04:58.319> and<01:04:58.520> L<01:04:58.960> can<01:04:59.119> also<01:04:59.359> mean<01:04:59.760> it<01:05:00.119> or<01:05:00.400> them<01:05:00.760> as 01:05:00.870 --> 01:05:00.880 align:start position:0% la Los and L can also mean it or them as 01:05:00.880 --> 01:05:03.630 align:start position:0% la Los and L can also mean it or them as an<01:05:01.160> object<01:05:01.520> or<01:05:01.680> a<01:05:01.799> person<01:05:02.240> Lo<01:05:02.599> can<01:05:02.720> mean<01:05:03.039> him<01:05:03.359> or 01:05:03.630 --> 01:05:03.640 align:start position:0% an object or a person Lo can mean him or 01:05:03.640 --> 01:05:06.150 align:start position:0% an object or a person Lo can mean him or it<01:05:03.920> masculine<01:05:04.640> La<01:05:05.000> can<01:05:05.119> mean<01:05:05.400> her<01:05:05.680> or<01:05:05.920> it 01:05:06.150 --> 01:05:06.160 align:start position:0% it masculine La can mean her or it 01:05:06.160 --> 01:05:08.630 align:start position:0% it masculine La can mean her or it feminine<01:05:06.760> Los<01:05:07.119> can<01:05:07.240> mean<01:05:07.559> them<01:05:07.839> masculine<01:05:08.520> as 01:05:08.630 --> 01:05:08.640 align:start position:0% feminine Los can mean them masculine as 01:05:08.640 --> 01:05:10.789 align:start position:0% feminine Los can mean them masculine as in<01:05:08.799> an<01:05:09.079> object<01:05:09.400> or<01:05:09.559> a<01:05:09.760> person<01:05:10.240> and<01:05:10.440> last<01:05:10.680> can 01:05:10.789 --> 01:05:10.799 align:start position:0% in an object or a person and last can 01:05:10.799 --> 01:05:13.069 align:start position:0% in an object or a person and last can mean<01:05:11.039> them<01:05:11.319> feminine<01:05:11.880> object<01:05:12.200> or<01:05:12.400> person<01:05:12.880> once 01:05:13.069 --> 01:05:13.079 align:start position:0% mean them feminine object or person once 01:05:13.079 --> 01:05:14.430 align:start position:0% mean them feminine object or person once again<01:05:13.359> you<01:05:13.520> have<01:05:13.599> to<01:05:13.720> remember<01:05:14.039> that<01:05:14.240> these 01:05:14.430 --> 01:05:14.440 align:start position:0% again you have to remember that these 01:05:14.440 --> 01:05:16.510 align:start position:0% again you have to remember that these pronouns<01:05:14.960> come<01:05:15.240> before<01:05:15.480> a<01:05:15.640> conjugative<01:05:16.160> verb 01:05:16.510 --> 01:05:16.520 align:start position:0% pronouns come before a conjugative verb 01:05:16.520 --> 01:05:19.870 align:start position:0% pronouns come before a conjugative verb consider<01:05:16.880> this<01:05:17.039> phrase<01:05:17.279> in<01:05:17.440> Spanish<01:05:18.480> y<01:05:19.480> i<01:05:19.599> buy 01:05:19.870 --> 01:05:19.880 align:start position:0% consider this phrase in Spanish y i buy 01:05:19.880 --> 01:05:21.670 align:start position:0% consider this phrase in Spanish y i buy a<01:05:20.039> car<01:05:20.400> in<01:05:20.559> English<01:05:20.960> if<01:05:21.039> you<01:05:21.160> want<01:05:21.240> to<01:05:21.400> replace 01:05:21.670 --> 01:05:21.680 align:start position:0% a car in English if you want to replace 01:05:21.680 --> 01:05:23.589 align:start position:0% a car in English if you want to replace the<01:05:21.839> object<01:05:22.119> noun<01:05:22.480> with<01:05:22.599> an<01:05:22.760> object<01:05:23.039> pronoun 01:05:23.589 --> 01:05:23.599 align:start position:0% the object noun with an object pronoun 01:05:23.599 --> 01:05:25.990 align:start position:0% the object noun with an object pronoun you<01:05:23.680> would<01:05:23.839> say<01:05:24.359> I<01:05:24.559> buy<01:05:24.839> it<01:05:25.160> putting<01:05:25.480> the<01:05:25.640> it 01:05:25.990 --> 01:05:26.000 align:start position:0% you would say I buy it putting the it 01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:27.870 align:start position:0% you would say I buy it putting the it after<01:05:26.319> by<01:05:26.640> in<01:05:26.760> Spanish<01:05:27.279> however<01:05:27.480> you<01:05:27.599> cannot 01:05:27.870 --> 01:05:27.880 align:start position:0% after by in Spanish however you cannot 01:05:27.880 --> 01:05:29.789 align:start position:0% after by in Spanish however you cannot do<01:05:28.079> that<01:05:28.359> so<01:05:28.559> instead<01:05:29.000> you<01:05:29.119> put<01:05:29.319> the<01:05:29.440> object 01:05:29.789 --> 01:05:29.799 align:start position:0% do that so instead you put the object 01:05:29.799 --> 01:05:31.710 align:start position:0% do that so instead you put the object pronoun<01:05:30.319> before<01:05:30.640> the<01:05:30.760> conjugative<01:05:31.279> verb<01:05:31.599> in 01:05:31.710 --> 01:05:31.720 align:start position:0% pronoun before the conjugative verb in 01:05:31.720 --> 01:05:33.630 align:start position:0% pronoun before the conjugative verb in this<01:05:31.880> case<01:05:32.319> considering<01:05:32.720> that<01:05:32.960> cooch<01:05:33.400> is<01:05:33.480> a 01:05:33.630 --> 01:05:33.640 align:start position:0% this case considering that cooch is a 01:05:33.640 --> 01:05:35.870 align:start position:0% this case considering that cooch is a masculine<01:05:34.079> word<01:05:34.400> we<01:05:34.520> need<01:05:34.640> to<01:05:34.760> use<01:05:35.119> lo<01:05:35.599> as<01:05:35.720> the 01:05:35.870 --> 01:05:35.880 align:start position:0% masculine word we need to use lo as the 01:05:35.880 --> 01:05:38.269 align:start position:0% masculine word we need to use lo as the pronoun<01:05:36.279> you<01:05:36.359> would<01:05:36.520> want<01:05:36.599> to<01:05:36.799> say<01:05:37.160> y<01:05:38.160> but 01:05:38.269 --> 01:05:38.279 align:start position:0% pronoun you would want to say y but 01:05:38.279 --> 01:05:39.470 align:start position:0% pronoun you would want to say y but Spanish<01:05:38.559> says<01:05:38.760> that<01:05:38.839> you<01:05:38.960> have<01:05:39.039> to<01:05:39.160> put<01:05:39.359> this 01:05:39.470 --> 01:05:39.480 align:start position:0% Spanish says that you have to put this 01:05:39.480 --> 01:05:41.390 align:start position:0% Spanish says that you have to put this pronoun<01:05:39.920> before<01:05:40.279> the<01:05:40.400> verb<01:05:40.720> so<01:05:40.880> instead<01:05:41.319> you 01:05:41.390 --> 01:05:41.400 align:start position:0% pronoun before the verb so instead you 01:05:41.400 --> 01:05:44.230 align:start position:0% pronoun before the verb so instead you will<01:05:41.599> say<01:05:42.000> yo<01:05:43.000> I<01:05:43.200> buy<01:05:43.440> it<01:05:43.760> I<01:05:43.839> don't<01:05:43.960> know<01:05:44.119> why 01:05:44.230 --> 01:05:44.240 align:start position:0% will say yo I buy it I don't know why 01:05:44.240 --> 01:05:45.510 align:start position:0% will say yo I buy it I don't know why Spanish<01:05:44.559> does<01:05:44.839> that<01:05:45.039> but<01:05:45.160> it's<01:05:45.279> something 01:05:45.510 --> 01:05:45.520 align:start position:0% Spanish does that but it's something 01:05:45.520 --> 01:05:46.910 align:start position:0% Spanish does that but it's something that<01:05:45.680> has<01:05:45.799> to<01:05:45.880> be<01:05:46.000> known<01:05:46.319> and<01:05:46.440> of<01:05:46.559> course<01:05:46.799> you 01:05:46.910 --> 01:05:46.920 align:start position:0% that has to be known and of course you 01:05:46.920 --> 01:05:48.349 align:start position:0% that has to be known and of course you can<01:05:47.039> generate<01:05:47.400> many<01:05:47.599> more<01:05:47.799> examples<01:05:48.200> in 01:05:48.349 --> 01:05:48.359 align:start position:0% can generate many more examples in 01:05:48.359 --> 01:05:49.910 align:start position:0% can generate many more examples in Spanish<01:05:48.799> and<01:05:48.880> I<01:05:49.000> even<01:05:49.160> recommend<01:05:49.520> that<01:05:49.599> you<01:05:49.760> do 01:05:49.910 --> 01:05:49.920 align:start position:0% Spanish and I even recommend that you do 01:05:49.920 --> 01:05:51.430 align:start position:0% Spanish and I even recommend that you do so<01:05:50.240> because<01:05:50.440> direct<01:05:50.680> object<01:05:50.960> pronouns<01:05:51.319> in 01:05:51.430 --> 01:05:51.440 align:start position:0% so because direct object pronouns in 01:05:51.440 --> 01:05:53.069 align:start position:0% so because direct object pronouns in Spanish<01:05:51.880> is<01:05:52.000> a<01:05:52.160> topic<01:05:52.400> that<01:05:52.520> I've<01:05:52.720> personally 01:05:53.069 --> 01:05:53.079 align:start position:0% Spanish is a topic that I've personally 01:05:53.079 --> 01:05:54.829 align:start position:0% Spanish is a topic that I've personally seen<01:05:53.440> many<01:05:53.640> students<01:05:54.079> struggle<01:05:54.400> with<01:05:54.599> you<01:05:54.680> can 01:05:54.829 --> 01:05:54.839 align:start position:0% seen many students struggle with you can 01:05:54.839 --> 01:05:57.589 align:start position:0% seen many students struggle with you can have<01:05:54.960> phrases<01:05:55.400> like<01:05:55.760> I<01:05:55.880> want<01:05:56.240> the<01:05:56.400> books<01:05:56.880> yier 01:05:57.589 --> 01:05:57.599 align:start position:0% have phrases like I want the books yier 01:05:57.599 --> 01:06:00.150 align:start position:0% have phrases like I want the books yier Los<01:05:57.839> libros<01:05:58.359> with<01:05:58.599> los<01:05:58.880> libros<01:05:59.440> being<01:05:59.799> them 01:06:00.150 --> 01:06:00.160 align:start position:0% Los libros with los libros being them 01:06:00.160 --> 01:06:02.390 align:start position:0% Los libros with los libros being them masculine<01:06:00.799> and<01:06:00.880> you<01:06:00.960> can<01:06:01.119> instead<01:06:01.480> say<01:06:01.839> I<01:06:02.039> want 01:06:02.390 --> 01:06:02.400 align:start position:0% masculine and you can instead say I want 01:06:02.400 --> 01:06:05.029 align:start position:0% masculine and you can instead say I want them<01:06:02.799> which<01:06:02.920> in<01:06:03.039> Spanish<01:06:03.400> would<01:06:03.520> be<01:06:03.920> y<01:06:04.799> you<01:06:04.880> can 01:06:05.029 --> 01:06:05.039 align:start position:0% them which in Spanish would be y you can 01:06:05.039 --> 01:06:07.670 align:start position:0% them which in Spanish would be y you can also<01:06:05.200> say<01:06:05.400> something<01:06:05.760> like<01:06:06.039> they<01:06:06.200> have<01:06:06.400> a 01:06:07.670 --> 01:06:07.680 align:start position:0% also say something like they have a 01:06:07.680 --> 01:06:10.309 align:start position:0% also say something like they have a house<01:06:08.680> but<01:06:08.760> you<01:06:08.839> can<01:06:09.039> instead<01:06:09.400> say<01:06:09.799> they<01:06:10.039> have 01:06:10.309 --> 01:06:10.319 align:start position:0% house but you can instead say they have 01:06:10.319 --> 01:06:12.789 align:start position:0% house but you can instead say they have it<01:06:10.640> which<01:06:10.799> would<01:06:10.920> be<01:06:11.480> AOS<01:06:12.480> you<01:06:12.559> can<01:06:12.680> have 01:06:12.789 --> 01:06:12.799 align:start position:0% it which would be AOS you can have 01:06:12.799 --> 01:06:14.910 align:start position:0% it which would be AOS you can have simpler<01:06:13.200> sentences<01:06:13.880> like<01:06:14.160> I<01:06:14.319> love<01:06:14.520> you<01:06:14.799> which 01:06:14.910 --> 01:06:14.920 align:start position:0% simpler sentences like I love you which 01:06:14.920 --> 01:06:16.549 align:start position:0% simpler sentences like I love you which uses<01:06:15.200> a<01:06:15.319> pronoun<01:06:15.720> immediately<01:06:16.319> without 01:06:16.549 --> 01:06:16.559 align:start position:0% uses a pronoun immediately without 01:06:16.559 --> 01:06:18.630 align:start position:0% uses a pronoun immediately without needing<01:06:16.799> to<01:06:16.920> modify<01:06:17.319> a<01:06:17.440> noun<01:06:17.720> for<01:06:17.960> a<01:06:18.160> pronoun 01:06:18.630 --> 01:06:18.640 align:start position:0% needing to modify a noun for a pronoun 01:06:18.640 --> 01:06:21.309 align:start position:0% needing to modify a noun for a pronoun so<01:06:18.799> the<01:06:18.880> sentence<01:06:19.200> would<01:06:19.359> simply<01:06:20.000> be<01:06:21.000> I<01:06:21.119> love 01:06:21.309 --> 01:06:21.319 align:start position:0% so the sentence would simply be I love 01:06:21.319 --> 01:06:22.910 align:start position:0% so the sentence would simply be I love you<01:06:21.520> you<01:06:21.640> can<01:06:21.799> repeat<01:06:22.160> this<01:06:22.359> concept<01:06:22.760> with 01:06:22.910 --> 01:06:22.920 align:start position:0% you you can repeat this concept with 01:06:22.920 --> 01:06:24.390 align:start position:0% you you can repeat this concept with another<01:06:23.200> pronoun<01:06:23.599> that<01:06:23.680> doesn't<01:06:24.160> to<01:06:24.240> get 01:06:24.390 --> 01:06:24.400 align:start position:0% another pronoun that doesn't to get 01:06:24.400 --> 01:06:26.750 align:start position:0% another pronoun that doesn't to get modified<01:06:24.960> like<01:06:25.160> NOS<01:06:25.599> you<01:06:25.680> can<01:06:25.880> say<01:06:26.200> you<01:06:26.480> watch 01:06:26.750 --> 01:06:26.760 align:start position:0% modified like NOS you can say you watch 01:06:26.760 --> 01:06:29.230 align:start position:0% modified like NOS you can say you watch us<01:06:27.200> which<01:06:27.319> would<01:06:27.480> be<01:06:27.760> to<01:06:28.160> no<01:06:28.520> me<01:06:28.720> us<01:06:29.039> and<01:06:29.160> the 01:06:29.230 --> 01:06:29.240 align:start position:0% us which would be to no me us and the 01:06:29.240 --> 01:06:30.950 align:start position:0% us which would be to no me us and the same<01:06:29.480> concept<01:06:29.880> can<01:06:30.079> basically<01:06:30.400> be<01:06:30.559> applied<01:06:30.839> to 01:06:30.950 --> 01:06:30.960 align:start position:0% same concept can basically be applied to 01:06:30.960 --> 01:06:32.470 align:start position:0% same concept can basically be applied to any<01:06:31.119> sentence<01:06:31.400> you<01:06:31.520> want<01:06:31.640> to<01:06:31.760> say<01:06:32.200> however 01:06:32.470 --> 01:06:32.480 align:start position:0% any sentence you want to say however 01:06:32.480 --> 01:06:33.589 align:start position:0% any sentence you want to say however there<01:06:32.599> are<01:06:32.760> more<01:06:32.960> things<01:06:33.200> you<01:06:33.279> should<01:06:33.440> know 01:06:33.589 --> 01:06:33.599 align:start position:0% there are more things you should know 01:06:33.599 --> 01:06:34.870 align:start position:0% there are more things you should know about<01:06:33.760> direct<01:06:34.000> object<01:06:34.279> pronouns 01:06:34.870 --> 01:06:34.880 align:start position:0% about direct object pronouns 01:06:34.880 --> 01:06:36.269 align:start position:0% about direct object pronouns specifically<01:06:35.319> relating<01:06:35.640> to<01:06:35.839> people<01:06:36.160> and 01:06:36.269 --> 01:06:36.279 align:start position:0% specifically relating to people and 01:06:36.279 --> 01:06:38.309 align:start position:0% specifically relating to people and using<01:06:36.640> pronouns<01:06:37.240> like<01:06:37.440> him<01:06:37.640> and<01:06:37.799> her<01:06:38.079> you<01:06:38.160> can 01:06:38.309 --> 01:06:38.319 align:start position:0% using pronouns like him and her you can 01:06:38.319 --> 01:06:40.269 align:start position:0% using pronouns like him and her you can have<01:06:38.400> a<01:06:38.520> sentence<01:06:38.920> like<01:06:39.160> she<01:06:39.440> watches<01:06:39.799> John 01:06:40.269 --> 01:06:40.279 align:start position:0% have a sentence like she watches John 01:06:40.279 --> 01:06:42.750 align:start position:0% have a sentence like she watches John and<01:06:40.359> you<01:06:40.480> would<01:06:40.599> want<01:06:40.720> to<01:06:40.880> say<01:06:41.319> a<01:06:42.319> but<01:06:42.480> Spanish 01:06:42.750 --> 01:06:42.760 align:start position:0% and you would want to say a but Spanish 01:06:42.760 --> 01:06:43.950 align:start position:0% and you would want to say a but Spanish says<01:06:42.920> that<01:06:43.039> whenever<01:06:43.279> you<01:06:43.400> have<01:06:43.480> a<01:06:43.599> connection 01:06:43.950 --> 01:06:43.960 align:start position:0% says that whenever you have a connection 01:06:43.960 --> 01:06:45.710 align:start position:0% says that whenever you have a connection with<01:06:44.079> a<01:06:44.240> person<01:06:44.640> you<01:06:44.760> have<01:06:44.880> to<01:06:45.000> put<01:06:45.119> a<01:06:45.279> personal 01:06:45.710 --> 01:06:45.720 align:start position:0% with a person you have to put a personal 01:06:45.720 --> 01:06:48.029 align:start position:0% with a person you have to put a personal preposition<01:06:46.520> a<01:06:46.920> before<01:06:47.200> the<01:06:47.319> person's<01:06:47.680> name 01:06:48.029 --> 01:06:48.039 align:start position:0% preposition a before the person's name 01:06:48.039 --> 01:06:51.069 align:start position:0% preposition a before the person's name so<01:06:48.160> you<01:06:48.240> would<01:06:48.400> simply<01:06:48.720> say<01:06:49.200> a<01:06:49.960> a<01:06:50.440> she<01:06:50.640> watches 01:06:51.069 --> 01:06:51.079 align:start position:0% so you would simply say a a she watches 01:06:51.079 --> 01:06:52.549 align:start position:0% so you would simply say a a she watches John<01:06:51.359> there<01:06:51.440> is<01:06:51.559> no<01:06:51.760> English<01:06:52.039> equivalent<01:06:52.440> for 01:06:52.549 --> 01:06:52.559 align:start position:0% John there is no English equivalent for 01:06:52.559 --> 01:06:54.190 align:start position:0% John there is no English equivalent for this<01:06:52.760> construction<01:06:53.359> but<01:06:53.440> you<01:06:53.520> can<01:06:53.680> instead 01:06:54.190 --> 01:06:54.200 align:start position:0% this construction but you can instead 01:06:54.200 --> 01:06:57.190 align:start position:0% this construction but you can instead say<01:06:54.480> she<01:06:54.680> watches<01:06:55.119> him<01:06:55.440> which<01:06:55.559> would<01:06:55.720> be<01:06:56.079> a<01:06:57.079> and 01:06:57.190 --> 01:06:57.200 align:start position:0% say she watches him which would be a and 01:06:57.200 --> 01:06:58.589 align:start position:0% say she watches him which would be a and the<01:06:57.279> same<01:06:57.480> concept<01:06:57.799> applies<01:06:58.039> to<01:06:58.160> any<01:06:58.319> sentence 01:06:58.589 --> 01:06:58.599 align:start position:0% the same concept applies to any sentence 01:06:58.599 --> 01:06:59.950 align:start position:0% the same concept applies to any sentence you<01:06:58.720> want<01:06:58.799> to<01:06:58.960> say<01:06:59.240> but<01:06:59.400> keep<01:06:59.520> in<01:06:59.640> mind<01:06:59.839> the 01:06:59.950 --> 01:06:59.960 align:start position:0% you want to say but keep in mind the 01:06:59.960 --> 01:07:01.870 align:start position:0% you want to say but keep in mind the personal<01:07:00.359> preposition<01:07:00.960> a<01:07:01.279> before<01:07:01.480> you<01:07:01.599> say<01:07:01.760> a 01:07:01.870 --> 01:07:01.880 align:start position:0% personal preposition a before you say a 01:07:01.880 --> 01:07:03.109 align:start position:0% personal preposition a before you say a person's<01:07:02.240> name<01:07:02.480> the<01:07:02.599> last<01:07:02.760> concept<01:07:03.039> you 01:07:03.109 --> 01:07:03.119 align:start position:0% person's name the last concept you 01:07:03.119 --> 01:07:04.390 align:start position:0% person's name the last concept you should<01:07:03.240> know<01:07:03.359> with<01:07:03.480> direct<01:07:03.760> object<01:07:04.039> pronouns 01:07:04.390 --> 01:07:04.400 align:start position:0% should know with direct object pronouns 01:07:04.400 --> 01:07:06.269 align:start position:0% should know with direct object pronouns in<01:07:04.520> Spanish<01:07:05.000> is<01:07:05.079> that<01:07:05.240> all<01:07:05.400> of<01:07:05.520> these<01:07:05.720> pronouns 01:07:06.269 --> 01:07:06.279 align:start position:0% in Spanish is that all of these pronouns 01:07:06.279 --> 01:07:08.230 align:start position:0% in Spanish is that all of these pronouns can<01:07:06.480> also<01:07:06.680> be<01:07:06.880> placed<01:07:07.240> after<01:07:07.559> infinitives 01:07:08.230 --> 01:07:08.240 align:start position:0% can also be placed after infinitives 01:07:08.240 --> 01:07:09.390 align:start position:0% can also be placed after infinitives which<01:07:08.400> actually<01:07:08.640> makes<01:07:08.839> your<01:07:09.039> thinking 01:07:09.390 --> 01:07:09.400 align:start position:0% which actually makes your thinking 01:07:09.400 --> 01:07:10.910 align:start position:0% which actually makes your thinking process<01:07:09.720> think<01:07:09.960> a<01:07:10.079> bit<01:07:10.279> better<01:07:10.599> and<01:07:10.760> more 01:07:10.910 --> 01:07:10.920 align:start position:0% process think a bit better and more 01:07:10.920 --> 01:07:12.630 align:start position:0% process think a bit better and more similar<01:07:11.240> to<01:07:11.400> English<01:07:11.720> than<01:07:11.839> to<01:07:12.000> anything<01:07:12.279> else 01:07:12.630 --> 01:07:12.640 align:start position:0% similar to English than to anything else 01:07:12.640 --> 01:07:14.430 align:start position:0% similar to English than to anything else take<01:07:12.839> this<01:07:13.000> phrase<01:07:13.240> for<01:07:13.440> instance<01:07:13.960> I<01:07:14.079> can<01:07:14.240> see 01:07:14.430 --> 01:07:14.440 align:start position:0% take this phrase for instance I can see 01:07:14.440 --> 01:07:16.589 align:start position:0% take this phrase for instance I can see you<01:07:14.680> in<01:07:14.799> Spanish<01:07:15.240> you<01:07:15.319> would<01:07:15.520> want<01:07:15.599> to 01:07:16.589 --> 01:07:16.599 align:start position:0% you in Spanish you would want to 01:07:16.599 --> 01:07:18.990 align:start position:0% you in Spanish you would want to say<01:07:17.599> and<01:07:17.720> this<01:07:17.880> sentence<01:07:18.359> actually<01:07:18.640> has<01:07:18.799> no 01:07:18.990 --> 01:07:19.000 align:start position:0% say and this sentence actually has no 01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:20.710 align:start position:0% say and this sentence actually has no mistakes<01:07:19.760> however<01:07:20.039> there's<01:07:20.200> a<01:07:20.359> different<01:07:20.599> way 01:07:20.710 --> 01:07:20.720 align:start position:0% mistakes however there's a different way 01:07:20.720 --> 01:07:22.069 align:start position:0% mistakes however there's a different way to<01:07:20.839> say<01:07:21.079> this<01:07:21.240> phrase<01:07:21.599> and<01:07:21.680> that<01:07:21.799> is<01:07:21.920> by 01:07:22.069 --> 01:07:22.079 align:start position:0% to say this phrase and that is by 01:07:22.079 --> 01:07:23.589 align:start position:0% to say this phrase and that is by attaching<01:07:22.400> the<01:07:22.520> direct<01:07:22.799> object<01:07:23.079> pronoun<01:07:23.440> to 01:07:23.589 --> 01:07:23.599 align:start position:0% attaching the direct object pronoun to 01:07:23.599 --> 01:07:27.269 align:start position:0% attaching the direct object pronoun to the<01:07:23.680> INF<01:07:24.400> you<01:07:24.480> can<01:07:25.119> say<01:07:26.119> but<01:07:26.240> you<01:07:26.319> can<01:07:26.480> also 01:07:27.269 --> 01:07:27.279 align:start position:0% the INF you can say but you can also 01:07:27.279 --> 01:07:29.510 align:start position:0% the INF you can say but you can also say<01:07:28.279> I<01:07:28.400> can<01:07:28.559> see<01:07:28.760> you<01:07:28.960> it<01:07:29.039> doesn't<01:07:29.279> matter 01:07:29.510 --> 01:07:29.520 align:start position:0% say I can see you it doesn't matter 01:07:29.520 --> 01:07:30.910 align:start position:0% say I can see you it doesn't matter which<01:07:29.680> phrase<01:07:29.920> you<01:07:30.039> say<01:07:30.400> because<01:07:30.559> in<01:07:30.680> case<01:07:30.839> you 01:07:30.910 --> 01:07:30.920 align:start position:0% which phrase you say because in case you 01:07:30.920 --> 01:07:32.349 align:start position:0% which phrase you say because in case you forget<01:07:31.160> how<01:07:31.279> to<01:07:31.359> say<01:07:31.520> one<01:07:31.720> phrase<01:07:32.119> you<01:07:32.200> can 01:07:32.349 --> 01:07:32.359 align:start position:0% forget how to say one phrase you can 01:07:32.359 --> 01:07:33.670 align:start position:0% forget how to say one phrase you can always<01:07:32.559> say<01:07:32.799> the<01:07:32.920> other<01:07:33.200> you<01:07:33.279> can<01:07:33.440> have 01:07:33.670 --> 01:07:33.680 align:start position:0% always say the other you can have 01:07:33.680 --> 01:07:36.309 align:start position:0% always say the other you can have examples<01:07:34.240> like<01:07:34.520> they<01:07:34.680> want<01:07:34.839> to<01:07:35.039> buy<01:07:35.319> the 01:07:36.309 --> 01:07:36.319 align:start position:0% examples like they want to buy the 01:07:36.319 --> 01:07:39.069 align:start position:0% examples like they want to buy the books<01:07:37.319> lios<01:07:37.880> with<01:07:38.079> los<01:07:38.279> libros<01:07:38.720> being<01:07:38.920> the 01:07:39.069 --> 01:07:39.079 align:start position:0% books lios with los libros being the 01:07:39.079 --> 01:07:41.589 align:start position:0% books lios with los libros being the masculine<01:07:39.520> pronoun<01:07:40.079> which<01:07:40.200> would 01:07:41.589 --> 01:07:41.599 align:start position:0% masculine pronoun which would 01:07:41.599 --> 01:07:43.309 align:start position:0% masculine pronoun which would be 01:07:43.309 --> 01:07:43.319 align:start position:0% be 01:07:43.319 --> 01:07:45.390 align:start position:0% be or<01:07:44.319> you<01:07:44.400> can<01:07:44.520> also<01:07:44.680> use<01:07:44.839> direct<01:07:45.119> object 01:07:45.390 --> 01:07:45.400 align:start position:0% or you can also use direct object 01:07:45.400 --> 01:07:46.670 align:start position:0% or you can also use direct object pronouns<01:07:45.839> when<01:07:46.000> speaking<01:07:46.279> in<01:07:46.400> the<01:07:46.520> near 01:07:46.670 --> 01:07:46.680 align:start position:0% pronouns when speaking in the near 01:07:46.680 --> 01:07:49.069 align:start position:0% pronouns when speaking in the near future<01:07:47.119> such<01:07:47.279> as<01:07:47.559> I'm<01:07:47.680> going<01:07:47.960> to<01:07:48.160> read<01:07:48.400> it<01:07:48.720> or<01:07:48.960> I 01:07:49.069 --> 01:07:49.079 align:start position:0% future such as I'm going to read it or I 01:07:49.079 --> 01:07:52.230 align:start position:0% future such as I'm going to read it or I have<01:07:49.200> to<01:07:49.400> read<01:07:49.640> it<01:07:49.960> which<01:07:50.079> can<01:07:50.240> be<01:07:50.359> said<01:07:50.760> as<01:07:51.240> Yol 01:07:52.230 --> 01:07:52.240 align:start position:0% have to read it which can be said as Yol 01:07:52.240 --> 01:07:54.710 align:start position:0% have to read it which can be said as Yol and<01:07:52.760> Yol<01:07:53.760> or<01:07:53.920> or<01:07:54.000> if<01:07:54.039> you<01:07:54.119> want<01:07:54.240> to<01:07:54.319> simplify 01:07:54.710 --> 01:07:54.720 align:start position:0% and Yol or or if you want to simplify 01:07:54.720 --> 01:07:56.630 align:start position:0% and Yol or or if you want to simplify the<01:07:54.839> order<01:07:55.079> of<01:07:55.200> the<01:07:55.319> words<01:07:55.760> you<01:07:55.839> can 01:07:56.630 --> 01:07:56.640 align:start position:0% the order of the words you can 01:07:56.640 --> 01:08:00.069 align:start position:0% the order of the words you can say<01:07:58.000> or<01:07:59.000> however<01:07:59.319> whenever<01:07:59.599> you<01:07:59.720> decide<01:07:59.960> to 01:08:00.069 --> 01:08:00.079 align:start position:0% say or however whenever you decide to 01:08:00.079 --> 01:08:01.510 align:start position:0% say or however whenever you decide to attach<01:08:00.279> a<01:08:00.400> direct<01:08:00.640> object<01:08:00.920> pronoun<01:08:01.240> to<01:08:01.400> an 01:08:01.510 --> 01:08:01.520 align:start position:0% attach a direct object pronoun to an 01:08:01.520 --> 01:08:02.990 align:start position:0% attach a direct object pronoun to an infinitive<01:08:02.119> you<01:08:02.240> have<01:08:02.359> to<01:08:02.559> remember<01:08:02.880> that 01:08:02.990 --> 01:08:03.000 align:start position:0% infinitive you have to remember that 01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:04.349 align:start position:0% infinitive you have to remember that there<01:08:03.119> are<01:08:03.279> infinitives<01:08:03.760> that<01:08:03.880> don't<01:08:04.079> change 01:08:04.349 --> 01:08:04.359 align:start position:0% there are infinitives that don't change 01:08:04.359 --> 01:08:06.230 align:start position:0% there are infinitives that don't change form<01:08:04.799> like<01:08:04.920> in<01:08:05.079> these<01:08:05.279> phrases<01:08:05.799> but<01:08:05.880> you<01:08:05.960> can 01:08:06.230 --> 01:08:06.240 align:start position:0% form like in these phrases but you can 01:08:06.240 --> 01:08:07.390 align:start position:0% form like in these phrases but you can sometimes<01:08:06.440> have<01:08:06.599> infinitives<01:08:07.039> that<01:08:07.119> do<01:08:07.279> get 01:08:07.390 --> 01:08:07.400 align:start position:0% sometimes have infinitives that do get 01:08:07.400 --> 01:08:08.870 align:start position:0% sometimes have infinitives that do get modified<01:08:07.799> in<01:08:07.920> the<01:08:08.039> present<01:08:08.279> progressive<01:08:08.799> you 01:08:08.870 --> 01:08:08.880 align:start position:0% modified in the present progressive you 01:08:08.880 --> 01:08:10.510 align:start position:0% modified in the present progressive you can<01:08:09.000> say<01:08:09.119> a<01:08:09.240> sentence<01:08:09.599> like<01:08:09.920> you're<01:08:10.200> watching 01:08:10.510 --> 01:08:10.520 align:start position:0% can say a sentence like you're watching 01:08:10.520 --> 01:08:12.750 align:start position:0% can say a sentence like you're watching me<01:08:10.880> which<01:08:11.000> can<01:08:11.160> be<01:08:11.279> said 01:08:12.750 --> 01:08:12.760 align:start position:0% me which can be said 01:08:12.760 --> 01:08:14.470 align:start position:0% me which can be said as 01:08:14.470 --> 01:08:14.480 align:start position:0% as 01:08:14.480 --> 01:08:16.630 align:start position:0% as or<01:08:15.480> and<01:08:15.640> both<01:08:15.839> phrases<01:08:16.199> have<01:08:16.359> the<01:08:16.440> same 01:08:16.630 --> 01:08:16.640 align:start position:0% or and both phrases have the same 01:08:16.640 --> 01:08:18.390 align:start position:0% or and both phrases have the same meaning<01:08:17.040> but<01:08:17.239> with<01:08:17.400> the<01:08:17.560> second<01:08:17.880> phrase<01:08:18.279> you 01:08:18.390 --> 01:08:18.400 align:start position:0% meaning but with the second phrase you 01:08:18.400 --> 01:08:20.309 align:start position:0% meaning but with the second phrase you have<01:08:18.520> to<01:08:18.640> put<01:08:18.799> an<01:08:19.040> accent<01:08:19.440> on<01:08:19.600> the<01:08:19.759> infinitive 01:08:20.309 --> 01:08:20.319 align:start position:0% have to put an accent on the infinitive 01:08:20.319 --> 01:08:21.709 align:start position:0% have to put an accent on the infinitive to<01:08:20.440> maintain<01:08:20.799> the<01:08:20.920> emphasis<01:08:21.359> on<01:08:21.560> that 01:08:21.709 --> 01:08:21.719 align:start position:0% to maintain the emphasis on that 01:08:21.719 --> 01:08:24.349 align:start position:0% to maintain the emphasis on that syllable<01:08:22.199> to<01:08:22.600> EST<01:08:23.600> and<01:08:23.640> you<01:08:23.719> can<01:08:23.960> say<01:08:24.159> other 01:08:24.349 --> 01:08:24.359 align:start position:0% syllable to EST and you can say other 01:08:24.359 --> 01:08:27.110 align:start position:0% syllable to EST and you can say other phrases<01:08:24.960> like<01:08:25.319> they<01:08:25.480> are<01:08:25.679> reading 01:08:27.110 --> 01:08:27.120 align:start position:0% phrases like they are reading 01:08:27.120 --> 01:08:28.669 align:start position:0% phrases like they are reading it 01:08:28.669 --> 01:08:28.679 align:start position:0% it 01:08:28.679 --> 01:08:31.110 align:start position:0% it or<01:08:29.679> with<01:08:29.759> an<01:08:29.960> accent<01:08:30.279> on<01:08:30.440> the<01:08:30.560> infinitive 01:08:31.110 --> 01:08:31.120 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive 01:08:31.120 --> 01:08:32.590 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive overall<01:08:31.560> you<01:08:31.679> have<01:08:31.839> to<01:08:32.040> remember<01:08:32.400> that<01:08:32.480> you 01:08:32.590 --> 01:08:32.600 align:start position:0% overall you have to remember that you 01:08:32.600 --> 01:08:34.430 align:start position:0% overall you have to remember that you cannot<01:08:32.920> attach<01:08:33.239> direct<01:08:33.520> object<01:08:33.799> pronouns<01:08:34.239> to 01:08:34.430 --> 01:08:34.440 align:start position:0% cannot attach direct object pronouns to 01:08:34.440 --> 01:08:36.470 align:start position:0% cannot attach direct object pronouns to conjugated<01:08:34.960> verbs<01:08:35.359> only<01:08:35.560> to<01:08:35.799> infinitives<01:08:36.400> you 01:08:36.470 --> 01:08:36.480 align:start position:0% conjugated verbs only to infinitives you 01:08:36.480 --> 01:08:39.470 align:start position:0% conjugated verbs only to infinitives you cannot<01:08:36.759> say<01:08:36.960> something<01:08:37.359> like<01:08:37.719> y<01:08:38.679> i<01:08:38.880> buy<01:08:39.159> it 01:08:39.470 --> 01:08:39.480 align:start position:0% cannot say something like y i buy it 01:08:39.480 --> 01:08:41.030 align:start position:0% cannot say something like y i buy it because<01:08:39.679> you<01:08:39.839> have<01:08:40.040> only<01:08:40.279> one<01:08:40.520> verb<01:08:40.759> in<01:08:40.880> the 01:08:41.030 --> 01:08:41.040 align:start position:0% because you have only one verb in the 01:08:41.040 --> 01:08:42.709 align:start position:0% because you have only one verb in the sentence<01:08:41.520> and<01:08:41.640> the<01:08:41.759> direct<01:08:42.040> object<01:08:42.319> pronoun 01:08:42.709 --> 01:08:42.719 align:start position:0% sentence and the direct object pronoun 01:08:42.719 --> 01:08:44.269 align:start position:0% sentence and the direct object pronoun is<01:08:42.880> placed<01:08:43.199> after<01:08:43.440> the<01:08:43.560> verb<01:08:43.920> but<01:08:44.000> you<01:08:44.120> can 01:08:44.269 --> 01:08:44.279 align:start position:0% is placed after the verb but you can 01:08:44.279 --> 01:08:45.510 align:start position:0% is placed after the verb but you can instead 01:08:45.510 --> 01:08:45.520 align:start position:0% instead 01:08:45.520 --> 01:08:48.470 align:start position:0% instead say<01:08:46.520> I'm<01:08:46.679> going<01:08:46.839> to<01:08:47.040> buy<01:08:47.319> it 01:08:48.470 --> 01:08:48.480 align:start position:0% say I'm going to buy it 01:08:48.480 --> 01:08:51.269 align:start position:0% say I'm going to buy it or<01:08:49.480> I'm<01:08:49.679> buying<01:08:50.000> it<01:08:50.279> because<01:08:50.480> in<01:08:50.679> these<01:08:50.880> cases 01:08:51.269 --> 01:08:51.279 align:start position:0% or I'm buying it because in these cases 01:08:51.279 --> 01:08:52.910 align:start position:0% or I'm buying it because in these cases you're<01:08:51.440> using<01:08:51.759> one<01:08:51.960> conjugative<01:08:52.480> verb<01:08:52.759> and 01:08:52.910 --> 01:08:52.920 align:start position:0% you're using one conjugative verb and 01:08:52.920 --> 01:08:54.349 align:start position:0% you're using one conjugative verb and one<01:08:53.120> infinitive<01:08:53.560> and<01:08:53.679> the<01:08:53.799> the<01:08:53.880> direct<01:08:54.120> object 01:08:54.349 --> 01:08:54.359 align:start position:0% one infinitive and the the direct object 01:08:54.359 --> 01:08:56.070 align:start position:0% one infinitive and the the direct object pronoun<01:08:54.799> is<01:08:55.000> attached<01:08:55.279> to<01:08:55.400> the<01:08:55.520> infinitive 01:08:56.070 --> 01:08:56.080 align:start position:0% pronoun is attached to the infinitive 01:08:56.080 --> 01:08:57.510 align:start position:0% pronoun is attached to the infinitive not<01:08:56.239> the<01:08:56.400> conjugated<01:08:56.880> verb<01:08:57.120> and<01:08:57.239> the<01:08:57.319> same 01:08:57.510 --> 01:08:57.520 align:start position:0% not the conjugated verb and the same 01:08:57.520 --> 01:08:58.910 align:start position:0% not the conjugated verb and the same concept<01:08:57.839> applies<01:08:58.080> to<01:08:58.239> any<01:08:58.400> sentence<01:08:58.719> you<01:08:58.799> want 01:08:58.910 --> 01:08:58.920 align:start position:0% concept applies to any sentence you want 01:08:58.920 --> 01:09:00.829 align:start position:0% concept applies to any sentence you want to<01:08:59.040> say<01:08:59.440> and<01:08:59.640> actually<01:09:00.159> I<01:09:00.279> recommend<01:09:00.640> many 01:09:00.829 --> 01:09:00.839 align:start position:0% to say and actually I recommend many 01:09:00.839 --> 01:09:02.510 align:start position:0% to say and actually I recommend many beginners<01:09:01.199> to<01:09:01.319> use<01:09:01.480> direct<01:09:01.799> object<01:09:02.040> pronouns 01:09:02.510 --> 01:09:02.520 align:start position:0% beginners to use direct object pronouns 01:09:02.520 --> 01:09:03.590 align:start position:0% beginners to use direct object pronouns by<01:09:02.679> attaching<01:09:03.000> them<01:09:03.120> to<01:09:03.239> the<01:09:03.319> end<01:09:03.480> of 01:09:03.590 --> 01:09:03.600 align:start position:0% by attaching them to the end of 01:09:03.600 --> 01:09:05.189 align:start position:0% by attaching them to the end of infinitives<01:09:04.279> because<01:09:04.440> it<01:09:04.560> makes<01:09:04.759> your<01:09:04.920> brain 01:09:05.189 --> 01:09:05.199 align:start position:0% infinitives because it makes your brain 01:09:05.199 --> 01:09:06.910 align:start position:0% infinitives because it makes your brain think<01:09:05.440> in<01:09:05.600> the<01:09:05.719> same<01:09:05.920> order<01:09:06.279> of<01:09:06.400> the<01:09:06.520> words<01:09:06.839> as 01:09:06.910 --> 01:09:06.920 align:start position:0% think in the same order of the words as 01:09:06.920 --> 01:09:08.470 align:start position:0% think in the same order of the words as you<01:09:07.040> would<01:09:07.199> use<01:09:07.400> in<01:09:07.520> English<01:09:07.920> you<01:09:08.040> don't<01:09:08.239> say 01:09:08.470 --> 01:09:08.480 align:start position:0% you would use in English you don't say 01:09:08.480 --> 01:09:11.189 align:start position:0% you would use in English you don't say in<01:09:08.640> English<01:09:09.319> I<01:09:09.560> it<01:09:10.000> am 01:09:11.189 --> 01:09:11.199 align:start position:0% in English I it am 01:09:11.199 --> 01:09:14.390 align:start position:0% in English I it am buying<01:09:12.199> but<01:09:12.279> you<01:09:12.480> instead<01:09:12.799> say<01:09:13.159> I<01:09:13.279> am<01:09:13.480> buying 01:09:14.390 --> 01:09:14.400 align:start position:0% buying but you instead say I am buying 01:09:14.400 --> 01:09:16.470 align:start position:0% buying but you instead say I am buying it<01:09:15.400> and<01:09:15.480> the<01:09:15.560> same<01:09:15.799> concept<01:09:16.120> basically 01:09:16.470 --> 01:09:16.480 align:start position:0% it and the same concept basically 01:09:16.480 --> 01:09:17.910 align:start position:0% it and the same concept basically applies<01:09:16.719> to<01:09:16.880> any<01:09:17.040> sentence<01:09:17.319> you<01:09:17.400> want<01:09:17.520> to<01:09:17.600> say 01:09:17.910 --> 01:09:17.920 align:start position:0% applies to any sentence you want to say 01:09:17.920 --> 01:09:19.829 align:start position:0% applies to any sentence you want to say indirect<01:09:18.400> object<01:09:18.679> pronouns<01:09:19.080> in<01:09:19.239> Spanish<01:09:19.679> are 01:09:19.829 --> 01:09:19.839 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns in Spanish are 01:09:19.839 --> 01:09:21.349 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns in Spanish are pronouns<01:09:20.239> that<01:09:20.359> take<01:09:20.520> the<01:09:20.600> form<01:09:20.799> of<01:09:20.920> an<01:09:21.080> object 01:09:21.349 --> 01:09:21.359 align:start position:0% pronouns that take the form of an object 01:09:21.359 --> 01:09:22.870 align:start position:0% pronouns that take the form of an object noun<01:09:21.759> in<01:09:21.839> order<01:09:22.080> to<01:09:22.199> avoid<01:09:22.440> repeating<01:09:22.799> the 01:09:22.870 --> 01:09:22.880 align:start position:0% noun in order to avoid repeating the 01:09:22.880 --> 01:09:24.510 align:start position:0% noun in order to avoid repeating the same<01:09:23.080> noun<01:09:23.400> in<01:09:23.480> my<01:09:23.799> previous<01:09:24.080> video<01:09:24.400> I 01:09:24.510 --> 01:09:24.520 align:start position:0% same noun in my previous video I 01:09:24.520 --> 01:09:25.829 align:start position:0% same noun in my previous video I explained<01:09:24.839> direct<01:09:25.080> object<01:09:25.319> pronouns<01:09:25.719> in 01:09:25.829 --> 01:09:25.839 align:start position:0% explained direct object pronouns in 01:09:25.839 --> 01:09:27.349 align:start position:0% explained direct object pronouns in Spanish<01:09:26.319> and<01:09:26.400> I<01:09:26.520> explained<01:09:26.839> that<01:09:26.920> a<01:09:27.040> direct 01:09:27.349 --> 01:09:27.359 align:start position:0% Spanish and I explained that a direct 01:09:27.359 --> 01:09:29.030 align:start position:0% Spanish and I explained that a direct object<01:09:27.640> pronoun<01:09:28.120> is<01:09:28.239> when<01:09:28.359> a<01:09:28.480> sentence<01:09:28.880> has 01:09:29.030 --> 01:09:29.040 align:start position:0% object pronoun is when a sentence has 01:09:29.040 --> 01:09:30.990 align:start position:0% object pronoun is when a sentence has only<01:09:29.279> one<01:09:29.480> direct<01:09:29.880> object<01:09:30.359> typically<01:09:30.679> coming 01:09:30.990 --> 01:09:31.000 align:start position:0% only one direct object typically coming 01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:32.749 align:start position:0% only one direct object typically coming right<01:09:31.159> after<01:09:31.359> a<01:09:31.480> conjugated<01:09:31.960> verb<01:09:32.159> in<01:09:32.279> English 01:09:32.749 --> 01:09:32.759 align:start position:0% right after a conjugated verb in English 01:09:32.759 --> 01:09:34.669 align:start position:0% right after a conjugated verb in English an<01:09:32.920> indirect<01:09:33.440> object<01:09:33.719> pronoun<01:09:34.199> is<01:09:34.359> actually 01:09:34.669 --> 01:09:34.679 align:start position:0% an indirect object pronoun is actually 01:09:34.679 --> 01:09:35.950 align:start position:0% an indirect object pronoun is actually quite<01:09:34.920> different<01:09:35.359> and<01:09:35.480> that<01:09:35.600> is<01:09:35.719> when<01:09:35.839> a 01:09:35.950 --> 01:09:35.960 align:start position:0% quite different and that is when a 01:09:35.960 --> 01:09:37.910 align:start position:0% quite different and that is when a sentence<01:09:36.359> has<01:09:36.560> two<01:09:36.839> objects<01:09:37.400> with<01:09:37.560> the<01:09:37.679> first 01:09:37.910 --> 01:09:37.920 align:start position:0% sentence has two objects with the first 01:09:37.920 --> 01:09:39.510 align:start position:0% sentence has two objects with the first object<01:09:38.199> being<01:09:38.400> a<01:09:38.560> direct<01:09:38.920> object<01:09:39.319> and<01:09:39.440> the 01:09:39.510 --> 01:09:39.520 align:start position:0% object being a direct object and the 01:09:39.520 --> 01:09:41.630 align:start position:0% object being a direct object and the second<01:09:39.880> object<01:09:40.159> being<01:09:40.359> an<01:09:40.600> indirect<01:09:41.199> object 01:09:41.630 --> 01:09:41.640 align:start position:0% second object being an indirect object 01:09:41.640 --> 01:09:43.229 align:start position:0% second object being an indirect object take<01:09:41.759> a<01:09:41.839> look<01:09:41.960> at<01:09:42.120> this<01:09:42.239> sentence<01:09:42.600> in<01:09:42.719> English 01:09:43.229 --> 01:09:43.239 align:start position:0% take a look at this sentence in English 01:09:43.239 --> 01:09:46.030 align:start position:0% take a look at this sentence in English I<01:09:43.400> buy<01:09:43.679> a<01:09:43.839> car<01:09:44.040> for<01:09:44.239> you<01:09:44.560> I<01:09:44.759> is<01:09:44.880> the<01:09:45.080> subject<01:09:45.679> buy 01:09:46.030 --> 01:09:46.040 align:start position:0% I buy a car for you I is the subject buy 01:09:46.040 --> 01:09:48.470 align:start position:0% I buy a car for you I is the subject buy is<01:09:46.159> the<01:09:46.319> verb<01:09:46.799> car<01:09:47.159> is<01:09:47.279> a<01:09:47.440> direct<01:09:47.799> object<01:09:48.080> noun 01:09:48.470 --> 01:09:48.480 align:start position:0% is the verb car is a direct object noun 01:09:48.480 --> 01:09:50.229 align:start position:0% is the verb car is a direct object noun because<01:09:48.679> it<01:09:48.799> comes<01:09:49.080> first<01:09:49.359> in<01:09:49.520> the<01:09:49.679> sentence 01:09:50.229 --> 01:09:50.239 align:start position:0% because it comes first in the sentence 01:09:50.239 --> 01:09:52.430 align:start position:0% because it comes first in the sentence and<01:09:50.440> U<01:09:50.799> is<01:09:50.960> the<01:09:51.159> indirect<01:09:51.640> object<01:09:51.960> pronoun 01:09:52.430 --> 01:09:52.440 align:start position:0% and U is the indirect object pronoun 01:09:52.440 --> 01:09:53.950 align:start position:0% and U is the indirect object pronoun because<01:09:52.640> it<01:09:52.759> comes<01:09:53.120> second<01:09:53.520> in<01:09:53.719> in<01:09:53.839> the 01:09:53.950 --> 01:09:53.960 align:start position:0% because it comes second in in the 01:09:53.960 --> 01:09:56.149 align:start position:0% because it comes second in in the sentence<01:09:54.440> in<01:09:54.600> this<01:09:54.800> video<01:09:55.239> I<01:09:55.320> will<01:09:55.560> only<01:09:55.840> cover 01:09:56.149 --> 01:09:56.159 align:start position:0% sentence in this video I will only cover 01:09:56.159 --> 01:09:58.510 align:start position:0% sentence in this video I will only cover indirect<01:09:56.679> objects<01:09:57.199> in<01:09:57.440> pronoun<01:09:57.840> form<01:09:58.280> because 01:09:58.510 --> 01:09:58.520 align:start position:0% indirect objects in pronoun form because 01:09:58.520 --> 01:09:59.830 align:start position:0% indirect objects in pronoun form because I<01:09:58.640> already<01:09:58.880> explained<01:09:59.280> direct<01:09:59.520> object 01:09:59.830 --> 01:09:59.840 align:start position:0% I already explained direct object 01:09:59.840 --> 01:10:01.709 align:start position:0% I already explained direct object pronouns<01:10:00.320> in<01:10:00.440> my<01:10:00.600> previous<01:10:00.960> video<01:10:01.280> direct 01:10:01.709 --> 01:10:01.719 align:start position:0% pronouns in my previous video direct 01:10:01.719 --> 01:10:03.189 align:start position:0% pronouns in my previous video direct objects<01:10:02.159> are<01:10:02.360> objects<01:10:02.719> that<01:10:02.840> are<01:10:02.960> first 01:10:03.189 --> 01:10:03.199 align:start position:0% objects are objects that are first 01:10:03.199 --> 01:10:05.149 align:start position:0% objects are objects that are first stated<01:10:03.600> in<01:10:03.719> a<01:10:03.920> sentence<01:10:04.400> and<01:10:04.600> indirect 01:10:05.149 --> 01:10:05.159 align:start position:0% stated in a sentence and indirect 01:10:05.159 --> 01:10:07.070 align:start position:0% stated in a sentence and indirect objects<01:10:05.600> are<01:10:05.840> objects<01:10:06.159> that<01:10:06.320> come<01:10:06.560> second<01:10:06.960> in 01:10:07.070 --> 01:10:07.080 align:start position:0% objects are objects that come second in 01:10:07.080 --> 01:10:09.110 align:start position:0% objects are objects that come second in a<01:10:07.239> sentence<01:10:07.679> and<01:10:07.800> in<01:10:07.960> this<01:10:08.120> video<01:10:08.480> all<01:10:08.719> direct 01:10:09.110 --> 01:10:09.120 align:start position:0% a sentence and in this video all direct 01:10:09.120 --> 01:10:10.950 align:start position:0% a sentence and in this video all direct objects<01:10:09.480> will<01:10:09.679> be<01:10:09.840> in<01:10:09.960> the<01:10:10.080> form<01:10:10.280> of<01:10:10.400> a<01:10:10.520> noun 01:10:10.950 --> 01:10:10.960 align:start position:0% objects will be in the form of a noun 01:10:10.960 --> 01:10:12.990 align:start position:0% objects will be in the form of a noun not<01:10:11.199> a<01:10:11.360> pronoun<01:10:11.840> and<01:10:12.000> therefore<01:10:12.520> I<01:10:12.600> will<01:10:12.760> only 01:10:12.990 --> 01:10:13.000 align:start position:0% not a pronoun and therefore I will only 01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:15.390 align:start position:0% not a pronoun and therefore I will only cover<01:10:13.360> indirect<01:10:13.920> objects<01:10:14.400> in<01:10:14.600> pronoun<01:10:15.000> form 01:10:15.390 --> 01:10:15.400 align:start position:0% cover indirect objects in pronoun form 01:10:15.400 --> 01:10:17.709 align:start position:0% cover indirect objects in pronoun form in<01:10:15.520> Spanish<01:10:15.960> they<01:10:16.120> look<01:10:16.320> like<01:10:16.520> this<01:10:17.040> me<01:10:17.520> which 01:10:17.709 --> 01:10:17.719 align:start position:0% in Spanish they look like this me which 01:10:17.719 --> 01:10:20.550 align:start position:0% in Spanish they look like this me which is<01:10:17.880> me<01:10:18.360> te<01:10:18.840> which<01:10:18.960> is<01:10:19.159> you<01:10:19.800> Le<01:10:20.199> and<01:10:20.360> this 01:10:20.550 --> 01:10:20.560 align:start position:0% is me te which is you Le and this 01:10:20.560 --> 01:10:22.709 align:start position:0% is me te which is you Le and this pronoun<01:10:20.920> can<01:10:21.120> simultaneously<01:10:21.840> mean<01:10:22.120> to<01:10:22.360> him 01:10:22.709 --> 01:10:22.719 align:start position:0% pronoun can simultaneously mean to him 01:10:22.719 --> 01:10:24.950 align:start position:0% pronoun can simultaneously mean to him or<01:10:22.920> to<01:10:23.120> her<01:10:23.400> or<01:10:23.800> a<01:10:23.920> person's<01:10:24.320> name<01:10:24.679> and<01:10:24.800> I'll 01:10:24.950 --> 01:10:24.960 align:start position:0% or to her or a person's name and I'll 01:10:24.960 --> 01:10:27.870 align:start position:0% or to her or a person's name and I'll get<01:10:25.080> to<01:10:25.280> that<01:10:25.400> in<01:10:25.480> a<01:10:25.640> bit<01:10:25.960> NOS<01:10:26.480> which<01:10:26.600> is<01:10:26.840> US<01:10:27.520> o 01:10:27.870 --> 01:10:27.880 align:start position:0% get to that in a bit NOS which is US o 01:10:27.880 --> 01:10:29.750 align:start position:0% get to that in a bit NOS which is US o which<01:10:27.960> is<01:10:28.159> all<01:10:28.280> of<01:10:28.440> you<01:10:28.840> and<01:10:29.000> Les<01:10:29.440> which<01:10:29.520> is 01:10:29.750 --> 01:10:29.760 align:start position:0% which is all of you and Les which is 01:10:29.760 --> 01:10:31.070 align:start position:0% which is all of you and Les which is them<01:10:30.040> as<01:10:30.120> you<01:10:30.239> can<01:10:30.400> probably<01:10:30.719> tell<01:10:30.920> from 01:10:31.070 --> 01:10:31.080 align:start position:0% them as you can probably tell from 01:10:31.080 --> 01:10:33.310 align:start position:0% them as you can probably tell from looking<01:10:31.280> at<01:10:31.400> the<01:10:31.480> chart<01:10:31.960> the<01:10:32.159> me<01:10:32.560> you<01:10:32.920> us<01:10:33.159> and 01:10:33.310 --> 01:10:33.320 align:start position:0% looking at the chart the me you us and 01:10:33.320 --> 01:10:35.390 align:start position:0% looking at the chart the me you us and all<01:10:33.440> of<01:10:33.560> you<01:10:33.760> pronouns<01:10:34.360> have<01:10:34.520> the<01:10:34.640> same<01:10:34.880> syntax 01:10:35.390 --> 01:10:35.400 align:start position:0% all of you pronouns have the same syntax 01:10:35.400 --> 01:10:36.910 align:start position:0% all of you pronouns have the same syntax as<01:10:35.560> direct<01:10:35.840> object<01:10:36.120> pronouns<01:10:36.600> which<01:10:36.760> makes 01:10:36.910 --> 01:10:36.920 align:start position:0% as direct object pronouns which makes 01:10:36.920 --> 01:10:38.630 align:start position:0% as direct object pronouns which makes the<01:10:37.040> language<01:10:37.360> more<01:10:37.560> convenient<01:10:38.320> however 01:10:38.630 --> 01:10:38.640 align:start position:0% the language more convenient however 01:10:38.640 --> 01:10:40.630 align:start position:0% the language more convenient however this<01:10:38.719> is<01:10:38.880> where<01:10:39.040> we<01:10:39.159> have<01:10:39.400> less<01:10:39.840> for<01:10:40.120> them<01:10:40.520> as 01:10:40.630 --> 01:10:40.640 align:start position:0% this is where we have less for them as 01:10:40.640 --> 01:10:42.910 align:start position:0% this is where we have less for them as in<01:10:40.880> people<01:10:41.360> and<01:10:41.600> Le<01:10:41.920> which<01:10:42.040> can<01:10:42.199> mean<01:10:42.400> to<01:10:42.640> him 01:10:42.910 --> 01:10:42.920 align:start position:0% in people and Le which can mean to him 01:10:42.920 --> 01:10:45.030 align:start position:0% in people and Le which can mean to him or<01:10:43.120> to<01:10:43.320> her<01:10:43.640> in<01:10:43.800> a<01:10:43.960> person's<01:10:44.320> name<01:10:44.719> and<01:10:44.800> it's<01:10:44.920> a 01:10:45.030 --> 01:10:45.040 align:start position:0% or to her in a person's name and it's a 01:10:45.040 --> 01:10:46.790 align:start position:0% or to her in a person's name and it's a tricky<01:10:45.360> concept<01:10:45.719> to<01:10:46.159> understand<01:10:46.520> but<01:10:46.640> I'll 01:10:46.790 --> 01:10:46.800 align:start position:0% tricky concept to understand but I'll 01:10:46.800 --> 01:10:48.630 align:start position:0% tricky concept to understand but I'll explain<01:10:47.080> it<01:10:47.239> as<01:10:47.360> easily<01:10:47.760> as<01:10:47.920> possible<01:10:48.360> looking 01:10:48.630 --> 01:10:48.640 align:start position:0% explain it as easily as possible looking 01:10:48.640 --> 01:10:51.030 align:start position:0% explain it as easily as possible looking back<01:10:48.800> at<01:10:48.920> this<01:10:49.080> phrase<01:10:49.600> I<01:10:49.760> buy<01:10:50.040> a<01:10:50.199> car<01:10:50.400> for<01:10:50.640> you 01:10:51.030 --> 01:10:51.040 align:start position:0% back at this phrase I buy a car for you 01:10:51.040 --> 01:10:53.110 align:start position:0% back at this phrase I buy a car for you car<01:10:51.239> is<01:10:51.360> the<01:10:51.520> direct<01:10:51.800> object<01:10:52.120> noun<01:10:52.600> and<01:10:52.760> you<01:10:53.000> is 01:10:53.110 --> 01:10:53.120 align:start position:0% car is the direct object noun and you is 01:10:53.120 --> 01:10:54.910 align:start position:0% car is the direct object noun and you is the<01:10:53.239> indirect<01:10:53.840> object<01:10:54.239> that's<01:10:54.440> already<01:10:54.760> in 01:10:54.910 --> 01:10:54.920 align:start position:0% the indirect object that's already in 01:10:54.920 --> 01:10:56.430 align:start position:0% the indirect object that's already in pronoun<01:10:55.320> form<01:10:55.640> saying<01:10:55.880> the<01:10:56.000> sentence<01:10:56.280> in 01:10:56.430 --> 01:10:56.440 align:start position:0% pronoun form saying the sentence in 01:10:56.440 --> 01:10:58.229 align:start position:0% pronoun form saying the sentence in Spanish<01:10:56.880> can<01:10:57.000> be<01:10:57.120> done<01:10:57.280> using<01:10:57.520> multiple<01:10:57.880> ways 01:10:58.229 --> 01:10:58.239 align:start position:0% Spanish can be done using multiple ways 01:10:58.239 --> 01:10:59.830 align:start position:0% Spanish can be done using multiple ways but<01:10:58.360> the<01:10:58.520> essential<01:10:58.880> point<01:10:59.080> of<01:10:59.199> the<01:10:59.320> video<01:10:59.679> is 01:10:59.830 --> 01:10:59.840 align:start position:0% but the essential point of the video is 01:10:59.840 --> 01:11:01.910 align:start position:0% but the essential point of the video is indirect<01:11:00.360> object<01:11:00.679> pronouns<01:11:01.239> we<01:11:01.360> can<01:11:01.600> hack<01:11:01.800> the 01:11:01.910 --> 01:11:01.920 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns we can hack the 01:11:01.920 --> 01:11:03.910 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns we can hack the system<01:11:02.199> by<01:11:02.360> simply 01:11:03.910 --> 01:11:03.920 align:start position:0% system by simply 01:11:03.920 --> 01:11:06.590 align:start position:0% system by simply saying<01:11:04.920> using<01:11:05.159> a<01:11:05.320> prepositional<01:11:05.960> pronoun<01:11:06.440> and 01:11:06.590 --> 01:11:06.600 align:start position:0% saying using a prepositional pronoun and 01:11:06.600 --> 01:11:08.350 align:start position:0% saying using a prepositional pronoun and while<01:11:06.840> that<01:11:07.000> saves<01:11:07.280> us<01:11:07.520> time<01:11:07.760> we<01:11:07.880> need<01:11:08.000> to 01:11:08.350 --> 01:11:08.360 align:start position:0% while that saves us time we need to 01:11:08.360 --> 01:11:09.950 align:start position:0% while that saves us time we need to understand<01:11:08.560> how<01:11:08.760> indirect<01:11:09.280> object<01:11:09.600> pronouns 01:11:09.950 --> 01:11:09.960 align:start position:0% understand how indirect object pronouns 01:11:09.960 --> 01:11:11.430 align:start position:0% understand how indirect object pronouns work<01:11:10.320> just<01:11:10.480> like<01:11:10.640> with<01:11:10.840> direct<01:11:11.120> object 01:11:11.430 --> 01:11:11.440 align:start position:0% work just like with direct object 01:11:11.440 --> 01:11:13.430 align:start position:0% work just like with direct object pronouns<01:11:12.040> indirect<01:11:12.560> object<01:11:12.840> pronouns 01:11:13.430 --> 01:11:13.440 align:start position:0% pronouns indirect object pronouns 01:11:13.440 --> 01:11:15.310 align:start position:0% pronouns indirect object pronouns likewise<01:11:13.840> come<01:11:14.120> before<01:11:14.440> conjugated<01:11:14.960> verbs 01:11:15.310 --> 01:11:15.320 align:start position:0% likewise come before conjugated verbs 01:11:15.320 --> 01:11:16.750 align:start position:0% likewise come before conjugated verbs and<01:11:15.480> not<01:11:15.719> after<01:11:16.000> them<01:11:16.280> so<01:11:16.400> saying<01:11:16.640> the 01:11:16.750 --> 01:11:16.760 align:start position:0% and not after them so saying the 01:11:16.760 --> 01:11:19.270 align:start position:0% and not after them so saying the sentence<01:11:17.080> in<01:11:17.199> Spanish<01:11:17.640> would<01:11:17.800> simply 01:11:19.270 --> 01:11:19.280 align:start position:0% sentence in Spanish would simply 01:11:19.280 --> 01:11:22.950 align:start position:0% sentence in Spanish would simply be<01:11:20.280> I<01:11:20.440> buy<01:11:20.679> you<01:11:21.000> a<01:11:21.159> car<01:11:21.679> or<01:11:22.000> I<01:11:22.159> buy<01:11:22.400> a<01:11:22.560> car<01:11:22.760> for 01:11:22.950 --> 01:11:22.960 align:start position:0% be I buy you a car or I buy a car for 01:11:22.960 --> 01:11:25.229 align:start position:0% be I buy you a car or I buy a car for you<01:11:23.159> with<01:11:23.280> the<01:11:23.600> indirect<01:11:23.920> object<01:11:24.239> pronoun 01:11:25.229 --> 01:11:25.239 align:start position:0% you with the indirect object pronoun 01:11:25.239 --> 01:11:27.350 align:start position:0% you with the indirect object pronoun acting<01:11:25.719> as<01:11:25.960> for<01:11:26.280> you<01:11:26.640> and<01:11:26.760> the<01:11:26.840> same<01:11:27.040> idea 01:11:27.350 --> 01:11:27.360 align:start position:0% acting as for you and the same idea 01:11:27.360 --> 01:11:28.630 align:start position:0% acting as for you and the same idea basically<01:11:27.719> applies<01:11:28.000> to<01:11:28.120> the<01:11:28.239> rest<01:11:28.400> of<01:11:28.520> the 01:11:28.630 --> 01:11:28.640 align:start position:0% basically applies to the rest of the 01:11:28.640 --> 01:11:30.149 align:start position:0% basically applies to the rest of the pronouns<01:11:29.199> but<01:11:29.360> there<01:11:29.480> are<01:11:29.640> more<01:11:29.840> things<01:11:30.040> you 01:11:30.149 --> 01:11:30.159 align:start position:0% pronouns but there are more things you 01:11:30.159 --> 01:11:31.350 align:start position:0% pronouns but there are more things you should<01:11:30.320> know<01:11:30.480> about<01:11:30.719> indirect<01:11:31.120> object 01:11:31.350 --> 01:11:31.360 align:start position:0% should know about indirect object 01:11:31.360 --> 01:11:33.510 align:start position:0% should know about indirect object pronouns<01:11:31.760> in<01:11:31.920> Spanish<01:11:32.480> such<01:11:32.640> as<01:11:32.800> the<01:11:32.960> pronoun 01:11:33.510 --> 01:11:33.520 align:start position:0% pronouns in Spanish such as the pronoun 01:11:33.520 --> 01:11:36.669 align:start position:0% pronouns in Spanish such as the pronoun le<01:11:33.960> le<01:11:34.320> can<01:11:34.560> simultaneously<01:11:35.280> mean<01:11:35.679> to<01:11:36.120> or<01:11:36.320> for 01:11:36.669 --> 01:11:36.679 align:start position:0% le le can simultaneously mean to or for 01:11:36.679 --> 01:11:39.390 align:start position:0% le le can simultaneously mean to or for him<01:11:37.080> or<01:11:37.320> to<01:11:37.639> or<01:11:37.840> for<01:11:38.080> her<01:11:38.440> or<01:11:38.560> a<01:11:38.719> person's<01:11:39.120> name 01:11:39.390 --> 01:11:39.400 align:start position:0% him or to or for her or a person's name 01:11:39.400 --> 01:11:40.870 align:start position:0% him or to or for her or a person's name and<01:11:39.600> in<01:11:39.679> order<01:11:39.880> to<01:11:40.080> specify<01:11:40.520> who<01:11:40.679> you're 01:11:40.870 --> 01:11:40.880 align:start position:0% and in order to specify who you're 01:11:40.880 --> 01:11:42.189 align:start position:0% and in order to specify who you're talking<01:11:41.199> about<01:11:41.480> you'll<01:11:41.639> need<01:11:41.800> to<01:11:41.920> put<01:11:42.080> the 01:11:42.189 --> 01:11:42.199 align:start position:0% talking about you'll need to put the 01:11:42.199 --> 01:11:44.830 align:start position:0% talking about you'll need to put the prepositional<01:11:42.800> structure<01:11:43.480> a<01:11:43.880> plus<01:11:44.040> a<01:11:44.199> pronoun 01:11:44.830 --> 01:11:44.840 align:start position:0% prepositional structure a plus a pronoun 01:11:44.840 --> 01:11:48.550 align:start position:0% prepositional structure a plus a pronoun like<01:11:45.239> a<01:11:45.800> or<01:11:46.159> a<01:11:46.840> which<01:11:46.960> mean<01:11:47.280> to<01:11:47.679> or<01:11:47.840> for<01:11:48.159> him<01:11:48.360> or 01:11:48.550 --> 01:11:48.560 align:start position:0% like a or a which mean to or for him or 01:11:48.560 --> 01:11:50.510 align:start position:0% like a or a which mean to or for him or her<01:11:48.920> consider<01:11:49.280> the<01:11:49.360> sentence<01:11:49.679> in<01:11:49.800> English<01:11:50.280> she 01:11:50.510 --> 01:11:50.520 align:start position:0% her consider the sentence in English she 01:11:50.520 --> 01:11:52.750 align:start position:0% her consider the sentence in English she buys<01:11:50.880> a<01:11:51.080> car<01:11:51.360> for<01:11:51.600> him<01:11:51.920> car<01:11:52.199> is<01:11:52.280> a<01:11:52.440> direct 01:11:52.750 --> 01:11:52.760 align:start position:0% buys a car for him car is a direct 01:11:52.760 --> 01:11:54.750 align:start position:0% buys a car for him car is a direct object<01:11:53.080> noun<01:11:53.600> while<01:11:53.840> him<01:11:54.080> is<01:11:54.199> the<01:11:54.320> indirect 01:11:54.750 --> 01:11:54.760 align:start position:0% object noun while him is the indirect 01:11:54.760 --> 01:11:56.629 align:start position:0% object noun while him is the indirect object<01:11:55.040> pronoun<01:11:55.600> and<01:11:55.800> as<01:11:55.880> you<01:11:56.000> can<01:11:56.159> see<01:11:56.480> we 01:11:56.629 --> 01:11:56.639 align:start position:0% object pronoun and as you can see we 01:11:56.639 --> 01:11:58.709 align:start position:0% object pronoun and as you can see we have<01:11:56.719> to<01:11:56.840> use<01:11:57.000> the<01:11:57.159> pronoun<01:11:57.760> Le<01:11:58.080> for<01:11:58.360> him<01:11:58.600> and 01:11:58.709 --> 01:11:58.719 align:start position:0% have to use the pronoun Le for him and 01:11:58.719 --> 01:12:01.030 align:start position:0% have to use the pronoun Le for him and in<01:11:58.880> Spanish<01:11:59.360> the<01:11:59.480> phrase<01:11:59.760> would 01:12:01.030 --> 01:12:01.040 align:start position:0% in Spanish the phrase would 01:12:01.040 --> 01:12:02.910 align:start position:0% in Spanish the phrase would be<01:12:02.040> and<01:12:02.120> because<01:12:02.320> we<01:12:02.440> have<01:12:02.520> a<01:12:02.600> visual 01:12:02.910 --> 01:12:02.920 align:start position:0% be and because we have a visual 01:12:02.920 --> 01:12:04.709 align:start position:0% be and because we have a visual translation<01:12:03.360> of<01:12:03.560> him<01:12:03.760> in<01:12:03.920> English<01:12:04.400> we<01:12:04.480> know 01:12:04.709 --> 01:12:04.719 align:start position:0% translation of him in English we know 01:12:04.719 --> 01:12:06.870 align:start position:0% translation of him in English we know that<01:12:05.040> LE<01:12:05.400> means<01:12:05.760> him<01:12:06.199> however<01:12:06.560> what<01:12:06.679> if<01:12:06.760> we 01:12:06.870 --> 01:12:06.880 align:start position:0% that LE means him however what if we 01:12:06.880 --> 01:12:08.350 align:start position:0% that LE means him however what if we don't<01:12:07.080> have<01:12:07.199> the<01:12:07.320> phrase<01:12:07.560> in<01:12:07.679> English<01:12:08.080> saying 01:12:08.350 --> 01:12:08.360 align:start position:0% don't have the phrase in English saying 01:12:08.360 --> 01:12:10.030 align:start position:0% don't have the phrase in English saying this<01:12:08.520> phrase<01:12:08.719> in 01:12:10.030 --> 01:12:10.040 align:start position:0% this phrase in 01:12:10.040 --> 01:12:11.910 align:start position:0% this phrase in Spanish<01:12:11.040> we<01:12:11.120> would<01:12:11.280> know<01:12:11.400> that<01:12:11.520> the<01:12:11.639> phrase 01:12:11.910 --> 01:12:11.920 align:start position:0% Spanish we would know that the phrase 01:12:11.920 --> 01:12:14.110 align:start position:0% Spanish we would know that the phrase means<01:12:12.280> she<01:12:12.520> buys<01:12:12.840> a<01:12:13.040> car<01:12:13.239> for<01:12:13.760> but<01:12:13.880> we<01:12:14.000> don't 01:12:14.110 --> 01:12:14.120 align:start position:0% means she buys a car for but we don't 01:12:14.120 --> 01:12:16.070 align:start position:0% means she buys a car for but we don't know<01:12:14.280> who<01:12:14.400> the<01:12:14.560> person<01:12:14.840> is<01:12:15.239> because<01:12:15.639> Le<01:12:15.920> can 01:12:16.070 --> 01:12:16.080 align:start position:0% know who the person is because Le can 01:12:16.080 --> 01:12:18.350 align:start position:0% know who the person is because Le can mean<01:12:16.400> him<01:12:16.719> her<01:12:16.960> or<01:12:17.239> person's<01:12:17.639> name<01:12:17.920> but<01:12:18.080> Le 01:12:18.350 --> 01:12:18.360 align:start position:0% mean him her or person's name but Le 01:12:18.360 --> 01:12:19.709 align:start position:0% mean him her or person's name but Le doesn't<01:12:18.639> specify<01:12:19.040> it<01:12:19.239> and<01:12:19.320> this<01:12:19.440> is<01:12:19.520> where 01:12:19.709 --> 01:12:19.719 align:start position:0% doesn't specify it and this is where 01:12:19.719 --> 01:12:21.310 align:start position:0% doesn't specify it and this is where Spanish<01:12:20.080> comes<01:12:20.280> in<01:12:20.560> and<01:12:20.679> says<01:12:20.880> to<01:12:21.000> use<01:12:21.159> the 01:12:21.310 --> 01:12:21.320 align:start position:0% Spanish comes in and says to use the 01:12:21.320 --> 01:12:23.550 align:start position:0% Spanish comes in and says to use the construction<01:12:21.960> a<01:12:22.320> and<01:12:22.440> then<01:12:22.560> a<01:12:22.719> pronoun<01:12:23.199> in 01:12:23.550 --> 01:12:23.560 align:start position:0% construction a and then a pronoun in 01:12:23.560 --> 01:12:25.030 align:start position:0% construction a and then a pronoun in this<01:12:23.719> case<01:12:24.080> L<01:12:24.320> this<01:12:24.440> construction<01:12:24.880> can 01:12:25.030 --> 01:12:25.040 align:start position:0% this case L this construction can 01:12:25.040 --> 01:12:26.590 align:start position:0% this case L this construction can actually<01:12:25.239> be<01:12:25.360> applied<01:12:25.639> to<01:12:25.800> any<01:12:26.000> pronoun<01:12:26.480> but 01:12:26.590 --> 01:12:26.600 align:start position:0% actually be applied to any pronoun but 01:12:26.600 --> 01:12:28.550 align:start position:0% actually be applied to any pronoun but more<01:12:26.800> than<01:12:27.040> less<01:12:27.400> it's<01:12:27.560> mainly<01:12:27.880> used<01:12:28.159> for<01:12:28.400> the 01:12:28.550 --> 01:12:28.560 align:start position:0% more than less it's mainly used for the 01:12:28.560 --> 01:12:30.270 align:start position:0% more than less it's mainly used for the pronoun<01:12:29.040> Le<01:12:29.280> because<01:12:29.440> it's<01:12:29.600> the<01:12:29.679> only<01:12:29.920> pronoun 01:12:30.270 --> 01:12:30.280 align:start position:0% pronoun Le because it's the only pronoun 01:12:30.280 --> 01:12:31.990 align:start position:0% pronoun Le because it's the only pronoun that<01:12:30.360> isn't<01:12:30.639> specific<01:12:31.080> enough<01:12:31.480> while<01:12:31.600> we<01:12:31.719> know 01:12:31.990 --> 01:12:32.000 align:start position:0% that isn't specific enough while we know 01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:35.669 align:start position:0% that isn't specific enough while we know that<01:12:32.360> me<01:12:32.760> is<01:12:33.000> me<01:12:33.480> te<01:12:33.800> is<01:12:34.040> you<01:12:34.320> and<01:12:34.480> so<01:12:34.639> on<01:12:35.159> Le<01:12:35.520> can 01:12:35.669 --> 01:12:35.679 align:start position:0% that me is me te is you and so on Le can 01:12:35.679 --> 01:12:37.830 align:start position:0% that me is me te is you and so on Le can mean<01:12:36.040> him<01:12:36.280> or<01:12:36.520> her<01:12:36.880> and<01:12:37.000> we<01:12:37.120> have<01:12:37.199> to<01:12:37.400> specify 01:12:37.830 --> 01:12:37.840 align:start position:0% mean him or her and we have to specify 01:12:37.840 --> 01:12:40.030 align:start position:0% mean him or her and we have to specify who<01:12:37.960> it<01:12:38.080> is<01:12:38.320> with<01:12:38.440> the<01:12:38.600> construction<01:12:39.320> a<01:12:39.880> this 01:12:40.030 --> 01:12:40.040 align:start position:0% who it is with the construction a this 01:12:40.040 --> 01:12:41.870 align:start position:0% who it is with the construction a this construction<01:12:40.760> has<01:12:40.880> to<01:12:40.960> be<01:12:41.120> placed<01:12:41.520> either<01:12:41.800> in 01:12:41.870 --> 01:12:41.880 align:start position:0% construction has to be placed either in 01:12:41.880 --> 01:12:43.470 align:start position:0% construction has to be placed either in the<01:12:42.040> beginning<01:12:42.320> of<01:12:42.440> a<01:12:42.560> sentence<01:12:43.040> or<01:12:43.239> in<01:12:43.360> the 01:12:43.470 --> 01:12:43.480 align:start position:0% the beginning of a sentence or in the 01:12:43.480 --> 01:12:45.629 align:start position:0% the beginning of a sentence or in the end<01:12:43.800> looking<01:12:44.040> at<01:12:44.239> this<01:12:44.440> phrase<01:12:44.880> she<01:12:45.120> buys<01:12:45.440> a 01:12:45.629 --> 01:12:45.639 align:start position:0% end looking at this phrase she buys a 01:12:45.639 --> 01:12:49.350 align:start position:0% end looking at this phrase she buys a car<01:12:45.840> for<01:12:46.120> him<01:12:46.480> in<01:12:46.639> Spanish<01:12:47.080> the<01:12:47.199> phrase<01:12:47.520> would 01:12:49.350 --> 01:12:49.360 align:start position:0% car for him in Spanish the phrase would 01:12:49.360 --> 01:12:51.590 align:start position:0% car for him in Spanish the phrase would be 01:12:51.590 --> 01:12:51.600 align:start position:0% be 01:12:51.600 --> 01:12:53.669 align:start position:0% be or<01:12:52.600> it<01:12:52.679> doesn't<01:12:52.880> matter<01:12:53.080> which<01:12:53.199> phrase<01:12:53.560> you 01:12:53.669 --> 01:12:53.679 align:start position:0% or it doesn't matter which phrase you 01:12:53.679 --> 01:12:55.510 align:start position:0% or it doesn't matter which phrase you say<01:12:53.960> but<01:12:54.120> I<01:12:54.239> recommend<01:12:54.600> making<01:12:54.880> sentences 01:12:55.510 --> 01:12:55.520 align:start position:0% say but I recommend making sentences 01:12:55.520 --> 01:12:56.950 align:start position:0% say but I recommend making sentences using<01:12:55.800> the<01:12:55.920> second<01:12:56.239> phrase<01:12:56.639> because<01:12:56.840> it's 01:12:56.950 --> 01:12:56.960 align:start position:0% using the second phrase because it's 01:12:56.960 --> 01:12:59.669 align:start position:0% using the second phrase because it's similar<01:12:57.239> to<01:12:57.400> the<01:12:57.480> order<01:12:57.719> of<01:12:57.840> the<01:12:57.920> words<01:12:58.159> in 01:12:59.669 --> 01:12:59.679 align:start position:0% similar to the order of the words in 01:12:59.679 --> 01:13:02.470 align:start position:0% similar to the order of the words in English<01:13:00.679> might<01:13:00.880> visually<01:13:01.199> be<01:13:01.440> translated<01:13:02.199> as 01:13:02.470 --> 01:13:02.480 align:start position:0% English might visually be translated as 01:13:02.480 --> 01:13:04.830 align:start position:0% English might visually be translated as she<01:13:02.920> him<01:13:03.280> buys<01:13:03.600> a<01:13:03.760> car<01:13:03.960> for<01:13:04.239> him<01:13:04.520> and<01:13:04.679> in 01:13:04.830 --> 01:13:04.840 align:start position:0% she him buys a car for him and in 01:13:04.840 --> 01:13:06.390 align:start position:0% she him buys a car for him and in English<01:13:05.320> it<01:13:05.440> doesn't<01:13:05.679> make<01:13:05.840> sense<01:13:06.040> to<01:13:06.159> say 01:13:06.390 --> 01:13:06.400 align:start position:0% English it doesn't make sense to say 01:13:06.400 --> 01:13:07.750 align:start position:0% English it doesn't make sense to say this<01:13:06.560> phrase<01:13:06.960> because<01:13:07.120> the<01:13:07.280> language<01:13:07.600> is 01:13:07.750 --> 01:13:07.760 align:start position:0% this phrase because the language is 01:13:07.760 --> 01:13:09.750 align:start position:0% this phrase because the language is specific<01:13:08.199> enough<01:13:08.520> with<01:13:08.679> the<01:13:08.840> pronouns<01:13:09.440> but<01:13:09.600> in 01:13:09.750 --> 01:13:09.760 align:start position:0% specific enough with the pronouns but in 01:13:09.760 --> 01:13:11.390 align:start position:0% specific enough with the pronouns but in Spanish<01:13:10.239> it<01:13:10.400> makes<01:13:10.679> sense<01:13:11.040> because<01:13:11.280> the 01:13:11.390 --> 01:13:11.400 align:start position:0% Spanish it makes sense because the 01:13:11.400 --> 01:13:13.110 align:start position:0% Spanish it makes sense because the pronoun<01:13:11.840> isn't<01:13:12.159> specific<01:13:12.560> enough<01:13:12.840> so<01:13:13.000> the 01:13:13.110 --> 01:13:13.120 align:start position:0% pronoun isn't specific enough so the 01:13:13.120 --> 01:13:15.110 align:start position:0% pronoun isn't specific enough so the sentence<01:13:13.480> would<01:13:13.639> simply<01:13:13.920> be<01:13:14.239> she<01:13:14.440> buys<01:13:14.800> a<01:13:14.960> car 01:13:15.110 --> 01:13:15.120 align:start position:0% sentence would simply be she buys a car 01:13:15.120 --> 01:13:17.390 align:start position:0% sentence would simply be she buys a car for<01:13:15.360> him<01:13:15.560> or<01:13:15.679> she<01:13:15.880> buys<01:13:16.199> him<01:13:16.480> a<01:13:16.600> car<01:13:17.000> while<01:13:17.239> the 01:13:17.390 --> 01:13:17.400 align:start position:0% for him or she buys him a car while the 01:13:17.400 --> 01:13:20.270 align:start position:0% for him or she buys him a car while the easy<01:13:17.679> pronouns<01:13:18.199> may<01:13:18.400> be<01:13:18.760> me<01:13:19.239> you<01:13:19.679> us<01:13:20.000> and<01:13:20.159> all 01:13:20.270 --> 01:13:20.280 align:start position:0% easy pronouns may be me you us and all 01:13:20.280 --> 01:13:22.470 align:start position:0% easy pronouns may be me you us and all of<01:13:20.440> you<01:13:20.719> I<01:13:20.800> would<01:13:20.920> like<01:13:21.080> to<01:13:21.199> focus<01:13:21.520> on<01:13:21.840> Le<01:13:22.159> for<01:13:22.320> a 01:13:22.470 --> 01:13:22.480 align:start position:0% of you I would like to focus on Le for a 01:13:22.480 --> 01:13:24.430 align:start position:0% of you I would like to focus on Le for a bit<01:13:22.800> because<01:13:23.040> like<01:13:23.159> I<01:13:23.480> said<01:13:23.760> this<01:13:23.920> pronoun<01:13:24.320> can 01:13:24.430 --> 01:13:24.440 align:start position:0% bit because like I said this pronoun can 01:13:24.440 --> 01:13:26.350 align:start position:0% bit because like I said this pronoun can mean<01:13:24.679> him<01:13:24.920> her<01:13:25.199> or<01:13:25.360> a<01:13:25.520> person's<01:13:25.880> name<01:13:26.239> and 01:13:26.350 --> 01:13:26.360 align:start position:0% mean him her or a person's name and 01:13:26.360 --> 01:13:28.229 align:start position:0% mean him her or a person's name and here's<01:13:26.560> what<01:13:26.679> I<01:13:26.800> mean<01:13:27.040> the<01:13:27.159> phrase<01:13:27.480> she<01:13:27.719> buys<01:13:28.040> a 01:13:28.229 --> 01:13:28.239 align:start position:0% here's what I mean the phrase she buys a 01:13:28.239 --> 01:13:30.750 align:start position:0% here's what I mean the phrase she buys a car<01:13:28.440> for<01:13:28.719> him<01:13:29.040> can<01:13:29.239> also<01:13:29.480> be<01:13:29.600> said<01:13:30.000> as<01:13:30.199> she<01:13:30.440> buys 01:13:30.750 --> 01:13:30.760 align:start position:0% car for him can also be said as she buys 01:13:30.760 --> 01:13:32.590 align:start position:0% car for him can also be said as she buys a<01:13:30.920> car<01:13:31.120> for<01:13:31.400> John<01:13:31.719> with<01:13:31.880> Jon<01:13:32.199> being<01:13:32.440> an 01:13:32.590 --> 01:13:32.600 align:start position:0% a car for John with Jon being an 01:13:32.600 --> 01:13:34.750 align:start position:0% a car for John with Jon being an indirect<01:13:33.080> object<01:13:33.400> noun<01:13:33.880> which<01:13:34.040> still<01:13:34.320> works 01:13:34.750 --> 01:13:34.760 align:start position:0% indirect object noun which still works 01:13:34.760 --> 01:13:36.229 align:start position:0% indirect object noun which still works putting<01:13:35.000> this<01:13:35.120> phrase<01:13:35.360> in<01:13:35.520> Spanish<01:13:35.920> is<01:13:36.040> no 01:13:36.229 --> 01:13:36.239 align:start position:0% putting this phrase in Spanish is no 01:13:36.239 --> 01:13:37.990 align:start position:0% putting this phrase in Spanish is no different<01:13:36.520> than<01:13:36.679> simply<01:13:36.960> saying<01:13:37.360> she<01:13:37.560> buys<01:13:37.840> a 01:13:37.990 --> 01:13:38.000 align:start position:0% different than simply saying she buys a 01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:39.790 align:start position:0% different than simply saying she buys a car<01:13:38.199> for<01:13:38.440> him<01:13:38.760> but<01:13:38.880> the<01:13:38.960> only<01:13:39.159> difference<01:13:39.679> is 01:13:39.790 --> 01:13:39.800 align:start position:0% car for him but the only difference is 01:13:39.800 --> 01:13:43.070 align:start position:0% car for him but the only difference is that<01:13:39.920> instead<01:13:40.199> of<01:13:40.320> saying<01:13:41.199> we<01:13:41.320> need<01:13:41.440> to 01:13:43.070 --> 01:13:43.080 align:start position:0% that instead of saying we need to 01:13:43.080 --> 01:13:45.669 align:start position:0% that instead of saying we need to say<01:13:44.080> just<01:13:44.199> to<01:13:44.360> specify<01:13:44.760> who<01:13:44.880> the<01:13:45.040> person<01:13:45.280> is<01:13:45.560> if 01:13:45.669 --> 01:13:45.679 align:start position:0% say just to specify who the person is if 01:13:45.679 --> 01:13:49.229 align:start position:0% say just to specify who the person is if we<01:13:45.800> say<01:13:46.000> she<01:13:46.199> buys<01:13:46.520> a<01:13:46.719> car<01:13:46.880> for<01:13:47.159> her<01:13:47.600> we<01:13:47.679> can 01:13:49.229 --> 01:13:49.239 align:start position:0% we say she buys a car for her we can 01:13:49.239 --> 01:13:52.430 align:start position:0% we say she buys a car for her we can say<01:13:50.239> if<01:13:50.320> we<01:13:50.480> say<01:13:50.679> she<01:13:50.880> buys<01:13:51.199> a<01:13:51.360> car<01:13:51.560> for<01:13:51.920> Emma 01:13:52.430 --> 01:13:52.440 align:start position:0% say if we say she buys a car for Emma 01:13:52.440 --> 01:13:54.950 align:start position:0% say if we say she buys a car for Emma then<01:13:52.560> we<01:13:52.639> can<01:13:52.800> say 01:13:54.950 --> 01:13:54.960 align:start position:0% then we can say 01:13:54.960 --> 01:13:56.510 align:start position:0% then we can say just<01:13:55.080> to<01:13:55.239> specify<01:13:55.600> who<01:13:55.719> the<01:13:55.880> person<01:13:56.120> is<01:13:56.400> and 01:13:56.510 --> 01:13:56.520 align:start position:0% just to specify who the person is and 01:13:56.520 --> 01:13:57.750 align:start position:0% just to specify who the person is and that's<01:13:56.679> basically<01:13:57.040> the<01:13:57.199> toughest<01:13:57.520> part<01:13:57.679> to 01:13:57.750 --> 01:13:57.760 align:start position:0% that's basically the toughest part to 01:13:57.760 --> 01:13:59.310 align:start position:0% that's basically the toughest part to know<01:13:57.960> with<01:13:58.120> indirect<01:13:58.560> object<01:13:58.840> pronouns<01:13:59.199> in 01:13:59.310 --> 01:13:59.320 align:start position:0% know with indirect object pronouns in 01:13:59.320 --> 01:14:00.790 align:start position:0% know with indirect object pronouns in Spanish<01:13:59.760> because<01:14:00.000> I've<01:14:00.120> seen<01:14:00.280> many<01:14:00.480> students 01:14:00.790 --> 01:14:00.800 align:start position:0% Spanish because I've seen many students 01:14:00.800 --> 01:14:02.669 align:start position:0% Spanish because I've seen many students failing<01:14:01.080> to<01:14:01.520> understand<01:14:01.719> what<01:14:01.960> Le<01:14:02.199> means<01:14:02.520> and 01:14:02.669 --> 01:14:02.679 align:start position:0% failing to understand what Le means and 01:14:02.679 --> 01:14:04.430 align:start position:0% failing to understand what Le means and why<01:14:02.880> every<01:14:03.120> sentence<01:14:03.520> has<01:14:03.639> the<01:14:03.800> construction 01:14:04.430 --> 01:14:04.440 align:start position:0% why every sentence has the construction 01:14:04.440 --> 01:14:05.990 align:start position:0% why every sentence has the construction a<01:14:04.719> with<01:14:04.840> a<01:14:04.960> pronoun<01:14:05.400> and<01:14:05.480> the<01:14:05.600> last<01:14:05.760> thing<01:14:05.840> to 01:14:05.990 --> 01:14:06.000 align:start position:0% a with a pronoun and the last thing to 01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:07.590 align:start position:0% a with a pronoun and the last thing to note<01:14:06.199> with<01:14:06.320> indirect<01:14:06.760> object<01:14:07.040> pronouns<01:14:07.440> in 01:14:07.590 --> 01:14:07.600 align:start position:0% note with indirect object pronouns in 01:14:07.600 --> 01:14:09.149 align:start position:0% note with indirect object pronouns in Spanish<01:14:08.120> is<01:14:08.239> that<01:14:08.400> these<01:14:08.600> pronouns<01:14:09.000> can 01:14:09.149 --> 01:14:09.159 align:start position:0% Spanish is that these pronouns can 01:14:09.159 --> 01:14:10.910 align:start position:0% Spanish is that these pronouns can likewise<01:14:09.600> be<01:14:09.719> applied<01:14:10.000> to<01:14:10.120> infinitives<01:14:10.800> the 01:14:10.910 --> 01:14:10.920 align:start position:0% likewise be applied to infinitives the 01:14:10.920 --> 01:14:12.550 align:start position:0% likewise be applied to infinitives the same<01:14:11.199> exact<01:14:11.520> way<01:14:11.760> that<01:14:11.960> direct<01:14:12.280> object 01:14:12.550 --> 01:14:12.560 align:start position:0% same exact way that direct object 01:14:12.560 --> 01:14:14.110 align:start position:0% same exact way that direct object pronouns<01:14:12.960> work<01:14:13.239> and<01:14:13.320> I'll<01:14:13.560> actually<01:14:13.840> provide 01:14:14.110 --> 01:14:14.120 align:start position:0% pronouns work and I'll actually provide 01:14:14.120 --> 01:14:15.750 align:start position:0% pronouns work and I'll actually provide more<01:14:14.360> examples<01:14:14.840> in<01:14:14.960> this<01:14:15.159> video<01:14:15.520> because 01:14:15.750 --> 01:14:15.760 align:start position:0% more examples in this video because 01:14:15.760 --> 01:14:17.510 align:start position:0% more examples in this video because indirect<01:14:16.239> object<01:14:16.480> pronouns<01:14:16.880> are<01:14:17.000> a<01:14:17.120> tricky 01:14:17.510 --> 01:14:17.520 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns are a tricky 01:14:17.520 --> 01:14:19.270 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns are a tricky category<01:14:18.000> in<01:14:18.159> Spanish<01:14:18.639> how<01:14:18.760> would<01:14:18.880> you<01:14:19.000> say 01:14:19.270 --> 01:14:19.280 align:start position:0% category in Spanish how would you say 01:14:19.280 --> 01:14:21.229 align:start position:0% category in Spanish how would you say this<01:14:19.440> phrase<01:14:19.719> in<01:14:19.880> Spanish<01:14:20.440> he<01:14:20.560> wants<01:14:20.800> to<01:14:20.960> buy 01:14:21.229 --> 01:14:21.239 align:start position:0% this phrase in Spanish he wants to buy 01:14:21.239 --> 01:14:27.189 align:start position:0% this phrase in Spanish he wants to buy you<01:14:21.560> a<01:14:21.719> book<01:14:22.400> you<01:14:22.520> can<01:14:22.679> say<01:14:23.000> l 01:14:27.189 --> 01:14:27.199 align:start position:0% 01:14:27.199 --> 01:14:29.709 align:start position:0% or<01:14:28.199> if<01:14:28.280> you<01:14:28.400> said<01:14:28.679> any<01:14:28.840> of<01:14:29.000> these<01:14:29.159> phrases<01:14:29.639> then 01:14:29.709 --> 01:14:29.719 align:start position:0% or if you said any of these phrases then 01:14:29.719 --> 01:14:31.550 align:start position:0% or if you said any of these phrases then you<01:14:29.840> did<01:14:29.960> a<01:14:30.120> good<01:14:30.320> job<01:14:30.600> how<01:14:30.719> would<01:14:30.840> you<01:14:30.960> say<01:14:31.360> she 01:14:31.550 --> 01:14:31.560 align:start position:0% you did a good job how would you say she 01:14:31.560 --> 01:14:36.030 align:start position:0% you did a good job how would you say she can<01:14:31.800> give<01:14:32.000> the<01:14:32.159> papers<01:14:32.639> to<01:14:32.880> us<01:14:33.480> you<01:14:33.600> can 01:14:36.030 --> 01:14:36.040 align:start position:0% 01:14:36.040 --> 01:14:38.470 align:start position:0% say 01:14:38.470 --> 01:14:38.480 align:start position:0% say 01:14:38.480 --> 01:14:41.350 align:start position:0% say or<01:14:39.480> how<01:14:39.600> would<01:14:39.719> you<01:14:39.880> say<01:14:40.199> I<01:14:40.360> teach<01:14:40.639> the<01:14:40.840> concept 01:14:41.350 --> 01:14:41.360 align:start position:0% or how would you say I teach the concept 01:14:41.360 --> 01:14:43.950 align:start position:0% or how would you say I teach the concept to 01:14:43.950 --> 01:14:43.960 align:start position:0% 01:14:43.960 --> 01:14:46.229 align:start position:0% them<01:14:44.960> how<01:14:45.080> would<01:14:45.199> you<01:14:45.360> say<01:14:45.639> you<01:14:45.840> write<01:14:46.080> a 01:14:46.229 --> 01:14:46.239 align:start position:0% them how would you say you write a 01:14:46.239 --> 01:14:49.990 align:start position:0% them how would you say you write a letter<01:14:46.719> to<01:14:46.960> her<01:14:47.679> you<01:14:47.800> can 01:14:49.990 --> 01:14:50.000 align:start position:0% letter to her you can 01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:52.270 align:start position:0% letter to her you can say 01:14:52.270 --> 01:14:52.280 align:start position:0% say 01:14:52.280 --> 01:14:54.030 align:start position:0% say or 01:14:54.030 --> 01:14:54.040 align:start position:0% or 01:14:54.040 --> 01:14:55.550 align:start position:0% or using<01:14:54.280> the<01:14:54.400> present<01:14:54.719> progressive<01:14:55.159> now<01:14:55.440> and 01:14:55.550 --> 01:14:55.560 align:start position:0% using the present progressive now and 01:14:55.560 --> 01:14:57.070 align:start position:0% using the present progressive now and remembering<01:14:55.960> that<01:14:56.080> you<01:14:56.199> have<01:14:56.320> to<01:14:56.440> put<01:14:56.679> accents 01:14:57.070 --> 01:14:57.080 align:start position:0% remembering that you have to put accents 01:14:57.080 --> 01:14:59.030 align:start position:0% remembering that you have to put accents on<01:14:57.320> infinitives<01:14:58.040> how<01:14:58.159> would<01:14:58.320> you<01:14:58.440> say<01:14:58.800> I<01:14:58.880> am 01:14:59.030 --> 01:14:59.040 align:start position:0% on infinitives how would you say I am 01:14:59.040 --> 01:15:02.430 align:start position:0% on infinitives how would you say I am reading<01:14:59.360> the<01:14:59.560> book<01:14:59.840> for<01:15:00.159> them 01:15:02.430 --> 01:15:02.440 align:start position:0% reading the book for them 01:15:02.440 --> 01:15:04.950 align:start position:0% reading the book for them y 01:15:04.950 --> 01:15:04.960 align:start position:0% y 01:15:04.960 --> 01:15:07.470 align:start position:0% y or<01:15:05.960> with<01:15:06.080> an<01:15:06.280> accent<01:15:06.560> on<01:15:06.719> the<01:15:06.840> infinitive<01:15:07.360> how 01:15:07.470 --> 01:15:07.480 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive how 01:15:07.480 --> 01:15:09.149 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive how would<01:15:07.600> you<01:15:07.719> say<01:15:08.040> we<01:15:08.159> are<01:15:08.320> telling<01:15:08.679> the<01:15:08.840> truth 01:15:09.149 --> 01:15:09.159 align:start position:0% would you say we are telling the truth 01:15:09.159 --> 01:15:12.629 align:start position:0% would you say we are telling the truth to<01:15:09.360> you<01:15:10.040> you<01:15:10.159> can 01:15:12.629 --> 01:15:12.639 align:start position:0% 01:15:12.639 --> 01:15:15.830 align:start position:0% say 01:15:15.830 --> 01:15:15.840 align:start position:0% 01:15:15.840 --> 01:15:18.310 align:start position:0% or<01:15:16.840> with<01:15:16.920> an<01:15:17.120> accent<01:15:17.440> on<01:15:17.560> the<01:15:17.679> infinitive<01:15:18.199> and 01:15:18.310 --> 01:15:18.320 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive and 01:15:18.320 --> 01:15:19.510 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive and the<01:15:18.440> last<01:15:18.639> one<01:15:18.880> which<01:15:19.000> can<01:15:19.120> be<01:15:19.199> said<01:15:19.400> in 01:15:19.510 --> 01:15:19.520 align:start position:0% the last one which can be said in 01:15:19.520 --> 01:15:21.470 align:start position:0% the last one which can be said in multiple<01:15:19.920> ways<01:15:20.280> how<01:15:20.400> would<01:15:20.560> you<01:15:20.719> say<01:15:21.120> she<01:15:21.280> is 01:15:21.470 --> 01:15:21.480 align:start position:0% multiple ways how would you say she is 01:15:21.480 --> 01:15:23.990 align:start position:0% multiple ways how would you say she is giving<01:15:21.880> the<01:15:22.040> money<01:15:22.480> to<01:15:22.760> him<01:15:23.360> here<01:15:23.480> are<01:15:23.679> all<01:15:23.840> the 01:15:23.990 --> 01:15:24.000 align:start position:0% giving the money to him here are all the 01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:29.590 align:start position:0% giving the money to him here are all the constructions<01:15:24.480> for<01:15:24.679> this 01:15:29.590 --> 01:15:29.600 align:start position:0% 01:15:29.600 --> 01:15:33.750 align:start position:0% phrase<01:15:30.600> with<01:15:30.719> an<01:15:30.920> accent<01:15:31.280> on<01:15:31.400> the 01:15:33.750 --> 01:15:33.760 align:start position:0% 01:15:33.760 --> 01:15:36.229 align:start position:0% infinitive 01:15:36.229 --> 01:15:36.239 align:start position:0% infinitive 01:15:36.239 --> 01:15:38.669 align:start position:0% infinitive or<01:15:37.239> with<01:15:37.320> an<01:15:37.520> accent<01:15:37.800> on<01:15:37.920> the<01:15:38.040> infinitive<01:15:38.520> even 01:15:38.669 --> 01:15:38.679 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive even 01:15:38.679 --> 01:15:40.310 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive even though<01:15:38.800> it's<01:15:38.880> a<01:15:39.000> long<01:15:39.320> example<01:15:39.920> this<01:15:40.040> is<01:15:40.159> how 01:15:40.310 --> 01:15:40.320 align:start position:0% though it's a long example this is how 01:15:40.320 --> 01:15:42.350 align:start position:0% though it's a long example this is how indirect<01:15:40.800> object<01:15:41.120> pronouns<01:15:41.520> work<01:15:41.760> in<01:15:41.880> Spanish 01:15:42.350 --> 01:15:42.360 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns work in Spanish 01:15:42.360 --> 01:15:43.550 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns work in Spanish and<01:15:42.440> it<01:15:42.560> doesn't<01:15:42.800> matter<01:15:43.040> which<01:15:43.199> phrase<01:15:43.440> you 01:15:43.550 --> 01:15:43.560 align:start position:0% and it doesn't matter which phrase you 01:15:43.560 --> 01:15:45.270 align:start position:0% and it doesn't matter which phrase you say<01:15:43.960> because<01:15:44.199> all<01:15:44.360> of<01:15:44.480> them<01:15:44.639> express<01:15:45.000> the<01:15:45.080> same 01:15:45.270 --> 01:15:45.280 align:start position:0% say because all of them express the same 01:15:45.280 --> 01:15:46.830 align:start position:0% say because all of them express the same meaning<01:15:45.600> and<01:15:45.679> in<01:15:45.800> case<01:15:45.960> you<01:15:46.080> get<01:15:46.239> confused<01:15:46.760> you 01:15:46.830 --> 01:15:46.840 align:start position:0% meaning and in case you get confused you 01:15:46.840 --> 01:15:48.750 align:start position:0% meaning and in case you get confused you can<01:15:47.000> always<01:15:47.280> go<01:15:47.480> back<01:15:47.600> to<01:15:47.719> the<01:15:47.880> basics<01:15:48.400> and<01:15:48.520> say 01:15:48.750 --> 01:15:48.760 align:start position:0% can always go back to the basics and say 01:15:48.760 --> 01:15:50.229 align:start position:0% can always go back to the basics and say any<01:15:48.920> phrase<01:15:49.199> you<01:15:49.320> want<01:15:49.679> because<01:15:49.920> people<01:15:50.120> will 01:15:50.229 --> 01:15:50.239 align:start position:0% any phrase you want because people will 01:15:50.239 --> 01:15:52.110 align:start position:0% any phrase you want because people will still<01:15:50.760> understand<01:15:50.880> you<01:15:51.199> my<01:15:51.400> goal<01:15:51.639> is<01:15:51.760> to<01:15:51.920> not 01:15:52.110 --> 01:15:52.120 align:start position:0% still understand you my goal is to not 01:15:52.120 --> 01:15:53.510 align:start position:0% still understand you my goal is to not confuse<01:15:52.520> you<01:15:52.760> but<01:15:52.880> to<01:15:52.960> show<01:15:53.199> show<01:15:53.320> you<01:15:53.400> that 01:15:53.510 --> 01:15:53.520 align:start position:0% confuse you but to show show you that 01:15:53.520 --> 01:15:54.830 align:start position:0% confuse you but to show show you that there<01:15:53.600> are<01:15:53.719> multiple<01:15:54.080> answers<01:15:54.400> to<01:15:54.560> any 01:15:54.830 --> 01:15:54.840 align:start position:0% there are multiple answers to any 01:15:54.840 --> 01:15:56.070 align:start position:0% there are multiple answers to any question<01:15:55.320> and<01:15:55.440> that<01:15:55.520> there<01:15:55.600> are<01:15:55.719> multiple 01:15:56.070 --> 01:15:56.080 align:start position:0% question and that there are multiple 01:15:56.080 --> 01:15:57.870 align:start position:0% question and that there are multiple ways<01:15:56.239> to<01:15:56.440> answer<01:15:56.840> any<01:15:57.080> question<01:15:57.480> it<01:15:57.600> doesn't 01:15:57.870 --> 01:15:57.880 align:start position:0% ways to answer any question it doesn't 01:15:57.880 --> 01:15:59.470 align:start position:0% ways to answer any question it doesn't always<01:15:58.120> have<01:15:58.239> to<01:15:58.360> be<01:15:58.560> one<01:15:58.800> answer<01:15:59.120> and<01:15:59.280> one 01:15:59.470 --> 01:15:59.480 align:start position:0% always have to be one answer and one 01:15:59.480 --> 01:16:01.030 align:start position:0% always have to be one answer and one answer<01:15:59.760> only<01:16:00.159> with<01:16:00.280> the<01:16:00.440> examples<01:16:00.800> that<01:16:00.920> I 01:16:01.030 --> 01:16:01.040 align:start position:0% answer only with the examples that I 01:16:01.040 --> 01:16:02.629 align:start position:0% answer only with the examples that I gave<01:16:01.239> in<01:16:01.360> the<01:16:01.520> video<01:16:01.840> I<01:16:01.960> tried<01:16:02.199> my<01:16:02.360> best<01:16:02.520> at 01:16:02.629 --> 01:16:02.639 align:start position:0% gave in the video I tried my best at 01:16:02.639 --> 01:16:04.070 align:start position:0% gave in the video I tried my best at showing<01:16:02.880> you<01:16:03.080> all<01:16:03.199> the<01:16:03.400> possibilities<01:16:03.960> that 01:16:04.070 --> 01:16:04.080 align:start position:0% showing you all the possibilities that 01:16:04.080 --> 01:16:05.430 align:start position:0% showing you all the possibilities that you<01:16:04.159> can<01:16:04.280> use<01:16:04.560> with<01:16:04.719> any<01:16:04.920> sentence<01:16:05.239> you<01:16:05.320> want 01:16:05.430 --> 01:16:05.440 align:start position:0% you can use with any sentence you want 01:16:05.440 --> 01:16:06.990 align:start position:0% you can use with any sentence you want to<01:16:05.560> say<01:16:05.840> and<01:16:05.960> in<01:16:06.080> case<01:16:06.239> you<01:16:06.320> got<01:16:06.520> all<01:16:06.639> of<01:16:06.800> them 01:16:06.990 --> 01:16:07.000 align:start position:0% to say and in case you got all of them 01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:08.510 align:start position:0% to say and in case you got all of them right<01:16:07.280> then<01:16:07.360> you<01:16:07.480> did<01:16:07.639> a<01:16:07.760> really<01:16:07.960> good<01:16:08.199> job<01:16:08.400> at 01:16:08.510 --> 01:16:08.520 align:start position:0% right then you did a really good job at 01:16:08.520 --> 01:16:10.030 align:start position:0% right then you did a really good job at finding<01:16:08.840> other<01:16:09.080> ways<01:16:09.320> to<01:16:09.480> find<01:16:09.719> different 01:16:10.030 --> 01:16:10.040 align:start position:0% finding other ways to find different 01:16:10.040 --> 01:16:11.910 align:start position:0% finding other ways to find different answers<01:16:10.520> in<01:16:10.639> my<01:16:10.800> two<01:16:11.000> previous<01:16:11.360> videos<01:16:11.800> I 01:16:11.910 --> 01:16:11.920 align:start position:0% answers in my two previous videos I 01:16:11.920 --> 01:16:13.510 align:start position:0% answers in my two previous videos I explained<01:16:12.280> the<01:16:12.360> concept<01:16:12.719> behind<01:16:13.000> direct<01:16:13.360> and 01:16:13.510 --> 01:16:13.520 align:start position:0% explained the concept behind direct and 01:16:13.520 --> 01:16:15.149 align:start position:0% explained the concept behind direct and indirect<01:16:13.960> object<01:16:14.239> pronouns<01:16:14.760> and<01:16:14.840> how<01:16:15.000> they 01:16:15.149 --> 01:16:15.159 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns and how they 01:16:15.159 --> 01:16:16.990 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns and how they apply<01:16:15.440> separately<01:16:16.000> direct<01:16:16.239> object<01:16:16.520> pronouns 01:16:16.990 --> 01:16:17.000 align:start position:0% apply separately direct object pronouns 01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:18.669 align:start position:0% apply separately direct object pronouns is<01:16:17.199> when<01:16:17.320> a<01:16:17.440> sentence<01:16:17.760> has<01:16:17.920> only<01:16:18.120> one<01:16:18.320> direct 01:16:18.669 --> 01:16:18.679 align:start position:0% is when a sentence has only one direct 01:16:18.679 --> 01:16:20.110 align:start position:0% is when a sentence has only one direct object<01:16:19.080> that<01:16:19.239> can<01:16:19.360> be<01:16:19.520> replaced<01:16:19.880> with<01:16:20.000> a 01:16:20.110 --> 01:16:20.120 align:start position:0% object that can be replaced with a 01:16:20.120 --> 01:16:22.470 align:start position:0% object that can be replaced with a pronoun<01:16:20.760> not<01:16:20.960> to<01:16:21.120> repeat<01:16:21.440> its<01:16:21.600> form<01:16:21.840> of<01:16:22.000> a<01:16:22.120> noun 01:16:22.470 --> 01:16:22.480 align:start position:0% pronoun not to repeat its form of a noun 01:16:22.480 --> 01:16:24.790 align:start position:0% pronoun not to repeat its form of a noun instead<01:16:22.719> of<01:16:22.800> saying<01:16:23.159> I<01:16:23.320> buy<01:16:23.520> a<01:16:23.719> car<01:16:24.199> I<01:16:24.280> can<01:16:24.440> say 01:16:24.790 --> 01:16:24.800 align:start position:0% instead of saying I buy a car I can say 01:16:24.800 --> 01:16:27.030 align:start position:0% instead of saying I buy a car I can say I<01:16:24.960> buy<01:16:25.280> it<01:16:25.719> with<01:16:25.920> it<01:16:26.199> being<01:16:26.400> a<01:16:26.520> direct<01:16:26.760> object 01:16:27.030 --> 01:16:27.040 align:start position:0% I buy it with it being a direct object 01:16:27.040 --> 01:16:28.830 align:start position:0% I buy it with it being a direct object pronoun<01:16:27.440> indirect<01:16:27.840> object<01:16:28.120> pronouns<01:16:28.560> is<01:16:28.719> when 01:16:28.830 --> 01:16:28.840 align:start position:0% pronoun indirect object pronouns is when 01:16:28.840 --> 01:16:30.470 align:start position:0% pronoun indirect object pronouns is when a<01:16:28.960> sentence<01:16:29.320> has<01:16:29.480> two<01:16:29.719> objects<01:16:30.239> with<01:16:30.360> the 01:16:30.470 --> 01:16:30.480 align:start position:0% a sentence has two objects with the 01:16:30.480 --> 01:16:32.030 align:start position:0% a sentence has two objects with the first<01:16:30.679> being<01:16:30.880> a<01:16:30.960> direct<01:16:31.400> object<01:16:31.840> and<01:16:31.960> the 01:16:32.030 --> 01:16:32.040 align:start position:0% first being a direct object and the 01:16:32.040 --> 01:16:33.830 align:start position:0% first being a direct object and the second<01:16:32.280> being<01:16:32.520> an<01:16:32.719> indirect<01:16:33.239> object<01:16:33.719> an 01:16:33.830 --> 01:16:33.840 align:start position:0% second being an indirect object an 01:16:33.840 --> 01:16:35.310 align:start position:0% second being an indirect object an indirect<01:16:34.239> object<01:16:34.520> pronoun<01:16:34.960> is<01:16:35.080> when<01:16:35.199> an 01:16:35.310 --> 01:16:35.320 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun is when an 01:16:35.320 --> 01:16:37.510 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun is when an indirect<01:16:35.760> object<01:16:36.080> noun<01:16:36.480> is<01:16:36.639> put<01:16:36.840> into<01:16:37.080> pronoun 01:16:37.510 --> 01:16:37.520 align:start position:0% indirect object noun is put into pronoun 01:16:37.520 --> 01:16:39.310 align:start position:0% indirect object noun is put into pronoun form<01:16:37.840> to<01:16:38.000> not<01:16:38.199> repeat<01:16:38.520> itself<01:16:38.920> instead<01:16:39.239> of 01:16:39.310 --> 01:16:39.320 align:start position:0% form to not repeat itself instead of 01:16:39.320 --> 01:16:41.750 align:start position:0% form to not repeat itself instead of saying<01:16:39.600> I<01:16:39.760> buy<01:16:39.960> a<01:16:40.120> car<01:16:40.280> for<01:16:40.480> John<01:16:41.000> I<01:16:41.080> can<01:16:41.280> say<01:16:41.600> I 01:16:41.750 --> 01:16:41.760 align:start position:0% saying I buy a car for John I can say I 01:16:41.760 --> 01:16:43.550 align:start position:0% saying I buy a car for John I can say I buy<01:16:41.960> a<01:16:42.120> car<01:16:42.280> for<01:16:42.520> him<01:16:42.760> with<01:16:42.960> him<01:16:43.199> being<01:16:43.440> the 01:16:43.550 --> 01:16:43.560 align:start position:0% buy a car for him with him being the 01:16:43.560 --> 01:16:45.270 align:start position:0% buy a car for him with him being the indirect<01:16:44.000> object<01:16:44.280> pronoun<01:16:44.760> while<01:16:44.920> I<01:16:45.040> talked 01:16:45.270 --> 01:16:45.280 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun while I talked 01:16:45.280 --> 01:16:46.950 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun while I talked about<01:16:45.480> both<01:16:45.719> Concepts<01:16:46.120> separately<01:16:46.679> in<01:16:46.840> this 01:16:46.950 --> 01:16:46.960 align:start position:0% about both Concepts separately in this 01:16:46.960 --> 01:16:48.709 align:start position:0% about both Concepts separately in this video<01:16:47.440> I<01:16:47.520> will<01:16:47.639> show<01:16:47.840> how<01:16:47.960> to<01:16:48.120> combine<01:16:48.520> both 01:16:48.709 --> 01:16:48.719 align:start position:0% video I will show how to combine both 01:16:48.719 --> 01:16:50.470 align:start position:0% video I will show how to combine both types<01:16:48.920> of<01:16:49.040> pronouns<01:16:49.560> in<01:16:49.679> one<01:16:49.880> sentence<01:16:50.360> and 01:16:50.470 --> 01:16:50.480 align:start position:0% types of pronouns in one sentence and 01:16:50.480 --> 01:16:51.790 align:start position:0% types of pronouns in one sentence and this<01:16:50.639> concept<01:16:50.960> is<01:16:51.120> actually<01:16:51.320> easier<01:16:51.679> than 01:16:51.790 --> 01:16:51.800 align:start position:0% this concept is actually easier than 01:16:51.800 --> 01:16:53.070 align:start position:0% this concept is actually easier than people<01:16:52.040> think<01:16:52.320> in<01:16:52.440> case<01:16:52.560> you<01:16:52.639> don't<01:16:52.800> remember 01:16:53.070 --> 01:16:53.080 align:start position:0% people think in case you don't remember 01:16:53.080 --> 01:16:54.030 align:start position:0% people think in case you don't remember remember<01:16:53.320> here's<01:16:53.520> what<01:16:53.639> the<01:16:53.760> Spanish 01:16:54.030 --> 01:16:54.040 align:start position:0% remember here's what the Spanish 01:16:54.040 --> 01:16:55.470 align:start position:0% remember here's what the Spanish pronouns<01:16:54.440> look<01:16:54.600> like<01:16:54.800> they<01:16:54.960> both<01:16:55.080> share<01:16:55.400> the 01:16:55.470 --> 01:16:55.480 align:start position:0% pronouns look like they both share the 01:16:55.480 --> 01:16:57.910 align:start position:0% pronouns look like they both share the same<01:16:55.719> Syntax<01:16:56.120> for<01:16:56.320> me<01:16:56.679> you<01:16:57.000> us<01:16:57.239> and<01:16:57.400> all<01:16:57.520> of<01:16:57.679> you 01:16:57.910 --> 01:16:57.920 align:start position:0% same Syntax for me you us and all of you 01:16:57.920 --> 01:16:59.910 align:start position:0% same Syntax for me you us and all of you but<01:16:58.040> change<01:16:58.320> in<01:16:58.480> the<01:16:58.679> he<01:16:58.880> and<01:16:59.080> they<01:16:59.280> pronouns 01:16:59.910 --> 01:16:59.920 align:start position:0% but change in the he and they pronouns 01:16:59.920 --> 01:17:03.070 align:start position:0% but change in the he and they pronouns lo<01:17:00.320> la<01:17:00.600> Los<01:17:00.960> and<01:17:01.199> L<01:17:01.600> mean<01:17:02.000> it<01:17:02.239> or<01:17:02.560> them<01:17:02.920> as 01:17:03.070 --> 01:17:03.080 align:start position:0% lo la Los and L mean it or them as 01:17:03.080 --> 01:17:05.470 align:start position:0% lo la Los and L mean it or them as something<01:17:03.400> masculine<01:17:03.840> or<01:17:04.080> feminine<01:17:04.719> while<01:17:05.080> Le 01:17:05.470 --> 01:17:05.480 align:start position:0% something masculine or feminine while Le 01:17:05.480 --> 01:17:08.390 align:start position:0% something masculine or feminine while Le and<01:17:05.800> Les<01:17:06.239> mean<01:17:06.600> he<01:17:06.880> or<01:17:07.080> she<01:17:07.480> and<01:17:07.760> them<01:17:08.120> as<01:17:08.199> a 01:17:08.390 --> 01:17:08.400 align:start position:0% and Les mean he or she and them as a 01:17:08.400 --> 01:17:10.229 align:start position:0% and Les mean he or she and them as a person<01:17:08.719> combining<01:17:09.159> both<01:17:09.400> pronouns<01:17:09.880> in<01:17:10.000> one 01:17:10.229 --> 01:17:10.239 align:start position:0% person combining both pronouns in one 01:17:10.239 --> 01:17:12.110 align:start position:0% person combining both pronouns in one sentence<01:17:10.760> is<01:17:10.960> actually<01:17:11.239> not<01:17:11.440> that<01:17:11.639> hard<01:17:12.000> but 01:17:12.110 --> 01:17:12.120 align:start position:0% sentence is actually not that hard but 01:17:12.120 --> 01:17:13.669 align:start position:0% sentence is actually not that hard but there<01:17:12.239> are<01:17:12.400> a<01:17:12.480> few<01:17:12.639> rules<01:17:12.880> to<01:17:13.000> note<01:17:13.280> with<01:17:13.480> both 01:17:13.669 --> 01:17:13.679 align:start position:0% there are a few rules to note with both 01:17:13.679 --> 01:17:15.270 align:start position:0% there are a few rules to note with both pronouns<01:17:14.120> whenever<01:17:14.400> you<01:17:14.520> decide<01:17:14.760> to<01:17:14.840> use<01:17:15.040> them 01:17:15.270 --> 01:17:15.280 align:start position:0% pronouns whenever you decide to use them 01:17:15.280 --> 01:17:16.750 align:start position:0% pronouns whenever you decide to use them the<01:17:15.400> first<01:17:15.639> rule<01:17:15.920> is<01:17:16.040> that<01:17:16.159> if<01:17:16.239> you're<01:17:16.400> using<01:17:16.639> a 01:17:16.750 --> 01:17:16.760 align:start position:0% the first rule is that if you're using a 01:17:16.760 --> 01:17:18.510 align:start position:0% the first rule is that if you're using a direct<01:17:17.080> object<01:17:17.360> pronoun<01:17:17.760> and<01:17:17.880> an<01:17:18.040> indirect 01:17:18.510 --> 01:17:18.520 align:start position:0% direct object pronoun and an indirect 01:17:18.520 --> 01:17:20.149 align:start position:0% direct object pronoun and an indirect object<01:17:18.800> pronoun<01:17:19.159> in<01:17:19.280> one<01:17:19.480> sentence<01:17:20.040> the 01:17:20.149 --> 01:17:20.159 align:start position:0% object pronoun in one sentence the 01:17:20.159 --> 01:17:21.950 align:start position:0% object pronoun in one sentence the indirect<01:17:20.600> object<01:17:20.920> pronoun<01:17:21.400> has<01:17:21.560> to<01:17:21.719> come 01:17:21.950 --> 01:17:21.960 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun has to come 01:17:21.960 --> 01:17:24.030 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun has to come first<01:17:22.320> in<01:17:22.440> the<01:17:22.560> sentence<01:17:23.080> and<01:17:23.239> as<01:17:23.400> always<01:17:23.800> both 01:17:24.030 --> 01:17:24.040 align:start position:0% first in the sentence and as always both 01:17:24.040 --> 01:17:25.750 align:start position:0% first in the sentence and as always both pronouns<01:17:24.440> come<01:17:24.600> before<01:17:24.800> a<01:17:24.920> conjugated<01:17:25.440> verb 01:17:25.750 --> 01:17:25.760 align:start position:0% pronouns come before a conjugated verb 01:17:25.760 --> 01:17:27.189 align:start position:0% pronouns come before a conjugated verb in<01:17:25.840> a<01:17:26.000> sentence<01:17:26.440> take<01:17:26.560> a<01:17:26.679> look<01:17:26.800> at<01:17:26.880> this<01:17:27.000> phrase 01:17:27.189 --> 01:17:27.199 align:start position:0% in a sentence take a look at this phrase 01:17:27.199 --> 01:17:29.390 align:start position:0% in a sentence take a look at this phrase in<01:17:27.320> English<01:17:27.760> I<01:17:27.880> buy<01:17:28.120> a<01:17:28.320> car<01:17:28.480> for<01:17:28.679> you<01:17:28.960> car<01:17:29.159> is<01:17:29.280> a 01:17:29.390 --> 01:17:29.400 align:start position:0% in English I buy a car for you car is a 01:17:29.400 --> 01:17:31.430 align:start position:0% in English I buy a car for you car is a direct<01:17:29.679> object<01:17:29.960> noun<01:17:30.400> you<01:17:30.679> is<01:17:30.800> an<01:17:30.960> indirect 01:17:31.430 --> 01:17:31.440 align:start position:0% direct object noun you is an indirect 01:17:31.440 --> 01:17:33.470 align:start position:0% direct object noun you is an indirect object<01:17:31.920> already<01:17:32.280> in<01:17:32.480> pronoun<01:17:32.920> form<01:17:33.239> and<01:17:33.360> so 01:17:33.470 --> 01:17:33.480 align:start position:0% object already in pronoun form and so 01:17:33.480 --> 01:17:35.510 align:start position:0% object already in pronoun form and so the<01:17:33.600> phrase<01:17:33.800> in<01:17:33.960> Spanish<01:17:34.280> would 01:17:35.510 --> 01:17:35.520 align:start position:0% the phrase in Spanish would 01:17:35.520 --> 01:17:37.870 align:start position:0% the phrase in Spanish would be<01:17:36.520> this<01:17:36.639> sentence<01:17:37.120> both<01:17:37.280> in<01:17:37.440> English<01:17:37.719> and 01:17:37.870 --> 01:17:37.880 align:start position:0% be this sentence both in English and 01:17:37.880 --> 01:17:39.510 align:start position:0% be this sentence both in English and Spanish<01:17:38.239> can<01:17:38.360> be<01:17:38.480> said<01:17:38.679> using<01:17:38.920> both<01:17:39.159> types<01:17:39.400> of 01:17:39.510 --> 01:17:39.520 align:start position:0% Spanish can be said using both types of 01:17:39.520 --> 01:17:41.350 align:start position:0% Spanish can be said using both types of pronouns<01:17:40.080> and<01:17:40.199> instead<01:17:40.440> of<01:17:40.520> saying<01:17:40.840> I<01:17:41.000> buy<01:17:41.239> a 01:17:41.350 --> 01:17:41.360 align:start position:0% pronouns and instead of saying I buy a 01:17:41.360 --> 01:17:44.070 align:start position:0% pronouns and instead of saying I buy a car<01:17:41.600> for<01:17:41.800> you<01:17:42.159> we<01:17:42.280> can<01:17:42.480> say<01:17:42.840> I<01:17:43.040> buy<01:17:43.360> you<01:17:43.719> it 01:17:44.070 --> 01:17:44.080 align:start position:0% car for you we can say I buy you it 01:17:44.080 --> 01:17:45.390 align:start position:0% car for you we can say I buy you it saying<01:17:44.320> this<01:17:44.480> phrase<01:17:44.679> in<01:17:44.840> Spanish<01:17:45.239> is 01:17:45.390 --> 01:17:45.400 align:start position:0% saying this phrase in Spanish is 01:17:45.400 --> 01:17:46.790 align:start position:0% saying this phrase in Spanish is actually<01:17:45.639> not<01:17:45.840> that<01:17:46.040> hard<01:17:46.400> because<01:17:46.600> you<01:17:46.719> have 01:17:46.790 --> 01:17:46.800 align:start position:0% actually not that hard because you have 01:17:46.800 --> 01:17:48.590 align:start position:0% actually not that hard because you have to<01:17:47.040> remember<01:17:47.280> to<01:17:47.400> put<01:17:47.600> both<01:17:47.840> pronouns<01:17:48.400> before 01:17:48.590 --> 01:17:48.600 align:start position:0% to remember to put both pronouns before 01:17:48.600 --> 01:17:50.229 align:start position:0% to remember to put both pronouns before a<01:17:48.760> conjugative<01:17:49.239> verb<01:17:49.520> with<01:17:49.679> the<01:17:49.800> indirect 01:17:50.229 --> 01:17:50.239 align:start position:0% a conjugative verb with the indirect 01:17:50.239 --> 01:17:52.189 align:start position:0% a conjugative verb with the indirect object<01:17:50.520> pronoun<01:17:50.920> coming<01:17:51.199> first<01:17:51.600> in<01:17:51.719> Spanish 01:17:52.189 --> 01:17:52.199 align:start position:0% object pronoun coming first in Spanish 01:17:52.199 --> 01:17:54.189 align:start position:0% object pronoun coming first in Spanish the<01:17:52.320> phrase<01:17:52.560> would<01:17:52.679> simply 01:17:54.189 --> 01:17:54.199 align:start position:0% the phrase would simply 01:17:54.199 --> 01:17:56.629 align:start position:0% the phrase would simply be<01:17:55.199> with<01:17:55.600> being<01:17:55.800> the<01:17:55.920> indirect<01:17:56.360> object 01:17:56.629 --> 01:17:56.639 align:start position:0% be with being the indirect object 01:17:56.639 --> 01:17:58.750 align:start position:0% be with being the indirect object pronoun<01:17:57.080> you<01:17:57.400> and<01:17:57.639> lo<01:17:57.920> being<01:17:58.080> a<01:17:58.199> direct<01:17:58.480> object 01:17:58.750 --> 01:17:58.760 align:start position:0% pronoun you and lo being a direct object 01:17:58.760 --> 01:18:00.750 align:start position:0% pronoun you and lo being a direct object pronoun<01:17:59.320> that's<01:17:59.480> a<01:17:59.679> masculine<01:18:00.320> it<01:18:00.639> the 01:18:00.750 --> 01:18:00.760 align:start position:0% pronoun that's a masculine it the 01:18:00.760 --> 01:18:02.750 align:start position:0% pronoun that's a masculine it the sentence<01:18:01.080> can<01:18:01.239> also<01:18:01.440> be<01:18:01.639> rephrased<01:18:02.320> using<01:18:02.600> the 01:18:02.750 --> 01:18:02.760 align:start position:0% sentence can also be rephrased using the 01:18:02.760 --> 01:18:04.790 align:start position:0% sentence can also be rephrased using the present<01:18:03.120> progressive<01:18:03.760> such<01:18:03.960> as<01:18:04.159> I<01:18:04.280> am<01:18:04.480> buying 01:18:04.790 --> 01:18:04.800 align:start position:0% present progressive such as I am buying 01:18:04.800 --> 01:18:06.510 align:start position:0% present progressive such as I am buying you<01:18:05.080> it<01:18:05.440> and<01:18:05.560> this<01:18:05.639> is<01:18:05.760> where<01:18:05.920> the<01:18:06.040> second<01:18:06.239> rule 01:18:06.510 --> 01:18:06.520 align:start position:0% you it and this is where the second rule 01:18:06.520 --> 01:18:08.149 align:start position:0% you it and this is where the second rule comes<01:18:06.719> in<01:18:07.000> allowing<01:18:07.400> both<01:18:07.600> pronouns<01:18:08.000> in 01:18:08.149 --> 01:18:08.159 align:start position:0% comes in allowing both pronouns in 01:18:08.159 --> 01:18:09.950 align:start position:0% comes in allowing both pronouns in Spanish<01:18:08.520> to<01:18:08.639> be<01:18:08.760> attached<01:18:09.080> to<01:18:09.239> infinitives<01:18:09.840> we 01:18:09.950 --> 01:18:09.960 align:start position:0% Spanish to be attached to infinitives we 01:18:09.960 --> 01:18:11.709 align:start position:0% Spanish to be attached to infinitives we can 01:18:11.709 --> 01:18:11.719 align:start position:0% can 01:18:11.719 --> 01:18:13.750 align:start position:0% can say 01:18:13.750 --> 01:18:13.760 align:start position:0% say 01:18:13.760 --> 01:18:16.070 align:start position:0% say or<01:18:14.760> with<01:18:14.880> the<01:18:15.000> indirect<01:18:15.480> object<01:18:15.760> pronoun 01:18:16.070 --> 01:18:16.080 align:start position:0% or with the indirect object pronoun 01:18:16.080 --> 01:18:18.030 align:start position:0% or with the indirect object pronoun coming<01:18:16.360> first<01:18:16.840> after<01:18:17.120> the<01:18:17.280> infinitive<01:18:17.880> and 01:18:18.030 --> 01:18:18.040 align:start position:0% coming first after the infinitive and 01:18:18.040 --> 01:18:20.629 align:start position:0% coming first after the infinitive and with<01:18:18.159> an<01:18:18.400> accent<01:18:18.760> on<01:18:18.920> the 01:18:20.629 --> 01:18:20.639 align:start position:0% with an accent on the 01:18:20.639 --> 01:18:23.310 align:start position:0% with an accent on the infinitive<01:18:21.639> however<01:18:22.000> considering<01:18:22.400> that<01:18:22.560> com 01:18:23.310 --> 01:18:23.320 align:start position:0% infinitive however considering that com 01:18:23.320 --> 01:18:25.070 align:start position:0% infinitive however considering that com is<01:18:23.400> an<01:18:23.560> infinitive<01:18:24.000> that<01:18:24.120> changes<01:18:24.480> form<01:18:24.960> it 01:18:25.070 --> 01:18:25.080 align:start position:0% is an infinitive that changes form it 01:18:25.080 --> 01:18:26.870 align:start position:0% is an infinitive that changes form it has<01:18:25.199> to<01:18:25.360> have<01:18:25.520> an<01:18:25.760> accent<01:18:26.320> regardless<01:18:26.760> if 01:18:26.870 --> 01:18:26.880 align:start position:0% has to have an accent regardless if 01:18:26.880 --> 01:18:28.709 align:start position:0% has to have an accent regardless if you're<01:18:27.040> using<01:18:27.280> a<01:18:27.440> direct<01:18:27.800> or<01:18:28.000> indirect<01:18:28.440> object 01:18:28.709 --> 01:18:28.719 align:start position:0% you're using a direct or indirect object 01:18:28.719 --> 01:18:30.830 align:start position:0% you're using a direct or indirect object pronoun<01:18:29.159> or<01:18:29.440> both<01:18:30.120> sometimes<01:18:30.440> you<01:18:30.520> can<01:18:30.679> have 01:18:30.830 --> 01:18:30.840 align:start position:0% pronoun or both sometimes you can have 01:18:30.840 --> 01:18:32.510 align:start position:0% pronoun or both sometimes you can have infinitives<01:18:31.360> that<01:18:31.480> don't<01:18:31.679> change<01:18:32.199> like<01:18:32.400> in 01:18:32.510 --> 01:18:32.520 align:start position:0% infinitives that don't change like in 01:18:32.520 --> 01:18:33.310 align:start position:0% infinitives that don't change like in the 01:18:33.310 --> 01:18:33.320 align:start position:0% the 01:18:33.320 --> 01:18:36.910 align:start position:0% the phrase<01:18:34.320> I<01:18:34.400> can<01:18:34.639> buy<01:18:34.920> it<01:18:35.320> which<01:18:35.440> puts<01:18:35.880> L<01:18:36.199> with 01:18:36.910 --> 01:18:36.920 align:start position:0% phrase I can buy it which puts L with 01:18:36.920 --> 01:18:38.669 align:start position:0% phrase I can buy it which puts L with and<01:18:37.080> as<01:18:37.199> you<01:18:37.280> can<01:18:37.400> see<01:18:37.719> no<01:18:38.000> accent<01:18:38.239> is<01:18:38.360> needed 01:18:38.669 --> 01:18:38.679 align:start position:0% and as you can see no accent is needed 01:18:38.679 --> 01:18:40.149 align:start position:0% and as you can see no accent is needed here<01:18:39.000> because<01:18:39.199> you're<01:18:39.320> using<01:18:39.560> an<01:18:39.719> infinitive 01:18:40.149 --> 01:18:40.159 align:start position:0% here because you're using an infinitive 01:18:40.159 --> 01:18:41.709 align:start position:0% here because you're using an infinitive that<01:18:40.280> doesn't<01:18:40.520> change<01:18:40.960> and<01:18:41.080> the<01:18:41.199> emphasis<01:18:41.600> on 01:18:41.709 --> 01:18:41.719 align:start position:0% that doesn't change and the emphasis on 01:18:41.719 --> 01:18:43.669 align:start position:0% that doesn't change and the emphasis on the<01:18:41.880> syllable<01:18:42.360> doesn't<01:18:42.600> go<01:18:42.800> away<01:18:43.239> however<01:18:43.560> the 01:18:43.669 --> 01:18:43.679 align:start position:0% the syllable doesn't go away however the 01:18:43.679 --> 01:18:45.310 align:start position:0% the syllable doesn't go away however the third<01:18:43.920> rule<01:18:44.280> is<01:18:44.400> that<01:18:44.560> when<01:18:44.679> you<01:18:44.800> use<01:18:45.080> both 01:18:45.310 --> 01:18:45.320 align:start position:0% third rule is that when you use both 01:18:45.320 --> 01:18:47.310 align:start position:0% third rule is that when you use both types<01:18:45.520> of<01:18:45.639> pronouns<01:18:46.159> you<01:18:46.280> must<01:18:46.480> put<01:18:46.639> an<01:18:46.880> accent 01:18:47.310 --> 01:18:47.320 align:start position:0% types of pronouns you must put an accent 01:18:47.320 --> 01:18:49.270 align:start position:0% types of pronouns you must put an accent on<01:18:47.560> both<01:18:47.880> types<01:18:48.120> of<01:18:48.280> infinitives<01:18:48.960> such<01:18:49.120> as 01:18:49.270 --> 01:18:49.280 align:start position:0% on both types of infinitives such as 01:18:49.280 --> 01:18:51.709 align:start position:0% on both types of infinitives such as saying<01:18:49.639> I<01:18:49.719> am<01:18:49.880> buying<01:18:50.199> you<01:18:50.400> it<01:18:50.800> or<01:18:51.199> I<01:18:51.280> can<01:18:51.480> buy 01:18:51.709 --> 01:18:51.719 align:start position:0% saying I am buying you it or I can buy 01:18:51.719 --> 01:18:53.830 align:start position:0% saying I am buying you it or I can buy you<01:18:51.920> it<01:18:52.239> which<01:18:52.320> in<01:18:52.440> Spanish<01:18:52.719> would 01:18:53.830 --> 01:18:53.840 align:start position:0% you it which in Spanish would 01:18:53.840 --> 01:18:55.470 align:start position:0% you it which in Spanish would be 01:18:55.470 --> 01:18:55.480 align:start position:0% be 01:18:55.480 --> 01:18:57.550 align:start position:0% be and<01:18:56.480> if<01:18:56.560> you<01:18:56.679> decide<01:18:56.920> to<01:18:57.040> attach<01:18:57.320> both 01:18:57.550 --> 01:18:57.560 align:start position:0% and if you decide to attach both 01:18:57.560 --> 01:18:59.110 align:start position:0% and if you decide to attach both pronouns<01:18:57.920> to<01:18:58.080> infinitives<01:18:58.639> then<01:18:58.719> you<01:18:58.840> have<01:18:58.960> to 01:18:59.110 --> 01:18:59.120 align:start position:0% pronouns to infinitives then you have to 01:18:59.120 --> 01:19:00.990 align:start position:0% pronouns to infinitives then you have to remember<01:18:59.400> to<01:18:59.560> put<01:18:59.760> accents<01:19:00.159> on<01:19:00.360> them<01:19:00.639> to<01:19:00.800> keep 01:19:00.990 --> 01:19:01.000 align:start position:0% remember to put accents on them to keep 01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:02.270 align:start position:0% remember to put accents on them to keep their<01:19:01.159> sound<01:19:01.520> if<01:19:01.600> you<01:19:01.719> decide<01:19:01.960> to<01:19:02.040> put<01:19:02.199> the 01:19:02.270 --> 01:19:02.280 align:start position:0% their sound if you decide to put the 01:19:02.280 --> 01:19:03.950 align:start position:0% their sound if you decide to put the pronouns<01:19:02.679> before<01:19:02.880> a<01:19:03.000> conjugative<01:19:03.480> verb<01:19:03.800> then 01:19:03.950 --> 01:19:03.960 align:start position:0% pronouns before a conjugative verb then 01:19:03.960 --> 01:19:05.629 align:start position:0% pronouns before a conjugative verb then no<01:19:04.239> accent<01:19:04.600> is<01:19:04.719> needed<01:19:05.159> here<01:19:05.280> are<01:19:05.440> some 01:19:05.629 --> 01:19:05.639 align:start position:0% no accent is needed here are some 01:19:05.639 --> 01:19:07.189 align:start position:0% no accent is needed here are some examples<01:19:06.159> how<01:19:06.239> would<01:19:06.400> you<01:19:06.480> say<01:19:06.639> the<01:19:06.760> phrase 01:19:07.189 --> 01:19:07.199 align:start position:0% examples how would you say the phrase 01:19:07.199 --> 01:19:11.189 align:start position:0% examples how would you say the phrase she<01:19:07.440> gives<01:19:07.639> me<01:19:07.880> it<01:19:08.159> in<01:19:08.360> Spanish<01:19:08.960> with<01:19:09.159> it<01:19:09.360> being 01:19:11.189 --> 01:19:11.199 align:start position:0% she gives me it in Spanish with it being 01:19:11.199 --> 01:19:13.709 align:start position:0% she gives me it in Spanish with it being masculine<01:19:12.199> with<01:19:12.480> me<01:19:12.800> being<01:19:13.040> the<01:19:13.199> indirect 01:19:13.709 --> 01:19:13.719 align:start position:0% masculine with me being the indirect 01:19:13.719 --> 01:19:16.030 align:start position:0% masculine with me being the indirect object<01:19:14.120> and<01:19:14.320> lo<01:19:14.560> being<01:19:14.719> a<01:19:14.880> direct<01:19:15.239> object<01:19:15.760> now 01:19:16.030 --> 01:19:16.040 align:start position:0% object and lo being a direct object now 01:19:16.040 --> 01:19:18.430 align:start position:0% object and lo being a direct object now how<01:19:16.159> would<01:19:16.280> you<01:19:16.400> say<01:19:16.719> she<01:19:17.080> is<01:19:17.360> giving<01:19:17.639> me<01:19:17.920> it 01:19:18.430 --> 01:19:18.440 align:start position:0% how would you say she is giving me it 01:19:18.440 --> 01:19:20.310 align:start position:0% how would you say she is giving me it you<01:19:18.560> can 01:19:20.310 --> 01:19:20.320 align:start position:0% you can 01:19:20.320 --> 01:19:22.350 align:start position:0% you can say<01:19:21.320> or<01:19:21.600> if<01:19:21.679> you<01:19:21.800> want<01:19:21.880> to<01:19:22.000> attach<01:19:22.239> the 01:19:22.350 --> 01:19:22.360 align:start position:0% say or if you want to attach the 01:19:22.360 --> 01:19:24.669 align:start position:0% say or if you want to attach the pronouns<01:19:22.639> to<01:19:23.000> infinitive<01:19:23.560> you<01:19:23.639> can 01:19:24.669 --> 01:19:24.679 align:start position:0% pronouns to infinitive you can 01:19:24.679 --> 01:19:27.189 align:start position:0% pronouns to infinitive you can say<01:19:25.679> with<01:19:25.800> an<01:19:26.000> accent<01:19:26.280> on<01:19:26.440> the<01:19:26.560> infinitive<01:19:27.120> how 01:19:27.189 --> 01:19:27.199 align:start position:0% say with an accent on the infinitive how 01:19:27.199 --> 01:19:28.870 align:start position:0% say with an accent on the infinitive how would<01:19:27.360> you<01:19:27.440> say<01:19:27.639> the<01:19:27.760> phrase<01:19:28.199> you<01:19:28.320> are<01:19:28.480> showing 01:19:28.870 --> 01:19:28.880 align:start position:0% would you say the phrase you are showing 01:19:28.880 --> 01:19:33.229 align:start position:0% would you say the phrase you are showing us<01:19:29.199> it<01:19:29.560> with<01:19:29.760> it<01:19:29.960> being<01:19:30.239> feminine<01:19:31.000> you<01:19:31.080> can 01:19:33.229 --> 01:19:33.239 align:start position:0% us it with it being feminine you can 01:19:33.239 --> 01:19:35.510 align:start position:0% us it with it being feminine you can say 01:19:35.510 --> 01:19:35.520 align:start position:0% say 01:19:35.520 --> 01:19:38.189 align:start position:0% say or<01:19:36.520> with<01:19:36.639> an<01:19:36.840> accent<01:19:37.159> on<01:19:37.320> the<01:19:37.440> infinitive<01:19:38.120> how 01:19:38.189 --> 01:19:38.199 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive how 01:19:38.199 --> 01:19:39.750 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive how would<01:19:38.320> you<01:19:38.400> say<01:19:38.560> the<01:19:38.679> phrase<01:19:39.159> they<01:19:39.280> want<01:19:39.480> to 01:19:39.750 --> 01:19:39.760 align:start position:0% would you say the phrase they want to 01:19:39.760 --> 01:19:41.709 align:start position:0% would you say the phrase they want to present<01:19:40.199> them<01:19:40.400> to<01:19:40.600> you<01:19:40.840> with<01:19:41.080> them<01:19:41.400> being 01:19:41.709 --> 01:19:41.719 align:start position:0% present them to you with them being 01:19:41.719 --> 01:19:44.590 align:start position:0% present them to you with them being masculine<01:19:42.719> you<01:19:42.800> can 01:19:44.590 --> 01:19:44.600 align:start position:0% masculine you can 01:19:44.600 --> 01:19:46.629 align:start position:0% masculine you can say 01:19:46.629 --> 01:19:46.639 align:start position:0% say 01:19:46.639 --> 01:19:48.990 align:start position:0% say oros<01:19:47.639> with<01:19:47.719> an<01:19:47.920> accent<01:19:48.239> on<01:19:48.360> the<01:19:48.520> infinitive 01:19:48.990 --> 01:19:49.000 align:start position:0% oros with an accent on the infinitive 01:19:49.000 --> 01:19:50.750 align:start position:0% oros with an accent on the infinitive the<01:19:49.080> more<01:19:49.199> you<01:19:49.320> try<01:19:49.639> this<01:19:49.840> concept<01:19:50.320> the<01:19:50.480> faster 01:19:50.750 --> 01:19:50.760 align:start position:0% the more you try this concept the faster 01:19:50.760 --> 01:19:52.390 align:start position:0% the more you try this concept the faster you'll<01:19:51.000> get<01:19:51.120> it<01:19:51.360> and<01:19:51.520> hopefully<01:19:52.000> I'm<01:19:52.120> doing<01:19:52.320> a 01:19:52.390 --> 01:19:52.400 align:start position:0% you'll get it and hopefully I'm doing a 01:19:52.400 --> 01:19:53.430 align:start position:0% you'll get it and hopefully I'm doing a good<01:19:52.520> job<01:19:52.719> for<01:19:52.880> presenting<01:19:53.239> these 01:19:53.430 --> 01:19:53.440 align:start position:0% good job for presenting these 01:19:53.440 --> 01:19:55.189 align:start position:0% good job for presenting these explanations<01:19:54.199> because<01:19:54.480> now<01:19:54.760> there's<01:19:55.000> one 01:19:55.189 --> 01:19:55.199 align:start position:0% explanations because now there's one 01:19:55.199 --> 01:19:56.750 align:start position:0% explanations because now there's one last<01:19:55.400> rule<01:19:55.639> you<01:19:55.719> need<01:19:55.880> to<01:19:56.000> know<01:19:56.320> with<01:19:56.520> both 01:19:56.750 --> 01:19:56.760 align:start position:0% last rule you need to know with both 01:19:56.760 --> 01:19:58.470 align:start position:0% last rule you need to know with both types<01:19:56.960> of<01:19:57.120> pronouns<01:19:57.679> also<01:19:57.840> known<01:19:58.080> as<01:19:58.199> double 01:19:58.470 --> 01:19:58.480 align:start position:0% types of pronouns also known as double 01:19:58.480 --> 01:19:59.950 align:start position:0% types of pronouns also known as double object<01:19:58.760> pronouns<01:19:59.280> and<01:19:59.360> that<01:19:59.480> is<01:19:59.600> whenever<01:19:59.840> you 01:19:59.950 --> 01:19:59.960 align:start position:0% object pronouns and that is whenever you 01:19:59.960 --> 01:20:01.669 align:start position:0% object pronouns and that is whenever you decide<01:20:00.199> to<01:20:00.320> use<01:20:00.480> two<01:20:00.679> specific<01:20:01.080> types<01:20:01.320> of<01:20:01.480> them 01:20:01.669 --> 01:20:01.679 align:start position:0% decide to use two specific types of them 01:20:01.679 --> 01:20:02.990 align:start position:0% decide to use two specific types of them you'll<01:20:01.840> need<01:20:01.960> to<01:20:02.080> modify<01:20:02.440> one<01:20:02.560> of<01:20:02.679> them<01:20:02.840> to 01:20:02.990 --> 01:20:03.000 align:start position:0% you'll need to modify one of them to 01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:04.790 align:start position:0% you'll need to modify one of them to avoid<01:20:03.280> repetition<01:20:03.800> here's<01:20:04.000> what<01:20:04.120> I<01:20:04.199> mean<01:20:04.639> take 01:20:04.790 --> 01:20:04.800 align:start position:0% avoid repetition here's what I mean take 01:20:04.800 --> 01:20:06.910 align:start position:0% avoid repetition here's what I mean take a<01:20:04.920> look<01:20:05.040> at<01:20:05.159> this<01:20:05.320> sentence<01:20:05.800> she<01:20:06.040> makes<01:20:06.360> it<01:20:06.679> for 01:20:06.910 --> 01:20:06.920 align:start position:0% a look at this sentence she makes it for 01:20:06.920 --> 01:20:08.709 align:start position:0% a look at this sentence she makes it for him<01:20:07.239> with<01:20:07.400> it<01:20:07.639> being<01:20:07.920> masculine<01:20:08.520> how<01:20:08.600> would 01:20:08.709 --> 01:20:08.719 align:start position:0% him with it being masculine how would 01:20:08.719 --> 01:20:10.030 align:start position:0% him with it being masculine how would you<01:20:08.840> say<01:20:09.040> this<01:20:09.120> phrase<01:20:09.360> in<01:20:09.520> Spanish 01:20:10.030 --> 01:20:10.040 align:start position:0% you say this phrase in Spanish 01:20:10.040 --> 01:20:11.229 align:start position:0% you say this phrase in Spanish considering<01:20:10.440> that<01:20:10.520> you<01:20:10.639> know<01:20:10.800> the<01:20:10.880> rules<01:20:11.080> for 01:20:11.229 --> 01:20:11.239 align:start position:0% considering that you know the rules for 01:20:11.239 --> 01:20:13.350 align:start position:0% considering that you know the rules for indirect<01:20:11.679> object<01:20:12.000> pronouns<01:20:12.639> instinctively 01:20:13.350 --> 01:20:13.360 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns instinctively 01:20:13.360 --> 01:20:15.990 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns instinctively you<01:20:13.440> would<01:20:13.679> probably<01:20:14.000> say<01:20:14.239> something 01:20:15.990 --> 01:20:16.000 align:start position:0% you would probably say something 01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:18.830 align:start position:0% you would probably say something like<01:20:17.000> or<01:20:17.120> if<01:20:17.199> you<01:20:17.320> want<01:20:17.480> to<01:20:17.760> you<01:20:17.840> can<01:20:18.000> put<01:20:18.320> a<01:20:18.760> at 01:20:18.830 --> 01:20:18.840 align:start position:0% like or if you want to you can put a at 01:20:18.840 --> 01:20:20.110 align:start position:0% like or if you want to you can put a at the<01:20:18.960> beginning<01:20:19.239> of<01:20:19.360> the<01:20:19.480> sentence<01:20:19.960> by 01:20:20.110 --> 01:20:20.120 align:start position:0% the beginning of the sentence by 01:20:20.120 --> 01:20:21.830 align:start position:0% the beginning of the sentence by technicality<01:20:21.040> this<01:20:21.159> sentence<01:20:21.480> would<01:20:21.639> be 01:20:21.830 --> 01:20:21.840 align:start position:0% technicality this sentence would be 01:20:21.840 --> 01:20:23.430 align:start position:0% technicality this sentence would be right<01:20:22.120> if<01:20:22.239> it<01:20:22.360> wasn't<01:20:22.560> for<01:20:22.800> spanish's<01:20:23.199> rule 01:20:23.430 --> 01:20:23.440 align:start position:0% right if it wasn't for spanish's rule 01:20:23.440 --> 01:20:25.430 align:start position:0% right if it wasn't for spanish's rule for<01:20:23.639> double<01:20:23.920> object<01:20:24.239> pronouns<01:20:24.800> and<01:20:24.960> that<01:20:25.120> is 01:20:25.430 --> 01:20:25.440 align:start position:0% for double object pronouns and that is 01:20:25.440 --> 01:20:26.990 align:start position:0% for double object pronouns and that is if<01:20:25.520> you're<01:20:25.679> using<01:20:26.000> two<01:20:26.199> pronouns<01:20:26.719> with<01:20:26.840> the 01:20:26.990 --> 01:20:27.000 align:start position:0% if you're using two pronouns with the 01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:29.030 align:start position:0% if you're using two pronouns with the letter<01:20:27.280> L<01:20:27.719> you<01:20:27.840> have<01:20:27.960> to<01:20:28.080> change<01:20:28.360> the<01:20:28.520> indirect 01:20:29.030 --> 01:20:29.040 align:start position:0% letter L you have to change the indirect 01:20:29.040 --> 01:20:31.430 align:start position:0% letter L you have to change the indirect object<01:20:29.320> pronoun<01:20:29.800> to<01:20:30.239> say<01:20:30.639> to<01:20:30.840> avoid<01:20:31.080> repeating 01:20:31.430 --> 01:20:31.440 align:start position:0% object pronoun to say to avoid repeating 01:20:31.440 --> 01:20:33.709 align:start position:0% object pronoun to say to avoid repeating the<01:20:31.560> same<01:20:31.760> letter<01:20:32.120> instead<01:20:32.360> of 01:20:33.709 --> 01:20:33.719 align:start position:0% the same letter instead of 01:20:33.719 --> 01:20:36.070 align:start position:0% the same letter instead of saying<01:20:34.719> you<01:20:34.840> need<01:20:34.960> to 01:20:36.070 --> 01:20:36.080 align:start position:0% saying you need to 01:20:36.080 --> 01:20:38.990 align:start position:0% saying you need to say<01:20:37.080> and<01:20:37.159> you<01:20:37.239> need<01:20:37.360> to<01:20:37.520> keep<01:20:37.719> the<01:20:38.320> part<01:20:38.760> in<01:20:38.880> the 01:20:38.990 --> 01:20:39.000 align:start position:0% say and you need to keep the part in the 01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:40.430 align:start position:0% say and you need to keep the part in the sentence<01:20:39.560> because<01:20:39.719> we<01:20:39.840> wouldn't<01:20:40.080> know<01:20:40.280> who 01:20:40.430 --> 01:20:40.440 align:start position:0% sentence because we wouldn't know who 01:20:40.440 --> 01:20:42.390 align:start position:0% sentence because we wouldn't know who the<01:20:40.560> pronoun<01:20:40.960> refers<01:20:41.320> to<01:20:41.679> without<01:20:41.920> it<01:20:42.199> this 01:20:42.390 --> 01:20:42.400 align:start position:0% the pronoun refers to without it this 01:20:42.400 --> 01:20:44.110 align:start position:0% the pronoun refers to without it this concept<01:20:42.719> can<01:20:42.840> also<01:20:43.040> be<01:20:43.159> replicated<01:20:43.679> using<01:20:43.960> an 01:20:44.110 --> 01:20:44.120 align:start position:0% concept can also be replicated using an 01:20:44.120 --> 01:20:46.189 align:start position:0% concept can also be replicated using an infinitive<01:20:44.760> such<01:20:44.960> as<01:20:45.199> she<01:20:45.440> wants<01:20:45.719> to<01:20:45.880> make<01:20:46.040> it 01:20:46.189 --> 01:20:46.199 align:start position:0% infinitive such as she wants to make it 01:20:46.199 --> 01:20:49.189 align:start position:0% infinitive such as she wants to make it for<01:20:46.440> him<01:20:46.800> which<01:20:46.960> can<01:20:47.080> be<01:20:47.199> said 01:20:49.189 --> 01:20:49.199 align:start position:0% for him which can be said 01:20:49.199 --> 01:20:51.390 align:start position:0% for him which can be said as 01:20:51.390 --> 01:20:51.400 align:start position:0% as 01:20:51.400 --> 01:20:54.030 align:start position:0% as or<01:20:52.400> with<01:20:52.480> an<01:20:52.760> Accent<01:20:53.080> on<01:20:53.239> the<01:20:53.360> infinitive<01:20:53.880> and 01:20:54.030 --> 01:20:54.040 align:start position:0% or with an Accent on the infinitive and 01:20:54.040 --> 01:20:55.950 align:start position:0% or with an Accent on the infinitive and with<01:20:54.280> a<01:20:54.480> l<01:20:54.760> in<01:20:54.880> the<01:20:55.040> sentence<01:20:55.440> the<01:20:55.560> trickiest 01:20:55.950 --> 01:20:55.960 align:start position:0% with a l in the sentence the trickiest 01:20:55.960 --> 01:20:57.510 align:start position:0% with a l in the sentence the trickiest thing<01:20:56.080> to<01:20:56.239> remember<01:20:56.600> with<01:20:56.760> this<01:20:56.920> rule<01:20:57.239> is<01:20:57.360> that 01:20:57.510 --> 01:20:57.520 align:start position:0% thing to remember with this rule is that 01:20:57.520 --> 01:20:59.550 align:start position:0% thing to remember with this rule is that you<01:20:57.639> cannot<01:20:58.000> use<01:20:58.280> two<01:20:58.600> pronouns<01:20:59.239> with<01:20:59.400> the 01:20:59.550 --> 01:20:59.560 align:start position:0% you cannot use two pronouns with the 01:20:59.560 --> 01:21:01.709 align:start position:0% you cannot use two pronouns with the letter<01:20:59.840> L<01:21:00.239> and<01:21:00.360> therefore<01:21:00.880> this<01:21:01.040> limits<01:21:01.360> our 01:21:01.709 --> 01:21:01.719 align:start position:0% letter L and therefore this limits our 01:21:01.719 --> 01:21:03.430 align:start position:0% letter L and therefore this limits our observation<01:21:02.480> when<01:21:02.600> it<01:21:02.719> comes<01:21:02.920> down<01:21:03.040> to<01:21:03.239> both 01:21:03.430 --> 01:21:03.440 align:start position:0% observation when it comes down to both 01:21:03.440 --> 01:21:05.149 align:start position:0% observation when it comes down to both types<01:21:03.679> of<01:21:03.800> pronouns<01:21:04.360> if<01:21:04.480> the<01:21:04.600> rule<01:21:04.800> says<01:21:05.040> we 01:21:05.149 --> 01:21:05.159 align:start position:0% types of pronouns if the rule says we 01:21:05.159 --> 01:21:06.669 align:start position:0% types of pronouns if the rule says we cannot<01:21:05.440> use<01:21:05.600> two<01:21:05.800> pronouns<01:21:06.199> with<01:21:06.320> the<01:21:06.440> letter 01:21:06.669 --> 01:21:06.679 align:start position:0% cannot use two pronouns with the letter 01:21:06.679 --> 01:21:08.750 align:start position:0% cannot use two pronouns with the letter L<01:21:07.080> this<01:21:07.199> means<01:21:07.440> that<01:21:07.600> the<01:21:07.679> rule<01:21:08.000> can<01:21:08.199> only<01:21:08.480> be 01:21:08.750 --> 01:21:08.760 align:start position:0% L this means that the rule can only be 01:21:08.760 --> 01:21:11.669 align:start position:0% L this means that the rule can only be applied<01:21:09.280> whenever<01:21:09.600> we<01:21:09.719> use<01:21:10.159> Le<01:21:10.679> Les<01:21:11.120> with<01:21:11.320> lo 01:21:11.669 --> 01:21:11.679 align:start position:0% applied whenever we use Le Les with lo 01:21:11.679 --> 01:21:14.910 align:start position:0% applied whenever we use Le Les with lo la<01:21:11.960> Los<01:21:12.280> or<01:21:12.520> L<01:21:12.880> being<01:21:13.199> him<01:21:13.600> her<01:21:14.080> them<01:21:14.480> combined 01:21:14.910 --> 01:21:14.920 align:start position:0% la Los or L being him her them combined 01:21:14.920 --> 01:21:16.830 align:start position:0% la Los or L being him her them combined with<01:21:15.159> it<01:21:15.400> or<01:21:15.639> them<01:21:15.920> the<01:21:16.000> only<01:21:16.199> combination<01:21:16.719> we 01:21:16.830 --> 01:21:16.840 align:start position:0% with it or them the only combination we 01:21:16.840 --> 01:21:18.189 align:start position:0% with it or them the only combination we can<01:21:16.960> have<01:21:17.159> with<01:21:17.280> two<01:21:17.480> pronouns<01:21:17.880> beginning 01:21:18.189 --> 01:21:18.199 align:start position:0% can have with two pronouns beginning 01:21:18.199 --> 01:21:20.270 align:start position:0% can have with two pronouns beginning with<01:21:18.280> the<01:21:18.400> letter<01:21:18.679> L<01:21:19.000> is<01:21:19.120> whenever<01:21:19.400> we<01:21:19.520> use<01:21:19.920> Le 01:21:20.270 --> 01:21:20.280 align:start position:0% with the letter L is whenever we use Le 01:21:20.280 --> 01:21:23.629 align:start position:0% with the letter L is whenever we use Le or<01:21:20.639> Les<01:21:21.080> with<01:21:21.320> lo<01:21:21.679> la<01:21:21.960> Los<01:21:22.239> or<01:21:23.080> and<01:21:23.239> only<01:21:23.480> in 01:21:23.629 --> 01:21:23.639 align:start position:0% or Les with lo la Los or and only in 01:21:23.639 --> 01:21:26.590 align:start position:0% or Les with lo la Los or and only in these<01:21:23.880> cases<01:21:24.360> does<01:21:24.800> le<01:21:25.159> and<01:21:25.440> Les<01:21:25.880> change<01:21:26.239> into 01:21:26.590 --> 01:21:26.600 align:start position:0% these cases does le and Les change into 01:21:26.600 --> 01:21:28.390 align:start position:0% these cases does le and Les change into say<01:21:26.880> so<01:21:27.080> overall<01:21:27.560> you<01:21:27.719> have<01:21:27.840> to<01:21:27.960> change<01:21:28.239> the 01:21:28.390 --> 01:21:28.400 align:start position:0% say so overall you have to change the 01:21:28.400 --> 01:21:30.669 align:start position:0% say so overall you have to change the indirect<01:21:28.800> object<01:21:29.120> pronoun<01:21:29.600> to<01:21:29.920> say<01:21:30.239> to<01:21:30.400> avoid 01:21:30.669 --> 01:21:30.679 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun to say to avoid 01:21:30.679 --> 01:21:31.950 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun to say to avoid repeating<01:21:31.000> the<01:21:31.120> same<01:21:31.360> letter<01:21:31.800> which 01:21:31.950 --> 01:21:31.960 align:start position:0% repeating the same letter which 01:21:31.960 --> 01:21:33.510 align:start position:0% repeating the same letter which limitedly<01:21:32.639> means<01:21:32.920> that<01:21:33.080> whenever<01:21:33.320> you're 01:21:33.510 --> 01:21:33.520 align:start position:0% limitedly means that whenever you're 01:21:33.520 --> 01:21:37.629 align:start position:0% limitedly means that whenever you're using<01:21:33.920> Le<01:21:34.239> or<01:21:34.520> Les<01:21:35.000> plus<01:21:35.480> lo<01:21:35.880> la<01:21:36.239> Los<01:21:36.560> or<01:21:36.880> L<01:21:37.400> Le 01:21:37.629 --> 01:21:37.639 align:start position:0% using Le or Les plus lo la Los or L Le 01:21:37.639 --> 01:21:40.470 align:start position:0% using Le or Les plus lo la Los or L Le and<01:21:37.880> Les<01:21:38.199> inevitably<01:21:38.960> both<01:21:39.199> turn<01:21:39.560> into<01:21:39.880> SE<01:21:40.239> so 01:21:40.470 --> 01:21:40.480 align:start position:0% and Les inevitably both turn into SE so 01:21:40.480 --> 01:21:41.910 align:start position:0% and Les inevitably both turn into SE so at<01:21:40.600> the<01:21:40.719> end<01:21:40.960> you<01:21:41.080> wouldn't<01:21:41.320> know<01:21:41.480> who<01:21:41.679> SE 01:21:41.910 --> 01:21:41.920 align:start position:0% at the end you wouldn't know who SE 01:21:41.920 --> 01:21:43.950 align:start position:0% at the end you wouldn't know who SE refers<01:21:42.280> to<01:21:42.600> without<01:21:42.800> using<01:21:43.080> the<01:21:43.239> construction 01:21:43.950 --> 01:21:43.960 align:start position:0% refers to without using the construction 01:21:43.960 --> 01:21:45.910 align:start position:0% refers to without using the construction a<01:21:44.320> plus<01:21:44.480> a<01:21:44.600> pronoun<01:21:45.000> with<01:21:45.159> indirect<01:21:45.600> object 01:21:45.910 --> 01:21:45.920 align:start position:0% a plus a pronoun with indirect object 01:21:45.920 --> 01:21:48.510 align:start position:0% a plus a pronoun with indirect object pronouns<01:21:46.520> Le<01:21:47.000> can<01:21:47.120> mean<01:21:47.320> to<01:21:47.520> him<01:21:47.800> or<01:21:48.000> to<01:21:48.159> her<01:21:48.400> so 01:21:48.510 --> 01:21:48.520 align:start position:0% pronouns Le can mean to him or to her so 01:21:48.520 --> 01:21:51.229 align:start position:0% pronouns Le can mean to him or to her so we<01:21:48.639> need<01:21:48.760> to<01:21:48.840> use<01:21:49.000> the<01:21:49.159> construction<01:21:49.800> a<01:21:50.400> or<01:21:50.719> a 01:21:51.229 --> 01:21:51.239 align:start position:0% we need to use the construction a or a 01:21:51.239 --> 01:21:53.510 align:start position:0% we need to use the construction a or a to<01:21:51.360> be<01:21:51.480> more<01:21:51.679> specific<01:21:52.120> the<01:21:52.239> pronoun<01:21:52.880> Les<01:21:53.280> is 01:21:53.510 --> 01:21:53.520 align:start position:0% to be more specific the pronoun Les is 01:21:53.520 --> 01:21:55.229 align:start position:0% to be more specific the pronoun Les is actually<01:21:53.920> already<01:21:54.320> specific<01:21:54.719> enough<01:21:55.000> so<01:21:55.120> we 01:21:55.229 --> 01:21:55.239 align:start position:0% actually already specific enough so we 01:21:55.239 --> 01:21:56.669 align:start position:0% actually already specific enough so we don't<01:21:55.360> need<01:21:55.480> to<01:21:55.600> use<01:21:55.800> this<01:21:55.960> construction 01:21:56.669 --> 01:21:56.679 align:start position:0% don't need to use this construction 01:21:56.679 --> 01:21:58.390 align:start position:0% don't need to use this construction however<01:21:57.000> with<01:21:57.159> double<01:21:57.480> object<01:21:57.800> pronouns 01:21:58.390 --> 01:21:58.400 align:start position:0% however with double object pronouns 01:21:58.400 --> 01:22:00.590 align:start position:0% however with double object pronouns because<01:21:58.880> Le<01:21:59.320> and<01:21:59.520> Les<01:21:59.880> both<01:22:00.080> begin<01:22:00.320> with<01:22:00.440> the 01:22:00.590 --> 01:22:00.600 align:start position:0% because Le and Les both begin with the 01:22:00.600 --> 01:22:02.910 align:start position:0% because Le and Les both begin with the letter<01:22:00.840> L<01:22:01.239> both<01:22:01.440> of<01:22:01.560> them<01:22:01.800> turn<01:22:02.120> into<01:22:02.400> the<01:22:02.520> word 01:22:02.910 --> 01:22:02.920 align:start position:0% letter L both of them turn into the word 01:22:02.920 --> 01:22:05.470 align:start position:0% letter L both of them turn into the word say<01:22:03.360> and<01:22:03.520> therefore<01:22:04.080> using<01:22:04.360> the<01:22:04.520> pronoun<01:22:05.040> say 01:22:05.470 --> 01:22:05.480 align:start position:0% say and therefore using the pronoun say 01:22:05.480 --> 01:22:06.990 align:start position:0% say and therefore using the pronoun say with<01:22:05.639> double<01:22:05.960> object<01:22:06.280> pronouns<01:22:06.800> can 01:22:06.990 --> 01:22:07.000 align:start position:0% with double object pronouns can 01:22:07.000 --> 01:22:09.629 align:start position:0% with double object pronouns can simultaneously<01:22:07.760> mean<01:22:08.159> to<01:22:08.400> him<01:22:08.719> or<01:22:08.920> to<01:22:09.120> her<01:22:09.440> or 01:22:09.629 --> 01:22:09.639 align:start position:0% simultaneously mean to him or to her or 01:22:09.639 --> 01:22:12.270 align:start position:0% simultaneously mean to him or to her or to<01:22:09.920> them<01:22:10.239> so<01:22:10.400> we<01:22:10.480> need<01:22:10.600> to<01:22:10.760> specify<01:22:11.159> it<01:22:11.360> with<01:22:11.679> a 01:22:12.270 --> 01:22:12.280 align:start position:0% to them so we need to specify it with a 01:22:12.280 --> 01:22:15.709 align:start position:0% to them so we need to specify it with a a<01:22:13.159> AOS<01:22:13.960> or<01:22:14.280> AAS<01:22:14.920> and<01:22:15.000> that's<01:22:15.159> really<01:22:15.360> the 01:22:15.709 --> 01:22:15.719 align:start position:0% a AOS or AAS and that's really the 01:22:15.719 --> 01:22:17.229 align:start position:0% a AOS or AAS and that's really the difficult<01:22:15.880> part<01:22:16.040> to<01:22:16.199> remember<01:22:16.679> whenever<01:22:17.040> used 01:22:17.229 --> 01:22:17.239 align:start position:0% difficult part to remember whenever used 01:22:17.239 --> 01:22:19.270 align:start position:0% difficult part to remember whenever used to<01:22:17.480> pronouns<01:22:17.880> with<01:22:18.000> the<01:22:18.120> letter<01:22:18.320> L<01:22:18.760> hopefully 01:22:19.270 --> 01:22:19.280 align:start position:0% to pronouns with the letter L hopefully 01:22:19.280 --> 01:22:20.629 align:start position:0% to pronouns with the letter L hopefully this<01:22:19.440> will<01:22:19.679> make<01:22:19.880> sense<01:22:20.080> to<01:22:20.159> you<01:22:20.400> here<01:22:20.520> are 01:22:20.629 --> 01:22:20.639 align:start position:0% this will make sense to you here are 01:22:20.639 --> 01:22:22.229 align:start position:0% this will make sense to you here are some<01:22:20.880> examples<01:22:21.199> of<01:22:21.360> double<01:22:21.600> object<01:22:21.880> pronouns 01:22:22.229 --> 01:22:22.239 align:start position:0% some examples of double object pronouns 01:22:22.239 --> 01:22:23.950 align:start position:0% some examples of double object pronouns using<01:22:22.639> two<01:22:22.800> pronouns<01:22:23.159> with<01:22:23.280> the<01:22:23.400> letter<01:22:23.600> L<01:22:23.880> how 01:22:23.950 --> 01:22:23.960 align:start position:0% using two pronouns with the letter L how 01:22:23.960 --> 01:22:25.790 align:start position:0% using two pronouns with the letter L how would<01:22:24.080> you<01:22:24.199> say<01:22:24.360> the<01:22:24.480> phrase<01:22:24.800> she<01:22:25.040> writes<01:22:25.440> it 01:22:25.790 --> 01:22:25.800 align:start position:0% would you say the phrase she writes it 01:22:25.800 --> 01:22:28.149 align:start position:0% would you say the phrase she writes it to<01:22:26.080> him<01:22:26.600> you<01:22:26.719> would 01:22:28.149 --> 01:22:28.159 align:start position:0% to him you would 01:22:28.159 --> 01:22:31.189 align:start position:0% to him you would say<01:22:29.159> and<01:22:29.239> you<01:22:29.320> would<01:22:29.480> include<01:22:30.440> to<01:22:30.639> specify<01:22:31.040> who 01:22:31.189 --> 01:22:31.199 align:start position:0% say and you would include to specify who 01:22:31.199 --> 01:22:33.910 align:start position:0% say and you would include to specify who it<01:22:31.320> is<01:22:31.679> because<01:22:32.159> say<01:22:32.520> can<01:22:32.639> mean<01:22:32.840> to<01:22:33.080> him<01:22:33.360> her<01:22:33.639> or 01:22:33.910 --> 01:22:33.920 align:start position:0% it is because say can mean to him her or 01:22:33.920 --> 01:22:35.669 align:start position:0% it is because say can mean to him her or them<01:22:34.239> here's<01:22:34.480> another<01:22:34.880> example<01:22:35.400> with<01:22:35.520> the 01:22:35.669 --> 01:22:35.679 align:start position:0% them here's another example with the 01:22:35.679 --> 01:22:37.310 align:start position:0% them here's another example with the same<01:22:35.920> sentence<01:22:36.440> how<01:22:36.520> would<01:22:36.679> you<01:22:36.800> say<01:22:37.040> she 01:22:37.310 --> 01:22:37.320 align:start position:0% same sentence how would you say she 01:22:37.320 --> 01:22:40.189 align:start position:0% same sentence how would you say she writes<01:22:37.679> it<01:22:38.040> to 01:22:40.189 --> 01:22:40.199 align:start position:0% writes it to 01:22:40.199 --> 01:22:42.629 align:start position:0% writes it to her<01:22:41.199> hopefully<01:22:41.600> that<01:22:41.760> wasn't<01:22:42.000> too<01:22:42.360> difficult 01:22:42.629 --> 01:22:42.639 align:start position:0% her hopefully that wasn't too difficult 01:22:42.639 --> 01:22:46.070 align:start position:0% her hopefully that wasn't too difficult how<01:22:42.760> would<01:22:42.880> you<01:22:43.040> say<01:22:43.280> she<01:22:43.520> writes<01:22:43.920> it<01:22:44.239> to 01:22:46.070 --> 01:22:46.080 align:start position:0% how would you say she writes it to 01:22:46.080 --> 01:22:48.910 align:start position:0% how would you say she writes it to themos<01:22:47.080> with<01:22:47.280> AOS<01:22:47.600> being<01:22:47.920> them<01:22:48.280> masculine<01:22:48.840> if 01:22:48.910 --> 01:22:48.920 align:start position:0% themos with AOS being them masculine if 01:22:48.920 --> 01:22:50.870 align:start position:0% themos with AOS being them masculine if you<01:22:49.040> want<01:22:49.199> to<01:22:49.440> you<01:22:49.520> can<01:22:49.639> change<01:22:49.960> AOS<01:22:50.280> to<01:22:50.480> AOS 01:22:50.870 --> 01:22:50.880 align:start position:0% you want to you can change AOS to AOS 01:22:50.880 --> 01:22:52.550 align:start position:0% you want to you can change AOS to AOS for<01:22:51.120> them<01:22:51.360> feminine<01:22:51.800> here's<01:22:52.040> another<01:22:52.320> example 01:22:52.550 --> 01:22:52.560 align:start position:0% for them feminine here's another example 01:22:52.560 --> 01:22:56.990 align:start position:0% for them feminine here's another example example<01:22:53.000> how<01:22:53.080> would<01:22:53.239> you<01:22:53.360> say<01:22:53.719> you<01:22:53.920> read<01:22:54.280> it<01:22:54.600> to 01:22:56.990 --> 01:22:57.000 align:start position:0% 01:22:57.000 --> 01:22:59.790 align:start position:0% them<01:22:58.000> with<01:22:58.239> AOS<01:22:58.679> applying<01:22:59.040> to<01:22:59.280> them<01:22:59.600> how<01:22:59.679> would 01:22:59.790 --> 01:22:59.800 align:start position:0% them with AOS applying to them how would 01:22:59.800 --> 01:23:03.669 align:start position:0% them with AOS applying to them how would you<01:22:59.960> say<01:23:00.199> you<01:23:00.360> read<01:23:00.840> them<01:23:01.239> to<01:23:01.560> them<01:23:02.280> to 01:23:03.669 --> 01:23:03.679 align:start position:0% you say you read them to them to 01:23:03.679 --> 01:23:06.790 align:start position:0% you say you read them to them to sayos<01:23:04.679> with<01:23:04.880> AOS<01:23:05.199> being<01:23:05.400> to<01:23:05.679> them<01:23:06.159> and<01:23:06.400> los 01:23:06.790 --> 01:23:06.800 align:start position:0% sayos with AOS being to them and los 01:23:06.800 --> 01:23:08.669 align:start position:0% sayos with AOS being to them and los being<01:23:07.120> them<01:23:07.360> as<01:23:07.520> the<01:23:07.719> object<01:23:08.040> you<01:23:08.199> read<01:23:08.560> here 01:23:08.669 --> 01:23:08.679 align:start position:0% being them as the object you read here 01:23:08.679 --> 01:23:10.550 align:start position:0% being them as the object you read here are<01:23:08.800> some<01:23:09.000> final<01:23:09.320> examples<01:23:09.719> with<01:23:09.880> infinitives 01:23:10.550 --> 01:23:10.560 align:start position:0% are some final examples with infinitives 01:23:10.560 --> 01:23:13.189 align:start position:0% are some final examples with infinitives how<01:23:10.679> would<01:23:10.800> you<01:23:10.960> say<01:23:11.320> I<01:23:11.440> am<01:23:11.600> buying<01:23:12.000> it<01:23:12.320> to<01:23:12.639> them 01:23:13.189 --> 01:23:13.199 align:start position:0% how would you say I am buying it to them 01:23:13.199 --> 01:23:15.550 align:start position:0% how would you say I am buying it to them you<01:23:13.280> can 01:23:15.550 --> 01:23:15.560 align:start position:0% 01:23:15.560 --> 01:23:18.030 align:start position:0% say 01:23:18.030 --> 01:23:18.040 align:start position:0% say 01:23:18.040 --> 01:23:20.510 align:start position:0% say or<01:23:19.040> with<01:23:19.120> an<01:23:19.320> accent<01:23:19.639> on<01:23:19.800> the<01:23:19.920> infinitive<01:23:20.440> if 01:23:20.510 --> 01:23:20.520 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive if 01:23:20.520 --> 01:23:22.229 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive if you<01:23:20.639> wanted<01:23:20.880> to<01:23:21.159> you<01:23:21.239> could<01:23:21.360> have<01:23:21.520> put<01:23:21.679> the<01:23:21.840> AOS 01:23:22.229 --> 01:23:22.239 align:start position:0% you wanted to you could have put the AOS 01:23:22.239 --> 01:23:23.830 align:start position:0% you wanted to you could have put the AOS part<01:23:22.600> at<01:23:22.719> the<01:23:22.800> beginning<01:23:23.080> of<01:23:23.199> the<01:23:23.320> sentence 01:23:23.830 --> 01:23:23.840 align:start position:0% part at the beginning of the sentence 01:23:23.840 --> 01:23:25.550 align:start position:0% part at the beginning of the sentence how<01:23:23.920> would<01:23:24.080> you<01:23:24.159> say<01:23:24.360> the<01:23:24.480> phrase<01:23:24.920> I<01:23:25.000> can<01:23:25.159> do<01:23:25.360> it 01:23:25.550 --> 01:23:25.560 align:start position:0% how would you say the phrase I can do it 01:23:25.560 --> 01:23:28.350 align:start position:0% how would you say the phrase I can do it to<01:23:25.840> him<01:23:26.400> you<01:23:26.520> can 01:23:28.350 --> 01:23:28.360 align:start position:0% to him you can 01:23:28.360 --> 01:23:30.669 align:start position:0% to him you can say 01:23:30.669 --> 01:23:30.679 align:start position:0% say 01:23:30.679 --> 01:23:33.110 align:start position:0% say or<01:23:31.679> with<01:23:31.760> an<01:23:31.960> accent<01:23:32.280> on<01:23:32.440> the<01:23:32.560> infinitive<01:23:33.040> and 01:23:33.110 --> 01:23:33.120 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive and 01:23:33.120 --> 01:23:35.750 align:start position:0% or with an accent on the infinitive and notice<01:23:33.400> how<01:23:33.520> in<01:23:33.719> both<01:23:33.920> phrases<01:23:34.920> refers<01:23:35.280> to<01:23:35.480> him 01:23:35.750 --> 01:23:35.760 align:start position:0% notice how in both phrases refers to him 01:23:35.760 --> 01:23:37.390 align:start position:0% notice how in both phrases refers to him because<01:23:35.960> it's<01:23:36.040> an<01:23:36.199> indirect<01:23:36.639> object<01:23:36.960> pronoun 01:23:37.390 --> 01:23:37.400 align:start position:0% because it's an indirect object pronoun 01:23:37.400 --> 01:23:38.990 align:start position:0% because it's an indirect object pronoun that<01:23:37.520> only<01:23:37.760> changes<01:23:38.159> to<01:23:38.360> say<01:23:38.719> because<01:23:38.920> we 01:23:38.990 --> 01:23:39.000 align:start position:0% that only changes to say because we 01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:40.910 align:start position:0% that only changes to say because we cannot<01:23:39.280> have<01:23:39.400> two<01:23:39.600> pronouns<01:23:40.040> with<01:23:40.159> a<01:23:40.280> letter<01:23:40.480> L 01:23:40.910 --> 01:23:40.920 align:start position:0% cannot have two pronouns with a letter L 01:23:40.920 --> 01:23:42.229 align:start position:0% cannot have two pronouns with a letter L I<01:23:41.000> really<01:23:41.199> hope<01:23:41.360> that<01:23:41.520> this<01:23:41.639> video<01:23:41.840> showed<01:23:42.120> you 01:23:42.229 --> 01:23:42.239 align:start position:0% I really hope that this video showed you 01:23:42.239 --> 01:23:43.870 align:start position:0% I really hope that this video showed you some<01:23:42.440> good<01:23:42.639> examples<01:23:43.159> and<01:23:43.280> explain<01:23:43.639> how<01:23:43.719> to 01:23:43.870 --> 01:23:43.880 align:start position:0% some good examples and explain how to 01:23:43.880 --> 01:23:45.629 align:start position:0% some good examples and explain how to combine<01:23:44.239> both<01:23:44.440> types<01:23:44.639> of<01:23:44.760> pronouns<01:23:45.320> together 01:23:45.629 --> 01:23:45.639 align:start position:0% combine both types of pronouns together 01:23:45.639 --> 01:23:47.070 align:start position:0% combine both types of pronouns together and<01:23:45.760> in<01:23:45.880> case<01:23:46.040> you're<01:23:46.199> still<01:23:46.400> confused<01:23:46.960> you 01:23:47.070 --> 01:23:47.080 align:start position:0% and in case you're still confused you 01:23:47.080 --> 01:23:48.830 align:start position:0% and in case you're still confused you can<01:23:47.239> always<01:23:47.520> go<01:23:47.760> back<01:23:48.000> and<01:23:48.120> try<01:23:48.280> to<01:23:48.719> understand 01:23:48.830 --> 01:23:48.840 align:start position:0% can always go back and try to understand 01:23:48.840 --> 01:23:50.830 align:start position:0% can always go back and try to understand the<01:23:49.040> concept<01:23:49.440> your<01:23:49.679> way<01:23:49.960> with<01:23:50.080> more<01:23:50.320> practice 01:23:50.830 --> 01:23:50.840 align:start position:0% the concept your way with more practice 01:23:50.840 --> 01:23:52.629 align:start position:0% the concept your way with more practice double<01:23:51.159> object<01:23:51.480> pronouns<01:23:51.960> would<01:23:52.120> eventually 01:23:52.629 --> 01:23:52.639 align:start position:0% double object pronouns would eventually 01:23:52.639 --> 01:23:54.030 align:start position:0% double object pronouns would eventually become<01:23:52.800> an<01:23:52.960> easy<01:23:53.239> topic<01:23:53.480> for<01:23:53.600> you<01:23:53.840> you've 01:23:54.030 --> 01:23:54.040 align:start position:0% become an easy topic for you you've 01:23:54.040 --> 01:23:55.430 align:start position:0% become an easy topic for you you've probably<01:23:54.280> seen<01:23:54.520> many<01:23:54.719> people<01:23:55.000> explain<01:23:55.320> the 01:23:55.430 --> 01:23:55.440 align:start position:0% probably seen many people explain the 01:23:55.440 --> 01:23:57.390 align:start position:0% probably seen many people explain the verb<01:23:55.719> gustar<01:23:56.280> in<01:23:56.480> Spanish<01:23:56.960> by<01:23:57.080> saying<01:23:57.280> that 01:23:57.390 --> 01:23:57.400 align:start position:0% verb gustar in Spanish by saying that 01:23:57.400 --> 01:24:00.870 align:start position:0% verb gustar in Spanish by saying that this<01:23:57.520> verb<01:23:57.719> means<01:23:58.000> to<01:23:58.199> like<01:23:58.560> as<01:23:58.719> in<01:23:59.520> mea<01:24:00.520> and 01:24:00.870 --> 01:24:00.880 align:start position:0% this verb means to like as in mea and 01:24:00.880 --> 01:24:03.470 align:start position:0% this verb means to like as in mea and mea<01:24:01.520> can<01:24:02.080> which<01:24:02.199> means<01:24:02.520> I<01:24:02.639> like<01:24:02.800> to<01:24:03.000> dance<01:24:03.360> and 01:24:03.470 --> 01:24:03.480 align:start position:0% mea can which means I like to dance and 01:24:03.480 --> 01:24:05.270 align:start position:0% mea can which means I like to dance and I<01:24:03.600> like<01:24:03.760> to<01:24:03.880> sing<01:24:04.239> I<01:24:04.520> however<01:24:04.719> do<01:24:04.880> not<01:24:05.040> like 01:24:05.270 --> 01:24:05.280 align:start position:0% I like to sing I however do not like 01:24:05.280 --> 01:24:06.870 align:start position:0% I like to sing I however do not like these<01:24:05.520> explanations<01:24:06.280> because<01:24:06.440> they<01:24:06.560> tend<01:24:06.719> to 01:24:06.870 --> 01:24:06.880 align:start position:0% these explanations because they tend to 01:24:06.880 --> 01:24:08.350 align:start position:0% these explanations because they tend to confuse<01:24:07.199> people<01:24:07.480> rather<01:24:07.679> than<01:24:07.840> make<01:24:07.960> them 01:24:08.350 --> 01:24:08.360 align:start position:0% confuse people rather than make them 01:24:08.360 --> 01:24:09.750 align:start position:0% confuse people rather than make them understand<01:24:08.520> the<01:24:08.639> subject<01:24:08.960> matter<01:24:09.320> properly 01:24:09.750 --> 01:24:09.760 align:start position:0% understand the subject matter properly 01:24:09.760 --> 01:24:11.830 align:start position:0% understand the subject matter properly in<01:24:09.880> sentences<01:24:10.440> like<01:24:10.679> I<01:24:10.840> like<01:24:11.000> to<01:24:11.199> dance<01:24:11.600> and<01:24:11.719> I 01:24:11.830 --> 01:24:11.840 align:start position:0% in sentences like I like to dance and I 01:24:11.840 --> 01:24:13.750 align:start position:0% in sentences like I like to dance and I like<01:24:12.000> to<01:24:12.159> sing<01:24:12.639> what<01:24:12.760> I<01:24:12.920> recommend<01:24:13.320> doing<01:24:13.639> is 01:24:13.750 --> 01:24:13.760 align:start position:0% like to sing what I recommend doing is 01:24:13.760 --> 01:24:15.110 align:start position:0% like to sing what I recommend doing is instead<01:24:14.040> of<01:24:14.120> using<01:24:14.400> the<01:24:14.520> construction 01:24:15.110 --> 01:24:15.120 align:start position:0% instead of using the construction 01:24:15.120 --> 01:24:16.870 align:start position:0% instead of using the construction megusta<01:24:15.880> which<01:24:16.040> visually<01:24:16.480> doesn't<01:24:16.719> make 01:24:16.870 --> 01:24:16.880 align:start position:0% megusta which visually doesn't make 01:24:16.880 --> 01:24:18.590 align:start position:0% megusta which visually doesn't make sense<01:24:17.239> you<01:24:17.320> can<01:24:17.440> use<01:24:17.600> the<01:24:17.719> verb<01:24:18.040> Amar<01:24:18.480> which 01:24:18.590 --> 01:24:18.600 align:start position:0% sense you can use the verb Amar which 01:24:18.600 --> 01:24:20.070 align:start position:0% sense you can use the verb Amar which means<01:24:18.840> to<01:24:19.040> love<01:24:19.280> instead<01:24:19.520> of<01:24:19.600> thinking<01:24:19.840> of<01:24:20.000> how 01:24:20.070 --> 01:24:20.080 align:start position:0% means to love instead of thinking of how 01:24:20.080 --> 01:24:22.070 align:start position:0% means to love instead of thinking of how to<01:24:20.199> use<01:24:20.480> gustar<01:24:21.080> in<01:24:21.239> English<01:24:21.639> and<01:24:21.760> instead<01:24:22.000> of 01:24:22.070 --> 01:24:22.080 align:start position:0% to use gustar in English and instead of 01:24:22.080 --> 01:24:24.149 align:start position:0% to use gustar in English and instead of saying<01:24:22.480> I<01:24:22.600> like<01:24:22.760> to<01:24:22.960> dance<01:24:23.360> or<01:24:23.520> to<01:24:23.679> sing<01:24:24.040> you 01:24:24.149 --> 01:24:24.159 align:start position:0% saying I like to dance or to sing you 01:24:24.159 --> 01:24:27.470 align:start position:0% saying I like to dance or to sing you can<01:24:24.320> simply<01:24:24.600> say<01:24:25.000> y<01:24:25.199> Amo<01:24:26.080> and<01:24:26.440> Y<01:24:26.600> Amo<01:24:27.360> which 01:24:27.470 --> 01:24:27.480 align:start position:0% can simply say y Amo and Y Amo which 01:24:27.480 --> 01:24:29.709 align:start position:0% can simply say y Amo and Y Amo which would<01:24:27.639> be<01:24:27.880> I<01:24:28.000> love<01:24:28.199> to<01:24:28.440> dance<01:24:28.840> or<01:24:29.000> to<01:24:29.159> sing<01:24:29.600> and 01:24:29.709 --> 01:24:29.719 align:start position:0% would be I love to dance or to sing and 01:24:29.719 --> 01:24:31.189 align:start position:0% would be I love to dance or to sing and this<01:24:29.880> method<01:24:30.120> is<01:24:30.239> actually<01:24:30.520> quite<01:24:30.760> effective 01:24:31.189 --> 01:24:31.199 align:start position:0% this method is actually quite effective 01:24:31.199 --> 01:24:32.629 align:start position:0% this method is actually quite effective because<01:24:31.480> most<01:24:31.679> of<01:24:31.800> the<01:24:31.960> time<01:24:32.239> that's<01:24:32.400> how<01:24:32.520> we 01:24:32.629 --> 01:24:32.639 align:start position:0% because most of the time that's how we 01:24:32.639 --> 01:24:34.149 align:start position:0% because most of the time that's how we use<01:24:32.840> these<01:24:33.000> verbs<01:24:33.360> and<01:24:33.480> it<01:24:33.600> also<01:24:33.800> makes<01:24:34.000> your 01:24:34.149 --> 01:24:34.159 align:start position:0% use these verbs and it also makes your 01:24:34.159 --> 01:24:35.629 align:start position:0% use these verbs and it also makes your brain<01:24:34.400> think<01:24:34.639> in<01:24:34.760> terms<01:24:34.960> of<01:24:35.120> the<01:24:35.199> order<01:24:35.440> of<01:24:35.560> the 01:24:35.629 --> 01:24:35.639 align:start position:0% brain think in terms of the order of the 01:24:35.639 --> 01:24:37.229 align:start position:0% brain think in terms of the order of the words<01:24:35.840> in<01:24:36.000> English<01:24:36.360> unlike<01:24:36.679> many<01:24:36.880> people<01:24:37.080> who 01:24:37.229 --> 01:24:37.239 align:start position:0% words in English unlike many people who 01:24:37.239 --> 01:24:39.510 align:start position:0% words in English unlike many people who explain<01:24:37.600> gustar<01:24:38.199> as<01:24:38.440> to<01:24:38.679> like<01:24:38.960> I<01:24:39.040> want<01:24:39.199> to<01:24:39.320> give 01:24:39.510 --> 01:24:39.520 align:start position:0% explain gustar as to like I want to give 01:24:39.520 --> 01:24:41.590 align:start position:0% explain gustar as to like I want to give gustar<01:24:40.119> a<01:24:40.239> different<01:24:40.520> definition<01:24:41.040> as<01:24:41.159> in<01:24:41.400> it 01:24:41.590 --> 01:24:41.600 align:start position:0% gustar a different definition as in it 01:24:41.600 --> 01:24:44.070 align:start position:0% gustar a different definition as in it pleases<01:24:42.159> or<01:24:42.480> they<01:24:42.719> please<01:24:43.199> the<01:24:43.280> verb<01:24:43.520> gustar 01:24:44.070 --> 01:24:44.080 align:start position:0% pleases or they please the verb gustar 01:24:44.080 --> 01:24:45.430 align:start position:0% pleases or they please the verb gustar is<01:24:44.280> actually<01:24:44.480> a<01:24:44.600> very<01:24:44.760> strange<01:24:45.080> verb<01:24:45.280> in 01:24:45.430 --> 01:24:45.440 align:start position:0% is actually a very strange verb in 01:24:45.440 --> 01:24:47.229 align:start position:0% is actually a very strange verb in Spanish<01:24:45.920> because<01:24:46.119> it<01:24:46.239> has<01:24:46.400> a<01:24:46.560> very<01:24:46.760> unusual 01:24:47.229 --> 01:24:47.239 align:start position:0% Spanish because it has a very unusual 01:24:47.239 --> 01:24:48.870 align:start position:0% Spanish because it has a very unusual conjugation<01:24:47.800> pattern<01:24:48.239> that<01:24:48.360> doesn't<01:24:48.600> follow 01:24:48.870 --> 01:24:48.880 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern that doesn't follow 01:24:48.880 --> 01:24:51.229 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern that doesn't follow the<01:24:49.000> normal<01:24:49.360> pattern<01:24:49.800> with<01:24:49.960> normal<01:24:50.320> ar<01:24:50.760> verbs 01:24:51.229 --> 01:24:51.239 align:start position:0% the normal pattern with normal ar verbs 01:24:51.239 --> 01:24:52.709 align:start position:0% the normal pattern with normal ar verbs gustar<01:24:51.760> has<01:24:51.880> only<01:24:52.080> two<01:24:52.320> two<01:24:52.440> types<01:24:52.600> of 01:24:52.709 --> 01:24:52.719 align:start position:0% gustar has only two two types of 01:24:52.719 --> 01:24:55.390 align:start position:0% gustar has only two two types of conjugations<01:24:53.440> which<01:24:53.560> are<01:24:53.880> gusta<01:24:54.560> and<01:24:54.800> gustan 01:24:55.390 --> 01:24:55.400 align:start position:0% conjugations which are gusta and gustan 01:24:55.400 --> 01:24:56.750 align:start position:0% conjugations which are gusta and gustan and<01:24:55.520> they<01:24:55.639> mainly<01:24:55.960> come<01:24:56.159> from<01:24:56.280> the<01:24:56.440> English 01:24:56.750 --> 01:24:56.760 align:start position:0% and they mainly come from the English 01:24:56.760 --> 01:24:59.189 align:start position:0% and they mainly come from the English verb<01:24:57.080> to<01:24:57.320> please<01:24:57.840> in<01:24:58.000> English<01:24:58.480> the<01:24:58.600> syntax<01:24:59.000> of 01:24:59.189 --> 01:24:59.199 align:start position:0% verb to please in English the syntax of 01:24:59.199 --> 01:25:00.910 align:start position:0% verb to please in English the syntax of to<01:24:59.440> please<01:24:59.880> stays<01:25:00.159> the<01:25:00.320> same<01:25:00.480> for<01:25:00.719> five 01:25:00.910 --> 01:25:00.920 align:start position:0% to please stays the same for five 01:25:00.920 --> 01:25:02.950 align:start position:0% to please stays the same for five pronouns<01:25:01.440> and<01:25:01.600> only<01:25:01.800> changes<01:25:02.199> in<01:25:02.320> the<01:25:02.520> he<01:25:02.719> she 01:25:02.950 --> 01:25:02.960 align:start position:0% pronouns and only changes in the he she 01:25:02.960 --> 01:25:04.990 align:start position:0% pronouns and only changes in the he she it<01:25:03.159> pronoun<01:25:03.560> to<01:25:03.679> connect<01:25:04.000> gustar<01:25:04.560> more<01:25:04.800> with 01:25:04.990 --> 01:25:05.000 align:start position:0% it pronoun to connect gustar more with 01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:06.550 align:start position:0% it pronoun to connect gustar more with English<01:25:05.560> concentrate<01:25:06.040> on<01:25:06.159> the<01:25:06.280> bottom 01:25:06.550 --> 01:25:06.560 align:start position:0% English concentrate on the bottom 01:25:06.560 --> 01:25:08.189 align:start position:0% English concentrate on the bottom pronouns<01:25:06.920> for<01:25:07.040> a<01:25:07.159> bit<01:25:07.480> specifically<01:25:07.920> on<01:25:08.080> the 01:25:08.189 --> 01:25:08.199 align:start position:0% pronouns for a bit specifically on the 01:25:08.199 --> 01:25:10.550 align:start position:0% pronouns for a bit specifically on the pronouns<01:25:08.760> it<01:25:08.960> pleases<01:25:09.520> and<01:25:09.840> they<01:25:10.000> please<01:25:10.480> the 01:25:10.550 --> 01:25:10.560 align:start position:0% pronouns it pleases and they please the 01:25:10.560 --> 01:25:11.910 align:start position:0% pronouns it pleases and they please the reason<01:25:10.800> why<01:25:10.920> I've<01:25:11.080> mentioned<01:25:11.480> this<01:25:11.800> is 01:25:11.910 --> 01:25:11.920 align:start position:0% reason why I've mentioned this is 01:25:11.920 --> 01:25:13.390 align:start position:0% reason why I've mentioned this is because<01:25:12.159> this<01:25:12.280> is<01:25:12.400> how<01:25:12.600> systematically 01:25:13.390 --> 01:25:13.400 align:start position:0% because this is how systematically 01:25:13.400 --> 01:25:15.229 align:start position:0% because this is how systematically gustar<01:25:13.960> Works<01:25:14.239> in<01:25:14.400> Spanish<01:25:14.880> and<01:25:14.960> that's<01:25:15.119> the 01:25:15.229 --> 01:25:15.239 align:start position:0% gustar Works in Spanish and that's the 01:25:15.239 --> 01:25:16.430 align:start position:0% gustar Works in Spanish and that's the closest<01:25:15.560> connection<01:25:15.880> I<01:25:15.960> can<01:25:16.080> give<01:25:16.199> it<01:25:16.320> in 01:25:16.430 --> 01:25:16.440 align:start position:0% closest connection I can give it in 01:25:16.440 --> 01:25:17.470 align:start position:0% closest connection I can give it in English<01:25:16.800> you<01:25:16.920> might<01:25:17.040> have<01:25:17.159> heard<01:25:17.360> some 01:25:17.470 --> 01:25:17.480 align:start position:0% English you might have heard some 01:25:17.480 --> 01:25:19.350 align:start position:0% English you might have heard some teachers<01:25:17.800> say<01:25:17.960> that<01:25:18.159> gustar<01:25:18.679> also<01:25:18.880> refers<01:25:19.199> to 01:25:19.350 --> 01:25:19.360 align:start position:0% teachers say that gustar also refers to 01:25:19.360 --> 01:25:21.070 align:start position:0% teachers say that gustar also refers to somebody<01:25:19.679> being<01:25:19.920> pleased<01:25:20.360> by<01:25:20.520> something<01:25:21.000> and 01:25:21.070 --> 01:25:21.080 align:start position:0% somebody being pleased by something and 01:25:21.080 --> 01:25:22.109 align:start position:0% somebody being pleased by something and this<01:25:21.199> is<01:25:21.360> actually<01:25:21.520> a<01:25:21.639> definition<01:25:22.000> that's 01:25:22.109 --> 01:25:22.119 align:start position:0% this is actually a definition that's 01:25:22.119 --> 01:25:23.550 align:start position:0% this is actually a definition that's more<01:25:22.360> more<01:25:22.520> accurate<01:25:22.880> and<01:25:23.000> I'll<01:25:23.159> get<01:25:23.239> to<01:25:23.440> that 01:25:23.550 --> 01:25:23.560 align:start position:0% more more accurate and I'll get to that 01:25:23.560 --> 01:25:25.310 align:start position:0% more more accurate and I'll get to that in<01:25:23.639> a<01:25:23.760> bit<01:25:24.520> is<01:25:24.639> considered<01:25:24.960> to<01:25:25.080> be<01:25:25.159> an 01:25:25.310 --> 01:25:25.320 align:start position:0% in a bit is considered to be an 01:25:25.320 --> 01:25:27.070 align:start position:0% in a bit is considered to be an irregular<01:25:25.880> verb<01:25:26.239> not<01:25:26.400> only<01:25:26.679> because<01:25:26.840> it<01:25:26.960> has 01:25:27.070 --> 01:25:27.080 align:start position:0% irregular verb not only because it has 01:25:27.080 --> 01:25:28.750 align:start position:0% irregular verb not only because it has two<01:25:27.280> conjugations<01:25:28.080> but<01:25:28.239> also<01:25:28.480> because<01:25:28.639> it 01:25:28.750 --> 01:25:28.760 align:start position:0% two conjugations but also because it 01:25:28.760 --> 01:25:32.189 align:start position:0% two conjugations but also because it doesn't<01:25:29.000> use<01:25:29.199> normal<01:25:29.560> pronouns<01:25:30.199> like<01:25:30.679> Y<01:25:31.639> noos 01:25:32.189 --> 01:25:32.199 align:start position:0% doesn't use normal pronouns like Y noos 01:25:32.199 --> 01:25:34.430 align:start position:0% doesn't use normal pronouns like Y noos and<01:25:32.360> so<01:25:32.480> on<01:25:32.840> but<01:25:33.040> rather<01:25:33.440> it<01:25:33.560> uses<01:25:33.920> indirect 01:25:34.430 --> 01:25:34.440 align:start position:0% and so on but rather it uses indirect 01:25:34.440 --> 01:25:36.149 align:start position:0% and so on but rather it uses indirect object<01:25:34.719> pronouns<01:25:35.119> to<01:25:35.280> specify<01:25:35.679> who<01:25:35.800> is<01:25:35.920> being 01:25:36.149 --> 01:25:36.159 align:start position:0% object pronouns to specify who is being 01:25:36.159 --> 01:25:37.830 align:start position:0% object pronouns to specify who is being pleased<01:25:36.520> by<01:25:36.719> what<01:25:37.000> putting<01:25:37.280> the<01:25:37.400> pronouns 01:25:37.830 --> 01:25:37.840 align:start position:0% pleased by what putting the pronouns 01:25:37.840 --> 01:25:39.550 align:start position:0% pleased by what putting the pronouns before<01:25:38.040> a<01:25:38.199> conjugated<01:25:38.679> verb<01:25:38.960> and<01:25:39.119> therefore 01:25:39.550 --> 01:25:39.560 align:start position:0% before a conjugated verb and therefore 01:25:39.560 --> 01:25:40.870 align:start position:0% before a conjugated verb and therefore the<01:25:39.679> only<01:25:39.920> sentences<01:25:40.360> that<01:25:40.440> you<01:25:40.560> can<01:25:40.719> have 01:25:40.870 --> 01:25:40.880 align:start position:0% the only sentences that you can have 01:25:40.880 --> 01:25:43.430 align:start position:0% the only sentences that you can have with<01:25:41.119> gust<01:25:41.679> are 01:25:43.430 --> 01:25:43.440 align:start position:0% with gust are 01:25:43.440 --> 01:25:45.830 align:start position:0% with gust are mea<01:25:44.440> and<01:25:44.560> we<01:25:44.679> have<01:25:44.760> to<01:25:44.920> remember<01:25:45.159> to<01:25:45.280> use<01:25:45.440> the 01:25:45.830 --> 01:25:45.840 align:start position:0% mea and we have to remember to use the 01:25:45.840 --> 01:25:49.030 align:start position:0% mea and we have to remember to use the construction<01:25:46.840> or<01:25:47.760> to<01:25:47.920> specify<01:25:48.320> who<01:25:48.560> Le<01:25:48.719> refers 01:25:49.030 --> 01:25:49.040 align:start position:0% construction or to specify who Le refers 01:25:49.040 --> 01:25:50.830 align:start position:0% construction or to specify who Le refers to<01:25:49.320> and<01:25:49.480> basically<01:25:50.000> the<01:25:50.119> list<01:25:50.360> goes<01:25:50.520> on<01:25:50.760> the 01:25:50.830 --> 01:25:50.840 align:start position:0% to and basically the list goes on the 01:25:50.840 --> 01:25:51.910 align:start position:0% to and basically the list goes on the reason<01:25:51.080> why<01:25:51.199> Spanish<01:25:51.480> uses<01:25:51.760> this 01:25:51.910 --> 01:25:51.920 align:start position:0% reason why Spanish uses this 01:25:51.920 --> 01:25:53.669 align:start position:0% reason why Spanish uses this Construction<01:25:52.520> with<01:25:52.719> gust<01:25:53.239> is<01:25:53.360> because<01:25:53.560> it 01:25:53.669 --> 01:25:53.679 align:start position:0% Construction with gust is because it 01:25:53.679 --> 01:25:55.510 align:start position:0% Construction with gust is because it specifies<01:25:54.159> who<01:25:54.280> is<01:25:54.400> being<01:25:54.639> pleased<01:25:55.040> by<01:25:55.239> what 01:25:55.510 --> 01:25:55.520 align:start position:0% specifies who is being pleased by what 01:25:55.520 --> 01:25:57.270 align:start position:0% specifies who is being pleased by what by<01:25:55.600> putting<01:25:55.880> the<01:25:56.000> indirect<01:25:56.440> object<01:25:56.760> pronoun 01:25:57.270 --> 01:25:57.280 align:start position:0% by putting the indirect object pronoun 01:25:57.280 --> 01:25:59.030 align:start position:0% by putting the indirect object pronoun before<01:25:57.480> a<01:25:57.679> conjugated<01:25:58.159> verb<01:25:58.480> looking<01:25:58.719> at<01:25:58.880> this 01:25:59.030 --> 01:25:59.040 align:start position:0% before a conjugated verb looking at this 01:25:59.040 --> 01:26:01.629 align:start position:0% before a conjugated verb looking at this phrase<01:25:59.600> mea<01:26:00.360> one<01:26:00.560> might<01:26:00.719> say<01:26:00.960> expressively 01:26:01.629 --> 01:26:01.639 align:start position:0% phrase mea one might say expressively 01:26:01.639 --> 01:26:03.229 align:start position:0% phrase mea one might say expressively that<01:26:01.760> it<01:26:01.880> means<01:26:02.280> I<01:26:02.440> like<01:26:02.760> but<01:26:02.880> visually 01:26:03.229 --> 01:26:03.239 align:start position:0% that it means I like but visually 01:26:03.239 --> 01:26:04.709 align:start position:0% that it means I like but visually looking<01:26:03.480> at<01:26:03.639> this<01:26:03.760> phrase<01:26:04.159> it<01:26:04.280> doesn't<01:26:04.520> make 01:26:04.709 --> 01:26:04.719 align:start position:0% looking at this phrase it doesn't make 01:26:04.719 --> 01:26:06.510 align:start position:0% looking at this phrase it doesn't make sense<01:26:04.920> for<01:26:05.080> this<01:26:05.199> phrase<01:26:05.480> to<01:26:05.600> be<01:26:05.800> that<01:26:06.080> because 01:26:06.510 --> 01:26:06.520 align:start position:0% sense for this phrase to be that because 01:26:06.520 --> 01:26:08.390 align:start position:0% sense for this phrase to be that because me<01:26:06.920> means<01:26:07.239> me<01:26:07.560> and<01:26:07.639> it's<01:26:07.760> not<01:26:07.880> a<01:26:08.040> normal 01:26:08.390 --> 01:26:08.400 align:start position:0% me means me and it's not a normal 01:26:08.400 --> 01:26:10.430 align:start position:0% me means me and it's not a normal pronoun<01:26:08.840> in<01:26:08.960> English<01:26:09.440> whenever<01:26:09.760> we<01:26:09.880> say<01:26:10.199> I 01:26:10.430 --> 01:26:10.440 align:start position:0% pronoun in English whenever we say I 01:26:10.440 --> 01:26:12.590 align:start position:0% pronoun in English whenever we say I like<01:26:10.800> we<01:26:10.920> use<01:26:11.080> the<01:26:11.199> normal<01:26:11.560> pronoun<01:26:12.040> I<01:26:12.400> and 01:26:12.590 --> 01:26:12.600 align:start position:0% like we use the normal pronoun I and 01:26:12.600 --> 01:26:14.310 align:start position:0% like we use the normal pronoun I and like<01:26:12.920> is<01:26:13.040> the<01:26:13.199> syntax<01:26:13.639> that<01:26:13.800> applies<01:26:14.080> to<01:26:14.199> the 01:26:14.310 --> 01:26:14.320 align:start position:0% like is the syntax that applies to the 01:26:14.320 --> 01:26:16.229 align:start position:0% like is the syntax that applies to the noun<01:26:14.639> and<01:26:14.760> not<01:26:14.960> the<01:26:15.119> continuation<01:26:15.760> after<01:26:16.000> it 01:26:16.229 --> 01:26:16.239 align:start position:0% noun and not the continuation after it 01:26:16.239 --> 01:26:17.910 align:start position:0% noun and not the continuation after it with<01:26:16.320> the<01:26:16.440> verb<01:26:16.679> gustar<01:26:17.199> the<01:26:17.320> conjugation 01:26:17.910 --> 01:26:17.920 align:start position:0% with the verb gustar the conjugation 01:26:17.920 --> 01:26:20.430 align:start position:0% with the verb gustar the conjugation gusta<01:26:18.560> applies<01:26:18.880> to<01:26:19.040> the<01:26:19.199> thing<01:26:19.560> being<01:26:19.840> pleased 01:26:20.430 --> 01:26:20.440 align:start position:0% gusta applies to the thing being pleased 01:26:20.440 --> 01:26:22.229 align:start position:0% gusta applies to the thing being pleased and<01:26:20.600> not<01:26:20.760> the<01:26:20.920> pronoun<01:26:21.440> as<01:26:21.560> in<01:26:21.800> it<01:26:21.960> pleas 01:26:22.229 --> 01:26:22.239 align:start position:0% and not the pronoun as in it pleas 01:26:22.239 --> 01:26:26.070 align:start position:0% and not the pronoun as in it pleas pleases<01:26:22.600> me<01:26:23.040> mea<01:26:23.880> or<01:26:24.320> they<01:26:24.560> please<01:26:24.920> me<01:26:25.280> mean 01:26:26.070 --> 01:26:26.080 align:start position:0% pleases me mea or they please me mean 01:26:26.080 --> 01:26:28.270 align:start position:0% pleases me mea or they please me mean overall<01:26:26.719> gustar<01:26:27.320> doesn't<01:26:27.600> necessarily<01:26:28.080> mean 01:26:28.270 --> 01:26:28.280 align:start position:0% overall gustar doesn't necessarily mean 01:26:28.280 --> 01:26:29.830 align:start position:0% overall gustar doesn't necessarily mean to<01:26:28.480> like<01:26:28.719> something<01:26:29.159> but<01:26:29.280> it<01:26:29.360> means<01:26:29.560> to<01:26:29.679> be 01:26:29.830 --> 01:26:29.840 align:start position:0% to like something but it means to be 01:26:29.840 --> 01:26:31.950 align:start position:0% to like something but it means to be pleased<01:26:30.280> by<01:26:30.480> something<01:26:31.040> with<01:26:31.360> gusta 01:26:31.950 --> 01:26:31.960 align:start position:0% pleased by something with gusta 01:26:31.960 --> 01:26:34.229 align:start position:0% pleased by something with gusta referring<01:26:32.320> to<01:26:32.560> it<01:26:32.760> pleases<01:26:33.400> and<01:26:33.679> gustan 01:26:34.229 --> 01:26:34.239 align:start position:0% referring to it pleases and gustan 01:26:34.239 --> 01:26:36.229 align:start position:0% referring to it pleases and gustan referring<01:26:34.600> to<01:26:34.960> they<01:26:35.159> please<01:26:35.679> and<01:26:35.800> from<01:26:36.040> there 01:26:36.229 --> 01:26:36.239 align:start position:0% referring to they please and from there 01:26:36.239 --> 01:26:37.790 align:start position:0% referring to they please and from there we<01:26:36.360> simply<01:26:36.639> have<01:26:36.760> to<01:26:36.880> choose<01:26:37.119> any<01:26:37.360> indirect 01:26:37.790 --> 01:26:37.800 align:start position:0% we simply have to choose any indirect 01:26:37.800 --> 01:26:39.430 align:start position:0% we simply have to choose any indirect object<01:26:38.040> pronoun<01:26:38.520> that<01:26:38.639> we<01:26:38.719> want<01:26:38.840> to<01:26:39.000> use<01:26:39.320> in 01:26:39.430 --> 01:26:39.440 align:start position:0% object pronoun that we want to use in 01:26:39.440 --> 01:26:41.270 align:start position:0% object pronoun that we want to use in Spanish<01:26:39.880> it<01:26:40.000> makes<01:26:40.280> sense<01:26:40.639> but<01:26:40.760> in<01:26:40.920> English 01:26:41.270 --> 01:26:41.280 align:start position:0% Spanish it makes sense but in English 01:26:41.280 --> 01:26:42.910 align:start position:0% Spanish it makes sense but in English it's<01:26:41.400> a<01:26:41.520> tricky<01:26:41.840> topic<01:26:42.080> to<01:26:42.239> explain<01:26:42.679> because 01:26:42.910 --> 01:26:42.920 align:start position:0% it's a tricky topic to explain because 01:26:42.920 --> 01:26:44.510 align:start position:0% it's a tricky topic to explain because English<01:26:43.239> doesn't<01:26:43.480> have<01:26:43.600> a<01:26:43.719> notion<01:26:44.040> of<01:26:44.199> this 01:26:44.510 --> 01:26:44.520 align:start position:0% English doesn't have a notion of this 01:26:44.520 --> 01:26:45.830 align:start position:0% English doesn't have a notion of this I'm<01:26:44.639> just<01:26:44.760> using<01:26:45.040> this<01:26:45.199> comparison<01:26:45.679> to 01:26:45.830 --> 01:26:45.840 align:start position:0% I'm just using this comparison to 01:26:45.840 --> 01:26:47.950 align:start position:0% I'm just using this comparison to visually<01:26:46.239> show<01:26:46.480> gustar<01:26:47.000> as<01:26:47.119> closely<01:26:47.480> as<01:26:47.560> I<01:26:47.719> can 01:26:47.950 --> 01:26:47.960 align:start position:0% visually show gustar as closely as I can 01:26:47.960 --> 01:26:50.070 align:start position:0% visually show gustar as closely as I can in<01:26:48.080> English<01:26:48.560> nonetheless<01:26:49.239> whenever<01:26:49.560> we<01:26:49.679> say 01:26:50.070 --> 01:26:50.080 align:start position:0% in English nonetheless whenever we say 01:26:50.080 --> 01:26:52.830 align:start position:0% in English nonetheless whenever we say megusta<01:26:50.920> or<01:26:51.239> mean<01:26:51.960> we're<01:26:52.280> not<01:26:52.400> necessarily 01:26:52.830 --> 01:26:52.840 align:start position:0% megusta or mean we're not necessarily 01:26:52.840 --> 01:26:55.109 align:start position:0% megusta or mean we're not necessarily saying<01:26:53.280> I<01:26:53.440> like<01:26:53.840> but<01:26:54.080> rather<01:26:54.400> we're<01:26:54.600> saying<01:26:54.920> it 01:26:55.109 --> 01:26:55.119 align:start position:0% saying I like but rather we're saying it 01:26:55.119 --> 01:26:57.470 align:start position:0% saying I like but rather we're saying it pleases<01:26:55.560> me<01:26:55.960> or<01:26:56.320> they<01:26:56.560> please<01:26:56.840> me<01:26:57.119> and<01:26:57.239> we<01:26:57.360> know 01:26:57.470 --> 01:26:57.480 align:start position:0% pleases me or they please me and we know 01:26:57.480 --> 01:26:59.950 align:start position:0% pleases me or they please me and we know to<01:26:57.600> use<01:26:57.840> pleases<01:26:58.400> with<01:26:58.639> it<01:26:59.000> and<01:26:59.199> please<01:26:59.679> with 01:26:59.950 --> 01:26:59.960 align:start position:0% to use pleases with it and please with 01:26:59.960 --> 01:27:02.030 align:start position:0% to use pleases with it and please with they<01:27:00.400> because<01:27:00.639> it's<01:27:00.800> the<01:27:00.960> syntax<01:27:01.360> in<01:27:01.520> English 01:27:02.030 --> 01:27:02.040 align:start position:0% they because it's the syntax in English 01:27:02.040 --> 01:27:04.550 align:start position:0% they because it's the syntax in English gusta<01:27:02.760> refers<01:27:03.080> to<01:27:03.320> it<01:27:03.520> pleases<01:27:04.119> plus<01:27:04.360> any 01:27:04.550 --> 01:27:04.560 align:start position:0% gusta refers to it pleases plus any 01:27:04.560 --> 01:27:06.830 align:start position:0% gusta refers to it pleases plus any pronoun<01:27:04.920> you<01:27:05.040> want<01:27:05.400> and<01:27:05.639> gustan<01:27:06.280> refers<01:27:06.600> to 01:27:06.830 --> 01:27:06.840 align:start position:0% pronoun you want and gustan refers to 01:27:06.840 --> 01:27:08.709 align:start position:0% pronoun you want and gustan refers to they<01:27:07.000> please<01:27:07.480> plus<01:27:07.679> any<01:27:07.840> pronoun<01:27:08.239> you<01:27:08.360> want 01:27:08.709 --> 01:27:08.719 align:start position:0% they please plus any pronoun you want 01:27:08.719 --> 01:27:11.149 align:start position:0% they please plus any pronoun you want the<01:27:08.840> phrase<01:27:09.360> mea<01:27:09.880> B<01:27:10.440> doesn't<01:27:10.719> necessarily 01:27:11.149 --> 01:27:11.159 align:start position:0% the phrase mea B doesn't necessarily 01:27:11.159 --> 01:27:13.270 align:start position:0% the phrase mea B doesn't necessarily mean<01:27:11.480> I<01:27:11.600> like<01:27:11.800> to<01:27:12.000> dance<01:27:12.440> but<01:27:12.679> rather<01:27:13.119> it 01:27:13.270 --> 01:27:13.280 align:start position:0% mean I like to dance but rather it 01:27:13.280 --> 01:27:14.709 align:start position:0% mean I like to dance but rather it pleases<01:27:13.679> me<01:27:13.840> to<01:27:14.040> dance<01:27:14.400> which<01:27:14.480> is<01:27:14.600> a 01:27:14.709 --> 01:27:14.719 align:start position:0% pleases me to dance which is a 01:27:14.719 --> 01:27:16.590 align:start position:0% pleases me to dance which is a translation<01:27:15.400> that's<01:27:15.600> far<01:27:15.760> more<01:27:15.960> logical<01:27:16.440> in 01:27:16.590 --> 01:27:16.600 align:start position:0% translation that's far more logical in 01:27:16.600 --> 01:27:19.950 align:start position:0% translation that's far more logical in English<01:27:17.080> then<01:27:17.320> I<01:27:17.440> like<01:27:17.600> to<01:27:17.800> dance<01:27:18.280> if<01:27:18.400> I<01:27:18.960> say 01:27:19.950 --> 01:27:19.960 align:start position:0% English then I like to dance if I say 01:27:19.960 --> 01:27:21.550 align:start position:0% English then I like to dance if I say I'm<01:27:20.080> saying<01:27:20.360> it<01:27:20.480> pleases<01:27:20.880> you<01:27:21.000> to<01:27:21.159> sing<01:27:21.440> which 01:27:21.550 --> 01:27:21.560 align:start position:0% I'm saying it pleases you to sing which 01:27:21.560 --> 01:27:23.350 align:start position:0% I'm saying it pleases you to sing which doesn't<01:27:21.800> automat<01:27:22.159> ially<01:27:22.480> mean<01:27:22.800> you<01:27:22.960> like<01:27:23.159> the 01:27:23.350 --> 01:27:23.360 align:start position:0% doesn't automat ially mean you like the 01:27:23.360 --> 01:27:25.430 align:start position:0% doesn't automat ially mean you like the sing<01:27:23.679> gusta<01:27:24.199> in<01:27:24.360> both<01:27:24.600> cases<01:27:24.880> refers<01:27:25.199> to<01:27:25.320> the 01:27:25.430 --> 01:27:25.440 align:start position:0% sing gusta in both cases refers to the 01:27:25.440 --> 01:27:27.030 align:start position:0% sing gusta in both cases refers to the infinitive<01:27:26.040> because<01:27:26.199> the<01:27:26.320> indirect<01:27:26.719> object 01:27:27.030 --> 01:27:27.040 align:start position:0% infinitive because the indirect object 01:27:27.040 --> 01:27:28.669 align:start position:0% infinitive because the indirect object pronoun<01:27:27.440> is<01:27:27.600> being<01:27:27.920> pleased<01:27:28.400> by<01:27:28.560> the 01:27:28.669 --> 01:27:28.679 align:start position:0% pronoun is being pleased by the 01:27:28.679 --> 01:27:30.470 align:start position:0% pronoun is being pleased by the infinitive<01:27:29.239> and<01:27:29.400> therefore<01:27:29.840> gusta<01:27:30.280> will 01:27:30.470 --> 01:27:30.480 align:start position:0% infinitive and therefore gusta will 01:27:30.480 --> 01:27:32.149 align:start position:0% infinitive and therefore gusta will always<01:27:30.760> refer<01:27:31.040> to<01:27:31.159> it<01:27:31.360> just<01:27:31.520> like<01:27:31.639> in<01:27:31.760> English 01:27:32.149 --> 01:27:32.159 align:start position:0% always refer to it just like in English 01:27:32.159 --> 01:27:34.229 align:start position:0% always refer to it just like in English pleases<01:27:32.600> refers<01:27:32.920> to<01:27:33.159> it<01:27:33.400> and<01:27:33.560> please<01:27:33.920> refers 01:27:34.229 --> 01:27:34.239 align:start position:0% pleases refers to it and please refers 01:27:34.239 --> 01:27:36.109 align:start position:0% pleases refers to it and please refers to<01:27:34.480> they<01:27:34.760> we<01:27:34.840> don't<01:27:35.000> say<01:27:35.199> in<01:27:35.360> English<01:27:35.880> it 01:27:36.109 --> 01:27:36.119 align:start position:0% to they we don't say in English it 01:27:36.119 --> 01:27:38.149 align:start position:0% to they we don't say in English it please<01:27:36.679> or<01:27:37.000> they<01:27:37.199> pleases<01:27:37.760> we<01:27:37.920> quite 01:27:38.149 --> 01:27:38.159 align:start position:0% please or they pleases we quite 01:27:38.159 --> 01:27:39.709 align:start position:0% please or they pleases we quite literally<01:27:38.480> say<01:27:38.760> the<01:27:38.920> opposite<01:27:39.360> and<01:27:39.520> that's 01:27:39.709 --> 01:27:39.719 align:start position:0% literally say the opposite and that's 01:27:39.719 --> 01:27:41.830 align:start position:0% literally say the opposite and that's exactly<01:27:40.040> how<01:27:40.280> gustar<01:27:40.840> Works<01:27:41.119> in<01:27:41.280> Spanish<01:27:41.760> if 01:27:41.830 --> 01:27:41.840 align:start position:0% exactly how gustar Works in Spanish if 01:27:41.840 --> 01:27:44.270 align:start position:0% exactly how gustar Works in Spanish if we<01:27:41.960> say<01:27:42.119> a<01:27:42.199> sentence<01:27:42.600> like<01:27:42.960> mean<01:27:43.600> Gatos<01:27:44.159> then 01:27:44.270 --> 01:27:44.280 align:start position:0% we say a sentence like mean Gatos then 01:27:44.280 --> 01:27:45.669 align:start position:0% we say a sentence like mean Gatos then we're<01:27:44.440> using<01:27:44.800> gustan<01:27:45.360> because<01:27:45.560> the 01:27:45.669 --> 01:27:45.679 align:start position:0% we're using gustan because the 01:27:45.679 --> 01:27:47.550 align:start position:0% we're using gustan because the continuation<01:27:46.280> is<01:27:46.400> a<01:27:46.520> noun<01:27:46.880> that's<01:27:47.040> plural<01:27:47.440> and 01:27:47.550 --> 01:27:47.560 align:start position:0% continuation is a noun that's plural and 01:27:47.560 --> 01:27:48.990 align:start position:0% continuation is a noun that's plural and if<01:27:47.679> we<01:27:47.800> put<01:27:47.960> this<01:27:48.119> phrase<01:27:48.320> in<01:27:48.440> English<01:27:48.880> we 01:27:48.990 --> 01:27:49.000 align:start position:0% if we put this phrase in English we 01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:50.870 align:start position:0% if we put this phrase in English we would<01:27:49.199> have<01:27:49.560> they<01:27:49.800> please<01:27:50.119> me<01:27:50.400> but<01:27:50.560> because<01:27:50.760> we 01:27:50.870 --> 01:27:50.880 align:start position:0% would have they please me but because we 01:27:50.880 --> 01:27:53.109 align:start position:0% would have they please me but because we have<01:27:51.119> cats<01:27:51.560> as<01:27:51.679> the<01:27:51.840> noun<01:27:52.199> we<01:27:52.320> would<01:27:52.480> say<01:27:52.840> cats 01:27:53.109 --> 01:27:53.119 align:start position:0% have cats as the noun we would say cats 01:27:53.119 --> 01:27:54.470 align:start position:0% have cats as the noun we would say cats please<01:27:53.400> me<01:27:53.639> and<01:27:53.719> so<01:27:53.880> the<01:27:54.000> phrase<01:27:54.239> doesn't 01:27:54.470 --> 01:27:54.480 align:start position:0% please me and so the phrase doesn't 01:27:54.480 --> 01:27:56.750 align:start position:0% please me and so the phrase doesn't really<01:27:54.639> mean<01:27:54.920> I<01:27:55.080> like<01:27:55.360> cats<01:27:55.719> but<01:27:55.960> rather<01:27:56.480> cats 01:27:56.750 --> 01:27:56.760 align:start position:0% really mean I like cats but rather cats 01:27:56.760 --> 01:27:58.470 align:start position:0% really mean I like cats but rather cats please<01:27:57.080> me<01:27:57.560> however<01:27:57.840> what<01:27:57.960> if<01:27:58.080> we<01:27:58.199> have<01:27:58.320> a 01:27:58.470 --> 01:27:58.480 align:start position:0% please me however what if we have a 01:27:58.480 --> 01:28:01.870 align:start position:0% please me however what if we have a sentence<01:27:59.000> like<01:27:59.360> mea<01:28:00.080> B<01:28:01.080> in<01:28:01.239> this<01:28:01.400> case<01:28:01.719> some 01:28:01.870 --> 01:28:01.880 align:start position:0% sentence like mea B in this case some 01:28:01.880 --> 01:28:03.750 align:start position:0% sentence like mea B in this case some people<01:28:02.119> might<01:28:02.320> think<01:28:02.440> to<01:28:02.600> use<01:28:02.960> gustan<01:28:03.560> because 01:28:03.750 --> 01:28:03.760 align:start position:0% people might think to use gustan because 01:28:03.760 --> 01:28:05.629 align:start position:0% people might think to use gustan because the<01:28:03.880> continuation<01:28:04.360> is<01:28:04.480> plural<01:28:04.920> but<01:28:05.119> actually 01:28:05.629 --> 01:28:05.639 align:start position:0% the continuation is plural but actually 01:28:05.639 --> 01:28:07.070 align:start position:0% the continuation is plural but actually this<01:28:05.760> sentence<01:28:06.080> can<01:28:06.199> be<01:28:06.320> broken<01:28:06.639> down<01:28:06.840> into 01:28:07.070 --> 01:28:07.080 align:start position:0% this sentence can be broken down into 01:28:07.080 --> 01:28:10.149 align:start position:0% this sentence can be broken down into two<01:28:07.360> separate<01:28:07.679> phrases<01:28:08.360> like<01:28:08.679> megusta<01:28:09.199> B<01:28:09.840> and 01:28:10.149 --> 01:28:10.159 align:start position:0% two separate phrases like megusta B and 01:28:10.159 --> 01:28:12.109 align:start position:0% two separate phrases like megusta B and mea<01:28:11.159> which<01:28:11.280> shows<01:28:11.520> that<01:28:11.639> we<01:28:11.719> don't<01:28:11.840> need<01:28:12.000> to 01:28:12.109 --> 01:28:12.119 align:start position:0% mea which shows that we don't need to 01:28:12.119 --> 01:28:13.950 align:start position:0% mea which shows that we don't need to use<01:28:12.360> gustan<01:28:12.920> because<01:28:13.159> nothing<01:28:13.440> is<01:28:13.560> plural 01:28:13.950 --> 01:28:13.960 align:start position:0% use gustan because nothing is plural 01:28:13.960 --> 01:28:15.510 align:start position:0% use gustan because nothing is plural it's<01:28:14.119> the<01:28:14.199> same<01:28:14.400> thing<01:28:14.520> as<01:28:14.679> saying<01:28:15.040> it<01:28:15.159> pleases 01:28:15.510 --> 01:28:15.520 align:start position:0% it's the same thing as saying it pleases 01:28:15.520 --> 01:28:17.229 align:start position:0% it's the same thing as saying it pleases me<01:28:15.679> to<01:28:15.840> dance<01:28:16.239> and<01:28:16.440> to<01:28:16.600> sing<01:28:16.880> which<01:28:17.000> can<01:28:17.119> be 01:28:17.229 --> 01:28:17.239 align:start position:0% me to dance and to sing which can be 01:28:17.239 --> 01:28:18.790 align:start position:0% me to dance and to sing which can be said<01:28:17.440> as<01:28:17.560> one<01:28:17.719> phrase<01:28:18.000> in<01:28:18.119> English<01:28:18.520> or<01:28:18.679> be 01:28:18.790 --> 01:28:18.800 align:start position:0% said as one phrase in English or be 01:28:18.800 --> 01:28:20.270 align:start position:0% said as one phrase in English or be broken<01:28:19.159> down<01:28:19.400> separately<01:28:19.960> which<01:28:20.080> still 01:28:20.270 --> 01:28:20.280 align:start position:0% broken down separately which still 01:28:20.280 --> 01:28:22.189 align:start position:0% broken down separately which still doesn't<01:28:20.560> change<01:28:20.960> the<01:28:21.159> it<01:28:21.360> pleases<01:28:21.800> part 01:28:22.189 --> 01:28:22.199 align:start position:0% doesn't change the it pleases part 01:28:22.199 --> 01:28:23.790 align:start position:0% doesn't change the it pleases part overall<01:28:22.760> the<01:28:22.880> same<01:28:23.119> concept<01:28:23.480> basically 01:28:23.790 --> 01:28:23.800 align:start position:0% overall the same concept basically 01:28:23.800 --> 01:28:25.390 align:start position:0% overall the same concept basically applies<01:28:24.080> to<01:28:24.199> any<01:28:24.360> pronoun<01:28:24.719> you<01:28:24.800> want<01:28:24.880> to<01:28:25.040> say 01:28:25.390 --> 01:28:25.400 align:start position:0% applies to any pronoun you want to say 01:28:25.400 --> 01:28:26.750 align:start position:0% applies to any pronoun you want to say along<01:28:25.639> with<01:28:25.800> any<01:28:26.000> continuation<01:28:26.560> that<01:28:26.639> you 01:28:26.750 --> 01:28:26.760 align:start position:0% along with any continuation that you 01:28:26.760 --> 01:28:28.470 align:start position:0% along with any continuation that you want<01:28:26.840> to<01:28:27.000> use<01:28:27.320> and<01:28:27.440> here<01:28:27.560> are<01:28:27.719> some<01:28:27.920> examples 01:28:28.470 --> 01:28:28.480 align:start position:0% want to use and here are some examples 01:28:28.480 --> 01:28:29.510 align:start position:0% want to use and here are some examples saying 01:28:29.510 --> 01:28:29.520 align:start position:0% saying 01:28:29.520 --> 01:28:32.189 align:start position:0% saying Meo<01:28:30.520> would<01:28:30.679> literally<01:28:31.080> mean<01:28:31.480> it<01:28:31.639> pleases<01:28:32.040> me 01:28:32.189 --> 01:28:32.199 align:start position:0% Meo would literally mean it pleases me 01:28:32.199 --> 01:28:34.070 align:start position:0% Meo would literally mean it pleases me to<01:28:32.360> speak<01:28:32.639> with<01:28:32.760> you<01:28:33.040> but<01:28:33.199> if<01:28:33.280> we<01:28:33.440> want<01:28:33.560> to<01:28:33.719> use 01:28:34.070 --> 01:28:34.080 align:start position:0% to speak with you but if we want to use 01:28:34.080 --> 01:28:36.350 align:start position:0% to speak with you but if we want to use gustan<01:28:34.600> we<01:28:34.719> can<01:28:34.840> say<01:28:35.080> something<01:28:35.400> like 01:28:36.350 --> 01:28:36.360 align:start position:0% gustan we can say something like 01:28:36.360 --> 01:28:38.750 align:start position:0% gustan we can say something like meas<01:28:37.360> and<01:28:37.480> in<01:28:37.639> this<01:28:37.800> case<01:28:38.119> we<01:28:38.239> would<01:28:38.400> use 01:28:38.750 --> 01:28:38.760 align:start position:0% meas and in this case we would use 01:28:38.760 --> 01:28:40.470 align:start position:0% meas and in this case we would use gustan<01:28:39.360> because<01:28:39.560> the<01:28:39.639> sentence<01:28:40.000> would<01:28:40.159> be 01:28:40.470 --> 01:28:40.480 align:start position:0% gustan because the sentence would be 01:28:40.480 --> 01:28:42.390 align:start position:0% gustan because the sentence would be your<01:28:40.760> words<01:28:41.280> please<01:28:41.560> me<01:28:41.880> with<01:28:42.000> the<01:28:42.119> word 01:28:42.390 --> 01:28:42.400 align:start position:0% your words please me with the word 01:28:42.400 --> 01:28:44.910 align:start position:0% your words please me with the word please<01:28:42.800> in<01:28:42.920> the<01:28:43.040> sentence<01:28:43.520> saying<01:28:43.760> a<01:28:43.880> sentence 01:28:44.910 --> 01:28:44.920 align:start position:0% please in the sentence saying a sentence 01:28:44.920 --> 01:28:47.390 align:start position:0% please in the sentence saying a sentence likea<01:28:45.920> would<01:28:46.119> literally<01:28:46.480> mean<01:28:46.880> the<01:28:47.040> house 01:28:47.390 --> 01:28:47.400 align:start position:0% likea would literally mean the house 01:28:47.400 --> 01:28:49.390 align:start position:0% likea would literally mean the house pleases<01:28:47.800> you<01:28:48.040> with<01:28:48.239> the<01:28:48.400> house<01:28:48.760> being<01:28:49.080> it 01:28:49.390 --> 01:28:49.400 align:start position:0% pleases you with the house being it 01:28:49.400 --> 01:28:52.310 align:start position:0% pleases you with the house being it which<01:28:49.560> pleases<01:28:49.920> you<01:28:50.159> saying<01:28:50.400> a<01:28:50.480> sentence<01:28:51.000> like 01:28:52.310 --> 01:28:52.320 align:start position:0% which pleases you saying a sentence like 01:28:52.320 --> 01:28:54.270 align:start position:0% which pleases you saying a sentence like who<01:28:52.480> got<01:28:52.679> football<01:28:53.199> would<01:28:53.360> literally<01:28:53.719> mean<01:28:54.119> it 01:28:54.270 --> 01:28:54.280 align:start position:0% who got football would literally mean it 01:28:54.280 --> 01:28:56.270 align:start position:0% who got football would literally mean it pleases<01:28:54.719> him<01:28:55.000> to<01:28:55.199> play<01:28:55.400> football<01:28:55.920> with<01:28:56.119> him 01:28:56.270 --> 01:28:56.280 align:start position:0% pleases him to play football with him 01:28:56.280 --> 01:28:58.270 align:start position:0% pleases him to play football with him being<01:28:56.480> the<01:28:56.639> construction<01:28:57.320> a<01:28:57.840> because<01:28:58.040> we<01:28:58.159> have 01:28:58.270 --> 01:28:58.280 align:start position:0% being the construction a because we have 01:28:58.280 --> 01:28:59.830 align:start position:0% being the construction a because we have to<01:28:58.440> remember<01:28:58.920> that<01:28:59.040> we<01:28:59.159> don't<01:28:59.320> know<01:28:59.480> who<01:28:59.679> Le 01:28:59.830 --> 01:28:59.840 align:start position:0% to remember that we don't know who Le 01:28:59.840 --> 01:29:01.709 align:start position:0% to remember that we don't know who Le refers<01:29:00.199> to<01:29:00.560> without<01:29:00.840> this<01:29:01.080> construction<01:29:01.639> we 01:29:01.709 --> 01:29:01.719 align:start position:0% refers to without this construction we 01:29:01.719 --> 01:29:04.750 align:start position:0% refers to without this construction we can<01:29:01.880> also<01:29:02.080> say<01:29:02.280> something<01:29:02.639> like<01:29:03.040> no<01:29:03.760> gusta 01:29:04.750 --> 01:29:04.760 align:start position:0% can also say something like no gusta 01:29:04.760 --> 01:29:06.669 align:start position:0% can also say something like no gusta which<01:29:04.880> would<01:29:05.040> be<01:29:05.400> it<01:29:05.560> pleases<01:29:06.000> us<01:29:06.199> to<01:29:06.360> speak 01:29:06.669 --> 01:29:06.679 align:start position:0% which would be it pleases us to speak 01:29:06.679 --> 01:29:10.270 align:start position:0% which would be it pleases us to speak Spanish<01:29:07.280> and<01:29:07.400> we<01:29:07.520> can<01:29:07.679> also<01:29:08.080> say<01:29:09.159> is<01:29:10.159> which 01:29:10.270 --> 01:29:10.280 align:start position:0% Spanish and we can also say is which 01:29:10.280 --> 01:29:12.109 align:start position:0% Spanish and we can also say is which would<01:29:10.440> be<01:29:10.639> it<01:29:10.760> pleases<01:29:11.239> them<01:29:11.560> to<01:29:11.719> listen<01:29:11.920> to 01:29:12.109 --> 01:29:12.119 align:start position:0% would be it pleases them to listen to 01:29:12.119 --> 01:29:13.669 align:start position:0% would be it pleases them to listen to music<01:29:12.480> you<01:29:12.560> can<01:29:12.679> say<01:29:12.880> any<01:29:13.080> sentence<01:29:13.360> you<01:29:13.480> want 01:29:13.669 --> 01:29:13.679 align:start position:0% music you can say any sentence you want 01:29:13.679 --> 01:29:15.470 align:start position:0% music you can say any sentence you want using<01:29:13.920> the<01:29:14.000> verb<01:29:14.280> gust<01:29:14.760> but<01:29:14.920> as<01:29:15.000> I<01:29:15.119> said<01:29:15.280> at<01:29:15.360> the 01:29:15.470 --> 01:29:15.480 align:start position:0% using the verb gust but as I said at the 01:29:15.480 --> 01:29:17.070 align:start position:0% using the verb gust but as I said at the beginning<01:29:15.719> of<01:29:15.840> the<01:29:16.000> video<01:29:16.440> instead<01:29:16.679> of<01:29:16.800> saying 01:29:17.070 --> 01:29:17.080 align:start position:0% beginning of the video instead of saying 01:29:17.080 --> 01:29:20.510 align:start position:0% beginning of the video instead of saying phrases<01:29:17.520> like<01:29:17.880> mea<01:29:18.360> B<01:29:18.880> we<01:29:19.000> can<01:29:19.159> say<01:29:19.520> yo<01:29:19.719> Amo<01:29:20.040> B 01:29:20.510 --> 01:29:20.520 align:start position:0% phrases like mea B we can say yo Amo B 01:29:20.520 --> 01:29:22.350 align:start position:0% phrases like mea B we can say yo Amo B which<01:29:20.639> would<01:29:20.760> mean<01:29:21.080> I<01:29:21.199> love<01:29:21.440> to<01:29:21.600> dance<01:29:22.119> rather 01:29:22.350 --> 01:29:22.360 align:start position:0% which would mean I love to dance rather 01:29:22.360 --> 01:29:24.550 align:start position:0% which would mean I love to dance rather than<01:29:22.639> I<01:29:22.760> like<01:29:22.920> to<01:29:23.119> dance<01:29:23.520> or<01:29:23.719> it<01:29:23.880> pleases<01:29:24.239> me<01:29:24.360> to 01:29:24.550 --> 01:29:24.560 align:start position:0% than I like to dance or it pleases me to 01:29:24.560 --> 01:29:26.070 align:start position:0% than I like to dance or it pleases me to dance<01:29:24.920> and<01:29:25.040> the<01:29:25.119> same<01:29:25.280> idea<01:29:25.560> applies<01:29:25.800> to<01:29:25.920> any 01:29:26.070 --> 01:29:26.080 align:start position:0% dance and the same idea applies to any 01:29:26.080 --> 01:29:27.830 align:start position:0% dance and the same idea applies to any pronoun<01:29:26.400> you<01:29:26.480> want<01:29:26.600> to<01:29:26.719> use<01:29:27.080> in<01:29:27.239> this<01:29:27.400> video<01:29:27.760> I 01:29:27.830 --> 01:29:27.840 align:start position:0% pronoun you want to use in this video I 01:29:27.840 --> 01:29:29.510 align:start position:0% pronoun you want to use in this video I wanted<01:29:28.080> to<01:29:28.199> show<01:29:28.360> you<01:29:28.480> how<01:29:28.639> the<01:29:28.760> verb<01:29:29.000> gustar 01:29:29.510 --> 01:29:29.520 align:start position:0% wanted to show you how the verb gustar 01:29:29.520 --> 01:29:31.109 align:start position:0% wanted to show you how the verb gustar Works<01:29:29.760> in<01:29:29.960> Spanish<01:29:30.360> so<01:29:30.520> that<01:29:30.639> you<01:29:30.719> can 01:29:31.109 --> 01:29:31.119 align:start position:0% Works in Spanish so that you can 01:29:31.119 --> 01:29:32.590 align:start position:0% Works in Spanish so that you can understand<01:29:31.239> how<01:29:31.400> the<01:29:31.560> verb<01:29:31.840> Works<01:29:32.080> in<01:29:32.199> English 01:29:32.590 --> 01:29:32.600 align:start position:0% understand how the verb Works in English 01:29:32.600 --> 01:29:34.790 align:start position:0% understand how the verb Works in English rather<01:29:32.800> than<01:29:33.000> explain<01:29:33.360> gustar<01:29:33.960> as<01:29:34.159> to<01:29:34.440> like<01:29:34.719> I 01:29:34.790 --> 01:29:34.800 align:start position:0% rather than explain gustar as to like I 01:29:34.800 --> 01:29:36.189 align:start position:0% rather than explain gustar as to like I decided<01:29:35.080> to<01:29:35.199> give<01:29:35.360> a<01:29:35.480> different<01:29:35.760> perspective 01:29:36.189 --> 01:29:36.199 align:start position:0% decided to give a different perspective 01:29:36.199 --> 01:29:37.790 align:start position:0% decided to give a different perspective on<01:29:36.400> this<01:29:36.560> verb<01:29:36.840> to<01:29:36.960> show<01:29:37.199> how<01:29:37.360> it's<01:29:37.520> closely 01:29:37.790 --> 01:29:37.800 align:start position:0% on this verb to show how it's closely 01:29:37.800 --> 01:29:39.310 align:start position:0% on this verb to show how it's closely related<01:29:38.159> to<01:29:38.280> English<01:29:38.679> so<01:29:38.840> this<01:29:39.000> video<01:29:39.199> was 01:29:39.310 --> 01:29:39.320 align:start position:0% related to English so this video was 01:29:39.320 --> 01:29:41.149 align:start position:0% related to English so this video was more<01:29:39.440> of<01:29:39.520> a<01:29:39.639> logical<01:29:40.119> presentation<01:29:40.800> of<01:29:40.960> how 01:29:41.149 --> 01:29:41.159 align:start position:0% more of a logical presentation of how 01:29:41.159 --> 01:29:43.189 align:start position:0% more of a logical presentation of how gustar<01:29:41.639> looks<01:29:41.840> like<01:29:41.960> in<01:29:42.119> English<01:29:42.760> sometimes 01:29:43.189 --> 01:29:43.199 align:start position:0% gustar looks like in English sometimes 01:29:43.199 --> 01:29:44.550 align:start position:0% gustar looks like in English sometimes there<01:29:43.360> are<01:29:43.600> Concepts<01:29:44.040> that<01:29:44.159> are<01:29:44.280> more 01:29:44.550 --> 01:29:44.560 align:start position:0% there are Concepts that are more 01:29:44.560 --> 01:29:46.350 align:start position:0% there are Concepts that are more practical<01:29:44.920> to<01:29:45.080> Know<01:29:45.440> Than<01:29:45.560> to<01:29:45.719> use<01:29:46.159> and<01:29:46.280> I 01:29:46.350 --> 01:29:46.360 align:start position:0% practical to Know Than to use and I 01:29:46.360 --> 01:29:48.030 align:start position:0% practical to Know Than to use and I would<01:29:46.480> say<01:29:46.639> that<01:29:46.840> gustar<01:29:47.280> falls<01:29:47.600> into<01:29:47.840> this 01:29:48.030 --> 01:29:48.040 align:start position:0% would say that gustar falls into this 01:29:48.040 --> 01:29:49.910 align:start position:0% would say that gustar falls into this category<01:29:48.520> Spanish<01:29:48.920> has<01:29:49.040> many<01:29:49.239> verbs<01:29:49.679> some<01:29:49.800> of 01:29:49.910 --> 01:29:49.920 align:start position:0% category Spanish has many verbs some of 01:29:49.920 --> 01:29:51.669 align:start position:0% category Spanish has many verbs some of which<01:29:50.040> are<01:29:50.159> normal<01:29:50.520> across<01:29:50.800> all<01:29:51.080> pronouns<01:29:51.600> and 01:29:51.669 --> 01:29:51.679 align:start position:0% which are normal across all pronouns and 01:29:51.679 --> 01:29:53.149 align:start position:0% which are normal across all pronouns and some<01:29:51.880> some<01:29:52.000> of<01:29:52.080> which<01:29:52.199> are<01:29:52.320> not<01:29:52.480> so<01:29:52.679> normal 01:29:53.149 --> 01:29:53.159 align:start position:0% some some of which are not so normal 01:29:53.159 --> 01:29:55.310 align:start position:0% some some of which are not so normal called<01:29:53.520> irregular<01:29:54.159> yo<01:29:54.480> verbs<01:29:54.960> while<01:29:55.080> you<01:29:55.159> may 01:29:55.310 --> 01:29:55.320 align:start position:0% called irregular yo verbs while you may 01:29:55.320 --> 01:29:57.270 align:start position:0% called irregular yo verbs while you may encounter<01:29:55.760> regular<01:29:56.119> verbs<01:29:56.480> like<01:29:56.719> K<01:29:57.159> the 01:29:57.270 --> 01:29:57.280 align:start position:0% encounter regular verbs like K the 01:29:57.280 --> 01:30:00.030 align:start position:0% encounter regular verbs like K the syntax<01:29:57.719> of<01:29:58.000> K<01:29:58.520> across<01:29:58.880> all<01:29:59.159> pronouns<01:29:59.679> follows 01:30:00.030 --> 01:30:00.040 align:start position:0% syntax of K across all pronouns follows 01:30:00.040 --> 01:30:01.350 align:start position:0% syntax of K across all pronouns follows the<01:30:00.119> standard<01:30:00.480> conjugation<01:30:00.960> pattern<01:30:01.239> of 01:30:01.350 --> 01:30:01.360 align:start position:0% the standard conjugation pattern of 01:30:01.360 --> 01:30:04.590 align:start position:0% the standard conjugation pattern of verbs<01:30:01.600> ending<01:30:01.840> in<01:30:02.000> e<01:30:02.199> r<01:30:02.679> such<01:30:02.840> as<01:30:03.119> o<01:30:03.639> s<01:30:04.040> a<01:30:04.320> and<01:30:04.440> so 01:30:04.590 --> 01:30:04.600 align:start position:0% verbs ending in e r such as o s a and so 01:30:04.600 --> 01:30:06.629 align:start position:0% verbs ending in e r such as o s a and so on<01:30:05.080> however<01:30:05.560> sometimes<01:30:05.800> in<01:30:05.960> Spanish<01:30:06.400> you'll 01:30:06.629 --> 01:30:06.639 align:start position:0% on however sometimes in Spanish you'll 01:30:06.639 --> 01:30:08.189 align:start position:0% on however sometimes in Spanish you'll encounter<01:30:07.040> verbs<01:30:07.280> that<01:30:07.440> follow<01:30:07.679> this<01:30:07.880> pattern 01:30:08.189 --> 01:30:08.199 align:start position:0% encounter verbs that follow this pattern 01:30:08.199 --> 01:30:10.149 align:start position:0% encounter verbs that follow this pattern across<01:30:08.520> all<01:30:08.760> pronouns<01:30:09.400> except<01:30:09.679> in<01:30:09.800> the<01:30:09.920> yo 01:30:10.149 --> 01:30:10.159 align:start position:0% across all pronouns except in the yo 01:30:10.159 --> 01:30:11.669 align:start position:0% across all pronouns except in the yo pronoun<01:30:10.560> and<01:30:10.679> while<01:30:10.920> these<01:30:11.080> verbs<01:30:11.360> follow<01:30:11.600> the 01:30:11.669 --> 01:30:11.679 align:start position:0% pronoun and while these verbs follow the 01:30:11.679 --> 01:30:13.470 align:start position:0% pronoun and while these verbs follow the normal<01:30:12.000> syntax<01:30:12.360> of<01:30:12.560> every<01:30:12.760> other<01:30:13.040> pronoun 01:30:13.470 --> 01:30:13.480 align:start position:0% normal syntax of every other pronoun 01:30:13.480 --> 01:30:14.709 align:start position:0% normal syntax of every other pronoun they<01:30:13.600> do<01:30:13.679> not<01:30:13.840> follow<01:30:14.080> the<01:30:14.159> pattern<01:30:14.440> for<01:30:14.600> the 01:30:14.709 --> 01:30:14.719 align:start position:0% they do not follow the pattern for the 01:30:14.719 --> 01:30:16.189 align:start position:0% they do not follow the pattern for the yo<01:30:14.960> pronoun<01:30:15.360> because<01:30:15.600> Spanish<01:30:15.920> says<01:30:16.080> that 01:30:16.189 --> 01:30:16.199 align:start position:0% yo pronoun because Spanish says that 01:30:16.199 --> 01:30:17.590 align:start position:0% yo pronoun because Spanish says that these<01:30:16.360> conjugations<01:30:16.960> don't<01:30:17.159> sound<01:30:17.400> good 01:30:17.590 --> 01:30:17.600 align:start position:0% these conjugations don't sound good 01:30:17.600 --> 01:30:19.070 align:start position:0% these conjugations don't sound good enough<01:30:17.920> when<01:30:18.040> the<01:30:18.159> word<01:30:18.320> is<01:30:18.440> said<01:30:18.800> there<01:30:18.920> are 01:30:19.070 --> 01:30:19.080 align:start position:0% enough when the word is said there are 01:30:19.080 --> 01:30:21.350 align:start position:0% enough when the word is said there are useful<01:30:19.480> verbs<01:30:19.920> like<01:30:20.280> Sal<01:30:20.840> which<01:30:20.960> means<01:30:21.199> to 01:30:21.350 --> 01:30:21.360 align:start position:0% useful verbs like Sal which means to 01:30:21.360 --> 01:30:22.790 align:start position:0% useful verbs like Sal which means to leave<01:30:21.679> and<01:30:21.960> while<01:30:22.119> the<01:30:22.239> verb<01:30:22.400> follows<01:30:22.679> the 01:30:22.790 --> 01:30:22.800 align:start position:0% leave and while the verb follows the 01:30:22.800 --> 01:30:24.870 align:start position:0% leave and while the verb follows the normal<01:30:23.080> syntax<01:30:23.440> of<01:30:23.560> verbs<01:30:23.800> ending<01:30:24.040> in<01:30:24.199> IR<01:30:24.760> it 01:30:24.870 --> 01:30:24.880 align:start position:0% normal syntax of verbs ending in IR it 01:30:24.880 --> 01:30:26.350 align:start position:0% normal syntax of verbs ending in IR it doesn't<01:30:25.119> do<01:30:25.280> so<01:30:25.440> with<01:30:25.560> the<01:30:25.679> yo<01:30:25.880> pronoun<01:30:26.280> you 01:30:26.350 --> 01:30:26.360 align:start position:0% doesn't do so with the yo pronoun you 01:30:26.360 --> 01:30:28.550 align:start position:0% doesn't do so with the yo pronoun you would<01:30:26.520> want<01:30:26.639> to<01:30:26.800> say<01:30:27.199> yo<01:30:27.920> but<01:30:28.080> Spanish<01:30:28.400> says 01:30:28.550 --> 01:30:28.560 align:start position:0% would want to say yo but Spanish says 01:30:28.560 --> 01:30:30.430 align:start position:0% would want to say yo but Spanish says that<01:30:28.679> this<01:30:28.840> word<01:30:29.000> sounds<01:30:29.360> bad<01:30:29.639> so<01:30:29.880> instead<01:30:30.320> you 01:30:30.430 --> 01:30:30.440 align:start position:0% that this word sounds bad so instead you 01:30:30.440 --> 01:30:32.550 align:start position:0% that this word sounds bad so instead you would<01:30:30.600> say<01:30:30.960> yo<01:30:31.280> salgo<01:30:31.679> ending<01:30:31.960> the<01:30:32.080> pronoun 01:30:32.550 --> 01:30:32.560 align:start position:0% would say yo salgo ending the pronoun 01:30:32.560 --> 01:30:34.229 align:start position:0% would say yo salgo ending the pronoun with<01:30:32.920> go<01:30:33.320> which<01:30:33.440> is<01:30:33.600> actually<01:30:33.840> a<01:30:34.000> common 01:30:34.229 --> 01:30:34.239 align:start position:0% with go which is actually a common 01:30:34.239 --> 01:30:35.950 align:start position:0% with go which is actually a common ending<01:30:34.560> for<01:30:34.760> irregular<01:30:35.239> verbs<01:30:35.480> in<01:30:35.600> the<01:30:35.719> yo 01:30:35.950 --> 01:30:35.960 align:start position:0% ending for irregular verbs in the yo 01:30:35.960 --> 01:30:37.430 align:start position:0% ending for irregular verbs in the yo pronoun<01:30:36.400> some<01:30:36.560> of<01:30:36.679> which<01:30:36.840> I<01:30:36.920> covered<01:30:37.199> in<01:30:37.280> my 01:30:37.430 --> 01:30:37.440 align:start position:0% pronoun some of which I covered in my 01:30:37.440 --> 01:30:40.550 align:start position:0% pronoun some of which I covered in my previous<01:30:37.719> videos<01:30:38.280> like<01:30:38.560> a<01:30:39.040> and<01:30:39.280> ten<01:30:39.800> a<01:30:40.239> follows 01:30:40.550 --> 01:30:40.560 align:start position:0% previous videos like a and ten a follows 01:30:40.560 --> 01:30:42.430 align:start position:0% previous videos like a and ten a follows the<01:30:40.679> normal<01:30:41.000> pattern<01:30:41.280> across<01:30:41.600> all<01:30:41.840> pronouns 01:30:42.430 --> 01:30:42.440 align:start position:0% the normal pattern across all pronouns 01:30:42.440 --> 01:30:44.830 align:start position:0% the normal pattern across all pronouns but<01:30:42.560> changes<01:30:42.880> to<01:30:43.199> AO<01:30:43.679> in<01:30:43.800> the<01:30:44.000> yo<01:30:44.239> pronoun<01:30:44.679> so 01:30:44.830 --> 01:30:44.840 align:start position:0% but changes to AO in the yo pronoun so 01:30:44.840 --> 01:30:46.669 align:start position:0% but changes to AO in the yo pronoun so that<01:30:44.960> it<01:30:45.040> sounds<01:30:45.320> better<01:30:45.560> when<01:30:45.719> said<01:30:46.119> t<01:30:46.520> does 01:30:46.669 --> 01:30:46.679 align:start position:0% that it sounds better when said t does 01:30:46.679 --> 01:30:48.669 align:start position:0% that it sounds better when said t does the<01:30:46.800> same<01:30:47.000> thing<01:30:47.199> with<01:30:47.400> yo<01:30:48.119> but<01:30:48.199> it's<01:30:48.400> also<01:30:48.600> a 01:30:48.669 --> 01:30:48.679 align:start position:0% the same thing with yo but it's also a 01:30:48.679 --> 01:30:50.629 align:start position:0% the same thing with yo but it's also a stem<01:30:48.920> changing<01:30:49.280> verb<01:30:49.560> across<01:30:49.840> some<01:30:50.080> pronouns 01:30:50.629 --> 01:30:50.639 align:start position:0% stem changing verb across some pronouns 01:30:50.639 --> 01:30:52.229 align:start position:0% stem changing verb across some pronouns but<01:30:50.760> the<01:30:50.920> topic<01:30:51.159> of<01:30:51.280> stem<01:30:51.480> changing<01:30:51.880> verbs<01:30:52.119> is 01:30:52.229 --> 01:30:52.239 align:start position:0% but the topic of stem changing verbs is 01:30:52.239 --> 01:30:53.830 align:start position:0% but the topic of stem changing verbs is for<01:30:52.400> the<01:30:52.520> video<01:30:52.960> after<01:30:53.239> this<01:30:53.320> one<01:30:53.560> you<01:30:53.639> might 01:30:53.830 --> 01:30:53.840 align:start position:0% for the video after this one you might 01:30:53.840 --> 01:30:55.629 align:start position:0% for the video after this one you might also<01:30:54.040> encounter<01:30:54.440> irregular<01:30:54.920> verbs<01:30:55.159> in<01:30:55.280> the<01:30:55.400> O 01:30:55.629 --> 01:30:55.639 align:start position:0% also encounter irregular verbs in the O 01:30:55.639 --> 01:30:58.550 align:start position:0% also encounter irregular verbs in the O pronoun<01:30:56.159> like<01:30:56.440> conduc<01:30:57.199> and<01:30:57.520> truc<01:30:58.159> in<01:30:58.320> both 01:30:58.550 --> 01:30:58.560 align:start position:0% pronoun like conduc and truc in both 01:30:58.560 --> 01:31:00.030 align:start position:0% pronoun like conduc and truc in both cases<01:30:59.000> the<01:30:59.119> verbs<01:30:59.360> follow<01:30:59.639> the<01:30:59.800> normal 01:31:00.030 --> 01:31:00.040 align:start position:0% cases the verbs follow the normal 01:31:00.040 --> 01:31:01.590 align:start position:0% cases the verbs follow the normal pattern<01:31:00.320> of<01:31:00.440> conjugating<01:31:00.920> verbs<01:31:01.159> ending<01:31:01.400> in 01:31:01.590 --> 01:31:01.600 align:start position:0% pattern of conjugating verbs ending in 01:31:01.600 --> 01:31:03.629 align:start position:0% pattern of conjugating verbs ending in IR<01:31:02.119> but<01:31:02.239> for<01:31:02.400> the<01:31:02.520> yo<01:31:02.760> pronoun<01:31:03.239> you<01:31:03.360> would<01:31:03.520> want 01:31:03.629 --> 01:31:03.639 align:start position:0% IR but for the yo pronoun you would want 01:31:03.639 --> 01:31:07.229 align:start position:0% IR but for the yo pronoun you would want to<01:31:03.800> say<01:31:04.199> Yoo<01:31:05.199> or<01:31:05.600> yo<01:31:06.520> but<01:31:06.639> Spanish<01:31:06.960> says<01:31:07.119> that 01:31:07.229 --> 01:31:07.239 align:start position:0% to say Yoo or yo but Spanish says that 01:31:07.239 --> 01:31:08.910 align:start position:0% to say Yoo or yo but Spanish says that these<01:31:07.400> words<01:31:07.639> sound<01:31:07.960> bad<01:31:08.159> one<01:31:08.360> said<01:31:08.679> so<01:31:08.800> it 01:31:08.910 --> 01:31:08.920 align:start position:0% these words sound bad one said so it 01:31:08.920 --> 01:31:10.750 align:start position:0% these words sound bad one said so it adds<01:31:09.119> an<01:31:09.239> extra<01:31:09.560> letter<01:31:09.960> to<01:31:10.119> avoid<01:31:10.400> the<01:31:10.560> bad 01:31:10.750 --> 01:31:10.760 align:start position:0% adds an extra letter to avoid the bad 01:31:10.760 --> 01:31:12.390 align:start position:0% adds an extra letter to avoid the bad sound<01:31:11.080> and<01:31:11.199> so<01:31:11.320> the<01:31:11.440> conjugations<01:31:12.000> would<01:31:12.199> end 01:31:12.390 --> 01:31:12.400 align:start position:0% sound and so the conjugations would end 01:31:12.400 --> 01:31:16.030 align:start position:0% sound and so the conjugations would end in<01:31:12.560> SK<01:31:12.920> pronounce<01:31:13.480> Yus<01:31:14.480> and<01:31:14.840> yuso<01:31:15.719> which<01:31:15.920> would 01:31:16.030 --> 01:31:16.040 align:start position:0% in SK pronounce Yus and yuso which would 01:31:16.040 --> 01:31:18.310 align:start position:0% in SK pronounce Yus and yuso which would mean<01:31:16.360> I<01:31:16.520> drive<01:31:17.080> and<01:31:17.239> I<01:31:17.440> translate<01:31:18.000> you<01:31:18.119> might 01:31:18.310 --> 01:31:18.320 align:start position:0% mean I drive and I translate you might 01:31:18.320 --> 01:31:20.390 align:start position:0% mean I drive and I translate you might also<01:31:18.520> encounter<01:31:19.040> this<01:31:19.199> verb<01:31:19.600> Dar<01:31:20.040> which<01:31:20.159> means 01:31:20.390 --> 01:31:20.400 align:start position:0% also encounter this verb Dar which means 01:31:20.400 --> 01:31:22.030 align:start position:0% also encounter this verb Dar which means to<01:31:20.600> give<01:31:20.840> and<01:31:21.000> while<01:31:21.159> it<01:31:21.239> follows<01:31:21.520> the<01:31:21.800> noral 01:31:22.030 --> 01:31:22.040 align:start position:0% to give and while it follows the noral 01:31:22.040 --> 01:31:23.629 align:start position:0% to give and while it follows the noral pattern<01:31:22.320> of<01:31:22.440> conjugating<01:31:22.880> verbs<01:31:23.080> ending<01:31:23.320> in<01:31:23.480> a 01:31:23.629 --> 01:31:23.639 align:start position:0% pattern of conjugating verbs ending in a 01:31:23.639 --> 01:31:25.870 align:start position:0% pattern of conjugating verbs ending in a r<01:31:24.040> the<01:31:24.159> conjugation<01:31:24.600> for<01:31:24.800> the<01:31:24.920> yo<01:31:25.159> pronoun<01:31:25.719> is 01:31:25.870 --> 01:31:25.880 align:start position:0% r the conjugation for the yo pronoun is 01:31:25.880 --> 01:31:28.270 align:start position:0% r the conjugation for the yo pronoun is not<01:31:26.199> yo<01:31:26.760> but<01:31:27.000> yo<01:31:27.480> which<01:31:27.600> is<01:31:27.679> sort<01:31:27.840> of<01:31:27.960> similar 01:31:28.270 --> 01:31:28.280 align:start position:0% not yo but yo which is sort of similar 01:31:28.280 --> 01:31:30.950 align:start position:0% not yo but yo which is sort of similar to<01:31:28.480> y<01:31:28.719> soy<01:31:29.040> with<01:31:29.159> the<01:31:29.280> verb<01:31:29.520> said<01:31:29.960> and<01:31:30.280> Y<01:31:30.520> EST 01:31:30.950 --> 01:31:30.960 align:start position:0% to y soy with the verb said and Y EST 01:31:30.960 --> 01:31:32.950 align:start position:0% to y soy with the verb said and Y EST with<01:31:31.080> the<01:31:31.199> verb<01:31:31.920> at<01:31:32.119> last<01:31:32.400> there's<01:31:32.639> also<01:31:32.840> the 01:31:32.950 --> 01:31:32.960 align:start position:0% with the verb at last there's also the 01:31:32.960 --> 01:31:34.750 align:start position:0% with the verb at last there's also the verb<01:31:33.280> ver<01:31:33.639> which<01:31:33.760> means<01:31:34.000> to<01:31:34.239> see<01:31:34.480> and<01:31:34.600> while 01:31:34.750 --> 01:31:34.760 align:start position:0% verb ver which means to see and while 01:31:34.760 --> 01:31:36.470 align:start position:0% verb ver which means to see and while its<01:31:34.960> conjugations<01:31:35.560> perfectly<01:31:35.920> correspond<01:31:36.360> to 01:31:36.470 --> 01:31:36.480 align:start position:0% its conjugations perfectly correspond to 01:31:36.480 --> 01:31:39.430 align:start position:0% its conjugations perfectly correspond to all<01:31:36.719> pronouns<01:31:37.320> the<01:31:37.480> Y<01:31:37.639> pronoun<01:31:38.199> is<01:31:38.360> not<01:31:38.679> y<01:31:39.239> but 01:31:39.430 --> 01:31:39.440 align:start position:0% all pronouns the Y pronoun is not y but 01:31:39.440 --> 01:31:41.790 align:start position:0% all pronouns the Y pronoun is not y but rather<01:31:39.800> Y<01:31:40.360> which<01:31:40.480> means<01:31:40.880> I<01:31:41.040> see<01:31:41.360> when<01:31:41.520> using 01:31:41.790 --> 01:31:41.800 align:start position:0% rather Y which means I see when using 01:31:41.800 --> 01:31:44.709 align:start position:0% rather Y which means I see when using verbs 01:31:44.709 --> 01:31:44.719 align:start position:0% 01:31:44.719 --> 01:31:47.189 align:start position:0% like<01:31:45.719> and<01:31:46.000> ver<01:31:46.320> you<01:31:46.440> have<01:31:46.560> to<01:31:46.719> remember<01:31:47.040> that 01:31:47.189 --> 01:31:47.199 align:start position:0% like and ver you have to remember that 01:31:47.199 --> 01:31:48.870 align:start position:0% like and ver you have to remember that these<01:31:47.360> verbs<01:31:47.600> follow<01:31:47.880> the<01:31:48.000> normal<01:31:48.320> syntax 01:31:48.870 --> 01:31:48.880 align:start position:0% these verbs follow the normal syntax 01:31:48.880 --> 01:31:50.750 align:start position:0% these verbs follow the normal syntax across<01:31:49.199> all<01:31:49.360> of<01:31:49.480> their<01:31:49.679> pronouns<01:31:50.360> except<01:31:50.600> in 01:31:50.750 --> 01:31:50.760 align:start position:0% across all of their pronouns except in 01:31:50.760 --> 01:31:52.149 align:start position:0% across all of their pronouns except in the<01:31:50.880> yo<01:31:51.119> pronoun<01:31:51.600> which<01:31:51.760> which<01:31:51.880> therefore 01:31:52.149 --> 01:31:52.159 align:start position:0% the yo pronoun which which therefore 01:31:52.159 --> 01:31:54.709 align:start position:0% the yo pronoun which which therefore makes<01:31:52.400> the<01:31:52.520> verbs<01:31:52.920> irregular<01:31:53.639> yo<01:31:54.040> verbs<01:31:54.520> and 01:31:54.709 --> 01:31:54.719 align:start position:0% makes the verbs irregular yo verbs and 01:31:54.719 --> 01:31:56.310 align:start position:0% makes the verbs irregular yo verbs and actually<01:31:55.280> these<01:31:55.440> verbs<01:31:55.679> would<01:31:55.840> be<01:31:56.000> practical 01:31:56.310 --> 01:31:56.320 align:start position:0% actually these verbs would be practical 01:31:56.320 --> 01:31:57.590 align:start position:0% actually these verbs would be practical to<01:31:56.480> use<01:31:56.679> whenever<01:31:56.920> you<01:31:57.040> decide<01:31:57.280> to<01:31:57.360> speak 01:31:57.590 --> 01:31:57.600 align:start position:0% to use whenever you decide to speak 01:31:57.600 --> 01:31:59.189 align:start position:0% to use whenever you decide to speak Spanish<01:31:58.080> but<01:31:58.199> just<01:31:58.360> remember<01:31:58.600> to<01:31:58.760> utilize<01:31:59.080> the 01:31:59.189 --> 01:31:59.199 align:start position:0% Spanish but just remember to utilize the 01:31:59.199 --> 01:32:00.950 align:start position:0% Spanish but just remember to utilize the yo<01:31:59.400> pronoun<01:31:59.840> properly<01:32:00.239> with<01:32:00.400> them<01:32:00.679> there<01:32:00.760> are 01:32:00.950 --> 01:32:00.960 align:start position:0% yo pronoun properly with them there are 01:32:00.960 --> 01:32:03.990 align:start position:0% yo pronoun properly with them there are more<01:32:01.159> types<01:32:01.400> of<01:32:01.600> irregular<01:32:02.199> yo<01:32:02.440> verbs<01:32:02.960> like 01:32:03.990 --> 01:32:04.000 align:start position:0% more types of irregular yo verbs like 01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:06.830 align:start position:0% more types of irregular yo verbs like P<01:32:05.000> and<01:32:05.679> and<01:32:05.840> while<01:32:06.080> these<01:32:06.280> verbs<01:32:06.520> follow 01:32:06.830 --> 01:32:06.840 align:start position:0% P and and while these verbs follow 01:32:06.840 --> 01:32:08.470 align:start position:0% P and and while these verbs follow different<01:32:07.080> patterns<01:32:07.400> for<01:32:07.520> the<01:32:07.639> Y<01:32:07.880> pronoun<01:32:08.320> I 01:32:08.470 --> 01:32:08.480 align:start position:0% different patterns for the Y pronoun I 01:32:08.480 --> 01:32:09.910 align:start position:0% different patterns for the Y pronoun I recommend<01:32:08.840> knowing<01:32:09.159> these<01:32:09.320> verbs<01:32:09.679> rather 01:32:09.910 --> 01:32:09.920 align:start position:0% recommend knowing these verbs rather 01:32:09.920 --> 01:32:11.430 align:start position:0% recommend knowing these verbs rather than<01:32:10.080> using<01:32:10.440> them<01:32:10.760> because<01:32:11.000> generally 01:32:11.430 --> 01:32:11.440 align:start position:0% than using them because generally 01:32:11.440 --> 01:32:12.870 align:start position:0% than using them because generally speaking<01:32:11.880> they're<01:32:12.080> not<01:32:12.239> that<01:32:12.400> useful<01:32:12.719> in 01:32:12.870 --> 01:32:12.880 align:start position:0% speaking they're not that useful in 01:32:12.880 --> 01:32:15.510 align:start position:0% speaking they're not that useful in conversation<01:32:13.560> for<01:32:13.760> instance<01:32:14.360> p<01:32:14.760> and<01:32:14.920> suon 01:32:15.510 --> 01:32:15.520 align:start position:0% conversation for instance p and suon 01:32:15.520 --> 01:32:17.390 align:start position:0% conversation for instance p and suon follow<01:32:15.880> the<01:32:16.000> common<01:32:16.280> go<01:32:16.480> ending<01:32:16.920> in<01:32:17.040> the<01:32:17.159> yo 01:32:17.390 --> 01:32:17.400 align:start position:0% follow the common go ending in the yo 01:32:17.400 --> 01:32:19.030 align:start position:0% follow the common go ending in the yo pronoun<01:32:17.920> while<01:32:18.119> maintaining<01:32:18.560> the<01:32:18.679> normal 01:32:19.030 --> 01:32:19.040 align:start position:0% pronoun while maintaining the normal 01:32:19.040 --> 01:32:20.790 align:start position:0% pronoun while maintaining the normal syntax<01:32:19.520> across<01:32:19.840> the<01:32:19.920> rest<01:32:20.080> of<01:32:20.159> the<01:32:20.280> pronouns 01:32:20.790 --> 01:32:20.800 align:start position:0% syntax across the rest of the pronouns 01:32:20.800 --> 01:32:22.669 align:start position:0% syntax across the rest of the pronouns protet<01:32:21.239> is<01:32:21.320> an<01:32:21.400> inter<01:32:21.840> in<01:32:21.960> verb<01:32:22.280> because<01:32:22.440> it's 01:32:22.669 --> 01:32:22.679 align:start position:0% protet is an inter in verb because it's 01:32:22.679 --> 01:32:24.189 align:start position:0% protet is an inter in verb because it's actually<01:32:22.960> the<01:32:23.040> only<01:32:23.280> verb<01:32:23.480> in<01:32:23.639> Spanish<01:32:24.080> that 01:32:24.189 --> 01:32:24.199 align:start position:0% actually the only verb in Spanish that 01:32:24.199 --> 01:32:26.350 align:start position:0% actually the only verb in Spanish that follows<01:32:24.520> an<01:32:24.679> irregular<01:32:25.360> ho<01:32:25.639> ending<01:32:26.040> for<01:32:26.239> the 01:32:26.350 --> 01:32:26.360 align:start position:0% follows an irregular ho ending for the 01:32:26.360 --> 01:32:28.030 align:start position:0% follows an irregular ho ending for the yo<01:32:26.600> pronoun<01:32:27.080> while<01:32:27.280> still<01:32:27.520> maintaining<01:32:27.920> the 01:32:28.030 --> 01:32:28.040 align:start position:0% yo pronoun while still maintaining the 01:32:28.040 --> 01:32:29.709 align:start position:0% yo pronoun while still maintaining the normal<01:32:28.320> conjugation<01:32:28.840> pattern<01:32:29.199> at<01:32:29.360> last<01:32:29.560> you 01:32:29.709 --> 01:32:29.719 align:start position:0% normal conjugation pattern at last you 01:32:29.719 --> 01:32:31.550 align:start position:0% normal conjugation pattern at last you can<01:32:29.840> have<01:32:29.960> a<01:32:30.080> verb<01:32:30.360> like<01:32:30.639> trer<01:32:31.159> which<01:32:31.280> follows 01:32:31.550 --> 01:32:31.560 align:start position:0% can have a verb like trer which follows 01:32:31.560 --> 01:32:32.990 align:start position:0% can have a verb like trer which follows the<01:32:31.679> normal<01:32:31.960> pattern<01:32:32.239> of<01:32:32.360> verbs<01:32:32.600> ending<01:32:32.840> in 01:32:32.990 --> 01:32:33.000 align:start position:0% the normal pattern of verbs ending in 01:32:33.000 --> 01:32:35.109 align:start position:0% the normal pattern of verbs ending in eer<01:32:33.560> but<01:32:33.679> in<01:32:33.800> the<01:32:33.960> yo<01:32:34.199> pronoun<01:32:34.679> it<01:32:34.840> has<01:32:35.000> the 01:32:35.109 --> 01:32:35.119 align:start position:0% eer but in the yo pronoun it has the 01:32:35.119 --> 01:32:37.350 align:start position:0% eer but in the yo pronoun it has the ending<01:32:35.520> Trio<01:32:36.119> and<01:32:36.320> actually<01:32:36.840> this<01:32:36.960> ending<01:32:37.239> is 01:32:37.350 --> 01:32:37.360 align:start position:0% ending Trio and actually this ending is 01:32:37.360 --> 01:32:39.390 align:start position:0% ending Trio and actually this ending is done<01:32:37.520> on<01:32:37.760> purpose<01:32:38.159> not<01:32:38.320> to<01:32:38.480> confuse<01:32:38.840> it<01:32:39.119> with 01:32:39.390 --> 01:32:39.400 align:start position:0% done on purpose not to confuse it with 01:32:39.400 --> 01:32:40.910 align:start position:0% done on purpose not to confuse it with tago<01:32:39.920> which<01:32:40.040> in<01:32:40.159> Spanish<01:32:40.480> comes<01:32:40.679> from<01:32:40.800> the 01:32:40.910 --> 01:32:40.920 align:start position:0% tago which in Spanish comes from the 01:32:40.920 --> 01:32:43.229 align:start position:0% tago which in Spanish comes from the word<01:32:41.199> tragar<01:32:41.840> which<01:32:41.960> means<01:32:42.159> to<01:32:42.360> swallow<01:32:42.880> suck 01:32:43.229 --> 01:32:43.239 align:start position:0% word tragar which means to swallow suck 01:32:43.239 --> 01:32:45.350 align:start position:0% word tragar which means to swallow suck down<01:32:43.560> or<01:32:43.760> eat<01:32:44.040> crap<01:32:44.400> and<01:32:44.600> actually<01:32:45.080> it's<01:32:45.239> one 01:32:45.350 --> 01:32:45.360 align:start position:0% down or eat crap and actually it's one 01:32:45.360 --> 01:32:46.669 align:start position:0% down or eat crap and actually it's one of<01:32:45.440> the<01:32:45.520> most<01:32:45.760> offensive<01:32:46.119> verbs<01:32:46.400> that<01:32:46.520> there 01:32:46.669 --> 01:32:46.679 align:start position:0% of the most offensive verbs that there 01:32:46.679 --> 01:32:48.149 align:start position:0% of the most offensive verbs that there is<01:32:46.920> so<01:32:47.080> it's<01:32:47.199> best<01:32:47.360> to<01:32:47.480> not<01:32:47.639> mention<01:32:47.880> it 01:32:48.149 --> 01:32:48.159 align:start position:0% is so it's best to not mention it 01:32:48.159 --> 01:32:49.590 align:start position:0% is so it's best to not mention it overall<01:32:48.639> you<01:32:48.800> just<01:32:48.920> have<01:32:49.040> to<01:32:49.119> know<01:32:49.320> that<01:32:49.440> with 01:32:49.590 --> 01:32:49.600 align:start position:0% overall you just have to know that with 01:32:49.600 --> 01:32:51.109 align:start position:0% overall you just have to know that with verbs<01:32:49.880> like<01:32:50.080> these<01:32:50.400> you<01:32:50.560> have<01:32:50.639> to<01:32:50.800> slightly 01:32:51.109 --> 01:32:51.119 align:start position:0% verbs like these you have to slightly 01:32:51.119 --> 01:32:53.390 align:start position:0% verbs like these you have to slightly modify<01:32:51.440> the<01:32:51.679> your<01:32:51.880> pronoun<01:32:52.400> across<01:32:52.719> all<01:32:52.960> verbs 01:32:53.390 --> 01:32:53.400 align:start position:0% modify the your pronoun across all verbs 01:32:53.400 --> 01:32:54.950 align:start position:0% modify the your pronoun across all verbs so<01:32:53.560> that<01:32:53.679> the<01:32:53.760> word<01:32:53.960> sounds<01:32:54.280> uniform<01:32:54.800> when 01:32:54.950 --> 01:32:54.960 align:start position:0% so that the word sounds uniform when 01:32:54.960 --> 01:32:56.669 align:start position:0% so that the word sounds uniform when said<01:32:55.320> and<01:32:55.440> at<01:32:55.639> that<01:32:55.800> point<01:32:56.119> you<01:32:56.199> can<01:32:56.360> basically 01:32:56.669 --> 01:32:56.679 align:start position:0% said and at that point you can basically 01:32:56.679 --> 01:32:58.310 align:start position:0% said and at that point you can basically say<01:32:56.920> any<01:32:57.080> sentence<01:32:57.400> you<01:32:57.520> want<01:32:57.800> using<01:32:58.119> these 01:32:58.310 --> 01:32:58.320 align:start position:0% say any sentence you want using these 01:32:58.320 --> 01:33:00.229 align:start position:0% say any sentence you want using these verbs<01:32:58.719> stem<01:32:58.960> changing<01:32:59.239> verbs<01:32:59.480> in<01:32:59.679> Spanish<01:33:00.040> are 01:33:00.229 --> 01:33:00.239 align:start position:0% verbs stem changing verbs in Spanish are 01:33:00.239 --> 01:33:01.830 align:start position:0% verbs stem changing verbs in Spanish are verbs<01:33:00.440> that<01:33:00.560> change<01:33:00.760> their<01:33:00.960> beginning<01:33:01.280> prefix 01:33:01.830 --> 01:33:01.840 align:start position:0% verbs that change their beginning prefix 01:33:01.840 --> 01:33:03.750 align:start position:0% verbs that change their beginning prefix or<01:33:02.080> stem<01:33:02.480> to<01:33:02.600> generate<01:33:02.920> a<01:33:03.040> better<01:33:03.280> sound<01:33:03.600> when 01:33:03.750 --> 01:33:03.760 align:start position:0% or stem to generate a better sound when 01:33:03.760 --> 01:33:05.350 align:start position:0% or stem to generate a better sound when the<01:33:03.840> words<01:33:04.040> are<01:33:04.199> said<01:33:04.560> in<01:33:04.679> Spanish<01:33:05.119> there<01:33:05.199> are 01:33:05.350 --> 01:33:05.360 align:start position:0% the words are said in Spanish there are 01:33:05.360 --> 01:33:07.070 align:start position:0% the words are said in Spanish there are four<01:33:05.600> types<01:33:05.800> of<01:33:05.880> stem<01:33:06.119> changing<01:33:06.480> verbs<01:33:06.840> and<01:33:06.960> in 01:33:07.070 --> 01:33:07.080 align:start position:0% four types of stem changing verbs and in 01:33:07.080 --> 01:33:08.750 align:start position:0% four types of stem changing verbs and in the<01:33:07.239> video<01:33:07.679> I<01:33:07.760> will<01:33:07.880> not<01:33:08.040> explain<01:33:08.360> all<01:33:08.520> stem 01:33:08.750 --> 01:33:08.760 align:start position:0% the video I will not explain all stem 01:33:08.760 --> 01:33:10.550 align:start position:0% the video I will not explain all stem changing<01:33:09.080> verbs<01:33:09.360> that<01:33:09.520> exist<01:33:09.760> in<01:33:09.920> Spanish<01:33:10.360> but 01:33:10.550 --> 01:33:10.560 align:start position:0% changing verbs that exist in Spanish but 01:33:10.560 --> 01:33:11.950 align:start position:0% changing verbs that exist in Spanish but rather<01:33:10.800> present<01:33:11.040> a<01:33:11.159> useful<01:33:11.440> verb<01:33:11.639> in<01:33:11.760> each 01:33:11.950 --> 01:33:11.960 align:start position:0% rather present a useful verb in each 01:33:11.960 --> 01:33:13.470 align:start position:0% rather present a useful verb in each category<01:33:12.560> so<01:33:12.679> that<01:33:12.800> you<01:33:12.880> can<01:33:13.280> understand<01:33:13.400> how 01:33:13.470 --> 01:33:13.480 align:start position:0% category so that you can understand how 01:33:13.480 --> 01:33:15.109 align:start position:0% category so that you can understand how stem<01:33:13.719> changing<01:33:14.040> Works<01:33:14.280> in<01:33:14.440> Spanish<01:33:14.880> and<01:33:14.960> then 01:33:15.109 --> 01:33:15.119 align:start position:0% stem changing Works in Spanish and then 01:33:15.119 --> 01:33:16.790 align:start position:0% stem changing Works in Spanish and then apply<01:33:15.400> to<01:33:15.480> any<01:33:15.679> other<01:33:15.840> verb<01:33:16.080> that<01:33:16.199> you<01:33:16.320> want<01:33:16.639> in 01:33:16.790 --> 01:33:16.800 align:start position:0% apply to any other verb that you want in 01:33:16.800 --> 01:33:18.310 align:start position:0% apply to any other verb that you want in that<01:33:17.000> category<01:33:17.520> the<01:33:17.600> four<01:33:17.800> main<01:33:18.000> types<01:33:18.199> of 01:33:18.310 --> 01:33:18.320 align:start position:0% that category the four main types of 01:33:18.320 --> 01:33:20.790 align:start position:0% that category the four main types of same-<01:33:18.560> changing<01:33:18.800> verbs<01:33:19.040> in<01:33:19.159> Spanish<01:33:19.719> are<01:33:20.119> e<01:33:20.440> to 01:33:20.790 --> 01:33:20.800 align:start position:0% same- changing verbs in Spanish are e to 01:33:20.800 --> 01:33:26.430 align:start position:0% same- changing verbs in Spanish are e to E<01:33:21.679> e<01:33:22.000> to<01:33:22.360> e<01:33:23.000> o<01:33:23.480> to<01:33:23.840> u<01:33:24.119> e<01:33:24.600> and<01:33:24.920> U<01:33:25.480> to<01:33:25.880> u<01:33:26.119> e 01:33:26.430 --> 01:33:26.440 align:start position:0% E e to e o to u e and U to u e 01:33:26.440 --> 01:33:28.790 align:start position:0% E e to e o to u e and U to u e considering<01:33:27.080> e<01:33:27.400> to<01:33:27.760> e<01:33:27.960> e<01:33:28.280> as<01:33:28.400> the<01:33:28.520> first 01:33:28.790 --> 01:33:28.800 align:start position:0% considering e to e e as the first 01:33:28.800 --> 01:33:30.149 align:start position:0% considering e to e e as the first category<01:33:29.159> of<01:33:29.280> stem<01:33:29.480> changing<01:33:29.800> verbs<01:33:30.000> in 01:33:30.149 --> 01:33:30.159 align:start position:0% category of stem changing verbs in 01:33:30.159 --> 01:33:31.830 align:start position:0% category of stem changing verbs in Spanish<01:33:30.679> I<01:33:30.840> actually<01:33:31.159> already<01:33:31.440> covered<01:33:31.719> a 01:33:31.830 --> 01:33:31.840 align:start position:0% Spanish I actually already covered a 01:33:31.840 --> 01:33:33.310 align:start position:0% Spanish I actually already covered a verb<01:33:32.080> like<01:33:32.239> that<01:33:32.480> in<01:33:32.600> one<01:33:32.719> of<01:33:32.840> my<01:33:33.000> previous 01:33:33.310 --> 01:33:33.320 align:start position:0% verb like that in one of my previous 01:33:33.320 --> 01:33:35.270 align:start position:0% verb like that in one of my previous videos<01:33:33.760> and<01:33:33.880> that<01:33:34.000> is<01:33:34.080> the<01:33:34.199> verb<01:33:34.440> ten<01:33:35.040> however 01:33:35.270 --> 01:33:35.280 align:start position:0% videos and that is the verb ten however 01:33:35.280 --> 01:33:36.790 align:start position:0% videos and that is the verb ten however for<01:33:35.440> the<01:33:35.560> sake<01:33:35.719> of<01:33:35.840> learning<01:33:36.320> let's<01:33:36.520> use<01:33:36.679> a 01:33:36.790 --> 01:33:36.800 align:start position:0% for the sake of learning let's use a 01:33:36.800 --> 01:33:38.950 align:start position:0% for the sake of learning let's use a different<01:33:37.040> useful<01:33:37.360> verb<01:33:37.840> like<01:33:38.119> empar<01:33:38.840> which 01:33:38.950 --> 01:33:38.960 align:start position:0% different useful verb like empar which 01:33:38.960 --> 01:33:41.030 align:start position:0% different useful verb like empar which means<01:33:39.199> to<01:33:39.400> start<01:33:39.719> or<01:33:39.880> to<01:33:40.080> begin<01:33:40.480> at<01:33:40.639> first<01:33:40.920> the 01:33:41.030 --> 01:33:41.040 align:start position:0% means to start or to begin at first the 01:33:41.040 --> 01:33:42.709 align:start position:0% means to start or to begin at first the stem<01:33:41.280> changing<01:33:41.560> rule<01:33:41.800> will<01:33:41.960> only<01:33:42.199> apply<01:33:42.520> in 01:33:42.709 --> 01:33:42.719 align:start position:0% stem changing rule will only apply in 01:33:42.719 --> 01:33:45.189 align:start position:0% stem changing rule will only apply in the<01:33:42.880> yo<01:33:43.239> to<01:33:43.600> L<01:33:43.840> and<01:33:44.040> AOS<01:33:44.400> pronouns<01:33:44.960> and<01:33:45.040> will 01:33:45.189 --> 01:33:45.199 align:start position:0% the yo to L and AOS pronouns and will 01:33:45.199 --> 01:33:47.910 align:start position:0% the yo to L and AOS pronouns and will not<01:33:45.320> apply<01:33:45.639> in<01:33:45.760> the<01:33:45.920> noos<01:33:46.600> and<01:33:46.840> votos<01:33:47.400> pronouns 01:33:47.910 --> 01:33:47.920 align:start position:0% not apply in the noos and votos pronouns 01:33:47.920 --> 01:33:49.669 align:start position:0% not apply in the noos and votos pronouns you<01:33:48.000> would<01:33:48.199> want<01:33:48.280> to<01:33:48.440> say<01:33:48.679> something<01:33:49.000> like<01:33:49.400> yo 01:33:49.669 --> 01:33:49.679 align:start position:0% you would want to say something like yo 01:33:49.679 --> 01:33:51.310 align:start position:0% you would want to say something like yo and<01:33:49.920> peso<01:33:50.320> but<01:33:50.480> Spanish<01:33:50.800> say<01:33:50.920> that<01:33:51.040> this<01:33:51.159> word 01:33:51.310 --> 01:33:51.320 align:start position:0% and peso but Spanish say that this word 01:33:51.320 --> 01:33:53.270 align:start position:0% and peso but Spanish say that this word sounds<01:33:51.719> bad<01:33:51.880> one<01:33:52.040> said<01:33:52.400> so<01:33:52.600> instead<01:33:53.040> you<01:33:53.159> have 01:33:53.270 --> 01:33:53.280 align:start position:0% sounds bad one said so instead you have 01:33:53.280 --> 01:33:54.990 align:start position:0% sounds bad one said so instead you have to<01:33:53.400> slightly<01:33:53.719> modify<01:33:54.080> the<01:33:54.159> stem<01:33:54.440> of<01:33:54.520> the<01:33:54.639> verb 01:33:54.990 --> 01:33:55.000 align:start position:0% to slightly modify the stem of the verb 01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:58.669 align:start position:0% to slightly modify the stem of the verb from<01:33:55.320> empo<01:33:56.119> to<01:33:56.560> Yo<01:33:57.560> which<01:33:57.679> means<01:33:58.040> I<01:33:58.239> start<01:33:58.600> and 01:33:58.669 --> 01:33:58.679 align:start position:0% from empo to Yo which means I start and 01:33:58.679 --> 01:34:00.189 align:start position:0% from empo to Yo which means I start and the<01:33:58.760> stem<01:33:58.960> changing<01:33:59.320> concept<01:33:59.719> applies<01:34:00.000> to<01:34:00.119> the 01:34:00.189 --> 01:34:00.199 align:start position:0% the stem changing concept applies to the 01:34:00.199 --> 01:34:02.470 align:start position:0% the stem changing concept applies to the rest<01:34:00.320> of<01:34:00.440> the<01:34:00.560> pronouns<01:34:01.159> aside<01:34:01.440> from<01:34:01.639> noos<01:34:02.280> and 01:34:02.470 --> 01:34:02.480 align:start position:0% rest of the pronouns aside from noos and 01:34:02.480 --> 01:34:08.310 align:start position:0% rest of the pronouns aside from noos and Vos<01:34:03.159> to<01:34:03.600> msas<01:34:04.600> you<01:34:04.840> start<01:34:05.639> LSA<01:34:06.639> he<01:34:06.840> starts 01:34:08.310 --> 01:34:08.320 align:start position:0% Vos to msas you start LSA he starts 01:34:08.320 --> 01:34:11.109 align:start position:0% Vos to msas you start LSA he starts no<01:34:09.320> we 01:34:11.109 --> 01:34:11.119 align:start position:0% no we 01:34:11.119 --> 01:34:15.310 align:start position:0% no we start<01:34:12.119> start<01:34:13.040> and<01:34:14.040> they<01:34:14.199> start<01:34:14.600> as<01:34:14.760> always<01:34:15.119> try 01:34:15.310 --> 01:34:15.320 align:start position:0% start start and they start as always try 01:34:15.320 --> 01:34:16.910 align:start position:0% start start and they start as always try not<01:34:15.520> focusing<01:34:15.840> on<01:34:16.000> these<01:34:16.199> pronouns<01:34:16.760> because 01:34:16.910 --> 01:34:16.920 align:start position:0% not focusing on these pronouns because 01:34:16.920 --> 01:34:18.430 align:start position:0% not focusing on these pronouns because they're<01:34:17.080> not<01:34:17.199> that<01:34:17.320> useful<01:34:17.600> in<01:34:17.800> conversation 01:34:18.430 --> 01:34:18.440 align:start position:0% they're not that useful in conversation 01:34:18.440 --> 01:34:19.629 align:start position:0% they're not that useful in conversation and<01:34:18.560> like<01:34:18.679> I<01:34:18.760> said<01:34:18.920> at<01:34:19.000> the<01:34:19.119> beginning<01:34:19.400> of<01:34:19.520> the 01:34:19.629 --> 01:34:19.639 align:start position:0% and like I said at the beginning of the 01:34:19.639 --> 01:34:21.070 align:start position:0% and like I said at the beginning of the video<01:34:20.040> it's<01:34:20.159> important<01:34:20.440> to<01:34:20.560> know<01:34:20.719> how<01:34:20.840> stem 01:34:21.070 --> 01:34:21.080 align:start position:0% video it's important to know how stem 01:34:21.080 --> 01:34:22.870 align:start position:0% video it's important to know how stem changing<01:34:21.760> work<01:34:21.920> in<01:34:22.040> Spanish<01:34:22.480> but<01:34:22.600> it's<01:34:22.719> not 01:34:22.870 --> 01:34:22.880 align:start position:0% changing work in Spanish but it's not 01:34:22.880 --> 01:34:24.149 align:start position:0% changing work in Spanish but it's not important<01:34:23.159> to<01:34:23.280> know<01:34:23.480> every<01:34:23.679> single<01:34:23.920> stem 01:34:24.149 --> 01:34:24.159 align:start position:0% important to know every single stem 01:34:24.159 --> 01:34:26.070 align:start position:0% important to know every single stem changing<01:34:24.480> verb<01:34:24.719> like<01:34:24.880> Nar<01:34:25.600> which<01:34:25.719> changes 01:34:26.070 --> 01:34:26.080 align:start position:0% changing verb like Nar which changes 01:34:26.080 --> 01:34:28.270 align:start position:0% changing verb like Nar which changes from<01:34:26.320> E<01:34:26.600> to<01:34:26.880> e<01:34:27.239> if<01:34:27.320> you<01:34:27.400> see<01:34:27.560> a<01:34:27.639> modified<01:34:28.040> verb 01:34:28.270 --> 01:34:28.280 align:start position:0% from E to e if you see a modified verb 01:34:28.280 --> 01:34:30.709 align:start position:0% from E to e if you see a modified verb that<01:34:28.400> goes<01:34:28.600> from<01:34:28.880> E<01:34:29.159> to<01:34:29.520> e<01:34:29.960> chances<01:34:30.320> are<01:34:30.600> that 01:34:30.709 --> 01:34:30.719 align:start position:0% that goes from E to e chances are that 01:34:30.719 --> 01:34:32.350 align:start position:0% that goes from E to e chances are that it's<01:34:30.840> stem<01:34:31.080> changing<01:34:31.600> next<01:34:31.800> up<01:34:32.080> there<01:34:32.159> are 01:34:32.350 --> 01:34:32.360 align:start position:0% it's stem changing next up there are 01:34:32.360 --> 01:34:35.070 align:start position:0% it's stem changing next up there are verbs<01:34:32.600> that<01:34:32.719> change<01:34:33.000> their<01:34:33.159> stem<01:34:33.560> from<01:34:33.880> E<01:34:34.239> to<01:34:34.600> e 01:34:35.070 --> 01:34:35.080 align:start position:0% verbs that change their stem from E to e 01:34:35.080 --> 01:34:37.109 align:start position:0% verbs that change their stem from E to e like<01:34:35.360> the<01:34:35.840> which<01:34:35.920> is<01:34:36.000> a<01:34:36.119> useful<01:34:36.480> verb<01:34:36.800> meaning 01:34:37.109 --> 01:34:37.119 align:start position:0% like the which is a useful verb meaning 01:34:37.119 --> 01:34:38.990 align:start position:0% like the which is a useful verb meaning to<01:34:37.320> say<01:34:37.639> the<01:34:37.800> SE<01:34:38.080> is<01:34:38.239> actually<01:34:38.520> considered<01:34:38.880> to 01:34:38.990 --> 01:34:39.000 align:start position:0% to say the SE is actually considered to 01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:40.950 align:start position:0% to say the SE is actually considered to be<01:34:39.199> irregular<01:34:39.679> in<01:34:39.800> the<01:34:39.960> yo<01:34:40.199> pronoun<01:34:40.679> with<01:34:40.800> the 01:34:40.950 --> 01:34:40.960 align:start position:0% be irregular in the yo pronoun with the 01:34:40.960 --> 01:34:42.870 align:start position:0% be irregular in the yo pronoun with the construction<01:34:41.520> Yodo<01:34:42.239> but<01:34:42.360> as<01:34:42.440> far<01:34:42.560> as<01:34:42.679> the<01:34:42.760> rest 01:34:42.870 --> 01:34:42.880 align:start position:0% construction Yodo but as far as the rest 01:34:42.880 --> 01:34:44.709 align:start position:0% construction Yodo but as far as the rest of<01:34:43.000> the<01:34:43.080> pronouns<01:34:43.520> go<01:34:43.760> the<01:34:43.960> SE<01:34:44.239> still<01:34:44.440> applies 01:34:44.709 --> 01:34:44.719 align:start position:0% of the pronouns go the SE still applies 01:34:44.719 --> 01:34:47.430 align:start position:0% of the pronouns go the SE still applies it<01:34:44.880> stem<01:34:45.080> changing<01:34:45.400> rule<01:34:45.800> for<01:34:46.040> two<01:34:46.520> L<01:34:46.800> and<01:34:47.000> AOS 01:34:47.430 --> 01:34:47.440 align:start position:0% it stem changing rule for two L and AOS 01:34:47.440 --> 01:34:49.390 align:start position:0% it stem changing rule for two L and AOS you<01:34:47.560> would<01:34:47.719> want<01:34:47.800> to<01:34:47.960> say<01:34:48.239> two<01:34:48.719> Des<01:34:49.239> but 01:34:49.390 --> 01:34:49.400 align:start position:0% you would want to say two Des but 01:34:49.400 --> 01:34:50.830 align:start position:0% you would want to say two Des but Spanish<01:34:49.719> says<01:34:49.880> that<01:34:50.000> this<01:34:50.159> verb<01:34:50.360> sounds<01:34:50.679> bad 01:34:50.830 --> 01:34:50.840 align:start position:0% Spanish says that this verb sounds bad 01:34:50.840 --> 01:34:53.149 align:start position:0% Spanish says that this verb sounds bad when<01:34:51.000> said<01:34:51.480> so<01:34:51.679> instead<01:34:52.119> you<01:34:52.280> have<01:34:52.400> to<01:34:52.560> say<01:34:52.800> to 01:34:53.149 --> 01:34:53.159 align:start position:0% when said so instead you have to say to 01:34:53.159 --> 01:34:57.189 align:start position:0% when said so instead you have to say to D<01:34:53.760> which<01:34:53.880> means<01:34:54.280> you<01:34:54.520> say<01:34:54.880> El<01:34:55.719> he<01:34:55.960> says 01:34:57.189 --> 01:34:57.199 align:start position:0% D which means you say El he says 01:34:57.199 --> 01:35:02.430 align:start position:0% D which means you say El he says noos<01:34:58.199> we<01:34:58.800> sayos<01:34:59.800> deis<01:35:00.520> y<01:35:00.840> say<01:35:01.159> and<01:35:01.360> AOS<01:35:01.880> desent 01:35:02.430 --> 01:35:02.440 align:start position:0% noos we sayos deis y say and AOS desent 01:35:02.440 --> 01:35:03.990 align:start position:0% noos we sayos deis y say and AOS desent they<01:35:02.639> say<01:35:02.880> try<01:35:03.080> not<01:35:03.239> focusing<01:35:03.600> on<01:35:03.760> these 01:35:03.990 --> 01:35:04.000 align:start position:0% they say try not focusing on these 01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:05.350 align:start position:0% they say try not focusing on these pronouns<01:35:04.480> because<01:35:04.679> they're<01:35:04.840> not<01:35:04.960> that<01:35:05.080> useful 01:35:05.350 --> 01:35:05.360 align:start position:0% pronouns because they're not that useful 01:35:05.360 --> 01:35:07.149 align:start position:0% pronouns because they're not that useful in<01:35:05.520> conversation<01:35:06.199> but<01:35:06.360> in<01:35:06.480> case<01:35:06.639> you<01:35:06.719> see<01:35:06.960> any 01:35:07.149 --> 01:35:07.159 align:start position:0% in conversation but in case you see any 01:35:07.159 --> 01:35:09.350 align:start position:0% in conversation but in case you see any other<01:35:07.440> verb<01:35:07.639> that<01:35:07.760> changes<01:35:08.040> from<01:35:08.320> E<01:35:08.679> to<01:35:08.960> e 01:35:09.350 --> 01:35:09.360 align:start position:0% other verb that changes from E to e 01:35:09.360 --> 01:35:11.470 align:start position:0% other verb that changes from E to e chances<01:35:09.719> are<01:35:10.000> it's<01:35:10.199> time<01:35:10.440> changing<01:35:10.920> next<01:35:11.159> up 01:35:11.470 --> 01:35:11.480 align:start position:0% chances are it's time changing next up 01:35:11.480 --> 01:35:13.750 align:start position:0% chances are it's time changing next up there<01:35:11.600> are<01:35:11.760> verbs<01:35:12.040> that<01:35:12.159> change<01:35:12.400> from<01:35:12.639> o<01:35:12.960> to<01:35:13.239> U 01:35:13.750 --> 01:35:13.760 align:start position:0% there are verbs that change from o to U 01:35:13.760 --> 01:35:15.229 align:start position:0% there are verbs that change from o to U and<01:35:13.880> I<01:35:14.080> actually<01:35:14.360> covered<01:35:14.600> a<01:35:14.719> useful<01:35:15.040> verb 01:35:15.229 --> 01:35:15.239 align:start position:0% and I actually covered a useful verb 01:35:15.239 --> 01:35:16.990 align:start position:0% and I actually covered a useful verb like<01:35:15.480> that<01:35:15.679> in<01:35:15.800> one<01:35:15.920> of<01:35:16.040> my<01:35:16.199> previous<01:35:16.520> videos 01:35:16.990 --> 01:35:17.000 align:start position:0% like that in one of my previous videos 01:35:17.000 --> 01:35:18.870 align:start position:0% like that in one of my previous videos which<01:35:17.080> is<01:35:17.320> p<01:35:17.760> but<01:35:17.880> for<01:35:18.000> the<01:35:18.119> sake<01:35:18.280> of<01:35:18.400> learning 01:35:18.870 --> 01:35:18.880 align:start position:0% which is p but for the sake of learning 01:35:18.880 --> 01:35:20.629 align:start position:0% which is p but for the sake of learning let's<01:35:19.040> use<01:35:19.199> a<01:35:19.320> different<01:35:19.560> useful<01:35:19.960> verb<01:35:20.320> like 01:35:20.629 --> 01:35:20.639 align:start position:0% let's use a different useful verb like 01:35:20.639 --> 01:35:22.270 align:start position:0% let's use a different useful verb like record<01:35:21.280> which<01:35:21.440> which<01:35:21.520> means<01:35:21.719> to<01:35:21.840> remember 01:35:22.270 --> 01:35:22.280 align:start position:0% record which which means to remember 01:35:22.280 --> 01:35:25.510 align:start position:0% record which which means to remember instead<01:35:22.520> of<01:35:22.639> saying<01:35:23.000> yo<01:35:23.840> you<01:35:23.960> need<01:35:24.080> to<01:35:24.520> Sayo 01:35:25.510 --> 01:35:25.520 align:start position:0% instead of saying yo you need to Sayo 01:35:25.520 --> 01:35:26.910 align:start position:0% instead of saying yo you need to Sayo which<01:35:25.639> sounds<01:35:25.920> better<01:35:26.199> when<01:35:26.360> said<01:35:26.719> and<01:35:26.800> the 01:35:26.910 --> 01:35:26.920 align:start position:0% which sounds better when said and the 01:35:26.920 --> 01:35:28.229 align:start position:0% which sounds better when said and the same<01:35:27.119> concept<01:35:27.440> applies<01:35:27.679> to<01:35:27.800> the<01:35:27.880> rest<01:35:28.040> of<01:35:28.119> the 01:35:28.229 --> 01:35:28.239 align:start position:0% same concept applies to the rest of the 01:35:28.239 --> 01:35:34.270 align:start position:0% same concept applies to the rest of the pronouns<01:35:29.239> toas<01:35:30.239> you<01:35:30.440> remember<01:35:31.440> El<01:35:32.440> he 01:35:34.270 --> 01:35:34.280 align:start position:0% pronouns toas you remember El he 01:35:34.280 --> 01:35:36.910 align:start position:0% pronouns toas you remember El he remembers<01:35:35.280> we 01:35:36.910 --> 01:35:36.920 align:start position:0% remembers we 01:35:36.920 --> 01:35:40.430 align:start position:0% remembers we remember<01:35:37.920> y'all<01:35:38.199> remember<01:35:38.880> and<01:35:39.280> AOS<01:35:40.280> they 01:35:40.430 --> 01:35:40.440 align:start position:0% remember y'all remember and AOS they 01:35:40.440 --> 01:35:41.830 align:start position:0% remember y'all remember and AOS they remember<01:35:40.800> try<01:35:41.000> not<01:35:41.159> focusing<01:35:41.480> on<01:35:41.639> these 01:35:41.830 --> 01:35:41.840 align:start position:0% remember try not focusing on these 01:35:41.840 --> 01:35:43.310 align:start position:0% remember try not focusing on these pronouns<01:35:42.360> because<01:35:42.560> they're<01:35:42.719> not<01:35:42.880> that<01:35:43.000> useful 01:35:43.310 --> 01:35:43.320 align:start position:0% pronouns because they're not that useful 01:35:43.320 --> 01:35:44.910 align:start position:0% pronouns because they're not that useful in<01:35:43.480> conversation<01:35:44.119> but<01:35:44.239> if<01:35:44.320> you<01:35:44.400> see<01:35:44.560> a<01:35:44.679> verb 01:35:44.910 --> 01:35:44.920 align:start position:0% in conversation but if you see a verb 01:35:44.920 --> 01:35:46.790 align:start position:0% in conversation but if you see a verb with<01:35:45.159> u<01:35:45.600> in<01:35:45.719> it<01:35:45.960> chances<01:35:46.280> are<01:35:46.440> it's<01:35:46.560> stem 01:35:46.790 --> 01:35:46.800 align:start position:0% with u in it chances are it's stem 01:35:46.800 --> 01:35:48.430 align:start position:0% with u in it chances are it's stem changing<01:35:47.239> and<01:35:47.400> finally<01:35:47.800> there's<01:35:48.040> one<01:35:48.239> last 01:35:48.430 --> 01:35:48.440 align:start position:0% changing and finally there's one last 01:35:48.440 --> 01:35:50.109 align:start position:0% changing and finally there's one last type<01:35:48.600> of<01:35:48.679> a<01:35:48.800> stem<01:35:49.000> changing<01:35:49.280> verb<01:35:49.480> in<01:35:49.639> Spanish 01:35:50.109 --> 01:35:50.119 align:start position:0% type of a stem changing verb in Spanish 01:35:50.119 --> 01:35:51.830 align:start position:0% type of a stem changing verb in Spanish and<01:35:50.280> as<01:35:50.400> far<01:35:50.520> as<01:35:50.679> I<01:35:50.800> know<01:35:51.080> it's<01:35:51.199> the<01:35:51.440> only<01:35:51.639> verb 01:35:51.830 --> 01:35:51.840 align:start position:0% and as far as I know it's the only verb 01:35:51.840 --> 01:35:54.590 align:start position:0% and as far as I know it's the only verb in<01:35:51.960> Spanish<01:35:52.360> that<01:35:52.480> changes<01:35:52.840> from<01:35:53.159> U<01:35:53.560> to<01:35:53.920> U<01:35:54.520> and 01:35:54.590 --> 01:35:54.600 align:start position:0% in Spanish that changes from U to U and 01:35:54.600 --> 01:35:56.310 align:start position:0% in Spanish that changes from U to U and that<01:35:54.719> is<01:35:54.840> the<01:35:54.920> verb<01:35:55.159> hug<01:35:55.600> which<01:35:55.679> means<01:35:55.880> to<01:35:56.040> play 01:35:56.310 --> 01:35:56.320 align:start position:0% that is the verb hug which means to play 01:35:56.320 --> 01:35:58.750 align:start position:0% that is the verb hug which means to play instead<01:35:56.560> of<01:35:56.679> saying<01:35:57.080> Yugo<01:35:58.000> you<01:35:58.119> need<01:35:58.239> to<01:35:58.400> say 01:35:58.750 --> 01:35:58.760 align:start position:0% instead of saying Yugo you need to say 01:35:58.760 --> 01:36:00.830 align:start position:0% instead of saying Yugo you need to say yo<01:35:59.520> and<01:35:59.639> one<01:35:59.800> thing<01:35:59.920> to<01:36:00.080> note<01:36:00.280> about<01:36:00.520> both<01:36:00.679> of 01:36:00.830 --> 01:36:00.840 align:start position:0% yo and one thing to note about both of 01:36:00.840 --> 01:36:03.070 align:start position:0% yo and one thing to note about both of these<01:36:01.000> words<01:36:01.400> is<01:36:01.480> that<01:36:01.639> the<01:36:01.760> word<01:36:02.040> Hugo<01:36:02.719> on<01:36:02.880> its 01:36:03.070 --> 01:36:03.080 align:start position:0% these words is that the word Hugo on its 01:36:03.080 --> 01:36:05.270 align:start position:0% these words is that the word Hugo on its own<01:36:03.560> actually<01:36:03.880> means<01:36:04.199> juice<01:36:04.639> and<01:36:04.760> so<01:36:04.920> it<01:36:05.040> makes 01:36:05.270 --> 01:36:05.280 align:start position:0% own actually means juice and so it makes 01:36:05.280 --> 01:36:06.910 align:start position:0% own actually means juice and so it makes sense<01:36:05.600> why<01:36:05.719> it<01:36:05.800> needs<01:36:05.960> to<01:36:06.080> be<01:36:06.199> modified<01:36:06.800> so 01:36:06.910 --> 01:36:06.920 align:start position:0% sense why it needs to be modified so 01:36:06.920 --> 01:36:08.870 align:start position:0% sense why it needs to be modified so that<01:36:07.040> it's<01:36:07.119> not<01:36:07.360> confused<01:36:07.920> with<01:36:08.159> this<01:36:08.320> word 01:36:08.870 --> 01:36:08.880 align:start position:0% that it's not confused with this word 01:36:08.880 --> 01:36:11.350 align:start position:0% that it's not confused with this word however<01:36:09.239> the<01:36:09.400> word<01:36:09.719> huego<01:36:10.440> on<01:36:10.600> its<01:36:10.760> own<01:36:11.159> can 01:36:11.350 --> 01:36:11.360 align:start position:0% however the word huego on its own can 01:36:11.360 --> 01:36:13.790 align:start position:0% however the word huego on its own can also<01:36:11.600> mean<01:36:11.880> game<01:36:12.280> as<01:36:12.440> in<01:36:12.760> video<01:36:13.119> huego<01:36:13.679> which 01:36:13.790 --> 01:36:13.800 align:start position:0% also mean game as in video huego which 01:36:13.800 --> 01:36:16.109 align:start position:0% also mean game as in video huego which means<01:36:14.080> video<01:36:14.360> game<01:36:14.679> but<01:36:14.760> the<01:36:14.880> wordo<01:36:15.639> itself 01:36:16.109 --> 01:36:16.119 align:start position:0% means video game but the wordo itself 01:36:16.119 --> 01:36:18.070 align:start position:0% means video game but the wordo itself changes<01:36:16.520> its<01:36:16.679> meaning<01:36:17.040> in<01:36:17.239> context<01:36:17.800> and<01:36:17.960> with 01:36:18.070 --> 01:36:18.080 align:start position:0% changes its meaning in context and with 01:36:18.080 --> 01:36:19.750 align:start position:0% changes its meaning in context and with the<01:36:18.199> verb<01:36:18.440> hugar<01:36:18.920> the<01:36:19.000> stem<01:36:19.239> changing<01:36:19.520> rule 01:36:19.750 --> 01:36:19.760 align:start position:0% the verb hugar the stem changing rule 01:36:19.760 --> 01:36:22.470 align:start position:0% the verb hugar the stem changing rule will<01:36:19.920> only<01:36:20.159> apply<01:36:20.400> for<01:36:20.639> the<01:36:20.800> yo<01:36:21.080> to<01:36:21.639> El<01:36:21.960> and<01:36:22.119> AOS 01:36:22.470 --> 01:36:22.480 align:start position:0% will only apply for the yo to El and AOS 01:36:22.480 --> 01:36:27.390 align:start position:0% will only apply for the yo to El and AOS pronouns<01:36:23.320> toas<01:36:24.320> you<01:36:24.560> play<01:36:25.000> El<01:36:26.000> he 01:36:27.390 --> 01:36:27.400 align:start position:0% pronouns toas you play El he 01:36:27.400 --> 01:36:32.149 align:start position:0% pronouns toas you play El he plays<01:36:28.400> we<01:36:28.639> play<01:36:29.119> Vos<01:36:29.800> H<01:36:30.639> y'all<01:36:30.960> play<01:36:31.480> and<01:36:31.719> AOS 01:36:32.149 --> 01:36:32.159 align:start position:0% plays we play Vos H y'all play and AOS 01:36:32.159 --> 01:36:34.390 align:start position:0% plays we play Vos H y'all play and AOS huan<01:36:32.960> they<01:36:33.119> play<01:36:33.360> try<01:36:33.520> not<01:36:33.679> focusing<01:36:34.040> on<01:36:34.199> these 01:36:34.390 --> 01:36:34.400 align:start position:0% huan they play try not focusing on these 01:36:34.400 --> 01:36:36.149 align:start position:0% huan they play try not focusing on these pronouns<01:36:34.920> because<01:36:35.199> like<01:36:35.320> I<01:36:35.440> say<01:36:35.639> all<01:36:35.760> the<01:36:35.920> time 01:36:36.149 --> 01:36:36.159 align:start position:0% pronouns because like I say all the time 01:36:36.159 --> 01:36:37.790 align:start position:0% pronouns because like I say all the time they're<01:36:36.360> not<01:36:36.520> useful<01:36:36.880> in<01:36:37.040> conversation<01:36:37.719> what 01:36:37.790 --> 01:36:37.800 align:start position:0% they're not useful in conversation what 01:36:37.800 --> 01:36:39.149 align:start position:0% they're not useful in conversation what you<01:36:37.880> should<01:36:38.040> have<01:36:38.159> known<01:36:38.400> from<01:36:38.560> this<01:36:38.719> video<01:36:39.040> is 01:36:39.149 --> 01:36:39.159 align:start position:0% you should have known from this video is 01:36:39.159 --> 01:36:40.629 align:start position:0% you should have known from this video is how<01:36:39.280> to<01:36:39.480> systematically<01:36:40.080> modify<01:36:40.440> stem 01:36:40.629 --> 01:36:40.639 align:start position:0% how to systematically modify stem 01:36:40.639 --> 01:36:42.070 align:start position:0% how to systematically modify stem changing<01:36:40.920> verbs<01:36:41.159> in<01:36:41.280> Spanish<01:36:41.760> so<01:36:41.880> that<01:36:41.960> you 01:36:42.070 --> 01:36:42.080 align:start position:0% changing verbs in Spanish so that you 01:36:42.080 --> 01:36:43.750 align:start position:0% changing verbs in Spanish so that you can<01:36:42.440> understand<01:36:42.600> how<01:36:42.760> words<01:36:43.080> sound<01:36:43.400> better 01:36:43.750 --> 01:36:43.760 align:start position:0% can understand how words sound better 01:36:43.760 --> 01:36:45.390 align:start position:0% can understand how words sound better when<01:36:43.880> they're<01:36:44.040> said<01:36:44.320> out<01:36:44.560> loud<01:36:44.920> of<01:36:45.040> course 01:36:45.390 --> 01:36:45.400 align:start position:0% when they're said out loud of course 01:36:45.400 --> 01:36:46.669 align:start position:0% when they're said out loud of course learning<01:36:45.719> all<01:36:45.840> stem<01:36:46.080> changing<01:36:46.320> verbs<01:36:46.560> in 01:36:46.669 --> 01:36:46.679 align:start position:0% learning all stem changing verbs in 01:36:46.679 --> 01:36:48.390 align:start position:0% learning all stem changing verbs in Spanish<01:36:47.080> is<01:36:47.199> completely<01:36:47.639> redundant<01:36:48.159> but<01:36:48.280> it's 01:36:48.390 --> 01:36:48.400 align:start position:0% Spanish is completely redundant but it's 01:36:48.400 --> 01:36:49.990 align:start position:0% Spanish is completely redundant but it's very<01:36:48.560> useful<01:36:48.880> to<01:36:49.239> understand<01:36:49.400> how<01:36:49.639> every<01:36:49.840> type 01:36:49.990 --> 01:36:50.000 align:start position:0% very useful to understand how every type 01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:51.990 align:start position:0% very useful to understand how every type of<01:36:50.119> stem<01:36:50.320> changing<01:36:50.679> verb<01:36:50.960> works<01:36:51.360> in<01:36:51.480> Spanish 01:36:51.990 --> 01:36:52.000 align:start position:0% of stem changing verb works in Spanish 01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:54.310 align:start position:0% of stem changing verb works in Spanish the<01:36:52.119> verb<01:36:52.400> sa<01:36:52.880> in<01:36:53.040> Spanish<01:36:53.440> means<01:36:53.719> to<01:36:53.880> know<01:36:54.199> but 01:36:54.310 --> 01:36:54.320 align:start position:0% the verb sa in Spanish means to know but 01:36:54.320 --> 01:36:55.910 align:start position:0% the verb sa in Spanish means to know but it's<01:36:54.440> not<01:36:54.600> used<01:36:54.840> the<01:36:54.960> same<01:36:55.159> way<01:36:55.400> as<01:36:55.520> it's<01:36:55.679> used 01:36:55.910 --> 01:36:55.920 align:start position:0% it's not used the same way as it's used 01:36:55.920 --> 01:36:57.870 align:start position:0% it's not used the same way as it's used in<01:36:56.040> English<01:36:56.480> in<01:36:56.639> English<01:36:57.080> we<01:36:57.199> use<01:36:57.400> the<01:36:57.520> verb<01:36:57.719> to 01:36:57.870 --> 01:36:57.880 align:start position:0% in English in English we use the verb to 01:36:57.880 --> 01:36:59.510 align:start position:0% in English in English we use the verb to know<01:36:58.119> in<01:36:58.239> many<01:36:58.480> different<01:36:58.760> ways<01:36:59.080> including 01:36:59.510 --> 01:36:59.520 align:start position:0% know in many different ways including 01:36:59.520 --> 01:37:01.310 align:start position:0% know in many different ways including knowing<01:36:59.800> factual<01:37:00.239> information<01:37:00.880> how<01:37:01.000> to<01:37:01.119> do 01:37:01.310 --> 01:37:01.320 align:start position:0% knowing factual information how to do 01:37:01.320 --> 01:37:03.109 align:start position:0% knowing factual information how to do something<01:37:01.760> and<01:37:01.880> knowing<01:37:02.199> people<01:37:02.600> places<01:37:03.000> and 01:37:03.109 --> 01:37:03.119 align:start position:0% something and knowing people places and 01:37:03.119 --> 01:37:04.629 align:start position:0% something and knowing people places and things<01:37:03.320> in<01:37:03.480> general<01:37:03.920> Spanish<01:37:04.400> however 01:37:04.629 --> 01:37:04.639 align:start position:0% things in general Spanish however 01:37:04.639 --> 01:37:06.189 align:start position:0% things in general Spanish however encompasses<01:37:05.199> only<01:37:05.440> some<01:37:05.600> of<01:37:05.719> the<01:37:05.840> things<01:37:06.040> I've 01:37:06.189 --> 01:37:06.199 align:start position:0% encompasses only some of the things I've 01:37:06.199 --> 01:37:07.790 align:start position:0% encompasses only some of the things I've listed<01:37:06.679> and<01:37:06.760> so<01:37:06.920> the<01:37:07.040> language<01:37:07.360> creates<01:37:07.639> two 01:37:07.790 --> 01:37:07.800 align:start position:0% listed and so the language creates two 01:37:07.800 --> 01:37:09.390 align:start position:0% listed and so the language creates two verbs<01:37:08.080> for<01:37:08.199> the<01:37:08.280> verb<01:37:08.480> to<01:37:08.639> know<01:37:08.960> and<01:37:09.080> in<01:37:09.239> this 01:37:09.390 --> 01:37:09.400 align:start position:0% verbs for the verb to know and in this 01:37:09.400 --> 01:37:11.430 align:start position:0% verbs for the verb to know and in this video<01:37:09.760> I<01:37:09.840> will<01:37:10.000> only<01:37:10.280> cover<01:37:10.520> the<01:37:10.639> verb<01:37:10.960> sa 01:37:11.430 --> 01:37:11.440 align:start position:0% video I will only cover the verb sa 01:37:11.440 --> 01:37:12.709 align:start position:0% video I will only cover the verb sa rather<01:37:11.600> than<01:37:11.800> explain<01:37:12.119> the<01:37:12.199> verb<01:37:12.440> how<01:37:12.560> most 01:37:12.709 --> 01:37:12.719 align:start position:0% rather than explain the verb how most 01:37:12.719 --> 01:37:14.070 align:start position:0% rather than explain the verb how most teachers<01:37:13.080> explain<01:37:13.400> it<01:37:13.600> I<01:37:13.639> would<01:37:13.760> like<01:37:13.880> to<01:37:14.000> give 01:37:14.070 --> 01:37:14.080 align:start position:0% teachers explain it I would like to give 01:37:14.080 --> 01:37:15.629 align:start position:0% teachers explain it I would like to give it<01:37:14.199> a<01:37:14.320> different<01:37:14.560> definition<01:37:15.159> by<01:37:15.320> saying<01:37:15.520> that 01:37:15.629 --> 01:37:15.639 align:start position:0% it a different definition by saying that 01:37:15.639 --> 01:37:17.109 align:start position:0% it a different definition by saying that the<01:37:15.760> verb<01:37:16.040> means<01:37:16.280> to<01:37:16.440> know<01:37:16.600> how<01:37:16.719> to<01:37:16.880> do 01:37:17.109 --> 01:37:17.119 align:start position:0% the verb means to know how to do 01:37:17.119 --> 01:37:19.149 align:start position:0% the verb means to know how to do something<01:37:17.560> or<01:37:17.679> knowing<01:37:18.040> factual<01:37:18.480> information 01:37:19.149 --> 01:37:19.159 align:start position:0% something or knowing factual information 01:37:19.159 --> 01:37:20.790 align:start position:0% something or knowing factual information and<01:37:19.280> it<01:37:19.440> actually<01:37:19.719> has<01:37:19.880> the<01:37:20.000> same<01:37:20.280> concept<01:37:20.679> as 01:37:20.790 --> 01:37:20.800 align:start position:0% and it actually has the same concept as 01:37:20.800 --> 01:37:22.510 align:start position:0% and it actually has the same concept as the<01:37:20.920> verb<01:37:21.320> said<01:37:21.679> which<01:37:21.800> means<01:37:22.000> to<01:37:22.159> be<01:37:22.400> the 01:37:22.510 --> 01:37:22.520 align:start position:0% the verb said which means to be the 01:37:22.520 --> 01:37:24.550 align:start position:0% the verb said which means to be the syntax<01:37:23.040> of<01:37:23.280> sa<01:37:23.800> follows<01:37:24.159> the<01:37:24.280> normal 01:37:24.550 --> 01:37:24.560 align:start position:0% syntax of sa follows the normal 01:37:24.560 --> 01:37:26.189 align:start position:0% syntax of sa follows the normal conjugation<01:37:25.080> pattern<01:37:25.360> for<01:37:25.520> verbs<01:37:25.800> ending<01:37:26.040> in 01:37:26.189 --> 01:37:26.199 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern for verbs ending in 01:37:26.199 --> 01:37:28.470 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern for verbs ending in e<01:37:26.360> r<01:37:26.760> but<01:37:26.880> is<01:37:27.080> actually<01:37:27.400> irregular<01:37:28.000> in<01:37:28.119> the<01:37:28.239> yo 01:37:28.470 --> 01:37:28.480 align:start position:0% e r but is actually irregular in the yo 01:37:28.480 --> 01:37:30.790 align:start position:0% e r but is actually irregular in the yo pronoun<01:37:29.000> yo<01:37:29.320> say<01:37:29.719> means<01:37:30.040> I<01:37:30.239> know<01:37:30.560> and<01:37:30.679> make 01:37:30.790 --> 01:37:30.800 align:start position:0% pronoun yo say means I know and make 01:37:30.800 --> 01:37:32.750 align:start position:0% pronoun yo say means I know and make sure<01:37:30.960> to<01:37:31.080> put<01:37:31.199> an<01:37:31.440> accent<01:37:31.800> on<01:37:32.080> say<01:37:32.480> because 01:37:32.750 --> 01:37:32.760 align:start position:0% sure to put an accent on say because 01:37:32.760 --> 01:37:34.149 align:start position:0% sure to put an accent on say because without<01:37:33.000> the<01:37:33.239> accent<01:37:33.679> you<01:37:33.760> will<01:37:33.920> have<01:37:34.040> an 01:37:34.149 --> 01:37:34.159 align:start position:0% without the accent you will have an 01:37:34.159 --> 01:37:35.750 align:start position:0% without the accent you will have an indirect<01:37:34.639> object<01:37:34.920> pronoun<01:37:35.400> that<01:37:35.520> will<01:37:35.639> have 01:37:35.750 --> 01:37:35.760 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun that will have 01:37:35.760 --> 01:37:37.229 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun that will have multiple<01:37:36.119> definitions<01:37:36.719> that<01:37:36.840> have<01:37:36.920> to<01:37:37.040> do 01:37:37.229 --> 01:37:37.239 align:start position:0% multiple definitions that have to do 01:37:37.239 --> 01:37:39.990 align:start position:0% multiple definitions that have to do with<01:37:37.400> oneself<01:37:38.040> toes<01:37:39.040> means<01:37:39.360> you<01:37:39.480> know<01:37:39.719> how<01:37:39.840> to 01:37:39.990 --> 01:37:40.000 align:start position:0% with oneself toes means you know how to 01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:42.709 align:start position:0% with oneself toes means you know how to do<01:37:40.199> something<01:37:40.679> which<01:37:40.800> is<01:37:41.000> factual<01:37:41.679> El<01:37:42.599> he 01:37:42.709 --> 01:37:42.719 align:start position:0% do something which is factual El he 01:37:42.719 --> 01:37:44.669 align:start position:0% do something which is factual El he knows<01:37:42.960> how<01:37:43.080> to<01:37:43.239> do<01:37:43.440> something 01:37:44.669 --> 01:37:44.679 align:start position:0% knows how to do something 01:37:44.679 --> 01:37:49.430 align:start position:0% knows how to do something noos<01:37:45.679> we<01:37:45.840> know<01:37:46.320> Vos<01:37:47.119> Sab<01:37:47.920> yall<01:37:48.199> know<01:37:48.679> and<01:37:48.920> AOS 01:37:49.430 --> 01:37:49.440 align:start position:0% noos we know Vos Sab yall know and AOS 01:37:49.440 --> 01:37:51.510 align:start position:0% noos we know Vos Sab yall know and AOS sain<01:37:50.040> they<01:37:50.159> know<01:37:50.400> try<01:37:50.599> not<01:37:50.760> concentrate<01:37:51.400> on 01:37:51.510 --> 01:37:51.520 align:start position:0% sain they know try not concentrate on 01:37:51.520 --> 01:37:52.870 align:start position:0% sain they know try not concentrate on these<01:37:51.719> pronouns<01:37:52.239> because<01:37:52.440> they're<01:37:52.599> not<01:37:52.760> that 01:37:52.870 --> 01:37:52.880 align:start position:0% these pronouns because they're not that 01:37:52.880 --> 01:37:54.550 align:start position:0% these pronouns because they're not that useful<01:37:53.159> in<01:37:53.360> conversation<01:37:54.080> but<01:37:54.199> like<01:37:54.320> I<01:37:54.400> said 01:37:54.550 --> 01:37:54.560 align:start position:0% useful in conversation but like I said 01:37:54.560 --> 01:37:56.550 align:start position:0% useful in conversation but like I said at<01:37:54.679> the<01:37:54.800> beginning<01:37:55.239> the<01:37:55.360> verb<01:37:55.639> sa<01:37:56.080> refers<01:37:56.400> to 01:37:56.550 --> 01:37:56.560 align:start position:0% at the beginning the verb sa refers to 01:37:56.560 --> 01:37:57.950 align:start position:0% at the beginning the verb sa refers to factually<01:37:56.960> knowing<01:37:57.280> something<01:37:57.679> part<01:37:57.800> of 01:37:57.950 --> 01:37:57.960 align:start position:0% factually knowing something part of 01:37:57.960 --> 01:37:59.229 align:start position:0% factually knowing something part of which<01:37:58.080> includes<01:37:58.520> actions<01:37:58.880> which<01:37:59.000> are 01:37:59.229 --> 01:37:59.239 align:start position:0% which includes actions which are 01:37:59.239 --> 01:38:00.750 align:start position:0% which includes actions which are factually<01:37:59.599> known<01:38:00.000> the<01:38:00.119> best<01:38:00.280> way<01:38:00.400> that<01:38:00.520> I<01:38:00.639> can 01:38:00.750 --> 01:38:00.760 align:start position:0% factually known the best way that I can 01:38:00.760 --> 01:38:02.830 align:start position:0% factually known the best way that I can explain<01:38:01.119> sabed<01:38:01.599> without<01:38:01.880> any<01:38:02.119> confusion<01:38:02.719> is 01:38:02.830 --> 01:38:02.840 align:start position:0% explain sabed without any confusion is 01:38:02.840 --> 01:38:04.830 align:start position:0% explain sabed without any confusion is through<01:38:03.040> the<01:38:03.159> verb<01:38:03.400> said<01:38:03.800> said<01:38:04.080> means<01:38:04.360> to<01:38:04.520> be 01:38:04.830 --> 01:38:04.840 align:start position:0% through the verb said said means to be 01:38:04.840 --> 01:38:06.310 align:start position:0% through the verb said said means to be as<01:38:04.960> in<01:38:05.159> having<01:38:05.400> factual<01:38:05.719> traits<01:38:06.040> about 01:38:06.310 --> 01:38:06.320 align:start position:0% as in having factual traits about 01:38:06.320 --> 01:38:08.030 align:start position:0% as in having factual traits about oneself<01:38:06.840> and<01:38:06.920> so<01:38:07.159> the<01:38:07.239> same<01:38:07.440> idea<01:38:07.679> works<01:38:07.880> for 01:38:08.030 --> 01:38:08.040 align:start position:0% oneself and so the same idea works for 01:38:08.040 --> 01:38:09.910 align:start position:0% oneself and so the same idea works for the<01:38:08.119> verb<01:38:08.800> because<01:38:08.960> it<01:38:09.080> refers<01:38:09.360> to<01:38:09.560> factually 01:38:09.910 --> 01:38:09.920 align:start position:0% the verb because it refers to factually 01:38:09.920 --> 01:38:11.910 align:start position:0% the verb because it refers to factually knowing<01:38:10.280> information<01:38:10.920> for<01:38:11.119> instance<01:38:11.719> if<01:38:11.800> I 01:38:11.910 --> 01:38:11.920 align:start position:0% knowing information for instance if I 01:38:11.920 --> 01:38:13.990 align:start position:0% knowing information for instance if I say<01:38:12.159> a<01:38:12.280> sentence 01:38:13.990 --> 01:38:14.000 align:start position:0% say a sentence 01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:16.229 align:start position:0% say a sentence like<01:38:15.000> I'm<01:38:15.199> factually<01:38:15.520> saying<01:38:15.840> that<01:38:15.960> I<01:38:16.080> know 01:38:16.229 --> 01:38:16.239 align:start position:0% like I'm factually saying that I know 01:38:16.239 --> 01:38:17.830 align:start position:0% like I'm factually saying that I know how<01:38:16.360> to<01:38:16.560> speak<01:38:16.920> Spanish<01:38:17.440> because<01:38:17.639> it's<01:38:17.719> a 01:38:17.830 --> 01:38:17.840 align:start position:0% how to speak Spanish because it's a 01:38:17.840 --> 01:38:19.589 align:start position:0% how to speak Spanish because it's a language<01:38:18.159> that<01:38:18.280> I've<01:38:18.440> mastered<01:38:18.920> over<01:38:19.199> time 01:38:19.589 --> 01:38:19.599 align:start position:0% language that I've mastered over time 01:38:19.599 --> 01:38:21.270 align:start position:0% language that I've mastered over time and<01:38:19.760> now<01:38:20.040> I<01:38:20.119> know<01:38:20.280> how<01:38:20.400> to<01:38:20.560> speak<01:38:20.760> it<01:38:20.960> just<01:38:21.159> just 01:38:21.270 --> 01:38:21.280 align:start position:0% and now I know how to speak it just just 01:38:21.280 --> 01:38:22.470 align:start position:0% and now I know how to speak it just just like<01:38:21.400> with<01:38:21.520> the<01:38:21.599> verb<01:38:21.800> said<01:38:22.159> you<01:38:22.239> cannot 01:38:22.470 --> 01:38:22.480 align:start position:0% like with the verb said you cannot 01:38:22.480 --> 01:38:24.629 align:start position:0% like with the verb said you cannot change<01:38:22.760> any<01:38:23.000> factual<01:38:23.360> traits<01:38:23.719> about<01:38:23.960> oneself 01:38:24.629 --> 01:38:24.639 align:start position:0% change any factual traits about oneself 01:38:24.639 --> 01:38:26.310 align:start position:0% change any factual traits about oneself the<01:38:24.760> same<01:38:25.080> way<01:38:25.400> you<01:38:25.520> cannot<01:38:25.800> forget<01:38:26.159> the 01:38:26.310 --> 01:38:26.320 align:start position:0% the same way you cannot forget the 01:38:26.320 --> 01:38:28.189 align:start position:0% the same way you cannot forget the factual<01:38:26.679> information<01:38:27.239> you<01:38:27.400> know<01:38:27.679> or<01:38:27.840> know<01:38:28.080> how 01:38:28.189 --> 01:38:28.199 align:start position:0% factual information you know or know how 01:38:28.199 --> 01:38:30.430 align:start position:0% factual information you know or know how to<01:38:28.320> do<01:38:28.599> if<01:38:28.679> I<01:38:28.800> say<01:38:28.960> a<01:38:29.080> sentence<01:38:29.520> like 01:38:30.430 --> 01:38:30.440 align:start position:0% to do if I say a sentence like 01:38:30.440 --> 01:38:32.750 align:start position:0% to do if I say a sentence like to<01:38:31.440> I'm<01:38:31.520> saying<01:38:31.760> that<01:38:31.880> you<01:38:32.119> factually<01:38:32.520> know 01:38:32.750 --> 01:38:32.760 align:start position:0% to I'm saying that you factually know 01:38:32.760 --> 01:38:34.270 align:start position:0% to I'm saying that you factually know the<01:38:32.960> time<01:38:33.320> because<01:38:33.599> time<01:38:33.800> is<01:38:33.920> something 01:38:34.270 --> 01:38:34.280 align:start position:0% the time because time is something 01:38:34.280 --> 01:38:35.790 align:start position:0% the time because time is something factual<01:38:34.599> to<01:38:34.760> know<01:38:35.000> and<01:38:35.080> you<01:38:35.199> cannot<01:38:35.440> change 01:38:35.790 --> 01:38:35.800 align:start position:0% factual to know and you cannot change 01:38:35.800 --> 01:38:38.109 align:start position:0% factual to know and you cannot change that<01:38:36.040> fact<01:38:36.360> if<01:38:36.480> I<01:38:36.599> say<01:38:36.760> a<01:38:36.840> sentence 01:38:38.109 --> 01:38:38.119 align:start position:0% that fact if I say a sentence 01:38:38.119 --> 01:38:40.430 align:start position:0% that fact if I say a sentence like<01:38:39.119> I'm<01:38:39.199> saying<01:38:39.440> that<01:38:39.560> he<01:38:39.760> factually<01:38:40.199> knows 01:38:40.430 --> 01:38:40.440 align:start position:0% like I'm saying that he factually knows 01:38:40.440 --> 01:38:41.750 align:start position:0% like I'm saying that he factually knows how<01:38:40.560> to<01:38:40.679> swim<01:38:40.960> meaning<01:38:41.239> that<01:38:41.360> he<01:38:41.480> cannot 01:38:41.750 --> 01:38:41.760 align:start position:0% how to swim meaning that he cannot 01:38:41.760 --> 01:38:43.550 align:start position:0% how to swim meaning that he cannot change<01:38:42.080> that<01:38:42.280> fact<01:38:42.560> about<01:38:42.760> swimming<01:38:43.199> he<01:38:43.320> knows 01:38:43.550 --> 01:38:43.560 align:start position:0% change that fact about swimming he knows 01:38:43.560 --> 01:38:45.350 align:start position:0% change that fact about swimming he knows how<01:38:43.679> to<01:38:43.840> swim<01:38:44.199> and<01:38:44.320> will<01:38:44.480> not<01:38:44.639> forget<01:38:44.960> anything 01:38:45.350 --> 01:38:45.360 align:start position:0% how to swim and will not forget anything 01:38:45.360 --> 01:38:46.950 align:start position:0% how to swim and will not forget anything and<01:38:45.480> with<01:38:45.719> examples<01:38:46.080> that<01:38:46.280> involve<01:38:46.599> factually 01:38:46.950 --> 01:38:46.960 align:start position:0% and with examples that involve factually 01:38:46.960 --> 01:38:49.430 align:start position:0% and with examples that involve factually knowing<01:38:47.199> how<01:38:47.320> to<01:38:47.480> do<01:38:47.679> something 01:38:49.430 --> 01:38:49.440 align:start position:0% knowing how to do something 01:38:49.440 --> 01:38:53.390 align:start position:0% knowing how to do something like<01:38:50.440> to<01:38:51.599> too 01:38:53.390 --> 01:38:53.400 align:start position:0% like to too 01:38:53.400 --> 01:38:55.709 align:start position:0% like to too and<01:38:54.400> Spanish<01:38:54.760> actually<01:38:54.960> has<01:38:55.080> a<01:38:55.199> convenient 01:38:55.709 --> 01:38:55.719 align:start position:0% and Spanish actually has a convenient 01:38:55.719 --> 01:38:57.550 align:start position:0% and Spanish actually has a convenient way<01:38:55.960> of<01:38:56.080> putting<01:38:56.360> phrases<01:38:56.840> together<01:38:57.280> so<01:38:57.400> that 01:38:57.550 --> 01:38:57.560 align:start position:0% way of putting phrases together so that 01:38:57.560 --> 01:38:59.310 align:start position:0% way of putting phrases together so that they<01:38:57.639> don't<01:38:57.840> repeat<01:38:58.199> unnecessary<01:38:58.760> words<01:38:59.199> by 01:38:59.310 --> 01:38:59.320 align:start position:0% they don't repeat unnecessary words by 01:38:59.320 --> 01:39:01.070 align:start position:0% they don't repeat unnecessary words by eliminating<01:38:59.800> the<01:38:59.920> word<01:39:00.199> Koo<01:39:00.760> from<01:39:00.960> the 01:39:01.070 --> 01:39:01.080 align:start position:0% eliminating the word Koo from the 01:39:01.080 --> 01:39:02.709 align:start position:0% eliminating the word Koo from the sentence<01:39:01.599> visually<01:39:01.960> looking<01:39:02.199> at<01:39:02.320> the<01:39:02.440> phrases 01:39:02.709 --> 01:39:02.719 align:start position:0% sentence visually looking at the phrases 01:39:02.719 --> 01:39:04.589 align:start position:0% sentence visually looking at the phrases in<01:39:02.880> English<01:39:03.320> and<01:39:03.440> putting<01:39:03.679> them<01:39:03.840> in<01:39:04.000> Spanish<01:39:04.520> I 01:39:04.589 --> 01:39:04.599 align:start position:0% in English and putting them in Spanish I 01:39:04.599 --> 01:39:06.189 align:start position:0% in English and putting them in Spanish I know<01:39:04.800> how<01:39:04.880> to<01:39:05.040> speak<01:39:05.320> Spanish<01:39:05.800> you<01:39:05.960> know<01:39:06.119> how 01:39:06.189 --> 01:39:06.199 align:start position:0% know how to speak Spanish you know how 01:39:06.199 --> 01:39:07.750 align:start position:0% know how to speak Spanish you know how to<01:39:06.320> play<01:39:06.480> the<01:39:06.639> piano<01:39:07.080> and<01:39:07.159> he<01:39:07.280> knows<01:39:07.480> how<01:39:07.599> to 01:39:07.750 --> 01:39:07.760 align:start position:0% to play the piano and he knows how to 01:39:07.760 --> 01:39:09.270 align:start position:0% to play the piano and he knows how to cook<01:39:08.000> well<01:39:08.320> you<01:39:08.400> don't<01:39:08.560> need<01:39:08.719> to<01:39:08.920> add<01:39:09.080> the 01:39:09.270 --> 01:39:09.280 align:start position:0% cook well you don't need to add the 01:39:09.280 --> 01:39:11.310 align:start position:0% cook well you don't need to add the adverb<01:39:09.800> KO<01:39:10.280> within<01:39:10.520> the<01:39:10.679> sentences<01:39:11.239> the 01:39:11.310 --> 01:39:11.320 align:start position:0% adverb KO within the sentences the 01:39:11.320 --> 01:39:12.830 align:start position:0% adverb KO within the sentences the reason<01:39:11.599> why<01:39:11.719> Spanish<01:39:12.080> does<01:39:12.360> that<01:39:12.560> is<01:39:12.679> to 01:39:12.830 --> 01:39:12.840 align:start position:0% reason why Spanish does that is to 01:39:12.840 --> 01:39:14.430 align:start position:0% reason why Spanish does that is to eliminate<01:39:13.280> repetition<01:39:13.639> of<01:39:13.800> words<01:39:14.239> because 01:39:14.430 --> 01:39:14.440 align:start position:0% eliminate repetition of words because 01:39:14.440 --> 01:39:15.910 align:start position:0% eliminate repetition of words because when<01:39:14.560> you<01:39:14.679> think<01:39:14.840> about<01:39:15.119> it<01:39:15.280> saying<01:39:15.520> a<01:39:15.639> phrase 01:39:15.910 --> 01:39:15.920 align:start position:0% when you think about it saying a phrase 01:39:15.920 --> 01:39:17.910 align:start position:0% when you think about it saying a phrase like<01:39:16.159> I<01:39:16.280> know<01:39:16.480> to<01:39:16.679> speak<01:39:16.960> Spanish<01:39:17.480> sounds<01:39:17.760> sort 01:39:17.910 --> 01:39:17.920 align:start position:0% like I know to speak Spanish sounds sort 01:39:17.920 --> 01:39:19.830 align:start position:0% like I know to speak Spanish sounds sort of<01:39:18.360> understandable<01:39:18.719> on<01:39:18.880> its<01:39:19.040> own<01:39:19.520> without<01:39:19.760> the 01:39:19.830 --> 01:39:19.840 align:start position:0% of understandable on its own without the 01:39:19.840 --> 01:39:21.790 align:start position:0% of understandable on its own without the need<01:39:20.040> of<01:39:20.159> the<01:39:20.320> word<01:39:20.560> that<01:39:20.719> specif<01:39:21.320> the<01:39:21.480> action 01:39:21.790 --> 01:39:21.800 align:start position:0% need of the word that specif the action 01:39:21.800 --> 01:39:23.270 align:start position:0% need of the word that specif the action so<01:39:21.960> just<01:39:22.119> simply<01:39:22.440> remember<01:39:22.880> that<01:39:23.000> you<01:39:23.080> won't 01:39:23.270 --> 01:39:23.280 align:start position:0% so just simply remember that you won't 01:39:23.280 --> 01:39:25.310 align:start position:0% so just simply remember that you won't need<01:39:23.480> the<01:39:23.639> adverb<01:39:24.000> KO<01:39:24.400> in<01:39:24.520> Spanish<01:39:25.080> because 01:39:25.310 --> 01:39:25.320 align:start position:0% need the adverb KO in Spanish because 01:39:25.320 --> 01:39:26.870 align:start position:0% need the adverb KO in Spanish because the<01:39:25.440> act<01:39:25.599> of<01:39:25.760> knowing<01:39:26.000> how<01:39:26.119> to<01:39:26.239> do<01:39:26.480> something 01:39:26.870 --> 01:39:26.880 align:start position:0% the act of knowing how to do something 01:39:26.880 --> 01:39:28.550 align:start position:0% the act of knowing how to do something is<01:39:27.080> already<01:39:27.400> clear<01:39:27.679> enough<01:39:27.880> in<01:39:28.000> Spanish 01:39:28.550 --> 01:39:28.560 align:start position:0% is already clear enough in Spanish 01:39:28.560 --> 01:39:30.750 align:start position:0% is already clear enough in Spanish overall<01:39:29.159> the<01:39:29.280> verb<01:39:29.520> sa<01:39:30.000> applies<01:39:30.320> to<01:39:30.440> knowing 01:39:30.750 --> 01:39:30.760 align:start position:0% overall the verb sa applies to knowing 01:39:30.760 --> 01:39:32.229 align:start position:0% overall the verb sa applies to knowing factual<01:39:31.159> information<01:39:31.719> and<01:39:31.880> factually 01:39:32.229 --> 01:39:32.239 align:start position:0% factual information and factually 01:39:32.239 --> 01:39:33.510 align:start position:0% factual information and factually knowing<01:39:32.520> how<01:39:32.599> to<01:39:32.760> do<01:39:32.920> something<01:39:33.239> and<01:39:33.320> it's 01:39:33.510 --> 01:39:33.520 align:start position:0% knowing how to do something and it's 01:39:33.520 --> 01:39:34.750 align:start position:0% knowing how to do something and it's actually<01:39:33.760> a<01:39:33.880> very<01:39:34.040> essential<01:39:34.400> verb<01:39:34.599> in 01:39:34.750 --> 01:39:34.760 align:start position:0% actually a very essential verb in 01:39:34.760 --> 01:39:36.350 align:start position:0% actually a very essential verb in Spanish<01:39:35.280> allowing<01:39:35.599> you<01:39:35.679> to<01:39:36.080> understand<01:39:36.239> how 01:39:36.350 --> 01:39:36.360 align:start position:0% Spanish allowing you to understand how 01:39:36.360 --> 01:39:38.070 align:start position:0% Spanish allowing you to understand how to<01:39:36.520> navigate<01:39:36.880> your<01:39:37.080> way<01:39:37.360> around<01:39:37.679> forms<01:39:37.960> of 01:39:38.070 --> 01:39:38.080 align:start position:0% to navigate your way around forms of 01:39:38.080 --> 01:39:39.550 align:start position:0% to navigate your way around forms of speech<01:39:38.480> once<01:39:38.599> you<01:39:38.719> have<01:39:38.880> understood<01:39:39.280> how<01:39:39.400> to 01:39:39.550 --> 01:39:39.560 align:start position:0% speech once you have understood how to 01:39:39.560 --> 01:39:41.109 align:start position:0% speech once you have understood how to work<01:39:39.800> with<01:39:39.960> this<01:39:40.119> verb<01:39:40.760> understanding<01:39:40.960> the 01:39:41.109 --> 01:39:41.119 align:start position:0% work with this verb understanding the 01:39:41.119 --> 01:39:43.589 align:start position:0% work with this verb understanding the verb<01:39:41.440> after<01:39:41.800> Saar<01:39:42.320> will<01:39:42.480> be<01:39:42.639> a<01:39:42.760> lot<01:39:43.040> easier 01:39:43.589 --> 01:39:43.599 align:start position:0% verb after Saar will be a lot easier 01:39:43.599 --> 01:39:45.310 align:start position:0% verb after Saar will be a lot easier because<01:39:43.840> normally<01:39:44.440> educators<01:39:44.880> will<01:39:45.080> teach 01:39:45.310 --> 01:39:45.320 align:start position:0% because normally educators will teach 01:39:45.320 --> 01:39:46.750 align:start position:0% because normally educators will teach both<01:39:45.480> verbs<01:39:45.760> at<01:39:45.920> once<01:39:46.280> which<01:39:46.440> generally 01:39:46.750 --> 01:39:46.760 align:start position:0% both verbs at once which generally 01:39:46.760 --> 01:39:48.510 align:start position:0% both verbs at once which generally causes<01:39:47.119> confusion<01:39:47.480> between<01:39:47.760> students<01:39:48.280> and<01:39:48.360> so 01:39:48.510 --> 01:39:48.520 align:start position:0% causes confusion between students and so 01:39:48.520 --> 01:39:50.550 align:start position:0% causes confusion between students and so the<01:39:48.639> verb<01:39:48.920> koser<01:39:49.520> is<01:39:49.599> for<01:39:49.760> the<01:39:49.920> video<01:39:50.320> after 01:39:50.550 --> 01:39:50.560 align:start position:0% the verb koser is for the video after 01:39:50.560 --> 01:39:52.830 align:start position:0% the verb koser is for the video after this<01:39:50.679> one<01:39:51.040> the<01:39:51.119> verb<01:39:51.400> koser<01:39:52.040> in<01:39:52.199> Spanish<01:39:52.599> means 01:39:52.830 --> 01:39:52.840 align:start position:0% this one the verb koser in Spanish means 01:39:52.840 --> 01:39:54.709 align:start position:0% this one the verb koser in Spanish means to<01:39:53.000> be<01:39:53.159> familiar<01:39:53.639> with<01:39:53.920> or<01:39:54.080> be<01:39:54.280> acquainted 01:39:54.709 --> 01:39:54.719 align:start position:0% to be familiar with or be acquainted 01:39:54.719 --> 01:39:56.589 align:start position:0% to be familiar with or be acquainted with<01:39:54.960> people<01:39:55.360> places<01:39:55.719> and<01:39:55.880> things<01:39:56.080> in<01:39:56.199> general 01:39:56.589 --> 01:39:56.599 align:start position:0% with people places and things in general 01:39:56.599 --> 01:39:58.310 align:start position:0% with people places and things in general unlike<01:39:56.880> the<01:39:56.960> verb<01:39:57.199> sa<01:39:57.719> which<01:39:57.840> means<01:39:58.040> to<01:39:58.159> know 01:39:58.310 --> 01:39:58.320 align:start position:0% unlike the verb sa which means to know 01:39:58.320 --> 01:40:00.149 align:start position:0% unlike the verb sa which means to know something<01:39:58.639> factually<01:39:59.159> or<01:39:59.320> do<01:39:59.560> something<01:40:00.040> the 01:40:00.149 --> 01:40:00.159 align:start position:0% something factually or do something the 01:40:00.159 --> 01:40:02.109 align:start position:0% something factually or do something the verb<01:40:00.440> konos<01:40:01.040> tends<01:40:01.239> to<01:40:01.360> lean<01:40:01.599> more<01:40:01.760> towards 01:40:02.109 --> 01:40:02.119 align:start position:0% verb konos tends to lean more towards 01:40:02.119 --> 01:40:03.750 align:start position:0% verb konos tends to lean more towards acquaintances<01:40:02.679> of<01:40:02.840> ideas<01:40:03.360> rather<01:40:03.599> than 01:40:03.750 --> 01:40:03.760 align:start position:0% acquaintances of ideas rather than 01:40:03.760 --> 01:40:05.470 align:start position:0% acquaintances of ideas rather than knowing<01:40:04.159> ideas<01:40:04.639> and<01:40:04.719> if<01:40:04.800> you<01:40:04.920> think<01:40:05.119> about<01:40:05.280> it 01:40:05.470 --> 01:40:05.480 align:start position:0% knowing ideas and if you think about it 01:40:05.480 --> 01:40:06.830 align:start position:0% knowing ideas and if you think about it there's<01:40:05.639> a<01:40:05.800> big<01:40:06.000> difference<01:40:06.320> between<01:40:06.599> knowing 01:40:06.830 --> 01:40:06.840 align:start position:0% there's a big difference between knowing 01:40:06.840 --> 01:40:08.470 align:start position:0% there's a big difference between knowing something<01:40:07.239> from<01:40:07.440> top<01:40:07.599> to<01:40:07.719> bottom<01:40:08.119> and<01:40:08.199> knowing 01:40:08.470 --> 01:40:08.480 align:start position:0% something from top to bottom and knowing 01:40:08.480 --> 01:40:09.910 align:start position:0% something from top to bottom and knowing something<01:40:08.760> that<01:40:08.880> isn't<01:40:09.119> fully<01:40:09.440> clear<01:40:09.800> which 01:40:09.910 --> 01:40:09.920 align:start position:0% something that isn't fully clear which 01:40:09.920 --> 01:40:11.229 align:start position:0% something that isn't fully clear which is<01:40:10.000> the<01:40:10.119> reason<01:40:10.360> why<01:40:10.480> Spanish<01:40:10.800> creates<01:40:11.080> two 01:40:11.229 --> 01:40:11.239 align:start position:0% is the reason why Spanish creates two 01:40:11.239 --> 01:40:12.910 align:start position:0% is the reason why Spanish creates two verbs<01:40:11.440> for<01:40:11.639> to<01:40:11.840> know<01:40:12.159> because<01:40:12.360> one<01:40:12.520> verb<01:40:12.719> means 01:40:12.910 --> 01:40:12.920 align:start position:0% verbs for to know because one verb means 01:40:12.920 --> 01:40:14.189 align:start position:0% verbs for to know because one verb means to<01:40:13.080> know<01:40:13.239> something<01:40:13.560> factually<01:40:14.000> and 01:40:14.189 --> 01:40:14.199 align:start position:0% to know something factually and 01:40:14.199 --> 01:40:15.790 align:start position:0% to know something factually and completely<01:40:14.719> whereas<01:40:15.040> the<01:40:15.159> other<01:40:15.360> indicates 01:40:15.790 --> 01:40:15.800 align:start position:0% completely whereas the other indicates 01:40:15.800 --> 01:40:17.189 align:start position:0% completely whereas the other indicates being<01:40:16.000> acquainted<01:40:16.400> with<01:40:16.560> something<01:40:17.000> rather 01:40:17.189 --> 01:40:17.199 align:start position:0% being acquainted with something rather 01:40:17.199 --> 01:40:18.910 align:start position:0% being acquainted with something rather than<01:40:17.360> fully<01:40:17.599> knowing<01:40:17.880> what<01:40:18.000> it<01:40:18.119> is<01:40:18.440> the<01:40:18.520> syntax 01:40:18.910 --> 01:40:18.920 align:start position:0% than fully knowing what it is the syntax 01:40:18.920 --> 01:40:20.750 align:start position:0% than fully knowing what it is the syntax of<01:40:19.119> Kos<01:40:19.679> follows<01:40:19.960> the<01:40:20.080> normal<01:40:20.360> conjugation 01:40:20.750 --> 01:40:20.760 align:start position:0% of Kos follows the normal conjugation 01:40:20.760 --> 01:40:22.830 align:start position:0% of Kos follows the normal conjugation path<01:40:21.239> or<01:40:21.320> verbs<01:40:21.560> ending<01:40:21.800> in<01:40:21.920> e<01:40:22.080> r<01:40:22.480> aside<01:40:22.719> from 01:40:22.830 --> 01:40:22.840 align:start position:0% path or verbs ending in e r aside from 01:40:22.840 --> 01:40:24.430 align:start position:0% path or verbs ending in e r aside from the<01:40:22.960> yo<01:40:23.199> pronoun<01:40:23.599> which<01:40:23.679> is<01:40:23.840> irregular 01:40:24.430 --> 01:40:24.440 align:start position:0% the yo pronoun which is irregular 01:40:24.440 --> 01:40:26.709 align:start position:0% the yo pronoun which is irregular following<01:40:24.880> the<01:40:25.599> ending<01:40:26.119> like<01:40:26.239> I<01:40:26.320> said<01:40:26.480> at<01:40:26.599> the 01:40:26.709 --> 01:40:26.719 align:start position:0% following the ending like I said at the 01:40:26.719 --> 01:40:28.629 align:start position:0% following the ending like I said at the beginning<01:40:27.199> konos<01:40:27.840> means<01:40:28.119> more<01:40:28.400> being 01:40:28.629 --> 01:40:28.639 align:start position:0% beginning konos means more being 01:40:28.639 --> 01:40:30.310 align:start position:0% beginning konos means more being familiar<01:40:29.119> with<01:40:29.280> people<01:40:29.639> places<01:40:29.960> and<01:40:30.119> things 01:40:30.310 --> 01:40:30.320 align:start position:0% familiar with people places and things 01:40:30.320 --> 01:40:32.070 align:start position:0% familiar with people places and things in<01:40:30.440> general<01:40:30.960> rather<01:40:31.199> than<01:40:31.360> knowing<01:40:31.679> something 01:40:32.070 --> 01:40:32.080 align:start position:0% in general rather than knowing something 01:40:32.080 --> 01:40:34.390 align:start position:0% in general rather than knowing something factually<01:40:32.679> therefore<01:40:33.199> yosco<01:40:34.040> means 01:40:34.390 --> 01:40:34.400 align:start position:0% factually therefore yosco means 01:40:34.400 --> 01:40:36.790 align:start position:0% factually therefore yosco means unfamiliar<01:40:35.159> with<01:40:35.280> a<01:40:35.480> person<01:40:35.960> place<01:40:36.239> or<01:40:36.480> thing 01:40:36.790 --> 01:40:36.800 align:start position:0% unfamiliar with a person place or thing 01:40:36.800 --> 01:40:37.990 align:start position:0% unfamiliar with a person place or thing rather<01:40:37.040> than<01:40:37.199> me<01:40:37.320> knowing<01:40:37.639> something 01:40:37.990 --> 01:40:38.000 align:start position:0% rather than me knowing something 01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:39.629 align:start position:0% rather than me knowing something factually<01:40:38.599> because<01:40:38.840> being<01:40:39.040> familiar<01:40:39.400> with<01:40:39.520> a 01:40:39.629 --> 01:40:39.639 align:start position:0% factually because being familiar with a 01:40:39.639 --> 01:40:40.910 align:start position:0% factually because being familiar with a person<01:40:39.960> place<01:40:40.119> or<01:40:40.320> thing<01:40:40.639> doesn't 01:40:40.910 --> 01:40:40.920 align:start position:0% person place or thing doesn't 01:40:40.920 --> 01:40:42.470 align:start position:0% person place or thing doesn't necessarily<01:40:41.400> mean<01:40:41.679> that<01:40:41.800> I<01:40:41.920> know<01:40:42.040> it<01:40:42.159> from<01:40:42.320> top 01:40:42.470 --> 01:40:42.480 align:start position:0% necessarily mean that I know it from top 01:40:42.480 --> 01:40:44.310 align:start position:0% necessarily mean that I know it from top to<01:40:42.599> bottom<01:40:42.880> two<01:40:43.199> koses<01:40:43.800> means<01:40:44.080> you're 01:40:44.310 --> 01:40:44.320 align:start position:0% to bottom two koses means you're 01:40:44.320 --> 01:40:47.149 align:start position:0% to bottom two koses means you're familiar<01:40:44.760> with<01:40:45.199> El<01:40:46.080> means<01:40:46.400> he's<01:40:46.679> familiar 01:40:47.149 --> 01:40:47.159 align:start position:0% familiar with El means he's familiar 01:40:47.159 --> 01:40:48.149 align:start position:0% familiar with El means he's familiar with 01:40:48.149 --> 01:40:48.159 align:start position:0% with 01:40:48.159 --> 01:40:52.390 align:start position:0% with noos<01:40:49.159> we're<01:40:49.400> familiar<01:40:49.920> with<01:40:51.040> Kos<01:40:51.960> y'all<01:40:52.199> are 01:40:52.390 --> 01:40:52.400 align:start position:0% noos we're familiar with Kos y'all are 01:40:52.400 --> 01:40:54.790 align:start position:0% noos we're familiar with Kos y'all are familiar<01:40:52.880> with<01:40:53.320> and<01:40:53.520> AOS<01:40:53.960> Kosen<01:40:54.520> they're 01:40:54.790 --> 01:40:54.800 align:start position:0% familiar with and AOS Kosen they're 01:40:54.800 --> 01:40:56.750 align:start position:0% familiar with and AOS Kosen they're familiar<01:40:55.199> with<01:40:55.520> as<01:40:55.639> always<01:40:56.040> try<01:40:56.280> not<01:40:56.440> focusing 01:40:56.750 --> 01:40:56.760 align:start position:0% familiar with as always try not focusing 01:40:56.760 --> 01:40:58.149 align:start position:0% familiar with as always try not focusing on<01:40:56.960> these<01:40:57.159> pronouns<01:40:57.679> because<01:40:57.840> they're<01:40:58.000> not 01:40:58.149 --> 01:40:58.159 align:start position:0% on these pronouns because they're not 01:40:58.159 --> 01:41:00.109 align:start position:0% on these pronouns because they're not that<01:40:58.280> useful<01:40:58.560> in<01:40:58.679> conversation<01:40:59.440> overall<01:40:59.960> the 01:41:00.109 --> 01:41:00.119 align:start position:0% that useful in conversation overall the 01:41:00.119 --> 01:41:01.910 align:start position:0% that useful in conversation overall the verb<01:41:00.400> konos<01:41:01.000> is<01:41:01.119> actually<01:41:01.400> considered<01:41:01.719> to<01:41:01.800> be 01:41:01.910 --> 01:41:01.920 align:start position:0% verb konos is actually considered to be 01:41:01.920 --> 01:41:03.629 align:start position:0% verb konos is actually considered to be a<01:41:02.040> very<01:41:02.199> useful<01:41:02.480> verb<01:41:02.719> in<01:41:02.840> Spanish<01:41:03.360> because<01:41:03.560> it 01:41:03.629 --> 01:41:03.639 align:start position:0% a very useful verb in Spanish because it 01:41:03.639 --> 01:41:05.229 align:start position:0% a very useful verb in Spanish because it helps<01:41:03.840> to<01:41:04.040> differentiate<01:41:04.639> the<01:41:04.760> qualities<01:41:05.119> of 01:41:05.229 --> 01:41:05.239 align:start position:0% helps to differentiate the qualities of 01:41:05.239 --> 01:41:06.870 align:start position:0% helps to differentiate the qualities of knowing<01:41:05.520> something<01:41:05.880> factually<01:41:06.480> and<01:41:06.599> being 01:41:06.870 --> 01:41:06.880 align:start position:0% knowing something factually and being 01:41:06.880 --> 01:41:08.470 align:start position:0% knowing something factually and being familiar<01:41:07.239> with<01:41:07.320> a<01:41:07.480> person<01:41:07.760> place<01:41:07.960> or<01:41:08.159> thing 01:41:08.470 --> 01:41:08.480 align:start position:0% familiar with a person place or thing 01:41:08.480 --> 01:41:10.149 align:start position:0% familiar with a person place or thing which<01:41:08.599> is<01:41:08.719> sort<01:41:08.880> of<01:41:09.000> the<01:41:09.119> same<01:41:09.360> way<01:41:09.599> the<01:41:09.719> verbs 01:41:10.149 --> 01:41:10.159 align:start position:0% which is sort of the same way the verbs 01:41:10.159 --> 01:41:12.790 align:start position:0% which is sort of the same way the verbs s<01:41:10.599> and<01:41:10.800> estar<01:41:11.320> work<01:41:11.719> konos<01:41:12.280> as<01:41:12.360> a<01:41:12.440> matter<01:41:12.679> of 01:41:12.790 --> 01:41:12.800 align:start position:0% s and estar work konos as a matter of 01:41:12.800 --> 01:41:14.229 align:start position:0% s and estar work konos as a matter of fact<01:41:13.080> is<01:41:13.199> very<01:41:13.400> useful<01:41:13.719> when<01:41:13.840> it<01:41:13.960> comes<01:41:14.119> down 01:41:14.229 --> 01:41:14.239 align:start position:0% fact is very useful when it comes down 01:41:14.239 --> 01:41:16.149 align:start position:0% fact is very useful when it comes down to<01:41:14.400> asking<01:41:14.719> questions<01:41:15.320> and<01:41:15.400> it<01:41:15.599> actually<01:41:15.840> uses 01:41:16.149 --> 01:41:16.159 align:start position:0% to asking questions and it actually uses 01:41:16.159 --> 01:41:18.109 align:start position:0% to asking questions and it actually uses direct<01:41:16.440> object<01:41:16.719> pronouns<01:41:17.119> to<01:41:17.280> replace<01:41:17.639> people 01:41:18.109 --> 01:41:18.119 align:start position:0% direct object pronouns to replace people 01:41:18.119 --> 01:41:19.669 align:start position:0% direct object pronouns to replace people places<01:41:18.440> and<01:41:18.639> things<01:41:19.040> which<01:41:19.199> could<01:41:19.360> all<01:41:19.520> be 01:41:19.669 --> 01:41:19.679 align:start position:0% places and things which could all be 01:41:19.679 --> 01:41:22.990 align:start position:0% places and things which could all be nouns<01:41:20.159> for<01:41:20.400> instance<01:41:20.920> if<01:41:21.040> I<01:41:21.239> ask<01:41:21.440> you<01:41:21.840> Kos<01:41:22.840> Las 01:41:22.990 --> 01:41:23.000 align:start position:0% nouns for instance if I ask you Kos Las 01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:24.750 align:start position:0% nouns for instance if I ask you Kos Las Vegas<01:41:23.400> I'm<01:41:23.520> not<01:41:23.719> necessarily<01:41:24.239> asking<01:41:24.480> you<01:41:24.639> if 01:41:24.750 --> 01:41:24.760 align:start position:0% Vegas I'm not necessarily asking you if 01:41:24.760 --> 01:41:26.229 align:start position:0% Vegas I'm not necessarily asking you if you<01:41:24.840> know<01:41:25.000> the<01:41:25.119> city<01:41:25.280> of<01:41:25.400> Las<01:41:25.639> Vegas<01:41:26.040> but 01:41:26.229 --> 01:41:26.239 align:start position:0% you know the city of Las Vegas but 01:41:26.239 --> 01:41:27.750 align:start position:0% you know the city of Las Vegas but rather<01:41:26.480> if<01:41:26.560> you're<01:41:26.840> familiar<01:41:27.280> with<01:41:27.440> the<01:41:27.560> city 01:41:27.750 --> 01:41:27.760 align:start position:0% rather if you're familiar with the city 01:41:27.760 --> 01:41:29.390 align:start position:0% rather if you're familiar with the city of<01:41:27.920> Las<01:41:28.119> Vegas<01:41:28.560> and<01:41:28.639> you<01:41:28.719> can<01:41:28.920> reply<01:41:29.239> with 01:41:29.390 --> 01:41:29.400 align:start position:0% of Las Vegas and you can reply with 01:41:29.400 --> 01:41:31.189 align:start position:0% of Las Vegas and you can reply with something 01:41:31.189 --> 01:41:31.199 align:start position:0% something 01:41:31.199 --> 01:41:33.149 align:start position:0% something like<01:41:32.199> or<01:41:32.280> if<01:41:32.360> you<01:41:32.440> want<01:41:32.560> to<01:41:32.639> use<01:41:32.800> a<01:41:32.920> direct 01:41:33.149 --> 01:41:33.159 align:start position:0% like or if you want to use a direct 01:41:33.159 --> 01:41:35.750 align:start position:0% like or if you want to use a direct object<01:41:33.440> pronoun<01:41:33.960> you<01:41:34.080> can<01:41:34.239> simply 01:41:35.750 --> 01:41:35.760 align:start position:0% object pronoun you can simply 01:41:35.760 --> 01:41:38.310 align:start position:0% object pronoun you can simply sayos<01:41:36.760> the<01:41:36.920> reason<01:41:37.119> why<01:41:37.239> the<01:41:37.360> verb<01:41:37.560> sa<01:41:38.040> cannot 01:41:38.310 --> 01:41:38.320 align:start position:0% sayos the reason why the verb sa cannot 01:41:38.320 --> 01:41:41.390 align:start position:0% sayos the reason why the verb sa cannot be<01:41:38.440> used<01:41:38.760> here<01:41:39.040> is<01:41:39.159> because<01:41:39.400> by<01:41:39.840> saying<01:41:40.840> lasas 01:41:41.390 --> 01:41:41.400 align:start position:0% be used here is because by saying lasas 01:41:41.400 --> 01:41:42.990 align:start position:0% be used here is because by saying lasas the<01:41:41.480> verb<01:41:41.719> sa<01:41:42.159> would<01:41:42.320> have<01:41:42.440> to<01:41:42.560> imply<01:41:42.800> that<01:41:42.880> you 01:41:42.990 --> 01:41:43.000 align:start position:0% the verb sa would have to imply that you 01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:44.709 align:start position:0% the verb sa would have to imply that you know<01:41:43.159> the<01:41:43.280> city<01:41:43.480> of<01:41:43.599> Las<01:41:43.840> Vegas<01:41:44.239> from<01:41:44.440> top<01:41:44.599> to 01:41:44.709 --> 01:41:44.719 align:start position:0% know the city of Las Vegas from top to 01:41:44.719 --> 01:41:46.910 align:start position:0% know the city of Las Vegas from top to bottom<01:41:45.199> including<01:41:45.599> the<01:41:45.760> people<01:41:46.159> streets<01:41:46.639> food 01:41:46.910 --> 01:41:46.920 align:start position:0% bottom including the people streets food 01:41:46.920 --> 01:41:48.310 align:start position:0% bottom including the people streets food and<01:41:47.080> everything<01:41:47.360> in<01:41:47.480> general<01:41:47.880> which<01:41:48.000> would<01:41:48.159> be 01:41:48.310 --> 01:41:48.320 align:start position:0% and everything in general which would be 01:41:48.320 --> 01:41:50.149 align:start position:0% and everything in general which would be impossible<01:41:48.760> to<01:41:48.880> know<01:41:49.280> ultimately<01:41:49.760> resulting 01:41:50.149 --> 01:41:50.159 align:start position:0% impossible to know ultimately resulting 01:41:50.159 --> 01:41:52.310 align:start position:0% impossible to know ultimately resulting in<01:41:50.280> an<01:41:50.400> incorrect<01:41:51.000> use<01:41:51.320> of<01:41:51.520> sa<01:41:51.920> which<01:41:52.000> is<01:41:52.119> why 01:41:52.310 --> 01:41:52.320 align:start position:0% in an incorrect use of sa which is why 01:41:52.320 --> 01:41:54.149 align:start position:0% in an incorrect use of sa which is why Spanish<01:41:52.639> calls<01:41:52.880> the<01:41:53.000> term<01:41:53.280> koser<01:41:53.880> being 01:41:54.149 --> 01:41:54.159 align:start position:0% Spanish calls the term koser being 01:41:54.159 --> 01:41:55.990 align:start position:0% Spanish calls the term koser being familiar<01:41:54.679> with<01:41:55.000> rather<01:41:55.239> than<01:41:55.400> fully<01:41:55.679> knowing 01:41:55.990 --> 01:41:56.000 align:start position:0% familiar with rather than fully knowing 01:41:56.000 --> 01:41:57.790 align:start position:0% familiar with rather than fully knowing the<01:41:56.159> person<01:41:56.520> place<01:41:56.760> or<01:41:56.960> thing<01:41:57.320> there<01:41:57.440> are<01:41:57.599> more 01:41:57.790 --> 01:41:57.800 align:start position:0% the person place or thing there are more 01:41:57.800 --> 01:41:59.750 align:start position:0% the person place or thing there are more examples<01:41:58.159> that<01:41:58.280> you<01:41:58.360> can<01:41:58.480> make<01:41:58.639> with<01:41:58.880> Kos<01:41:59.520> like 01:41:59.750 --> 01:41:59.760 align:start position:0% examples that you can make with Kos like 01:41:59.760 --> 01:42:02.430 align:start position:0% examples that you can make with Kos like asking<01:42:00.080> about<01:42:00.360> people<01:42:01.000> koses<01:42:02.000> meaning<01:42:02.320> are 01:42:02.430 --> 01:42:02.440 align:start position:0% asking about people koses meaning are 01:42:02.440 --> 01:42:04.510 align:start position:0% asking about people koses meaning are you<01:42:02.599> familiar<01:42:03.080> with<01:42:03.320> JN<01:42:03.679> and<01:42:03.880> as<01:42:03.960> you<01:42:04.080> can<01:42:04.199> see 01:42:04.510 --> 01:42:04.520 align:start position:0% you familiar with JN and as you can see 01:42:04.520 --> 01:42:05.910 align:start position:0% you familiar with JN and as you can see Spanish<01:42:04.840> decides<01:42:05.159> to<01:42:05.239> use<01:42:05.400> the<01:42:05.560> personal 01:42:05.910 --> 01:42:05.920 align:start position:0% Spanish decides to use the personal 01:42:05.920 --> 01:42:07.589 align:start position:0% Spanish decides to use the personal preposition<01:42:06.599> a<01:42:06.920> when<01:42:07.040> it<01:42:07.119> comes<01:42:07.320> down<01:42:07.440> to 01:42:07.589 --> 01:42:07.599 align:start position:0% preposition a when it comes down to 01:42:07.599 --> 01:42:09.109 align:start position:0% preposition a when it comes down to being<01:42:07.800> familiar<01:42:08.199> with<01:42:08.360> people<01:42:08.679> but<01:42:08.800> in<01:42:08.960> this 01:42:09.109 --> 01:42:09.119 align:start position:0% being familiar with people but in this 01:42:09.119 --> 01:42:10.310 align:start position:0% being familiar with people but in this case<01:42:09.440> you<01:42:09.520> can<01:42:09.679> just<01:42:09.840> consider<01:42:10.199> the 01:42:10.310 --> 01:42:10.320 align:start position:0% case you can just consider the 01:42:10.320 --> 01:42:11.990 align:start position:0% case you can just consider the preposition<01:42:10.760> to<01:42:10.880> be<01:42:11.000> the<01:42:11.159> equivalent<01:42:11.719> of<01:42:11.840> the 01:42:11.990 --> 01:42:12.000 align:start position:0% preposition to be the equivalent of the 01:42:12.000 --> 01:42:13.910 align:start position:0% preposition to be the equivalent of the preposition<01:42:12.679> with<01:42:12.960> in<01:42:13.119> English<01:42:13.520> so<01:42:13.679> whenever 01:42:13.910 --> 01:42:13.920 align:start position:0% preposition with in English so whenever 01:42:13.920 --> 01:42:15.350 align:start position:0% preposition with in English so whenever you<01:42:14.040> refer<01:42:14.280> to<01:42:14.440> people<01:42:14.599> in<01:42:14.800> general<01:42:15.199> you 01:42:15.350 --> 01:42:15.360 align:start position:0% you refer to people in general you 01:42:15.360 --> 01:42:17.070 align:start position:0% you refer to people in general you always<01:42:15.599> have<01:42:15.719> to<01:42:15.840> include<01:42:16.119> the<01:42:16.239> personal<01:42:16.719> a 01:42:17.070 --> 01:42:17.080 align:start position:0% always have to include the personal a 01:42:17.080 --> 01:42:19.390 align:start position:0% always have to include the personal a and<01:42:17.239> with<01:42:17.400> the<01:42:17.560> sentence<01:42:18.159> koses<01:42:18.679> Aon<01:42:19.119> you<01:42:19.239> can 01:42:19.390 --> 01:42:19.400 align:start position:0% and with the sentence koses Aon you can 01:42:19.400 --> 01:42:22.470 align:start position:0% and with the sentence koses Aon you can reply<01:42:19.800> with<01:42:20.080> c<01:42:20.520> y<01:42:20.920> Kos<01:42:21.520> a<01:42:22.040> or<01:42:22.119> if<01:42:22.199> you<01:42:22.280> want<01:42:22.400> to 01:42:22.470 --> 01:42:22.480 align:start position:0% reply with c y Kos a or if you want to 01:42:22.480 --> 01:42:24.589 align:start position:0% reply with c y Kos a or if you want to use<01:42:22.599> a<01:42:22.679> direct<01:42:22.960> object<01:42:23.239> pronoun<01:42:23.800> you<01:42:23.920> can<01:42:24.119> say 01:42:24.589 --> 01:42:24.599 align:start position:0% use a direct object pronoun you can say 01:42:24.599 --> 01:42:27.350 align:start position:0% use a direct object pronoun you can say C<01:42:25.119> Yos<01:42:26.119> there<01:42:26.239> are<01:42:26.440> of<01:42:26.560> course<01:42:26.800> more<01:42:27.000> examples 01:42:27.350 --> 01:42:27.360 align:start position:0% C Yos there are of course more examples 01:42:27.360 --> 01:42:29.990 align:start position:0% C Yos there are of course more examples that<01:42:27.480> you<01:42:27.560> can<01:42:27.679> make<01:42:27.840> with<01:42:28.040> Kos 01:42:29.990 --> 01:42:30.000 align:start position:0% that you can make with Kos 01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:34.149 align:start position:0% that you can make with Kos like<01:42:31.000> he<01:42:31.119> is<01:42:31.320> familiar<01:42:31.719> with<01:42:31.880> my<01:42:32.040> granddad<01:42:32.639> or 01:42:34.149 --> 01:42:34.159 align:start position:0% like he is familiar with my granddad or 01:42:34.159 --> 01:42:36.629 align:start position:0% like he is familiar with my granddad or maybe<01:42:35.159> I'm<01:42:35.360> familiar<01:42:35.800> with<01:42:35.960> the<01:42:36.159> books<01:42:36.520> or 01:42:36.629 --> 01:42:36.639 align:start position:0% maybe I'm familiar with the books or 01:42:36.639 --> 01:42:37.589 align:start position:0% maybe I'm familiar with the books or maybe<01:42:36.880> if<01:42:36.920> you<01:42:37.000> want<01:42:37.119> to<01:42:37.199> include<01:42:37.440> an 01:42:37.589 --> 01:42:37.599 align:start position:0% maybe if you want to include an 01:42:37.599 --> 01:42:40.550 align:start position:0% maybe if you want to include an infinitive<01:42:38.080> inside<01:42:38.639> you<01:42:38.719> can 01:42:40.550 --> 01:42:40.560 align:start position:0% infinitive inside you can 01:42:40.560 --> 01:42:42.709 align:start position:0% infinitive inside you can say<01:42:41.560> which<01:42:41.679> would<01:42:41.800> mean<01:42:42.119> you<01:42:42.239> want<01:42:42.400> to<01:42:42.560> be 01:42:42.709 --> 01:42:42.719 align:start position:0% say which would mean you want to be 01:42:42.719 --> 01:42:44.430 align:start position:0% say which would mean you want to be familiar<01:42:43.199> with<01:42:43.400> the<01:42:43.560> country<01:42:43.960> as<01:42:44.119> country 01:42:44.430 --> 01:42:44.440 align:start position:0% familiar with the country as country 01:42:44.440 --> 01:42:46.750 align:start position:0% familiar with the country as country refers<01:42:44.719> to<01:42:44.840> a<01:42:44.920> physical<01:42:45.280> Place<01:42:45.679> overall<01:42:46.239> konos 01:42:46.750 --> 01:42:46.760 align:start position:0% refers to a physical Place overall konos 01:42:46.760 --> 01:42:48.430 align:start position:0% refers to a physical Place overall konos is<01:42:46.880> an<01:42:47.000> eminent<01:42:47.360> verb<01:42:47.560> in<01:42:47.719> Spanish<01:42:48.199> because<01:42:48.360> it 01:42:48.430 --> 01:42:48.440 align:start position:0% is an eminent verb in Spanish because it 01:42:48.440 --> 01:42:49.709 align:start position:0% is an eminent verb in Spanish because it helps<01:42:48.639> you<01:42:49.000> understand<01:42:49.119> how<01:42:49.239> to<01:42:49.400> think<01:42:49.520> of 01:42:49.709 --> 01:42:49.719 align:start position:0% helps you understand how to think of 01:42:49.719 --> 01:42:51.470 align:start position:0% helps you understand how to think of people<01:42:50.119> places<01:42:50.360> and<01:42:50.480> things<01:42:50.800> in<01:42:50.920> general<01:42:51.320> by 01:42:51.470 --> 01:42:51.480 align:start position:0% people places and things in general by 01:42:51.480 --> 01:42:53.149 align:start position:0% people places and things in general by being<01:42:51.719> familiar<01:42:52.119> with<01:42:52.280> these<01:42:52.480> ideas<01:42:52.960> rather 01:42:53.149 --> 01:42:53.159 align:start position:0% being familiar with these ideas rather 01:42:53.159 --> 01:42:54.430 align:start position:0% being familiar with these ideas rather than<01:42:53.320> fully<01:42:53.560> and<01:42:53.760> factually<01:42:54.119> knowing 01:42:54.430 --> 01:42:54.440 align:start position:0% than fully and factually knowing 01:42:54.440 --> 01:42:55.830 align:start position:0% than fully and factually knowing everything<01:42:54.719> about<01:42:55.000> people<01:42:55.360> places<01:42:55.679> and 01:42:55.830 --> 01:42:55.840 align:start position:0% everything about people places and 01:42:55.840 --> 01:42:57.390 align:start position:0% everything about people places and things<01:42:56.239> I<01:42:56.440> actually<01:42:56.679> don't<01:42:57.119> understand<01:42:57.280> why 01:42:57.390 --> 01:42:57.400 align:start position:0% things I actually don't understand why 01:42:57.400 --> 01:42:58.709 align:start position:0% things I actually don't understand why teachers<01:42:57.679> teach<01:42:57.920> both<01:42:58.080> of<01:42:58.199> these<01:42:58.320> verbs<01:42:58.560> at 01:42:58.709 --> 01:42:58.719 align:start position:0% teachers teach both of these verbs at 01:42:58.719 --> 01:43:00.470 align:start position:0% teachers teach both of these verbs at once<01:42:59.119> as<01:42:59.239> I<01:42:59.400> see<01:42:59.599> the<01:42:59.719> two<01:42:59.880> verbs<01:43:00.199> having 01:43:00.470 --> 01:43:00.480 align:start position:0% once as I see the two verbs having 01:43:00.480 --> 01:43:02.070 align:start position:0% once as I see the two verbs having completely<01:43:00.840> different<01:43:01.119> definitions<01:43:01.760> and<01:43:01.880> so 01:43:02.070 --> 01:43:02.080 align:start position:0% completely different definitions and so 01:43:02.080 --> 01:43:03.550 align:start position:0% completely different definitions and so mainly<01:43:02.599> each<01:43:02.800> verb<01:43:03.000> needs<01:43:03.239> its<01:43:03.360> own 01:43:03.550 --> 01:43:03.560 align:start position:0% mainly each verb needs its own 01:43:03.560 --> 01:43:05.229 align:start position:0% mainly each verb needs its own explanation<01:43:04.159> of<01:43:04.280> how<01:43:04.400> to<01:43:04.560> work<01:43:04.760> with<01:43:04.880> it<01:43:05.080> the 01:43:05.229 --> 01:43:05.239 align:start position:0% explanation of how to work with it the 01:43:05.239 --> 01:43:06.990 align:start position:0% explanation of how to work with it the past<01:43:05.440> tense<01:43:05.639> for<01:43:05.840> regular<01:43:06.119> verbs<01:43:06.360> in<01:43:06.520> Spanish 01:43:06.990 --> 01:43:07.000 align:start position:0% past tense for regular verbs in Spanish 01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:08.709 align:start position:0% past tense for regular verbs in Spanish follows<01:43:07.400> the<01:43:07.520> same<01:43:07.719> idea<01:43:08.080> for<01:43:08.280> the<01:43:08.400> present 01:43:08.709 --> 01:43:08.719 align:start position:0% follows the same idea for the present 01:43:08.719 --> 01:43:10.070 align:start position:0% follows the same idea for the present tense<01:43:09.119> which<01:43:09.239> I<01:43:09.320> covered<01:43:09.599> in<01:43:09.719> one<01:43:09.800> of<01:43:09.920> my 01:43:10.070 --> 01:43:10.080 align:start position:0% tense which I covered in one of my 01:43:10.080 --> 01:43:11.910 align:start position:0% tense which I covered in one of my previous<01:43:10.400> videos<01:43:10.880> but<01:43:11.000> in<01:43:11.159> this<01:43:11.320> video<01:43:11.679> I<01:43:11.760> will 01:43:11.910 --> 01:43:11.920 align:start position:0% previous videos but in this video I will 01:43:11.920 --> 01:43:13.629 align:start position:0% previous videos but in this video I will only<01:43:12.159> explain<01:43:12.480> the<01:43:12.639> past<01:43:12.840> tense<01:43:13.040> for<01:43:13.239> regular 01:43:13.629 --> 01:43:13.639 align:start position:0% only explain the past tense for regular 01:43:13.639 --> 01:43:16.350 align:start position:0% only explain the past tense for regular a<01:43:13.880> r<01:43:14.119> e<01:43:14.360> r<01:43:14.639> and<01:43:14.840> I<01:43:15.000> are<01:43:15.199> verbs<01:43:15.480> in<01:43:15.639> Spanish<01:43:16.199> also 01:43:16.350 --> 01:43:16.360 align:start position:0% a r e r and I are verbs in Spanish also 01:43:16.360 --> 01:43:18.189 align:start position:0% a r e r and I are verbs in Spanish also known<01:43:16.599> as<01:43:16.719> the<01:43:16.840> predate<01:43:17.360> or<01:43:17.639> past<01:43:17.880> simple 01:43:18.189 --> 01:43:18.199 align:start position:0% known as the predate or past simple 01:43:18.199 --> 01:43:19.709 align:start position:0% known as the predate or past simple tense<01:43:18.679> just<01:43:18.840> like<01:43:19.000> with<01:43:19.119> the<01:43:19.239> present<01:43:19.480> tense 01:43:19.709 --> 01:43:19.719 align:start position:0% tense just like with the present tense 01:43:19.719 --> 01:43:21.390 align:start position:0% tense just like with the present tense in<01:43:19.880> Spanish<01:43:20.320> the<01:43:20.440> past<01:43:20.840> tense<01:43:21.000> follows<01:43:21.280> the 01:43:21.390 --> 01:43:21.400 align:start position:0% in Spanish the past tense follows the 01:43:21.400 --> 01:43:23.390 align:start position:0% in Spanish the past tense follows the same<01:43:21.639> idea<01:43:22.080> of<01:43:22.239> dropping<01:43:22.560> off<01:43:22.760> the<01:43:22.880> ending<01:43:23.280> of 01:43:23.390 --> 01:43:23.400 align:start position:0% same idea of dropping off the ending of 01:43:23.400 --> 01:43:26.229 align:start position:0% same idea of dropping off the ending of the<01:43:23.560> a<01:43:23.719> r<01:43:23.960> e<01:43:24.159> r<01:43:24.440> or<01:43:24.800> I<01:43:25.239> verb<01:43:25.639> and<01:43:25.760> then<01:43:25.920> adding 01:43:26.229 --> 01:43:26.239 align:start position:0% the a r e r or I verb and then adding 01:43:26.239 --> 01:43:27.589 align:start position:0% the a r e r or I verb and then adding the<01:43:26.360> ending<01:43:26.719> that<01:43:26.880> corresponds<01:43:27.360> with<01:43:27.480> the 01:43:27.589 --> 01:43:27.599 align:start position:0% the ending that corresponds with the 01:43:27.599 --> 01:43:29.430 align:start position:0% the ending that corresponds with the pronoun<01:43:28.080> let's<01:43:28.239> start<01:43:28.440> with<01:43:28.599> regular<01:43:29.000> ar 01:43:29.430 --> 01:43:29.440 align:start position:0% pronoun let's start with regular ar 01:43:29.440 --> 01:43:31.390 align:start position:0% pronoun let's start with regular ar verbs<01:43:29.880> for<01:43:30.040> the<01:43:30.159> yo<01:43:30.440> pronoun<01:43:30.920> you<01:43:31.080> drop<01:43:31.320> the 01:43:31.390 --> 01:43:31.400 align:start position:0% verbs for the yo pronoun you drop the 01:43:31.400 --> 01:43:32.830 align:start position:0% verbs for the yo pronoun you drop the ending<01:43:31.679> of<01:43:31.800> the<01:43:31.920> verb<01:43:32.239> and<01:43:32.360> then<01:43:32.520> add<01:43:32.719> the 01:43:32.830 --> 01:43:32.840 align:start position:0% ending of the verb and then add the 01:43:32.840 --> 01:43:35.030 align:start position:0% ending of the verb and then add the ending<01:43:33.440> a<01:43:33.840> with<01:43:33.960> an<01:43:34.199> accent<01:43:34.639> meaning<01:43:34.920> that 01:43:35.030 --> 01:43:35.040 align:start position:0% ending a with an accent meaning that 01:43:35.040 --> 01:43:36.790 align:start position:0% ending a with an accent meaning that You'<01:43:35.239> always<01:43:35.480> have<01:43:35.599> an<01:43:35.800> emphasis<01:43:36.320> on<01:43:36.480> that 01:43:36.790 --> 01:43:36.800 align:start position:0% You' always have an emphasis on that 01:43:36.800 --> 01:43:38.510 align:start position:0% You' always have an emphasis on that vowel<01:43:37.159> when<01:43:37.239> you<01:43:37.320> say<01:43:37.560> the<01:43:37.679> conjugative<01:43:38.199> verb 01:43:38.510 --> 01:43:38.520 align:start position:0% vowel when you say the conjugative verb 01:43:38.520 --> 01:43:40.669 align:start position:0% vowel when you say the conjugative verb for<01:43:38.760> two<01:43:39.199> you<01:43:39.360> drop<01:43:39.639> the<01:43:39.760> ending<01:43:40.199> and<01:43:40.280> then<01:43:40.480> add 01:43:40.669 --> 01:43:40.679 align:start position:0% for two you drop the ending and then add 01:43:40.679 --> 01:43:44.109 align:start position:0% for two you drop the ending and then add the<01:43:40.800> ending<01:43:41.440> AE<01:43:41.920> for<01:43:42.239> l<01:43:42.639> or<01:43:42.960> AO<01:43:43.320> said<01:43:43.679> you<01:43:43.840> drop 01:43:44.109 --> 01:43:44.119 align:start position:0% the ending AE for l or AO said you drop 01:43:44.119 --> 01:43:46.510 align:start position:0% the ending AE for l or AO said you drop the<01:43:44.239> ending<01:43:44.800> and<01:43:44.960> at<01:43:45.159> the<01:43:45.239> ending<01:43:45.760> o<01:43:46.159> with<01:43:46.280> an 01:43:46.510 --> 01:43:46.520 align:start position:0% the ending and at the ending o with an 01:43:46.520 --> 01:43:48.229 align:start position:0% the ending and at the ending o with an accent<01:43:46.960> meaning<01:43:47.239> that<01:43:47.360> you<01:43:47.520> likewise<01:43:47.920> put<01:43:48.080> an 01:43:48.229 --> 01:43:48.239 align:start position:0% accent meaning that you likewise put an 01:43:48.239 --> 01:43:50.750 align:start position:0% accent meaning that you likewise put an emphasis<01:43:48.639> on<01:43:48.880> that<01:43:49.080> vow<01:43:49.400> for<01:43:49.599> noos<01:43:50.440> you<01:43:50.679> you 01:43:50.750 --> 01:43:50.760 align:start position:0% emphasis on that vow for noos you you 01:43:50.760 --> 01:43:52.430 align:start position:0% emphasis on that vow for noos you you put<01:43:51.080> Amos<01:43:51.560> and<01:43:51.679> it's<01:43:51.880> actually<01:43:52.119> the<01:43:52.239> same 01:43:52.430 --> 01:43:52.440 align:start position:0% put Amos and it's actually the same 01:43:52.440 --> 01:43:54.189 align:start position:0% put Amos and it's actually the same ending<01:43:52.840> for<01:43:53.000> the<01:43:53.159> pronoun<01:43:53.719> that<01:43:53.800> you<01:43:53.960> have<01:43:54.080> in 01:43:54.189 --> 01:43:54.199 align:start position:0% ending for the pronoun that you have in 01:43:54.199 --> 01:43:55.589 align:start position:0% ending for the pronoun that you have in the<01:43:54.320> present<01:43:54.599> tense<01:43:55.000> and<01:43:55.080> so<01:43:55.239> you<01:43:55.320> can<01:43:55.440> only 01:43:55.589 --> 01:43:55.599 align:start position:0% the present tense and so you can only 01:43:55.599 --> 01:43:56.950 align:start position:0% the present tense and so you can only tell<01:43:55.760> the<01:43:55.880> difference<01:43:56.199> between<01:43:56.520> them<01:43:56.719> in 01:43:56.950 --> 01:43:56.960 align:start position:0% tell the difference between them in 01:43:56.960 --> 01:44:00.830 align:start position:0% tell the difference between them in context<01:43:57.520> foros<01:43:58.520> you<01:43:58.760> put<01:43:59.080> a<01:43:59.760> and<01:43:59.880> for<01:44:00.119> AOS<01:44:00.679> you 01:44:00.830 --> 01:44:00.840 align:start position:0% context foros you put a and for AOS you 01:44:00.840 --> 01:44:03.109 align:start position:0% context foros you put a and for AOS you put<01:44:01.119> Aron<01:44:01.560> let's<01:44:01.719> use<01:44:01.920> the<01:44:02.000> verb<01:44:02.280> a<01:44:02.840> as<01:44:02.960> an 01:44:03.109 --> 01:44:03.119 align:start position:0% put Aron let's use the verb a as an 01:44:03.119 --> 01:44:05.030 align:start position:0% put Aron let's use the verb a as an example<01:44:03.560> how<01:44:03.679> would<01:44:03.800> you<01:44:03.920> conjugate<01:44:04.440> a<01:44:04.880> for 01:44:05.030 --> 01:44:05.040 align:start position:0% example how would you conjugate a for 01:44:05.040 --> 01:44:06.990 align:start position:0% example how would you conjugate a for the<01:44:05.199> yo<01:44:05.400> pronoun<01:44:05.800> you<01:44:05.920> take<01:44:06.119> a<01:44:06.639> drop<01:44:06.920> the 01:44:06.990 --> 01:44:07.000 align:start position:0% the yo pronoun you take a drop the 01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:09.510 align:start position:0% the yo pronoun you take a drop the ending<01:44:07.520> and<01:44:07.679> add<01:44:07.920> the<01:44:08.040> ending<01:44:08.760> e<01:44:09.119> with<01:44:09.239> an 01:44:09.510 --> 01:44:09.520 align:start position:0% ending and add the ending e with an 01:44:09.520 --> 01:44:13.030 align:start position:0% ending and add the ending e with an accent<01:44:10.080> and<01:44:10.159> so<01:44:10.320> it's<01:44:10.480> pronounced<01:44:11.239> y<01:44:12.239> I<01:44:12.440> spoke 01:44:13.030 --> 01:44:13.040 align:start position:0% accent and so it's pronounced y I spoke 01:44:13.040 --> 01:44:17.229 align:start position:0% accent and so it's pronounced y I spoke it's<01:44:13.239> not<01:44:13.800> y<01:44:14.800> it's<01:44:15.239> y<01:44:15.920> for<01:44:16.199> two<01:44:16.679> you<01:44:16.840> drop<01:44:17.119> the 01:44:17.229 --> 01:44:17.239 align:start position:0% it's not y it's y for two you drop the 01:44:17.239 --> 01:44:20.030 align:start position:0% it's not y it's y for two you drop the ending<01:44:17.760> and<01:44:17.960> add<01:44:18.159> the<01:44:18.239> ending<01:44:18.760> AE<01:44:19.360> so<01:44:19.520> you<01:44:19.679> get 01:44:20.030 --> 01:44:20.040 align:start position:0% ending and add the ending AE so you get 01:44:20.040 --> 01:44:23.830 align:start position:0% ending and add the ending AE so you get aast<01:44:20.719> meaning<01:44:21.199> you<01:44:21.440> spoke<01:44:22.000> for<01:44:22.360> l<01:44:22.760> or<01:44:23.040> a<01:44:23.400> said 01:44:23.830 --> 01:44:23.840 align:start position:0% aast meaning you spoke for l or a said 01:44:23.840 --> 01:44:26.030 align:start position:0% aast meaning you spoke for l or a said you<01:44:24.000> get<01:44:24.440> ablo<01:44:25.080> with<01:44:25.199> an<01:44:25.320> emphasis<01:44:25.719> on<01:44:25.880> the 01:44:26.030 --> 01:44:26.040 align:start position:0% you get ablo with an emphasis on the 01:44:26.040 --> 01:44:29.709 align:start position:0% you get ablo with an emphasis on the Last<01:44:26.239> Vow<01:44:26.639> it's<01:44:26.800> not<01:44:27.199> ablo<01:44:28.000> it's<01:44:28.520> ablo<01:44:29.280> he<01:44:29.520> or 01:44:29.709 --> 01:44:29.719 align:start position:0% Last Vow it's not ablo it's ablo he or 01:44:29.719 --> 01:44:32.950 align:start position:0% Last Vow it's not ablo it's ablo he or she<01:44:30.000> spoke<01:44:30.440> for<01:44:30.679> noos<01:44:31.599> you<01:44:31.760> get<01:44:32.000> abl<01:44:32.719> and<01:44:32.800> it's 01:44:32.950 --> 01:44:32.960 align:start position:0% she spoke for noos you get abl and it's 01:44:32.960 --> 01:44:34.229 align:start position:0% she spoke for noos you get abl and it's pronounced<01:44:33.360> the<01:44:33.440> same<01:44:33.639> way<01:44:33.880> as<01:44:33.960> in<01:44:34.080> the 01:44:34.229 --> 01:44:34.239 align:start position:0% pronounced the same way as in the 01:44:34.239 --> 01:44:35.669 align:start position:0% pronounced the same way as in the present<01:44:34.520> form<01:44:34.920> and<01:44:35.000> so<01:44:35.119> you<01:44:35.239> can<01:44:35.360> only<01:44:35.520> tell 01:44:35.669 --> 01:44:35.679 align:start position:0% present form and so you can only tell 01:44:35.679 --> 01:44:37.589 align:start position:0% present form and so you can only tell the<01:44:35.800> difference<01:44:36.119> between<01:44:36.400> them<01:44:36.719> in<01:44:36.960> context 01:44:37.589 --> 01:44:37.599 align:start position:0% the difference between them in context 01:44:37.599 --> 01:44:40.390 align:start position:0% the difference between them in context for<01:44:37.840> votos<01:44:38.639> you<01:44:38.800> get<01:44:39.080> ablast<01:44:39.960> which<01:44:40.080> is<01:44:40.199> you 01:44:40.390 --> 01:44:40.400 align:start position:0% for votos you get ablast which is you 01:44:40.400 --> 01:44:43.189 align:start position:0% for votos you get ablast which is you all<01:44:40.639> spoke<01:44:41.080> and<01:44:41.199> for<01:44:41.440> AOS<01:44:41.920> you<01:44:42.080> get<01:44:42.320> ablon<01:44:43.040> they 01:44:43.189 --> 01:44:43.199 align:start position:0% all spoke and for AOS you get ablon they 01:44:43.199 --> 01:44:45.589 align:start position:0% all spoke and for AOS you get ablon they spoke<01:44:43.639> as<01:44:43.760> far<01:44:43.920> as<01:44:44.119> ar<01:44:44.520> verbs<01:44:44.840> go<01:44:45.159> I<01:44:45.280> recommend 01:44:45.589 --> 01:44:45.599 align:start position:0% spoke as far as ar verbs go I recommend 01:44:45.599 --> 01:44:47.270 align:start position:0% spoke as far as ar verbs go I recommend that<01:44:45.679> you<01:44:45.800> memorize<01:44:46.239> all<01:44:46.360> of<01:44:46.480> these<01:44:46.679> endings 01:44:47.270 --> 01:44:47.280 align:start position:0% that you memorize all of these endings 01:44:47.280 --> 01:44:49.229 align:start position:0% that you memorize all of these endings except<01:44:47.599> votos<01:44:48.360> because<01:44:48.560> there<01:44:48.679> is<01:44:48.800> no<01:44:48.960> pattern 01:44:49.229 --> 01:44:49.239 align:start position:0% except votos because there is no pattern 01:44:49.239 --> 01:44:50.709 align:start position:0% except votos because there is no pattern to<01:44:49.320> follow<01:44:49.599> with<01:44:49.760> any<01:44:49.960> of<01:44:50.119> them<01:44:50.440> but<01:44:50.560> but<01:44:50.639> the 01:44:50.709 --> 01:44:50.719 align:start position:0% to follow with any of them but but the 01:44:50.719 --> 01:44:53.109 align:start position:0% to follow with any of them but but the trickiest<01:44:51.080> pronoun<01:44:51.440> to<01:44:51.599> use<01:44:51.920> is<01:44:52.080> noos<01:44:52.880> because 01:44:53.109 --> 01:44:53.119 align:start position:0% trickiest pronoun to use is noos because 01:44:53.119 --> 01:44:55.870 align:start position:0% trickiest pronoun to use is noos because the<01:44:53.199> word<01:44:53.480> abl<01:44:54.199> can<01:44:54.320> mean<01:44:54.639> both<01:44:55.000> we<01:44:55.239> speak<01:44:55.679> and 01:44:55.870 --> 01:44:55.880 align:start position:0% the word abl can mean both we speak and 01:44:55.880 --> 01:44:57.830 align:start position:0% the word abl can mean both we speak and we<01:44:56.080> spoke<01:44:56.760> however<01:44:57.080> there<01:44:57.199> is<01:44:57.320> a<01:44:57.440> way<01:44:57.560> to<01:44:57.679> tell 01:44:57.830 --> 01:44:57.840 align:start position:0% we spoke however there is a way to tell 01:44:57.840 --> 01:44:59.510 align:start position:0% we spoke however there is a way to tell the<01:44:57.960> difference<01:44:58.239> between<01:44:58.599> them<01:44:58.719> in<01:44:58.920> context 01:44:59.510 --> 01:44:59.520 align:start position:0% the difference between them in context 01:44:59.520 --> 01:45:01.229 align:start position:0% the difference between them in context and<01:44:59.599> that<01:44:59.719> is<01:44:59.840> by<01:45:00.000> looking<01:45:00.199> for<01:45:00.480> keywords<01:45:01.040> that 01:45:01.229 --> 01:45:01.239 align:start position:0% and that is by looking for keywords that 01:45:01.239 --> 01:45:05.030 align:start position:0% and that is by looking for keywords that Express<01:45:01.679> time<01:45:02.040> for<01:45:02.239> instance<01:45:02.840> if<01:45:02.960> I<01:45:03.159> say<01:45:03.560> AO<01:45:04.560> a 01:45:05.030 --> 01:45:05.040 align:start position:0% Express time for instance if I say AO a 01:45:05.040 --> 01:45:06.709 align:start position:0% Express time for instance if I say AO a I'm<01:45:05.159> saying<01:45:05.360> that<01:45:05.520> we<01:45:05.679> speak<01:45:05.920> with<01:45:06.080> you<01:45:06.280> now 01:45:06.709 --> 01:45:06.719 align:start position:0% I'm saying that we speak with you now 01:45:06.719 --> 01:45:08.790 align:start position:0% I'm saying that we speak with you now because<01:45:06.920> the<01:45:07.000> word<01:45:07.320> a<01:45:07.840> indicates<01:45:08.360> that 01:45:08.790 --> 01:45:08.800 align:start position:0% because the word a indicates that 01:45:08.800 --> 01:45:10.830 align:start position:0% because the word a indicates that however<01:45:09.159> if<01:45:09.239> I<01:45:09.400> have<01:45:09.520> a<01:45:09.639> sentence 01:45:10.830 --> 01:45:10.840 align:start position:0% however if I have a sentence 01:45:10.840 --> 01:45:13.430 align:start position:0% however if I have a sentence like<01:45:11.840> the<01:45:11.920> sentence<01:45:12.239> would<01:45:12.400> logically<01:45:12.840> be<01:45:13.280> we 01:45:13.430 --> 01:45:13.440 align:start position:0% like the sentence would logically be we 01:45:13.440 --> 01:45:15.669 align:start position:0% like the sentence would logically be we spoke<01:45:13.760> with<01:45:13.960> them<01:45:14.199> yesterday<01:45:14.880> because<01:45:15.239> AER 01:45:15.669 --> 01:45:15.679 align:start position:0% spoke with them yesterday because AER 01:45:15.679 --> 01:45:17.270 align:start position:0% spoke with them yesterday because AER indicates<01:45:16.199> yesterday<01:45:16.679> which<01:45:16.800> is<01:45:16.880> an<01:45:17.040> action 01:45:17.270 --> 01:45:17.280 align:start position:0% indicates yesterday which is an action 01:45:17.280 --> 01:45:19.070 align:start position:0% indicates yesterday which is an action done<01:45:17.440> in<01:45:17.560> the<01:45:17.760> past<01:45:18.119> and<01:45:18.239> that's<01:45:18.440> really<01:45:18.719> as 01:45:19.070 --> 01:45:19.080 align:start position:0% done in the past and that's really as 01:45:19.080 --> 01:45:20.950 align:start position:0% done in the past and that's really as difficult<01:45:19.320> as<01:45:19.440> it<01:45:19.599> gets<01:45:20.040> now<01:45:20.239> there<01:45:20.560> are<01:45:20.719> verbs 01:45:20.950 --> 01:45:20.960 align:start position:0% difficult as it gets now there are verbs 01:45:20.960 --> 01:45:23.510 align:start position:0% difficult as it gets now there are verbs ending<01:45:21.199> in<01:45:21.360> e<01:45:21.560> r<01:45:21.800> and<01:45:22.080> I<01:45:22.639> and<01:45:22.880> conveniently 01:45:23.510 --> 01:45:23.520 align:start position:0% ending in e r and I and conveniently 01:45:23.520 --> 01:45:25.030 align:start position:0% ending in e r and I and conveniently unlike<01:45:23.840> the<01:45:24.000> present<01:45:24.280> tense<01:45:24.639> which<01:45:24.800> has<01:45:24.920> a 01:45:25.030 --> 01:45:25.040 align:start position:0% unlike the present tense which has a 01:45:25.040 --> 01:45:26.470 align:start position:0% unlike the present tense which has a different<01:45:25.280> conjugation<01:45:25.800> pattern<01:45:26.080> for<01:45:26.280> each 01:45:26.470 --> 01:45:26.480 align:start position:0% different conjugation pattern for each 01:45:26.480 --> 01:45:28.189 align:start position:0% different conjugation pattern for each type<01:45:26.639> of<01:45:26.800> verb<01:45:27.159> Spanish<01:45:27.520> decides<01:45:27.840> to<01:45:27.920> use<01:45:28.119> the 01:45:28.189 --> 01:45:28.199 align:start position:0% type of verb Spanish decides to use the 01:45:28.199 --> 01:45:30.310 align:start position:0% type of verb Spanish decides to use the same<01:45:28.520> Syntax<01:45:29.040> for<01:45:29.239> the<01:45:29.400> past<01:45:29.599> tense<01:45:29.920> of<01:45:30.080> verbs 01:45:30.310 --> 01:45:30.320 align:start position:0% same Syntax for the past tense of verbs 01:45:30.320 --> 01:45:32.910 align:start position:0% same Syntax for the past tense of verbs ending<01:45:30.599> in<01:45:30.760> e<01:45:31.239> and<01:45:31.480> IR<01:45:32.000> both<01:45:32.239> verbs<01:45:32.560> that<01:45:32.719> end 01:45:32.910 --> 01:45:32.920 align:start position:0% ending in e and IR both verbs that end 01:45:32.920 --> 01:45:35.589 align:start position:0% ending in e and IR both verbs that end in<01:45:33.080> e<01:45:33.520> and<01:45:33.800> IR<01:45:34.280> share<01:45:34.599> the<01:45:34.719> same<01:45:34.960> ending<01:45:35.480> which 01:45:35.589 --> 01:45:35.599 align:start position:0% in e and IR share the same ending which 01:45:35.599 --> 01:45:37.030 align:start position:0% in e and IR share the same ending which might<01:45:35.800> develop<01:45:36.080> an<01:45:36.199> easier<01:45:36.560> conjugation 01:45:37.030 --> 01:45:37.040 align:start position:0% might develop an easier conjugation 01:45:37.040 --> 01:45:39.109 align:start position:0% might develop an easier conjugation pattern<01:45:37.360> to<01:45:37.520> memorize<01:45:38.119> for<01:45:38.239> the<01:45:38.400> yo<01:45:38.639> pronoun 01:45:39.109 --> 01:45:39.119 align:start position:0% pattern to memorize for the yo pronoun 01:45:39.119 --> 01:45:40.510 align:start position:0% pattern to memorize for the yo pronoun you<01:45:39.239> drop<01:45:39.520> the<01:45:39.599> ending<01:45:39.840> of<01:45:39.960> the<01:45:40.040> verb<01:45:40.280> ending 01:45:40.510 --> 01:45:40.520 align:start position:0% you drop the ending of the verb ending 01:45:40.520 --> 01:45:43.470 align:start position:0% you drop the ending of the verb ending in<01:45:40.719> e<01:45:40.880> r<01:45:41.159> or<01:45:41.440> I<01:45:42.000> and<01:45:42.119> you<01:45:42.239> add<01:45:42.400> the<01:45:42.520> ending<01:45:43.040> e 01:45:43.470 --> 01:45:43.480 align:start position:0% in e r or I and you add the ending e 01:45:43.480 --> 01:45:46.030 align:start position:0% in e r or I and you add the ending e with<01:45:43.599> an<01:45:43.760> emphasis<01:45:44.159> on<01:45:44.360> that<01:45:44.639> vow<01:45:45.119> for<01:45:45.360> two<01:45:45.880> you 01:45:46.030 --> 01:45:46.040 align:start position:0% with an emphasis on that vow for two you 01:45:46.040 --> 01:45:48.750 align:start position:0% with an emphasis on that vow for two you drop<01:45:46.320> the<01:45:46.440> ending<01:45:46.880> and<01:45:47.040> add<01:45:47.280> the<01:45:47.360> ending<01:45:48.000> e<01:45:48.480> for 01:45:48.750 --> 01:45:48.760 align:start position:0% drop the ending and add the ending e for 01:45:48.760 --> 01:45:51.589 align:start position:0% drop the ending and add the ending e for l<01:45:49.199> or<01:45:49.480> a<01:45:50.080> you<01:45:50.239> drop<01:45:50.480> drop<01:45:50.639> the<01:45:50.719> ending<01:45:51.239> and<01:45:51.400> add 01:45:51.589 --> 01:45:51.599 align:start position:0% l or a you drop drop the ending and add 01:45:51.599 --> 01:45:54.430 align:start position:0% l or a you drop drop the ending and add the<01:45:51.719> ending<01:45:52.320> EO<01:45:52.880> with<01:45:53.000> an<01:45:53.159> emphasis<01:45:53.679> on<01:45:53.920> the<01:45:54.080> o 01:45:54.430 --> 01:45:54.440 align:start position:0% the ending EO with an emphasis on the o 01:45:54.440 --> 01:45:57.070 align:start position:0% the ending EO with an emphasis on the o for<01:45:54.679> noos<01:45:55.480> you<01:45:55.639> drop<01:45:55.920> the<01:45:56.040> ending<01:45:56.599> and<01:45:56.800> add<01:45:57.000> the 01:45:57.070 --> 01:45:57.080 align:start position:0% for noos you drop the ending and add the 01:45:57.080 --> 01:45:59.030 align:start position:0% for noos you drop the ending and add the ending<01:45:57.599> OS<01:45:58.119> which<01:45:58.239> is<01:45:58.440> actually<01:45:58.719> the<01:45:58.840> same 01:45:59.030 --> 01:45:59.040 align:start position:0% ending OS which is actually the same 01:45:59.040 --> 01:46:00.870 align:start position:0% ending OS which is actually the same ending<01:45:59.520> as<01:45:59.639> the<01:45:59.760> ending<01:46:00.040> of<01:46:00.159> verbs<01:46:00.440> ending<01:46:00.679> in 01:46:00.870 --> 01:46:00.880 align:start position:0% ending as the ending of verbs ending in 01:46:00.880 --> 01:46:02.950 align:start position:0% ending as the ending of verbs ending in IR<01:46:01.360> in<01:46:01.480> the<01:46:01.639> present<01:46:01.920> tense<01:46:02.320> and<01:46:02.440> once<01:46:02.679> again 01:46:02.950 --> 01:46:02.960 align:start position:0% IR in the present tense and once again 01:46:02.960 --> 01:46:04.270 align:start position:0% IR in the present tense and once again you<01:46:03.040> can<01:46:03.159> only<01:46:03.320> tell<01:46:03.480> the<01:46:03.639> difference<01:46:03.920> between 01:46:04.270 --> 01:46:04.280 align:start position:0% you can only tell the difference between 01:46:04.280 --> 01:46:07.109 align:start position:0% you can only tell the difference between them<01:46:04.520> in<01:46:04.760> context<01:46:05.360> and<01:46:05.560> finally<01:46:05.960> for<01:46:06.239> votos 01:46:07.109 --> 01:46:07.119 align:start position:0% them in context and finally for votos 01:46:07.119 --> 01:46:10.350 align:start position:0% them in context and finally for votos you<01:46:07.320> get<01:46:08.320> and<01:46:08.400> for<01:46:08.639> AOS<01:46:09.119> you<01:46:09.280> get<01:46:10.000> let's<01:46:10.159> use 01:46:10.350 --> 01:46:10.360 align:start position:0% you get and for AOS you get let's use 01:46:10.360 --> 01:46:13.030 align:start position:0% you get and for AOS you get let's use the<01:46:10.480> verbs<01:46:11.360> and<01:46:11.599> VI<01:46:12.080> as<01:46:12.239> useful<01:46:12.560> verbs<01:46:12.960> how 01:46:13.030 --> 01:46:13.040 align:start position:0% the verbs and VI as useful verbs how 01:46:13.040 --> 01:46:14.990 align:start position:0% the verbs and VI as useful verbs how would<01:46:13.159> you<01:46:13.280> conjugate<01:46:13.679> the<01:46:13.800> verb<01:46:14.520> in<01:46:14.639> the<01:46:14.800> past 01:46:14.990 --> 01:46:15.000 align:start position:0% would you conjugate the verb in the past 01:46:15.000 --> 01:46:17.189 align:start position:0% would you conjugate the verb in the past tense<01:46:15.199> for<01:46:15.360> the<01:46:15.480> yo<01:46:15.679> pronoun<01:46:16.040> you<01:46:16.199> take<01:46:16.440> K<01:46:16.920> drop 01:46:17.189 --> 01:46:17.199 align:start position:0% tense for the yo pronoun you take K drop 01:46:17.199 --> 01:46:20.950 align:start position:0% tense for the yo pronoun you take K drop the<01:46:17.320> ending<01:46:17.960> and<01:46:18.159> put<01:46:18.520> e<01:46:19.000> and<01:46:19.119> so<01:46:19.280> you<01:46:19.480> get<01:46:19.840> yo<01:46:20.760> I 01:46:20.950 --> 01:46:20.960 align:start position:0% the ending and put e and so you get yo I 01:46:20.960 --> 01:46:24.229 align:start position:0% the ending and put e and so you get yo I at<01:46:21.320> for<01:46:21.599> two<01:46:22.080> you<01:46:22.280> get<01:46:22.639> kist<01:46:23.440> which<01:46:23.520> is<01:46:23.679> U<01:46:23.920> at 01:46:24.229 --> 01:46:24.239 align:start position:0% at for two you get kist which is U at 01:46:24.239 --> 01:46:28.709 align:start position:0% at for two you get kist which is U at for<01:46:24.480> L<01:46:24.920> you<01:46:25.239> Geto<01:46:26.239> which<01:46:26.360> is<01:46:26.760> he<01:46:27.000> at<01:46:27.320> foros<01:46:28.280> you 01:46:28.709 --> 01:46:28.719 align:start position:0% for L you Geto which is he at foros you 01:46:28.719 --> 01:46:31.550 align:start position:0% for L you Geto which is he at foros you getos<01:46:29.719> which<01:46:29.840> is<01:46:30.040> we 01:46:31.550 --> 01:46:31.560 align:start position:0% getos which is we 01:46:31.560 --> 01:46:35.470 align:start position:0% getos which is we ateos<01:46:32.560> yall<01:46:32.840> ate<01:46:33.199> and<01:46:33.560> AOS<01:46:34.560> they<01:46:34.760> ate<01:46:35.080> and<01:46:35.239> now 01:46:35.470 --> 01:46:35.480 align:start position:0% ateos yall ate and AOS they ate and now 01:46:35.480 --> 01:46:37.390 align:start position:0% ateos yall ate and AOS they ate and now you<01:46:35.639> simply<01:46:35.960> replicate<01:46:36.440> the<01:46:36.560> same<01:46:36.760> idea<01:46:37.199> with 01:46:37.390 --> 01:46:37.400 align:start position:0% you simply replicate the same idea with 01:46:37.400 --> 01:46:39.950 align:start position:0% you simply replicate the same idea with regular<01:46:37.760> verbs<01:46:38.040> ending<01:46:38.280> in<01:46:38.480> IR<01:46:39.119> like<01:46:39.360> VI 01:46:39.950 --> 01:46:39.960 align:start position:0% regular verbs ending in IR like VI 01:46:39.960 --> 01:46:41.669 align:start position:0% regular verbs ending in IR like VI however<01:46:40.280> don't<01:46:40.480> forget<01:46:40.800> about<01:46:40.960> the<01:46:41.119> noos 01:46:41.669 --> 01:46:41.679 align:start position:0% however don't forget about the noos 01:46:41.679 --> 01:46:44.149 align:start position:0% however don't forget about the noos pronoun<01:46:42.199> of<01:46:42.360> ir<01:46:42.719> verbs<01:46:43.000> ending<01:46:43.239> in<01:46:43.440> OS<01:46:43.960> because 01:46:44.149 --> 01:46:44.159 align:start position:0% pronoun of ir verbs ending in OS because 01:46:44.159 --> 01:46:46.189 align:start position:0% pronoun of ir verbs ending in OS because they<01:46:44.280> do<01:46:44.440> share<01:46:44.679> the<01:46:44.760> same<01:46:44.960> ending<01:46:45.440> if<01:46:45.599> I<01:46:45.760> say 01:46:46.189 --> 01:46:46.199 align:start position:0% they do share the same ending if I say 01:46:46.199 --> 01:46:48.390 align:start position:0% they do share the same ending if I say Vios<01:46:46.679> in<01:46:46.880> Las<01:46:47.040> Vegas<01:46:47.320> a<01:46:47.800> I'm<01:46:47.920> saying<01:46:48.119> that<01:46:48.239> we 01:46:48.390 --> 01:46:48.400 align:start position:0% Vios in Las Vegas a I'm saying that we 01:46:48.400 --> 01:46:50.669 align:start position:0% Vios in Las Vegas a I'm saying that we live<01:46:48.520> in<01:46:48.639> Las<01:46:48.880> Vegas<01:46:49.400> now<01:46:49.760> because<01:46:50.040> a 01:46:50.669 --> 01:46:50.679 align:start position:0% live in Las Vegas now because a 01:46:50.679 --> 01:46:53.310 align:start position:0% live in Las Vegas now because a indicates<01:46:51.199> that<01:46:51.599> however<01:46:51.960> if<01:46:52.080> I<01:46:52.280> say<01:46:52.679> Vios<01:46:53.119> and 01:46:53.310 --> 01:46:53.320 align:start position:0% indicates that however if I say Vios and 01:46:53.320 --> 01:46:54.070 align:start position:0% indicates that however if I say Vios and Los 01:46:54.070 --> 01:46:54.080 align:start position:0% Los 01:46:54.080 --> 01:46:56.550 align:start position:0% Los Angeles<01:46:55.080> I'm<01:46:55.199> saying<01:46:55.480> that<01:46:55.639> we<01:46:55.760> lived<01:46:56.159> in<01:46:56.320> Los 01:46:56.550 --> 01:46:56.560 align:start position:0% Angeles I'm saying that we lived in Los 01:46:56.560 --> 01:46:59.390 align:start position:0% Angeles I'm saying that we lived in Los Angeles<01:46:57.000> a<01:46:57.159> year<01:46:57.360> ago<01:46:58.119> because<01:46:59.119> is<01:46:59.239> the 01:46:59.390 --> 01:46:59.400 align:start position:0% Angeles a year ago because is the 01:46:59.400 --> 01:47:01.030 align:start position:0% Angeles a year ago because is the construction<01:46:59.960> that<01:47:00.119> indicates<01:47:00.639> that<01:47:00.840> so 01:47:01.030 --> 01:47:01.040 align:start position:0% construction that indicates that so 01:47:01.040 --> 01:47:02.709 align:start position:0% construction that indicates that so overall<01:47:01.560> you<01:47:01.719> have<01:47:01.800> to<01:47:01.960> watch<01:47:02.119> out<01:47:02.280> for<01:47:02.520> these 01:47:02.709 --> 01:47:02.719 align:start position:0% overall you have to watch out for these 01:47:02.719 --> 01:47:04.430 align:start position:0% overall you have to watch out for these things<01:47:03.080> because<01:47:03.360> that's<01:47:03.520> as<01:47:03.880> difficult<01:47:04.159> as<01:47:04.280> it 01:47:04.430 --> 01:47:04.440 align:start position:0% things because that's as difficult as it 01:47:04.440 --> 01:47:06.510 align:start position:0% things because that's as difficult as it gets<01:47:04.800> and<01:47:04.920> with<01:47:05.080> regular<01:47:05.400> verbs<01:47:05.679> ending<01:47:05.960> in<01:47:06.080> ER 01:47:06.510 --> 01:47:06.520 align:start position:0% gets and with regular verbs ending in ER 01:47:06.520 --> 01:47:08.589 align:start position:0% gets and with regular verbs ending in ER and<01:47:06.760> IR<01:47:07.320> I<01:47:07.440> recommend<01:47:07.800> just<01:47:07.960> memorizing<01:47:08.480> the 01:47:08.589 --> 01:47:08.599 align:start position:0% and IR I recommend just memorizing the 01:47:08.599 --> 01:47:11.109 align:start position:0% and IR I recommend just memorizing the pattern<01:47:08.880> for<01:47:09.080> all<01:47:09.360> pronouns<01:47:10.000> except<01:47:10.280> votos 01:47:11.109 --> 01:47:11.119 align:start position:0% pattern for all pronouns except votos 01:47:11.119 --> 01:47:12.510 align:start position:0% pattern for all pronouns except votos because<01:47:11.320> it's<01:47:11.480> the<01:47:11.599> same<01:47:11.760> in<01:47:11.960> both<01:47:12.159> types<01:47:12.360> of 01:47:12.510 --> 01:47:12.520 align:start position:0% because it's the same in both types of 01:47:12.520 --> 01:47:14.350 align:start position:0% because it's the same in both types of verbs<01:47:12.960> and<01:47:13.119> also<01:47:13.360> because<01:47:13.560> it's<01:47:13.679> a<01:47:13.880> pattern 01:47:14.350 --> 01:47:14.360 align:start position:0% verbs and also because it's a pattern 01:47:14.360 --> 01:47:15.790 align:start position:0% verbs and also because it's a pattern that<01:47:14.480> you<01:47:14.560> would<01:47:14.719> see<01:47:14.920> all<01:47:15.040> the<01:47:15.239> time<01:47:15.520> whenever 01:47:15.790 --> 01:47:15.800 align:start position:0% that you would see all the time whenever 01:47:15.800 --> 01:47:17.709 align:start position:0% that you would see all the time whenever you<01:47:15.920> study<01:47:16.239> the<01:47:16.400> past<01:47:16.599> tense<01:47:16.840> in<01:47:16.960> Spanish<01:47:17.520> as<01:47:17.599> I 01:47:17.709 --> 01:47:17.719 align:start position:0% you study the past tense in Spanish as I 01:47:17.719 --> 01:47:19.149 align:start position:0% you study the past tense in Spanish as I said<01:47:17.880> in<01:47:18.000> my<01:47:18.119> video<01:47:18.360> on<01:47:18.480> how<01:47:18.599> to<01:47:18.760> conjugate 01:47:19.149 --> 01:47:19.159 align:start position:0% said in my video on how to conjugate 01:47:19.159 --> 01:47:20.910 align:start position:0% said in my video on how to conjugate verbs<01:47:19.480> in<01:47:19.599> Spanish<01:47:20.000> in<01:47:20.080> the<01:47:20.400> present<01:47:20.639> tense 01:47:20.910 --> 01:47:20.920 align:start position:0% verbs in Spanish in the present tense 01:47:20.920 --> 01:47:22.830 align:start position:0% verbs in Spanish in the present tense there<01:47:21.040> is<01:47:21.199> no<01:47:21.320> point<01:47:21.480> in<01:47:21.599> knowing<01:47:21.920> every<01:47:22.199> a<01:47:22.400> r<01:47:22.639> e 01:47:22.830 --> 01:47:22.840 align:start position:0% there is no point in knowing every a r e 01:47:22.840 --> 01:47:24.830 align:start position:0% there is no point in knowing every a r e r<01:47:23.080> and<01:47:23.280> IR<01:47:23.679> verb<01:47:23.960> out<01:47:24.159> there<01:47:24.440> because<01:47:24.639> you'll 01:47:24.830 --> 01:47:24.840 align:start position:0% r and IR verb out there because you'll 01:47:24.840 --> 01:47:26.350 align:start position:0% r and IR verb out there because you'll never<01:47:25.040> use<01:47:25.280> all<01:47:25.440> of<01:47:25.560> them<01:47:25.800> I<01:47:25.920> decided<01:47:26.239> to 01:47:26.350 --> 01:47:26.360 align:start position:0% never use all of them I decided to 01:47:26.360 --> 01:47:29.390 align:start position:0% never use all of them I decided to utilize<01:47:26.760> useful<01:47:27.159> verbs<01:47:27.599> like<01:47:27.880> abl<01:47:28.400> com<01:47:28.800> and<01:47:28.960> VI 01:47:29.390 --> 01:47:29.400 align:start position:0% utilize useful verbs like abl com and VI 01:47:29.400 --> 01:47:31.070 align:start position:0% utilize useful verbs like abl com and VI to<01:47:29.560> demonstrate<01:47:30.000> how<01:47:30.199> regular<01:47:30.560> verbs<01:47:30.920> in 01:47:31.070 --> 01:47:31.080 align:start position:0% to demonstrate how regular verbs in 01:47:31.080 --> 01:47:32.830 align:start position:0% to demonstrate how regular verbs in Spanish<01:47:31.480> work<01:47:31.760> in<01:47:31.880> the<01:47:32.040> past<01:47:32.280> tense<01:47:32.639> I<01:47:32.719> could 01:47:32.830 --> 01:47:32.840 align:start position:0% Spanish work in the past tense I could 01:47:32.840 --> 01:47:34.430 align:start position:0% Spanish work in the past tense I could have<01:47:33.000> extended<01:47:33.400> the<01:47:33.520> video<01:47:33.920> by<01:47:34.080> giving 01:47:34.430 --> 01:47:34.440 align:start position:0% have extended the video by giving 01:47:34.440 --> 01:47:36.430 align:start position:0% have extended the video by giving examples<01:47:35.000> but<01:47:35.119> I<01:47:35.239> chose<01:47:35.520> not<01:47:35.679> to<01:47:36.040> because<01:47:36.280> I 01:47:36.430 --> 01:47:36.440 align:start position:0% examples but I chose not to because I 01:47:36.440 --> 01:47:38.070 align:start position:0% examples but I chose not to because I believe<01:47:36.679> that<01:47:36.760> you<01:47:36.840> can<01:47:37.000> do<01:47:37.159> so<01:47:37.400> on<01:47:37.560> your<01:47:37.719> own 01:47:38.070 --> 01:47:38.080 align:start position:0% believe that you can do so on your own 01:47:38.080 --> 01:47:40.109 align:start position:0% believe that you can do so on your own because<01:47:38.280> knowing<01:47:38.520> how<01:47:38.679> the<01:47:38.920> past<01:47:39.320> or<01:47:39.599> predate 01:47:40.109 --> 01:47:40.119 align:start position:0% because knowing how the past or predate 01:47:40.119 --> 01:47:42.109 align:start position:0% because knowing how the past or predate tense<01:47:40.560> Works<01:47:40.840> in<01:47:41.000> Spanish<01:47:41.480> is<01:47:41.639> sufficient 01:47:42.109 --> 01:47:42.119 align:start position:0% tense Works in Spanish is sufficient 01:47:42.119 --> 01:47:43.990 align:start position:0% tense Works in Spanish is sufficient enough<01:47:42.440> to<01:47:42.880> understand<01:47:43.040> how<01:47:43.199> it<01:47:43.320> can<01:47:43.480> be<01:47:43.639> used 01:47:43.990 --> 01:47:44.000 align:start position:0% enough to understand how it can be used 01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:45.950 align:start position:0% enough to understand how it can be used as<01:47:44.119> far<01:47:44.239> as<01:47:44.400> the<01:47:44.560> past<01:47:44.760> tense<01:47:45.040> goes<01:47:45.239> in<01:47:45.400> Spanish 01:47:45.950 --> 01:47:45.960 align:start position:0% as far as the past tense goes in Spanish 01:47:45.960 --> 01:47:47.669 align:start position:0% as far as the past tense goes in Spanish there<01:47:46.080> are<01:47:46.360> actually<01:47:46.679> multiple<01:47:47.159> variations 01:47:47.669 --> 01:47:47.679 align:start position:0% there are actually multiple variations 01:47:47.679 --> 01:47:50.070 align:start position:0% there are actually multiple variations of<01:47:47.800> it<01:47:48.080> like<01:47:48.360> the<01:47:48.560> imperfect<01:47:49.280> past<01:47:49.560> perfect 01:47:50.070 --> 01:47:50.080 align:start position:0% of it like the imperfect past perfect 01:47:50.080 --> 01:47:51.910 align:start position:0% of it like the imperfect past perfect condition<01:47:50.639> and<01:47:50.960> conditional<01:47:51.320> perfect<01:47:51.760> and 01:47:51.910 --> 01:47:51.920 align:start position:0% condition and conditional perfect and 01:47:51.920 --> 01:47:53.550 align:start position:0% condition and conditional perfect and all<01:47:52.040> of<01:47:52.159> these<01:47:52.360> tenses<01:47:52.800> are<01:47:53.080> topics<01:47:53.360> for 01:47:53.550 --> 01:47:53.560 align:start position:0% all of these tenses are topics for 01:47:53.560 --> 01:47:55.629 align:start position:0% all of these tenses are topics for future<01:47:53.880> videos<01:47:54.360> so<01:47:54.520> I<01:47:54.639> decided<01:47:54.960> to<01:47:55.080> not<01:47:55.320> over 01:47:55.629 --> 01:47:55.639 align:start position:0% future videos so I decided to not over 01:47:55.639 --> 01:47:57.589 align:start position:0% future videos so I decided to not over complicate<01:47:56.040> the<01:47:56.199> past<01:47:56.400> tenses<01:47:56.760> in<01:47:56.880> Spanish<01:47:57.440> by 01:47:57.589 --> 01:47:57.599 align:start position:0% complicate the past tenses in Spanish by 01:47:57.599 --> 01:47:59.390 align:start position:0% complicate the past tenses in Spanish by simply<01:47:57.840> showing<01:47:58.320> the<01:47:58.480> regular<01:47:58.880> past<01:47:59.119> simple 01:47:59.390 --> 01:47:59.400 align:start position:0% simply showing the regular past simple 01:47:59.400 --> 01:48:02.470 align:start position:0% simply showing the regular past simple tense<01:47:59.760> for<01:48:00.000> regular<01:48:00.440> a<01:48:00.639> r<01:48:00.960> e<01:48:01.159> r<01:48:01.440> and<01:48:01.639> ir<01:48:02.040> verbs 01:48:02.470 --> 01:48:02.480 align:start position:0% tense for regular a r e r and ir verbs 01:48:02.480 --> 01:48:03.629 align:start position:0% tense for regular a r e r and ir verbs and<01:48:02.560> if<01:48:02.639> you<01:48:02.760> see<01:48:02.960> any<01:48:03.159> verb<01:48:03.440> that's 01:48:03.629 --> 01:48:03.639 align:start position:0% and if you see any verb that's 01:48:03.639 --> 01:48:05.149 align:start position:0% and if you see any verb that's conjugated<01:48:04.159> in<01:48:04.280> the<01:48:04.400> ways<01:48:04.599> that<01:48:04.719> I've<01:48:04.840> shown 01:48:05.149 --> 01:48:05.159 align:start position:0% conjugated in the ways that I've shown 01:48:05.159 --> 01:48:06.830 align:start position:0% conjugated in the ways that I've shown in<01:48:05.239> the<01:48:05.400> video<01:48:05.840> that<01:48:05.960> means<01:48:06.320> that<01:48:06.480> this<01:48:06.639> verb 01:48:06.830 --> 01:48:06.840 align:start position:0% in the video that means that this verb 01:48:06.840 --> 01:48:08.870 align:start position:0% in the video that means that this verb is<01:48:06.960> in<01:48:07.080> the<01:48:07.280> past<01:48:07.520> simple<01:48:07.840> tense<01:48:08.360> Spanish<01:48:08.719> has 01:48:08.870 --> 01:48:08.880 align:start position:0% is in the past simple tense Spanish has 01:48:08.880 --> 01:48:11.270 align:start position:0% is in the past simple tense Spanish has the<01:48:09.000> verbs<01:48:09.400> said<01:48:09.800> and<01:48:10.080> E<01:48:10.480> which<01:48:10.599> mean<01:48:10.800> to<01:48:10.960> be 01:48:11.270 --> 01:48:11.280 align:start position:0% the verbs said and E which mean to be 01:48:11.280 --> 01:48:12.790 align:start position:0% the verbs said and E which mean to be and<01:48:11.440> to<01:48:11.639> go<01:48:11.920> and<01:48:12.040> even<01:48:12.239> though<01:48:12.400> these<01:48:12.560> verbs 01:48:12.790 --> 01:48:12.800 align:start position:0% and to go and even though these verbs 01:48:12.800 --> 01:48:13.990 align:start position:0% and to go and even though these verbs have<01:48:12.960> different<01:48:13.239> definitions<01:48:13.880> the 01:48:13.990 --> 01:48:14.000 align:start position:0% have different definitions the 01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:15.550 align:start position:0% have different definitions the convenient<01:48:14.480> thing<01:48:14.719> about<01:48:14.960> them<01:48:15.199> is<01:48:15.280> that<01:48:15.440> they 01:48:15.550 --> 01:48:15.560 align:start position:0% convenient thing about them is that they 01:48:15.560 --> 01:48:17.149 align:start position:0% convenient thing about them is that they both<01:48:15.679> share<01:48:15.960> the<01:48:16.080> same<01:48:16.320> syntax<01:48:16.880> when<01:48:17.000> they're 01:48:17.149 --> 01:48:17.159 align:start position:0% both share the same syntax when they're 01:48:17.159 --> 01:48:19.550 align:start position:0% both share the same syntax when they're put<01:48:17.320> into<01:48:17.639> past<01:48:17.840> simple<01:48:18.360> or<01:48:18.599> predate<01:48:19.080> tense<01:48:19.400> in 01:48:19.550 --> 01:48:19.560 align:start position:0% put into past simple or predate tense in 01:48:19.560 --> 01:48:21.910 align:start position:0% put into past simple or predate tense in Spanish<01:48:19.960> the<01:48:20.080> ver<01:48:20.480> said<01:48:20.800> means<01:48:21.040> to<01:48:21.239> be<01:48:21.599> as<01:48:21.719> in 01:48:21.910 --> 01:48:21.920 align:start position:0% Spanish the ver said means to be as in 01:48:21.920 --> 01:48:23.830 align:start position:0% Spanish the ver said means to be as in being<01:48:22.280> and<01:48:22.440> having<01:48:22.679> traits<01:48:23.000> about<01:48:23.280> oneself 01:48:23.830 --> 01:48:23.840 align:start position:0% being and having traits about oneself 01:48:23.840 --> 01:48:25.510 align:start position:0% being and having traits about oneself and<01:48:23.960> the<01:48:24.040> synx<01:48:24.400> of<01:48:24.520> this<01:48:24.719> verb<01:48:24.960> in<01:48:25.040> the<01:48:25.199> present 01:48:25.510 --> 01:48:25.520 align:start position:0% and the synx of this verb in the present 01:48:25.520 --> 01:48:27.510 align:start position:0% and the synx of this verb in the present tense<01:48:25.920> has<01:48:26.119> six<01:48:26.360> different<01:48:26.639> conjugations<01:48:27.320> for 01:48:27.510 --> 01:48:27.520 align:start position:0% tense has six different conjugations for 01:48:27.520 --> 01:48:29.629 align:start position:0% tense has six different conjugations for the<01:48:27.639> six<01:48:27.880> pronouns<01:48:28.480> the<01:48:28.599> verb<01:48:28.880> ear<01:48:29.320> however 01:48:29.629 --> 01:48:29.639 align:start position:0% the six pronouns the verb ear however 01:48:29.639 --> 01:48:31.229 align:start position:0% the six pronouns the verb ear however means<01:48:29.920> to<01:48:30.119> go<01:48:30.440> and<01:48:30.760> sometimes<01:48:30.960> can<01:48:31.080> be 01:48:31.229 --> 01:48:31.239 align:start position:0% means to go and sometimes can be 01:48:31.239 --> 01:48:33.629 align:start position:0% means to go and sometimes can be referred<01:48:31.560> to<01:48:31.800> as<01:48:32.000> to<01:48:32.199> go<01:48:32.400> to<01:48:32.840> but<01:48:32.960> its<01:48:33.159> syntax 01:48:33.629 --> 01:48:33.639 align:start position:0% referred to as to go to but its syntax 01:48:33.639 --> 01:48:35.189 align:start position:0% referred to as to go to but its syntax is<01:48:33.800> completely<01:48:34.239> different<01:48:34.599> in<01:48:34.719> the<01:48:34.880> present 01:48:35.189 --> 01:48:35.199 align:start position:0% is completely different in the present 01:48:35.199 --> 01:48:37.030 align:start position:0% is completely different in the present tense<01:48:35.560> from<01:48:35.679> the<01:48:35.800> verb<01:48:36.040> set<01:48:36.400> the<01:48:36.520> two<01:48:36.679> verbs<01:48:36.920> in 01:48:37.030 --> 01:48:37.040 align:start position:0% tense from the verb set the two verbs in 01:48:37.040 --> 01:48:38.790 align:start position:0% tense from the verb set the two verbs in the<01:48:37.199> past<01:48:37.440> simple<01:48:37.719> tense<01:48:38.119> share<01:48:38.440> the<01:48:38.560> same 01:48:38.790 --> 01:48:38.800 align:start position:0% the past simple tense share the same 01:48:38.800 --> 01:48:40.310 align:start position:0% the past simple tense share the same syntax<01:48:39.320> which<01:48:39.440> makes<01:48:39.679> Spanish<01:48:40.040> more 01:48:40.310 --> 01:48:40.320 align:start position:0% syntax which makes Spanish more 01:48:40.320 --> 01:48:41.870 align:start position:0% syntax which makes Spanish more convenient<01:48:40.960> having<01:48:41.119> an<01:48:41.320> irregular 01:48:41.870 --> 01:48:41.880 align:start position:0% convenient having an irregular 01:48:41.880 --> 01:48:43.470 align:start position:0% convenient having an irregular conjugation<01:48:42.480> pattern<01:48:42.880> and<01:48:42.960> so<01:48:43.119> you<01:48:43.199> can<01:48:43.320> only 01:48:43.470 --> 01:48:43.480 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern and so you can only 01:48:43.480 --> 01:48:44.830 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern and so you can only tell<01:48:43.639> the<01:48:43.719> difference<01:48:44.000> between<01:48:44.400> them<01:48:44.639> in 01:48:44.830 --> 01:48:44.840 align:start position:0% tell the difference between them in 01:48:44.840 --> 01:48:47.669 align:start position:0% tell the difference between them in context<01:48:45.520> fui<01:48:46.080> can<01:48:46.280> simultaneously<01:48:47.080> mean<01:48:47.520> I 01:48:47.669 --> 01:48:47.679 align:start position:0% context fui can simultaneously mean I 01:48:47.679 --> 01:48:49.910 align:start position:0% context fui can simultaneously mean I went<01:48:47.960> somewhere<01:48:48.480> or<01:48:48.639> to<01:48:48.840> do<01:48:49.040> something<01:48:49.560> or<01:48:49.800> I 01:48:49.910 --> 01:48:49.920 align:start position:0% went somewhere or to do something or I 01:48:49.920 --> 01:48:52.149 align:start position:0% went somewhere or to do something or I was<01:48:50.480> as<01:48:50.599> in<01:48:50.840> actions<01:48:51.320> that<01:48:51.440> were<01:48:51.599> completed<01:48:52.040> in 01:48:52.149 --> 01:48:52.159 align:start position:0% was as in actions that were completed in 01:48:52.159 --> 01:48:53.950 align:start position:0% was as in actions that were completed in the<01:48:52.360> past<01:48:52.679> and<01:48:52.800> I'll<01:48:52.960> get<01:48:53.080> to<01:48:53.239> that<01:48:53.360> in<01:48:53.480> a<01:48:53.639> bit 01:48:53.950 --> 01:48:53.960 align:start position:0% the past and I'll get to that in a bit 01:48:53.960 --> 01:48:56.390 align:start position:0% the past and I'll get to that in a bit fuiste<01:48:54.760> can<01:48:54.920> mean<01:48:55.199> you<01:48:55.400> went<01:48:55.679> somewhere<01:48:56.080> or<01:48:56.239> to 01:48:56.390 --> 01:48:56.400 align:start position:0% fuiste can mean you went somewhere or to 01:48:56.400 --> 01:48:58.390 align:start position:0% fuiste can mean you went somewhere or to do<01:48:56.639> something<01:48:57.159> and<01:48:57.320> also<01:48:57.599> you<01:48:57.760> were<01:48:58.159> in<01:48:58.239> a 01:48:58.390 --> 01:48:58.400 align:start position:0% do something and also you were in a 01:48:58.400 --> 01:49:00.790 align:start position:0% do something and also you were in a position<01:48:58.800> somewhere<01:48:59.280> Fu<01:48:59.800> can<01:48:59.920> mean<01:49:00.199> he<01:49:00.400> or<01:49:00.560> she 01:49:00.790 --> 01:49:00.800 align:start position:0% position somewhere Fu can mean he or she 01:49:00.800 --> 01:49:02.990 align:start position:0% position somewhere Fu can mean he or she went<01:49:01.199> and<01:49:01.320> it<01:49:01.440> also<01:49:01.599> has<01:49:01.719> a<01:49:01.840> ubiquitous<01:49:02.400> use<01:49:02.800> of 01:49:02.990 --> 01:49:03.000 align:start position:0% went and it also has a ubiquitous use of 01:49:03.000 --> 01:49:05.030 align:start position:0% went and it also has a ubiquitous use of it<01:49:03.239> was<01:49:03.599> in<01:49:03.760> Spanish<01:49:04.320> making<01:49:04.560> it<01:49:04.679> one<01:49:04.800> of<01:49:04.920> the 01:49:05.030 --> 01:49:05.040 align:start position:0% it was in Spanish making it one of the 01:49:05.040 --> 01:49:06.750 align:start position:0% it was in Spanish making it one of the most<01:49:05.239> useful<01:49:05.599> words<01:49:05.920> in<01:49:06.080> the<01:49:06.280> past<01:49:06.480> simple 01:49:06.750 --> 01:49:06.760 align:start position:0% most useful words in the past simple 01:49:06.760 --> 01:49:10.830 align:start position:0% most useful words in the past simple tense<01:49:07.199> fuos<01:49:08.000> means<01:49:08.360> we<01:49:08.520> went<01:49:08.920> or<01:49:09.199> we<01:49:09.360> were<01:49:09.840> Fu 01:49:10.830 --> 01:49:10.840 align:start position:0% tense fuos means we went or we were Fu 01:49:10.840 --> 01:49:13.790 align:start position:0% tense fuos means we went or we were Fu means<01:49:11.320> y'all<01:49:11.599> went<01:49:12.000> or<01:49:12.320> y'all<01:49:12.599> were<01:49:13.000> and<01:49:13.159> fuon 01:49:13.790 --> 01:49:13.800 align:start position:0% means y'all went or y'all were and fuon 01:49:13.800 --> 01:49:15.550 align:start position:0% means y'all went or y'all were and fuon can<01:49:13.920> mean<01:49:14.280> they<01:49:14.440> went<01:49:14.760> or<01:49:14.960> they<01:49:15.119> were<01:49:15.440> I 01:49:15.550 --> 01:49:15.560 align:start position:0% can mean they went or they were I 01:49:15.560 --> 01:49:17.109 align:start position:0% can mean they went or they were I recommend<01:49:15.920> that<01:49:16.000> you<01:49:16.159> actually<01:49:16.400> focus<01:49:16.679> on<01:49:16.840> all 01:49:17.109 --> 01:49:17.119 align:start position:0% recommend that you actually focus on all 01:49:17.119 --> 01:49:19.750 align:start position:0% recommend that you actually focus on all pronouns<01:49:17.760> except<01:49:18.119> votos<01:49:18.760> and<01:49:19.040> AOS<01:49:19.560> because 01:49:19.750 --> 01:49:19.760 align:start position:0% pronouns except votos and AOS because 01:49:19.760 --> 01:49:21.270 align:start position:0% pronouns except votos and AOS because all<01:49:19.880> of<01:49:19.960> these<01:49:20.280> conjugations<01:49:20.880> are<01:49:21.080> very 01:49:21.270 --> 01:49:21.280 align:start position:0% all of these conjugations are very 01:49:21.280 --> 01:49:23.189 align:start position:0% all of these conjugations are very useful<01:49:21.639> in<01:49:21.760> Spanish<01:49:22.320> as<01:49:22.400> I<01:49:22.520> said<01:49:22.760> before<01:49:23.119> you 01:49:23.189 --> 01:49:23.199 align:start position:0% useful in Spanish as I said before you 01:49:23.199 --> 01:49:24.390 align:start position:0% useful in Spanish as I said before you can<01:49:23.360> only<01:49:23.520> tell<01:49:23.679> the<01:49:23.800> difference<01:49:24.119> between 01:49:24.390 --> 01:49:24.400 align:start position:0% can only tell the difference between 01:49:24.400 --> 01:49:26.070 align:start position:0% can only tell the difference between said<01:49:24.679> and<01:49:24.840> ear<01:49:25.119> in<01:49:25.199> the<01:49:25.360> past<01:49:25.560> simple<01:49:25.840> in 01:49:26.070 --> 01:49:26.080 align:start position:0% said and ear in the past simple in 01:49:26.080 --> 01:49:27.709 align:start position:0% said and ear in the past simple in context<01:49:26.639> and<01:49:26.760> there's<01:49:27.000> actually<01:49:27.199> an<01:49:27.360> easy<01:49:27.599> way 01:49:27.709 --> 01:49:27.719 align:start position:0% context and there's actually an easy way 01:49:27.719 --> 01:49:29.270 align:start position:0% context and there's actually an easy way to<01:49:27.880> distinguish<01:49:28.360> their<01:49:28.480> meaning<01:49:28.920> and<01:49:29.040> that<01:49:29.159> is 01:49:29.270 --> 01:49:29.280 align:start position:0% to distinguish their meaning and that is 01:49:29.280 --> 01:49:31.149 align:start position:0% to distinguish their meaning and that is through<01:49:29.520> the<01:49:29.679> preposition<01:49:30.360> a<01:49:30.639> which<01:49:30.760> is<01:49:30.880> used 01:49:31.149 --> 01:49:31.159 align:start position:0% through the preposition a which is used 01:49:31.159 --> 01:49:33.270 align:start position:0% through the preposition a which is used as<01:49:31.320> the<01:49:31.480> preposition<01:49:31.960> to<01:49:32.480> in<01:49:32.639> English<01:49:33.159> just 01:49:33.270 --> 01:49:33.280 align:start position:0% as the preposition to in English just 01:49:33.280 --> 01:49:35.109 align:start position:0% as the preposition to in English just like<01:49:33.440> when<01:49:33.560> we<01:49:33.679> say<01:49:33.960> actions<01:49:34.320> in<01:49:34.440> the<01:49:34.599> present 01:49:35.109 --> 01:49:35.119 align:start position:0% like when we say actions in the present 01:49:35.119 --> 01:49:38.470 align:start position:0% like when we say actions in the present such<01:49:35.360> as<01:49:35.679> yo<01:49:36.280> ala<01:49:37.239> I<01:49:37.360> go<01:49:37.560> to<01:49:37.719> the<01:49:37.840> store<01:49:38.280> it's 01:49:38.470 --> 01:49:38.480 align:start position:0% such as yo ala I go to the store it's 01:49:38.480 --> 01:49:40.070 align:start position:0% such as yo ala I go to the store it's the<01:49:38.599> same<01:49:38.840> way<01:49:39.080> you<01:49:39.199> would<01:49:39.320> say<01:49:39.560> the<01:49:39.679> phrase<01:49:39.960> in 01:49:40.070 --> 01:49:40.080 align:start position:0% the same way you would say the phrase in 01:49:40.080 --> 01:49:43.750 align:start position:0% the same way you would say the phrase in the<01:49:40.239> past<01:49:40.760> y<01:49:41.520> ala<01:49:42.440> I<01:49:42.599> went<01:49:42.920> to<01:49:43.080> the<01:49:43.239> store<01:49:43.599> which 01:49:43.750 --> 01:49:43.760 align:start position:0% the past y ala I went to the store which 01:49:43.760 --> 01:49:45.830 align:start position:0% the past y ala I went to the store which ultimately<01:49:44.320> changes<01:49:44.760> only<01:49:45.000> one<01:49:45.239> word<01:49:45.560> making 01:49:45.830 --> 01:49:45.840 align:start position:0% ultimately changes only one word making 01:49:45.840 --> 01:49:47.629 align:start position:0% ultimately changes only one word making the<01:49:46.000> language<01:49:46.440> easier<01:49:46.719> to<01:49:47.159> understand<01:49:47.480> and 01:49:47.629 --> 01:49:47.639 align:start position:0% the language easier to understand and 01:49:47.639 --> 01:49:49.390 align:start position:0% the language easier to understand and easier<01:49:47.920> to<01:49:48.080> distinguish<01:49:48.560> from<01:49:48.719> the<01:49:48.800> verb<01:49:49.040> set 01:49:49.390 --> 01:49:49.400 align:start position:0% easier to distinguish from the verb set 01:49:49.400 --> 01:49:50.830 align:start position:0% easier to distinguish from the verb set in<01:49:49.560> this<01:49:49.719> context<01:49:50.119> next<01:49:50.360> we<01:49:50.480> know<01:49:50.599> that<01:49:50.719> the 01:49:50.830 --> 01:49:50.840 align:start position:0% in this context next we know that the 01:49:50.840 --> 01:49:52.350 align:start position:0% in this context next we know that the verb<01:49:51.040> is<01:49:51.280> IR<01:49:51.719> because<01:49:51.880> we<01:49:52.000> see<01:49:52.199> the 01:49:52.350 --> 01:49:52.360 align:start position:0% verb is IR because we see the 01:49:52.360 --> 01:49:54.550 align:start position:0% verb is IR because we see the preposition<01:49:53.000> a<01:49:53.400> which<01:49:53.480> is<01:49:53.599> placed<01:49:53.960> only<01:49:54.239> after 01:49:54.550 --> 01:49:54.560 align:start position:0% preposition a which is placed only after 01:49:54.560 --> 01:49:56.870 align:start position:0% preposition a which is placed only after conjugations<01:49:55.159> of<01:49:55.280> the<01:49:55.400> verb<01:49:56.159> regardless<01:49:56.760> if 01:49:56.870 --> 01:49:56.880 align:start position:0% conjugations of the verb regardless if 01:49:56.880 --> 01:50:00.709 align:start position:0% conjugations of the verb regardless if it's<01:49:57.000> in<01:49:57.159> the<01:49:57.320> present<01:49:57.639> or<01:49:57.840> past<01:49:58.320> y<01:49:58.760> ala<01:49:59.760> and<01:50:00.119> Y 01:50:00.709 --> 01:50:00.719 align:start position:0% it's in the present or past y ala and Y 01:50:00.719 --> 01:50:03.589 align:start position:0% it's in the present or past y ala and Y ala<01:50:01.520> mean<01:50:01.840> I<01:50:01.960> go<01:50:02.119> to<01:50:02.239> the<01:50:02.400> store<01:50:02.760> and<01:50:02.960> I<01:50:03.119> went<01:50:03.440> to 01:50:03.589 --> 01:50:03.599 align:start position:0% ala mean I go to the store and I went to 01:50:03.599 --> 01:50:05.270 align:start position:0% ala mean I go to the store and I went to the<01:50:03.719> store<01:50:04.080> which<01:50:04.199> simply<01:50:04.480> changes<01:50:04.840> only<01:50:05.080> one 01:50:05.270 --> 01:50:05.280 align:start position:0% the store which simply changes only one 01:50:05.280 --> 01:50:07.470 align:start position:0% the store which simply changes only one word<01:50:05.639> noticeably<01:50:06.520> understanding<01:50:06.960> that<01:50:07.159> ear 01:50:07.470 --> 01:50:07.480 align:start position:0% word noticeably understanding that ear 01:50:07.480 --> 01:50:09.229 align:start position:0% word noticeably understanding that ear is<01:50:07.599> used<01:50:08.080> because<01:50:08.280> you<01:50:08.400> have<01:50:08.560> the<01:50:08.719> preposition 01:50:09.229 --> 01:50:09.239 align:start position:0% is used because you have the preposition 01:50:09.239 --> 01:50:11.589 align:start position:0% is used because you have the preposition a<01:50:09.599> after<01:50:09.840> the<01:50:09.960> conjugation<01:50:10.599> in<01:50:10.800> both<01:50:11.040> cases 01:50:11.589 --> 01:50:11.599 align:start position:0% a after the conjugation in both cases 01:50:11.599 --> 01:50:13.030 align:start position:0% a after the conjugation in both cases however<01:50:11.880> you<01:50:12.000> can<01:50:12.320> sometimes<01:50:12.560> refer<01:50:12.840> to 01:50:13.030 --> 01:50:13.040 align:start position:0% however you can sometimes refer to 01:50:13.040 --> 01:50:14.990 align:start position:0% however you can sometimes refer to actions 01:50:14.990 --> 01:50:15.000 align:start position:0% actions 01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:17.390 align:start position:0% actions like<01:50:16.000> you<01:50:16.159> go<01:50:16.280> to<01:50:16.440> do<01:50:16.599> your<01:50:16.760> homework<01:50:17.239> and<01:50:17.320> if 01:50:17.390 --> 01:50:17.400 align:start position:0% like you go to do your homework and if 01:50:17.400 --> 01:50:18.790 align:start position:0% like you go to do your homework and if you<01:50:17.520> want<01:50:17.599> to<01:50:17.719> put<01:50:17.840> the<01:50:17.960> phrase<01:50:18.199> in<01:50:18.320> the<01:50:18.480> past 01:50:18.790 --> 01:50:18.800 align:start position:0% you want to put the phrase in the past 01:50:18.800 --> 01:50:20.550 align:start position:0% you want to put the phrase in the past you<01:50:18.920> simply<01:50:19.199> change<01:50:19.480> only<01:50:19.679> one<01:50:19.840> word<01:50:20.440> by 01:50:20.550 --> 01:50:20.560 align:start position:0% you simply change only one word by 01:50:20.560 --> 01:50:21.870 align:start position:0% you simply change only one word by saying 01:50:21.870 --> 01:50:21.880 align:start position:0% saying 01:50:21.880 --> 01:50:24.350 align:start position:0% saying to<01:50:22.880> you<01:50:23.000> went<01:50:23.199> to<01:50:23.320> do<01:50:23.480> your<01:50:23.639> homework<01:50:24.119> and<01:50:24.199> in 01:50:24.350 --> 01:50:24.360 align:start position:0% to you went to do your homework and in 01:50:24.360 --> 01:50:25.910 align:start position:0% to you went to do your homework and in both<01:50:24.599> cases<01:50:25.159> everything<01:50:25.440> else<01:50:25.639> in<01:50:25.760> the 01:50:25.910 --> 01:50:25.920 align:start position:0% both cases everything else in the 01:50:25.920 --> 01:50:27.470 align:start position:0% both cases everything else in the sentence<01:50:26.239> stays<01:50:26.520> the<01:50:26.639> same<01:50:27.040> besides<01:50:27.320> the 01:50:27.470 --> 01:50:27.480 align:start position:0% sentence stays the same besides the 01:50:27.480 --> 01:50:29.470 align:start position:0% sentence stays the same besides the conjugation<01:50:27.920> of<01:50:28.480> both<01:50:28.639> in<01:50:28.840> English<01:50:29.239> and 01:50:29.470 --> 01:50:29.480 align:start position:0% conjugation of both in English and 01:50:29.480 --> 01:50:32.790 align:start position:0% conjugation of both in English and Spanish<01:50:29.960> and<01:50:30.080> you<01:50:30.159> can<01:50:30.280> make<01:50:30.440> more<01:50:30.719> examples 01:50:32.790 --> 01:50:32.800 align:start position:0% Spanish and you can make more examples 01:50:32.800 --> 01:50:35.430 align:start position:0% Spanish and you can make more examples like<01:50:33.800> she<01:50:33.920> went<01:50:34.119> to<01:50:34.239> the<01:50:34.400> concert<01:50:34.800> yesterday 01:50:35.430 --> 01:50:35.440 align:start position:0% like she went to the concert yesterday 01:50:35.440 --> 01:50:37.109 align:start position:0% like she went to the concert yesterday with<01:50:35.719> a<01:50:36.119> indicating<01:50:36.560> that<01:50:36.679> the<01:50:36.840> action 01:50:37.109 --> 01:50:37.119 align:start position:0% with a indicating that the action 01:50:37.119 --> 01:50:39.149 align:start position:0% with a indicating that the action happened<01:50:37.400> in<01:50:37.520> the<01:50:37.679> past<01:50:38.000> and<01:50:38.159> also<01:50:38.400> having<01:50:38.800> Al 01:50:39.149 --> 01:50:39.159 align:start position:0% happened in the past and also having Al 01:50:39.159 --> 01:50:41.069 align:start position:0% happened in the past and also having Al which<01:50:39.280> means<01:50:39.599> to<01:50:39.960> the<01:50:40.360> again<01:50:40.560> knowing<01:50:40.960> that 01:50:41.069 --> 01:50:41.079 align:start position:0% which means to the again knowing that 01:50:41.079 --> 01:50:42.709 align:start position:0% which means to the again knowing that it's<01:50:41.239> the<01:50:41.400> verb<01:50:42.040> you<01:50:42.119> can<01:50:42.239> also<01:50:42.400> say<01:50:42.599> a 01:50:42.709 --> 01:50:42.719 align:start position:0% it's the verb you can also say a 01:50:42.719 --> 01:50:45.950 align:start position:0% it's the verb you can also say a sentence<01:50:43.599> like<01:50:44.599> Fiesta<01:50:45.199> we<01:50:45.320> went<01:50:45.480> to<01:50:45.599> see<01:50:45.840> the 01:50:45.950 --> 01:50:45.960 align:start position:0% sentence like Fiesta we went to see the 01:50:45.960 --> 01:50:47.550 align:start position:0% sentence like Fiesta we went to see the party<01:50:46.400> and<01:50:46.520> this<01:50:46.639> sentence<01:50:47.000> also<01:50:47.239> has<01:50:47.400> the 01:50:47.550 --> 01:50:47.560 align:start position:0% party and this sentence also has the 01:50:47.560 --> 01:50:49.629 align:start position:0% party and this sentence also has the preposition<01:50:48.079> a<01:50:48.320> inside<01:50:48.880> which<01:50:49.000> refers<01:50:49.320> to<01:50:49.440> an 01:50:49.629 --> 01:50:49.639 align:start position:0% preposition a inside which refers to an 01:50:49.639 --> 01:50:51.589 align:start position:0% preposition a inside which refers to an action<01:50:50.079> done<01:50:50.280> in<01:50:50.440> the<01:50:50.599> past<01:50:51.000> once<01:50:51.239> again 01:50:51.589 --> 01:50:51.599 align:start position:0% action done in the past once again 01:50:51.599 --> 01:50:52.990 align:start position:0% action done in the past once again showing<01:50:51.920> that<01:50:52.040> the<01:50:52.159> sentence<01:50:52.520> contains<01:50:52.920> the 01:50:52.990 --> 01:50:53.000 align:start position:0% showing that the sentence contains the 01:50:53.000 --> 01:50:54.750 align:start position:0% showing that the sentence contains the verb<01:50:53.280> ear<01:50:53.560> the<01:50:53.639> biggest<01:50:53.880> tip<01:50:54.119> that<01:50:54.280> I<01:50:54.360> can<01:50:54.560> give 01:50:54.750 --> 01:50:54.760 align:start position:0% verb ear the biggest tip that I can give 01:50:54.760 --> 01:50:56.270 align:start position:0% verb ear the biggest tip that I can give for<01:50:54.960> telling<01:50:55.239> the<01:50:55.360> difference<01:50:55.679> between<01:50:55.960> said 01:50:56.270 --> 01:50:56.280 align:start position:0% for telling the difference between said 01:50:56.280 --> 01:50:57.990 align:start position:0% for telling the difference between said and<01:50:56.440> ear<01:50:56.719> in<01:50:56.840> the<01:50:57.000> past<01:50:57.199> simple<01:50:57.639> is<01:50:57.760> that<01:50:57.880> if 01:50:57.990 --> 01:50:58.000 align:start position:0% and ear in the past simple is that if 01:50:58.000 --> 01:50:59.510 align:start position:0% and ear in the past simple is that if you<01:50:58.079> see<01:50:58.280> this<01:50:58.440> conjugation<01:50:59.199> and<01:50:59.280> you<01:50:59.360> don't 01:50:59.510 --> 01:50:59.520 align:start position:0% you see this conjugation and you don't 01:50:59.520 --> 01:51:01.189 align:start position:0% you see this conjugation and you don't know<01:50:59.719> which<01:50:59.840> one<01:51:00.000> it<01:51:00.119> is<01:51:00.360> try<01:51:00.639> looking<01:51:00.840> for<01:51:01.040> the 01:51:01.189 --> 01:51:01.199 align:start position:0% know which one it is try looking for the 01:51:01.199 --> 01:51:03.270 align:start position:0% know which one it is try looking for the preposition<01:51:01.760> ah<01:51:02.199> after<01:51:02.440> the<01:51:02.599> conjugation<01:51:03.159> if 01:51:03.270 --> 01:51:03.280 align:start position:0% preposition ah after the conjugation if 01:51:03.280 --> 01:51:05.149 align:start position:0% preposition ah after the conjugation if there<01:51:03.400> is<01:51:03.599> an<01:51:03.800> ah<01:51:04.320> with<01:51:04.480> or<01:51:04.719> without<01:51:04.960> an 01:51:05.149 --> 01:51:05.159 align:start position:0% there is an ah with or without an 01:51:05.159 --> 01:51:06.990 align:start position:0% there is an ah with or without an infinitive<01:51:05.679> the<01:51:05.800> verb<01:51:06.119> is<01:51:06.320> IR<01:51:06.639> because<01:51:06.880> there 01:51:06.990 --> 01:51:07.000 align:start position:0% infinitive the verb is IR because there 01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:08.669 align:start position:0% infinitive the verb is IR because there isn't<01:51:07.239> much<01:51:07.400> of<01:51:07.480> a<01:51:07.599> change<01:51:07.960> from<01:51:08.159> its<01:51:08.280> form<01:51:08.520> in 01:51:08.669 --> 01:51:08.679 align:start position:0% isn't much of a change from its form in 01:51:08.679 --> 01:51:10.310 align:start position:0% isn't much of a change from its form in the<01:51:08.840> present<01:51:09.320> now<01:51:09.840> understanding<01:51:10.079> how<01:51:10.199> the 01:51:10.310 --> 01:51:10.320 align:start position:0% the present now understanding how the 01:51:10.320 --> 01:51:12.310 align:start position:0% the present now understanding how the verb<01:51:10.560> said<01:51:10.920> works<01:51:11.159> in<01:51:11.280> the<01:51:11.440> past<01:51:11.639> simple<01:51:12.119> is 01:51:12.310 --> 01:51:12.320 align:start position:0% verb said works in the past simple is 01:51:12.320 --> 01:51:13.629 align:start position:0% verb said works in the past simple is actually<01:51:12.599> a<01:51:12.719> bit<01:51:12.880> more<01:51:13.280> difficult<01:51:13.440> to 01:51:13.629 --> 01:51:13.639 align:start position:0% actually a bit more difficult to 01:51:13.639 --> 01:51:15.629 align:start position:0% actually a bit more difficult to comprehend<01:51:14.239> due<01:51:14.440> to<01:51:14.560> its<01:51:14.760> variations<01:51:15.360> in<01:51:15.480> the 01:51:15.629 --> 01:51:15.639 align:start position:0% comprehend due to its variations in the 01:51:15.639 --> 01:51:17.510 align:start position:0% comprehend due to its variations in the past<01:51:16.000> currently<01:51:16.520> we're<01:51:16.679> working<01:51:17.000> in<01:51:17.159> the<01:51:17.320> past 01:51:17.510 --> 01:51:17.520 align:start position:0% past currently we're working in the past 01:51:17.520 --> 01:51:19.310 align:start position:0% past currently we're working in the past simple<01:51:18.040> also<01:51:18.199> known<01:51:18.400> as<01:51:18.520> the<01:51:18.639> predate<01:51:19.079> and<01:51:19.199> as 01:51:19.310 --> 01:51:19.320 align:start position:0% simple also known as the predate and as 01:51:19.320 --> 01:51:20.990 align:start position:0% simple also known as the predate and as I<01:51:19.400> said<01:51:19.520> in<01:51:19.599> my<01:51:19.719> previous<01:51:20.239> video<01:51:20.520> Spanish<01:51:20.880> has 01:51:20.990 --> 01:51:21.000 align:start position:0% I said in my previous video Spanish has 01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:23.390 align:start position:0% I said in my previous video Spanish has many<01:51:21.239> variations<01:51:21.840> of<01:51:22.000> the<01:51:22.199> past<01:51:22.719> such<01:51:22.960> as<01:51:23.239> the 01:51:23.390 --> 01:51:23.400 align:start position:0% many variations of the past such as the 01:51:23.400 --> 01:51:25.589 align:start position:0% many variations of the past such as the imperfect<01:51:24.119> conditional<01:51:24.560> and<01:51:24.679> so<01:51:24.840> on<01:51:25.280> however 01:51:25.589 --> 01:51:25.599 align:start position:0% imperfect conditional and so on however 01:51:25.599 --> 01:51:27.069 align:start position:0% imperfect conditional and so on however what's<01:51:25.800> important<01:51:26.119> with<01:51:26.239> the<01:51:26.360> verb<01:51:26.560> said<01:51:27.000> is 01:51:27.069 --> 01:51:27.079 align:start position:0% what's important with the verb said is 01:51:27.079 --> 01:51:28.629 align:start position:0% what's important with the verb said is that<01:51:27.239> it's<01:51:27.360> used<01:51:27.639> in<01:51:27.719> the<01:51:27.880> past<01:51:28.159> simple 01:51:28.629 --> 01:51:28.639 align:start position:0% that it's used in the past simple 01:51:28.639 --> 01:51:30.709 align:start position:0% that it's used in the past simple strictly<01:51:29.040> for<01:51:29.280> describing<01:51:29.880> actions<01:51:30.480> that 01:51:30.709 --> 01:51:30.719 align:start position:0% strictly for describing actions that 01:51:30.719 --> 01:51:32.629 align:start position:0% strictly for describing actions that specifically<01:51:31.520> happened<01:51:31.880> in<01:51:32.000> the<01:51:32.199> past<01:51:32.560> and 01:51:32.629 --> 01:51:32.639 align:start position:0% specifically happened in the past and 01:51:32.639 --> 01:51:34.350 align:start position:0% specifically happened in the past and I'm<01:51:32.760> putting<01:51:33.000> a<01:51:33.119> very<01:51:33.360> big<01:51:33.599> emphasis<01:51:34.040> on<01:51:34.199> the 01:51:34.350 --> 01:51:34.360 align:start position:0% I'm putting a very big emphasis on the 01:51:34.360 --> 01:51:36.149 align:start position:0% I'm putting a very big emphasis on the word<01:51:34.679> specifically<01:51:35.400> as<01:51:35.520> I<01:51:35.599> don't<01:51:35.719> want<01:51:35.840> to<01:51:36.000> lie 01:51:36.149 --> 01:51:36.159 align:start position:0% word specifically as I don't want to lie 01:51:36.159 --> 01:51:37.709 align:start position:0% word specifically as I don't want to lie to<01:51:36.280> any<01:51:36.400> of<01:51:36.480> you<01:51:36.639> watching<01:51:36.920> this<01:51:37.079> video<01:51:37.560> I 01:51:37.709 --> 01:51:37.719 align:start position:0% to any of you watching this video I 01:51:37.719 --> 01:51:39.270 align:start position:0% to any of you watching this video I myself<01:51:38.040> struggled<01:51:38.480> with<01:51:38.599> the<01:51:38.719> verb<01:51:38.920> said<01:51:39.199> in 01:51:39.270 --> 01:51:39.280 align:start position:0% myself struggled with the verb said in 01:51:39.280 --> 01:51:41.109 align:start position:0% myself struggled with the verb said in the<01:51:39.440> past<01:51:39.639> simple<01:51:40.119> but<01:51:40.239> I<01:51:40.320> can<01:51:40.480> describe<01:51:40.840> it<01:51:41.000> in 01:51:41.109 --> 01:51:41.119 align:start position:0% the past simple but I can describe it in 01:51:41.119 --> 01:51:42.510 align:start position:0% the past simple but I can describe it in the<01:51:41.239> easiest<01:51:41.599> way<01:51:41.840> possible<01:51:42.199> you<01:51:42.320> might 01:51:42.510 --> 01:51:42.520 align:start position:0% the easiest way possible you might 01:51:42.520 --> 01:51:44.149 align:start position:0% the easiest way possible you might remember<01:51:42.800> me<01:51:42.960> explaining<01:51:43.360> the<01:51:43.480> verb<01:51:43.719> said<01:51:44.040> in 01:51:44.149 --> 01:51:44.159 align:start position:0% remember me explaining the verb said in 01:51:44.159 --> 01:51:45.629 align:start position:0% remember me explaining the verb said in one<01:51:44.280> of<01:51:44.400> my<01:51:44.560> previous<01:51:44.880> videos<01:51:45.360> where<01:51:45.520> I 01:51:45.629 --> 01:51:45.639 align:start position:0% one of my previous videos where I 01:51:45.639 --> 01:51:47.350 align:start position:0% one of my previous videos where I described<01:51:46.079> how<01:51:46.199> the<01:51:46.280> verb<01:51:46.520> said<01:51:46.880> works<01:51:47.119> in<01:51:47.239> the 01:51:47.350 --> 01:51:47.360 align:start position:0% described how the verb said works in the 01:51:47.360 --> 01:51:48.910 align:start position:0% described how the verb said works in the present<01:51:47.639> form<01:51:48.040> part<01:51:48.159> of<01:51:48.320> which<01:51:48.440> includes<01:51:48.840> the 01:51:48.910 --> 01:51:48.920 align:start position:0% present form part of which includes the 01:51:48.920 --> 01:51:50.709 align:start position:0% present form part of which includes the following<01:51:49.320> applications<01:51:50.000> of<01:51:50.159> said<01:51:50.440> you<01:51:50.520> might 01:51:50.709 --> 01:51:50.719 align:start position:0% following applications of said you might 01:51:50.719 --> 01:51:52.149 align:start position:0% following applications of said you might be<01:51:50.880> thinking<01:51:51.360> that<01:51:51.520> since<01:51:51.760> these<01:51:51.880> are<01:51:52.000> the 01:51:52.149 --> 01:51:52.159 align:start position:0% be thinking that since these are the 01:51:52.159 --> 01:51:54.030 align:start position:0% be thinking that since these are the uses<01:51:52.560> that<01:51:52.639> are<01:51:52.800> utilized<01:51:53.280> for<01:51:53.480> said<01:51:53.800> in<01:51:53.920> the 01:51:54.030 --> 01:51:54.040 align:start position:0% uses that are utilized for said in the 01:51:54.040 --> 01:51:55.470 align:start position:0% uses that are utilized for said in the present<01:51:54.320> form<01:51:54.679> then<01:51:54.800> they<01:51:54.920> all<01:51:55.119> have<01:51:55.239> to<01:51:55.360> be 01:51:55.470 --> 01:51:55.480 align:start position:0% present form then they all have to be 01:51:55.480 --> 01:51:57.629 align:start position:0% present form then they all have to be used<01:51:55.880> in<01:51:55.960> the<01:51:56.159> past<01:51:56.360> tense<01:51:56.760> also<01:51:57.320> however 01:51:57.629 --> 01:51:57.639 align:start position:0% used in the past tense also however 01:51:57.639 --> 01:51:59.390 align:start position:0% used in the past tense also however since<01:51:57.920> I<01:51:58.000> said<01:51:58.199> that<01:51:58.360> said<01:51:58.760> is<01:51:58.880> used<01:51:59.119> in<01:51:59.239> the 01:51:59.390 --> 01:51:59.400 align:start position:0% since I said that said is used in the 01:51:59.400 --> 01:52:00.910 align:start position:0% since I said that said is used in the past<01:51:59.639> only<01:51:59.840> for<01:52:00.079> situations<01:52:00.599> that<01:52:00.719> were 01:52:00.910 --> 01:52:00.920 align:start position:0% past only for situations that were 01:52:00.920 --> 01:52:02.870 align:start position:0% past only for situations that were finished<01:52:01.360> specifically<01:52:01.880> and<01:52:02.119> factually<01:52:02.760> this 01:52:02.870 --> 01:52:02.880 align:start position:0% finished specifically and factually this 01:52:02.880 --> 01:52:04.910 align:start position:0% finished specifically and factually this Narrows<01:52:03.320> the<01:52:03.400> field<01:52:03.760> of<01:52:03.880> the<01:52:04.040> verb<01:52:04.360> being<01:52:04.599> used 01:52:04.910 --> 01:52:04.920 align:start position:0% Narrows the field of the verb being used 01:52:04.920 --> 01:52:07.270 align:start position:0% Narrows the field of the verb being used in<01:52:05.040> the<01:52:05.199> past<01:52:05.599> only<01:52:06.000> to<01:52:06.239> when<01:52:06.599> where<01:52:06.840> and<01:52:07.040> how 01:52:07.270 --> 01:52:07.280 align:start position:0% in the past only to when where and how 01:52:07.280 --> 01:52:08.950 align:start position:0% in the past only to when where and how events<01:52:07.599> took<01:52:07.880> place<01:52:08.280> which<01:52:08.400> can<01:52:08.599> also<01:52:08.800> be 01:52:08.950 --> 01:52:08.960 align:start position:0% events took place which can also be 01:52:08.960 --> 01:52:10.910 align:start position:0% events took place which can also be explained<01:52:09.440> as<01:52:09.639> events<01:52:10.040> that<01:52:10.239> happened<01:52:10.639> or 01:52:10.910 --> 01:52:10.920 align:start position:0% explained as events that happened or 01:52:10.920 --> 01:52:12.709 align:start position:0% explained as events that happened or finished<01:52:11.360> in<01:52:11.480> the<01:52:11.679> past<01:52:12.040> suppose<01:52:12.320> we<01:52:12.480> have<01:52:12.599> the 01:52:12.709 --> 01:52:12.719 align:start position:0% finished in the past suppose we have the 01:52:12.719 --> 01:52:15.629 align:start position:0% finished in the past suppose we have the phrase<01:52:13.239> la<01:52:13.480> pelicula<01:52:14.199> Fu<01:52:14.639> AB<01:52:15.239> meaning<01:52:15.520> the 01:52:15.629 --> 01:52:15.639 align:start position:0% phrase la pelicula Fu AB meaning the 01:52:15.639 --> 01:52:17.589 align:start position:0% phrase la pelicula Fu AB meaning the movie<01:52:15.960> was<01:52:16.159> boring<01:52:16.639> in<01:52:16.800> this<01:52:16.960> case<01:52:17.280> we<01:52:17.440> have 01:52:17.589 --> 01:52:17.599 align:start position:0% movie was boring in this case we have 01:52:17.599 --> 01:52:20.669 align:start position:0% movie was boring in this case we have the<01:52:17.760> use<01:52:18.040> of<01:52:18.280> Fu<01:52:18.840> which<01:52:19.000> indicates<01:52:19.639> was<01:52:20.199> as<01:52:20.360> in 01:52:20.669 --> 01:52:20.679 align:start position:0% the use of Fu which indicates was as in 01:52:20.679 --> 01:52:22.870 align:start position:0% the use of Fu which indicates was as in the<01:52:20.840> movie<01:52:21.199> was<01:52:21.520> boring<01:52:21.920> since<01:52:22.079> a<01:52:22.239> movie<01:52:22.599> is<01:52:22.719> an 01:52:22.870 --> 01:52:22.880 align:start position:0% the movie was boring since a movie is an 01:52:22.880 --> 01:52:24.310 align:start position:0% the movie was boring since a movie is an event<01:52:23.159> that<01:52:23.280> happened<01:52:23.599> in<01:52:23.719> the<01:52:23.880> past<01:52:24.159> and 01:52:24.310 --> 01:52:24.320 align:start position:0% event that happened in the past and 01:52:24.320 --> 01:52:25.990 align:start position:0% event that happened in the past and stayed<01:52:24.639> in<01:52:24.760> the<01:52:24.920> past<01:52:25.320> the<01:52:25.480> act<01:52:25.679> of<01:52:25.840> the 01:52:25.990 --> 01:52:26.000 align:start position:0% stayed in the past the act of the 01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:28.390 align:start position:0% stayed in the past the act of the sentence<01:52:26.599> remains<01:52:26.920> factual<01:52:27.560> because<01:52:27.760> of<01:52:28.040> how 01:52:28.390 --> 01:52:28.400 align:start position:0% sentence remains factual because of how 01:52:28.400 --> 01:52:29.910 align:start position:0% sentence remains factual because of how was<01:52:28.679> the<01:52:28.800> movie<01:52:29.159> and<01:52:29.280> since<01:52:29.520> there<01:52:29.639> is<01:52:29.800> the 01:52:29.910 --> 01:52:29.920 align:start position:0% was the movie and since there is the 01:52:29.920 --> 01:52:32.270 align:start position:0% was the movie and since there is the word<01:52:30.159> f<01:52:30.639> in<01:52:30.760> the<01:52:30.880> sentence<01:52:31.480> this<01:52:31.599> shows<01:52:31.920> you 01:52:32.270 --> 01:52:32.280 align:start position:0% word f in the sentence this shows you 01:52:32.280 --> 01:52:34.030 align:start position:0% word f in the sentence this shows you how<01:52:32.480> fu<01:52:32.920> is<01:52:33.000> used<01:52:33.280> more<01:52:33.560> than<01:52:33.719> the<01:52:33.840> other 01:52:34.030 --> 01:52:34.040 align:start position:0% how fu is used more than the other 01:52:34.040 --> 01:52:36.030 align:start position:0% how fu is used more than the other conjugations<01:52:34.719> of<01:52:34.880> SE<01:52:35.360> however<01:52:35.639> and<01:52:35.760> this<01:52:35.920> is 01:52:36.030 --> 01:52:36.040 align:start position:0% conjugations of SE however and this is 01:52:36.040 --> 01:52:37.430 align:start position:0% conjugations of SE however and this is something<01:52:36.239> that<01:52:36.360> I'll<01:52:36.560> show<01:52:37.000> rather<01:52:37.239> than 01:52:37.430 --> 01:52:37.440 align:start position:0% something that I'll show rather than 01:52:37.440 --> 01:52:39.189 align:start position:0% something that I'll show rather than explain<01:52:37.920> if<01:52:38.040> you<01:52:38.199> take<01:52:38.440> this<01:52:38.599> phrase<01:52:39.040> the 01:52:39.189 --> 01:52:39.199 align:start position:0% explain if you take this phrase the 01:52:39.199 --> 01:52:40.870 align:start position:0% explain if you take this phrase the movie<01:52:39.480> was<01:52:39.719> boring<01:52:40.159> and<01:52:40.280> plug<01:52:40.480> it<01:52:40.599> into<01:52:40.760> a 01:52:40.870 --> 01:52:40.880 align:start position:0% movie was boring and plug it into a 01:52:40.880 --> 01:52:42.750 align:start position:0% movie was boring and plug it into a translator<01:52:41.560> it<01:52:41.679> might<01:52:41.840> give<01:52:41.960> a<01:52:42.119> translation 01:52:42.750 --> 01:52:42.760 align:start position:0% translator it might give a translation 01:52:42.760 --> 01:52:44.229 align:start position:0% translator it might give a translation that<01:52:42.920> has<01:52:43.079> the<01:52:43.199> word<01:52:43.560> era<01:52:43.960> while<01:52:44.119> the 01:52:44.229 --> 01:52:44.239 align:start position:0% that has the word era while the 01:52:44.239 --> 01:52:45.750 align:start position:0% that has the word era while the translation<01:52:44.679> of<01:52:44.800> the<01:52:44.920> sentence<01:52:45.280> doesn't<01:52:45.560> go 01:52:45.750 --> 01:52:45.760 align:start position:0% translation of the sentence doesn't go 01:52:45.760 --> 01:52:47.669 align:start position:0% translation of the sentence doesn't go away<01:52:46.079> the<01:52:46.159> meaning<01:52:46.520> is<01:52:46.719> quite<01:52:47.000> wrong<01:52:47.480> about 01:52:47.669 --> 01:52:47.679 align:start position:0% away the meaning is quite wrong about 01:52:47.679 --> 01:52:50.030 align:start position:0% away the meaning is quite wrong about the<01:52:47.840> phrase<01:52:48.320> because<01:52:48.679> era<01:52:49.079> is<01:52:49.239> the<01:52:49.400> imperfect 01:52:50.030 --> 01:52:50.040 align:start position:0% the phrase because era is the imperfect 01:52:50.040 --> 01:52:52.390 align:start position:0% the phrase because era is the imperfect tense<01:52:50.360> of<01:52:50.560> said<01:52:50.920> of<01:52:51.040> the<01:52:51.199> it<01:52:51.480> pronoun<01:52:52.000> meaning 01:52:52.390 --> 01:52:52.400 align:start position:0% tense of said of the it pronoun meaning 01:52:52.400 --> 01:52:54.069 align:start position:0% tense of said of the it pronoun meaning used<01:52:52.679> to<01:52:52.840> be<01:52:53.079> and<01:52:53.199> it's<01:52:53.400> actually<01:52:53.639> a<01:52:53.800> word 01:52:54.069 --> 01:52:54.079 align:start position:0% used to be and it's actually a word 01:52:54.079 --> 01:52:55.790 align:start position:0% used to be and it's actually a word that's<01:52:54.239> used<01:52:54.480> more<01:52:54.719> often<01:52:55.000> than<01:52:55.199> F<01:52:55.599> but<01:52:55.719> the 01:52:55.790 --> 01:52:55.800 align:start position:0% that's used more often than F but the 01:52:55.800 --> 01:52:57.310 align:start position:0% that's used more often than F but the emphasis<01:52:56.119> of<01:52:56.280> this<01:52:56.480> video<01:52:56.800> is<01:52:56.960> the<01:52:57.119> past 01:52:57.310 --> 01:52:57.320 align:start position:0% emphasis of this video is the past 01:52:57.320 --> 01:53:00.470 align:start position:0% emphasis of this video is the past simple<01:52:57.800> saying<01:52:58.159> laela<01:52:59.000> ER<01:52:59.360> AB<01:53:00.040> means<01:53:00.320> the 01:53:00.470 --> 01:53:00.480 align:start position:0% simple saying laela ER AB means the 01:53:00.480 --> 01:53:02.629 align:start position:0% simple saying laela ER AB means the movie<01:53:00.880> used<01:53:01.159> to<01:53:01.280> be<01:53:01.480> boring<01:53:02.040> which<01:53:02.199> logically 01:53:02.629 --> 01:53:02.639 align:start position:0% movie used to be boring which logically 01:53:02.639 --> 01:53:04.750 align:start position:0% movie used to be boring which logically doesn't<01:53:02.920> make<01:53:03.119> sense<01:53:03.520> which<01:53:03.599> is<01:53:03.760> why<01:53:03.960> F<01:53:04.480> has<01:53:04.639> to 01:53:04.750 --> 01:53:04.760 align:start position:0% doesn't make sense which is why F has to 01:53:04.760 --> 01:53:07.030 align:start position:0% doesn't make sense which is why F has to be<01:53:04.880> used<01:53:05.320> indicating<01:53:05.800> how<01:53:06.040> events<01:53:06.520> took<01:53:06.760> place 01:53:07.030 --> 01:53:07.040 align:start position:0% be used indicating how events took place 01:53:07.040 --> 01:53:08.950 align:start position:0% be used indicating how events took place in<01:53:07.159> the<01:53:07.320> past<01:53:07.679> era<01:53:08.159> is<01:53:08.239> used<01:53:08.520> more<01:53:08.719> when<01:53:08.840> it 01:53:08.950 --> 01:53:08.960 align:start position:0% in the past era is used more when it 01:53:08.960 --> 01:53:10.589 align:start position:0% in the past era is used more when it comes<01:53:09.159> down<01:53:09.280> to<01:53:09.440> describing<01:53:10.000> objects<01:53:10.400> and 01:53:10.589 --> 01:53:10.599 align:start position:0% comes down to describing objects and 01:53:10.599 --> 01:53:12.109 align:start position:0% comes down to describing objects and people<01:53:11.000> but<01:53:11.119> it's<01:53:11.239> a<01:53:11.400> topic<01:53:11.599> for<01:53:11.719> a<01:53:11.840> future 01:53:12.109 --> 01:53:12.119 align:start position:0% people but it's a topic for a future 01:53:12.119 --> 01:53:13.910 align:start position:0% people but it's a topic for a future video<01:53:12.560> in<01:53:12.719> this<01:53:12.920> video<01:53:13.280> I<01:53:13.400> just<01:53:13.520> wanted<01:53:13.800> to 01:53:13.910 --> 01:53:13.920 align:start position:0% video in this video I just wanted to 01:53:13.920 --> 01:53:15.350 align:start position:0% video in this video I just wanted to mention<01:53:14.280> that<01:53:14.599> so<01:53:14.760> that<01:53:14.880> you<01:53:14.960> don't<01:53:15.159> get 01:53:15.350 --> 01:53:15.360 align:start position:0% mention that so that you don't get 01:53:15.360 --> 01:53:17.270 align:start position:0% mention that so that you don't get confused<01:53:15.880> about<01:53:16.079> how<01:53:16.199> the<01:53:16.360> use<01:53:16.679> said<01:53:17.000> in<01:53:17.119> the 01:53:17.270 --> 01:53:17.280 align:start position:0% confused about how the use said in the 01:53:17.280 --> 01:53:19.550 align:start position:0% confused about how the use said in the past<01:53:17.480> tense<01:53:17.920> fu<01:53:18.520> is<01:53:18.719> by<01:53:18.880> far<01:53:19.079> the<01:53:19.159> most<01:53:19.320> common 01:53:19.550 --> 01:53:19.560 align:start position:0% past tense fu is by far the most common 01:53:19.560 --> 01:53:22.229 align:start position:0% past tense fu is by far the most common use<01:53:19.880> of<01:53:20.320> used<01:53:20.520> for<01:53:20.679> the<01:53:20.840> construction<01:53:21.599> it<01:53:21.840> was 01:53:22.229 --> 01:53:22.239 align:start position:0% use of used for the construction it was 01:53:22.239 --> 01:53:24.030 align:start position:0% use of used for the construction it was like 01:53:24.030 --> 01:53:24.040 align:start position:0% like 01:53:24.040 --> 01:53:26.750 align:start position:0% like saying<01:53:25.040> it<01:53:25.159> was<01:53:25.639> difficult<01:53:25.960> to<01:53:26.119> study<01:53:26.400> for<01:53:26.560> the 01:53:26.750 --> 01:53:26.760 align:start position:0% saying it was difficult to study for the 01:53:26.760 --> 01:53:28.350 align:start position:0% saying it was difficult to study for the test<01:53:27.079> which<01:53:27.199> can<01:53:27.360> be<01:53:27.440> said<01:53:27.719> the<01:53:27.880> same<01:53:28.119> in<01:53:28.239> the 01:53:28.350 --> 01:53:28.360 align:start position:0% test which can be said the same in the 01:53:28.360 --> 01:53:31.270 align:start position:0% test which can be said the same in the present<01:53:28.679> tense<01:53:29.040> by<01:53:29.199> simply<01:53:29.440> changing<01:53:29.840> one 01:53:31.270 --> 01:53:31.280 align:start position:0% present tense by simply changing one 01:53:31.280 --> 01:53:33.950 align:start position:0% present tense by simply changing one word<01:53:32.280> it<01:53:32.360> is<01:53:32.760> difficult<01:53:33.000> to<01:53:33.159> do<01:53:33.320> the<01:53:33.480> test<01:53:33.840> and 01:53:33.950 --> 01:53:33.960 align:start position:0% word it is difficult to do the test and 01:53:33.960 --> 01:53:35.510 align:start position:0% word it is difficult to do the test and you<01:53:34.040> can<01:53:34.159> also<01:53:34.400> have<01:53:34.520> simpler<01:53:34.960> sentences 01:53:35.510 --> 01:53:35.520 align:start position:0% you can also have simpler sentences 01:53:35.520 --> 01:53:37.030 align:start position:0% you can also have simpler sentences which<01:53:35.639> are<01:53:35.840> sentences<01:53:36.320> that<01:53:36.480> I<01:53:36.639> recommend 01:53:37.030 --> 01:53:37.040 align:start position:0% which are sentences that I recommend 01:53:37.040 --> 01:53:38.830 align:start position:0% which are sentences that I recommend using<01:53:37.360> the<01:53:37.480> most 01:53:38.830 --> 01:53:38.840 align:start position:0% using the most 01:53:38.840 --> 01:53:41.589 align:start position:0% using the most likea<01:53:39.840> meaning<01:53:40.119> the<01:53:40.280> party<01:53:40.719> was<01:53:40.920> in<01:53:41.079> the<01:53:41.239> club 01:53:41.589 --> 01:53:41.599 align:start position:0% likea meaning the party was in the club 01:53:41.599 --> 01:53:43.229 align:start position:0% likea meaning the party was in the club which<01:53:41.679> is<01:53:41.840> the<01:53:41.960> easiest<01:53:42.360> sentence<01:53:42.840> that<01:53:42.960> shows 01:53:43.229 --> 01:53:43.239 align:start position:0% which is the easiest sentence that shows 01:53:43.239 --> 01:53:45.310 align:start position:0% which is the easiest sentence that shows how<01:53:43.480> said<01:53:43.840> is<01:53:43.960> used<01:53:44.239> perfectly<01:53:44.719> and<01:53:44.840> logically 01:53:45.310 --> 01:53:45.320 align:start position:0% how said is used perfectly and logically 01:53:45.320 --> 01:53:47.310 align:start position:0% how said is used perfectly and logically in<01:53:45.440> the<01:53:45.639> past<01:53:45.960> by<01:53:46.159> acting<01:53:46.480> as<01:53:46.599> an<01:53:46.800> event<01:53:47.199> that 01:53:47.310 --> 01:53:47.320 align:start position:0% in the past by acting as an event that 01:53:47.320 --> 01:53:49.109 align:start position:0% in the past by acting as an event that took<01:53:47.520> place<01:53:47.840> in<01:53:47.960> the<01:53:48.119> past<01:53:48.400> and<01:53:48.560> stayed<01:53:48.880> in<01:53:49.000> the 01:53:49.109 --> 01:53:49.119 align:start position:0% took place in the past and stayed in the 01:53:49.119 --> 01:53:51.069 align:start position:0% took place in the past and stayed in the past<01:53:49.440> in<01:53:49.560> the<01:53:49.840> video<01:53:50.199> I<01:53:50.320> wanted<01:53:50.520> to<01:53:50.639> show<01:53:50.920> how 01:53:51.069 --> 01:53:51.079 align:start position:0% past in the video I wanted to show how 01:53:51.079 --> 01:53:53.550 align:start position:0% past in the video I wanted to show how the<01:53:51.199> verbs<01:53:51.560> sir<01:53:52.000> and<01:53:52.199> ear<01:53:52.520> work<01:53:52.760> in<01:53:52.920> Spanish<01:53:53.440> by 01:53:53.550 --> 01:53:53.560 align:start position:0% the verbs sir and ear work in Spanish by 01:53:53.560 --> 01:53:55.030 align:start position:0% the verbs sir and ear work in Spanish by having<01:53:53.800> the<01:53:53.880> same<01:53:54.119> syntax<01:53:54.560> in<01:53:54.679> the<01:53:54.840> past 01:53:55.030 --> 01:53:55.040 align:start position:0% having the same syntax in the past 01:53:55.040 --> 01:53:56.910 align:start position:0% having the same syntax in the past simple<01:53:55.360> tense<01:53:55.760> and<01:53:55.880> also<01:53:56.119> being<01:53:56.360> able<01:53:56.599> to<01:53:56.760> tell 01:53:56.910 --> 01:53:56.920 align:start position:0% simple tense and also being able to tell 01:53:56.920 --> 01:53:58.709 align:start position:0% simple tense and also being able to tell the<01:53:57.040> difference<01:53:57.360> between<01:53:57.719> them<01:53:57.920> in<01:53:58.119> context 01:53:58.709 --> 01:53:58.719 align:start position:0% the difference between them in context 01:53:58.719 --> 01:54:00.350 align:start position:0% the difference between them in context of<01:53:58.880> course<01:53:59.239> you<01:53:59.360> can<01:53:59.480> make<01:53:59.679> any<01:53:59.880> sentence<01:54:00.239> that 01:54:00.350 --> 01:54:00.360 align:start position:0% of course you can make any sentence that 01:54:00.360 --> 01:54:02.069 align:start position:0% of course you can make any sentence that you<01:54:00.480> want<01:54:00.719> using<01:54:01.040> said<01:54:01.360> and<01:54:01.599> IR<01:54:01.920> but<01:54:02.000> the 01:54:02.069 --> 01:54:02.079 align:start position:0% you want using said and IR but the 01:54:02.079 --> 01:54:03.790 align:start position:0% you want using said and IR but the biggest<01:54:02.360> step<01:54:02.560> that<01:54:02.719> I<01:54:02.840> can<01:54:03.040> give<01:54:03.360> in<01:54:03.440> order<01:54:03.679> to 01:54:03.790 --> 01:54:03.800 align:start position:0% biggest step that I can give in order to 01:54:03.800 --> 01:54:05.030 align:start position:0% biggest step that I can give in order to tell<01:54:03.960> the<01:54:04.079> difference<01:54:04.400> between<01:54:04.679> them<01:54:04.800> in 01:54:05.030 --> 01:54:05.040 align:start position:0% tell the difference between them in 01:54:05.040 --> 01:54:07.430 align:start position:0% tell the difference between them in context<01:54:05.639> is<01:54:05.800> that<01:54:05.920> the<01:54:06.040> verb<01:54:06.320> IR<01:54:06.679> means<01:54:06.960> to<01:54:07.119> go 01:54:07.430 --> 01:54:07.440 align:start position:0% context is that the verb IR means to go 01:54:07.440 --> 01:54:09.229 align:start position:0% context is that the verb IR means to go and<01:54:07.520> if<01:54:07.599> you<01:54:07.719> see<01:54:07.880> the<01:54:08.000> preposition<01:54:08.599> ah<01:54:09.040> with 01:54:09.229 --> 01:54:09.239 align:start position:0% and if you see the preposition ah with 01:54:09.239 --> 01:54:11.030 align:start position:0% and if you see the preposition ah with or<01:54:09.440> without<01:54:09.679> an<01:54:09.840> infinitive<01:54:10.400> after<01:54:10.679> it<01:54:10.920> then 01:54:11.030 --> 01:54:11.040 align:start position:0% or without an infinitive after it then 01:54:11.040 --> 01:54:13.550 align:start position:0% or without an infinitive after it then the<01:54:11.159> verb<01:54:11.480> has<01:54:11.599> to<01:54:11.760> be<01:54:12.079> IR<01:54:12.440> alongside<01:54:13.199> the<01:54:13.320> verb 01:54:13.550 --> 01:54:13.560 align:start position:0% the verb has to be IR alongside the verb 01:54:13.560 --> 01:54:15.350 align:start position:0% the verb has to be IR alongside the verb said<01:54:14.000> means<01:54:14.280> to<01:54:14.440> be<01:54:14.760> and<01:54:14.880> if<01:54:14.960> you<01:54:15.040> see<01:54:15.239> a 01:54:15.350 --> 01:54:15.360 align:start position:0% said means to be and if you see a 01:54:15.360 --> 01:54:16.470 align:start position:0% said means to be and if you see a sentence<01:54:15.800> that<01:54:15.920> begins<01:54:16.239> with<01:54:16.360> the 01:54:16.470 --> 01:54:16.480 align:start position:0% sentence that begins with the 01:54:16.480 --> 01:54:18.750 align:start position:0% sentence that begins with the construction<01:54:17.000> F<01:54:17.480> meaning<01:54:17.880> it<01:54:18.119> was<01:54:18.520> or<01:54:18.639> a 01:54:18.750 --> 01:54:18.760 align:start position:0% construction F meaning it was or a 01:54:18.760 --> 01:54:20.830 align:start position:0% construction F meaning it was or a sentence<01:54:19.079> that<01:54:19.239> has<01:54:19.400> f<01:54:19.960> in<01:54:20.119> it<01:54:20.360> with<01:54:20.480> an<01:54:20.639> event 01:54:20.830 --> 01:54:20.840 align:start position:0% sentence that has f in it with an event 01:54:20.840 --> 01:54:22.390 align:start position:0% sentence that has f in it with an event that's<01:54:21.040> specifically<01:54:21.440> finished<01:54:21.760> in<01:54:21.880> the<01:54:22.040> past 01:54:22.390 --> 01:54:22.400 align:start position:0% that's specifically finished in the past 01:54:22.400 --> 01:54:24.270 align:start position:0% that's specifically finished in the past then<01:54:22.599> that<01:54:22.760> verb<01:54:23.079> is<01:54:23.239> the<01:54:23.360> verb<01:54:23.599> said<01:54:24.000> in<01:54:24.119> the 01:54:24.270 --> 01:54:24.280 align:start position:0% then that verb is the verb said in the 01:54:24.280 --> 01:54:25.870 align:start position:0% then that verb is the verb said in the past<01:54:24.719> if<01:54:24.800> you<01:54:24.920> want<01:54:25.119> to<01:54:25.440> you<01:54:25.560> can<01:54:25.679> even 01:54:25.870 --> 01:54:25.880 align:start position:0% past if you want to you can even 01:54:25.880 --> 01:54:27.470 align:start position:0% past if you want to you can even practice<01:54:26.159> on<01:54:26.360> some<01:54:26.480> of<01:54:26.639> my<01:54:26.800> sentences<01:54:27.280> in<01:54:27.360> the 01:54:27.470 --> 01:54:27.480 align:start position:0% practice on some of my sentences in the 01:54:27.480 --> 01:54:29.430 align:start position:0% practice on some of my sentences in the video<01:54:27.920> and<01:54:28.079> put<01:54:28.239> them<01:54:28.360> in<01:54:28.520> English<01:54:29.119> in<01:54:29.239> order 01:54:29.430 --> 01:54:29.440 align:start position:0% video and put them in English in order 01:54:29.440 --> 01:54:30.910 align:start position:0% video and put them in English in order to<01:54:29.599> see<01:54:29.719> if<01:54:29.840> you<01:54:29.960> got<01:54:30.119> them<01:54:30.320> right<01:54:30.599> and<01:54:30.679> if<01:54:30.800> you 01:54:30.910 --> 01:54:30.920 align:start position:0% to see if you got them right and if you 01:54:30.920 --> 01:54:32.510 align:start position:0% to see if you got them right and if you did<01:54:31.199> then<01:54:31.320> you<01:54:31.400> did<01:54:31.560> a<01:54:31.679> good<01:54:31.880> job<01:54:32.199> there<01:54:32.320> are 01:54:32.510 --> 01:54:32.520 align:start position:0% did then you did a good job there are 01:54:32.520 --> 01:54:34.470 align:start position:0% did then you did a good job there are many<01:54:32.760> types<01:54:32.960> of<01:54:33.119> verbs<01:54:33.360> in<01:54:33.480> Spanish<01:54:34.079> such<01:54:34.280> as 01:54:34.470 --> 01:54:34.480 align:start position:0% many types of verbs in Spanish such as 01:54:34.480 --> 01:54:36.589 align:start position:0% many types of verbs in Spanish such as stem<01:54:34.760> changing<01:54:35.280> irregular<01:54:35.880> yo<01:54:36.199> and<01:54:36.360> just 01:54:36.589 --> 01:54:36.599 align:start position:0% stem changing irregular yo and just 01:54:36.599 --> 01:54:38.430 align:start position:0% stem changing irregular yo and just irregular<01:54:37.079> verbs<01:54:37.360> in<01:54:37.480> general<01:54:37.960> and<01:54:38.079> in<01:54:38.239> this 01:54:38.430 --> 01:54:38.440 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in general and in this 01:54:38.440 --> 01:54:39.870 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in general and in this video<01:54:38.800> I<01:54:38.880> would<01:54:39.000> like<01:54:39.119> to<01:54:39.280> describe<01:54:39.639> every 01:54:39.870 --> 01:54:39.880 align:start position:0% video I would like to describe every 01:54:39.880 --> 01:54:41.629 align:start position:0% video I would like to describe every type<01:54:40.079> of<01:54:40.239> them<01:54:40.520> in<01:54:40.599> the<01:54:40.760> past<01:54:41.000> simple<01:54:41.239> form 01:54:41.629 --> 01:54:41.639 align:start position:0% type of them in the past simple form 01:54:41.639 --> 01:54:42.910 align:start position:0% type of them in the past simple form even<01:54:41.880> though<01:54:42.040> not<01:54:42.280> every<01:54:42.480> verb<01:54:42.679> will<01:54:42.800> be 01:54:42.910 --> 01:54:42.920 align:start position:0% even though not every verb will be 01:54:42.920 --> 01:54:44.430 align:start position:0% even though not every verb will be included<01:54:43.320> in<01:54:43.440> the<01:54:43.560> video<01:54:44.000> because<01:54:44.199> you<01:54:44.280> don't 01:54:44.430 --> 01:54:44.440 align:start position:0% included in the video because you don't 01:54:44.440 --> 01:54:46.069 align:start position:0% included in the video because you don't need<01:54:44.679> all<01:54:44.840> of<01:54:44.960> them<01:54:45.280> I<01:54:45.360> will<01:54:45.560> explain<01:54:45.920> all 01:54:46.069 --> 01:54:46.079 align:start position:0% need all of them I will explain all 01:54:46.079 --> 01:54:47.990 align:start position:0% need all of them I will explain all types<01:54:46.320> of<01:54:46.440> verbs<01:54:46.840> in<01:54:46.960> the<01:54:47.119> past<01:54:47.360> for<01:54:47.560> the<01:54:47.719> first 01:54:47.990 --> 01:54:48.000 align:start position:0% types of verbs in the past for the first 01:54:48.000 --> 01:54:49.669 align:start position:0% types of verbs in the past for the first video<01:54:48.400> but<01:54:48.520> in<01:54:48.639> the<01:54:48.800> second<01:54:49.079> one<01:54:49.320> I'll<01:54:49.480> f 01:54:49.669 --> 01:54:49.679 align:start position:0% video but in the second one I'll f 01:54:49.679 --> 01:54:51.149 align:start position:0% video but in the second one I'll f finished<01:54:49.960> what<01:54:50.079> I<01:54:50.199> left<01:54:50.440> off<01:54:50.719> the<01:54:50.800> list<01:54:51.000> will 01:54:51.149 --> 01:54:51.159 align:start position:0% finished what I left off the list will 01:54:51.159 --> 01:54:52.750 align:start position:0% finished what I left off the list will include<01:54:51.480> weird<01:54:51.679> stem<01:54:51.920> changing<01:54:52.280> verbs<01:54:52.599> and 01:54:52.750 --> 01:54:52.760 align:start position:0% include weird stem changing verbs and 01:54:52.760 --> 01:54:54.750 align:start position:0% include weird stem changing verbs and irregular<01:54:53.280> yo<01:54:53.520> verbs<01:54:53.960> which<01:54:54.079> I<01:54:54.159> will<01:54:54.360> separate 01:54:54.750 --> 01:54:54.760 align:start position:0% irregular yo verbs which I will separate 01:54:54.760 --> 01:54:56.629 align:start position:0% irregular yo verbs which I will separate by<01:54:54.960> categories<01:54:55.599> and<01:54:55.719> explain<01:54:56.040> how<01:54:56.119> to<01:54:56.280> use<01:54:56.520> in 01:54:56.629 --> 01:54:56.639 align:start position:0% by categories and explain how to use in 01:54:56.639 --> 01:54:58.750 align:start position:0% by categories and explain how to use in the<01:54:56.800> past<01:54:57.119> doing<01:54:57.360> so<01:54:57.679> as<01:54:57.840> quickly<01:54:58.159> as<01:54:58.280> I<01:54:58.440> can 01:54:58.750 --> 01:54:58.760 align:start position:0% the past doing so as quickly as I can 01:54:58.760 --> 01:55:00.629 align:start position:0% the past doing so as quickly as I can starting<01:54:59.119> with<01:54:59.360> generic<01:54:59.760> irregular<01:55:00.280> verbs 01:55:00.629 --> 01:55:00.639 align:start position:0% starting with generic irregular verbs 01:55:00.639 --> 01:55:02.910 align:start position:0% starting with generic irregular verbs that<01:55:00.800> have<01:55:00.960> the<01:55:01.119> TUV<01:55:01.840> change<01:55:02.239> in<01:55:02.440> them<01:55:02.719> one<01:55:02.840> of 01:55:02.910 --> 01:55:02.920 align:start position:0% that have the TUV change in them one of 01:55:02.920 --> 01:55:04.750 align:start position:0% that have the TUV change in them one of the<01:55:03.000> verbs<01:55:03.280> that<01:55:03.400> falls<01:55:03.719> into<01:55:03.960> this<01:55:04.159> category 01:55:04.750 --> 01:55:04.760 align:start position:0% the verbs that falls into this category 01:55:04.760 --> 01:55:06.470 align:start position:0% the verbs that falls into this category is<01:55:05.040> Ted<01:55:05.440> which<01:55:05.639> doesn't<01:55:05.840> follow<01:55:06.079> the<01:55:06.199> normal 01:55:06.470 --> 01:55:06.480 align:start position:0% is Ted which doesn't follow the normal 01:55:06.480 --> 01:55:08.229 align:start position:0% is Ted which doesn't follow the normal conjugation<01:55:07.040> pattern<01:55:07.440> of<01:55:07.560> verbs<01:55:07.840> ending<01:55:08.079> in 01:55:08.229 --> 01:55:08.239 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern of verbs ending in 01:55:08.239 --> 01:55:10.350 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern of verbs ending in eer<01:55:08.800> instead<01:55:09.040> of<01:55:09.119> following<01:55:09.480> the<01:55:09.599> syntax<01:55:10.199> of 01:55:10.350 --> 01:55:10.360 align:start position:0% eer instead of following the syntax of 01:55:10.360 --> 01:55:12.870 align:start position:0% eer instead of following the syntax of normal<01:55:10.719> verbs<01:55:11.000> ending<01:55:11.239> in<01:55:11.400> eer<01:55:12.000> taned<01:55:12.560> decides 01:55:12.870 --> 01:55:12.880 align:start position:0% normal verbs ending in eer taned decides 01:55:12.880 --> 01:55:17.629 align:start position:0% normal verbs ending in eer taned decides to<01:55:13.040> use<01:55:13.480> T<01:55:14.360> as<01:55:14.480> its<01:55:14.639> main<01:55:14.880> stem<01:55:15.400> y<01:55:16.360> means<01:55:16.840> I<01:55:17.079> had 01:55:17.629 --> 01:55:17.639 align:start position:0% to use T as its main stem y means I had 01:55:17.639 --> 01:55:21.910 align:start position:0% to use T as its main stem y means I had to<01:55:18.639> you<01:55:18.920> had<01:55:19.360> l<01:55:19.840> tovo<01:55:20.599> he<01:55:20.880> had<01:55:21.239> and<01:55:21.360> so<01:55:21.520> on<01:55:21.800> I 01:55:21.910 --> 01:55:21.920 align:start position:0% to you had l tovo he had and so on I 01:55:21.920 --> 01:55:23.709 align:start position:0% to you had l tovo he had and so on I recommend<01:55:22.280> not<01:55:22.440> focusing<01:55:22.800> on<01:55:23.000> these<01:55:23.199> pronouns 01:55:23.709 --> 01:55:23.719 align:start position:0% recommend not focusing on these pronouns 01:55:23.719 --> 01:55:24.830 align:start position:0% recommend not focusing on these pronouns because<01:55:23.920> they're<01:55:24.079> not<01:55:24.239> that<01:55:24.360> useful<01:55:24.679> in 01:55:24.830 --> 01:55:24.840 align:start position:0% because they're not that useful in 01:55:24.840 --> 01:55:26.550 align:start position:0% because they're not that useful in conversation<01:55:25.560> and<01:55:25.639> so<01:55:25.840> the<01:55:25.960> other<01:55:26.159> ones<01:55:26.400> are 01:55:26.550 --> 01:55:26.560 align:start position:0% conversation and so the other ones are 01:55:26.560 --> 01:55:28.709 align:start position:0% conversation and so the other ones are more<01:55:26.800> useful<01:55:27.360> like 01:55:28.709 --> 01:55:28.719 align:start position:0% more useful like 01:55:28.719 --> 01:55:31.109 align:start position:0% more useful like saying<01:55:29.719> I<01:55:29.840> had<01:55:30.000> a<01:55:30.199> cat<01:55:30.520> or<01:55:30.679> maybe<01:55:30.880> if<01:55:30.960> you<01:55:31.040> want 01:55:31.109 --> 01:55:31.119 align:start position:0% saying I had a cat or maybe if you want 01:55:31.119 --> 01:55:34.109 align:start position:0% saying I had a cat or maybe if you want to<01:55:31.239> include<01:55:31.520> an<01:55:31.719> action<01:55:32.000> inside<01:55:32.560> you<01:55:32.639> can 01:55:34.109 --> 01:55:34.119 align:start position:0% to include an action inside you can 01:55:34.119 --> 01:55:36.790 align:start position:0% to include an action inside you can say<01:55:35.119> meaning<01:55:35.440> you<01:55:35.679> had<01:55:35.880> to<01:55:36.000> do<01:55:36.159> your<01:55:36.280> homework 01:55:36.790 --> 01:55:36.800 align:start position:0% say meaning you had to do your homework 01:55:36.800 --> 01:55:38.310 align:start position:0% say meaning you had to do your homework and<01:55:36.920> from<01:55:37.159> there<01:55:37.400> you<01:55:37.480> can<01:55:37.639> make<01:55:37.840> any<01:55:38.000> sentence 01:55:38.310 --> 01:55:38.320 align:start position:0% and from there you can make any sentence 01:55:38.320 --> 01:55:40.470 align:start position:0% and from there you can make any sentence you<01:55:38.480> want<01:55:38.880> after<01:55:39.119> the<01:55:39.239> verb<01:55:39.480> T<01:55:39.920> there<01:55:40.040> are<01:55:40.239> some 01:55:40.470 --> 01:55:40.480 align:start position:0% you want after the verb T there are some 01:55:40.480 --> 01:55:42.910 align:start position:0% you want after the verb T there are some verbs<01:55:40.920> that<01:55:41.119> have<01:55:41.320> the<01:55:41.440> word<01:55:41.840> ten<01:55:42.360> in<01:55:42.560> them 01:55:42.910 --> 01:55:42.920 align:start position:0% verbs that have the word ten in them 01:55:42.920 --> 01:55:44.709 align:start position:0% verbs that have the word ten in them with<01:55:43.159> different<01:55:43.440> prefix<01:55:44.000> in<01:55:44.079> the<01:55:44.199> beginning 01:55:44.709 --> 01:55:44.719 align:start position:0% with different prefix in the beginning 01:55:44.719 --> 01:55:48.750 align:start position:0% with different prefix in the beginning such<01:55:44.960> as<01:55:45.320> DET<01:55:46.480> rer<01:55:47.480> and<01:55:47.719> oper<01:55:48.320> and<01:55:48.440> in<01:55:48.520> case<01:55:48.679> you 01:55:48.750 --> 01:55:48.760 align:start position:0% such as DET rer and oper and in case you 01:55:48.760 --> 01:55:50.109 align:start position:0% such as DET rer and oper and in case you want<01:55:48.880> to<01:55:49.000> use<01:55:49.159> any<01:55:49.280> of<01:55:49.400> them<01:55:49.639> in<01:55:49.719> the<01:55:49.880> past 01:55:50.109 --> 01:55:50.119 align:start position:0% want to use any of them in the past 01:55:50.119 --> 01:55:52.149 align:start position:0% want to use any of them in the past tense<01:55:50.480> you<01:55:50.639> have<01:55:50.760> to<01:55:50.960> remember<01:55:51.440> to<01:55:51.679> likewise 01:55:52.149 --> 01:55:52.159 align:start position:0% tense you have to remember to likewise 01:55:52.159 --> 01:55:55.310 align:start position:0% tense you have to remember to likewise change<01:55:52.520> them<01:55:52.880> with<01:55:53.199> the<01:55:54.199> like<01:55:54.320> you<01:55:54.440> change<01:55:55.199> and 01:55:55.310 --> 01:55:55.320 align:start position:0% change them with the like you change and 01:55:55.320 --> 01:55:56.870 align:start position:0% change them with the like you change and with<01:55:55.480> verbs<01:55:55.800> like<01:55:56.000> these<01:55:56.280> it's<01:55:56.440> more<01:55:56.599> useful 01:55:56.870 --> 01:55:56.880 align:start position:0% with verbs like these it's more useful 01:55:56.880 --> 01:55:58.550 align:start position:0% with verbs like these it's more useful to<01:55:57.000> know<01:55:57.239> them<01:55:57.560> than<01:55:57.679> to<01:55:57.800> use<01:55:58.000> them<01:55:58.239> luckily 01:55:58.550 --> 01:55:58.560 align:start position:0% to know them than to use them luckily 01:55:58.560 --> 01:56:00.550 align:start position:0% to know them than to use them luckily for<01:55:58.760> Spanish<01:55:59.320> there's<01:55:59.480> a<01:55:59.639> very<01:55:59.800> useful<01:56:00.199> verb 01:56:00.550 --> 01:56:00.560 align:start position:0% for Spanish there's a very useful verb 01:56:00.560 --> 01:56:03.629 align:start position:0% for Spanish there's a very useful verb that<01:56:00.719> similarly<01:56:01.239> uses<01:56:01.840> the<01:56:02.760> ending<01:56:03.400> which<01:56:03.480> is 01:56:03.629 --> 01:56:03.639 align:start position:0% that similarly uses the ending which is 01:56:03.639 --> 01:56:04.790 align:start position:0% that similarly uses the ending which is something<01:56:03.880> you<01:56:03.960> don't<01:56:04.199> expect<01:56:04.480> from<01:56:04.639> this 01:56:04.790 --> 01:56:04.800 align:start position:0% something you don't expect from this 01:56:04.800 --> 01:56:06.589 align:start position:0% something you don't expect from this verb<01:56:05.119> and<01:56:05.239> that<01:56:05.360> is<01:56:05.480> the<01:56:05.639> verb<01:56:05.960> EST<01:56:06.400> rather 01:56:06.589 --> 01:56:06.599 align:start position:0% verb and that is the verb EST rather 01:56:06.599 --> 01:56:07.830 align:start position:0% verb and that is the verb EST rather than<01:56:06.719> following<01:56:07.079> normal<01:56:07.360> conjugation 01:56:07.830 --> 01:56:07.840 align:start position:0% than following normal conjugation 01:56:07.840 --> 01:56:10.149 align:start position:0% than following normal conjugation patterns<01:56:08.199> for<01:56:08.400> verbs<01:56:08.639> ending<01:56:08.880> in<01:56:09.040> a<01:56:09.199> r<01:56:09.639> EST 01:56:10.149 --> 01:56:10.159 align:start position:0% patterns for verbs ending in a r EST 01:56:10.159 --> 01:56:12.550 align:start position:0% patterns for verbs ending in a r EST decides<01:56:10.480> to<01:56:10.560> use<01:56:10.800> the<01:56:11.520> ending<01:56:11.960> in<01:56:12.119> all<01:56:12.280> of<01:56:12.400> its 01:56:12.550 --> 01:56:12.560 align:start position:0% decides to use the ending in all of its 01:56:12.560 --> 01:56:16.589 align:start position:0% decides to use the ending in all of its pronouns<01:56:13.199> y<01:56:13.400> EST<01:56:14.040> means<01:56:14.480> I<01:56:14.679> was<01:56:15.079> to<01:56:15.400> EST<01:56:16.400> you 01:56:16.589 --> 01:56:16.599 align:start position:0% pronouns y EST means I was to EST you 01:56:16.599 --> 01:56:19.550 align:start position:0% pronouns y EST means I was to EST you were<01:56:17.040> El<01:56:17.320> esto<01:56:18.119> he<01:56:18.360> was<01:56:18.679> and<01:56:18.800> so<01:56:18.960> on<01:56:19.199> like<01:56:19.360> with 01:56:19.550 --> 01:56:19.560 align:start position:0% were El esto he was and so on like with 01:56:19.560 --> 01:56:21.510 align:start position:0% were El esto he was and so on like with the<01:56:19.639> verb<01:56:19.920> T<01:56:20.280> I<01:56:20.400> recommend<01:56:20.800> not<01:56:21.000> focusing<01:56:21.360> on 01:56:21.510 --> 01:56:21.520 align:start position:0% the verb T I recommend not focusing on 01:56:21.520 --> 01:56:23.069 align:start position:0% the verb T I recommend not focusing on these<01:56:21.760> pronouns<01:56:22.320> because<01:56:22.520> the<01:56:22.639> other<01:56:22.840> ones 01:56:23.069 --> 01:56:23.079 align:start position:0% these pronouns because the other ones 01:56:23.079 --> 01:56:24.709 align:start position:0% these pronouns because the other ones are<01:56:23.239> more<01:56:23.440> useful<01:56:23.880> one<01:56:24.040> important<01:56:24.360> rule<01:56:24.599> you 01:56:24.709 --> 01:56:24.719 align:start position:0% are more useful one important rule you 01:56:24.719 --> 01:56:26.669 align:start position:0% are more useful one important rule you have<01:56:24.800> to<01:56:24.960> remember<01:56:25.320> with<01:56:25.520> estar<01:56:26.000> in<01:56:26.119> the<01:56:26.280> past 01:56:26.669 --> 01:56:26.679 align:start position:0% have to remember with estar in the past 01:56:26.679 --> 01:56:28.470 align:start position:0% have to remember with estar in the past is<01:56:26.800> that<01:56:26.920> it's<01:56:27.040> used<01:56:27.360> for<01:56:27.639> things<01:56:27.920> done<01:56:28.199> in<01:56:28.320> the 01:56:28.470 --> 01:56:28.480 align:start position:0% is that it's used for things done in the 01:56:28.480 --> 01:56:30.950 align:start position:0% is that it's used for things done in the past<01:56:28.920> that<01:56:29.079> stayed<01:56:29.520> in<01:56:29.639> the<01:56:29.840> past<01:56:30.199> in<01:56:30.320> my<01:56:30.520> video 01:56:30.950 --> 01:56:30.960 align:start position:0% past that stayed in the past in my video 01:56:30.960 --> 01:56:32.430 align:start position:0% past that stayed in the past in my video about<01:56:31.199> a<01:56:31.400> star<01:56:31.719> I<01:56:31.840> talked<01:56:32.079> about<01:56:32.280> the 01:56:32.430 --> 01:56:32.440 align:start position:0% about a star I talked about the 01:56:32.440 --> 01:56:34.310 align:start position:0% about a star I talked about the applications<01:56:32.960> of<01:56:33.119> a<01:56:33.320> star<01:56:33.599> in<01:56:33.679> the<01:56:33.840> present 01:56:34.310 --> 01:56:34.320 align:start position:0% applications of a star in the present 01:56:34.320 --> 01:56:36.069 align:start position:0% applications of a star in the present but<01:56:34.440> in<01:56:34.599> the<01:56:34.800> past<01:56:35.159> it<01:56:35.280> basically<01:56:35.679> applies<01:56:35.960> for 01:56:36.069 --> 01:56:36.079 align:start position:0% but in the past it basically applies for 01:56:36.079 --> 01:56:38.030 align:start position:0% but in the past it basically applies for a<01:56:36.239> location<01:56:36.760> more<01:56:36.960> than<01:56:37.079> to<01:56:37.280> anything<01:56:37.599> else<01:56:37.960> I 01:56:38.030 --> 01:56:38.040 align:start position:0% a location more than to anything else I 01:56:38.040 --> 01:56:40.669 align:start position:0% a location more than to anything else I can<01:56:38.159> say<01:56:38.320> a<01:56:38.440> sentence<01:56:38.840> like<01:56:39.119> esto<01:56:39.560> in<01:56:39.719> Madrid<01:56:40.599> I 01:56:40.669 --> 01:56:40.679 align:start position:0% can say a sentence like esto in Madrid I 01:56:40.679 --> 01:56:42.430 align:start position:0% can say a sentence like esto in Madrid I am<01:56:40.840> in<01:56:41.040> Madrid<01:56:41.520> with<01:56:41.679> him<01:56:41.960> but<01:56:42.040> if<01:56:42.159> I<01:56:42.239> want<01:56:42.320> to 01:56:42.430 --> 01:56:42.440 align:start position:0% am in Madrid with him but if I want to 01:56:42.440 --> 01:56:44.149 align:start position:0% am in Madrid with him but if I want to say<01:56:42.599> this<01:56:42.760> phrase<01:56:43.000> in<01:56:43.119> the<01:56:43.280> past<01:56:43.679> I'd<01:56:43.840> simply 01:56:44.149 --> 01:56:44.159 align:start position:0% say this phrase in the past I'd simply 01:56:44.159 --> 01:56:47.069 align:start position:0% say this phrase in the past I'd simply say<01:56:44.639> y<01:56:44.920> EST<01:56:45.440> in<01:56:45.599> Madrid<01:56:46.320> because<01:56:46.560> my<01:56:46.719> action 01:56:47.069 --> 01:56:47.079 align:start position:0% say y EST in Madrid because my action 01:56:47.079 --> 01:56:48.750 align:start position:0% say y EST in Madrid because my action was<01:56:47.239> finished<01:56:47.599> in<01:56:47.719> the<01:56:47.880> past<01:56:48.199> meaning<01:56:48.480> that<01:56:48.599> I 01:56:48.750 --> 01:56:48.760 align:start position:0% was finished in the past meaning that I 01:56:48.760 --> 01:56:50.589 align:start position:0% was finished in the past meaning that I never<01:56:49.159> returned<01:56:49.679> there<01:56:49.880> and<01:56:50.040> of<01:56:50.199> course<01:56:50.480> you 01:56:50.589 --> 01:56:50.599 align:start position:0% never returned there and of course you 01:56:50.599 --> 01:56:52.149 align:start position:0% never returned there and of course you can<01:56:50.760> make<01:56:50.920> any<01:56:51.079> sentence<01:56:51.400> you<01:56:51.520> want<01:56:51.880> but<01:56:52.000> just 01:56:52.149 --> 01:56:52.159 align:start position:0% can make any sentence you want but just 01:56:52.159 --> 01:56:54.109 align:start position:0% can make any sentence you want but just be<01:56:52.320> careful<01:56:52.840> with<01:56:52.960> using<01:56:53.280> locations<01:56:53.840> in<01:56:53.960> the 01:56:54.109 --> 01:56:54.119 align:start position:0% be careful with using locations in the 01:56:54.119 --> 01:56:56.229 align:start position:0% be careful with using locations in the past<01:56:54.480> the<01:56:54.599> last<01:56:54.840> verb<01:56:55.159> that<01:56:55.280> follows<01:56:55.599> the<01:56:55.840> U 01:56:56.229 --> 01:56:56.239 align:start position:0% past the last verb that follows the U 01:56:56.239 --> 01:56:58.430 align:start position:0% past the last verb that follows the U ending<01:56:56.760> is<01:56:56.920> another<01:56:57.199> verb<01:56:57.560> you<01:56:57.679> don't<01:56:58.000> expect 01:56:58.430 --> 01:56:58.440 align:start position:0% ending is another verb you don't expect 01:56:58.440 --> 01:57:00.109 align:start position:0% ending is another verb you don't expect and<01:56:58.560> that<01:56:58.639> is<01:56:58.760> the<01:56:58.880> verb<01:56:59.159> andar<01:56:59.679> meaning<01:56:59.920> to 01:57:00.109 --> 01:57:00.119 align:start position:0% and that is the verb andar meaning to 01:57:00.119 --> 01:57:01.510 align:start position:0% and that is the verb andar meaning to walk<01:57:00.480> instead<01:57:00.719> of<01:57:00.840> following<01:57:01.119> the<01:57:01.239> normal 01:57:01.510 --> 01:57:01.520 align:start position:0% walk instead of following the normal 01:57:01.520 --> 01:57:03.550 align:start position:0% walk instead of following the normal conjugation<01:57:02.000> of<01:57:02.159> a<01:57:02.320> r<01:57:02.599> verbs<01:57:03.000> it<01:57:03.119> decides<01:57:03.440> to 01:57:03.550 --> 01:57:03.560 align:start position:0% conjugation of a r verbs it decides to 01:57:03.560 --> 01:57:06.069 align:start position:0% conjugation of a r verbs it decides to use<01:57:03.800> the<01:57:04.040> U<01:57:04.440> ending<01:57:04.920> to<01:57:05.079> indicate<01:57:05.480> an<01:57:05.719> action 01:57:06.069 --> 01:57:06.079 align:start position:0% use the U ending to indicate an action 01:57:06.079 --> 01:57:08.270 align:start position:0% use the U ending to indicate an action done<01:57:06.360> in<01:57:06.480> the<01:57:06.639> past<01:57:06.960> with<01:57:07.079> a<01:57:07.199> verb<01:57:07.480> like<01:57:07.719> andar 01:57:08.270 --> 01:57:08.280 align:start position:0% done in the past with a verb like andar 01:57:08.280 --> 01:57:09.990 align:start position:0% done in the past with a verb like andar I<01:57:08.440> recommend<01:57:08.800> just<01:57:08.920> knowing<01:57:09.239> the<01:57:09.360> verb<01:57:09.760> rather 01:57:09.990 --> 01:57:10.000 align:start position:0% I recommend just knowing the verb rather 01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:11.990 align:start position:0% I recommend just knowing the verb rather than<01:57:10.159> using<01:57:10.480> it<01:57:10.800> next<01:57:11.040> up<01:57:11.280> there<01:57:11.400> are<01:57:11.639> verbs 01:57:11.990 --> 01:57:12.000 align:start position:0% than using it next up there are verbs 01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:14.750 align:start position:0% than using it next up there are verbs that<01:57:12.159> follow<01:57:12.560> a<01:57:12.840> p<01:57:13.800> ending<01:57:14.360> which<01:57:14.480> luckily 01:57:14.750 --> 01:57:14.760 align:start position:0% that follow a p ending which luckily 01:57:14.760 --> 01:57:16.430 align:start position:0% that follow a p ending which luckily share<01:57:15.079> the<01:57:15.199> same<01:57:15.400> verb<01:57:15.760> but<01:57:15.920> with<01:57:16.119> different 01:57:16.430 --> 01:57:16.440 align:start position:0% share the same verb but with different 01:57:16.440 --> 01:57:18.390 align:start position:0% share the same verb but with different prefixes<01:57:17.119> and<01:57:17.239> that<01:57:17.320> is<01:57:17.440> the<01:57:17.560> verb<01:57:17.800> P<01:57:18.199> instead 01:57:18.390 --> 01:57:18.400 align:start position:0% prefixes and that is the verb P instead 01:57:18.400 --> 01:57:20.069 align:start position:0% prefixes and that is the verb P instead of<01:57:18.480> following<01:57:18.760> the<01:57:18.840> normal<01:57:19.079> conjug<01:57:19.760> pattern 01:57:20.069 --> 01:57:20.079 align:start position:0% of following the normal conjug pattern 01:57:20.079 --> 01:57:22.069 align:start position:0% of following the normal conjug pattern of<01:57:20.239> verbs<01:57:20.480> ending<01:57:20.719> in<01:57:20.880> e<01:57:21.040> r<01:57:21.400> Spanish<01:57:21.760> decides 01:57:22.069 --> 01:57:22.079 align:start position:0% of verbs ending in e r Spanish decides 01:57:22.079 --> 01:57:26.270 align:start position:0% of verbs ending in e r Spanish decides to<01:57:22.239> change<01:57:22.480> it<01:57:22.800> to<01:57:23.280> P<01:57:24.239> for<01:57:24.440> all<01:57:24.719> pronouns<01:57:25.400> y 01:57:26.270 --> 01:57:26.280 align:start position:0% to change it to P for all pronouns y 01:57:26.280 --> 01:57:31.430 align:start position:0% to change it to P for all pronouns y means<01:57:26.679> I<01:57:26.960> put<01:57:27.159> in<01:57:27.280> the<01:57:27.520> past<01:57:28.280> to<01:57:29.280> you<01:57:29.520> put<01:57:30.159> El<01:57:31.159> he 01:57:31.430 --> 01:57:31.440 align:start position:0% means I put in the past to you put El he 01:57:31.440 --> 01:57:33.270 align:start position:0% means I put in the past to you put El he put<01:57:31.800> and<01:57:31.960> so<01:57:32.079> on<01:57:32.480> as<01:57:32.639> always<01:57:33.040> don't 01:57:33.270 --> 01:57:33.280 align:start position:0% put and so on as always don't 01:57:33.280 --> 01:57:34.709 align:start position:0% put and so on as always don't concentrate<01:57:33.719> on<01:57:33.880> these<01:57:34.079> pronouns<01:57:34.560> because 01:57:34.709 --> 01:57:34.719 align:start position:0% concentrate on these pronouns because 01:57:34.719 --> 01:57:36.270 align:start position:0% concentrate on these pronouns because they're<01:57:34.880> not<01:57:35.040> that<01:57:35.159> useful<01:57:35.520> in<01:57:35.679> conversation 01:57:36.270 --> 01:57:36.280 align:start position:0% they're not that useful in conversation 01:57:36.280 --> 01:57:37.629 align:start position:0% they're not that useful in conversation if<01:57:36.400> you<01:57:36.480> were<01:57:36.599> to<01:57:36.760> say<01:57:36.880> a<01:57:37.000> sentence<01:57:37.360> in<01:57:37.480> the 01:57:37.629 --> 01:57:37.639 align:start position:0% if you were to say a sentence in the 01:57:37.639 --> 01:57:40.470 align:start position:0% if you were to say a sentence in the past<01:57:37.920> using<01:57:38.280> p<01:57:38.679> you<01:57:38.760> can<01:57:38.920> say<01:57:39.119> something 01:57:40.470 --> 01:57:40.480 align:start position:0% past using p you can say something 01:57:40.480 --> 01:57:43.189 align:start position:0% past using p you can say something like<01:57:41.480> I<01:57:41.599> put<01:57:41.840> my<01:57:42.000> phone<01:57:42.280> here<01:57:42.480> or<01:57:42.679> maybe<01:57:43.119> you 01:57:43.189 --> 01:57:43.199 align:start position:0% like I put my phone here or maybe you 01:57:43.199 --> 01:57:46.390 align:start position:0% like I put my phone here or maybe you can<01:57:43.440> ask<01:57:43.599> a<01:57:43.800> question<01:57:44.440> like<01:57:45.040> don't<01:57:46.040> meaning 01:57:46.390 --> 01:57:46.400 align:start position:0% can ask a question like don't meaning 01:57:46.400 --> 01:57:48.109 align:start position:0% can ask a question like don't meaning where<01:57:46.520> did<01:57:46.679> you<01:57:46.800> put<01:57:46.960> my<01:57:47.079> shirt<01:57:47.520> of<01:57:47.679> course<01:57:48.000> you 01:57:48.109 --> 01:57:48.119 align:start position:0% where did you put my shirt of course you 01:57:48.119 --> 01:57:49.870 align:start position:0% where did you put my shirt of course you can<01:57:48.239> say<01:57:48.440> any<01:57:48.639> sentence<01:57:48.960> you<01:57:49.079> want<01:57:49.400> using<01:57:49.679> this 01:57:49.870 --> 01:57:49.880 align:start position:0% can say any sentence you want using this 01:57:49.880 --> 01:57:51.669 align:start position:0% can say any sentence you want using this verb<01:57:50.159> I'm<01:57:50.280> just<01:57:50.440> giving<01:57:50.639> a<01:57:50.760> few<01:57:51.000> examples<01:57:51.520> to 01:57:51.669 --> 01:57:51.679 align:start position:0% verb I'm just giving a few examples to 01:57:51.679 --> 01:57:53.709 align:start position:0% verb I'm just giving a few examples to demonstrate<01:57:52.119> how<01:57:52.239> to<01:57:52.360> use<01:57:52.560> the<01:57:52.679> verb<01:57:53.000> after<01:57:53.280> P 01:57:53.709 --> 01:57:53.719 align:start position:0% demonstrate how to use the verb after P 01:57:53.719 --> 01:57:55.310 align:start position:0% demonstrate how to use the verb after P there<01:57:53.800> are<01:57:53.960> many<01:57:54.239> other<01:57:54.440> verbs<01:57:54.840> that<01:57:54.960> follow 01:57:55.310 --> 01:57:55.320 align:start position:0% there are many other verbs that follow 01:57:55.320 --> 01:58:00.350 align:start position:0% there are many other verbs that follow the<01:57:55.599> P<01:57:56.400> change<01:57:57.079> like<01:57:58.079> prop<01:57:58.800> Dison<01:57:59.520> compon<01:58:00.159> and 01:58:00.350 --> 01:58:00.360 align:start position:0% the P change like prop Dison compon and 01:58:00.360 --> 01:58:01.990 align:start position:0% the P change like prop Dison compon and Des<01:58:00.599> compon<01:58:01.119> and<01:58:01.199> in<01:58:01.320> case<01:58:01.440> you<01:58:01.560> have<01:58:01.679> to<01:58:01.800> use 01:58:01.990 --> 01:58:02.000 align:start position:0% Des compon and in case you have to use 01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:03.550 align:start position:0% Des compon and in case you have to use any<01:58:02.159> of<01:58:02.280> them<01:58:02.480> in<01:58:02.599> the<01:58:02.760> past<01:58:03.079> remember<01:58:03.400> to 01:58:03.550 --> 01:58:03.560 align:start position:0% any of them in the past remember to 01:58:03.560 --> 01:58:05.229 align:start position:0% any of them in the past remember to change<01:58:03.880> them<01:58:04.280> the<01:58:04.400> same<01:58:04.719> way<01:58:04.960> you<01:58:05.079> would 01:58:05.229 --> 01:58:05.239 align:start position:0% change them the same way you would 01:58:05.239 --> 01:58:07.189 align:start position:0% change them the same way you would change<01:58:05.639> p<01:58:06.000> and<01:58:06.119> with<01:58:06.239> verbs<01:58:06.560> like<01:58:06.760> these<01:58:07.079> I 01:58:07.189 --> 01:58:07.199 align:start position:0% change p and with verbs like these I 01:58:07.199 --> 01:58:08.830 align:start position:0% change p and with verbs like these I recommend<01:58:07.599> just<01:58:07.760> knowing<01:58:08.119> them<01:58:08.440> rather<01:58:08.679> than 01:58:08.830 --> 01:58:08.840 align:start position:0% recommend just knowing them rather than 01:58:08.840 --> 01:58:10.669 align:start position:0% recommend just knowing them rather than using<01:58:09.119> them<01:58:09.440> next<01:58:09.679> up<01:58:09.920> there<01:58:10.040> are<01:58:10.280> verbs 01:58:10.669 --> 01:58:10.679 align:start position:0% using them next up there are verbs 01:58:10.679 --> 01:58:11.550 align:start position:0% using them next up there are verbs ending 01:58:11.550 --> 01:58:11.560 align:start position:0% ending 01:58:11.560 --> 01:58:14.189 align:start position:0% ending in<01:58:12.560> and<01:58:12.679> as<01:58:12.800> far<01:58:12.960> as<01:58:13.119> I<01:58:13.199> know<01:58:13.599> there<01:58:13.719> are<01:58:13.920> only 01:58:14.189 --> 01:58:14.199 align:start position:0% in and as far as I know there are only 01:58:14.199 --> 01:58:15.790 align:start position:0% in and as far as I know there are only three<01:58:14.400> of<01:58:14.560> them<01:58:14.760> in<01:58:14.960> Spanish<01:58:15.480> and<01:58:15.560> they're 01:58:15.790 --> 01:58:15.800 align:start position:0% three of them in Spanish and they're 01:58:15.800 --> 01:58:19.390 align:start position:0% three of them in Spanish and they're very<01:58:16.000> useful<01:58:16.639> like<01:58:17.000> conduc<01:58:17.760> truc<01:58:18.480> and<01:58:18.760> produc 01:58:19.390 --> 01:58:19.400 align:start position:0% very useful like conduc truc and produc 01:58:19.400 --> 01:58:20.589 align:start position:0% very useful like conduc truc and produc rather<01:58:19.599> than<01:58:19.719> following<01:58:20.079> the<01:58:20.199> pattern<01:58:20.480> of 01:58:20.589 --> 01:58:20.599 align:start position:0% rather than following the pattern of 01:58:20.599 --> 01:58:22.550 align:start position:0% rather than following the pattern of verbs<01:58:20.840> ending<01:58:21.079> in<01:58:21.239> IR<01:58:21.760> Spanish<01:58:22.119> decides<01:58:22.440> to 01:58:22.550 --> 01:58:22.560 align:start position:0% verbs ending in IR Spanish decides to 01:58:22.560 --> 01:58:24.750 align:start position:0% verbs ending in IR Spanish decides to change<01:58:22.880> them<01:58:23.119> in<01:58:23.239> the<01:58:23.400> ending<01:58:23.960> by 01:58:24.750 --> 01:58:24.760 align:start position:0% change them in the ending by 01:58:24.760 --> 01:58:27.310 align:start position:0% change them in the ending by adding<01:58:25.760> taking<01:58:25.960> the<01:58:26.079> verb<01:58:26.360> cond<01:58:27.040> as<01:58:27.119> an 01:58:27.310 --> 01:58:27.320 align:start position:0% adding taking the verb cond as an 01:58:27.320 --> 01:58:31.950 align:start position:0% adding taking the verb cond as an example<01:58:27.960> y<01:58:28.880> means<01:58:29.280> I<01:58:29.440> drove<01:58:30.360> to<01:58:31.360> means<01:58:31.760> you 01:58:31.950 --> 01:58:31.960 align:start position:0% example y means I drove to means you 01:58:31.960 --> 01:58:35.390 align:start position:0% example y means I drove to means you drove<01:58:32.639> El<01:58:33.639> means<01:58:34.040> he<01:58:34.199> drove<01:58:34.679> and<01:58:34.840> so<01:58:34.960> on<01:58:35.280> I 01:58:35.390 --> 01:58:35.400 align:start position:0% drove El means he drove and so on I 01:58:35.400 --> 01:58:37.229 align:start position:0% drove El means he drove and so on I recommend<01:58:35.760> knowing<01:58:36.040> all<01:58:36.280> pronouns<01:58:36.920> except 01:58:37.229 --> 01:58:37.239 align:start position:0% recommend knowing all pronouns except 01:58:37.239 --> 01:58:39.069 align:start position:0% recommend knowing all pronouns except votos<01:58:37.960> because<01:58:38.159> the<01:58:38.280> sentences<01:58:38.760> that<01:58:38.880> you<01:58:38.960> can 01:58:39.069 --> 01:58:39.079 align:start position:0% votos because the sentences that you can 01:58:39.079 --> 01:58:40.709 align:start position:0% votos because the sentences that you can make<01:58:39.280> with<01:58:39.440> them<01:58:39.639> are<01:58:39.840> very<01:58:40.040> useful<01:58:40.480> and<01:58:40.599> the 01:58:40.709 --> 01:58:40.719 align:start position:0% make with them are very useful and the 01:58:40.719 --> 01:58:42.229 align:start position:0% make with them are very useful and the same<01:58:40.920> concept<01:58:41.280> applies<01:58:41.560> to<01:58:41.679> all<01:58:41.800> of<01:58:41.960> them 01:58:42.229 --> 01:58:42.239 align:start position:0% same concept applies to all of them 01:58:42.239 --> 01:58:43.709 align:start position:0% same concept applies to all of them whenever<01:58:42.520> you<01:58:42.639> decide<01:58:42.920> to<01:58:43.000> use<01:58:43.199> them<01:58:43.440> in<01:58:43.560> the 01:58:43.709 --> 01:58:43.719 align:start position:0% whenever you decide to use them in the 01:58:43.719 --> 01:58:45.589 align:start position:0% whenever you decide to use them in the past<01:58:44.040> any<01:58:44.239> way<01:58:44.440> you<01:58:44.560> want<01:58:44.960> while<01:58:45.079> we're<01:58:45.280> on<01:58:45.440> the 01:58:45.589 --> 01:58:45.599 align:start position:0% past any way you want while we're on the 01:58:45.599 --> 01:58:48.390 align:start position:0% past any way you want while we're on the category<01:58:46.119> of<01:58:46.440> De<01:58:47.320> there<01:58:47.440> are<01:58:47.639> verbs<01:58:48.079> that<01:58:48.239> have 01:58:48.390 --> 01:58:48.400 align:start position:0% category of De there are verbs that have 01:58:48.400 --> 01:58:51.069 align:start position:0% category of De there are verbs that have an<01:58:48.679> e<01:58:49.360> ending<01:58:49.800> in<01:58:49.920> the<01:58:50.119> past<01:58:50.320> simple<01:58:50.760> meaning 01:58:51.069 --> 01:58:51.079 align:start position:0% an e ending in the past simple meaning 01:58:51.079 --> 01:58:52.830 align:start position:0% an e ending in the past simple meaning to<01:58:51.239> say<01:58:51.599> or<01:58:51.760> to<01:58:51.920> tell<01:58:52.199> instead<01:58:52.440> of<01:58:52.520> following 01:58:52.830 --> 01:58:52.840 align:start position:0% to say or to tell instead of following 01:58:52.840 --> 01:58:54.629 align:start position:0% to say or to tell instead of following the<01:58:52.920> pattern<01:58:53.199> of<01:58:53.400> ir<01:58:53.719> verbs<01:58:54.079> Spanish<01:58:54.440> gives 01:58:54.629 --> 01:58:54.639 align:start position:0% the pattern of ir verbs Spanish gives 01:58:54.639 --> 01:58:59.430 align:start position:0% the pattern of ir verbs Spanish gives the<01:58:54.760> verb<01:58:55.000> the<01:58:55.400> and<01:58:56.480> change<01:58:57.480> I<01:58:57.639> spoke<01:58:58.280> to<01:58:59.280> you 01:58:59.430 --> 01:58:59.440 align:start position:0% the verb the and change I spoke to you 01:58:59.440 --> 01:59:01.669 align:start position:0% the verb the and change I spoke to you spoke<01:58:59.880> and<01:59:00.000> so<01:59:00.159> on<01:59:00.400> with<01:59:00.520> a<01:59:00.639> verb<01:59:00.880> like<01:59:01.560> I 01:59:01.669 --> 01:59:01.679 align:start position:0% spoke and so on with a verb like I 01:59:01.679 --> 01:59:03.669 align:start position:0% spoke and so on with a verb like I recommend<01:59:02.079> knowing<01:59:02.400> all<01:59:02.639> pronouns<01:59:03.320> except 01:59:03.669 --> 01:59:03.679 align:start position:0% recommend knowing all pronouns except 01:59:03.679 --> 01:59:05.550 align:start position:0% recommend knowing all pronouns except Vos<01:59:04.400> because<01:59:04.639> these<01:59:04.800> pronouns<01:59:05.159> are<01:59:05.360> very 01:59:05.550 --> 01:59:05.560 align:start position:0% Vos because these pronouns are very 01:59:05.560 --> 01:59:07.430 align:start position:0% Vos because these pronouns are very useful<01:59:06.079> especially<01:59:06.440> when<01:59:06.560> you<01:59:06.719> incorporate 01:59:07.430 --> 01:59:07.440 align:start position:0% useful especially when you incorporate 01:59:07.440 --> 01:59:09.149 align:start position:0% useful especially when you incorporate every<01:59:07.679> Spanish<01:59:08.079> concept<01:59:08.480> with<01:59:08.639> them<01:59:08.920> for 01:59:09.149 --> 01:59:09.159 align:start position:0% every Spanish concept with them for 01:59:09.159 --> 01:59:11.790 align:start position:0% every Spanish concept with them for instance<01:59:09.679> I<01:59:09.760> can<01:59:09.920> say<01:59:10.079> a<01:59:10.199> sentence 01:59:11.790 --> 01:59:11.800 align:start position:0% instance I can say a sentence 01:59:11.800 --> 01:59:14.270 align:start position:0% instance I can say a sentence like<01:59:12.800> meaning<01:59:13.159> I<01:59:13.320> told<01:59:13.560> you<01:59:13.840> that<01:59:13.960> I'm<01:59:14.119> going 01:59:14.270 --> 01:59:14.280 align:start position:0% like meaning I told you that I'm going 01:59:14.280 --> 01:59:15.709 align:start position:0% like meaning I told you that I'm going to<01:59:14.400> be<01:59:14.599> there<01:59:14.800> or<01:59:14.960> maybe<01:59:15.159> some<01:59:15.360> simpler 01:59:15.709 --> 01:59:15.719 align:start position:0% to be there or maybe some simpler 01:59:15.719 --> 01:59:18.790 align:start position:0% to be there or maybe some simpler sentences<01:59:16.119> would<01:59:16.280> be<01:59:16.440> better<01:59:16.960> like<01:59:17.679> El<01:59:18.679> he 01:59:18.790 --> 01:59:18.800 align:start position:0% sentences would be better like El he 01:59:18.800 --> 01:59:21.870 align:start position:0% sentences would be better like El he told<01:59:18.960> me<01:59:19.119> that<01:59:19.599> yesterday<01:59:20.079> or 01:59:21.870 --> 01:59:21.880 align:start position:0% told me that yesterday or 01:59:21.880 --> 01:59:24.390 align:start position:0% told me that yesterday or maybe<01:59:22.880> they<01:59:23.000> told<01:59:23.239> us<01:59:23.560> that<01:59:23.719> they<01:59:23.840> are<01:59:24.119> there 01:59:24.390 --> 01:59:24.400 align:start position:0% maybe they told us that they are there 01:59:24.400 --> 01:59:26.189 align:start position:0% maybe they told us that they are there with<01:59:24.520> a<01:59:24.599> verb<01:59:24.840> like<01:59:25.440> you<01:59:25.520> can<01:59:25.679> basically<01:59:26.000> make 01:59:26.189 --> 01:59:26.199 align:start position:0% with a verb like you can basically make 01:59:26.199 --> 01:59:27.870 align:start position:0% with a verb like you can basically make any<01:59:26.400> sentence<01:59:26.719> you<01:59:26.840> want<01:59:27.280> depending<01:59:27.599> on<01:59:27.760> what 01:59:27.870 --> 01:59:27.880 align:start position:0% any sentence you want depending on what 01:59:27.880 --> 01:59:29.669 align:start position:0% any sentence you want depending on what you<01:59:27.960> want<01:59:28.079> to<01:59:28.239> say<01:59:28.639> actually<01:59:29.159> there<01:59:29.280> are<01:59:29.480> some 01:59:29.669 --> 01:59:29.679 align:start position:0% you want to say actually there are some 01:59:29.679 --> 01:59:32.149 align:start position:0% you want to say actually there are some verbs<01:59:29.960> that<01:59:30.119> put<01:59:30.280> a<01:59:30.440> prefix<01:59:30.920> before<01:59:31.280> the<01:59:31.840> like 01:59:32.149 --> 01:59:32.159 align:start position:0% verbs that put a prefix before the like 01:59:32.159 --> 01:59:34.550 align:start position:0% verbs that put a prefix before the like PR<01:59:32.800> and<01:59:33.079> Contra<01:59:33.880> and<01:59:34.000> whenever<01:59:34.239> you<01:59:34.320> want<01:59:34.440> to 01:59:34.550 --> 01:59:34.560 align:start position:0% PR and Contra and whenever you want to 01:59:34.560 --> 01:59:36.149 align:start position:0% PR and Contra and whenever you want to use<01:59:34.760> these<01:59:34.880> verbs<01:59:35.159> in<01:59:35.280> the<01:59:35.440> past<01:59:35.719> remember<01:59:36.040> to 01:59:36.149 --> 01:59:36.159 align:start position:0% use these verbs in the past remember to 01:59:36.159 --> 01:59:38.430 align:start position:0% use these verbs in the past remember to change<01:59:36.520> them<01:59:36.840> like<01:59:37.119> the<01:59:37.520> and<01:59:37.719> as<01:59:37.880> always<01:59:38.320> it's 01:59:38.430 --> 01:59:38.440 align:start position:0% change them like the and as always it's 01:59:38.440 --> 01:59:40.030 align:start position:0% change them like the and as always it's more<01:59:38.639> useful<01:59:38.920> to<01:59:39.040> know<01:59:39.280> them<01:59:39.560> than<01:59:39.679> to<01:59:39.800> use 01:59:40.030 --> 01:59:40.040 align:start position:0% more useful to know them than to use 01:59:40.040 --> 01:59:42.310 align:start position:0% more useful to know them than to use them<01:59:40.320> at<01:59:40.520> last<01:59:40.800> there's<01:59:41.000> the<01:59:41.159> verb<01:59:41.920> meaning<01:59:42.119> to 01:59:42.310 --> 01:59:42.320 align:start position:0% them at last there's the verb meaning to 01:59:42.320 --> 01:59:44.149 align:start position:0% them at last there's the verb meaning to bring<01:59:42.760> which<01:59:42.880> is<01:59:43.040> actually<01:59:43.360> the<01:59:43.520> last<01:59:43.719> verb<01:59:44.000> to 01:59:44.149 --> 01:59:44.159 align:start position:0% bring which is actually the last verb to 01:59:44.159 --> 01:59:46.350 align:start position:0% bring which is actually the last verb to include<01:59:44.560> a<01:59:45.199> in<01:59:45.280> the<01:59:45.440> past<01:59:45.679> simple<01:59:45.960> tense 01:59:46.350 --> 01:59:46.360 align:start position:0% include a in the past simple tense 01:59:46.360 --> 01:59:48.109 align:start position:0% include a in the past simple tense instead<01:59:46.599> of<01:59:46.679> following<01:59:47.040> normal<01:59:47.360> ER<01:59:47.719> verb 01:59:48.109 --> 01:59:48.119 align:start position:0% instead of following normal ER verb 01:59:48.119 --> 01:59:50.510 align:start position:0% instead of following normal ER verb conjugations<01:59:49.119> the<01:59:49.239> decides<01:59:49.480> to<01:59:49.599> add<01:59:49.800> a<01:59:50.360> in 01:59:50.510 --> 01:59:50.520 align:start position:0% conjugations the decides to add a in 01:59:50.520 --> 01:59:51.390 align:start position:0% conjugations the decides to add a in every 01:59:51.390 --> 01:59:51.400 align:start position:0% every 01:59:51.400 --> 01:59:55.149 align:start position:0% every pronoun<01:59:52.400> I<01:59:52.599> brought<01:59:53.199> to<01:59:54.199> you<01:59:54.400> brought<01:59:54.840> and<01:59:55.000> so 01:59:55.149 --> 01:59:55.159 align:start position:0% pronoun I brought to you brought and so 01:59:55.159 --> 01:59:57.310 align:start position:0% pronoun I brought to you brought and so on<01:59:55.360> with<01:59:55.480> a<01:59:55.599> verb<01:59:55.800> like<01:59:56.520> I<01:59:56.639> recommend<01:59:57.000> knowing 01:59:57.310 --> 01:59:57.320 align:start position:0% on with a verb like I recommend knowing 01:59:57.320 --> 01:59:59.350 align:start position:0% on with a verb like I recommend knowing it<01:59:57.560> rather<01:59:57.800> than<01:59:57.960> using<01:59:58.199> it<01:59:58.520> next<01:59:58.760> up<01:59:59.040> there<01:59:59.159> is 01:59:59.350 --> 01:59:59.360 align:start position:0% it rather than using it next up there is 01:59:59.360 --> 02:00:01.310 align:start position:0% it rather than using it next up there is the<01:59:59.599> East<01:59:59.960> category<02:00:00.639> which<02:00:00.760> is<02:00:00.880> used<02:00:01.159> through 02:00:01.310 --> 02:00:01.320 align:start position:0% the East category which is used through 02:00:01.320 --> 02:00:02.830 align:start position:0% the East category which is used through the<02:00:01.440> verb<02:00:01.719> AER<02:00:02.119> instead<02:00:02.360> of<02:00:02.440> following<02:00:02.719> the 02:00:02.830 --> 02:00:02.840 align:start position:0% the verb AER instead of following the 02:00:02.840 --> 02:00:05.510 align:start position:0% the verb AER instead of following the normal<02:00:03.119> ER<02:00:03.560> pattern<02:00:04.119> a<02:00:04.520> uses<02:00:04.800> an<02:00:05.000> irregular 02:00:05.510 --> 02:00:05.520 align:start position:0% normal ER pattern a uses an irregular 02:00:05.520 --> 02:00:07.629 align:start position:0% normal ER pattern a uses an irregular pattern<02:00:05.960> across<02:00:06.280> all<02:00:06.560> pronouns<02:00:07.159> and<02:00:07.280> not<02:00:07.400> only 02:00:07.629 --> 02:00:07.639 align:start position:0% pattern across all pronouns and not only 02:00:07.639 --> 02:00:09.510 align:start position:0% pattern across all pronouns and not only does<02:00:07.760> it<02:00:07.920> do<02:00:08.119> that<02:00:08.400> but<02:00:08.520> it<02:00:08.679> has<02:00:08.800> an<02:00:09.000> irregular 02:00:09.510 --> 02:00:09.520 align:start position:0% does it do that but it has an irregular 02:00:09.520 --> 02:00:11.510 align:start position:0% does it do that but it has an irregular word<02:00:09.920> within<02:00:10.159> its<02:00:10.360> irregular<02:00:10.920> pattern<02:00:11.320> for 02:00:11.510 --> 02:00:11.520 align:start position:0% word within its irregular pattern for 02:00:11.520 --> 02:00:14.229 align:start position:0% word within its irregular pattern for the<02:00:11.760> L<02:00:12.400> pronoun<02:00:12.840> which<02:00:12.920> is<02:00:13.199> ISO<02:00:13.560> meaning<02:00:13.880> he<02:00:14.079> or 02:00:14.229 --> 02:00:14.239 align:start position:0% the L pronoun which is ISO meaning he or 02:00:14.239 --> 02:00:16.350 align:start position:0% the L pronoun which is ISO meaning he or she<02:00:14.520> did<02:00:14.760> or<02:00:14.960> made<02:00:15.320> the<02:00:15.400> reason<02:00:15.679> Spanish<02:00:16.040> does 02:00:16.350 --> 02:00:16.360 align:start position:0% she did or made the reason Spanish does 02:00:16.360 --> 02:00:18.270 align:start position:0% she did or made the reason Spanish does that<02:00:16.639> is<02:00:16.800> because<02:00:17.079> when<02:00:17.280> say<02:00:17.679> is<02:00:17.800> put<02:00:18.040> before 02:00:18.270 --> 02:00:18.280 align:start position:0% that is because when say is put before 02:00:18.280 --> 02:00:21.430 align:start position:0% that is because when say is put before an<02:00:18.520> O<02:00:18.840> it<02:00:18.920> would<02:00:19.239> have<02:00:19.320> a<02:00:19.520> c<02:00:19.760> sound<02:00:20.360> like<02:00:20.719> ELO 02:00:21.430 --> 02:00:21.440 align:start position:0% an O it would have a c sound like ELO 02:00:21.440 --> 02:00:23.390 align:start position:0% an O it would have a c sound like ELO but<02:00:21.520> the<02:00:21.639> word<02:00:21.800> needs<02:00:22.000> to<02:00:22.159> maintain<02:00:22.560> a<02:00:23.000> sound 02:00:23.390 --> 02:00:23.400 align:start position:0% but the word needs to maintain a sound 02:00:23.400 --> 02:00:26.149 align:start position:0% but the word needs to maintain a sound so<02:00:23.560> it<02:00:23.719> uses<02:00:24.280> Zeta<02:00:24.800> instead<02:00:25.320> with<02:00:25.520> a<02:00:26.040> I 02:00:26.149 --> 02:00:26.159 align:start position:0% so it uses Zeta instead with a I 02:00:26.159 --> 02:00:28.030 align:start position:0% so it uses Zeta instead with a I recommend<02:00:26.520> knowing<02:00:26.760> all<02:00:27.000> pronouns<02:00:27.679> except 02:00:28.030 --> 02:00:28.040 align:start position:0% recommend knowing all pronouns except 02:00:28.040 --> 02:00:29.669 align:start position:0% recommend knowing all pronouns except Ros<02:00:28.719> because<02:00:28.880> they're<02:00:29.040> useful<02:00:29.480> in 02:00:29.669 --> 02:00:29.679 align:start position:0% Ros because they're useful in 02:00:29.679 --> 02:00:31.550 align:start position:0% Ros because they're useful in conversation<02:00:30.360> for<02:00:30.560> instance<02:00:31.079> a<02:00:31.199> common 02:00:31.550 --> 02:00:31.560 align:start position:0% conversation for instance a common 02:00:31.560 --> 02:00:34.470 align:start position:0% conversation for instance a common question<02:00:31.880> that<02:00:32.000> is<02:00:32.239> asked<02:00:32.679> many<02:00:32.960> times<02:00:33.480> is 02:00:34.470 --> 02:00:34.480 align:start position:0% question that is asked many times is 02:00:34.480 --> 02:00:36.149 align:start position:0% question that is asked many times is meaning<02:00:34.760> what<02:00:34.880> did<02:00:35.000> you<02:00:35.159> do<02:00:35.560> yesterday<02:00:36.040> and 02:00:36.149 --> 02:00:36.159 align:start position:0% meaning what did you do yesterday and 02:00:36.159 --> 02:00:39.069 align:start position:0% meaning what did you do yesterday and you<02:00:36.239> can<02:00:36.400> reply<02:00:37.239> with<02:00:38.239> meaning<02:00:38.599> I<02:00:38.719> did<02:00:38.920> my 02:00:39.069 --> 02:00:39.079 align:start position:0% you can reply with meaning I did my 02:00:39.079 --> 02:00:41.069 align:start position:0% you can reply with meaning I did my homework<02:00:39.560> you<02:00:39.639> can<02:00:39.760> also<02:00:39.960> use<02:00:40.159> the<02:00:40.280> verb<02:00:40.639> as<02:00:40.840> to 02:00:41.069 --> 02:00:41.079 align:start position:0% homework you can also use the verb as to 02:00:41.079 --> 02:00:43.589 align:start position:0% homework you can also use the verb as to make<02:00:41.400> in<02:00:41.480> a<02:00:41.679> sentence<02:00:42.400> like 02:00:43.589 --> 02:00:43.599 align:start position:0% make in a sentence like 02:00:43.599 --> 02:00:47.629 align:start position:0% make in a sentence like no<02:00:44.599> we<02:00:44.800> made<02:00:45.000> the<02:00:45.159> bed<02:00:45.520> or 02:00:47.629 --> 02:00:47.639 align:start position:0% no we made the bed or 02:00:47.639 --> 02:00:50.390 align:start position:0% no we made the bed or maybe<02:00:48.639> they<02:00:48.760> made<02:00:48.960> a<02:00:49.119> a<02:00:49.280> cake<02:00:49.520> for<02:00:49.719> us<02:00:50.079> and<02:00:50.239> of 02:00:50.390 --> 02:00:50.400 align:start position:0% maybe they made a a cake for us and of 02:00:50.400 --> 02:00:51.709 align:start position:0% maybe they made a a cake for us and of course<02:00:50.719> you<02:00:50.800> can<02:00:50.960> make<02:00:51.119> any<02:00:51.280> sentence<02:00:51.599> you 02:00:51.709 --> 02:00:51.719 align:start position:0% course you can make any sentence you 02:00:51.719 --> 02:00:54.990 align:start position:0% course you can make any sentence you want<02:00:52.040> using<02:00:52.400> AER<02:00:52.840> there<02:00:52.960> are<02:00:53.239> also<02:00:53.639> the<02:00:54.000> verbs 02:00:54.990 --> 02:00:55.000 align:start position:0% want using AER there are also the verbs 02:00:55.000 --> 02:00:57.069 align:start position:0% want using AER there are also the verbs and<02:00:55.960> and<02:00:56.040> in<02:00:56.159> case<02:00:56.320> you<02:00:56.400> want<02:00:56.520> to<02:00:56.599> use<02:00:56.800> any<02:00:56.920> of 02:00:57.069 --> 02:00:57.079 align:start position:0% and and in case you want to use any of 02:00:57.079 --> 02:00:58.910 align:start position:0% and and in case you want to use any of them<02:00:57.239> in<02:00:57.360> the<02:00:57.520> past<02:00:57.840> you<02:00:58.000> have<02:00:58.119> to<02:00:58.239> change<02:00:58.560> them 02:00:58.910 --> 02:00:58.920 align:start position:0% them in the past you have to change them 02:00:58.920 --> 02:01:00.550 align:start position:0% them in the past you have to change them as<02:00:59.040> you<02:00:59.159> would<02:00:59.400> with<02:00:59.639> AER<02:01:00.040> but<02:01:00.199> with<02:01:00.360> these 02:01:00.550 --> 02:01:00.560 align:start position:0% as you would with AER but with these 02:01:00.560 --> 02:01:02.229 align:start position:0% as you would with AER but with these verbs<02:01:00.960> it's<02:01:01.079> more<02:01:01.239> useful<02:01:01.520> to<02:01:01.639> know<02:01:01.840> them<02:01:02.079> than 02:01:02.229 --> 02:01:02.239 align:start position:0% verbs it's more useful to know them than 02:01:02.239 --> 02:01:04.109 align:start position:0% verbs it's more useful to know them than to<02:01:02.360> use<02:01:02.599> them<02:01:02.800> the<02:01:02.960> last<02:01:03.199> category<02:01:03.639> for<02:01:03.920> this 02:01:04.109 --> 02:01:04.119 align:start position:0% to use them the last category for this 02:01:04.119 --> 02:01:06.629 align:start position:0% to use them the last category for this video<02:01:04.560> is<02:01:04.719> verbs<02:01:05.079> that<02:01:05.280> have<02:01:05.440> the<02:01:05.760> VIN<02:01:06.079> ending 02:01:06.629 --> 02:01:06.639 align:start position:0% video is verbs that have the VIN ending 02:01:06.639 --> 02:01:08.109 align:start position:0% video is verbs that have the VIN ending like<02:01:06.880> venir<02:01:07.320> rather<02:01:07.520> than<02:01:07.679> following<02:01:08.000> the 02:01:08.109 --> 02:01:08.119 align:start position:0% like venir rather than following the 02:01:08.119 --> 02:01:10.109 align:start position:0% like venir rather than following the normal<02:01:08.440> pattern<02:01:08.719> or<02:01:08.920> verbs<02:01:09.159> ending<02:01:09.400> in<02:01:09.560> IR 02:01:10.109 --> 02:01:10.119 align:start position:0% normal pattern or verbs ending in IR 02:01:10.119 --> 02:01:12.229 align:start position:0% normal pattern or verbs ending in IR venir<02:01:10.599> changes<02:01:10.960> all<02:01:11.119> of<02:01:11.239> its<02:01:11.400> conjugations<02:01:12.119> in 02:01:12.229 --> 02:01:12.239 align:start position:0% venir changes all of its conjugations in 02:01:12.239 --> 02:01:16.270 align:start position:0% venir changes all of its conjugations in the<02:01:12.400> past<02:01:12.800> yo<02:01:13.199> V<02:01:13.840> I<02:01:14.040> came<02:01:14.440> to<02:01:14.840> V<02:01:15.599> you<02:01:15.840> came<02:01:16.159> and 02:01:16.270 --> 02:01:16.280 align:start position:0% the past yo V I came to V you came and 02:01:16.280 --> 02:01:18.430 align:start position:0% the past yo V I came to V you came and so<02:01:16.440> on<02:01:16.719> I<02:01:16.840> suggest<02:01:17.199> knowing<02:01:17.520> all<02:01:17.760> pronouns 02:01:18.430 --> 02:01:18.440 align:start position:0% so on I suggest knowing all pronouns 02:01:18.440 --> 02:01:20.470 align:start position:0% so on I suggest knowing all pronouns except<02:01:18.760> V<02:01:19.480> because<02:01:19.639> it's<02:01:19.760> a<02:01:19.880> useful<02:01:20.159> verb<02:01:20.360> to 02:01:20.470 --> 02:01:20.480 align:start position:0% except V because it's a useful verb to 02:01:20.480 --> 02:01:22.550 align:start position:0% except V because it's a useful verb to know<02:01:20.760> in<02:01:20.880> the<02:01:21.040> past<02:01:21.440> for<02:01:21.639> instance<02:01:22.079> a<02:01:22.239> common 02:01:22.550 --> 02:01:22.560 align:start position:0% know in the past for instance a common 02:01:22.560 --> 02:01:25.510 align:start position:0% know in the past for instance a common question<02:01:22.880> with<02:01:23.079> ven<02:01:23.560> in<02:01:23.679> the<02:01:23.840> past<02:01:24.239> is<02:01:25.040> V 02:01:25.510 --> 02:01:25.520 align:start position:0% question with ven in the past is V 02:01:25.520 --> 02:01:26.950 align:start position:0% question with ven in the past is V meaning<02:01:25.800> from<02:01:26.040> where<02:01:26.199> you<02:01:26.400> came<02:01:26.639> and<02:01:26.719> you<02:01:26.800> can 02:01:26.950 --> 02:01:26.960 align:start position:0% meaning from where you came and you can 02:01:26.960 --> 02:01:28.109 align:start position:0% meaning from where you came and you can reply 02:01:28.109 --> 02:01:28.119 align:start position:0% reply 02:01:28.119 --> 02:01:30.589 align:start position:0% reply with<02:01:29.119> I<02:01:29.239> came<02:01:29.440> from<02:01:29.639> my<02:01:29.800> house<02:01:30.159> you<02:01:30.239> can<02:01:30.400> also 02:01:30.589 --> 02:01:30.599 align:start position:0% with I came from my house you can also 02:01:30.599 --> 02:01:32.669 align:start position:0% with I came from my house you can also say<02:01:30.800> something 02:01:32.669 --> 02:01:32.679 align:start position:0% say something 02:01:32.679 --> 02:01:35.310 align:start position:0% say something like<02:01:33.679> we<02:01:33.840> came<02:01:34.000> from<02:01:34.159> the<02:01:34.320> concert<02:01:34.760> at<02:01:34.920> night 02:01:35.310 --> 02:01:35.320 align:start position:0% like we came from the concert at night 02:01:35.320 --> 02:01:36.870 align:start position:0% like we came from the concert at night or 02:01:36.870 --> 02:01:36.880 align:start position:0% or 02:01:36.880 --> 02:01:39.189 align:start position:0% or maybe<02:01:37.880> they<02:01:38.040> came<02:01:38.280> from<02:01:38.480> the<02:01:38.599> school<02:01:38.920> and<02:01:39.040> of 02:01:39.189 --> 02:01:39.199 align:start position:0% maybe they came from the school and of 02:01:39.199 --> 02:01:40.589 align:start position:0% maybe they came from the school and of course<02:01:39.599> you<02:01:39.679> can<02:01:39.800> make<02:01:40.000> any<02:01:40.159> sentence<02:01:40.480> you 02:01:40.589 --> 02:01:40.599 align:start position:0% course you can make any sentence you 02:01:40.599 --> 02:01:42.669 align:start position:0% course you can make any sentence you want<02:01:40.840> using<02:01:41.119> the<02:01:41.199> verb<02:01:41.480> V<02:01:41.840> in<02:01:41.960> the<02:01:42.119> past<02:01:42.480> and 02:01:42.669 --> 02:01:42.679 align:start position:0% want using the verb V in the past and 02:01:42.679 --> 02:01:44.589 align:start position:0% want using the verb V in the past and actually<02:01:43.239> there<02:01:43.360> is<02:01:43.520> the<02:01:43.639> verb<02:01:44.000> prevenir 02:01:44.589 --> 02:01:44.599 align:start position:0% actually there is the verb prevenir 02:01:44.599 --> 02:01:46.149 align:start position:0% actually there is the verb prevenir meaning<02:01:44.880> to<02:01:45.119> prevent<02:01:45.599> and<02:01:45.719> in<02:01:45.840> case<02:01:46.000> you<02:01:46.079> want 02:01:46.149 --> 02:01:46.159 align:start position:0% meaning to prevent and in case you want 02:01:46.159 --> 02:01:47.790 align:start position:0% meaning to prevent and in case you want to<02:01:46.280> use<02:01:46.400> it<02:01:46.520> in<02:01:46.639> the<02:01:46.800> past<02:01:47.119> remember<02:01:47.400> to<02:01:47.560> change 02:01:47.790 --> 02:01:47.800 align:start position:0% to use it in the past remember to change 02:01:47.800 --> 02:01:49.990 align:start position:0% to use it in the past remember to change it<02:01:48.079> like<02:01:48.280> the<02:01:48.400> verb<02:01:48.679> venir<02:01:49.119> and<02:01:49.320> as<02:01:49.520> always 02:01:49.990 --> 02:01:50.000 align:start position:0% it like the verb venir and as always 02:01:50.000 --> 02:01:51.430 align:start position:0% it like the verb venir and as always it's<02:01:50.079> a<02:01:50.239> verb<02:01:50.440> that's<02:01:50.560> more<02:01:50.719> useful<02:01:51.000> to<02:01:51.119> Know 02:01:51.430 --> 02:01:51.440 align:start position:0% it's a verb that's more useful to Know 02:01:51.440 --> 02:01:53.310 align:start position:0% it's a verb that's more useful to Know Than<02:01:51.599> to<02:01:51.760> utilize<02:01:52.360> this<02:01:52.480> has<02:01:52.599> been<02:01:52.880> all<02:01:53.119> types 02:01:53.310 --> 02:01:53.320 align:start position:0% Than to utilize this has been all types 02:01:53.320 --> 02:01:55.069 align:start position:0% Than to utilize this has been all types of<02:01:53.520> irregular<02:01:54.000> verbs<02:01:54.280> in<02:01:54.400> the<02:01:54.520> past<02:01:54.719> tense<02:01:54.920> in 02:01:55.069 --> 02:01:55.079 align:start position:0% of irregular verbs in the past tense in 02:01:55.079 --> 02:01:57.350 align:start position:0% of irregular verbs in the past tense in Spanish<02:01:55.560> part<02:01:55.760> one<02:01:56.199> the<02:01:56.400> last<02:01:56.639> category<02:01:57.159> of 02:01:57.350 --> 02:01:57.360 align:start position:0% Spanish part one the last category of 02:01:57.360 --> 02:01:58.990 align:start position:0% Spanish part one the last category of irregular<02:01:57.880> verbs<02:01:58.159> in<02:01:58.239> the<02:01:58.400> past<02:01:58.599> tense<02:01:58.840> in 02:01:58.990 --> 02:01:59.000 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in the past tense in 02:01:59.000 --> 02:02:00.629 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in the past tense in Spanish<02:01:59.440> is<02:01:59.560> the<02:01:59.719> category<02:02:00.239> I<02:02:00.440> call 02:02:00.629 --> 02:02:00.639 align:start position:0% Spanish is the category I call 02:02:00.639 --> 02:02:02.270 align:start position:0% Spanish is the category I call miscellaneous<02:02:01.480> meaning<02:02:01.760> that<02:02:01.920> there<02:02:02.040> are 02:02:02.270 --> 02:02:02.280 align:start position:0% miscellaneous meaning that there are 02:02:02.280 --> 02:02:04.510 align:start position:0% miscellaneous meaning that there are verbs<02:02:02.719> that<02:02:02.920> irregularly<02:02:03.679> change<02:02:04.040> their<02:02:04.199> form 02:02:04.510 --> 02:02:04.520 align:start position:0% verbs that irregularly change their form 02:02:04.520 --> 02:02:06.270 align:start position:0% verbs that irregularly change their form in<02:02:04.639> the<02:02:04.800> past<02:02:05.239> and<02:02:05.360> that<02:02:05.520> there<02:02:05.679> aren't<02:02:06.040> any 02:02:06.270 --> 02:02:06.280 align:start position:0% in the past and that there aren't any 02:02:06.280 --> 02:02:07.950 align:start position:0% in the past and that there aren't any other<02:02:06.520> verbs<02:02:06.840> that<02:02:07.000> replicate<02:02:07.400> their<02:02:07.560> form 02:02:07.950 --> 02:02:07.960 align:start position:0% other verbs that replicate their form 02:02:07.960 --> 02:02:09.910 align:start position:0% other verbs that replicate their form like<02:02:08.119> the<02:02:08.199> verb<02:02:08.480> cab<02:02:08.880> meaning<02:02:09.159> to<02:02:09.320> fit<02:02:09.719> rather 02:02:09.910 --> 02:02:09.920 align:start position:0% like the verb cab meaning to fit rather 02:02:09.920 --> 02:02:11.109 align:start position:0% like the verb cab meaning to fit rather than<02:02:10.040> following<02:02:10.400> the<02:02:10.480> pattern<02:02:10.760> of<02:02:10.880> verbs 02:02:11.109 --> 02:02:11.119 align:start position:0% than following the pattern of verbs 02:02:11.119 --> 02:02:13.550 align:start position:0% than following the pattern of verbs ending<02:02:11.360> in<02:02:11.520> e<02:02:11.719> r<02:02:12.119> as<02:02:12.239> far<02:02:12.400> as<02:02:12.520> I<02:02:12.639> know<02:02:13.000> cab<02:02:13.440> is 02:02:13.550 --> 02:02:13.560 align:start position:0% ending in e r as far as I know cab is 02:02:13.560 --> 02:02:17.510 align:start position:0% ending in e r as far as I know cab is the<02:02:13.679> only<02:02:13.920> verb<02:02:14.199> that<02:02:14.320> follows<02:02:15.119> the<02:02:16.119> pattern<02:02:16.639> y 02:02:17.510 --> 02:02:17.520 align:start position:0% the only verb that follows the pattern y 02:02:17.520 --> 02:02:20.950 align:start position:0% the only verb that follows the pattern y I<02:02:17.719> fit<02:02:18.119> to<02:02:19.400> you<02:02:19.960> and<02:02:20.079> so<02:02:20.239> on<02:02:20.480> I<02:02:20.599> recommend 02:02:20.950 --> 02:02:20.960 align:start position:0% I fit to you and so on I recommend 02:02:20.960 --> 02:02:22.750 align:start position:0% I fit to you and so on I recommend knowing<02:02:21.239> this<02:02:21.400> verb<02:02:21.760> rather<02:02:21.960> than<02:02:22.119> using<02:02:22.400> it 02:02:22.750 --> 02:02:22.760 align:start position:0% knowing this verb rather than using it 02:02:22.760 --> 02:02:24.629 align:start position:0% knowing this verb rather than using it next<02:02:23.000> up<02:02:23.239> there<02:02:23.320> is<02:02:23.480> the<02:02:23.599> verb<02:02:24.320> which<02:02:24.440> is<02:02:24.520> the 02:02:24.629 --> 02:02:24.639 align:start position:0% next up there is the verb which is the 02:02:24.639 --> 02:02:27.350 align:start position:0% next up there is the verb which is the only<02:02:24.920> verb<02:02:25.280> that<02:02:25.440> has<02:02:25.679> the<02:02:26.679> pattern<02:02:27.119> in<02:02:27.199> the 02:02:27.350 --> 02:02:27.360 align:start position:0% only verb that has the pattern in the 02:02:27.360 --> 02:02:31.709 align:start position:0% only verb that has the pattern in the past<02:02:27.840> y<02:02:28.800> I<02:02:29.000> could<02:02:29.599> toist<02:02:30.599> you<02:02:30.800> could<02:02:31.159> and<02:02:31.280> so<02:02:31.440> on 02:02:31.709 --> 02:02:31.719 align:start position:0% past y I could toist you could and so on 02:02:31.719 --> 02:02:33.629 align:start position:0% past y I could toist you could and so on I<02:02:31.840> recommend<02:02:32.159> knowing<02:02:32.440> all<02:02:32.679> pronouns<02:02:33.280> except 02:02:33.629 --> 02:02:33.639 align:start position:0% I recommend knowing all pronouns except 02:02:33.639 --> 02:02:35.830 align:start position:0% I recommend knowing all pronouns except Theos<02:02:34.280> because<02:02:34.520> p<02:02:34.800> is<02:02:34.880> a<02:02:35.000> very<02:02:35.159> useful<02:02:35.480> verb<02:02:35.719> in 02:02:35.830 --> 02:02:35.840 align:start position:0% Theos because p is a very useful verb in 02:02:35.840 --> 02:02:37.550 align:start position:0% Theos because p is a very useful verb in the<02:02:36.000> past<02:02:36.239> tense<02:02:36.639> but<02:02:36.760> one<02:02:36.920> important<02:02:37.239> rule<02:02:37.400> to 02:02:37.550 --> 02:02:37.560 align:start position:0% the past tense but one important rule to 02:02:37.560 --> 02:02:39.510 align:start position:0% the past tense but one important rule to remember<02:02:37.920> with<02:02:38.119> pod<02:02:38.520> in<02:02:38.599> the<02:02:38.719> past<02:02:38.960> simple<02:02:39.400> is 02:02:39.510 --> 02:02:39.520 align:start position:0% remember with pod in the past simple is 02:02:39.520 --> 02:02:41.390 align:start position:0% remember with pod in the past simple is that<02:02:39.639> it's<02:02:39.800> only<02:02:40.040> used<02:02:40.400> for<02:02:40.719> actions<02:02:41.239> that 02:02:41.390 --> 02:02:41.400 align:start position:0% that it's only used for actions that 02:02:41.400 --> 02:02:43.149 align:start position:0% that it's only used for actions that happened<02:02:41.719> in<02:02:41.840> the<02:02:42.000> past<02:02:42.320> and<02:02:42.440> that<02:02:42.599> stayed<02:02:43.000> in 02:02:43.149 --> 02:02:43.159 align:start position:0% happened in the past and that stayed in 02:02:43.159 --> 02:02:45.149 align:start position:0% happened in the past and that stayed in the<02:02:43.280> past<02:02:43.639> it's<02:02:43.800> significant<02:02:44.440> to<02:02:44.599> not<02:02:44.800> confuse 02:02:45.149 --> 02:02:45.159 align:start position:0% the past it's significant to not confuse 02:02:45.159 --> 02:02:47.149 align:start position:0% the past it's significant to not confuse it<02:02:45.360> with<02:02:45.520> a<02:02:45.639> phrase<02:02:46.000> like<02:02:46.280> I<02:02:46.480> could<02:02:46.719> have<02:02:47.000> plus 02:02:47.149 --> 02:02:47.159 align:start position:0% it with a phrase like I could have plus 02:02:47.159 --> 02:02:48.629 align:start position:0% it with a phrase like I could have plus an<02:02:47.360> infinitive<02:02:47.920> because<02:02:48.119> this<02:02:48.239> would<02:02:48.400> be<02:02:48.520> the 02:02:48.629 --> 02:02:48.639 align:start position:0% an infinitive because this would be the 02:02:48.639 --> 02:02:50.550 align:start position:0% an infinitive because this would be the past<02:02:49.000> participle<02:02:49.520> in<02:02:49.679> Spanish<02:02:50.199> which<02:02:50.320> is<02:02:50.400> a 02:02:50.550 --> 02:02:50.560 align:start position:0% past participle in Spanish which is a 02:02:50.560 --> 02:02:52.390 align:start position:0% past participle in Spanish which is a topic<02:02:50.760> for<02:02:50.880> a<02:02:51.000> future<02:02:51.320> video<02:02:51.719> instead<02:02:52.159> you<02:02:52.239> can 02:02:52.390 --> 02:02:52.400 align:start position:0% topic for a future video instead you can 02:02:52.400 --> 02:02:54.430 align:start position:0% topic for a future video instead you can use<02:02:53.040> in<02:02:53.159> the<02:02:53.320> past<02:02:53.520> simple<02:02:54.040> by<02:02:54.159> saying 02:02:54.430 --> 02:02:54.440 align:start position:0% use in the past simple by saying 02:02:54.440 --> 02:02:55.750 align:start position:0% use in the past simple by saying something 02:02:55.750 --> 02:02:55.760 align:start position:0% something 02:02:55.760 --> 02:02:59.270 align:start position:0% something like<02:02:56.760> I<02:02:56.920> could<02:02:57.119> speak<02:02:57.400> with<02:02:57.520> him<02:02:57.760> or<02:02:57.920> maybe 02:02:59.270 --> 02:02:59.280 align:start position:0% like I could speak with him or maybe 02:02:59.280 --> 02:03:01.750 align:start position:0% like I could speak with him or maybe toest<02:03:00.280> you<02:03:00.400> could<02:03:00.599> go<02:03:00.840> to<02:03:01.000> the<02:03:01.199> party<02:03:01.599> of 02:03:01.750 --> 02:03:01.760 align:start position:0% toest you could go to the party of 02:03:01.760 --> 02:03:03.350 align:start position:0% toest you could go to the party of course<02:03:02.119> it's<02:03:02.280> up<02:03:02.440> to<02:03:02.560> you<02:03:02.760> to<02:03:02.880> say<02:03:03.159> any 02:03:03.350 --> 02:03:03.360 align:start position:0% course it's up to you to say any 02:03:03.360 --> 02:03:05.669 align:start position:0% course it's up to you to say any sentence<02:03:03.760> that<02:03:03.840> you<02:03:03.960> want<02:03:04.280> with<02:03:04.480> P<02:03:04.920> after 02:03:05.669 --> 02:03:05.679 align:start position:0% sentence that you want with P after 02:03:05.679 --> 02:03:07.390 align:start position:0% sentence that you want with P after there's<02:03:05.920> the<02:03:06.040> verb<02:03:06.360> sa<02:03:06.800> which<02:03:06.920> is<02:03:07.040> the<02:03:07.159> only 02:03:07.390 --> 02:03:07.400 align:start position:0% there's the verb sa which is the only 02:03:07.400 --> 02:03:08.750 align:start position:0% there's the verb sa which is the only verb<02:03:07.760> that<02:03:07.880> uses 02:03:08.750 --> 02:03:08.760 align:start position:0% verb that uses 02:03:08.760 --> 02:03:13.830 align:start position:0% verb that uses an<02:03:09.760> pattern<02:03:10.360> y<02:03:11.280> means<02:03:11.679> I<02:03:11.880> knew<02:03:12.440> toist<02:03:13.440> means 02:03:13.830 --> 02:03:13.840 align:start position:0% an pattern y means I knew toist means 02:03:13.840 --> 02:03:15.950 align:start position:0% an pattern y means I knew toist means you<02:03:14.119> knew<02:03:14.480> and<02:03:14.639> so<02:03:14.800> on<02:03:15.079> don't<02:03:15.280> focus<02:03:15.560> on<02:03:15.719> these 02:03:15.950 --> 02:03:15.960 align:start position:0% you knew and so on don't focus on these 02:03:15.960 --> 02:03:17.350 align:start position:0% you knew and so on don't focus on these pronouns<02:03:16.480> because<02:03:16.639> they're<02:03:16.800> not<02:03:16.960> that<02:03:17.079> useful 02:03:17.350 --> 02:03:17.360 align:start position:0% pronouns because they're not that useful 02:03:17.360 --> 02:03:19.030 align:start position:0% pronouns because they're not that useful in<02:03:17.520> conversation<02:03:18.119> one<02:03:18.280> thing<02:03:18.400> to<02:03:18.520> note<02:03:18.719> with 02:03:19.030 --> 02:03:19.040 align:start position:0% in conversation one thing to note with 02:03:19.040 --> 02:03:20.990 align:start position:0% in conversation one thing to note with sa<02:03:19.480> in<02:03:19.599> the<02:03:19.760> past<02:03:19.960> simple<02:03:20.440> is<02:03:20.560> that<02:03:20.679> it's<02:03:20.800> used 02:03:20.990 --> 02:03:21.000 align:start position:0% sa in the past simple is that it's used 02:03:21.000 --> 02:03:22.669 align:start position:0% sa in the past simple is that it's used in<02:03:21.199> context<02:03:21.760> when<02:03:21.840> it<02:03:21.960> comes<02:03:22.159> down<02:03:22.280> to<02:03:22.440> knowing 02:03:22.669 --> 02:03:22.679 align:start position:0% in context when it comes down to knowing 02:03:22.679 --> 02:03:24.510 align:start position:0% in context when it comes down to knowing something<02:03:23.040> factually<02:03:23.639> but<02:03:23.760> not<02:03:23.960> necessarily 02:03:24.510 --> 02:03:24.520 align:start position:0% something factually but not necessarily 02:03:24.520 --> 02:03:26.030 align:start position:0% something factually but not necessarily something<02:03:24.800> that<02:03:24.880> you<02:03:25.000> knew<02:03:25.239> how<02:03:25.320> to<02:03:25.480> do<02:03:25.760> in<02:03:25.840> the 02:03:26.030 --> 02:03:26.040 align:start position:0% something that you knew how to do in the 02:03:26.040 --> 02:03:28.069 align:start position:0% something that you knew how to do in the present<02:03:26.480> sa<02:03:27.040> is<02:03:27.159> used<02:03:27.400> for<02:03:27.560> the<02:03:27.679> following 02:03:28.069 --> 02:03:28.079 align:start position:0% present sa is used for the following 02:03:28.079 --> 02:03:29.709 align:start position:0% present sa is used for the following applications<02:03:28.840> but<02:03:28.960> in<02:03:29.079> the<02:03:29.199> past<02:03:29.440> simple 02:03:29.709 --> 02:03:29.719 align:start position:0% applications but in the past simple 02:03:29.719 --> 02:03:31.149 align:start position:0% applications but in the past simple tense<02:03:30.119> it's<02:03:30.239> used<02:03:30.480> to<02:03:30.560> know<02:03:30.800> something 02:03:31.149 --> 02:03:31.159 align:start position:0% tense it's used to know something 02:03:31.159 --> 02:03:33.990 align:start position:0% tense it's used to know something factual<02:03:31.840> like 02:03:33.990 --> 02:03:34.000 align:start position:0% factual like 02:03:34.000 --> 02:03:36.589 align:start position:0% factual like saying<02:03:35.000> I<02:03:35.119> knew<02:03:35.440> who<02:03:35.599> won<02:03:35.920> the<02:03:36.040> game<02:03:36.360> and<02:03:36.480> in 02:03:36.589 --> 02:03:36.599 align:start position:0% saying I knew who won the game and in 02:03:36.599 --> 02:03:38.750 align:start position:0% saying I knew who won the game and in the<02:03:36.760> sentence<02:03:37.199> I<02:03:37.360> use<02:03:37.599> Saed<02:03:38.000> in<02:03:38.079> the<02:03:38.239> past<02:03:38.599> by 02:03:38.750 --> 02:03:38.760 align:start position:0% the sentence I use Saed in the past by 02:03:38.760 --> 02:03:40.390 align:start position:0% the sentence I use Saed in the past by factually<02:03:39.119> knowing<02:03:39.400> who<02:03:39.520> won<02:03:39.719> the<02:03:39.840> game<02:03:40.159> along 02:03:40.390 --> 02:03:40.400 align:start position:0% factually knowing who won the game along 02:03:40.400 --> 02:03:42.709 align:start position:0% factually knowing who won the game along with<02:03:40.560> using<02:03:40.760> a<02:03:40.960> regular<02:03:41.280> AR<02:03:41.760> verb<02:03:42.079> for<02:03:42.320> the<02:03:42.480> he 02:03:42.709 --> 02:03:42.719 align:start position:0% with using a regular AR verb for the he 02:03:42.719 --> 02:03:44.910 align:start position:0% with using a regular AR verb for the he she<02:03:43.040> pronoun<02:03:43.599> of<02:03:43.719> course<02:03:44.040> it's<02:03:44.199> up<02:03:44.360> to<02:03:44.520> you<02:03:44.760> to 02:03:44.910 --> 02:03:44.920 align:start position:0% she pronoun of course it's up to you to 02:03:44.920 --> 02:03:46.910 align:start position:0% she pronoun of course it's up to you to say<02:03:45.159> any<02:03:45.360> sentence<02:03:45.760> that<02:03:45.840> you<02:03:46.000> want<02:03:46.280> with<02:03:46.440> sa 02:03:46.910 --> 02:03:46.920 align:start position:0% say any sentence that you want with sa 02:03:46.920 --> 02:03:48.830 align:start position:0% say any sentence that you want with sa after<02:03:47.159> sa<02:03:47.679> there's<02:03:47.880> the<02:03:48.000> verb<02:03:48.320> K<02:03:48.679> which<02:03:48.800> is 02:03:48.830 --> 02:03:48.840 align:start position:0% after sa there's the verb K which is 02:03:48.840 --> 02:03:51.030 align:start position:0% after sa there's the verb K which is which<02:03:48.920> is<02:03:49.040> the<02:03:49.119> only<02:03:49.400> verb<02:03:49.800> that<02:03:49.960> uses<02:03:50.480> aiss 02:03:51.030 --> 02:03:51.040 align:start position:0% which is the only verb that uses aiss 02:03:51.040 --> 02:03:55.350 align:start position:0% which is the only verb that uses aiss pattern<02:03:51.599> Y<02:03:52.599> is<02:03:52.840> I<02:03:53.040> wanted<02:03:53.920> toist<02:03:54.920> is<02:03:55.159> you 02:03:55.350 --> 02:03:55.360 align:start position:0% pattern Y is I wanted toist is you 02:03:55.360 --> 02:03:57.189 align:start position:0% pattern Y is I wanted toist is you wanted<02:03:55.840> and<02:03:55.960> so<02:03:56.119> on<02:03:56.360> don't<02:03:56.520> focus<02:03:56.840> on<02:03:57.040> these 02:03:57.189 --> 02:03:57.199 align:start position:0% wanted and so on don't focus on these 02:03:57.199 --> 02:03:58.750 align:start position:0% wanted and so on don't focus on these pronouns<02:03:57.760> because<02:03:57.920> they're<02:03:58.079> not<02:03:58.280> that<02:03:58.400> useful 02:03:58.750 --> 02:03:58.760 align:start position:0% pronouns because they're not that useful 02:03:58.760 --> 02:04:00.910 align:start position:0% pronouns because they're not that useful in<02:03:58.960> conversation<02:03:59.639> one<02:03:59.760> thing<02:03:59.880> to<02:04:00.000> note<02:04:00.239> with<02:04:00.480> K 02:04:00.910 --> 02:04:00.920 align:start position:0% in conversation one thing to note with K 02:04:00.920 --> 02:04:02.549 align:start position:0% in conversation one thing to note with K is<02:04:01.040> that<02:04:01.159> it's<02:04:01.280> used<02:04:01.520> in<02:04:01.599> the<02:04:01.760> past<02:04:01.960> simple<02:04:02.360> for 02:04:02.549 --> 02:04:02.559 align:start position:0% is that it's used in the past simple for 02:04:02.559 --> 02:04:04.030 align:start position:0% is that it's used in the past simple for things<02:04:02.760> that<02:04:02.880> you<02:04:03.000> wanted<02:04:03.280> in<02:04:03.400> the<02:04:03.559> past<02:04:03.880> and 02:04:04.030 --> 02:04:04.040 align:start position:0% things that you wanted in the past and 02:04:04.040 --> 02:04:06.350 align:start position:0% things that you wanted in the past and that<02:04:04.159> stayed<02:04:04.520> in<02:04:04.599> the<02:04:04.840> past<02:04:05.199> like 02:04:06.350 --> 02:04:06.360 align:start position:0% that stayed in the past like 02:04:06.360 --> 02:04:08.830 align:start position:0% that stayed in the past like saying<02:04:07.360> I<02:04:07.480> wanted<02:04:07.880> to<02:04:08.079> play<02:04:08.320> with<02:04:08.480> you<02:04:08.760> which 02:04:08.830 --> 02:04:08.840 align:start position:0% saying I wanted to play with you which 02:04:08.840 --> 02:04:10.549 align:start position:0% saying I wanted to play with you which is<02:04:08.960> an<02:04:09.159> action<02:04:09.440> that<02:04:09.559> I<02:04:09.639> wanted<02:04:09.880> to<02:04:10.040> do<02:04:10.320> and<02:04:10.440> I 02:04:10.549 --> 02:04:10.559 align:start position:0% is an action that I wanted to do and I 02:04:10.559 --> 02:04:12.390 align:start position:0% is an action that I wanted to do and I no<02:04:10.760> longer<02:04:11.119> want<02:04:11.280> to<02:04:11.400> do<02:04:11.559> it<02:04:11.760> I<02:04:11.840> can<02:04:11.960> also<02:04:12.159> say 02:04:12.390 --> 02:04:12.400 align:start position:0% no longer want to do it I can also say 02:04:12.400 --> 02:04:13.990 align:start position:0% no longer want to do it I can also say something 02:04:13.990 --> 02:04:14.000 align:start position:0% something 02:04:14.000 --> 02:04:16.629 align:start position:0% something like<02:04:15.000> she<02:04:15.199> wanted<02:04:15.639> to<02:04:15.800> open<02:04:16.040> the<02:04:16.199> door<02:04:16.480> because 02:04:16.629 --> 02:04:16.639 align:start position:0% like she wanted to open the door because 02:04:16.639 --> 02:04:18.350 align:start position:0% like she wanted to open the door because it's<02:04:16.800> an<02:04:17.000> action<02:04:17.360> that<02:04:17.520> stayed<02:04:17.800> in<02:04:17.880> the<02:04:18.040> past 02:04:18.350 --> 02:04:18.360 align:start position:0% it's an action that stayed in the past 02:04:18.360 --> 02:04:20.310 align:start position:0% it's an action that stayed in the past meaning<02:04:18.599> that<02:04:18.920> no<02:04:19.079> longer<02:04:19.400> wants<02:04:19.639> to<02:04:19.800> do<02:04:19.920> it<02:04:20.159> at 02:04:20.310 --> 02:04:20.320 align:start position:0% meaning that no longer wants to do it at 02:04:20.320 --> 02:04:22.189 align:start position:0% meaning that no longer wants to do it at last<02:04:20.559> in<02:04:20.679> the<02:04:20.800> miscellaneous<02:04:21.520> category<02:04:22.079> there 02:04:22.189 --> 02:04:22.199 align:start position:0% last in the miscellaneous category there 02:04:22.199 --> 02:04:24.350 align:start position:0% last in the miscellaneous category there are<02:04:22.400> the<02:04:22.559> verbs<02:04:23.000> V<02:04:23.239> and<02:04:23.480> dar<02:04:23.800> and<02:04:23.920> the<02:04:24.040> easiest 02:04:24.350 --> 02:04:24.360 align:start position:0% are the verbs V and dar and the easiest 02:04:24.360 --> 02:04:25.990 align:start position:0% are the verbs V and dar and the easiest way<02:04:24.480> to<02:04:24.639> remember<02:04:25.040> them<02:04:25.199> in<02:04:25.320> the<02:04:25.480> past<02:04:25.679> simple 02:04:25.990 --> 02:04:26.000 align:start position:0% way to remember them in the past simple 02:04:26.000 --> 02:04:27.549 align:start position:0% way to remember them in the past simple tense<02:04:26.360> is<02:04:26.480> that<02:04:26.599> they<02:04:26.800> literally<02:04:27.119> share<02:04:27.440> the 02:04:27.549 --> 02:04:27.559 align:start position:0% tense is that they literally share the 02:04:27.559 --> 02:04:29.709 align:start position:0% tense is that they literally share the same<02:04:27.760> ending<02:04:28.199> for<02:04:28.400> all<02:04:28.639> pronouns<02:04:29.320> aside<02:04:29.559> from 02:04:29.709 --> 02:04:29.719 align:start position:0% same ending for all pronouns aside from 02:04:29.719 --> 02:04:31.910 align:start position:0% same ending for all pronouns aside from the<02:04:29.840> first<02:04:30.079> letter<02:04:30.480> of<02:04:30.679> every<02:04:30.920> conjugation<02:04:31.639> y 02:04:31.910 --> 02:04:31.920 align:start position:0% the first letter of every conjugation y 02:04:31.920 --> 02:04:37.390 align:start position:0% the first letter of every conjugation y v<02:04:32.360> i<02:04:32.559> saw<02:04:33.119> y<02:04:33.840> I<02:04:34.079> gave<02:04:34.480> to<02:04:34.800> V<02:04:35.599> you<02:04:35.840> saw<02:04:36.239> to<02:04:37.159> you 02:04:37.390 --> 02:04:37.400 align:start position:0% v i saw y I gave to V you saw to you 02:04:37.400 --> 02:04:39.270 align:start position:0% v i saw y I gave to V you saw to you gave<02:04:37.760> and<02:04:37.920> so<02:04:38.079> on<02:04:38.320> I<02:04:38.440> recommend<02:04:38.800> focusing<02:04:39.119> on 02:04:39.270 --> 02:04:39.280 align:start position:0% gave and so on I recommend focusing on 02:04:39.280 --> 02:04:41.510 align:start position:0% gave and so on I recommend focusing on all<02:04:39.520> pronouns<02:04:40.159> except<02:04:40.520> Vos<02:04:41.199> because<02:04:41.360> they're 02:04:41.510 --> 02:04:41.520 align:start position:0% all pronouns except Vos because they're 02:04:41.520 --> 02:04:43.669 align:start position:0% all pronouns except Vos because they're useful<02:04:41.880> in<02:04:42.040> conversation<02:04:42.639> try<02:04:42.920> some<02:04:43.119> examples 02:04:43.669 --> 02:04:43.679 align:start position:0% useful in conversation try some examples 02:04:43.679 --> 02:04:47.669 align:start position:0% useful in conversation try some examples on<02:04:43.800> your<02:04:43.960> own<02:04:44.400> y<02:04:45.280> andesta<02:04:46.280> means<02:04:46.800> I<02:04:46.920> saw<02:04:47.239> you<02:04:47.559> at 02:04:47.669 --> 02:04:47.679 align:start position:0% on your own y andesta means I saw you at 02:04:47.679 --> 02:04:50.790 align:start position:0% on your own y andesta means I saw you at the<02:04:47.840> party<02:04:48.159> to<02:04:48.440> V 02:04:50.790 --> 02:04:50.800 align:start position:0% 02:04:50.800 --> 02:04:54.350 align:start position:0% means<02:04:51.239> you<02:04:51.360> saw<02:04:51.679> my<02:04:51.840> mother<02:04:52.280> in<02:04:52.400> the 02:04:54.350 --> 02:04:54.360 align:start position:0% means you saw my mother in the 02:04:54.360 --> 02:04:58.350 align:start position:0% means you saw my mother in the house<02:04:55.360> means<02:04:55.800> he<02:04:56.000> saw<02:04:56.320> how<02:04:56.440> I<02:04:56.559> did<02:04:56.760> my 02:04:58.350 --> 02:04:58.360 align:start position:0% house means he saw how I did my 02:04:58.360 --> 02:05:02.189 align:start position:0% house means he saw how I did my homework<02:04:59.360> means<02:04:59.800> I<02:04:59.960> gave<02:05:00.159> you<02:05:00.440> my 02:05:02.189 --> 02:05:02.199 align:start position:0% homework means I gave you my 02:05:02.199 --> 02:05:05.189 align:start position:0% homework means I gave you my pencil<02:05:03.199> means<02:05:03.719> he<02:05:03.960> gave<02:05:04.159> us<02:05:04.440> the<02:05:04.639> past<02:05:05.079> these 02:05:05.189 --> 02:05:05.199 align:start position:0% pencil means he gave us the past these 02:05:05.199 --> 02:05:06.709 align:start position:0% pencil means he gave us the past these are<02:05:05.360> just<02:05:05.480> some<02:05:05.639> of<02:05:05.760> the<02:05:05.920> examples<02:05:06.520> that<02:05:06.599> you 02:05:06.709 --> 02:05:06.719 align:start position:0% are just some of the examples that you 02:05:06.719 --> 02:05:08.390 align:start position:0% are just some of the examples that you can<02:05:06.880> make<02:05:07.119> with<02:05:07.320> ver<02:05:07.559> and<02:05:07.719> D<02:05:07.960> in<02:05:08.040> the<02:05:08.199> past 02:05:08.390 --> 02:05:08.400 align:start position:0% can make with ver and D in the past 02:05:08.400 --> 02:05:10.310 align:start position:0% can make with ver and D in the past simple<02:05:08.920> and<02:05:09.079> as<02:05:09.280> always<02:05:09.679> you<02:05:09.800> can<02:05:09.920> say<02:05:10.159> any 02:05:10.310 --> 02:05:10.320 align:start position:0% simple and as always you can say any 02:05:10.320 --> 02:05:12.790 align:start position:0% simple and as always you can say any sentence<02:05:10.639> you<02:05:10.760> want<02:05:11.040> using<02:05:11.440> ver<02:05:11.679> and<02:05:11.920> D<02:05:12.320> now<02:05:12.639> we 02:05:12.790 --> 02:05:12.800 align:start position:0% sentence you want using ver and D now we 02:05:12.800 --> 02:05:14.109 align:start position:0% sentence you want using ver and D now we get<02:05:12.920> to<02:05:13.000> the<02:05:13.159> category<02:05:13.480> of<02:05:13.599> stem<02:05:13.840> changing 02:05:14.109 --> 02:05:14.119 align:start position:0% get to the category of stem changing 02:05:14.119 --> 02:05:15.669 align:start position:0% get to the category of stem changing verbs<02:05:14.400> in<02:05:14.520> the<02:05:14.639> past<02:05:14.840> simple<02:05:15.199> the<02:05:15.320> very<02:05:15.480> first 02:05:15.669 --> 02:05:15.679 align:start position:0% verbs in the past simple the very first 02:05:15.679 --> 02:05:17.549 align:start position:0% verbs in the past simple the very first thing<02:05:15.840> that<02:05:16.000> I<02:05:16.159> suggest<02:05:16.520> to<02:05:16.679> all<02:05:16.840> of<02:05:16.960> you<02:05:17.280> is<02:05:17.360> to 02:05:17.549 --> 02:05:17.559 align:start position:0% thing that I suggest to all of you is to 02:05:17.559 --> 02:05:19.109 align:start position:0% thing that I suggest to all of you is to remember<02:05:18.079> that<02:05:18.239> basically<02:05:18.760> all<02:05:18.880> of<02:05:18.960> these 02:05:19.109 --> 02:05:19.119 align:start position:0% remember that basically all of these 02:05:19.119 --> 02:05:20.709 align:start position:0% remember that basically all of these stem<02:05:19.320> changing<02:05:19.679> verbs<02:05:20.040> will<02:05:20.199> only<02:05:20.440> apply 02:05:20.709 --> 02:05:20.719 align:start position:0% stem changing verbs will only apply 02:05:20.719 --> 02:05:22.870 align:start position:0% stem changing verbs will only apply their<02:05:20.880> stem<02:05:21.119> changing<02:05:21.440> rule<02:05:21.800> for<02:05:22.040> the<02:05:22.280> L<02:05:22.639> and 02:05:22.870 --> 02:05:22.880 align:start position:0% their stem changing rule for the L and 02:05:22.880 --> 02:05:25.109 align:start position:0% their stem changing rule for the L and AOS<02:05:23.360> pronouns<02:05:24.040> all<02:05:24.159> of<02:05:24.360> these<02:05:24.520> verbs<02:05:24.920> are 02:05:25.109 --> 02:05:25.119 align:start position:0% AOS pronouns all of these verbs are 02:05:25.119 --> 02:05:26.549 align:start position:0% AOS pronouns all of these verbs are regular<02:05:25.520> verbs<02:05:25.880> that<02:05:26.000> follow<02:05:26.280> normal 02:05:26.549 --> 02:05:26.559 align:start position:0% regular verbs that follow normal 02:05:26.559 --> 02:05:28.149 align:start position:0% regular verbs that follow normal conjugation<02:05:27.119> patterns<02:05:27.639> across<02:05:27.960> their 02:05:28.149 --> 02:05:28.159 align:start position:0% conjugation patterns across their 02:05:28.159 --> 02:05:30.870 align:start position:0% conjugation patterns across their pronouns<02:05:28.880> except<02:05:29.199> for<02:05:29.480> L<02:05:29.800> and<02:05:30.040> AOS<02:05:30.520> so<02:05:30.719> just 02:05:30.870 --> 02:05:30.880 align:start position:0% pronouns except for L and AOS so just 02:05:30.880 --> 02:05:32.549 align:start position:0% pronouns except for L and AOS so just remember<02:05:31.320> that<02:05:31.559> the<02:05:31.679> second<02:05:31.920> thing<02:05:32.079> I'll<02:05:32.239> say 02:05:32.549 --> 02:05:32.559 align:start position:0% remember that the second thing I'll say 02:05:32.559 --> 02:05:34.229 align:start position:0% remember that the second thing I'll say is<02:05:32.639> that<02:05:32.800> I<02:05:32.880> won't<02:05:33.119> give<02:05:33.320> any<02:05:33.559> examples<02:05:34.079> with 02:05:34.229 --> 02:05:34.239 align:start position:0% is that I won't give any examples with 02:05:34.239 --> 02:05:35.629 align:start position:0% is that I won't give any examples with any<02:05:34.360> of<02:05:34.480> the<02:05:34.559> following<02:05:34.960> verbs<02:05:35.320> because<02:05:35.520> these 02:05:35.629 --> 02:05:35.639 align:start position:0% any of the following verbs because these 02:05:35.639 --> 02:05:37.149 align:start position:0% any of the following verbs because these are<02:05:35.800> stem<02:05:36.040> changing<02:05:36.360> verbs<02:05:36.719> that<02:05:36.840> you<02:05:36.960> should 02:05:37.149 --> 02:05:37.159 align:start position:0% are stem changing verbs that you should 02:05:37.159 --> 02:05:39.030 align:start position:0% are stem changing verbs that you should know<02:05:37.440> more<02:05:37.639> than<02:05:37.840> use<02:05:38.320> considering<02:05:38.800> that<02:05:38.920> the 02:05:39.030 --> 02:05:39.040 align:start position:0% know more than use considering that the 02:05:39.040 --> 02:05:40.589 align:start position:0% know more than use considering that the only<02:05:39.239> useful<02:05:39.559> way<02:05:39.679> to<02:05:39.800> utilize<02:05:40.239> them<02:05:40.440> is 02:05:40.589 --> 02:05:40.599 align:start position:0% only useful way to utilize them is 02:05:40.599 --> 02:05:42.790 align:start position:0% only useful way to utilize them is through<02:05:40.800> the<02:05:40.960> L<02:05:41.239> and<02:05:41.440> AOS<02:05:41.840> pronouns<02:05:42.400> taking<02:05:42.639> a 02:05:42.790 --> 02:05:42.800 align:start position:0% through the L and AOS pronouns taking a 02:05:42.800 --> 02:05:45.189 align:start position:0% through the L and AOS pronouns taking a verb<02:05:43.040> like<02:05:43.239> sugar<02:05:43.960> for<02:05:44.199> instance<02:05:44.719> it's<02:05:44.840> a<02:05:44.960> stem 02:05:45.189 --> 02:05:45.199 align:start position:0% verb like sugar for instance it's a stem 02:05:45.199 --> 02:05:48.229 align:start position:0% verb like sugar for instance it's a stem changing<02:05:45.559> verb<02:05:45.960> that<02:05:46.079> falls<02:05:46.400> into<02:05:46.679> the<02:05:47.000> a<02:05:47.360> to<02:05:47.760> e 02:05:48.229 --> 02:05:48.239 align:start position:0% changing verb that falls into the a to e 02:05:48.239 --> 02:05:49.709 align:start position:0% changing verb that falls into the a to e category<02:05:48.800> and<02:05:48.880> it<02:05:49.000> follows<02:05:49.280> the<02:05:49.400> normal 02:05:49.709 --> 02:05:49.719 align:start position:0% category and it follows the normal 02:05:49.719 --> 02:05:51.510 align:start position:0% category and it follows the normal conjugation<02:05:50.280> pattern<02:05:50.639> of<02:05:50.840> verbs<02:05:51.079> ending<02:05:51.320> in 02:05:51.510 --> 02:05:51.520 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern of verbs ending in 02:05:51.520 --> 02:05:54.310 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern of verbs ending in IR<02:05:52.119> except<02:05:52.400> for<02:05:52.639> L<02:05:52.960> and<02:05:53.199> AOS<02:05:53.719> instead<02:05:53.960> of<02:05:54.079> using 02:05:54.310 --> 02:05:54.320 align:start position:0% IR except for L and AOS instead of using 02:05:54.320 --> 02:05:57.109 align:start position:0% IR except for L and AOS instead of using the<02:05:54.480> stem<02:05:54.880> beginning<02:05:55.280> with<02:05:55.559> e<02:05:55.960> sug<02:05:56.679> decides<02:05:57.000> to 02:05:57.109 --> 02:05:57.119 align:start position:0% the stem beginning with e sug decides to 02:05:57.119 --> 02:05:59.390 align:start position:0% the stem beginning with e sug decides to use<02:05:57.440> e<02:05:57.880> instead<02:05:58.360> and<02:05:58.520> at<02:05:58.679> the<02:05:58.800> most<02:05:59.199> it's<02:05:59.280> a 02:05:59.390 --> 02:05:59.400 align:start position:0% use e instead and at the most it's a 02:05:59.400 --> 02:06:00.990 align:start position:0% use e instead and at the most it's a verb<02:05:59.599> that's<02:05:59.760> more<02:05:59.920> useful<02:06:00.199> to<02:06:00.320> Know<02:06:00.679> Than<02:06:00.840> to 02:06:00.990 --> 02:06:01.000 align:start position:0% verb that's more useful to Know Than to 02:06:01.000 --> 02:06:03.109 align:start position:0% verb that's more useful to Know Than to utilize<02:06:01.599> generally<02:06:02.199> the<02:06:02.360> same<02:06:02.639> concept 02:06:03.109 --> 02:06:03.119 align:start position:0% utilize generally the same concept 02:06:03.119 --> 02:06:04.310 align:start position:0% utilize generally the same concept applies<02:06:03.400> to<02:06:03.520> the<02:06:03.639> rest<02:06:03.760> of<02:06:03.880> the<02:06:03.960> verbs<02:06:04.199> that 02:06:04.310 --> 02:06:04.320 align:start position:0% applies to the rest of the verbs that 02:06:04.320 --> 02:06:07.350 align:start position:0% applies to the rest of the verbs that I'm<02:06:04.440> about<02:06:04.679> to<02:06:04.880> list<02:06:05.199> going<02:06:05.480> from<02:06:05.800> E<02:06:06.119> to<02:06:06.440> e<02:06:06.960> like 02:06:07.350 --> 02:06:07.360 align:start position:0% I'm about to list going from E to e like 02:06:07.360 --> 02:06:09.950 align:start position:0% I'm about to list going from E to e like M<02:06:07.920> which<02:06:08.040> means<02:06:08.280> to<02:06:08.480> lie<02:06:08.960> prefer<02:06:09.599> which<02:06:09.760> means 02:06:09.950 --> 02:06:09.960 align:start position:0% M which means to lie prefer which means 02:06:09.960 --> 02:06:12.790 align:start position:0% M which means to lie prefer which means to<02:06:10.159> prefer<02:06:10.719> SE<02:06:11.199> meaning<02:06:11.480> to<02:06:11.679> follow<02:06:12.159> con 02:06:12.790 --> 02:06:12.800 align:start position:0% to prefer SE meaning to follow con 02:06:12.800 --> 02:06:15.350 align:start position:0% to prefer SE meaning to follow con meaning<02:06:13.079> to<02:06:13.320> get<02:06:13.800> repe<02:06:14.400> meaning<02:06:14.639> to<02:06:14.840> repeat 02:06:15.350 --> 02:06:15.360 align:start position:0% meaning to get repe meaning to repeat 02:06:15.360 --> 02:06:17.950 align:start position:0% meaning to get repe meaning to repeat Ser<02:06:15.960> meaning<02:06:16.199> to<02:06:16.360> serve<02:06:16.840> and<02:06:17.079> ped<02:06:17.520> meaning<02:06:17.760> to 02:06:17.950 --> 02:06:17.960 align:start position:0% Ser meaning to serve and ped meaning to 02:06:17.960 --> 02:06:19.910 align:start position:0% Ser meaning to serve and ped meaning to ask<02:06:18.159> for<02:06:18.639> all<02:06:18.760> of<02:06:18.880> these<02:06:19.000> verbs<02:06:19.280> are<02:06:19.440> useful<02:06:19.760> to 02:06:19.910 --> 02:06:19.920 align:start position:0% ask for all of these verbs are useful to 02:06:19.920 --> 02:06:21.549 align:start position:0% ask for all of these verbs are useful to know<02:06:20.280> rather<02:06:20.520> than<02:06:20.639> to<02:06:20.800> use<02:06:21.199> and<02:06:21.280> the<02:06:21.400> only 02:06:21.549 --> 02:06:21.559 align:start position:0% know rather than to use and the only 02:06:21.559 --> 02:06:22.870 align:start position:0% know rather than to use and the only thing<02:06:21.679> you<02:06:21.760> should<02:06:21.920> know<02:06:22.119> about<02:06:22.360> them<02:06:22.639> is<02:06:22.760> that 02:06:22.870 --> 02:06:22.880 align:start position:0% thing you should know about them is that 02:06:22.880 --> 02:06:25.270 align:start position:0% thing you should know about them is that they<02:06:23.000> change<02:06:23.320> their<02:06:23.480> stems<02:06:23.960> from<02:06:24.199> E<02:06:24.400> to<02:06:24.599> e<02:06:25.000> only 02:06:25.270 --> 02:06:25.280 align:start position:0% they change their stems from E to e only 02:06:25.280 --> 02:06:27.390 align:start position:0% they change their stems from E to e only in<02:06:25.440> the<02:06:25.639> L<02:06:25.840> and<02:06:26.040> AOS<02:06:26.400> pronouns<02:06:26.920> in<02:06:27.040> the<02:06:27.199> past 02:06:27.390 --> 02:06:27.400 align:start position:0% in the L and AOS pronouns in the past 02:06:27.400 --> 02:06:29.149 align:start position:0% in the L and AOS pronouns in the past simple<02:06:27.679> tense<02:06:28.159> next<02:06:28.400> up<02:06:28.639> there<02:06:28.760> are<02:06:28.920> stem 02:06:29.149 --> 02:06:29.159 align:start position:0% simple tense next up there are stem 02:06:29.159 --> 02:06:31.790 align:start position:0% simple tense next up there are stem changing<02:06:29.520> verbs<02:06:29.920> going<02:06:30.159> from<02:06:30.440> o<02:06:30.840> to<02:06:31.159> U<02:06:31.559> and<02:06:31.679> as 02:06:31.790 --> 02:06:31.800 align:start position:0% changing verbs going from o to U and as 02:06:31.800 --> 02:06:33.549 align:start position:0% changing verbs going from o to U and as far<02:06:31.960> as<02:06:32.079> I<02:06:32.199> know<02:06:32.520> there<02:06:32.639> are<02:06:32.840> only<02:06:33.079> two<02:06:33.239> of<02:06:33.400> them 02:06:33.549 --> 02:06:33.559 align:start position:0% far as I know there are only two of them 02:06:33.559 --> 02:06:36.109 align:start position:0% far as I know there are only two of them in<02:06:33.719> Spanish<02:06:34.199> and<02:06:34.320> these<02:06:34.440> are<02:06:34.840> dormir<02:06:35.400> and 02:06:36.109 --> 02:06:36.119 align:start position:0% in Spanish and these are dormir and 02:06:36.119 --> 02:06:38.030 align:start position:0% in Spanish and these are dormir and meaning<02:06:36.400> to<02:06:36.520> sleep<02:06:36.920> and<02:06:37.040> to<02:06:37.239> die<02:06:37.520> dormir 02:06:38.030 --> 02:06:38.040 align:start position:0% meaning to sleep and to die dormir 02:06:38.040 --> 02:06:39.950 align:start position:0% meaning to sleep and to die dormir follows<02:06:38.360> the<02:06:38.480> normal<02:06:38.760> pattern<02:06:39.040> of<02:06:39.199> ir<02:06:39.559> verbs 02:06:39.950 --> 02:06:39.960 align:start position:0% follows the normal pattern of ir verbs 02:06:39.960 --> 02:06:41.669 align:start position:0% follows the normal pattern of ir verbs but<02:06:40.079> only<02:06:40.280> changes<02:06:40.599> its<02:06:40.800> stem<02:06:41.119> in<02:06:41.239> the<02:06:41.360> L<02:06:41.520> and 02:06:41.669 --> 02:06:41.679 align:start position:0% but only changes its stem in the L and 02:06:41.679 --> 02:06:46.350 align:start position:0% but only changes its stem in the L and AOS<02:06:42.040> pronouns<02:06:42.719> meaning<02:06:43.280> El<02:06:44.280> he<02:06:44.440> slept<02:06:44.960> and<02:06:45.360> AOS 02:06:46.350 --> 02:06:46.360 align:start position:0% AOS pronouns meaning El he slept and AOS 02:06:46.360 --> 02:06:47.870 align:start position:0% AOS pronouns meaning El he slept and AOS they<02:06:46.440> slept<02:06:46.840> and<02:06:46.960> the<02:06:47.040> same<02:06:47.280> concept<02:06:47.639> applies 02:06:47.870 --> 02:06:47.880 align:start position:0% they slept and the same concept applies 02:06:47.880 --> 02:06:52.270 align:start position:0% they slept and the same concept applies to<02:06:48.000> the<02:06:48.079> verb<02:06:48.719> El<02:06:49.559> is<02:06:49.800> he<02:06:50.079> died<02:06:50.520> and<02:06:50.960> aoson<02:06:51.960> is 02:06:52.270 --> 02:06:52.280 align:start position:0% to the verb El is he died and aoson is 02:06:52.280 --> 02:06:54.149 align:start position:0% to the verb El is he died and aoson is they<02:06:52.480> died<02:06:52.880> as<02:06:53.040> always<02:06:53.520> these<02:06:53.679> verbs<02:06:53.920> are<02:06:54.040> more 02:06:54.149 --> 02:06:54.159 align:start position:0% they died as always these verbs are more 02:06:54.159 --> 02:06:56.030 align:start position:0% they died as always these verbs are more useful<02:06:54.480> to<02:06:54.599> Know<02:06:54.880> Than<02:06:55.040> to<02:06:55.159> use<02:06:55.599> the<02:06:55.760> last 02:06:56.030 --> 02:06:56.040 align:start position:0% useful to Know Than to use the last 02:06:56.040 --> 02:06:57.910 align:start position:0% useful to Know Than to use the last category<02:06:56.480> of<02:06:56.639> St<02:06:56.840> changing<02:06:57.159> verbs<02:06:57.520> are<02:06:57.679> verbs 02:06:57.910 --> 02:06:57.920 align:start position:0% category of St changing verbs are verbs 02:06:57.920 --> 02:06:59.750 align:start position:0% category of St changing verbs are verbs that<02:06:58.119> have<02:06:58.239> the<02:06:58.360> letter<02:06:58.719> igga<02:06:59.400> and<02:06:59.559> also 02:06:59.750 --> 02:06:59.760 align:start position:0% that have the letter igga and also 02:06:59.760 --> 02:07:01.229 align:start position:0% that have the letter igga and also include<02:07:00.199> Accents<02:07:00.599> in<02:07:00.760> most<02:07:00.920> of<02:07:01.040> their 02:07:01.229 --> 02:07:01.239 align:start position:0% include Accents in most of their 02:07:01.239 --> 02:07:03.390 align:start position:0% include Accents in most of their pronouns<02:07:01.800> in<02:07:01.920> order<02:07:02.159> to<02:07:02.320> maintain<02:07:02.760> the<02:07:02.880> sound 02:07:03.390 --> 02:07:03.400 align:start position:0% pronouns in order to maintain the sound 02:07:03.400 --> 02:07:05.109 align:start position:0% pronouns in order to maintain the sound after<02:07:03.639> having<02:07:03.920> two<02:07:04.159> vowels<02:07:04.679> right<02:07:04.840> next<02:07:05.000> to 02:07:05.109 --> 02:07:05.119 align:start position:0% after having two vowels right next to 02:07:05.119 --> 02:07:07.109 align:start position:0% after having two vowels right next to each<02:07:05.239> other<02:07:05.599> these<02:07:05.760> can<02:07:05.920> be<02:07:06.079> verbs 02:07:07.109 --> 02:07:07.119 align:start position:0% each other these can be verbs 02:07:07.119 --> 02:07:10.069 align:start position:0% each other these can be verbs like<02:07:08.119> and<02:07:08.840> and<02:07:09.000> as<02:07:09.119> you<02:07:09.239> can<02:07:09.360> see<02:07:09.679> they<02:07:09.800> are<02:07:09.960> the 02:07:10.069 --> 02:07:10.079 align:start position:0% like and and as you can see they are the 02:07:10.079 --> 02:07:11.950 align:start position:0% like and and as you can see they are the only<02:07:10.320> verbs<02:07:10.599> in<02:07:10.760> Spanish<02:07:11.320> that<02:07:11.480> have<02:07:11.639> two 02:07:11.950 --> 02:07:11.960 align:start position:0% only verbs in Spanish that have two 02:07:11.960 --> 02:07:13.589 align:start position:0% only verbs in Spanish that have two vowels<02:07:12.559> right<02:07:12.719> next<02:07:12.880> to<02:07:13.000> each<02:07:13.119> other<02:07:13.440> so 02:07:13.589 --> 02:07:13.599 align:start position:0% vowels right next to each other so 02:07:13.599 --> 02:07:15.390 align:start position:0% vowels right next to each other so Spanish<02:07:13.960> decides<02:07:14.280> to<02:07:14.400> put<02:07:14.639> accents<02:07:15.119> on<02:07:15.239> some 02:07:15.390 --> 02:07:15.400 align:start position:0% Spanish decides to put accents on some 02:07:15.400 --> 02:07:17.189 align:start position:0% Spanish decides to put accents on some of<02:07:15.520> their<02:07:15.679> pronouns<02:07:16.159> in<02:07:16.280> the<02:07:16.440> past<02:07:16.639> simple<02:07:17.079> in 02:07:17.189 --> 02:07:17.199 align:start position:0% of their pronouns in the past simple in 02:07:17.199 --> 02:07:18.870 align:start position:0% of their pronouns in the past simple in order<02:07:17.440> to<02:07:17.639> maintain<02:07:18.079> their<02:07:18.239> sound<02:07:18.760> the 02:07:18.870 --> 02:07:18.880 align:start position:0% order to maintain their sound the 02:07:18.880 --> 02:07:20.470 align:start position:0% order to maintain their sound the easiest<02:07:19.199> way<02:07:19.320> to<02:07:19.440> memorize<02:07:19.920> them<02:07:20.199> is<02:07:20.280> to 02:07:20.470 --> 02:07:20.480 align:start position:0% easiest way to memorize them is to 02:07:20.480 --> 02:07:22.030 align:start position:0% easiest way to memorize them is to remember<02:07:20.960> that<02:07:21.119> they<02:07:21.239> all<02:07:21.360> share<02:07:21.679> the<02:07:21.800> same 02:07:22.030 --> 02:07:22.040 align:start position:0% remember that they all share the same 02:07:22.040 --> 02:07:23.669 align:start position:0% remember that they all share the same ending<02:07:22.599> but<02:07:22.760> different<02:07:23.040> letters<02:07:23.440> in<02:07:23.520> the 02:07:23.669 --> 02:07:23.679 align:start position:0% ending but different letters in the 02:07:23.679 --> 02:07:27.790 align:start position:0% ending but different letters in the beginning<02:07:24.199> Y<02:07:25.079> is<02:07:25.320> I<02:07:25.480> believed<02:07:26.159> Y<02:07:26.840> is<02:07:27.079> I<02:07:27.280> read 02:07:27.790 --> 02:07:27.800 align:start position:0% beginning Y is I believed Y is I read 02:07:27.800 --> 02:07:31.709 align:start position:0% beginning Y is I believed Y is I read and<02:07:28.119> Y<02:07:28.920> is<02:07:29.119> I<02:07:29.280> heard<02:07:29.800> toist<02:07:30.800> is<02:07:31.000> you<02:07:31.199> believed 02:07:31.709 --> 02:07:31.719 align:start position:0% and Y is I heard toist is you believed 02:07:31.719 --> 02:07:35.510 align:start position:0% and Y is I heard toist is you believed to<02:07:32.079> Leist<02:07:32.800> is<02:07:33.079> you<02:07:33.320> read<02:07:33.719> and<02:07:33.880> to<02:07:34.280> O<02:07:35.079> is<02:07:35.320> you 02:07:35.510 --> 02:07:35.520 align:start position:0% to Leist is you read and to O is you 02:07:35.520 --> 02:07:37.830 align:start position:0% to Leist is you read and to O is you heard<02:07:35.960> and<02:07:36.079> so<02:07:36.280> on<02:07:36.599> as<02:07:36.760> always<02:07:37.280> it's<02:07:37.440> useful<02:07:37.719> to 02:07:37.830 --> 02:07:37.840 align:start position:0% heard and so on as always it's useful to 02:07:37.840 --> 02:07:39.549 align:start position:0% heard and so on as always it's useful to know<02:07:38.079> these<02:07:38.199> verbs<02:07:38.599> rather<02:07:38.840> than<02:07:38.960> to<02:07:39.119> use<02:07:39.320> them 02:07:39.549 --> 02:07:39.559 align:start position:0% know these verbs rather than to use them 02:07:39.559 --> 02:07:41.470 align:start position:0% know these verbs rather than to use them and<02:07:39.719> now<02:07:39.960> we<02:07:40.079> made<02:07:40.280> it<02:07:40.400> to<02:07:40.520> the<02:07:40.639> final<02:07:40.960> category 02:07:41.470 --> 02:07:41.480 align:start position:0% and now we made it to the final category 02:07:41.480 --> 02:07:43.350 align:start position:0% and now we made it to the final category of<02:07:41.639> irregular<02:07:42.119> verbs<02:07:42.360> in<02:07:42.559> Spanish<02:07:43.079> which<02:07:43.280> I 02:07:43.350 --> 02:07:43.360 align:start position:0% of irregular verbs in Spanish which I 02:07:43.360 --> 02:07:44.950 align:start position:0% of irregular verbs in Spanish which I think<02:07:43.559> is<02:07:43.719> the<02:07:43.920> easiest<02:07:44.559> and<02:07:44.679> that<02:07:44.760> is 02:07:44.950 --> 02:07:44.960 align:start position:0% think is the easiest and that is 02:07:44.960 --> 02:07:47.430 align:start position:0% think is the easiest and that is irregular<02:07:45.480> verbs<02:07:45.920> that<02:07:46.040> are<02:07:46.360> only<02:07:46.800> irregular 02:07:47.430 --> 02:07:47.440 align:start position:0% irregular verbs that are only irregular 02:07:47.440 --> 02:07:49.390 align:start position:0% irregular verbs that are only irregular in<02:07:47.559> the<02:07:47.719> yo<02:07:47.960> pronoun<02:07:48.360> and<02:07:48.520> in<02:07:48.599> the<02:07:48.719> past<02:07:48.920> symbol 02:07:49.390 --> 02:07:49.400 align:start position:0% in the yo pronoun and in the past symbol 02:07:49.400 --> 02:07:51.030 align:start position:0% in the yo pronoun and in the past symbol actually<02:07:49.960> there<02:07:50.079> are<02:07:50.320> three<02:07:50.520> types<02:07:50.760> of<02:07:50.880> them 02:07:51.030 --> 02:07:51.040 align:start position:0% actually there are three types of them 02:07:51.040 --> 02:07:53.549 align:start position:0% actually there are three types of them in<02:07:51.199> Spanish<02:07:51.679> known<02:07:51.960> as<02:07:52.119> verbs<02:07:52.400> that<02:07:52.559> end<02:07:52.760> in<02:07:53.000> K 02:07:53.549 --> 02:07:53.559 align:start position:0% in Spanish known as verbs that end in K 02:07:53.559 --> 02:07:55.629 align:start position:0% in Spanish known as verbs that end in K G<02:07:54.000> or<02:07:54.360> tar<02:07:54.760> and<02:07:54.880> since<02:07:55.040> there's<02:07:55.239> no<02:07:55.360> point<02:07:55.520> in 02:07:55.629 --> 02:07:55.639 align:start position:0% G or tar and since there's no point in 02:07:55.639 --> 02:07:57.390 align:start position:0% G or tar and since there's no point in knowing<02:07:55.920> all<02:07:56.079> verbs<02:07:56.320> in<02:07:56.520> Spanish<02:07:57.000> I'll<02:07:57.159> show 02:07:57.390 --> 02:07:57.400 align:start position:0% knowing all verbs in Spanish I'll show 02:07:57.400 --> 02:07:59.470 align:start position:0% knowing all verbs in Spanish I'll show one<02:07:57.599> useful<02:07:58.000> verb<02:07:58.280> from<02:07:58.480> each<02:07:58.760> category<02:07:59.280> at 02:07:59.470 --> 02:07:59.480 align:start position:0% one useful verb from each category at 02:07:59.480 --> 02:08:01.629 align:start position:0% one useful verb from each category at first<02:07:59.880> there<02:08:00.000> are<02:08:00.199> the<02:08:00.320> verbs<02:08:00.599> ending<02:08:00.880> in<02:08:01.119> k 02:08:01.629 --> 02:08:01.639 align:start position:0% first there are the verbs ending in k 02:08:01.639 --> 02:08:03.510 align:start position:0% first there are the verbs ending in k like<02:08:02.000> practicar<02:08:02.760> and<02:08:02.920> while<02:08:03.159> this<02:08:03.320> verb 02:08:03.510 --> 02:08:03.520 align:start position:0% like practicar and while this verb 02:08:03.520 --> 02:08:05.109 align:start position:0% like practicar and while this verb follows<02:08:03.800> the<02:08:03.880> normal<02:08:04.159> conjugation<02:08:04.719> pattern 02:08:05.109 --> 02:08:05.119 align:start position:0% follows the normal conjugation pattern 02:08:05.119 --> 02:08:07.470 align:start position:0% follows the normal conjugation pattern for<02:08:05.360> a<02:08:05.800> verbs<02:08:06.079> in<02:08:06.199> the<02:08:06.360> past<02:08:06.559> simple<02:08:07.040> it's<02:08:07.199> only 02:08:07.470 --> 02:08:07.480 align:start position:0% for a verbs in the past simple it's only 02:08:07.480 --> 02:08:09.990 align:start position:0% for a verbs in the past simple it's only irregular<02:08:08.079> in<02:08:08.199> the<02:08:08.360> yo<02:08:08.599> pronoun<02:08:09.040> ending<02:08:09.360> in 02:08:09.990 --> 02:08:10.000 align:start position:0% irregular in the yo pronoun ending in 02:08:10.000 --> 02:08:12.589 align:start position:0% irregular in the yo pronoun ending in meaning<02:08:10.440> Yo<02:08:10.719> practi<02:08:11.480> which<02:08:11.599> is<02:08:11.800> I<02:08:12.040> practiced 02:08:12.589 --> 02:08:12.599 align:start position:0% meaning Yo practi which is I practiced 02:08:12.599 --> 02:08:14.350 align:start position:0% meaning Yo practi which is I practiced in<02:08:12.719> case<02:08:12.880> you<02:08:13.000> see<02:08:13.239> any<02:08:13.440> other<02:08:13.639> verb<02:08:13.880> ending<02:08:14.159> in 02:08:14.350 --> 02:08:14.360 align:start position:0% in case you see any other verb ending in 02:08:14.360 --> 02:08:15.870 align:start position:0% in case you see any other verb ending in k<02:08:14.679> and<02:08:14.760> you<02:08:14.840> want<02:08:14.920> to<02:08:15.079> use<02:08:15.239> it<02:08:15.400> in<02:08:15.520> the<02:08:15.679> yo 02:08:15.870 --> 02:08:15.880 align:start position:0% k and you want to use it in the yo 02:08:15.880 --> 02:08:17.669 align:start position:0% k and you want to use it in the yo pronoun<02:08:16.280> in<02:08:16.400> the<02:08:16.559> past<02:08:16.920> remember<02:08:17.199> to<02:08:17.360> Simply 02:08:17.669 --> 02:08:17.679 align:start position:0% pronoun in the past remember to Simply 02:08:17.679 --> 02:08:19.030 align:start position:0% pronoun in the past remember to Simply change<02:08:17.920> it<02:08:18.159> to 02:08:19.030 --> 02:08:19.040 align:start position:0% change it to 02:08:19.040 --> 02:08:21.549 align:start position:0% change it to next<02:08:19.280> up<02:08:19.559> there<02:08:19.679> are<02:08:19.880> verbs<02:08:20.159> ending<02:08:20.440> in<02:08:20.719> g<02:08:21.239> like 02:08:21.549 --> 02:08:21.559 align:start position:0% next up there are verbs ending in g like 02:08:21.559 --> 02:08:23.589 align:start position:0% next up there are verbs ending in g like H<02:08:22.159> and<02:08:22.360> while<02:08:22.559> this<02:08:22.719> verb<02:08:22.920> follows<02:08:23.159> the<02:08:23.320> normal 02:08:23.589 --> 02:08:23.599 align:start position:0% H and while this verb follows the normal 02:08:23.599 --> 02:08:25.430 align:start position:0% H and while this verb follows the normal conjugation<02:08:24.239> in<02:08:24.360> the<02:08:24.559> past<02:08:24.760> simple<02:08:25.239> it's 02:08:25.430 --> 02:08:25.440 align:start position:0% conjugation in the past simple it's 02:08:25.440 --> 02:08:28.149 align:start position:0% conjugation in the past simple it's irregular<02:08:26.000> in<02:08:26.119> the<02:08:26.280> Y<02:08:26.520> pronoun<02:08:27.079> ending<02:08:27.480> in<02:08:27.880> GE 02:08:28.149 --> 02:08:28.159 align:start position:0% irregular in the Y pronoun ending in GE 02:08:28.159 --> 02:08:30.629 align:start position:0% irregular in the Y pronoun ending in GE meaning<02:08:28.599> Yo<02:08:29.360> which<02:08:29.440> is<02:08:29.639> I<02:08:29.840> played<02:08:30.280> in<02:08:30.400> case<02:08:30.559> you 02:08:30.629 --> 02:08:30.639 align:start position:0% meaning Yo which is I played in case you 02:08:30.639 --> 02:08:32.510 align:start position:0% meaning Yo which is I played in case you see<02:08:30.880> any<02:08:31.079> other<02:08:31.280> verb<02:08:31.520> ending<02:08:31.800> in<02:08:32.040> g<02:08:32.360> and<02:08:32.440> you 02:08:32.510 --> 02:08:32.520 align:start position:0% see any other verb ending in g and you 02:08:32.520 --> 02:08:34.189 align:start position:0% see any other verb ending in g and you want<02:08:32.599> to<02:08:32.760> use<02:08:32.880> it<02:08:33.000> in<02:08:33.119> the<02:08:33.280> yo<02:08:33.520> pronoun<02:08:33.920> in<02:08:34.040> the 02:08:34.189 --> 02:08:34.199 align:start position:0% want to use it in the yo pronoun in the 02:08:34.199 --> 02:08:36.589 align:start position:0% want to use it in the yo pronoun in the past<02:08:34.599> remember<02:08:34.880> to<02:08:35.040> Simply<02:08:35.320> change<02:08:35.559> it<02:08:35.840> to<02:08:36.280> G 02:08:36.589 --> 02:08:36.599 align:start position:0% past remember to Simply change it to G 02:08:36.599 --> 02:08:38.589 align:start position:0% past remember to Simply change it to G at<02:08:36.800> last<02:08:37.159> there<02:08:37.280> are<02:08:37.440> verbs<02:08:37.719> ending<02:08:37.960> in<02:08:38.199> Zar 02:08:38.589 --> 02:08:38.599 align:start position:0% at last there are verbs ending in Zar 02:08:38.599 --> 02:08:40.669 align:start position:0% at last there are verbs ending in Zar like<02:08:38.880> organizar<02:08:39.760> which<02:08:39.960> also<02:08:40.199> maintain<02:08:40.559> the 02:08:40.669 --> 02:08:40.679 align:start position:0% like organizar which also maintain the 02:08:40.679 --> 02:08:42.270 align:start position:0% like organizar which also maintain the normal<02:08:41.000> conjugation<02:08:41.480> pattern<02:08:41.840> in<02:08:41.960> the<02:08:42.119> past 02:08:42.270 --> 02:08:42.280 align:start position:0% normal conjugation pattern in the past 02:08:42.280 --> 02:08:44.109 align:start position:0% normal conjugation pattern in the past simple<02:08:42.840> while<02:08:43.000> it's<02:08:43.239> your<02:08:43.480> pronoun<02:08:43.920> is 02:08:44.109 --> 02:08:44.119 align:start position:0% simple while it's your pronoun is 02:08:44.119 --> 02:08:47.109 align:start position:0% simple while it's your pronoun is irregular<02:08:44.719> ending<02:08:45.079> in<02:08:45.639> meaning<02:08:46.040> your<02:08:46.360> organ 02:08:47.109 --> 02:08:47.119 align:start position:0% irregular ending in meaning your organ 02:08:47.119 --> 02:08:49.149 align:start position:0% irregular ending in meaning your organ which<02:08:47.199> is<02:08:47.440> I<02:08:47.639> organized<02:08:48.239> as<02:08:48.440> as<02:08:48.559> always<02:08:49.000> in 02:08:49.149 --> 02:08:49.159 align:start position:0% which is I organized as as always in 02:08:49.159 --> 02:08:50.750 align:start position:0% which is I organized as as always in case<02:08:49.280> you<02:08:49.400> see<02:08:49.679> any<02:08:49.840> other<02:08:50.040> verb<02:08:50.280> ending<02:08:50.559> in 02:08:50.750 --> 02:08:50.760 align:start position:0% case you see any other verb ending in 02:08:50.760 --> 02:08:52.229 align:start position:0% case you see any other verb ending in Zar<02:08:51.119> and<02:08:51.199> you<02:08:51.280> want<02:08:51.360> to<02:08:51.480> use<02:08:51.639> it<02:08:51.760> in<02:08:51.880> the<02:08:52.000> yo 02:08:52.229 --> 02:08:52.239 align:start position:0% Zar and you want to use it in the yo 02:08:52.239 --> 02:08:53.950 align:start position:0% Zar and you want to use it in the yo pronoun<02:08:52.599> in<02:08:52.719> the<02:08:52.920> past<02:08:53.239> remember<02:08:53.520> to<02:08:53.679> Simply 02:08:53.950 --> 02:08:53.960 align:start position:0% pronoun in the past remember to Simply 02:08:53.960 --> 02:08:55.910 align:start position:0% pronoun in the past remember to Simply change<02:08:54.199> it<02:08:54.440> to<02:08:54.800> say<02:08:55.119> and<02:08:55.239> this<02:08:55.320> is<02:08:55.440> where<02:08:55.679> all 02:08:55.910 --> 02:08:55.920 align:start position:0% change it to say and this is where all 02:08:55.920 --> 02:08:57.709 align:start position:0% change it to say and this is where all types<02:08:56.159> of<02:08:56.360> irregular<02:08:56.880> verbs<02:08:57.239> in<02:08:57.360> the<02:08:57.520> past 02:08:57.709 --> 02:08:57.719 align:start position:0% types of irregular verbs in the past 02:08:57.719 --> 02:08:59.229 align:start position:0% types of irregular verbs in the past tense<02:08:57.920> in<02:08:58.079> Spanish<02:08:58.520> come<02:08:58.679> to<02:08:58.840> an<02:08:58.960> end 02:08:59.229 --> 02:08:59.239 align:start position:0% tense in Spanish come to an end 02:08:59.239 --> 02:09:00.709 align:start position:0% tense in Spanish come to an end throughout<02:08:59.599> both<02:08:59.760> of<02:08:59.880> these<02:09:00.079> videos<02:09:00.599> I 02:09:00.709 --> 02:09:00.719 align:start position:0% throughout both of these videos I 02:09:00.719 --> 02:09:02.350 align:start position:0% throughout both of these videos I demonstrated<02:09:01.360> all<02:09:01.520> types<02:09:01.719> of<02:09:01.880> irregular 02:09:02.350 --> 02:09:02.360 align:start position:0% demonstrated all types of irregular 02:09:02.360 --> 02:09:04.229 align:start position:0% demonstrated all types of irregular verbs<02:09:02.599> in<02:09:02.760> Spanish<02:09:03.239> in<02:09:03.320> the<02:09:03.520> past<02:09:03.719> tense<02:09:04.119> in 02:09:04.229 --> 02:09:04.239 align:start position:0% verbs in Spanish in the past tense in 02:09:04.239 --> 02:09:06.189 align:start position:0% verbs in Spanish in the past tense in order<02:09:04.520> for<02:09:04.719> all<02:09:04.840> of<02:09:05.000> you<02:09:05.199> to<02:09:05.719> understand<02:09:06.079> what 02:09:06.189 --> 02:09:06.199 align:start position:0% order for all of you to understand what 02:09:06.199 --> 02:09:08.149 align:start position:0% order for all of you to understand what are<02:09:06.440> their<02:09:06.679> types<02:09:07.079> how<02:09:07.199> to<02:09:07.360> use<02:09:07.599> them<02:09:07.880> and<02:09:08.000> when 02:09:08.149 --> 02:09:08.159 align:start position:0% are their types how to use them and when 02:09:08.159 --> 02:09:10.109 align:start position:0% are their types how to use them and when to<02:09:08.320> use<02:09:08.520> them<02:09:08.840> of<02:09:08.960> course<02:09:09.360> knowing<02:09:09.679> all<02:09:09.840> verbs 02:09:10.109 --> 02:09:10.119 align:start position:0% to use them of course knowing all verbs 02:09:10.119 --> 02:09:12.109 align:start position:0% to use them of course knowing all verbs in<02:09:10.280> Spanish<02:09:10.679> is<02:09:10.880> impossible<02:09:11.520> and<02:09:11.719> potentially 02:09:12.109 --> 02:09:12.119 align:start position:0% in Spanish is impossible and potentially 02:09:12.119 --> 02:09:14.109 align:start position:0% in Spanish is impossible and potentially useless<02:09:12.719> so<02:09:12.880> I<02:09:13.000> decided<02:09:13.320> to<02:09:13.480> exploit<02:09:13.840> the<02:09:13.920> most 02:09:14.109 --> 02:09:14.119 align:start position:0% useless so I decided to exploit the most 02:09:14.119 --> 02:09:15.950 align:start position:0% useless so I decided to exploit the most useful<02:09:14.480> ones<02:09:14.760> and<02:09:14.880> put<02:09:15.040> them<02:09:15.159> in<02:09:15.280> two<02:09:15.480> videos 02:09:15.950 --> 02:09:15.960 align:start position:0% useful ones and put them in two videos 02:09:15.960 --> 02:09:17.310 align:start position:0% useful ones and put them in two videos so<02:09:16.079> that<02:09:16.199> you<02:09:16.280> don't<02:09:16.440> have<02:09:16.559> to<02:09:16.679> look<02:09:16.800> up<02:09:17.000> any<02:09:17.199> of 02:09:17.310 --> 02:09:17.320 align:start position:0% so that you don't have to look up any of 02:09:17.320 --> 02:09:18.910 align:start position:0% so that you don't have to look up any of them<02:09:17.599> and<02:09:17.719> they're<02:09:17.880> almost<02:09:18.400> all<02:09:18.599> in<02:09:18.760> these 02:09:18.910 --> 02:09:18.920 align:start position:0% them and they're almost all in these 02:09:18.920 --> 02:09:20.709 align:start position:0% them and they're almost all in these videos<02:09:19.400> in<02:09:19.520> case<02:09:19.679> you<02:09:19.760> didn't<02:09:20.000> remember<02:09:20.400> them 02:09:20.709 --> 02:09:20.719 align:start position:0% videos in case you didn't remember them 02:09:20.719 --> 02:09:22.629 align:start position:0% videos in case you didn't remember them or<02:09:20.880> forgot<02:09:21.280> some<02:09:21.440> of<02:09:21.599> them<02:09:21.840> you<02:09:21.920> can<02:09:22.119> always<02:09:22.440> go 02:09:22.629 --> 02:09:22.639 align:start position:0% or forgot some of them you can always go 02:09:22.639 --> 02:09:24.430 align:start position:0% or forgot some of them you can always go back<02:09:22.880> and<02:09:23.040> find<02:09:23.280> them<02:09:23.440> within<02:09:23.679> the<02:09:23.840> videos<02:09:24.320> not 02:09:24.430 --> 02:09:24.440 align:start position:0% back and find them within the videos not 02:09:24.440 --> 02:09:25.950 align:start position:0% back and find them within the videos not to<02:09:24.599> mention<02:09:25.040> that<02:09:25.159> you<02:09:25.320> probably<02:09:25.599> don't<02:09:25.760> need 02:09:25.950 --> 02:09:25.960 align:start position:0% to mention that you probably don't need 02:09:25.960 --> 02:09:27.870 align:start position:0% to mention that you probably don't need all<02:09:26.119> of<02:09:26.239> them<02:09:26.520> the<02:09:26.639> point<02:09:26.840> of<02:09:27.000> this<02:09:27.239> idea<02:09:27.719> was 02:09:27.870 --> 02:09:27.880 align:start position:0% all of them the point of this idea was 02:09:27.880 --> 02:09:29.589 align:start position:0% all of them the point of this idea was to<02:09:28.040> provide<02:09:28.320> a<02:09:28.520> guide<02:09:28.840> to<02:09:29.040> all<02:09:29.239> types<02:09:29.440> of 02:09:29.589 --> 02:09:29.599 align:start position:0% to provide a guide to all types of 02:09:29.599 --> 02:09:31.149 align:start position:0% to provide a guide to all types of irregular<02:09:30.079> verbs<02:09:30.360> in<02:09:30.480> the<02:09:30.599> past<02:09:30.800> tense<02:09:31.000> in 02:09:31.149 --> 02:09:31.159 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in the past tense in 02:09:31.159 --> 02:09:33.030 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in the past tense in Spanish<02:09:31.639> to<02:09:32.079> understand<02:09:32.239> how<02:09:32.360> to<02:09:32.480> use<02:09:32.760> them 02:09:33.030 --> 02:09:33.040 align:start position:0% Spanish to understand how to use them 02:09:33.040 --> 02:09:34.629 align:start position:0% Spanish to understand how to use them when<02:09:33.159> you<02:09:33.280> want<02:09:33.440> to<02:09:33.760> and<02:09:33.880> like<02:09:34.000> I<02:09:34.159> always<02:09:34.440> like 02:09:34.629 --> 02:09:34.639 align:start position:0% when you want to and like I always like 02:09:34.639 --> 02:09:36.790 align:start position:0% when you want to and like I always like to<02:09:34.800> say<02:09:35.159> some<02:09:35.480> concepts<02:09:36.000> are<02:09:36.119> more<02:09:36.320> useful<02:09:36.639> to 02:09:36.790 --> 02:09:36.800 align:start position:0% to say some concepts are more useful to 02:09:36.800 --> 02:09:38.589 align:start position:0% to say some concepts are more useful to Know<02:09:37.119> Than<02:09:37.280> to<02:09:37.440> use<02:09:37.840> and<02:09:38.000> this<02:09:38.199> video 02:09:38.589 --> 02:09:38.599 align:start position:0% Know Than to use and this video 02:09:38.599 --> 02:09:40.350 align:start position:0% Know Than to use and this video summarizes<02:09:39.280> all<02:09:39.440> of<02:09:39.520> it<02:09:39.679> in<02:09:39.800> a<02:09:39.920> nutshell 02:09:40.350 --> 02:09:40.360 align:start position:0% summarizes all of it in a nutshell 02:09:40.360 --> 02:09:41.990 align:start position:0% summarizes all of it in a nutshell reflexive<02:09:40.800> verbs<02:09:41.040> in<02:09:41.199> Spanish<02:09:41.599> are<02:09:41.760> verbs 02:09:41.990 --> 02:09:42.000 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs in Spanish are verbs 02:09:42.000 --> 02:09:43.510 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs in Spanish are verbs that<02:09:42.119> are<02:09:42.239> applyed<02:09:42.559> to<02:09:42.679> oneself<02:09:43.280> which<02:09:43.400> is 02:09:43.510 --> 02:09:43.520 align:start position:0% that are applyed to oneself which is 02:09:43.520 --> 02:09:44.870 align:start position:0% that are applyed to oneself which is typically<02:09:43.840> the<02:09:44.000> definition<02:09:44.520> that<02:09:44.719> most 02:09:44.870 --> 02:09:44.880 align:start position:0% typically the definition that most 02:09:44.880 --> 02:09:46.910 align:start position:0% typically the definition that most teachers<02:09:45.400> give<02:09:45.639> them<02:09:46.040> however<02:09:46.320> I<02:09:46.400> do<02:09:46.520> not<02:09:46.719> like 02:09:46.910 --> 02:09:46.920 align:start position:0% teachers give them however I do not like 02:09:46.920 --> 02:09:48.390 align:start position:0% teachers give them however I do not like this<02:09:47.119> explanation<02:09:47.760> because<02:09:47.960> I<02:09:48.079> have<02:09:48.159> a<02:09:48.320> a 02:09:48.390 --> 02:09:48.400 align:start position:0% this explanation because I have a a 02:09:48.400 --> 02:09:49.750 align:start position:0% this explanation because I have a a different<02:09:48.599> way<02:09:48.719> of<02:09:48.840> expressing<02:09:49.320> reflexive 02:09:49.750 --> 02:09:49.760 align:start position:0% different way of expressing reflexive 02:09:49.760 --> 02:09:51.629 align:start position:0% different way of expressing reflexive verbs<02:09:50.000> in<02:09:50.119> Spanish<02:09:50.599> making<02:09:50.840> it<02:09:50.960> easier<02:09:51.280> to 02:09:51.629 --> 02:09:51.639 align:start position:0% verbs in Spanish making it easier to 02:09:51.639 --> 02:09:52.790 align:start position:0% verbs in Spanish making it easier to understand<02:09:51.960> what<02:09:52.079> they<02:09:52.159> mean<02:09:52.480> a<02:09:52.599> different 02:09:52.790 --> 02:09:52.800 align:start position:0% understand what they mean a different 02:09:52.800 --> 02:09:54.030 align:start position:0% understand what they mean a different way<02:09:52.920> to<02:09:53.040> look<02:09:53.159> at<02:09:53.280> reflexive<02:09:53.679> verbs<02:09:53.920> in 02:09:54.030 --> 02:09:54.040 align:start position:0% way to look at reflexive verbs in 02:09:54.040 --> 02:09:55.549 align:start position:0% way to look at reflexive verbs in Spanish<02:09:54.520> is<02:09:54.599> that<02:09:54.719> they<02:09:54.840> typically<02:09:55.119> follow<02:09:55.400> a 02:09:55.549 --> 02:09:55.559 align:start position:0% Spanish is that they typically follow a 02:09:55.559 --> 02:09:57.510 align:start position:0% Spanish is that they typically follow a preposition<02:09:56.119> or<02:09:56.360> some<02:09:56.559> continuation<02:09:57.280> the<02:09:57.360> way 02:09:57.510 --> 02:09:57.520 align:start position:0% preposition or some continuation the way 02:09:57.520 --> 02:09:59.109 align:start position:0% preposition or some continuation the way that<02:09:57.639> they<02:09:57.760> look<02:09:57.920> in<02:09:58.079> Spanish<02:09:58.599> is<02:09:58.719> by<02:09:58.880> having 02:09:59.109 --> 02:09:59.119 align:start position:0% that they look in Spanish is by having 02:09:59.119 --> 02:10:00.510 align:start position:0% that they look in Spanish is by having any<02:09:59.360> regular<02:09:59.760> verb<02:10:00.040> following<02:10:00.360> the 02:10:00.510 --> 02:10:00.520 align:start position:0% any regular verb following the 02:10:00.520 --> 02:10:02.549 align:start position:0% any regular verb following the continuation<02:10:01.199> say<02:10:01.639> after<02:10:02.079> which<02:10:02.199> is<02:10:02.280> a<02:10:02.400> form 02:10:02.549 --> 02:10:02.559 align:start position:0% continuation say after which is a form 02:10:02.559 --> 02:10:04.430 align:start position:0% continuation say after which is a form of<02:10:02.679> an<02:10:02.840> indirect<02:10:03.320> object<02:10:03.639> pronoun<02:10:04.119> that<02:10:04.320> has 02:10:04.430 --> 02:10:04.440 align:start position:0% of an indirect object pronoun that has 02:10:04.440 --> 02:10:06.229 align:start position:0% of an indirect object pronoun that has to<02:10:04.559> do<02:10:04.679> with<02:10:04.840> oneself<02:10:05.480> I<02:10:05.559> will<02:10:05.679> not<02:10:05.880> explain 02:10:06.229 --> 02:10:06.239 align:start position:0% to do with oneself I will not explain 02:10:06.239 --> 02:10:07.830 align:start position:0% to do with oneself I will not explain every<02:10:06.480> reflexive<02:10:06.920> verb<02:10:07.119> in<02:10:07.239> Spanish<02:10:07.679> because 02:10:07.830 --> 02:10:07.840 align:start position:0% every reflexive verb in Spanish because 02:10:07.840 --> 02:10:09.350 align:start position:0% every reflexive verb in Spanish because you<02:10:07.960> don't<02:10:08.119> need<02:10:08.320> all<02:10:08.480> of<02:10:08.639> them<02:10:08.920> but<02:10:09.040> I<02:10:09.119> will 02:10:09.350 --> 02:10:09.360 align:start position:0% you don't need all of them but I will 02:10:09.360 --> 02:10:11.270 align:start position:0% you don't need all of them but I will present<02:10:09.760> the<02:10:09.880> most<02:10:10.040> useful<02:10:10.400> ones<02:10:10.559> in<02:10:10.719> Spanish 02:10:11.270 --> 02:10:11.280 align:start position:0% present the most useful ones in Spanish 02:10:11.280 --> 02:10:12.830 align:start position:0% present the most useful ones in Spanish at<02:10:11.440> first<02:10:11.719> I<02:10:11.800> would<02:10:11.960> like<02:10:12.040> to<02:10:12.199> demonstrate<02:10:12.679> how 02:10:12.830 --> 02:10:12.840 align:start position:0% at first I would like to demonstrate how 02:10:12.840 --> 02:10:14.669 align:start position:0% at first I would like to demonstrate how reflexive<02:10:13.320> verbs<02:10:13.719> work<02:10:13.920> in<02:10:14.079> general<02:10:14.599> by 02:10:14.669 --> 02:10:14.679 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs work in general by 02:10:14.679 --> 02:10:16.629 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs work in general by showing<02:10:15.040> how<02:10:15.199> one<02:10:15.400> verb<02:10:15.719> works<02:10:16.079> first<02:10:16.480> let's 02:10:16.629 --> 02:10:16.639 align:start position:0% showing how one verb works first let's 02:10:16.639 --> 02:10:18.669 align:start position:0% showing how one verb works first let's take<02:10:16.800> the<02:10:16.920> verb<02:10:17.159> Lavar<02:10:17.719> as<02:10:17.800> an<02:10:17.960> example<02:10:18.559> this 02:10:18.669 --> 02:10:18.679 align:start position:0% take the verb Lavar as an example this 02:10:18.679 --> 02:10:20.629 align:start position:0% take the verb Lavar as an example this verb<02:10:18.920> in<02:10:19.079> Spanish<02:10:19.520> means<02:10:19.800> to<02:10:20.000> wash<02:10:20.360> but<02:10:20.480> in 02:10:20.629 --> 02:10:20.639 align:start position:0% verb in Spanish means to wash but in 02:10:20.639 --> 02:10:22.510 align:start position:0% verb in Spanish means to wash but in Spanish<02:10:21.079> the<02:10:21.199> verb<02:10:21.400> to<02:10:21.599> wash<02:10:21.960> doesn't<02:10:22.239> always 02:10:22.510 --> 02:10:22.520 align:start position:0% Spanish the verb to wash doesn't always 02:10:22.520 --> 02:10:24.669 align:start position:0% Spanish the verb to wash doesn't always conclude<02:10:22.960> in<02:10:23.079> its<02:10:23.280> regular<02:10:23.599> form<02:10:24.000> often<02:10:24.320> times 02:10:24.669 --> 02:10:24.679 align:start position:0% conclude in its regular form often times 02:10:24.679 --> 02:10:26.270 align:start position:0% conclude in its regular form often times when<02:10:24.840> we<02:10:24.960> think<02:10:25.119> of<02:10:25.320> washing<02:10:25.679> something<02:10:26.119> we 02:10:26.270 --> 02:10:26.280 align:start position:0% when we think of washing something we 02:10:26.280 --> 02:10:28.350 align:start position:0% when we think of washing something we can<02:10:26.639> sometimes<02:10:26.840> say<02:10:27.199> to<02:10:27.400> wash<02:10:27.679> up<02:10:28.040> if<02:10:28.119> you<02:10:28.199> look 02:10:28.350 --> 02:10:28.360 align:start position:0% can sometimes say to wash up if you look 02:10:28.360 --> 02:10:30.030 align:start position:0% can sometimes say to wash up if you look at<02:10:28.440> the<02:10:28.559> verb<02:10:28.760> in<02:10:28.880> Spanish<02:10:29.360> and<02:10:29.480> compare<02:10:29.760> it<02:10:29.880> to 02:10:30.030 --> 02:10:30.040 align:start position:0% at the verb in Spanish and compare it to 02:10:30.040 --> 02:10:31.629 align:start position:0% at the verb in Spanish and compare it to English<02:10:30.520> there<02:10:30.679> isn't<02:10:31.000> really<02:10:31.239> much<02:10:31.360> of<02:10:31.480> a 02:10:31.629 --> 02:10:31.639 align:start position:0% English there isn't really much of a 02:10:31.639 --> 02:10:33.149 align:start position:0% English there isn't really much of a difference<02:10:32.119> but<02:10:32.280> once<02:10:32.480> this<02:10:32.639> verb<02:10:32.840> becomes 02:10:33.149 --> 02:10:33.159 align:start position:0% difference but once this verb becomes 02:10:33.159 --> 02:10:34.549 align:start position:0% difference but once this verb becomes reflexive<02:10:33.760> we<02:10:33.920> start<02:10:34.079> to<02:10:34.199> see<02:10:34.360> that<02:10:34.480> the 02:10:34.549 --> 02:10:34.559 align:start position:0% reflexive we start to see that the 02:10:34.559 --> 02:10:36.790 align:start position:0% reflexive we start to see that the meaning<02:10:34.880> is<02:10:35.040> changing<02:10:35.520> laar<02:10:35.960> means<02:10:36.199> to<02:10:36.400> wash 02:10:36.790 --> 02:10:36.800 align:start position:0% meaning is changing laar means to wash 02:10:36.800 --> 02:10:38.910 align:start position:0% meaning is changing laar means to wash but<02:10:37.000> Lavar<02:10:37.719> means<02:10:37.960> to<02:10:38.119> wash<02:10:38.360> up<02:10:38.639> which<02:10:38.760> is<02:10:38.840> a 02:10:38.910 --> 02:10:38.920 align:start position:0% but Lavar means to wash up which is a 02:10:38.920 --> 02:10:40.589 align:start position:0% but Lavar means to wash up which is a verb<02:10:39.119> that's<02:10:39.239> put<02:10:39.400> in<02:10:39.480> a<02:10:39.599> reflexive<02:10:40.079> form<02:10:40.480> and 02:10:40.589 --> 02:10:40.599 align:start position:0% verb that's put in a reflexive form and 02:10:40.599 --> 02:10:42.069 align:start position:0% verb that's put in a reflexive form and that's<02:10:40.760> really<02:10:40.960> the<02:10:41.079> closest<02:10:41.400> connection<02:10:41.960> I 02:10:42.069 --> 02:10:42.079 align:start position:0% that's really the closest connection I 02:10:42.079 --> 02:10:43.390 align:start position:0% that's really the closest connection I can<02:10:42.280> give<02:10:42.360> it<02:10:42.480> in<02:10:42.599> English<02:10:42.960> the<02:10:43.079> way<02:10:43.199> that<02:10:43.320> you 02:10:43.390 --> 02:10:43.400 align:start position:0% can give it in English the way that you 02:10:43.400 --> 02:10:44.870 align:start position:0% can give it in English the way that you would<02:10:43.520> use<02:10:43.679> the<02:10:43.800> verb<02:10:44.000> in<02:10:44.159> Spanish<02:10:44.639> is<02:10:44.760> by 02:10:44.870 --> 02:10:44.880 align:start position:0% would use the verb in Spanish is by 02:10:44.880 --> 02:10:46.589 align:start position:0% would use the verb in Spanish is by using<02:10:45.159> indirect<02:10:45.599> object<02:10:45.920> pronouns<02:10:46.480> and 02:10:46.589 --> 02:10:46.599 align:start position:0% using indirect object pronouns and 02:10:46.599 --> 02:10:48.109 align:start position:0% using indirect object pronouns and putting<02:10:46.880> them<02:10:47.040> before<02:10:47.280> the<02:10:47.400> conjugated<02:10:47.880> verb 02:10:48.109 --> 02:10:48.119 align:start position:0% putting them before the conjugated verb 02:10:48.119 --> 02:10:50.750 align:start position:0% putting them before the conjugated verb for<02:10:48.239> for<02:10:48.440> instance<02:10:48.960> saying<02:10:49.400> Yol<02:10:49.679> Lao<02:10:50.119> means<02:10:50.559> I 02:10:50.750 --> 02:10:50.760 align:start position:0% for for instance saying Yol Lao means I 02:10:50.760 --> 02:10:52.669 align:start position:0% for for instance saying Yol Lao means I wash<02:10:51.280> as<02:10:51.400> in<02:10:51.639> I<02:10:51.800> wash<02:10:52.040> something<02:10:52.320> that's<02:10:52.480> not 02:10:52.669 --> 02:10:52.679 align:start position:0% wash as in I wash something that's not 02:10:52.679 --> 02:10:55.950 align:start position:0% wash as in I wash something that's not related<02:10:53.000> to<02:10:53.119> oneself<02:10:53.760> as<02:10:53.920> in<02:10:54.239> Yolo<02:10:55.000> Co<02:10:55.520> I<02:10:55.679> wash 02:10:55.950 --> 02:10:55.960 align:start position:0% related to oneself as in Yolo Co I wash 02:10:55.960 --> 02:10:58.629 align:start position:0% related to oneself as in Yolo Co I wash the<02:10:56.079> car<02:10:56.599> however<02:10:56.960> if<02:10:57.040> I<02:10:57.159> were<02:10:57.360> to<02:10:57.520> say<02:10:58.000> Meelo 02:10:58.629 --> 02:10:58.639 align:start position:0% the car however if I were to say Meelo 02:10:58.639 --> 02:11:00.470 align:start position:0% the car however if I were to say Meelo this<02:10:58.719> is<02:10:58.840> where<02:10:59.040> the<02:10:59.159> meaning<02:10:59.480> itself<02:10:59.920> changes 02:11:00.470 --> 02:11:00.480 align:start position:0% this is where the meaning itself changes 02:11:00.480 --> 02:11:02.629 align:start position:0% this is where the meaning itself changes because<02:11:00.679> the<02:11:00.800> verb<02:11:01.040> is<02:11:01.199> not<02:11:01.480> wash<02:11:02.000> but<02:11:02.199> rather 02:11:02.629 --> 02:11:02.639 align:start position:0% because the verb is not wash but rather 02:11:02.639 --> 02:11:04.910 align:start position:0% because the verb is not wash but rather wash<02:11:02.920> up<02:11:03.239> meaning<02:11:03.559> I<02:11:03.719> wash<02:11:03.960> up<02:11:04.199> something<02:11:04.760> that 02:11:04.910 --> 02:11:04.920 align:start position:0% wash up meaning I wash up something that 02:11:04.920 --> 02:11:06.910 align:start position:0% wash up meaning I wash up something that has<02:11:05.079> to<02:11:05.199> do<02:11:05.360> with<02:11:05.520> oneself<02:11:06.159> for<02:11:06.360> instance 02:11:06.910 --> 02:11:06.920 align:start position:0% has to do with oneself for instance 02:11:06.920 --> 02:11:10.510 align:start position:0% has to do with oneself for instance saying<02:11:07.520> y<02:11:08.520> means<02:11:08.880> I<02:11:09.079> wash<02:11:09.320> the<02:11:09.440> car<02:11:09.800> but<02:11:09.920> saying 02:11:10.510 --> 02:11:10.520 align:start position:0% saying y means I wash the car but saying 02:11:10.520 --> 02:11:13.709 align:start position:0% saying y means I wash the car but saying meos<02:11:11.520> means<02:11:11.880> I<02:11:12.040> wash<02:11:12.280> up<02:11:12.559> my<02:11:12.760> hands<02:11:13.199> in<02:11:13.320> Spanish 02:11:13.709 --> 02:11:13.719 align:start position:0% meos means I wash up my hands in Spanish 02:11:13.719 --> 02:11:15.430 align:start position:0% meos means I wash up my hands in Spanish the<02:11:13.840> verb<02:11:14.040> to<02:11:14.239> wash<02:11:14.559> can<02:11:14.679> change<02:11:14.920> its<02:11:15.079> meaning 02:11:15.430 --> 02:11:15.440 align:start position:0% the verb to wash can change its meaning 02:11:15.440 --> 02:11:17.189 align:start position:0% the verb to wash can change its meaning depending<02:11:15.760> on<02:11:15.880> how<02:11:16.040> the<02:11:16.199> action<02:11:16.480> is<02:11:16.599> used<02:11:17.040> with 02:11:17.189 --> 02:11:17.199 align:start position:0% depending on how the action is used with 02:11:17.199 --> 02:11:19.830 align:start position:0% depending on how the action is used with laar<02:11:17.639> meaning<02:11:17.880> to<02:11:18.000> was<02:11:18.480> and<02:11:18.599> with<02:11:19.400> meaning<02:11:19.639> to 02:11:19.830 --> 02:11:19.840 align:start position:0% laar meaning to was and with meaning to 02:11:19.840 --> 02:11:21.549 align:start position:0% laar meaning to was and with meaning to wash<02:11:20.079> up<02:11:20.400> and<02:11:20.520> with<02:11:20.719> the<02:11:20.840> verb<02:11:21.159> getting<02:11:21.360> a 02:11:21.549 --> 02:11:21.559 align:start position:0% wash up and with the verb getting a 02:11:21.559 --> 02:11:22.950 align:start position:0% wash up and with the verb getting a preposition<02:11:22.239> when<02:11:22.360> it's<02:11:22.520> logically 02:11:22.950 --> 02:11:22.960 align:start position:0% preposition when it's logically 02:11:22.960 --> 02:11:25.229 align:start position:0% preposition when it's logically translated<02:11:23.639> into<02:11:23.880> English<02:11:24.360> in<02:11:24.480> simpler<02:11:24.880> words 02:11:25.229 --> 02:11:25.239 align:start position:0% translated into English in simpler words 02:11:25.239 --> 02:11:27.189 align:start position:0% translated into English in simpler words reflexive<02:11:25.760> verbs<02:11:26.000> in<02:11:26.159> Spanish<02:11:26.639> like<02:11:26.880> these 02:11:27.189 --> 02:11:27.199 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs in Spanish like these 02:11:27.199 --> 02:11:28.910 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs in Spanish like these are<02:11:27.400> verbs<02:11:27.639> that<02:11:27.760> follow<02:11:28.000> a<02:11:28.159> preposition<02:11:28.760> or 02:11:28.910 --> 02:11:28.920 align:start position:0% are verbs that follow a preposition or 02:11:28.920 --> 02:11:30.470 align:start position:0% are verbs that follow a preposition or some<02:11:29.159> continuation<02:11:29.800> when<02:11:29.960> they're<02:11:30.119> put<02:11:30.280> into 02:11:30.470 --> 02:11:30.480 align:start position:0% some continuation when they're put into 02:11:30.480 --> 02:11:32.149 align:start position:0% some continuation when they're put into English<02:11:30.960> and<02:11:31.119> as<02:11:31.199> I<02:11:31.320> said<02:11:31.480> in<02:11:31.599> the<02:11:31.719> beginning 02:11:32.149 --> 02:11:32.159 align:start position:0% English and as I said in the beginning 02:11:32.159 --> 02:11:33.629 align:start position:0% English and as I said in the beginning that's<02:11:32.320> the<02:11:32.480> closest<02:11:32.840> connection<02:11:33.280> I<02:11:33.360> can<02:11:33.520> give 02:11:33.629 --> 02:11:33.639 align:start position:0% that's the closest connection I can give 02:11:33.639 --> 02:11:35.430 align:start position:0% that's the closest connection I can give it<02:11:33.719> in<02:11:33.840> English<02:11:34.280> with<02:11:34.480> every<02:11:34.719> verb<02:11:35.079> having<02:11:35.320> its 02:11:35.430 --> 02:11:35.440 align:start position:0% it in English with every verb having its 02:11:35.440 --> 02:11:36.950 align:start position:0% it in English with every verb having its own<02:11:35.639> unique<02:11:36.000> definition<02:11:36.520> if<02:11:36.599> you<02:11:36.719> think<02:11:36.840> it's 02:11:36.950 --> 02:11:36.960 align:start position:0% own unique definition if you think it's 02:11:36.960 --> 02:11:38.790 align:start position:0% own unique definition if you think it's a<02:11:37.280> difficult<02:11:37.480> Concept<02:11:37.800> in<02:11:37.920> Spanish<02:11:38.440> you'd<02:11:38.679> be 02:11:38.790 --> 02:11:38.800 align:start position:0% a difficult Concept in Spanish you'd be 02:11:38.800 --> 02:11:40.430 align:start position:0% a difficult Concept in Spanish you'd be surprised<02:11:39.199> to<02:11:39.320> know<02:11:39.599> that<02:11:39.719> in<02:11:39.880> English<02:11:40.320> there 02:11:40.430 --> 02:11:40.440 align:start position:0% surprised to know that in English there 02:11:40.440 --> 02:11:42.270 align:start position:0% surprised to know that in English there are<02:11:40.599> many<02:11:40.840> verbs<02:11:41.079> that<02:11:41.239> f<02:11:41.440> with<02:11:41.599> prepositions 02:11:42.270 --> 02:11:42.280 align:start position:0% are many verbs that f with prepositions 02:11:42.280 --> 02:11:43.750 align:start position:0% are many verbs that f with prepositions and<02:11:42.400> not<02:11:42.559> only<02:11:42.800> are<02:11:43.040> they<02:11:43.239> different<02:11:43.599> their 02:11:43.750 --> 02:11:43.760 align:start position:0% and not only are they different their 02:11:43.760 --> 02:11:45.629 align:start position:0% and not only are they different their meaning<02:11:44.000> changes<02:11:44.400> indefinitely<02:11:45.079> in<02:11:45.239> English 02:11:45.629 --> 02:11:45.639 align:start position:0% meaning changes indefinitely in English 02:11:45.639 --> 02:11:47.069 align:start position:0% meaning changes indefinitely in English you<02:11:45.719> can<02:11:45.880> have<02:11:46.079> the<02:11:46.199> verb<02:11:46.400> to<02:11:46.599> give<02:11:46.880> but<02:11:47.000> when 02:11:47.069 --> 02:11:47.079 align:start position:0% you can have the verb to give but when 02:11:47.079 --> 02:11:48.629 align:start position:0% you can have the verb to give but when you<02:11:47.159> start<02:11:47.400> adding<02:11:47.679> prepositions<02:11:48.280> to<02:11:48.400> it<02:11:48.559> the 02:11:48.629 --> 02:11:48.639 align:start position:0% you start adding prepositions to it the 02:11:48.639 --> 02:11:50.390 align:start position:0% you start adding prepositions to it the meaning<02:11:48.920> changes<02:11:49.320> through<02:11:49.520> all<02:11:49.760> verbs<02:11:50.199> to 02:11:50.390 --> 02:11:50.400 align:start position:0% meaning changes through all verbs to 02:11:50.400 --> 02:11:52.750 align:start position:0% meaning changes through all verbs to give<02:11:50.719> to<02:11:50.920> give<02:11:51.159> off<02:11:51.520> to<02:11:51.760> give<02:11:51.960> up<02:11:52.280> and<02:11:52.400> to<02:11:52.599> give 02:11:52.750 --> 02:11:52.760 align:start position:0% give to give off to give up and to give 02:11:52.760 --> 02:11:54.390 align:start position:0% give to give off to give up and to give in<02:11:53.079> are<02:11:53.239> verbs<02:11:53.480> that<02:11:53.599> change<02:11:53.840> their<02:11:54.000> meaning 02:11:54.390 --> 02:11:54.400 align:start position:0% in are verbs that change their meaning 02:11:54.400 --> 02:11:55.990 align:start position:0% in are verbs that change their meaning once<02:11:54.599> they're<02:11:54.760> put<02:11:54.920> into<02:11:55.199> context<02:11:55.760> and<02:11:55.840> that's 02:11:55.990 --> 02:11:56.000 align:start position:0% once they're put into context and that's 02:11:56.000 --> 02:11:58.069 align:start position:0% once they're put into context and that's only<02:11:56.280> one<02:11:56.440> verb<02:11:56.639> to<02:11:56.800> use<02:11:57.159> not<02:11:57.280> to<02:11:57.480> mention<02:11:57.920> that 02:11:58.069 --> 02:11:58.079 align:start position:0% only one verb to use not to mention that 02:11:58.079 --> 02:11:59.549 align:start position:0% only one verb to use not to mention that it's<02:11:58.199> a<02:11:58.360> concept<02:11:58.760> many<02:11:58.920> people<02:11:59.119> who<02:11:59.239> learn 02:11:59.549 --> 02:11:59.559 align:start position:0% it's a concept many people who learn 02:11:59.559 --> 02:12:01.470 align:start position:0% it's a concept many people who learn English<02:11:59.920> struggle<02:12:00.320> with<02:12:00.559> in<02:12:00.639> Spanish<02:12:01.159> however 02:12:01.470 --> 02:12:01.480 align:start position:0% English struggle with in Spanish however 02:12:01.480 --> 02:12:03.109 align:start position:0% English struggle with in Spanish however this<02:12:01.639> concept<02:12:01.960> is<02:12:02.079> easier<02:12:02.400> to<02:12:02.800> understand 02:12:03.109 --> 02:12:03.119 align:start position:0% this concept is easier to understand 02:12:03.119 --> 02:12:04.470 align:start position:0% this concept is easier to understand because<02:12:03.320> the<02:12:03.440> difference<02:12:03.719> between<02:12:03.920> a<02:12:04.119> regular 02:12:04.470 --> 02:12:04.480 align:start position:0% because the difference between a regular 02:12:04.480 --> 02:12:06.549 align:start position:0% because the difference between a regular verb<02:12:04.719> and<02:12:04.880> a<02:12:05.000> reflexive<02:12:05.520> verb<02:12:05.760> in<02:12:05.960> Spanish<02:12:06.440> is 02:12:06.549 --> 02:12:06.559 align:start position:0% verb and a reflexive verb in Spanish is 02:12:06.559 --> 02:12:08.470 align:start position:0% verb and a reflexive verb in Spanish is the<02:12:06.719> word<02:12:07.000> say<02:12:07.400> in<02:12:07.520> the<02:12:07.639> verb<02:12:07.960> itself<02:12:08.360> which 02:12:08.470 --> 02:12:08.480 align:start position:0% the word say in the verb itself which 02:12:08.480 --> 02:12:10.350 align:start position:0% the word say in the verb itself which can<02:12:08.679> indicate<02:12:09.199> that<02:12:09.360> it's<02:12:09.480> a<02:12:09.639> verb<02:12:09.960> that<02:12:10.079> has<02:12:10.199> a 02:12:10.350 --> 02:12:10.360 align:start position:0% can indicate that it's a verb that has a 02:12:10.360 --> 02:12:12.510 align:start position:0% can indicate that it's a verb that has a preposition<02:12:11.000> after<02:12:11.239> it<02:12:11.440> in<02:12:11.559> English<02:12:12.000> laar 02:12:12.510 --> 02:12:12.520 align:start position:0% preposition after it in English laar 02:12:12.520 --> 02:12:15.149 align:start position:0% preposition after it in English laar means<02:12:12.760> to<02:12:12.960> wash<02:12:13.320> but<02:12:13.520> laar<02:12:14.199> means<02:12:14.440> to<02:12:14.639> wash<02:12:14.840> up 02:12:15.149 --> 02:12:15.159 align:start position:0% means to wash but laar means to wash up 02:12:15.159 --> 02:12:16.870 align:start position:0% means to wash but laar means to wash up which<02:12:15.280> logically<02:12:15.679> Works<02:12:15.960> in<02:12:16.119> Spanish<02:12:16.599> but<02:12:16.719> in 02:12:16.870 --> 02:12:16.880 align:start position:0% which logically Works in Spanish but in 02:12:16.880 --> 02:12:18.990 align:start position:0% which logically Works in Spanish but in English<02:12:17.360> it<02:12:17.480> may<02:12:17.639> cause<02:12:17.840> a<02:12:18.199> of<02:12:18.280> confusion<02:12:18.880> we 02:12:18.990 --> 02:12:19.000 align:start position:0% English it may cause a of confusion we 02:12:19.000 --> 02:12:21.589 align:start position:0% English it may cause a of confusion we can<02:12:19.159> also<02:12:19.440> say<02:12:19.800> I<02:12:19.960> wash<02:12:20.159> up<02:12:20.360> the<02:12:20.520> car<02:12:20.920> or<02:12:21.199> I<02:12:21.360> wash 02:12:21.589 --> 02:12:21.599 align:start position:0% can also say I wash up the car or I wash 02:12:21.599 --> 02:12:23.270 align:start position:0% can also say I wash up the car or I wash my<02:12:21.760> hands<02:12:22.159> and<02:12:22.320> while<02:12:22.599> that's<02:12:22.800> normal<02:12:23.119> in 02:12:23.270 --> 02:12:23.280 align:start position:0% my hands and while that's normal in 02:12:23.280 --> 02:12:25.189 align:start position:0% my hands and while that's normal in English<02:12:23.760> Spanish<02:12:24.119> doesn't<02:12:24.400> allow<02:12:24.719> this<02:12:24.920> idea 02:12:25.189 --> 02:12:25.199 align:start position:0% English Spanish doesn't allow this idea 02:12:25.199 --> 02:12:26.910 align:start position:0% English Spanish doesn't allow this idea to<02:12:25.360> work<02:12:25.719> which<02:12:25.840> is<02:12:26.000> why<02:12:26.199> it<02:12:26.320> generates 02:12:26.910 --> 02:12:26.920 align:start position:0% to work which is why it generates 02:12:26.920 --> 02:12:28.310 align:start position:0% to work which is why it generates different<02:12:27.159> meanings<02:12:27.559> with<02:12:27.760> every<02:12:27.960> verb 02:12:28.310 --> 02:12:28.320 align:start position:0% different meanings with every verb 02:12:28.320 --> 02:12:29.830 align:start position:0% different meanings with every verb reflexive<02:12:28.800> verbs<02:12:29.079> can<02:12:29.239> also<02:12:29.440> work<02:12:29.599> in<02:12:29.719> the 02:12:29.830 --> 02:12:29.840 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs can also work in the 02:12:29.840 --> 02:12:31.589 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs can also work in the present<02:12:30.159> progressive<02:12:30.760> like<02:12:30.920> saying<02:12:31.320> to 02:12:31.589 --> 02:12:31.599 align:start position:0% present progressive like saying to 02:12:31.599 --> 02:12:35.310 align:start position:0% present progressive like saying to estando<02:12:32.599> meaning<02:12:32.880> you<02:12:33.040> are<02:12:33.239> washing<02:12:34.320> and 02:12:35.310 --> 02:12:35.320 align:start position:0% estando meaning you are washing and 02:12:35.320 --> 02:12:36.750 align:start position:0% estando meaning you are washing and meaning<02:12:35.559> you<02:12:35.679> are<02:12:35.880> washing<02:12:36.280> up<02:12:36.599> in<02:12:36.679> the 02:12:36.750 --> 02:12:36.760 align:start position:0% meaning you are washing up in the 02:12:36.760 --> 02:12:38.629 align:start position:0% meaning you are washing up in the present<02:12:37.079> progressive<02:12:37.639> you<02:12:37.719> can<02:12:37.880> also<02:12:38.199> attach 02:12:38.629 --> 02:12:38.639 align:start position:0% present progressive you can also attach 02:12:38.639 --> 02:12:40.350 align:start position:0% present progressive you can also attach the<02:12:38.760> indirect<02:12:39.199> object<02:12:39.520> pronoun<02:12:39.920> to<02:12:40.079> the<02:12:40.199> end 02:12:40.350 --> 02:12:40.360 align:start position:0% the indirect object pronoun to the end 02:12:40.360 --> 02:12:43.189 align:start position:0% the indirect object pronoun to the end of<02:12:40.480> the<02:12:40.599> infinitive<02:12:41.119> itself<02:12:41.559> like<02:12:41.679> saying<02:12:42.199> EST 02:12:43.189 --> 02:12:43.199 align:start position:0% of the infinitive itself like saying EST 02:12:43.199 --> 02:12:44.709 align:start position:0% of the infinitive itself like saying EST but<02:12:43.280> for<02:12:43.400> Spanish<02:12:43.719> speakers<02:12:44.239> it<02:12:44.320> would<02:12:44.480> be<02:12:44.559> too 02:12:44.709 --> 02:12:44.719 align:start position:0% but for Spanish speakers it would be too 02:12:44.719 --> 02:12:46.350 align:start position:0% but for Spanish speakers it would be too strange<02:12:45.040> to<02:12:45.199> say<02:12:45.520> which<02:12:45.599> is<02:12:45.760> why<02:12:45.920> most<02:12:46.079> of<02:12:46.199> the 02:12:46.350 --> 02:12:46.360 align:start position:0% strange to say which is why most of the 02:12:46.360 --> 02:12:48.149 align:start position:0% strange to say which is why most of the time<02:12:46.599> the<02:12:46.719> indirect<02:12:47.119> object<02:12:47.400> pronoun<02:12:47.840> has<02:12:48.040> has 02:12:48.149 --> 02:12:48.159 align:start position:0% time the indirect object pronoun has has 02:12:48.159 --> 02:12:49.910 align:start position:0% time the indirect object pronoun has has to<02:12:48.239> be<02:12:48.360> put<02:12:48.599> before<02:12:48.880> a<02:12:49.040> conjugative<02:12:49.520> verb<02:12:49.760> it's 02:12:49.910 --> 02:12:49.920 align:start position:0% to be put before a conjugative verb it's 02:12:49.920 --> 02:12:51.390 align:start position:0% to be put before a conjugative verb it's the<02:12:50.040> same<02:12:50.239> thing<02:12:50.360> as<02:12:50.520> saying<02:12:50.760> in<02:12:50.880> English<02:12:51.280> you 02:12:51.390 --> 02:12:51.400 align:start position:0% the same thing as saying in English you 02:12:51.400 --> 02:12:53.229 align:start position:0% the same thing as saying in English you are<02:12:51.639> washing<02:12:52.119> to<02:12:52.360> you<02:12:52.679> which<02:12:52.800> doesn't<02:12:53.079> make 02:12:53.229 --> 02:12:53.239 align:start position:0% are washing to you which doesn't make 02:12:53.239 --> 02:12:55.189 align:start position:0% are washing to you which doesn't make sense<02:12:53.599> so<02:12:53.800> overall<02:12:54.320> just<02:12:54.520> remember<02:12:54.920> to<02:12:55.040> put 02:12:55.189 --> 02:12:55.199 align:start position:0% sense so overall just remember to put 02:12:55.199 --> 02:12:56.750 align:start position:0% sense so overall just remember to put indirect<02:12:55.599> object<02:12:56.000> pronouns<02:12:56.440> before 02:12:56.750 --> 02:12:56.760 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns before 02:12:56.760 --> 02:12:59.069 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns before conjugated<02:12:57.239> verbs<02:12:57.679> at<02:12:57.880> last<02:12:58.280> reflexive<02:12:58.760> verbs 02:12:59.069 --> 02:12:59.079 align:start position:0% conjugated verbs at last reflexive verbs 02:12:59.079 --> 02:13:00.629 align:start position:0% conjugated verbs at last reflexive verbs can<02:12:59.280> also<02:12:59.480> function<02:12:59.840> in<02:12:59.920> the<02:13:00.079> past<02:13:00.320> simple 02:13:00.629 --> 02:13:00.639 align:start position:0% can also function in the past simple 02:13:00.639 --> 02:13:02.910 align:start position:0% can also function in the past simple tense<02:13:01.119> like<02:13:01.280> saying<02:13:01.679> El<02:13:01.920> La<02:13:02.360> meaning<02:13:02.719> he 02:13:02.910 --> 02:13:02.920 align:start position:0% tense like saying El La meaning he 02:13:02.920 --> 02:13:06.229 align:start position:0% tense like saying El La meaning he washed<02:13:03.360> but<02:13:03.480> saying<02:13:04.079> a<02:13:05.079> means<02:13:05.440> he<02:13:05.599> washed<02:13:05.920> up 02:13:06.229 --> 02:13:06.239 align:start position:0% washed but saying a means he washed up 02:13:06.239 --> 02:13:07.790 align:start position:0% washed but saying a means he washed up and<02:13:06.360> we<02:13:06.480> know<02:13:06.639> that<02:13:06.719> it's<02:13:06.840> a<02:13:07.040> he<02:13:07.360> because<02:13:07.559> the 02:13:07.790 --> 02:13:07.800 align:start position:0% and we know that it's a he because the 02:13:07.800 --> 02:13:09.790 align:start position:0% and we know that it's a he because the construction<02:13:08.800> indicates<02:13:09.320> that<02:13:09.520> and<02:13:09.599> that's 02:13:09.790 --> 02:13:09.800 align:start position:0% construction indicates that and that's 02:13:09.800 --> 02:13:11.270 align:start position:0% construction indicates that and that's really<02:13:10.000> how<02:13:10.159> reflexive<02:13:10.599> verbs<02:13:10.920> work<02:13:11.119> in 02:13:11.270 --> 02:13:11.280 align:start position:0% really how reflexive verbs work in 02:13:11.280 --> 02:13:12.790 align:start position:0% really how reflexive verbs work in Spanish<02:13:11.760> and<02:13:11.840> I<02:13:12.000> would<02:13:12.159> even<02:13:12.360> say<02:13:12.679> that 02:13:12.790 --> 02:13:12.800 align:start position:0% Spanish and I would even say that 02:13:12.800 --> 02:13:14.470 align:start position:0% Spanish and I would even say that they're<02:13:12.960> not<02:13:13.199> as<02:13:13.400> hard<02:13:13.760> as<02:13:13.880> people<02:13:14.159> think<02:13:14.360> they 02:13:14.470 --> 02:13:14.480 align:start position:0% they're not as hard as people think they 02:13:14.480 --> 02:13:16.069 align:start position:0% they're not as hard as people think they are<02:13:14.679> for<02:13:14.800> the<02:13:14.920> sake<02:13:15.079> of<02:13:15.199> learning<02:13:15.639> I'd<02:13:15.800> like<02:13:15.920> to 02:13:16.069 --> 02:13:16.079 align:start position:0% are for the sake of learning I'd like to 02:13:16.079 --> 02:13:18.030 align:start position:0% are for the sake of learning I'd like to give<02:13:16.239> all<02:13:16.400> of<02:13:16.520> you<02:13:16.760> useful<02:13:17.199> reflexive<02:13:17.599> verbs 02:13:18.030 --> 02:13:18.040 align:start position:0% give all of you useful reflexive verbs 02:13:18.040 --> 02:13:19.229 align:start position:0% give all of you useful reflexive verbs so<02:13:18.159> that<02:13:18.239> you<02:13:18.320> can<02:13:18.719> understand<02:13:18.920> how<02:13:19.079> these 02:13:19.229 --> 02:13:19.239 align:start position:0% so that you can understand how these 02:13:19.239 --> 02:13:20.950 align:start position:0% so that you can understand how these verbs<02:13:19.520> work<02:13:19.719> at<02:13:19.960> Best<02:13:20.280> because<02:13:20.480> I'm<02:13:20.599> not<02:13:20.760> going 02:13:20.950 --> 02:13:20.960 align:start position:0% verbs work at Best because I'm not going 02:13:20.960 --> 02:13:22.350 align:start position:0% verbs work at Best because I'm not going to<02:13:21.079> list<02:13:21.360> every<02:13:21.599> verb<02:13:21.840> that<02:13:21.960> exists<02:13:22.239> in 02:13:22.350 --> 02:13:22.360 align:start position:0% to list every verb that exists in 02:13:22.360 --> 02:13:24.069 align:start position:0% to list every verb that exists in Spanish<02:13:22.840> some<02:13:22.960> of<02:13:23.079> the<02:13:23.199> most<02:13:23.400> useful<02:13:23.719> ones<02:13:23.920> in 02:13:24.069 --> 02:13:24.079 align:start position:0% Spanish some of the most useful ones in 02:13:24.079 --> 02:13:30.030 align:start position:0% Spanish some of the most useful ones in Spanish<02:13:24.639> are<02:13:25.079> B 02:13:30.030 --> 02:13:30.040 align:start position:0% 02:13:30.040 --> 02:13:34.830 align:start position:0% Le<02:13:31.520> and<02:13:32.520> means<02:13:32.760> to<02:13:33.000> bathe<02:13:33.400> but<02:13:34.239> means<02:13:34.520> to<02:13:34.679> take 02:13:34.830 --> 02:13:34.840 align:start position:0% Le and means to bathe but means to take 02:13:34.840 --> 02:13:37.549 align:start position:0% Le and means to bathe but means to take a<02:13:35.000> bath<02:13:35.320> saying<02:13:35.559> a<02:13:35.719> sentence<02:13:36.119> like<02:13:36.440> Yano<02:13:37.199> means 02:13:37.549 --> 02:13:37.559 align:start position:0% a bath saying a sentence like Yano means 02:13:37.559 --> 02:13:40.270 align:start position:0% a bath saying a sentence like Yano means I<02:13:37.760> bathe<02:13:38.199> but<02:13:38.320> saying<02:13:38.760> Meo<02:13:39.440> means<02:13:39.800> I<02:13:39.960> take<02:13:40.119> a 02:13:40.270 --> 02:13:40.280 align:start position:0% I bathe but saying Meo means I take a 02:13:40.280 --> 02:13:41.790 align:start position:0% I bathe but saying Meo means I take a bath<02:13:40.639> of<02:13:40.800> course<02:13:41.119> you<02:13:41.199> can<02:13:41.360> stretch<02:13:41.679> the 02:13:41.790 --> 02:13:41.800 align:start position:0% bath of course you can stretch the 02:13:41.800 --> 02:13:43.390 align:start position:0% bath of course you can stretch the sentence<02:13:42.239> in<02:13:42.400> any<02:13:42.599> way<02:13:42.719> you<02:13:42.840> want<02:13:43.199> whether 02:13:43.390 --> 02:13:43.400 align:start position:0% sentence in any way you want whether 02:13:43.400 --> 02:13:44.870 align:start position:0% sentence in any way you want whether it's<02:13:43.520> using<02:13:43.760> a<02:13:43.880> different<02:13:44.159> object<02:13:44.440> pronoun 02:13:44.870 --> 02:13:44.880 align:start position:0% it's using a different object pronoun 02:13:44.880 --> 02:13:46.390 align:start position:0% it's using a different object pronoun putting<02:13:45.079> it<02:13:45.199> in<02:13:45.280> the<02:13:45.440> present<02:13:45.719> progressive<02:13:46.199> or 02:13:46.390 --> 02:13:46.400 align:start position:0% putting it in the present progressive or 02:13:46.400 --> 02:13:48.830 align:start position:0% putting it in the present progressive or past<02:13:46.599> simple<02:13:46.880> tense<02:13:47.360> leant<02:13:47.840> say<02:13:48.199> is<02:13:48.280> a<02:13:48.440> verb 02:13:48.830 --> 02:13:48.840 align:start position:0% past simple tense leant say is a verb 02:13:48.840 --> 02:13:50.430 align:start position:0% past simple tense leant say is a verb that's<02:13:49.040> easier<02:13:49.360> to<02:13:49.800> understand<02:13:50.159> because 02:13:50.430 --> 02:13:50.440 align:start position:0% that's easier to understand because 02:13:50.440 --> 02:13:52.790 align:start position:0% that's easier to understand because leant<02:13:51.079> means<02:13:51.320> to<02:13:51.520> lift<02:13:51.840> or<02:13:52.000> to<02:13:52.199> raise<02:13:52.639> but 02:13:52.790 --> 02:13:52.800 align:start position:0% leant means to lift or to raise but 02:13:52.800 --> 02:13:55.589 align:start position:0% leant means to lift or to raise but leant<02:13:53.639> means<02:13:53.920> to<02:13:54.119> lift<02:13:54.360> up<02:13:54.639> or<02:13:54.960> get<02:13:55.119> up<02:13:55.360> to 02:13:55.589 --> 02:13:55.599 align:start position:0% leant means to lift up or get up to 02:13:55.599 --> 02:13:59.149 align:start position:0% leant means to lift up or get up to leaste<02:13:56.480> means<02:13:56.840> you<02:13:57.040> lifted<02:13:57.599> but<02:13:57.840> taste<02:13:58.840> means 02:13:59.149 --> 02:13:59.159 align:start position:0% leaste means you lifted but taste means 02:13:59.159 --> 02:14:01.149 align:start position:0% leaste means you lifted but taste means you<02:13:59.400> got<02:13:59.639> up<02:14:00.000> of<02:14:00.119> course<02:14:00.480> you<02:14:00.559> can<02:14:00.679> stretch<02:14:01.040> the 02:14:01.149 --> 02:14:01.159 align:start position:0% you got up of course you can stretch the 02:14:01.159 --> 02:14:03.189 align:start position:0% you got up of course you can stretch the sentence<02:14:01.520> in<02:14:01.679> any<02:14:01.880> way<02:14:02.000> you<02:14:02.119> want<02:14:02.520> desper 02:14:03.189 --> 02:14:03.199 align:start position:0% sentence in any way you want desper 02:14:03.199 --> 02:14:06.030 align:start position:0% sentence in any way you want desper means<02:14:03.400> to<02:14:03.599> arouse<02:14:04.199> or<02:14:04.360> to<02:14:04.599> awake<02:14:05.000> but<02:14:05.159> Des 02:14:06.030 --> 02:14:06.040 align:start position:0% means to arouse or to awake but Des 02:14:06.040 --> 02:14:08.470 align:start position:0% means to arouse or to awake but Des means<02:14:06.280> to<02:14:06.440> wake<02:14:06.679> up<02:14:07.280> desperto<02:14:07.960> means<02:14:08.280> he 02:14:08.470 --> 02:14:08.480 align:start position:0% means to wake up desperto means he 02:14:08.480 --> 02:14:09.629 align:start position:0% means to wake up desperto means he aroused 02:14:09.629 --> 02:14:09.639 align:start position:0% aroused 02:14:09.639 --> 02:14:13.069 align:start position:0% aroused butto<02:14:10.639> means<02:14:10.960> he<02:14:11.159> woke<02:14:11.400> up<02:14:11.800> d<02:14:12.320> means<02:14:12.559> to<02:14:12.679> sleep 02:14:13.069 --> 02:14:13.079 align:start position:0% butto means he woke up d means to sleep 02:14:13.079 --> 02:14:15.669 align:start position:0% butto means he woke up d means to sleep but<02:14:14.040> means<02:14:14.280> to<02:14:14.440> fall<02:14:14.679> asleep<02:14:15.119> I<02:14:15.280> really<02:14:15.480> hope 02:14:15.669 --> 02:14:15.679 align:start position:0% but means to fall asleep I really hope 02:14:15.679 --> 02:14:16.830 align:start position:0% but means to fall asleep I really hope that<02:14:15.760> you're<02:14:15.920> starting<02:14:16.159> to<02:14:16.320> get<02:14:16.440> the<02:14:16.559> hang<02:14:16.719> of 02:14:16.830 --> 02:14:16.840 align:start position:0% that you're starting to get the hang of 02:14:16.840 --> 02:14:18.109 align:start position:0% that you're starting to get the hang of it<02:14:17.000> now<02:14:17.320> because<02:14:17.520> most<02:14:17.679> of<02:14:17.760> the<02:14:17.960> these 02:14:18.109 --> 02:14:18.119 align:start position:0% it now because most of the these 02:14:18.119 --> 02:14:19.709 align:start position:0% it now because most of the these reflexive<02:14:18.520> verbs<02:14:18.840> are<02:14:19.000> verbs<02:14:19.239> that<02:14:19.320> are<02:14:19.480> used 02:14:19.709 --> 02:14:19.719 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs are verbs that are used 02:14:19.719 --> 02:14:21.470 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs are verbs that are used in<02:14:19.800> the<02:14:19.960> past<02:14:20.199> simple<02:14:20.480> tense<02:14:20.960> of<02:14:21.119> course<02:14:21.400> you 02:14:21.470 --> 02:14:21.480 align:start position:0% in the past simple tense of course you 02:14:21.480 --> 02:14:24.149 align:start position:0% in the past simple tense of course you can<02:14:21.599> make<02:14:21.800> any<02:14:21.960> sentence<02:14:22.320> you<02:14:22.440> want<02:14:23.079> using<02:14:24.079> is 02:14:24.149 --> 02:14:24.159 align:start position:0% can make any sentence you want using is 02:14:24.159 --> 02:14:26.350 align:start position:0% can make any sentence you want using is a<02:14:24.280> very<02:14:24.480> interesting<02:14:24.880> one<02:14:25.280> because<02:14:25.920> means<02:14:26.159> to 02:14:26.350 --> 02:14:26.360 align:start position:0% a very interesting one because means to 02:14:26.360 --> 02:14:29.350 align:start position:0% a very interesting one because means to go<02:14:26.719> but<02:14:27.559> means<02:14:27.800> to<02:14:27.960> go<02:14:28.159> away<02:14:28.599> or<02:14:28.800> to<02:14:29.000> leave 02:14:29.350 --> 02:14:29.360 align:start position:0% go but means to go away or to leave 02:14:29.360 --> 02:14:32.629 align:start position:0% go but means to go away or to leave saying<02:14:29.719> y<02:14:30.320> means<02:14:30.719> I<02:14:30.920> go<02:14:31.239> but<02:14:31.360> saying<02:14:31.800> Meo<02:14:32.280> means 02:14:32.629 --> 02:14:32.639 align:start position:0% saying y means I go but saying Meo means 02:14:32.639 --> 02:14:34.750 align:start position:0% saying y means I go but saying Meo means I<02:14:32.800> go<02:14:33.000> away<02:14:33.440> or<02:14:33.760> I<02:14:33.960> leave<02:14:34.320> and<02:14:34.400> the<02:14:34.520> same 02:14:34.750 --> 02:14:34.760 align:start position:0% I go away or I leave and the same 02:14:34.760 --> 02:14:36.310 align:start position:0% I go away or I leave and the same concept<02:14:35.159> applies<02:14:35.440> to<02:14:35.559> any<02:14:35.760> pronoun<02:14:36.159> and 02:14:36.310 --> 02:14:36.320 align:start position:0% concept applies to any pronoun and 02:14:36.320 --> 02:14:38.589 align:start position:0% concept applies to any pronoun and sentence<02:14:36.639> you<02:14:36.760> want<02:14:36.840> to<02:14:37.000> use<02:14:37.360> p<02:14:37.800> means<02:14:38.040> to<02:14:38.239> put 02:14:38.589 --> 02:14:38.599 align:start position:0% sentence you want to use p means to put 02:14:38.599 --> 02:14:40.830 align:start position:0% sentence you want to use p means to put but<02:14:38.800> P<02:14:39.239> say<02:14:39.520> means<02:14:39.760> to<02:14:39.960> put<02:14:40.199> down<02:14:40.520> but<02:14:40.679> let's 02:14:40.830 --> 02:14:40.840 align:start position:0% but P say means to put down but let's 02:14:40.840 --> 02:14:42.910 align:start position:0% but P say means to put down but let's not<02:14:41.040> forget<02:14:41.400> that<02:14:41.559> it's<02:14:41.639> an<02:14:41.920> irregular<02:14:42.360> y<02:14:42.559> verb 02:14:42.910 --> 02:14:42.920 align:start position:0% not forget that it's an irregular y verb 02:14:42.920 --> 02:14:46.189 align:start position:0% not forget that it's an irregular y verb yongo<02:14:43.719> means<02:14:44.119> I<02:14:44.320> put<02:14:44.760> but<02:14:45.000> me<02:14:45.199> Pongo<02:14:45.679> means<02:14:46.040> I 02:14:46.189 --> 02:14:46.199 align:start position:0% yongo means I put but me Pongo means I 02:14:46.199 --> 02:14:47.870 align:start position:0% yongo means I put but me Pongo means I put<02:14:46.480> down<02:14:46.719> and<02:14:46.840> the<02:14:46.920> same<02:14:47.119> concept<02:14:47.440> applies<02:14:47.679> to 02:14:47.870 --> 02:14:47.880 align:start position:0% put down and the same concept applies to 02:14:47.880 --> 02:14:49.629 align:start position:0% put down and the same concept applies to any<02:14:48.040> pronoun<02:14:48.440> and<02:14:48.599> sentence<02:14:48.920> you<02:14:49.000> want<02:14:49.119> to<02:14:49.239> use 02:14:49.629 --> 02:14:49.639 align:start position:0% any pronoun and sentence you want to use 02:14:49.639 --> 02:14:51.830 align:start position:0% any pronoun and sentence you want to use S<02:14:50.360> is<02:14:50.520> actually<02:14:50.719> a<02:14:50.880> reflexive<02:14:51.360> verb<02:14:51.679> that's 02:14:51.830 --> 02:14:51.840 align:start position:0% S is actually a reflexive verb that's 02:14:51.840 --> 02:14:55.030 align:start position:0% S is actually a reflexive verb that's also<02:14:52.040> stem<02:14:52.320> changing<02:14:52.760> s<02:14:53.320> means<02:14:53.559> to<02:14:53.760> sit<02:14:54.159> but 02:14:55.030 --> 02:14:55.040 align:start position:0% also stem changing s means to sit but 02:14:55.040 --> 02:14:58.030 align:start position:0% also stem changing s means to sit but means<02:14:55.280> to<02:14:55.400> sit<02:14:55.639> down<02:14:56.000> yento<02:14:56.840> means<02:14:57.239> I<02:14:57.440> said<02:14:57.800> but 02:14:58.030 --> 02:14:58.040 align:start position:0% means to sit down yento means I said but 02:14:58.040 --> 02:15:00.430 align:start position:0% means to sit down yento means I said but meso<02:14:58.840> means<02:14:59.159> I<02:14:59.280> said<02:14:59.559> down<02:14:59.800> and<02:14:59.920> the<02:15:00.040> last<02:15:00.239> most 02:15:00.430 --> 02:15:00.440 align:start position:0% meso means I said down and the last most 02:15:00.440 --> 02:15:02.470 align:start position:0% meso means I said down and the last most useful<02:15:00.800> reflexive<02:15:01.239> verb<02:15:01.599> is<02:15:01.800> actually<02:15:02.079> a<02:15:02.199> verb 02:15:02.470 --> 02:15:02.480 align:start position:0% useful reflexive verb is actually a verb 02:15:02.480 --> 02:15:04.109 align:start position:0% useful reflexive verb is actually a verb that<02:15:02.599> many<02:15:02.800> beginners<02:15:03.199> heard<02:15:03.440> of<02:15:03.679> but<02:15:03.840> never 02:15:04.109 --> 02:15:04.119 align:start position:0% that many beginners heard of but never 02:15:04.119 --> 02:15:06.430 align:start position:0% that many beginners heard of but never understood<02:15:04.719> and<02:15:04.840> that<02:15:04.920> is<02:15:05.119> yamar<02:15:05.719> while<02:15:05.960> yamar 02:15:06.430 --> 02:15:06.440 align:start position:0% understood and that is yamar while yamar 02:15:06.440 --> 02:15:08.310 align:start position:0% understood and that is yamar while yamar means<02:15:06.679> to<02:15:06.880> call<02:15:07.280> as<02:15:07.400> in<02:15:07.520> to<02:15:07.679> call<02:15:07.880> someone<02:15:08.199> by 02:15:08.310 --> 02:15:08.320 align:start position:0% means to call as in to call someone by 02:15:08.320 --> 02:15:10.830 align:start position:0% means to call as in to call someone by phone<02:15:08.760> yamar<02:15:09.360> means<02:15:09.599> to<02:15:09.760> call<02:15:10.000> oneself<02:15:10.639> or 02:15:10.830 --> 02:15:10.840 align:start position:0% phone yamar means to call oneself or 02:15:10.840 --> 02:15:12.470 align:start position:0% phone yamar means to call oneself or yourself<02:15:11.360> in<02:15:11.520> this<02:15:11.639> case<02:15:12.079> because<02:15:12.239> it's<02:15:12.360> a 02:15:12.470 --> 02:15:12.480 align:start position:0% yourself in this case because it's a 02:15:12.480 --> 02:15:14.149 align:start position:0% yourself in this case because it's a verb<02:15:12.719> that<02:15:12.880> has<02:15:13.000> to<02:15:13.119> do<02:15:13.280> with<02:15:13.440> oneself<02:15:14.040> the 02:15:14.149 --> 02:15:14.159 align:start position:0% verb that has to do with oneself the 02:15:14.159 --> 02:15:15.790 align:start position:0% verb that has to do with oneself the most<02:15:14.360> used<02:15:14.679> sentence<02:15:15.159> that<02:15:15.320> everyone<02:15:15.639> has 02:15:15.790 --> 02:15:15.800 align:start position:0% most used sentence that everyone has 02:15:15.800 --> 02:15:18.069 align:start position:0% most used sentence that everyone has heard<02:15:16.000> of<02:15:16.360> isas<02:15:17.360> meaning<02:15:17.599> how<02:15:17.840> how<02:15:17.920> do<02:15:17.960> you 02:15:18.069 --> 02:15:18.079 align:start position:0% heard of isas meaning how how do you 02:15:18.079 --> 02:15:20.229 align:start position:0% heard of isas meaning how how do you call<02:15:18.280> yourself<02:15:18.800> while<02:15:19.040> koyas<02:15:19.800> can<02:15:19.920> mean<02:15:20.119> how 02:15:20.229 --> 02:15:20.239 align:start position:0% call yourself while koyas can mean how 02:15:20.239 --> 02:15:22.030 align:start position:0% call yourself while koyas can mean how do<02:15:20.360> you<02:15:20.520> call<02:15:20.920> as<02:15:21.079> in<02:15:21.360> how<02:15:21.480> do<02:15:21.559> you<02:15:21.679> call<02:15:21.880> your 02:15:22.030 --> 02:15:22.040 align:start position:0% do you call as in how do you call your 02:15:22.040 --> 02:15:24.790 align:start position:0% do you call as in how do you call your favorite<02:15:22.400> person<02:15:22.760> or<02:15:22.960> whatever<02:15:23.480> komas<02:15:24.360> means 02:15:24.790 --> 02:15:24.800 align:start position:0% favorite person or whatever komas means 02:15:24.800 --> 02:15:26.229 align:start position:0% favorite person or whatever komas means how<02:15:24.920> do<02:15:25.040> you<02:15:25.159> call<02:15:25.400> yourself<02:15:25.920> which<02:15:26.040> is<02:15:26.119> a 02:15:26.229 --> 02:15:26.239 align:start position:0% how do you call yourself which is a 02:15:26.239 --> 02:15:27.990 align:start position:0% how do you call yourself which is a fancy<02:15:26.559> way<02:15:26.679> of<02:15:26.800> saying<02:15:27.239> what's<02:15:27.440> your<02:15:27.639> name<02:15:27.880> you 02:15:27.990 --> 02:15:28.000 align:start position:0% fancy way of saying what's your name you 02:15:28.000 --> 02:15:30.669 align:start position:0% fancy way of saying what's your name you can<02:15:28.199> reply<02:15:28.639> by<02:15:28.760> saying<02:15:29.199> May<02:15:29.719> Alex<02:15:30.199> or<02:15:30.360> whatever 02:15:30.669 --> 02:15:30.679 align:start position:0% can reply by saying May Alex or whatever 02:15:30.679 --> 02:15:32.470 align:start position:0% can reply by saying May Alex or whatever your<02:15:30.880> name<02:15:31.119> is<02:15:31.400> a<02:15:31.520> lot<02:15:31.639> of<02:15:31.760> beginners<02:15:32.280> would 02:15:32.470 --> 02:15:32.480 align:start position:0% your name is a lot of beginners would 02:15:32.480 --> 02:15:35.270 align:start position:0% your name is a lot of beginners would tend<02:15:32.639> to<02:15:32.800> say<02:15:32.960> something<02:15:33.320> like<02:15:33.639> May<02:15:34.199> s<02:15:34.480> Alex<02:15:34.960> or 02:15:35.270 --> 02:15:35.280 align:start position:0% tend to say something like May s Alex or 02:15:35.280 --> 02:15:36.870 align:start position:0% tend to say something like May s Alex or yoy<02:15:35.840> Alex<02:15:36.239> and<02:15:36.360> when<02:15:36.440> you<02:15:36.559> put<02:15:36.760> these 02:15:36.870 --> 02:15:36.880 align:start position:0% yoy Alex and when you put these 02:15:36.880 --> 02:15:38.830 align:start position:0% yoy Alex and when you put these sentences<02:15:37.320> in<02:15:37.480> English<02:15:37.880> you'll<02:15:38.119> get<02:15:38.400> I<02:15:38.559> call 02:15:38.830 --> 02:15:38.840 align:start position:0% sentences in English you'll get I call 02:15:38.840 --> 02:15:41.549 align:start position:0% sentences in English you'll get I call myself<02:15:39.199> as<02:15:39.480> Alex<02:15:40.040> or<02:15:40.320> I<02:15:40.480> call<02:15:40.800> Alex<02:15:41.320> and<02:15:41.440> these 02:15:41.549 --> 02:15:41.559 align:start position:0% myself as Alex or I call Alex and these 02:15:41.559 --> 02:15:43.629 align:start position:0% myself as Alex or I call Alex and these are<02:15:41.840> incorrect<02:15:42.320> responses<02:15:42.840> to<02:15:42.960> the<02:15:43.159> question 02:15:43.629 --> 02:15:43.639 align:start position:0% are incorrect responses to the question 02:15:43.639 --> 02:15:45.950 align:start position:0% are incorrect responses to the question komas<02:15:44.440> and<02:15:44.599> now<02:15:44.840> you<02:15:44.960> hopefully<02:15:45.599> understand 02:15:45.950 --> 02:15:45.960 align:start position:0% komas and now you hopefully understand 02:15:45.960 --> 02:15:47.510 align:start position:0% komas and now you hopefully understand what<02:15:46.119> this<02:15:46.239> phrase<02:15:46.520> finally<02:15:46.880> means<02:15:47.280> along 02:15:47.510 --> 02:15:47.520 align:start position:0% what this phrase finally means along 02:15:47.520 --> 02:15:49.510 align:start position:0% what this phrase finally means along with<02:15:47.639> how<02:15:47.920> reflexive<02:15:48.320> verbs<02:15:48.639> work<02:15:48.880> in<02:15:49.040> Spanish 02:15:49.510 --> 02:15:49.520 align:start position:0% with how reflexive verbs work in Spanish 02:15:49.520 --> 02:15:51.470 align:start position:0% with how reflexive verbs work in Spanish reciprocal<02:15:50.079> reflexive<02:15:50.480> verbs<02:15:50.719> in<02:15:50.880> Spanish<02:15:51.320> is 02:15:51.470 --> 02:15:51.480 align:start position:0% reciprocal reflexive verbs in Spanish is 02:15:51.480 --> 02:15:52.709 align:start position:0% reciprocal reflexive verbs in Spanish is the<02:15:51.599> English<02:15:51.880> version<02:15:52.159> of<02:15:52.280> verbs<02:15:52.520> that 02:15:52.709 --> 02:15:52.719 align:start position:0% the English version of verbs that 02:15:52.719 --> 02:15:54.549 align:start position:0% the English version of verbs that reciprocate<02:15:53.280> subjects<02:15:53.840> that<02:15:53.960> involve<02:15:54.280> two<02:15:54.440> or 02:15:54.549 --> 02:15:54.559 align:start position:0% reciprocate subjects that involve two or 02:15:54.559 --> 02:15:56.510 align:start position:0% reciprocate subjects that involve two or more<02:15:54.800> people<02:15:55.320> as<02:15:55.440> in<02:15:55.599> each<02:15:55.800> other<02:15:56.159> or<02:15:56.360> one 02:15:56.510 --> 02:15:56.520 align:start position:0% more people as in each other or one 02:15:56.520 --> 02:15:58.310 align:start position:0% more people as in each other or one another<02:15:57.000> while<02:15:57.199> reflexive<02:15:57.639> verbs<02:15:57.920> Express<02:15:58.199> a 02:15:58.310 --> 02:15:58.320 align:start position:0% another while reflexive verbs Express a 02:15:58.320 --> 02:15:59.870 align:start position:0% another while reflexive verbs Express a verb<02:15:58.520> that<02:15:58.599> is<02:15:58.719> followed<02:15:59.000> by<02:15:59.079> a<02:15:59.199> preposition 02:15:59.870 --> 02:15:59.880 align:start position:0% verb that is followed by a preposition 02:15:59.880 --> 02:16:01.669 align:start position:0% verb that is followed by a preposition reciprocal<02:16:00.400> reflexives<02:16:01.079> always<02:16:01.320> tend<02:16:01.520> to 02:16:01.669 --> 02:16:01.679 align:start position:0% reciprocal reflexives always tend to 02:16:01.679 --> 02:16:03.189 align:start position:0% reciprocal reflexives always tend to have<02:16:01.800> two<02:16:01.960> or<02:16:02.119> more<02:16:02.360> subjects<02:16:02.840> when<02:16:02.920> you<02:16:03.040> think 02:16:03.189 --> 02:16:03.199 align:start position:0% have two or more subjects when you think 02:16:03.199 --> 02:16:04.950 align:start position:0% have two or more subjects when you think about<02:16:03.360> it<02:16:03.480> in<02:16:03.599> both<02:16:03.880> English<02:16:04.119> and<02:16:04.280> Spanish<02:16:04.840> we 02:16:04.950 --> 02:16:04.960 align:start position:0% about it in both English and Spanish we 02:16:04.960 --> 02:16:06.669 align:start position:0% about it in both English and Spanish we refer<02:16:05.280> to<02:16:05.440> each<02:16:05.559> other<02:16:05.920> whenever<02:16:06.239> we<02:16:06.360> speak<02:16:06.559> of 02:16:06.669 --> 02:16:06.679 align:start position:0% refer to each other whenever we speak of 02:16:06.679 --> 02:16:08.310 align:start position:0% refer to each other whenever we speak of two<02:16:06.840> or<02:16:07.000> more<02:16:07.199> subjects<02:16:07.719> so<02:16:07.840> we<02:16:07.960> logically 02:16:08.310 --> 02:16:08.320 align:start position:0% two or more subjects so we logically 02:16:08.320 --> 02:16:10.069 align:start position:0% two or more subjects so we logically don't<02:16:08.480> need<02:16:08.639> the<02:16:08.760> singular<02:16:09.199> pronouns<02:16:09.800> and<02:16:09.880> so 02:16:10.069 --> 02:16:10.079 align:start position:0% don't need the singular pronouns and so 02:16:10.079 --> 02:16:11.589 align:start position:0% don't need the singular pronouns and so we<02:16:10.199> only<02:16:10.400> have<02:16:10.520> to<02:16:10.679> work<02:16:11.000> with<02:16:11.119> the<02:16:11.239> plural 02:16:11.589 --> 02:16:11.599 align:start position:0% we only have to work with the plural 02:16:11.599 --> 02:16:13.390 align:start position:0% we only have to work with the plural pronouns<02:16:12.239> reciprocal<02:16:12.760> reflexives<02:16:13.239> in 02:16:13.390 --> 02:16:13.400 align:start position:0% pronouns reciprocal reflexives in 02:16:13.400 --> 02:16:15.109 align:start position:0% pronouns reciprocal reflexives in Spanish<02:16:13.960> Express<02:16:14.280> an<02:16:14.520> action<02:16:14.880> that's 02:16:15.109 --> 02:16:15.119 align:start position:0% Spanish Express an action that's 02:16:15.119 --> 02:16:17.109 align:start position:0% Spanish Express an action that's reciprocated<02:16:15.920> between<02:16:16.199> two<02:16:16.360> or<02:16:16.520> more<02:16:16.760> people 02:16:17.109 --> 02:16:17.119 align:start position:0% reciprocated between two or more people 02:16:17.119 --> 02:16:18.750 align:start position:0% reciprocated between two or more people and<02:16:17.239> they<02:16:17.320> work<02:16:17.760> similarly<02:16:18.199> to<02:16:18.360> regular 02:16:18.750 --> 02:16:18.760 align:start position:0% and they work similarly to regular 02:16:18.760 --> 02:16:20.229 align:start position:0% and they work similarly to regular reflexives<02:16:19.360> the<02:16:19.480> way<02:16:19.599> that<02:16:19.719> reciprocal 02:16:20.229 --> 02:16:20.239 align:start position:0% reflexives the way that reciprocal 02:16:20.239 --> 02:16:22.229 align:start position:0% reflexives the way that reciprocal reflexives<02:16:20.840> work<02:16:21.239> is<02:16:21.360> by<02:16:21.480> using<02:16:21.760> indirect 02:16:22.229 --> 02:16:22.239 align:start position:0% reflexives work is by using indirect 02:16:22.239 --> 02:16:24.350 align:start position:0% reflexives work is by using indirect object<02:16:22.559> pronouns<02:16:23.159> but<02:16:23.280> in<02:16:23.440> this<02:16:23.679> context<02:16:24.199> we 02:16:24.350 --> 02:16:24.360 align:start position:0% object pronouns but in this context we 02:16:24.360 --> 02:16:27.109 align:start position:0% object pronouns but in this context we only<02:16:24.559> need<02:16:24.800> the<02:16:24.920> plural<02:16:25.280> ones<02:16:25.760> like<02:16:26.079> No<02:16:26.480> And<02:16:26.760> SE 02:16:27.109 --> 02:16:27.119 align:start position:0% only need the plural ones like No And SE 02:16:27.119 --> 02:16:28.870 align:start position:0% only need the plural ones like No And SE which<02:16:27.239> are<02:16:27.440> the<02:16:27.559> most<02:16:27.719> used<02:16:28.000> ones<02:16:28.199> in<02:16:28.360> Spanish 02:16:28.870 --> 02:16:28.880 align:start position:0% which are the most used ones in Spanish 02:16:28.880 --> 02:16:30.310 align:start position:0% which are the most used ones in Spanish the<02:16:28.960> way<02:16:29.119> that<02:16:29.199> you<02:16:29.280> would<02:16:29.440> use<02:16:29.559> it<02:16:29.679> in<02:16:29.840> Spanish 02:16:30.310 --> 02:16:30.320 align:start position:0% the way that you would use it in Spanish 02:16:30.320 --> 02:16:31.950 align:start position:0% the way that you would use it in Spanish is<02:16:30.440> by<02:16:30.599> having<02:16:30.760> a<02:16:30.920> verb<02:16:31.280> that<02:16:31.400> can<02:16:31.520> be<02:16:31.639> used 02:16:31.950 --> 02:16:31.960 align:start position:0% is by having a verb that can be used 02:16:31.960 --> 02:16:34.309 align:start position:0% is by having a verb that can be used with<02:16:32.080> one<02:16:32.240> another<02:16:32.840> like<02:16:33.160> AUD<02:16:34.040> which<02:16:34.120> is<02:16:34.200> a 02:16:34.309 --> 02:16:34.319 align:start position:0% with one another like AUD which is a 02:16:34.319 --> 02:16:35.950 align:start position:0% with one another like AUD which is a common<02:16:34.599> verb<02:16:34.800> used<02:16:35.000> for<02:16:35.200> this<02:16:35.399> context 02:16:35.950 --> 02:16:35.960 align:start position:0% common verb used for this context 02:16:35.960 --> 02:16:37.429 align:start position:0% common verb used for this context meaning<02:16:36.240> to<02:16:36.399> help<02:16:36.599> each<02:16:36.719> other<02:16:37.080> since<02:16:37.240> we're 02:16:37.429 --> 02:16:37.439 align:start position:0% meaning to help each other since we're 02:16:37.439 --> 02:16:39.629 align:start position:0% meaning to help each other since we're only<02:16:37.679> working<02:16:38.000> with<02:16:38.200> pronouns<02:16:38.800> like<02:16:39.040> Nos<02:16:39.439> and 02:16:39.629 --> 02:16:39.639 align:start position:0% only working with pronouns like Nos and 02:16:39.639 --> 02:16:41.509 align:start position:0% only working with pronouns like Nos and SE<02:16:40.000> every<02:16:40.240> example<02:16:40.719> in<02:16:40.840> the<02:16:41.000> video<02:16:41.319> will 02:16:41.509 --> 02:16:41.519 align:start position:0% SE every example in the video will 02:16:41.519 --> 02:16:43.709 align:start position:0% SE every example in the video will utilize<02:16:42.040> the<02:16:42.200> we<02:16:42.479> and<02:16:42.719> they<02:16:42.920> pronouns<02:16:43.559> if<02:16:43.639> I 02:16:43.709 --> 02:16:43.719 align:start position:0% utilize the we and they pronouns if I 02:16:43.719 --> 02:16:45.349 align:start position:0% utilize the we and they pronouns if I were<02:16:43.880> to<02:16:44.000> use<02:16:44.240> this<02:16:44.399> verb<02:16:44.679> and<02:16:44.800> say<02:16:45.040> something 02:16:45.349 --> 02:16:45.359 align:start position:0% were to use this verb and say something 02:16:45.359 --> 02:16:48.349 align:start position:0% were to use this verb and say something like<02:16:45.679> noos<02:16:46.319> AUD<02:16:47.120> the<02:16:47.200> meaning<02:16:47.399> would<02:16:47.559> be<02:16:47.760> be<02:16:48.080> we 02:16:48.349 --> 02:16:48.359 align:start position:0% like noos AUD the meaning would be be we 02:16:48.359 --> 02:16:50.309 align:start position:0% like noos AUD the meaning would be be we help<02:16:48.920> however<02:16:49.240> if<02:16:49.359> we<02:16:49.479> want<02:16:49.599> to<02:16:49.760> reciprocate 02:16:50.309 --> 02:16:50.319 align:start position:0% help however if we want to reciprocate 02:16:50.319 --> 02:16:53.070 align:start position:0% help however if we want to reciprocate the<02:16:50.439> action<02:16:50.880> we<02:16:51.000> would<02:16:51.160> say<02:16:51.599> no<02:16:51.920> a<02:16:52.599> meaning<02:16:52.920> we 02:16:53.070 --> 02:16:53.080 align:start position:0% the action we would say no a meaning we 02:16:53.080 --> 02:16:54.589 align:start position:0% the action we would say no a meaning we help<02:16:53.359> each<02:16:53.519> other<02:16:53.840> and<02:16:53.920> it<02:16:54.040> doesn't<02:16:54.280> get<02:16:54.439> any 02:16:54.589 --> 02:16:54.599 align:start position:0% help each other and it doesn't get any 02:16:54.599 --> 02:16:56.070 align:start position:0% help each other and it doesn't get any more<02:16:55.000> difficult<02:16:55.160> than<02:16:55.359> this<02:16:55.679> the<02:16:55.840> same 02:16:56.070 --> 02:16:56.080 align:start position:0% more difficult than this the same 02:16:56.080 --> 02:16:57.750 align:start position:0% more difficult than this the same concept<02:16:56.439> can<02:16:56.559> be<02:16:56.719> applied<02:16:57.000> to<02:16:57.200> se<02:16:57.559> when<02:16:57.639> we 02:16:57.750 --> 02:16:57.760 align:start position:0% concept can be applied to se when we 02:16:57.760 --> 02:16:59.549 align:start position:0% concept can be applied to se when we know<02:16:57.960> who<02:16:58.120> the<02:16:58.240> subjects<02:16:58.599> are<02:16:58.840> using<02:16:59.120> the<02:16:59.240> verb 02:16:59.549 --> 02:16:59.559 align:start position:0% know who the subjects are using the verb 02:16:59.559 --> 02:17:02.230 align:start position:0% know who the subjects are using the verb abar<02:17:00.439> meaning<02:17:00.679> to<02:17:00.880> hug<02:17:01.080> each<02:17:01.200> other<02:17:01.599> I<02:17:01.679> can<02:17:01.880> say 02:17:02.230 --> 02:17:02.240 align:start position:0% abar meaning to hug each other I can say 02:17:02.240 --> 02:17:05.349 align:start position:0% abar meaning to hug each other I can say AOS<02:17:02.639> Aban<02:17:03.280> meaning<02:17:03.679> they<02:17:03.880> hug<02:17:04.200> but<02:17:04.319> saying<02:17:04.679> AOS 02:17:05.349 --> 02:17:05.359 align:start position:0% AOS Aban meaning they hug but saying AOS 02:17:05.359 --> 02:17:07.469 align:start position:0% AOS Aban meaning they hug but saying AOS Aban<02:17:06.000> means<02:17:06.359> they<02:17:06.519> hug<02:17:06.760> each<02:17:06.880> other<02:17:07.160> just<02:17:07.280> like 02:17:07.469 --> 02:17:07.479 align:start position:0% Aban means they hug each other just like 02:17:07.479 --> 02:17:09.270 align:start position:0% Aban means they hug each other just like regular<02:17:07.880> reflexive<02:17:08.359> verbs<02:17:08.760> reciprocal 02:17:09.270 --> 02:17:09.280 align:start position:0% regular reflexive verbs reciprocal 02:17:09.280 --> 02:17:11.070 align:start position:0% regular reflexive verbs reciprocal reflexives<02:17:09.880> can<02:17:10.040> function<02:17:10.439> like<02:17:10.639> any<02:17:10.840> other 02:17:11.070 --> 02:17:11.080 align:start position:0% reflexives can function like any other 02:17:11.080 --> 02:17:12.870 align:start position:0% reflexives can function like any other verb<02:17:11.399> both<02:17:11.679> in<02:17:11.800> the<02:17:11.880> present<02:17:12.200> progressive<02:17:12.760> in 02:17:12.870 --> 02:17:12.880 align:start position:0% verb both in the present progressive in 02:17:12.880 --> 02:17:14.629 align:start position:0% verb both in the present progressive in the<02:17:13.040> past<02:17:13.240> simple<02:17:13.559> saying<02:17:13.800> a<02:17:13.960> sentence<02:17:14.359> like 02:17:14.629 --> 02:17:14.639 align:start position:0% the past simple saying a sentence like 02:17:14.639 --> 02:17:18.190 align:start position:0% the past simple saying a sentence like EST<02:17:15.160> es<02:17:15.960> means<02:17:16.319> we<02:17:16.439> are<02:17:16.639> listening<02:17:17.160> but<02:17:17.319> no 02:17:18.190 --> 02:17:18.200 align:start position:0% EST es means we are listening but no 02:17:18.200 --> 02:17:20.750 align:start position:0% EST es means we are listening but no es<02:17:18.920> means<02:17:19.280> we<02:17:19.399> are<02:17:19.599> listening<02:17:20.000> to<02:17:20.200> each<02:17:20.319> other 02:17:20.750 --> 02:17:20.760 align:start position:0% es means we are listening to each other 02:17:20.760 --> 02:17:22.709 align:start position:0% es means we are listening to each other likewise<02:17:21.319> I<02:17:21.439> can<02:17:21.599> say 02:17:22.709 --> 02:17:22.719 align:start position:0% likewise I can say 02:17:22.719 --> 02:17:25.270 align:start position:0% likewise I can say jimos<02:17:23.719> which<02:17:23.840> means<02:17:24.160> JN<02:17:24.359> and<02:17:24.519> I<02:17:24.719> knew<02:17:25.120> but 02:17:25.270 --> 02:17:25.280 align:start position:0% jimos which means JN and I knew but 02:17:25.280 --> 02:17:28.750 align:start position:0% jimos which means JN and I knew but saying<02:17:25.679> J<02:17:26.359> noos<02:17:27.359> means<02:17:27.760> JN<02:17:28.000> and<02:17:28.160> I<02:17:28.359> knew<02:17:28.599> each 02:17:28.750 --> 02:17:28.760 align:start position:0% saying J noos means JN and I knew each 02:17:28.760 --> 02:17:30.110 align:start position:0% saying J noos means JN and I knew each other<02:17:29.080> even<02:17:29.319> though<02:17:29.599> the<02:17:29.760> topic<02:17:29.960> of 02:17:30.110 --> 02:17:30.120 align:start position:0% other even though the topic of 02:17:30.120 --> 02:17:31.830 align:start position:0% other even though the topic of reciprocal<02:17:30.599> reflexives<02:17:31.160> isn't<02:17:31.479> that<02:17:31.639> well 02:17:31.830 --> 02:17:31.840 align:start position:0% reciprocal reflexives isn't that well 02:17:31.840 --> 02:17:33.669 align:start position:0% reciprocal reflexives isn't that well known<02:17:32.200> it<02:17:32.319> does<02:17:32.479> have<02:17:32.599> a<02:17:32.679> useful<02:17:33.080> application 02:17:33.669 --> 02:17:33.679 align:start position:0% known it does have a useful application 02:17:33.679 --> 02:17:35.270 align:start position:0% known it does have a useful application in<02:17:33.840> many<02:17:34.080> sentences<02:17:34.679> and<02:17:34.800> some<02:17:34.920> of<02:17:35.040> the<02:17:35.120> most 02:17:35.270 --> 02:17:35.280 align:start position:0% in many sentences and some of the most 02:17:35.280 --> 02:17:37.870 align:start position:0% in many sentences and some of the most useful<02:17:35.639> reciprocal<02:17:36.120> reflexes<02:17:36.800> are 02:17:37.870 --> 02:17:37.880 align:start position:0% useful reciprocal reflexes are 02:17:37.880 --> 02:17:40.709 align:start position:0% useful reciprocal reflexes are Sal<02:17:38.880> and<02:17:39.519> the<02:17:39.599> biggest<02:17:39.840> tip<02:17:40.080> that<02:17:40.240> I<02:17:40.319> can<02:17:40.519> give 02:17:40.709 --> 02:17:40.719 align:start position:0% Sal and the biggest tip that I can give 02:17:40.719 --> 02:17:42.669 align:start position:0% Sal and the biggest tip that I can give to<02:17:40.920> remember<02:17:41.240> reciprocal<02:17:41.800> reflexes<02:17:42.439> is<02:17:42.519> that 02:17:42.669 --> 02:17:42.679 align:start position:0% to remember reciprocal reflexes is that 02:17:42.679 --> 02:17:44.750 align:start position:0% to remember reciprocal reflexes is that whenever<02:17:42.920> you<02:17:43.040> see<02:17:43.399> say<02:17:43.800> after<02:17:44.000> a<02:17:44.200> verb<02:17:44.599> it 02:17:44.750 --> 02:17:44.760 align:start position:0% whenever you see say after a verb it 02:17:44.760 --> 02:17:46.070 align:start position:0% whenever you see say after a verb it always<02:17:45.000> means<02:17:45.359> that<02:17:45.479> the<02:17:45.559> verb<02:17:45.800> has<02:17:45.920> a 02:17:46.070 --> 02:17:46.080 align:start position:0% always means that the verb has a 02:17:46.080 --> 02:17:48.190 align:start position:0% always means that the verb has a preposition<02:17:46.639> or<02:17:46.800> a<02:17:46.920> continuation<02:17:47.719> after<02:17:47.960> it 02:17:48.190 --> 02:17:48.200 align:start position:0% preposition or a continuation after it 02:17:48.200 --> 02:17:51.910 align:start position:0% preposition or a continuation after it in<02:17:48.359> this<02:17:48.559> case<02:17:49.000> Salud<02:17:49.840> and<02:17:50.040> cont<02:17:50.840> and<02:17:51.200> ver<02:17:51.719> all 02:17:51.910 --> 02:17:51.920 align:start position:0% in this case Salud and cont and ver all 02:17:51.920 --> 02:17:53.549 align:start position:0% in this case Salud and cont and ver all have<02:17:52.120> their<02:17:52.319> definitions<02:17:53.040> but<02:17:53.120> they<02:17:53.240> gain<02:17:53.439> a 02:17:53.549 --> 02:17:53.559 align:start position:0% have their definitions but they gain a 02:17:53.559 --> 02:17:55.750 align:start position:0% have their definitions but they gain a different<02:17:53.840> definition<02:17:54.519> once<02:17:54.960> say<02:17:55.319> is<02:17:55.479> inside 02:17:55.750 --> 02:17:55.760 align:start position:0% different definition once say is inside 02:17:55.760 --> 02:17:57.469 align:start position:0% different definition once say is inside the<02:17:55.880> verb<02:17:56.200> if<02:17:56.280> you<02:17:56.439> really<02:17:56.639> want<02:17:56.840> to<02:17:57.200> you<02:17:57.319> can 02:17:57.469 --> 02:17:57.479 align:start position:0% the verb if you really want to you can 02:17:57.479 --> 02:17:59.150 align:start position:0% the verb if you really want to you can technically<02:17:57.840> use<02:17:58.080> any<02:17:58.280> verb<02:17:58.519> in<02:17:58.639> Spanish<02:17:59.040> and 02:17:59.150 --> 02:17:59.160 align:start position:0% technically use any verb in Spanish and 02:17:59.160 --> 02:18:00.669 align:start position:0% technically use any verb in Spanish and make<02:17:59.280> it<02:17:59.439> reciprocal<02:18:00.120> as<02:18:00.240> long<02:18:00.359> as<02:18:00.519> the 02:18:00.669 --> 02:18:00.679 align:start position:0% make it reciprocal as long as the 02:18:00.679 --> 02:18:02.429 align:start position:0% make it reciprocal as long as the context<02:18:01.200> makes<02:18:01.479> sense<02:18:01.880> with<02:18:02.000> the<02:18:02.120> inclusion 02:18:02.429 --> 02:18:02.439 align:start position:0% context makes sense with the inclusion 02:18:02.439 --> 02:18:04.070 align:start position:0% context makes sense with the inclusion of<02:18:02.559> two<02:18:02.719> or<02:18:02.840> more<02:18:03.000> people<02:18:03.319> for<02:18:03.599> instance 02:18:04.070 --> 02:18:04.080 align:start position:0% of two or more people for instance 02:18:04.080 --> 02:18:06.469 align:start position:0% of two or more people for instance saying<02:18:04.359> a<02:18:04.519> sentence<02:18:04.920> like<02:18:05.200> Los<02:18:05.439> Amigos<02:18:05.840> Salon 02:18:06.469 --> 02:18:06.479 align:start position:0% saying a sentence like Los Amigos Salon 02:18:06.479 --> 02:18:08.150 align:start position:0% saying a sentence like Los Amigos Salon means<02:18:06.800> the<02:18:06.920> friends<02:18:07.319> greeted<02:18:07.880> but<02:18:07.960> if<02:18:08.080> you 02:18:08.150 --> 02:18:08.160 align:start position:0% means the friends greeted but if you 02:18:08.160 --> 02:18:10.629 align:start position:0% means the friends greeted but if you were<02:18:08.359> to<02:18:08.519> say<02:18:08.800> Los<02:18:09.000> Amigos<02:18:09.559> say<02:18:09.760> Salon<02:18:10.519> this 02:18:10.629 --> 02:18:10.639 align:start position:0% were to say Los Amigos say Salon this 02:18:10.639 --> 02:18:12.110 align:start position:0% were to say Los Amigos say Salon this would<02:18:10.800> mean<02:18:11.120> the<02:18:11.240> friends<02:18:11.599> greeted<02:18:12.000> each 02:18:12.110 --> 02:18:12.120 align:start position:0% would mean the friends greeted each 02:18:12.120 --> 02:18:14.190 align:start position:0% would mean the friends greeted each other<02:18:12.519> similarly<02:18:13.160> you<02:18:13.240> can<02:18:13.359> use<02:18:13.559> two<02:18:13.760> verbs<02:18:14.040> in 02:18:14.190 --> 02:18:14.200 align:start position:0% other similarly you can use two verbs in 02:18:14.200 --> 02:18:16.509 align:start position:0% other similarly you can use two verbs in one<02:18:14.439> sentence 02:18:16.509 --> 02:18:16.519 align:start position:0% one sentence 02:18:16.519 --> 02:18:19.230 align:start position:0% one sentence like<02:18:17.599> know<02:18:17.800> vimos<02:18:18.319> meaning<02:18:18.599> we<02:18:18.760> encountered 02:18:19.230 --> 02:18:19.240 align:start position:0% like know vimos meaning we encountered 02:18:19.240 --> 02:18:21.030 align:start position:0% like know vimos meaning we encountered each<02:18:19.399> other<02:18:19.719> in<02:18:19.840> the<02:18:20.000> cinema<02:18:20.519> when<02:18:20.679> we<02:18:20.800> saw 02:18:21.030 --> 02:18:21.040 align:start position:0% each other in the cinema when we saw 02:18:21.040 --> 02:18:22.669 align:start position:0% each other in the cinema when we saw each<02:18:21.160> other<02:18:21.479> and<02:18:21.559> in<02:18:21.719> this<02:18:21.920> context<02:18:22.399> we<02:18:22.519> know 02:18:22.669 --> 02:18:22.679 align:start position:0% each other and in this context we know 02:18:22.679 --> 02:18:24.750 align:start position:0% each other and in this context we know that<02:18:22.880> encontr<02:18:23.719> is<02:18:23.800> in<02:18:23.960> the<02:18:24.160> past<02:18:24.479> because 02:18:24.750 --> 02:18:24.760 align:start position:0% that encontr is in the past because 02:18:24.760 --> 02:18:26.709 align:start position:0% that encontr is in the past because vimos<02:18:25.160> is<02:18:25.280> in<02:18:25.399> the<02:18:25.599> past<02:18:25.800> form<02:18:26.000> too<02:18:26.359> and<02:18:26.559> as 02:18:26.709 --> 02:18:26.719 align:start position:0% vimos is in the past form too and as 02:18:26.719 --> 02:18:28.589 align:start position:0% vimos is in the past form too and as always<02:18:27.200> it's<02:18:27.399> up<02:18:27.559> to<02:18:27.679> you<02:18:27.960> to<02:18:28.080> say<02:18:28.359> any 02:18:28.589 --> 02:18:28.599 align:start position:0% always it's up to you to say any 02:18:28.599 --> 02:18:30.270 align:start position:0% always it's up to you to say any sentence<02:18:29.040> that<02:18:29.160> you<02:18:29.240> want<02:18:29.519> using<02:18:29.800> reciprocal 02:18:30.270 --> 02:18:30.280 align:start position:0% sentence that you want using reciprocal 02:18:30.280 --> 02:18:31.990 align:start position:0% sentence that you want using reciprocal reflexives<02:18:30.880> in<02:18:31.000> Spanish<02:18:31.479> the<02:18:31.599> imperfect 02:18:31.990 --> 02:18:32.000 align:start position:0% reflexives in Spanish the imperfect 02:18:32.000 --> 02:18:33.709 align:start position:0% reflexives in Spanish the imperfect tense<02:18:32.240> in<02:18:32.399> Spanish<02:18:32.800> is<02:18:32.920> a<02:18:33.040> form<02:18:33.200> of<02:18:33.319> the<02:18:33.479> past 02:18:33.709 --> 02:18:33.719 align:start position:0% tense in Spanish is a form of the past 02:18:33.719 --> 02:18:35.790 align:start position:0% tense in Spanish is a form of the past tense<02:18:34.080> used<02:18:34.359> to<02:18:34.479> indicate<02:18:35.000> actions<02:18:35.439> that<02:18:35.599> used 02:18:35.790 --> 02:18:35.800 align:start position:0% tense used to indicate actions that used 02:18:35.800 --> 02:18:37.950 align:start position:0% tense used to indicate actions that used to<02:18:36.000> happen<02:18:36.359> or<02:18:36.519> were<02:18:36.800> happening<02:18:37.200> in<02:18:37.319> the<02:18:37.519> past 02:18:37.950 --> 02:18:37.960 align:start position:0% to happen or were happening in the past 02:18:37.960 --> 02:18:39.549 align:start position:0% to happen or were happening in the past what<02:18:38.080> makes<02:18:38.399> this<02:18:38.559> tense<02:18:38.960> the<02:18:39.080> easiest<02:18:39.439> to 02:18:39.549 --> 02:18:39.559 align:start position:0% what makes this tense the easiest to 02:18:39.559 --> 02:18:41.150 align:start position:0% what makes this tense the easiest to memorize<02:18:39.960> in<02:18:40.120> Spanish<02:18:40.599> is<02:18:40.719> that<02:18:40.840> it's<02:18:41.000> only 02:18:41.150 --> 02:18:41.160 align:start position:0% memorize in Spanish is that it's only 02:18:41.160 --> 02:18:42.950 align:start position:0% memorize in Spanish is that it's only modifyed<02:18:41.639> two<02:18:41.840> ways<02:18:42.240> without<02:18:42.519> having<02:18:42.760> any 02:18:42.950 --> 02:18:42.960 align:start position:0% modifyed two ways without having any 02:18:42.960 --> 02:18:44.790 align:start position:0% modifyed two ways without having any irregular<02:18:43.439> y<02:18:43.719> verbs<02:18:44.040> or<02:18:44.160> stem<02:18:44.439> changing 02:18:44.790 --> 02:18:44.800 align:start position:0% irregular y verbs or stem changing 02:18:44.800 --> 02:18:46.509 align:start position:0% irregular y verbs or stem changing patterns<02:18:45.359> aside<02:18:45.639> from<02:18:45.800> three<02:18:46.040> completely 02:18:46.509 --> 02:18:46.519 align:start position:0% patterns aside from three completely 02:18:46.519 --> 02:18:48.469 align:start position:0% patterns aside from three completely irregular<02:18:47.000> ones<02:18:47.679> however<02:18:47.920> it's<02:18:48.080> important<02:18:48.399> to 02:18:48.469 --> 02:18:48.479 align:start position:0% irregular ones however it's important to 02:18:48.479 --> 02:18:50.190 align:start position:0% irregular ones however it's important to not<02:18:48.679> confuse<02:18:49.000> the<02:18:49.160> past<02:18:49.359> imperfect<02:18:49.920> with<02:18:50.040> the 02:18:50.190 --> 02:18:50.200 align:start position:0% not confuse the past imperfect with the 02:18:50.200 --> 02:18:51.549 align:start position:0% not confuse the past imperfect with the past<02:18:50.399> simple<02:18:50.840> because<02:18:51.040> the<02:18:51.160> two<02:18:51.280> of<02:18:51.399> them 02:18:51.549 --> 02:18:51.559 align:start position:0% past simple because the two of them 02:18:51.559 --> 02:18:53.270 align:start position:0% past simple because the two of them generate<02:18:51.960> different<02:18:52.160> meanings<02:18:52.519> in<02:18:52.719> context 02:18:53.270 --> 02:18:53.280 align:start position:0% generate different meanings in context 02:18:53.280 --> 02:18:54.910 align:start position:0% generate different meanings in context in<02:18:53.399> my<02:18:53.599> video<02:18:53.920> where<02:18:54.160> I<02:18:54.319> talked<02:18:54.559> about<02:18:54.719> the 02:18:54.910 --> 02:18:54.920 align:start position:0% in my video where I talked about the 02:18:54.920 --> 02:18:56.950 align:start position:0% in my video where I talked about the past<02:18:55.080> simple<02:18:55.399> tense<02:18:55.880> included<02:18:56.319> examples<02:18:56.760> of 02:18:56.950 --> 02:18:56.960 align:start position:0% past simple tense included examples of 02:18:56.960 --> 02:18:58.549 align:start position:0% past simple tense included examples of actions<02:18:57.240> that<02:18:57.359> simply<02:18:57.679> happened<02:18:57.960> in<02:18:58.080> the<02:18:58.240> past 02:18:58.549 --> 02:18:58.559 align:start position:0% actions that simply happened in the past 02:18:58.559 --> 02:19:00.709 align:start position:0% actions that simply happened in the past hence<02:18:58.760> the<02:18:58.880> name<02:18:59.280> past<02:18:59.519> simple<02:18:59.880> the<02:19:00.040> imperfect 02:19:00.709 --> 02:19:00.719 align:start position:0% hence the name past simple the imperfect 02:19:00.719 --> 02:19:02.429 align:start position:0% hence the name past simple the imperfect also<02:19:00.880> known<02:19:01.120> as<02:19:01.240> the<02:19:01.439> past<02:19:01.679> imperfect<02:19:02.240> is<02:19:02.319> a 02:19:02.429 --> 02:19:02.439 align:start position:0% also known as the past imperfect is a 02:19:02.439 --> 02:19:04.190 align:start position:0% also known as the past imperfect is a tense<02:19:02.679> that<02:19:02.800> has<02:19:02.960> two<02:19:03.160> explanations<02:19:03.880> meaning 02:19:04.190 --> 02:19:04.200 align:start position:0% tense that has two explanations meaning 02:19:04.200 --> 02:19:06.150 align:start position:0% tense that has two explanations meaning used<02:19:04.399> to<02:19:04.639> happen<02:19:05.000> or<02:19:05.240> was<02:19:05.479> happening<02:19:05.880> in<02:19:06.000> the 02:19:06.150 --> 02:19:06.160 align:start position:0% used to happen or was happening in the 02:19:06.160 --> 02:19:07.910 align:start position:0% used to happen or was happening in the past<02:19:06.479> and<02:19:06.559> I'm<02:19:06.719> putting<02:19:06.920> a<02:19:07.080> big<02:19:07.280> emphasis<02:19:07.760> on 02:19:07.910 --> 02:19:07.920 align:start position:0% past and I'm putting a big emphasis on 02:19:07.920 --> 02:19:09.429 align:start position:0% past and I'm putting a big emphasis on the<02:19:08.000> meaning<02:19:08.359> was<02:19:08.639> happening<02:19:09.120> because<02:19:09.319> it's 02:19:09.429 --> 02:19:09.439 align:start position:0% the meaning was happening because it's 02:19:09.439 --> 02:19:11.110 align:start position:0% the meaning was happening because it's more<02:19:09.559> of<02:19:09.679> an<02:19:09.880> accurate<02:19:10.280> translation<02:19:10.960> once 02:19:11.110 --> 02:19:11.120 align:start position:0% more of an accurate translation once 02:19:11.120 --> 02:19:12.469 align:start position:0% more of an accurate translation once it's<02:19:11.240> put<02:19:11.439> in<02:19:11.599> English<02:19:12.000> and<02:19:12.080> it's<02:19:12.280> the 02:19:12.469 --> 02:19:12.479 align:start position:0% it's put in English and it's the 02:19:12.479 --> 02:19:14.190 align:start position:0% it's put in English and it's the definition<02:19:13.000> that<02:19:13.160> most<02:19:13.319> teachers<02:19:13.760> don't<02:19:14.000> talk 02:19:14.190 --> 02:19:14.200 align:start position:0% definition that most teachers don't talk 02:19:14.200 --> 02:19:16.110 align:start position:0% definition that most teachers don't talk about<02:19:14.559> as<02:19:14.639> I<02:19:14.760> said<02:19:14.960> again<02:19:15.280> the<02:19:15.439> past<02:19:15.639> imperfect 02:19:16.110 --> 02:19:16.120 align:start position:0% about as I said again the past imperfect 02:19:16.120 --> 02:19:17.830 align:start position:0% about as I said again the past imperfect tense<02:19:16.439> is<02:19:16.559> the<02:19:16.679> simplest<02:19:16.960> one<02:19:17.120> in<02:19:17.240> Spanish 02:19:17.830 --> 02:19:17.840 align:start position:0% tense is the simplest one in Spanish 02:19:17.840 --> 02:19:19.230 align:start position:0% tense is the simplest one in Spanish because<02:19:18.040> it<02:19:18.160> only<02:19:18.359> has<02:19:18.519> two<02:19:18.719> conjugation 02:19:19.230 --> 02:19:19.240 align:start position:0% because it only has two conjugation 02:19:19.240 --> 02:19:22.750 align:start position:0% because it only has two conjugation patterns<02:19:19.760> with<02:19:19.960> a<02:19:20.120> r<02:19:20.519> and<02:19:20.719> e<02:19:20.920> r/<02:19:21.639> i<02:19:22.080> verbs<02:19:22.559> let's 02:19:22.750 --> 02:19:22.760 align:start position:0% patterns with a r and e r/ i verbs let's 02:19:22.760 --> 02:19:24.509 align:start position:0% patterns with a r and e r/ i verbs let's start<02:19:23.120> with<02:19:23.240> verbs<02:19:23.519> ending<02:19:23.760> in<02:19:23.920> a<02:19:24.080> r<02:19:24.359> to 02:19:24.509 --> 02:19:24.519 align:start position:0% start with verbs ending in a r to 02:19:24.519 --> 02:19:26.270 align:start position:0% start with verbs ending in a r to conjugate<02:19:24.960> this<02:19:25.120> verb<02:19:25.319> in<02:19:25.479> the<02:19:25.559> Y<02:19:25.800> pronoun<02:19:26.200> you 02:19:26.270 --> 02:19:26.280 align:start position:0% conjugate this verb in the Y pronoun you 02:19:26.280 --> 02:19:28.030 align:start position:0% conjugate this verb in the Y pronoun you drop<02:19:26.559> the<02:19:26.639> ending<02:19:26.880> of<02:19:27.000> the<02:19:27.120> verb<02:19:27.479> and<02:19:27.559> you<02:19:27.679> get 02:19:28.030 --> 02:19:28.040 align:start position:0% drop the ending of the verb and you get 02:19:28.040 --> 02:19:31.110 align:start position:0% drop the ending of the verb and you get ABA<02:19:28.439> for<02:19:28.639> two<02:19:29.080> you<02:19:29.240> get<02:19:29.599> abas<02:19:30.160> for<02:19:30.359> L<02:19:30.719> you<02:19:30.840> also 02:19:31.110 --> 02:19:31.120 align:start position:0% ABA for two you get abas for L you also 02:19:31.120 --> 02:19:33.030 align:start position:0% ABA for two you get abas for L you also get<02:19:31.359> ABA<02:19:31.760> and<02:19:31.840> it's<02:19:32.040> the<02:19:32.160> same<02:19:32.359> ending<02:19:32.760> as<02:19:32.880> with 02:19:33.030 --> 02:19:33.040 align:start position:0% get ABA and it's the same ending as with 02:19:33.040 --> 02:19:34.589 align:start position:0% get ABA and it's the same ending as with the<02:19:33.160> Y<02:19:33.359> pronoun<02:19:33.800> so<02:19:33.920> you<02:19:34.000> can<02:19:34.120> only<02:19:34.280> tell<02:19:34.479> the 02:19:34.589 --> 02:19:34.599 align:start position:0% the Y pronoun so you can only tell the 02:19:34.599 --> 02:19:36.429 align:start position:0% the Y pronoun so you can only tell the difference<02:19:34.880> between<02:19:35.200> them<02:19:35.399> in<02:19:35.639> context<02:19:36.200> for 02:19:36.429 --> 02:19:36.439 align:start position:0% difference between them in context for 02:19:36.439 --> 02:19:38.910 align:start position:0% difference between them in context for noos<02:19:37.240> you<02:19:37.439> get<02:19:37.719> abamos<02:19:38.319> and<02:19:38.439> we<02:19:38.559> have<02:19:38.639> to<02:19:38.760> put 02:19:38.910 --> 02:19:38.920 align:start position:0% noos you get abamos and we have to put 02:19:38.920 --> 02:19:40.870 align:start position:0% noos you get abamos and we have to put an<02:19:39.120> accent<02:19:39.439> on<02:19:39.599> the<02:19:39.719> first<02:19:40.040> a<02:19:40.439> because<02:19:40.639> we<02:19:40.760> have 02:19:40.870 --> 02:19:40.880 align:start position:0% an accent on the first a because we have 02:19:40.880 --> 02:19:42.509 align:start position:0% an accent on the first a because we have to<02:19:41.000> maintain<02:19:41.359> the<02:19:41.519> sound<02:19:41.760> of<02:19:41.880> the<02:19:42.000> word<02:19:42.280> for 02:19:42.509 --> 02:19:42.519 align:start position:0% to maintain the sound of the word for 02:19:42.519 --> 02:19:45.509 align:start position:0% to maintain the sound of the word for Vos<02:19:43.160> you<02:19:43.319> get<02:19:43.599> ab<02:19:44.080> and<02:19:44.200> for<02:19:44.399> AOS<02:19:44.800> you<02:19:44.920> get<02:19:45.160> Aban 02:19:45.509 --> 02:19:45.519 align:start position:0% Vos you get ab and for AOS you get Aban 02:19:45.519 --> 02:19:47.469 align:start position:0% Vos you get ab and for AOS you get Aban let's<02:19:45.679> take<02:19:45.840> the<02:19:45.960> verb<02:19:46.200> abl<02:19:46.760> as<02:19:46.880> an<02:19:47.040> example 02:19:47.469 --> 02:19:47.479 align:start position:0% let's take the verb abl as an example 02:19:47.479 --> 02:19:48.750 align:start position:0% let's take the verb abl as an example how<02:19:47.599> would<02:19:47.719> you<02:19:47.840> conjugate<02:19:48.280> it<02:19:48.479> in<02:19:48.599> the 02:19:48.750 --> 02:19:48.760 align:start position:0% how would you conjugate it in the 02:19:48.760 --> 02:19:50.550 align:start position:0% how would you conjugate it in the imperfect<02:19:49.280> for<02:19:49.439> the<02:19:49.600> yo<02:19:49.800> pronoun<02:19:50.200> you<02:19:50.359> take 02:19:50.550 --> 02:19:50.560 align:start position:0% imperfect for the yo pronoun you take 02:19:50.560 --> 02:19:53.510 align:start position:0% imperfect for the yo pronoun you take abl<02:19:51.080> drop<02:19:51.359> the<02:19:51.479> ending<02:19:52.000> and<02:19:52.200> get<02:19:52.479> yo<02:19:52.800> abla<02:19:53.359> and 02:19:53.510 --> 02:19:53.520 align:start position:0% abl drop the ending and get yo abla and 02:19:53.520 --> 02:19:55.670 align:start position:0% abl drop the ending and get yo abla and this<02:19:53.640> phrase<02:19:53.920> means<02:19:54.319> I<02:19:54.479> used<02:19:54.720> to<02:19:54.920> speak<02:19:55.240> or<02:19:55.560> I 02:19:55.670 --> 02:19:55.680 align:start position:0% this phrase means I used to speak or I 02:19:55.680 --> 02:19:57.190 align:start position:0% this phrase means I used to speak or I was<02:19:55.880> speaking<02:19:56.359> and<02:19:56.479> I'll<02:19:56.680> actually<02:19:56.920> get<02:19:57.040> to 02:19:57.190 --> 02:19:57.200 align:start position:0% was speaking and I'll actually get to 02:19:57.200 --> 02:19:58.990 align:start position:0% was speaking and I'll actually get to this<02:19:57.399> structure<02:19:57.920> later<02:19:58.200> in<02:19:58.319> the<02:19:58.439> video<02:19:58.760> for 02:19:58.990 --> 02:19:59.000 align:start position:0% this structure later in the video for 02:19:59.000 --> 02:20:02.510 align:start position:0% this structure later in the video for two<02:19:59.439> you<02:19:59.600> get<02:19:59.880> aabas<02:20:00.680> for<02:20:00.920> L<02:20:01.359> you<02:20:01.560> get<02:20:01.760> abla<02:20:02.439> and 02:20:02.510 --> 02:20:02.520 align:start position:0% two you get aabas for L you get abla and 02:20:02.520 --> 02:20:03.910 align:start position:0% two you get aabas for L you get abla and you<02:20:02.640> have<02:20:02.760> to<02:20:02.880> put<02:20:03.040> the<02:20:03.120> pronoun<02:20:03.560> before<02:20:03.800> the 02:20:03.910 --> 02:20:03.920 align:start position:0% you have to put the pronoun before the 02:20:03.920 --> 02:20:06.510 align:start position:0% you have to put the pronoun before the verb<02:20:04.160> to<02:20:04.319> not<02:20:04.520> confuse<02:20:04.840> it<02:20:05.080> with<02:20:05.319> Y<02:20:05.600> for<02:20:05.800> noos 02:20:06.510 --> 02:20:06.520 align:start position:0% verb to not confuse it with Y for noos 02:20:06.520 --> 02:20:08.270 align:start position:0% verb to not confuse it with Y for noos you<02:20:06.680> get 02:20:08.270 --> 02:20:08.280 align:start position:0% you get 02:20:08.280 --> 02:20:11.550 align:start position:0% you get AOS<02:20:09.280> and<02:20:09.520> AOS<02:20:10.520> try<02:20:10.680> not<02:20:10.880> concentrating<02:20:11.399> on 02:20:11.550 --> 02:20:11.560 align:start position:0% AOS and AOS try not concentrating on 02:20:11.560 --> 02:20:12.990 align:start position:0% AOS and AOS try not concentrating on these<02:20:11.760> pronouns<02:20:12.280> because<02:20:12.479> they're<02:20:12.640> the<02:20:12.760> least 02:20:12.990 --> 02:20:13.000 align:start position:0% these pronouns because they're the least 02:20:13.000 --> 02:20:14.950 align:start position:0% these pronouns because they're the least used<02:20:13.319> ones<02:20:13.479> in<02:20:13.680> conversation<02:20:14.319> if<02:20:14.479> anything 02:20:14.950 --> 02:20:14.960 align:start position:0% used ones in conversation if anything 02:20:14.960 --> 02:20:16.349 align:start position:0% used ones in conversation if anything you<02:20:15.040> should<02:20:15.240> only<02:20:15.479> know<02:20:15.680> how<02:20:15.800> to<02:20:15.960> conjugate 02:20:16.349 --> 02:20:16.359 align:start position:0% you should only know how to conjugate 02:20:16.359 --> 02:20:17.429 align:start position:0% you should only know how to conjugate them<02:20:16.520> and<02:20:16.600> the<02:20:16.720> best<02:20:16.880> thing<02:20:17.000> about<02:20:17.160> this 02:20:17.429 --> 02:20:17.439 align:start position:0% them and the best thing about this 02:20:17.439 --> 02:20:18.790 align:start position:0% them and the best thing about this conjugation<02:20:17.880> pattern<02:20:18.240> is<02:20:18.359> that<02:20:18.479> it's<02:20:18.680> the 02:20:18.790 --> 02:20:18.800 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern is that it's the 02:20:18.800 --> 02:20:20.870 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern is that it's the same<02:20:19.120> across<02:20:19.560> every<02:20:19.840> AR<02:20:20.240> verb<02:20:20.479> there<02:20:20.600> is<02:20:20.720> in 02:20:20.870 --> 02:20:20.880 align:start position:0% same across every AR verb there is in 02:20:20.880 --> 02:20:22.309 align:start position:0% same across every AR verb there is in Spanish<02:20:21.319> there<02:20:21.439> is<02:20:21.560> no<02:20:21.680> ST<02:20:21.960> changing 02:20:22.309 --> 02:20:22.319 align:start position:0% Spanish there is no ST changing 02:20:22.319 --> 02:20:23.750 align:start position:0% Spanish there is no ST changing irregular<02:20:22.840> y<02:20:23.040> verbs<02:20:23.319> which<02:20:23.439> makes<02:20:23.640> the 02:20:23.750 --> 02:20:23.760 align:start position:0% irregular y verbs which makes the 02:20:23.760 --> 02:20:25.590 align:start position:0% irregular y verbs which makes the imperfect<02:20:24.160> tense<02:20:24.479> very<02:20:24.720> convenient<02:20:25.359> and<02:20:25.439> it's 02:20:25.590 --> 02:20:25.600 align:start position:0% imperfect tense very convenient and it's 02:20:25.600 --> 02:20:27.429 align:start position:0% imperfect tense very convenient and it's the<02:20:25.720> same<02:20:25.920> thing<02:20:26.200> with<02:20:26.359> verbs<02:20:26.600> ending<02:20:26.840> in<02:20:27.000> e<02:20:27.160> r 02:20:27.429 --> 02:20:27.439 align:start position:0% the same thing with verbs ending in e r 02:20:27.439 --> 02:20:29.230 align:start position:0% the same thing with verbs ending in e r and<02:20:27.680> IR<02:20:28.319> however<02:20:28.600> they<02:20:28.720> have<02:20:28.840> a<02:20:28.960> different 02:20:29.230 --> 02:20:29.240 align:start position:0% and IR however they have a different 02:20:29.240 --> 02:20:31.910 align:start position:0% and IR however they have a different pattern<02:20:29.520> than<02:20:29.680> a<02:20:30.040> verbs<02:20:30.439> but<02:20:30.640> both<02:20:30.880> e<02:20:31.080> r<02:20:31.359> and<02:20:31.560> ir 02:20:31.910 --> 02:20:31.920 align:start position:0% pattern than a verbs but both e r and ir 02:20:31.920 --> 02:20:33.750 align:start position:0% pattern than a verbs but both e r and ir verbs<02:20:32.240> share<02:20:32.560> the<02:20:32.680> same<02:20:32.880> pattern<02:20:33.160> for<02:20:33.399> the<02:20:33.520> Y 02:20:33.750 --> 02:20:33.760 align:start position:0% verbs share the same pattern for the Y 02:20:33.760 --> 02:20:35.550 align:start position:0% verbs share the same pattern for the Y pronoun<02:20:34.160> you<02:20:34.280> drop<02:20:34.600> the<02:20:34.680> ending<02:20:34.920> of<02:20:35.080> the<02:20:35.200> verb 02:20:35.550 --> 02:20:35.560 align:start position:0% pronoun you drop the ending of the verb 02:20:35.560 --> 02:20:39.750 align:start position:0% pronoun you drop the ending of the verb and<02:20:35.760> put<02:20:36.600> for<02:20:36.880> two<02:20:37.359> you<02:20:37.640> putas<02:20:38.640> for<02:20:38.880> L<02:20:39.319> you<02:20:39.479> also 02:20:39.750 --> 02:20:39.760 align:start position:0% and put for two you putas for L you also 02:20:39.760 --> 02:20:41.830 align:start position:0% and put for two you putas for L you also get<02:20:40.439> and<02:20:40.560> don't<02:20:40.800> confuse<02:20:41.120> it<02:20:41.399> with<02:20:41.520> the<02:20:41.640> your 02:20:41.830 --> 02:20:41.840 align:start position:0% get and don't confuse it with the your 02:20:41.840 --> 02:20:45.469 align:start position:0% get and don't confuse it with the your pronoun<02:20:42.120> in<02:20:42.359> context<02:20:42.920> for<02:20:43.160> noos<02:20:43.880> you<02:20:44.120> getos 02:20:45.469 --> 02:20:45.479 align:start position:0% pronoun in context for noos you getos 02:20:45.479 --> 02:20:49.590 align:start position:0% pronoun in context for noos you getos Vos<02:20:46.479> and<02:20:46.720> AOS<02:20:47.680> taking<02:20:47.920> the<02:20:48.040> verbs<02:20:48.760> and<02:20:49.359> as 02:20:49.590 --> 02:20:49.600 align:start position:0% Vos and AOS taking the verbs and as 02:20:49.600 --> 02:20:51.030 align:start position:0% Vos and AOS taking the verbs and as examples<02:20:50.200> how<02:20:50.319> would<02:20:50.439> you<02:20:50.560> conjugate<02:20:50.960> the 02:20:51.030 --> 02:20:51.040 align:start position:0% examples how would you conjugate the 02:20:51.040 --> 02:20:53.030 align:start position:0% examples how would you conjugate the verb<02:20:51.280> K<02:20:51.680> in<02:20:51.800> the<02:20:51.960> imperfect<02:20:52.479> for<02:20:52.640> the<02:20:52.800> yo 02:20:53.030 --> 02:20:53.040 align:start position:0% verb K in the imperfect for the yo 02:20:53.040 --> 02:20:55.590 align:start position:0% verb K in the imperfect for the yo pronoun<02:20:53.520> you<02:20:53.680> take<02:20:54.319> drop<02:20:54.600> the<02:20:54.680> ending<02:20:55.280> and<02:20:55.439> put 02:20:55.590 --> 02:20:55.600 align:start position:0% pronoun you take drop the ending and put 02:20:55.600 --> 02:20:58.990 align:start position:0% pronoun you take drop the ending and put the<02:20:55.720> ending<02:20:56.720> so<02:20:56.880> you<02:20:57.080> get<02:20:57.479> yo<02:20:58.319> meaning<02:20:58.640> I<02:20:58.760> used 02:20:58.990 --> 02:20:59.000 align:start position:0% the ending so you get yo meaning I used 02:20:59.000 --> 02:21:01.230 align:start position:0% the ending so you get yo meaning I used to<02:20:59.160> eat<02:20:59.479> or<02:20:59.680> I<02:20:59.840> was<02:21:00.000> eating<02:21:00.439> I<02:21:00.560> was<02:21:00.760> eating<02:21:01.120> is 02:21:01.230 --> 02:21:01.240 align:start position:0% to eat or I was eating I was eating is 02:21:01.240 --> 02:21:02.870 align:start position:0% to eat or I was eating I was eating is more<02:21:01.359> of<02:21:01.479> an<02:21:01.680> accurate<02:21:02.080> definition<02:21:02.640> and<02:21:02.720> I'll 02:21:02.870 --> 02:21:02.880 align:start position:0% more of an accurate definition and I'll 02:21:02.880 --> 02:21:05.830 align:start position:0% more of an accurate definition and I'll get<02:21:03.000> to<02:21:03.160> that<02:21:03.399> later<02:21:03.800> for<02:21:04.080> to<02:21:04.520> you<02:21:04.720> getas<02:21:05.680> you 02:21:05.830 --> 02:21:05.840 align:start position:0% get to that later for to you getas you 02:21:05.840 --> 02:21:07.990 align:start position:0% get to that later for to you getas you used<02:21:06.080> to<02:21:06.240> eat<02:21:06.439> or<02:21:06.640> you<02:21:06.760> were<02:21:06.960> eating<02:21:07.399> for<02:21:07.640> El 02:21:07.990 --> 02:21:08.000 align:start position:0% used to eat or you were eating for El 02:21:08.000 --> 02:21:11.670 align:start position:0% used to eat or you were eating for El you<02:21:08.200> get<02:21:09.080> for<02:21:09.319> noos<02:21:09.960> you 02:21:11.670 --> 02:21:11.680 align:start position:0% you get for noos you 02:21:11.680 --> 02:21:15.070 align:start position:0% you get for noos you get<02:21:12.920> andos<02:21:13.920> and<02:21:14.040> now<02:21:14.240> you<02:21:14.359> simply<02:21:14.640> replicate 02:21:15.070 --> 02:21:15.080 align:start position:0% get andos and now you simply replicate 02:21:15.080 --> 02:21:17.389 align:start position:0% get andos and now you simply replicate the<02:21:15.160> same<02:21:15.399> idea<02:21:15.880> with<02:21:16.000> the<02:21:16.120> verb<02:21:16.359> VI<02:21:16.800> as<02:21:16.920> always 02:21:17.389 --> 02:21:17.399 align:start position:0% the same idea with the verb VI as always 02:21:17.399 --> 02:21:18.910 align:start position:0% the same idea with the verb VI as always try<02:21:17.600> not<02:21:17.720> focusing<02:21:18.080> on<02:21:18.240> these<02:21:18.439> pronouns 02:21:18.910 --> 02:21:18.920 align:start position:0% try not focusing on these pronouns 02:21:18.920 --> 02:21:19.990 align:start position:0% try not focusing on these pronouns because<02:21:19.120> they're<02:21:19.280> not<02:21:19.439> that<02:21:19.560> useful<02:21:19.840> in 02:21:19.990 --> 02:21:20.000 align:start position:0% because they're not that useful in 02:21:20.000 --> 02:21:21.670 align:start position:0% because they're not that useful in conversation<02:21:20.640> as<02:21:20.760> I<02:21:20.880> said<02:21:21.080> before<02:21:21.439> there<02:21:21.560> is 02:21:21.670 --> 02:21:21.680 align:start position:0% conversation as I said before there is 02:21:21.680 --> 02:21:23.710 align:start position:0% conversation as I said before there is no<02:21:21.840> stem<02:21:22.080> changing<02:21:22.520> irregular<02:21:23.000> yo<02:21:23.240> pronouns 02:21:23.710 --> 02:21:23.720 align:start position:0% no stem changing irregular yo pronouns 02:21:23.720 --> 02:21:25.550 align:start position:0% no stem changing irregular yo pronouns or<02:21:23.880> any<02:21:24.080> irregular<02:21:24.640> exceptions<02:21:25.160> with<02:21:25.359> verbs 02:21:25.550 --> 02:21:25.560 align:start position:0% or any irregular exceptions with verbs 02:21:25.560 --> 02:21:27.990 align:start position:0% or any irregular exceptions with verbs ending<02:21:25.800> in<02:21:25.960> e<02:21:26.399> and<02:21:26.600> IR<02:21:27.280> however<02:21:27.520> there's<02:21:27.760> only 02:21:27.990 --> 02:21:28.000 align:start position:0% ending in e and IR however there's only 02:21:28.000 --> 02:21:29.790 align:start position:0% ending in e and IR however there's only three<02:21:28.200> completely<02:21:28.640> irregular<02:21:29.120> verbs<02:21:29.520> in<02:21:29.640> the 02:21:29.790 --> 02:21:29.800 align:start position:0% three completely irregular verbs in the 02:21:29.800 --> 02:21:31.590 align:start position:0% three completely irregular verbs in the imperfect<02:21:30.399> which<02:21:30.520> are<02:21:30.680> very<02:21:30.880> useful<02:21:31.439> and 02:21:31.590 --> 02:21:31.600 align:start position:0% imperfect which are very useful and 02:21:31.600 --> 02:21:33.990 align:start position:0% imperfect which are very useful and those<02:21:31.720> are<02:21:32.520> ver<02:21:32.840> and<02:21:33.040> S<02:21:33.359> because<02:21:33.600> there<02:21:33.720> is<02:21:33.840> no 02:21:33.990 --> 02:21:34.000 align:start position:0% those are ver and S because there is no 02:21:34.000 --> 02:21:35.510 align:start position:0% those are ver and S because there is no conjugation<02:21:34.520> pattern<02:21:34.800> to<02:21:34.920> follow<02:21:35.160> with<02:21:35.359> any 02:21:35.510 --> 02:21:35.520 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern to follow with any 02:21:35.520 --> 02:21:37.110 align:start position:0% conjugation pattern to follow with any of<02:21:35.640> them<02:21:35.920> I<02:21:36.040> recommend<02:21:36.439> just<02:21:36.600> memorizing 02:21:37.110 --> 02:21:37.120 align:start position:0% of them I recommend just memorizing 02:21:37.120 --> 02:21:39.469 align:start position:0% of them I recommend just memorizing their<02:21:37.319> patterns<02:21:37.680> in<02:21:37.800> the<02:21:37.960> imperfect<02:21:38.560> for<02:21:39.319> you 02:21:39.469 --> 02:21:39.479 align:start position:0% their patterns in the imperfect for you 02:21:39.479 --> 02:21:42.590 align:start position:0% their patterns in the imperfect for you get<02:21:39.800> yo<02:21:40.560> I<02:21:40.640> used<02:21:40.840> to<02:21:41.040> go<02:21:41.319> or<02:21:41.520> I<02:21:41.640> was<02:21:41.840> going<02:21:42.280> to 02:21:42.590 --> 02:21:42.600 align:start position:0% get yo I used to go or I was going to 02:21:42.600 --> 02:21:45.510 align:start position:0% get yo I used to go or I was going to ibas<02:21:43.319> Elba<02:21:44.000> and<02:21:44.160> so<02:21:44.319> on<02:21:44.640> as<02:21:44.840> always<02:21:45.240> don't 02:21:45.510 --> 02:21:45.520 align:start position:0% ibas Elba and so on as always don't 02:21:45.520 --> 02:21:49.190 align:start position:0% ibas Elba and so on as always don't focus<02:21:45.840> on<02:21:46.040> these<02:21:46.240> pronouns<02:21:46.800> for<02:21:47.600> you<02:21:48.080> get<02:21:49.080> I 02:21:49.190 --> 02:21:49.200 align:start position:0% focus on these pronouns for you get I 02:21:49.200 --> 02:21:51.750 align:start position:0% focus on these pronouns for you get I used<02:21:49.399> to<02:21:49.560> see<02:21:49.840> or<02:21:50.080> I<02:21:50.240> was<02:21:50.399> seeing 02:21:51.750 --> 02:21:51.760 align:start position:0% used to see or I was seeing 02:21:51.760 --> 02:21:54.790 align:start position:0% used to see or I was seeing two<02:21:52.760> and<02:21:52.920> so<02:21:53.040> on<02:21:53.399> as<02:21:53.560> always<02:21:53.960> don't<02:21:54.240> focus<02:21:54.600> on 02:21:54.790 --> 02:21:54.800 align:start position:0% two and so on as always don't focus on 02:21:54.800 --> 02:21:57.150 align:start position:0% two and so on as always don't focus on these<02:21:54.960> pronouns<02:21:55.600> at<02:21:55.760> last<02:21:56.040> you<02:21:56.160> have<02:21:56.319> the<02:21:56.479> verb 02:21:57.150 --> 02:21:57.160 align:start position:0% these pronouns at last you have the verb 02:21:57.160 --> 02:21:59.030 align:start position:0% these pronouns at last you have the verb which 02:21:59.030 --> 02:21:59.040 align:start position:0% which 02:21:59.040 --> 02:22:02.469 align:start position:0% which is<02:22:00.040> and<02:22:00.200> so<02:22:00.319> on<02:22:00.600> the<02:22:00.680> verb<02:22:01.479> however<02:22:01.880> is<02:22:02.040> used<02:22:02.399> in 02:22:02.469 --> 02:22:02.479 align:start position:0% is and so on the verb however is used in 02:22:02.479 --> 02:22:04.389 align:start position:0% is and so on the verb however is used in a<02:22:02.640> very<02:22:02.840> different<02:22:03.200> way<02:22:03.479> in<02:22:03.600> the<02:22:03.760> imperfect 02:22:04.389 --> 02:22:04.399 align:start position:0% a very different way in the imperfect 02:22:04.399 --> 02:22:06.429 align:start position:0% a very different way in the imperfect than<02:22:04.600> in<02:22:04.720> the<02:22:04.920> past<02:22:05.120> simple<02:22:05.520> said<02:22:05.920> in<02:22:06.040> the<02:22:06.200> past 02:22:06.429 --> 02:22:06.439 align:start position:0% than in the past simple said in the past 02:22:06.439 --> 02:22:07.950 align:start position:0% than in the past simple said in the past simple<02:22:06.920> describes<02:22:07.399> things<02:22:07.800> that 02:22:07.950 --> 02:22:07.960 align:start position:0% simple describes things that 02:22:07.960 --> 02:22:09.510 align:start position:0% simple describes things that specifically<02:22:08.479> happened<02:22:08.800> in<02:22:08.920> the<02:22:09.080> past<02:22:09.399> and 02:22:09.510 --> 02:22:09.520 align:start position:0% specifically happened in the past and 02:22:09.520 --> 02:22:11.270 align:start position:0% specifically happened in the past and that<02:22:09.640> were<02:22:09.840> finished<02:22:10.319> in<02:22:10.439> the<02:22:10.640> past<02:22:10.960> mainly 02:22:11.270 --> 02:22:11.280 align:start position:0% that were finished in the past mainly 02:22:11.280 --> 02:22:13.150 align:start position:0% that were finished in the past mainly speaking<02:22:11.600> of<02:22:11.800> when<02:22:12.160> where<02:22:12.399> and<02:22:12.600> how<02:22:12.840> events 02:22:13.150 --> 02:22:13.160 align:start position:0% speaking of when where and how events 02:22:13.160 --> 02:22:15.510 align:start position:0% speaking of when where and how events took<02:22:13.399> place<02:22:13.920> however<02:22:14.200> said<02:22:14.600> in<02:22:14.720> the<02:22:14.920> imperfect 02:22:15.510 --> 02:22:15.520 align:start position:0% took place however said in the imperfect 02:22:15.520 --> 02:22:16.990 align:start position:0% took place however said in the imperfect changes<02:22:15.880> its<02:22:16.040> meaning<02:22:16.439> by<02:22:16.600> applying<02:22:16.880> to 02:22:16.990 --> 02:22:17.000 align:start position:0% changes its meaning by applying to 02:22:17.000 --> 02:22:18.830 align:start position:0% changes its meaning by applying to things<02:22:17.399> that<02:22:17.520> used<02:22:17.680> to<02:22:17.880> happen<02:22:18.319> or<02:22:18.520> were 02:22:18.830 --> 02:22:18.840 align:start position:0% things that used to happen or were 02:22:18.840 --> 02:22:20.670 align:start position:0% things that used to happen or were happening<02:22:19.319> in<02:22:19.439> the<02:22:19.640> past<02:22:20.000> so<02:22:20.120> it's<02:22:20.280> important 02:22:20.670 --> 02:22:20.680 align:start position:0% happening in the past so it's important 02:22:20.680 --> 02:22:22.550 align:start position:0% happening in the past so it's important to<02:22:20.840> not<02:22:21.040> confuse<02:22:21.399> the<02:22:21.560> past<02:22:21.760> simple<02:22:22.120> and<02:22:22.319> past 02:22:22.550 --> 02:22:22.560 align:start position:0% to not confuse the past simple and past 02:22:22.560 --> 02:22:24.830 align:start position:0% to not confuse the past simple and past imperfect<02:22:23.120> saying<02:22:23.359> a<02:22:23.479> sentence<02:22:23.920> like<02:22:24.240> Yu 02:22:24.830 --> 02:22:24.840 align:start position:0% imperfect saying a sentence like Yu 02:22:24.840 --> 02:22:27.030 align:start position:0% imperfect saying a sentence like Yu Bonito<02:22:25.439> would<02:22:25.640> imply<02:22:25.960> that<02:22:26.160> I<02:22:26.240> was<02:22:26.479> beautiful 02:22:27.030 --> 02:22:27.040 align:start position:0% Bonito would imply that I was beautiful 02:22:27.040 --> 02:22:28.950 align:start position:0% Bonito would imply that I was beautiful at<02:22:27.160> a<02:22:27.359> specific<02:22:27.840> time<02:22:28.120> in<02:22:28.240> the<02:22:28.439> past<02:22:28.800> which 02:22:28.950 --> 02:22:28.960 align:start position:0% at a specific time in the past which 02:22:28.960 --> 02:22:30.469 align:start position:0% at a specific time in the past which logically<02:22:29.359> doesn't<02:22:29.640> make<02:22:29.840> sense<02:22:30.240> on<02:22:30.359> the 02:22:30.469 --> 02:22:30.479 align:start position:0% logically doesn't make sense on the 02:22:30.479 --> 02:22:33.030 align:start position:0% logically doesn't make sense on the other<02:22:30.680> hand<02:22:31.000> saying<02:22:31.439> y<02:22:31.760> erab<02:22:32.040> Bonito<02:22:32.560> means<02:22:32.920> I 02:22:33.030 --> 02:22:33.040 align:start position:0% other hand saying y erab Bonito means I 02:22:33.040 --> 02:22:34.830 align:start position:0% other hand saying y erab Bonito means I used<02:22:33.280> to<02:22:33.399> be<02:22:33.560> beautiful<02:22:34.160> indicating<02:22:34.600> that<02:22:34.720> it 02:22:34.830 --> 02:22:34.840 align:start position:0% used to be beautiful indicating that it 02:22:34.840 --> 02:22:36.070 align:start position:0% used to be beautiful indicating that it wasn't<02:22:35.120> something<02:22:35.359> that<02:22:35.520> specifically 02:22:36.070 --> 02:22:36.080 align:start position:0% wasn't something that specifically 02:22:36.080 --> 02:22:37.870 align:start position:0% wasn't something that specifically happened<02:22:36.479> but<02:22:36.680> rather<02:22:36.880> a<02:22:37.000> trait<02:22:37.439> that<02:22:37.640> was 02:22:37.870 --> 02:22:37.880 align:start position:0% happened but rather a trait that was 02:22:37.880 --> 02:22:39.309 align:start position:0% happened but rather a trait that was happening<02:22:38.280> in<02:22:38.399> the<02:22:38.560> past<02:22:38.960> that's<02:22:39.160> the 02:22:39.309 --> 02:22:39.319 align:start position:0% happening in the past that's the 02:22:39.319 --> 02:22:40.990 align:start position:0% happening in the past that's the difference<02:22:39.840> between<02:22:40.160> said<02:22:40.520> in<02:22:40.680> the<02:22:40.800> past 02:22:40.990 --> 02:22:41.000 align:start position:0% difference between said in the past 02:22:41.000 --> 02:22:42.710 align:start position:0% difference between said in the past simple<02:22:41.439> and<02:22:41.640> past<02:22:41.880> imperfect<02:22:42.359> which<02:22:42.479> is<02:22:42.560> a 02:22:42.710 --> 02:22:42.720 align:start position:0% simple and past imperfect which is a 02:22:42.720 --> 02:22:44.270 align:start position:0% simple and past imperfect which is a topic<02:22:42.960> that's<02:22:43.359> difficult<02:22:43.479> to<02:22:43.880> understand<02:22:44.160> but 02:22:44.270 --> 02:22:44.280 align:start position:0% topic that's difficult to understand but 02:22:44.280 --> 02:22:45.950 align:start position:0% topic that's difficult to understand but the<02:22:44.399> best<02:22:44.600> tip<02:22:44.800> that<02:22:44.960> I<02:22:45.040> can<02:22:45.240> give<02:22:45.439> for 02:22:45.950 --> 02:22:45.960 align:start position:0% the best tip that I can give for 02:22:45.960 --> 02:22:47.510 align:start position:0% the best tip that I can give for understanding<02:22:46.240> said<02:22:46.600> in<02:22:46.720> the<02:22:46.840> imperf<02:22:47.160> perfect 02:22:47.510 --> 02:22:47.520 align:start position:0% understanding said in the imperf perfect 02:22:47.520 --> 02:22:49.750 align:start position:0% understanding said in the imperf perfect is<02:22:47.640> that<02:22:47.760> it<02:22:47.880> means<02:22:48.359> used<02:22:48.680> to<02:22:48.840> be<02:22:49.120> in<02:22:49.240> the<02:22:49.439> past 02:22:49.750 --> 02:22:49.760 align:start position:0% is that it means used to be in the past 02:22:49.760 --> 02:22:51.510 align:start position:0% is that it means used to be in the past and<02:22:49.840> its<02:22:50.000> most<02:22:50.200> common<02:22:50.479> uses<02:22:50.920> are<02:22:51.120> ones<02:22:51.359> that 02:22:51.510 --> 02:22:51.520 align:start position:0% and its most common uses are ones that 02:22:51.520 --> 02:22:53.070 align:start position:0% and its most common uses are ones that have<02:22:51.640> to<02:22:51.720> do<02:22:51.880> with<02:22:52.040> people<02:22:52.439> for<02:22:52.640> instance 02:22:53.070 --> 02:22:53.080 align:start position:0% have to do with people for instance 02:22:53.080 --> 02:22:56.309 align:start position:0% have to do with people for instance saying<02:22:53.359> a<02:22:53.520> sentence<02:22:53.920> like<02:22:54.200> to<02:22:54.920> isud<02:22:55.760> means<02:22:56.120> you 02:22:56.309 --> 02:22:56.319 align:start position:0% saying a sentence like to isud means you 02:22:56.319 --> 02:22:58.910 align:start position:0% saying a sentence like to isud means you were<02:22:56.840> as<02:22:57.000> in<02:22:57.280> you<02:22:57.479> used<02:22:57.720> to<02:22:57.880> be<02:22:58.200> a<02:22:58.359> student<02:22:58.800> and 02:22:58.910 --> 02:22:58.920 align:start position:0% were as in you used to be a student and 02:22:58.920 --> 02:23:01.550 align:start position:0% were as in you used to be a student and you're<02:22:59.120> no<02:22:59.319> longer<02:22:59.680> a<02:22:59.800> student<02:23:00.160> now<02:23:00.800> erapid 02:23:01.550 --> 02:23:01.560 align:start position:0% you're no longer a student now erapid 02:23:01.560 --> 02:23:03.870 align:start position:0% you're no longer a student now erapid means<02:23:01.920> he<02:23:02.160> was<02:23:02.520> as<02:23:02.640> in<02:23:02.880> he<02:23:03.000> used<02:23:03.240> to<02:23:03.359> be<02:23:03.560> fast 02:23:03.870 --> 02:23:03.880 align:start position:0% means he was as in he used to be fast 02:23:03.880 --> 02:23:05.910 align:start position:0% means he was as in he used to be fast but<02:23:04.000> he's<02:23:04.200> no<02:23:04.359> longer<02:23:04.760> fast<02:23:05.040> now<02:23:05.399> hopefully 02:23:05.910 --> 02:23:05.920 align:start position:0% but he's no longer fast now hopefully 02:23:05.920 --> 02:23:07.630 align:start position:0% but he's no longer fast now hopefully I'm<02:23:06.040> making<02:23:06.319> this<02:23:06.520> concept<02:23:07.000> as<02:23:07.160> easy<02:23:07.479> as 02:23:07.630 --> 02:23:07.640 align:start position:0% I'm making this concept as easy as 02:23:07.640 --> 02:23:09.349 align:start position:0% I'm making this concept as easy as possible<02:23:08.120> overall<02:23:08.680> this<02:23:08.800> is<02:23:09.000> everything<02:23:09.280> you 02:23:09.349 --> 02:23:09.359 align:start position:0% possible overall this is everything you 02:23:09.359 --> 02:23:10.830 align:start position:0% possible overall this is everything you should<02:23:09.560> know<02:23:09.760> about<02:23:09.960> the<02:23:10.120> imperfect<02:23:10.520> tense 02:23:10.830 --> 02:23:10.840 align:start position:0% should know about the imperfect tense 02:23:10.840 --> 02:23:12.070 align:start position:0% should know about the imperfect tense but<02:23:10.960> there's<02:23:11.160> still<02:23:11.359> one<02:23:11.560> concept<02:23:11.920> that<02:23:12.000> I 02:23:12.070 --> 02:23:12.080 align:start position:0% but there's still one concept that I 02:23:12.080 --> 02:23:13.510 align:start position:0% but there's still one concept that I need<02:23:12.240> to<02:23:12.359> mention<02:23:12.720> to<02:23:12.840> fully<02:23:13.080> explain<02:23:13.359> the 02:23:13.510 --> 02:23:13.520 align:start position:0% need to mention to fully explain the 02:23:13.520 --> 02:23:14.750 align:start position:0% need to mention to fully explain the imperfect<02:23:13.920> and<02:23:14.040> it's<02:23:14.160> something<02:23:14.359> that<02:23:14.520> has<02:23:14.640> to 02:23:14.750 --> 02:23:14.760 align:start position:0% imperfect and it's something that has to 02:23:14.760 --> 02:23:16.349 align:start position:0% imperfect and it's something that has to do<02:23:14.920> with<02:23:15.040> the<02:23:15.160> verb<02:23:15.479> estar<02:23:15.920> in<02:23:16.000> the<02:23:16.080> beginning 02:23:16.349 --> 02:23:16.359 align:start position:0% do with the verb estar in the beginning 02:23:16.359 --> 02:23:18.269 align:start position:0% do with the verb estar in the beginning of<02:23:16.479> the<02:23:16.640> video<02:23:17.160> I<02:23:17.240> talked<02:23:17.439> about<02:23:17.640> phrases<02:23:18.040> like 02:23:18.269 --> 02:23:18.279 align:start position:0% of the video I talked about phrases like 02:23:18.279 --> 02:23:20.750 align:start position:0% of the video I talked about phrases like yo<02:23:18.520> ABA<02:23:19.160> which<02:23:19.279> means<02:23:19.560> I<02:23:19.680> used<02:23:19.880> to<02:23:20.040> speak<02:23:20.439> or<02:23:20.640> I 02:23:20.750 --> 02:23:20.760 align:start position:0% yo ABA which means I used to speak or I 02:23:20.760 --> 02:23:22.349 align:start position:0% yo ABA which means I used to speak or I was<02:23:21.000> speaking<02:23:21.439> visually<02:23:21.800> looking<02:23:22.040> at<02:23:22.200> this 02:23:22.349 --> 02:23:22.359 align:start position:0% was speaking visually looking at this 02:23:22.359 --> 02:23:24.030 align:start position:0% was speaking visually looking at this phrase<02:23:22.760> it<02:23:22.880> sort<02:23:23.080> of<02:23:23.240> makes<02:23:23.479> sense<02:23:23.800> that<02:23:23.920> the 02:23:24.030 --> 02:23:24.040 align:start position:0% phrase it sort of makes sense that the 02:23:24.040 --> 02:23:25.710 align:start position:0% phrase it sort of makes sense that the phrase<02:23:24.279> would<02:23:24.439> be<02:23:24.720> I<02:23:24.840> used<02:23:25.120> to<02:23:25.240> speak<02:23:25.560> but 02:23:25.710 --> 02:23:25.720 align:start position:0% phrase would be I used to speak but 02:23:25.720 --> 02:23:27.230 align:start position:0% phrase would be I used to speak but let's<02:23:25.880> not<02:23:26.080> forget<02:23:26.520> that<02:23:26.640> the<02:23:26.800> imperfect 02:23:27.230 --> 02:23:27.240 align:start position:0% let's not forget that the imperfect 02:23:27.240 --> 02:23:29.110 align:start position:0% let's not forget that the imperfect tense<02:23:27.640> also<02:23:27.880> applies<02:23:28.240> to<02:23:28.399> things<02:23:28.640> that<02:23:28.800> were 02:23:29.110 --> 02:23:29.120 align:start position:0% tense also applies to things that were 02:23:29.120 --> 02:23:30.550 align:start position:0% tense also applies to things that were happening<02:23:29.479> in<02:23:29.600> the<02:23:29.760> past<02:23:30.080> looking<02:23:30.319> at<02:23:30.439> the 02:23:30.550 --> 02:23:30.560 align:start position:0% happening in the past looking at the 02:23:30.560 --> 02:23:32.550 align:start position:0% happening in the past looking at the phrase<02:23:31.040> I<02:23:31.240> was<02:23:31.479> speaking<02:23:32.000> we<02:23:32.080> can<02:23:32.200> see<02:23:32.439> that 02:23:32.550 --> 02:23:32.560 align:start position:0% phrase I was speaking we can see that 02:23:32.560 --> 02:23:33.590 align:start position:0% phrase I was speaking we can see that there's<02:23:32.720> a<02:23:32.840> form<02:23:33.040> of<02:23:33.200> the<02:23:33.319> present 02:23:33.590 --> 02:23:33.600 align:start position:0% there's a form of the present 02:23:33.600 --> 02:23:35.429 align:start position:0% there's a form of the present progressive<02:23:34.160> in<02:23:34.279> the<02:23:34.439> imperfect<02:23:35.000> due<02:23:35.200> to<02:23:35.279> the 02:23:35.429 --> 02:23:35.439 align:start position:0% progressive in the imperfect due to the 02:23:35.439 --> 02:23:38.070 align:start position:0% progressive in the imperfect due to the construction<02:23:36.160> was<02:23:36.680> with<02:23:36.920> ing<02:23:37.560> while<02:23:37.720> it<02:23:37.880> can 02:23:38.070 --> 02:23:38.080 align:start position:0% construction was with ing while it can 02:23:38.080 --> 02:23:40.950 align:start position:0% construction was with ing while it can mean<02:23:38.319> I<02:23:38.439> used<02:23:38.640> to<02:23:38.800> speak<02:23:39.200> yo<02:23:39.439> abla<02:23:40.120> signifies<02:23:40.800> I 02:23:40.950 --> 02:23:40.960 align:start position:0% mean I used to speak yo abla signifies I 02:23:40.960 --> 02:23:43.070 align:start position:0% mean I used to speak yo abla signifies I was<02:23:41.279> speaking<02:23:41.840> rather<02:23:42.080> than<02:23:42.240> I<02:23:42.359> used<02:23:42.560> to<02:23:42.720> speak 02:23:43.070 --> 02:23:43.080 align:start position:0% was speaking rather than I used to speak 02:23:43.080 --> 02:23:44.389 align:start position:0% was speaking rather than I used to speak and<02:23:43.200> the<02:23:43.319> only<02:23:43.520> way<02:23:43.640> to<02:23:44.040> understand<02:23:44.200> this 02:23:44.389 --> 02:23:44.399 align:start position:0% and the only way to understand this 02:23:44.399 --> 02:23:46.550 align:start position:0% and the only way to understand this concept<02:23:44.880> is<02:23:45.000> through<02:23:45.240> the<02:23:45.359> verb<02:23:45.600> estar<02:23:46.080> by<02:23:46.279> far 02:23:46.550 --> 02:23:46.560 align:start position:0% concept is through the verb estar by far 02:23:46.560 --> 02:23:48.269 align:start position:0% concept is through the verb estar by far the<02:23:46.680> most<02:23:46.840> useful<02:23:47.040> use<02:23:47.200> ful<02:23:47.399> application<02:23:48.000> of 02:23:48.269 --> 02:23:48.279 align:start position:0% the most useful use ful application of 02:23:48.279 --> 02:23:50.110 align:start position:0% the most useful use ful application of estar<02:23:48.720> in<02:23:48.840> the<02:23:48.960> imperfect<02:23:49.560> is<02:23:49.680> the<02:23:49.800> present 02:23:50.110 --> 02:23:50.120 align:start position:0% estar in the imperfect is the present 02:23:50.120 --> 02:23:52.550 align:start position:0% estar in the imperfect is the present progressive<02:23:50.600> saying<02:23:50.840> a<02:23:50.960> sentence<02:23:51.359> like<02:23:51.720> yoa 02:23:52.550 --> 02:23:52.560 align:start position:0% progressive saying a sentence like yoa 02:23:52.560 --> 02:23:54.389 align:start position:0% progressive saying a sentence like yoa can<02:23:52.680> mean<02:23:53.000> I<02:23:53.120> was<02:23:53.359> speaking<02:23:53.840> but<02:23:54.000> another<02:23:54.279> way 02:23:54.389 --> 02:23:54.399 align:start position:0% can mean I was speaking but another way 02:23:54.399 --> 02:23:55.630 align:start position:0% can mean I was speaking but another way to<02:23:54.560> write<02:23:54.760> this<02:23:54.920> using<02:23:55.240> the<02:23:55.359> present 02:23:55.630 --> 02:23:55.640 align:start position:0% to write this using the present 02:23:55.640 --> 02:23:58.910 align:start position:0% to write this using the present progressive<02:23:56.359> is<02:23:56.720> y<02:23:57.240> EST<02:23:58.240> derived<02:23:58.640> from<02:23:58.800> the 02:23:58.910 --> 02:23:58.920 align:start position:0% progressive is y EST derived from the 02:23:58.920 --> 02:24:00.710 align:start position:0% progressive is y EST derived from the verb<02:23:59.200> EST<02:23:59.600> and<02:23:59.720> looking<02:23:59.920> at<02:24:00.080> this<02:24:00.240> phrase<02:24:00.600> it 02:24:00.710 --> 02:24:00.720 align:start position:0% verb EST and looking at this phrase it 02:24:00.720 --> 02:24:01.910 align:start position:0% verb EST and looking at this phrase it makes<02:24:00.960> more<02:24:01.160> sense<02:24:01.439> to<02:24:01.560> use<02:24:01.760> this 02:24:01.910 --> 02:24:01.920 align:start position:0% makes more sense to use this 02:24:01.920 --> 02:24:04.150 align:start position:0% makes more sense to use this construction<02:24:02.560> than<02:24:02.720> simply<02:24:03.040> saying<02:24:03.520> yo<02:24:03.720> abla 02:24:04.150 --> 02:24:04.160 align:start position:0% construction than simply saying yo abla 02:24:04.160 --> 02:24:06.309 align:start position:0% construction than simply saying yo abla to<02:24:04.279> put<02:24:04.399> it<02:24:04.520> into<02:24:04.720> simpler<02:24:05.080> words<02:24:05.520> yo<02:24:05.720> abla 02:24:06.309 --> 02:24:06.319 align:start position:0% to put it into simpler words yo abla 02:24:06.319 --> 02:24:08.070 align:start position:0% to put it into simpler words yo abla means<02:24:06.680> I<02:24:06.800> was<02:24:07.040> speaking<02:24:07.520> and<02:24:07.600> it<02:24:07.720> can<02:24:07.880> be 02:24:08.070 --> 02:24:08.080 align:start position:0% means I was speaking and it can be 02:24:08.080 --> 02:24:10.510 align:start position:0% means I was speaking and it can be written<02:24:08.600> as<02:24:08.840> yo<02:24:09.080> esta<02:24:09.960> and<02:24:10.040> it<02:24:10.120> doesn't<02:24:10.359> get 02:24:10.510 --> 02:24:10.520 align:start position:0% written as yo esta and it doesn't get 02:24:10.520 --> 02:24:11.950 align:start position:0% written as yo esta and it doesn't get more<02:24:10.880> difficult<02:24:11.080> than<02:24:11.279> this<02:24:11.560> some<02:24:11.680> of<02:24:11.800> you 02:24:11.950 --> 02:24:11.960 align:start position:0% more difficult than this some of you 02:24:11.960 --> 02:24:13.830 align:start position:0% more difficult than this some of you might<02:24:12.160> think<02:24:12.399> to<02:24:12.520> use<02:24:12.840> AAR<02:24:13.319> from<02:24:13.479> the<02:24:13.640> past 02:24:13.830 --> 02:24:13.840 align:start position:0% might think to use AAR from the past 02:24:13.840 --> 02:24:16.670 align:start position:0% might think to use AAR from the past simple<02:24:14.319> by<02:24:14.439> saying<02:24:15.120> y<02:24:16.120> but<02:24:16.240> this<02:24:16.319> would<02:24:16.479> be<02:24:16.560> an 02:24:16.670 --> 02:24:16.680 align:start position:0% simple by saying y but this would be an 02:24:16.680 --> 02:24:18.590 align:start position:0% simple by saying y but this would be an incorrect<02:24:17.279> use<02:24:17.600> of<02:24:17.840> estar<02:24:18.319> because<02:24:18.479> the 02:24:18.590 --> 02:24:18.600 align:start position:0% incorrect use of estar because the 02:24:18.600 --> 02:24:20.269 align:start position:0% incorrect use of estar because the present<02:24:18.920> progressive<02:24:19.479> is<02:24:19.600> an<02:24:19.840> action<02:24:20.080> that's 02:24:20.269 --> 02:24:20.279 align:start position:0% present progressive is an action that's 02:24:20.279 --> 02:24:22.190 align:start position:0% present progressive is an action that's always<02:24:20.600> continuous<02:24:21.279> even<02:24:21.520> in<02:24:21.680> the<02:24:21.880> past 02:24:22.190 --> 02:24:22.200 align:start position:0% always continuous even in the past 02:24:22.200 --> 02:24:23.990 align:start position:0% always continuous even in the past because<02:24:22.399> it's<02:24:22.520> a<02:24:22.680> continuous<02:24:23.240> action<02:24:23.680> meaning 02:24:23.990 --> 02:24:24.000 align:start position:0% because it's a continuous action meaning 02:24:24.000 --> 02:24:25.830 align:start position:0% because it's a continuous action meaning that<02:24:24.120> it's<02:24:24.359> happening<02:24:24.920> the<02:24:25.080> imperfect<02:24:25.720> is 02:24:25.830 --> 02:24:25.840 align:start position:0% that it's happening the imperfect is 02:24:25.840 --> 02:24:27.389 align:start position:0% that it's happening the imperfect is needed<02:24:26.200> for<02:24:26.479> estan<02:24:26.920> in<02:24:27.000> the<02:24:27.120> present 02:24:27.389 --> 02:24:27.399 align:start position:0% needed for estan in the present 02:24:27.399 --> 02:24:29.990 align:start position:0% needed for estan in the present progressive<02:24:27.920> instead<02:24:28.160> of<02:24:28.279> saying<02:24:28.640> y<02:24:28.880> EST<02:24:29.880> we 02:24:29.990 --> 02:24:30.000 align:start position:0% progressive instead of saying y EST we 02:24:30.000 --> 02:24:32.830 align:start position:0% progressive instead of saying y EST we need<02:24:30.120> to<02:24:30.279> say<02:24:30.680> y<02:24:31.040> EST<02:24:32.040> because<02:24:32.240> the<02:24:32.399> action<02:24:32.640> is 02:24:32.830 --> 02:24:32.840 align:start position:0% need to say y EST because the action is 02:24:32.840 --> 02:24:34.590 align:start position:0% need to say y EST because the action is continuous<02:24:33.439> and<02:24:33.560> the<02:24:33.680> same<02:24:33.920> concept<02:24:34.319> applies 02:24:34.590 --> 02:24:34.600 align:start position:0% continuous and the same concept applies 02:24:34.600 --> 02:24:36.070 align:start position:0% continuous and the same concept applies to<02:24:34.720> any<02:24:34.920> sentence<02:24:35.240> you<02:24:35.319> want<02:24:35.439> to<02:24:35.560> say<02:24:35.880> for 02:24:36.070 --> 02:24:36.080 align:start position:0% to any sentence you want to say for 02:24:36.080 --> 02:24:38.190 align:start position:0% to any sentence you want to say for instance<02:24:36.520> saying<02:24:36.760> a<02:24:36.920> sentence 02:24:38.190 --> 02:24:38.200 align:start position:0% instance saying a sentence 02:24:38.200 --> 02:24:41.269 align:start position:0% instance saying a sentence like<02:24:39.200> can<02:24:39.319> mean<02:24:39.720> you<02:24:39.960> used<02:24:40.240> to<02:24:40.399> walk<02:24:40.680> every<02:24:41.000> day 02:24:41.269 --> 02:24:41.279 align:start position:0% like can mean you used to walk every day 02:24:41.279 --> 02:24:43.030 align:start position:0% like can mean you used to walk every day or<02:24:41.479> you<02:24:41.640> were<02:24:41.920> walking<02:24:42.359> every<02:24:42.600> day<02:24:42.920> and 02:24:43.030 --> 02:24:43.040 align:start position:0% or you were walking every day and 02:24:43.040 --> 02:24:45.630 align:start position:0% or you were walking every day and another<02:24:43.319> way<02:24:43.439> to<02:24:43.600> write<02:24:43.880> this<02:24:44.160> is<02:24:44.439> to 02:24:45.630 --> 02:24:45.640 align:start position:0% another way to write this is to 02:24:45.640 --> 02:24:48.710 align:start position:0% another way to write this is to estas<02:24:46.640> saying<02:24:47.040> a<02:24:47.120> sentence 02:24:48.710 --> 02:24:48.720 align:start position:0% estas saying a sentence 02:24:48.720 --> 02:24:51.590 align:start position:0% estas saying a sentence like<02:24:49.720> means<02:24:50.080> he<02:24:50.200> used<02:24:50.439> to<02:24:50.600> eat<02:24:50.960> or<02:24:51.200> he<02:24:51.359> was 02:24:51.590 --> 02:24:51.600 align:start position:0% like means he used to eat or he was 02:24:51.600 --> 02:24:53.429 align:start position:0% like means he used to eat or he was eating<02:24:52.080> in<02:24:52.200> the<02:24:52.319> mornings<02:24:52.880> and<02:24:53.040> another<02:24:53.319> way 02:24:53.429 --> 02:24:53.439 align:start position:0% eating in the mornings and another way 02:24:53.439 --> 02:24:55.870 align:start position:0% eating in the mornings and another way to<02:24:53.600> write<02:24:53.880> this 02:24:55.870 --> 02:24:55.880 align:start position:0% to write this 02:24:55.880 --> 02:24:58.469 align:start position:0% to write this is<02:24:56.880> saying<02:24:57.120> a<02:24:57.240> sentence 02:24:58.469 --> 02:24:58.479 align:start position:0% is saying a sentence 02:24:58.479 --> 02:25:01.150 align:start position:0% is saying a sentence like<02:24:59.479> means<02:24:59.760> I<02:24:59.880> used<02:25:00.040> to<02:25:00.160> go<02:25:00.279> to<02:25:00.439> the<02:25:00.560> school<02:25:00.920> or 02:25:01.150 --> 02:25:01.160 align:start position:0% like means I used to go to the school or 02:25:01.160 --> 02:25:02.710 align:start position:0% like means I used to go to the school or I<02:25:01.319> was<02:25:01.520> going<02:25:01.760> to<02:25:01.880> the<02:25:02.000> school<02:25:02.359> and<02:25:02.479> with<02:25:02.600> the 02:25:02.710 --> 02:25:02.720 align:start position:0% I was going to the school and with the 02:25:02.720 --> 02:25:04.590 align:start position:0% I was going to the school and with the verb<02:25:03.359> there<02:25:03.479> is<02:25:03.640> no<02:25:03.760> way<02:25:03.880> to<02:25:04.080> rewrite<02:25:04.439> the 02:25:04.590 --> 02:25:04.600 align:start position:0% verb there is no way to rewrite the 02:25:04.600 --> 02:25:06.670 align:start position:0% verb there is no way to rewrite the sentence<02:25:05.160> because<02:25:05.760> doesn't<02:25:06.040> have<02:25:06.160> a<02:25:06.279> form<02:25:06.560> in 02:25:06.670 --> 02:25:06.680 align:start position:0% sentence because doesn't have a form in 02:25:06.680 --> 02:25:07.990 align:start position:0% sentence because doesn't have a form in the<02:25:06.800> present<02:25:07.120> progressive<02:25:07.640> saying<02:25:07.880> a 02:25:07.990 --> 02:25:08.000 align:start position:0% the present progressive saying a 02:25:08.000 --> 02:25:09.150 align:start position:0% the present progressive saying a sentence 02:25:09.150 --> 02:25:09.160 align:start position:0% sentence 02:25:09.160 --> 02:25:11.990 align:start position:0% sentence like<02:25:10.160> means<02:25:10.479> you<02:25:10.600> used<02:25:10.760> to<02:25:10.960> be<02:25:11.200> very<02:25:11.479> happy<02:25:11.880> and 02:25:11.990 --> 02:25:12.000 align:start position:0% like means you used to be very happy and 02:25:12.000 --> 02:25:13.550 align:start position:0% like means you used to be very happy and with<02:25:12.160> the<02:25:12.240> verb<02:25:12.520> estar<02:25:13.040> this<02:25:13.160> would<02:25:13.319> be<02:25:13.399> a 02:25:13.550 --> 02:25:13.560 align:start position:0% with the verb estar this would be a 02:25:13.560 --> 02:25:15.429 align:start position:0% with the verb estar this would be a correct<02:25:13.880> way<02:25:14.040> to<02:25:14.200> use<02:25:14.399> it<02:25:14.640> because<02:25:14.960> estar<02:25:15.359> in 02:25:15.429 --> 02:25:15.439 align:start position:0% correct way to use it because estar in 02:25:15.439 --> 02:25:17.510 align:start position:0% correct way to use it because estar in the<02:25:15.600> imperfect<02:25:16.240> has<02:25:16.359> the<02:25:16.439> same<02:25:16.920> appliations 02:25:17.510 --> 02:25:17.520 align:start position:0% the imperfect has the same appliations 02:25:17.520 --> 02:25:19.070 align:start position:0% the imperfect has the same appliations as<02:25:17.640> in<02:25:17.760> the<02:25:17.920> present<02:25:18.279> so<02:25:18.439> there<02:25:18.600> isn't<02:25:18.880> really 02:25:19.070 --> 02:25:19.080 align:start position:0% as in the present so there isn't really 02:25:19.080 --> 02:25:20.630 align:start position:0% as in the present so there isn't really much<02:25:19.240> of<02:25:19.319> a<02:25:19.439> change<02:25:19.920> aside<02:25:20.160> from<02:25:20.319> the<02:25:20.399> way<02:25:20.560> you 02:25:20.630 --> 02:25:20.640 align:start position:0% much of a change aside from the way you 02:25:20.640 --> 02:25:22.030 align:start position:0% much of a change aside from the way you would<02:25:20.800> use<02:25:20.920> it<02:25:21.080> in<02:25:21.200> the<02:25:21.319> present<02:25:21.600> progressive 02:25:22.030 --> 02:25:22.040 align:start position:0% would use it in the present progressive 02:25:22.040 --> 02:25:23.830 align:start position:0% would use it in the present progressive stress<02:25:22.399> possessed<02:25:22.800> adjectives<02:25:23.200> in<02:25:23.359> Spanish 02:25:23.830 --> 02:25:23.840 align:start position:0% stress possessed adjectives in Spanish 02:25:23.840 --> 02:25:25.269 align:start position:0% stress possessed adjectives in Spanish indicate<02:25:24.160> to<02:25:24.279> whom<02:25:24.439> a<02:25:24.560> possess<02:25:24.920> object 02:25:25.269 --> 02:25:25.279 align:start position:0% indicate to whom a possess object 02:25:25.279 --> 02:25:26.870 align:start position:0% indicate to whom a possess object belongs<02:25:25.840> I<02:25:25.920> already<02:25:26.160> made<02:25:26.319> a<02:25:26.399> video<02:25:26.640> about 02:25:26.870 --> 02:25:26.880 align:start position:0% belongs I already made a video about 02:25:26.880 --> 02:25:28.230 align:start position:0% belongs I already made a video about this<02:25:27.080> topic<02:25:27.399> talking<02:25:27.680> about<02:25:27.880> normal 02:25:28.230 --> 02:25:28.240 align:start position:0% this topic talking about normal 02:25:28.240 --> 02:25:30.630 align:start position:0% this topic talking about normal possessive<02:25:28.640> adjectives<02:25:29.200> such<02:25:29.399> as<02:25:29.720> my<02:25:30.160> your 02:25:30.630 --> 02:25:30.640 align:start position:0% possessive adjectives such as my your 02:25:30.640 --> 02:25:33.269 align:start position:0% possessive adjectives such as my your his<02:25:30.880> her<02:25:31.319> our<02:25:31.760> y'alls<02:25:32.200> and<02:25:32.439> there<02:25:32.800> but<02:25:32.960> stress 02:25:33.269 --> 02:25:33.279 align:start position:0% his her our y'alls and there but stress 02:25:33.279 --> 02:25:34.910 align:start position:0% his her our y'alls and there but stress possessive<02:25:33.680> adjectives<02:25:34.200> are<02:25:34.439> adjectives 02:25:34.910 --> 02:25:34.920 align:start position:0% possessive adjectives are adjectives 02:25:34.920 --> 02:25:36.830 align:start position:0% possessive adjectives are adjectives that<02:25:35.080> indicate<02:25:35.520> to<02:25:35.720> whom<02:25:35.920> something<02:25:36.240> belongs 02:25:36.830 --> 02:25:36.840 align:start position:0% that indicate to whom something belongs 02:25:36.840 --> 02:25:39.389 align:start position:0% that indicate to whom something belongs in<02:25:36.960> English<02:25:37.479> these<02:25:37.680> can<02:25:37.840> be<02:25:38.240> mine<02:25:38.680> yours<02:25:39.240> his 02:25:39.389 --> 02:25:39.399 align:start position:0% in English these can be mine yours his 02:25:39.399 --> 02:25:42.030 align:start position:0% in English these can be mine yours his or<02:25:39.600> hers<02:25:40.000> ours<02:25:40.479> Ys<02:25:41.000> and<02:25:41.200> theirs<02:25:41.640> and<02:25:41.760> they<02:25:41.880> can 02:25:42.030 --> 02:25:42.040 align:start position:0% or hers ours Ys and theirs and they can 02:25:42.040 --> 02:25:44.349 align:start position:0% or hers ours Ys and theirs and they can be<02:25:42.200> used<02:25:42.600> in<02:25:42.760> sentences<02:25:43.439> like<02:25:43.720> the<02:25:43.880> computer 02:25:44.349 --> 02:25:44.359 align:start position:0% be used in sentences like the computer 02:25:44.359 --> 02:25:46.550 align:start position:0% be used in sentences like the computer is<02:25:44.560> mine<02:25:44.960> or<02:25:45.200> the<02:25:45.359> computer<02:25:45.840> of<02:25:46.080> mine<02:25:46.399> which 02:25:46.550 --> 02:25:46.560 align:start position:0% is mine or the computer of mine which 02:25:46.560 --> 02:25:48.030 align:start position:0% is mine or the computer of mine which similar<02:25:47.040> ly<02:25:47.120> applies<02:25:47.439> to<02:25:47.560> the<02:25:47.680> rest<02:25:47.800> of<02:25:47.880> the 02:25:48.030 --> 02:25:48.040 align:start position:0% similar ly applies to the rest of the 02:25:48.040 --> 02:25:49.950 align:start position:0% similar ly applies to the rest of the adjectives<02:25:48.520> in<02:25:48.680> Spanish<02:25:49.240> just<02:25:49.399> like<02:25:49.600> regular 02:25:49.950 --> 02:25:49.960 align:start position:0% adjectives in Spanish just like regular 02:25:49.960 --> 02:25:51.990 align:start position:0% adjectives in Spanish just like regular possessive<02:25:50.399> adjectives<02:25:50.920> stressed<02:25:51.359> ones<02:25:51.800> have 02:25:51.990 --> 02:25:52.000 align:start position:0% possessive adjectives stressed ones have 02:25:52.000 --> 02:25:53.710 align:start position:0% possessive adjectives stressed ones have gender<02:25:52.359> and<02:25:52.560> plurality<02:25:53.279> with<02:25:53.479> every 02:25:53.710 --> 02:25:53.720 align:start position:0% gender and plurality with every 02:25:53.720 --> 02:25:55.389 align:start position:0% gender and plurality with every adjective<02:25:54.160> having<02:25:54.359> a<02:25:54.479> gender<02:25:54.960> depending<02:25:55.279> on 02:25:55.389 --> 02:25:55.399 align:start position:0% adjective having a gender depending on 02:25:55.399 --> 02:25:56.670 align:start position:0% adjective having a gender depending on the<02:25:55.520> number<02:25:55.760> of<02:25:56.000> objects<02:25:56.399> that<02:25:56.520> you're 02:25:56.670 --> 02:25:56.680 align:start position:0% the number of objects that you're 02:25:56.680 --> 02:25:58.990 align:start position:0% the number of objects that you're referring<02:25:57.040> to<02:25:57.319> to<02:25:57.439> say<02:25:57.720> mine<02:25:58.200> in<02:25:58.359> Spanish<02:25:58.880> the 02:25:58.990 --> 02:25:59.000 align:start position:0% referring to to say mine in Spanish the 02:25:59.000 --> 02:26:01.670 align:start position:0% referring to to say mine in Spanish the word<02:25:59.240> has<02:25:59.359> to<02:25:59.520> be<02:25:59.960> mo<02:26:00.520> with<02:26:00.640> an<02:26:00.880> accent<02:26:01.359> if<02:26:01.479> it's 02:26:01.670 --> 02:26:01.680 align:start position:0% word has to be mo with an accent if it's 02:26:01.680 --> 02:26:04.150 align:start position:0% word has to be mo with an accent if it's masculine<02:26:02.279> or<02:26:02.560> Mia<02:26:03.040> if<02:26:03.160> it's<02:26:03.319> feminine<02:26:03.760> to<02:26:03.920> say 02:26:04.150 --> 02:26:04.160 align:start position:0% masculine or Mia if it's feminine to say 02:26:04.160 --> 02:26:07.389 align:start position:0% masculine or Mia if it's feminine to say yours<02:26:04.680> the<02:26:04.800> word<02:26:05.040> is<02:26:05.319> tuo<02:26:05.920> masculine<02:26:06.600> and<02:26:06.840> tuya 02:26:07.389 --> 02:26:07.399 align:start position:0% yours the word is tuo masculine and tuya 02:26:07.399 --> 02:26:09.910 align:start position:0% yours the word is tuo masculine and tuya feminine<02:26:07.800> to<02:26:07.960> say<02:26:08.240> ours<02:26:08.720> or<02:26:09.000> Ys<02:26:09.520> the<02:26:09.640> form<02:26:09.800> of 02:26:09.910 --> 02:26:09.920 align:start position:0% feminine to say ours or Ys the form of 02:26:09.920 --> 02:26:11.670 align:start position:0% feminine to say ours or Ys the form of the<02:26:10.040> possessive<02:26:10.479> adjective<02:26:11.040> actually<02:26:11.359> stays 02:26:11.670 --> 02:26:11.680 align:start position:0% the possessive adjective actually stays 02:26:11.680 --> 02:26:13.110 align:start position:0% the possessive adjective actually stays the<02:26:11.800> same<02:26:12.080> as<02:26:12.200> the<02:26:12.359> regular<02:26:12.720> possessive 02:26:13.110 --> 02:26:13.120 align:start position:0% the same as the regular possessive 02:26:13.120 --> 02:26:14.590 align:start position:0% the same as the regular possessive adjective<02:26:13.600> which<02:26:13.760> makes<02:26:13.960> Spanish<02:26:14.359> more 02:26:14.590 --> 02:26:14.600 align:start position:0% adjective which makes Spanish more 02:26:14.600 --> 02:26:16.030 align:start position:0% adjective which makes Spanish more convenient<02:26:15.160> so<02:26:15.279> you<02:26:15.399> can<02:26:15.560> only<02:26:15.760> tell<02:26:15.920> the 02:26:16.030 --> 02:26:16.040 align:start position:0% convenient so you can only tell the 02:26:16.040 --> 02:26:17.950 align:start position:0% convenient so you can only tell the difference<02:26:16.359> between<02:26:16.640> them<02:26:17.040> in<02:26:17.240> context<02:26:17.840> the 02:26:17.950 --> 02:26:17.960 align:start position:0% difference between them in context the 02:26:17.960 --> 02:26:20.750 align:start position:0% difference between them in context the words<02:26:18.359> suo<02:26:18.920> masculine<02:26:19.520> and<02:26:19.680> suya<02:26:20.200> feminine 02:26:20.750 --> 02:26:20.760 align:start position:0% words suo masculine and suya feminine 02:26:20.760 --> 02:26:23.190 align:start position:0% words suo masculine and suya feminine can<02:26:20.880> mean<02:26:21.279> his<02:26:21.680> hers<02:26:22.080> or<02:26:22.359> theirs<02:26:22.840> and<02:26:22.960> so<02:26:23.080> you 02:26:23.190 --> 02:26:23.200 align:start position:0% can mean his hers or theirs and so you 02:26:23.200 --> 02:26:24.349 align:start position:0% can mean his hers or theirs and so you can<02:26:23.319> only<02:26:23.479> tell<02:26:23.640> the<02:26:23.760> difference<02:26:24.080> between 02:26:24.349 --> 02:26:24.359 align:start position:0% can only tell the difference between 02:26:24.359 --> 02:26:25.870 align:start position:0% can only tell the difference between them<02:26:24.520> in<02:26:24.640> context<02:26:25.279> in<02:26:25.399> case<02:26:25.560> you<02:26:25.640> need<02:26:25.760> to 02:26:25.870 --> 02:26:25.880 align:start position:0% them in context in case you need to 02:26:25.880 --> 02:26:27.830 align:start position:0% them in context in case you need to pluralize<02:26:26.439> any<02:26:26.600> of<02:26:26.760> them<02:26:27.040> you<02:26:27.160> simply<02:26:27.439> put<02:26:27.640> an 02:26:27.830 --> 02:26:27.840 align:start position:0% pluralize any of them you simply put an 02:26:27.840 --> 02:26:29.670 align:start position:0% pluralize any of them you simply put an essay<02:26:28.359> after<02:26:28.680> every<02:26:28.960> adjective<02:26:29.359> saying<02:26:29.560> a 02:26:29.670 --> 02:26:29.680 align:start position:0% essay after every adjective saying a 02:26:29.680 --> 02:26:32.389 align:start position:0% essay after every adjective saying a sentence<02:26:30.120> like<02:26:30.439> a<02:26:30.640> Lio<02:26:31.160> is<02:26:31.800> would<02:26:31.960> mean<02:26:32.240> the 02:26:32.389 --> 02:26:32.399 align:start position:0% sentence like a Lio is would mean the 02:26:32.399 --> 02:26:34.150 align:start position:0% sentence like a Lio is would mean the book<02:26:32.640> is<02:26:32.880> mine<02:26:33.279> with<02:26:33.399> the<02:26:33.520> ending<02:26:33.840> of<02:26:34.000> the 02:26:34.150 --> 02:26:34.160 align:start position:0% book is mine with the ending of the 02:26:34.160 --> 02:26:35.750 align:start position:0% book is mine with the ending of the adjective<02:26:34.720> matching<02:26:35.040> the<02:26:35.160> gender<02:26:35.520> of<02:26:35.640> the 02:26:35.750 --> 02:26:35.760 align:start position:0% adjective matching the gender of the 02:26:35.760 --> 02:26:37.429 align:start position:0% adjective matching the gender of the noun<02:26:36.080> but<02:26:36.200> another<02:26:36.479> way<02:26:36.600> to<02:26:36.760> say<02:26:37.000> this<02:26:37.279> would 02:26:37.429 --> 02:26:37.439 align:start position:0% noun but another way to say this would 02:26:37.439 --> 02:26:39.790 align:start position:0% noun but another way to say this would be<02:26:37.720> a<02:26:37.840> Libro<02:26:38.600> meaning<02:26:38.920> the<02:26:39.080> book<02:26:39.240> of<02:26:39.399> mine 02:26:39.790 --> 02:26:39.800 align:start position:0% be a Libro meaning the book of mine 02:26:39.800 --> 02:26:41.309 align:start position:0% be a Libro meaning the book of mine which<02:26:39.920> still<02:26:40.160> makes<02:26:40.439> sense<02:26:40.880> but<02:26:41.000> it's<02:26:41.120> not 02:26:41.309 --> 02:26:41.319 align:start position:0% which still makes sense but it's not 02:26:41.319 --> 02:26:43.230 align:start position:0% which still makes sense but it's not that<02:26:41.439> useful<02:26:41.840> conversationally<02:26:42.720> instead<02:26:43.160> you 02:26:43.230 --> 02:26:43.240 align:start position:0% that useful conversationally instead you 02:26:43.240 --> 02:26:44.870 align:start position:0% that useful conversationally instead you can<02:26:43.399> use<02:26:43.640> these<02:26:43.880> adjectives<02:26:44.399> when<02:26:44.560> talking 02:26:44.870 --> 02:26:44.880 align:start position:0% can use these adjectives when talking 02:26:44.880 --> 02:26:47.910 align:start position:0% can use these adjectives when talking about<02:26:45.200> people<02:26:45.720> like<02:26:46.080> Joan<02:26:46.439> is<02:26:46.920> amig<02:26:47.560> meaning 02:26:47.910 --> 02:26:47.920 align:start position:0% about people like Joan is amig meaning 02:26:47.920 --> 02:26:49.550 align:start position:0% about people like Joan is amig meaning John<02:26:48.240> is<02:26:48.359> a<02:26:48.520> friend<02:26:48.720> of<02:26:48.840> mine<02:26:49.120> and<02:26:49.240> the<02:26:49.359> same 02:26:49.550 --> 02:26:49.560 align:start position:0% John is a friend of mine and the same 02:26:49.560 --> 02:26:51.110 align:start position:0% John is a friend of mine and the same principle<02:26:50.000> applies<02:26:50.319> to<02:26:50.439> any<02:26:50.640> phrase<02:26:50.880> you<02:26:51.000> want 02:26:51.110 --> 02:26:51.120 align:start position:0% principle applies to any phrase you want 02:26:51.120 --> 02:26:54.190 align:start position:0% principle applies to any phrase you want to<02:26:51.240> say<02:26:51.560> saying<02:26:51.840> something<02:26:52.200> like<02:26:53.080> Laut<02:26:54.080> would 02:26:54.190 --> 02:26:54.200 align:start position:0% to say saying something like Laut would 02:26:54.200 --> 02:26:55.910 align:start position:0% to say saying something like Laut would mean<02:26:54.399> the<02:26:54.560> computer<02:26:55.040> of<02:26:55.200> yours<02:26:55.680> with<02:26:55.840> the 02:26:55.910 --> 02:26:55.920 align:start position:0% mean the computer of yours with the 02:26:55.920 --> 02:26:57.349 align:start position:0% mean the computer of yours with the ending<02:26:56.160> of<02:26:56.319> the<02:26:56.479> adjective<02:26:56.960> matching<02:26:57.240> the 02:26:57.349 --> 02:26:57.359 align:start position:0% ending of the adjective matching the 02:26:57.359 --> 02:26:59.190 align:start position:0% ending of the adjective matching the gender<02:26:57.720> of<02:26:57.840> the<02:26:57.960> noun<02:26:58.240> saying<02:26:58.520> something<02:26:58.880> like 02:26:59.190 --> 02:26:59.200 align:start position:0% gender of the noun saying something like 02:26:59.200 --> 02:27:01.990 align:start position:0% gender of the noun saying something like La<02:26:59.399> clra<02:27:00.399> would<02:27:00.560> mean<02:27:00.800> the<02:27:00.960> class<02:27:01.240> of<02:27:01.439> ours 02:27:01.990 --> 02:27:02.000 align:start position:0% La clra would mean the class of ours 02:27:02.000 --> 02:27:03.469 align:start position:0% La clra would mean the class of ours again<02:27:02.240> matching<02:27:02.520> the<02:27:02.640> gender<02:27:03.080> and<02:27:03.200> in<02:27:03.319> case 02:27:03.469 --> 02:27:03.479 align:start position:0% again matching the gender and in case 02:27:03.479 --> 02:27:05.830 align:start position:0% again matching the gender and in case you<02:27:03.560> want<02:27:03.640> to<02:27:03.760> pluralize<02:27:04.279> it<02:27:04.479> you<02:27:04.600> can<02:27:04.840> Sayes 02:27:05.830 --> 02:27:05.840 align:start position:0% you want to pluralize it you can Sayes 02:27:05.840 --> 02:27:08.630 align:start position:0% you want to pluralize it you can Sayes noas<02:27:06.479> meaning<02:27:06.840> the<02:27:07.040> classes<02:27:07.520> of<02:27:07.680> ours<02:27:08.279> because 02:27:08.630 --> 02:27:08.640 align:start position:0% noas meaning the classes of ours because 02:27:08.640 --> 02:27:11.790 align:start position:0% noas meaning the classes of ours because Su<02:27:09.240> suya<02:27:09.840> suos<02:27:10.399> and<02:27:10.560> suas<02:27:11.160> can<02:27:11.319> have<02:27:11.479> more<02:27:11.640> than 02:27:11.790 --> 02:27:11.800 align:start position:0% Su suya suos and suas can have more than 02:27:11.800 --> 02:27:13.710 align:start position:0% Su suya suos and suas can have more than one<02:27:11.960> meaning<02:27:12.399> you<02:27:12.479> can<02:27:12.640> avoid<02:27:12.920> the<02:27:13.080> confusion 02:27:13.710 --> 02:27:13.720 align:start position:0% one meaning you can avoid the confusion 02:27:13.720 --> 02:27:15.710 align:start position:0% one meaning you can avoid the confusion by<02:27:13.880> specifying<02:27:14.399> who<02:27:14.560> the<02:27:14.680> subject<02:27:15.040> pronoun<02:27:15.439> is 02:27:15.710 --> 02:27:15.720 align:start position:0% by specifying who the subject pronoun is 02:27:15.720 --> 02:27:18.309 align:start position:0% by specifying who the subject pronoun is for<02:27:15.920> instance<02:27:16.319> saying<02:27:16.800> El<02:27:17.439> suo<02:27:17.960> would<02:27:18.120> mean 02:27:18.309 --> 02:27:18.319 align:start position:0% for instance saying El suo would mean 02:27:18.319 --> 02:27:20.349 align:start position:0% for instance saying El suo would mean the<02:27:18.479> keyboard<02:27:19.040> of<02:27:19.399> but<02:27:19.520> because<02:27:19.760> suo<02:27:20.200> has 02:27:20.349 --> 02:27:20.359 align:start position:0% the keyboard of but because suo has 02:27:20.359 --> 02:27:22.030 align:start position:0% the keyboard of but because suo has multiple<02:27:20.720> meanings<02:27:21.160> we<02:27:21.279> need<02:27:21.399> to<02:27:21.520> specify<02:27:21.920> the 02:27:22.030 --> 02:27:22.040 align:start position:0% multiple meanings we need to specify the 02:27:22.040 --> 02:27:23.790 align:start position:0% multiple meanings we need to specify the subject<02:27:22.319> in<02:27:22.520> context<02:27:23.080> by<02:27:23.200> saying<02:27:23.479> something 02:27:23.790 --> 02:27:23.800 align:start position:0% subject in context by saying something 02:27:23.800 --> 02:27:26.510 align:start position:0% subject in context by saying something like<02:27:24.160> El<02:27:25.160> meaning<02:27:25.439> the<02:27:25.560> keyboard<02:27:26.000> of<02:27:26.200> his 02:27:26.510 --> 02:27:26.520 align:start position:0% like El meaning the keyboard of his 02:27:26.520 --> 02:27:28.150 align:start position:0% like El meaning the keyboard of his because<02:27:26.720> we<02:27:26.840> know<02:27:27.040> that<02:27:27.240> L<02:27:27.560> refers<02:27:27.880> to<02:27:28.000> a 02:27:28.150 --> 02:27:28.160 align:start position:0% because we know that L refers to a 02:27:28.160 --> 02:27:29.790 align:start position:0% because we know that L refers to a masculine<02:27:28.680> his<02:27:29.000> we<02:27:29.080> can<02:27:29.200> now<02:27:29.399> change<02:27:29.640> the 02:27:29.790 --> 02:27:29.800 align:start position:0% masculine his we can now change the 02:27:29.800 --> 02:27:32.550 align:start position:0% masculine his we can now change the sentence<02:27:30.240> to<02:27:30.680> ELO<02:27:31.680> which<02:27:31.760> would<02:27:31.920> still<02:27:32.160> mean 02:27:32.550 --> 02:27:32.560 align:start position:0% sentence to ELO which would still mean 02:27:32.560 --> 02:27:34.269 align:start position:0% sentence to ELO which would still mean the<02:27:32.720> keyboard<02:27:33.080> of<02:27:33.240> his<02:27:33.520> and<02:27:33.640> the<02:27:33.760> same<02:27:33.960> idea 02:27:34.269 --> 02:27:34.279 align:start position:0% the keyboard of his and the same idea 02:27:34.279 --> 02:27:35.590 align:start position:0% the keyboard of his and the same idea applies<02:27:34.560> to<02:27:34.680> any<02:27:34.880> subject<02:27:35.200> that<02:27:35.279> you<02:27:35.399> want<02:27:35.479> to 02:27:35.590 --> 02:27:35.600 align:start position:0% applies to any subject that you want to 02:27:35.600 --> 02:27:37.230 align:start position:0% applies to any subject that you want to use<02:27:35.920> but<02:27:36.080> keep<02:27:36.240> in<02:27:36.359> mind<02:27:36.720> gender<02:27:37.040> and 02:27:37.230 --> 02:27:37.240 align:start position:0% use but keep in mind gender and 02:27:37.240 --> 02:27:38.750 align:start position:0% use but keep in mind gender and plurality<02:27:37.840> one<02:27:38.000> thing<02:27:38.160> to<02:27:38.319> note<02:27:38.640> with 02:27:38.750 --> 02:27:38.760 align:start position:0% plurality one thing to note with 02:27:38.760 --> 02:27:40.389 align:start position:0% plurality one thing to note with stressed<02:27:39.200> possessive<02:27:39.600> adjectives<02:27:40.160> is<02:27:40.279> that 02:27:40.389 --> 02:27:40.399 align:start position:0% stressed possessive adjectives is that 02:27:40.399 --> 02:27:41.950 align:start position:0% stressed possessive adjectives is that they<02:27:40.520> can<02:27:40.640> also<02:27:40.960> function<02:27:41.479> with<02:27:41.640> the<02:27:41.760> same 02:27:41.950 --> 02:27:41.960 align:start position:0% they can also function with the same 02:27:41.960 --> 02:27:43.990 align:start position:0% they can also function with the same meaning<02:27:42.439> as<02:27:42.600> regular<02:27:43.000> possessive<02:27:43.439> adjectives 02:27:43.990 --> 02:27:44.000 align:start position:0% meaning as regular possessive adjectives 02:27:44.000 --> 02:27:46.150 align:start position:0% meaning as regular possessive adjectives like<02:27:44.120> saying<02:27:44.520> to<02:27:44.800> quaderno<02:27:45.520> which<02:27:45.640> means<02:27:45.960> your 02:27:46.150 --> 02:27:46.160 align:start position:0% like saying to quaderno which means your 02:27:46.160 --> 02:27:48.030 align:start position:0% like saying to quaderno which means your notebook<02:27:46.840> but<02:27:46.960> this<02:27:47.120> phrase<02:27:47.479> can<02:27:47.640> also<02:27:47.840> be 02:27:48.030 --> 02:27:48.040 align:start position:0% notebook but this phrase can also be 02:27:48.040 --> 02:27:49.830 align:start position:0% notebook but this phrase can also be Rewritten<02:27:48.720> while<02:27:48.920> keeping<02:27:49.160> its<02:27:49.319> meaning<02:27:49.680> like 02:27:49.830 --> 02:27:49.840 align:start position:0% Rewritten while keeping its meaning like 02:27:49.840 --> 02:27:52.910 align:start position:0% Rewritten while keeping its meaning like saying<02:27:50.479> El<02:27:51.479> and<02:27:51.640> now<02:27:51.960> this<02:27:52.080> sentence<02:27:52.439> means 02:27:52.910 --> 02:27:52.920 align:start position:0% saying El and now this sentence means 02:27:52.920 --> 02:27:55.030 align:start position:0% saying El and now this sentence means both<02:27:53.240> your<02:27:53.479> notebook<02:27:54.080> and<02:27:54.200> the<02:27:54.359> notebook<02:27:54.880> of 02:27:55.030 --> 02:27:55.040 align:start position:0% both your notebook and the notebook of 02:27:55.040 --> 02:27:56.910 align:start position:0% both your notebook and the notebook of yours<02:27:55.439> and<02:27:55.560> the<02:27:55.640> same<02:27:55.880> idea<02:27:56.319> applies<02:27:56.600> to<02:27:56.760> any 02:27:56.910 --> 02:27:56.920 align:start position:0% yours and the same idea applies to any 02:27:56.920 --> 02:27:58.429 align:start position:0% yours and the same idea applies to any other<02:27:57.120> sentence<02:27:57.439> you<02:27:57.560> want<02:27:57.640> to<02:27:57.800> say<02:27:58.080> using 02:27:58.429 --> 02:27:58.439 align:start position:0% other sentence you want to say using 02:27:58.439 --> 02:28:00.910 align:start position:0% other sentence you want to say using these<02:27:58.680> adjectives<02:27:59.279> POR<02:27:59.640> in<02:27:59.800> Spanish<02:28:00.279> means<02:28:00.680> by 02:28:00.910 --> 02:28:00.920 align:start position:0% these adjectives POR in Spanish means by 02:28:00.920 --> 02:28:03.710 align:start position:0% these adjectives POR in Spanish means by or<02:28:01.200> through<02:28:01.680> and<02:28:01.880> para<02:28:02.319> means<02:28:02.680> four<02:28:03.319> sometimes 02:28:03.710 --> 02:28:03.720 align:start position:0% or through and para means four sometimes 02:28:03.720 --> 02:28:05.190 align:start position:0% or through and para means four sometimes the<02:28:03.840> two<02:28:04.040> prepositions<02:28:04.720> have<02:28:04.920> the<02:28:05.000> same 02:28:05.190 --> 02:28:05.200 align:start position:0% the two prepositions have the same 02:28:05.200 --> 02:28:06.469 align:start position:0% the two prepositions have the same meaning<02:28:05.600> but<02:28:05.680> are<02:28:05.840> used<02:28:06.040> in<02:28:06.200> different 02:28:06.469 --> 02:28:06.479 align:start position:0% meaning but are used in different 02:28:06.479 --> 02:28:08.070 align:start position:0% meaning but are used in different situations<02:28:07.120> so<02:28:07.240> you<02:28:07.359> cannot<02:28:07.600> use<02:28:07.840> them 02:28:08.070 --> 02:28:08.080 align:start position:0% situations so you cannot use them 02:28:08.080 --> 02:28:09.950 align:start position:0% situations so you cannot use them interchangeably<02:28:08.960> in<02:28:09.120> this<02:28:09.279> video<02:28:09.680> I'd<02:28:09.800> like 02:28:09.950 --> 02:28:09.960 align:start position:0% interchangeably in this video I'd like 02:28:09.960 --> 02:28:11.429 align:start position:0% interchangeably in this video I'd like to<02:28:10.080> explain<02:28:10.359> all<02:28:10.479> the<02:28:10.680> differences<02:28:11.120> between 02:28:11.429 --> 02:28:11.439 align:start position:0% to explain all the differences between 02:28:11.439 --> 02:28:13.309 align:start position:0% to explain all the differences between them<02:28:11.720> and<02:28:11.800> how<02:28:11.920> to<02:28:12.040> use<02:28:12.240> them<02:28:12.359> in<02:28:12.520> what<02:28:12.760> context 02:28:13.309 --> 02:28:13.319 align:start position:0% them and how to use them in what context 02:28:13.319 --> 02:28:14.990 align:start position:0% them and how to use them in what context mainly<02:28:13.600> speaking<02:28:13.880> of<02:28:14.040> movement<02:28:14.560> time<02:28:14.840> and 02:28:14.990 --> 02:28:15.000 align:start position:0% mainly speaking of movement time and 02:28:15.000 --> 02:28:17.110 align:start position:0% mainly speaking of movement time and action<02:28:15.439> which<02:28:15.600> both<02:28:15.880> Po<02:28:16.120> and<02:28:16.279> Para<02:28:16.880> but<02:28:17.000> in 02:28:17.110 --> 02:28:17.120 align:start position:0% action which both Po and Para but in 02:28:17.120 --> 02:28:18.550 align:start position:0% action which both Po and Para but in different<02:28:17.359> circumstances<02:28:18.120> starting<02:28:18.439> with 02:28:18.550 --> 02:28:18.560 align:start position:0% different circumstances starting with 02:28:18.560 --> 02:28:20.710 align:start position:0% different circumstances starting with the<02:28:18.680> first<02:28:18.920> usage<02:28:19.240> of<02:28:19.479> por<02:28:19.880> this<02:28:20.080> preposition 02:28:20.710 --> 02:28:20.720 align:start position:0% the first usage of por this preposition 02:28:20.720 --> 02:28:22.950 align:start position:0% the first usage of por this preposition can<02:28:20.880> literally<02:28:21.279> mean<02:28:21.720> by<02:28:22.000> or<02:28:22.240> through<02:28:22.760> which 02:28:22.950 --> 02:28:22.960 align:start position:0% can literally mean by or through which 02:28:22.960 --> 02:28:24.990 align:start position:0% can literally mean by or through which involves<02:28:23.399> movement<02:28:23.960> but<02:28:24.080> it's<02:28:24.240> used<02:28:24.520> as<02:28:24.760> other 02:28:24.990 --> 02:28:25.000 align:start position:0% involves movement but it's used as other 02:28:25.000 --> 02:28:26.550 align:start position:0% involves movement but it's used as other prepositions<02:28:25.720> when<02:28:25.840> it<02:28:25.960> comes<02:28:26.160> down<02:28:26.279> to<02:28:26.439> the 02:28:26.550 --> 02:28:26.560 align:start position:0% prepositions when it comes down to the 02:28:26.560 --> 02:28:28.349 align:start position:0% prepositions when it comes down to the duration<02:28:26.920> of<02:28:27.040> an<02:28:27.200> event<02:28:27.479> or<02:28:27.680> a<02:28:27.800> reason<02:28:28.080> for<02:28:28.240> a 02:28:28.349 --> 02:28:28.359 align:start position:0% duration of an event or a reason for a 02:28:28.359 --> 02:28:30.630 align:start position:0% duration of an event or a reason for a circumstance<02:28:29.120> for<02:28:29.319> instance<02:28:29.800> you<02:28:29.880> can<02:28:30.040> use<02:28:30.279> po 02:28:30.630 --> 02:28:30.640 align:start position:0% circumstance for instance you can use po 02:28:30.640 --> 02:28:32.309 align:start position:0% circumstance for instance you can use po when<02:28:30.800> speaking<02:28:31.080> of<02:28:31.200> the<02:28:31.359> preposition<02:28:31.880> by<02:28:32.120> or 02:28:32.309 --> 02:28:32.319 align:start position:0% when speaking of the preposition by or 02:28:32.319 --> 02:28:33.790 align:start position:0% when speaking of the preposition by or through 02:28:33.790 --> 02:28:33.800 align:start position:0% through 02:28:33.800 --> 02:28:36.950 align:start position:0% through like<02:28:34.800> which<02:28:34.960> literally<02:28:35.359> means<02:28:35.880> I<02:28:36.080> went<02:28:36.439> by<02:28:36.760> or 02:28:36.950 --> 02:28:36.960 align:start position:0% like which literally means I went by or 02:28:36.960 --> 02:28:38.590 align:start position:0% like which literally means I went by or through<02:28:37.240> the<02:28:37.439> park<02:28:37.760> which<02:28:37.920> logically<02:28:38.319> makes 02:28:38.590 --> 02:28:38.600 align:start position:0% through the park which logically makes 02:28:38.600 --> 02:28:40.469 align:start position:0% through the park which logically makes sense<02:28:39.000> both<02:28:39.160> in<02:28:39.319> English<02:28:39.680> and<02:28:39.880> Spanish 02:28:40.469 --> 02:28:40.479 align:start position:0% sense both in English and Spanish 02:28:40.479 --> 02:28:43.070 align:start position:0% sense both in English and Spanish however<02:28:40.760> saying<02:28:41.000> a<02:28:41.160> sentence<02:28:41.560> like<02:28:41.840> YOLO<02:28:42.279> isos 02:28:43.070 --> 02:28:43.080 align:start position:0% however saying a sentence like YOLO isos 02:28:43.080 --> 02:28:45.990 align:start position:0% however saying a sentence like YOLO isos oras<02:28:43.680> indicates<02:28:44.240> I<02:28:44.399> did<02:28:44.640> it<02:28:44.760> for<02:28:44.960> 2<02:28:45.200> hours<02:28:45.800> with 02:28:45.990 --> 02:28:46.000 align:start position:0% oras indicates I did it for 2 hours with 02:28:46.000 --> 02:28:47.950 align:start position:0% oras indicates I did it for 2 hours with po<02:28:46.279> acting<02:28:46.680> as<02:28:46.800> the<02:28:46.960> preposition<02:28:47.399> for<02:28:47.800> in 02:28:47.950 --> 02:28:47.960 align:start position:0% po acting as the preposition for in 02:28:47.960 --> 02:28:49.710 align:start position:0% po acting as the preposition for in English<02:28:48.399> and<02:28:48.520> it<02:28:48.600> is<02:28:48.760> tricky<02:28:49.040> to<02:28:49.479> understand 02:28:49.710 --> 02:28:49.720 align:start position:0% English and it is tricky to understand 02:28:49.720 --> 02:28:51.190 align:start position:0% English and it is tricky to understand the<02:28:49.840> best<02:28:50.000> tip<02:28:50.200> that<02:28:50.359> I<02:28:50.439> can<02:28:50.600> give<02:28:50.800> to 02:28:51.190 --> 02:28:51.200 align:start position:0% the best tip that I can give to 02:28:51.200 --> 02:28:52.429 align:start position:0% the best tip that I can give to understand<02:28:51.359> this<02:28:51.560> better<02:28:51.920> is<02:28:52.040> instead<02:28:52.319> of 02:28:52.429 --> 02:28:52.439 align:start position:0% understand this better is instead of 02:28:52.439 --> 02:28:53.910 align:start position:0% understand this better is instead of thinking<02:28:52.680> of<02:28:52.840> the<02:28:52.920> sentence<02:28:53.240> in<02:28:53.399> English<02:28:53.800> you 02:28:53.910 --> 02:28:53.920 align:start position:0% thinking of the sentence in English you 02:28:53.920 --> 02:28:55.670 align:start position:0% thinking of the sentence in English you can<02:28:54.040> logically<02:28:54.399> think<02:28:54.640> of<02:28:54.800> por<02:28:55.240> as<02:28:55.399> something 02:28:55.670 --> 02:28:55.680 align:start position:0% can logically think of por as something 02:28:55.680 --> 02:28:57.590 align:start position:0% can logically think of por as something that's<02:28:55.840> used<02:28:56.120> for<02:28:56.279> a<02:28:56.439> duration<02:28:56.960> or<02:28:57.160> during 02:28:57.590 --> 02:28:57.600 align:start position:0% that's used for a duration or during 02:28:57.600 --> 02:28:59.269 align:start position:0% that's used for a duration or during something<02:28:58.160> which<02:28:58.279> leads<02:28:58.560> to<02:28:58.720> the<02:28:58.840> second<02:28:59.080> use 02:28:59.269 --> 02:28:59.279 align:start position:0% something which leads to the second use 02:28:59.279 --> 02:29:01.349 align:start position:0% something which leads to the second use of<02:28:59.479> por<02:28:59.800> instead<02:29:00.040> of<02:29:00.200> saying<02:29:00.520> I<02:29:00.640> did<02:29:00.800> it<02:29:00.920> for<02:29:01.120> 2 02:29:01.349 --> 02:29:01.359 align:start position:0% of por instead of saying I did it for 2 02:29:01.359 --> 02:29:03.670 align:start position:0% of por instead of saying I did it for 2 hours<02:29:01.880> we<02:29:01.960> can<02:29:02.120> think<02:29:02.279> of<02:29:02.399> it<02:29:02.600> as<02:29:02.960> I<02:29:03.160> did<02:29:03.399> it 02:29:03.670 --> 02:29:03.680 align:start position:0% hours we can think of it as I did it 02:29:03.680 --> 02:29:05.550 align:start position:0% hours we can think of it as I did it during<02:29:04.000> 2<02:29:04.279> hours<02:29:04.800> which<02:29:04.960> demonstrates<02:29:05.479> the 02:29:05.550 --> 02:29:05.560 align:start position:0% during 2 hours which demonstrates the 02:29:05.560 --> 02:29:06.830 align:start position:0% during 2 hours which demonstrates the use<02:29:05.720> of<02:29:05.840> a<02:29:06.000> duration<02:29:06.479> through<02:29:06.680> the 02:29:06.830 --> 02:29:06.840 align:start position:0% use of a duration through the 02:29:06.840 --> 02:29:09.030 align:start position:0% use of a duration through the preposition<02:29:07.399> por<02:29:07.720> which<02:29:07.840> is<02:29:07.960> why<02:29:08.160> por<02:29:08.520> is<02:29:08.680> used 02:29:09.030 --> 02:29:09.040 align:start position:0% preposition por which is why por is used 02:29:09.040 --> 02:29:10.550 align:start position:0% preposition por which is why por is used it<02:29:09.120> is<02:29:09.279> tricky<02:29:09.560> to<02:29:10.000> understand<02:29:10.279> but<02:29:10.399> that's 02:29:10.550 --> 02:29:10.560 align:start position:0% it is tricky to understand but that's 02:29:10.560 --> 02:29:12.150 align:start position:0% it is tricky to understand but that's the<02:29:10.680> closest<02:29:11.000> connection<02:29:11.520> I<02:29:11.640> can<02:29:11.800> give<02:29:11.920> it<02:29:12.040> in 02:29:12.150 --> 02:29:12.160 align:start position:0% the closest connection I can give it in 02:29:12.160 --> 02:29:14.230 align:start position:0% the closest connection I can give it in English<02:29:12.640> another<02:29:12.920> way<02:29:13.040> to<02:29:13.160> use<02:29:13.399> po<02:29:13.760> is<02:29:13.880> for<02:29:14.080> a 02:29:14.230 --> 02:29:14.240 align:start position:0% English another way to use po is for a 02:29:14.240 --> 02:29:19.230 align:start position:0% English another way to use po is for a reason<02:29:14.479> of<02:29:14.680> action<02:29:15.120> like<02:29:15.279> in<02:29:15.399> the<02:29:15.560> sentence<02:29:16.160> y 02:29:19.230 --> 02:29:19.240 align:start position:0% 02:29:19.240 --> 02:29:21.510 align:start position:0% which<02:29:19.359> means<02:29:19.760> I<02:29:19.960> arrived<02:29:20.439> late<02:29:20.760> to<02:29:20.920> the<02:29:21.120> house 02:29:21.510 --> 02:29:21.520 align:start position:0% which means I arrived late to the house 02:29:21.520 --> 02:29:22.870 align:start position:0% which means I arrived late to the house because<02:29:21.760> of<02:29:21.880> the<02:29:22.040> traffic<02:29:22.439> and<02:29:22.520> in<02:29:22.680> this 02:29:22.870 --> 02:29:22.880 align:start position:0% because of the traffic and in this 02:29:22.880 --> 02:29:25.110 align:start position:0% because of the traffic and in this context<02:29:23.479> PO<02:29:23.720> is<02:29:23.840> used<02:29:24.120> as<02:29:24.240> the<02:29:24.359> preposition 02:29:25.110 --> 02:29:25.120 align:start position:0% context PO is used as the preposition 02:29:25.120 --> 02:29:26.630 align:start position:0% context PO is used as the preposition because<02:29:25.439> of<02:29:25.760> because<02:29:25.960> there's<02:29:26.160> a<02:29:26.279> reason<02:29:26.479> of 02:29:26.630 --> 02:29:26.640 align:start position:0% because of because there's a reason of 02:29:26.640 --> 02:29:28.230 align:start position:0% because of because there's a reason of the<02:29:26.840> action<02:29:27.120> done<02:29:27.359> in<02:29:27.479> the<02:29:27.640> sentence<02:29:28.120> and 02:29:28.230 --> 02:29:28.240 align:start position:0% the action done in the sentence and 02:29:28.240 --> 02:29:29.710 align:start position:0% the action done in the sentence and that's<02:29:28.399> the<02:29:28.520> closest<02:29:28.840> connection<02:29:29.319> I<02:29:29.399> can<02:29:29.560> give 02:29:29.710 --> 02:29:29.720 align:start position:0% that's the closest connection I can give 02:29:29.720 --> 02:29:31.950 align:start position:0% that's the closest connection I can give it<02:29:30.040> now<02:29:30.279> to<02:29:30.479> get<02:29:30.640> more<02:29:30.880> precise<02:29:31.279> with<02:29:31.479> po<02:29:31.840> we 02:29:31.950 --> 02:29:31.960 align:start position:0% it now to get more precise with po we 02:29:31.960 --> 02:29:34.030 align:start position:0% it now to get more precise with po we have<02:29:32.040> to<02:29:32.160> take<02:29:32.279> a<02:29:32.399> look<02:29:32.680> at<02:29:32.920> movement<02:29:33.479> time<02:29:33.760> and 02:29:34.030 --> 02:29:34.040 align:start position:0% have to take a look at movement time and 02:29:34.040 --> 02:29:35.870 align:start position:0% have to take a look at movement time and action<02:29:34.439> a<02:29:34.560> bit<02:29:34.760> more<02:29:34.960> specifically<02:29:35.640> aside 02:29:35.870 --> 02:29:35.880 align:start position:0% action a bit more specifically aside 02:29:35.880 --> 02:29:38.030 align:start position:0% action a bit more specifically aside from<02:29:36.080> these<02:29:36.319> categories<02:29:36.880> P<02:29:37.200> can<02:29:37.359> also<02:29:37.560> be<02:29:37.720> used 02:29:38.030 --> 02:29:38.040 align:start position:0% from these categories P can also be used 02:29:38.040 --> 02:29:39.950 align:start position:0% from these categories P can also be used in<02:29:38.240> topics<02:29:38.640> like<02:29:38.800> in<02:29:38.960> the<02:29:39.080> search<02:29:39.359> for<02:29:39.800> and 02:29:39.950 --> 02:29:39.960 align:start position:0% in topics like in the search for and 02:29:39.960 --> 02:29:41.590 align:start position:0% in topics like in the search for and exchange<02:29:40.479> units<02:29:40.760> of<02:29:40.920> measurement<02:29:41.439> and 02:29:41.590 --> 02:29:41.600 align:start position:0% exchange units of measurement and 02:29:41.600 --> 02:29:43.670 align:start position:0% exchange units of measurement and idiomatic<02:29:42.279> expressions<02:29:42.920> for<02:29:43.120> instance 02:29:43.670 --> 02:29:43.680 align:start position:0% idiomatic expressions for instance 02:29:43.680 --> 02:29:44.670 align:start position:0% idiomatic expressions for instance saying 02:29:44.670 --> 02:29:44.680 align:start position:0% saying 02:29:44.680 --> 02:29:47.230 align:start position:0% saying yapis<02:29:45.680> indicates<02:29:46.120> that<02:29:46.279> I<02:29:46.560> went<02:29:46.760> for<02:29:47.040> my 02:29:47.230 --> 02:29:47.240 align:start position:0% yapis indicates that I went for my 02:29:47.240 --> 02:29:48.910 align:start position:0% yapis indicates that I went for my pencil<02:29:47.720> which<02:29:47.880> visually<02:29:48.240> doesn't<02:29:48.520> make<02:29:48.680> sense 02:29:48.910 --> 02:29:48.920 align:start position:0% pencil which visually doesn't make sense 02:29:48.920 --> 02:29:50.830 align:start position:0% pencil which visually doesn't make sense in<02:29:49.040> English<02:29:49.520> with<02:29:49.640> the<02:29:49.800> preposition<02:29:50.279> for<02:29:50.720> but 02:29:50.830 --> 02:29:50.840 align:start position:0% in English with the preposition for but 02:29:50.840 --> 02:29:52.830 align:start position:0% in English with the preposition for but another<02:29:51.120> way<02:29:51.240> to<02:29:51.359> look<02:29:51.479> at<02:29:51.600> the<02:29:51.760> sentence<02:29:52.399> is<02:29:52.720> I 02:29:52.830 --> 02:29:52.840 align:start position:0% another way to look at the sentence is I 02:29:52.840 --> 02:29:55.110 align:start position:0% another way to look at the sentence is I went<02:29:53.279> in<02:29:53.479> search<02:29:53.800> of<02:29:53.960> my<02:29:54.120> pencil<02:29:54.600> which<02:29:54.720> is<02:29:54.880> why 02:29:55.110 --> 02:29:55.120 align:start position:0% went in search of my pencil which is why 02:29:55.120 --> 02:29:57.150 align:start position:0% went in search of my pencil which is why po<02:29:55.479> has<02:29:55.600> to<02:29:55.720> be<02:29:55.840> used<02:29:56.200> in<02:29:56.359> this<02:29:56.560> context 02:29:57.150 --> 02:29:57.160 align:start position:0% po has to be used in this context 02:29:57.160 --> 02:29:59.429 align:start position:0% po has to be used in this context another<02:29:57.520> example<02:29:58.000> can<02:29:58.160> be<02:29:58.319> an<02:29:58.520> exchange<02:29:59.160> like 02:29:59.429 --> 02:29:59.439 align:start position:0% another example can be an exchange like 02:29:59.439 --> 02:30:01.030 align:start position:0% another example can be an exchange like in<02:29:59.560> the 02:30:01.030 --> 02:30:01.040 align:start position:0% in the 02:30:01.040 --> 02:30:03.469 align:start position:0% in the sentence<02:30:02.040> meaning<02:30:02.399> I<02:30:02.600> gave<02:30:02.760> you<02:30:02.880> money<02:30:03.240> for 02:30:03.469 --> 02:30:03.479 align:start position:0% sentence meaning I gave you money for 02:30:03.479 --> 02:30:05.670 align:start position:0% sentence meaning I gave you money for the<02:30:03.640> ticket<02:30:04.080> once<02:30:04.319> again<02:30:04.680> po<02:30:05.080> functions<02:30:05.520> as 02:30:05.670 --> 02:30:05.680 align:start position:0% the ticket once again po functions as 02:30:05.680 --> 02:30:07.349 align:start position:0% the ticket once again po functions as the<02:30:05.840> preposition<02:30:06.240> for<02:30:06.560> in<02:30:06.720> English<02:30:07.200> but 02:30:07.349 --> 02:30:07.359 align:start position:0% the preposition for in English but 02:30:07.359 --> 02:30:09.150 align:start position:0% the preposition for in English but another<02:30:07.600> way<02:30:07.720> to<02:30:07.840> say<02:30:08.040> the<02:30:08.200> sentence<02:30:08.760> is<02:30:09.000> I 02:30:09.150 --> 02:30:09.160 align:start position:0% another way to say the sentence is I 02:30:09.160 --> 02:30:10.870 align:start position:0% another way to say the sentence is I gave<02:30:09.359> you<02:30:09.520> money<02:30:09.920> in<02:30:10.120> exchange<02:30:10.560> for<02:30:10.720> the 02:30:10.870 --> 02:30:10.880 align:start position:0% gave you money in exchange for the 02:30:10.880 --> 02:30:12.750 align:start position:0% gave you money in exchange for the ticket<02:30:11.279> with<02:30:11.399> the<02:30:11.520> words<02:30:11.800> in<02:30:12.000> exchange<02:30:12.359> for 02:30:12.750 --> 02:30:12.760 align:start position:0% ticket with the words in exchange for 02:30:12.760 --> 02:30:14.750 align:start position:0% ticket with the words in exchange for all<02:30:13.000> meaning<02:30:13.439> Po<02:30:13.800> in<02:30:13.960> Spanish<02:30:14.439> even<02:30:14.640> though 02:30:14.750 --> 02:30:14.760 align:start position:0% all meaning Po in Spanish even though 02:30:14.760 --> 02:30:15.990 align:start position:0% all meaning Po in Spanish even though it's<02:30:14.880> hard<02:30:15.040> to<02:30:15.479> understand<02:30:15.760> that's<02:30:15.880> the 02:30:15.990 --> 02:30:16.000 align:start position:0% it's hard to understand that's the 02:30:16.000 --> 02:30:17.950 align:start position:0% it's hard to understand that's the closest<02:30:16.479> connection<02:30:16.840> I<02:30:16.920> can<02:30:17.120> give<02:30:17.240> it<02:30:17.800> can 02:30:17.950 --> 02:30:17.960 align:start position:0% closest connection I can give it can 02:30:17.960 --> 02:30:21.150 align:start position:0% closest connection I can give it can also<02:30:18.160> be<02:30:18.279> used<02:30:18.560> for<02:30:18.720> units<02:30:19.000> of<02:30:19.160> measurement 02:30:21.150 --> 02:30:21.160 align:start position:0% also be used for units of measurement 02:30:21.160 --> 02:30:26.269 align:start position:0% also be used for units of measurement like<02:30:22.560> K<02:30:23.560> which<02:30:23.680> means<02:30:24.040> I<02:30:24.120> was<02:30:24.319> driving<02:30:24.920> 120<02:30:25.680> km 02:30:26.269 --> 02:30:26.279 align:start position:0% like K which means I was driving 120 km 02:30:26.279 --> 02:30:28.110 align:start position:0% like K which means I was driving 120 km per<02:30:26.520> hour<02:30:27.000> with<02:30:27.200> por<02:30:27.600> acting<02:30:27.840> as<02:30:27.960> the 02:30:28.110 --> 02:30:28.120 align:start position:0% per hour with por acting as the 02:30:28.120 --> 02:30:29.630 align:start position:0% per hour with por acting as the preposition<02:30:28.640> per<02:30:29.000> even<02:30:29.200> though<02:30:29.319> it's<02:30:29.439> not<02:30:29.560> a 02:30:29.630 --> 02:30:29.640 align:start position:0% preposition per even though it's not a 02:30:29.640 --> 02:30:31.510 align:start position:0% preposition per even though it's not a useful<02:30:30.000> sentence<02:30:30.479> it<02:30:30.600> does<02:30:30.800> make<02:30:31.040> sense<02:30:31.279> for 02:30:31.510 --> 02:30:31.520 align:start position:0% useful sentence it does make sense for 02:30:31.520 --> 02:30:33.910 align:start position:0% useful sentence it does make sense for use<02:30:31.680> of<02:30:31.840> por<02:30:32.200> at<02:30:32.319> last<02:30:32.720> p<02:30:33.040> is<02:30:33.200> also<02:30:33.399> used<02:30:33.680> for 02:30:33.910 --> 02:30:33.920 align:start position:0% use of por at last p is also used for 02:30:33.920 --> 02:30:37.349 align:start position:0% use of por at last p is also used for idiomatic<02:30:34.560> expressions<02:30:35.240> like<02:30:35.520> pemp<02:30:36.439> and<02:30:36.720> P 02:30:37.349 --> 02:30:37.359 align:start position:0% idiomatic expressions like pemp and P 02:30:37.359 --> 02:30:39.389 align:start position:0% idiomatic expressions like pemp and P which<02:30:37.479> mean<02:30:37.640> for<02:30:37.960> example<02:30:38.520> and<02:30:38.680> at<02:30:39.000> last<02:30:39.319> and 02:30:39.389 --> 02:30:39.399 align:start position:0% which mean for example and at last and 02:30:39.399 --> 02:30:41.190 align:start position:0% which mean for example and at last and you<02:30:39.520> have<02:30:39.640> the<02:30:39.800> prepositions<02:30:40.319> for<02:30:40.640> and<02:30:40.880> at 02:30:41.190 --> 02:30:41.200 align:start position:0% you have the prepositions for and at 02:30:41.200 --> 02:30:42.710 align:start position:0% you have the prepositions for and at which<02:30:41.319> don't<02:30:41.560> really<02:30:41.760> make<02:30:41.920> sense<02:30:42.160> in<02:30:42.279> English 02:30:42.710 --> 02:30:42.720 align:start position:0% which don't really make sense in English 02:30:42.720 --> 02:30:44.830 align:start position:0% which don't really make sense in English but<02:30:42.920> once<02:30:43.120> again<02:30:43.520> that's<02:30:43.680> how<02:30:43.920> por<02:30:44.279> functions 02:30:44.830 --> 02:30:44.840 align:start position:0% but once again that's how por functions 02:30:44.840 --> 02:30:46.510 align:start position:0% but once again that's how por functions with<02:30:45.000> movement<02:30:45.600> time<02:30:45.840> and<02:30:46.000> action<02:30:46.319> in<02:30:46.439> in 02:30:46.510 --> 02:30:46.520 align:start position:0% with movement time and action in in 02:30:46.520 --> 02:30:48.790 align:start position:0% with movement time and action in in summary<02:30:47.000> P<02:30:47.359> applies<02:30:47.680> to<02:30:47.840> these<02:30:48.040> circumstances 02:30:48.790 --> 02:30:48.800 align:start position:0% summary P applies to these circumstances 02:30:48.800 --> 02:30:50.309 align:start position:0% summary P applies to these circumstances but<02:30:48.920> the<02:30:49.000> critical<02:30:49.359> part<02:30:49.560> to<02:30:49.720> remember<02:30:50.200> is 02:30:50.309 --> 02:30:50.319 align:start position:0% but the critical part to remember is 02:30:50.319 --> 02:30:52.269 align:start position:0% but the critical part to remember is that<02:30:50.439> it<02:30:50.600> applies<02:30:51.040> to<02:30:51.359> past<02:30:51.640> or<02:30:51.880> current 02:30:52.269 --> 02:30:52.279 align:start position:0% that it applies to past or current 02:30:52.279 --> 02:30:53.910 align:start position:0% that it applies to past or current movement<02:30:52.840> time<02:30:53.040> and<02:30:53.240> action<02:30:53.560> with<02:30:53.720> more 02:30:53.910 --> 02:30:53.920 align:start position:0% movement time and action with more 02:30:53.920 --> 02:30:55.870 align:start position:0% movement time and action with more examples<02:30:54.399> on<02:30:54.560> the<02:30:54.680> way<02:30:54.920> B<02:30:55.279> specifically 02:30:55.870 --> 02:30:55.880 align:start position:0% examples on the way B specifically 02:30:55.880 --> 02:30:58.030 align:start position:0% examples on the way B specifically indicates<02:30:56.439> things<02:30:56.680> like<02:30:56.880> a<02:30:57.040> general<02:30:57.439> motion 02:30:58.030 --> 02:30:58.040 align:start position:0% indicates things like a general motion 02:30:58.040 --> 02:31:00.349 align:start position:0% indicates things like a general motion like<02:30:58.319> by<02:30:58.520> or<02:30:58.800> through<02:30:59.240> a<02:30:59.359> duration<02:30:59.720> of<02:30:59.920> action 02:31:00.349 --> 02:31:00.359 align:start position:0% like by or through a duration of action 02:31:00.359 --> 02:31:02.710 align:start position:0% like by or through a duration of action as<02:31:00.560> enduring<02:31:01.160> a<02:31:01.279> reason<02:31:01.560> for<02:31:01.720> an<02:31:01.920> action<02:31:02.399> like 02:31:02.710 --> 02:31:02.720 align:start position:0% as enduring a reason for an action like 02:31:02.720 --> 02:31:05.150 align:start position:0% as enduring a reason for an action like because<02:31:03.120> of<02:31:03.479> an<02:31:03.720> object<02:31:04.000> of<02:31:04.120> a<02:31:04.279> search<02:31:04.720> as<02:31:04.960> in 02:31:05.150 --> 02:31:05.160 align:start position:0% because of an object of a search as in 02:31:05.160 --> 02:31:07.389 align:start position:0% because of an object of a search as in search<02:31:05.520> of<02:31:05.840> an<02:31:06.040> exchange<02:31:06.640> like<02:31:06.800> in<02:31:07.040> exchange 02:31:07.389 --> 02:31:07.399 align:start position:0% search of an exchange like in exchange 02:31:07.399 --> 02:31:09.630 align:start position:0% search of an exchange like in exchange for<02:31:07.760> units<02:31:08.080> of<02:31:08.240> measurement<02:31:08.760> as<02:31:08.880> in<02:31:09.120> per<02:31:09.479> an 02:31:09.630 --> 02:31:09.640 align:start position:0% for units of measurement as in per an 02:31:09.640 --> 02:31:11.790 align:start position:0% for units of measurement as in per an idiomatic<02:31:10.240> phrases<02:31:10.840> like<02:31:11.040> these<02:31:11.200> ones<02:31:11.640> that's 02:31:11.790 --> 02:31:11.800 align:start position:0% idiomatic phrases like these ones that's 02:31:11.800 --> 02:31:14.230 align:start position:0% idiomatic phrases like these ones that's how<02:31:12.040> por<02:31:12.399> functions<02:31:12.760> in<02:31:12.920> Spanish<02:31:13.520> para<02:31:13.960> on<02:31:14.120> the 02:31:14.230 --> 02:31:14.240 align:start position:0% how por functions in Spanish para on the 02:31:14.240 --> 02:31:16.630 align:start position:0% how por functions in Spanish para on the other<02:31:14.439> hand<02:31:14.760> literally<02:31:15.240> translates<02:31:15.880> as<02:31:16.040> for 02:31:16.630 --> 02:31:16.640 align:start position:0% other hand literally translates as for 02:31:16.640 --> 02:31:18.190 align:start position:0% other hand literally translates as for but<02:31:16.920> sometimes<02:31:17.160> functions<02:31:17.760> like<02:31:17.960> other 02:31:18.190 --> 02:31:18.200 align:start position:0% but sometimes functions like other 02:31:18.200 --> 02:31:20.429 align:start position:0% but sometimes functions like other prepositions<02:31:18.960> just<02:31:19.160> like<02:31:19.399> Po<02:31:19.760> para<02:31:20.200> also 02:31:20.429 --> 02:31:20.439 align:start position:0% prepositions just like Po para also 02:31:20.439 --> 02:31:22.429 align:start position:0% prepositions just like Po para also applies<02:31:20.760> to<02:31:20.920> movement<02:31:21.399> time<02:31:21.640> and<02:31:21.880> action<02:31:22.319> but 02:31:22.429 --> 02:31:22.439 align:start position:0% applies to movement time and action but 02:31:22.439 --> 02:31:24.750 align:start position:0% applies to movement time and action but in<02:31:22.640> these<02:31:22.840> cases<02:31:23.319> para<02:31:23.640> indicates<02:31:24.080> an<02:31:24.279> event 02:31:24.750 --> 02:31:24.760 align:start position:0% in these cases para indicates an event 02:31:24.760 --> 02:31:27.190 align:start position:0% in these cases para indicates an event in<02:31:24.880> the<02:31:25.040> future<02:31:25.600> or<02:31:25.800> a<02:31:26.000> purpose<02:31:26.439> for<02:31:26.640> an<02:31:26.840> event 02:31:27.190 --> 02:31:27.200 align:start position:0% in the future or a purpose for an event 02:31:27.200 --> 02:31:30.030 align:start position:0% in the future or a purpose for an event for<02:31:27.399> instance<02:31:27.840> saying<02:31:28.120> a<02:31:28.279> sentence<02:31:28.680> like<02:31:29.040> Y 02:31:30.030 --> 02:31:30.040 align:start position:0% for instance saying a sentence like Y 02:31:30.040 --> 02:31:32.670 align:start position:0% for instance saying a sentence like Y lasas<02:31:30.680> El<02:31:30.800> Lunes<02:31:31.319> means<02:31:31.720> I<02:31:31.880> leave<02:31:32.200> for<02:31:32.479> Las 02:31:32.670 --> 02:31:32.680 align:start position:0% lasas El Lunes means I leave for Las 02:31:32.680 --> 02:31:35.030 align:start position:0% lasas El Lunes means I leave for Las Vegas<02:31:33.000> on<02:31:33.160> Monday<02:31:33.680> indicating<02:31:34.160> a<02:31:34.359> destination 02:31:35.030 --> 02:31:35.040 align:start position:0% Vegas on Monday indicating a destination 02:31:35.040 --> 02:31:36.510 align:start position:0% Vegas on Monday indicating a destination that<02:31:35.160> I'm<02:31:35.319> going<02:31:35.520> to<02:31:35.680> reach<02:31:36.120> which<02:31:36.240> is<02:31:36.359> an 02:31:36.510 --> 02:31:36.520 align:start position:0% that I'm going to reach which is an 02:31:36.520 --> 02:31:37.750 align:start position:0% that I'm going to reach which is an event<02:31:36.840> that's<02:31:37.000> going<02:31:37.080> to<02:31:37.240> happen<02:31:37.560> in<02:31:37.640> the 02:31:37.750 --> 02:31:37.760 align:start position:0% event that's going to happen in the 02:31:37.760 --> 02:31:39.550 align:start position:0% event that's going to happen in the future<02:31:38.319> however<02:31:38.600> saying<02:31:38.920> something<02:31:39.240> like 02:31:39.550 --> 02:31:39.560 align:start position:0% future however saying something like 02:31:39.560 --> 02:31:43.150 align:start position:0% future however saying something like YOLO<02:31:39.960> Voya<02:31:40.760> said<02:31:41.760> means<02:31:42.160> I'm<02:31:42.319> going<02:31:42.520> to<02:31:42.680> do<02:31:42.840> it 02:31:43.150 --> 02:31:43.160 align:start position:0% YOLO Voya said means I'm going to do it 02:31:43.160 --> 02:31:45.269 align:start position:0% YOLO Voya said means I'm going to do it by<02:31:43.359> Friday<02:31:43.800> and<02:31:43.920> in<02:31:44.040> this<02:31:44.160> tricky<02:31:44.560> context<02:31:45.160> the 02:31:45.269 --> 02:31:45.279 align:start position:0% by Friday and in this tricky context the 02:31:45.279 --> 02:31:47.710 align:start position:0% by Friday and in this tricky context the word<02:31:45.680> para<02:31:46.080> Acts<02:31:46.439> as<02:31:46.560> the<02:31:46.720> preposition<02:31:47.240> by<02:31:47.600> in 02:31:47.710 --> 02:31:47.720 align:start position:0% word para Acts as the preposition by in 02:31:47.720 --> 02:31:49.309 align:start position:0% word para Acts as the preposition by in English<02:31:48.120> which<02:31:48.319> doesn't<02:31:48.560> make<02:31:48.800> sense<02:31:49.120> but<02:31:49.200> it 02:31:49.309 --> 02:31:49.319 align:start position:0% English which doesn't make sense but it 02:31:49.319 --> 02:31:51.190 align:start position:0% English which doesn't make sense but it does<02:31:49.560> function<02:31:50.080> as<02:31:50.160> a<02:31:50.399> deadline<02:31:50.960> in<02:31:51.080> the 02:31:51.190 --> 02:31:51.200 align:start position:0% does function as a deadline in the 02:31:51.200 --> 02:31:53.269 align:start position:0% does function as a deadline in the future<02:31:51.600> which<02:31:51.720> is<02:31:51.880> why<02:31:52.080> para<02:31:52.520> is<02:31:52.600> used<02:31:53.040> another 02:31:53.269 --> 02:31:53.279 align:start position:0% future which is why para is used another 02:31:53.279 --> 02:31:55.110 align:start position:0% future which is why para is used another way<02:31:53.399> to<02:31:53.520> look<02:31:53.640> at<02:31:53.760> the<02:31:53.920> sentence<02:31:54.479> is<02:31:54.760> I'm<02:31:54.880> going 02:31:55.110 --> 02:31:55.120 align:start position:0% way to look at the sentence is I'm going 02:31:55.120 --> 02:31:57.469 align:start position:0% way to look at the sentence is I'm going to<02:31:55.240> do<02:31:55.399> it<02:31:55.640> on<02:31:55.920> Friday<02:31:56.399> with<02:31:56.640> para<02:31:57.080> acting<02:31:57.359> as 02:31:57.469 --> 02:31:57.479 align:start position:0% to do it on Friday with para acting as 02:31:57.479 --> 02:31:59.469 align:start position:0% to do it on Friday with para acting as the<02:31:57.640> preposition<02:31:58.200> on<02:31:58.600> which<02:31:58.720> still<02:31:59.000> indicates 02:31:59.469 --> 02:31:59.479 align:start position:0% the preposition on which still indicates 02:31:59.479 --> 02:32:01.710 align:start position:0% the preposition on which still indicates a<02:31:59.640> deadline<02:32:00.120> in<02:32:00.240> the<02:32:00.319> future<02:32:00.800> at<02:32:00.960> last<02:32:01.319> para 02:32:01.710 --> 02:32:01.720 align:start position:0% a deadline in the future at last para 02:32:01.720 --> 02:32:03.389 align:start position:0% a deadline in the future at last para can<02:32:01.880> also<02:32:02.120> demonstrate<02:32:02.640> a<02:32:02.800> purpose<02:32:03.080> for<02:32:03.240> an 02:32:03.389 --> 02:32:03.399 align:start position:0% can also demonstrate a purpose for an 02:32:03.399 --> 02:32:06.110 align:start position:0% can also demonstrate a purpose for an action<02:32:03.840> like<02:32:04.000> in<02:32:04.120> the 02:32:06.110 --> 02:32:06.120 align:start position:0% action like in the 02:32:06.120 --> 02:32:08.710 align:start position:0% action like in the sentence<02:32:07.120> meaning<02:32:07.439> I<02:32:07.560> study<02:32:07.920> Spanish<02:32:08.319> to<02:32:08.479> be<02:32:08.600> a 02:32:08.710 --> 02:32:08.720 align:start position:0% sentence meaning I study Spanish to be a 02:32:08.720 --> 02:32:10.070 align:start position:0% sentence meaning I study Spanish to be a teacher<02:32:09.120> even<02:32:09.319> though<02:32:09.439> there's<02:32:09.680> completely 02:32:10.070 --> 02:32:10.080 align:start position:0% teacher even though there's completely 02:32:10.080 --> 02:32:12.030 align:start position:0% teacher even though there's completely no<02:32:10.319> preposition<02:32:10.800> in<02:32:10.920> the<02:32:11.080> sentence<02:32:11.560> by<02:32:11.720> saying 02:32:12.030 --> 02:32:12.040 align:start position:0% no preposition in the sentence by saying 02:32:12.040 --> 02:32:13.750 align:start position:0% no preposition in the sentence by saying I<02:32:12.160> study<02:32:12.479> Spanish<02:32:12.800> to<02:32:12.920> be<02:32:13.040> a<02:32:13.160> teacher<02:32:13.640> what 02:32:13.750 --> 02:32:13.760 align:start position:0% I study Spanish to be a teacher what 02:32:13.760 --> 02:32:15.870 align:start position:0% I study Spanish to be a teacher what we're<02:32:13.960> trying<02:32:14.200> to<02:32:14.359> say<02:32:14.760> is<02:32:14.960> I<02:32:15.080> study<02:32:15.439> Spanish 02:32:15.870 --> 02:32:15.880 align:start position:0% we're trying to say is I study Spanish 02:32:15.880 --> 02:32:17.870 align:start position:0% we're trying to say is I study Spanish in<02:32:16.319> order<02:32:16.520> to<02:32:16.600> be<02:32:16.720> a<02:32:16.840> teacher<02:32:17.240> with<02:32:17.479> para 02:32:17.870 --> 02:32:17.880 align:start position:0% in order to be a teacher with para 02:32:17.880 --> 02:32:19.349 align:start position:0% in order to be a teacher with para acting<02:32:18.160> as<02:32:18.240> a<02:32:18.399> purpose<02:32:18.680> of<02:32:18.800> the<02:32:19.000> action 02:32:19.349 --> 02:32:19.359 align:start position:0% acting as a purpose of the action 02:32:19.359 --> 02:32:21.190 align:start position:0% acting as a purpose of the action literally<02:32:19.760> meaning<02:32:20.200> in<02:32:20.359> order<02:32:20.640> to<02:32:21.040> this 02:32:21.190 --> 02:32:21.200 align:start position:0% literally meaning in order to this 02:32:21.200 --> 02:32:22.870 align:start position:0% literally meaning in order to this sentence<02:32:21.640> can<02:32:21.840> also<02:32:22.040> be<02:32:22.200> written<02:32:22.720> the 02:32:22.870 --> 02:32:22.880 align:start position:0% sentence can also be written the 02:32:22.880 --> 02:32:24.950 align:start position:0% sentence can also be written the opposite<02:32:23.279> way 02:32:24.950 --> 02:32:24.960 align:start position:0% opposite way 02:32:24.960 --> 02:32:27.630 align:start position:0% opposite way Prof<02:32:25.960> in<02:32:26.080> order<02:32:26.279> to<02:32:26.439> be<02:32:26.560> a<02:32:26.680> teacher<02:32:27.160> I<02:32:27.279> study 02:32:27.630 --> 02:32:27.640 align:start position:0% Prof in order to be a teacher I study 02:32:27.640 --> 02:32:29.030 align:start position:0% Prof in order to be a teacher I study Spanish<02:32:28.160> I<02:32:28.279> believe<02:32:28.520> that<02:32:28.680> this<02:32:28.760> is<02:32:28.880> the 02:32:29.030 --> 02:32:29.040 align:start position:0% Spanish I believe that this is the 02:32:29.040 --> 02:32:31.030 align:start position:0% Spanish I believe that this is the easiest<02:32:29.399> form<02:32:29.600> of<02:32:29.800> para<02:32:30.040> to<02:32:30.200> remember<02:32:30.720> because 02:32:31.030 --> 02:32:31.040 align:start position:0% easiest form of para to remember because 02:32:31.040 --> 02:32:32.950 align:start position:0% easiest form of para to remember because para<02:32:31.319> in<02:32:31.439> this<02:32:31.640> context<02:32:32.279> will<02:32:32.479> always<02:32:32.760> come 02:32:32.950 --> 02:32:32.960 align:start position:0% para in this context will always come 02:32:32.960 --> 02:32:35.150 align:start position:0% para in this context will always come before<02:32:33.240> a<02:32:33.399> verb<02:32:33.720> indicating<02:32:34.200> in<02:32:34.359> order<02:32:34.680> to<02:32:35.040> and 02:32:35.150 --> 02:32:35.160 align:start position:0% before a verb indicating in order to and 02:32:35.160 --> 02:32:36.590 align:start position:0% before a verb indicating in order to and that's<02:32:35.279> the<02:32:35.399> closest<02:32:35.720> connection<02:32:36.160> I<02:32:36.279> can<02:32:36.439> give 02:32:36.590 --> 02:32:36.600 align:start position:0% that's the closest connection I can give 02:32:36.600 --> 02:32:38.870 align:start position:0% that's the closest connection I can give it<02:32:37.040> however<02:32:37.399> para<02:32:37.760> has<02:32:37.960> other<02:32:38.200> uses<02:32:38.640> that<02:32:38.720> are 02:32:38.870 --> 02:32:38.880 align:start position:0% it however para has other uses that are 02:32:38.880 --> 02:32:40.630 align:start position:0% it however para has other uses that are more<02:32:39.080> logical<02:32:39.520> than<02:32:39.760> por<02:32:40.040> once<02:32:40.200> you<02:32:40.359> put<02:32:40.520> the 02:32:40.630 --> 02:32:40.640 align:start position:0% more logical than por once you put the 02:32:40.640 --> 02:32:42.750 align:start position:0% more logical than por once you put the context<02:32:41.160> into<02:32:41.399> English<02:32:41.880> still<02:32:42.120> falling<02:32:42.520> into 02:32:42.750 --> 02:32:42.760 align:start position:0% context into English still falling into 02:32:42.760 --> 02:32:45.030 align:start position:0% context into English still falling into the<02:32:42.920> category<02:32:43.399> of<02:32:43.560> movement<02:32:44.120> time<02:32:44.359> and<02:32:44.600> action 02:32:45.030 --> 02:32:45.040 align:start position:0% the category of movement time and action 02:32:45.040 --> 02:32:47.110 align:start position:0% the category of movement time and action P<02:32:45.359> can<02:32:45.479> be<02:32:45.600> used<02:32:45.800> for<02:32:45.960> being<02:32:46.359> the<02:32:46.479> recipient<02:32:46.920> of 02:32:47.110 --> 02:32:47.120 align:start position:0% P can be used for being the recipient of 02:32:47.120 --> 02:32:48.990 align:start position:0% P can be used for being the recipient of something<02:32:47.520> a<02:32:47.680> comparison<02:32:48.200> with<02:32:48.399> others<02:32:48.840> and 02:32:48.990 --> 02:32:49.000 align:start position:0% something a comparison with others and 02:32:49.000 --> 02:32:51.110 align:start position:0% something a comparison with others and in<02:32:49.160> the<02:32:49.359> employment<02:32:49.840> of<02:32:50.160> for<02:32:50.359> instance<02:32:50.800> saying 02:32:51.110 --> 02:32:51.120 align:start position:0% in the employment of for instance saying 02:32:51.120 --> 02:32:54.429 align:start position:0% in the employment of for instance saying something<02:32:51.439> like<02:32:52.240> estal<02:32:53.240> means<02:32:53.680> this<02:32:53.920> gift<02:32:54.319> is 02:32:54.429 --> 02:32:54.439 align:start position:0% something like estal means this gift is 02:32:54.439 --> 02:32:56.550 align:start position:0% something like estal means this gift is for<02:32:54.720> him<02:32:55.000> with<02:32:55.200> him<02:32:55.479> acting<02:32:55.720> as<02:32:55.880> the<02:32:56.040> recipient 02:32:56.550 --> 02:32:56.560 align:start position:0% for him with him acting as the recipient 02:32:56.560 --> 02:32:58.630 align:start position:0% for him with him acting as the recipient of<02:32:56.720> the<02:32:56.840> phrase<02:32:57.279> which<02:32:57.399> is<02:32:57.560> why<02:32:57.800> para<02:32:58.120> is<02:32:58.240> used 02:32:58.630 --> 02:32:58.640 align:start position:0% of the phrase which is why para is used 02:32:58.640 --> 02:33:01.110 align:start position:0% of the phrase which is why para is used as<02:32:58.840> for<02:32:59.200> saying<02:32:59.479> something 02:33:01.110 --> 02:33:01.120 align:start position:0% as for saying something 02:33:01.120 --> 02:33:03.910 align:start position:0% as for saying something like<02:33:02.120> means<02:33:02.399> for<02:33:02.600> me<02:33:02.960> this<02:33:03.160> lesson<02:33:03.439> is<02:33:03.600> easy 02:33:03.910 --> 02:33:03.920 align:start position:0% like means for me this lesson is easy 02:33:03.920 --> 02:33:05.910 align:start position:0% like means for me this lesson is easy comparing<02:33:04.319> the<02:33:04.479> lesson<02:33:04.920> with<02:33:05.160> myself<02:33:05.640> and<02:33:05.760> in 02:33:05.910 --> 02:33:05.920 align:start position:0% comparing the lesson with myself and in 02:33:05.920 --> 02:33:08.469 align:start position:0% comparing the lesson with myself and in this<02:33:06.120> context<02:33:06.720> para<02:33:07.040> is<02:33:07.200> also<02:33:07.439> used<02:33:07.800> as<02:33:07.960> for<02:33:08.319> in 02:33:08.469 --> 02:33:08.479 align:start position:0% this context para is also used as for in 02:33:08.479 --> 02:33:10.550 align:start position:0% this context para is also used as for in English<02:33:08.960> at<02:33:09.120> last<02:33:09.399> you<02:33:09.479> can<02:33:09.640> also<02:33:09.800> use<02:33:10.080> par<02:33:10.439> in 02:33:10.550 --> 02:33:10.560 align:start position:0% English at last you can also use par in 02:33:10.560 --> 02:33:12.750 align:start position:0% English at last you can also use par in the<02:33:10.720> employment<02:33:11.240> of<02:33:11.600> such 02:33:12.750 --> 02:33:12.760 align:start position:0% the employment of such 02:33:12.760 --> 02:33:15.670 align:start position:0% the employment of such Asel<02:33:13.760> meaning<02:33:14.160> she<02:33:14.359> works<02:33:14.760> for<02:33:15.000> Telecom<02:33:15.520> and 02:33:15.670 --> 02:33:15.680 align:start position:0% Asel meaning she works for Telecom and 02:33:15.680 --> 02:33:17.790 align:start position:0% Asel meaning she works for Telecom and once<02:33:15.880> again<02:33:16.279> para<02:33:16.600> is<02:33:16.760> used<02:33:17.080> as<02:33:17.279> for<02:33:17.680> in 02:33:17.790 --> 02:33:17.800 align:start position:0% once again para is used as for in 02:33:17.800 --> 02:33:19.830 align:start position:0% once again para is used as for in summary<02:33:18.319> para<02:33:18.720> applies<02:33:19.000> to<02:33:19.160> movement<02:33:19.640> time 02:33:19.830 --> 02:33:19.840 align:start position:0% summary para applies to movement time 02:33:19.840 --> 02:33:21.389 align:start position:0% summary para applies to movement time and<02:33:20.120> action<02:33:20.600> but<02:33:20.760> what's<02:33:20.960> important<02:33:21.240> to 02:33:21.389 --> 02:33:21.399 align:start position:0% and action but what's important to 02:33:21.399 --> 02:33:23.150 align:start position:0% and action but what's important to remember<02:33:21.920> is<02:33:22.040> that<02:33:22.160> it<02:33:22.319> applies<02:33:22.600> to<02:33:22.800> events 02:33:23.150 --> 02:33:23.160 align:start position:0% remember is that it applies to events 02:33:23.160 --> 02:33:24.630 align:start position:0% remember is that it applies to events that<02:33:23.279> will<02:33:23.479> happen<02:33:23.760> in<02:33:23.840> the<02:33:23.960> future<02:33:24.439> like 02:33:24.630 --> 02:33:24.640 align:start position:0% that will happen in the future like 02:33:24.640 --> 02:33:26.790 align:start position:0% that will happen in the future like destinations<02:33:25.520> deadlines<02:33:26.040> and<02:33:26.200> purposes 02:33:26.790 --> 02:33:26.800 align:start position:0% destinations deadlines and purposes 02:33:26.800 --> 02:33:28.349 align:start position:0% destinations deadlines and purposes along<02:33:27.080> with<02:33:27.279> recipients<02:33:27.760> of<02:33:27.920> something 02:33:28.349 --> 02:33:28.359 align:start position:0% along with recipients of something 02:33:28.359 --> 02:33:30.510 align:start position:0% along with recipients of something comparisons<02:33:29.040> and<02:33:29.200> employment<02:33:29.880> overall<02:33:30.399> The 02:33:30.510 --> 02:33:30.520 align:start position:0% comparisons and employment overall The 02:33:30.520 --> 02:33:32.510 align:start position:0% comparisons and employment overall The crucial<02:33:30.880> part<02:33:31.040> to<02:33:31.200> remember<02:33:31.760> about<02:33:32.040> Po<02:33:32.319> and 02:33:32.510 --> 02:33:32.520 align:start position:0% crucial part to remember about Po and 02:33:32.520 --> 02:33:33.990 align:start position:0% crucial part to remember about Po and para<02:33:32.880> is<02:33:33.000> that<02:33:33.120> they<02:33:33.279> both<02:33:33.520> apply<02:33:33.760> for 02:33:33.990 --> 02:33:34.000 align:start position:0% para is that they both apply for 02:33:34.000 --> 02:33:35.990 align:start position:0% para is that they both apply for movement<02:33:34.479> time<02:33:34.680> and<02:33:34.920> action<02:33:35.399> while<02:33:35.600> sharing 02:33:35.990 --> 02:33:36.000 align:start position:0% movement time and action while sharing 02:33:36.000 --> 02:33:37.830 align:start position:0% movement time and action while sharing different<02:33:36.279> circumstances<02:33:37.000> in<02:33:37.160> each<02:33:37.399> category 02:33:37.830 --> 02:33:37.840 align:start position:0% different circumstances in each category 02:33:37.840 --> 02:33:39.870 align:start position:0% different circumstances in each category po<02:33:38.200> May<02:33:38.439> apply<02:33:38.680> to<02:33:38.800> a<02:33:38.920> general<02:33:39.279> motion<02:33:39.760> the 02:33:39.870 --> 02:33:39.880 align:start position:0% po May apply to a general motion the 02:33:39.880 --> 02:33:41.510 align:start position:0% po May apply to a general motion the duration<02:33:40.240> of<02:33:40.359> an<02:33:40.520> event<02:33:40.840> and<02:33:41.000> the<02:33:41.120> reason<02:33:41.359> for 02:33:41.510 --> 02:33:41.520 align:start position:0% duration of an event and the reason for 02:33:41.520 --> 02:33:43.710 align:start position:0% duration of an event and the reason for an<02:33:41.720> action<02:33:42.160> including<02:33:42.640> ideas<02:33:43.080> like<02:33:43.279> an<02:33:43.479> object 02:33:43.710 --> 02:33:43.720 align:start position:0% an action including ideas like an object 02:33:43.720 --> 02:33:45.389 align:start position:0% an action including ideas like an object of<02:33:43.880> a<02:33:44.040> search<02:33:44.359> an<02:33:44.520> exchange<02:33:45.000> units<02:33:45.279> of 02:33:45.389 --> 02:33:45.399 align:start position:0% of a search an exchange units of 02:33:45.399 --> 02:33:47.670 align:start position:0% of a search an exchange units of measurement<02:33:45.880> an<02:33:46.160> idiomatic<02:33:46.680> statements<02:33:47.240> par 02:33:47.670 --> 02:33:47.680 align:start position:0% measurement an idiomatic statements par 02:33:47.680 --> 02:33:49.469 align:start position:0% measurement an idiomatic statements par also<02:33:47.920> applies<02:33:48.200> to<02:33:48.319> movement<02:33:48.680> time<02:33:48.840> and<02:33:49.040> action 02:33:49.469 --> 02:33:49.479 align:start position:0% also applies to movement time and action 02:33:49.479 --> 02:33:51.030 align:start position:0% also applies to movement time and action but<02:33:49.600> mainly<02:33:49.880> speaks<02:33:50.240> of<02:33:50.439> events<02:33:50.800> in<02:33:50.920> the 02:33:51.030 --> 02:33:51.040 align:start position:0% but mainly speaks of events in the 02:33:51.040 --> 02:33:53.110 align:start position:0% but mainly speaks of events in the future<02:33:51.399> like<02:33:51.640> destinations<02:33:52.439> deadlines<02:33:52.920> and 02:33:53.110 --> 02:33:53.120 align:start position:0% future like destinations deadlines and 02:33:53.120 --> 02:33:54.910 align:start position:0% future like destinations deadlines and purposes<02:33:53.720> while<02:33:53.920> having<02:33:54.279> recipients<02:33:54.760> of 02:33:54.910 --> 02:33:54.920 align:start position:0% purposes while having recipients of 02:33:54.920 --> 02:33:56.830 align:start position:0% purposes while having recipients of something<02:33:55.399> comparisons<02:33:56.000> and<02:33:56.200> employment<02:33:56.760> the 02:33:56.830 --> 02:33:56.840 align:start position:0% something comparisons and employment the 02:33:56.840 --> 02:33:58.429 align:start position:0% something comparisons and employment the biggest<02:33:57.120> tip<02:33:57.319> that<02:33:57.479> I<02:33:57.560> can<02:33:57.760> give<02:33:58.000> to 02:33:58.429 --> 02:33:58.439 align:start position:0% biggest tip that I can give to 02:33:58.439 --> 02:33:59.790 align:start position:0% biggest tip that I can give to understand<02:33:58.600> when<02:33:58.760> to<02:33:58.880> use<02:33:59.120> por<02:33:59.439> and<02:33:59.560> when<02:33:59.680> to 02:33:59.790 --> 02:33:59.800 align:start position:0% understand when to use por and when to 02:33:59.800 --> 02:34:02.309 align:start position:0% understand when to use por and when to use<02:34:00.080> para<02:34:00.479> is<02:34:00.600> to<02:34:00.760> always<02:34:01.080> remember<02:34:01.680> that<02:34:01.880> por 02:34:02.309 --> 02:34:02.319 align:start position:0% use para is to always remember that por 02:34:02.319 --> 02:34:04.230 align:start position:0% use para is to always remember that por is<02:34:02.399> used<02:34:02.680> more<02:34:02.880> for<02:34:03.120> movement<02:34:03.720> time<02:34:04.000> and 02:34:04.230 --> 02:34:04.240 align:start position:0% is used more for movement time and 02:34:04.240 --> 02:34:06.590 align:start position:0% is used more for movement time and action<02:34:04.640> in<02:34:04.800> the<02:34:05.000> past<02:34:05.399> but<02:34:05.600> para<02:34:06.040> is<02:34:06.160> used<02:34:06.439> more 02:34:06.590 --> 02:34:06.600 align:start position:0% action in the past but para is used more 02:34:06.600 --> 02:34:08.150 align:start position:0% action in the past but para is used more for<02:34:06.800> movement<02:34:07.200> time<02:34:07.359> and<02:34:07.560> action<02:34:07.920> in<02:34:08.040> the 02:34:08.150 --> 02:34:08.160 align:start position:0% for movement time and action in the 02:34:08.160 --> 02:34:09.750 align:start position:0% for movement time and action in the future<02:34:08.600> and<02:34:08.800> as<02:34:09.000> always<02:34:09.399> these<02:34:09.520> are<02:34:09.640> the 02:34:09.750 --> 02:34:09.760 align:start position:0% future and as always these are the 02:34:09.760 --> 02:34:11.469 align:start position:0% future and as always these are the closest<02:34:10.160> connections<02:34:10.760> I<02:34:10.840> can<02:34:11.000> give<02:34:11.160> them<02:34:11.359> in 02:34:11.469 --> 02:34:11.479 align:start position:0% closest connections I can give them in 02:34:11.479 --> 02:34:13.710 align:start position:0% closest connections I can give them in English<02:34:12.080> comparatives<02:34:12.760> and<02:34:12.960> superlatives<02:34:13.560> in 02:34:13.710 --> 02:34:13.720 align:start position:0% English comparatives and superlatives in 02:34:13.720 --> 02:34:15.550 align:start position:0% English comparatives and superlatives in Spanish<02:34:14.279> explain<02:34:14.600> the<02:34:14.760> differences<02:34:15.279> between 02:34:15.550 --> 02:34:15.560 align:start position:0% Spanish explain the differences between 02:34:15.560 --> 02:34:17.550 align:start position:0% Spanish explain the differences between people<02:34:15.880> and<02:34:16.240> things<02:34:16.600> in<02:34:16.760> English<02:34:17.240> there's<02:34:17.399> a 02:34:17.550 --> 02:34:17.560 align:start position:0% people and things in English there's a 02:34:17.560 --> 02:34:19.269 align:start position:0% people and things in English there's a very<02:34:17.760> simple<02:34:18.080> system<02:34:18.479> on<02:34:18.640> how<02:34:18.720> to<02:34:18.880> use<02:34:19.080> these 02:34:19.269 --> 02:34:19.279 align:start position:0% very simple system on how to use these 02:34:19.279 --> 02:34:20.830 align:start position:0% very simple system on how to use these ideas<02:34:19.640> correctly<02:34:20.160> but<02:34:20.279> there<02:34:20.399> are<02:34:20.520> a<02:34:20.600> few 02:34:20.830 --> 02:34:20.840 align:start position:0% ideas correctly but there are a few 02:34:20.840 --> 02:34:22.349 align:start position:0% ideas correctly but there are a few exceptions<02:34:21.279> that<02:34:21.399> make<02:34:21.600> the<02:34:21.720> language<02:34:22.080> sound 02:34:22.349 --> 02:34:22.359 align:start position:0% exceptions that make the language sound 02:34:22.359 --> 02:34:23.990 align:start position:0% exceptions that make the language sound better<02:34:22.680> in<02:34:22.800> Spanish<02:34:23.600> understanding<02:34:23.800> how 02:34:23.990 --> 02:34:24.000 align:start position:0% better in Spanish understanding how 02:34:24.000 --> 02:34:26.070 align:start position:0% better in Spanish understanding how these<02:34:24.200> ideas<02:34:24.560> work<02:34:24.920> can<02:34:25.080> be<02:34:25.200> a<02:34:25.319> bit<02:34:25.479> tricky<02:34:25.920> but 02:34:26.070 --> 02:34:26.080 align:start position:0% these ideas work can be a bit tricky but 02:34:26.080 --> 02:34:27.910 align:start position:0% these ideas work can be a bit tricky but I'll<02:34:26.240> try<02:34:26.439> to<02:34:26.600> explain<02:34:26.920> them<02:34:27.200> as<02:34:27.319> easily<02:34:27.720> as 02:34:27.910 --> 02:34:27.920 align:start position:0% I'll try to explain them as easily as 02:34:27.920 --> 02:34:29.110 align:start position:0% I'll try to explain them as easily as possible<02:34:28.319> before<02:34:28.520> fully<02:34:28.800> knowing 02:34:29.110 --> 02:34:29.120 align:start position:0% possible before fully knowing 02:34:29.120 --> 02:34:30.710 align:start position:0% possible before fully knowing comparatives<02:34:29.640> and<02:34:29.800> superlatives<02:34:30.439> you<02:34:30.600> have 02:34:30.710 --> 02:34:30.720 align:start position:0% comparatives and superlatives you have 02:34:30.720 --> 02:34:32.389 align:start position:0% comparatives and superlatives you have to<02:34:30.800> know<02:34:31.000> that<02:34:31.160> Spanish<02:34:31.760> actually<02:34:32.120> doesn't 02:34:32.389 --> 02:34:32.399 align:start position:0% to know that Spanish actually doesn't 02:34:32.399 --> 02:34:34.190 align:start position:0% to know that Spanish actually doesn't have<02:34:32.520> a<02:34:32.640> notion<02:34:33.160> of<02:34:33.319> adding<02:34:33.640> letters<02:34:34.000> at<02:34:34.120> the 02:34:34.190 --> 02:34:34.200 align:start position:0% have a notion of adding letters at the 02:34:34.200 --> 02:34:36.030 align:start position:0% have a notion of adding letters at the end<02:34:34.359> of<02:34:34.479> simple<02:34:34.800> words<02:34:35.240> like<02:34:35.359> in<02:34:35.479> English<02:34:35.880> so 02:34:36.030 --> 02:34:36.040 align:start position:0% end of simple words like in English so 02:34:36.040 --> 02:34:38.590 align:start position:0% end of simple words like in English so it<02:34:36.200> relies<02:34:36.560> on<02:34:36.720> the<02:34:36.840> words<02:34:37.279> mass<02:34:37.760> and<02:34:38.040> Menos 02:34:38.590 --> 02:34:38.600 align:start position:0% it relies on the words mass and Menos 02:34:38.600 --> 02:34:40.590 align:start position:0% it relies on the words mass and Menos meaning<02:34:39.000> more<02:34:39.319> or<02:34:39.560> less<02:34:39.920> to<02:34:40.160> express<02:34:40.439> its 02:34:40.590 --> 02:34:40.600 align:start position:0% meaning more or less to express its 02:34:40.600 --> 02:34:42.030 align:start position:0% meaning more or less to express its phrases<02:34:41.080> make<02:34:41.200> sure<02:34:41.359> that<02:34:41.479> you<02:34:41.600> focus<02:34:41.880> on 02:34:42.030 --> 02:34:42.040 align:start position:0% phrases make sure that you focus on 02:34:42.040 --> 02:34:43.670 align:start position:0% phrases make sure that you focus on these<02:34:42.240> words<02:34:42.600> because<02:34:42.800> you<02:34:42.920> will<02:34:43.040> see<02:34:43.279> them<02:34:43.439> in 02:34:43.670 --> 02:34:43.680 align:start position:0% these words because you will see them in 02:34:43.680 --> 02:34:45.710 align:start position:0% these words because you will see them in almost<02:34:44.040> every<02:34:44.319> sentence<02:34:44.840> as<02:34:44.920> an<02:34:45.120> example<02:34:45.600> the 02:34:45.710 --> 02:34:45.720 align:start position:0% almost every sentence as an example the 02:34:45.720 --> 02:34:47.750 align:start position:0% almost every sentence as an example the sentence 02:34:47.750 --> 02:34:47.760 align:start position:0% sentence 02:34:47.760 --> 02:34:49.670 align:start position:0% sentence means<02:34:48.279> this<02:34:48.520> class<02:34:48.840> is<02:34:49.000> small<02:34:49.359> but<02:34:49.479> its 02:34:49.670 --> 02:34:49.680 align:start position:0% means this class is small but its 02:34:49.680 --> 02:34:51.269 align:start position:0% means this class is small but its comparative<02:34:50.200> version<02:34:50.680> is<02:34:50.840> different<02:34:51.120> in 02:34:51.269 --> 02:34:51.279 align:start position:0% comparative version is different in 02:34:51.279 --> 02:34:53.550 align:start position:0% comparative version is different in Spanish<02:34:51.760> in<02:34:51.920> English<02:34:52.479> we<02:34:52.600> say<02:34:52.920> the<02:34:53.120> class<02:34:53.399> is 02:34:53.550 --> 02:34:53.560 align:start position:0% Spanish in English we say the class is 02:34:53.560 --> 02:34:55.910 align:start position:0% Spanish in English we say the class is smaller<02:34:54.200> by<02:34:54.319> adding<02:34:54.600> the<02:34:54.720> letters<02:34:55.160> e<02:34:55.399> r<02:34:55.760> to 02:34:55.910 --> 02:34:55.920 align:start position:0% smaller by adding the letters e r to 02:34:55.920 --> 02:34:57.710 align:start position:0% smaller by adding the letters e r to simple<02:34:56.279> words<02:34:56.680> but<02:34:56.800> Spanish<02:34:57.200> does<02:34:57.359> not<02:34:57.560> have 02:34:57.710 --> 02:34:57.720 align:start position:0% simple words but Spanish does not have 02:34:57.720 --> 02:34:59.550 align:start position:0% simple words but Spanish does not have the<02:34:57.840> system<02:34:58.279> instead<02:34:58.720> it<02:34:58.840> decides<02:34:59.160> to<02:34:59.279> use<02:34:59.439> the 02:34:59.550 --> 02:34:59.560 align:start position:0% the system instead it decides to use the 02:34:59.560 --> 02:35:01.670 align:start position:0% the system instead it decides to use the word<02:34:59.800> mass<02:35:00.279> meaning<02:35:00.600> more<02:35:00.960> to<02:35:01.160> justify<02:35:01.560> the 02:35:01.670 --> 02:35:01.680 align:start position:0% word mass meaning more to justify the 02:35:01.680 --> 02:35:03.190 align:start position:0% word mass meaning more to justify the meaning<02:35:02.160> by<02:35:02.279> putting<02:35:02.520> it<02:35:02.680> before<02:35:03.000> the 02:35:03.190 --> 02:35:03.200 align:start position:0% meaning by putting it before the 02:35:03.200 --> 02:35:06.750 align:start position:0% meaning by putting it before the adjective<02:35:03.720> so<02:35:04.000> the<02:35:04.120> sentence<02:35:04.479> would<02:35:04.840> be<02:35:05.840> is 02:35:06.750 --> 02:35:06.760 align:start position:0% adjective so the sentence would be is 02:35:06.760 --> 02:35:08.790 align:start position:0% adjective so the sentence would be is meaning<02:35:07.120> this<02:35:07.359> class<02:35:07.760> is<02:35:07.960> more<02:35:08.200> small<02:35:08.640> while 02:35:08.790 --> 02:35:08.800 align:start position:0% meaning this class is more small while 02:35:08.800 --> 02:35:10.550 align:start position:0% meaning this class is more small while this<02:35:08.920> is<02:35:09.080> logical<02:35:09.479> in<02:35:09.640> Spanish<02:35:10.160> it<02:35:10.240> feels 02:35:10.550 --> 02:35:10.560 align:start position:0% this is logical in Spanish it feels 02:35:10.560 --> 02:35:12.590 align:start position:0% this is logical in Spanish it feels weird<02:35:10.920> to<02:35:11.080> say<02:35:11.279> more<02:35:11.560> small<02:35:11.880> in<02:35:12.080> English 02:35:12.590 --> 02:35:12.600 align:start position:0% weird to say more small in English 02:35:12.600 --> 02:35:14.230 align:start position:0% weird to say more small in English because<02:35:12.840> English<02:35:13.200> simply<02:35:13.560> adds<02:35:13.800> letters<02:35:14.120> to 02:35:14.230 --> 02:35:14.240 align:start position:0% because English simply adds letters to 02:35:14.240 --> 02:35:15.590 align:start position:0% because English simply adds letters to the<02:35:14.359> end<02:35:14.520> of<02:35:14.680> regular<02:35:15.080> adjectives 02:35:15.590 --> 02:35:15.600 align:start position:0% the end of regular adjectives 02:35:15.600 --> 02:35:17.469 align:start position:0% the end of regular adjectives nonetheless<02:35:16.319> it's<02:35:16.479> still<02:35:16.800> possible<02:35:17.120> to<02:35:17.279> say 02:35:17.469 --> 02:35:17.479 align:start position:0% nonetheless it's still possible to say 02:35:17.479 --> 02:35:19.510 align:start position:0% nonetheless it's still possible to say the<02:35:17.600> phrase<02:35:18.000> as<02:35:18.120> it<02:35:18.279> is<02:35:18.600> this<02:35:18.800> class<02:35:19.120> is<02:35:19.279> more 02:35:19.510 --> 02:35:19.520 align:start position:0% the phrase as it is this class is more 02:35:19.520 --> 02:35:21.469 align:start position:0% the phrase as it is this class is more small<02:35:19.880> which<02:35:20.000> is<02:35:20.160> literally<02:35:20.720> and<02:35:20.960> Visually 02:35:21.469 --> 02:35:21.479 align:start position:0% small which is literally and Visually 02:35:21.479 --> 02:35:23.230 align:start position:0% small which is literally and Visually how<02:35:21.640> the<02:35:21.760> sentence<02:35:22.160> Works<02:35:22.520> in<02:35:22.680> Spanish<02:35:23.120> the 02:35:23.230 --> 02:35:23.240 align:start position:0% how the sentence Works in Spanish the 02:35:23.240 --> 02:35:25.269 align:start position:0% how the sentence Works in Spanish the superlative<02:35:23.760> version<02:35:24.200> on<02:35:24.359> the<02:35:24.479> other<02:35:24.720> hand<02:35:25.080> is 02:35:25.269 --> 02:35:25.279 align:start position:0% superlative version on the other hand is 02:35:25.279 --> 02:35:27.110 align:start position:0% superlative version on the other hand is actually<02:35:25.600> a<02:35:25.720> bit<02:35:25.880> more<02:35:26.160> complex<02:35:26.760> because<02:35:26.960> it 02:35:27.110 --> 02:35:27.120 align:start position:0% actually a bit more complex because it 02:35:27.120 --> 02:35:29.110 align:start position:0% actually a bit more complex because it adds<02:35:27.319> an<02:35:27.479> article<02:35:27.960> to<02:35:28.120> justify<02:35:28.560> the<02:35:28.680> claim 02:35:29.110 --> 02:35:29.120 align:start position:0% adds an article to justify the claim 02:35:29.120 --> 02:35:31.269 align:start position:0% adds an article to justify the claim both<02:35:29.279> in<02:35:29.479> English<02:35:29.920> and<02:35:30.080> Spanish<02:35:30.600> the<02:35:30.720> sentence 02:35:31.269 --> 02:35:31.279 align:start position:0% both in English and Spanish the sentence 02:35:31.279 --> 02:35:33.309 align:start position:0% both in English and Spanish the sentence this<02:35:31.520> class<02:35:31.840> is<02:35:32.080> the<02:35:32.200> smallest<02:35:32.760> contains<02:35:33.120> an 02:35:33.309 --> 02:35:33.319 align:start position:0% this class is the smallest contains an 02:35:33.319 --> 02:35:35.309 align:start position:0% this class is the smallest contains an EST<02:35:34.000> at<02:35:34.120> the<02:35:34.200> end<02:35:34.359> of<02:35:34.479> the<02:35:34.640> adjective<02:35:35.080> and<02:35:35.200> the 02:35:35.309 --> 02:35:35.319 align:start position:0% EST at the end of the adjective and the 02:35:35.319 --> 02:35:37.389 align:start position:0% EST at the end of the adjective and the article<02:35:35.720> the<02:35:36.120> that<02:35:36.319> specifies<02:35:37.000> that<02:35:37.200> this 02:35:37.389 --> 02:35:37.399 align:start position:0% article the that specifies that this 02:35:37.399 --> 02:35:39.870 align:start position:0% article the that specifies that this class<02:35:37.800> is<02:35:37.960> in<02:35:38.200> fact<02:35:38.520> the<02:35:38.640> smallest<02:35:39.240> similarly 02:35:39.870 --> 02:35:39.880 align:start position:0% class is in fact the smallest similarly 02:35:39.880 --> 02:35:41.510 align:start position:0% class is in fact the smallest similarly this<02:35:40.040> is<02:35:40.160> how<02:35:40.319> the<02:35:40.479> sentence<02:35:41.080> Works<02:35:41.319> in 02:35:41.510 --> 02:35:41.520 align:start position:0% this is how the sentence Works in 02:35:41.520 --> 02:35:43.070 align:start position:0% this is how the sentence Works in Spanish<02:35:42.040> which<02:35:42.160> only<02:35:42.359> changes<02:35:42.720> the<02:35:42.800> meaning 02:35:43.070 --> 02:35:43.080 align:start position:0% Spanish which only changes the meaning 02:35:43.080 --> 02:35:44.710 align:start position:0% Spanish which only changes the meaning of<02:35:43.240> one<02:35:43.439> word<02:35:43.800> the<02:35:43.920> sentence<02:35:44.240> in<02:35:44.359> Spanish 02:35:44.710 --> 02:35:44.720 align:start position:0% of one word the sentence in Spanish 02:35:44.720 --> 02:35:48.630 align:start position:0% of one word the sentence in Spanish would<02:35:44.880> be<02:35:45.240> EST<02:35:46.080> is<02:35:46.399> l<02:35:47.319> meaning<02:35:47.680> this<02:35:47.880> class<02:35:48.319> is 02:35:48.630 --> 02:35:48.640 align:start position:0% would be EST is l meaning this class is 02:35:48.640 --> 02:35:50.550 align:start position:0% would be EST is l meaning this class is the<02:35:48.840> most<02:35:49.120> small<02:35:49.560> while<02:35:49.760> this<02:35:49.920> makes<02:35:50.160> sense<02:35:50.359> in 02:35:50.550 --> 02:35:50.560 align:start position:0% the most small while this makes sense in 02:35:50.560 --> 02:35:52.710 align:start position:0% the most small while this makes sense in Spanish<02:35:51.080> it<02:35:51.240> again<02:35:51.439> seems<02:35:51.800> odd<02:35:52.040> to<02:35:52.200> say<02:35:52.520> the 02:35:52.710 --> 02:35:52.720 align:start position:0% Spanish it again seems odd to say the 02:35:52.720 --> 02:35:54.550 align:start position:0% Spanish it again seems odd to say the most<02:35:53.000> small<02:35:53.399> because<02:35:53.640> English<02:35:54.040> combines<02:35:54.399> the 02:35:54.550 --> 02:35:54.560 align:start position:0% most small because English combines the 02:35:54.560 --> 02:35:56.550 align:start position:0% most small because English combines the words<02:35:54.960> nevertheless<02:35:55.640> it's<02:35:55.800> still<02:35:56.080> possible 02:35:56.550 --> 02:35:56.560 align:start position:0% words nevertheless it's still possible 02:35:56.560 --> 02:35:58.710 align:start position:0% words nevertheless it's still possible to<02:35:56.720> say<02:35:56.960> this<02:35:57.120> phrase<02:35:57.520> as<02:35:57.640> it<02:35:57.800> is<02:35:58.120> this<02:35:58.319> class 02:35:58.710 --> 02:35:58.720 align:start position:0% to say this phrase as it is this class 02:35:58.720 --> 02:36:00.710 align:start position:0% to say this phrase as it is this class is<02:35:58.960> the<02:35:59.120> most<02:35:59.399> small<02:35:59.760> with<02:35:59.920> the<02:36:00.000> word<02:36:00.240> mus 02:36:00.710 --> 02:36:00.720 align:start position:0% is the most small with the word mus 02:36:00.720 --> 02:36:02.670 align:start position:0% is the most small with the word mus acting<02:36:00.960> as<02:36:01.120> the<02:36:01.240> word<02:36:01.439> most<02:36:01.840> unlike<02:36:02.200> more<02:36:02.520> from 02:36:02.670 --> 02:36:02.680 align:start position:0% acting as the word most unlike more from 02:36:02.680 --> 02:36:04.070 align:start position:0% acting as the word most unlike more from the<02:36:02.840> previous<02:36:03.160> phrase<02:36:03.600> even<02:36:03.800> though<02:36:03.920> it's 02:36:04.070 --> 02:36:04.080 align:start position:0% the previous phrase even though it's 02:36:04.080 --> 02:36:06.429 align:start position:0% the previous phrase even though it's unusual<02:36:04.640> to<02:36:04.760> see<02:36:05.000> phrases<02:36:05.399> like<02:36:05.680> more<02:36:05.960> small 02:36:06.429 --> 02:36:06.439 align:start position:0% unusual to see phrases like more small 02:36:06.439 --> 02:36:08.469 align:start position:0% unusual to see phrases like more small and<02:36:06.680> the<02:36:06.920> most<02:36:07.200> small<02:36:07.600> this<02:36:07.680> is<02:36:07.800> how<02:36:08.000> Spanish 02:36:08.469 --> 02:36:08.479 align:start position:0% and the most small this is how Spanish 02:36:08.479 --> 02:36:10.349 align:start position:0% and the most small this is how Spanish defines<02:36:08.920> comparatives<02:36:09.520> and<02:36:09.640> superlatives 02:36:10.349 --> 02:36:10.359 align:start position:0% defines comparatives and superlatives 02:36:10.359 --> 02:36:12.070 align:start position:0% defines comparatives and superlatives English<02:36:10.680> decides<02:36:11.000> to<02:36:11.160> combine<02:36:11.479> the<02:36:11.600> phrases 02:36:12.070 --> 02:36:12.080 align:start position:0% English decides to combine the phrases 02:36:12.080 --> 02:36:13.870 align:start position:0% English decides to combine the phrases into<02:36:12.319> one<02:36:12.560> word<02:36:12.960> rather<02:36:13.160> than<02:36:13.359> keeping<02:36:13.680> them 02:36:13.870 --> 02:36:13.880 align:start position:0% into one word rather than keeping them 02:36:13.880 --> 02:36:15.630 align:start position:0% into one word rather than keeping them in<02:36:14.040> their<02:36:14.160> form<02:36:14.560> so<02:36:14.720> there's<02:36:14.920> really<02:36:15.160> nothing 02:36:15.630 --> 02:36:15.640 align:start position:0% in their form so there's really nothing 02:36:15.640 --> 02:36:17.230 align:start position:0% in their form so there's really nothing difficult<02:36:16.000> about<02:36:16.240> this<02:36:16.439> concept<02:36:16.920> once<02:36:17.080> you 02:36:17.230 --> 02:36:17.240 align:start position:0% difficult about this concept once you 02:36:17.240 --> 02:36:18.910 align:start position:0% difficult about this concept once you visually<02:36:17.560> see<02:36:17.760> it<02:36:17.880> in<02:36:18.000> English<02:36:18.439> as<02:36:18.560> a<02:36:18.680> matter 02:36:18.910 --> 02:36:18.920 align:start position:0% visually see it in English as a matter 02:36:18.920 --> 02:36:20.469 align:start position:0% visually see it in English as a matter of<02:36:19.080> fact<02:36:19.319> it's<02:36:19.479> easier<02:36:19.760> to<02:36:20.120> understand<02:36:20.279> this 02:36:20.469 --> 02:36:20.479 align:start position:0% of fact it's easier to understand this 02:36:20.479 --> 02:36:22.389 align:start position:0% of fact it's easier to understand this concept<02:36:20.920> once<02:36:21.080> you<02:36:21.200> start<02:36:21.439> using<02:36:21.760> less<02:36:22.160> to 02:36:22.389 --> 02:36:22.399 align:start position:0% concept once you start using less to 02:36:22.399 --> 02:36:24.389 align:start position:0% concept once you start using less to express<02:36:22.880> an<02:36:23.080> inferior<02:36:23.600> quality<02:36:24.080> saying 02:36:24.389 --> 02:36:24.399 align:start position:0% express an inferior quality saying 02:36:24.399 --> 02:36:26.389 align:start position:0% express an inferior quality saying something<02:36:24.720> like<02:36:25.040> this<02:36:25.240> class<02:36:25.560> is<02:36:25.760> less<02:36:26.000> small 02:36:26.389 --> 02:36:26.399 align:start position:0% something like this class is less small 02:36:26.399 --> 02:36:28.309 align:start position:0% something like this class is less small and<02:36:26.600> this<02:36:26.760> class<02:36:27.080> is<02:36:27.240> the<02:36:27.399> least<02:36:27.680> small<02:36:28.160> is 02:36:28.309 --> 02:36:28.319 align:start position:0% and this class is the least small is 02:36:28.319 --> 02:36:30.349 align:start position:0% and this class is the least small is visually<02:36:28.760> how<02:36:28.880> the<02:36:29.000> sentences<02:36:29.520> work<02:36:29.800> in 02:36:30.349 --> 02:36:30.359 align:start position:0% visually how the sentences work in 02:36:30.359 --> 02:36:35.510 align:start position:0% visually how the sentences work in Spanish<02:36:31.439> is<02:36:32.439> and<02:36:33.640> isos<02:36:34.640> is<02:36:34.800> literally<02:36:35.240> how<02:36:35.399> the 02:36:35.510 --> 02:36:35.520 align:start position:0% Spanish is and isos is literally how the 02:36:35.520 --> 02:36:37.110 align:start position:0% Spanish is and isos is literally how the phrases<02:36:35.880> work<02:36:36.120> in<02:36:36.279> English<02:36:36.720> the<02:36:36.840> only 02:36:37.110 --> 02:36:37.120 align:start position:0% phrases work in English the only 02:36:37.120 --> 02:36:38.830 align:start position:0% phrases work in English the only difference<02:36:37.520> is<02:36:37.680> that<02:36:37.840> in<02:36:37.960> the<02:36:38.080> first<02:36:38.359> sentence 02:36:38.830 --> 02:36:38.840 align:start position:0% difference is that in the first sentence 02:36:38.840 --> 02:36:41.030 align:start position:0% difference is that in the first sentence menos<02:36:39.160> means<02:36:39.520> less<02:36:39.920> and<02:36:40.080> in<02:36:40.200> the<02:36:40.359> second<02:36:40.800> L 02:36:41.030 --> 02:36:41.040 align:start position:0% menos means less and in the second L 02:36:41.040 --> 02:36:43.070 align:start position:0% menos means less and in the second L menos<02:36:41.439> means<02:36:41.800> the<02:36:41.960> least<02:36:42.359> an<02:36:42.520> easy<02:36:42.760> way<02:36:42.880> to 02:36:43.070 --> 02:36:43.080 align:start position:0% menos means the least an easy way to 02:36:43.080 --> 02:36:44.990 align:start position:0% menos means the least an easy way to remember<02:36:43.479> this<02:36:43.760> is<02:36:43.920> if<02:36:44.000> you<02:36:44.120> see<02:36:44.319> an<02:36:44.439> article 02:36:44.990 --> 02:36:45.000 align:start position:0% remember this is if you see an article 02:36:45.000 --> 02:36:47.389 align:start position:0% remember this is if you see an article before<02:36:45.319> maso<02:36:45.640> Menos<02:36:46.279> they<02:36:46.359> would<02:36:46.560> mean<02:36:47.040> most 02:36:47.389 --> 02:36:47.399 align:start position:0% before maso Menos they would mean most 02:36:47.399 --> 02:36:49.670 align:start position:0% before maso Menos they would mean most or<02:36:47.640> least<02:36:48.080> if<02:36:48.200> there<02:36:48.359> isn't<02:36:48.640> an<02:36:48.840> article<02:36:49.399> Mas 02:36:49.670 --> 02:36:49.680 align:start position:0% or least if there isn't an article Mas 02:36:49.680 --> 02:36:52.670 align:start position:0% or least if there isn't an article Mas omos<02:36:50.359> simply<02:36:50.680> mean<02:36:51.120> more<02:36:51.359> or<02:36:51.640> less<02:36:52.040> as<02:36:52.200> always 02:36:52.670 --> 02:36:52.680 align:start position:0% omos simply mean more or less as always 02:36:52.680 --> 02:36:54.429 align:start position:0% omos simply mean more or less as always it's<02:36:52.840> up<02:36:53.000> to<02:36:53.120> you<02:36:53.319> to<02:36:53.479> say<02:36:53.680> any<02:36:53.960> sentence<02:36:54.319> that 02:36:54.429 --> 02:36:54.439 align:start position:0% it's up to you to say any sentence that 02:36:54.439 --> 02:36:56.830 align:start position:0% it's up to you to say any sentence that you<02:36:54.560> want<02:36:54.840> using<02:36:55.200> M<02:36:55.479> or<02:36:55.640> menos<02:36:56.080> an<02:36:56.240> even<02:36:56.479> easier 02:36:56.830 --> 02:36:56.840 align:start position:0% you want using M or menos an even easier 02:36:56.840 --> 02:36:58.510 align:start position:0% you want using M or menos an even easier way<02:36:56.960> to<02:36:57.399> understand<02:36:57.560> this<02:36:57.760> concept<02:36:58.279> is<02:36:58.399> by 02:36:58.510 --> 02:36:58.520 align:start position:0% way to understand this concept is by 02:36:58.520 --> 02:37:00.190 align:start position:0% way to understand this concept is by using<02:36:58.840> words<02:36:59.240> that<02:36:59.359> do<02:36:59.479> not<02:36:59.680> combine 02:37:00.190 --> 02:37:00.200 align:start position:0% using words that do not combine 02:37:00.200 --> 02:37:02.150 align:start position:0% using words that do not combine themselves<02:37:00.680> this<02:37:00.800> shirt<02:37:01.200> is<02:37:01.399> expensive<02:37:02.000> in 02:37:02.150 --> 02:37:02.160 align:start position:0% themselves this shirt is expensive in 02:37:02.160 --> 02:37:05.269 align:start position:0% themselves this shirt is expensive in Spanish<02:37:02.680> is<02:37:03.040> esta<02:37:03.880> esar<02:37:04.439> the<02:37:04.520> sentence<02:37:04.880> say 02:37:05.269 --> 02:37:05.279 align:start position:0% Spanish is esta esar the sentence say 02:37:05.279 --> 02:37:07.429 align:start position:0% Spanish is esta esar the sentence say this<02:37:05.399> shirt<02:37:05.720> is<02:37:05.920> more<02:37:06.160> or<02:37:06.399> less<02:37:06.680> expensive<02:37:07.279> and 02:37:07.429 --> 02:37:07.439 align:start position:0% this shirt is more or less expensive and 02:37:07.439 --> 02:37:09.030 align:start position:0% this shirt is more or less expensive and this<02:37:07.560> shirt<02:37:07.880> is<02:37:08.040> the<02:37:08.200> most<02:37:08.479> or<02:37:08.720> least 02:37:09.030 --> 02:37:09.040 align:start position:0% this shirt is the most or least 02:37:09.040 --> 02:37:11.030 align:start position:0% this shirt is the most or least expensive<02:37:09.640> work<02:37:10.000> even<02:37:10.279> comparably<02:37:10.840> to 02:37:11.030 --> 02:37:11.040 align:start position:0% expensive work even comparably to 02:37:11.040 --> 02:37:13.070 align:start position:0% expensive work even comparably to Spanish<02:37:11.600> because<02:37:11.840> the<02:37:11.920> word<02:37:12.200> expensive<02:37:12.840> isn't 02:37:13.070 --> 02:37:13.080 align:start position:0% Spanish because the word expensive isn't 02:37:13.080 --> 02:37:15.389 align:start position:0% Spanish because the word expensive isn't a<02:37:13.279> word<02:37:13.640> that<02:37:13.840> combines<02:37:14.319> itself<02:37:14.720> we<02:37:14.840> don't<02:37:15.040> say 02:37:15.389 --> 02:37:15.399 align:start position:0% a word that combines itself we don't say 02:37:15.399 --> 02:37:17.750 align:start position:0% a word that combines itself we don't say expensive<02:37:16.279> or<02:37:16.560> expensivest<02:37:17.439> because<02:37:17.680> the 02:37:17.750 --> 02:37:17.760 align:start position:0% expensive or expensivest because the 02:37:17.760 --> 02:37:19.790 align:start position:0% expensive or expensivest because the sound<02:37:18.000> of<02:37:18.120> the<02:37:18.279> words<02:37:18.680> would<02:37:18.840> be<02:37:19.040> too<02:37:19.279> bad<02:37:19.600> so 02:37:19.790 --> 02:37:19.800 align:start position:0% sound of the words would be too bad so 02:37:19.800 --> 02:37:21.429 align:start position:0% sound of the words would be too bad so that's<02:37:19.960> the<02:37:20.080> reason<02:37:20.520> why<02:37:20.680> English<02:37:21.040> decides<02:37:21.319> to 02:37:21.429 --> 02:37:21.439 align:start position:0% that's the reason why English decides to 02:37:21.439 --> 02:37:24.309 align:start position:0% that's the reason why English decides to use<02:37:21.680> words<02:37:22.120> like<02:37:22.319> more<02:37:22.840> most<02:37:23.319> less<02:37:23.600> or<02:37:23.880> least 02:37:24.309 --> 02:37:24.319 align:start position:0% use words like more most less or least 02:37:24.319 --> 02:37:27.990 align:start position:0% use words like more most less or least esta<02:37:25.479> isos<02:37:26.479> and<02:37:26.680> esta 02:37:27.990 --> 02:37:28.000 align:start position:0% esta isos and esta 02:37:28.000 --> 02:37:30.910 align:start position:0% esta isos and esta isos<02:37:29.000> literally<02:37:29.600> and<02:37:29.800> Visually<02:37:30.279> mean<02:37:30.800> this 02:37:30.910 --> 02:37:30.920 align:start position:0% isos literally and Visually mean this 02:37:30.920 --> 02:37:32.990 align:start position:0% isos literally and Visually mean this shirt<02:37:31.319> is<02:37:31.439> more<02:37:31.680> or<02:37:31.920> less<02:37:32.200> expensive<02:37:32.760> and<02:37:32.880> this 02:37:32.990 --> 02:37:33.000 align:start position:0% shirt is more or less expensive and this 02:37:33.000 --> 02:37:35.309 align:start position:0% shirt is more or less expensive and this shirt<02:37:33.399> is<02:37:33.680> the<02:37:33.880> most<02:37:34.160> or<02:37:34.359> least<02:37:34.680> expensive<02:37:35.200> and 02:37:35.309 --> 02:37:35.319 align:start position:0% shirt is the most or least expensive and 02:37:35.319 --> 02:37:37.190 align:start position:0% shirt is the most or least expensive and that<02:37:35.439> is<02:37:35.640> as<02:37:36.040> difficult<02:37:36.279> as<02:37:36.399> it<02:37:36.600> gets<02:37:37.040> as 02:37:37.190 --> 02:37:37.200 align:start position:0% that is as difficult as it gets as 02:37:37.200 --> 02:37:38.750 align:start position:0% that is as difficult as it gets as always<02:37:37.680> it's<02:37:37.840> up<02:37:38.000> to<02:37:38.120> you<02:37:38.319> to<02:37:38.479> use 02:37:38.750 --> 02:37:38.760 align:start position:0% always it's up to you to use 02:37:38.760 --> 02:37:40.750 align:start position:0% always it's up to you to use comparatives<02:37:39.319> and<02:37:39.479> superlatives<02:37:40.240> to<02:37:40.359> say<02:37:40.560> any 02:37:40.750 --> 02:37:40.760 align:start position:0% comparatives and superlatives to say any 02:37:40.760 --> 02:37:42.670 align:start position:0% comparatives and superlatives to say any sentence<02:37:41.120> you<02:37:41.240> want<02:37:41.640> at<02:37:41.840> last<02:37:42.200> there's<02:37:42.439> one 02:37:42.670 --> 02:37:42.680 align:start position:0% sentence you want at last there's one 02:37:42.680 --> 02:37:44.429 align:start position:0% sentence you want at last there's one final<02:37:43.000> concept<02:37:43.319> to<02:37:43.479> know<02:37:43.800> with<02:37:43.960> comparatives 02:37:44.429 --> 02:37:44.439 align:start position:0% final concept to know with comparatives 02:37:44.439 --> 02:37:45.910 align:start position:0% final concept to know with comparatives and<02:37:44.560> superlatives<02:37:45.200> and<02:37:45.319> there<02:37:45.479> somewhat 02:37:45.910 --> 02:37:45.920 align:start position:0% and superlatives and there somewhat 02:37:45.920 --> 02:37:47.670 align:start position:0% and superlatives and there somewhat similar<02:37:46.240> to<02:37:46.359> the<02:37:46.520> concept<02:37:46.840> in<02:37:46.960> English<02:37:47.319> being 02:37:47.670 --> 02:37:47.680 align:start position:0% similar to the concept in English being 02:37:47.680 --> 02:37:49.710 align:start position:0% similar to the concept in English being irregular<02:37:48.319> comparatives<02:37:48.840> and<02:37:49.040> superlatives 02:37:49.710 --> 02:37:49.720 align:start position:0% irregular comparatives and superlatives 02:37:49.720 --> 02:37:51.830 align:start position:0% irregular comparatives and superlatives that<02:37:49.880> have<02:37:50.000> to<02:37:50.120> do<02:37:50.319> with<02:37:50.479> words<02:37:51.040> like<02:37:51.279> Bueno 02:37:51.830 --> 02:37:51.840 align:start position:0% that have to do with words like Bueno 02:37:51.840 --> 02:37:54.469 align:start position:0% that have to do with words like Bueno Buena<02:37:52.439> Malo<02:37:52.840> Mala<02:37:53.279> Hoven<02:37:53.800> which<02:37:53.920> is<02:37:54.000> a<02:37:54.080> neutral 02:37:54.469 --> 02:37:54.479 align:start position:0% Buena Malo Mala Hoven which is a neutral 02:37:54.479 --> 02:37:57.550 align:start position:0% Buena Malo Mala Hoven which is a neutral adjective<02:37:55.040> and<02:37:55.240> vi<02:37:55.680> vi<02:37:56.120> which<02:37:56.240> mean<02:37:56.720> good<02:37:57.160> bad 02:37:57.550 --> 02:37:57.560 align:start position:0% adjective and vi vi which mean good bad 02:37:57.560 --> 02:37:59.590 align:start position:0% adjective and vi vi which mean good bad young<02:37:57.840> and<02:37:58.000> old<02:37:58.439> as<02:37:58.560> far<02:37:58.720> as<02:37:58.840> I<02:37:59.000> know<02:37:59.279> these<02:37:59.399> are 02:37:59.590 --> 02:37:59.600 align:start position:0% young and old as far as I know these are 02:37:59.600 --> 02:38:01.590 align:start position:0% young and old as far as I know these are the<02:37:59.720> only<02:38:00.000> irregular<02:38:00.640> qualities<02:38:01.160> used<02:38:01.439> to 02:38:01.590 --> 02:38:01.600 align:start position:0% the only irregular qualities used to 02:38:01.600 --> 02:38:03.389 align:start position:0% the only irregular qualities used to describe<02:38:02.040> something<02:38:02.359> as<02:38:02.600> inferior<02:38:03.200> or 02:38:03.389 --> 02:38:03.399 align:start position:0% describe something as inferior or 02:38:03.399 --> 02:38:05.269 align:start position:0% describe something as inferior or Superior<02:38:04.000> in<02:38:04.160> English<02:38:04.640> saying<02:38:04.960> something 02:38:05.269 --> 02:38:05.279 align:start position:0% Superior in English saying something 02:38:05.279 --> 02:38:07.030 align:start position:0% Superior in English saying something like<02:38:05.560> this<02:38:05.760> lesson<02:38:06.120> is<02:38:06.319> good<02:38:06.640> would<02:38:06.800> be<02:38:06.920> a 02:38:07.030 --> 02:38:07.040 align:start position:0% like this lesson is good would be a 02:38:07.040 --> 02:38:08.830 align:start position:0% like this lesson is good would be a simple<02:38:07.359> sentence<02:38:07.840> but<02:38:07.960> the<02:38:08.080> word<02:38:08.279> changes<02:38:08.640> to 02:38:08.830 --> 02:38:08.840 align:start position:0% simple sentence but the word changes to 02:38:08.840 --> 02:38:10.910 align:start position:0% simple sentence but the word changes to Better<02:38:09.240> In<02:38:09.359> the<02:38:09.520> comparative<02:38:10.040> form<02:38:10.479> and<02:38:10.720> the 02:38:10.910 --> 02:38:10.920 align:start position:0% Better In the comparative form and the 02:38:10.920 --> 02:38:12.510 align:start position:0% Better In the comparative form and the best<02:38:11.279> in<02:38:11.399> the<02:38:11.560> superlative<02:38:12.120> and<02:38:12.240> it's<02:38:12.399> the 02:38:12.510 --> 02:38:12.520 align:start position:0% best in the superlative and it's the 02:38:12.520 --> 02:38:14.790 align:start position:0% best in the superlative and it's the same<02:38:12.720> idea<02:38:13.200> of<02:38:13.319> the<02:38:13.479> word<02:38:13.720> bad<02:38:14.080> being<02:38:14.359> worse 02:38:14.790 --> 02:38:14.800 align:start position:0% same idea of the word bad being worse 02:38:14.800 --> 02:38:17.150 align:start position:0% same idea of the word bad being worse and<02:38:15.000> worst<02:38:15.399> span<02:38:16.000> likewise<02:38:16.399> has<02:38:16.560> this<02:38:16.800> concept 02:38:17.150 --> 02:38:17.160 align:start position:0% and worst span likewise has this concept 02:38:17.160 --> 02:38:20.190 align:start position:0% and worst span likewise has this concept but<02:38:17.319> it's<02:38:17.399> a<02:38:17.520> bit<02:38:17.640> more<02:38:17.880> irregular<02:38:18.520> saying<02:38:19.200> EST 02:38:20.190 --> 02:38:20.200 align:start position:0% but it's a bit more irregular saying EST 02:38:20.200 --> 02:38:22.070 align:start position:0% but it's a bit more irregular saying EST bu<02:38:20.680> would<02:38:20.800> be<02:38:20.920> a<02:38:21.040> simple<02:38:21.359> sentence<02:38:21.840> but<02:38:21.960> the 02:38:22.070 --> 02:38:22.080 align:start position:0% bu would be a simple sentence but the 02:38:22.080 --> 02:38:24.070 align:start position:0% bu would be a simple sentence but the comparative<02:38:22.600> version<02:38:23.040> would 02:38:24.070 --> 02:38:24.080 align:start position:0% comparative version would 02:38:24.080 --> 02:38:26.510 align:start position:0% comparative version would be<02:38:25.080> meaning<02:38:25.399> this<02:38:25.560> lesson<02:38:25.960> is<02:38:26.120> better 02:38:26.510 --> 02:38:26.520 align:start position:0% be meaning this lesson is better 02:38:26.520 --> 02:38:28.389 align:start position:0% be meaning this lesson is better similarly<02:38:27.000> having<02:38:27.200> an<02:38:27.399> irregular<02:38:27.920> change 02:38:28.389 --> 02:38:28.399 align:start position:0% similarly having an irregular change 02:38:28.399 --> 02:38:30.190 align:start position:0% similarly having an irregular change like<02:38:28.560> in<02:38:28.720> English<02:38:29.120> in<02:38:29.200> the<02:38:29.359> superlative<02:38:29.880> form 02:38:30.190 --> 02:38:30.200 align:start position:0% like in English in the superlative form 02:38:30.200 --> 02:38:33.030 align:start position:0% like in English in the superlative form the<02:38:30.319> sentence<02:38:30.680> would<02:38:30.840> be<02:38:31.200> EST<02:38:32.000> is<02:38:32.240> Lor<02:38:32.760> with<02:38:32.880> an 02:38:33.030 --> 02:38:33.040 align:start position:0% the sentence would be EST is Lor with an 02:38:33.040 --> 02:38:34.710 align:start position:0% the sentence would be EST is Lor with an article<02:38:33.439> indicating<02:38:34.000> this<02:38:34.240> but<02:38:34.359> in<02:38:34.520> this 02:38:34.710 --> 02:38:34.720 align:start position:0% article indicating this but in this 02:38:34.720 --> 02:38:37.190 align:start position:0% article indicating this but in this context<02:38:35.279> the<02:38:35.359> word<02:38:35.640> meor<02:38:36.120> means<02:38:36.560> best<02:38:36.960> rather 02:38:37.190 --> 02:38:37.200 align:start position:0% context the word meor means best rather 02:38:37.200 --> 02:38:38.910 align:start position:0% context the word meor means best rather than<02:38:37.399> better<02:38:37.720> from<02:38:37.880> the<02:38:38.040> previous<02:38:38.359> phrase<02:38:38.800> a 02:38:38.910 --> 02:38:38.920 align:start position:0% than better from the previous phrase a 02:38:38.920 --> 02:38:40.429 align:start position:0% than better from the previous phrase a tip<02:38:39.120> that<02:38:39.240> I<02:38:39.359> can<02:38:39.520> give<02:38:39.760> here<02:38:40.000> is<02:38:40.120> that<02:38:40.279> if<02:38:40.359> you 02:38:40.429 --> 02:38:40.439 align:start position:0% tip that I can give here is that if you 02:38:40.439 --> 02:38:42.190 align:start position:0% tip that I can give here is that if you see<02:38:40.600> an<02:38:40.760> article<02:38:41.120> before<02:38:41.439> mahor<02:38:41.880> the<02:38:42.000> word 02:38:42.190 --> 02:38:42.200 align:start position:0% see an article before mahor the word 02:38:42.200 --> 02:38:43.990 align:start position:0% see an article before mahor the word would<02:38:42.359> mean<02:38:42.720> the<02:38:42.920> best<02:38:43.240> if<02:38:43.399> there<02:38:43.560> isn't<02:38:43.840> an 02:38:43.990 --> 02:38:44.000 align:start position:0% would mean the best if there isn't an 02:38:44.000 --> 02:38:46.230 align:start position:0% would mean the best if there isn't an article<02:38:44.520> mahor<02:38:45.040> simply<02:38:45.279> means<02:38:45.560> best<02:38:46.000> and<02:38:46.080> it's 02:38:46.230 --> 02:38:46.240 align:start position:0% article mahor simply means best and it's 02:38:46.240 --> 02:38:49.469 align:start position:0% article mahor simply means best and it's the<02:38:46.359> same<02:38:46.560> irregular<02:38:47.160> concept<02:38:47.680> for<02:38:47.960> Malo<02:38:48.399> Mal 02:38:49.469 --> 02:38:49.479 align:start position:0% the same irregular concept for Malo Mal 02:38:49.479 --> 02:38:53.030 align:start position:0% the same irregular concept for Malo Mal and<02:38:50.479> saying<02:38:50.760> something<02:38:51.240> like<02:38:52.240> Malo<02:38:52.680> means 02:38:53.030 --> 02:38:53.040 align:start position:0% and saying something like Malo means 02:38:53.040 --> 02:38:55.910 align:start position:0% and saying something like Malo means this<02:38:53.200> book<02:38:53.359> is<02:38:53.560> bad<02:38:53.920> saying<02:38:54.279> EST<02:38:55.040> es<02:38:55.640> means 02:38:55.910 --> 02:38:55.920 align:start position:0% this book is bad saying EST es means 02:38:55.920 --> 02:38:57.830 align:start position:0% this book is bad saying EST es means this<02:38:56.080> book<02:38:56.240> is<02:38:56.439> worse<02:38:56.840> and<02:38:56.960> saying 02:38:57.830 --> 02:38:57.840 align:start position:0% this book is worse and saying 02:38:57.840 --> 02:39:00.469 align:start position:0% this book is worse and saying EST<02:38:58.840> means<02:38:59.200> this<02:38:59.399> book<02:38:59.680> is<02:38:59.920> the<02:39:00.080> worst 02:39:00.469 --> 02:39:00.479 align:start position:0% EST means this book is the worst 02:39:00.479 --> 02:39:02.670 align:start position:0% EST means this book is the worst similarly<02:39:01.160> it's<02:39:01.319> the<02:39:01.439> same<02:39:01.720> concept<02:39:02.160> with 02:39:02.670 --> 02:39:02.680 align:start position:0% similarly it's the same concept with 02:39:02.680 --> 02:39:06.070 align:start position:0% similarly it's the same concept with meaning<02:39:03.000> young<02:39:03.359> and<02:39:04.359> meaning<02:39:04.680> old<02:39:05.040> saying<02:39:05.399> El 02:39:06.070 --> 02:39:06.080 align:start position:0% meaning young and meaning old saying El 02:39:06.080 --> 02:39:09.429 align:start position:0% meaning young and meaning old saying El is<02:39:06.680> means<02:39:07.000> the<02:39:07.160> kid<02:39:07.359> is<02:39:07.520> Young<02:39:07.840> saying<02:39:08.439> El 02:39:09.429 --> 02:39:09.439 align:start position:0% is means the kid is Young saying El 02:39:09.439 --> 02:39:11.429 align:start position:0% is means the kid is Young saying El means<02:39:09.760> the<02:39:09.880> kid<02:39:10.040> is<02:39:10.200> younger<02:39:10.720> and 02:39:11.429 --> 02:39:11.439 align:start position:0% means the kid is younger and 02:39:11.439 --> 02:39:14.429 align:start position:0% means the kid is younger and saying<02:39:12.439> means<02:39:12.800> the<02:39:12.960> kid<02:39:13.279> is<02:39:13.399> the<02:39:13.560> youngest 02:39:14.429 --> 02:39:14.439 align:start position:0% saying means the kid is the youngest 02:39:14.439 --> 02:39:17.469 align:start position:0% saying means the kid is the youngest saying<02:39:15.439> means<02:39:15.720> means<02:39:15.920> she<02:39:16.120> is<02:39:16.240> old<02:39:16.600> saying<02:39:16.960> a 02:39:17.469 --> 02:39:17.479 align:start position:0% saying means means she is old saying a 02:39:17.479 --> 02:39:20.150 align:start position:0% saying means means she is old saying a mayor<02:39:17.920> means<02:39:18.240> she's<02:39:18.560> older<02:39:19.040> and<02:39:19.200> saying<02:39:19.479> a<02:39:20.000> LA 02:39:20.150 --> 02:39:20.160 align:start position:0% mayor means she's older and saying a LA 02:39:20.160 --> 02:39:22.429 align:start position:0% mayor means she's older and saying a LA mayor<02:39:20.560> means<02:39:20.840> she<02:39:21.000> is<02:39:21.160> the<02:39:21.279> oldest<02:39:21.920> of<02:39:22.040> course 02:39:22.429 --> 02:39:22.439 align:start position:0% mayor means she is the oldest of course 02:39:22.439 --> 02:39:24.230 align:start position:0% mayor means she is the oldest of course it's<02:39:22.600> up<02:39:22.760> to<02:39:22.920> you<02:39:23.120> to<02:39:23.279> say<02:39:23.479> any<02:39:23.760> sentence<02:39:24.120> that 02:39:24.230 --> 02:39:24.240 align:start position:0% it's up to you to say any sentence that 02:39:24.240 --> 02:39:26.150 align:start position:0% it's up to you to say any sentence that you<02:39:24.319> want<02:39:24.640> using<02:39:24.960> irregular<02:39:25.560> comparatives 02:39:26.150 --> 02:39:26.160 align:start position:0% you want using irregular comparatives 02:39:26.160 --> 02:39:27.670 align:start position:0% you want using irregular comparatives and<02:39:26.279> superlatives<02:39:26.840> in<02:39:26.960> Spanish<02:39:27.399> there<02:39:27.520> are 02:39:27.670 --> 02:39:27.680 align:start position:0% and superlatives in Spanish there are 02:39:27.680 --> 02:39:29.469 align:start position:0% and superlatives in Spanish there are many<02:39:27.920> negative<02:39:28.240> forms<02:39:28.520> in<02:39:28.680> Spanish<02:39:29.160> that 02:39:29.469 --> 02:39:29.479 align:start position:0% many negative forms in Spanish that 02:39:29.479 --> 02:39:31.349 align:start position:0% many negative forms in Spanish that sometimes<02:39:29.680> work<02:39:29.960> similarly<02:39:30.399> to<02:39:30.600> English<02:39:31.040> and 02:39:31.349 --> 02:39:31.359 align:start position:0% sometimes work similarly to English and 02:39:31.359 --> 02:39:32.910 align:start position:0% sometimes work similarly to English and sometimes<02:39:31.560> don't<02:39:31.960> in<02:39:32.120> this<02:39:32.279> video<02:39:32.640> I'd<02:39:32.800> like 02:39:32.910 --> 02:39:32.920 align:start position:0% sometimes don't in this video I'd like 02:39:32.920 --> 02:39:34.309 align:start position:0% sometimes don't in this video I'd like to<02:39:33.040> explain<02:39:33.319> how<02:39:33.439> negatives<02:39:33.880> work<02:39:34.040> in<02:39:34.160> the 02:39:34.309 --> 02:39:34.319 align:start position:0% to explain how negatives work in the 02:39:34.319 --> 02:39:35.870 align:start position:0% to explain how negatives work in the language<02:39:34.760> starting<02:39:35.040> from<02:39:35.240> basic<02:39:35.479> words<02:39:35.680> and 02:39:35.870 --> 02:39:35.880 align:start position:0% language starting from basic words and 02:39:35.880 --> 02:39:37.349 align:start position:0% language starting from basic words and sentences<02:39:36.439> all<02:39:36.560> the<02:39:36.680> way<02:39:36.800> to<02:39:36.880> how<02:39:37.000> they<02:39:37.160> use 02:39:37.349 --> 02:39:37.359 align:start position:0% sentences all the way to how they use 02:39:37.359 --> 02:39:38.990 align:start position:0% sentences all the way to how they use them<02:39:37.560> properly<02:39:38.080> first<02:39:38.439> there<02:39:38.560> are<02:39:38.760> some 02:39:38.990 --> 02:39:39.000 align:start position:0% them properly first there are some 02:39:39.000 --> 02:39:40.510 align:start position:0% them properly first there are some indefinite<02:39:39.560> and<02:39:39.720> negative<02:39:40.040> words<02:39:40.279> you<02:39:40.359> should 02:39:40.510 --> 02:39:40.520 align:start position:0% indefinite and negative words you should 02:39:40.520 --> 02:39:42.309 align:start position:0% indefinite and negative words you should know<02:39:40.720> in<02:39:40.840> Spanish<02:39:41.399> like<02:39:41.600> these<02:39:41.760> ones<02:39:42.120> these 02:39:42.309 --> 02:39:42.319 align:start position:0% know in Spanish like these ones these 02:39:42.319 --> 02:39:44.429 align:start position:0% know in Spanish like these ones these words<02:39:42.600> refer<02:39:42.880> to<02:39:43.080> people<02:39:43.439> and<02:39:43.640> things<02:39:44.040> but<02:39:44.200> not 02:39:44.429 --> 02:39:44.439 align:start position:0% words refer to people and things but not 02:39:44.439 --> 02:39:46.630 align:start position:0% words refer to people and things but not specifically<02:39:45.040> algo<02:39:45.439> means<02:39:45.640> means<02:39:46.040> something 02:39:46.630 --> 02:39:46.640 align:start position:0% specifically algo means means something 02:39:46.640 --> 02:39:49.670 align:start position:0% specifically algo means means something alen<02:39:47.279> means<02:39:47.680> someone<02:39:48.279> alun<02:39:48.840> means<02:39:49.200> any<02:39:49.600> and 02:39:49.670 --> 02:39:49.680 align:start position:0% alen means someone alun means any and 02:39:49.680 --> 02:39:51.190 align:start position:0% alen means someone alun means any and it's<02:39:49.840> the<02:39:49.960> only<02:39:50.200> word<02:39:50.399> that<02:39:50.560> has<02:39:50.720> gender<02:39:51.040> and 02:39:51.190 --> 02:39:51.200 align:start position:0% it's the only word that has gender and 02:39:51.200 --> 02:39:52.670 align:start position:0% it's the only word that has gender and plurality<02:39:51.880> along<02:39:52.120> with<02:39:52.240> the<02:39:52.359> negative 02:39:52.670 --> 02:39:52.680 align:start position:0% plurality along with the negative 02:39:52.680 --> 02:39:55.990 align:start position:0% plurality along with the negative version<02:39:52.960> too<02:39:53.279> c<02:39:54.000> means<02:39:54.359> always<02:39:54.920> anden<02:39:55.680> means 02:39:55.990 --> 02:39:56.000 align:start position:0% version too c means always anden means 02:39:56.000 --> 02:39:58.670 align:start position:0% version too c means always anden means also<02:39:56.479> the<02:39:56.600> negative<02:39:56.960> words<02:39:57.319> are<02:39:57.760> NADA<02:39:58.279> meaning 02:39:58.670 --> 02:39:58.680 align:start position:0% also the negative words are NADA meaning 02:39:58.680 --> 02:40:01.309 align:start position:0% also the negative words are NADA meaning nothing<02:39:59.200> NAD<02:39:59.840> meaning<02:40:00.200> no<02:40:00.359> one<02:40:00.760> ningun 02:40:01.309 --> 02:40:01.319 align:start position:0% nothing NAD meaning no one ningun 02:40:01.319 --> 02:40:04.150 align:start position:0% nothing NAD meaning no one ningun meaning<02:40:01.760> not<02:40:02.080> any<02:40:02.520> Nuna<02:40:03.160> meaning<02:40:03.479> never<02:40:03.960> and 02:40:04.150 --> 02:40:04.160 align:start position:0% meaning not any Nuna meaning never and 02:40:04.160 --> 02:40:06.190 align:start position:0% meaning not any Nuna meaning never and TCO<02:40:04.840> meaning<02:40:05.160> neither<02:40:05.640> even<02:40:05.800> though<02:40:05.960> I<02:40:06.040> will 02:40:06.190 --> 02:40:06.200 align:start position:0% TCO meaning neither even though I will 02:40:06.200 --> 02:40:07.870 align:start position:0% TCO meaning neither even though I will not<02:40:06.359> use<02:40:06.600> all<02:40:06.720> of<02:40:06.880> these<02:40:07.080> words<02:40:07.479> they're<02:40:07.640> still 02:40:07.870 --> 02:40:07.880 align:start position:0% not use all of these words they're still 02:40:07.880 --> 02:40:09.870 align:start position:0% not use all of these words they're still very<02:40:08.080> useful<02:40:08.359> to<02:40:08.520> know<02:40:08.840> at<02:40:08.960> first<02:40:09.200> in<02:40:09.359> English 02:40:09.870 --> 02:40:09.880 align:start position:0% very useful to know at first in English 02:40:09.880 --> 02:40:11.349 align:start position:0% very useful to know at first in English we<02:40:10.000> can<02:40:10.120> have<02:40:10.279> simple<02:40:10.600> sentences<02:40:11.160> with 02:40:11.349 --> 02:40:11.359 align:start position:0% we can have simple sentences with 02:40:11.359 --> 02:40:13.830 align:start position:0% we can have simple sentences with negatives<02:40:12.000> like<02:40:12.319> I<02:40:12.439> do<02:40:12.600> not<02:40:12.800> speak<02:40:13.080> French<02:40:13.600> or 02:40:13.830 --> 02:40:13.840 align:start position:0% negatives like I do not speak French or 02:40:13.840 --> 02:40:15.750 align:start position:0% negatives like I do not speak French or he<02:40:14.000> does<02:40:14.200> not<02:40:14.319> speak<02:40:14.560> Italian<02:40:15.040> in<02:40:15.160> Spanish<02:40:15.640> we 02:40:15.750 --> 02:40:15.760 align:start position:0% he does not speak Italian in Spanish we 02:40:15.760 --> 02:40:17.389 align:start position:0% he does not speak Italian in Spanish we have<02:40:15.840> to<02:40:15.960> use<02:40:16.120> the<02:40:16.240> word<02:40:16.479> no<02:40:16.800> by<02:40:16.960> placing<02:40:17.240> it 02:40:17.389 --> 02:40:17.399 align:start position:0% have to use the word no by placing it 02:40:17.399 --> 02:40:21.230 align:start position:0% have to use the word no by placing it before<02:40:17.600> a<02:40:17.760> verb 02:40:21.230 --> 02:40:21.240 align:start position:0% 02:40:21.240 --> 02:40:23.710 align:start position:0% like<02:40:22.240> however<02:40:22.560> when<02:40:22.680> we<02:40:22.840> answer<02:40:23.080> a<02:40:23.240> question 02:40:23.710 --> 02:40:23.720 align:start position:0% like however when we answer a question 02:40:23.720 --> 02:40:25.309 align:start position:0% like however when we answer a question and<02:40:23.840> the<02:40:24.000> response<02:40:24.319> is<02:40:24.479> negative<02:40:24.920> the<02:40:25.040> use<02:40:25.160> of 02:40:25.309 --> 02:40:25.319 align:start position:0% and the response is negative the use of 02:40:25.319 --> 02:40:27.070 align:start position:0% and the response is negative the use of two<02:40:25.520> negative<02:40:25.840> words<02:40:26.160> can<02:40:26.319> be<02:40:26.439> used<02:40:26.880> like 02:40:27.070 --> 02:40:27.080 align:start position:0% two negative words can be used like 02:40:27.080 --> 02:40:29.950 align:start position:0% two negative words can be used like asking<02:40:27.640> can<02:40:27.800> you<02:40:27.960> come<02:40:28.160> today<02:40:29.000> v<02:40:29.359> o<02:40:29.680> if<02:40:29.800> the 02:40:29.950 --> 02:40:29.960 align:start position:0% asking can you come today v o if the 02:40:29.960 --> 02:40:32.070 align:start position:0% asking can you come today v o if the response<02:40:30.240> is<02:40:30.439> negative<02:40:30.920> I<02:40:31.000> can<02:40:31.200> say<02:40:31.560> no<02:40:31.960> I 02:40:32.070 --> 02:40:32.080 align:start position:0% response is negative I can say no I 02:40:32.080 --> 02:40:34.070 align:start position:0% response is negative I can say no I cannot<02:40:32.439> come<02:40:32.720> today<02:40:33.080> with<02:40:33.240> two<02:40:33.479> negatives<02:40:33.960> in 02:40:34.070 --> 02:40:34.080 align:start position:0% cannot come today with two negatives in 02:40:34.080 --> 02:40:36.150 align:start position:0% cannot come today with two negatives in the<02:40:34.240> sentence<02:40:34.760> in<02:40:34.920> Spanish<02:40:35.359> the<02:40:35.520> idea<02:40:35.840> works 02:40:36.150 --> 02:40:36.160 align:start position:0% the sentence in Spanish the idea works 02:40:36.160 --> 02:40:37.990 align:start position:0% the sentence in Spanish the idea works the<02:40:36.279> same<02:40:36.479> way<02:40:36.760> if<02:40:36.840> the<02:40:37.000> response<02:40:37.319> is<02:40:37.520> negative 02:40:37.990 --> 02:40:38.000 align:start position:0% the same way if the response is negative 02:40:38.000 --> 02:40:41.269 align:start position:0% the same way if the response is negative I<02:40:38.120> can<02:40:38.319> say<02:40:38.680> no<02:40:39.120> y<02:40:39.600> no<02:40:40.600> comparing<02:40:40.920> the<02:40:41.040> phrase 02:40:41.269 --> 02:40:41.279 align:start position:0% I can say no y no comparing the phrase 02:40:41.279 --> 02:40:42.950 align:start position:0% I can say no y no comparing the phrase to<02:40:41.479> English<02:40:41.920> the<02:40:42.040> only<02:40:42.279> difference<02:40:42.680> is<02:40:42.800> that 02:40:42.950 --> 02:40:42.960 align:start position:0% to English the only difference is that 02:40:42.960 --> 02:40:45.349 align:start position:0% to English the only difference is that the<02:40:43.080> word<02:40:43.319> not<02:40:43.720> is<02:40:43.880> placed<02:40:44.200> after<02:40:44.560> can<02:40:44.920> but<02:40:45.080> no 02:40:45.349 --> 02:40:45.359 align:start position:0% the word not is placed after can but no 02:40:45.359 --> 02:40:47.230 align:start position:0% the word not is placed after can but no is<02:40:45.520> is<02:40:45.640> placed<02:40:45.920> before<02:40:46.240> PUO<02:40:46.680> because<02:40:46.880> Spanish 02:40:47.230 --> 02:40:47.240 align:start position:0% is is placed before PUO because Spanish 02:40:47.240 --> 02:40:49.030 align:start position:0% is is placed before PUO because Spanish places<02:40:47.560> negatives<02:40:48.040> before<02:40:48.359> verbs<02:40:48.720> all<02:40:48.880> the 02:40:49.030 --> 02:40:49.040 align:start position:0% places negatives before verbs all the 02:40:49.040 --> 02:40:50.990 align:start position:0% places negatives before verbs all the time<02:40:49.359> we<02:40:49.439> can<02:40:49.600> also<02:40:49.920> ask<02:40:50.160> something<02:40:50.560> like<02:40:50.840> did 02:40:50.990 --> 02:40:51.000 align:start position:0% time we can also ask something like did 02:40:51.000 --> 02:40:52.550 align:start position:0% time we can also ask something like did you<02:40:51.080> go<02:40:51.200> to<02:40:51.359> the<02:40:51.479> store<02:40:51.840> and<02:40:51.960> the<02:40:52.120> answer<02:40:52.359> can 02:40:52.550 --> 02:40:52.560 align:start position:0% you go to the store and the answer can 02:40:52.560 --> 02:40:54.910 align:start position:0% you go to the store and the answer can be<02:40:52.880> no<02:40:53.279> I<02:40:53.479> did<02:40:53.680> not<02:40:54.000> go<02:40:54.160> to<02:40:54.279> the<02:40:54.439> store<02:40:54.800> in 02:40:54.910 --> 02:40:54.920 align:start position:0% be no I did not go to the store in 02:40:54.920 --> 02:40:57.269 align:start position:0% be no I did not go to the store in Spanish<02:40:55.399> the<02:40:55.520> idea<02:40:55.840> works<02:40:56.200> the<02:40:56.319> same 02:40:57.269 --> 02:40:57.279 align:start position:0% Spanish the idea works the same 02:40:57.279 --> 02:40:59.230 align:start position:0% Spanish the idea works the same way 02:40:59.230 --> 02:40:59.240 align:start position:0% way 02:40:59.240 --> 02:41:01.790 align:start position:0% way no<02:41:00.240> as<02:41:00.399> always<02:41:00.840> you<02:41:00.960> can<02:41:01.080> make<02:41:01.240> any<02:41:01.479> sentence 02:41:01.790 --> 02:41:01.800 align:start position:0% no as always you can make any sentence 02:41:01.800 --> 02:41:03.269 align:start position:0% no as always you can make any sentence you<02:41:01.920> want<02:41:02.160> using<02:41:02.479> simple<02:41:02.760> negatives<02:41:03.120> in 02:41:03.269 --> 02:41:03.279 align:start position:0% you want using simple negatives in 02:41:03.279 --> 02:41:04.870 align:start position:0% you want using simple negatives in Spanish<02:41:03.760> but<02:41:03.880> it<02:41:04.000> doesn't<02:41:04.279> stop<02:41:04.600> here 02:41:04.870 --> 02:41:04.880 align:start position:0% Spanish but it doesn't stop here 02:41:04.880 --> 02:41:06.469 align:start position:0% Spanish but it doesn't stop here negative<02:41:05.279> words<02:41:05.640> can<02:41:05.760> be<02:41:05.920> used<02:41:06.160> in<02:41:06.279> many 02:41:06.469 --> 02:41:06.479 align:start position:0% negative words can be used in many 02:41:06.479 --> 02:41:08.309 align:start position:0% negative words can be used in many different<02:41:06.760> ways<02:41:07.000> in<02:41:07.120> Spanish<02:41:07.640> as<02:41:07.800> opposed<02:41:08.160> to 02:41:08.309 --> 02:41:08.319 align:start position:0% different ways in Spanish as opposed to 02:41:08.319 --> 02:41:10.230 align:start position:0% different ways in Spanish as opposed to English<02:41:08.840> in<02:41:09.000> English<02:41:09.520> you<02:41:09.640> can<02:41:09.760> say<02:41:09.960> things 02:41:10.230 --> 02:41:10.240 align:start position:0% English in English you can say things 02:41:10.240 --> 02:41:12.510 align:start position:0% English in English you can say things like<02:41:10.520> nobody<02:41:10.880> eats<02:41:11.319> and<02:41:11.439> she<02:41:11.640> never<02:41:11.880> runs<02:41:12.359> and 02:41:12.510 --> 02:41:12.520 align:start position:0% like nobody eats and she never runs and 02:41:12.520 --> 02:41:14.269 align:start position:0% like nobody eats and she never runs and in<02:41:12.680> Spanish<02:41:13.240> there<02:41:13.359> are<02:41:13.520> many<02:41:13.760> ways<02:41:14.080> you<02:41:14.160> can 02:41:14.269 --> 02:41:14.279 align:start position:0% in Spanish there are many ways you can 02:41:14.279 --> 02:41:17.230 align:start position:0% in Spanish there are many ways you can change<02:41:14.600> these<02:41:14.760> sentences<02:41:15.240> you<02:41:15.319> can 02:41:17.230 --> 02:41:17.240 align:start position:0% change these sentences you can 02:41:17.240 --> 02:41:19.830 align:start position:0% change these sentences you can say<02:41:18.240> which<02:41:18.359> is<02:41:18.479> visually<02:41:18.840> more<02:41:19.080> logical<02:41:19.640> but 02:41:19.830 --> 02:41:19.840 align:start position:0% say which is visually more logical but 02:41:19.840 --> 02:41:21.910 align:start position:0% say which is visually more logical but unlike<02:41:20.279> English<02:41:20.800> Spanish<02:41:21.160> can<02:41:21.319> contain<02:41:21.720> two 02:41:21.910 --> 02:41:21.920 align:start position:0% unlike English Spanish can contain two 02:41:21.920 --> 02:41:23.750 align:start position:0% unlike English Spanish can contain two or<02:41:22.040> more<02:41:22.279> negative<02:41:22.680> words<02:41:23.160> especially<02:41:23.520> when<02:41:23.640> a 02:41:23.750 --> 02:41:23.760 align:start position:0% or more negative words especially when a 02:41:23.760 --> 02:41:25.550 align:start position:0% or more negative words especially when a sentence<02:41:24.080> begins<02:41:24.399> with<02:41:24.520> a<02:41:24.640> negative<02:41:25.040> idea 02:41:25.550 --> 02:41:25.560 align:start position:0% sentence begins with a negative idea 02:41:25.560 --> 02:41:27.230 align:start position:0% sentence begins with a negative idea with<02:41:25.680> the<02:41:25.760> full<02:41:26.040> sentence<02:41:26.439> being<02:41:26.720> negative<02:41:27.160> I 02:41:27.230 --> 02:41:27.240 align:start position:0% with the full sentence being negative I 02:41:27.240 --> 02:41:29.510 align:start position:0% with the full sentence being negative I can<02:41:27.399> say<02:41:27.840> I<02:41:27.960> do<02:41:28.160> not<02:41:28.359> eat<02:41:28.720> anything<02:41:29.279> with<02:41:29.399> the 02:41:29.510 --> 02:41:29.520 align:start position:0% can say I do not eat anything with the 02:41:29.520 --> 02:41:31.670 align:start position:0% can say I do not eat anything with the word<02:41:29.760> not<02:41:30.200> before<02:41:30.560> eat<02:41:30.920> and<02:41:31.080> with<02:41:31.200> the<02:41:31.279> word 02:41:31.670 --> 02:41:31.680 align:start position:0% word not before eat and with the word 02:41:31.680 --> 02:41:33.429 align:start position:0% word not before eat and with the word anything<02:41:32.200> being<02:41:32.560> indefinite<02:41:33.120> in<02:41:33.279> the 02:41:33.429 --> 02:41:33.439 align:start position:0% anything being indefinite in the 02:41:33.439 --> 02:41:35.150 align:start position:0% anything being indefinite in the sentence<02:41:33.920> in<02:41:34.080> Spanish<02:41:34.520> the<02:41:34.640> sentence<02:41:35.000> would 02:41:35.150 --> 02:41:35.160 align:start position:0% sentence in Spanish the sentence would 02:41:35.160 --> 02:41:38.349 align:start position:0% sentence in Spanish the sentence would be<02:41:35.560> Y<02:41:35.920> no<02:41:36.840> meaning<02:41:37.160> I<02:41:37.279> do<02:41:37.439> not<02:41:37.680> eat<02:41:37.960> anything 02:41:38.349 --> 02:41:38.359 align:start position:0% be Y no meaning I do not eat anything 02:41:38.359 --> 02:41:40.110 align:start position:0% be Y no meaning I do not eat anything but<02:41:38.520> as<02:41:38.640> you<02:41:38.720> can<02:41:38.880> see<02:41:39.240> Spanish<02:41:39.600> has<02:41:39.720> a<02:41:39.840> double 02:41:40.110 --> 02:41:40.120 align:start position:0% but as you can see Spanish has a double 02:41:40.120 --> 02:41:42.070 align:start position:0% but as you can see Spanish has a double negative<02:41:40.600> with<02:41:40.760> the<02:41:40.880> word<02:41:41.080> NADA<02:41:41.600> which<02:41:41.760> means 02:41:42.070 --> 02:41:42.080 align:start position:0% negative with the word NADA which means 02:41:42.080 --> 02:41:44.110 align:start position:0% negative with the word NADA which means nothing<02:41:42.479> the<02:41:42.560> sentence<02:41:42.960> would<02:41:43.160> visually<02:41:43.600> be<02:41:44.000> I 02:41:44.110 --> 02:41:44.120 align:start position:0% nothing the sentence would visually be I 02:41:44.120 --> 02:41:45.670 align:start position:0% nothing the sentence would visually be I do<02:41:44.279> not<02:41:44.520> eat<02:41:44.800> nothing<02:41:45.120> even<02:41:45.279> though<02:41:45.560> the 02:41:45.670 --> 02:41:45.680 align:start position:0% do not eat nothing even though the 02:41:45.680 --> 02:41:47.110 align:start position:0% do not eat nothing even though the sentence<02:41:45.960> makes<02:41:46.200> sense<02:41:46.399> in<02:41:46.560> Spanish<02:41:47.000> it 02:41:47.110 --> 02:41:47.120 align:start position:0% sentence makes sense in Spanish it 02:41:47.120 --> 02:41:48.790 align:start position:0% sentence makes sense in Spanish it doesn't<02:41:47.359> make<02:41:47.560> sense<02:41:47.880> in<02:41:48.040> English<02:41:48.560> because 02:41:48.790 --> 02:41:48.800 align:start position:0% doesn't make sense in English because 02:41:48.800 --> 02:41:50.670 align:start position:0% doesn't make sense in English because English<02:41:49.120> doesn't<02:41:49.439> allow<02:41:49.840> double<02:41:50.200> negatives 02:41:50.670 --> 02:41:50.680 align:start position:0% English doesn't allow double negatives 02:41:50.680 --> 02:41:52.550 align:start position:0% English doesn't allow double negatives nonetheless<02:41:51.359> that's<02:41:51.520> how<02:41:51.720> negatives<02:41:52.160> work<02:41:52.399> in 02:41:52.550 --> 02:41:52.560 align:start position:0% nonetheless that's how negatives work in 02:41:52.560 --> 02:41:54.230 align:start position:0% nonetheless that's how negatives work in Spanish<02:41:53.000> and<02:41:53.080> we<02:41:53.200> can<02:41:53.399> make<02:41:53.560> any<02:41:53.760> sentence<02:41:54.120> we 02:41:54.230 --> 02:41:54.240 align:start position:0% Spanish and we can make any sentence we 02:41:54.240 --> 02:41:56.070 align:start position:0% Spanish and we can make any sentence we want<02:41:54.600> how<02:41:54.720> would<02:41:54.840> you<02:41:54.960> say<02:41:55.120> the<02:41:55.279> sentence<02:41:55.800> I<02:41:55.920> do 02:41:56.070 --> 02:41:56.080 align:start position:0% want how would you say the sentence I do 02:41:56.080 --> 02:41:59.230 align:start position:0% want how would you say the sentence I do not<02:41:56.200> see<02:41:56.520> anything<02:41:56.960> in<02:41:57.160> Spanish<02:41:57.960> Y<02:41:58.200> noada<02:41:59.120> how 02:41:59.230 --> 02:41:59.240 align:start position:0% not see anything in Spanish Y noada how 02:41:59.240 --> 02:42:01.990 align:start position:0% not see anything in Spanish Y noada how would<02:41:59.359> you<02:41:59.479> say<02:41:59.720> you<02:41:59.920> never<02:42:00.200> eat 02:42:01.990 --> 02:42:02.000 align:start position:0% would you say you never eat 02:42:02.000 --> 02:42:04.349 align:start position:0% would you say you never eat anything<02:42:03.000> how<02:42:03.120> would<02:42:03.240> you<02:42:03.359> say<02:42:03.720> he<02:42:03.920> does<02:42:04.120> not 02:42:04.349 --> 02:42:04.359 align:start position:0% anything how would you say he does not 02:42:04.359 --> 02:42:05.550 align:start position:0% anything how would you say he does not know 02:42:05.550 --> 02:42:05.560 align:start position:0% know 02:42:05.560 --> 02:42:07.750 align:start position:0% know anything<02:42:06.560> that's<02:42:06.720> how<02:42:06.880> negatives<02:42:07.359> work<02:42:07.600> in 02:42:07.750 --> 02:42:07.760 align:start position:0% anything that's how negatives work in 02:42:07.760 --> 02:42:09.950 align:start position:0% anything that's how negatives work in Spanish<02:42:08.279> at<02:42:08.479> last<02:42:08.840> there<02:42:08.960> are<02:42:09.120> two<02:42:09.439> concepts 02:42:09.950 --> 02:42:09.960 align:start position:0% Spanish at last there are two concepts 02:42:09.960 --> 02:42:11.870 align:start position:0% Spanish at last there are two concepts that<02:42:10.080> need<02:42:10.279> more<02:42:10.560> explanation<02:42:11.319> involving 02:42:11.870 --> 02:42:11.880 align:start position:0% that need more explanation involving 02:42:11.880 --> 02:42:14.590 align:start position:0% that need more explanation involving alen<02:42:12.560> and<02:42:12.760> NAD<02:42:13.240> meaning<02:42:13.560> someone<02:42:13.960> and<02:42:14.120> no<02:42:14.279> one 02:42:14.590 --> 02:42:14.600 align:start position:0% alen and NAD meaning someone and no one 02:42:14.600 --> 02:42:15.950 align:start position:0% alen and NAD meaning someone and no one and<02:42:14.800> alun<02:42:15.200> and 02:42:15.950 --> 02:42:15.960 align:start position:0% and alun and 02:42:15.960 --> 02:42:17.870 align:start position:0% and alun and meaning<02:42:16.319> any<02:42:16.640> or<02:42:16.840> not<02:42:17.120> any<02:42:17.479> because<02:42:17.720> they 02:42:17.870 --> 02:42:17.880 align:start position:0% meaning any or not any because they 02:42:17.880 --> 02:42:20.469 align:start position:0% meaning any or not any because they indicate<02:42:18.319> people<02:42:18.720> alen<02:42:19.279> and<02:42:19.439> N<02:42:20.040> have<02:42:20.160> to<02:42:20.319> use 02:42:20.469 --> 02:42:20.479 align:start position:0% indicate people alen and N have to use 02:42:20.479 --> 02:42:22.349 align:start position:0% indicate people alen and N have to use the<02:42:20.640> personal<02:42:21.120> a<02:42:21.439> which<02:42:21.560> is<02:42:21.680> used<02:42:21.960> before<02:42:22.240> the 02:42:22.349 --> 02:42:22.359 align:start position:0% the personal a which is used before the 02:42:22.359 --> 02:42:24.710 align:start position:0% the personal a which is used before the words<02:42:22.840> for<02:42:23.000> instance<02:42:23.600> I<02:42:23.680> can<02:42:23.880> ask<02:42:24.200> did<02:42:24.359> you<02:42:24.479> see 02:42:24.710 --> 02:42:24.720 align:start position:0% words for instance I can ask did you see 02:42:24.720 --> 02:42:26.870 align:start position:0% words for instance I can ask did you see someone<02:42:25.200> and<02:42:25.319> you<02:42:25.399> can<02:42:25.600> reply<02:42:25.960> with<02:42:26.240> no<02:42:26.560> I<02:42:26.680> did 02:42:26.870 --> 02:42:26.880 align:start position:0% someone and you can reply with no I did 02:42:26.880 --> 02:42:28.670 align:start position:0% someone and you can reply with no I did not<02:42:27.040> see<02:42:27.279> someone<02:42:27.720> in<02:42:27.840> Spanish<02:42:28.240> whenever<02:42:28.520> you 02:42:28.670 --> 02:42:28.680 align:start position:0% not see someone in Spanish whenever you 02:42:28.680 --> 02:42:29.990 align:start position:0% not see someone in Spanish whenever you ask<02:42:28.880> about<02:42:29.160> people<02:42:29.479> you<02:42:29.600> will<02:42:29.760> have<02:42:29.880> to 02:42:29.990 --> 02:42:30.000 align:start position:0% ask about people you will have to 02:42:30.000 --> 02:42:33.030 align:start position:0% ask about people you will have to include<02:42:30.319> the<02:42:30.439> personal<02:42:30.880> a<02:42:31.160> like<02:42:31.399> saying<02:42:31.960> V<02:42:32.960> and 02:42:33.030 --> 02:42:33.040 align:start position:0% include the personal a like saying V and 02:42:33.040 --> 02:42:36.110 align:start position:0% include the personal a like saying V and you<02:42:33.120> can<02:42:33.319> reply<02:42:33.680> with<02:42:33.960> no<02:42:34.600> Y<02:42:35.600> and<02:42:35.760> as<02:42:35.880> you<02:42:36.000> can 02:42:36.110 --> 02:42:36.120 align:start position:0% you can reply with no Y and as you can 02:42:36.120 --> 02:42:38.469 align:start position:0% you can reply with no Y and as you can see<02:42:36.439> the<02:42:36.600> personal<02:42:37.080> a<02:42:37.399> is<02:42:37.560> placed<02:42:37.920> both<02:42:38.120> in<02:42:38.240> the 02:42:38.469 --> 02:42:38.479 align:start position:0% see the personal a is placed both in the 02:42:38.479 --> 02:42:40.870 align:start position:0% see the personal a is placed both in the question<02:42:38.880> and<02:42:39.080> answer<02:42:39.520> additionally<02:42:40.279> Nadia 02:42:40.870 --> 02:42:40.880 align:start position:0% question and answer additionally Nadia 02:42:40.880 --> 02:42:42.429 align:start position:0% question and answer additionally Nadia indicates<02:42:41.319> no<02:42:41.520> one<02:42:41.800> which<02:42:41.920> is<02:42:42.000> a<02:42:42.160> third 02:42:42.429 --> 02:42:42.439 align:start position:0% indicates no one which is a third 02:42:42.439 --> 02:42:43.910 align:start position:0% indicates no one which is a third negative<02:42:42.840> in<02:42:42.960> the<02:42:43.120> sentence<02:42:43.680> which<02:42:43.760> is 02:42:43.910 --> 02:42:43.920 align:start position:0% negative in the sentence which is 02:42:43.920 --> 02:42:45.750 align:start position:0% negative in the sentence which is impossible<02:42:44.399> in<02:42:44.560> English<02:42:44.960> but<02:42:45.080> logic<02:42:45.319> iCal<02:42:45.600> in 02:42:45.750 --> 02:42:45.760 align:start position:0% impossible in English but logic iCal in 02:42:45.760 --> 02:42:47.429 align:start position:0% impossible in English but logic iCal in Spanish<02:42:46.240> of<02:42:46.399> course<02:42:46.720> you<02:42:46.840> have<02:42:46.960> to<02:42:47.120> watch<02:42:47.279> out 02:42:47.429 --> 02:42:47.439 align:start position:0% Spanish of course you have to watch out 02:42:47.439 --> 02:42:49.230 align:start position:0% Spanish of course you have to watch out for<02:42:47.640> these<02:42:47.800> ideas<02:42:48.359> finally<02:42:48.840> there<02:42:48.960> are<02:42:49.160> the 02:42:49.230 --> 02:42:49.240 align:start position:0% for these ideas finally there are the 02:42:49.240 --> 02:42:51.990 align:start position:0% for these ideas finally there are the words<02:42:49.600> alun<02:42:50.120> and<02:42:50.279> nun<02:42:50.840> which<02:42:50.960> mean<02:42:51.240> any<02:42:51.520> or<02:42:51.720> not 02:42:51.990 --> 02:42:52.000 align:start position:0% words alun and nun which mean any or not 02:42:52.000 --> 02:42:53.550 align:start position:0% words alun and nun which mean any or not any<02:42:52.399> and<02:42:52.479> they're<02:42:52.720> the<02:42:52.840> most<02:42:53.080> complicated 02:42:53.550 --> 02:42:53.560 align:start position:0% any and they're the most complicated 02:42:53.560 --> 02:42:55.070 align:start position:0% any and they're the most complicated negatives<02:42:53.920> in<02:42:54.080> Spanish<02:42:54.560> mainly<02:42:54.880> because 02:42:55.070 --> 02:42:55.080 align:start position:0% negatives in Spanish mainly because 02:42:55.080 --> 02:42:56.710 align:start position:0% negatives in Spanish mainly because they're<02:42:55.279> the<02:42:55.399> only<02:42:55.640> ones<02:42:56.040> that<02:42:56.200> have<02:42:56.359> gender 02:42:56.710 --> 02:42:56.720 align:start position:0% they're the only ones that have gender 02:42:56.720 --> 02:42:58.590 align:start position:0% they're the only ones that have gender and<02:42:56.880> plurality<02:42:57.640> however<02:42:57.920> using<02:42:58.240> them<02:42:58.359> in 02:42:58.590 --> 02:42:58.600 align:start position:0% and plurality however using them in 02:42:58.600 --> 02:43:00.389 align:start position:0% and plurality however using them in context<02:42:59.160> is<02:42:59.319> not<02:42:59.520> that<02:42:59.720> complicated 02:43:00.389 --> 02:43:00.399 align:start position:0% context is not that complicated 02:43:00.399 --> 02:43:01.429 align:start position:0% context is not that complicated especially<02:43:00.720> when<02:43:00.840> you<02:43:00.960> know<02:43:01.120> what<02:43:01.200> the 02:43:01.429 --> 02:43:01.439 align:start position:0% especially when you know what the 02:43:01.439 --> 02:43:03.830 align:start position:0% especially when you know what the context<02:43:01.920> is<02:43:02.279> asking<02:43:02.640> something 02:43:03.830 --> 02:43:03.840 align:start position:0% context is asking something 02:43:03.840 --> 02:43:06.630 align:start position:0% context is asking something like<02:43:04.840> means<02:43:05.200> do<02:43:05.319> you<02:43:05.520> have<02:43:05.760> any<02:43:06.000> book<02:43:06.279> here<02:43:06.560> if 02:43:06.630 --> 02:43:06.640 align:start position:0% like means do you have any book here if 02:43:06.640 --> 02:43:08.389 align:start position:0% like means do you have any book here if you<02:43:06.800> reply<02:43:07.160> with<02:43:07.240> a<02:43:07.399> negative<02:43:07.880> the<02:43:08.000> word<02:43:08.279> has 02:43:08.389 --> 02:43:08.399 align:start position:0% you reply with a negative the word has 02:43:08.399 --> 02:43:10.190 align:start position:0% you reply with a negative the word has to<02:43:08.600> match<02:43:08.840> the<02:43:09.000> gender<02:43:09.399> and<02:43:09.560> plurality<02:43:10.080> if 02:43:10.190 --> 02:43:10.200 align:start position:0% to match the gender and plurality if 02:43:10.200 --> 02:43:11.910 align:start position:0% to match the gender and plurality if there<02:43:10.359> is<02:43:10.479> one<02:43:10.800> so<02:43:11.080> the<02:43:11.240> answer<02:43:11.439> in<02:43:11.600> Spanish 02:43:11.910 --> 02:43:11.920 align:start position:0% there is one so the answer in Spanish 02:43:11.920 --> 02:43:13.750 align:start position:0% there is one so the answer in Spanish would<02:43:12.080> be 02:43:13.750 --> 02:43:13.760 align:start position:0% would be 02:43:13.760 --> 02:43:16.830 align:start position:0% would be no<02:43:14.760> no<02:43:14.960> I<02:43:15.040> do<02:43:15.399> not<02:43:15.600> have<02:43:15.800> any<02:43:16.040> book<02:43:16.279> here<02:43:16.640> again 02:43:16.830 --> 02:43:16.840 align:start position:0% no no I do not have any book here again 02:43:16.840 --> 02:43:18.790 align:start position:0% no no I do not have any book here again having<02:43:17.200> nun<02:43:17.680> as<02:43:17.760> a<02:43:17.920> third<02:43:18.160> negative<02:43:18.520> in<02:43:18.640> case 02:43:18.790 --> 02:43:18.800 align:start position:0% having nun as a third negative in case 02:43:18.800 --> 02:43:20.590 align:start position:0% having nun as a third negative in case we<02:43:18.920> want<02:43:19.000> to<02:43:19.160> pluralize<02:43:19.640> the<02:43:19.760> sentence<02:43:20.279> we<02:43:20.399> can 02:43:20.590 --> 02:43:20.600 align:start position:0% we want to pluralize the sentence we can 02:43:20.600 --> 02:43:24.070 align:start position:0% we want to pluralize the sentence we can ask<02:43:21.439> alak<02:43:22.439> meaning<02:43:22.720> do<02:43:22.840> you<02:43:23.000> have<02:43:23.319> some<02:43:23.600> or<02:43:23.840> any 02:43:24.070 --> 02:43:24.080 align:start position:0% ask alak meaning do you have some or any 02:43:24.080 --> 02:43:27.110 align:start position:0% ask alak meaning do you have some or any books<02:43:24.399> here<02:43:24.680> and<02:43:24.760> the<02:43:24.880> reply<02:43:25.200> can<02:43:25.359> be 02:43:27.110 --> 02:43:27.120 align:start position:0% books here and the reply can be 02:43:27.120 --> 02:43:30.150 align:start position:0% books here and the reply can be no<02:43:28.120> meaning<02:43:28.479> no<02:43:28.840> I<02:43:28.920> do<02:43:29.080> not<02:43:29.359> have<02:43:29.640> any<02:43:29.880> books 02:43:30.150 --> 02:43:30.160 align:start position:0% no meaning no I do not have any books 02:43:30.160 --> 02:43:32.030 align:start position:0% no meaning no I do not have any books here<02:43:30.439> in<02:43:30.600> Spanish<02:43:31.000> you<02:43:31.120> have<02:43:31.319> three<02:43:31.520> negatives 02:43:32.030 --> 02:43:32.040 align:start position:0% here in Spanish you have three negatives 02:43:32.040 --> 02:43:33.870 align:start position:0% here in Spanish you have three negatives but<02:43:32.160> English<02:43:32.479> does<02:43:32.640> not<02:43:32.800> allow<02:43:33.080> it<02:43:33.319> one<02:43:33.520> final 02:43:33.870 --> 02:43:33.880 align:start position:0% but English does not allow it one final 02:43:33.880 --> 02:43:35.630 align:start position:0% but English does not allow it one final example<02:43:34.319> can<02:43:34.479> be 02:43:35.630 --> 02:43:35.640 align:start position:0% example can be 02:43:35.640 --> 02:43:37.990 align:start position:0% example can be Kos<02:43:36.640> meaning<02:43:36.920> are<02:43:37.040> you<02:43:37.240> familiar<02:43:37.680> with<02:43:37.840> any 02:43:37.990 --> 02:43:38.000 align:start position:0% Kos meaning are you familiar with any 02:43:38.000 --> 02:43:40.070 align:start position:0% Kos meaning are you familiar with any store<02:43:38.399> around<02:43:38.720> here<02:43:38.960> and<02:43:39.040> you<02:43:39.160> can<02:43:39.359> reply<02:43:39.720> with 02:43:40.070 --> 02:43:40.080 align:start position:0% store around here and you can reply with 02:43:40.080 --> 02:43:43.190 align:start position:0% store around here and you can reply with no<02:43:40.399> y<02:43:40.720> kosuna<02:43:41.680> meaning<02:43:42.040> no<02:43:42.319> I<02:43:42.399> am<02:43:42.560> not<02:43:42.760> familiar 02:43:43.190 --> 02:43:43.200 align:start position:0% no y kosuna meaning no I am not familiar 02:43:43.200 --> 02:43:44.910 align:start position:0% no y kosuna meaning no I am not familiar with<02:43:43.399> any<02:43:43.800> as<02:43:43.960> always<02:43:44.359> you<02:43:44.479> can<02:43:44.600> make<02:43:44.760> any 02:43:44.910 --> 02:43:44.920 align:start position:0% with any as always you can make any 02:43:44.920 --> 02:43:46.550 align:start position:0% with any as always you can make any sentence<02:43:45.399> you<02:43:45.520> want<02:43:45.720> using<02:43:46.000> negatives<02:43:46.399> in 02:43:46.550 --> 02:43:46.560 align:start position:0% sentence you want using negatives in 02:43:46.560 --> 02:43:48.510 align:start position:0% sentence you want using negatives in Spanish<02:43:47.040> and<02:43:47.200> hopefully<02:43:47.720> after<02:43:48.040> this<02:43:48.200> video 02:43:48.510 --> 02:43:48.520 align:start position:0% Spanish and hopefully after this video 02:43:48.520 --> 02:43:50.070 align:start position:0% Spanish and hopefully after this video you<02:43:48.920> understand<02:43:49.080> how<02:43:49.240> negatives<02:43:49.640> work<02:43:49.840> in<02:43:49.960> the 02:43:50.070 --> 02:43:50.080 align:start position:0% you understand how negatives work in the 02:43:50.080 --> 02:43:52.110 align:start position:0% you understand how negatives work in the language<02:43:50.840> familiar<02:43:51.359> two<02:43:51.560> commands<02:43:51.960> in 02:43:52.110 --> 02:43:52.120 align:start position:0% language familiar two commands in 02:43:52.120 --> 02:43:54.190 align:start position:0% language familiar two commands in Spanish<02:43:52.600> is<02:43:52.720> a<02:43:52.840> singular<02:43:53.319> informal<02:43:53.760> way<02:43:54.000> to 02:43:54.190 --> 02:43:54.200 align:start position:0% Spanish is a singular informal way to 02:43:54.200 --> 02:43:55.990 align:start position:0% Spanish is a singular informal way to tell<02:43:54.399> someone<02:43:54.960> what<02:43:55.080> to<02:43:55.240> do<02:43:55.520> when<02:43:55.640> you<02:43:55.760> speak 02:43:55.990 --> 02:43:56.000 align:start position:0% tell someone what to do when you speak 02:43:56.000 --> 02:43:58.030 align:start position:0% tell someone what to do when you speak to<02:43:56.160> them<02:43:56.399> in<02:43:56.560> English<02:43:57.120> this<02:43:57.279> concept<02:43:57.640> is<02:43:57.800> very 02:43:58.030 --> 02:43:58.040 align:start position:0% to them in English this concept is very 02:43:58.040 --> 02:43:59.429 align:start position:0% to them in English this concept is very simple<02:43:58.520> because<02:43:58.720> it<02:43:58.840> doesn't<02:43:59.080> matter<02:43:59.319> what 02:43:59.429 --> 02:43:59.439 align:start position:0% simple because it doesn't matter what 02:43:59.439 --> 02:44:01.389 align:start position:0% simple because it doesn't matter what verb<02:43:59.680> we<02:43:59.800> use<02:44:00.120> its<02:44:00.279> form<02:44:00.560> in<02:44:00.680> the<02:44:00.800> infinitive 02:44:01.389 --> 02:44:01.399 align:start position:0% verb we use its form in the infinitive 02:44:01.399 --> 02:44:03.309 align:start position:0% verb we use its form in the infinitive will<02:44:01.640> always<02:44:01.920> stay<02:44:02.200> the<02:44:02.319> same<02:44:02.680> saying<02:44:03.040> you 02:44:03.309 --> 02:44:03.319 align:start position:0% will always stay the same saying you 02:44:03.319 --> 02:44:05.230 align:start position:0% will always stay the same saying you speak<02:44:03.680> can<02:44:03.840> mean<02:44:04.080> one<02:44:04.279> thing<02:44:04.680> but<02:44:04.840> saying 02:44:05.230 --> 02:44:05.240 align:start position:0% speak can mean one thing but saying 02:44:05.240 --> 02:44:07.070 align:start position:0% speak can mean one thing but saying Speak<02:44:05.680> can<02:44:05.840> generate<02:44:06.240> a<02:44:06.359> command<02:44:06.800> and<02:44:06.880> it's 02:44:07.070 --> 02:44:07.080 align:start position:0% Speak can generate a command and it's 02:44:07.080 --> 02:44:09.030 align:start position:0% Speak can generate a command and it's the<02:44:07.200> same<02:44:07.359> form<02:44:07.760> with<02:44:07.920> any<02:44:08.120> verb<02:44:08.399> in<02:44:08.520> English 02:44:09.030 --> 02:44:09.040 align:start position:0% the same form with any verb in English 02:44:09.040 --> 02:44:11.150 align:start position:0% the same form with any verb in English like<02:44:09.319> eat<02:44:09.520> your<02:44:09.680> food<02:44:10.040> tie<02:44:10.279> your<02:44:10.399> shoes<02:44:10.880> look 02:44:11.150 --> 02:44:11.160 align:start position:0% like eat your food tie your shoes look 02:44:11.160 --> 02:44:13.469 align:start position:0% like eat your food tie your shoes look up<02:44:11.439> get<02:44:11.640> up<02:44:11.880> leave<02:44:12.200> now<02:44:12.560> and<02:44:12.720> so<02:44:12.880> on<02:44:13.120> the<02:44:13.240> reason 02:44:13.469 --> 02:44:13.479 align:start position:0% up get up leave now and so on the reason 02:44:13.479 --> 02:44:14.950 align:start position:0% up get up leave now and so on the reason why<02:44:13.600> it's<02:44:13.720> easy<02:44:13.960> in<02:44:14.120> English<02:44:14.560> is<02:44:14.680> because<02:44:14.880> the 02:44:14.950 --> 02:44:14.960 align:start position:0% why it's easy in English is because the 02:44:14.960 --> 02:44:16.790 align:start position:0% why it's easy in English is because the Comm<02:44:15.279> and<02:44:15.439> always<02:44:15.680> stays<02:44:15.920> in<02:44:16.080> the<02:44:16.200> same<02:44:16.399> form 02:44:16.790 --> 02:44:16.800 align:start position:0% Comm and always stays in the same form 02:44:16.800 --> 02:44:18.429 align:start position:0% Comm and always stays in the same form as<02:44:16.920> the<02:44:17.080> infinitive<02:44:17.640> Spanish<02:44:18.160> however 02:44:18.429 --> 02:44:18.439 align:start position:0% as the infinitive Spanish however 02:44:18.439 --> 02:44:20.150 align:start position:0% as the infinitive Spanish however modifies<02:44:18.960> these<02:44:19.160> words<02:44:19.600> both<02:44:19.840> in<02:44:19.960> the 02:44:20.150 --> 02:44:20.160 align:start position:0% modifies these words both in the 02:44:20.160 --> 02:44:21.950 align:start position:0% modifies these words both in the affirmative<02:44:20.680> and<02:44:20.800> negative<02:44:21.120> two<02:44:21.359> commands 02:44:21.950 --> 02:44:21.960 align:start position:0% affirmative and negative two commands 02:44:21.960 --> 02:44:23.950 align:start position:0% affirmative and negative two commands without<02:44:22.200> needing<02:44:22.560> the<02:44:22.720> pronoun<02:44:23.200> two<02:44:23.520> regular 02:44:23.950 --> 02:44:23.960 align:start position:0% without needing the pronoun two regular 02:44:23.960 --> 02:44:27.110 align:start position:0% without needing the pronoun two regular a<02:44:24.160> r<02:44:24.479> e<02:44:24.720> r<02:44:25.080> and<02:44:25.319> i<02:44:25.760> verbs<02:44:26.160> will<02:44:26.359> keep<02:44:26.560> their<02:44:26.720> form 02:44:27.110 --> 02:44:27.120 align:start position:0% a r e r and i verbs will keep their form 02:44:27.120 --> 02:44:29.790 align:start position:0% a r e r and i verbs will keep their form as<02:44:27.240> a<02:44:27.399> two<02:44:27.600> command<02:44:28.120> by<02:44:28.279> taking<02:44:28.560> the<02:44:28.720> L<02:44:29.000> AA<02:44:29.399> form 02:44:29.790 --> 02:44:29.800 align:start position:0% as a two command by taking the L AA form 02:44:29.800 --> 02:44:31.710 align:start position:0% as a two command by taking the L AA form from<02:44:29.960> the<02:44:30.120> present<02:44:30.399> simple<02:44:30.800> for<02:44:30.960> instance 02:44:31.710 --> 02:44:31.720 align:start position:0% from the present simple for instance 02:44:31.720 --> 02:44:34.550 align:start position:0% from the present simple for instance saying<02:44:32.720> means<02:44:33.080> he<02:44:33.240> speaks<02:44:33.760> but<02:44:33.880> simply<02:44:34.160> saying 02:44:34.550 --> 02:44:34.560 align:start position:0% saying means he speaks but simply saying 02:44:34.560 --> 02:44:37.110 align:start position:0% saying means he speaks but simply saying abah<02:44:35.120> means<02:44:35.520> speak<02:44:36.040> as<02:44:36.160> in<02:44:36.479> I'm<02:44:36.640> giving<02:44:36.880> you<02:44:37.000> a 02:44:37.110 --> 02:44:37.120 align:start position:0% abah means speak as in I'm giving you a 02:44:37.120 --> 02:44:39.349 align:start position:0% abah means speak as in I'm giving you a command<02:44:37.560> to<02:44:37.760> speak<02:44:38.040> now<02:44:38.479> similarly<02:44:39.120> we<02:44:39.240> can 02:44:39.349 --> 02:44:39.359 align:start position:0% command to speak now similarly we can 02:44:39.359 --> 02:44:42.349 align:start position:0% command to speak now similarly we can use<02:44:39.520> an<02:44:39.720> ER<02:44:40.160> verb<02:44:40.560> like<02:44:40.840> com<02:44:41.359> saying<02:44:41.680> something 02:44:42.349 --> 02:44:42.359 align:start position:0% use an ER verb like com saying something 02:44:42.359 --> 02:44:44.710 align:start position:0% use an ER verb like com saying something likea<02:44:43.359> meaning<02:44:43.680> eat<02:44:43.920> your<02:44:44.120> food<02:44:44.520> without 02:44:44.710 --> 02:44:44.720 align:start position:0% likea meaning eat your food without 02:44:44.720 --> 02:44:46.429 align:start position:0% likea meaning eat your food without needing<02:44:44.960> to<02:44:45.200> put<02:44:45.359> the<02:44:45.479> pronoun<02:44:45.840> to<02:44:46.200> in<02:44:46.319> the 02:44:46.429 --> 02:44:46.439 align:start position:0% needing to put the pronoun to in the 02:44:46.439 --> 02:44:48.469 align:start position:0% needing to put the pronoun to in the beginning<02:44:46.880> we<02:44:46.960> can<02:44:47.080> also<02:44:47.279> use<02:44:47.439> an<02:44:47.640> IR<02:44:48.080> verb 02:44:48.469 --> 02:44:48.479 align:start position:0% beginning we can also use an IR verb 02:44:48.479 --> 02:44:50.469 align:start position:0% beginning we can also use an IR verb like<02:44:49.240> and<02:44:49.359> say<02:44:49.560> something 02:44:50.469 --> 02:44:50.479 align:start position:0% like and say something 02:44:50.479 --> 02:44:52.950 align:start position:0% like and say something like<02:44:51.479> meaning<02:44:51.840> open<02:44:52.080> the<02:44:52.240> door<02:44:52.479> please<02:44:52.880> and 02:44:52.950 --> 02:44:52.960 align:start position:0% like meaning open the door please and 02:44:52.960 --> 02:44:54.510 align:start position:0% like meaning open the door please and the<02:44:53.120> same<02:44:53.319> concept<02:44:53.640> applies<02:44:53.920> to<02:44:54.080> any<02:44:54.279> other 02:44:54.510 --> 02:44:54.520 align:start position:0% the same concept applies to any other 02:44:54.520 --> 02:44:56.269 align:start position:0% the same concept applies to any other regular<02:44:54.920> verb<02:44:55.279> that<02:44:55.399> you<02:44:55.479> want<02:44:55.600> to<02:44:55.720> use<02:44:56.000> in<02:44:56.120> the 02:44:56.269 --> 02:44:56.279 align:start position:0% regular verb that you want to use in the 02:44:56.279 --> 02:44:57.950 align:start position:0% regular verb that you want to use in the affirmative<02:44:56.720> command<02:44:57.279> however<02:44:57.640> there<02:44:57.760> are 02:44:57.950 --> 02:44:57.960 align:start position:0% affirmative command however there are 02:44:57.960 --> 02:44:59.870 align:start position:0% affirmative command however there are some<02:44:58.200> irregular<02:44:58.680> affirmative<02:44:59.080> to<02:44:59.359> commands 02:44:59.870 --> 02:44:59.880 align:start position:0% some irregular affirmative to commands 02:44:59.880 --> 02:45:03.429 align:start position:0% some irregular affirmative to commands involving 02:45:03.429 --> 02:45:03.439 align:start position:0% 02:45:03.439 --> 02:45:06.190 align:start position:0% ver<02:45:04.439> and<02:45:04.640> V<02:45:05.040> the<02:45:05.120> best<02:45:05.319> tip<02:45:05.479> that<02:45:05.640> I<02:45:05.720> can<02:45:05.880> give 02:45:06.190 --> 02:45:06.200 align:start position:0% ver and V the best tip that I can give 02:45:06.200 --> 02:45:07.670 align:start position:0% ver and V the best tip that I can give is<02:45:06.279> to<02:45:06.399> just<02:45:06.560> memorize<02:45:07.000> these<02:45:07.160> commands 02:45:07.670 --> 02:45:07.680 align:start position:0% is to just memorize these commands 02:45:07.680 --> 02:45:08.910 align:start position:0% is to just memorize these commands because<02:45:07.880> there<02:45:07.960> is<02:45:08.080> no<02:45:08.279> pattern<02:45:08.560> to<02:45:08.640> follow 02:45:08.910 --> 02:45:08.920 align:start position:0% because there is no pattern to follow 02:45:08.920 --> 02:45:10.349 align:start position:0% because there is no pattern to follow with<02:45:09.120> any<02:45:09.279> of 02:45:10.349 --> 02:45:10.359 align:start position:0% with any of 02:45:10.359 --> 02:45:13.870 align:start position:0% with any of them<02:45:11.359> means<02:45:11.720> put<02:45:11.880> the<02:45:12.000> phone<02:45:12.279> on<02:45:12.439> the<02:45:12.880> table 02:45:13.870 --> 02:45:13.880 align:start position:0% them means put the phone on the table 02:45:13.880 --> 02:45:16.710 align:start position:0% them means put the phone on the table means<02:45:14.240> do<02:45:14.399> your<02:45:14.560> homework<02:45:15.240> Sala<02:45:16.080> means<02:45:16.439> leave 02:45:16.710 --> 02:45:16.720 align:start position:0% means do your homework Sala means leave 02:45:16.720 --> 02:45:19.630 align:start position:0% means do your homework Sala means leave now<02:45:17.080> VES<02:45:18.080> means<02:45:18.439> come<02:45:18.720> if<02:45:18.840> you<02:45:19.000> can<02:45:19.399> this<02:45:19.479> is 02:45:19.630 --> 02:45:19.640 align:start position:0% now VES means come if you can this is 02:45:19.640 --> 02:45:21.389 align:start position:0% now VES means come if you can this is how<02:45:19.840> irregular<02:45:20.399> commands<02:45:20.920> work<02:45:21.160> in<02:45:21.279> the 02:45:21.389 --> 02:45:21.399 align:start position:0% how irregular commands work in the 02:45:21.399 --> 02:45:23.269 align:start position:0% how irregular commands work in the affirmative<02:45:22.000> at<02:45:22.160> last<02:45:22.439> there<02:45:22.560> are<02:45:22.720> the<02:45:22.840> verbs 02:45:23.269 --> 02:45:23.279 align:start position:0% affirmative at last there are the verbs 02:45:23.279 --> 02:45:25.429 align:start position:0% affirmative at last there are the verbs ver<02:45:23.560> and<02:45:24.160> which<02:45:24.319> have<02:45:24.479> the<02:45:24.600> same<02:45:24.840> pattern<02:45:25.279> so 02:45:25.429 --> 02:45:25.439 align:start position:0% ver and which have the same pattern so 02:45:25.439 --> 02:45:26.750 align:start position:0% ver and which have the same pattern so you<02:45:25.520> can<02:45:25.680> only<02:45:25.840> tell<02:45:26.040> their<02:45:26.240> difference<02:45:26.520> in 02:45:26.750 --> 02:45:26.760 align:start position:0% you can only tell their difference in 02:45:26.760 --> 02:45:28.590 align:start position:0% you can only tell their difference in context<02:45:27.319> a<02:45:27.439> tip<02:45:27.640> that<02:45:27.760> I<02:45:27.880> can<02:45:28.080> give<02:45:28.279> is<02:45:28.399> if<02:45:28.520> you 02:45:28.590 --> 02:45:28.600 align:start position:0% context a tip that I can give is if you 02:45:28.600 --> 02:45:31.150 align:start position:0% context a tip that I can give is if you see<02:45:28.760> the<02:45:28.920> preposition<02:45:29.479> a<02:45:29.880> after<02:45:30.520> the<02:45:30.640> verb<02:45:30.920> has 02:45:31.150 --> 02:45:31.160 align:start position:0% see the preposition a after the verb has 02:45:31.160 --> 02:45:34.429 align:start position:0% see the preposition a after the verb has to<02:45:31.359> be<02:45:31.920> as<02:45:32.479> in<02:45:33.479> go<02:45:33.600> to<02:45:33.760> the<02:45:33.880> school<02:45:34.279> if<02:45:34.359> you 02:45:34.429 --> 02:45:34.439 align:start position:0% to be as in go to the school if you 02:45:34.439 --> 02:45:36.469 align:start position:0% to be as in go to the school if you don't<02:45:34.600> see<02:45:34.800> a<02:45:34.960> preposition<02:45:35.479> after<02:45:36.120> the<02:45:36.200> verb 02:45:36.469 --> 02:45:36.479 align:start position:0% don't see a preposition after the verb 02:45:36.479 --> 02:45:40.070 align:start position:0% don't see a preposition after the verb is<02:45:37.040> as<02:45:37.640> in<02:45:38.640> see<02:45:38.960> that<02:45:39.160> movie<02:45:39.520> of<02:45:39.640> course<02:45:39.960> you 02:45:40.070 --> 02:45:40.080 align:start position:0% is as in see that movie of course you 02:45:40.080 --> 02:45:41.790 align:start position:0% is as in see that movie of course you can<02:45:40.200> say<02:45:40.479> any<02:45:40.640> command<02:45:41.000> that<02:45:41.080> you<02:45:41.200> want<02:45:41.479> using 02:45:41.790 --> 02:45:41.800 align:start position:0% can say any command that you want using 02:45:41.800 --> 02:45:43.630 align:start position:0% can say any command that you want using regular<02:45:42.279> and<02:45:42.479> irregular<02:45:43.040> verbs<02:45:43.399> in<02:45:43.520> the 02:45:43.630 --> 02:45:43.640 align:start position:0% regular and irregular verbs in the 02:45:43.640 --> 02:45:45.389 align:start position:0% regular and irregular verbs in the affirmative<02:45:44.040> form<02:45:44.479> now<02:45:44.720> under<02:45:45.200> understanding 02:45:45.389 --> 02:45:45.399 align:start position:0% affirmative form now under understanding 02:45:45.399 --> 02:45:46.990 align:start position:0% affirmative form now under understanding how<02:45:45.560> two<02:45:45.760> commands<02:45:46.200> work<02:45:46.399> in<02:45:46.520> the<02:45:46.640> negative 02:45:46.990 --> 02:45:47.000 align:start position:0% how two commands work in the negative 02:45:47.000 --> 02:45:48.710 align:start position:0% how two commands work in the negative form<02:45:47.319> can<02:45:47.479> be<02:45:47.640> tricky<02:45:48.160> but<02:45:48.279> there<02:45:48.359> is<02:45:48.520> one 02:45:48.710 --> 02:45:48.720 align:start position:0% form can be tricky but there is one 02:45:48.720 --> 02:45:50.150 align:start position:0% form can be tricky but there is one pattern<02:45:49.000> to<02:45:49.160> follow<02:45:49.560> in<02:45:49.720> case<02:45:49.880> you<02:45:50.000> get 02:45:50.150 --> 02:45:50.160 align:start position:0% pattern to follow in case you get 02:45:50.160 --> 02:45:52.349 align:start position:0% pattern to follow in case you get confused<02:45:50.680> in<02:45:50.800> the<02:45:50.920> negative<02:45:51.240> form<02:45:51.600> ar<02:45:51.960> verbs 02:45:52.349 --> 02:45:52.359 align:start position:0% confused in the negative form ar verbs 02:45:52.359 --> 02:45:53.870 align:start position:0% confused in the negative form ar verbs will<02:45:52.520> drop<02:45:52.760> their<02:45:52.960> ending<02:45:53.439> and<02:45:53.600> get<02:45:53.760> the 02:45:53.870 --> 02:45:53.880 align:start position:0% will drop their ending and get the 02:45:53.880 --> 02:45:56.110 align:start position:0% will drop their ending and get the ending<02:45:54.279> s<02:45:54.760> along<02:45:55.040> with<02:45:55.160> the<02:45:55.279> word<02:45:55.479> no<02:45:55.880> in<02:45:56.000> the 02:45:56.110 --> 02:45:56.120 align:start position:0% ending s along with the word no in the 02:45:56.120 --> 02:45:58.630 align:start position:0% ending s along with the word no in the beginning<02:45:56.520> for<02:45:56.760> e<02:45:56.960> r<02:45:57.200> and<02:45:57.439> ir<02:45:57.800> verbs<02:45:58.240> you<02:45:58.359> drop 02:45:58.630 --> 02:45:58.640 align:start position:0% beginning for e r and ir verbs you drop 02:45:58.640 --> 02:46:00.870 align:start position:0% beginning for e r and ir verbs you drop the<02:45:58.760> ending<02:45:59.200> and<02:45:59.359> put<02:45:59.560> the<02:45:59.680> ending<02:46:00.160> us<02:46:00.640> along 02:46:00.870 --> 02:46:00.880 align:start position:0% the ending and put the ending us along 02:46:00.880 --> 02:46:02.750 align:start position:0% the ending and put the ending us along with<02:46:01.120> no<02:46:01.399> in<02:46:01.520> the<02:46:01.640> beginning<02:46:02.080> for<02:46:02.279> instance 02:46:02.750 --> 02:46:02.760 align:start position:0% with no in the beginning for instance 02:46:02.760 --> 02:46:05.429 align:start position:0% with no in the beginning for instance saying<02:46:03.160> a<02:46:03.560> a<02:46:04.080> means<02:46:04.439> speak<02:46:04.800> now<02:46:05.200> in<02:46:05.319> the 02:46:05.429 --> 02:46:05.439 align:start position:0% saying a a means speak now in the 02:46:05.439 --> 02:46:06.870 align:start position:0% saying a a means speak now in the affirmative<02:46:05.880> form<02:46:06.200> but<02:46:06.319> how<02:46:06.439> would<02:46:06.560> you<02:46:06.680> say 02:46:06.870 --> 02:46:06.880 align:start position:0% affirmative form but how would you say 02:46:06.880 --> 02:46:08.349 align:start position:0% affirmative form but how would you say this<02:46:07.040> command<02:46:07.399> in<02:46:07.520> the<02:46:07.640> negative<02:46:07.960> form<02:46:08.240> You 02:46:08.349 --> 02:46:08.359 align:start position:0% this command in the negative form You 02:46:08.359 --> 02:46:10.670 align:start position:0% this command in the negative form You Begin<02:46:08.600> by<02:46:08.720> saying<02:46:09.040> no<02:46:09.399> you<02:46:09.520> take<02:46:09.760> a<02:46:10.279> drop<02:46:10.560> the 02:46:10.670 --> 02:46:10.680 align:start position:0% Begin by saying no you take a drop the 02:46:10.680 --> 02:46:12.950 align:start position:0% Begin by saying no you take a drop the ending<02:46:11.120> and<02:46:11.279> put<02:46:11.439> the<02:46:11.560> ending<02:46:12.040> s<02:46:12.479> so<02:46:12.640> you<02:46:12.760> get 02:46:12.950 --> 02:46:12.960 align:start position:0% ending and put the ending s so you get 02:46:12.960 --> 02:46:15.550 align:start position:0% ending and put the ending s so you get no<02:46:13.319> aess<02:46:13.960> don't<02:46:14.240> speak<02:46:14.600> and<02:46:14.720> the<02:46:14.800> same<02:46:15.160> idea 02:46:15.550 --> 02:46:15.560 align:start position:0% no aess don't speak and the same idea 02:46:15.560 --> 02:46:17.469 align:start position:0% no aess don't speak and the same idea works<02:46:15.800> for<02:46:16.040> any<02:46:16.279> regular<02:46:16.680> AR<02:46:17.080> verb<02:46:17.279> you<02:46:17.359> want 02:46:17.469 --> 02:46:17.479 align:start position:0% works for any regular AR verb you want 02:46:17.479 --> 02:46:20.510 align:start position:0% works for any regular AR verb you want to<02:46:17.640> use<02:46:17.960> for<02:46:18.200> e<02:46:18.640> and<02:46:18.840> ir<02:46:19.240> verbs<02:46:19.680> like<02:46:19.920> com<02:46:20.319> and 02:46:20.510 --> 02:46:20.520 align:start position:0% to use for e and ir verbs like com and 02:46:20.520 --> 02:46:23.590 align:start position:0% to use for e and ir verbs like com and ab<02:46:20.920> You<02:46:21.040> Begin<02:46:21.319> by<02:46:21.439> saying<02:46:21.720> no<02:46:22.080> take<02:46:22.399> com<02:46:22.840> and 02:46:23.590 --> 02:46:23.600 align:start position:0% ab You Begin by saying no take com and 02:46:23.600 --> 02:46:26.070 align:start position:0% ab You Begin by saying no take com and drop<02:46:23.840> the<02:46:23.960> endings<02:46:24.600> and<02:46:24.760> put<02:46:24.960> the<02:46:25.080> ending<02:46:25.680> as 02:46:26.070 --> 02:46:26.080 align:start position:0% drop the endings and put the ending as 02:46:26.080 --> 02:46:28.630 align:start position:0% drop the endings and put the ending as so<02:46:26.240> you<02:46:26.399> get<02:46:26.560> no<02:46:26.840> commas<02:46:27.399> and<02:46:27.560> no<02:46:27.840> abas<02:46:28.319> meaning 02:46:28.630 --> 02:46:28.640 align:start position:0% so you get no commas and no abas meaning 02:46:28.640 --> 02:46:30.590 align:start position:0% so you get no commas and no abas meaning don't<02:46:28.960> eat<02:46:29.319> and<02:46:29.479> don't<02:46:29.760> open<02:46:30.160> and<02:46:30.240> the<02:46:30.359> same 02:46:30.590 --> 02:46:30.600 align:start position:0% don't eat and don't open and the same 02:46:30.600 --> 02:46:33.190 align:start position:0% don't eat and don't open and the same idea<02:46:31.040> applies<02:46:31.319> to<02:46:31.479> any<02:46:31.680> other<02:46:31.960> regular<02:46:32.439> e<02:46:32.960> and 02:46:33.190 --> 02:46:33.200 align:start position:0% idea applies to any other regular e and 02:46:33.200 --> 02:46:34.910 align:start position:0% idea applies to any other regular e and IR<02:46:33.560> verb<02:46:33.760> you<02:46:33.880> want<02:46:33.960> to<02:46:34.080> use<02:46:34.439> the<02:46:34.600> negative 02:46:34.910 --> 02:46:34.920 align:start position:0% IR verb you want to use the negative 02:46:34.920 --> 02:46:36.710 align:start position:0% IR verb you want to use the negative form<02:46:35.200> of<02:46:35.319> two<02:46:35.520> commands<02:46:36.120> actually<02:46:36.439> doesn't 02:46:36.710 --> 02:46:36.720 align:start position:0% form of two commands actually doesn't 02:46:36.720 --> 02:46:38.070 align:start position:0% form of two commands actually doesn't stop<02:46:37.040> here<02:46:37.319> because<02:46:37.520> there's<02:46:37.680> a<02:46:37.800> lot<02:46:37.920> of 02:46:38.070 --> 02:46:38.080 align:start position:0% stop here because there's a lot of 02:46:38.080 --> 02:46:39.950 align:start position:0% stop here because there's a lot of irregular<02:46:38.640> verbs<02:46:39.040> that<02:46:39.160> change<02:46:39.399> their<02:46:39.600> form 02:46:39.950 --> 02:46:39.960 align:start position:0% irregular verbs that change their form 02:46:39.960 --> 02:46:41.469 align:start position:0% irregular verbs that change their form once<02:46:40.160> they<02:46:40.279> become<02:46:40.560> negative<02:46:41.040> including 02:46:41.469 --> 02:46:41.479 align:start position:0% once they become negative including 02:46:41.479 --> 02:46:44.030 align:start position:0% once they become negative including irregular<02:46:41.960> y<02:46:42.160> verbs<02:46:42.560> verbs<02:46:42.840> that<02:46:42.960> end<02:46:43.160> in<02:46:43.359> K<02:46:43.800> G 02:46:44.030 --> 02:46:44.040 align:start position:0% irregular y verbs verbs that end in K G 02:46:44.040 --> 02:46:46.389 align:start position:0% irregular y verbs verbs that end in K G and<02:46:44.240> SAR<02:46:44.560> and<02:46:45.040> regular<02:46:45.359> verbs<02:46:45.760> in<02:46:45.920> general 02:46:46.389 --> 02:46:46.399 align:start position:0% and SAR and regular verbs in general 02:46:46.399 --> 02:46:49.870 align:start position:0% and SAR and regular verbs in general verbs 02:46:49.870 --> 02:46:49.880 align:start position:0% 02:46:49.880 --> 02:46:52.870 align:start position:0% like<02:46:50.880> and<02:46:51.359> all<02:46:51.520> share<02:46:51.800> one<02:46:52.040> common<02:46:52.319> change<02:46:52.760> and 02:46:52.870 --> 02:46:52.880 align:start position:0% like and all share one common change and 02:46:52.880 --> 02:46:54.670 align:start position:0% like and all share one common change and that<02:46:53.000> is<02:46:53.120> being<02:46:53.399> irregular<02:46:53.920> in<02:46:54.000> the<02:46:54.120> Y<02:46:54.359> form 02:46:54.670 --> 02:46:54.680 align:start position:0% that is being irregular in the Y form 02:46:54.680 --> 02:46:55.870 align:start position:0% that is being irregular in the Y form and<02:46:54.800> the<02:46:54.880> way<02:46:55.000> that<02:46:55.120> you<02:46:55.240> would<02:46:55.359> use<02:46:55.600> them<02:46:55.760> in 02:46:55.870 --> 02:46:55.880 align:start position:0% and the way that you would use them in 02:46:55.880 --> 02:46:57.630 align:start position:0% and the way that you would use them in the<02:46:56.000> negative<02:46:56.359> command<02:46:56.880> is<02:46:57.040> by<02:46:57.200> taking<02:46:57.439> their 02:46:57.630 --> 02:46:57.640 align:start position:0% the negative command is by taking their 02:46:57.640 --> 02:46:59.510 align:start position:0% the negative command is by taking their y<02:46:57.880> form<02:46:58.200> from<02:46:58.359> the<02:46:58.520> present<02:46:58.960> dropping<02:46:59.319> their 02:46:59.510 --> 02:46:59.520 align:start position:0% y form from the present dropping their 02:46:59.520 --> 02:47:01.590 align:start position:0% y form from the present dropping their vows<02:46:59.880> from<02:47:00.040> the<02:47:00.160> end<02:47:00.479> and<02:47:00.640> adding<02:47:00.960> the<02:47:01.120> ending 02:47:01.590 --> 02:47:01.600 align:start position:0% vows from the end and adding the ending 02:47:01.600 --> 02:47:04.590 align:start position:0% vows from the end and adding the ending us<02:47:02.080> so<02:47:02.399> it<02:47:02.520> would<02:47:02.680> look<02:47:02.920> like<02:47:03.120> this<02:47:03.439> no<02:47:03.720> kusas 02:47:04.590 --> 02:47:04.600 align:start position:0% us so it would look like this no kusas 02:47:04.600 --> 02:47:07.469 align:start position:0% us so it would look like this no kusas don't<02:47:04.840> drive<02:47:05.479> no<02:47:05.760> digas<02:47:06.359> don't<02:47:06.640> tell<02:47:07.000> or<02:47:07.240> don't 02:47:07.469 --> 02:47:07.479 align:start position:0% don't drive no digas don't tell or don't 02:47:07.479 --> 02:47:10.550 align:start position:0% don't drive no digas don't tell or don't say<02:47:07.920> no<02:47:08.200> AAS<02:47:08.760> don't<02:47:09.080> do<02:47:09.399> or<02:47:09.600> don't<02:47:09.920> make<02:47:10.319> no 02:47:10.550 --> 02:47:10.560 align:start position:0% say no AAS don't do or don't make no 02:47:10.560 --> 02:47:13.710 align:start position:0% say no AAS don't do or don't make no pongas<02:47:11.240> don't<02:47:11.560> put<02:47:11.840> no<02:47:12.040> Salas<02:47:12.760> don't<02:47:13.000> leave<02:47:13.439> no 02:47:13.710 --> 02:47:13.720 align:start position:0% pongas don't put no Salas don't leave no 02:47:13.720 --> 02:47:16.750 align:start position:0% pongas don't put no Salas don't leave no Trias<02:47:14.479> don't<02:47:14.680> bring<02:47:15.279> no<02:47:15.560> vengas<02:47:16.160> don't<02:47:16.439> come 02:47:16.750 --> 02:47:16.760 align:start position:0% Trias don't bring no vengas don't come 02:47:16.760 --> 02:47:19.190 align:start position:0% Trias don't bring no vengas don't come and<02:47:16.920> no<02:47:17.160> veas<02:47:17.640> don't<02:47:17.920> see<02:47:18.279> inevitably<02:47:18.920> there's 02:47:19.190 --> 02:47:19.200 align:start position:0% and no veas don't see inevitably there's 02:47:19.200 --> 02:47:21.190 align:start position:0% and no veas don't see inevitably there's other<02:47:19.439> irregular<02:47:19.920> y<02:47:20.160> verbs<02:47:20.399> in<02:47:20.560> Spanish<02:47:21.080> that 02:47:21.190 --> 02:47:21.200 align:start position:0% other irregular y verbs in Spanish that 02:47:21.200 --> 02:47:22.870 align:start position:0% other irregular y verbs in Spanish that have<02:47:21.319> to<02:47:21.399> be<02:47:21.560> modified<02:47:22.000> like<02:47:22.200> these<02:47:22.359> ones<02:47:22.720> but 02:47:22.870 --> 02:47:22.880 align:start position:0% have to be modified like these ones but 02:47:22.880 --> 02:47:24.750 align:start position:0% have to be modified like these ones but it<02:47:23.000> is<02:47:23.160> not<02:47:23.399> necessary<02:47:23.840> to<02:47:24.000> know<02:47:24.200> all<02:47:24.319> of<02:47:24.479> them 02:47:24.750 --> 02:47:24.760 align:start position:0% it is not necessary to know all of them 02:47:24.760 --> 02:47:26.190 align:start position:0% it is not necessary to know all of them as<02:47:24.880> long<02:47:25.000> as<02:47:25.080> they<02:47:25.200> know<02:47:25.359> the<02:47:25.479> useful<02:47:25.800> ones 02:47:26.190 --> 02:47:26.200 align:start position:0% as long as they know the useful ones 02:47:26.200 --> 02:47:28.230 align:start position:0% as long as they know the useful ones after<02:47:26.520> irregular<02:47:27.040> yo<02:47:27.240> verbs<02:47:27.640> there<02:47:27.760> are<02:47:27.960> verbs 02:47:28.230 --> 02:47:28.240 align:start position:0% after irregular yo verbs there are verbs 02:47:28.240 --> 02:47:30.510 align:start position:0% after irregular yo verbs there are verbs ending<02:47:28.479> in<02:47:28.720> k<02:47:29.120> g<02:47:29.359> and<02:47:29.520> S<02:47:29.880> and<02:47:30.000> these<02:47:30.160> verbs<02:47:30.399> have 02:47:30.510 --> 02:47:30.520 align:start position:0% ending in k g and S and these verbs have 02:47:30.520 --> 02:47:31.990 align:start position:0% ending in k g and S and these verbs have a<02:47:30.640> spelling<02:47:30.960> change<02:47:31.240> in<02:47:31.319> the<02:47:31.439> negative<02:47:31.760> two 02:47:31.990 --> 02:47:32.000 align:start position:0% a spelling change in the negative two 02:47:32.000 --> 02:47:35.510 align:start position:0% a spelling change in the negative two commands<02:47:32.640> like<02:47:33.240> prac<02:47:34.240> and<02:47:34.479> organizar<02:47:35.279> while 02:47:35.510 --> 02:47:35.520 align:start position:0% commands like prac and organizar while 02:47:35.520 --> 02:47:37.230 align:start position:0% commands like prac and organizar while they<02:47:35.640> keep<02:47:35.840> their<02:47:36.000> forms<02:47:36.359> in<02:47:36.479> the<02:47:36.600> affirmative 02:47:37.230 --> 02:47:37.240 align:start position:0% they keep their forms in the affirmative 02:47:37.240 --> 02:47:38.790 align:start position:0% they keep their forms in the affirmative these<02:47:37.439> verbs<02:47:37.720> change<02:47:38.040> their<02:47:38.240> spellings<02:47:38.680> in 02:47:38.790 --> 02:47:38.800 align:start position:0% these verbs change their spellings in 02:47:38.800 --> 02:47:40.670 align:start position:0% these verbs change their spellings in the<02:47:38.960> negative<02:47:39.439> like<02:47:39.760> practicar<02:47:40.520> which 02:47:40.670 --> 02:47:40.680 align:start position:0% the negative like practicar which 02:47:40.680 --> 02:47:43.590 align:start position:0% the negative like practicar which becomes<02:47:41.200> no<02:47:41.640> practi<02:47:42.439> don't<02:47:42.800> practice<02:47:43.399> having 02:47:43.590 --> 02:47:43.600 align:start position:0% becomes no practi don't practice having 02:47:43.600 --> 02:47:45.950 align:start position:0% becomes no practi don't practice having an<02:47:43.800> s<02:47:44.040> ending<02:47:44.520> as<02:47:44.760> with<02:47:44.880> with<02:47:45.000> any<02:47:45.200> AR<02:47:45.600> verb<02:47:45.840> in 02:47:45.950 --> 02:47:45.960 align:start position:0% an s ending as with with any AR verb in 02:47:45.960 --> 02:47:49.190 align:start position:0% an s ending as with with any AR verb in the<02:47:46.080> negative<02:47:46.399> form<02:47:46.760> hugar<02:47:47.399> becomes<02:47:48.200> no 02:47:49.190 --> 02:47:49.200 align:start position:0% the negative form hugar becomes no 02:47:49.200 --> 02:47:50.750 align:start position:0% the negative form hugar becomes no meaning<02:47:49.520> don't<02:47:49.840> play<02:47:50.240> and<02:47:50.319> it's<02:47:50.439> a<02:47:50.560> stem 02:47:50.750 --> 02:47:50.760 align:start position:0% meaning don't play and it's a stem 02:47:50.760 --> 02:47:52.670 align:start position:0% meaning don't play and it's a stem changing<02:47:51.160> verb<02:47:51.479> that<02:47:51.600> changes<02:47:51.920> its<02:47:52.160> stem<02:47:52.520> as 02:47:52.670 --> 02:47:52.680 align:start position:0% changing verb that changes its stem as 02:47:52.680 --> 02:47:54.510 align:start position:0% changing verb that changes its stem as with<02:47:52.920> any<02:47:53.080> stem<02:47:53.319> changing<02:47:53.680> verb<02:47:54.040> in<02:47:54.200> both<02:47:54.399> the 02:47:54.510 --> 02:47:54.520 align:start position:0% with any stem changing verb in both the 02:47:54.520 --> 02:47:56.110 align:start position:0% with any stem changing verb in both the affirmative<02:47:55.000> and<02:47:55.160> negative<02:47:55.479> forms<02:47:55.960> and 02:47:56.110 --> 02:47:56.120 align:start position:0% affirmative and negative forms and 02:47:56.120 --> 02:47:59.429 align:start position:0% affirmative and negative forms and finally<02:47:56.640> organ<02:47:57.479> which<02:47:57.640> becomes<02:47:58.240> no<02:47:58.560> organes 02:47:59.429 --> 02:47:59.439 align:start position:0% finally organ which becomes no organes 02:47:59.439 --> 02:48:01.830 align:start position:0% finally organ which becomes no organes don't<02:47:59.800> organize<02:48:00.520> at<02:48:00.680> last<02:48:01.080> there<02:48:01.200> are<02:48:01.439> General 02:48:01.830 --> 02:48:01.840 align:start position:0% don't organize at last there are General 02:48:01.840 --> 02:48:04.590 align:start position:0% don't organize at last there are General irregular<02:48:02.319> verbs<02:48:02.640> in<02:48:02.720> the<02:48:02.880> negative 02:48:04.590 --> 02:48:04.600 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in the negative 02:48:04.600 --> 02:48:07.110 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in the negative like<02:48:05.600> and<02:48:06.200> if<02:48:06.279> you<02:48:06.359> want<02:48:06.479> to<02:48:06.600> put<02:48:06.760> them<02:48:06.880> in<02:48:07.000> the 02:48:07.110 --> 02:48:07.120 align:start position:0% like and if you want to put them in the 02:48:07.120 --> 02:48:08.750 align:start position:0% like and if you want to put them in the negative<02:48:07.479> form<02:48:07.800> they<02:48:07.920> will<02:48:08.080> look<02:48:08.279> like<02:48:08.479> this 02:48:08.750 --> 02:48:08.760 align:start position:0% negative form they will look like this 02:48:08.760 --> 02:48:10.230 align:start position:0% negative form they will look like this and<02:48:08.880> the<02:48:09.000> best<02:48:09.160> tip<02:48:09.359> that<02:48:09.520> I<02:48:09.600> can<02:48:09.760> give<02:48:10.040> is<02:48:10.120> to 02:48:10.230 --> 02:48:10.240 align:start position:0% and the best tip that I can give is to 02:48:10.240 --> 02:48:11.870 align:start position:0% and the best tip that I can give is to memorize<02:48:10.680> these<02:48:10.840> forms<02:48:11.279> because<02:48:11.479> there<02:48:11.600> is<02:48:11.720> no 02:48:11.870 --> 02:48:11.880 align:start position:0% memorize these forms because there is no 02:48:11.880 --> 02:48:13.349 align:start position:0% memorize these forms because there is no pattern<02:48:12.160> to<02:48:12.279> follow<02:48:12.520> with<02:48:12.680> them<02:48:12.920> of<02:48:13.040> course 02:48:13.349 --> 02:48:13.359 align:start position:0% pattern to follow with them of course 02:48:13.359 --> 02:48:15.150 align:start position:0% pattern to follow with them of course you<02:48:13.439> can<02:48:13.600> say<02:48:13.840> any<02:48:14.040> command<02:48:14.359> you<02:48:14.479> want<02:48:14.880> using 02:48:15.150 --> 02:48:15.160 align:start position:0% you can say any command you want using 02:48:15.160 --> 02:48:17.110 align:start position:0% you can say any command you want using irregular<02:48:15.680> negative<02:48:16.080> commands<02:48:16.479> in<02:48:16.600> Spanish 02:48:17.110 --> 02:48:17.120 align:start position:0% irregular negative commands in Spanish 02:48:17.120 --> 02:48:18.469 align:start position:0% irregular negative commands in Spanish an<02:48:17.279> interesting<02:48:17.760> concept<02:48:18.120> with<02:48:18.279> these 02:48:18.469 --> 02:48:18.479 align:start position:0% an interesting concept with these 02:48:18.479 --> 02:48:20.190 align:start position:0% an interesting concept with these commands<02:48:18.960> is<02:48:19.080> that<02:48:19.240> they<02:48:19.319> can<02:48:19.439> be<02:48:19.640> combined 02:48:20.190 --> 02:48:20.200 align:start position:0% commands is that they can be combined 02:48:20.200 --> 02:48:22.349 align:start position:0% commands is that they can be combined with<02:48:20.399> direct<02:48:20.800> and<02:48:21.000> indirect<02:48:21.479> object<02:48:21.800> pronouns 02:48:22.349 --> 02:48:22.359 align:start position:0% with direct and indirect object pronouns 02:48:22.359 --> 02:48:24.190 align:start position:0% with direct and indirect object pronouns one<02:48:22.479> of<02:48:22.600> the<02:48:22.680> most<02:48:22.920> useful<02:48:23.279> phrases<02:48:23.800> with<02:48:23.960> two 02:48:24.190 --> 02:48:24.200 align:start position:0% one of the most useful phrases with two 02:48:24.200 --> 02:48:26.230 align:start position:0% one of the most useful phrases with two commands<02:48:24.720> involves<02:48:25.120> the<02:48:25.240> verb<02:48:25.560> the<02:48:25.960> meaning 02:48:26.230 --> 02:48:26.240 align:start position:0% commands involves the verb the meaning 02:48:26.240 --> 02:48:28.990 align:start position:0% commands involves the verb the meaning to<02:48:26.439> say<02:48:26.760> or<02:48:26.920> to<02:48:27.080> tell<02:48:27.479> saying<02:48:27.840> d<02:48:28.200> means<02:48:28.640> tell 02:48:28.990 --> 02:48:29.000 align:start position:0% to say or to tell saying d means tell 02:48:29.000 --> 02:48:31.550 align:start position:0% to say or to tell saying d means tell and<02:48:29.160> saying<02:48:29.439> noas<02:48:30.240> means<02:48:30.640> don't<02:48:30.960> tell<02:48:31.279> we<02:48:31.359> can 02:48:31.550 --> 02:48:31.560 align:start position:0% and saying noas means don't tell we can 02:48:31.560 --> 02:48:33.349 align:start position:0% and saying noas means don't tell we can combine<02:48:31.920> these<02:48:32.120> words<02:48:32.479> using<02:48:32.880> direct<02:48:33.200> and 02:48:33.349 --> 02:48:33.359 align:start position:0% combine these words using direct and 02:48:33.359 --> 02:48:35.349 align:start position:0% combine these words using direct and indirect<02:48:33.840> object<02:48:34.160> pronouns<02:48:34.800> like<02:48:34.920> saying 02:48:35.349 --> 02:48:35.359 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns like saying 02:48:35.359 --> 02:48:37.710 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns like saying tell<02:48:35.600> me<02:48:35.880> or<02:48:36.120> tell<02:48:36.319> me<02:48:36.560> it<02:48:36.920> in<02:48:37.080> Spanish<02:48:37.600> the 02:48:37.710 --> 02:48:37.720 align:start position:0% tell me or tell me it in Spanish the 02:48:37.720 --> 02:48:39.950 align:start position:0% tell me or tell me it in Spanish the affirmative<02:48:38.160> form<02:48:38.520> would<02:48:38.680> be<02:48:39.040> di<02:48:39.600> meaning 02:48:39.950 --> 02:48:39.960 align:start position:0% affirmative form would be di meaning 02:48:39.960 --> 02:48:41.590 align:start position:0% affirmative form would be di meaning tell<02:48:40.200> me<02:48:40.560> which<02:48:40.720> combines<02:48:41.080> the<02:48:41.200> words 02:48:41.590 --> 02:48:41.600 align:start position:0% tell me which combines the words 02:48:41.600 --> 02:48:43.790 align:start position:0% tell me which combines the words together<02:48:42.000> and<02:48:42.120> saying<02:48:42.439> tell<02:48:42.680> me<02:48:42.920> it<02:48:43.319> would<02:48:43.479> be 02:48:43.790 --> 02:48:43.800 align:start position:0% together and saying tell me it would be 02:48:43.800 --> 02:48:46.230 align:start position:0% together and saying tell me it would be Deo<02:48:44.359> with<02:48:44.479> an<02:48:44.840> Accent<02:48:45.160> on<02:48:45.399> D<02:48:45.800> because<02:48:46.000> we<02:48:46.120> have 02:48:46.230 --> 02:48:46.240 align:start position:0% Deo with an Accent on D because we have 02:48:46.240 --> 02:48:47.830 align:start position:0% Deo with an Accent on D because we have to<02:48:46.359> maintain<02:48:46.760> the<02:48:46.880> sound<02:48:47.240> due<02:48:47.399> to<02:48:47.520> the<02:48:47.640> amount 02:48:47.830 --> 02:48:47.840 align:start position:0% to maintain the sound due to the amount 02:48:47.840 --> 02:48:49.870 align:start position:0% to maintain the sound due to the amount of<02:48:47.960> syllables<02:48:48.479> in<02:48:48.560> the<02:48:48.720> word<02:48:49.160> Deo<02:48:49.680> in<02:48:49.760> the 02:48:49.870 --> 02:48:49.880 align:start position:0% of syllables in the word Deo in the 02:48:49.880 --> 02:48:51.309 align:start position:0% of syllables in the word Deo in the negative<02:48:50.200> form<02:48:50.520> instead<02:48:50.760> of<02:48:50.880> attaching<02:48:51.200> the 02:48:51.309 --> 02:48:51.319 align:start position:0% negative form instead of attaching the 02:48:51.319 --> 02:48:53.190 align:start position:0% negative form instead of attaching the pronouns<02:48:51.720> to<02:48:51.880> the<02:48:52.000> verb<02:48:52.319> we<02:48:52.439> have<02:48:52.560> to<02:48:52.760> separate 02:48:53.190 --> 02:48:53.200 align:start position:0% pronouns to the verb we have to separate 02:48:53.200 --> 02:48:55.190 align:start position:0% pronouns to the verb we have to separate them<02:48:53.479> by<02:48:53.600> putting<02:48:53.880> them<02:48:54.040> before<02:48:54.359> the<02:48:54.479> verb<02:48:54.840> so 02:48:55.190 --> 02:48:55.200 align:start position:0% them by putting them before the verb so 02:48:55.200 --> 02:48:57.630 align:start position:0% them by putting them before the verb so the<02:48:55.319> phrases<02:48:55.680> would<02:48:55.840> be<02:48:56.160> nigas<02:48:57.080> meaning<02:48:57.399> don't 02:48:57.630 --> 02:48:57.640 align:start position:0% the phrases would be nigas meaning don't 02:48:57.640 --> 02:49:00.429 align:start position:0% the phrases would be nigas meaning don't tell<02:48:57.880> me<02:48:58.240> and<02:48:58.520> nigas<02:48:59.479> meaning<02:48:59.760> don't<02:49:00.000> tell<02:49:00.160> me 02:49:00.429 --> 02:49:00.439 align:start position:0% tell me and nigas meaning don't tell me 02:49:00.439 --> 02:49:02.590 align:start position:0% tell me and nigas meaning don't tell me it<02:49:00.880> that's<02:49:01.040> how<02:49:01.240> direct<02:49:01.640> and<02:49:01.800> indirect<02:49:02.279> object 02:49:02.590 --> 02:49:02.600 align:start position:0% it that's how direct and indirect object 02:49:02.600 --> 02:49:04.630 align:start position:0% it that's how direct and indirect object pronouns<02:49:03.160> work<02:49:03.399> with<02:49:03.600> two<02:49:03.800> commands<02:49:04.359> we<02:49:04.479> can 02:49:04.630 --> 02:49:04.640 align:start position:0% pronouns work with two commands we can 02:49:04.640 --> 02:49:06.830 align:start position:0% pronouns work with two commands we can say<02:49:05.000> Pono<02:49:05.560> meaning<02:49:05.920> put<02:49:06.120> it<02:49:06.439> and<02:49:06.560> in<02:49:06.680> the 02:49:06.830 --> 02:49:06.840 align:start position:0% say Pono meaning put it and in the 02:49:06.840 --> 02:49:09.429 align:start position:0% say Pono meaning put it and in the negative<02:49:07.160> form<02:49:07.560> the<02:49:07.680> sentence<02:49:08.040> would<02:49:08.200> be<02:49:08.479> noas 02:49:09.429 --> 02:49:09.439 align:start position:0% negative form the sentence would be noas 02:49:09.439 --> 02:49:12.230 align:start position:0% negative form the sentence would be noas don't<02:49:09.720> put<02:49:09.880> it<02:49:10.160> saying<02:49:10.640> ven<02:49:11.200> means<02:49:11.600> come<02:49:11.800> to<02:49:11.960> me 02:49:12.230 --> 02:49:12.240 align:start position:0% don't put it saying ven means come to me 02:49:12.240 --> 02:49:14.190 align:start position:0% don't put it saying ven means come to me and<02:49:12.359> in<02:49:12.479> the<02:49:12.640> negative<02:49:12.960> form<02:49:13.359> the<02:49:13.520> phrase<02:49:13.840> is 02:49:14.190 --> 02:49:14.200 align:start position:0% and in the negative form the phrase is 02:49:14.200 --> 02:49:16.830 align:start position:0% and in the negative form the phrase is no<02:49:15.160> don't<02:49:15.399> come<02:49:15.560> to<02:49:15.680> me<02:49:15.960> like<02:49:16.120> I<02:49:16.279> always<02:49:16.560> say 02:49:16.830 --> 02:49:16.840 align:start position:0% no don't come to me like I always say 02:49:16.840 --> 02:49:18.429 align:start position:0% no don't come to me like I always say there<02:49:16.960> are<02:49:17.160> millions<02:49:17.520> of<02:49:17.640> sentences<02:49:18.239> that<02:49:18.319> you 02:49:18.429 --> 02:49:18.439 align:start position:0% there are millions of sentences that you 02:49:18.439 --> 02:49:20.150 align:start position:0% there are millions of sentences that you can<02:49:18.600> make<02:49:18.800> with<02:49:18.960> them<02:49:19.239> and<02:49:19.359> it's<02:49:19.560> up<02:49:19.680> to<02:49:19.840> you<02:49:20.040> to 02:49:20.150 --> 02:49:20.160 align:start position:0% can make with them and it's up to you to 02:49:20.160 --> 02:49:22.150 align:start position:0% can make with them and it's up to you to say<02:49:20.439> any<02:49:20.600> sentence<02:49:21.000> that<02:49:21.080> you<02:49:21.200> want<02:49:21.640> one<02:49:21.880> last 02:49:22.150 --> 02:49:22.160 align:start position:0% say any sentence that you want one last 02:49:22.160 --> 02:49:23.910 align:start position:0% say any sentence that you want one last concept<02:49:22.560> to<02:49:22.760> note<02:49:22.960> with<02:49:23.120> two<02:49:23.279> commands<02:49:23.720> is 02:49:23.910 --> 02:49:23.920 align:start position:0% concept to note with two commands is 02:49:23.920 --> 02:49:25.510 align:start position:0% concept to note with two commands is reflexive<02:49:24.439> verbs<02:49:24.840> which<02:49:24.960> are<02:49:25.120> verbs<02:49:25.359> that 02:49:25.510 --> 02:49:25.520 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs which are verbs that 02:49:25.520 --> 02:49:27.150 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs which are verbs that follow<02:49:25.760> a<02:49:25.920> preposition<02:49:26.560> and<02:49:26.720> within<02:49:26.960> two 02:49:27.150 --> 02:49:27.160 align:start position:0% follow a preposition and within two 02:49:27.160 --> 02:49:28.670 align:start position:0% follow a preposition and within two commands<02:49:27.720> they<02:49:27.840> function<02:49:28.239> slightly 02:49:28.670 --> 02:49:28.680 align:start position:0% commands they function slightly 02:49:28.680 --> 02:49:30.110 align:start position:0% commands they function slightly differently<02:49:29.239> than<02:49:29.399> any<02:49:29.560> of<02:49:29.680> the<02:49:29.800> previous 02:49:30.110 --> 02:49:30.120 align:start position:0% differently than any of the previous 02:49:30.120 --> 02:49:31.990 align:start position:0% differently than any of the previous verbs<02:49:30.399> we've<02:49:30.600> seen<02:49:30.840> so<02:49:31.040> far<02:49:31.319> taking<02:49:31.560> the<02:49:31.680> verb 02:49:31.990 --> 02:49:32.000 align:start position:0% verbs we've seen so far taking the verb 02:49:32.000 --> 02:49:34.469 align:start position:0% verbs we've seen so far taking the verb leant<02:49:32.840> meaning<02:49:33.120> to<02:49:33.319> get<02:49:33.479> up<02:49:33.840> this<02:49:34.000> verb<02:49:34.239> in<02:49:34.359> the 02:49:34.469 --> 02:49:34.479 align:start position:0% leant meaning to get up this verb in the 02:49:34.479 --> 02:49:36.910 align:start position:0% leant meaning to get up this verb in the affirmative<02:49:34.920> command<02:49:35.359> will<02:49:35.520> be<02:49:35.920> leant<02:49:36.640> and<02:49:36.800> as 02:49:36.910 --> 02:49:36.920 align:start position:0% affirmative command will be leant and as 02:49:36.920 --> 02:49:38.469 align:start position:0% affirmative command will be leant and as you<02:49:37.000> can<02:49:37.160> see<02:49:37.479> the<02:49:37.600> first<02:49:37.800> part<02:49:37.960> of<02:49:38.080> the<02:49:38.200> word 02:49:38.469 --> 02:49:38.479 align:start position:0% you can see the first part of the word 02:49:38.479 --> 02:49:40.110 align:start position:0% you can see the first part of the word takes<02:49:38.760> the<02:49:38.880> correct<02:49:39.200> form<02:49:39.479> of<02:49:39.680> affirmative 02:49:40.110 --> 02:49:40.120 align:start position:0% takes the correct form of affirmative 02:49:40.120 --> 02:49:42.030 align:start position:0% takes the correct form of affirmative commands<02:49:40.600> having<02:49:40.800> an<02:49:41.080> accent<02:49:41.520> to<02:49:41.680> keep<02:49:41.880> the 02:49:42.030 --> 02:49:42.040 align:start position:0% commands having an accent to keep the 02:49:42.040 --> 02:49:43.990 align:start position:0% commands having an accent to keep the sound<02:49:42.399> but<02:49:42.560> includes<02:49:43.120> the<02:49:43.439> at<02:49:43.520> the<02:49:43.600> end<02:49:43.760> of<02:49:43.880> the 02:49:43.990 --> 02:49:44.000 align:start position:0% sound but includes the at the end of the 02:49:44.000 --> 02:49:45.910 align:start position:0% sound but includes the at the end of the word<02:49:44.319> in<02:49:44.399> order<02:49:44.840> to<02:49:45.000> signify<02:49:45.560> that<02:49:45.640> it's<02:49:45.760> a 02:49:45.910 --> 02:49:45.920 align:start position:0% word in order to signify that it's a 02:49:45.920 --> 02:49:48.349 align:start position:0% word in order to signify that it's a reflexive<02:49:46.439> verb<02:49:46.840> leant<02:49:47.479> on<02:49:47.640> its<02:49:47.800> own<02:49:48.120> would<02:49:48.239> be 02:49:48.349 --> 02:49:48.359 align:start position:0% reflexive verb leant on its own would be 02:49:48.359 --> 02:49:51.110 align:start position:0% reflexive verb leant on its own would be a<02:49:48.520> command<02:49:48.800> for<02:49:49.080> Lift<02:49:49.439> or<02:49:49.680> raise<02:49:50.160> and<02:49:50.359> leant 02:49:51.110 --> 02:49:51.120 align:start position:0% a command for Lift or raise and leant 02:49:51.120 --> 02:49:53.349 align:start position:0% a command for Lift or raise and leant means<02:49:51.520> get<02:49:51.720> up<02:49:51.960> or<02:49:52.239> lift<02:49:52.479> up<02:49:52.800> in<02:49:52.920> the<02:49:53.040> negative 02:49:53.349 --> 02:49:53.359 align:start position:0% means get up or lift up in the negative 02:49:53.359 --> 02:49:55.349 align:start position:0% means get up or lift up in the negative form<02:49:53.800> we<02:49:53.960> take<02:49:54.160> the<02:49:54.319> pronoun<02:49:54.880> and<02:49:55.040> put<02:49:55.160> it 02:49:55.349 --> 02:49:55.359 align:start position:0% form we take the pronoun and put it 02:49:55.359 --> 02:49:56.870 align:start position:0% form we take the pronoun and put it before<02:49:55.640> the<02:49:55.800> verb<02:49:56.160> without<02:49:56.399> forgetting<02:49:56.760> to 02:49:56.870 --> 02:49:56.880 align:start position:0% before the verb without forgetting to 02:49:56.880 --> 02:49:58.550 align:start position:0% before the verb without forgetting to change<02:49:57.160> the<02:49:57.279> verb<02:49:57.560> in<02:49:57.680> the<02:49:57.800> end<02:49:58.160> so<02:49:58.319> that<02:49:58.439> it 02:49:58.550 --> 02:49:58.560 align:start position:0% change the verb in the end so that it 02:49:58.560 --> 02:50:01.469 align:start position:0% change the verb in the end so that it matches<02:49:58.840> its<02:49:59.040> negative<02:49:59.359> form<02:50:00.160> not<02:50:01.160> meaning 02:50:01.469 --> 02:50:01.479 align:start position:0% matches its negative form not meaning 02:50:01.479 --> 02:50:04.070 align:start position:0% matches its negative form not meaning don't<02:50:01.800> get<02:50:02.000> up<02:50:02.279> here's<02:50:02.560> another<02:50:02.880> phrase<02:50:03.319> d 02:50:04.070 --> 02:50:04.080 align:start position:0% don't get up here's another phrase d 02:50:04.080 --> 02:50:06.190 align:start position:0% don't get up here's another phrase d means<02:50:04.319> to<02:50:04.479> fall<02:50:04.680> asleep<02:50:05.120> it<02:50:05.239> ends<02:50:05.439> in<02:50:05.680> ir<02:50:06.120> and 02:50:06.190 --> 02:50:06.200 align:start position:0% means to fall asleep it ends in ir and 02:50:06.200 --> 02:50:07.550 align:start position:0% means to fall asleep it ends in ir and it's<02:50:06.359> also<02:50:06.560> stem<02:50:06.840> changing<02:50:07.239> how<02:50:07.319> would<02:50:07.439> you 02:50:07.550 --> 02:50:07.560 align:start position:0% it's also stem changing how would you 02:50:07.560 --> 02:50:09.030 align:start position:0% it's also stem changing how would you say<02:50:07.760> this<02:50:07.920> verb<02:50:08.160> in<02:50:08.239> the<02:50:08.359> affirmative<02:50:08.840> two 02:50:09.030 --> 02:50:09.040 align:start position:0% say this verb in the affirmative two 02:50:09.040 --> 02:50:12.229 align:start position:0% say this verb in the affirmative two command<02:50:09.520> the<02:50:09.640> verb<02:50:09.880> would<02:50:10.200> be<02:50:11.200> with<02:50:11.880> being<02:50:12.080> the 02:50:12.229 --> 02:50:12.239 align:start position:0% command the verb would be with being the 02:50:12.239 --> 02:50:14.429 align:start position:0% command the verb would be with being the stem<02:50:12.439> change<02:50:12.920> an<02:50:13.160> accent<02:50:13.560> on<02:50:13.840> E<02:50:14.040> to<02:50:14.200> keep<02:50:14.359> the 02:50:14.429 --> 02:50:14.439 align:start position:0% stem change an accent on E to keep the 02:50:14.439 --> 02:50:17.030 align:start position:0% stem change an accent on E to keep the sound<02:50:15.080> and<02:50:15.279> T<02:50:15.600> at<02:50:15.720> the<02:50:15.840> end<02:50:16.239> which<02:50:16.399> signifies 02:50:17.030 --> 02:50:17.040 align:start position:0% sound and T at the end which signifies 02:50:17.040 --> 02:50:19.229 align:start position:0% sound and T at the end which signifies the<02:50:17.160> verb<02:50:17.479> as<02:50:17.680> reflexive<02:50:18.239> and<02:50:18.399> as<02:50:18.479> a<02:50:18.680> side<02:50:18.880> note 02:50:19.229 --> 02:50:19.239 align:start position:0% the verb as reflexive and as a side note 02:50:19.239 --> 02:50:21.030 align:start position:0% the verb as reflexive and as a side note reflexive<02:50:19.720> verbs<02:50:20.080> that<02:50:20.160> are<02:50:20.319> used<02:50:20.560> within<02:50:20.840> two 02:50:21.030 --> 02:50:21.040 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs that are used within two 02:50:21.040 --> 02:50:23.110 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs that are used within two commands<02:50:21.479> will<02:50:21.720> always<02:50:21.960> use<02:50:22.160> the<02:50:22.319> pronoun<02:50:22.840> te 02:50:23.110 --> 02:50:23.120 align:start position:0% commands will always use the pronoun te 02:50:23.120 --> 02:50:24.750 align:start position:0% commands will always use the pronoun te because<02:50:23.279> we're<02:50:23.479> giving<02:50:23.760> commands<02:50:24.200> to<02:50:24.399> you 02:50:24.750 --> 02:50:24.760 align:start position:0% because we're giving commands to you 02:50:24.760 --> 02:50:27.269 align:start position:0% because we're giving commands to you hence<02:50:25.200> to<02:50:25.640> te<02:50:25.920> is<02:50:26.000> a<02:50:26.160> pronoun<02:50:26.520> from<02:50:26.760> to<02:50:27.200> which 02:50:27.269 --> 02:50:27.279 align:start position:0% hence to te is a pronoun from to which 02:50:27.279 --> 02:50:29.309 align:start position:0% hence to te is a pronoun from to which is<02:50:27.520> why<02:50:27.720> it's<02:50:27.880> always<02:50:28.200> used<02:50:28.640> finally<02:50:29.200> how 02:50:29.309 --> 02:50:29.319 align:start position:0% is why it's always used finally how 02:50:29.319 --> 02:50:31.070 align:start position:0% is why it's always used finally how would<02:50:29.439> you<02:50:29.520> say<02:50:29.760> this<02:50:29.920> verb<02:50:30.160> in<02:50:30.279> the<02:50:30.399> negative 02:50:31.070 --> 02:50:31.080 align:start position:0% would you say this verb in the negative 02:50:31.080 --> 02:50:35.510 align:start position:0% would you say this verb in the negative command<02:50:32.520> not<02:50:33.520> with<02:50:34.080> coming<02:50:34.399> before<02:50:34.680> the<02:50:34.800> verb 02:50:35.510 --> 02:50:35.520 align:start position:0% command not with coming before the verb 02:50:35.520 --> 02:50:37.590 align:start position:0% command not with coming before the verb being<02:50:35.720> the<02:50:35.840> stem<02:50:36.040> change<02:50:36.479> and<02:50:36.640> the<02:50:36.760> ending<02:50:37.200> as 02:50:37.590 --> 02:50:37.600 align:start position:0% being the stem change and the ending as 02:50:37.600 --> 02:50:39.269 align:start position:0% being the stem change and the ending as which<02:50:37.800> corresponds<02:50:38.359> in<02:50:38.439> the<02:50:38.600> negative<02:50:38.960> form 02:50:39.269 --> 02:50:39.279 align:start position:0% which corresponds in the negative form 02:50:39.279 --> 02:50:40.950 align:start position:0% which corresponds in the negative form with<02:50:39.439> verbs<02:50:39.720> ending<02:50:39.960> in<02:50:40.120> IR<02:50:40.640> that's<02:50:40.760> how 02:50:40.950 --> 02:50:40.960 align:start position:0% with verbs ending in IR that's how 02:50:40.960 --> 02:50:42.710 align:start position:0% with verbs ending in IR that's how reflexive<02:50:41.399> verbs<02:50:41.760> work<02:50:42.000> in<02:50:42.120> the<02:50:42.279> affirmative 02:50:42.710 --> 02:50:42.720 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs work in the affirmative 02:50:42.720 --> 02:50:44.429 align:start position:0% reflexive verbs work in the affirmative and<02:50:42.880> negative<02:50:43.200> commands<02:50:43.680> and<02:50:43.800> if<02:50:43.880> you<02:50:44.000> want<02:50:44.200> to 02:50:44.429 --> 02:50:44.439 align:start position:0% and negative commands and if you want to 02:50:44.439 --> 02:50:45.910 align:start position:0% and negative commands and if you want to you<02:50:44.600> you<02:50:44.680> can<02:50:44.800> even<02:50:45.000> include<02:50:45.439> direct<02:50:45.760> and 02:50:45.910 --> 02:50:45.920 align:start position:0% you you can even include direct and 02:50:45.920 --> 02:50:47.950 align:start position:0% you you can even include direct and indirect<02:50:46.359> object<02:50:46.680> pronouns<02:50:47.319> with<02:50:47.520> them<02:50:47.840> as 02:50:47.950 --> 02:50:47.960 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns with them as 02:50:47.960 --> 02:50:50.269 align:start position:0% indirect object pronouns with them as long<02:50:48.080> as<02:50:48.200> the<02:50:48.399> context<02:50:48.960> makes<02:50:49.239> sense<02:50:49.680> noos 02:50:50.269 --> 02:50:50.279 align:start position:0% long as the context makes sense noos 02:50:50.279 --> 02:50:51.990 align:start position:0% long as the context makes sense noos commands<02:50:50.720> in<02:50:50.880> Spanish<02:50:51.439> is<02:50:51.560> the<02:50:51.680> English 02:50:51.990 --> 02:50:52.000 align:start position:0% commands in Spanish is the English 02:50:52.000 --> 02:50:53.870 align:start position:0% commands in Spanish is the English version<02:50:52.319> of<02:50:52.520> Let's<02:50:52.800> Do<02:50:53.000> Something<02:50:53.520> mainly 02:50:53.870 --> 02:50:53.880 align:start position:0% version of Let's Do Something mainly 02:50:53.880 --> 02:50:55.990 align:start position:0% version of Let's Do Something mainly emphasizing<02:50:54.439> the<02:50:54.560> we<02:50:54.800> pronoun<02:50:55.359> in<02:50:55.520> English 02:50:55.990 --> 02:50:56.000 align:start position:0% emphasizing the we pronoun in English 02:50:56.000 --> 02:50:57.469 align:start position:0% emphasizing the we pronoun in English it's<02:50:56.120> a<02:50:56.239> very<02:50:56.439> easy<02:50:56.760> concept<02:50:57.200> because<02:50:57.399> it 02:50:57.469 --> 02:50:57.479 align:start position:0% it's a very easy concept because it 02:50:57.479 --> 02:50:58.910 align:start position:0% it's a very easy concept because it doesn't<02:50:57.720> matter<02:50:57.960> what<02:50:58.120> verb<02:50:58.359> we<02:50:58.479> use<02:50:58.800> we 02:50:58.910 --> 02:50:58.920 align:start position:0% doesn't matter what verb we use we 02:50:58.920 --> 02:51:00.790 align:start position:0% doesn't matter what verb we use we simply<02:50:59.200> have<02:50:59.319> to<02:50:59.439> put<02:50:59.600> the<02:50:59.720> phrase<02:51:00.080> let<02:51:00.600> and 02:51:00.790 --> 02:51:00.800 align:start position:0% simply have to put the phrase let and 02:51:00.800 --> 02:51:02.990 align:start position:0% simply have to put the phrase let and then<02:51:01.080> we<02:51:01.239> put<02:51:01.439> any<02:51:01.600> verb<02:51:01.840> we<02:51:01.960> want<02:51:02.399> like<02:51:02.720> let's 02:51:02.990 --> 02:51:03.000 align:start position:0% then we put any verb we want like let's 02:51:03.000 --> 02:51:05.469 align:start position:0% then we put any verb we want like let's speak<02:51:03.479> let's<02:51:03.720> eat<02:51:04.120> let's<02:51:04.399> open<02:51:04.840> and<02:51:04.960> so<02:51:05.120> on<02:51:05.399> it 02:51:05.469 --> 02:51:05.479 align:start position:0% speak let's eat let's open and so on it 02:51:05.479 --> 02:51:06.870 align:start position:0% speak let's eat let's open and so on it literally<02:51:05.840> doesn't<02:51:06.120> matter<02:51:06.399> what<02:51:06.520> verb<02:51:06.760> we 02:51:06.870 --> 02:51:06.880 align:start position:0% literally doesn't matter what verb we 02:51:06.880 --> 02:51:08.670 align:start position:0% literally doesn't matter what verb we use<02:51:07.239> the<02:51:07.359> form<02:51:07.640> of<02:51:07.760> the<02:51:07.880> verb<02:51:08.160> in<02:51:08.279> the<02:51:08.399> wi 02:51:08.670 --> 02:51:08.680 align:start position:0% use the form of the verb in the wi 02:51:08.680 --> 02:51:10.630 align:start position:0% use the form of the verb in the wi command<02:51:09.120> will<02:51:09.359> always<02:51:09.680> have<02:51:09.840> the<02:51:09.960> same<02:51:10.160> form 02:51:10.630 --> 02:51:10.640 align:start position:0% command will always have the same form 02:51:10.640 --> 02:51:12.590 align:start position:0% command will always have the same form as<02:51:10.760> the<02:51:10.920> infinitive<02:51:11.479> in<02:51:11.600> Spanish<02:51:12.160> this<02:51:12.319> idea 02:51:12.590 --> 02:51:12.600 align:start position:0% as the infinitive in Spanish this idea 02:51:12.600 --> 02:51:14.349 align:start position:0% as the infinitive in Spanish this idea completely<02:51:13.040> changes<02:51:13.560> for<02:51:13.760> basically<02:51:14.120> every 02:51:14.349 --> 02:51:14.359 align:start position:0% completely changes for basically every 02:51:14.359 --> 02:51:16.110 align:start position:0% completely changes for basically every type<02:51:14.760> of<02:51:14.840> verb<02:51:15.120> but<02:51:15.239> there<02:51:15.359> are<02:51:15.520> some<02:51:15.800> patterns 02:51:16.110 --> 02:51:16.120 align:start position:0% type of verb but there are some patterns 02:51:16.120 --> 02:51:18.469 align:start position:0% type of verb but there are some patterns to<02:51:16.279> follow<02:51:16.640> for<02:51:16.880> regular<02:51:17.279> ar<02:51:17.720> verbs<02:51:18.080> you<02:51:18.239> keep 02:51:18.469 --> 02:51:18.479 align:start position:0% to follow for regular ar verbs you keep 02:51:18.479 --> 02:51:20.150 align:start position:0% to follow for regular ar verbs you keep the<02:51:18.600> same<02:51:18.840> ending<02:51:19.399> as<02:51:19.520> you<02:51:19.640> would<02:51:19.840> in<02:51:20.000> the 02:51:20.150 --> 02:51:20.160 align:start position:0% the same ending as you would in the 02:51:20.160 --> 02:51:22.870 align:start position:0% the same ending as you would in the present<02:51:20.600> and<02:51:20.720> change<02:51:21.120> a<02:51:21.479> to<02:51:21.800> a<02:51:22.080> for<02:51:22.239> regular<02:51:22.720> e 02:51:22.870 --> 02:51:22.880 align:start position:0% present and change a to a for regular e 02:51:22.880 --> 02:51:25.349 align:start position:0% present and change a to a for regular e r<02:51:23.120> and<02:51:23.319> i<02:51:23.720> verbs<02:51:24.160> you<02:51:24.279> keep<02:51:24.479> the<02:51:24.600> same<02:51:24.840> ending 02:51:25.349 --> 02:51:25.359 align:start position:0% r and i verbs you keep the same ending 02:51:25.359 --> 02:51:27.110 align:start position:0% r and i verbs you keep the same ending as<02:51:25.520> you<02:51:25.640> would<02:51:25.880> in<02:51:26.000> the<02:51:26.160> present<02:51:26.600> and<02:51:26.720> change 02:51:27.110 --> 02:51:27.120 align:start position:0% as you would in the present and change 02:51:27.120 --> 02:51:29.910 align:start position:0% as you would in the present and change the<02:51:27.319> e<02:51:27.720> or<02:51:28.000> e<02:51:28.439> to<02:51:28.680> a<02:51:29.040> if<02:51:29.120> you<02:51:29.239> take<02:51:29.399> a<02:51:29.520> closer 02:51:29.910 --> 02:51:29.920 align:start position:0% the e or e to a if you take a closer 02:51:29.920 --> 02:51:31.830 align:start position:0% the e or e to a if you take a closer look<02:51:30.200> you<02:51:30.319> can<02:51:30.479> probably<02:51:30.920> tell<02:51:31.239> that<02:51:31.399> only<02:51:31.640> one 02:51:31.830 --> 02:51:31.840 align:start position:0% look you can probably tell that only one 02:51:31.840 --> 02:51:33.510 align:start position:0% look you can probably tell that only one letter<02:51:32.120> changes<02:51:32.640> so<02:51:32.800> it's<02:51:33.000> almost<02:51:33.279> like<02:51:33.399> a 02:51:33.510 --> 02:51:33.520 align:start position:0% letter changes so it's almost like a 02:51:33.520 --> 02:51:35.309 align:start position:0% letter changes so it's almost like a switch<02:51:34.000> between<02:51:34.279> the<02:51:34.399> types<02:51:34.640> of<02:51:34.760> verbs<02:51:35.200> the 02:51:35.309 --> 02:51:35.319 align:start position:0% switch between the types of verbs the 02:51:35.319 --> 02:51:36.910 align:start position:0% switch between the types of verbs the best<02:51:35.479> thing<02:51:35.680> about<02:51:35.920> these<02:51:36.080> changes<02:51:36.600> and<02:51:36.760> for 02:51:36.910 --> 02:51:36.920 align:start position:0% best thing about these changes and for 02:51:36.920 --> 02:51:38.830 align:start position:0% best thing about these changes and for every<02:51:37.160> verb<02:51:37.399> there<02:51:37.520> is<02:51:37.640> in<02:51:37.760> the<02:51:37.880> noos<02:51:38.359> command 02:51:38.830 --> 02:51:38.840 align:start position:0% every verb there is in the noos command 02:51:38.840 --> 02:51:40.590 align:start position:0% every verb there is in the noos command is<02:51:38.920> that<02:51:39.120> these<02:51:39.239> changes<02:51:39.680> are<02:51:39.920> kept<02:51:40.239> even<02:51:40.479> in 02:51:40.590 --> 02:51:40.600 align:start position:0% is that these changes are kept even in 02:51:40.600 --> 02:51:43.429 align:start position:0% is that these changes are kept even in the<02:51:40.720> negative<02:51:41.080> command<02:51:41.600> abl<02:51:42.359> means<02:51:42.760> we<02:51:42.960> speak 02:51:43.429 --> 02:51:43.439 align:start position:0% the negative command abl means we speak 02:51:43.439 --> 02:51:46.950 align:start position:0% the negative command abl means we speak but<02:51:43.720> ablos<02:51:44.560> means<02:51:44.920> let's<02:51:45.200> speak<02:51:45.640> Kos<02:51:46.319> means<02:51:46.760> we 02:51:46.950 --> 02:51:46.960 align:start position:0% but ablos means let's speak Kos means we 02:51:46.960 --> 02:51:50.670 align:start position:0% but ablos means let's speak Kos means we eat<02:51:47.359> but<02:51:47.560> K<02:51:48.279> means<02:51:48.680> let's<02:51:48.920> eat<02:51:49.399> abos<02:51:50.120> means<02:51:50.439> we 02:51:50.670 --> 02:51:50.680 align:start position:0% eat but K means let's eat abos means we 02:51:50.680 --> 02:51:53.389 align:start position:0% eat but K means let's eat abos means we open<02:51:51.200> but<02:51:51.399> abamos<02:51:52.080> means<02:51:52.520> let's<02:51:52.760> open<02:51:53.120> and<02:51:53.279> in 02:51:53.389 --> 02:51:53.399 align:start position:0% open but abamos means let's open and in 02:51:53.399 --> 02:51:55.389 align:start position:0% open but abamos means let's open and in the<02:51:53.560> negative<02:51:54.040> they<02:51:54.160> keep<02:51:54.359> their<02:51:54.560> forms<02:51:55.120> with 02:51:55.389 --> 02:51:55.399 align:start position:0% the negative they keep their forms with 02:51:55.399 --> 02:51:57.150 align:start position:0% the negative they keep their forms with no<02:51:55.800> in<02:51:55.920> the<02:51:56.040> beginning<02:51:56.479> that's<02:51:56.600> how<02:51:56.800> regular 02:51:57.150 --> 02:51:57.160 align:start position:0% no in the beginning that's how regular 02:51:57.160 --> 02:51:59.309 align:start position:0% no in the beginning that's how regular verbs<02:51:57.560> function<02:51:57.920> with<02:51:58.080> noos<02:51:58.640> commands<02:51:59.120> both 02:51:59.309 --> 02:51:59.319 align:start position:0% verbs function with noos commands both 02:51:59.319 --> 02:52:01.190 align:start position:0% verbs function with noos commands both in<02:51:59.479> the<02:51:59.600> affirmative<02:52:00.120> and<02:52:00.239> negative<02:52:00.920> however 02:52:01.190 --> 02:52:01.200 align:start position:0% in the affirmative and negative however 02:52:01.200 --> 02:52:02.830 align:start position:0% in the affirmative and negative however there<02:52:01.319> are<02:52:01.520> many<02:52:01.760> irregular<02:52:02.279> verbs<02:52:02.600> in<02:52:02.720> the 02:52:02.830 --> 02:52:02.840 align:start position:0% there are many irregular verbs in the 02:52:02.840 --> 02:52:04.750 align:start position:0% there are many irregular verbs in the nosos<02:52:03.359> commands<02:52:03.800> but<02:52:03.920> I<02:52:04.000> will<02:52:04.160> not<02:52:04.319> put<02:52:04.520> all<02:52:04.640> of 02:52:04.750 --> 02:52:04.760 align:start position:0% nosos commands but I will not put all of 02:52:04.760 --> 02:52:06.269 align:start position:0% nosos commands but I will not put all of them<02:52:05.000> in<02:52:05.160> this<02:52:05.359> video<02:52:05.800> because<02:52:06.000> you<02:52:06.120> don't 02:52:06.269 --> 02:52:06.279 align:start position:0% them in this video because you don't 02:52:06.279 --> 02:52:07.990 align:start position:0% them in this video because you don't need<02:52:06.520> all<02:52:06.680> of<02:52:06.800> them<02:52:07.040> if<02:52:07.200> anything<02:52:07.680> I'll<02:52:07.840> give 02:52:07.990 --> 02:52:08.000 align:start position:0% need all of them if anything I'll give 02:52:08.000 --> 02:52:09.670 align:start position:0% need all of them if anything I'll give the<02:52:08.080> most<02:52:08.279> useful<02:52:08.680> verbs<02:52:09.040> once<02:52:09.319> that<02:52:09.439> you<02:52:09.520> can 02:52:09.670 --> 02:52:09.680 align:start position:0% the most useful verbs once that you can 02:52:09.680 --> 02:52:13.469 align:start position:0% the most useful verbs once that you can just<02:52:09.840> memorize<02:52:10.399> these<02:52:10.560> verbs 02:52:13.469 --> 02:52:13.479 align:start position:0% 02:52:13.479 --> 02:52:15.229 align:start position:0% include 02:52:15.229 --> 02:52:15.239 align:start position:0% include 02:52:15.239 --> 02:52:16.910 align:start position:0% include V 02:52:16.910 --> 02:52:16.920 align:start position:0% V 02:52:16.920 --> 02:52:19.510 align:start position:0% V ver<02:52:17.920> and<02:52:18.520> in<02:52:18.640> case<02:52:18.800> you<02:52:18.920> want<02:52:19.000> to<02:52:19.120> use<02:52:19.319> these 02:52:19.510 --> 02:52:19.520 align:start position:0% ver and in case you want to use these 02:52:19.520 --> 02:52:21.950 align:start position:0% ver and in case you want to use these verbs<02:52:19.880> in<02:52:20.000> the's<02:52:20.680> commands<02:52:21.200> now<02:52:21.319> you<02:52:21.439> know<02:52:21.680> how 02:52:21.950 --> 02:52:21.960 align:start position:0% verbs in the's commands now you know how 02:52:21.960 --> 02:52:23.710 align:start position:0% verbs in the's commands now you know how and<02:52:22.080> of<02:52:22.239> course<02:52:22.640> there's<02:52:22.920> other<02:52:23.160> verbs<02:52:23.600> that 02:52:23.710 --> 02:52:23.720 align:start position:0% and of course there's other verbs that 02:52:23.720 --> 02:52:25.510 align:start position:0% and of course there's other verbs that follow<02:52:24.080> these<02:52:24.279> irregular<02:52:24.840> patterns<02:52:25.319> but<02:52:25.439> you 02:52:25.510 --> 02:52:25.520 align:start position:0% follow these irregular patterns but you 02:52:25.520 --> 02:52:26.990 align:start position:0% follow these irregular patterns but you don't<02:52:25.680> need<02:52:25.800> to<02:52:25.880> know<02:52:26.080> all<02:52:26.200> of<02:52:26.319> them<02:52:26.640> after 02:52:26.990 --> 02:52:27.000 align:start position:0% don't need to know all of them after 02:52:27.000 --> 02:52:29.190 align:start position:0% don't need to know all of them after these<02:52:27.200> verbs<02:52:27.640> there<02:52:27.800> are<02:52:28.000> verbs<02:52:28.279> ending<02:52:28.520> in<02:52:28.760> k 02:52:29.190 --> 02:52:29.200 align:start position:0% these verbs there are verbs ending in k 02:52:29.200 --> 02:52:30.710 align:start position:0% these verbs there are verbs ending in k g<02:52:29.439> and<02:52:29.640> Zar<02:52:30.000> and<02:52:30.080> these<02:52:30.239> verbs<02:52:30.520> have<02:52:30.640> a 02:52:30.710 --> 02:52:30.720 align:start position:0% g and Zar and these verbs have a 02:52:30.720 --> 02:52:32.510 align:start position:0% g and Zar and these verbs have a spelling<02:52:31.040> change<02:52:31.319> in<02:52:31.439> the<02:52:31.600> nro's<02:52:32.080> command 02:52:32.510 --> 02:52:32.520 align:start position:0% spelling change in the nro's command 02:52:32.520 --> 02:52:34.750 align:start position:0% spelling change in the nro's command while<02:52:32.720> changing<02:52:33.120> the<02:52:33.239> ending<02:52:33.520> to<02:52:33.920> practicar 02:52:34.750 --> 02:52:34.760 align:start position:0% while changing the ending to practicar 02:52:34.760 --> 02:52:37.630 align:start position:0% while changing the ending to practicar becomes<02:52:35.319> practicos<02:52:36.319> meaning<02:52:36.640> let's<02:52:36.960> practice 02:52:37.630 --> 02:52:37.640 align:start position:0% becomes practicos meaning let's practice 02:52:37.640 --> 02:52:40.469 align:start position:0% becomes practicos meaning let's practice hugar<02:52:38.239> becomes<02:52:38.800> hugos<02:52:39.560> meaning<02:52:39.880> let's<02:52:40.160> play 02:52:40.469 --> 02:52:40.479 align:start position:0% hugar becomes hugos meaning let's play 02:52:40.479 --> 02:52:43.469 align:start position:0% hugar becomes hugos meaning let's play and<02:52:40.680> organizar<02:52:41.600> becomes<02:52:42.200> organos<02:52:43.160> meaning 02:52:43.469 --> 02:52:43.479 align:start position:0% and organizar becomes organos meaning 02:52:43.479 --> 02:52:45.309 align:start position:0% and organizar becomes organos meaning let's<02:52:43.720> organize<02:52:44.279> if<02:52:44.439> if<02:52:44.520> you<02:52:44.600> see<02:52:44.840> any<02:52:45.040> other 02:52:45.309 --> 02:52:45.319 align:start position:0% let's organize if if you see any other 02:52:45.319 --> 02:52:47.830 align:start position:0% let's organize if if you see any other verb<02:52:45.600> that<02:52:45.720> ends<02:52:45.960> in<02:52:46.200> K<02:52:46.600> G<02:52:46.880> andar<02:52:47.439> remember<02:52:47.720> to 02:52:47.830 --> 02:52:47.840 align:start position:0% verb that ends in K G andar remember to 02:52:47.840 --> 02:52:49.670 align:start position:0% verb that ends in K G andar remember to change<02:52:48.120> the<02:52:48.239> ending<02:52:48.680> and<02:52:48.880> spelling<02:52:49.399> in<02:52:49.520> case 02:52:49.670 --> 02:52:49.680 align:start position:0% change the ending and spelling in case 02:52:49.680 --> 02:52:51.469 align:start position:0% change the ending and spelling in case you<02:52:49.800> want<02:52:49.880> to<02:52:50.000> use<02:52:50.160> it<02:52:50.319> in<02:52:50.399> the<02:52:50.560> noos<02:52:51.040> command 02:52:51.469 --> 02:52:51.479 align:start position:0% you want to use it in the noos command 02:52:51.479 --> 02:52:52.990 align:start position:0% you want to use it in the noos command after<02:52:51.800> these<02:52:52.000> verbs<02:52:52.439> there<02:52:52.560> are<02:52:52.720> stem 02:52:52.990 --> 02:52:53.000 align:start position:0% after these verbs there are stem 02:52:53.000 --> 02:52:54.590 align:start position:0% after these verbs there are stem changing<02:52:53.359> verbs<02:52:53.720> and<02:52:53.840> there's<02:52:54.040> one<02:52:54.239> important 02:52:54.590 --> 02:52:54.600 align:start position:0% changing verbs and there's one important 02:52:54.600 --> 02:52:56.070 align:start position:0% changing verbs and there's one important thing<02:52:54.800> you<02:52:54.920> need<02:52:55.040> to<02:52:55.160> know<02:52:55.359> about<02:52:55.600> them<02:52:55.920> and 02:52:56.070 --> 02:52:56.080 align:start position:0% thing you need to know about them and 02:52:56.080 --> 02:52:58.110 align:start position:0% thing you need to know about them and that<02:52:56.239> is<02:52:56.600> only<02:52:56.840> stem<02:52:57.120> changing<02:52:57.520> verbs<02:52:57.960> that 02:52:58.110 --> 02:52:58.120 align:start position:0% that is only stem changing verbs that 02:52:58.120 --> 02:53:00.670 align:start position:0% that is only stem changing verbs that end<02:52:58.359> in<02:52:58.560> IR<02:52:59.120> change<02:52:59.479> their<02:52:59.680> stem<02:53:00.080> but<02:53:00.279> only 02:53:00.670 --> 02:53:00.680 align:start position:0% end in IR change their stem but only 02:53:00.680 --> 02:53:02.990 align:start position:0% end in IR change their stem but only with<02:53:00.880> one<02:53:01.120> letter<02:53:01.600> like<02:53:01.920> dormir<02:53:02.600> which<02:53:02.760> goes 02:53:02.990 --> 02:53:03.000 align:start position:0% with one letter like dormir which goes 02:53:03.000 --> 02:53:05.670 align:start position:0% with one letter like dormir which goes from<02:53:03.279> o<02:53:03.680> to<02:53:03.880> U<02:53:04.160> in<02:53:04.279> the<02:53:04.439> noos<02:53:04.960> command<02:53:05.399> it<02:53:05.479> will 02:53:05.670 --> 02:53:05.680 align:start position:0% from o to U in the noos command it will 02:53:05.680 --> 02:53:08.870 align:start position:0% from o to U in the noos command it will be<02:53:05.960> dur<02:53:06.720> meaning<02:53:07.040> let's<02:53:07.279> sleep<02:53:07.720> not<02:53:08.040> damos 02:53:08.870 --> 02:53:08.880 align:start position:0% be dur meaning let's sleep not damos 02:53:08.880 --> 02:53:10.630 align:start position:0% be dur meaning let's sleep not damos it's<02:53:09.000> a<02:53:09.120> tricky<02:53:09.439> exception<02:53:10.000> but<02:53:10.120> it's<02:53:10.279> easy<02:53:10.479> to 02:53:10.630 --> 02:53:10.640 align:start position:0% it's a tricky exception but it's easy to 02:53:10.640 --> 02:53:13.309 align:start position:0% it's a tricky exception but it's easy to memorize<02:53:11.200> there's<02:53:11.479> other<02:53:11.720> verbs<02:53:12.160> like<02:53:12.479> C<02:53:13.080> and 02:53:13.309 --> 02:53:13.319 align:start position:0% memorize there's other verbs like C and 02:53:13.319 --> 02:53:15.269 align:start position:0% memorize there's other verbs like C and P<02:53:13.800> which<02:53:13.880> are<02:53:14.040> also<02:53:14.439> stem<02:53:14.640> changing<02:53:14.920> verbs 02:53:15.269 --> 02:53:15.279 align:start position:0% P which are also stem changing verbs 02:53:15.279 --> 02:53:17.790 align:start position:0% P which are also stem changing verbs ending<02:53:15.520> in<02:53:15.720> ir<02:53:16.239> and<02:53:16.399> they<02:53:16.520> would<02:53:16.680> be<02:53:17.000> sintamos 02:53:17.790 --> 02:53:17.800 align:start position:0% ending in ir and they would be sintamos 02:53:17.800 --> 02:53:20.150 align:start position:0% ending in ir and they would be sintamos and<02:53:18.120> pedamos<02:53:18.760> meaning<02:53:19.080> let's<02:53:19.319> feel<02:53:19.720> and<02:53:19.880> let's 02:53:20.150 --> 02:53:20.160 align:start position:0% and pedamos meaning let's feel and let's 02:53:20.160 --> 02:53:22.150 align:start position:0% and pedamos meaning let's feel and let's ask<02:53:20.399> for<02:53:20.840> that's<02:53:21.000> how<02:53:21.160> stem<02:53:21.399> changing<02:53:21.760> verbs 02:53:22.150 --> 02:53:22.160 align:start position:0% ask for that's how stem changing verbs 02:53:22.160 --> 02:53:24.150 align:start position:0% ask for that's how stem changing verbs specifically<02:53:22.680> verbs<02:53:22.960> ending<02:53:23.239> in<02:53:23.439> IR<02:53:23.920> work 02:53:24.150 --> 02:53:24.160 align:start position:0% specifically verbs ending in IR work 02:53:24.160 --> 02:53:26.150 align:start position:0% specifically verbs ending in IR work with<02:53:24.319> nosal's<02:53:24.880> commands<02:53:25.399> these<02:53:25.560> commands<02:53:25.960> can 02:53:26.150 --> 02:53:26.160 align:start position:0% with nosal's commands these commands can 02:53:26.160 --> 02:53:27.990 align:start position:0% with nosal's commands these commands can likewise<02:53:26.560> work<02:53:26.800> with<02:53:27.000> direct<02:53:27.399> and<02:53:27.560> indirect 02:53:27.990 --> 02:53:28.000 align:start position:0% likewise work with direct and indirect 02:53:28.000 --> 02:53:29.550 align:start position:0% likewise work with direct and indirect object<02:53:28.359> pronouns<02:53:28.880> but<02:53:29.000> it's<02:53:29.120> a<02:53:29.239> bit<02:53:29.359> more 02:53:29.550 --> 02:53:29.560 align:start position:0% object pronouns but it's a bit more 02:53:29.560 --> 02:53:31.429 align:start position:0% object pronouns but it's a bit more tricky<02:53:29.960> in<02:53:30.080> the<02:53:30.239> affirmative<02:53:30.840> the<02:53:31.000> pronouns 02:53:31.429 --> 02:53:31.439 align:start position:0% tricky in the affirmative the pronouns 02:53:31.439 --> 02:53:33.429 align:start position:0% tricky in the affirmative the pronouns are<02:53:31.640> attached<02:53:31.960> to<02:53:32.080> the<02:53:32.239> verb<02:53:32.600> with<02:53:32.880> accents 02:53:33.429 --> 02:53:33.439 align:start position:0% are attached to the verb with accents 02:53:33.439 --> 02:53:34.990 align:start position:0% are attached to the verb with accents but<02:53:33.560> in<02:53:33.680> the<02:53:33.840> negative<02:53:34.279> they're<02:53:34.520> separated 02:53:34.990 --> 02:53:35.000 align:start position:0% but in the negative they're separated 02:53:35.000 --> 02:53:37.950 align:start position:0% but in the negative they're separated with<02:53:35.160> no<02:53:35.439> accent<02:53:36.000> abamos<02:53:36.880> means<02:53:37.279> let's<02:53:37.600> open 02:53:37.950 --> 02:53:37.960 align:start position:0% with no accent abamos means let's open 02:53:37.960 --> 02:53:40.990 align:start position:0% with no accent abamos means let's open it<02:53:38.279> and<02:53:38.439> in<02:53:38.560> the<02:53:38.720> negative<02:53:39.279> it's<02:53:39.760> noos<02:53:40.760> let's 02:53:40.990 --> 02:53:41.000 align:start position:0% it and in the negative it's noos let's 02:53:41.000 --> 02:53:43.269 align:start position:0% it and in the negative it's noos let's not<02:53:41.279> open<02:53:41.600> it<02:53:41.960> both<02:53:42.200> phrases<02:53:42.720> have<02:53:42.880> the<02:53:43.000> verb 02:53:43.269 --> 02:53:43.279 align:start position:0% not open it both phrases have the verb 02:53:43.279 --> 02:53:45.030 align:start position:0% not open it both phrases have the verb and<02:53:43.439> the<02:53:43.600> pronoun<02:53:44.080> and<02:53:44.160> it's<02:53:44.479> attached<02:53:44.800> in<02:53:44.920> the 02:53:45.030 --> 02:53:45.040 align:start position:0% and the pronoun and it's attached in the 02:53:45.040 --> 02:53:47.110 align:start position:0% and the pronoun and it's attached in the affirmative<02:53:45.560> with<02:53:45.680> an<02:53:45.960> accent<02:53:46.439> but<02:53:46.600> separated 02:53:47.110 --> 02:53:47.120 align:start position:0% affirmative with an accent but separated 02:53:47.120 --> 02:53:49.830 align:start position:0% affirmative with an accent but separated in<02:53:47.239> the<02:53:47.399> negative<02:53:47.880> compros<02:53:48.760> can<02:53:48.880> mean<02:53:49.200> let<02:53:49.560> by 02:53:49.830 --> 02:53:49.840 align:start position:0% in the negative compros can mean let by 02:53:49.840 --> 02:53:51.830 align:start position:0% in the negative compros can mean let by them<02:53:50.200> with<02:53:50.439> them<02:53:50.600> being<02:53:50.840> an<02:53:51.080> object<02:53:51.560> and<02:53:51.680> in 02:53:51.830 --> 02:53:51.840 align:start position:0% them with them being an object and in 02:53:51.840 --> 02:53:54.670 align:start position:0% them with them being an object and in the<02:53:51.960> negative<02:53:52.520> the<02:53:52.640> sentence<02:53:53.080> is<02:53:53.479> no<02:53:54.479> let's 02:53:54.670 --> 02:53:54.680 align:start position:0% the negative the sentence is no let's 02:53:54.680 --> 02:53:56.710 align:start position:0% the negative the sentence is no let's not<02:53:54.920> buy<02:53:55.160> them<02:53:55.439> both<02:53:55.640> phrases<02:53:56.200> likewise<02:53:56.560> have 02:53:56.710 --> 02:53:56.720 align:start position:0% not buy them both phrases likewise have 02:53:56.720 --> 02:53:59.550 align:start position:0% not buy them both phrases likewise have the<02:53:56.880> verb<02:53:57.200> and<02:53:57.319> the<02:53:57.800> pronoun<02:53:58.800> can<02:53:58.960> mean<02:53:59.319> let's 02:53:59.550 --> 02:53:59.560 align:start position:0% the verb and the pronoun can mean let's 02:53:59.560 --> 02:54:01.790 align:start position:0% the verb and the pronoun can mean let's bring<02:53:59.840> you<02:54:00.080> it<02:54:00.439> and<02:54:00.560> in<02:54:00.680> the<02:54:00.840> negative<02:54:01.399> it's 02:54:01.790 --> 02:54:01.800 align:start position:0% bring you it and in the negative it's 02:54:01.800 --> 02:54:04.550 align:start position:0% bring you it and in the negative it's notos<02:54:02.800> let's<02:54:03.040> not<02:54:03.239> bring<02:54:03.479> you<02:54:03.680> it<02:54:04.040> of<02:54:04.200> course 02:54:04.550 --> 02:54:04.560 align:start position:0% notos let's not bring you it of course 02:54:04.560 --> 02:54:06.190 align:start position:0% notos let's not bring you it of course you<02:54:04.640> can<02:54:04.800> make<02:54:05.000> any<02:54:05.160> sentence<02:54:05.520> you<02:54:05.600> want<02:54:05.880> using 02:54:06.190 --> 02:54:06.200 align:start position:0% you can make any sentence you want using 02:54:06.200 --> 02:54:08.110 align:start position:0% you can make any sentence you want using these<02:54:06.359> commands<02:54:06.880> with<02:54:07.120> direct<02:54:07.479> and<02:54:07.680> indirect 02:54:08.110 --> 02:54:08.120 align:start position:0% these commands with direct and indirect 02:54:08.120 --> 02:54:10.229 align:start position:0% these commands with direct and indirect object<02:54:08.439> pronouns<02:54:09.040> the<02:54:09.200> last<02:54:09.479> concept<02:54:09.800> to<02:54:09.920> know 02:54:10.229 --> 02:54:10.239 align:start position:0% object pronouns the last concept to know 02:54:10.239 --> 02:54:12.030 align:start position:0% object pronouns the last concept to know with<02:54:10.399> Nosotros<02:54:10.920> commands<02:54:11.359> is<02:54:11.560> reflexive 02:54:12.030 --> 02:54:12.040 align:start position:0% with Nosotros commands is reflexive 02:54:12.040 --> 02:54:13.590 align:start position:0% with Nosotros commands is reflexive verbs<02:54:12.479> because<02:54:12.680> we're<02:54:12.840> only<02:54:13.120> working<02:54:13.439> with 02:54:13.590 --> 02:54:13.600 align:start position:0% verbs because we're only working with 02:54:13.600 --> 02:54:16.269 align:start position:0% verbs because we're only working with Nosotros<02:54:14.359> the<02:54:14.479> indirect<02:54:14.920> object<02:54:15.279> pronoun<02:54:15.760> NOS 02:54:16.269 --> 02:54:16.279 align:start position:0% Nosotros the indirect object pronoun NOS 02:54:16.279 --> 02:54:18.469 align:start position:0% Nosotros the indirect object pronoun NOS will<02:54:16.479> always<02:54:16.760> be<02:54:16.920> used<02:54:17.359> with<02:54:17.520> reflexive<02:54:18.040> verbs 02:54:18.469 --> 02:54:18.479 align:start position:0% will always be used with reflexive verbs 02:54:18.479 --> 02:54:20.349 align:start position:0% will always be used with reflexive verbs especially<02:54:18.840> in<02:54:19.000> the<02:54:19.120> affirmative<02:54:19.760> where<02:54:19.960> NOS 02:54:20.349 --> 02:54:20.359 align:start position:0% especially in the affirmative where NOS 02:54:20.359 --> 02:54:21.990 align:start position:0% especially in the affirmative where NOS is<02:54:20.520> attached<02:54:20.880> to<02:54:21.000> the<02:54:21.120> verb<02:54:21.399> Spanish<02:54:21.720> has<02:54:21.840> a 02:54:21.990 --> 02:54:22.000 align:start position:0% is attached to the verb Spanish has a 02:54:22.000 --> 02:54:23.990 align:start position:0% is attached to the verb Spanish has a very<02:54:22.160> important<02:54:22.560> rule<02:54:22.920> saying<02:54:23.279> that<02:54:23.439> when<02:54:23.640> NOS 02:54:23.990 --> 02:54:24.000 align:start position:0% very important rule saying that when NOS 02:54:24.000 --> 02:54:25.710 align:start position:0% very important rule saying that when NOS is<02:54:24.160> attached<02:54:24.479> to<02:54:24.600> the<02:54:24.720> affirmative<02:54:25.160> nosos 02:54:25.710 --> 02:54:25.720 align:start position:0% is attached to the affirmative nosos 02:54:25.720 --> 02:54:27.990 align:start position:0% is attached to the affirmative nosos command<02:54:26.200> the<02:54:26.359> final<02:54:26.800> s<02:54:27.200> is<02:54:27.399> dropped<02:54:27.760> from<02:54:27.880> the 02:54:27.990 --> 02:54:28.000 align:start position:0% command the final s is dropped from the 02:54:28.000 --> 02:54:29.830 align:start position:0% command the final s is dropped from the verb<02:54:28.239> ending<02:54:28.760> in<02:54:28.880> order<02:54:29.080> for<02:54:29.279> the<02:54:29.399> word<02:54:29.680> to 02:54:29.830 --> 02:54:29.840 align:start position:0% verb ending in order for the word to 02:54:29.840 --> 02:54:31.229 align:start position:0% verb ending in order for the word to sound<02:54:30.120> better<02:54:30.479> when<02:54:30.680> said<02:54:30.960> take<02:54:31.120> the 02:54:31.229 --> 02:54:31.239 align:start position:0% sound better when said take the 02:54:31.239 --> 02:54:33.550 align:start position:0% sound better when said take the reflexive<02:54:31.840> verb<02:54:32.840> how<02:54:32.920> would<02:54:33.040> you<02:54:33.160> say<02:54:33.399> this 02:54:33.550 --> 02:54:33.560 align:start position:0% reflexive verb how would you say this 02:54:33.560 --> 02:54:35.550 align:start position:0% reflexive verb how would you say this verb<02:54:33.760> in<02:54:33.880> the<02:54:34.040> no's<02:54:34.560> command<02:54:35.160> you<02:54:35.279> would<02:54:35.439> want 02:54:35.550 --> 02:54:35.560 align:start position:0% verb in the no's command you would want 02:54:35.560 --> 02:54:38.389 align:start position:0% verb in the no's command you would want to<02:54:35.760> sayos<02:54:36.760> no<02:54:37.040> and<02:54:37.239> while<02:54:37.520> this<02:54:37.720> makes<02:54:38.000> sense 02:54:38.389 --> 02:54:38.399 align:start position:0% to sayos no and while this makes sense 02:54:38.399 --> 02:54:39.990 align:start position:0% to sayos no and while this makes sense Spanish<02:54:38.760> says<02:54:38.960> that<02:54:39.120> this<02:54:39.279> word<02:54:39.479> sounds<02:54:39.800> bad 02:54:39.990 --> 02:54:40.000 align:start position:0% Spanish says that this word sounds bad 02:54:40.000 --> 02:54:42.190 align:start position:0% Spanish says that this word sounds bad when<02:54:40.200> said<02:54:40.560> so<02:54:40.680> we<02:54:40.800> need<02:54:40.920> to<02:54:41.080> eliminate<02:54:41.680> the<02:54:41.840> S 02:54:42.190 --> 02:54:42.200 align:start position:0% when said so we need to eliminate the S 02:54:42.200 --> 02:54:44.269 align:start position:0% when said so we need to eliminate the S to<02:54:42.359> avoid<02:54:42.600> repeating<02:54:43.000> the<02:54:43.120> same<02:54:43.359> sound<02:54:43.800> so<02:54:44.120> the 02:54:44.269 --> 02:54:44.279 align:start position:0% to avoid repeating the same sound so the 02:54:44.279 --> 02:54:46.550 align:start position:0% to avoid repeating the same sound so the the<02:54:44.359> phrase<02:54:44.640> would<02:54:44.760> be<02:54:45.120> SOS<02:54:45.960> meaning<02:54:46.279> let's 02:54:46.550 --> 02:54:46.560 align:start position:0% the phrase would be SOS meaning let's 02:54:46.560 --> 02:54:48.110 align:start position:0% the phrase would be SOS meaning let's sit<02:54:46.800> down<02:54:47.080> and<02:54:47.200> in<02:54:47.319> the<02:54:47.479> negative<02:54:48.000> the 02:54:48.110 --> 02:54:48.120 align:start position:0% sit down and in the negative the 02:54:48.120 --> 02:54:50.110 align:start position:0% sit down and in the negative the indirect<02:54:48.560> object<02:54:48.880> pronoun<02:54:49.359> is<02:54:49.520> put<02:54:49.800> before 02:54:50.110 --> 02:54:50.120 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun is put before 02:54:50.120 --> 02:54:51.910 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun is put before the<02:54:50.239> verb<02:54:50.680> while<02:54:50.880> the<02:54:51.000> verb<02:54:51.319> itself<02:54:51.720> is 02:54:51.910 --> 02:54:51.920 align:start position:0% the verb while the verb itself is 02:54:51.920 --> 02:54:54.670 align:start position:0% the verb while the verb itself is conjugated<02:54:52.600> the<02:54:52.760> proper<02:54:53.040> way<02:54:53.399> no<02:54:53.640> noos<02:54:54.520> let's 02:54:54.670 --> 02:54:54.680 align:start position:0% conjugated the proper way no noos let's 02:54:54.680 --> 02:54:56.389 align:start position:0% conjugated the proper way no noos let's not<02:54:54.880> sit<02:54:55.160> down<02:54:55.520> as<02:54:55.600> you<02:54:55.720> can<02:54:55.840> see<02:54:56.160> in<02:54:56.279> the 02:54:56.389 --> 02:54:56.399 align:start position:0% not sit down as you can see in the 02:54:56.399 --> 02:54:58.429 align:start position:0% not sit down as you can see in the affirmative<02:54:57.000> the<02:54:57.120> S<02:54:57.399> is<02:54:57.560> dropped<02:54:58.040> but<02:54:58.200> in<02:54:58.279> the 02:54:58.429 --> 02:54:58.439 align:start position:0% affirmative the S is dropped but in the 02:54:58.439 --> 02:55:00.630 align:start position:0% affirmative the S is dropped but in the negative<02:54:58.960> the<02:54:59.080> S<02:54:59.279> is<02:54:59.439> kept<02:54:59.840> as<02:54:59.960> a<02:55:00.120> side<02:55:00.399> note 02:55:00.630 --> 02:55:00.640 align:start position:0% negative the S is kept as a side note 02:55:00.640 --> 02:55:02.469 align:start position:0% negative the S is kept as a side note the<02:55:00.760> rule<02:55:00.960> of<02:55:01.120> dropping<02:55:01.439> an<02:55:01.600> S<02:55:01.960> also<02:55:02.200> applies 02:55:02.469 --> 02:55:02.479 align:start position:0% the rule of dropping an S also applies 02:55:02.479 --> 02:55:04.510 align:start position:0% the rule of dropping an S also applies for<02:55:02.680> the<02:55:02.800> indirect<02:55:03.279> object<02:55:03.600> pronoun<02:55:04.120> say 02:55:04.510 --> 02:55:04.520 align:start position:0% for the indirect object pronoun say 02:55:04.520 --> 02:55:06.670 align:start position:0% for the indirect object pronoun say meaning<02:55:04.840> to<02:55:05.080> him<02:55:05.399> to<02:55:05.560> her<02:55:05.880> or<02:55:06.040> to<02:55:06.279> them<02:55:06.560> when 02:55:06.670 --> 02:55:06.680 align:start position:0% meaning to him to her or to them when 02:55:06.680 --> 02:55:07.910 align:start position:0% meaning to him to her or to them when it's<02:55:06.880> attached<02:55:07.239> to<02:55:07.319> the<02:55:07.479> verb<02:55:07.720> in<02:55:07.800> the 02:55:07.910 --> 02:55:07.920 align:start position:0% it's attached to the verb in the 02:55:07.920 --> 02:55:09.590 align:start position:0% it's attached to the verb in the affirmative<02:55:08.479> in<02:55:08.600> order<02:55:08.840> to<02:55:09.000> avoid<02:55:09.239> repeating 02:55:09.590 --> 02:55:09.600 align:start position:0% affirmative in order to avoid repeating 02:55:09.600 --> 02:55:11.349 align:start position:0% affirmative in order to avoid repeating the<02:55:09.720> same<02:55:09.920> letter<02:55:10.279> and<02:55:10.439> the<02:55:10.560> same<02:55:10.800> sound<02:55:11.239> how 02:55:11.349 --> 02:55:11.359 align:start position:0% the same letter and the same sound how 02:55:11.359 --> 02:55:13.190 align:start position:0% the same letter and the same sound how would<02:55:11.479> you<02:55:11.560> say<02:55:11.760> the<02:55:11.880> phrase<02:55:12.359> let's<02:55:12.680> give<02:55:12.920> him 02:55:13.190 --> 02:55:13.200 align:start position:0% would you say the phrase let's give him 02:55:13.200 --> 02:55:16.150 align:start position:0% would you say the phrase let's give him it<02:55:13.720> you<02:55:13.840> would<02:55:13.960> want<02:55:14.439> say<02:55:14.760> de<02:55:15.760> but<02:55:15.880> Spanish 02:55:16.150 --> 02:55:16.160 align:start position:0% it you would want say de but Spanish 02:55:16.160 --> 02:55:17.910 align:start position:0% it you would want say de but Spanish says<02:55:16.319> to<02:55:16.479> eliminate<02:55:16.880> the<02:55:17.000> final<02:55:17.319> s<02:55:17.640> from<02:55:17.800> the 02:55:17.910 --> 02:55:17.920 align:start position:0% says to eliminate the final s from the 02:55:17.920 --> 02:55:19.670 align:start position:0% says to eliminate the final s from the verb<02:55:18.239> to<02:55:18.359> avoid<02:55:18.600> repeating<02:55:18.960> the<02:55:19.080> same<02:55:19.279> letter 02:55:19.670 --> 02:55:19.680 align:start position:0% verb to avoid repeating the same letter 02:55:19.680 --> 02:55:22.269 align:start position:0% verb to avoid repeating the same letter so<02:55:19.960> the<02:55:20.080> phrase<02:55:20.359> would<02:55:20.520> be<02:55:20.840> deos<02:55:21.800> let's<02:55:22.040> give 02:55:22.269 --> 02:55:22.279 align:start position:0% so the phrase would be deos let's give 02:55:22.279 --> 02:55:24.110 align:start position:0% so the phrase would be deos let's give him<02:55:22.520> it<02:55:22.800> in<02:55:22.880> the<02:55:23.040> negative<02:55:23.560> the<02:55:23.680> phrase<02:55:23.960> would 02:55:24.110 --> 02:55:24.120 align:start position:0% him it in the negative the phrase would 02:55:24.120 --> 02:55:27.429 align:start position:0% him it in the negative the phrase would be<02:55:24.640> no<02:55:25.640> let's<02:55:25.840> not<02:55:26.080> give<02:55:26.279> him<02:55:26.479> it<02:55:26.800> with<02:55:26.920> an<02:55:27.080> s 02:55:27.429 --> 02:55:27.439 align:start position:0% be no let's not give him it with an s 02:55:27.439 --> 02:55:29.190 align:start position:0% be no let's not give him it with an s present<02:55:27.760> in<02:55:27.880> the<02:55:28.040> verb<02:55:28.399> how<02:55:28.520> would<02:55:28.640> you<02:55:28.800> say 02:55:29.190 --> 02:55:29.200 align:start position:0% present in the verb how would you say 02:55:29.200 --> 02:55:31.229 align:start position:0% present in the verb how would you say let's<02:55:29.479> make<02:55:29.760> her 02:55:31.229 --> 02:55:31.239 align:start position:0% let's make her 02:55:31.239 --> 02:55:33.870 align:start position:0% let's make her it<02:55:32.239> with<02:55:32.399> the<02:55:32.560> S<02:55:32.840> dropped<02:55:33.160> from<02:55:33.319> the<02:55:33.439> verb<02:55:33.760> in 02:55:33.870 --> 02:55:33.880 align:start position:0% it with the S dropped from the verb in 02:55:33.880 --> 02:55:37.269 align:start position:0% it with the S dropped from the verb in the<02:55:34.000> negative<02:55:34.560> the<02:55:34.680> phrase<02:55:35.040> is<02:55:35.800> no<02:55:36.800> let's<02:55:37.040> not 02:55:37.269 --> 02:55:37.279 align:start position:0% the negative the phrase is no let's not 02:55:37.279 --> 02:55:39.349 align:start position:0% the negative the phrase is no let's not make<02:55:37.479> her<02:55:37.760> it<02:55:38.040> with<02:55:38.200> an<02:55:38.399> s<02:55:38.760> present<02:55:39.080> in<02:55:39.200> the 02:55:39.349 --> 02:55:39.359 align:start position:0% make her it with an s present in the 02:55:39.359 --> 02:55:41.710 align:start position:0% make her it with an s present in the verb<02:55:39.680> how<02:55:39.800> would<02:55:39.920> you<02:55:40.080> say<02:55:40.439> let's<02:55:40.720> take<02:55:40.840> a<02:55:41.080> bath 02:55:41.710 --> 02:55:41.720 align:start position:0% verb how would you say let's take a bath 02:55:41.720 --> 02:55:44.229 align:start position:0% verb how would you say let's take a bath Bonos<02:55:42.520> in<02:55:42.640> the<02:55:42.760> negative<02:55:43.319> the<02:55:43.439> phrase<02:55:43.800> is<02:55:44.040> no 02:55:44.229 --> 02:55:44.239 align:start position:0% Bonos in the negative the phrase is no 02:55:44.239 --> 02:55:46.670 align:start position:0% Bonos in the negative the phrase is no no<02:55:44.520> BOS<02:55:45.160> with<02:55:45.279> an<02:55:45.439> s<02:55:45.720> in<02:55:45.880> the<02:55:46.000> verb<02:55:46.319> that's<02:55:46.520> what 02:55:46.670 --> 02:55:46.680 align:start position:0% no BOS with an s in the verb that's what 02:55:46.680 --> 02:55:48.910 align:start position:0% no BOS with an s in the verb that's what happens<02:55:47.120> when<02:55:47.359> no<02:55:47.760> and<02:55:47.960> say<02:55:48.239> are<02:55:48.479> attached<02:55:48.800> to 02:55:48.910 --> 02:55:48.920 align:start position:0% happens when no and say are attached to 02:55:48.920 --> 02:55:50.630 align:start position:0% happens when no and say are attached to the<02:55:49.040> verbs<02:55:49.319> in<02:55:49.439> the<02:55:49.600> affirmative<02:55:50.000> form<02:55:50.439> at 02:55:50.630 --> 02:55:50.640 align:start position:0% the verbs in the affirmative form at 02:55:50.640 --> 02:55:52.349 align:start position:0% the verbs in the affirmative form at last<02:55:51.000> there's<02:55:51.239> the<02:55:51.359> verb<02:55:52.000> which<02:55:52.160> is<02:55:52.279> the 02:55:52.349 --> 02:55:52.359 align:start position:0% last there's the verb which is the 02:55:52.359 --> 02:55:54.229 align:start position:0% last there's the verb which is the trickiest<02:55:52.800> verb<02:55:53.000> in<02:55:53.080> the<02:55:53.239> noos<02:55:53.760> command 02:55:54.229 --> 02:55:54.239 align:start position:0% trickiest verb in the noos command 02:55:54.239 --> 02:55:55.590 align:start position:0% trickiest verb in the noos command because<02:55:54.439> it's<02:55:54.600> the<02:55:54.720> only<02:55:54.960> verb<02:55:55.319> that<02:55:55.439> has 02:55:55.590 --> 02:55:55.600 align:start position:0% because it's the only verb that has 02:55:55.600 --> 02:55:57.469 align:start position:0% because it's the only verb that has multiple<02:55:55.960> meanings<02:55:56.520> both<02:55:56.760> in<02:55:56.880> the<02:55:57.040> present 02:55:57.469 --> 02:55:57.479 align:start position:0% multiple meanings both in the present 02:55:57.479 --> 02:55:59.150 align:start position:0% multiple meanings both in the present and<02:55:57.680> command<02:55:58.040> forms<02:55:58.560> and<02:55:58.720> here<02:55:58.800> is<02:55:58.960> what<02:55:59.080> I 02:55:59.150 --> 02:55:59.160 align:start position:0% and command forms and here is what I 02:55:59.160 --> 02:56:01.349 align:start position:0% and command forms and here is what I mean<02:55:59.520> if<02:55:59.640> we<02:55:59.760> want<02:55:59.840> to<02:56:00.000> say<02:56:00.439> we're<02:56:00.720> going<02:56:01.239> we 02:56:01.349 --> 02:56:01.359 align:start position:0% mean if we want to say we're going we 02:56:01.359 --> 02:56:03.790 align:start position:0% mean if we want to say we're going we need<02:56:01.520> to<02:56:01.680> say<02:56:02.040> vamos<02:56:02.600> the<02:56:02.720> word<02:56:02.920> vamos<02:56:03.359> itself 02:56:03.790 --> 02:56:03.800 align:start position:0% need to say vamos the word vamos itself 02:56:03.800 --> 02:56:05.469 align:start position:0% need to say vamos the word vamos itself is<02:56:03.960> taken<02:56:04.200> from<02:56:04.359> the<02:56:04.520> present<02:56:04.840> simple<02:56:05.359> which 02:56:05.469 --> 02:56:05.479 align:start position:0% is taken from the present simple which 02:56:05.479 --> 02:56:07.309 align:start position:0% is taken from the present simple which means<02:56:05.880> we're<02:56:06.120> going<02:56:06.479> but<02:56:06.600> Spanish<02:56:06.920> adds<02:56:07.120> its 02:56:07.309 --> 02:56:07.319 align:start position:0% means we're going but Spanish adds its 02:56:07.319 --> 02:56:09.590 align:start position:0% means we're going but Spanish adds its second<02:56:07.600> definition<02:56:08.239> to<02:56:08.439> vamos<02:56:08.920> meaning<02:56:09.279> let 02:56:09.590 --> 02:56:09.600 align:start position:0% second definition to vamos meaning let 02:56:09.600 --> 02:56:12.469 align:start position:0% second definition to vamos meaning let go<02:56:10.120> however<02:56:10.439> using<02:56:10.800> vamos<02:56:11.359> as<02:56:11.560> let<02:56:11.880> go<02:56:12.279> is 02:56:12.469 --> 02:56:12.479 align:start position:0% go however using vamos as let go is 02:56:12.479 --> 02:56:14.269 align:start position:0% go however using vamos as let go is informal<02:56:12.920> in<02:56:13.160> context<02:56:13.680> because<02:56:13.880> there's<02:56:14.160> the 02:56:14.269 --> 02:56:14.279 align:start position:0% informal in context because there's the 02:56:14.279 --> 02:56:16.070 align:start position:0% informal in context because there's the second<02:56:14.520> word<02:56:14.720> in<02:56:14.880> Spanish<02:56:15.359> that<02:56:15.479> means<02:56:15.800> let's 02:56:16.070 --> 02:56:16.080 align:start position:0% second word in Spanish that means let's 02:56:16.080 --> 02:56:18.710 align:start position:0% second word in Spanish that means let's go<02:56:16.439> IR<02:56:16.800> is<02:56:17.040> actually<02:56:17.439> irregular<02:56:17.960> in<02:56:18.080> the<02:56:18.239> no's 02:56:18.710 --> 02:56:18.720 align:start position:0% go IR is actually irregular in the no's 02:56:18.720 --> 02:56:21.070 align:start position:0% go IR is actually irregular in the no's command<02:56:19.120> being<02:56:19.399> V<02:56:20.120> which<02:56:20.239> formally<02:56:20.640> means 02:56:21.070 --> 02:56:21.080 align:start position:0% command being V which formally means 02:56:21.080 --> 02:56:24.590 align:start position:0% command being V which formally means let's<02:56:21.359> go<02:56:21.720> both<02:56:22.000> V<02:56:22.560> and<02:56:22.800> V<02:56:23.439> mean<02:56:23.800> let's<02:56:24.080> go<02:56:24.399> but 02:56:24.590 --> 02:56:24.600 align:start position:0% let's go both V and V mean let's go but 02:56:24.600 --> 02:56:26.429 align:start position:0% let's go both V and V mean let's go but context<02:56:25.000> will<02:56:25.120> change<02:56:25.399> the<02:56:25.600> action<02:56:26.040> based<02:56:26.279> on 02:56:26.429 --> 02:56:26.439 align:start position:0% context will change the action based on 02:56:26.439 --> 02:56:27.670 align:start position:0% context will change the action based on the<02:56:26.560> situation<02:56:27.080> the<02:56:27.160> reason<02:56:27.399> why<02:56:27.520> I'm 02:56:27.670 --> 02:56:27.680 align:start position:0% the situation the reason why I'm 02:56:27.680 --> 02:56:29.550 align:start position:0% the situation the reason why I'm concentrating<02:56:28.239> on<02:56:28.359> the<02:56:28.439> word<02:56:28.640> vamos<02:56:29.080> so<02:56:29.239> much 02:56:29.550 --> 02:56:29.560 align:start position:0% concentrating on the word vamos so much 02:56:29.560 --> 02:56:30.990 align:start position:0% concentrating on the word vamos so much is<02:56:29.680> because<02:56:29.880> in<02:56:30.120> Spanish<02:56:30.560> you<02:56:30.720> have<02:56:30.840> the 02:56:30.990 --> 02:56:31.000 align:start position:0% is because in Spanish you have the 02:56:31.000 --> 02:56:33.710 align:start position:0% is because in Spanish you have the reflexive<02:56:31.479> verb<02:56:32.399> meaning<02:56:32.680> to<02:56:32.840> go<02:56:33.040> out<02:56:33.520> this 02:56:33.710 --> 02:56:33.720 align:start position:0% reflexive verb meaning to go out this 02:56:33.720 --> 02:56:35.469 align:start position:0% reflexive verb meaning to go out this verb<02:56:34.000> is<02:56:34.160> very<02:56:34.359> tricky<02:56:34.640> to<02:56:35.080> understand 02:56:35.469 --> 02:56:35.479 align:start position:0% verb is very tricky to understand 02:56:35.479 --> 02:56:37.349 align:start position:0% verb is very tricky to understand especially<02:56:35.840> with<02:56:36.000> no's<02:56:36.479> commands<02:56:36.960> now<02:56:37.120> that<02:56:37.279> I 02:56:37.349 --> 02:56:37.359 align:start position:0% especially with no's commands now that I 02:56:37.359 --> 02:56:39.670 align:start position:0% especially with no's commands now that I have<02:56:37.479> shown<02:56:37.720> you<02:56:37.960> Vos<02:56:38.399> and<02:56:38.560> vayamos<02:56:39.160> as<02:56:39.399> let's 02:56:39.670 --> 02:56:39.680 align:start position:0% have shown you Vos and vayamos as let's 02:56:39.680 --> 02:56:41.550 align:start position:0% have shown you Vos and vayamos as let's go<02:56:40.000> how<02:56:40.080> would<02:56:40.239> you<02:56:40.319> say<02:56:40.520> the<02:56:40.680> phrase<02:56:41.080> let's<02:56:41.359> go 02:56:41.550 --> 02:56:41.560 align:start position:0% go how would you say the phrase let's go 02:56:41.560 --> 02:56:44.309 align:start position:0% go how would you say the phrase let's go out<02:56:42.200> since<02:56:42.479> I<02:56:42.560> said<02:56:42.800> that<02:56:42.960> V<02:56:43.439> is<02:56:43.520> the<02:56:43.640> irregular 02:56:44.309 --> 02:56:44.319 align:start position:0% out since I said that V is the irregular 02:56:44.319 --> 02:56:46.429 align:start position:0% out since I said that V is the irregular form<02:56:44.600> of<02:56:44.760> let's<02:56:45.040> go<02:56:45.359> some<02:56:45.479> of<02:56:45.600> you<02:56:45.760> might<02:56:46.000> say 02:56:46.429 --> 02:56:46.439 align:start position:0% form of let's go some of you might say 02:56:46.439 --> 02:56:48.790 align:start position:0% form of let's go some of you might say vamonos<02:56:47.200> but<02:56:47.439> actually<02:56:47.960> it's<02:56:48.160> the<02:56:48.279> incorrect 02:56:48.790 --> 02:56:48.800 align:start position:0% vamonos but actually it's the incorrect 02:56:48.800 --> 02:56:50.870 align:start position:0% vamonos but actually it's the incorrect way<02:56:48.960> to<02:56:49.080> say<02:56:49.279> let's<02:56:49.560> go<02:56:49.760> out<02:56:50.120> so<02:56:50.359> instead<02:56:50.760> you 02:56:50.870 --> 02:56:50.880 align:start position:0% way to say let's go out so instead you 02:56:50.880 --> 02:56:52.870 align:start position:0% way to say let's go out so instead you need<02:56:51.000> to<02:56:51.160> say<02:56:51.520> vamonos<02:56:52.160> using<02:56:52.439> the<02:56:52.600> present 02:56:52.870 --> 02:56:52.880 align:start position:0% need to say vamonos using the present 02:56:52.880 --> 02:56:55.269 align:start position:0% need to say vamonos using the present simple<02:56:53.200> version<02:56:53.600> of<02:56:54.239> with<02:56:54.439> s<02:56:54.760> dropped<02:56:55.120> from 02:56:55.269 --> 02:56:55.279 align:start position:0% simple version of with s dropped from 02:56:55.279 --> 02:56:57.670 align:start position:0% simple version of with s dropped from the<02:56:55.399> end<02:56:55.560> of<02:56:55.680> the<02:56:55.800> verb<02:56:56.200> Vos<02:56:56.800> means<02:56:57.200> let's<02:56:57.479> go 02:56:57.670 --> 02:56:57.680 align:start position:0% the end of the verb Vos means let's go 02:56:57.680 --> 02:56:59.469 align:start position:0% the end of the verb Vos means let's go out<02:56:58.040> or<02:56:58.279> let's<02:56:58.560> leave<02:56:58.960> if<02:56:59.040> you<02:56:59.120> want<02:56:59.239> to<02:56:59.359> be 02:56:59.469 --> 02:56:59.479 align:start position:0% out or let's leave if you want to be 02:56:59.479 --> 02:57:01.510 align:start position:0% out or let's leave if you want to be formal<02:56:59.960> and<02:57:00.120> a<02:57:00.200> lot<02:57:00.319> of<02:57:00.479> beginners<02:57:01.040> hear<02:57:01.359> this 02:57:01.510 --> 02:57:01.520 align:start position:0% formal and a lot of beginners hear this 02:57:01.520 --> 02:57:03.309 align:start position:0% formal and a lot of beginners hear this word<02:57:01.840> but<02:57:01.960> never<02:57:02.479> understand<02:57:02.680> what<02:57:02.800> it<02:57:02.920> means 02:57:03.309 --> 02:57:03.319 align:start position:0% word but never understand what it means 02:57:03.319 --> 02:57:04.750 align:start position:0% word but never understand what it means and<02:57:03.439> now<02:57:03.720> hopefully<02:57:04.040> you<02:57:04.399> understand<02:57:04.680> the 02:57:04.750 --> 02:57:04.760 align:start position:0% and now hopefully you understand the 02:57:04.760 --> 02:57:06.990 align:start position:0% and now hopefully you understand the reason<02:57:05.000> I<02:57:05.200> emphasized<02:57:05.760> vamos<02:57:06.239> so<02:57:06.479> much<02:57:06.880> is 02:57:06.990 --> 02:57:07.000 align:start position:0% reason I emphasized vamos so much is 02:57:07.000 --> 02:57:08.590 align:start position:0% reason I emphasized vamos so much is because<02:57:07.200> it<02:57:07.359> ties<02:57:07.680> back<02:57:07.840> to<02:57:08.040> the<02:57:08.160> reflexive 02:57:08.590 --> 02:57:08.600 align:start position:0% because it ties back to the reflexive 02:57:08.600 --> 02:57:10.910 align:start position:0% because it ties back to the reflexive verb<02:57:09.359> meaning<02:57:09.640> to<02:57:09.800> go<02:57:10.000> out<02:57:10.399> and<02:57:10.520> rather<02:57:10.760> than 02:57:10.910 --> 02:57:10.920 align:start position:0% verb meaning to go out and rather than 02:57:10.920 --> 02:57:12.830 align:start position:0% verb meaning to go out and rather than using<02:57:11.160> the<02:57:11.319> irregular<02:57:11.880> vamonos<02:57:12.439> form<02:57:12.720> you 02:57:12.830 --> 02:57:12.840 align:start position:0% using the irregular vamonos form you 02:57:12.840 --> 02:57:14.910 align:start position:0% using the irregular vamonos form you need<02:57:12.960> to<02:57:13.120> say<02:57:13.439> vamonos<02:57:14.080> in<02:57:14.200> the<02:57:14.359> negative 02:57:14.910 --> 02:57:14.920 align:start position:0% need to say vamonos in the negative 02:57:14.920 --> 02:57:16.670 align:start position:0% need to say vamonos in the negative however<02:57:15.319> we<02:57:15.479> have<02:57:15.600> to<02:57:15.720> use<02:57:16.000> the<02:57:16.160> irregular 02:57:16.670 --> 02:57:16.680 align:start position:0% however we have to use the irregular 02:57:16.680 --> 02:57:20.150 align:start position:0% however we have to use the irregular form<02:57:16.920> of<02:57:17.720> so<02:57:17.920> the<02:57:18.040> phrase<02:57:18.319> is<02:57:18.520> not<02:57:18.960> nonos<02:57:19.920> but 02:57:20.150 --> 02:57:20.160 align:start position:0% form of so the phrase is not nonos but 02:57:20.160 --> 02:57:22.950 align:start position:0% form of so the phrase is not nonos but rather<02:57:20.640> nonos<02:57:21.640> let's<02:57:21.840> not<02:57:22.160> go<02:57:22.319> out<02:57:22.720> this<02:57:22.840> is 02:57:22.950 --> 02:57:22.960 align:start position:0% rather nonos let's not go out this is 02:57:22.960 --> 02:57:26.110 align:start position:0% rather nonos let's not go out this is how<02:57:23.600> and<02:57:24.359> function<02:57:24.720> with<02:57:24.880> no's<02:57:25.359> commands<02:57:25.840> past 02:57:26.110 --> 02:57:26.120 align:start position:0% how and function with no's commands past 02:57:26.120 --> 02:57:28.190 align:start position:0% how and function with no's commands past participles<02:57:26.840> as<02:57:27.040> adjectives<02:57:27.439> in<02:57:27.640> Spanish<02:57:28.080> is 02:57:28.190 --> 02:57:28.200 align:start position:0% participles as adjectives in Spanish is 02:57:28.200 --> 02:57:30.229 align:start position:0% participles as adjectives in Spanish is a<02:57:28.319> form<02:57:28.520> of<02:57:28.600> a<02:57:28.760> verb<02:57:29.040> used<02:57:29.319> to<02:57:29.439> form<02:57:29.720> a<02:57:29.880> perfect 02:57:30.229 --> 02:57:30.239 align:start position:0% a form of a verb used to form a perfect 02:57:30.239 --> 02:57:32.229 align:start position:0% a form of a verb used to form a perfect or<02:57:30.399> a<02:57:30.560> passive<02:57:30.880> tense<02:57:31.279> as<02:57:31.439> an<02:57:31.600> adjective<02:57:32.080> in 02:57:32.229 --> 02:57:32.239 align:start position:0% or a passive tense as an adjective in 02:57:32.239 --> 02:57:34.190 align:start position:0% or a passive tense as an adjective in English<02:57:32.760> this<02:57:32.920> concept<02:57:33.239> is<02:57:33.399> very<02:57:33.640> simple 02:57:34.190 --> 02:57:34.200 align:start position:0% English this concept is very simple 02:57:34.200 --> 02:57:36.590 align:start position:0% English this concept is very simple because<02:57:34.439> most<02:57:34.680> verbs<02:57:35.000> often<02:57:35.279> end<02:57:35.479> in<02:57:35.680> ed<02:57:36.319> like 02:57:36.590 --> 02:57:36.600 align:start position:0% because most verbs often end in ed like 02:57:36.600 --> 02:57:38.670 align:start position:0% because most verbs often end in ed like talk<02:57:37.080> which<02:57:37.239> becomes<02:57:37.600> talked<02:57:38.120> clean<02:57:38.520> which 02:57:38.670 --> 02:57:38.680 align:start position:0% talk which becomes talked clean which 02:57:38.680 --> 02:57:40.670 align:start position:0% talk which becomes talked clean which becomes<02:57:39.000> cleaned<02:57:39.479> and<02:57:39.600> so<02:57:39.760> on<02:57:40.239> however<02:57:40.560> there 02:57:40.670 --> 02:57:40.680 align:start position:0% becomes cleaned and so on however there 02:57:40.680 --> 02:57:43.070 align:start position:0% becomes cleaned and so on however there are<02:57:40.880> irregular<02:57:41.359> verbs<02:57:41.640> in<02:57:41.760> English<02:57:42.319> like<02:57:42.640> buy 02:57:43.070 --> 02:57:43.080 align:start position:0% are irregular verbs in English like buy 02:57:43.080 --> 02:57:45.389 align:start position:0% are irregular verbs in English like buy Drive<02:57:43.600> speak<02:57:44.120> and<02:57:44.279> so<02:57:44.399> on<02:57:44.760> obviously<02:57:45.279> you 02:57:45.389 --> 02:57:45.399 align:start position:0% Drive speak and so on obviously you 02:57:45.399 --> 02:57:46.590 align:start position:0% Drive speak and so on obviously you don't<02:57:45.560> need<02:57:45.680> to<02:57:45.800> know<02:57:46.000> all<02:57:46.120> of<02:57:46.239> them<02:57:46.479> in 02:57:46.590 --> 02:57:46.600 align:start position:0% don't need to know all of them in 02:57:46.600 --> 02:57:48.309 align:start position:0% don't need to know all of them in Spanish<02:57:47.000> nonetheless<02:57:47.640> you<02:57:47.800> have<02:57:47.960> the<02:57:48.080> same 02:57:48.309 --> 02:57:48.319 align:start position:0% Spanish nonetheless you have the same 02:57:48.319 --> 02:57:50.229 align:start position:0% Spanish nonetheless you have the same concept<02:57:48.800> but<02:57:48.920> with<02:57:49.040> a<02:57:49.160> bit<02:57:49.319> more<02:57:49.520> variety<02:57:50.080> and 02:57:50.229 --> 02:57:50.239 align:start position:0% concept but with a bit more variety and 02:57:50.239 --> 02:57:52.190 align:start position:0% concept but with a bit more variety and just<02:57:50.359> a<02:57:50.479> few<02:57:50.680> irregular<02:57:51.200> verbs<02:57:51.640> that<02:57:51.720> are<02:57:51.960> easy 02:57:52.190 --> 02:57:52.200 align:start position:0% just a few irregular verbs that are easy 02:57:52.200 --> 02:57:54.349 align:start position:0% just a few irregular verbs that are easy to<02:57:52.319> memorize<02:57:52.880> for<02:57:53.080> regular<02:57:53.439> ar<02:57:53.880> verbs<02:57:54.239> the 02:57:54.349 --> 02:57:54.359 align:start position:0% to memorize for regular ar verbs the 02:57:54.359 --> 02:57:56.389 align:start position:0% to memorize for regular ar verbs the form<02:57:54.560> of<02:57:54.680> the<02:57:54.840> past<02:57:55.120> participle<02:57:55.720> is<02:57:55.880> achieved 02:57:56.389 --> 02:57:56.399 align:start position:0% form of the past participle is achieved 02:57:56.399 --> 02:57:58.070 align:start position:0% form of the past participle is achieved by<02:57:56.520> dropping<02:57:56.880> the<02:57:57.000> ending<02:57:57.520> and<02:57:57.640> putting<02:57:57.960> the 02:57:58.070 --> 02:57:58.080 align:start position:0% by dropping the ending and putting the 02:57:58.080 --> 02:58:01.309 align:start position:0% by dropping the ending and putting the ending<02:57:58.640> ad<02:57:59.160> like<02:57:59.439> abl<02:58:00.040> which<02:58:00.200> becomes<02:58:00.640> abl 02:58:01.309 --> 02:58:01.319 align:start position:0% ending ad like abl which becomes abl 02:58:01.319 --> 02:58:04.110 align:start position:0% ending ad like abl which becomes abl speak<02:58:01.800> to<02:58:01.960> spoken<02:58:02.399> for<02:58:02.600> regular<02:58:03.040> e<02:58:03.520> and<02:58:03.760> ir 02:58:04.110 --> 02:58:04.120 align:start position:0% speak to spoken for regular e and ir 02:58:04.120 --> 02:58:06.030 align:start position:0% speak to spoken for regular e and ir verbs<02:58:04.520> you<02:58:04.680> drop<02:58:04.920> the<02:58:05.040> ending<02:58:05.560> and<02:58:05.720> add<02:58:05.920> the 02:58:06.030 --> 02:58:06.040 align:start position:0% verbs you drop the ending and add the 02:58:06.040 --> 02:58:09.190 align:start position:0% verbs you drop the ending and add the ending<02:58:06.600> Ido<02:58:07.239> like<02:58:07.520> com<02:58:08.120> which<02:58:08.200> is<02:58:08.399> comido<02:58:09.000> and 02:58:09.190 --> 02:58:09.200 align:start position:0% ending Ido like com which is comido and 02:58:09.200 --> 02:58:11.510 align:start position:0% ending Ido like com which is comido and viid<02:58:09.720> which<02:58:09.800> is<02:58:10.000> vivido<02:58:10.479> meaning<02:58:10.840> eaten<02:58:11.319> and 02:58:11.510 --> 02:58:11.520 align:start position:0% viid which is vivido meaning eaten and 02:58:11.520 --> 02:58:13.190 align:start position:0% viid which is vivido meaning eaten and lived<02:58:11.960> in<02:58:12.080> case<02:58:12.239> you<02:58:12.319> want<02:58:12.399> to<02:58:12.520> use<02:58:12.760> any<02:58:12.960> other 02:58:13.190 --> 02:58:13.200 align:start position:0% lived in case you want to use any other 02:58:13.200 --> 02:58:16.150 align:start position:0% lived in case you want to use any other regular<02:58:13.520> verb<02:58:13.760> that<02:58:14.040> ends<02:58:14.239> in<02:58:14.359> a<02:58:14.520> r<02:58:14.800> e<02:58:15.000> r<02:58:15.319> or<02:58:15.640> I 02:58:16.150 --> 02:58:16.160 align:start position:0% regular verb that ends in a r e r or I 02:58:16.160 --> 02:58:17.750 align:start position:0% regular verb that ends in a r e r or I now<02:58:16.319> you<02:58:16.399> know<02:58:16.640> how<02:58:16.920> there<02:58:17.040> are<02:58:17.399> however 02:58:17.750 --> 02:58:17.760 align:start position:0% now you know how there are however 02:58:17.760 --> 02:58:19.990 align:start position:0% now you know how there are however irregular<02:58:18.319> verbs<02:58:18.720> that<02:58:18.880> require<02:58:19.279> an<02:58:19.560> accent 02:58:19.990 --> 02:58:20.000 align:start position:0% irregular verbs that require an accent 02:58:20.000 --> 02:58:22.750 align:start position:0% irregular verbs that require an accent on<02:58:20.200> the<02:58:20.359> E<02:58:20.680> primarily<02:58:21.160> e<02:58:21.359> r<02:58:21.600> and<02:58:21.760> ir<02:58:22.160> verbs<02:58:22.600> that 02:58:22.750 --> 02:58:22.760 align:start position:0% on the E primarily e r and ir verbs that 02:58:22.760 --> 02:58:26.190 align:start position:0% on the E primarily e r and ir verbs that end<02:58:23.000> with<02:58:23.200> two<02:58:23.439> vowels<02:58:24.080> like<02:58:25.040> which<02:58:25.200> becomes 02:58:26.190 --> 02:58:26.200 align:start position:0% end with two vowels like which becomes 02:58:26.200 --> 02:58:27.910 align:start position:0% end with two vowels like which becomes with<02:58:26.279> an<02:58:26.439> emphasis<02:58:26.880> on<02:58:27.120> the 02:58:27.910 --> 02:58:27.920 align:start position:0% with an emphasis on the 02:58:27.920 --> 02:58:29.830 align:start position:0% with an emphasis on the E<02:58:28.920> which 02:58:29.830 --> 02:58:29.840 align:start position:0% E which 02:58:29.840 --> 02:58:31.630 align:start position:0% E which becomes<02:58:30.840> which 02:58:31.630 --> 02:58:31.640 align:start position:0% becomes which 02:58:31.640 --> 02:58:33.429 align:start position:0% becomes which becomes<02:58:32.640> which 02:58:33.429 --> 02:58:33.439 align:start position:0% becomes which 02:58:33.439 --> 02:58:35.309 align:start position:0% becomes which becomes<02:58:34.439> which 02:58:35.309 --> 02:58:35.319 align:start position:0% becomes which 02:58:35.319 --> 02:58:37.150 align:start position:0% becomes which becomes<02:58:36.319> which 02:58:37.150 --> 02:58:37.160 align:start position:0% becomes which 02:58:37.160 --> 02:58:40.070 align:start position:0% becomes which becomes<02:58:38.160> which<02:58:38.359> becomes<02:58:39.359> of<02:58:39.479> course<02:58:39.840> there's 02:58:40.070 --> 02:58:40.080 align:start position:0% becomes which becomes of course there's 02:58:40.080 --> 02:58:41.790 align:start position:0% becomes which becomes of course there's other<02:58:40.279> verbs<02:58:40.560> in<02:58:40.720> Spanish<02:58:41.200> that<02:58:41.319> follow<02:58:41.640> this 02:58:41.790 --> 02:58:41.800 align:start position:0% other verbs in Spanish that follow this 02:58:41.800 --> 02:58:43.110 align:start position:0% other verbs in Spanish that follow this pattern<02:58:42.239> but<02:58:42.319> you<02:58:42.399> don't<02:58:42.560> need<02:58:42.680> to<02:58:42.800> know<02:58:43.000> all 02:58:43.110 --> 02:58:43.120 align:start position:0% pattern but you don't need to know all 02:58:43.120 --> 02:58:44.990 align:start position:0% pattern but you don't need to know all of<02:58:43.239> them<02:58:43.520> at<02:58:43.680> last<02:58:44.200> there<02:58:44.319> are<02:58:44.520> General 02:58:44.990 --> 02:58:45.000 align:start position:0% of them at last there are General 02:58:45.000 --> 02:58:47.469 align:start position:0% of them at last there are General irregular<02:58:45.520> verbs<02:58:45.920> used<02:58:46.279> as<02:58:46.520> past<02:58:46.800> participles 02:58:47.469 --> 02:58:47.479 align:start position:0% irregular verbs used as past participles 02:58:47.479 --> 02:58:54.550 align:start position:0% irregular verbs used as past participles and<02:58:47.680> these 02:58:54.550 --> 02:58:54.560 align:start position:0% 02:58:54.560 --> 02:58:56.990 align:start position:0% include<02:58:55.560> and<02:58:56.200> in<02:58:56.319> case<02:58:56.479> you<02:58:56.560> want<02:58:56.640> to<02:58:56.760> use 02:58:56.990 --> 02:58:57.000 align:start position:0% include and in case you want to use 02:58:57.000 --> 02:58:58.830 align:start position:0% include and in case you want to use these<02:58:57.160> verbs<02:58:57.520> as<02:58:57.720> adjectives<02:58:58.359> now<02:58:58.479> you<02:58:58.600> know 02:58:58.830 --> 02:58:58.840 align:start position:0% these verbs as adjectives now you know 02:58:58.840 --> 02:59:00.990 align:start position:0% these verbs as adjectives now you know how<02:58:59.279> however<02:58:59.600> in<02:58:59.800> Spanish<02:59:00.319> these<02:59:00.479> verbs<02:59:00.800> are 02:59:00.990 --> 02:59:01.000 align:start position:0% how however in Spanish these verbs are 02:59:01.000 --> 02:59:03.030 align:start position:0% how however in Spanish these verbs are often<02:59:01.319> used<02:59:01.720> with<02:59:01.840> the<02:59:01.960> verb<02:59:02.279> estar<02:59:02.840> because 02:59:03.030 --> 02:59:03.040 align:start position:0% often used with the verb estar because 02:59:03.040 --> 02:59:05.030 align:start position:0% often used with the verb estar because in<02:59:03.160> case<02:59:03.319> you<02:59:03.439> don't<02:59:03.640> remember<02:59:04.239> estar<02:59:04.720> is<02:59:04.840> used 02:59:05.030 --> 02:59:05.040 align:start position:0% in case you don't remember estar is used 02:59:05.040 --> 02:59:06.590 align:start position:0% in case you don't remember estar is used to<02:59:05.200> describe<02:59:05.560> the<02:59:05.840> condition<02:59:06.040> of<02:59:06.239> things 02:59:06.590 --> 02:59:06.600 align:start position:0% to describe the condition of things 02:59:06.600 --> 02:59:08.870 align:start position:0% to describe the condition of things temporarily<02:59:07.399> when<02:59:07.520> we<02:59:07.640> use<02:59:07.960> past<02:59:08.239> participles 02:59:08.870 --> 02:59:08.880 align:start position:0% temporarily when we use past participles 02:59:08.880 --> 02:59:10.990 align:start position:0% temporarily when we use past participles as<02:59:09.120> adjectives<02:59:09.680> we're<02:59:09.880> using<02:59:10.279> adjectives<02:59:10.800> to 02:59:10.990 --> 02:59:11.000 align:start position:0% as adjectives we're using adjectives to 02:59:11.000 --> 02:59:12.830 align:start position:0% as adjectives we're using adjectives to describe<02:59:11.439> something<02:59:11.840> for<02:59:12.080> the<02:59:12.200> moment<02:59:12.680> in 02:59:12.830 --> 02:59:12.840 align:start position:0% describe something for the moment in 02:59:12.840 --> 02:59:14.790 align:start position:0% describe something for the moment in Spanish<02:59:13.279> gender<02:59:13.600> and<02:59:13.920> plurality<02:59:14.520> have<02:59:14.640> to 02:59:14.790 --> 02:59:14.800 align:start position:0% Spanish gender and plurality have to 02:59:14.800 --> 02:59:16.590 align:start position:0% Spanish gender and plurality have to match<02:59:15.080> in<02:59:15.200> the<02:59:15.359> sentence<02:59:15.840> and<02:59:16.000> here<02:59:16.160> are<02:59:16.359> some 02:59:16.590 --> 02:59:16.600 align:start position:0% match in the sentence and here are some 02:59:16.600 --> 02:59:18.670 align:start position:0% match in the sentence and here are some examples<02:59:17.160> saying<02:59:17.479> something<02:59:17.840> like<02:59:18.160> I<02:59:18.319> close 02:59:18.670 --> 02:59:18.680 align:start position:0% examples saying something like I close 02:59:18.680 --> 02:59:20.429 align:start position:0% examples saying something like I close the<02:59:18.840> door<02:59:19.279> would 02:59:20.429 --> 02:59:20.439 align:start position:0% the door would 02:59:20.439 --> 02:59:23.070 align:start position:0% the door would be<02:59:21.439> but<02:59:21.600> another<02:59:21.880> way<02:59:22.000> to<02:59:22.120> say<02:59:22.319> the<02:59:22.479> sentence 02:59:23.070 --> 02:59:23.080 align:start position:0% be but another way to say the sentence 02:59:23.080 --> 02:59:25.429 align:start position:0% be but another way to say the sentence is<02:59:23.439> the<02:59:23.640> door<02:59:23.920> is 02:59:25.429 --> 02:59:25.439 align:start position:0% is the door is 02:59:25.439 --> 02:59:27.630 align:start position:0% is the door is closed<02:59:26.439> and<02:59:26.640> as<02:59:26.720> you<02:59:26.840> can<02:59:26.960> see<02:59:27.239> we're<02:59:27.399> using 02:59:27.630 --> 02:59:27.640 align:start position:0% closed and as you can see we're using 02:59:27.640 --> 02:59:29.750 align:start position:0% closed and as you can see we're using the<02:59:27.760> verb<02:59:28.520> to<02:59:28.680> describe<02:59:29.040> the<02:59:29.359> condition<02:59:29.600> of 02:59:29.750 --> 02:59:29.760 align:start position:0% the verb to describe the condition of 02:59:29.760 --> 02:59:32.229 align:start position:0% the verb to describe the condition of the<02:59:29.960> door<02:59:30.319> with<02:59:30.600> s<02:59:31.239> being<02:59:31.479> the<02:59:31.640> adjective<02:59:32.120> that 02:59:32.229 --> 02:59:32.239 align:start position:0% the door with s being the adjective that 02:59:32.239 --> 02:59:34.070 align:start position:0% the door with s being the adjective that matches<02:59:32.560> the<02:59:32.680> gender<02:59:33.080> hence<02:59:33.359> puera<02:59:33.840> is<02:59:33.920> a 02:59:34.070 --> 02:59:34.080 align:start position:0% matches the gender hence puera is a 02:59:34.080 --> 02:59:35.750 align:start position:0% matches the gender hence puera is a feminine<02:59:34.479> word<02:59:34.840> Additionally<02:59:35.479> you<02:59:35.560> don't 02:59:35.750 --> 02:59:35.760 align:start position:0% feminine word Additionally you don't 02:59:35.760 --> 02:59:37.550 align:start position:0% feminine word Additionally you don't have<02:59:35.880> to<02:59:36.000> use<02:59:36.200> the<02:59:36.319> verb<02:59:36.600> EST<02:59:37.080> when<02:59:37.239> writing 02:59:37.550 --> 02:59:37.560 align:start position:0% have to use the verb EST when writing 02:59:37.560 --> 02:59:39.630 align:start position:0% have to use the verb EST when writing such<02:59:37.720> a<02:59:37.880> sentence<02:59:38.439> instead<02:59:38.840> we<02:59:38.960> can<02:59:39.160> just<02:59:39.319> say 02:59:39.630 --> 02:59:39.640 align:start position:0% such a sentence instead we can just say 02:59:39.640 --> 02:59:42.590 align:start position:0% such a sentence instead we can just say the<02:59:39.840> closed<02:59:40.319> door<02:59:40.720> which<02:59:40.840> would<02:59:41.000> be<02:59:41.479> LA<02:59:42.479> and 02:59:42.590 --> 02:59:42.600 align:start position:0% the closed door which would be LA and 02:59:42.600 --> 02:59:44.190 align:start position:0% the closed door which would be LA and because<02:59:42.800> we're<02:59:42.960> using<02:59:43.200> a<02:59:43.359> past<02:59:43.520> participle<02:59:44.040> le 02:59:44.190 --> 02:59:44.200 align:start position:0% because we're using a past participle le 02:59:44.200 --> 02:59:46.150 align:start position:0% because we're using a past participle le as<02:59:44.319> an<02:59:44.520> adjective<02:59:45.080> we<02:59:45.200> have<02:59:45.319> to<02:59:45.479> put<02:59:45.640> it<02:59:45.920> after 02:59:46.150 --> 02:59:46.160 align:start position:0% as an adjective we have to put it after 02:59:46.160 --> 02:59:48.030 align:start position:0% as an adjective we have to put it after the<02:59:46.319> noun<02:59:46.760> because<02:59:46.960> it's<02:59:47.080> a<02:59:47.160> rule<02:59:47.359> in<02:59:47.560> Spanish 02:59:48.030 --> 02:59:48.040 align:start position:0% the noun because it's a rule in Spanish 02:59:48.040 --> 02:59:49.910 align:start position:0% the noun because it's a rule in Spanish and<02:59:48.200> basically<02:59:48.720> the<02:59:48.840> same<02:59:49.040> idea<02:59:49.479> applies<02:59:49.760> to 02:59:49.910 --> 02:59:49.920 align:start position:0% and basically the same idea applies to 02:59:49.920 --> 02:59:51.309 align:start position:0% and basically the same idea applies to any<02:59:50.080> sentence<02:59:50.399> you<02:59:50.520> want<02:59:50.600> to<02:59:50.760> say<02:59:51.080> and<02:59:51.200> here 02:59:51.309 --> 02:59:51.319 align:start position:0% any sentence you want to say and here 02:59:51.319 --> 02:59:52.950 align:start position:0% any sentence you want to say and here are<02:59:51.479> some<02:59:51.720> examples<02:59:52.279> how<02:59:52.399> would<02:59:52.520> you<02:59:52.600> say<02:59:52.800> the 02:59:52.950 --> 02:59:52.960 align:start position:0% are some examples how would you say the 02:59:52.960 --> 02:59:55.790 align:start position:0% are some examples how would you say the phrase<02:59:53.399> the<02:59:53.560> book<02:59:53.840> is 02:59:55.790 --> 02:59:55.800 align:start position:0% phrase the book is 02:59:55.800 --> 02:59:57.990 align:start position:0% phrase the book is open<02:59:56.800> and<02:59:56.960> now<02:59:57.239> how<02:59:57.359> would<02:59:57.479> you<02:59:57.560> say<02:59:57.840> this 02:59:57.990 --> 02:59:58.000 align:start position:0% open and now how would you say this 02:59:58.000 --> 03:00:00.229 align:start position:0% open and now how would you say this phrase<02:59:58.479> without 03:00:00.229 --> 03:00:00.239 align:start position:0% phrase without 03:00:00.239 --> 03:00:03.429 align:start position:0% phrase without aarto<03:00:01.239> meaning<03:00:01.560> the<03:00:01.720> opened<03:00:02.200> book<03:00:02.560> with<03:00:02.760> abto 03:00:03.429 --> 03:00:03.439 align:start position:0% aarto meaning the opened book with abto 03:00:03.439 --> 03:00:05.309 align:start position:0% aarto meaning the opened book with abto being<03:00:03.640> an<03:00:03.880> irregular<03:00:04.520> adjective<03:00:05.080> how<03:00:05.160> would 03:00:05.309 --> 03:00:05.319 align:start position:0% being an irregular adjective how would 03:00:05.319 --> 03:00:08.550 align:start position:0% being an irregular adjective how would you<03:00:05.399> say<03:00:05.600> the<03:00:05.800> texts<03:00:06.200> are<03:00:06.520> written 03:00:08.550 --> 03:00:08.560 align:start position:0% you say the texts are written 03:00:08.560 --> 03:00:10.710 align:start position:0% you say the texts are written texos<03:00:09.560> and<03:00:09.720> now<03:00:10.000> how<03:00:10.120> would<03:00:10.239> you<03:00:10.359> say<03:00:10.560> this 03:00:10.710 --> 03:00:10.720 align:start position:0% texos and now how would you say this 03:00:10.720 --> 03:00:12.750 align:start position:0% texos and now how would you say this phrase<03:00:11.160> without 03:00:12.750 --> 03:00:12.760 align:start position:0% phrase without 03:00:12.760 --> 03:00:16.150 align:start position:0% phrase without AAR<03:00:14.200> the<03:00:14.359> written<03:00:14.720> text<03:00:15.279> how<03:00:15.399> would<03:00:15.520> you<03:00:15.680> say 03:00:16.150 --> 03:00:16.160 align:start position:0% AAR the written text how would you say 03:00:16.160 --> 03:00:18.309 align:start position:0% AAR the written text how would you say the<03:00:16.319> bed<03:00:16.600> is 03:00:18.309 --> 03:00:18.319 align:start position:0% the bed is 03:00:18.319 --> 03:00:21.910 align:start position:0% the bed is made<03:00:19.520> or<03:00:20.520> meaning<03:00:20.840> the<03:00:21.000> made<03:00:21.279> bed<03:00:21.640> how<03:00:21.800> would 03:00:21.910 --> 03:00:21.920 align:start position:0% made or meaning the made bed how would 03:00:21.920 --> 03:00:25.349 align:start position:0% made or meaning the made bed how would you<03:00:22.080> say<03:00:22.399> the<03:00:22.600> problem<03:00:22.960> is 03:00:25.349 --> 03:00:25.359 align:start position:0% 03:00:25.359 --> 03:00:27.229 align:start position:0% resolved 03:00:27.229 --> 03:00:27.239 align:start position:0% resolved 03:00:27.239 --> 03:00:29.790 align:start position:0% resolved or<03:00:28.239> the<03:00:28.399> resolved<03:00:29.000> problem<03:00:29.399> how<03:00:29.520> would<03:00:29.640> you 03:00:29.790 --> 03:00:29.800 align:start position:0% or the resolved problem how would you 03:00:29.800 --> 03:00:33.670 align:start position:0% or the resolved problem how would you say<03:00:30.239> my<03:00:30.439> answers<03:00:30.840> are 03:00:33.670 --> 03:00:33.680 align:start position:0% 03:00:33.680 --> 03:00:35.950 align:start position:0% completed 03:00:35.950 --> 03:00:35.960 align:start position:0% completed 03:00:35.960 --> 03:00:38.550 align:start position:0% completed or<03:00:36.960> my<03:00:37.120> completed<03:00:37.560> answers<03:00:38.120> and<03:00:38.200> here's<03:00:38.399> a 03:00:38.550 --> 03:00:38.560 align:start position:0% or my completed answers and here's a 03:00:38.560 --> 03:00:40.269 align:start position:0% or my completed answers and here's a very<03:00:38.760> interesting<03:00:39.120> one<03:00:39.439> how<03:00:39.560> would<03:00:39.680> you<03:00:39.880> say 03:00:40.269 --> 03:00:40.279 align:start position:0% very interesting one how would you say 03:00:40.279 --> 03:00:42.110 align:start position:0% very interesting one how would you say the<03:00:40.479> day<03:00:40.720> is 03:00:42.110 --> 03:00:42.120 align:start position:0% the day is 03:00:42.120 --> 03:00:44.710 align:start position:0% the day is dead<03:00:43.120> now<03:00:43.319> how<03:00:43.399> would<03:00:43.520> you<03:00:43.600> say<03:00:43.840> say<03:00:44.200> the<03:00:44.399> dead 03:00:44.710 --> 03:00:44.720 align:start position:0% dead now how would you say say the dead 03:00:44.720 --> 03:00:47.269 align:start position:0% dead now how would you say say the dead day<03:00:45.160> El<03:00:45.760> muerto<03:00:46.279> hopefully<03:00:46.840> you<03:00:46.960> can<03:00:47.080> see 03:00:47.269 --> 03:00:47.279 align:start position:0% day El muerto hopefully you can see 03:00:47.279 --> 03:00:48.830 align:start position:0% day El muerto hopefully you can see where<03:00:47.399> I'm<03:00:47.520> going<03:00:47.760> with<03:00:47.920> this<03:00:48.200> and<03:00:48.359> if<03:00:48.520> not 03:00:48.830 --> 03:00:48.840 align:start position:0% where I'm going with this and if not 03:00:48.840 --> 03:00:50.790 align:start position:0% where I'm going with this and if not what<03:00:48.960> I'm<03:00:49.080> trying<03:00:49.319> to<03:00:49.479> say<03:00:49.920> is<03:00:50.120> the<03:00:50.279> Day<03:00:50.479> of<03:00:50.640> the 03:00:50.790 --> 03:00:50.800 align:start position:0% what I'm trying to say is the Day of the 03:00:50.800 --> 03:00:52.630 align:start position:0% what I'm trying to say is the Day of the Dead<03:00:51.080> which<03:00:51.160> is<03:00:51.239> a<03:00:51.359> famous<03:00:51.680> Mexican<03:00:52.120> holiday 03:00:52.630 --> 03:00:52.640 align:start position:0% Dead which is a famous Mexican holiday 03:00:52.640 --> 03:00:54.110 align:start position:0% Dead which is a famous Mexican holiday that<03:00:52.760> people<03:00:53.000> hear<03:00:53.239> about<03:00:53.560> how<03:00:53.680> would<03:00:53.800> you<03:00:53.920> say 03:00:54.110 --> 03:00:54.120 align:start position:0% that people hear about how would you say 03:00:54.120 --> 03:00:55.469 align:start position:0% that people hear about how would you say this<03:00:54.279> phrase<03:00:54.600> in 03:00:55.469 --> 03:00:55.479 align:start position:0% this phrase in 03:00:55.479 --> 03:00:58.950 align:start position:0% this phrase in Spanish<03:00:56.479> de<03:00:56.800> muos<03:00:57.399> The<03:00:57.560> Day<03:00:57.760> of<03:00:57.880> the<03:00:58.040> Dead<03:00:58.399> muos 03:00:58.950 --> 03:00:58.960 align:start position:0% Spanish de muos The Day of the Dead muos 03:00:58.960 --> 03:01:00.790 align:start position:0% Spanish de muos The Day of the Dead muos is<03:00:59.080> a<03:00:59.239> past<03:00:59.479> participle<03:01:00.160> used<03:01:00.439> as<03:01:00.600> an 03:01:00.790 --> 03:01:00.800 align:start position:0% is a past participle used as an 03:01:00.800 --> 03:01:02.469 align:start position:0% is a past participle used as an adjective<03:01:01.239> that's<03:01:01.479> plural<03:01:02.000> and<03:01:02.160> now 03:01:02.469 --> 03:01:02.479 align:start position:0% adjective that's plural and now 03:01:02.479 --> 03:01:03.830 align:start position:0% adjective that's plural and now hopefully<03:01:02.800> you<03:01:03.200> understand<03:01:03.520> what<03:01:03.680> this 03:01:03.830 --> 03:01:03.840 align:start position:0% hopefully you understand what this 03:01:03.840 --> 03:01:05.630 align:start position:0% hopefully you understand what this phrase<03:01:04.080> means<03:01:04.520> and<03:01:04.720> here<03:01:04.960> I<03:01:05.040> want<03:01:05.160> to<03:01:05.239> show<03:01:05.479> one 03:01:05.630 --> 03:01:05.640 align:start position:0% phrase means and here I want to show one 03:01:05.640 --> 03:01:07.309 align:start position:0% phrase means and here I want to show one personal<03:01:06.120> concept<03:01:06.560> that<03:01:06.680> I<03:01:06.800> used<03:01:06.960> to<03:01:07.120> think 03:01:07.309 --> 03:01:07.319 align:start position:0% personal concept that I used to think 03:01:07.319 --> 03:01:08.750 align:start position:0% personal concept that I used to think about<03:01:07.680> when<03:01:07.800> I<03:01:07.880> was<03:01:07.960> learning<03:01:08.279> Spanish 03:01:08.750 --> 03:01:08.760 align:start position:0% about when I was learning Spanish 03:01:08.760 --> 03:01:10.590 align:start position:0% about when I was learning Spanish through<03:01:09.000> English<03:01:09.479> in<03:01:09.680> English<03:01:10.200> I<03:01:10.279> used<03:01:10.479> to 03:01:10.590 --> 03:01:10.600 align:start position:0% through English in English I used to 03:01:10.600 --> 03:01:12.750 align:start position:0% through English in English I used to think<03:01:10.760> of<03:01:10.920> phrases<03:01:11.399> like<03:01:11.760> I<03:01:11.880> finished<03:01:12.439> and<03:01:12.640> I 03:01:12.750 --> 03:01:12.760 align:start position:0% think of phrases like I finished and I 03:01:12.760 --> 03:01:14.670 align:start position:0% think of phrases like I finished and I am<03:01:12.920> finished<03:01:13.359> looking<03:01:13.800> at<03:01:13.920> these<03:01:14.080> phrases<03:01:14.560> I 03:01:14.670 --> 03:01:14.680 align:start position:0% am finished looking at these phrases I 03:01:14.680 --> 03:01:16.550 align:start position:0% am finished looking at these phrases I used<03:01:14.840> to<03:01:15.000> think<03:01:15.319> that<03:01:15.479> the<03:01:15.600> same<03:01:15.880> concept<03:01:16.279> work 03:01:16.550 --> 03:01:16.560 align:start position:0% used to think that the same concept work 03:01:16.560 --> 03:01:18.229 align:start position:0% used to think that the same concept work in<03:01:16.720> Spanish<03:01:17.200> because<03:01:17.439> English<03:01:17.760> has<03:01:17.920> the<03:01:18.040> same 03:01:18.229 --> 03:01:18.239 align:start position:0% in Spanish because English has the same 03:01:18.239 --> 03:01:20.349 align:start position:0% in Spanish because English has the same word<03:01:18.520> for<03:01:18.760> finished<03:01:19.200> in<03:01:19.319> the<03:01:19.439> two<03:01:19.640> sentences 03:01:20.349 --> 03:01:20.359 align:start position:0% word for finished in the two sentences 03:01:20.359 --> 03:01:21.910 align:start position:0% word for finished in the two sentences therefore<03:01:20.920> I<03:01:21.000> thought<03:01:21.200> that<03:01:21.319> the<03:01:21.439> way<03:01:21.560> you<03:01:21.720> say 03:01:21.910 --> 03:01:21.920 align:start position:0% therefore I thought that the way you say 03:01:21.920 --> 03:01:25.990 align:start position:0% therefore I thought that the way you say the<03:01:22.040> phrases<03:01:22.319> in<03:01:22.520> Spanish<03:01:23.359> is<03:01:24.800> and<03:01:25.800> and<03:01:25.920> the 03:01:25.990 --> 03:01:26.000 align:start position:0% the phrases in Spanish is and and the 03:01:26.000 --> 03:01:27.670 align:start position:0% the phrases in Spanish is and and the reason<03:01:26.239> why<03:01:26.399> I<03:01:26.520> thought<03:01:26.800> this<03:01:27.000> way<03:01:27.319> is<03:01:27.439> because 03:01:27.670 --> 03:01:27.680 align:start position:0% reason why I thought this way is because 03:01:27.680 --> 03:01:29.150 align:start position:0% reason why I thought this way is because the<03:01:27.760> word<03:01:28.000> finished<03:01:28.520> doesn't<03:01:28.760> change<03:01:29.000> in 03:01:29.150 --> 03:01:29.160 align:start position:0% the word finished doesn't change in 03:01:29.160 --> 03:01:30.590 align:start position:0% the word finished doesn't change in English<03:01:29.560> so<03:01:29.720> it<03:01:29.840> must<03:01:30.040> be<03:01:30.200> the<03:01:30.279> same<03:01:30.439> in 03:01:30.590 --> 03:01:30.600 align:start position:0% English so it must be the same in 03:01:30.600 --> 03:01:32.790 align:start position:0% English so it must be the same in Spanish<03:01:31.279> however<03:01:31.640> because<03:01:32.000> at<03:01:32.160> the<03:01:32.359> time<03:01:32.720> I 03:01:32.790 --> 03:01:32.800 align:start position:0% Spanish however because at the time I 03:01:32.800 --> 03:01:34.389 align:start position:0% Spanish however because at the time I haven't<03:01:33.040> learned<03:01:33.399> past<03:01:33.600> participles<03:01:34.200> yet 03:01:34.389 --> 03:01:34.399 align:start position:0% haven't learned past participles yet 03:01:34.399 --> 03:01:35.910 align:start position:0% haven't learned past participles yet this<03:01:34.479> is<03:01:34.640> where<03:01:34.880> I<03:01:35.080> realized<03:01:35.680> that<03:01:35.800> the 03:01:35.910 --> 03:01:35.920 align:start position:0% this is where I realized that the 03:01:35.920 --> 03:01:40.030 align:start position:0% this is where I realized that the phrases<03:01:36.279> are<03:01:36.640> Y<03:01:37.439> and<03:01:37.880> ymin<03:01:38.880> with<03:01:39.040> termin<03:01:39.720> being 03:01:40.030 --> 03:01:40.040 align:start position:0% phrases are Y and ymin with termin being 03:01:40.040 --> 03:01:41.670 align:start position:0% phrases are Y and ymin with termin being the<03:01:40.200> adjective<03:01:40.640> and<03:01:40.800> here<03:01:41.120> my<03:01:41.279> thinking 03:01:41.670 --> 03:01:41.680 align:start position:0% the adjective and here my thinking 03:01:41.680 --> 03:01:43.790 align:start position:0% the adjective and here my thinking process<03:01:42.040> changed<03:01:42.560> because<03:01:42.800> I<03:01:42.960> realized<03:01:43.640> why 03:01:43.790 --> 03:01:43.800 align:start position:0% process changed because I realized why 03:01:43.800 --> 03:01:45.469 align:start position:0% process changed because I realized why English<03:01:44.080> is<03:01:44.200> a<03:01:44.319> simple<03:01:44.640> language<03:01:45.160> especially 03:01:45.469 --> 03:01:45.479 align:start position:0% English is a simple language especially 03:01:45.479 --> 03:01:47.150 align:start position:0% English is a simple language especially when<03:01:45.600> it's<03:01:45.760> compared<03:01:46.080> to<03:01:46.239> Spanish<03:01:46.760> in<03:01:46.920> these 03:01:47.150 --> 03:01:47.160 align:start position:0% when it's compared to Spanish in these 03:01:47.160 --> 03:01:48.750 align:start position:0% when it's compared to Spanish in these cases<03:01:47.560> you<03:01:47.680> have<03:01:47.800> to<03:01:47.960> watch<03:01:48.120> out<03:01:48.319> for<03:01:48.560> these 03:01:48.750 --> 03:01:48.760 align:start position:0% cases you have to watch out for these 03:01:48.760 --> 03:01:50.469 align:start position:0% cases you have to watch out for these ideas<03:01:49.239> when<03:01:49.359> you<03:01:49.439> learn<03:01:49.720> languages<03:01:50.279> because 03:01:50.469 --> 03:01:50.479 align:start position:0% ideas when you learn languages because 03:01:50.479 --> 03:01:52.110 align:start position:0% ideas when you learn languages because it<03:01:50.560> teaches<03:01:50.840> you<03:01:50.960> how<03:01:51.080> to<03:01:51.239> think<03:01:51.439> properly<03:01:51.920> so 03:01:52.110 --> 03:01:52.120 align:start position:0% it teaches you how to think properly so 03:01:52.120 --> 03:01:53.750 align:start position:0% it teaches you how to think properly so that's<03:01:52.279> it<03:01:52.560> the<03:01:52.720> present<03:01:53.040> perfect<03:01:53.319> tense<03:01:53.560> in 03:01:53.750 --> 03:01:53.760 align:start position:0% that's it the present perfect tense in 03:01:53.760 --> 03:01:55.429 align:start position:0% that's it the present perfect tense in Spanish<03:01:54.239> is<03:01:54.399> the<03:01:54.520> English<03:01:54.880> version<03:01:55.279> of 03:01:55.429 --> 03:01:55.439 align:start position:0% Spanish is the English version of 03:01:55.439 --> 03:01:56.870 align:start position:0% Spanish is the English version of talking<03:01:55.720> about<03:01:56.000> something<03:01:56.279> that<03:01:56.399> someone<03:01:56.720> has 03:01:56.870 --> 03:01:56.880 align:start position:0% talking about something that someone has 03:01:56.880 --> 03:01:58.790 align:start position:0% talking about something that someone has done<03:01:57.200> using<03:01:57.479> the<03:01:57.600> verb<03:01:57.800> to<03:01:58.000> have<03:01:58.319> along<03:01:58.560> with 03:01:58.790 --> 03:01:58.800 align:start position:0% done using the verb to have along with 03:01:58.800 --> 03:02:00.349 align:start position:0% done using the verb to have along with past<03:01:59.040> participles<03:01:59.720> you<03:01:59.800> can<03:01:59.960> generate 03:02:00.349 --> 03:02:00.359 align:start position:0% past participles you can generate 03:02:00.359 --> 03:02:02.429 align:start position:0% past participles you can generate sentences<03:02:01.040> like<03:02:01.359> I<03:02:01.479> have<03:02:01.680> talked<03:02:02.080> you<03:02:02.279> have 03:02:02.429 --> 03:02:02.439 align:start position:0% sentences like I have talked you have 03:02:02.439 --> 03:02:04.950 align:start position:0% sentences like I have talked you have eaten<03:02:03.000> he<03:02:03.200> has<03:02:03.399> left<03:02:03.760> and<03:02:03.880> so<03:02:04.040> on<03:02:04.319> in<03:02:04.439> Spanish 03:02:04.950 --> 03:02:04.960 align:start position:0% eaten he has left and so on in Spanish 03:02:04.960 --> 03:02:06.750 align:start position:0% eaten he has left and so on in Spanish you<03:02:05.120> have<03:02:05.279> the<03:02:05.399> same<03:02:05.680> concept<03:02:06.040> of<03:02:06.239> this<03:02:06.399> tense 03:02:06.750 --> 03:02:06.760 align:start position:0% you have the same concept of this tense 03:02:06.760 --> 03:02:08.710 align:start position:0% you have the same concept of this tense using<03:02:07.040> the<03:02:07.160> verb<03:02:07.439> AB<03:02:07.800> meaning<03:02:08.080> to<03:02:08.239> have<03:02:08.399> done 03:02:08.710 --> 03:02:08.720 align:start position:0% using the verb AB meaning to have done 03:02:08.720 --> 03:02:10.349 align:start position:0% using the verb AB meaning to have done something<03:02:09.239> which<03:02:09.399> needs<03:02:09.560> to<03:02:09.680> be<03:02:09.840> conjugated 03:02:10.349 --> 03:02:10.359 align:start position:0% something which needs to be conjugated 03:02:10.359 --> 03:02:11.870 align:start position:0% something which needs to be conjugated the<03:02:10.560> proper<03:02:10.840> way<03:02:11.160> along<03:02:11.439> with<03:02:11.640> past 03:02:11.870 --> 03:02:11.880 align:start position:0% the proper way along with past 03:02:11.880 --> 03:02:13.870 align:start position:0% the proper way along with past participles<03:02:12.560> in<03:02:12.720> Spanish<03:02:13.120> you<03:02:13.279> have<03:02:13.640> six 03:02:13.870 --> 03:02:13.880 align:start position:0% participles in Spanish you have six 03:02:13.880 --> 03:02:17.309 align:start position:0% participles in Spanish you have six conjugations<03:02:14.600> of<03:02:14.840> a<03:02:15.359> y<03:02:15.960> means<03:02:16.399> I<03:02:16.600> have<03:02:17.040> plus 03:02:17.309 --> 03:02:17.319 align:start position:0% conjugations of a y means I have plus 03:02:17.319 --> 03:02:19.990 align:start position:0% conjugations of a y means I have plus any<03:02:17.560> past<03:02:17.800> participle<03:02:18.279> you<03:02:18.399> want<03:02:18.800> to<03:02:19.160> as<03:02:19.600> means 03:02:19.990 --> 03:02:20.000 align:start position:0% any past participle you want to as means 03:02:20.000 --> 03:02:24.309 align:start position:0% any past participle you want to as means you<03:02:20.239> have<03:02:20.640> l<03:02:21.319> means<03:02:21.840> he<03:02:22.080> has<03:02:22.479> noos<03:02:23.160> OS<03:02:23.760> we<03:02:23.960> have 03:02:24.309 --> 03:02:24.319 align:start position:0% you have l means he has noos OS we have 03:02:24.319 --> 03:02:27.790 align:start position:0% you have l means he has noos OS we have Vos<03:02:25.000> AB<03:02:25.720> y'all<03:02:26.040> have<03:02:26.359> and<03:02:26.560> AOS<03:02:27.040> an<03:02:27.399> they<03:02:27.560> have 03:02:27.790 --> 03:02:27.800 align:start position:0% Vos AB y'all have and AOS an they have 03:02:27.800 --> 03:02:29.510 align:start position:0% Vos AB y'all have and AOS an they have try<03:02:28.000> not<03:02:28.200> focusing<03:02:28.560> on<03:02:28.760> these<03:02:28.960> pronouns 03:02:29.510 --> 03:02:29.520 align:start position:0% try not focusing on these pronouns 03:02:29.520 --> 03:02:30.750 align:start position:0% try not focusing on these pronouns because<03:02:29.760> they're<03:02:29.880> not<03:02:30.080> that<03:02:30.200> useful<03:02:30.560> in 03:02:30.750 --> 03:02:30.760 align:start position:0% because they're not that useful in 03:02:30.760 --> 03:02:32.030 align:start position:0% because they're not that useful in conversation<03:02:31.439> like<03:02:31.560> I<03:02:31.680> said<03:02:31.800> at<03:02:31.920> the 03:02:32.030 --> 03:02:32.040 align:start position:0% conversation like I said at the 03:02:32.040 --> 03:02:33.349 align:start position:0% conversation like I said at the beginning<03:02:32.479> you<03:02:32.600> need<03:02:32.720> to<03:02:32.840> use<03:02:33.120> past 03:02:33.349 --> 03:02:33.359 align:start position:0% beginning you need to use past 03:02:33.359 --> 03:02:35.389 align:start position:0% beginning you need to use past participles<03:02:34.040> in<03:02:34.120> order<03:02:34.399> to<03:02:34.520> demonstrate<03:02:35.160> an 03:02:35.389 --> 03:02:35.399 align:start position:0% participles in order to demonstrate an 03:02:35.399 --> 03:02:36.910 align:start position:0% participles in order to demonstrate an action<03:02:35.680> in<03:02:35.840> the<03:02:35.960> present<03:02:36.279> perfect<03:02:36.720> for 03:02:36.910 --> 03:02:36.920 align:start position:0% action in the present perfect for 03:02:36.920 --> 03:02:39.870 align:start position:0% action in the present perfect for instance<03:02:37.439> saying<03:02:38.000> yo<03:02:38.560> abl<03:02:39.200> means<03:02:39.600> I<03:02:39.720> have 03:02:39.870 --> 03:02:39.880 align:start position:0% instance saying yo abl means I have 03:02:39.880 --> 03:02:42.309 align:start position:0% instance saying yo abl means I have spoken<03:02:40.520> with<03:02:40.800> e<03:02:41.080> being<03:02:41.279> the<03:02:41.479> conjugation<03:02:42.160> that 03:02:42.309 --> 03:02:42.319 align:start position:0% spoken with e being the conjugation that 03:02:42.319 --> 03:02:44.510 align:start position:0% spoken with e being the conjugation that matches<03:02:42.600> the<03:02:42.760> yo<03:02:42.960> pronoun<03:02:43.399> and<03:02:43.560> and<03:02:43.720> abl<03:02:44.279> being 03:02:44.510 --> 03:02:44.520 align:start position:0% matches the yo pronoun and and abl being 03:02:44.520 --> 03:02:46.429 align:start position:0% matches the yo pronoun and and abl being the<03:02:44.720> past<03:02:44.960> participle<03:02:45.520> Additionally<03:02:46.160> you<03:02:46.279> can 03:02:46.429 --> 03:02:46.439 align:start position:0% the past participle Additionally you can 03:02:46.439 --> 03:02:48.590 align:start position:0% the past participle Additionally you can say<03:02:46.840> to<03:02:47.160> asido 03:02:48.590 --> 03:02:48.600 align:start position:0% say to asido 03:02:48.600 --> 03:02:51.510 align:start position:0% say to asido Ando<03:02:49.600> meaning<03:02:49.960> you<03:02:50.160> have<03:02:50.359> eaten<03:02:50.880> and<03:02:51.080> he<03:02:51.239> has 03:02:51.510 --> 03:02:51.520 align:start position:0% Ando meaning you have eaten and he has 03:02:51.520 --> 03:02:52.750 align:start position:0% Ando meaning you have eaten and he has read<03:02:51.840> again<03:02:52.000> showing<03:02:52.319> the<03:02:52.479> proper 03:02:52.750 --> 03:02:52.760 align:start position:0% read again showing the proper 03:02:52.760 --> 03:02:55.110 align:start position:0% read again showing the proper conjugation<03:02:53.319> of<03:02:53.600> a<03:02:54.000> with<03:02:54.120> a<03:02:54.319> past<03:02:54.520> participle 03:02:55.110 --> 03:02:55.120 align:start position:0% conjugation of a with a past participle 03:02:55.120 --> 03:02:57.070 align:start position:0% conjugation of a with a past participle in<03:02:55.279> both<03:02:55.560> cases<03:02:56.000> and<03:02:56.160> basically<03:02:56.680> the<03:02:56.800> same 03:02:57.070 --> 03:02:57.080 align:start position:0% in both cases and basically the same 03:02:57.080 --> 03:02:58.790 align:start position:0% in both cases and basically the same idea<03:02:57.560> applies<03:02:57.840> to<03:02:58.000> any<03:02:58.160> sentence<03:02:58.479> you<03:02:58.560> want<03:02:58.680> to 03:02:58.790 --> 03:02:58.800 align:start position:0% idea applies to any sentence you want to 03:02:58.800 --> 03:03:00.469 align:start position:0% idea applies to any sentence you want to say<03:02:59.279> however<03:02:59.600> there<03:02:59.680> are<03:02:59.840> a<03:02:59.920> few<03:03:00.120> things<03:03:00.319> to 03:03:00.469 --> 03:03:00.479 align:start position:0% say however there are a few things to 03:03:00.479 --> 03:03:02.190 align:start position:0% say however there are a few things to note<03:03:00.840> about<03:03:01.040> the<03:03:01.200> present<03:03:01.479> perfect<03:03:01.800> tense<03:03:02.040> in 03:03:02.190 --> 03:03:02.200 align:start position:0% note about the present perfect tense in 03:03:02.200 --> 03:03:03.750 align:start position:0% note about the present perfect tense in Spanish<03:03:02.640> that<03:03:02.760> is<03:03:02.880> slightly<03:03:03.279> different<03:03:03.600> in 03:03:03.750 --> 03:03:03.760 align:start position:0% Spanish that is slightly different in 03:03:03.760 --> 03:03:05.630 align:start position:0% Spanish that is slightly different in English<03:03:04.239> the<03:03:04.399> past<03:03:04.680> participle<03:03:05.279> does<03:03:05.479> not 03:03:05.630 --> 03:03:05.640 align:start position:0% English the past participle does not 03:03:05.640 --> 03:03:07.229 align:start position:0% English the past participle does not change<03:03:05.920> form<03:03:06.359> when<03:03:06.479> it's<03:03:06.640> in<03:03:06.760> the<03:03:06.920> present 03:03:07.229 --> 03:03:07.239 align:start position:0% change form when it's in the present 03:03:07.239 --> 03:03:09.590 align:start position:0% change form when it's in the present perfect<03:03:07.720> it<03:03:07.840> only<03:03:08.120> changes<03:03:08.760> once<03:03:09.000> it's<03:03:09.200> used 03:03:09.590 --> 03:03:09.600 align:start position:0% perfect it only changes once it's used 03:03:09.600 --> 03:03:11.429 align:start position:0% perfect it only changes once it's used as<03:03:09.720> an<03:03:09.920> adjective<03:03:10.479> because<03:03:10.680> it<03:03:10.840> has<03:03:10.960> to<03:03:11.160> match 03:03:11.429 --> 03:03:11.439 align:start position:0% as an adjective because it has to match 03:03:11.439 --> 03:03:13.630 align:start position:0% as an adjective because it has to match the<03:03:11.600> gender<03:03:11.920> and<03:03:12.120> plurality<03:03:12.760> for<03:03:12.960> instance<03:03:13.560> I 03:03:13.630 --> 03:03:13.640 align:start position:0% the gender and plurality for instance I 03:03:13.640 --> 03:03:15.429 align:start position:0% the gender and plurality for instance I can<03:03:13.720> say<03:03:13.920> a<03:03:14.000> sentence<03:03:14.439> like<03:03:14.760> the<03:03:14.920> doors<03:03:15.200> are 03:03:15.429 --> 03:03:15.439 align:start position:0% can say a sentence like the doors are 03:03:15.439 --> 03:03:19.190 align:start position:0% can say a sentence like the doors are closed<03:03:16.080> lasas<03:03:16.960> estas<03:03:17.960> with<03:03:18.080> the<03:03:18.200> word<03:03:18.600> SAS 03:03:19.190 --> 03:03:19.200 align:start position:0% closed lasas estas with the word SAS 03:03:19.200 --> 03:03:21.590 align:start position:0% closed lasas estas with the word SAS matching<03:03:19.479> the<03:03:19.640> gender<03:03:20.000> in<03:03:20.200> plurality<03:03:20.720> of<03:03:20.960> puas 03:03:21.590 --> 03:03:21.600 align:start position:0% matching the gender in plurality of puas 03:03:21.600 --> 03:03:22.910 align:start position:0% matching the gender in plurality of puas putting<03:03:21.840> the<03:03:21.960> sentence<03:03:22.279> in<03:03:22.439> the<03:03:22.600> present 03:03:22.910 --> 03:03:22.920 align:start position:0% putting the sentence in the present 03:03:22.920 --> 03:03:24.429 align:start position:0% putting the sentence in the present perfect<03:03:23.279> will<03:03:23.479> change<03:03:23.760> the<03:03:23.880> gender<03:03:24.239> and 03:03:24.429 --> 03:03:24.439 align:start position:0% perfect will change the gender and 03:03:24.439 --> 03:03:27.150 align:start position:0% perfect will change the gender and plurality<03:03:25.160> based<03:03:25.399> on<03:03:25.560> the<03:03:25.680> speaker<03:03:26.200> so<03:03:26.560> if<03:03:26.800> I 03:03:27.150 --> 03:03:27.160 align:start position:0% plurality based on the speaker so if I 03:03:27.160 --> 03:03:30.469 align:start position:0% plurality based on the speaker so if I as<03:03:27.279> a<03:03:27.439> man<03:03:27.800> say<03:03:28.120> the<03:03:28.239> sentence<03:03:28.800> it<03:03:28.920> would<03:03:29.080> be 03:03:30.469 --> 03:03:30.479 align:start position:0% as a man say the sentence it would be 03:03:30.479 --> 03:03:33.630 align:start position:0% as a man say the sentence it would be Y<03:03:31.479> and<03:03:31.680> here<03:03:32.040> I'm<03:03:32.160> using<03:03:32.479> S<03:03:33.120> as<03:03:33.200> a<03:03:33.399> past 03:03:33.630 --> 03:03:33.640 align:start position:0% Y and here I'm using S as a past 03:03:33.640 --> 03:03:35.990 align:start position:0% Y and here I'm using S as a past participle<03:03:34.279> of<03:03:34.520> myself<03:03:35.120> and<03:03:35.319> not<03:03:35.680> as<03:03:35.800> an 03:03:35.990 --> 03:03:36.000 align:start position:0% participle of myself and not as an 03:03:36.000 --> 03:03:38.110 align:start position:0% participle of myself and not as an adjective<03:03:36.439> in<03:03:36.520> the<03:03:36.640> previous<03:03:36.960> phrase<03:03:37.520> sadas 03:03:38.110 --> 03:03:38.120 align:start position:0% adjective in the previous phrase sadas 03:03:38.120 --> 03:03:40.110 align:start position:0% adjective in the previous phrase sadas is<03:03:38.239> in<03:03:38.439> fact<03:03:38.800> used<03:03:39.120> as<03:03:39.279> an<03:03:39.439> adjective<03:03:39.880> so 03:03:40.110 --> 03:03:40.120 align:start position:0% is in fact used as an adjective so 03:03:40.120 --> 03:03:41.670 align:start position:0% is in fact used as an adjective so overall<03:03:40.560> you<03:03:40.720> have<03:03:40.840> to<03:03:41.000> watch<03:03:41.160> out<03:03:41.319> for<03:03:41.520> these 03:03:41.670 --> 03:03:41.680 align:start position:0% overall you have to watch out for these 03:03:41.680 --> 03:03:43.550 align:start position:0% overall you have to watch out for these ideas<03:03:42.239> additionally<03:03:42.880> when<03:03:43.000> working<03:03:43.279> in<03:03:43.479> in 03:03:43.550 --> 03:03:43.560 align:start position:0% ideas additionally when working in in 03:03:43.560 --> 03:03:45.229 align:start position:0% ideas additionally when working in in the<03:03:43.680> present<03:03:43.960> perfect<03:03:44.239> tense<03:03:44.479> in<03:03:44.640> Spanish<03:03:45.120> the 03:03:45.229 --> 03:03:45.239 align:start position:0% the present perfect tense in Spanish the 03:03:45.239 --> 03:03:47.269 align:start position:0% the present perfect tense in Spanish the two<03:03:45.479> elements<03:03:46.080> of<03:03:46.359> AED<03:03:46.720> and<03:03:46.840> a<03:03:47.040> past 03:03:47.269 --> 03:03:47.279 align:start position:0% two elements of AED and a past 03:03:47.279 --> 03:03:49.190 align:start position:0% two elements of AED and a past participle<03:03:47.960> always<03:03:48.239> have<03:03:48.359> to<03:03:48.479> be<03:03:48.800> together 03:03:49.190 --> 03:03:49.200 align:start position:0% participle always have to be together 03:03:49.200 --> 03:03:50.990 align:start position:0% participle always have to be together and<03:03:49.359> can<03:03:49.520> never<03:03:49.720> be<03:03:49.920> separated<03:03:50.560> this<03:03:50.680> means 03:03:50.990 --> 03:03:51.000 align:start position:0% and can never be separated this means 03:03:51.000 --> 03:03:52.110 align:start position:0% and can never be separated this means that<03:03:51.120> whenever<03:03:51.439> you're<03:03:51.640> working<03:03:51.960> with 03:03:52.110 --> 03:03:52.120 align:start position:0% that whenever you're working with 03:03:52.120 --> 03:03:54.070 align:start position:0% that whenever you're working with negatives<03:03:52.560> and<03:03:52.760> direct<03:03:53.080> and<03:03:53.279> indirect<03:03:53.760> object 03:03:54.070 --> 03:03:54.080 align:start position:0% negatives and direct and indirect object 03:03:54.080 --> 03:03:56.710 align:start position:0% negatives and direct and indirect object pronouns<03:03:54.680> they<03:03:54.800> will<03:03:55.040> always<03:03:55.439> come<03:03:55.840> before<03:03:56.239> a 03:03:56.710 --> 03:03:56.720 align:start position:0% pronouns they will always come before a 03:03:56.720 --> 03:03:59.790 align:start position:0% pronouns they will always come before a in<03:03:56.880> every<03:03:57.160> sentence<03:03:57.720> asking<03:03:58.080> something<03:03:58.800> likeo 03:03:59.790 --> 03:03:59.800 align:start position:0% in every sentence asking something likeo 03:03:59.800 --> 03:04:01.510 align:start position:0% in every sentence asking something likeo means<03:04:00.200> have<03:04:00.319> you<03:04:00.479> read<03:04:00.680> the<03:04:00.840> book<03:04:01.120> and<03:04:01.239> you<03:04:01.319> can 03:04:01.510 --> 03:04:01.520 align:start position:0% means have you read the book and you can 03:04:01.520 --> 03:04:05.150 align:start position:0% means have you read the book and you can reply<03:04:01.920> with<03:04:02.239> C<03:04:02.680> Yol<03:04:03.680> meaning<03:04:04.160> yes<03:04:04.479> I<03:04:04.640> have<03:04:04.880> read 03:04:05.150 --> 03:04:05.160 align:start position:0% reply with C Yol meaning yes I have read 03:04:05.160 --> 03:04:07.070 align:start position:0% reply with C Yol meaning yes I have read it<03:04:05.520> with<03:04:05.760> Lo<03:04:06.080> being<03:04:06.279> the<03:04:06.439> direct<03:04:06.760> object 03:04:07.070 --> 03:04:07.080 align:start position:0% it with Lo being the direct object 03:04:07.080 --> 03:04:09.070 align:start position:0% it with Lo being the direct object pronoun<03:04:07.680> before<03:04:08.040> a<03:04:08.439> if<03:04:08.520> you<03:04:08.600> want<03:04:08.680> to<03:04:08.800> put<03:04:08.920> a 03:04:09.070 --> 03:04:09.080 align:start position:0% pronoun before a if you want to put a 03:04:09.080 --> 03:04:11.670 align:start position:0% pronoun before a if you want to put a negative<03:04:09.439> in<03:04:09.560> the<03:04:09.760> phrase<03:04:10.239> you<03:04:10.319> can<03:04:10.520> say 03:04:11.670 --> 03:04:11.680 align:start position:0% negative in the phrase you can say 03:04:11.680 --> 03:04:14.510 align:start position:0% negative in the phrase you can say no<03:04:12.680> no<03:04:12.920> I<03:04:13.040> have<03:04:13.200> not<03:04:13.560> read<03:04:13.840> it<03:04:14.120> you<03:04:14.200> can<03:04:14.319> also 03:04:14.510 --> 03:04:14.520 align:start position:0% no no I have not read it you can also 03:04:14.520 --> 03:04:16.389 align:start position:0% no no I have not read it you can also use<03:04:14.720> indirect<03:04:15.160> object<03:04:15.520> pronouns<03:04:16.040> and<03:04:16.160> say 03:04:16.389 --> 03:04:16.399 align:start position:0% use indirect object pronouns and say 03:04:16.399 --> 03:04:18.550 align:start position:0% use indirect object pronouns and say something<03:04:16.720> like<03:04:17.000> John<03:04:17.319> has<03:04:17.479> told<03:04:17.760> me<03:04:18.040> it<03:04:18.399> which 03:04:18.550 --> 03:04:18.560 align:start position:0% something like John has told me it which 03:04:18.560 --> 03:04:21.429 align:start position:0% something like John has told me it which would<03:04:18.720> be<03:04:19.040> joh<03:04:19.520> Meelo<03:04:20.520> with<03:04:20.760> me<03:04:21.040> being<03:04:21.239> an 03:04:21.429 --> 03:04:21.439 align:start position:0% would be joh Meelo with me being an 03:04:21.439 --> 03:04:23.710 align:start position:0% would be joh Meelo with me being an indirect<03:04:21.880> object<03:04:22.160> pronoun<03:04:22.680> and<03:04:22.880> La<03:04:23.239> being<03:04:23.520> a 03:04:23.710 --> 03:04:23.720 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun and La being a 03:04:23.720 --> 03:04:25.269 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun and La being a direct<03:04:24.200> object<03:04:24.479> pronoun<03:04:24.880> if<03:04:24.960> you<03:04:25.080> want<03:04:25.160> to 03:04:25.269 --> 03:04:25.279 align:start position:0% direct object pronoun if you want to 03:04:25.279 --> 03:04:27.190 align:start position:0% direct object pronoun if you want to make<03:04:25.439> the<03:04:25.560> sentence<03:04:25.960> negative<03:04:26.479> you<03:04:26.560> can<03:04:26.760> say 03:04:27.190 --> 03:04:27.200 align:start position:0% make the sentence negative you can say 03:04:27.200 --> 03:04:30.790 align:start position:0% make the sentence negative you can say joh<03:04:27.800> no<03:04:28.800> joh<03:04:29.080> has<03:04:29.239> not<03:04:29.479> told<03:04:29.720> me<03:04:29.920> it<03:04:30.279> either<03:04:30.520> way 03:04:30.790 --> 03:04:30.800 align:start position:0% joh no joh has not told me it either way 03:04:30.800 --> 03:04:32.590 align:start position:0% joh no joh has not told me it either way the<03:04:30.960> construction<03:04:31.439> with<03:04:31.680> a<03:04:32.080> and<03:04:32.200> the<03:04:32.359> past 03:04:32.590 --> 03:04:32.600 align:start position:0% the construction with a and the past 03:04:32.600 --> 03:04:34.510 align:start position:0% the construction with a and the past participle<03:04:33.200> always<03:04:33.479> stays<03:04:33.960> together<03:04:34.359> and 03:04:34.510 --> 03:04:34.520 align:start position:0% participle always stays together and 03:04:34.520 --> 03:04:36.469 align:start position:0% participle always stays together and never<03:04:34.800> separates<03:04:35.479> as<03:04:35.640> always<03:04:36.000> you<03:04:36.080> can<03:04:36.239> say 03:04:36.469 --> 03:04:36.479 align:start position:0% never separates as always you can say 03:04:36.479 --> 03:04:38.070 align:start position:0% never separates as always you can say any<03:04:36.640> sentence<03:04:37.000> you<03:04:37.080> want<03:04:37.399> using<03:04:37.640> the<03:04:37.760> present 03:04:38.070 --> 03:04:38.080 align:start position:0% any sentence you want using the present 03:04:38.080 --> 03:04:40.110 align:start position:0% any sentence you want using the present perfect<03:04:38.439> in<03:04:38.560> Spanish<03:04:39.279> however<03:04:39.640> there's<03:04:39.880> one 03:04:40.110 --> 03:04:40.120 align:start position:0% perfect in Spanish however there's one 03:04:40.120 --> 03:04:41.950 align:start position:0% perfect in Spanish however there's one last<03:04:40.359> concept<03:04:40.840> about<03:04:41.080> the<03:04:41.200> present<03:04:41.560> perfect 03:04:41.950 --> 03:04:41.960 align:start position:0% last concept about the present perfect 03:04:41.960 --> 03:04:43.349 align:start position:0% last concept about the present perfect that<03:04:42.080> needs<03:04:42.239> to<03:04:42.359> be<03:04:42.479> known<03:04:42.880> and<03:04:42.960> that<03:04:43.040> is<03:04:43.160> using 03:04:43.349 --> 03:04:43.359 align:start position:0% that needs to be known and that is using 03:04:43.359 --> 03:04:45.190 align:start position:0% that needs to be known and that is using using<03:04:43.560> the<03:04:43.680> present<03:04:44.000> perfect<03:04:44.399> as<03:04:44.560> to<03:04:44.760> have<03:04:45.000> had 03:04:45.190 --> 03:04:45.200 align:start position:0% using the present perfect as to have had 03:04:45.200 --> 03:04:47.150 align:start position:0% using the present perfect as to have had something<03:04:45.680> in<03:04:45.840> English<03:04:46.319> the<03:04:46.439> verb<03:04:46.680> to<03:04:46.880> have 03:04:47.150 --> 03:04:47.160 align:start position:0% something in English the verb to have 03:04:47.160 --> 03:04:49.070 align:start position:0% something in English the verb to have can<03:04:47.279> mean<03:04:47.479> a<03:04:47.640> main<03:04:47.920> verb<03:04:48.279> like<03:04:48.439> to<03:04:48.600> have<03:04:48.720> to<03:04:48.880> do 03:04:49.070 --> 03:04:49.080 align:start position:0% can mean a main verb like to have to do 03:04:49.080 --> 03:04:50.389 align:start position:0% can mean a main verb like to have to do something<03:04:49.520> or<03:04:49.680> to<03:04:49.840> have<03:04:50.000> something<03:04:50.239> in 03:04:50.389 --> 03:04:50.399 align:start position:0% something or to have something in 03:04:50.399 --> 03:04:52.510 align:start position:0% something or to have something in general<03:04:50.880> or<03:04:51.080> an<03:04:51.319> additional<03:04:51.720> verb<03:04:52.120> like<03:04:52.399> I 03:04:52.510 --> 03:04:52.520 align:start position:0% general or an additional verb like I 03:04:52.520 --> 03:04:54.550 align:start position:0% general or an additional verb like I have<03:04:52.720> read<03:04:53.160> I<03:04:53.279> have<03:04:53.439> eaten<03:04:53.880> and<03:04:54.000> so<03:04:54.160> on<03:04:54.439> in 03:04:54.550 --> 03:04:54.560 align:start position:0% have read I have eaten and so on in 03:04:54.560 --> 03:04:56.349 align:start position:0% have read I have eaten and so on in Spanish<03:04:55.080> however<03:04:55.319> you<03:04:55.439> have<03:04:55.640> two<03:04:55.800> verbs<03:04:56.120> for 03:04:56.349 --> 03:04:56.359 align:start position:0% Spanish however you have two verbs for 03:04:56.359 --> 03:04:58.630 align:start position:0% Spanish however you have two verbs for these<03:04:56.560> cases<03:04:57.040> one<03:04:57.239> being<03:04:57.560> ten<03:04:58.000> and<03:04:58.120> one<03:04:58.319> being 03:04:58.630 --> 03:04:58.640 align:start position:0% these cases one being ten and one being 03:04:58.640 --> 03:05:00.349 align:start position:0% these cases one being ten and one being a<03:04:59.040> which<03:04:59.120> is<03:04:59.319> different<03:04:59.520> in<03:04:59.680> English<03:05:00.120> when<03:05:00.239> you 03:05:00.349 --> 03:05:00.359 align:start position:0% a which is different in English when you 03:05:00.359 --> 03:05:02.030 align:start position:0% a which is different in English when you only<03:05:00.600> have<03:05:00.760> the<03:05:00.880> same<03:05:01.120> word<03:05:01.439> for<03:05:01.680> both<03:05:01.920> the 03:05:02.030 --> 03:05:02.040 align:start position:0% only have the same word for both the 03:05:02.040 --> 03:05:03.950 align:start position:0% only have the same word for both the infinitive<03:05:02.680> and<03:05:02.840> the<03:05:02.960> sentence<03:05:03.479> in<03:05:03.600> order<03:05:03.840> to 03:05:03.950 --> 03:05:03.960 align:start position:0% infinitive and the sentence in order to 03:05:03.960 --> 03:05:05.950 align:start position:0% infinitive and the sentence in order to say<03:05:04.120> a<03:05:04.239> sentence<03:05:04.680> like<03:05:05.040> I<03:05:05.200> have<03:05:05.439> had<03:05:05.560> a<03:05:05.680> lot<03:05:05.840> of 03:05:05.950 --> 03:05:05.960 align:start position:0% say a sentence like I have had a lot of 03:05:05.960 --> 03:05:07.590 align:start position:0% say a sentence like I have had a lot of friends<03:05:06.439> it<03:05:06.560> might<03:05:06.760> be<03:05:06.920> confusing<03:05:07.399> for 03:05:07.590 --> 03:05:07.600 align:start position:0% friends it might be confusing for 03:05:07.600 --> 03:05:09.469 align:start position:0% friends it might be confusing for students<03:05:08.120> because<03:05:08.359> they<03:05:08.479> see<03:05:08.720> two<03:05:08.920> versions 03:05:09.469 --> 03:05:09.479 align:start position:0% students because they see two versions 03:05:09.479 --> 03:05:11.309 align:start position:0% students because they see two versions of<03:05:09.600> the<03:05:09.720> verb<03:05:09.960> to<03:05:10.160> have<03:05:10.479> which<03:05:10.560> is<03:05:10.800> have<03:05:11.120> and 03:05:11.309 --> 03:05:11.319 align:start position:0% of the verb to have which is have and 03:05:11.319 --> 03:05:12.870 align:start position:0% of the verb to have which is have and had<03:05:11.600> but<03:05:11.760> literally<03:05:12.359> the<03:05:12.439> way<03:05:12.560> that<03:05:12.680> you<03:05:12.760> would 03:05:12.870 --> 03:05:12.880 align:start position:0% had but literally the way that you would 03:05:12.880 --> 03:05:14.950 align:start position:0% had but literally the way that you would say<03:05:13.000> the<03:05:13.560> in<03:05:13.720> Spanish 03:05:14.950 --> 03:05:14.960 align:start position:0% say the in Spanish 03:05:14.960 --> 03:05:18.349 align:start position:0% say the in Spanish is<03:05:15.960> much<03:05:16.399> Amigos<03:05:17.000> using<03:05:17.760> as<03:05:17.880> the<03:05:18.080> proper 03:05:18.349 --> 03:05:18.359 align:start position:0% is much Amigos using as the proper 03:05:18.359 --> 03:05:20.710 align:start position:0% is much Amigos using as the proper conjugation<03:05:18.960> of<03:05:19.560> for<03:05:19.720> the<03:05:19.880> Y<03:05:20.080> pronoun<03:05:20.600> and 03:05:20.710 --> 03:05:20.720 align:start position:0% conjugation of for the Y pronoun and 03:05:20.720 --> 03:05:23.349 align:start position:0% conjugation of for the Y pronoun and using<03:05:21.640> as<03:05:21.760> a<03:05:21.880> simple<03:05:22.279> past<03:05:22.520> participle<03:05:23.120> of<03:05:23.239> the 03:05:23.349 --> 03:05:23.359 align:start position:0% using as a simple past participle of the 03:05:23.359 --> 03:05:25.469 align:start position:0% using as a simple past participle of the verb<03:05:23.600> tet<03:05:24.120> as<03:05:24.200> you<03:05:24.319> can<03:05:24.479> see<03:05:24.800> we<03:05:24.960> have<03:05:25.120> the<03:05:25.239> verb 03:05:25.469 --> 03:05:25.479 align:start position:0% verb tet as you can see we have the verb 03:05:25.479 --> 03:05:27.229 align:start position:0% verb tet as you can see we have the verb to<03:05:25.680> have<03:05:25.920> twice<03:05:26.239> in<03:05:26.359> English<03:05:26.880> because<03:05:27.080> it 03:05:27.229 --> 03:05:27.239 align:start position:0% to have twice in English because it 03:05:27.239 --> 03:05:28.910 align:start position:0% to have twice in English because it functions<03:05:27.760> with<03:05:27.920> multiple<03:05:28.279> meanings<03:05:28.760> in 03:05:28.910 --> 03:05:28.920 align:start position:0% functions with multiple meanings in 03:05:28.920 --> 03:05:31.070 align:start position:0% functions with multiple meanings in Spanish<03:05:29.399> you<03:05:29.560> have<03:05:29.680> two<03:05:29.840> verbs<03:05:30.120> for<03:05:30.319> this<03:05:30.680> a 03:05:31.070 --> 03:05:31.080 align:start position:0% Spanish you have two verbs for this a 03:05:31.080 --> 03:05:32.950 align:start position:0% Spanish you have two verbs for this a and<03:05:31.239> t<03:05:31.600> with<03:05:31.720> one<03:05:31.880> verb<03:05:32.120> being<03:05:32.359> conjugated<03:05:32.840> to 03:05:32.950 --> 03:05:32.960 align:start position:0% and t with one verb being conjugated to 03:05:32.960 --> 03:05:34.750 align:start position:0% and t with one verb being conjugated to match<03:05:33.160> the<03:05:33.319> pronoun<03:05:33.840> and<03:05:33.960> one<03:05:34.160> being<03:05:34.359> a<03:05:34.520> past 03:05:34.750 --> 03:05:34.760 align:start position:0% match the pronoun and one being a past 03:05:34.760 --> 03:05:36.229 align:start position:0% match the pronoun and one being a past participle<03:05:35.279> and<03:05:35.399> this<03:05:35.520> is<03:05:35.720> actually<03:05:36.040> a 03:05:36.229 --> 03:05:36.239 align:start position:0% participle and this is actually a 03:05:36.239 --> 03:05:37.830 align:start position:0% participle and this is actually a concept<03:05:36.680> that<03:05:36.800> I<03:05:36.880> used<03:05:37.040> to<03:05:37.160> think<03:05:37.399> about<03:05:37.680> in 03:05:37.830 --> 03:05:37.840 align:start position:0% concept that I used to think about in 03:05:37.840 --> 03:05:39.710 align:start position:0% concept that I used to think about in English<03:05:38.279> I<03:05:38.359> used<03:05:38.520> to<03:05:38.640> think<03:05:38.760> of<03:05:38.920> phrases<03:05:39.359> like 03:05:39.710 --> 03:05:39.720 align:start position:0% English I used to think of phrases like 03:05:39.720 --> 03:05:41.550 align:start position:0% English I used to think of phrases like I<03:05:39.840> have<03:05:40.000> to<03:05:40.160> read<03:05:40.479> and<03:05:40.680> I<03:05:40.840> have<03:05:41.000> read<03:05:41.359> and<03:05:41.479> I 03:05:41.550 --> 03:05:41.560 align:start position:0% I have to read and I have read and I 03:05:41.560 --> 03:05:43.590 align:start position:0% I have to read and I have read and I thought<03:05:41.720> that<03:05:41.840> the<03:05:41.960> phrases<03:05:42.279> in<03:05:42.439> Spanish<03:05:42.960> are 03:05:43.590 --> 03:05:43.600 align:start position:0% thought that the phrases in Spanish are 03:05:43.600 --> 03:05:46.870 align:start position:0% thought that the phrases in Spanish are Y<03:05:44.760> and<03:05:45.760> and<03:05:45.840> the<03:05:45.960> reason<03:05:46.200> why<03:05:46.319> I<03:05:46.439> thought<03:05:46.720> this 03:05:46.870 --> 03:05:46.880 align:start position:0% Y and and the reason why I thought this 03:05:46.880 --> 03:05:48.790 align:start position:0% Y and and the reason why I thought this way<03:05:47.200> is<03:05:47.359> because<03:05:47.640> English<03:05:48.040> has<03:05:48.200> the<03:05:48.319> same<03:05:48.520> word 03:05:48.790 --> 03:05:48.800 align:start position:0% way is because English has the same word 03:05:48.800 --> 03:05:50.550 align:start position:0% way is because English has the same word for<03:05:49.160> have<03:05:49.520> so<03:05:49.680> it<03:05:49.800> must<03:05:50.000> be<03:05:50.160> the<03:05:50.239> same<03:05:50.399> in 03:05:50.550 --> 03:05:50.560 align:start position:0% for have so it must be the same in 03:05:50.560 --> 03:05:52.590 align:start position:0% for have so it must be the same in Spanish<03:05:51.239> however<03:05:51.640> I<03:05:51.760> later<03:05:52.000> learned<03:05:52.479> that 03:05:52.590 --> 03:05:52.600 align:start position:0% Spanish however I later learned that 03:05:52.600 --> 03:05:55.070 align:start position:0% Spanish however I later learned that Spanish<03:05:52.960> has<03:05:53.120> two<03:05:53.319> versions<03:05:53.800> for<03:05:54.080> to<03:05:54.319> have<03:05:54.640> a 03:05:55.070 --> 03:05:55.080 align:start position:0% Spanish has two versions for to have a 03:05:55.080 --> 03:05:56.990 align:start position:0% Spanish has two versions for to have a and<03:05:55.720> and<03:05:55.800> that<03:05:55.880> you<03:05:56.080> also<03:05:56.359> have<03:05:56.520> the<03:05:56.680> present 03:05:56.990 --> 03:05:57.000 align:start position:0% and and that you also have the present 03:05:57.000 --> 03:05:59.990 align:start position:0% and and that you also have the present perfect<03:05:57.520> so<03:05:57.840> I<03:05:58.000> realized<03:05:58.640> that<03:05:58.760> the<03:05:58.880> sentences 03:05:59.990 --> 03:06:00.000 align:start position:0% perfect so I realized that the sentences 03:06:00.000 --> 03:06:03.750 align:start position:0% perfect so I realized that the sentences are<03:06:01.279> and<03:06:02.279> with<03:06:02.880> being<03:06:03.080> the<03:06:03.239> verb<03:06:03.479> in<03:06:03.600> the 03:06:03.750 --> 03:06:03.760 align:start position:0% are and with being the verb in the 03:06:03.760 --> 03:06:05.229 align:start position:0% are and with being the verb in the present<03:06:04.040> perfect<03:06:04.439> even<03:06:04.600> though<03:06:04.760> it's<03:06:04.840> a<03:06:04.960> small 03:06:05.229 --> 03:06:05.239 align:start position:0% present perfect even though it's a small 03:06:05.239 --> 03:06:07.070 align:start position:0% present perfect even though it's a small difference<03:06:05.760> it<03:06:05.880> just<03:06:06.040> shows<03:06:06.319> you<03:06:06.640> how<03:06:06.800> simple 03:06:07.070 --> 03:06:07.080 align:start position:0% difference it just shows you how simple 03:06:07.080 --> 03:06:08.630 align:start position:0% difference it just shows you how simple of<03:06:07.200> a<03:06:07.359> language<03:06:07.720> English<03:06:08.120> is<03:06:08.399> when<03:06:08.520> it's 03:06:08.630 --> 03:06:08.640 align:start position:0% of a language English is when it's 03:06:08.640 --> 03:06:09.990 align:start position:0% of a language English is when it's compared<03:06:08.960> to<03:06:09.120> Spanish<03:06:09.520> and<03:06:09.640> there's<03:06:09.800> more<03:06:09.920> of 03:06:09.990 --> 03:06:10.000 align:start position:0% compared to Spanish and there's more of 03:06:10.000 --> 03:06:11.590 align:start position:0% compared to Spanish and there's more of it<03:06:10.120> to<03:06:10.239> come<03:06:10.520> the<03:06:10.680> past<03:06:10.920> perfect<03:06:11.200> tense<03:06:11.439> in 03:06:11.590 --> 03:06:11.600 align:start position:0% it to come the past perfect tense in 03:06:11.600 --> 03:06:13.510 align:start position:0% it to come the past perfect tense in Spanish<03:06:12.160> works<03:06:12.479> the<03:06:12.600> same<03:06:12.840> way<03:06:13.279> has<03:06:13.399> the 03:06:13.510 --> 03:06:13.520 align:start position:0% Spanish works the same way has the 03:06:13.520 --> 03:06:15.030 align:start position:0% Spanish works the same way has the present<03:06:13.840> perfect<03:06:14.120> tense<03:06:14.520> but<03:06:14.640> instead<03:06:14.920> of 03:06:15.030 --> 03:06:15.040 align:start position:0% present perfect tense but instead of 03:06:15.040 --> 03:06:16.590 align:start position:0% present perfect tense but instead of indicating<03:06:15.560> what<03:06:15.720> someone<03:06:16.000> has<03:06:16.160> done<03:06:16.479> it 03:06:16.590 --> 03:06:16.600 align:start position:0% indicating what someone has done it 03:06:16.600 --> 03:06:18.670 align:start position:0% indicating what someone has done it speaks<03:06:16.880> about<03:06:17.200> what<03:06:17.359> someone<03:06:17.880> had<03:06:18.120> done<03:06:18.479> hence 03:06:18.670 --> 03:06:18.680 align:start position:0% speaks about what someone had done hence 03:06:18.680 --> 03:06:20.190 align:start position:0% speaks about what someone had done hence it's<03:06:18.840> in<03:06:19.000> the<03:06:19.160> past<03:06:19.560> like<03:06:19.720> the<03:06:19.880> present 03:06:20.190 --> 03:06:20.200 align:start position:0% it's in the past like the present 03:06:20.200 --> 03:06:22.349 align:start position:0% it's in the past like the present perfect<03:06:20.720> the<03:06:20.880> past<03:06:21.160> perfect<03:06:21.680> also<03:06:21.920> uses<03:06:22.200> the 03:06:22.349 --> 03:06:22.359 align:start position:0% perfect the past perfect also uses the 03:06:22.359 --> 03:06:24.630 align:start position:0% perfect the past perfect also uses the construction<03:06:23.000> a<03:06:23.439> plus<03:06:23.600> a<03:06:23.800> past<03:06:24.040> participle 03:06:24.630 --> 03:06:24.640 align:start position:0% construction a plus a past participle 03:06:24.640 --> 03:06:26.790 align:start position:0% construction a plus a past participle but<03:06:24.760> in<03:06:24.920> this<03:06:25.120> case<03:06:25.520> the<03:06:25.680> verb<03:06:26.000> a<03:06:26.399> has<03:06:26.520> to<03:06:26.640> be 03:06:26.790 --> 03:06:26.800 align:start position:0% but in this case the verb a has to be 03:06:26.800 --> 03:06:28.469 align:start position:0% but in this case the verb a has to be conjugated<03:06:27.359> in<03:06:27.479> a<03:06:27.640> different<03:06:27.920> way<03:06:28.239> because 03:06:28.469 --> 03:06:28.479 align:start position:0% conjugated in a different way because 03:06:28.479 --> 03:06:30.830 align:start position:0% conjugated in a different way because the<03:06:28.640> past<03:06:28.920> perfect<03:06:29.439> speaks<03:06:29.800> of<03:06:29.960> the<03:06:30.160> imperfect 03:06:30.830 --> 03:06:30.840 align:start position:0% the past perfect speaks of the imperfect 03:06:30.840 --> 03:06:34.070 align:start position:0% the past perfect speaks of the imperfect past<03:06:31.080> tense<03:06:31.520> for<03:06:31.800> yo<03:06:32.160> you<03:06:32.319> get<03:06:32.600> yo<03:06:32.960> ABIA<03:06:33.560> I<03:06:33.760> had 03:06:34.070 --> 03:06:34.080 align:start position:0% past tense for yo you get yo ABIA I had 03:06:34.080 --> 03:06:35.870 align:start position:0% past tense for yo you get yo ABIA I had plus<03:06:34.279> any<03:06:34.520> past<03:06:34.720> participle<03:06:35.200> you<03:06:35.319> want<03:06:35.640> for 03:06:35.870 --> 03:06:35.880 align:start position:0% plus any past participle you want for 03:06:35.880 --> 03:06:40.030 align:start position:0% plus any past participle you want for two<03:06:36.239> you<03:06:36.399> get<03:06:36.640> to<03:06:37.080> abas<03:06:37.880> you<03:06:38.120> had<03:06:38.840> ABIA<03:06:39.399> he<03:06:39.600> had 03:06:40.030 --> 03:06:40.040 align:start position:0% two you get to abas you had ABIA he had 03:06:40.040 --> 03:06:45.590 align:start position:0% two you get to abas you had ABIA he had no<03:06:40.760> AB<03:06:41.560> we<03:06:41.880> had<03:06:42.880> AB<03:06:43.239> I<03:06:43.640> y'<03:06:43.960> had<03:06:44.279> and<03:06:44.479> AOS<03:06:45.000> Aban 03:06:45.590 --> 03:06:45.600 align:start position:0% no AB we had AB I y' had and AOS Aban 03:06:45.600 --> 03:06:47.110 align:start position:0% no AB we had AB I y' had and AOS Aban they<03:06:45.800> had<03:06:46.040> try<03:06:46.200> not<03:06:46.399> focusing<03:06:46.760> on<03:06:46.920> these 03:06:47.110 --> 03:06:47.120 align:start position:0% they had try not focusing on these 03:06:47.120 --> 03:06:48.630 align:start position:0% they had try not focusing on these pronouns<03:06:47.640> because<03:06:47.840> they're<03:06:48.000> not<03:06:48.200> that<03:06:48.319> useful 03:06:48.630 --> 03:06:48.640 align:start position:0% pronouns because they're not that useful 03:06:48.640 --> 03:06:50.550 align:start position:0% pronouns because they're not that useful in<03:06:48.800> conversation<03:06:49.479> the<03:06:49.640> past<03:06:49.920> perfect<03:06:50.399> is 03:06:50.550 --> 03:06:50.560 align:start position:0% in conversation the past perfect is 03:06:50.560 --> 03:06:52.309 align:start position:0% in conversation the past perfect is often<03:06:50.800> used<03:06:51.080> with<03:06:51.239> the<03:06:51.359> word<03:06:51.640> yah<03:06:51.960> meaning 03:06:52.309 --> 03:06:52.319 align:start position:0% often used with the word yah meaning 03:06:52.319 --> 03:06:54.389 align:start position:0% often used with the word yah meaning already<03:06:52.840> to<03:06:53.000> indicate<03:06:53.359> that<03:06:53.520> an<03:06:53.720> action<03:06:54.200> had 03:06:54.389 --> 03:06:54.399 align:start position:0% already to indicate that an action had 03:06:54.399 --> 03:06:56.229 align:start position:0% already to indicate that an action had already<03:06:54.760> occurred<03:06:55.279> before<03:06:55.600> another<03:06:56.040> just 03:06:56.229 --> 03:06:56.239 align:start position:0% already occurred before another just 03:06:56.239 --> 03:06:57.870 align:start position:0% already occurred before another just like<03:06:56.399> the<03:06:56.520> present<03:06:56.880> perfect<03:06:57.399> the<03:06:57.600> past 03:06:57.870 --> 03:06:57.880 align:start position:0% like the present perfect the past 03:06:57.880 --> 03:06:59.790 align:start position:0% like the present perfect the past perfect<03:06:58.359> also<03:06:58.560> maintains<03:06:59.040> the<03:06:59.200> construction 03:06:59.790 --> 03:06:59.800 align:start position:0% perfect also maintains the construction 03:06:59.800 --> 03:07:02.190 align:start position:0% perfect also maintains the construction a<03:07:00.279> plus<03:07:00.439> a<03:07:00.680> past<03:07:00.920> participle<03:07:01.600> which<03:07:01.760> cannot<03:07:02.040> be 03:07:02.190 --> 03:07:02.200 align:start position:0% a plus a past participle which cannot be 03:07:02.200 --> 03:07:04.349 align:start position:0% a plus a past participle which cannot be separated<03:07:02.840> therefore<03:07:03.359> the<03:07:03.479> word<03:07:03.840> yah<03:07:04.160> will 03:07:04.349 --> 03:07:04.359 align:start position:0% separated therefore the word yah will 03:07:04.359 --> 03:07:06.110 align:start position:0% separated therefore the word yah will always<03:07:04.680> come<03:07:05.040> before<03:07:05.359> this<03:07:05.560> construction 03:07:06.110 --> 03:07:06.120 align:start position:0% always come before this construction 03:07:06.120 --> 03:07:08.150 align:start position:0% always come before this construction saying<03:07:06.399> a<03:07:06.520> sentence 03:07:08.150 --> 03:07:08.160 align:start position:0% saying a sentence 03:07:08.160 --> 03:07:11.710 align:start position:0% saying a sentence like<03:07:09.160> means<03:07:09.560> she<03:07:09.800> had<03:07:10.040> left<03:07:10.399> already<03:07:11.000> or<03:07:11.399> she 03:07:11.710 --> 03:07:11.720 align:start position:0% like means she had left already or she 03:07:11.720 --> 03:07:13.150 align:start position:0% like means she had left already or she already<03:07:12.080> had<03:07:12.279> left<03:07:12.560> if<03:07:12.640> you<03:07:12.720> want<03:07:12.800> to<03:07:12.920> VIs 03:07:13.150 --> 03:07:13.160 align:start position:0% already had left if you want to VIs 03:07:13.160 --> 03:07:15.389 align:start position:0% already had left if you want to VIs ually<03:07:13.439> translate<03:07:13.880> the<03:07:14.000> sentence<03:07:14.560> similarly<03:07:15.279> I 03:07:15.389 --> 03:07:15.399 align:start position:0% ually translate the sentence similarly I 03:07:15.399 --> 03:07:16.790 align:start position:0% ually translate the sentence similarly I can 03:07:16.790 --> 03:07:16.800 align:start position:0% can 03:07:16.800 --> 03:07:19.990 align:start position:0% can say<03:07:17.800> which<03:07:17.920> means<03:07:18.279> I<03:07:18.399> had<03:07:18.560> studied<03:07:19.000> already<03:07:19.560> or 03:07:19.990 --> 03:07:20.000 align:start position:0% say which means I had studied already or 03:07:20.000 --> 03:07:21.990 align:start position:0% say which means I had studied already or I<03:07:20.200> already<03:07:20.560> had<03:07:20.720> studied<03:07:21.399> however<03:07:21.800> these 03:07:21.990 --> 03:07:22.000 align:start position:0% I already had studied however these 03:07:22.000 --> 03:07:24.070 align:start position:0% I already had studied however these sentences<03:07:22.479> are<03:07:22.640> too<03:07:22.840> easy<03:07:23.120> to<03:07:23.279> utilize<03:07:23.840> and 03:07:24.070 --> 03:07:24.080 align:start position:0% sentences are too easy to utilize and 03:07:24.080 --> 03:07:25.790 align:start position:0% sentences are too easy to utilize and often<03:07:24.399> times<03:07:24.720> you'll<03:07:24.920> see<03:07:25.080> more<03:07:25.279> complicated 03:07:25.790 --> 03:07:25.800 align:start position:0% often times you'll see more complicated 03:07:25.800 --> 03:07:27.830 align:start position:0% often times you'll see more complicated phrases<03:07:26.359> especially<03:07:26.800> ones<03:07:27.200> that<03:07:27.359> involve<03:07:27.680> the 03:07:27.830 --> 03:07:27.840 align:start position:0% phrases especially ones that involve the 03:07:27.840 --> 03:07:30.429 align:start position:0% phrases especially ones that involve the conjunction<03:07:28.520> an<03:07:29.319> plus<03:07:29.600> a<03:07:29.760> noun<03:07:30.040> or<03:07:30.239> an 03:07:30.429 --> 03:07:30.439 align:start position:0% conjunction an plus a noun or an 03:07:30.439 --> 03:07:32.150 align:start position:0% conjunction an plus a noun or an infinitive<03:07:31.040> which<03:07:31.160> means<03:07:31.479> before<03:07:31.960> for 03:07:32.150 --> 03:07:32.160 align:start position:0% infinitive which means before for 03:07:32.160 --> 03:07:35.429 align:start position:0% infinitive which means before for instance<03:07:32.680> saying<03:07:33.479> an<03:07:34.479> means<03:07:34.840> before<03:07:35.239> this 03:07:35.429 --> 03:07:35.439 align:start position:0% instance saying an means before this 03:07:35.439 --> 03:07:36.990 align:start position:0% instance saying an means before this year<03:07:35.760> which<03:07:35.880> is<03:07:35.960> an<03:07:36.120> easy<03:07:36.359> phrase<03:07:36.600> to 03:07:36.990 --> 03:07:37.000 align:start position:0% year which is an easy phrase to 03:07:37.000 --> 03:07:38.870 align:start position:0% year which is an easy phrase to understand<03:07:37.359> but<03:07:37.479> saying<03:07:37.800> something<03:07:38.160> like<03:07:38.479> an 03:07:38.870 --> 03:07:38.880 align:start position:0% understand but saying something like an 03:07:38.880 --> 03:07:41.269 align:start position:0% understand but saying something like an dear<03:07:39.399> means<03:07:39.760> before<03:07:40.120> arriving<03:07:40.680> and<03:07:40.840> I<03:07:40.920> can<03:07:41.080> use 03:07:41.269 --> 03:07:41.279 align:start position:0% dear means before arriving and I can use 03:07:41.279 --> 03:07:45.630 align:start position:0% dear means before arriving and I can use it<03:07:41.520> in<03:07:41.600> a<03:07:41.760> sentence<03:07:42.200> like<03:07:42.520> an 03:07:45.630 --> 03:07:45.640 align:start position:0% 03:07:45.640 --> 03:07:47.349 align:start position:0% before<03:07:45.920> arriving<03:07:46.319> to<03:07:46.479> the<03:07:46.600> school<03:07:47.040> I<03:07:47.160> had 03:07:47.349 --> 03:07:47.359 align:start position:0% before arriving to the school I had 03:07:47.359 --> 03:07:50.309 align:start position:0% before arriving to the school I had eaten<03:07:47.800> already 03:07:50.309 --> 03:07:50.319 align:start position:0% 03:07:50.319 --> 03:07:53.349 align:start position:0% or<03:07:51.319> much<03:07:51.720> before<03:07:52.040> this<03:07:52.200> month<03:07:52.600> I<03:07:52.720> had<03:07:52.880> worked<03:07:53.200> a 03:07:53.349 --> 03:07:53.359 align:start position:0% or much before this month I had worked a 03:07:53.359 --> 03:07:55.229 align:start position:0% or much before this month I had worked a lot<03:07:53.760> of<03:07:53.920> course<03:07:54.239> you<03:07:54.359> can<03:07:54.479> say<03:07:54.720> any<03:07:54.920> sentence 03:07:55.229 --> 03:07:55.239 align:start position:0% lot of course you can say any sentence 03:07:55.239 --> 03:07:56.750 align:start position:0% lot of course you can say any sentence you<03:07:55.359> want<03:07:55.600> using<03:07:55.880> the<03:07:56.080> past<03:07:56.319> perfect<03:07:56.600> in 03:07:56.750 --> 03:07:56.760 align:start position:0% you want using the past perfect in 03:07:56.760 --> 03:07:58.710 align:start position:0% you want using the past perfect in Spanish<03:07:57.239> including<03:07:57.680> negatives<03:07:58.239> reflexive 03:07:58.710 --> 03:07:58.720 align:start position:0% Spanish including negatives reflexive 03:07:58.720 --> 03:08:00.510 align:start position:0% Spanish including negatives reflexive verbs<03:07:59.120> and<03:07:59.279> direct<03:07:59.560> and<03:07:59.720> indirect<03:08:00.200> object 03:08:00.510 --> 03:08:00.520 align:start position:0% verbs and direct and indirect object 03:08:00.520 --> 03:08:02.349 align:start position:0% verbs and direct and indirect object pronouns<03:08:01.120> and<03:08:01.279> as<03:08:01.399> a<03:08:01.560> matter<03:08:01.760> of<03:08:01.920> fact<03:08:02.200> they're 03:08:02.349 --> 03:08:02.359 align:start position:0% pronouns and as a matter of fact they're 03:08:02.359 --> 03:08:04.150 align:start position:0% pronouns and as a matter of fact they're used<03:08:02.640> the<03:08:02.760> same<03:08:03.000> way<03:08:03.359> as<03:08:03.520> in<03:08:03.680> the<03:08:03.840> present 03:08:04.150 --> 03:08:04.160 align:start position:0% used the same way as in the present 03:08:04.160 --> 03:08:06.510 align:start position:0% used the same way as in the present perfect<03:08:04.600> saying<03:08:04.880> a<03:08:05.000> sentence<03:08:05.439> like 03:08:06.510 --> 03:08:06.520 align:start position:0% perfect saying a sentence like 03:08:06.520 --> 03:08:09.950 align:start position:0% perfect saying a sentence like El<03:08:07.520> means<03:08:07.960> he<03:08:08.160> had<03:08:08.319> shown<03:08:08.640> me<03:08:08.880> it<03:08:09.239> with<03:08:09.479> me<03:08:09.800> and 03:08:09.950 --> 03:08:09.960 align:start position:0% El means he had shown me it with me and 03:08:09.960 --> 03:08:11.910 align:start position:0% El means he had shown me it with me and lo<03:08:10.359> being<03:08:10.600> the<03:08:10.760> object<03:08:11.120> pronouns<03:08:11.640> and<03:08:11.760> if<03:08:11.840> you 03:08:11.910 --> 03:08:11.920 align:start position:0% lo being the object pronouns and if you 03:08:11.920 --> 03:08:13.550 align:start position:0% lo being the object pronouns and if you want<03:08:12.040> to<03:08:12.120> put<03:08:12.239> a<03:08:12.359> negative<03:08:12.680> in<03:08:12.800> the<03:08:13.080> sentence 03:08:13.550 --> 03:08:13.560 align:start position:0% want to put a negative in the sentence 03:08:13.560 --> 03:08:15.670 align:start position:0% want to put a negative in the sentence you<03:08:13.640> can 03:08:15.670 --> 03:08:15.680 align:start position:0% you can 03:08:15.680 --> 03:08:19.790 align:start position:0% you can say<03:08:16.680> he<03:08:16.840> never<03:08:17.160> had<03:08:17.319> shown<03:08:17.640> me<03:08:17.880> it<03:08:18.239> or 03:08:19.790 --> 03:08:19.800 align:start position:0% say he never had shown me it or 03:08:19.800 --> 03:08:22.910 align:start position:0% say he never had shown me it or no<03:08:20.800> he<03:08:20.960> had<03:08:21.200> not<03:08:21.479> shown<03:08:21.760> me<03:08:21.960> it<03:08:22.319> Additionally 03:08:22.910 --> 03:08:22.920 align:start position:0% no he had not shown me it Additionally 03:08:22.920 --> 03:08:24.830 align:start position:0% no he had not shown me it Additionally you<03:08:23.040> can<03:08:23.160> use<03:08:23.439> reflexive<03:08:23.920> verbs<03:08:24.239> in<03:08:24.359> the<03:08:24.560> past 03:08:24.830 --> 03:08:24.840 align:start position:0% you can use reflexive verbs in the past 03:08:24.840 --> 03:08:26.670 align:start position:0% you can use reflexive verbs in the past perfect<03:08:25.279> by<03:08:25.399> putting<03:08:25.640> the<03:08:25.800> object<03:08:26.120> pronouns 03:08:26.670 --> 03:08:26.680 align:start position:0% perfect by putting the object pronouns 03:08:26.680 --> 03:08:28.950 align:start position:0% perfect by putting the object pronouns of<03:08:26.840> the<03:08:26.960> verb<03:08:27.319> before<03:08:27.600> the<03:08:27.760> construction<03:08:28.479> a 03:08:28.950 --> 03:08:28.960 align:start position:0% of the verb before the construction a 03:08:28.960 --> 03:08:31.110 align:start position:0% of the verb before the construction a plus<03:08:29.200> a<03:08:29.399> past<03:08:29.640> participle<03:08:30.160> a<03:08:30.279> useful<03:08:30.680> sentence 03:08:31.110 --> 03:08:31.120 align:start position:0% plus a past participle a useful sentence 03:08:31.120 --> 03:08:33.510 align:start position:0% plus a past participle a useful sentence can 03:08:33.510 --> 03:08:33.520 align:start position:0% 03:08:33.520 --> 03:08:36.349 align:start position:0% be<03:08:34.520> before<03:08:34.800> going<03:08:35.000> to<03:08:35.200> work<03:08:35.560> I<03:08:35.720> had<03:08:36.000> taken<03:08:36.239> a 03:08:36.349 --> 03:08:36.359 align:start position:0% be before going to work I had taken a 03:08:36.359 --> 03:08:37.830 align:start position:0% be before going to work I had taken a shower<03:08:36.800> and<03:08:36.960> as<03:08:37.120> you<03:08:37.239> can<03:08:37.359> see<03:08:37.680> the 03:08:37.830 --> 03:08:37.840 align:start position:0% shower and as you can see the 03:08:37.840 --> 03:08:39.950 align:start position:0% shower and as you can see the construction<03:08:38.359> of<03:08:38.640> a<03:08:39.080> doesn't<03:08:39.399> separate 03:08:39.950 --> 03:08:39.960 align:start position:0% construction of a doesn't separate 03:08:39.960 --> 03:08:41.429 align:start position:0% construction of a doesn't separate because<03:08:40.200> the<03:08:40.319> object<03:08:40.680> pronoun<03:08:41.160> of<03:08:41.279> the 03:08:41.429 --> 03:08:41.439 align:start position:0% because the object pronoun of the 03:08:41.439 --> 03:08:43.269 align:start position:0% because the object pronoun of the reflexive<03:08:41.920> verb<03:08:42.279> is<03:08:42.399> placed<03:08:42.720> before<03:08:42.960> for<03:08:43.120> this 03:08:43.269 --> 03:08:43.279 align:start position:0% reflexive verb is placed before for this 03:08:43.279 --> 03:08:45.030 align:start position:0% reflexive verb is placed before for this construction<03:08:43.800> and<03:08:43.920> the<03:08:44.040> same<03:08:44.239> idea<03:08:44.720> applies 03:08:45.030 --> 03:08:45.040 align:start position:0% construction and the same idea applies 03:08:45.040 --> 03:08:46.870 align:start position:0% construction and the same idea applies to<03:08:45.239> every<03:08:45.479> phrase<03:08:45.920> that<03:08:46.080> I've<03:08:46.239> shown<03:08:46.560> in<03:08:46.680> the 03:08:46.870 --> 03:08:46.880 align:start position:0% to every phrase that I've shown in the 03:08:46.880 --> 03:08:48.469 align:start position:0% to every phrase that I've shown in the video<03:08:47.319> and<03:08:47.520> any<03:08:47.720> phrase<03:08:48.040> that<03:08:48.160> you<03:08:48.239> want<03:08:48.359> to 03:08:48.469 --> 03:08:48.479 align:start position:0% video and any phrase that you want to 03:08:48.479 --> 03:08:50.510 align:start position:0% video and any phrase that you want to say<03:08:48.840> personally<03:08:49.479> however<03:08:49.800> I<03:08:49.880> don't<03:08:50.160> recommend 03:08:50.510 --> 03:08:50.520 align:start position:0% say personally however I don't recommend 03:08:50.520 --> 03:08:52.309 align:start position:0% say personally however I don't recommend using<03:08:50.760> the<03:08:50.960> past<03:08:51.239> perfect<03:08:51.640> with<03:08:51.840> reflexive 03:08:52.309 --> 03:08:52.319 align:start position:0% using the past perfect with reflexive 03:08:52.319 --> 03:08:53.830 align:start position:0% using the past perfect with reflexive verbs<03:08:52.720> because<03:08:52.960> there<03:08:53.080> are<03:08:53.239> not<03:08:53.479> that<03:08:53.640> many 03:08:53.830 --> 03:08:53.840 align:start position:0% verbs because there are not that many 03:08:53.840 --> 03:08:55.309 align:start position:0% verbs because there are not that many sentences<03:08:54.319> that<03:08:54.399> you<03:08:54.520> can<03:08:54.640> make<03:08:54.880> with<03:08:55.040> them 03:08:55.309 --> 03:08:55.319 align:start position:0% sentences that you can make with them 03:08:55.319 --> 03:08:57.349 align:start position:0% sentences that you can make with them let<03:08:55.520> alone<03:08:55.840> useful<03:08:56.239> sentences<03:08:56.880> even<03:08:57.120> though<03:08:57.279> I 03:08:57.349 --> 03:08:57.359 align:start position:0% let alone useful sentences even though I 03:08:57.359 --> 03:08:59.070 align:start position:0% let alone useful sentences even though I don't<03:08:57.520> like<03:08:57.680> saying<03:08:57.960> this<03:08:58.160> quite<03:08:58.399> often<03:08:58.800> I 03:08:59.070 --> 03:08:59.080 align:start position:0% don't like saying this quite often I 03:08:59.080 --> 03:09:00.990 align:start position:0% don't like saying this quite often I recommend<03:08:59.600> not<03:08:59.880> using<03:09:00.160> the<03:09:00.359> past<03:09:00.600> perfect 03:09:00.990 --> 03:09:01.000 align:start position:0% recommend not using the past perfect 03:09:01.000 --> 03:09:02.710 align:start position:0% recommend not using the past perfect when<03:09:01.160> speaking<03:09:01.479> Spanish<03:09:01.840> conversationally 03:09:02.710 --> 03:09:02.720 align:start position:0% when speaking Spanish conversationally 03:09:02.720 --> 03:09:04.389 align:start position:0% when speaking Spanish conversationally because<03:09:02.920> it's<03:09:03.080> a<03:09:03.200> lot<03:09:03.399> easier<03:09:03.880> to<03:09:04.080> express 03:09:04.389 --> 03:09:04.399 align:start position:0% because it's a lot easier to express 03:09:04.399 --> 03:09:06.110 align:start position:0% because it's a lot easier to express your<03:09:04.600> thoughts<03:09:04.960> using<03:09:05.239> the<03:09:05.399> regular<03:09:05.880> past 03:09:06.110 --> 03:09:06.120 align:start position:0% your thoughts using the regular past 03:09:06.120 --> 03:09:08.070 align:start position:0% your thoughts using the regular past tense<03:09:06.479> or<03:09:06.640> the<03:09:06.800> imperfect<03:09:07.520> even<03:09:07.720> though<03:09:07.880> I<03:09:07.960> did 03:09:08.070 --> 03:09:08.080 align:start position:0% tense or the imperfect even though I did 03:09:08.080 --> 03:09:10.110 align:start position:0% tense or the imperfect even though I did not<03:09:08.279> present<03:09:08.600> many<03:09:08.880> examples<03:09:09.399> in<03:09:09.520> the<03:09:09.680> video<03:09:10.040> I 03:09:10.110 --> 03:09:10.120 align:start position:0% not present many examples in the video I 03:09:10.120 --> 03:09:11.910 align:start position:0% not present many examples in the video I believe<03:09:10.359> that<03:09:10.479> the<03:09:10.680> past<03:09:10.920> perfect<03:09:11.399> is<03:09:11.520> a<03:09:11.680> tense 03:09:11.910 --> 03:09:11.920 align:start position:0% believe that the past perfect is a tense 03:09:11.920 --> 03:09:13.349 align:start position:0% believe that the past perfect is a tense that's<03:09:12.080> useful<03:09:12.359> to<03:09:12.520> know<03:09:12.800> but<03:09:13.000> but<03:09:13.080> not<03:09:13.239> that 03:09:13.349 --> 03:09:13.359 align:start position:0% that's useful to know but but not that 03:09:13.359 --> 03:09:15.070 align:start position:0% that's useful to know but but not that useful<03:09:13.680> to<03:09:13.800> utilize<03:09:14.399> because<03:09:14.600> there<03:09:14.720> are<03:09:14.880> not 03:09:15.070 --> 03:09:15.080 align:start position:0% useful to utilize because there are not 03:09:15.080 --> 03:09:16.910 align:start position:0% useful to utilize because there are not that<03:09:15.239> many<03:09:15.439> sentences<03:09:16.120> that<03:09:16.239> you<03:09:16.359> can<03:09:16.520> make<03:09:16.840> in 03:09:16.910 --> 03:09:16.920 align:start position:0% that many sentences that you can make in 03:09:16.920 --> 03:09:18.349 align:start position:0% that many sentences that you can make in the<03:09:17.080> first<03:09:17.359> place<03:09:17.680> but<03:09:17.840> that<03:09:18.000> of<03:09:18.120> course 03:09:18.349 --> 03:09:18.359 align:start position:0% the first place but that of course 03:09:18.359 --> 03:09:20.030 align:start position:0% the first place but that of course depends<03:09:18.640> on<03:09:18.760> the<03:09:18.920> context<03:09:19.479> and<03:09:19.600> just<03:09:19.760> like<03:09:19.920> I 03:09:20.030 --> 03:09:20.040 align:start position:0% depends on the context and just like I 03:09:20.040 --> 03:09:21.830 align:start position:0% depends on the context and just like I concluded<03:09:20.520> in<03:09:20.600> the<03:09:20.720> previous<03:09:21.120> videos<03:09:21.600> I<03:09:21.680> used 03:09:21.830 --> 03:09:21.840 align:start position:0% concluded in the previous videos I used 03:09:21.840 --> 03:09:23.269 align:start position:0% concluded in the previous videos I used to<03:09:21.960> think<03:09:22.120> of<03:09:22.239> phrases<03:09:22.640> like<03:09:22.840> these<03:09:23.120> in 03:09:23.269 --> 03:09:23.279 align:start position:0% to think of phrases like these in 03:09:23.279 --> 03:09:24.990 align:start position:0% to think of phrases like these in English<03:09:23.800> when<03:09:23.920> I<03:09:24.000> was<03:09:24.160> learning<03:09:24.520> Spanish 03:09:24.990 --> 03:09:25.000 align:start position:0% English when I was learning Spanish 03:09:25.000 --> 03:09:26.790 align:start position:0% English when I was learning Spanish through<03:09:25.279> English<03:09:25.880> therefore<03:09:26.359> I<03:09:26.479> thought<03:09:26.640> that 03:09:26.790 --> 03:09:26.800 align:start position:0% through English therefore I thought that 03:09:26.800 --> 03:09:28.750 align:start position:0% through English therefore I thought that if<03:09:26.960> the<03:09:27.080> word<03:09:27.359> had<03:09:27.720> is<03:09:27.840> the<03:09:27.960> same<03:09:28.160> in<03:09:28.319> English 03:09:28.750 --> 03:09:28.760 align:start position:0% if the word had is the same in English 03:09:28.760 --> 03:09:30.309 align:start position:0% if the word had is the same in English it<03:09:28.960> must<03:09:29.080> be<03:09:29.239> the<03:09:29.359> same<03:09:29.520> in<03:09:29.680> Spanish<03:09:30.160> but 03:09:30.309 --> 03:09:30.319 align:start position:0% it must be the same in Spanish but 03:09:30.319 --> 03:09:32.229 align:start position:0% it must be the same in Spanish but literally<03:09:30.880> Spanish<03:09:31.239> has<03:09:31.399> three<03:09:31.600> tenses<03:09:32.000> for 03:09:32.229 --> 03:09:32.239 align:start position:0% literally Spanish has three tenses for 03:09:32.239 --> 03:09:33.950 align:start position:0% literally Spanish has three tenses for these<03:09:32.439> cases<03:09:32.960> which<03:09:33.080> completely<03:09:33.479> changes<03:09:33.840> the 03:09:33.950 --> 03:09:33.960 align:start position:0% these cases which completely changes the 03:09:33.960 --> 03:09:35.750 align:start position:0% these cases which completely changes the word<03:09:34.399> and<03:09:34.560> now<03:09:34.840> you<03:09:34.960> can<03:09:35.080> hopefully 03:09:35.750 --> 03:09:35.760 align:start position:0% word and now you can hopefully 03:09:35.760 --> 03:09:37.550 align:start position:0% word and now you can hopefully understand<03:09:36.120> why<03:09:36.279> English<03:09:36.680> is<03:09:36.960> easier<03:09:37.439> when 03:09:37.550 --> 03:09:37.560 align:start position:0% understand why English is easier when 03:09:37.560 --> 03:09:39.030 align:start position:0% understand why English is easier when it's<03:09:37.720> compared<03:09:38.000> to<03:09:38.160> Spanish<03:09:38.640> and<03:09:38.760> it's<03:09:38.920> the 03:09:39.030 --> 03:09:39.040 align:start position:0% it's compared to Spanish and it's the 03:09:39.040 --> 03:09:40.830 align:start position:0% it's compared to Spanish and it's the same<03:09:39.359> process<03:09:39.840> that<03:09:40.000> I<03:09:40.160> had<03:09:40.279> to<03:09:40.399> go<03:09:40.560> through 03:09:40.830 --> 03:09:40.840 align:start position:0% same process that I had to go through 03:09:40.840 --> 03:09:42.950 align:start position:0% same process that I had to go through the<03:09:40.920> future<03:09:41.200> tense<03:09:41.520> in<03:09:41.680> Spanish<03:09:42.239> indicates<03:09:42.600> an 03:09:42.950 --> 03:09:42.960 align:start position:0% the future tense in Spanish indicates an 03:09:42.960 --> 03:09:44.229 align:start position:0% the future tense in Spanish indicates an action<03:09:43.200> that<03:09:43.359> will<03:09:43.479> simply<03:09:43.800> happen<03:09:44.000> in<03:09:44.120> the 03:09:44.229 --> 03:09:44.239 align:start position:0% action that will simply happen in the 03:09:44.239 --> 03:09:46.070 align:start position:0% action that will simply happen in the future<03:09:44.680> hence<03:09:44.920> it's<03:09:45.080> the<03:09:45.200> simple<03:09:45.479> future<03:09:45.920> in 03:09:46.070 --> 03:09:46.080 align:start position:0% future hence it's the simple future in 03:09:46.080 --> 03:09:47.830 align:start position:0% future hence it's the simple future in English<03:09:46.560> it's<03:09:46.680> a<03:09:46.800> very<03:09:47.000> simple<03:09:47.359> concept 03:09:47.830 --> 03:09:47.840 align:start position:0% English it's a very simple concept 03:09:47.840 --> 03:09:49.110 align:start position:0% English it's a very simple concept because<03:09:48.040> it<03:09:48.120> doesn't<03:09:48.359> matter<03:09:48.600> what<03:09:48.800> verb<03:09:49.000> we 03:09:49.110 --> 03:09:49.120 align:start position:0% because it doesn't matter what verb we 03:09:49.120 --> 03:09:51.110 align:start position:0% because it doesn't matter what verb we use<03:09:49.479> we<03:09:49.640> always<03:09:49.920> put<03:09:50.080> the<03:09:50.200> word<03:09:50.439> will<03:09:50.880> before 03:09:51.110 --> 03:09:51.120 align:start position:0% use we always put the word will before 03:09:51.120 --> 03:09:52.670 align:start position:0% use we always put the word will before the<03:09:51.279> verb<03:09:51.640> which<03:09:51.760> doesn't<03:09:52.000> change<03:09:52.279> the<03:09:52.439> verb 03:09:52.670 --> 03:09:52.680 align:start position:0% the verb which doesn't change the verb 03:09:52.680 --> 03:09:54.710 align:start position:0% the verb which doesn't change the verb itself<03:09:53.160> in<03:09:53.319> Spanish<03:09:53.800> the<03:09:53.920> future<03:09:54.200> is<03:09:54.319> a<03:09:54.439> simple 03:09:54.710 --> 03:09:54.720 align:start position:0% itself in Spanish the future is a simple 03:09:54.720 --> 03:09:56.429 align:start position:0% itself in Spanish the future is a simple tense<03:09:55.160> consisting<03:09:55.560> of<03:09:55.720> one<03:09:55.920> word<03:09:56.279> which 03:09:56.429 --> 03:09:56.439 align:start position:0% tense consisting of one word which 03:09:56.439 --> 03:09:58.030 align:start position:0% tense consisting of one word which doesn't<03:09:56.680> really<03:09:56.960> conjugate<03:09:57.399> the<03:09:57.520> verb<03:09:57.840> but 03:09:58.030 --> 03:09:58.040 align:start position:0% doesn't really conjugate the verb but 03:09:58.040 --> 03:10:00.110 align:start position:0% doesn't really conjugate the verb but rather<03:09:58.439> keeps<03:09:58.720> the<03:09:58.880> form<03:09:59.120> of<03:09:59.239> the<03:09:59.359> verb<03:09:59.760> as<03:09:59.960> the 03:10:00.110 --> 03:10:00.120 align:start position:0% rather keeps the form of the verb as the 03:10:00.120 --> 03:10:01.790 align:start position:0% rather keeps the form of the verb as the infinitive<03:10:00.720> and<03:10:00.840> then<03:10:01.000> add<03:10:01.239> some<03:10:01.399> letters 03:10:01.790 --> 03:10:01.800 align:start position:0% infinitive and then add some letters 03:10:01.800 --> 03:10:03.670 align:start position:0% infinitive and then add some letters after<03:10:02.040> it<03:10:02.319> principally<03:10:02.880> verbs<03:10:03.160> in<03:10:03.279> the<03:10:03.399> future 03:10:03.670 --> 03:10:03.680 align:start position:0% after it principally verbs in the future 03:10:03.680 --> 03:10:05.309 align:start position:0% after it principally verbs in the future tense<03:10:03.920> in<03:10:04.080> Spanish<03:10:04.600> don't<03:10:04.880> really<03:10:05.080> get 03:10:05.309 --> 03:10:05.319 align:start position:0% tense in Spanish don't really get 03:10:05.319 --> 03:10:07.429 align:start position:0% tense in Spanish don't really get conjugated<03:10:05.960> but<03:10:06.160> rather<03:10:06.600> they<03:10:06.720> change<03:10:07.279> by 03:10:07.429 --> 03:10:07.439 align:start position:0% conjugated but rather they change by 03:10:07.439 --> 03:10:09.150 align:start position:0% conjugated but rather they change by having<03:10:07.680> letters<03:10:08.120> after<03:10:08.399> them<03:10:08.720> the<03:10:08.840> best<03:10:09.000> thing 03:10:09.150 --> 03:10:09.160 align:start position:0% having letters after them the best thing 03:10:09.160 --> 03:10:10.750 align:start position:0% having letters after them the best thing about<03:10:09.359> the<03:10:09.479> future<03:10:09.760> tense<03:10:10.000> in<03:10:10.160> Spanish<03:10:10.640> is 03:10:10.750 --> 03:10:10.760 align:start position:0% about the future tense in Spanish is 03:10:10.760 --> 03:10:13.070 align:start position:0% about the future tense in Spanish is that<03:10:10.880> it<03:10:11.000> doesn't<03:10:11.279> matter<03:10:11.760> if<03:10:11.880> we<03:10:12.000> use<03:10:12.200> an<03:10:12.359> AR<03:10:12.920> e 03:10:13.070 --> 03:10:13.080 align:start position:0% that it doesn't matter if we use an AR e 03:10:13.080 --> 03:10:15.630 align:start position:0% that it doesn't matter if we use an AR e r<03:10:13.359> or<03:10:13.640> I<03:10:14.080> verb<03:10:14.479> stem<03:10:14.720> changing<03:10:15.120> or<03:10:15.359> an 03:10:15.630 --> 03:10:15.640 align:start position:0% r or I verb stem changing or an 03:10:15.640 --> 03:10:17.710 align:start position:0% r or I verb stem changing or an irregular<03:10:16.200> yo<03:10:16.479> verb<03:10:16.800> the<03:10:16.920> change<03:10:17.120> to<03:10:17.279> the<03:10:17.399> verb 03:10:17.710 --> 03:10:17.720 align:start position:0% irregular yo verb the change to the verb 03:10:17.720 --> 03:10:19.950 align:start position:0% irregular yo verb the change to the verb itself<03:10:18.200> will<03:10:18.359> stay<03:10:18.640> the<03:10:18.760> same<03:10:19.120> across<03:10:19.560> almost 03:10:19.950 --> 03:10:19.960 align:start position:0% itself will stay the same across almost 03:10:19.960 --> 03:10:22.030 align:start position:0% itself will stay the same across almost every<03:10:20.239> verb<03:10:20.560> there<03:10:20.720> is<03:10:20.920> in<03:10:21.080> Spanish<03:10:21.520> for<03:10:21.640> the<03:10:21.800> Y 03:10:22.030 --> 03:10:22.040 align:start position:0% every verb there is in Spanish for the Y 03:10:22.040 --> 03:10:23.710 align:start position:0% every verb there is in Spanish for the Y pronoun<03:10:22.520> you<03:10:22.640> keep<03:10:22.880> the<03:10:22.960> form<03:10:23.160> of<03:10:23.279> the<03:10:23.399> verb 03:10:23.710 --> 03:10:23.720 align:start position:0% pronoun you keep the form of the verb 03:10:23.720 --> 03:10:26.030 align:start position:0% pronoun you keep the form of the verb and<03:10:23.840> then<03:10:24.000> put<03:10:24.200> the<03:10:24.319> ending<03:10:24.880> e<03:10:25.200> with<03:10:25.319> an<03:10:25.600> accent 03:10:26.030 --> 03:10:26.040 align:start position:0% and then put the ending e with an accent 03:10:26.040 --> 03:10:27.309 align:start position:0% and then put the ending e with an accent so<03:10:26.160> that<03:10:26.279> when<03:10:26.399> you<03:10:26.479> say<03:10:26.680> the<03:10:26.840> word<03:10:27.160> the 03:10:27.309 --> 03:10:27.319 align:start position:0% so that when you say the word the 03:10:27.319 --> 03:10:29.750 align:start position:0% so that when you say the word the emphasis<03:10:27.800> is<03:10:27.960> put<03:10:28.200> on<03:10:28.399> that<03:10:28.640> accent<03:10:29.120> for<03:10:29.359> two 03:10:29.750 --> 03:10:29.760 align:start position:0% emphasis is put on that accent for two 03:10:29.760 --> 03:10:32.469 align:start position:0% emphasis is put on that accent for two you<03:10:29.920> put<03:10:30.160> as<03:10:30.520> with<03:10:30.640> an<03:10:30.840> accent<03:10:31.359> for<03:10:31.600> L<03:10:32.000> you<03:10:32.160> put 03:10:32.469 --> 03:10:32.479 align:start position:0% you put as with an accent for L you put 03:10:32.479 --> 03:10:35.590 align:start position:0% you put as with an accent for L you put a<03:10:32.880> with<03:10:33.000> an<03:10:33.200> accent<03:10:33.640> for<03:10:33.840> noos<03:10:34.560> you<03:10:34.720> put<03:10:35.040> Emos 03:10:35.590 --> 03:10:35.600 align:start position:0% a with an accent for noos you put Emos 03:10:35.600 --> 03:10:37.309 align:start position:0% a with an accent for noos you put Emos with<03:10:35.760> no<03:10:36.040> accent<03:10:36.439> making<03:10:36.720> it<03:10:36.880> the<03:10:37.040> only 03:10:37.309 --> 03:10:37.319 align:start position:0% with no accent making it the only 03:10:37.319 --> 03:10:39.190 align:start position:0% with no accent making it the only pronoun<03:10:37.800> in<03:10:37.960> the<03:10:38.080> future<03:10:38.399> tense<03:10:38.760> with<03:10:38.920> no 03:10:39.190 --> 03:10:39.200 align:start position:0% pronoun in the future tense with no 03:10:39.200 --> 03:10:41.670 align:start position:0% pronoun in the future tense with no accent<03:10:39.600> for<03:10:39.800> votos<03:10:40.520> you<03:10:40.680> put<03:10:40.960> Ace<03:10:41.399> with<03:10:41.520> an 03:10:41.670 --> 03:10:41.680 align:start position:0% accent for votos you put Ace with an 03:10:41.680 --> 03:10:43.990 align:start position:0% accent for votos you put Ace with an accent<03:10:42.160> and<03:10:42.239> for<03:10:42.439> AOS<03:10:42.920> you<03:10:43.080> put<03:10:43.319> an<03:10:43.720> with<03:10:43.840> an 03:10:43.990 --> 03:10:44.000 align:start position:0% accent and for AOS you put an with an 03:10:44.000 --> 03:10:45.870 align:start position:0% accent and for AOS you put an with an accent<03:10:44.399> with<03:10:44.520> the<03:10:44.640> future<03:10:44.920> tense<03:10:45.160> in<03:10:45.319> Spanish 03:10:45.870 --> 03:10:45.880 align:start position:0% accent with the future tense in Spanish 03:10:45.880 --> 03:10:47.830 align:start position:0% accent with the future tense in Spanish I<03:10:46.000> recommend<03:10:46.399> focusing<03:10:46.760> on<03:10:46.960> all<03:10:47.200> pronouns 03:10:47.830 --> 03:10:47.840 align:start position:0% I recommend focusing on all pronouns 03:10:47.840 --> 03:10:49.990 align:start position:0% I recommend focusing on all pronouns except<03:10:48.200> votos<03:10:48.920> because<03:10:49.120> using<03:10:49.479> any<03:10:49.680> verb<03:10:49.880> in 03:10:49.990 --> 03:10:50.000 align:start position:0% except votos because using any verb in 03:10:50.000 --> 03:10:51.830 align:start position:0% except votos because using any verb in the<03:10:50.080> future<03:10:50.399> tense<03:10:50.680> is<03:10:50.920> very<03:10:51.160> practical<03:10:51.720> there 03:10:51.830 --> 03:10:51.840 align:start position:0% the future tense is very practical there 03:10:51.840 --> 03:10:53.950 align:start position:0% the future tense is very practical there are<03:10:52.200> however<03:10:52.479> a<03:10:52.600> few<03:10:52.840> irregular<03:10:53.399> verbs<03:10:53.720> in<03:10:53.840> the 03:10:53.950 --> 03:10:53.960 align:start position:0% are however a few irregular verbs in the 03:10:53.960 --> 03:10:55.990 align:start position:0% are however a few irregular verbs in the future<03:10:54.439> mainly<03:10:54.800> ones<03:10:55.120> that<03:10:55.239> are<03:10:55.399> simply<03:10:55.680> mixed 03:10:55.990 --> 03:10:56.000 align:start position:0% future mainly ones that are simply mixed 03:10:56.000 --> 03:10:57.630 align:start position:0% future mainly ones that are simply mixed up<03:10:56.279> the<03:10:56.399> best<03:10:56.560> tip<03:10:56.760> that<03:10:56.920> I<03:10:57.000> can<03:10:57.160> give<03:10:57.399> is<03:10:57.520> to 03:10:57.630 --> 03:10:57.640 align:start position:0% up the best tip that I can give is to 03:10:57.640 --> 03:10:59.110 align:start position:0% up the best tip that I can give is to just<03:10:57.800> memorize<03:10:58.279> these<03:10:58.439> verbs<03:10:58.800> because<03:10:59.000> there 03:10:59.110 --> 03:10:59.120 align:start position:0% just memorize these verbs because there 03:10:59.120 --> 03:11:00.830 align:start position:0% just memorize these verbs because there is<03:10:59.239> no<03:10:59.399> pattern<03:10:59.680> to<03:10:59.800> follow<03:11:00.080> with<03:11:00.239> any<03:11:00.399> of<03:11:00.520> them 03:11:00.830 --> 03:11:00.840 align:start position:0% is no pattern to follow with any of them 03:11:00.840 --> 03:11:02.030 align:start position:0% is no pattern to follow with any of them but<03:11:01.000> keep<03:11:01.160> in<03:11:01.319> mind<03:11:01.600> that<03:11:01.720> they<03:11:01.840> still 03:11:02.030 --> 03:11:02.040 align:start position:0% but keep in mind that they still 03:11:02.040 --> 03:11:04.030 align:start position:0% but keep in mind that they still maintain<03:11:02.439> the<03:11:02.600> same<03:11:02.840> ending<03:11:03.359> as<03:11:03.439> for<03:11:03.680> regular 03:11:04.030 --> 03:11:04.040 align:start position:0% maintain the same ending as for regular 03:11:04.040 --> 03:11:06.190 align:start position:0% maintain the same ending as for regular verbs<03:11:04.479> in<03:11:04.600> the<03:11:04.760> list<03:11:05.160> you<03:11:05.319> have<03:11:05.479> verbs<03:11:05.840> like 03:11:06.190 --> 03:11:06.200 align:start position:0% verbs in the list you have verbs like 03:11:06.200 --> 03:11:09.309 align:start position:0% verbs in the list you have verbs like the<03:11:06.720> meaning<03:11:07.000> to<03:11:07.160> say<03:11:07.399> or<03:11:07.560> to<03:11:07.760> tell<03:11:08.200> a<03:11:08.720> to<03:11:08.880> do<03:11:09.120> or 03:11:09.309 --> 03:11:09.319 align:start position:0% the meaning to say or to tell a to do or 03:11:09.319 --> 03:11:14.830 align:start position:0% the meaning to say or to tell a to do or to<03:11:09.520> make<03:11:10.439> to<03:11:10.720> can<03:11:11.720> to<03:11:11.920> put<03:11:12.880> to<03:11:13.040> want<03:11:13.560> sa<03:11:14.120> to<03:11:14.319> know 03:11:14.830 --> 03:11:14.840 align:start position:0% to make to can to put to want sa to know 03:11:14.840 --> 03:11:17.790 align:start position:0% to make to can to put to want sa to know Sal<03:11:15.319> to<03:11:15.520> leave<03:11:15.960> ten<03:11:16.399> to<03:11:16.600> have<03:11:17.040> and<03:11:17.239> venir<03:11:17.600> to 03:11:17.790 --> 03:11:17.800 align:start position:0% Sal to leave ten to have and venir to 03:11:17.800 --> 03:11:19.710 align:start position:0% Sal to leave ten to have and venir to come<03:11:18.120> as<03:11:18.239> far<03:11:18.399> as<03:11:18.560> I<03:11:18.680> know<03:11:19.000> these<03:11:19.160> are<03:11:19.319> the<03:11:19.439> only 03:11:19.710 --> 03:11:19.720 align:start position:0% come as far as I know these are the only 03:11:19.720 --> 03:11:21.510 align:start position:0% come as far as I know these are the only irregular<03:11:20.200> verbs<03:11:20.479> in<03:11:20.560> the<03:11:20.640> future<03:11:20.960> tense<03:11:21.359> and 03:11:21.510 --> 03:11:21.520 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in the future tense and 03:11:21.520 --> 03:11:23.229 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in the future tense and here<03:11:21.640> are<03:11:21.800> some<03:11:22.040> examples<03:11:22.600> saying<03:11:22.920> something 03:11:23.229 --> 03:11:23.239 align:start position:0% here are some examples saying something 03:11:23.239 --> 03:11:25.710 align:start position:0% here are some examples saying something like<03:11:23.439> I<03:11:23.560> will<03:11:23.680> do<03:11:23.880> my<03:11:24.080> homework<03:11:24.600> will 03:11:25.710 --> 03:11:25.720 align:start position:0% like I will do my homework will 03:11:25.720 --> 03:11:28.349 align:start position:0% like I will do my homework will be<03:11:26.720> saying<03:11:27.040> you<03:11:27.160> will<03:11:27.359> buy<03:11:27.560> a<03:11:27.720> house<03:11:28.120> in<03:11:28.239> the 03:11:28.349 --> 03:11:28.359 align:start position:0% be saying you will buy a house in the 03:11:28.359 --> 03:11:31.190 align:start position:0% be saying you will buy a house in the future<03:11:29.000> can 03:11:31.190 --> 03:11:31.200 align:start position:0% future can 03:11:31.200 --> 03:11:35.630 align:start position:0% future can be<03:11:32.200> saying<03:11:32.640> he<03:11:32.760> will<03:11:32.960> be<03:11:33.160> 30<03:11:33.479> years<03:11:33.720> old<03:11:34.120> will 03:11:35.630 --> 03:11:35.640 align:start position:0% be saying he will be 30 years old will 03:11:35.640 --> 03:11:38.150 align:start position:0% be saying he will be 30 years old will be<03:11:36.640> and<03:11:36.800> we<03:11:36.920> have<03:11:37.000> to<03:11:37.080> use<03:11:37.239> the<03:11:37.359> verb<03:11:38.000> to 03:11:38.150 --> 03:11:38.160 align:start position:0% be and we have to use the verb to 03:11:38.160 --> 03:11:39.830 align:start position:0% be and we have to use the verb to express<03:11:38.479> having<03:11:38.680> an<03:11:38.840> age<03:11:39.160> so<03:11:39.319> watch<03:11:39.479> out<03:11:39.640> for 03:11:39.830 --> 03:11:39.840 align:start position:0% express having an age so watch out for 03:11:39.840 --> 03:11:41.750 align:start position:0% express having an age so watch out for that 03:11:41.750 --> 03:11:41.760 align:start position:0% that 03:11:41.760 --> 03:11:44.750 align:start position:0% that saying<03:11:43.160> can<03:11:43.319> mean<03:11:43.680> we<03:11:43.800> will<03:11:44.000> learn<03:11:44.399> Spanish 03:11:44.750 --> 03:11:44.760 align:start position:0% saying can mean we will learn Spanish 03:11:44.760 --> 03:11:46.950 align:start position:0% saying can mean we will learn Spanish tomorrow<03:11:45.239> with<03:11:45.359> the<03:11:45.479> word<03:11:45.800> Manana<03:11:46.399> helping<03:11:46.720> us 03:11:46.950 --> 03:11:46.960 align:start position:0% tomorrow with the word Manana helping us 03:11:46.960 --> 03:11:48.389 align:start position:0% tomorrow with the word Manana helping us indicate<03:11:47.439> that<03:11:47.560> the<03:11:47.760> action<03:11:48.000> is<03:11:48.160> in<03:11:48.279> the 03:11:48.389 --> 03:11:48.399 align:start position:0% indicate that the action is in the 03:11:48.399 --> 03:11:50.190 align:start position:0% indicate that the action is in the future<03:11:48.840> saying<03:11:49.200> AOS 03:11:50.190 --> 03:11:50.200 align:start position:0% future saying AOS 03:11:50.200 --> 03:11:53.110 align:start position:0% future saying AOS Vos<03:11:51.200> can<03:11:51.359> mean<03:11:51.720> they<03:11:51.840> will<03:11:52.080> come<03:11:52.399> if<03:11:52.560> they<03:11:52.720> want 03:11:53.110 --> 03:11:53.120 align:start position:0% Vos can mean they will come if they want 03:11:53.120 --> 03:11:56.030 align:start position:0% Vos can mean they will come if they want saying<03:11:53.600> y<03:11:54.560> can<03:11:54.680> mean<03:11:55.000> I<03:11:55.080> will<03:11:55.359> give<03:11:55.479> you<03:11:55.720> it 03:11:56.030 --> 03:11:56.040 align:start position:0% saying y can mean I will give you it 03:11:56.040 --> 03:11:57.630 align:start position:0% saying y can mean I will give you it using<03:11:56.359> direct<03:11:56.680> and<03:11:56.840> indirect<03:11:57.319> object 03:11:57.630 --> 03:11:57.640 align:start position:0% using direct and indirect object 03:11:57.640 --> 03:11:59.309 align:start position:0% using direct and indirect object pronouns<03:11:58.160> which<03:11:58.279> will<03:11:58.479> always<03:11:58.840> come<03:11:59.080> before 03:11:59.309 --> 03:11:59.319 align:start position:0% pronouns which will always come before 03:11:59.319 --> 03:12:02.429 align:start position:0% pronouns which will always come before the<03:11:59.439> verb<03:11:59.800> saying<03:12:00.520> El<03:12:01.520> can<03:12:01.640> mean<03:12:01.960> he<03:12:02.080> will<03:12:02.279> take 03:12:02.429 --> 03:12:02.439 align:start position:0% the verb saying El can mean he will take 03:12:02.439 --> 03:12:04.469 align:start position:0% the verb saying El can mean he will take a<03:12:02.600> bath<03:12:03.000> using<03:12:03.239> a<03:12:03.399> reflexive<03:12:03.920> verb<03:12:04.200> with<03:12:04.359> the 03:12:04.469 --> 03:12:04.479 align:start position:0% a bath using a reflexive verb with the 03:12:04.479 --> 03:12:06.309 align:start position:0% a bath using a reflexive verb with the object<03:12:04.840> pronoun<03:12:05.279> coming<03:12:05.600> before<03:12:05.880> the<03:12:06.000> verb 03:12:06.309 --> 03:12:06.319 align:start position:0% object pronoun coming before the verb 03:12:06.319 --> 03:12:07.990 align:start position:0% object pronoun coming before the verb ultimately<03:12:07.000> there<03:12:07.120> are<03:12:07.319> many<03:12:07.520> phrases<03:12:07.880> that 03:12:07.990 --> 03:12:08.000 align:start position:0% ultimately there are many phrases that 03:12:08.000 --> 03:12:09.469 align:start position:0% ultimately there are many phrases that you<03:12:08.080> can<03:12:08.239> make<03:12:08.520> using<03:12:08.800> the<03:12:08.920> simple<03:12:09.160> future 03:12:09.469 --> 03:12:09.479 align:start position:0% you can make using the simple future 03:12:09.479 --> 03:12:11.229 align:start position:0% you can make using the simple future tense<03:12:09.720> in<03:12:09.880> Spanish<03:12:10.359> and<03:12:10.479> it's<03:12:10.640> up<03:12:10.800> to<03:12:10.920> you<03:12:11.120> to 03:12:11.229 --> 03:12:11.239 align:start position:0% tense in Spanish and it's up to you to 03:12:11.239 --> 03:12:12.790 align:start position:0% tense in Spanish and it's up to you to say<03:12:11.439> any<03:12:11.600> phrase<03:12:11.880> that<03:12:12.000> you<03:12:12.120> want<03:12:12.399> because<03:12:12.720> it 03:12:12.790 --> 03:12:12.800 align:start position:0% say any phrase that you want because it 03:12:12.800 --> 03:12:14.830 align:start position:0% say any phrase that you want because it is<03:12:12.920> not<03:12:13.080> that<03:12:13.279> hard<03:12:13.560> to<03:12:13.720> memorize<03:12:14.359> finally 03:12:14.830 --> 03:12:14.840 align:start position:0% is not that hard to memorize finally 03:12:14.840 --> 03:12:16.429 align:start position:0% is not that hard to memorize finally there's<03:12:15.040> one<03:12:15.279> last<03:12:15.560> concept<03:12:16.040> that<03:12:16.160> I<03:12:16.279> would 03:12:16.429 --> 03:12:16.439 align:start position:0% there's one last concept that I would 03:12:16.439 --> 03:12:18.349 align:start position:0% there's one last concept that I would like<03:12:16.600> to<03:12:16.800> present<03:12:17.279> that<03:12:17.399> mainly<03:12:17.760> has<03:12:17.920> to<03:12:18.080> do 03:12:18.349 --> 03:12:18.359 align:start position:0% like to present that mainly has to do 03:12:18.359 --> 03:12:19.830 align:start position:0% like to present that mainly has to do with<03:12:18.600> expressing<03:12:19.040> your<03:12:19.239> thoughts<03:12:19.600> in<03:12:19.720> the 03:12:19.830 --> 03:12:19.840 align:start position:0% with expressing your thoughts in the 03:12:19.840 --> 03:12:21.950 align:start position:0% with expressing your thoughts in the future<03:12:20.319> and<03:12:20.439> how<03:12:20.680> to<03:12:20.840> think<03:12:21.160> in<03:12:21.359> Spanish<03:12:21.840> in 03:12:21.950 --> 03:12:21.960 align:start position:0% future and how to think in Spanish in 03:12:21.960 --> 03:12:23.630 align:start position:0% future and how to think in Spanish in terms<03:12:22.160> of<03:12:22.279> the<03:12:22.399> future<03:12:22.880> which<03:12:23.040> doesn't<03:12:23.359> really 03:12:23.630 --> 03:12:23.640 align:start position:0% terms of the future which doesn't really 03:12:23.640 --> 03:12:25.630 align:start position:0% terms of the future which doesn't really require<03:12:24.239> the<03:12:24.399> simple<03:12:24.680> future<03:12:25.000> tense<03:12:25.399> before 03:12:25.630 --> 03:12:25.640 align:start position:0% require the simple future tense before 03:12:25.640 --> 03:12:27.670 align:start position:0% require the simple future tense before learning<03:12:26.000> this<03:12:26.200> tense<03:12:26.600> I<03:12:26.720> made<03:12:26.880> a<03:12:27.000> video<03:12:27.439> about 03:12:27.670 --> 03:12:27.680 align:start position:0% learning this tense I made a video about 03:12:27.680 --> 03:12:29.710 align:start position:0% learning this tense I made a video about the<03:12:27.800> verb<03:12:28.120> e<03:12:28.479> talking<03:12:28.840> about<03:12:29.080> how<03:12:29.200> to<03:12:29.359> use<03:12:29.600> the 03:12:29.710 --> 03:12:29.720 align:start position:0% the verb e talking about how to use the 03:12:29.720 --> 03:12:31.590 align:start position:0% the verb e talking about how to use the verb<03:12:30.040> to<03:12:30.200> go<03:12:30.439> in<03:12:30.640> Spanish<03:12:31.200> something<03:12:31.479> that 03:12:31.590 --> 03:12:31.600 align:start position:0% verb to go in Spanish something that 03:12:31.600 --> 03:12:33.429 align:start position:0% verb to go in Spanish something that I've<03:12:31.760> mentioned<03:12:32.200> over<03:12:32.479> time<03:12:32.880> with<03:12:33.000> the<03:12:33.160> verb 03:12:33.429 --> 03:12:33.439 align:start position:0% I've mentioned over time with the verb 03:12:33.439 --> 03:12:34.790 align:start position:0% I've mentioned over time with the verb ear<03:12:33.800> and<03:12:33.920> something<03:12:34.160> that<03:12:34.319> people<03:12:34.560> don't 03:12:34.790 --> 03:12:34.800 align:start position:0% ear and something that people don't 03:12:34.800 --> 03:12:36.429 align:start position:0% ear and something that people don't realize<03:12:35.200> when<03:12:35.319> learning<03:12:35.680> Spanish<03:12:36.239> is<03:12:36.319> that 03:12:36.429 --> 03:12:36.439 align:start position:0% realize when learning Spanish is that 03:12:36.439 --> 03:12:38.510 align:start position:0% realize when learning Spanish is that the<03:12:36.560> verb<03:12:36.920> IR<03:12:37.239> can<03:12:37.399> effectively<03:12:37.880> be<03:12:38.000> used<03:12:38.359> to 03:12:38.510 --> 03:12:38.520 align:start position:0% the verb IR can effectively be used to 03:12:38.520 --> 03:12:40.469 align:start position:0% the verb IR can effectively be used to express<03:12:38.840> the<03:12:39.000> near<03:12:39.239> future<03:12:39.760> using<03:12:40.040> the 03:12:40.469 --> 03:12:40.479 align:start position:0% express the near future using the 03:12:40.479 --> 03:12:42.670 align:start position:0% express the near future using the construction<03:12:41.479> plus<03:12:41.640> an<03:12:41.840> infinitive<03:12:42.279> in<03:12:42.399> the 03:12:42.670 --> 03:12:42.680 align:start position:0% construction plus an infinitive in the 03:12:42.680 --> 03:12:44.550 align:start position:0% construction plus an infinitive in the present<03:12:42.960> simple<03:12:43.399> for<03:12:43.600> instance<03:12:44.080> I<03:12:44.160> can<03:12:44.279> say<03:12:44.479> a 03:12:44.550 --> 03:12:44.560 align:start position:0% present simple for instance I can say a 03:12:44.560 --> 03:12:46.030 align:start position:0% present simple for instance I can say a sentence 03:12:46.030 --> 03:12:46.040 align:start position:0% sentence 03:12:46.040 --> 03:12:48.469 align:start position:0% sentence like<03:12:47.040> meaning<03:12:47.399> I'm<03:12:47.520> going<03:12:47.720> to<03:12:47.880> eat<03:12:48.160> in<03:12:48.279> the 03:12:48.469 --> 03:12:48.479 align:start position:0% like meaning I'm going to eat in the 03:12:48.479 --> 03:12:50.429 align:start position:0% like meaning I'm going to eat in the afternoon<03:12:49.120> which<03:12:49.279> indicates<03:12:49.680> an<03:12:49.960> action<03:12:50.319> in 03:12:50.429 --> 03:12:50.439 align:start position:0% afternoon which indicates an action in 03:12:50.439 --> 03:12:52.710 align:start position:0% afternoon which indicates an action in the<03:12:50.600> near<03:12:50.840> future<03:12:51.279> using<03:12:51.560> the<03:12:51.720> infinitive 03:12:52.710 --> 03:12:52.720 align:start position:0% the near future using the infinitive 03:12:52.720 --> 03:12:54.790 align:start position:0% the near future using the infinitive however<03:12:53.000> we<03:12:53.120> can<03:12:53.319> in<03:12:53.479> fact<03:12:53.760> use<03:12:54.000> the<03:12:54.120> verb<03:12:54.439> ear 03:12:54.790 --> 03:12:54.800 align:start position:0% however we can in fact use the verb ear 03:12:54.800 --> 03:12:56.670 align:start position:0% however we can in fact use the verb ear as<03:12:54.920> an<03:12:55.080> infinitive<03:12:55.640> to<03:12:55.840> express<03:12:56.160> the<03:12:56.239> future 03:12:56.670 --> 03:12:56.680 align:start position:0% as an infinitive to express the future 03:12:56.680 --> 03:12:59.030 align:start position:0% as an infinitive to express the future when<03:12:56.840> speaking<03:12:57.279> saying<03:12:57.560> something<03:12:57.920> like 03:12:59.030 --> 03:12:59.040 align:start position:0% when speaking saying something like 03:12:59.040 --> 03:13:01.950 align:start position:0% when speaking saying something like y<03:13:00.040> means<03:13:00.439> I'm<03:13:00.600> going<03:13:00.800> to<03:13:01.000> go<03:13:01.239> to<03:13:01.439> the<03:13:01.560> school 03:13:01.950 --> 03:13:01.960 align:start position:0% y means I'm going to go to the school 03:13:01.960 --> 03:13:03.710 align:start position:0% y means I'm going to go to the school which<03:13:02.160> expressively<03:13:02.640> shows<03:13:03.040> the<03:13:03.160> future<03:13:03.479> in 03:13:03.710 --> 03:13:03.720 align:start position:0% which expressively shows the future in 03:13:03.720 --> 03:13:05.790 align:start position:0% which expressively shows the future in context<03:13:04.239> and<03:13:04.359> the<03:13:04.479> same<03:13:04.720> idea<03:13:05.200> applies<03:13:05.520> to<03:13:05.640> any 03:13:05.790 --> 03:13:05.800 align:start position:0% context and the same idea applies to any 03:13:05.800 --> 03:13:08.309 align:start position:0% context and the same idea applies to any sentence<03:13:06.120> that<03:13:06.239> you<03:13:06.319> want<03:13:06.399> to<03:13:06.600> say<03:13:06.920> using<03:13:07.319> Y 03:13:08.309 --> 03:13:08.319 align:start position:0% sentence that you want to say using Y 03:13:08.319 --> 03:13:09.870 align:start position:0% sentence that you want to say using Y now<03:13:08.600> instead<03:13:08.840> of<03:13:09.040> actively<03:13:09.399> using<03:13:09.720> this 03:13:09.870 --> 03:13:09.880 align:start position:0% now instead of actively using this 03:13:09.880 --> 03:13:11.429 align:start position:0% now instead of actively using this phrase<03:13:10.279> we<03:13:10.359> can<03:13:10.479> use<03:13:10.680> the<03:13:10.800> simple<03:13:11.080> future 03:13:11.429 --> 03:13:11.439 align:start position:0% phrase we can use the simple future 03:13:11.439 --> 03:13:14.229 align:start position:0% phrase we can use the simple future tense<03:13:11.800> by<03:13:11.960> simply<03:13:12.200> saying 03:13:14.229 --> 03:13:14.239 align:start position:0% tense by simply saying 03:13:14.239 --> 03:13:16.190 align:start position:0% tense by simply saying meaning<03:13:14.640> I<03:13:14.760> will<03:13:15.000> go<03:13:15.279> to<03:13:15.439> the<03:13:15.560> school<03:13:15.960> as<03:13:16.080> you 03:13:16.190 --> 03:13:16.200 align:start position:0% meaning I will go to the school as you 03:13:16.200 --> 03:13:17.870 align:start position:0% meaning I will go to the school as you can<03:13:16.319> see<03:13:16.640> in<03:13:16.720> order<03:13:16.960> to<03:13:17.160> express<03:13:17.439> the<03:13:17.560> future 03:13:17.870 --> 03:13:17.880 align:start position:0% can see in order to express the future 03:13:17.880 --> 03:13:19.510 align:start position:0% can see in order to express the future when<03:13:18.040> speaking<03:13:18.560> we<03:13:18.680> have<03:13:18.800> two<03:13:19.000> phrases<03:13:19.399> that 03:13:19.510 --> 03:13:19.520 align:start position:0% when speaking we have two phrases that 03:13:19.520 --> 03:13:21.870 align:start position:0% when speaking we have two phrases that can<03:13:19.680> do<03:13:19.800> so<03:13:20.160> with<03:13:20.319> one<03:13:20.680> using<03:13:20.960> the<03:13:21.120> verb<03:13:21.399> ear<03:13:21.760> as 03:13:21.870 --> 03:13:21.880 align:start position:0% can do so with one using the verb ear as 03:13:21.880 --> 03:13:23.910 align:start position:0% can do so with one using the verb ear as an<03:13:22.080> infinitive<03:13:22.720> I'm<03:13:22.880> going<03:13:23.080> to<03:13:23.319> go<03:13:23.600> and<03:13:23.760> with 03:13:23.910 --> 03:13:23.920 align:start position:0% an infinitive I'm going to go and with 03:13:23.920 --> 03:13:25.950 align:start position:0% an infinitive I'm going to go and with the<03:13:24.080> other<03:13:24.439> being<03:13:24.680> the<03:13:24.800> simple<03:13:25.080> future<03:13:25.640> I<03:13:25.720> will 03:13:25.950 --> 03:13:25.960 align:start position:0% the other being the simple future I will 03:13:25.960 --> 03:13:27.469 align:start position:0% the other being the simple future I will go<03:13:26.279> and<03:13:26.359> you<03:13:26.439> don't<03:13:26.680> really<03:13:26.960> have<03:13:27.080> to<03:13:27.200> use<03:13:27.359> the 03:13:27.469 --> 03:13:27.479 align:start position:0% go and you don't really have to use the 03:13:27.479 --> 03:13:29.510 align:start position:0% go and you don't really have to use the verb<03:13:27.760> ear<03:13:28.040> you<03:13:28.120> can<03:13:28.239> say<03:13:28.439> something 03:13:29.510 --> 03:13:29.520 align:start position:0% verb ear you can say something 03:13:29.520 --> 03:13:33.190 align:start position:0% verb ear you can say something like<03:13:30.520> she<03:13:30.680> is<03:13:30.840> going<03:13:31.040> to<03:13:31.279> walk<03:13:31.640> but<03:13:32.200> saying 03:13:33.190 --> 03:13:33.200 align:start position:0% like she is going to walk but saying 03:13:33.200 --> 03:13:35.030 align:start position:0% like she is going to walk but saying means<03:13:33.640> she<03:13:33.840> will<03:13:34.080> walk<03:13:34.439> it<03:13:34.520> doesn't<03:13:34.760> matter 03:13:35.030 --> 03:13:35.040 align:start position:0% means she will walk it doesn't matter 03:13:35.040 --> 03:13:36.590 align:start position:0% means she will walk it doesn't matter which<03:13:35.200> phrase<03:13:35.439> you<03:13:35.560> say<03:13:35.920> because<03:13:36.120> you<03:13:36.239> express 03:13:36.590 --> 03:13:36.600 align:start position:0% which phrase you say because you express 03:13:36.600 --> 03:13:38.550 align:start position:0% which phrase you say because you express the<03:13:36.720> future<03:13:37.200> in<03:13:37.319> the<03:13:37.439> two<03:13:37.640> sentences<03:13:38.279> in<03:13:38.399> case 03:13:38.550 --> 03:13:38.560 align:start position:0% the future in the two sentences in case 03:13:38.560 --> 03:13:40.150 align:start position:0% the future in the two sentences in case you<03:13:38.640> forget<03:13:38.960> the<03:13:39.080> simple<03:13:39.319> future<03:13:39.680> tense<03:13:40.080> you 03:13:40.150 --> 03:13:40.160 align:start position:0% you forget the simple future tense you 03:13:40.160 --> 03:13:42.550 align:start position:0% you forget the simple future tense you can<03:13:40.319> use<03:13:40.720> IR<03:13:41.040> instead<03:13:41.520> and<03:13:41.720> vice<03:13:41.960> versa<03:13:42.319> person 03:13:42.550 --> 03:13:42.560 align:start position:0% can use IR instead and vice versa person 03:13:42.560 --> 03:13:44.630 align:start position:0% can use IR instead and vice versa person personally<03:13:43.040> I<03:13:43.120> think<03:13:43.319> it's<03:13:43.520> best<03:13:43.840> to<03:13:44.000> use<03:13:44.319> IR 03:13:44.630 --> 03:13:44.640 align:start position:0% personally I think it's best to use IR 03:13:44.640 --> 03:13:45.710 align:start position:0% personally I think it's best to use IR because<03:13:44.840> you<03:13:44.920> don't<03:13:45.120> have<03:13:45.200> to<03:13:45.319> change<03:13:45.560> the 03:13:45.710 --> 03:13:45.720 align:start position:0% because you don't have to change the 03:13:45.720 --> 03:13:48.190 align:start position:0% because you don't have to change the infinitive<03:13:46.239> all<03:13:46.359> you<03:13:46.520> do<03:13:46.840> is<03:13:47.000> use<03:13:47.880> and<03:13:48.000> then 03:13:48.190 --> 03:13:48.200 align:start position:0% infinitive all you do is use and then 03:13:48.200 --> 03:13:49.830 align:start position:0% infinitive all you do is use and then any<03:13:48.399> verb<03:13:48.640> you<03:13:48.760> want<03:13:49.160> whereas<03:13:49.439> using<03:13:49.720> the 03:13:49.830 --> 03:13:49.840 align:start position:0% any verb you want whereas using the 03:13:49.840 --> 03:13:51.870 align:start position:0% any verb you want whereas using the simple<03:13:50.120> future<03:13:50.520> tense<03:13:50.960> might<03:13:51.200> require<03:13:51.640> more 03:13:51.870 --> 03:13:51.880 align:start position:0% simple future tense might require more 03:13:51.880 --> 03:13:53.550 align:start position:0% simple future tense might require more thinking<03:13:52.399> because<03:13:52.640> instead<03:13:52.920> of<03:13:53.080> conjugating 03:13:53.550 --> 03:13:53.560 align:start position:0% thinking because instead of conjugating 03:13:53.560 --> 03:13:54.950 align:start position:0% thinking because instead of conjugating the<03:13:53.720> verb<03:13:54.000> you<03:13:54.120> have<03:13:54.239> to<03:13:54.399> remember<03:13:54.760> which 03:13:54.950 --> 03:13:54.960 align:start position:0% the verb you have to remember which 03:13:54.960 --> 03:13:56.710 align:start position:0% the verb you have to remember which letter<03:13:55.160> to<03:13:55.359> place<03:13:55.760> after<03:13:56.040> the<03:13:56.200> verb<03:13:56.479> and<03:13:56.600> it's 03:13:56.710 --> 03:13:56.720 align:start position:0% letter to place after the verb and it's 03:13:56.720 --> 03:13:58.710 align:start position:0% letter to place after the verb and it's a<03:13:56.840> lot<03:13:57.000> to<03:13:57.120> memorize<03:13:57.760> this<03:13:58.000> in<03:13:58.200> fact<03:13:58.520> is<03:13:58.600> a 03:13:58.710 --> 03:13:58.720 align:start position:0% a lot to memorize this in fact is a 03:13:58.720 --> 03:14:00.830 align:start position:0% a lot to memorize this in fact is a useful<03:13:59.000> Lang<03:13:59.319> hack<03:13:59.600> either<03:13:59.880> way<03:14:00.239> this<03:14:00.399> video 03:14:00.830 --> 03:14:00.840 align:start position:0% useful Lang hack either way this video 03:14:00.840 --> 03:14:02.710 align:start position:0% useful Lang hack either way this video was<03:14:01.080> about<03:14:01.359> the<03:14:01.479> simple<03:14:01.760> future<03:14:02.120> tense<03:14:02.560> but 03:14:02.710 --> 03:14:02.720 align:start position:0% was about the simple future tense but 03:14:02.720 --> 03:14:04.349 align:start position:0% was about the simple future tense but this<03:14:02.960> hack<03:14:03.279> is<03:14:03.399> useful<03:14:03.720> to<03:14:03.920> express<03:14:04.239> the 03:14:04.349 --> 03:14:04.359 align:start position:0% this hack is useful to express the 03:14:04.359 --> 03:14:06.070 align:start position:0% this hack is useful to express the future<03:14:04.840> and<03:14:04.960> not<03:14:05.120> so<03:14:05.239> in<03:14:05.359> the<03:14:05.439> future<03:14:05.760> simple 03:14:06.070 --> 03:14:06.080 align:start position:0% future and not so in the future simple 03:14:06.080 --> 03:14:07.670 align:start position:0% future and not so in the future simple tense<03:14:06.560> the<03:14:06.640> future<03:14:06.960> perfect<03:14:07.279> tense<03:14:07.520> in 03:14:07.670 --> 03:14:07.680 align:start position:0% tense the future perfect tense in 03:14:07.680 --> 03:14:09.389 align:start position:0% tense the future perfect tense in Spanish<03:14:08.160> speaks<03:14:08.479> about<03:14:08.760> what<03:14:08.920> will<03:14:09.200> have 03:14:09.389 --> 03:14:09.399 align:start position:0% Spanish speaks about what will have 03:14:09.399 --> 03:14:11.309 align:start position:0% Spanish speaks about what will have happened<03:14:09.880> at<03:14:10.000> some<03:14:10.239> point<03:14:10.560> in<03:14:10.680> the<03:14:10.800> future<03:14:11.200> in 03:14:11.309 --> 03:14:11.319 align:start position:0% happened at some point in the future in 03:14:11.319 --> 03:14:12.750 align:start position:0% happened at some point in the future in English<03:14:11.800> it's<03:14:11.920> a<03:14:12.080> tense<03:14:12.319> that's<03:14:12.520> it's<03:14:12.640> not 03:14:12.750 --> 03:14:12.760 align:start position:0% English it's a tense that's it's not 03:14:12.760 --> 03:14:14.830 align:start position:0% English it's a tense that's it's not used<03:14:13.080> often<03:14:13.479> but<03:14:13.640> when<03:14:13.760> it<03:14:13.880> is<03:14:14.239> it's<03:14:14.359> a<03:14:14.479> simple 03:14:14.830 --> 03:14:14.840 align:start position:0% used often but when it is it's a simple 03:14:14.840 --> 03:14:16.710 align:start position:0% used often but when it is it's a simple concept<03:14:15.399> because<03:14:15.640> all<03:14:15.840> we<03:14:15.960> do<03:14:16.239> is<03:14:16.359> put<03:14:16.600> the 03:14:16.710 --> 03:14:16.720 align:start position:0% concept because all we do is put the 03:14:16.720 --> 03:14:18.550 align:start position:0% concept because all we do is put the construction<03:14:17.279> will<03:14:17.600> have<03:14:17.920> and<03:14:18.040> then<03:14:18.160> we<03:14:18.319> add 03:14:18.550 --> 03:14:18.560 align:start position:0% construction will have and then we add 03:14:18.560 --> 03:14:20.469 align:start position:0% construction will have and then we add any<03:14:18.760> participle<03:14:19.279> that<03:14:19.399> we<03:14:19.520> want<03:14:19.880> after<03:14:20.279> in 03:14:20.469 --> 03:14:20.479 align:start position:0% any participle that we want after in 03:14:20.479 --> 03:14:21.950 align:start position:0% any participle that we want after in Spanish<03:14:20.920> however<03:14:21.200> we<03:14:21.319> have<03:14:21.439> a<03:14:21.560> slightly 03:14:21.950 --> 03:14:21.960 align:start position:0% Spanish however we have a slightly 03:14:21.960 --> 03:14:23.469 align:start position:0% Spanish however we have a slightly different<03:14:22.279> concept<03:14:22.760> that<03:14:22.920> again<03:14:23.080> uses<03:14:23.359> the 03:14:23.469 --> 03:14:23.479 align:start position:0% different concept that again uses the 03:14:23.479 --> 03:14:25.670 align:start position:0% different concept that again uses the verb<03:14:23.760> a<03:14:24.200> but<03:14:24.319> in<03:14:24.439> the<03:14:24.560> future<03:14:24.960> perfect<03:14:25.399> we<03:14:25.520> use 03:14:25.670 --> 03:14:25.680 align:start position:0% verb a but in the future perfect we use 03:14:25.680 --> 03:14:27.830 align:start position:0% verb a but in the future perfect we use a<03:14:25.840> conjugation<03:14:26.600> that<03:14:26.720> is<03:14:26.880> equivalent<03:14:27.439> to<03:14:27.640> both 03:14:27.830 --> 03:14:27.840 align:start position:0% a conjugation that is equivalent to both 03:14:27.840 --> 03:14:29.670 align:start position:0% a conjugation that is equivalent to both of<03:14:27.960> the<03:14:28.080> words<03:14:28.560> will<03:14:28.880> have<03:14:29.120> for<03:14:29.279> the<03:14:29.439> yo 03:14:29.670 --> 03:14:29.680 align:start position:0% of the words will have for the yo 03:14:29.680 --> 03:14:31.870 align:start position:0% of the words will have for the yo pronoun<03:14:30.200> we<03:14:30.319> have<03:14:30.479> the<03:14:30.640> word<03:14:31.000> AB<03:14:31.520> which<03:14:31.640> is<03:14:31.720> a 03:14:31.870 --> 03:14:31.880 align:start position:0% pronoun we have the word AB which is a 03:14:31.880 --> 03:14:34.070 align:start position:0% pronoun we have the word AB which is a conjugation<03:14:32.439> of<03:14:32.720> a<03:14:33.160> plus<03:14:33.359> any<03:14:33.600> participle 03:14:34.070 --> 03:14:34.080 align:start position:0% conjugation of a plus any participle 03:14:34.080 --> 03:14:36.990 align:start position:0% conjugation of a plus any participle that<03:14:34.200> we<03:14:34.319> want<03:14:34.640> after<03:14:35.040> for<03:14:35.279> two<03:14:35.800> we<03:14:35.920> have<03:14:36.279> abas 03:14:36.990 --> 03:14:37.000 align:start position:0% that we want after for two we have abas 03:14:37.000 --> 03:14:40.190 align:start position:0% that we want after for two we have abas for<03:14:37.279> El<03:14:37.760> we<03:14:37.920> have<03:14:38.279> Abra<03:14:38.760> for<03:14:38.960> noos<03:14:39.720> we<03:14:39.880> have 03:14:40.190 --> 03:14:40.200 align:start position:0% for El we have Abra for noos we have 03:14:40.200 --> 03:14:42.630 align:start position:0% for El we have Abra for noos we have abos<03:14:40.920> with<03:14:41.080> no<03:14:41.359> accent<03:14:41.800> making<03:14:42.040> it<03:14:42.160> the<03:14:42.239> only 03:14:42.630 --> 03:14:42.640 align:start position:0% abos with no accent making it the only 03:14:42.640 --> 03:14:44.830 align:start position:0% abos with no accent making it the only conjugation<03:14:43.160> of<03:14:43.359> a<03:14:43.760> in<03:14:43.880> the<03:14:43.960> future<03:14:44.359> perfect 03:14:44.830 --> 03:14:44.840 align:start position:0% conjugation of a in the future perfect 03:14:44.840 --> 03:14:47.710 align:start position:0% conjugation of a in the future perfect with<03:14:44.960> no<03:14:45.239> accent<03:14:45.640> for<03:14:45.840> votos<03:14:46.560> we<03:14:46.720> have<03:14:47.000> ab<03:14:47.640> and 03:14:47.710 --> 03:14:47.720 align:start position:0% with no accent for votos we have ab and 03:14:47.720 --> 03:14:50.030 align:start position:0% with no accent for votos we have ab and for<03:14:47.960> AOS<03:14:48.439> we<03:14:48.600> have<03:14:48.840> Aban<03:14:49.359> as<03:14:49.439> you<03:14:49.520> can<03:14:49.720> probably 03:14:50.030 --> 03:14:50.040 align:start position:0% for AOS we have Aban as you can probably 03:14:50.040 --> 03:14:51.510 align:start position:0% for AOS we have Aban as you can probably tell<03:14:50.239> by<03:14:50.359> looking<03:14:50.600> at<03:14:50.720> the<03:14:50.800> chart<03:14:51.120> the<03:14:51.239> ending 03:14:51.510 --> 03:14:51.520 align:start position:0% tell by looking at the chart the ending 03:14:51.520 --> 03:14:53.429 align:start position:0% tell by looking at the chart the ending of<03:14:51.640> all<03:14:51.760> of<03:14:51.920> these<03:14:52.120> conjugations<03:14:52.760> of<03:14:53.000> a 03:14:53.429 --> 03:14:53.439 align:start position:0% of all of these conjugations of a 03:14:53.439 --> 03:14:55.110 align:start position:0% of all of these conjugations of a perfectly<03:14:53.880> correspond<03:14:54.479> to<03:14:54.640> the<03:14:54.720> ending 03:14:55.110 --> 03:14:55.120 align:start position:0% perfectly correspond to the ending 03:14:55.120 --> 03:14:56.990 align:start position:0% perfectly correspond to the ending pattern<03:14:55.520> of<03:14:55.720> verbs<03:14:56.040> in<03:14:56.160> the<03:14:56.279> simple<03:14:56.560> future 03:14:56.990 --> 03:14:57.000 align:start position:0% pattern of verbs in the simple future 03:14:57.000 --> 03:14:58.510 align:start position:0% pattern of verbs in the simple future and<03:14:57.120> that<03:14:57.239> is<03:14:57.359> because<03:14:57.600> the<03:14:57.720> future<03:14:58.080> perfect 03:14:58.510 --> 03:14:58.520 align:start position:0% and that is because the future perfect 03:14:58.520 --> 03:15:00.229 align:start position:0% and that is because the future perfect literally<03:14:58.960> just<03:14:59.200> copies<03:14:59.520> the<03:14:59.680> ending<03:15:00.120> that 03:15:00.229 --> 03:15:00.239 align:start position:0% literally just copies the ending that 03:15:00.239 --> 03:15:01.590 align:start position:0% literally just copies the ending that you<03:15:00.359> would<03:15:00.520> have<03:15:00.640> for<03:15:00.840> verbs<03:15:01.120> in<03:15:01.239> the<03:15:01.319> simple 03:15:01.590 --> 03:15:01.600 align:start position:0% you would have for verbs in the simple 03:15:01.600 --> 03:15:03.750 align:start position:0% you would have for verbs in the simple future<03:15:02.080> for<03:15:02.279> the<03:15:02.399> verb<03:15:02.680> a<03:15:03.080> so<03:15:03.200> it's<03:15:03.359> really<03:15:03.560> not 03:15:03.750 --> 03:15:03.760 align:start position:0% future for the verb a so it's really not 03:15:03.760 --> 03:15:05.750 align:start position:0% future for the verb a so it's really not that<03:15:04.080> difficult<03:15:04.239> to<03:15:04.359> memorize<03:15:05.000> as<03:15:05.160> always<03:15:05.560> try 03:15:05.750 --> 03:15:05.760 align:start position:0% that difficult to memorize as always try 03:15:05.760 --> 03:15:07.309 align:start position:0% that difficult to memorize as always try not<03:15:05.920> focusing<03:15:06.279> on<03:15:06.439> these<03:15:06.640> conjugations 03:15:07.309 --> 03:15:07.319 align:start position:0% not focusing on these conjugations 03:15:07.319 --> 03:15:08.590 align:start position:0% not focusing on these conjugations because<03:15:07.479> they're<03:15:07.640> the<03:15:07.760> least<03:15:08.000> used<03:15:08.239> ones<03:15:08.439> in 03:15:08.590 --> 03:15:08.600 align:start position:0% because they're the least used ones in 03:15:08.600 --> 03:15:10.469 align:start position:0% because they're the least used ones in conversation<03:15:09.279> in<03:15:09.399> Spanish<03:15:09.960> a<03:15:10.080> way<03:15:10.239> that<03:15:10.399> the 03:15:10.469 --> 03:15:10.479 align:start position:0% conversation in Spanish a way that the 03:15:10.479 --> 03:15:12.590 align:start position:0% conversation in Spanish a way that the future<03:15:10.840> perfect<03:15:11.319> can<03:15:11.439> be<03:15:11.560> used<03:15:11.880> effectively 03:15:12.590 --> 03:15:12.600 align:start position:0% future perfect can be used effectively 03:15:12.600 --> 03:15:14.469 align:start position:0% future perfect can be used effectively is<03:15:12.720> by<03:15:12.880> using<03:15:13.120> it<03:15:13.279> with<03:15:13.479> time<03:15:13.720> expressions 03:15:14.469 --> 03:15:14.479 align:start position:0% is by using it with time expressions 03:15:14.479 --> 03:15:17.590 align:start position:0% is by using it with time expressions like<03:15:14.800> para<03:15:15.239> and<03:15:15.479> D<03:15:16.120> which<03:15:16.239> mean<03:15:16.640> by<03:15:16.920> and<03:15:17.160> within 03:15:17.590 --> 03:15:17.600 align:start position:0% like para and D which mean by and within 03:15:17.600 --> 03:15:19.269 align:start position:0% like para and D which mean by and within and<03:15:17.760> then<03:15:18.040> any<03:15:18.279> time<03:15:18.520> expression<03:15:19.040> that<03:15:19.160> you 03:15:19.269 --> 03:15:19.279 align:start position:0% and then any time expression that you 03:15:19.279 --> 03:15:21.229 align:start position:0% and then any time expression that you want<03:15:19.720> these<03:15:19.920> constructions<03:15:20.680> can<03:15:20.880> help<03:15:21.080> us 03:15:21.229 --> 03:15:21.239 align:start position:0% want these constructions can help us 03:15:21.239 --> 03:15:23.110 align:start position:0% want these constructions can help us talk<03:15:21.479> about<03:15:21.840> what<03:15:22.040> will<03:15:22.279> have<03:15:22.479> happened<03:15:22.960> at 03:15:23.110 --> 03:15:23.120 align:start position:0% talk about what will have happened at 03:15:23.120 --> 03:15:24.630 align:start position:0% talk about what will have happened at some<03:15:23.359> point<03:15:23.680> in<03:15:23.760> the<03:15:23.920> future<03:15:24.319> saying 03:15:24.630 --> 03:15:24.640 align:start position:0% some point in the future saying 03:15:24.640 --> 03:15:27.110 align:start position:0% some point in the future saying something 03:15:27.110 --> 03:15:27.120 align:start position:0% 03:15:27.120 --> 03:15:29.790 align:start position:0% like<03:15:28.120> can<03:15:28.239> mean<03:15:28.600> by<03:15:28.760> Monday<03:15:29.319> I<03:15:29.399> will<03:15:29.640> have 03:15:29.790 --> 03:15:29.800 align:start position:0% like can mean by Monday I will have 03:15:29.800 --> 03:15:31.910 align:start position:0% like can mean by Monday I will have finished<03:15:30.160> my<03:15:30.359> tasks<03:15:30.800> with<03:15:31.000> El<03:15:31.199> Lunes<03:15:31.720> being 03:15:31.910 --> 03:15:31.920 align:start position:0% finished my tasks with El Lunes being 03:15:31.920 --> 03:15:34.110 align:start position:0% finished my tasks with El Lunes being the<03:15:32.080> time<03:15:32.319> expression<03:15:32.960> AB<03:15:33.520> signifying<03:15:34.040> the 03:15:34.110 --> 03:15:34.120 align:start position:0% the time expression AB signifying the 03:15:34.120 --> 03:15:36.110 align:start position:0% the time expression AB signifying the words<03:15:34.399> we'll<03:15:34.640> have<03:15:34.800> for<03:15:35.040> y<03:15:35.319> and<03:15:35.479> terminado 03:15:36.110 --> 03:15:36.120 align:start position:0% words we'll have for y and terminado 03:15:36.120 --> 03:15:40.790 align:start position:0% words we'll have for y and terminado being<03:15:36.359> the<03:15:36.520> participle<03:15:37.120> similarly<03:15:37.840> I<03:15:37.920> can 03:15:40.790 --> 03:15:40.800 align:start position:0% 03:15:40.800 --> 03:15:43.030 align:start position:0% say<03:15:41.800> meaning<03:15:42.160> Within<03:15:42.359> within<03:15:42.560> a<03:15:42.680> year<03:15:42.960> you 03:15:43.030 --> 03:15:43.040 align:start position:0% say meaning Within within a year you 03:15:43.040 --> 03:15:45.790 align:start position:0% say meaning Within within a year you will<03:15:43.279> have<03:15:43.479> left<03:15:43.840> your<03:15:44.040> job<03:15:44.319> using<03:15:44.800> un<03:15:45.560> as<03:15:45.640> a 03:15:45.790 --> 03:15:45.800 align:start position:0% will have left your job using un as a 03:15:45.800 --> 03:15:48.189 align:start position:0% will have left your job using un as a Time<03:15:46.040> expression<03:15:46.600> with<03:15:46.760> the<03:15:46.920> construction<03:15:47.520> D 03:15:48.189 --> 03:15:48.199 align:start position:0% Time expression with the construction D 03:15:48.199 --> 03:15:49.870 align:start position:0% Time expression with the construction D additionally<03:15:48.840> I<03:15:48.920> can 03:15:49.870 --> 03:15:49.880 align:start position:0% additionally I can 03:15:49.880 --> 03:15:54.510 align:start position:0% additionally I can say<03:15:51.199> Abra<03:15:52.199> muchas<03:15:53.199> which<03:15:53.319> means<03:15:53.720> by<03:15:53.960> that<03:15:54.199> date 03:15:54.510 --> 03:15:54.520 align:start position:0% say Abra muchas which means by that date 03:15:54.520 --> 03:15:56.870 align:start position:0% say Abra muchas which means by that date John<03:15:54.840> will<03:15:55.080> have<03:15:55.439> received<03:15:55.800> many<03:15:56.080> offers<03:15:56.640> with 03:15:56.870 --> 03:15:56.880 align:start position:0% John will have received many offers with 03:15:56.880 --> 03:15:59.389 align:start position:0% John will have received many offers with esaa<03:15:57.640> being<03:15:57.800> the<03:15:57.960> time<03:15:58.199> expression<03:15:58.760> as<03:15:58.920> always 03:15:59.389 --> 03:15:59.399 align:start position:0% esaa being the time expression as always 03:15:59.399 --> 03:16:01.030 align:start position:0% esaa being the time expression as always the<03:15:59.520> same<03:15:59.760> concept<03:16:00.199> applies<03:16:00.520> to<03:16:00.640> any<03:16:00.800> phrase 03:16:01.030 --> 03:16:01.040 align:start position:0% the same concept applies to any phrase 03:16:01.040 --> 03:16:02.510 align:start position:0% the same concept applies to any phrase that<03:16:01.160> you<03:16:01.239> want<03:16:01.359> to<03:16:01.479> say<03:16:01.800> using<03:16:02.080> the<03:16:02.199> future 03:16:02.510 --> 03:16:02.520 align:start position:0% that you want to say using the future 03:16:02.520 --> 03:16:04.229 align:start position:0% that you want to say using the future perfect<03:16:02.800> tense<03:16:03.120> in<03:16:03.279> Spanish<03:16:03.840> even<03:16:04.040> though<03:16:04.160> I 03:16:04.229 --> 03:16:04.239 align:start position:0% perfect tense in Spanish even though I 03:16:04.239 --> 03:16:06.070 align:start position:0% perfect tense in Spanish even though I did<03:16:04.399> not<03:16:04.600> present<03:16:04.920> many<03:16:05.199> examples<03:16:05.760> in<03:16:05.920> this 03:16:06.070 --> 03:16:06.080 align:start position:0% did not present many examples in this 03:16:06.080 --> 03:16:08.070 align:start position:0% did not present many examples in this video<03:16:06.479> and<03:16:06.680> only<03:16:06.960> concentrated<03:16:07.560> on<03:16:07.680> the<03:16:07.840> first 03:16:08.070 --> 03:16:08.080 align:start position:0% video and only concentrated on the first 03:16:08.080 --> 03:16:10.110 align:start position:0% video and only concentrated on the first three<03:16:08.319> pronouns<03:16:08.920> the<03:16:09.040> future<03:16:09.399> perfect<03:16:09.720> tense 03:16:10.110 --> 03:16:10.120 align:start position:0% three pronouns the future perfect tense 03:16:10.120 --> 03:16:11.990 align:start position:0% three pronouns the future perfect tense is<03:16:10.239> one<03:16:10.359> of<03:16:10.479> the<03:16:10.600> least<03:16:10.840> used<03:16:11.120> ones<03:16:11.399> in<03:16:11.560> Spanish 03:16:11.990 --> 03:16:12.000 align:start position:0% is one of the least used ones in Spanish 03:16:12.000 --> 03:16:14.030 align:start position:0% is one of the least used ones in Spanish mainly<03:16:12.439> because<03:16:12.640> no<03:16:12.760> one<03:16:12.920> uses<03:16:13.239> it<03:16:13.479> in<03:16:13.720> actual 03:16:14.030 --> 03:16:14.040 align:start position:0% mainly because no one uses it in actual 03:16:14.040 --> 03:16:15.830 align:start position:0% mainly because no one uses it in actual conversation<03:16:14.720> as<03:16:14.800> a<03:16:14.920> matter<03:16:15.160> of<03:16:15.319> fact<03:16:15.600> I<03:16:15.680> did 03:16:15.830 --> 03:16:15.840 align:start position:0% conversation as a matter of fact I did 03:16:15.840 --> 03:16:17.630 align:start position:0% conversation as a matter of fact I did not<03:16:16.040> present<03:16:16.399> any<03:16:16.600> sentences<03:16:17.199> involving 03:16:17.630 --> 03:16:17.640 align:start position:0% not present any sentences involving 03:16:17.640 --> 03:16:19.550 align:start position:0% not present any sentences involving negatives<03:16:18.199> reflexive<03:16:18.680> verbs<03:16:19.040> and<03:16:19.239> object 03:16:19.550 --> 03:16:19.560 align:start position:0% negatives reflexive verbs and object 03:16:19.560 --> 03:16:21.550 align:start position:0% negatives reflexive verbs and object pronouns<03:16:20.120> mostly<03:16:20.560> because<03:16:20.800> it's<03:16:21.000> impossible 03:16:21.550 --> 03:16:21.560 align:start position:0% pronouns mostly because it's impossible 03:16:21.560 --> 03:16:23.349 align:start position:0% pronouns mostly because it's impossible to<03:16:21.720> make<03:16:21.840> a<03:16:22.000> logical<03:16:22.399> phrase<03:16:22.840> using<03:16:23.160> these 03:16:23.349 --> 03:16:23.359 align:start position:0% to make a logical phrase using these 03:16:23.359 --> 03:16:25.469 align:start position:0% to make a logical phrase using these ideas<03:16:23.720> in<03:16:23.840> the<03:16:23.960> future<03:16:24.319> perfect<03:16:24.840> if<03:16:25.040> anything 03:16:25.469 --> 03:16:25.479 align:start position:0% ideas in the future perfect if anything 03:16:25.479 --> 03:16:27.150 align:start position:0% ideas in the future perfect if anything the<03:16:25.600> future<03:16:25.960> perfect<03:16:26.439> is<03:16:26.560> a<03:16:26.680> tense<03:16:26.960> that<03:16:27.080> is 03:16:27.150 --> 03:16:27.160 align:start position:0% the future perfect is a tense that is 03:16:27.160 --> 03:16:29.349 align:start position:0% the future perfect is a tense that is useful<03:16:27.479> to<03:16:27.640> know<03:16:27.960> but<03:16:28.080> not<03:16:28.319> useful<03:16:28.600> to<03:16:28.760> utilize 03:16:29.349 --> 03:16:29.359 align:start position:0% useful to know but not useful to utilize 03:16:29.359 --> 03:16:31.349 align:start position:0% useful to know but not useful to utilize simply<03:16:29.720> because<03:16:30.120> it's<03:16:30.239> used<03:16:30.479> in<03:16:30.640> rare<03:16:30.920> cases 03:16:31.349 --> 03:16:31.359 align:start position:0% simply because it's used in rare cases 03:16:31.359 --> 03:16:32.950 align:start position:0% simply because it's used in rare cases when<03:16:31.520> talking<03:16:31.800> about<03:16:32.120> actions<03:16:32.640> that<03:16:32.760> are 03:16:32.950 --> 03:16:32.960 align:start position:0% when talking about actions that are 03:16:32.960 --> 03:16:35.150 align:start position:0% when talking about actions that are guaranteed<03:16:33.600> and<03:16:33.800> completed<03:16:34.439> by<03:16:34.600> some<03:16:34.880> point 03:16:35.150 --> 03:16:35.160 align:start position:0% guaranteed and completed by some point 03:16:35.160 --> 03:16:36.950 align:start position:0% guaranteed and completed by some point in<03:16:35.279> the<03:16:35.399> future<03:16:35.840> both<03:16:36.120> literally<03:16:36.760> and 03:16:36.950 --> 03:16:36.960 align:start position:0% in the future both literally and 03:16:36.960 --> 03:16:39.030 align:start position:0% in the future both literally and conversationally<03:16:37.880> the<03:16:38.000> future<03:16:38.399> perfect<03:16:38.880> is 03:16:39.030 --> 03:16:39.040 align:start position:0% conversationally the future perfect is 03:16:39.040 --> 03:16:41.550 align:start position:0% conversationally the future perfect is not<03:16:39.199> used<03:16:39.560> very<03:16:39.800> often<03:16:40.279> if<03:16:40.439> ever<03:16:40.960> which<03:16:41.080> is<03:16:41.279> why 03:16:41.550 --> 03:16:41.560 align:start position:0% not used very often if ever which is why 03:16:41.560 --> 03:16:42.750 align:start position:0% not used very often if ever which is why it's<03:16:41.680> useful<03:16:41.960> to<03:16:42.239> understand<03:16:42.479> understand<03:16:42.640> how 03:16:42.750 --> 03:16:42.760 align:start position:0% it's useful to understand understand how 03:16:42.760 --> 03:16:44.950 align:start position:0% it's useful to understand understand how it<03:16:42.920> works<03:16:43.359> but<03:16:43.479> not<03:16:43.600> so<03:16:43.760> much<03:16:43.920> to<03:16:44.120> use<03:16:44.680> the 03:16:44.950 --> 03:16:44.960 align:start position:0% it works but not so much to use the 03:16:44.960 --> 03:16:46.710 align:start position:0% it works but not so much to use the conditional<03:16:45.239> tense<03:16:45.560> in<03:16:45.720> Spanish<03:16:46.239> indicates 03:16:46.710 --> 03:16:46.720 align:start position:0% conditional tense in Spanish indicates 03:16:46.720 --> 03:16:48.550 align:start position:0% conditional tense in Spanish indicates what<03:16:46.880> one<03:16:47.040> would<03:16:47.239> do<03:16:47.520> or<03:16:47.720> what<03:16:47.880> would<03:16:48.160> happen 03:16:48.550 --> 03:16:48.560 align:start position:0% what one would do or what would happen 03:16:48.560 --> 03:16:50.550 align:start position:0% what one would do or what would happen in<03:16:48.640> a<03:16:48.840> situation<03:16:49.399> in<03:16:49.560> English<03:16:50.080> it's<03:16:50.239> a<03:16:50.399> very 03:16:50.550 --> 03:16:50.560 align:start position:0% in a situation in English it's a very 03:16:50.560 --> 03:16:52.229 align:start position:0% in a situation in English it's a very simple<03:16:50.920> concept<03:16:51.439> because<03:16:51.640> it<03:16:51.720> doesn't<03:16:51.960> matter 03:16:52.229 --> 03:16:52.239 align:start position:0% simple concept because it doesn't matter 03:16:52.239 --> 03:16:54.070 align:start position:0% simple concept because it doesn't matter what<03:16:52.399> verb<03:16:52.600> we<03:16:52.760> use<03:16:53.080> we<03:16:53.239> always<03:16:53.520> put<03:16:53.680> the<03:16:53.800> word 03:16:54.070 --> 03:16:54.080 align:start position:0% what verb we use we always put the word 03:16:54.080 --> 03:16:55.550 align:start position:0% what verb we use we always put the word would<03:16:54.439> before<03:16:54.720> the<03:16:54.880> verb<03:16:55.199> which<03:16:55.359> doesn't 03:16:55.550 --> 03:16:55.560 align:start position:0% would before the verb which doesn't 03:16:55.560 --> 03:16:57.750 align:start position:0% would before the verb which doesn't change<03:16:55.880> the<03:16:56.000> verb<03:16:56.279> itself<03:16:56.760> in<03:16:56.920> Spanish<03:16:57.479> the 03:16:57.750 --> 03:16:57.760 align:start position:0% change the verb itself in Spanish the 03:16:57.760 --> 03:16:59.670 align:start position:0% change the verb itself in Spanish the conditional<03:16:58.120> is<03:16:58.279> a<03:16:58.399> tense<03:16:58.880> that<03:16:59.040> has<03:16:59.199> only<03:16:59.479> one 03:16:59.670 --> 03:16:59.680 align:start position:0% conditional is a tense that has only one 03:16:59.680 --> 03:17:01.469 align:start position:0% conditional is a tense that has only one word<03:17:00.040> which<03:17:00.160> doesn't<03:17:00.439> really<03:17:00.640> get<03:17:00.840> conjugated 03:17:01.469 --> 03:17:01.479 align:start position:0% word which doesn't really get conjugated 03:17:01.479 --> 03:17:03.510 align:start position:0% word which doesn't really get conjugated but<03:17:01.720> rather<03:17:02.080> keeps<03:17:02.319> the<03:17:02.439> form<03:17:02.720> of<03:17:02.840> the<03:17:02.960> verb<03:17:03.319> as 03:17:03.510 --> 03:17:03.520 align:start position:0% but rather keeps the form of the verb as 03:17:03.520 --> 03:17:04.950 align:start position:0% but rather keeps the form of the verb as the<03:17:03.680> infinitive<03:17:04.279> and<03:17:04.399> then<03:17:04.560> adds<03:17:04.800> some 03:17:04.950 --> 03:17:04.960 align:start position:0% the infinitive and then adds some 03:17:04.960 --> 03:17:06.950 align:start position:0% the infinitive and then adds some letters<03:17:05.399> after<03:17:05.640> it<03:17:05.880> as<03:17:06.000> a<03:17:06.120> matter<03:17:06.399> of<03:17:06.560> fact<03:17:06.800> its 03:17:06.950 --> 03:17:06.960 align:start position:0% letters after it as a matter of fact its 03:17:06.960 --> 03:17:08.750 align:start position:0% letters after it as a matter of fact its modification<03:17:07.600> pattern<03:17:08.040> is<03:17:08.199> similar<03:17:08.479> to<03:17:08.600> the 03:17:08.750 --> 03:17:08.760 align:start position:0% modification pattern is similar to the 03:17:08.760 --> 03:17:10.510 align:start position:0% modification pattern is similar to the simple<03:17:09.000> future<03:17:09.359> tense<03:17:09.800> where<03:17:09.960> verbs<03:17:10.319> don't 03:17:10.510 --> 03:17:10.520 align:start position:0% simple future tense where verbs don't 03:17:10.520 --> 03:17:12.710 align:start position:0% simple future tense where verbs don't get<03:17:10.720> conjugated<03:17:11.399> but<03:17:11.600> rather<03:17:11.960> they<03:17:12.279> change<03:17:12.600> by 03:17:12.710 --> 03:17:12.720 align:start position:0% get conjugated but rather they change by 03:17:12.720 --> 03:17:14.389 align:start position:0% get conjugated but rather they change by having<03:17:12.960> letters<03:17:13.399> after<03:17:13.680> them<03:17:13.960> just<03:17:14.120> like<03:17:14.279> the 03:17:14.389 --> 03:17:14.399 align:start position:0% having letters after them just like the 03:17:14.399 --> 03:17:16.189 align:start position:0% having letters after them just like the simple<03:17:14.640> future<03:17:15.000> tense<03:17:15.399> it<03:17:15.520> doesn't<03:17:15.760> matter<03:17:16.080> if 03:17:16.189 --> 03:17:16.199 align:start position:0% simple future tense it doesn't matter if 03:17:16.199 --> 03:17:19.309 align:start position:0% simple future tense it doesn't matter if we<03:17:16.319> use<03:17:16.560> a<03:17:16.720> r<03:17:17.040> e<03:17:17.239> r<03:17:17.600> or<03:17:17.880> I<03:17:18.279> verbs<03:17:18.640> stem<03:17:18.960> changing 03:17:19.309 --> 03:17:19.319 align:start position:0% we use a r e r or I verbs stem changing 03:17:19.319 --> 03:17:21.309 align:start position:0% we use a r e r or I verbs stem changing or<03:17:19.520> irregular<03:17:20.080> yo<03:17:20.359> verbs<03:17:20.680> the<03:17:20.800> change<03:17:21.040> to<03:17:21.199> the 03:17:21.309 --> 03:17:21.319 align:start position:0% or irregular yo verbs the change to the 03:17:21.319 --> 03:17:23.070 align:start position:0% or irregular yo verbs the change to the verbs<03:17:21.760> themselves<03:17:22.160> will<03:17:22.359> stay<03:17:22.600> the<03:17:22.720> same 03:17:23.070 --> 03:17:23.080 align:start position:0% verbs themselves will stay the same 03:17:23.080 --> 03:17:24.750 align:start position:0% verbs themselves will stay the same across<03:17:23.479> almost<03:17:23.840> every<03:17:24.080> verb<03:17:24.319> there<03:17:24.479> is<03:17:24.600> in 03:17:24.750 --> 03:17:24.760 align:start position:0% across almost every verb there is in 03:17:24.760 --> 03:17:26.750 align:start position:0% across almost every verb there is in Spanish<03:17:25.239> for<03:17:25.399> the<03:17:25.560> yo<03:17:25.800> pronoun<03:17:26.279> you<03:17:26.439> keep<03:17:26.680> the 03:17:26.750 --> 03:17:26.760 align:start position:0% Spanish for the yo pronoun you keep the 03:17:26.760 --> 03:17:29.070 align:start position:0% Spanish for the yo pronoun you keep the form<03:17:27.000> of<03:17:27.120> the<03:17:27.239> verb<03:17:27.560> and<03:17:27.720> put<03:17:27.880> the<03:17:28.000> ending<03:17:28.600> I 03:17:29.070 --> 03:17:29.080 align:start position:0% form of the verb and put the ending I 03:17:29.080 --> 03:17:30.710 align:start position:0% form of the verb and put the ending I with<03:17:29.199> an<03:17:29.439> accent<03:17:29.880> so<03:17:30.040> that<03:17:30.160> when<03:17:30.279> you<03:17:30.359> say<03:17:30.560> the 03:17:30.710 --> 03:17:30.720 align:start position:0% with an accent so that when you say the 03:17:30.720 --> 03:17:32.790 align:start position:0% with an accent so that when you say the word<03:17:31.000> the<03:17:31.120> emphasis<03:17:31.479> is<03:17:31.640> put<03:17:31.840> on<03:17:32.080> that<03:17:32.319> accent 03:17:32.790 --> 03:17:32.800 align:start position:0% word the emphasis is put on that accent 03:17:32.800 --> 03:17:35.670 align:start position:0% word the emphasis is put on that accent for<03:17:33.000> two<03:17:33.399> you<03:17:33.560> putas<03:17:34.319> with<03:17:34.439> an<03:17:34.600> accent<03:17:35.000> for<03:17:35.239> L 03:17:35.670 --> 03:17:35.680 align:start position:0% for two you putas with an accent for L 03:17:35.680 --> 03:17:38.429 align:start position:0% for two you putas with an accent for L you<03:17:35.800> put<03:17:36.600> with<03:17:36.720> an<03:17:36.920> accent<03:17:37.399> for<03:17:37.640> noos<03:17:38.279> you 03:17:38.429 --> 03:17:38.439 align:start position:0% you put with an accent for noos you 03:17:38.439 --> 03:17:42.269 align:start position:0% you put with an accent for noos you putos<03:17:39.359> for<03:17:39.600> Vos<03:17:40.239> you<03:17:40.399> put<03:17:41.279> and<03:17:41.399> for<03:17:41.600> AOS<03:17:41.960> you 03:17:42.269 --> 03:17:42.279 align:start position:0% putos for Vos you put and for AOS you 03:17:42.279 --> 03:17:43.950 align:start position:0% putos for Vos you put and for AOS you putan<03:17:42.880> with<03:17:43.000> the<03:17:43.279> conditional<03:17:43.600> tense<03:17:43.800> in 03:17:43.950 --> 03:17:43.960 align:start position:0% putan with the conditional tense in 03:17:43.960 --> 03:17:45.750 align:start position:0% putan with the conditional tense in Spanish<03:17:44.479> I<03:17:44.600> recommend<03:17:45.000> focusing<03:17:45.359> on<03:17:45.520> all 03:17:45.750 --> 03:17:45.760 align:start position:0% Spanish I recommend focusing on all 03:17:45.760 --> 03:17:48.070 align:start position:0% Spanish I recommend focusing on all pronouns<03:17:46.399> except<03:17:46.720> Vos<03:17:47.399> because<03:17:47.560> using<03:17:47.880> any 03:17:48.070 --> 03:17:48.080 align:start position:0% pronouns except Vos because using any 03:17:48.080 --> 03:17:49.750 align:start position:0% pronouns except Vos because using any verb<03:17:48.279> in<03:17:48.399> the<03:17:48.680> conditional<03:17:49.000> tense<03:17:49.359> is<03:17:49.520> very 03:17:49.750 --> 03:17:49.760 align:start position:0% verb in the conditional tense is very 03:17:49.760 --> 03:17:51.830 align:start position:0% verb in the conditional tense is very useful<03:17:50.439> however<03:17:50.760> there<03:17:50.880> are<03:17:51.040> a<03:17:51.120> few<03:17:51.359> irregular 03:17:51.830 --> 03:17:51.840 align:start position:0% useful however there are a few irregular 03:17:51.840 --> 03:17:53.349 align:start position:0% useful however there are a few irregular verbs<03:17:52.279> and<03:17:52.399> believe<03:17:52.640> it<03:17:52.760> or<03:17:52.880> not<03:17:53.199> the 03:17:53.349 --> 03:17:53.359 align:start position:0% verbs and believe it or not the 03:17:53.359 --> 03:17:55.110 align:start position:0% verbs and believe it or not the irregular<03:17:53.880> verbs<03:17:54.279> that<03:17:54.399> you<03:17:54.520> have<03:17:54.640> in<03:17:54.800> the 03:17:55.110 --> 03:17:55.120 align:start position:0% irregular verbs that you have in the 03:17:55.120 --> 03:17:56.870 align:start position:0% irregular verbs that you have in the conditional<03:17:55.439> tense<03:17:55.800> are<03:17:56.000> the<03:17:56.120> same<03:17:56.319> ones<03:17:56.800> that 03:17:56.870 --> 03:17:56.880 align:start position:0% conditional tense are the same ones that 03:17:56.880 --> 03:17:58.429 align:start position:0% conditional tense are the same ones that you<03:17:57.040> have<03:17:57.199> in<03:17:57.319> the<03:17:57.399> future<03:17:57.760> tense<03:17:58.160> meaning 03:17:58.429 --> 03:17:58.439 align:start position:0% you have in the future tense meaning 03:17:58.439 --> 03:18:00.469 align:start position:0% you have in the future tense meaning that<03:17:58.560> it's<03:17:58.720> easier<03:17:59.199> to<03:17:59.359> memorize<03:17:59.880> these<03:18:00.080> verbs 03:18:00.469 --> 03:18:00.479 align:start position:0% that it's easier to memorize these verbs 03:18:00.479 --> 03:18:02.389 align:start position:0% that it's easier to memorize these verbs nonetheless<03:18:01.160> the<03:18:01.439> conditional<03:18:01.760> tense<03:18:02.120> has<03:18:02.239> a 03:18:02.389 --> 03:18:02.399 align:start position:0% nonetheless the conditional tense has a 03:18:02.399 --> 03:18:04.070 align:start position:0% nonetheless the conditional tense has a different<03:18:02.680> conjugation<03:18:03.239> pattern<03:18:03.680> unlike<03:18:03.960> the 03:18:04.070 --> 03:18:04.080 align:start position:0% different conjugation pattern unlike the 03:18:04.080 --> 03:18:05.990 align:start position:0% different conjugation pattern unlike the future<03:18:04.399> tense<03:18:04.920> similarly<03:18:05.560> there<03:18:05.680> is<03:18:05.840> no 03:18:05.990 --> 03:18:06.000 align:start position:0% future tense similarly there is no 03:18:06.000 --> 03:18:07.349 align:start position:0% future tense similarly there is no pattern<03:18:06.319> to<03:18:06.439> follow<03:18:06.720> with<03:18:06.880> any<03:18:07.040> of<03:18:07.199> these 03:18:07.349 --> 03:18:07.359 align:start position:0% pattern to follow with any of these 03:18:07.359 --> 03:18:09.070 align:start position:0% pattern to follow with any of these verbs<03:18:07.760> but<03:18:07.920> they<03:18:08.040> still<03:18:08.319> have<03:18:08.680> the<03:18:08.800> same 03:18:09.070 --> 03:18:09.080 align:start position:0% verbs but they still have the same 03:18:09.080 --> 03:18:11.550 align:start position:0% verbs but they still have the same ending<03:18:09.640> as<03:18:09.760> for<03:18:10.000> regular<03:18:10.399> verbs<03:18:10.880> in<03:18:11.040> the<03:18:11.160> list 03:18:11.550 --> 03:18:11.560 align:start position:0% ending as for regular verbs in the list 03:18:11.560 --> 03:18:12.710 align:start position:0% ending as for regular verbs in the list you<03:18:11.720> have 03:18:12.710 --> 03:18:12.720 align:start position:0% you have 03:18:12.720 --> 03:18:15.630 align:start position:0% you have meaning<03:18:13.000> to<03:18:13.199> say<03:18:13.479> or<03:18:13.640> to<03:18:13.840> tell<03:18:14.239> a<03:18:14.800> to<03:18:15.000> do<03:18:15.239> or<03:18:15.399> to 03:18:15.630 --> 03:18:15.640 align:start position:0% meaning to say or to tell a to do or to 03:18:15.640 --> 03:18:20.830 align:start position:0% meaning to say or to tell a to do or to make<03:18:16.640> to<03:18:16.880> can<03:18:17.359> p<03:18:17.920> to<03:18:18.120> put<03:18:19.000> to<03:18:19.239> want<03:18:19.760> sa<03:18:20.239> to<03:18:20.399> know 03:18:20.830 --> 03:18:20.840 align:start position:0% make to can p to put to want sa to know 03:18:20.840 --> 03:18:24.110 align:start position:0% make to can p to put to want sa to know Sal<03:18:21.359> to<03:18:21.600> leave<03:18:22.040> T<03:18:22.479> to<03:18:22.720> have<03:18:23.040> and<03:18:23.239> ven<03:18:23.640> to<03:18:23.800> come 03:18:24.110 --> 03:18:24.120 align:start position:0% Sal to leave T to have and ven to come 03:18:24.120 --> 03:18:25.710 align:start position:0% Sal to leave T to have and ven to come as<03:18:24.239> far<03:18:24.399> as<03:18:24.520> I<03:18:24.640> know<03:18:25.000> these<03:18:25.120> are<03:18:25.319> the<03:18:25.439> only 03:18:25.710 --> 03:18:25.720 align:start position:0% as far as I know these are the only 03:18:25.720 --> 03:18:27.630 align:start position:0% as far as I know these are the only irregular<03:18:26.239> verbs<03:18:26.600> in<03:18:26.720> the<03:18:27.080> conditional<03:18:27.520> which 03:18:27.630 --> 03:18:27.640 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in the conditional which 03:18:27.640 --> 03:18:29.469 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in the conditional which are<03:18:27.800> literally<03:18:28.279> the<03:18:28.399> same<03:18:28.640> verbs<03:18:29.080> as<03:18:29.239> in<03:18:29.359> the 03:18:29.469 --> 03:18:29.479 align:start position:0% are literally the same verbs as in the 03:18:29.479 --> 03:18:31.229 align:start position:0% are literally the same verbs as in the future<03:18:29.800> tense<03:18:30.160> and<03:18:30.279> the<03:18:30.399> most<03:18:30.600> useful<03:18:30.960> cases 03:18:31.229 --> 03:18:31.239 align:start position:0% future tense and the most useful cases 03:18:31.239 --> 03:18:33.229 align:start position:0% future tense and the most useful cases to<03:18:31.399> use<03:18:31.720> in<03:18:31.920> the<03:18:32.239> conditional<03:18:32.760> are<03:18:32.960> in 03:18:33.229 --> 03:18:33.239 align:start position:0% to use in the conditional are in 03:18:33.239 --> 03:18:36.030 align:start position:0% to use in the conditional are in questions<03:18:34.319> likeo<03:18:35.319> meaning<03:18:35.600> would<03:18:35.720> you<03:18:35.920> go 03:18:36.030 --> 03:18:36.040 align:start position:0% questions likeo meaning would you go 03:18:36.040 --> 03:18:38.229 align:start position:0% questions likeo meaning would you go with<03:18:36.239> me<03:18:36.479> and<03:18:36.600> you<03:18:36.680> can<03:18:36.880> reply<03:18:37.239> with 03:18:38.229 --> 03:18:38.239 align:start position:0% with me and you can reply with 03:18:38.239 --> 03:18:40.870 align:start position:0% with me and you can reply with C<03:18:39.239> yes<03:18:39.439> I<03:18:39.560> would<03:18:39.800> go<03:18:39.960> with<03:18:40.080> you<03:18:40.319> you<03:18:40.399> can<03:18:40.600> also 03:18:40.870 --> 03:18:40.880 align:start position:0% C yes I would go with you you can also 03:18:40.880 --> 03:18:43.550 align:start position:0% C yes I would go with you you can also ask<03:18:41.160> something<03:18:41.520> like 03:18:43.550 --> 03:18:43.560 align:start position:0% ask something like 03:18:43.560 --> 03:18:45.189 align:start position:0% ask something like meaning<03:18:43.880> would<03:18:44.080> he<03:18:44.239> buy<03:18:44.520> that<03:18:44.720> car<03:18:45.000> and<03:18:45.120> you 03:18:45.189 --> 03:18:45.199 align:start position:0% meaning would he buy that car and you 03:18:45.199 --> 03:18:47.070 align:start position:0% meaning would he buy that car and you can<03:18:45.359> reply<03:18:45.760> with 03:18:47.070 --> 03:18:47.080 align:start position:0% can reply with 03:18:47.080 --> 03:18:50.070 align:start position:0% can reply with C<03:18:48.080> yes<03:18:48.319> he<03:18:48.439> would<03:18:48.640> buy<03:18:48.880> that<03:18:49.040> car<03:18:49.399> additionally 03:18:50.070 --> 03:18:50.080 align:start position:0% C yes he would buy that car additionally 03:18:50.080 --> 03:18:52.830 align:start position:0% C yes he would buy that car additionally we<03:18:50.199> can<03:18:50.399> ask<03:18:50.800> Vian<03:18:51.399> AOS<03:18:51.680> and<03:18:51.880> eston<03:18:52.560> meaning 03:18:52.830 --> 03:18:52.840 align:start position:0% we can ask Vian AOS and eston meaning 03:18:52.840 --> 03:18:54.389 align:start position:0% we can ask Vian AOS and eston meaning would<03:18:53.040> they<03:18:53.199> live<03:18:53.479> in<03:18:53.640> this<03:18:53.800> region<03:18:54.199> and<03:18:54.319> you 03:18:54.389 --> 03:18:54.399 align:start position:0% would they live in this region and you 03:18:54.399 --> 03:18:57.790 align:start position:0% would they live in this region and you can<03:18:54.560> reply<03:18:54.960> with<03:18:55.239> C<03:18:55.640> AOS<03:18:55.920> Vian<03:18:56.560> and<03:18:56.720> eston<03:18:57.560> yes 03:18:57.790 --> 03:18:57.800 align:start position:0% can reply with C AOS Vian and eston yes 03:18:57.800 --> 03:18:59.349 align:start position:0% can reply with C AOS Vian and eston yes they<03:18:57.920> would<03:18:58.160> live<03:18:58.399> in<03:18:58.560> this<03:18:58.720> region<03:18:59.120> we<03:18:59.199> can 03:18:59.349 --> 03:18:59.359 align:start position:0% they would live in this region we can 03:18:59.359 --> 03:19:01.030 align:start position:0% they would live in this region we can also<03:18:59.560> use<03:18:59.800> the<03:19:00.080> conditional<03:19:00.399> tense<03:19:00.840> with 03:19:01.030 --> 03:19:01.040 align:start position:0% also use the conditional tense with 03:19:01.040 --> 03:19:02.990 align:start position:0% also use the conditional tense with irregular<03:19:01.560> verbs<03:19:02.000> like 03:19:02.990 --> 03:19:03.000 align:start position:0% irregular verbs like 03:19:03.000 --> 03:19:05.510 align:start position:0% irregular verbs like saying<03:19:04.000> meaning<03:19:04.359> we<03:19:04.479> would<03:19:04.680> want<03:19:05.040> a<03:19:05.160> plate 03:19:05.510 --> 03:19:05.520 align:start position:0% saying meaning we would want a plate 03:19:05.520 --> 03:19:08.030 align:start position:0% saying meaning we would want a plate please<03:19:05.920> or 03:19:08.030 --> 03:19:08.040 align:start position:0% please or 03:19:08.040 --> 03:19:10.710 align:start position:0% please or maybe<03:19:09.040> you<03:19:09.160> would<03:19:09.359> say<03:19:09.680> that<03:19:09.840> this<03:19:10.080> lesson<03:19:10.520> is 03:19:10.710 --> 03:19:10.720 align:start position:0% maybe you would say that this lesson is 03:19:10.720 --> 03:19:12.710 align:start position:0% maybe you would say that this lesson is good<03:19:11.040> a<03:19:11.199> popular<03:19:11.600> phrase<03:19:12.120> that<03:19:12.239> comes<03:19:12.439> up<03:19:12.600> in 03:19:12.710 --> 03:19:12.720 align:start position:0% good a popular phrase that comes up in 03:19:12.720 --> 03:19:15.229 align:start position:0% good a popular phrase that comes up in the<03:19:13.040> conditional<03:19:13.359> tense 03:19:15.229 --> 03:19:15.239 align:start position:0% the conditional tense 03:19:15.239 --> 03:19:18.110 align:start position:0% the conditional tense is<03:19:16.239> without<03:19:16.560> you<03:19:16.920> I<03:19:17.040> don't<03:19:17.279> know<03:19:17.640> what<03:19:17.800> I<03:19:17.920> would 03:19:18.110 --> 03:19:18.120 align:start position:0% is without you I don't know what I would 03:19:18.120 --> 03:19:19.990 align:start position:0% is without you I don't know what I would do<03:19:18.399> and<03:19:18.560> this<03:19:18.720> sentence<03:19:19.319> actually<03:19:19.680> has<03:19:19.800> a 03:19:19.990 --> 03:19:20.000 align:start position:0% do and this sentence actually has a 03:19:20.000 --> 03:19:21.830 align:start position:0% do and this sentence actually has a negative<03:19:20.479> and<03:19:20.600> uses<03:19:20.880> the<03:19:21.000> verb<03:19:21.279> as<03:19:21.439> said<03:19:21.760> which 03:19:21.830 --> 03:19:21.840 align:start position:0% negative and uses the verb as said which 03:19:21.840 --> 03:19:23.550 align:start position:0% negative and uses the verb as said which is<03:19:22.000> irregular<03:19:22.600> in<03:19:22.760> the<03:19:23.040> conditional<03:19:23.439> just 03:19:23.550 --> 03:19:23.560 align:start position:0% is irregular in the conditional just 03:19:23.560 --> 03:19:25.150 align:start position:0% is irregular in the conditional just like<03:19:23.760> with<03:19:23.920> every<03:19:24.160> other<03:19:24.439> tense<03:19:24.880> the 03:19:25.150 --> 03:19:25.160 align:start position:0% like with every other tense the 03:19:25.160 --> 03:19:26.990 align:start position:0% like with every other tense the conditional<03:19:25.640> can<03:19:25.800> likewise<03:19:26.239> function<03:19:26.760> with 03:19:26.990 --> 03:19:27.000 align:start position:0% conditional can likewise function with 03:19:27.000 --> 03:19:29.349 align:start position:0% conditional can likewise function with negatives<03:19:27.479> and<03:19:27.680> object<03:19:28.080> pronouns<03:19:28.600> and<03:19:28.800> by<03:19:29.000> far 03:19:29.349 --> 03:19:29.359 align:start position:0% negatives and object pronouns and by far 03:19:29.359 --> 03:19:30.870 align:start position:0% negatives and object pronouns and by far the<03:19:29.560> most<03:19:29.840> practical<03:19:30.279> and<03:19:30.439> useful 03:19:30.870 --> 03:19:30.880 align:start position:0% the most practical and useful 03:19:30.880 --> 03:19:32.870 align:start position:0% the most practical and useful application<03:19:31.600> of<03:19:31.760> the<03:19:32.080> conditional<03:19:32.600> is<03:19:32.720> the 03:19:32.870 --> 03:19:32.880 align:start position:0% application of the conditional is the 03:19:32.880 --> 03:19:34.910 align:start position:0% application of the conditional is the verb<03:19:33.160> P<03:19:33.600> which<03:19:33.720> is<03:19:33.840> commonly<03:19:34.239> used<03:19:34.560> to<03:19:34.720> make 03:19:34.910 --> 03:19:34.920 align:start position:0% verb P which is commonly used to make 03:19:34.920 --> 03:19:37.510 align:start position:0% verb P which is commonly used to make polite<03:19:35.279> Expressions<03:19:35.960> asking<03:19:36.359> something 03:19:37.510 --> 03:19:37.520 align:start position:0% polite Expressions asking something 03:19:37.520 --> 03:19:40.030 align:start position:0% polite Expressions asking something like<03:19:38.520> can<03:19:38.680> mean<03:19:39.000> could<03:19:39.120> you<03:19:39.279> open<03:19:39.520> the<03:19:39.640> window 03:19:40.030 --> 03:19:40.040 align:start position:0% like can mean could you open the window 03:19:40.040 --> 03:19:43.429 align:start position:0% like can mean could you open the window and<03:19:40.160> you<03:19:40.239> can<03:19:40.439> reply<03:19:40.800> with<03:19:41.120> see<03:19:41.560> y 03:19:43.429 --> 03:19:43.439 align:start position:0% and you can reply with see y 03:19:43.439 --> 03:19:45.469 align:start position:0% and you can reply with see y yes<03:19:43.720> I<03:19:43.840> could<03:19:44.040> open<03:19:44.319> the<03:19:44.439> window<03:19:44.800> or<03:19:44.960> maybe<03:19:45.399> if 03:19:45.469 --> 03:19:45.479 align:start position:0% yes I could open the window or maybe if 03:19:45.479 --> 03:19:48.710 align:start position:0% yes I could open the window or maybe if you<03:19:45.560> want<03:19:45.680> to<03:19:45.840> reply<03:19:46.199> negatively<03:19:46.840> you<03:19:46.920> can<03:19:47.160> say 03:19:48.710 --> 03:19:48.720 align:start position:0% you want to reply negatively you can say 03:19:48.720 --> 03:19:51.429 align:start position:0% you want to reply negatively you can say no<03:19:49.720> no<03:19:50.000> I<03:19:50.160> could<03:19:50.319> not<03:19:50.520> open<03:19:50.760> the<03:19:50.880> window<03:19:51.279> or 03:19:51.429 --> 03:19:51.439 align:start position:0% no no I could not open the window or 03:19:51.439 --> 03:19:52.910 align:start position:0% no no I could not open the window or maybe<03:19:51.800> you<03:19:51.920> can<03:19:52.040> use<03:19:52.160> a<03:19:52.319> direct<03:19:52.600> object 03:19:52.910 --> 03:19:52.920 align:start position:0% maybe you can use a direct object 03:19:52.920 --> 03:19:55.429 align:start position:0% maybe you can use a direct object pronoun<03:19:53.359> instead<03:19:53.840> like<03:19:54.040> saying 03:19:55.429 --> 03:19:55.439 align:start position:0% pronoun instead like saying 03:19:55.439 --> 03:19:57.510 align:start position:0% pronoun instead like saying no<03:19:56.439> or 03:19:57.510 --> 03:19:57.520 align:start position:0% no or 03:19:57.520 --> 03:20:00.349 align:start position:0% no or no<03:19:58.520> no<03:19:58.800> I<03:19:58.920> could<03:19:59.080> not<03:19:59.359> open<03:19:59.680> it<03:20:00.040> with<03:20:00.199> the 03:20:00.349 --> 03:20:00.359 align:start position:0% no no I could not open it with the 03:20:00.359 --> 03:20:02.189 align:start position:0% no no I could not open it with the direct<03:20:00.680> object<03:20:01.000> pronoun<03:20:01.479> being<03:20:01.760> attached<03:20:02.080> to 03:20:02.189 --> 03:20:02.199 align:start position:0% direct object pronoun being attached to 03:20:02.199 --> 03:20:03.990 align:start position:0% direct object pronoun being attached to the<03:20:02.319> infinitive<03:20:02.840> or<03:20:03.040> put<03:20:03.239> before<03:20:03.520> the<03:20:03.640> verb 03:20:03.990 --> 03:20:04.000 align:start position:0% the infinitive or put before the verb 03:20:04.000 --> 03:20:05.510 align:start position:0% the infinitive or put before the verb which<03:20:04.120> is<03:20:04.319> possible<03:20:04.680> in<03:20:04.840> the<03:20:05.199> conditional 03:20:05.510 --> 03:20:05.520 align:start position:0% which is possible in the conditional 03:20:05.520 --> 03:20:07.030 align:start position:0% which is possible in the conditional tense<03:20:06.000> in<03:20:06.120> case<03:20:06.279> you<03:20:06.359> want<03:20:06.439> to<03:20:06.560> include<03:20:06.840> an 03:20:07.030 --> 03:20:07.040 align:start position:0% tense in case you want to include an 03:20:07.040 --> 03:20:08.990 align:start position:0% tense in case you want to include an indirect<03:20:07.560> object<03:20:07.840> pronoun<03:20:08.319> you<03:20:08.439> can<03:20:08.600> likewise 03:20:08.990 --> 03:20:09.000 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun you can likewise 03:20:09.000 --> 03:20:12.710 align:start position:0% indirect object pronoun you can likewise do<03:20:09.160> so<03:20:09.520> by<03:20:09.800> asking<03:20:10.800> daro<03:20:11.359> or<03:20:11.720> Melo 03:20:12.710 --> 03:20:12.720 align:start position:0% do so by asking daro or Melo 03:20:12.720 --> 03:20:14.429 align:start position:0% do so by asking daro or Melo could<03:20:12.840> you<03:20:13.040> give<03:20:13.199> me<03:20:13.399> it<03:20:13.680> and<03:20:13.760> you<03:20:13.840> can<03:20:14.040> reply 03:20:14.429 --> 03:20:14.439 align:start position:0% could you give me it and you can reply 03:20:14.439 --> 03:20:15.590 align:start position:0% could you give me it and you can reply with 03:20:15.590 --> 03:20:15.600 align:start position:0% with 03:20:15.600 --> 03:20:17.590 align:start position:0% with no<03:20:16.600> or 03:20:17.590 --> 03:20:17.600 align:start position:0% no or 03:20:17.600 --> 03:20:20.469 align:start position:0% no or no<03:20:18.600> no<03:20:18.880> I<03:20:19.000> could<03:20:19.160> not<03:20:19.399> give<03:20:19.560> you<03:20:19.760> it<03:20:20.120> as<03:20:20.239> you<03:20:20.359> can 03:20:20.469 --> 03:20:20.479 align:start position:0% no no I could not give you it as you can 03:20:20.479 --> 03:20:22.349 align:start position:0% no no I could not give you it as you can see<03:20:20.800> the<03:20:20.920> object<03:20:21.239> pronouns<03:20:21.800> can<03:20:21.960> either<03:20:22.199> be 03:20:22.349 --> 03:20:22.359 align:start position:0% see the object pronouns can either be 03:20:22.359 --> 03:20:23.990 align:start position:0% see the object pronouns can either be put<03:20:22.560> before<03:20:22.800> the<03:20:22.960> conjugated<03:20:23.479> verb<03:20:23.800> or 03:20:23.990 --> 03:20:24.000 align:start position:0% put before the conjugated verb or 03:20:24.000 --> 03:20:25.510 align:start position:0% put before the conjugated verb or attached<03:20:24.319> to<03:20:24.439> the<03:20:24.560> infinitive<03:20:25.080> and<03:20:25.160> the<03:20:25.279> same 03:20:25.510 --> 03:20:25.520 align:start position:0% attached to the infinitive and the same 03:20:25.520 --> 03:20:27.309 align:start position:0% attached to the infinitive and the same idea<03:20:25.960> applies<03:20:26.279> to<03:20:26.439> any<03:20:26.640> other<03:20:26.840> sentence<03:20:27.199> that 03:20:27.309 --> 03:20:27.319 align:start position:0% idea applies to any other sentence that 03:20:27.319 --> 03:20:29.189 align:start position:0% idea applies to any other sentence that you<03:20:27.439> want<03:20:27.520> to<03:20:27.640> say<03:20:27.960> at<03:20:28.160> last<03:20:28.520> you<03:20:28.600> can<03:20:28.760> use<03:20:28.920> the 03:20:29.189 --> 03:20:29.199 align:start position:0% you want to say at last you can use the 03:20:29.199 --> 03:20:30.990 align:start position:0% you want to say at last you can use the conditional<03:20:29.479> tense<03:20:29.920> with<03:20:30.120> reflexive<03:20:30.600> verbs 03:20:30.990 --> 03:20:31.000 align:start position:0% conditional tense with reflexive verbs 03:20:31.000 --> 03:20:32.710 align:start position:0% conditional tense with reflexive verbs like<03:20:31.120> saying<03:20:31.600> I<03:20:31.680> would<03:20:31.880> take<03:20:32.040> a<03:20:32.199> bath<03:20:32.600> you 03:20:32.710 --> 03:20:32.720 align:start position:0% like saying I would take a bath you 03:20:32.720 --> 03:20:34.670 align:start position:0% like saying I would take a bath you would<03:20:32.920> go<03:20:33.120> out<03:20:33.479> and<03:20:33.600> we<03:20:33.720> would<03:20:33.920> have<03:20:34.080> fun<03:20:34.479> these 03:20:34.670 --> 03:20:34.680 align:start position:0% would go out and we would have fun these 03:20:34.680 --> 03:20:36.670 align:start position:0% would go out and we would have fun these sentences<03:20:35.239> use<03:20:35.560> reflexive<03:20:36.080> verbs<03:20:36.479> and<03:20:36.600> the 03:20:36.670 --> 03:20:36.680 align:start position:0% sentences use reflexive verbs and the 03:20:36.680 --> 03:20:38.150 align:start position:0% sentences use reflexive verbs and the way<03:20:36.800> that<03:20:36.920> you<03:20:37.000> would<03:20:37.160> say<03:20:37.319> them<03:20:37.479> in<03:20:37.640> Spanish 03:20:38.150 --> 03:20:38.160 align:start position:0% way that you would say them in Spanish 03:20:38.160 --> 03:20:39.870 align:start position:0% way that you would say them in Spanish is<03:20:38.279> by<03:20:38.399> putting<03:20:38.680> the<03:20:38.840> object<03:20:39.120> pronoun<03:20:39.640> before 03:20:39.870 --> 03:20:39.880 align:start position:0% is by putting the object pronoun before 03:20:39.880 --> 03:20:43.269 align:start position:0% is by putting the object pronoun before the<03:20:40.040> conjugated<03:20:40.560> verb<03:20:40.960> May 03:20:43.269 --> 03:20:43.279 align:start position:0% the conjugated verb May 03:20:43.279 --> 03:20:45.670 align:start position:0% the conjugated verb May and<03:20:44.279> practically<03:20:44.960> however<03:20:45.319> I<03:20:45.399> don't 03:20:45.670 --> 03:20:45.680 align:start position:0% and practically however I don't 03:20:45.680 --> 03:20:47.349 align:start position:0% and practically however I don't recommend<03:20:46.040> using<03:20:46.359> reflexive<03:20:46.800> verbs<03:20:47.160> because 03:20:47.349 --> 03:20:47.359 align:start position:0% recommend using reflexive verbs because 03:20:47.359 --> 03:20:48.469 align:start position:0% recommend using reflexive verbs because there's<03:20:47.560> nothing<03:20:47.760> much<03:20:47.920> you<03:20:48.040> can<03:20:48.160> do<03:20:48.319> with 03:20:48.469 --> 03:20:48.479 align:start position:0% there's nothing much you can do with 03:20:48.479 --> 03:20:50.150 align:start position:0% there's nothing much you can do with them<03:20:48.760> but<03:20:48.880> it<03:20:48.960> is<03:20:49.160> important<03:20:49.479> to<03:20:49.600> know<03:20:50.000> how 03:20:50.150 --> 03:20:50.160 align:start position:0% them but it is important to know how 03:20:50.160 --> 03:20:51.670 align:start position:0% them but it is important to know how they<03:20:50.279> work<03:20:50.640> in<03:20:50.760> the<03:20:51.040> conditional<03:20:51.399> the 03:20:51.670 --> 03:20:51.680 align:start position:0% they work in the conditional the 03:20:51.680 --> 03:20:53.150 align:start position:0% they work in the conditional the conditional<03:20:51.960> perfect<03:20:52.279> tense<03:20:52.520> in<03:20:52.680> Spanish 03:20:53.150 --> 03:20:53.160 align:start position:0% conditional perfect tense in Spanish 03:20:53.160 --> 03:20:54.870 align:start position:0% conditional perfect tense in Spanish indicates<03:20:53.640> what<03:20:53.800> would<03:20:54.040> have<03:20:54.239> happened<03:20:54.680> or 03:20:54.870 --> 03:20:54.880 align:start position:0% indicates what would have happened or 03:20:54.880 --> 03:20:56.830 align:start position:0% indicates what would have happened or what<03:20:55.080> one<03:20:55.319> would<03:20:55.520> have<03:20:55.680> done<03:20:56.040> in<03:20:56.199> English<03:20:56.720> it's 03:20:56.830 --> 03:20:56.840 align:start position:0% what one would have done in English it's 03:20:56.840 --> 03:20:58.790 align:start position:0% what one would have done in English it's a<03:20:57.000> tense<03:20:57.359> that's<03:20:57.520> not<03:20:57.680> used<03:20:58.040> often<03:20:58.479> but<03:20:58.640> when 03:20:58.790 --> 03:20:58.800 align:start position:0% a tense that's not used often but when 03:20:58.800 --> 03:21:00.710 align:start position:0% a tense that's not used often but when it<03:20:58.920> is<03:20:59.160> it's<03:20:59.279> a<03:20:59.399> simple<03:20:59.760> concept<03:21:00.279> because<03:21:00.520> all 03:21:00.710 --> 03:21:00.720 align:start position:0% it is it's a simple concept because all 03:21:00.720 --> 03:21:02.790 align:start position:0% it is it's a simple concept because all we<03:21:00.840> do<03:21:01.160> is<03:21:01.319> put<03:21:01.479> the<03:21:01.640> construction<03:21:02.160> would<03:21:02.439> have 03:21:02.790 --> 03:21:02.800 align:start position:0% we do is put the construction would have 03:21:02.800 --> 03:21:04.309 align:start position:0% we do is put the construction would have and<03:21:02.920> then<03:21:03.040> we<03:21:03.199> add<03:21:03.359> any<03:21:03.600> participle<03:21:04.080> that<03:21:04.199> we 03:21:04.309 --> 03:21:04.319 align:start position:0% and then we add any participle that we 03:21:04.319 --> 03:21:06.269 align:start position:0% and then we add any participle that we want<03:21:04.600> after<03:21:05.000> in<03:21:05.120> Spanish<03:21:05.640> however<03:21:05.960> we<03:21:06.080> have<03:21:06.160> a 03:21:06.269 --> 03:21:06.279 align:start position:0% want after in Spanish however we have a 03:21:06.279 --> 03:21:07.630 align:start position:0% want after in Spanish however we have a slightly<03:21:06.640> different<03:21:06.920> concept<03:21:07.359> that<03:21:07.479> again 03:21:07.630 --> 03:21:07.640 align:start position:0% slightly different concept that again 03:21:07.640 --> 03:21:09.750 align:start position:0% slightly different concept that again uses<03:21:07.920> the<03:21:08.040> verb<03:21:08.319> a<03:21:08.760> but<03:21:08.880> in<03:21:09.040> the<03:21:09.359> conditional 03:21:09.750 --> 03:21:09.760 align:start position:0% uses the verb a but in the conditional 03:21:09.760 --> 03:21:11.469 align:start position:0% uses the verb a but in the conditional perfect<03:21:10.199> we<03:21:10.279> use<03:21:10.439> a<03:21:10.560> conjugation<03:21:11.239> that<03:21:11.359> is 03:21:11.469 --> 03:21:11.479 align:start position:0% perfect we use a conjugation that is 03:21:11.479 --> 03:21:13.429 align:start position:0% perfect we use a conjugation that is equivalent<03:21:12.160> to<03:21:12.359> both<03:21:12.520> of<03:21:12.640> the<03:21:12.760> words<03:21:13.160> would 03:21:13.429 --> 03:21:13.439 align:start position:0% equivalent to both of the words would 03:21:13.439 --> 03:21:15.510 align:start position:0% equivalent to both of the words would have<03:21:13.680> for<03:21:13.840> the<03:21:13.960> Y<03:21:14.199> pronoun<03:21:14.720> we<03:21:14.880> have<03:21:15.080> the<03:21:15.199> word 03:21:15.510 --> 03:21:15.520 align:start position:0% have for the Y pronoun we have the word 03:21:15.520 --> 03:21:17.950 align:start position:0% have for the Y pronoun we have the word abria<03:21:16.160> which<03:21:16.279> is<03:21:16.359> a<03:21:16.479> conjugation<03:21:17.080> of<03:21:17.319> a<03:21:17.760> plus 03:21:17.950 --> 03:21:17.960 align:start position:0% abria which is a conjugation of a plus 03:21:17.960 --> 03:21:20.110 align:start position:0% abria which is a conjugation of a plus any<03:21:18.199> participle<03:21:18.840> that<03:21:18.960> we<03:21:19.120> want<03:21:19.439> after<03:21:19.880> for 03:21:20.110 --> 03:21:20.120 align:start position:0% any participle that we want after for 03:21:20.120 --> 03:21:23.510 align:start position:0% any participle that we want after for two<03:21:20.560> we<03:21:20.720> have<03:21:21.040> abas<03:21:21.760> for<03:21:22.000> L<03:21:22.399> we<03:21:22.560> have<03:21:22.800> abria<03:21:23.319> for 03:21:23.510 --> 03:21:23.520 align:start position:0% two we have abas for L we have abria for 03:21:23.520 --> 03:21:27.910 align:start position:0% two we have abas for L we have abria for noos<03:21:24.199> we<03:21:24.319> have<03:21:24.600> abos<03:21:25.439> Vos<03:21:26.120> Abri<03:21:26.800> and<03:21:26.960> AOS<03:21:27.399> Abri 03:21:27.910 --> 03:21:27.920 align:start position:0% noos we have abos Vos Abri and AOS Abri 03:21:27.920 --> 03:21:29.189 align:start position:0% noos we have abos Vos Abri and AOS Abri as<03:21:28.040> you<03:21:28.120> can<03:21:28.279> probably<03:21:28.560> tell<03:21:28.760> by<03:21:28.880> looking<03:21:29.080> at 03:21:29.189 --> 03:21:29.199 align:start position:0% as you can probably tell by looking at 03:21:29.199 --> 03:21:30.670 align:start position:0% as you can probably tell by looking at the<03:21:29.319> chart<03:21:29.680> the<03:21:29.800> ending<03:21:30.080> of<03:21:30.239> all<03:21:30.359> of<03:21:30.479> these 03:21:30.670 --> 03:21:30.680 align:start position:0% the chart the ending of all of these 03:21:30.680 --> 03:21:33.110 align:start position:0% the chart the ending of all of these conjugations<03:21:31.399> of<03:21:31.600> a<03:21:32.080> perfectly<03:21:32.520> correspond 03:21:33.110 --> 03:21:33.120 align:start position:0% conjugations of a perfectly correspond 03:21:33.120 --> 03:21:34.750 align:start position:0% conjugations of a perfectly correspond to<03:21:33.239> the<03:21:33.359> ending<03:21:33.760> pattern<03:21:34.120> of<03:21:34.279> verbs<03:21:34.520> in<03:21:34.640> the 03:21:34.750 --> 03:21:34.760 align:start position:0% to the ending pattern of verbs in the 03:21:34.760 --> 03:21:36.110 align:start position:0% to the ending pattern of verbs in the simple<03:21:35.199> conditional<03:21:35.560> and<03:21:35.640> that<03:21:35.720> is<03:21:35.920> because 03:21:36.110 --> 03:21:36.120 align:start position:0% simple conditional and that is because 03:21:36.120 --> 03:21:37.910 align:start position:0% simple conditional and that is because the<03:21:36.439> conditional<03:21:36.760> perfect<03:21:37.239> literally<03:21:37.680> just 03:21:37.910 --> 03:21:37.920 align:start position:0% the conditional perfect literally just 03:21:37.920 --> 03:21:39.349 align:start position:0% the conditional perfect literally just copies<03:21:38.279> the<03:21:38.399> ending<03:21:38.880> that<03:21:39.000> you<03:21:39.080> would<03:21:39.239> have 03:21:39.349 --> 03:21:39.359 align:start position:0% copies the ending that you would have 03:21:39.359 --> 03:21:40.950 align:start position:0% copies the ending that you would have for<03:21:39.560> verbs<03:21:39.880> in<03:21:40.000> the<03:21:40.279> conditional<03:21:40.680> so<03:21:40.800> it's 03:21:40.950 --> 03:21:40.960 align:start position:0% for verbs in the conditional so it's 03:21:40.960 --> 03:21:42.910 align:start position:0% for verbs in the conditional so it's really<03:21:41.160> not<03:21:41.359> that<03:21:41.640> difficult<03:21:42.000> to<03:21:42.120> memorize<03:21:42.760> as 03:21:42.910 --> 03:21:42.920 align:start position:0% really not that difficult to memorize as 03:21:42.920 --> 03:21:44.349 align:start position:0% really not that difficult to memorize as always<03:21:43.279> try<03:21:43.479> not<03:21:43.640> focusing<03:21:44.040> on<03:21:44.199> these 03:21:44.349 --> 03:21:44.359 align:start position:0% always try not focusing on these 03:21:44.359 --> 03:21:45.750 align:start position:0% always try not focusing on these conjugations<03:21:45.120> because<03:21:45.319> they're<03:21:45.479> the<03:21:45.560> least 03:21:45.750 --> 03:21:45.760 align:start position:0% conjugations because they're the least 03:21:45.760 --> 03:21:47.830 align:start position:0% conjugations because they're the least used<03:21:46.000> ones<03:21:46.239> in<03:21:46.399> conversation<03:21:47.000> in<03:21:47.160> Spanish<03:21:47.720> a 03:21:47.830 --> 03:21:47.840 align:start position:0% used ones in conversation in Spanish a 03:21:47.840 --> 03:21:49.349 align:start position:0% used ones in conversation in Spanish a way<03:21:47.960> that<03:21:48.080> the<03:21:48.359> conditional<03:21:48.720> perfect<03:21:49.120> can<03:21:49.239> be 03:21:49.349 --> 03:21:49.359 align:start position:0% way that the conditional perfect can be 03:21:49.359 --> 03:21:51.269 align:start position:0% way that the conditional perfect can be used<03:21:49.680> effectively<03:21:50.319> is<03:21:50.479> by<03:21:50.640> expressing<03:21:51.080> an 03:21:51.269 --> 03:21:51.279 align:start position:0% used effectively is by expressing an 03:21:51.279 --> 03:21:52.870 align:start position:0% used effectively is by expressing an action<03:21:51.640> that<03:21:51.800> would<03:21:51.960> have<03:21:52.160> happened<03:21:52.560> but<03:21:52.720> did 03:21:52.870 --> 03:21:52.880 align:start position:0% action that would have happened but did 03:21:52.880 --> 03:21:55.269 align:start position:0% action that would have happened but did not<03:21:53.199> saying<03:21:53.520> something<03:21:53.880> like 03:21:55.269 --> 03:21:55.279 align:start position:0% not saying something like 03:21:55.279 --> 03:21:57.790 align:start position:0% not saying something like y<03:21:56.279> would<03:21:56.399> mean<03:21:56.800> I<03:21:56.880> would<03:21:57.080> have<03:21:57.239> finished<03:21:57.600> my 03:21:57.790 --> 03:21:57.800 align:start position:0% y would mean I would have finished my 03:21:57.800 --> 03:22:00.110 align:start position:0% y would mean I would have finished my job<03:21:58.120> with<03:21:58.319> ABA<03:21:58.880> being<03:21:59.120> the<03:21:59.279> conjugation<03:21:59.960> that 03:22:00.110 --> 03:22:00.120 align:start position:0% job with ABA being the conjugation that 03:22:00.120 --> 03:22:02.309 align:start position:0% job with ABA being the conjugation that matches<03:22:00.399> the<03:22:00.560> Y<03:22:00.800> pronoun<03:22:01.319> additionally<03:22:02.040> I<03:22:02.120> can 03:22:02.309 --> 03:22:02.319 align:start position:0% matches the Y pronoun additionally I can 03:22:02.319 --> 03:22:04.349 align:start position:0% matches the Y pronoun additionally I can say 03:22:04.349 --> 03:22:04.359 align:start position:0% say 03:22:04.359 --> 03:22:06.910 align:start position:0% say to<03:22:05.359> which<03:22:05.479> means<03:22:05.840> you<03:22:06.000> would<03:22:06.160> have<03:22:06.359> enjoyed 03:22:06.910 --> 03:22:06.920 align:start position:0% to which means you would have enjoyed 03:22:06.920 --> 03:22:08.870 align:start position:0% to which means you would have enjoyed being<03:22:07.239> there<03:22:07.560> with<03:22:07.800> abas<03:22:08.439> matching<03:22:08.760> the 03:22:08.870 --> 03:22:08.880 align:start position:0% being there with abas matching the 03:22:08.880 --> 03:22:11.269 align:start position:0% being there with abas matching the pronoun<03:22:09.239> too<03:22:09.600> or<03:22:09.760> maybe<03:22:10.199> we<03:22:10.319> can<03:22:10.479> say<03:22:10.920> Aya 03:22:11.269 --> 03:22:11.279 align:start position:0% pronoun too or maybe we can say Aya 03:22:11.279 --> 03:22:13.790 align:start position:0% pronoun too or maybe we can say Aya abria<03:22:11.960> abto<03:22:12.560> Las<03:22:12.760> Ventanas<03:22:13.359> meaning<03:22:13.600> she 03:22:13.790 --> 03:22:13.800 align:start position:0% abria abto Las Ventanas meaning she 03:22:13.800 --> 03:22:16.110 align:start position:0% abria abto Las Ventanas meaning she would<03:22:13.960> have<03:22:14.160> opened<03:22:14.640> the<03:22:14.760> windows<03:22:15.359> with<03:22:15.560> abria 03:22:16.110 --> 03:22:16.120 align:start position:0% would have opened the windows with abria 03:22:16.120 --> 03:22:17.830 align:start position:0% would have opened the windows with abria matching<03:22:16.439> the<03:22:16.560> pronoun<03:22:17.040> Aya<03:22:17.479> and<03:22:17.640> with 03:22:17.830 --> 03:22:17.840 align:start position:0% matching the pronoun Aya and with 03:22:17.840 --> 03:22:20.309 align:start position:0% matching the pronoun Aya and with abierto<03:22:18.520> being<03:22:18.720> an<03:22:18.920> irregular<03:22:19.479> participle<03:22:20.160> as 03:22:20.309 --> 03:22:20.319 align:start position:0% abierto being an irregular participle as 03:22:20.319 --> 03:22:22.150 align:start position:0% abierto being an irregular participle as always<03:22:20.760> the<03:22:20.880> same<03:22:21.160> concept<03:22:21.600> applies<03:22:21.880> to<03:22:22.000> any 03:22:22.150 --> 03:22:22.160 align:start position:0% always the same concept applies to any 03:22:22.160 --> 03:22:23.750 align:start position:0% always the same concept applies to any phrase<03:22:22.439> that<03:22:22.520> you<03:22:22.640> want<03:22:22.720> to<03:22:22.880> say<03:22:23.160> using<03:22:23.439> the 03:22:23.750 --> 03:22:23.760 align:start position:0% phrase that you want to say using the 03:22:23.760 --> 03:22:25.309 align:start position:0% phrase that you want to say using the conditional<03:22:24.080> perfect<03:22:24.359> tense<03:22:24.680> in<03:22:24.800> Spanish 03:22:25.309 --> 03:22:25.319 align:start position:0% conditional perfect tense in Spanish 03:22:25.319 --> 03:22:26.590 align:start position:0% conditional perfect tense in Spanish even<03:22:25.520> though<03:22:25.640> I<03:22:25.720> did<03:22:25.840> not<03:22:26.000> present<03:22:26.319> many 03:22:26.590 --> 03:22:26.600 align:start position:0% even though I did not present many 03:22:26.600 --> 03:22:28.429 align:start position:0% even though I did not present many examples<03:22:27.080> in<03:22:27.239> this<03:22:27.399> video<03:22:27.840> the<03:22:28.120> conditional 03:22:28.429 --> 03:22:28.439 align:start position:0% examples in this video the conditional 03:22:28.439 --> 03:22:30.229 align:start position:0% examples in this video the conditional perfect<03:22:28.880> is<03:22:29.000> one<03:22:29.120> of<03:22:29.199> the<03:22:29.319> least<03:22:29.560> used<03:22:29.840> tenses 03:22:30.229 --> 03:22:30.239 align:start position:0% perfect is one of the least used tenses 03:22:30.239 --> 03:22:32.150 align:start position:0% perfect is one of the least used tenses in<03:22:30.399> Spanish<03:22:30.920> mainly<03:22:31.239> because<03:22:31.479> no<03:22:31.560> one<03:22:31.720> uses<03:22:32.000> it 03:22:32.150 --> 03:22:32.160 align:start position:0% in Spanish mainly because no one uses it 03:22:32.160 --> 03:22:33.790 align:start position:0% in Spanish mainly because no one uses it in<03:22:32.399> actual<03:22:32.680> conversation<03:22:33.359> just<03:22:33.520> like<03:22:33.680> with 03:22:33.790 --> 03:22:33.800 align:start position:0% in actual conversation just like with 03:22:33.800 --> 03:22:35.389 align:start position:0% in actual conversation just like with the<03:22:33.920> future<03:22:34.279> perfect<03:22:34.600> tense<03:22:35.000> I<03:22:35.080> did<03:22:35.239> not 03:22:35.389 --> 03:22:35.399 align:start position:0% the future perfect tense I did not 03:22:35.399 --> 03:22:36.950 align:start position:0% the future perfect tense I did not present<03:22:35.800> any<03:22:36.000> sentences<03:22:36.560> involving 03:22:36.950 --> 03:22:36.960 align:start position:0% present any sentences involving 03:22:36.960 --> 03:22:38.830 align:start position:0% present any sentences involving negatives<03:22:37.479> reflexive<03:22:37.920> verbs<03:22:38.279> and<03:22:38.479> object 03:22:38.830 --> 03:22:38.840 align:start position:0% negatives reflexive verbs and object 03:22:38.840 --> 03:22:40.830 align:start position:0% negatives reflexive verbs and object pronouns<03:22:39.439> mostly<03:22:39.840> because<03:22:40.239> it's<03:22:40.399> impossible 03:22:40.830 --> 03:22:40.840 align:start position:0% pronouns mostly because it's impossible 03:22:40.840 --> 03:22:42.510 align:start position:0% pronouns mostly because it's impossible to<03:22:40.920> make<03:22:41.080> a<03:22:41.199> logical<03:22:41.479> phrase<03:22:42.000> using<03:22:42.319> these 03:22:42.510 --> 03:22:42.520 align:start position:0% to make a logical phrase using these 03:22:42.520 --> 03:22:44.229 align:start position:0% to make a logical phrase using these ideas<03:22:43.000> if<03:22:43.160> anything<03:22:43.560> the<03:22:43.840> conditional 03:22:44.229 --> 03:22:44.239 align:start position:0% ideas if anything the conditional 03:22:44.239 --> 03:22:45.990 align:start position:0% ideas if anything the conditional perfect<03:22:44.640> is<03:22:44.760> a<03:22:44.920> tense<03:22:45.319> that<03:22:45.439> is<03:22:45.560> useful<03:22:45.840> to 03:22:45.990 --> 03:22:46.000 align:start position:0% perfect is a tense that is useful to 03:22:46.000 --> 03:22:48.030 align:start position:0% perfect is a tense that is useful to know<03:22:46.279> but<03:22:46.399> not<03:22:46.600> useful<03:22:46.920> to<03:22:47.080> utilize<03:22:47.640> so<03:22:47.800> that's 03:22:48.030 --> 03:22:48.040 align:start position:0% know but not useful to utilize so that's 03:22:48.040 --> 03:22:50.870 align:start position:0% know but not useful to utilize so that's that<03:22:48.319> K<03:22:48.680> and<03:22:48.880> lo<03:22:49.319> in<03:22:49.479> Spanish<03:22:50.040> both<03:22:50.279> mean<03:22:50.560> what 03:22:50.870 --> 03:22:50.880 align:start position:0% that K and lo in Spanish both mean what 03:22:50.880 --> 03:22:53.309 align:start position:0% that K and lo in Spanish both mean what but<03:22:51.279> sometimes<03:22:51.760> K<03:22:52.000> can<03:22:52.160> mean<03:22:52.479> that<03:22:52.840> without<03:22:53.080> an 03:22:53.309 --> 03:22:53.319 align:start position:0% but sometimes K can mean that without an 03:22:53.319 --> 03:22:55.229 align:start position:0% but sometimes K can mean that without an accent<03:22:53.800> as<03:22:53.920> a<03:22:54.040> conjunction<03:22:54.800> however<03:22:55.120> they 03:22:55.229 --> 03:22:55.239 align:start position:0% accent as a conjunction however they 03:22:55.239 --> 03:22:57.030 align:start position:0% accent as a conjunction however they cannot<03:22:55.520> be<03:22:55.600> used<03:22:55.880> interchangeably<03:22:56.760> because 03:22:57.030 --> 03:22:57.040 align:start position:0% cannot be used interchangeably because 03:22:57.040 --> 03:22:59.590 align:start position:0% cannot be used interchangeably because while<03:22:57.319> K<03:22:57.600> is<03:22:57.760> the<03:22:57.840> most<03:22:58.040> used<03:22:58.319> conjunction<03:22:59.040> Lo 03:22:59.590 --> 03:22:59.600 align:start position:0% while K is the most used conjunction Lo 03:22:59.600 --> 03:23:00.910 align:start position:0% while K is the most used conjunction Lo has<03:22:59.720> a<03:22:59.800> bit<03:22:59.920> of<03:23:00.040> a<03:23:00.160> different<03:23:00.399> meaning 03:23:00.910 --> 03:23:00.920 align:start position:0% has a bit of a different meaning 03:23:00.920 --> 03:23:02.550 align:start position:0% has a bit of a different meaning indicating<03:23:01.520> what<03:23:01.800> in<03:23:01.920> the<03:23:02.040> beginning<03:23:02.399> or 03:23:02.550 --> 03:23:02.560 align:start position:0% indicating what in the beginning or 03:23:02.560 --> 03:23:04.110 align:start position:0% indicating what in the beginning or middle<03:23:02.840> of<03:23:02.920> a<03:23:03.080> sentence<03:23:03.560> and<03:23:03.640> I'll<03:23:03.800> get<03:23:03.920> to 03:23:04.110 --> 03:23:04.120 align:start position:0% middle of a sentence and I'll get to 03:23:04.120 --> 03:23:05.910 align:start position:0% middle of a sentence and I'll get to that<03:23:04.239> in<03:23:04.359> a<03:23:04.479> bit<03:23:04.800> first<03:23:05.080> I'd<03:23:05.239> like<03:23:05.359> to<03:23:05.479> discuss 03:23:05.910 --> 03:23:05.920 align:start position:0% that in a bit first I'd like to discuss 03:23:05.920 --> 03:23:08.309 align:start position:0% that in a bit first I'd like to discuss the<03:23:06.040> word<03:23:06.319> K<03:23:06.680> while<03:23:06.960> K<03:23:07.239> can<03:23:07.359> mean<03:23:07.680> what<03:23:08.000> with<03:23:08.120> an 03:23:08.309 --> 03:23:08.319 align:start position:0% the word K while K can mean what with an 03:23:08.319 --> 03:23:10.630 align:start position:0% the word K while K can mean what with an accent<03:23:08.840> without<03:23:09.120> the<03:23:09.359> accent<03:23:09.840> it<03:23:09.920> means<03:23:10.359> that 03:23:10.630 --> 03:23:10.640 align:start position:0% accent without the accent it means that 03:23:10.640 --> 03:23:12.030 align:start position:0% accent without the accent it means that as<03:23:10.760> a<03:23:10.920> conjunction<03:23:11.359> meaning<03:23:11.760> that<03:23:11.880> it's 03:23:12.030 --> 03:23:12.040 align:start position:0% as a conjunction meaning that it's 03:23:12.040 --> 03:23:13.790 align:start position:0% as a conjunction meaning that it's expressing<03:23:12.520> a<03:23:12.680> subordinate<03:23:13.199> clause<03:23:13.640> and 03:23:13.790 --> 03:23:13.800 align:start position:0% expressing a subordinate clause and 03:23:13.800 --> 03:23:15.469 align:start position:0% expressing a subordinate clause and similarly<03:23:14.359> it's<03:23:14.520> used<03:23:14.760> the<03:23:14.880> same<03:23:15.080> way<03:23:15.319> in 03:23:15.469 --> 03:23:15.479 align:start position:0% similarly it's used the same way in 03:23:15.479 --> 03:23:17.269 align:start position:0% similarly it's used the same way in Spanish<03:23:16.000> typically<03:23:16.520> it's<03:23:16.680> used<03:23:16.920> in<03:23:17.040> long 03:23:17.269 --> 03:23:17.279 align:start position:0% Spanish typically it's used in long 03:23:17.279 --> 03:23:19.030 align:start position:0% Spanish typically it's used in long sentences<03:23:17.960> especially<03:23:18.319> when<03:23:18.479> we<03:23:18.640> use<03:23:18.800> a<03:23:18.880> lot 03:23:19.030 --> 03:23:19.040 align:start position:0% sentences especially when we use a lot 03:23:19.040 --> 03:23:20.910 align:start position:0% sentences especially when we use a lot of<03:23:19.160> Spanish<03:23:19.479> ideas<03:23:19.960> at<03:23:20.120> once<03:23:20.479> and<03:23:20.560> so<03:23:20.720> we<03:23:20.800> can 03:23:20.910 --> 03:23:20.920 align:start position:0% of Spanish ideas at once and so we can 03:23:20.920 --> 03:23:22.830 align:start position:0% of Spanish ideas at once and so we can have<03:23:21.080> phrases<03:23:21.479> like<03:23:21.800> I<03:23:21.880> will<03:23:22.080> use<03:23:22.319> the<03:23:22.439> phone 03:23:22.830 --> 03:23:22.840 align:start position:0% have phrases like I will use the phone 03:23:22.840 --> 03:23:24.550 align:start position:0% have phrases like I will use the phone that<03:23:23.040> I<03:23:23.199> bought<03:23:23.520> with<03:23:23.680> the<03:23:23.800> word<03:23:24.080> that<03:23:24.359> being 03:23:24.550 --> 03:23:24.560 align:start position:0% that I bought with the word that being 03:23:24.560 --> 03:23:26.389 align:start position:0% that I bought with the word that being the<03:23:24.720> conjunction<03:23:25.279> in<03:23:25.439> Spanish<03:23:25.960> the<03:23:26.080> sentence 03:23:26.389 --> 03:23:26.399 align:start position:0% the conjunction in Spanish the sentence 03:23:26.399 --> 03:23:30.110 align:start position:0% the conjunction in Spanish the sentence will<03:23:26.600> literally<03:23:27.120> and<03:23:27.279> Visually<03:23:27.880> be<03:23:28.080> the 03:23:30.110 --> 03:23:30.120 align:start position:0% will literally and Visually be the 03:23:30.120 --> 03:23:33.389 align:start position:0% will literally and Visually be the same<03:23:31.120> as<03:23:31.199> you<03:23:31.319> can<03:23:31.479> see<03:23:32.199> is<03:23:32.319> used<03:23:32.680> as<03:23:32.920> that<03:23:33.239> the 03:23:33.389 --> 03:23:33.399 align:start position:0% same as you can see is used as that the 03:23:33.399 --> 03:23:35.510 align:start position:0% same as you can see is used as that the same<03:23:33.680> way<03:23:33.960> in<03:23:34.120> English<03:23:34.600> technically<03:23:35.000> speaking 03:23:35.510 --> 03:23:35.520 align:start position:0% same way in English technically speaking 03:23:35.520 --> 03:23:37.150 align:start position:0% same way in English technically speaking however<03:23:35.840> the<03:23:35.960> phrase<03:23:36.199> in<03:23:36.399> English<03:23:36.880> can<03:23:37.000> be 03:23:37.150 --> 03:23:37.160 align:start position:0% however the phrase in English can be 03:23:37.160 --> 03:23:38.950 align:start position:0% however the phrase in English can be said<03:23:37.399> and<03:23:37.600> written<03:23:38.040> without<03:23:38.279> the<03:23:38.399> conjunction 03:23:38.950 --> 03:23:38.960 align:start position:0% said and written without the conjunction 03:23:38.960 --> 03:23:40.309 align:start position:0% said and written without the conjunction I'll<03:23:39.120> use<03:23:39.319> the<03:23:39.399> phone<03:23:39.640> I<03:23:39.800> bought<03:23:40.160> but 03:23:40.309 --> 03:23:40.319 align:start position:0% I'll use the phone I bought but 03:23:40.319 --> 03:23:42.389 align:start position:0% I'll use the phone I bought but realistically<03:23:41.080> we<03:23:41.239> always<03:23:41.439> have<03:23:41.840> included 03:23:42.389 --> 03:23:42.399 align:start position:0% realistically we always have included 03:23:42.399 --> 03:23:43.790 align:start position:0% realistically we always have included especially<03:23:42.760> in<03:23:42.920> Spanish<03:23:43.359> saying<03:23:43.640> the 03:23:43.790 --> 03:23:43.800 align:start position:0% especially in Spanish saying the 03:23:43.800 --> 03:23:45.349 align:start position:0% especially in Spanish saying the sentence<03:23:44.239> without<03:23:44.439> the<03:23:44.640> conjunction 03:23:45.349 --> 03:23:45.359 align:start position:0% sentence without the conjunction 03:23:45.359 --> 03:23:47.110 align:start position:0% sentence without the conjunction signifies<03:23:45.800> an<03:23:46.000> incomplete<03:23:46.560> phrase<03:23:47.000> and 03:23:47.110 --> 03:23:47.120 align:start position:0% signifies an incomplete phrase and 03:23:47.120 --> 03:23:48.750 align:start position:0% signifies an incomplete phrase and that's<03:23:47.279> why<03:23:47.399> the<03:23:47.520> conjunction<03:23:48.080> is<03:23:48.239> needed<03:23:48.640> and 03:23:48.750 --> 03:23:48.760 align:start position:0% that's why the conjunction is needed and 03:23:48.760 --> 03:23:50.670 align:start position:0% that's why the conjunction is needed and here<03:23:48.920> are<03:23:49.120> more<03:23:49.319> sentences<03:23:50.000> that<03:23:50.160> incorporate 03:23:50.670 --> 03:23:50.680 align:start position:0% here are more sentences that incorporate 03:23:50.680 --> 03:23:52.750 align:start position:0% here are more sentences that incorporate intermediate<03:23:51.199> Spanish<03:23:51.600> concepts<03:23:52.160> with<03:23:52.399> K<03:23:52.640> how 03:23:52.750 --> 03:23:52.760 align:start position:0% intermediate Spanish concepts with K how 03:23:52.760 --> 03:23:54.349 align:start position:0% intermediate Spanish concepts with K how would<03:23:52.880> you<03:23:52.960> say<03:23:53.199> the<03:23:53.319> phrase<03:23:53.760> he<03:23:53.920> wants<03:23:54.199> the 03:23:54.349 --> 03:23:54.359 align:start position:0% would you say the phrase he wants the 03:23:54.359 --> 03:23:57.910 align:start position:0% would you say the phrase he wants the book<03:23:54.680> that<03:23:54.800> is<03:23:54.960> on<03:23:55.160> the 03:23:57.910 --> 03:23:57.920 align:start position:0% 03:23:57.920 --> 03:24:00.630 align:start position:0% Shelf<03:23:58.920> with<03:23:59.199> that<03:23:59.479> and<03:24:00.120> expressing<03:24:00.479> the 03:24:00.630 --> 03:24:00.640 align:start position:0% Shelf with that and expressing the 03:24:00.640 --> 03:24:02.469 align:start position:0% Shelf with that and expressing the subordinate<03:24:01.120> clause<03:24:01.520> and<03:24:01.680> with<03:24:01.800> the<03:24:01.960> sentence 03:24:02.469 --> 03:24:02.479 align:start position:0% subordinate clause and with the sentence 03:24:02.479 --> 03:24:04.189 align:start position:0% subordinate clause and with the sentence literally<03:24:02.880> following<03:24:03.279> the<03:24:03.399> same<03:24:03.640> pattern<03:24:04.120> as 03:24:04.189 --> 03:24:04.199 align:start position:0% literally following the same pattern as 03:24:04.199 --> 03:24:06.269 align:start position:0% literally following the same pattern as in<03:24:04.399> Spanish<03:24:04.960> how<03:24:05.080> would<03:24:05.239> you<03:24:05.359> say<03:24:05.840> the<03:24:05.960> house 03:24:06.269 --> 03:24:06.279 align:start position:0% in Spanish how would you say the house 03:24:06.279 --> 03:24:08.389 align:start position:0% in Spanish how would you say the house that<03:24:06.399> you<03:24:06.520> see<03:24:06.920> is 03:24:08.389 --> 03:24:08.399 align:start position:0% that you see is 03:24:08.399 --> 03:24:11.189 align:start position:0% that you see is big<03:24:09.399> is<03:24:09.560> Grande<03:24:10.080> this<03:24:10.239> sentence<03:24:10.680> was<03:24:10.800> an<03:24:10.960> easy 03:24:11.189 --> 03:24:11.199 align:start position:0% big is Grande this sentence was an easy 03:24:11.199 --> 03:24:12.950 align:start position:0% big is Grande this sentence was an easy one<03:24:11.479> now<03:24:11.640> now<03:24:11.840> how<03:24:11.920> would<03:24:12.080> you<03:24:12.199> say<03:24:12.520> we<03:24:12.640> went<03:24:12.800> to 03:24:12.950 --> 03:24:12.960 align:start position:0% one now now how would you say we went to 03:24:12.960 --> 03:24:17.189 align:start position:0% one now now how would you say we went to a<03:24:13.120> restaurant<03:24:13.720> that<03:24:13.840> is 03:24:17.189 --> 03:24:17.199 align:start position:0% 03:24:17.199 --> 03:24:19.269 align:start position:0% expensive<03:24:18.199> how<03:24:18.279> would<03:24:18.399> you<03:24:18.520> say<03:24:18.720> the<03:24:18.880> phrase 03:24:19.269 --> 03:24:19.279 align:start position:0% expensive how would you say the phrase 03:24:19.279 --> 03:24:23.070 align:start position:0% expensive how would you say the phrase they<03:24:19.399> will<03:24:19.600> do<03:24:19.800> the<03:24:19.960> job<03:24:20.319> that<03:24:20.479> they 03:24:23.070 --> 03:24:23.080 align:start position:0% 03:24:23.080 --> 03:24:25.630 align:start position:0% have<03:24:24.080> now<03:24:24.319> how<03:24:24.399> would<03:24:24.560> you<03:24:24.720> say<03:24:25.040> I<03:24:25.160> have<03:24:25.359> taken 03:24:25.630 --> 03:24:25.640 align:start position:0% have now how would you say I have taken 03:24:25.640 --> 03:24:30.429 align:start position:0% have now how would you say I have taken the<03:24:25.800> medicine<03:24:26.359> that<03:24:26.479> the<03:24:26.640> doctor<03:24:26.960> gave 03:24:30.429 --> 03:24:30.439 align:start position:0% 03:24:30.439 --> 03:24:32.950 align:start position:0% me<03:24:31.439> this<03:24:31.600> sentence<03:24:32.040> was<03:24:32.160> a<03:24:32.279> bit<03:24:32.680> difficult 03:24:32.950 --> 03:24:32.960 align:start position:0% me this sentence was a bit difficult 03:24:32.960 --> 03:24:34.630 align:start position:0% me this sentence was a bit difficult because<03:24:33.120> it<03:24:33.239> used<03:24:33.479> the<03:24:33.600> present<03:24:33.960> perfect<03:24:34.479> the 03:24:34.630 --> 03:24:34.640 align:start position:0% because it used the present perfect the 03:24:34.640 --> 03:24:36.429 align:start position:0% because it used the present perfect the past<03:24:34.960> a<03:24:35.080> direct<03:24:35.359> object<03:24:35.680> pronoun<03:24:36.199> and<03:24:36.319> the 03:24:36.429 --> 03:24:36.439 align:start position:0% past a direct object pronoun and the 03:24:36.439 --> 03:24:38.189 align:start position:0% past a direct object pronoun and the conjunction<03:24:37.000> K<03:24:37.319> if<03:24:37.399> you<03:24:37.520> got<03:24:37.680> the<03:24:37.800> sentence 03:24:38.189 --> 03:24:38.199 align:start position:0% conjunction K if you got the sentence 03:24:38.199 --> 03:24:39.910 align:start position:0% conjunction K if you got the sentence right<03:24:38.439> then<03:24:38.520> you<03:24:38.640> did<03:24:38.760> a<03:24:38.920> good<03:24:39.120> job<03:24:39.359> and<03:24:39.479> if<03:24:39.640> not 03:24:39.910 --> 03:24:39.920 align:start position:0% right then you did a good job and if not 03:24:39.920 --> 03:24:41.389 align:start position:0% right then you did a good job and if not now<03:24:40.040> you<03:24:40.120> can<03:24:40.239> learn<03:24:40.520> how<03:24:40.680> phrases<03:24:41.040> work<03:24:41.279> with 03:24:41.389 --> 03:24:41.399 align:start position:0% now you can learn how phrases work with 03:24:41.399 --> 03:24:43.110 align:start position:0% now you can learn how phrases work with the<03:24:41.640> conjunction<03:24:42.319> and<03:24:42.439> here's<03:24:42.680> one<03:24:42.920> last 03:24:43.110 --> 03:24:43.120 align:start position:0% the conjunction and here's one last 03:24:43.120 --> 03:24:44.630 align:start position:0% the conjunction and here's one last sentence<03:24:43.600> that's<03:24:43.720> a<03:24:43.840> bit<03:24:44.000> tricky<03:24:44.399> how<03:24:44.520> would 03:24:44.630 --> 03:24:44.640 align:start position:0% sentence that's a bit tricky how would 03:24:44.640 --> 03:24:46.790 align:start position:0% sentence that's a bit tricky how would you<03:24:44.760> say<03:24:44.960> the<03:24:45.120> phrase<03:24:45.520> I<03:24:45.640> see<03:24:46.000> that<03:24:46.239> that<03:24:46.439> man 03:24:46.790 --> 03:24:46.800 align:start position:0% you say the phrase I see that that man 03:24:46.800 --> 03:24:49.870 align:start position:0% you say the phrase I see that that man is 03:24:49.870 --> 03:24:49.880 align:start position:0% 03:24:49.880 --> 03:24:51.950 align:start position:0% standing<03:24:50.880> the<03:24:50.960> reason<03:24:51.199> why<03:24:51.359> the<03:24:51.479> sentence<03:24:51.760> is 03:24:51.950 --> 03:24:51.960 align:start position:0% standing the reason why the sentence is 03:24:51.960 --> 03:24:53.870 align:start position:0% standing the reason why the sentence is complicated<03:24:52.680> is<03:24:52.840> because<03:24:53.040> in<03:24:53.239> English<03:24:53.720> we 03:24:53.870 --> 03:24:53.880 align:start position:0% complicated is because in English we 03:24:53.880 --> 03:24:55.710 align:start position:0% complicated is because in English we have<03:24:54.040> the<03:24:54.160> word<03:24:54.479> that<03:24:54.800> which<03:24:54.920> is<03:24:55.000> used<03:24:55.279> twice 03:24:55.710 --> 03:24:55.720 align:start position:0% have the word that which is used twice 03:24:55.720 --> 03:24:57.269 align:start position:0% have the word that which is used twice but<03:24:55.880> with<03:24:56.040> different<03:24:56.279> meanings<03:24:56.840> the<03:24:56.960> first 03:24:57.269 --> 03:24:57.279 align:start position:0% but with different meanings the first 03:24:57.279 --> 03:24:59.110 align:start position:0% but with different meanings the first that<03:24:57.600> is<03:24:57.720> a<03:24:57.840> conjunction<03:24:58.520> and<03:24:58.640> the<03:24:58.760> second 03:24:59.110 --> 03:24:59.120 align:start position:0% that is a conjunction and the second 03:24:59.120 --> 03:25:00.790 align:start position:0% that is a conjunction and the second that<03:24:59.359> is<03:24:59.479> a<03:24:59.600> demonstrative<03:25:00.160> adjective<03:25:00.640> even 03:25:00.790 --> 03:25:00.800 align:start position:0% that is a demonstrative adjective even 03:25:00.800 --> 03:25:01.830 align:start position:0% that is a demonstrative adjective even though<03:25:00.920> it's<03:25:01.000> a<03:25:01.120> tricky<03:25:01.399> concept<03:25:01.720> that 03:25:01.830 --> 03:25:01.840 align:start position:0% though it's a tricky concept that 03:25:01.840 --> 03:25:03.309 align:start position:0% though it's a tricky concept that English<03:25:02.120> students<03:25:02.479> have<03:25:02.600> to<03:25:02.720> deal<03:25:02.960> with<03:25:03.160> it's 03:25:03.309 --> 03:25:03.319 align:start position:0% English students have to deal with it's 03:25:03.319 --> 03:25:05.510 align:start position:0% English students have to deal with it's pretty<03:25:03.560> normal<03:25:03.840> in<03:25:04.000> Spanish<03:25:04.560> this<03:25:04.760> idea<03:25:05.239> just 03:25:05.510 --> 03:25:05.520 align:start position:0% pretty normal in Spanish this idea just 03:25:05.520 --> 03:25:07.309 align:start position:0% pretty normal in Spanish this idea just shows<03:25:05.920> how<03:25:06.080> English<03:25:06.439> is<03:25:06.600> simple<03:25:07.040> because<03:25:07.199> it 03:25:07.309 --> 03:25:07.319 align:start position:0% shows how English is simple because it 03:25:07.319 --> 03:25:09.349 align:start position:0% shows how English is simple because it repeats<03:25:07.680> one<03:25:07.880> word<03:25:08.199> multiple<03:25:08.640> times<03:25:09.040> but<03:25:09.199> with 03:25:09.349 --> 03:25:09.359 align:start position:0% repeats one word multiple times but with 03:25:09.359 --> 03:25:11.070 align:start position:0% repeats one word multiple times but with different<03:25:09.640> meanings<03:25:10.160> in<03:25:10.319> other<03:25:10.560> languages 03:25:11.070 --> 03:25:11.080 align:start position:0% different meanings in other languages 03:25:11.080 --> 03:25:12.590 align:start position:0% different meanings in other languages especially<03:25:11.560> in<03:25:11.640> Spanish<03:25:12.040> you<03:25:12.199> have<03:25:12.399> other 03:25:12.590 --> 03:25:12.600 align:start position:0% especially in Spanish you have other 03:25:12.600 --> 03:25:14.870 align:start position:0% especially in Spanish you have other words<03:25:12.880> for<03:25:13.120> these<03:25:13.359> cases<03:25:13.880> but<03:25:14.040> not<03:25:14.160> in<03:25:14.319> English 03:25:14.870 --> 03:25:14.880 align:start position:0% words for these cases but not in English 03:25:14.880 --> 03:25:16.990 align:start position:0% words for these cases but not in English that's<03:25:15.040> how<03:25:15.359> K<03:25:15.680> as<03:25:15.760> a<03:25:15.920> conjunction<03:25:16.560> Works<03:25:16.840> in 03:25:16.990 --> 03:25:17.000 align:start position:0% that's how K as a conjunction Works in 03:25:17.000 --> 03:25:19.269 align:start position:0% that's how K as a conjunction Works in Spanish<03:25:17.560> now<03:25:17.800> we<03:25:17.920> have<03:25:18.080> the<03:25:18.199> words<03:25:18.600> Lo<03:25:19.160> which 03:25:19.269 --> 03:25:19.279 align:start position:0% Spanish now we have the words Lo which 03:25:19.279 --> 03:25:21.229 align:start position:0% Spanish now we have the words Lo which mean<03:25:19.640> what<03:25:19.880> but<03:25:20.040> not<03:25:20.199> in<03:25:20.319> the<03:25:20.479> definite<03:25:20.840> form 03:25:21.229 --> 03:25:21.239 align:start position:0% mean what but not in the definite form 03:25:21.239 --> 03:25:22.790 align:start position:0% mean what but not in the definite form even<03:25:21.439> though<03:25:21.600> many<03:25:21.880> Educators<03:25:22.439> give<03:25:22.640> these 03:25:22.790 --> 03:25:22.800 align:start position:0% even though many Educators give these 03:25:22.800 --> 03:25:24.309 align:start position:0% even though many Educators give these words<03:25:23.120> different<03:25:23.439> definitions<03:25:24.160> my 03:25:24.309 --> 03:25:24.319 align:start position:0% words different definitions my 03:25:24.319 --> 03:25:26.950 align:start position:0% words different definitions my explanation<03:25:24.800> of<03:25:24.960> Lo<03:25:25.520> is<03:25:25.680> very<03:25:25.880> simple<03:25:26.319> Lo<03:25:26.800> in 03:25:26.950 --> 03:25:26.960 align:start position:0% explanation of Lo is very simple Lo in 03:25:26.960 --> 03:25:29.150 align:start position:0% explanation of Lo is very simple Lo in Spanish<03:25:27.520> is<03:25:27.640> used<03:25:28.000> as<03:25:28.239> what<03:25:28.600> but<03:25:28.760> not<03:25:28.960> in 03:25:29.150 --> 03:25:29.160 align:start position:0% Spanish is used as what but not in 03:25:29.160 --> 03:25:30.870 align:start position:0% Spanish is used as what but not in question<03:25:29.479> form<03:25:29.880> and<03:25:30.000> most<03:25:30.160> of<03:25:30.319> the<03:25:30.439> time<03:25:30.760> it's 03:25:30.870 --> 03:25:30.880 align:start position:0% question form and most of the time it's 03:25:30.880 --> 03:25:32.389 align:start position:0% question form and most of the time it's put<03:25:31.080> in<03:25:31.199> the<03:25:31.319> beginning<03:25:31.720> or<03:25:31.880> middle<03:25:32.160> of<03:25:32.279> a 03:25:32.389 --> 03:25:32.399 align:start position:0% put in the beginning or middle of a 03:25:32.399 --> 03:25:33.910 align:start position:0% put in the beginning or middle of a sentence<03:25:32.800> to<03:25:32.920> visually<03:25:33.239> show<03:25:33.479> what<03:25:33.560> I<03:25:33.680> want<03:25:33.760> to 03:25:33.910 --> 03:25:33.920 align:start position:0% sentence to visually show what I want to 03:25:33.920 --> 03:25:35.870 align:start position:0% sentence to visually show what I want to say<03:25:34.199> here's<03:25:34.399> a<03:25:34.560> simple<03:25:34.880> sentence<03:25:35.399> consisting 03:25:35.870 --> 03:25:35.880 align:start position:0% say here's a simple sentence consisting 03:25:35.880 --> 03:25:39.630 align:start position:0% say here's a simple sentence consisting of<03:25:36.040> the<03:25:36.120> word<03:25:36.439> quando<03:25:37.080> which<03:25:37.199> means<03:25:37.520> when 03:25:39.630 --> 03:25:39.640 align:start position:0% of the word quando which means when 03:25:39.640 --> 03:25:42.469 align:start position:0% of the word quando which means when qu<03:25:40.640> when<03:25:40.760> I<03:25:40.880> was<03:25:41.040> young<03:25:41.279> I<03:25:41.560> had<03:25:41.680> a<03:25:41.840> dog<03:25:42.160> in<03:25:42.319> this 03:25:42.469 --> 03:25:42.479 align:start position:0% qu when I was young I had a dog in this 03:25:42.479 --> 03:25:44.469 align:start position:0% qu when I was young I had a dog in this sentence<03:25:42.960> I'm<03:25:43.080> using<03:25:43.359> the<03:25:43.479> word<03:25:43.720> when<03:25:44.120> not<03:25:44.359> as 03:25:44.469 --> 03:25:44.479 align:start position:0% sentence I'm using the word when not as 03:25:44.479 --> 03:25:46.229 align:start position:0% sentence I'm using the word when not as a<03:25:44.680> question<03:25:45.199> but<03:25:45.359> as<03:25:45.439> a<03:25:45.600> conjunction 03:25:46.229 --> 03:25:46.239 align:start position:0% a question but as a conjunction 03:25:46.239 --> 03:25:47.550 align:start position:0% a question but as a conjunction especially<03:25:46.600> in<03:25:46.720> Spanish<03:25:47.120> when<03:25:47.199> it<03:25:47.319> doesn't 03:25:47.550 --> 03:25:47.560 align:start position:0% especially in Spanish when it doesn't 03:25:47.560 --> 03:25:49.469 align:start position:0% especially in Spanish when it doesn't have<03:25:47.680> an<03:25:47.880> accent<03:25:48.399> this<03:25:48.560> sentence<03:25:49.080> can<03:25:49.199> still 03:25:49.469 --> 03:25:49.479 align:start position:0% have an accent this sentence can still 03:25:49.479 --> 03:25:51.110 align:start position:0% have an accent this sentence can still maintain<03:25:49.840> its<03:25:50.000> meaning<03:25:50.439> even<03:25:50.600> if<03:25:50.680> you<03:25:50.800> switch 03:25:51.110 --> 03:25:51.120 align:start position:0% maintain its meaning even if you switch 03:25:51.120 --> 03:25:53.229 align:start position:0% maintain its meaning even if you switch the<03:25:51.239> phrases<03:25:51.760> like<03:25:51.920> saying<03:25:52.399> I<03:25:52.520> had<03:25:52.640> a<03:25:52.840> dog<03:25:53.120> when 03:25:53.229 --> 03:25:53.239 align:start position:0% the phrases like saying I had a dog when 03:25:53.239 --> 03:25:55.269 align:start position:0% the phrases like saying I had a dog when I<03:25:53.359> was 03:25:55.269 --> 03:25:55.279 align:start position:0% I was 03:25:55.279 --> 03:25:57.750 align:start position:0% I was young<03:25:56.279> both<03:25:56.439> in<03:25:56.600> English<03:25:56.920> and<03:25:57.080> Spanish<03:25:57.600> the 03:25:57.750 --> 03:25:57.760 align:start position:0% young both in English and Spanish the 03:25:57.760 --> 03:25:59.550 align:start position:0% young both in English and Spanish the conjunction<03:25:58.279> when<03:25:58.640> keeps<03:25:58.880> its<03:25:59.040> meaning<03:25:59.399> and 03:25:59.550 --> 03:25:59.560 align:start position:0% conjunction when keeps its meaning and 03:25:59.560 --> 03:26:01.150 align:start position:0% conjunction when keeps its meaning and doesn't<03:25:59.800> change<03:26:00.040> to<03:26:00.160> a<03:26:00.319> question<03:26:00.800> with<03:26:00.960> this 03:26:01.150 --> 03:26:01.160 align:start position:0% doesn't change to a question with this 03:26:01.160 --> 03:26:03.070 align:start position:0% doesn't change to a question with this concept<03:26:01.520> in<03:26:01.640> mind<03:26:02.040> this<03:26:02.160> is<03:26:02.319> literally<03:26:02.880> and 03:26:03.070 --> 03:26:03.080 align:start position:0% concept in mind this is literally and 03:26:03.080 --> 03:26:05.710 align:start position:0% concept in mind this is literally and exactly<03:26:03.680> how<03:26:03.920> lo<03:26:04.520> is<03:26:04.640> used<03:26:04.880> in<03:26:05.040> Spanish<03:26:05.600> and 03:26:05.710 --> 03:26:05.720 align:start position:0% exactly how lo is used in Spanish and 03:26:05.720 --> 03:26:07.389 align:start position:0% exactly how lo is used in Spanish and here<03:26:05.880> are<03:26:06.040> some<03:26:06.279> examples<03:26:06.880> how<03:26:06.960> would<03:26:07.080> you<03:26:07.199> say 03:26:07.389 --> 03:26:07.399 align:start position:0% here are some examples how would you say 03:26:07.399 --> 03:26:09.790 align:start position:0% here are some examples how would you say the<03:26:07.560> phrase<03:26:08.040> what<03:26:08.239> I<03:26:08.359> want<03:26:08.720> is<03:26:08.800> a 03:26:09.790 --> 03:26:09.800 align:start position:0% the phrase what I want is a 03:26:09.800 --> 03:26:12.950 align:start position:0% the phrase what I want is a house<03:26:10.800> is<03:26:11.800> now<03:26:12.040> if<03:26:12.120> you<03:26:12.199> were<03:26:12.399> to<03:26:12.520> switch<03:26:12.800> the 03:26:12.950 --> 03:26:12.960 align:start position:0% house is now if you were to switch the 03:26:12.960 --> 03:26:14.550 align:start position:0% house is now if you were to switch the phrases<03:26:13.399> and<03:26:13.560> keep<03:26:13.760> the<03:26:13.880> meaning<03:26:14.319> how<03:26:14.439> would 03:26:14.550 --> 03:26:14.560 align:start position:0% phrases and keep the meaning how would 03:26:14.560 --> 03:26:19.030 align:start position:0% phrases and keep the meaning how would you<03:26:14.720> do<03:26:14.840> so<03:26:15.640> a<03:26:15.840> house<03:26:16.160> is<03:26:16.319> what<03:26:16.479> I<03:26:16.800> want<03:26:17.880> is<03:26:18.880> in 03:26:19.030 --> 03:26:19.040 align:start position:0% you do so a house is what I want is in 03:26:19.040 --> 03:26:20.870 align:start position:0% you do so a house is what I want is in both<03:26:19.279> sentences<03:26:20.040> what<03:26:20.239> is<03:26:20.359> used<03:26:20.640> in<03:26:20.760> the 03:26:20.870 --> 03:26:20.880 align:start position:0% both sentences what is used in the 03:26:20.880 --> 03:26:22.670 align:start position:0% both sentences what is used in the beginning<03:26:21.279> or<03:26:21.439> middle<03:26:21.720> of<03:26:21.880> the<03:26:22.000> sentence<03:26:22.560> the 03:26:22.670 --> 03:26:22.680 align:start position:0% beginning or middle of the sentence the 03:26:22.680 --> 03:26:25.150 align:start position:0% beginning or middle of the sentence the same<03:26:22.960> way<03:26:23.319> Lo<03:26:23.920> is<03:26:24.040> used<03:26:24.279> in<03:26:24.439> Spanish<03:26:25.000> that's 03:26:25.150 --> 03:26:25.160 align:start position:0% same way Lo is used in Spanish that's 03:26:25.160 --> 03:26:27.550 align:start position:0% same way Lo is used in Spanish that's how<03:26:25.359> lo<03:26:25.880> Works<03:26:26.160> in<03:26:26.319> Spanish<03:26:26.840> and<03:26:27.000> hopefully 03:26:27.550 --> 03:26:27.560 align:start position:0% how lo Works in Spanish and hopefully 03:26:27.560 --> 03:26:29.269 align:start position:0% how lo Works in Spanish and hopefully I'm<03:26:27.720> making<03:26:28.000> this<03:26:28.199> concept<03:26:28.680> as<03:26:28.800> easy<03:26:29.080> as 03:26:29.269 --> 03:26:29.279 align:start position:0% I'm making this concept as easy as 03:26:29.279 --> 03:26:31.110 align:start position:0% I'm making this concept as easy as possible<03:26:29.760> here<03:26:29.880> are<03:26:30.080> more<03:26:30.319> sentences<03:26:31.000> how 03:26:31.110 --> 03:26:31.120 align:start position:0% possible here are more sentences how 03:26:31.120 --> 03:26:34.830 align:start position:0% possible here are more sentences how would<03:26:31.279> you<03:26:31.439> say<03:26:31.720> you<03:26:31.840> don't<03:26:32.080> know<03:26:32.479> what<03:26:32.640> you 03:26:34.830 --> 03:26:34.840 align:start position:0% 03:26:34.840 --> 03:26:37.110 align:start position:0% want<03:26:35.840> now<03:26:36.040> how<03:26:36.160> would<03:26:36.279> you<03:26:36.439> rephrase<03:26:36.960> the 03:26:37.110 --> 03:26:37.120 align:start position:0% want now how would you rephrase the 03:26:37.120 --> 03:26:39.750 align:start position:0% want now how would you rephrase the sentence<03:26:37.600> with<03:26:37.880> what<03:26:38.120> in<03:26:38.239> the<03:26:38.600> beginning<03:26:39.600> what 03:26:39.750 --> 03:26:39.760 align:start position:0% sentence with what in the beginning what 03:26:39.760 --> 03:26:42.870 align:start position:0% sentence with what in the beginning what you<03:26:39.920> want<03:26:40.279> you<03:26:40.399> don't<03:26:40.640> know<03:26:40.960> Lo 03:26:42.870 --> 03:26:42.880 align:start position:0% you want you don't know Lo 03:26:42.880 --> 03:26:44.429 align:start position:0% you want you don't know Lo how<03:26:42.960> would<03:26:43.080> you<03:26:43.199> say<03:26:43.399> the<03:26:43.560> phrase<03:26:43.960> he<03:26:44.120> has<03:26:44.239> to 03:26:44.429 --> 03:26:44.439 align:start position:0% how would you say the phrase he has to 03:26:44.439 --> 03:26:47.750 align:start position:0% how would you say the phrase he has to do<03:26:44.760> what<03:26:44.880> he<03:26:45.000> needs<03:26:45.239> to 03:26:47.750 --> 03:26:47.760 align:start position:0% 03:26:47.760 --> 03:26:50.910 align:start position:0% do<03:26:48.760> now<03:26:48.960> how<03:26:49.040> would<03:26:49.160> you<03:26:49.359> rephrase<03:26:49.760> it<03:26:50.600> what<03:26:50.760> he 03:26:50.910 --> 03:26:50.920 align:start position:0% do now how would you rephrase it what he 03:26:50.920 --> 03:26:53.790 align:start position:0% do now how would you rephrase it what he needs<03:26:51.160> to<03:26:51.319> do<03:26:51.680> he<03:26:51.840> has<03:26:52.000> to 03:26:53.790 --> 03:26:53.800 align:start position:0% needs to do he has to 03:26:53.800 --> 03:26:56.269 align:start position:0% needs to do he has to do<03:26:54.800> how<03:26:54.880> would<03:26:55.040> you<03:26:55.199> say<03:26:55.560> what<03:26:55.720> they<03:26:55.840> need<03:26:56.160> is 03:26:56.269 --> 03:26:56.279 align:start position:0% do how would you say what they need is 03:26:56.279 --> 03:26:59.110 align:start position:0% do how would you say what they need is something<03:26:56.560> to 03:26:59.110 --> 03:26:59.120 align:start position:0% 03:26:59.120 --> 03:27:02.030 align:start position:0% eat<03:27:00.120> and<03:27:00.279> now<03:27:00.520> how<03:27:00.640> would<03:27:00.760> you<03:27:00.880> rephrase<03:27:01.279> it 03:27:02.030 --> 03:27:02.040 align:start position:0% eat and now how would you rephrase it 03:27:02.040 --> 03:27:05.189 align:start position:0% eat and now how would you rephrase it something<03:27:02.359> to<03:27:02.560> eat<03:27:02.880> is<03:27:03.040> what<03:27:03.199> they<03:27:03.319> need<03:27:03.640> Al 03:27:05.189 --> 03:27:05.199 align:start position:0% something to eat is what they need Al 03:27:05.199 --> 03:27:07.910 align:start position:0% something to eat is what they need Al is<03:27:06.199> how<03:27:06.319> would<03:27:06.439> you<03:27:06.640> say<03:27:06.960> I<03:27:07.080> did<03:27:07.239> not<03:27:07.399> see<03:27:07.800> what 03:27:07.910 --> 03:27:07.920 align:start position:0% is how would you say I did not see what 03:27:07.920 --> 03:27:09.830 align:start position:0% is how would you say I did not see what you<03:27:08.080> gave 03:27:09.830 --> 03:27:09.840 align:start position:0% you gave 03:27:09.840 --> 03:27:12.590 align:start position:0% you gave me<03:27:10.840> and<03:27:11.000> now<03:27:11.399> how<03:27:11.479> would<03:27:11.560> you<03:27:11.680> rephrase<03:27:12.040> it 03:27:12.590 --> 03:27:12.600 align:start position:0% me and now how would you rephrase it 03:27:12.600 --> 03:27:14.429 align:start position:0% me and now how would you rephrase it what<03:27:12.760> you<03:27:12.960> gave<03:27:13.120> me<03:27:13.439> I<03:27:13.600> did<03:27:13.760> not 03:27:14.429 --> 03:27:14.439 align:start position:0% what you gave me I did not 03:27:14.439 --> 03:27:17.429 align:start position:0% what you gave me I did not see<03:27:15.439> Y<03:27:16.040> and<03:27:16.199> finally<03:27:16.680> here's<03:27:16.920> a<03:27:17.080> generic 03:27:17.429 --> 03:27:17.439 align:start position:0% see Y and finally here's a generic 03:27:17.439 --> 03:27:19.189 align:start position:0% see Y and finally here's a generic phrase<03:27:17.880> that<03:27:17.960> I've<03:27:18.120> said<03:27:18.399> previously<03:27:18.960> in<03:27:19.080> the 03:27:19.189 --> 03:27:19.199 align:start position:0% phrase that I've said previously in the 03:27:19.199 --> 03:27:21.189 align:start position:0% phrase that I've said previously in the video<03:27:19.720> how<03:27:19.840> would<03:27:20.000> you<03:27:20.120> say<03:27:20.399> to<03:27:20.600> visually<03:27:20.920> show 03:27:21.189 --> 03:27:21.199 align:start position:0% video how would you say to visually show 03:27:21.199 --> 03:27:24.630 align:start position:0% video how would you say to visually show what<03:27:21.319> I<03:27:21.439> want<03:27:21.600> to 03:27:24.630 --> 03:27:24.640 align:start position:0% 03:27:24.640 --> 03:27:27.510 align:start position:0% say<03:27:25.640> this<03:27:25.760> sentence<03:27:26.319> unlike<03:27:26.720> others<03:27:27.160> cannot 03:27:27.510 --> 03:27:27.520 align:start position:0% say this sentence unlike others cannot 03:27:27.520 --> 03:27:30.070 align:start position:0% say this sentence unlike others cannot be<03:27:27.720> rephrased<03:27:28.399> but<03:27:28.520> it<03:27:28.640> does<03:27:28.800> show<03:27:29.239> how<03:27:29.439> lo<03:27:29.960> can 03:27:30.070 --> 03:27:30.080 align:start position:0% be rephrased but it does show how lo can 03:27:30.080 --> 03:27:32.030 align:start position:0% be rephrased but it does show how lo can be<03:27:30.199> used<03:27:30.439> in<03:27:30.600> other<03:27:30.840> sentences<03:27:31.279> too<03:27:31.560> so<03:27:31.800> that's 03:27:32.030 --> 03:27:32.040 align:start position:0% be used in other sentences too so that's 03:27:32.040 --> 03:27:33.750 align:start position:0% be used in other sentences too so that's that<03:27:32.239> in<03:27:32.359> this<03:27:32.560> video<03:27:32.880> and<03:27:33.000> the<03:27:33.120> videos<03:27:33.479> after 03:27:33.750 --> 03:27:33.760 align:start position:0% that in this video and the videos after 03:27:33.760 --> 03:27:34.910 align:start position:0% that in this video and the videos after this<03:27:33.880> one<03:27:34.160> I'll<03:27:34.319> be<03:27:34.439> explaining<03:27:34.760> the 03:27:34.910 --> 03:27:34.920 align:start position:0% this one I'll be explaining the 03:27:34.920 --> 03:27:36.790 align:start position:0% this one I'll be explaining the subjunctive<03:27:35.520> in<03:27:35.680> Spanish<03:27:36.199> which<03:27:36.319> is<03:27:36.439> the<03:27:36.600> last 03:27:36.790 --> 03:27:36.800 align:start position:0% subjunctive in Spanish which is the last 03:27:36.800 --> 03:27:38.550 align:start position:0% subjunctive in Spanish which is the last most<03:27:37.199> difficult<03:27:37.399> concept<03:27:37.800> ending<03:27:38.120> all<03:27:38.279> of<03:27:38.399> my 03:27:38.550 --> 03:27:38.560 align:start position:0% most difficult concept ending all of my 03:27:38.560 --> 03:27:40.510 align:start position:0% most difficult concept ending all of my Topics<03:27:38.960> in<03:27:39.120> Spanish<03:27:39.680> typically<03:27:40.199> it's<03:27:40.319> a 03:27:40.510 --> 03:27:40.520 align:start position:0% Topics in Spanish typically it's a 03:27:40.520 --> 03:27:42.030 align:start position:0% Topics in Spanish typically it's a concept<03:27:40.920> that<03:27:41.040> students<03:27:41.279> students<03:27:41.520> learn<03:27:41.840> in 03:27:42.030 --> 03:27:42.040 align:start position:0% concept that students students learn in 03:27:42.040 --> 03:27:44.070 align:start position:0% concept that students students learn in intermediate<03:27:42.640> Spanish<03:27:43.160> before<03:27:43.479> learning<03:27:43.960> the 03:27:44.070 --> 03:27:44.080 align:start position:0% intermediate Spanish before learning the 03:27:44.080 --> 03:27:45.990 align:start position:0% intermediate Spanish before learning the future<03:27:44.399> tenses<03:27:45.080> however<03:27:45.319> I<03:27:45.439> decided<03:27:45.760> to<03:27:45.880> keep 03:27:45.990 --> 03:27:46.000 align:start position:0% future tenses however I decided to keep 03:27:46.000 --> 03:27:47.469 align:start position:0% future tenses however I decided to keep it<03:27:46.160> until<03:27:46.399> the<03:27:46.520> end<03:27:46.800> because<03:27:46.960> of<03:27:47.080> its 03:27:47.469 --> 03:27:47.479 align:start position:0% it until the end because of its 03:27:47.479 --> 03:27:48.870 align:start position:0% it until the end because of its difficulty<03:27:47.880> and<03:27:48.040> after<03:27:48.239> I'm<03:27:48.359> done<03:27:48.560> with<03:27:48.680> it 03:27:48.870 --> 03:27:48.880 align:start position:0% difficulty and after I'm done with it 03:27:48.880 --> 03:27:50.550 align:start position:0% difficulty and after I'm done with it I'll<03:27:49.040> compile<03:27:49.479> all<03:27:49.600> of<03:27:49.720> my<03:27:49.880> Spanish<03:27:50.199> videos 03:27:50.550 --> 03:27:50.560 align:start position:0% I'll compile all of my Spanish videos 03:27:50.560 --> 03:27:52.309 align:start position:0% I'll compile all of my Spanish videos into<03:27:50.800> one<03:27:51.000> long<03:27:51.279> video<03:27:51.720> that<03:27:51.880> has<03:27:52.080> every 03:27:52.309 --> 03:27:52.319 align:start position:0% into one long video that has every 03:27:52.319 --> 03:27:53.870 align:start position:0% into one long video that has every Spanish<03:27:52.720> principle<03:27:53.199> the<03:27:53.319> reason<03:27:53.600> why<03:27:53.720> the 03:27:53.870 --> 03:27:53.880 align:start position:0% Spanish principle the reason why the 03:27:53.880 --> 03:27:55.830 align:start position:0% Spanish principle the reason why the subjunctive<03:27:54.479> is<03:27:54.600> so<03:27:54.800> hard<03:27:55.239> is<03:27:55.359> because<03:27:55.560> it<03:27:55.720> has 03:27:55.830 --> 03:27:55.840 align:start position:0% subjunctive is so hard is because it has 03:27:55.840 --> 03:27:57.750 align:start position:0% subjunctive is so hard is because it has a<03:27:55.960> lot<03:27:56.080> of<03:27:56.239> variations<03:27:56.960> more<03:27:57.160> than<03:27:57.359> any<03:27:57.560> other 03:27:57.750 --> 03:27:57.760 align:start position:0% a lot of variations more than any other 03:27:57.760 --> 03:27:59.590 align:start position:0% a lot of variations more than any other tense<03:27:58.040> in<03:27:58.199> Spanish<03:27:58.680> that<03:27:58.760> have<03:27:58.920> shown<03:27:59.239> on<03:27:59.439> this 03:27:59.590 --> 03:27:59.600 align:start position:0% tense in Spanish that have shown on this 03:27:59.600 --> 03:28:01.469 align:start position:0% tense in Spanish that have shown on this channel<03:28:00.040> unlike<03:28:00.319> the<03:28:00.479> past<03:28:00.720> tense<03:28:01.080> which<03:28:01.279> has 03:28:01.469 --> 03:28:01.479 align:start position:0% channel unlike the past tense which has 03:28:01.479 --> 03:28:03.110 align:start position:0% channel unlike the past tense which has three<03:28:01.840> and<03:28:01.960> the<03:28:02.040> future<03:28:02.319> tense<03:28:02.680> which<03:28:02.840> has<03:28:02.960> a 03:28:03.110 --> 03:28:03.120 align:start position:0% three and the future tense which has a 03:28:03.120 --> 03:28:04.910 align:start position:0% three and the future tense which has a couple<03:28:03.560> the<03:28:03.680> subjunctive<03:28:04.319> has<03:28:04.439> a<03:28:04.560> total<03:28:04.800> of 03:28:04.910 --> 03:28:04.920 align:start position:0% couple the subjunctive has a total of 03:28:04.920 --> 03:28:06.870 align:start position:0% couple the subjunctive has a total of four<03:28:05.199> variations<03:28:05.960> that<03:28:06.080> need<03:28:06.239> to<03:28:06.319> be<03:28:06.439> shown 03:28:06.870 --> 03:28:06.880 align:start position:0% four variations that need to be shown 03:28:06.880 --> 03:28:08.670 align:start position:0% four variations that need to be shown individually<03:28:07.600> in<03:28:07.760> this<03:28:07.960> video<03:28:08.279> I'll<03:28:08.479> only 03:28:08.670 --> 03:28:08.680 align:start position:0% individually in this video I'll only 03:28:08.680 --> 03:28:09.990 align:start position:0% individually in this video I'll only explain<03:28:09.040> the<03:28:09.160> principles<03:28:09.760> of<03:28:09.880> the 03:28:09.990 --> 03:28:10.000 align:start position:0% explain the principles of the 03:28:10.000 --> 03:28:11.790 align:start position:0% explain the principles of the subjunctive<03:28:10.600> and<03:28:10.760> individual<03:28:11.439> after<03:28:11.680> this 03:28:11.790 --> 03:28:11.800 align:start position:0% subjunctive and individual after this 03:28:11.800 --> 03:28:14.030 align:start position:0% subjunctive and individual after this one<03:28:12.080> I'll<03:28:12.239> explain<03:28:12.640> each<03:28:12.920> topic<03:28:13.319> individually 03:28:14.030 --> 03:28:14.040 align:start position:0% one I'll explain each topic individually 03:28:14.040 --> 03:28:16.030 align:start position:0% one I'll explain each topic individually before<03:28:14.319> learning<03:28:14.840> how<03:28:14.960> to<03:28:15.120> make<03:28:15.319> sentences<03:28:15.880> in 03:28:16.030 --> 03:28:16.040 align:start position:0% before learning how to make sentences in 03:28:16.040 --> 03:28:17.710 align:start position:0% before learning how to make sentences in the<03:28:16.160> subjunctive<03:28:16.760> we<03:28:16.880> need<03:28:17.000> to<03:28:17.439> understand 03:28:17.710 --> 03:28:17.720 align:start position:0% the subjunctive we need to understand 03:28:17.720 --> 03:28:19.670 align:start position:0% the subjunctive we need to understand its<03:28:17.880> formation<03:28:18.479> and<03:28:18.640> the<03:28:18.760> variations<03:28:19.399> that<03:28:19.479> it 03:28:19.670 --> 03:28:19.680 align:start position:0% its formation and the variations that it 03:28:19.680 --> 03:28:21.710 align:start position:0% its formation and the variations that it has<03:28:20.000> as<03:28:20.120> far<03:28:20.279> as<03:28:20.399> I<03:28:20.520> know<03:28:20.800> in<03:28:20.920> the<03:28:21.040> subjunctive 03:28:21.710 --> 03:28:21.720 align:start position:0% has as far as I know in the subjunctive 03:28:21.720 --> 03:28:23.429 align:start position:0% has as far as I know in the subjunctive there<03:28:21.840> are<03:28:22.080> only<03:28:22.359> four<03:28:22.680> ways<03:28:23.040> that<03:28:23.199> it<03:28:23.319> can 03:28:23.429 --> 03:28:23.439 align:start position:0% there are only four ways that it can 03:28:23.439 --> 03:28:25.150 align:start position:0% there are only four ways that it can change<03:28:23.840> there's<03:28:24.080> the<03:28:24.239> present<03:28:24.520> subjunctive 03:28:25.150 --> 03:28:25.160 align:start position:0% change there's the present subjunctive 03:28:25.160 --> 03:28:26.870 align:start position:0% change there's the present subjunctive the<03:28:25.319> past<03:28:25.520> subjunctive<03:28:26.120> the<03:28:26.239> present<03:28:26.560> perfect 03:28:26.870 --> 03:28:26.880 align:start position:0% the past subjunctive the present perfect 03:28:26.880 --> 03:28:28.229 align:start position:0% the past subjunctive the present perfect subjunctive<03:28:27.439> and<03:28:27.560> the<03:28:27.720> past<03:28:27.920> perfect 03:28:28.229 --> 03:28:28.239 align:start position:0% subjunctive and the past perfect 03:28:28.239 --> 03:28:29.870 align:start position:0% subjunctive and the past perfect subjunctive<03:28:28.800> there<03:28:28.960> also<03:28:29.160> used<03:28:29.359> to<03:28:29.479> be<03:28:29.760> a 03:28:29.870 --> 03:28:29.880 align:start position:0% subjunctive there also used to be a 03:28:29.880 --> 03:28:31.630 align:start position:0% subjunctive there also used to be a future<03:28:30.239> subjunctive<03:28:30.720> in<03:28:30.880> Spanish<03:28:31.359> which<03:28:31.479> is 03:28:31.630 --> 03:28:31.640 align:start position:0% future subjunctive in Spanish which is 03:28:31.640 --> 03:28:33.630 align:start position:0% future subjunctive in Spanish which is now<03:28:31.880> Obsolete<03:28:32.479> and<03:28:32.600> being<03:28:32.880> replaced<03:28:33.359> by<03:28:33.520> the 03:28:33.630 --> 03:28:33.640 align:start position:0% now Obsolete and being replaced by the 03:28:33.640 --> 03:28:35.830 align:start position:0% now Obsolete and being replaced by the present<03:28:33.960> subjunctive<03:28:34.600> overall<03:28:35.239> just<03:28:35.399> know 03:28:35.830 --> 03:28:35.840 align:start position:0% present subjunctive overall just know 03:28:35.840 --> 03:28:37.710 align:start position:0% present subjunctive overall just know that<03:28:36.080> these<03:28:36.399> are<03:28:36.600> the<03:28:36.800> variations<03:28:37.479> of<03:28:37.600> the 03:28:37.710 --> 03:28:37.720 align:start position:0% that these are the variations of the 03:28:37.720 --> 03:28:39.710 align:start position:0% that these are the variations of the subjunctive<03:28:38.319> I<03:28:38.399> already<03:28:38.680> made<03:28:38.920> videos<03:28:39.479> about 03:28:39.710 --> 03:28:39.720 align:start position:0% subjunctive I already made videos about 03:28:39.720 --> 03:28:41.510 align:start position:0% subjunctive I already made videos about the<03:28:39.840> present<03:28:40.239> and<03:28:40.359> the<03:28:40.520> past<03:28:40.720> in<03:28:40.840> Spanish<03:28:41.439> and 03:28:41.510 --> 03:28:41.520 align:start position:0% the present and the past in Spanish and 03:28:41.520 --> 03:28:43.349 align:start position:0% the present and the past in Spanish and so<03:28:41.720> some<03:28:42.000> concepts<03:28:42.479> are<03:28:42.640> more<03:28:42.800> useful<03:28:43.160> than 03:28:43.349 --> 03:28:43.359 align:start position:0% so some concepts are more useful than 03:28:43.359 --> 03:28:45.349 align:start position:0% so some concepts are more useful than others<03:28:43.960> however<03:28:44.319> after<03:28:44.640> this<03:28:44.840> video<03:28:45.160> I'll 03:28:45.349 --> 03:28:45.359 align:start position:0% others however after this video I'll 03:28:45.359 --> 03:28:47.150 align:start position:0% others however after this video I'll explain<03:28:45.720> each<03:28:45.920> tense<03:28:46.319> separately<03:28:46.920> because 03:28:47.150 --> 03:28:47.160 align:start position:0% explain each tense separately because 03:28:47.160 --> 03:28:48.830 align:start position:0% explain each tense separately because there's<03:28:47.319> a<03:28:47.439> lot<03:28:47.600> to<03:28:47.720> know<03:28:48.040> in<03:28:48.199> this<03:28:48.399> video<03:28:48.760> I 03:28:48.830 --> 03:28:48.840 align:start position:0% there's a lot to know in this video I 03:28:48.840 --> 03:28:50.630 align:start position:0% there's a lot to know in this video I will<03:28:49.000> not<03:28:49.239> focus<03:28:49.479> on<03:28:49.680> any<03:28:49.840> of<03:28:50.000> these<03:28:50.160> tenses 03:28:50.630 --> 03:28:50.640 align:start position:0% will not focus on any of these tenses 03:28:50.640 --> 03:28:52.070 align:start position:0% will not focus on any of these tenses because<03:28:50.840> I'll<03:28:51.040> just<03:28:51.239> explain<03:28:51.760> how<03:28:51.920> the 03:28:52.070 --> 03:28:52.080 align:start position:0% because I'll just explain how the 03:28:52.080 --> 03:28:53.830 align:start position:0% because I'll just explain how the subjunctive<03:28:52.720> Works<03:28:53.000> in<03:28:53.160> general<03:28:53.680> by 03:28:53.830 --> 03:28:53.840 align:start position:0% subjunctive Works in general by 03:28:53.840 --> 03:28:55.469 align:start position:0% subjunctive Works in general by presenting<03:28:54.319> its<03:28:54.479> fundamentals<03:28:55.199> you<03:28:55.319> might 03:28:55.469 --> 03:28:55.479 align:start position:0% presenting its fundamentals you might 03:28:55.479 --> 03:28:56.790 align:start position:0% presenting its fundamentals you might have<03:28:55.600> heard<03:28:55.800> some<03:28:55.920> teachers<03:28:56.279> explaining<03:28:56.680> the 03:28:56.790 --> 03:28:56.800 align:start position:0% have heard some teachers explaining the 03:28:56.800 --> 03:28:58.830 align:start position:0% have heard some teachers explaining the subjunctive<03:28:57.439> as<03:28:57.560> a<03:28:57.720> mood<03:28:58.120> that<03:28:58.279> expresses<03:28:58.720> the 03:28:58.830 --> 03:28:58.840 align:start position:0% subjunctive as a mood that expresses the 03:28:58.840 --> 03:29:00.710 align:start position:0% subjunctive as a mood that expresses the speaker's<03:28:59.279> attitude<03:28:59.760> towards<03:29:00.199> events 03:29:00.710 --> 03:29:00.720 align:start position:0% speaker's attitude towards events 03:29:00.720 --> 03:29:02.710 align:start position:0% speaker's attitude towards events actions<03:29:01.000> and<03:29:01.199> states<03:29:01.560> that<03:29:01.680> are<03:29:01.880> uncertain<03:29:02.520> or 03:29:02.710 --> 03:29:02.720 align:start position:0% actions and states that are uncertain or 03:29:02.720 --> 03:29:04.590 align:start position:0% actions and states that are uncertain or hypothetical<03:29:03.399> despite<03:29:03.760> other<03:29:04.040> Educators 03:29:04.590 --> 03:29:04.600 align:start position:0% hypothetical despite other Educators 03:29:04.600 --> 03:29:06.349 align:start position:0% hypothetical despite other Educators explaining<03:29:05.000> the<03:29:05.160> subjunctive<03:29:05.680> differently<03:29:06.239> I 03:29:06.349 --> 03:29:06.359 align:start position:0% explaining the subjunctive differently I 03:29:06.359 --> 03:29:08.229 align:start position:0% explaining the subjunctive differently I do<03:29:06.520> not<03:29:06.680> like<03:29:06.960> any<03:29:07.120> of<03:29:07.279> these<03:29:07.520> explanations 03:29:08.229 --> 03:29:08.239 align:start position:0% do not like any of these explanations 03:29:08.239 --> 03:29:09.630 align:start position:0% do not like any of these explanations because<03:29:08.439> they<03:29:08.560> tend<03:29:08.720> to<03:29:08.840> confuse<03:29:09.199> students 03:29:09.630 --> 03:29:09.640 align:start position:0% because they tend to confuse students 03:29:09.640 --> 03:29:10.710 align:start position:0% because they tend to confuse students rather<03:29:09.840> than<03:29:10.000> make<03:29:10.160> them<03:29:10.520> understand<03:29:10.640> the 03:29:10.710 --> 03:29:10.720 align:start position:0% rather than make them understand the 03:29:10.720 --> 03:29:12.590 align:start position:0% rather than make them understand the subject<03:29:11.199> matter<03:29:11.439> properly<03:29:11.880> I<03:29:12.040> recommend<03:29:12.439> that 03:29:12.590 --> 03:29:12.600 align:start position:0% subject matter properly I recommend that 03:29:12.600 --> 03:29:14.429 align:start position:0% subject matter properly I recommend that all<03:29:12.720> of<03:29:12.880> you<03:29:13.160> ignore<03:29:13.560> these<03:29:13.760> definitions 03:29:14.429 --> 03:29:14.439 align:start position:0% all of you ignore these definitions 03:29:14.439 --> 03:29:16.150 align:start position:0% all of you ignore these definitions because<03:29:14.720> my<03:29:14.880> definition<03:29:15.319> of<03:29:15.439> the<03:29:15.560> subjunctive 03:29:16.150 --> 03:29:16.160 align:start position:0% because my definition of the subjunctive 03:29:16.160 --> 03:29:17.950 align:start position:0% because my definition of the subjunctive is<03:29:16.319> far<03:29:16.560> simpler<03:29:17.040> but<03:29:17.199> keep<03:29:17.359> in<03:29:17.479> mind<03:29:17.800> that 03:29:17.950 --> 03:29:17.960 align:start position:0% is far simpler but keep in mind that 03:29:17.960 --> 03:29:19.710 align:start position:0% is far simpler but keep in mind that this<03:29:18.160> explanation<03:29:18.760> makes<03:29:19.080> perfect<03:29:19.399> sense<03:29:19.600> to 03:29:19.710 --> 03:29:19.720 align:start position:0% this explanation makes perfect sense to 03:29:19.720 --> 03:29:21.590 align:start position:0% this explanation makes perfect sense to me<03:29:20.000> I<03:29:20.160> apologize<03:29:20.800> if<03:29:20.880> it<03:29:21.000> doesn't<03:29:21.239> make<03:29:21.399> sense 03:29:21.590 --> 03:29:21.600 align:start position:0% me I apologize if it doesn't make sense 03:29:21.600 --> 03:29:22.910 align:start position:0% me I apologize if it doesn't make sense to<03:29:21.720> you<03:29:21.920> but<03:29:22.000> it<03:29:22.080> should<03:29:22.239> help<03:29:22.399> you<03:29:22.800> understand 03:29:22.910 --> 03:29:22.920 align:start position:0% to you but it should help you understand 03:29:22.920 --> 03:29:24.550 align:start position:0% to you but it should help you understand the<03:29:23.080> subjunctive<03:29:23.600> better<03:29:23.960> the<03:29:24.080> easiest<03:29:24.439> way 03:29:24.550 --> 03:29:24.560 align:start position:0% the subjunctive better the easiest way 03:29:24.560 --> 03:29:26.150 align:start position:0% the subjunctive better the easiest way to<03:29:24.640> spot<03:29:24.880> a<03:29:25.000> subjunctive<03:29:25.479> sentence<03:29:26.000> is 03:29:26.150 --> 03:29:26.160 align:start position:0% to spot a subjunctive sentence is 03:29:26.160 --> 03:29:28.150 align:start position:0% to spot a subjunctive sentence is through<03:29:26.439> this<03:29:26.640> construction<03:29:27.359> subject<03:29:27.720> verb 03:29:28.150 --> 03:29:28.160 align:start position:0% through this construction subject verb 03:29:28.160 --> 03:29:30.309 align:start position:0% through this construction subject verb plus<03:29:28.520> that<03:29:28.800> plus<03:29:29.040> subject<03:29:29.359> verb<03:29:29.640> in<03:29:29.800> Spanish 03:29:30.309 --> 03:29:30.319 align:start position:0% plus that plus subject verb in Spanish 03:29:30.319 --> 03:29:32.790 align:start position:0% plus that plus subject verb in Spanish the<03:29:30.399> phrase<03:29:30.680> will<03:29:30.840> be<03:29:31.239> subject<03:29:31.600> verb<03:29:32.040> plus<03:29:32.399> K 03:29:32.790 --> 03:29:32.800 align:start position:0% the phrase will be subject verb plus K 03:29:32.800 --> 03:29:34.590 align:start position:0% the phrase will be subject verb plus K plus<03:29:33.040> subject<03:29:33.359> verb<03:29:33.760> this<03:29:33.960> is<03:29:34.120> the<03:29:34.279> type<03:29:34.439> of 03:29:34.590 --> 03:29:34.600 align:start position:0% plus subject verb this is the type of 03:29:34.600 --> 03:29:36.429 align:start position:0% plus subject verb this is the type of phrase<03:29:35.000> that<03:29:35.160> you<03:29:35.239> will<03:29:35.399> see<03:29:35.680> all<03:29:35.840> the<03:29:36.000> time 03:29:36.429 --> 03:29:36.439 align:start position:0% phrase that you will see all the time 03:29:36.439 --> 03:29:37.950 align:start position:0% phrase that you will see all the time which<03:29:36.640> activates<03:29:37.080> the<03:29:37.239> subjunctive<03:29:37.720> meaning 03:29:37.950 --> 03:29:37.960 align:start position:0% which activates the subjunctive meaning 03:29:37.960 --> 03:29:39.710 align:start position:0% which activates the subjunctive meaning that<03:29:38.120> a<03:29:38.279> sentence<03:29:38.760> can<03:29:38.920> start<03:29:39.199> with<03:29:39.439> any 03:29:39.710 --> 03:29:39.720 align:start position:0% that a sentence can start with any 03:29:39.720 --> 03:29:41.710 align:start position:0% that a sentence can start with any subject<03:29:40.160> and<03:29:40.359> any<03:29:40.600> verb<03:29:40.880> and<03:29:41.199> continue<03:29:41.560> with 03:29:41.710 --> 03:29:41.720 align:start position:0% subject and any verb and continue with 03:29:41.720 --> 03:29:44.510 align:start position:0% subject and any verb and continue with any<03:29:42.000> subject<03:29:42.399> and<03:29:42.600> any<03:29:42.800> verb<03:29:43.199> aside<03:29:43.479> from<03:29:43.680> Vos 03:29:44.510 --> 03:29:44.520 align:start position:0% any subject and any verb aside from Vos 03:29:44.520 --> 03:29:45.670 align:start position:0% any subject and any verb aside from Vos however<03:29:44.800> this<03:29:44.880> is<03:29:45.000> where<03:29:45.160> we<03:29:45.239> need<03:29:45.399> to<03:29:45.520> pay 03:29:45.670 --> 03:29:45.680 align:start position:0% however this is where we need to pay 03:29:45.680 --> 03:29:47.309 align:start position:0% however this is where we need to pay close<03:29:45.920> attention<03:29:46.199> to<03:29:46.319> the<03:29:46.479> details<03:29:47.000> in<03:29:47.120> order 03:29:47.309 --> 03:29:47.319 align:start position:0% close attention to the details in order 03:29:47.319 --> 03:29:49.150 align:start position:0% close attention to the details in order to<03:29:47.479> fully<03:29:48.040> understand<03:29:48.359> what<03:29:48.560> activates<03:29:49.000> the 03:29:49.150 --> 03:29:49.160 align:start position:0% to fully understand what activates the 03:29:49.160 --> 03:29:50.710 align:start position:0% to fully understand what activates the subjunctive<03:29:49.720> and<03:29:49.920> what<03:29:50.080> doesn't<03:29:50.560> just 03:29:50.710 --> 03:29:50.720 align:start position:0% subjunctive and what doesn't just 03:29:50.720 --> 03:29:52.469 align:start position:0% subjunctive and what doesn't just because<03:29:50.920> a<03:29:51.080> sentence<03:29:51.560> has<03:29:51.680> a<03:29:51.840> subject<03:29:52.160> verb 03:29:52.469 --> 03:29:52.479 align:start position:0% because a sentence has a subject verb 03:29:52.479 --> 03:29:54.269 align:start position:0% because a sentence has a subject verb plus<03:29:52.760> ke<03:29:53.040> plus<03:29:53.160> a<03:29:53.279> subject<03:29:53.600> and<03:29:53.720> a<03:29:53.840> verb<03:29:54.160> it 03:29:54.269 --> 03:29:54.279 align:start position:0% plus ke plus a subject and a verb it 03:29:54.279 --> 03:29:56.070 align:start position:0% plus ke plus a subject and a verb it does<03:29:54.479> not<03:29:54.720> mean<03:29:55.080> that<03:29:55.199> the<03:29:55.319> phrase<03:29:55.560> will<03:29:55.720> be<03:29:55.960> in 03:29:56.070 --> 03:29:56.080 align:start position:0% does not mean that the phrase will be in 03:29:56.080 --> 03:29:57.630 align:start position:0% does not mean that the phrase will be in the<03:29:56.239> subjunctive<03:29:56.840> mainly<03:29:57.199> because<03:29:57.399> we<03:29:57.520> have 03:29:57.630 --> 03:29:57.640 align:start position:0% the subjunctive mainly because we have 03:29:57.640 --> 03:29:59.469 align:start position:0% the subjunctive mainly because we have to<03:29:57.760> pay<03:29:57.920> close<03:29:58.199> attention<03:29:58.640> to<03:29:58.800> the<03:29:58.920> first<03:29:59.160> verb 03:29:59.469 --> 03:29:59.479 align:start position:0% to pay close attention to the first verb 03:29:59.479 --> 03:30:01.110 align:start position:0% to pay close attention to the first verb in<03:29:59.600> the<03:29:59.760> sentence<03:30:00.319> in<03:30:00.439> order<03:30:00.680> to<03:30:00.840> have<03:30:00.960> a 03:30:01.110 --> 03:30:01.120 align:start position:0% in the sentence in order to have a 03:30:01.120 --> 03:30:02.790 align:start position:0% in the sentence in order to have a sentence<03:30:01.560> that<03:30:01.680> is<03:30:01.920> activated<03:30:02.560> in<03:30:02.680> the 03:30:02.790 --> 03:30:02.800 align:start position:0% sentence that is activated in the 03:30:02.800 --> 03:30:04.590 align:start position:0% sentence that is activated in the subjunctive<03:30:03.479> the<03:30:03.640> first<03:30:03.920> verb<03:30:04.279> in<03:30:04.399> the 03:30:04.590 --> 03:30:04.600 align:start position:0% subjunctive the first verb in the 03:30:04.600 --> 03:30:06.630 align:start position:0% subjunctive the first verb in the sentence<03:30:05.160> conjugated<03:30:05.680> with<03:30:05.800> its<03:30:06.000> pronoun 03:30:06.630 --> 03:30:06.640 align:start position:0% sentence conjugated with its pronoun 03:30:06.640 --> 03:30:09.670 align:start position:0% sentence conjugated with its pronoun must<03:30:07.000> be<03:30:07.399> a<03:30:07.560> verb<03:30:07.760> of<03:30:07.920> will<03:30:08.359> emotion<03:30:09.000> influence 03:30:09.670 --> 03:30:09.680 align:start position:0% must be a verb of will emotion influence 03:30:09.680 --> 03:30:11.670 align:start position:0% must be a verb of will emotion influence recommendation<03:30:10.439> or<03:30:10.640> doubt<03:30:11.120> disbelief<03:30:11.520> and 03:30:11.670 --> 03:30:11.680 align:start position:0% recommendation or doubt disbelief and 03:30:11.680 --> 03:30:13.710 align:start position:0% recommendation or doubt disbelief and denial<03:30:12.160> a<03:30:12.279> simple<03:30:12.560> way<03:30:12.680> to<03:30:12.880> remember<03:30:13.319> this<03:30:13.600> is 03:30:13.710 --> 03:30:13.720 align:start position:0% denial a simple way to remember this is 03:30:13.720 --> 03:30:15.349 align:start position:0% denial a simple way to remember this is by<03:30:13.840> using<03:30:14.120> the<03:30:14.199> word<03:30:14.439> weird<03:30:14.880> the<03:30:15.000> initial 03:30:15.349 --> 03:30:15.359 align:start position:0% by using the word weird the initial 03:30:15.359 --> 03:30:17.510 align:start position:0% by using the word weird the initial letter<03:30:15.720> of<03:30:15.920> every<03:30:16.239> category<03:30:16.840> combines<03:30:17.279> into 03:30:17.510 --> 03:30:17.520 align:start position:0% letter of every category combines into 03:30:17.520 --> 03:30:19.349 align:start position:0% letter of every category combines into the<03:30:17.640> word<03:30:17.880> weird<03:30:18.279> so<03:30:18.399> you<03:30:18.520> must<03:30:18.720> have<03:30:18.840> a<03:30:18.960> verb 03:30:19.349 --> 03:30:19.359 align:start position:0% the word weird so you must have a verb 03:30:19.359 --> 03:30:21.349 align:start position:0% the word weird so you must have a verb that<03:30:19.520> comes<03:30:19.760> from<03:30:19.960> this<03:30:20.120> list<03:30:20.560> if<03:30:20.680> a<03:30:20.840> verb<03:30:21.160> does 03:30:21.349 --> 03:30:21.359 align:start position:0% that comes from this list if a verb does 03:30:21.359 --> 03:30:23.349 align:start position:0% that comes from this list if a verb does not<03:30:21.600> come<03:30:21.760> from<03:30:21.960> weird<03:30:22.399> the<03:30:22.520> subjunctive<03:30:23.160> is 03:30:23.349 --> 03:30:23.359 align:start position:0% not come from weird the subjunctive is 03:30:23.359 --> 03:30:25.110 align:start position:0% not come from weird the subjunctive is not<03:30:23.680> activated<03:30:24.160> and<03:30:24.279> here's<03:30:24.479> what<03:30:24.600> I<03:30:24.680> mean<03:30:25.040> we 03:30:25.110 --> 03:30:25.120 align:start position:0% not activated and here's what I mean we 03:30:25.120 --> 03:30:27.070 align:start position:0% not activated and here's what I mean we can<03:30:25.279> have<03:30:25.399> a<03:30:25.560> sentence<03:30:25.960> like<03:30:26.279> I<03:30:26.439> believe<03:30:26.880> that 03:30:27.070 --> 03:30:27.080 align:start position:0% can have a sentence like I believe that 03:30:27.080 --> 03:30:29.110 align:start position:0% can have a sentence like I believe that you<03:30:27.239> ate<03:30:27.560> which<03:30:27.680> in<03:30:27.800> Spanish<03:30:28.120> would 03:30:29.110 --> 03:30:29.120 align:start position:0% you ate which in Spanish would 03:30:29.120 --> 03:30:32.030 align:start position:0% you ate which in Spanish would be<03:30:30.120> in<03:30:30.279> this<03:30:30.439> case<03:30:30.800> the<03:30:30.960> phrase<03:30:31.359> is<03:30:31.520> not<03:30:31.760> in<03:30:31.880> the 03:30:32.030 --> 03:30:32.040 align:start position:0% be in this case the phrase is not in the 03:30:32.040 --> 03:30:34.070 align:start position:0% be in this case the phrase is not in the subjunctive<03:30:32.720> because<03:30:32.920> the<03:30:33.040> verb<03:30:33.840> doesn't 03:30:34.070 --> 03:30:34.080 align:start position:0% subjunctive because the verb doesn't 03:30:34.080 --> 03:30:35.830 align:start position:0% subjunctive because the verb doesn't come<03:30:34.239> from<03:30:34.439> weird<03:30:34.800> it's<03:30:34.920> simply<03:30:35.199> a<03:30:35.319> verb<03:30:35.680> that 03:30:35.830 --> 03:30:35.840 align:start position:0% come from weird it's simply a verb that 03:30:35.840 --> 03:30:37.670 align:start position:0% come from weird it's simply a verb that expresses<03:30:36.239> an<03:30:36.399> opinion<03:30:36.840> not<03:30:36.960> to<03:30:37.120> mention<03:30:37.560> that 03:30:37.670 --> 03:30:37.680 align:start position:0% expresses an opinion not to mention that 03:30:37.680 --> 03:30:39.110 align:start position:0% expresses an opinion not to mention that the<03:30:37.800> second<03:30:38.080> verb<03:30:38.319> in<03:30:38.439> the<03:30:38.560> phrase<03:30:38.960> is 03:30:39.110 --> 03:30:39.120 align:start position:0% the second verb in the phrase is 03:30:39.120 --> 03:30:41.189 align:start position:0% the second verb in the phrase is conjugated<03:30:39.680> properly<03:30:40.199> therefore<03:30:40.680> it's<03:30:40.800> not 03:30:41.189 --> 03:30:41.199 align:start position:0% conjugated properly therefore it's not 03:30:41.199 --> 03:30:43.349 align:start position:0% conjugated properly therefore it's not in<03:30:41.279> the<03:30:41.399> subjunctive<03:30:42.040> similarly<03:30:42.680> we<03:30:42.800> can<03:30:42.960> say 03:30:43.349 --> 03:30:43.359 align:start position:0% in the subjunctive similarly we can say 03:30:43.359 --> 03:30:45.429 align:start position:0% in the subjunctive similarly we can say I<03:30:43.479> know<03:30:43.680> that<03:30:43.800> you<03:30:44.000> ate<03:30:44.359> which<03:30:44.479> would 03:30:45.429 --> 03:30:45.439 align:start position:0% I know that you ate which would 03:30:45.439 --> 03:30:48.110 align:start position:0% I know that you ate which would be<03:30:46.439> this<03:30:46.600> sentence<03:30:47.120> also<03:30:47.359> doesn't<03:30:47.760> activate 03:30:48.110 --> 03:30:48.120 align:start position:0% be this sentence also doesn't activate 03:30:48.120 --> 03:30:50.229 align:start position:0% be this sentence also doesn't activate the<03:30:48.239> subjunctive<03:30:48.840> because<03:30:49.199> sa<03:30:49.600> means<03:30:49.840> to<03:30:50.000> know 03:30:50.229 --> 03:30:50.239 align:start position:0% the subjunctive because sa means to know 03:30:50.239 --> 03:30:52.189 align:start position:0% the subjunctive because sa means to know factually<03:30:50.840> and<03:30:51.040> therefore<03:30:51.520> it<03:30:51.640> does<03:30:51.840> not<03:30:52.040> come 03:30:52.189 --> 03:30:52.199 align:start position:0% factually and therefore it does not come 03:30:52.199 --> 03:30:54.030 align:start position:0% factually and therefore it does not come from<03:30:52.399> weird<03:30:52.800> in<03:30:52.960> these<03:30:53.199> cases<03:30:53.640> you<03:30:53.760> have<03:30:53.880> to 03:30:54.030 --> 03:30:54.040 align:start position:0% from weird in these cases you have to 03:30:54.040 --> 03:30:55.990 align:start position:0% from weird in these cases you have to find<03:30:54.279> verbs<03:30:54.680> that<03:30:54.880> activate<03:30:55.239> the<03:30:55.399> subjunctive 03:30:55.990 --> 03:30:56.000 align:start position:0% find verbs that activate the subjunctive 03:30:56.000 --> 03:30:57.590 align:start position:0% find verbs that activate the subjunctive and<03:30:56.160> these<03:30:56.319> have<03:30:56.439> to<03:30:56.520> be<03:30:56.680> verbs<03:30:57.040> of<03:30:57.199> will 03:30:57.590 --> 03:30:57.600 align:start position:0% and these have to be verbs of will 03:30:57.600 --> 03:30:59.750 align:start position:0% and these have to be verbs of will emotion<03:30:58.199> influence<03:30:58.840> recommendation<03:30:59.560> or 03:30:59.750 --> 03:30:59.760 align:start position:0% emotion influence recommendation or 03:30:59.760 --> 03:31:01.750 align:start position:0% emotion influence recommendation or doubt<03:31:00.120> disbelief<03:31:00.600> and<03:31:00.760> denial<03:31:01.199> based<03:31:01.399> on<03:31:01.560> my 03:31:01.750 --> 03:31:01.760 align:start position:0% doubt disbelief and denial based on my 03:31:01.760 --> 03:31:03.630 align:start position:0% doubt disbelief and denial based on my experience<03:31:02.160> in<03:31:02.319> Spanish<03:31:02.880> these<03:31:03.120> are<03:31:03.279> the<03:31:03.439> most 03:31:03.630 --> 03:31:03.640 align:start position:0% experience in Spanish these are the most 03:31:03.640 --> 03:31:05.070 align:start position:0% experience in Spanish these are the most common<03:31:03.920> verbs<03:31:04.319> that<03:31:04.520> activate<03:31:05.000> the 03:31:05.070 --> 03:31:05.080 align:start position:0% common verbs that activate the 03:31:05.080 --> 03:31:06.389 align:start position:0% common verbs that activate the subjunctive<03:31:05.640> which<03:31:05.760> means<03:31:06.000> that<03:31:06.120> they<03:31:06.239> can 03:31:06.389 --> 03:31:06.399 align:start position:0% subjunctive which means that they can 03:31:06.399 --> 03:31:08.189 align:start position:0% subjunctive which means that they can begin<03:31:06.640> with<03:31:06.840> literally<03:31:07.319> any<03:31:07.600> subject<03:31:08.040> in 03:31:08.189 --> 03:31:08.199 align:start position:0% begin with literally any subject in 03:31:08.199 --> 03:31:10.150 align:start position:0% begin with literally any subject in Spanish<03:31:08.760> obviously<03:31:09.359> I'm<03:31:09.520> not<03:31:09.680> including 03:31:10.150 --> 03:31:10.160 align:start position:0% Spanish obviously I'm not including 03:31:10.160 --> 03:31:12.030 align:start position:0% Spanish obviously I'm not including every<03:31:10.359> verb<03:31:10.600> on<03:31:10.720> theist<03:31:11.080> list<03:31:11.359> but<03:31:11.600> these<03:31:11.840> are 03:31:12.030 --> 03:31:12.040 align:start position:0% every verb on theist list but these are 03:31:12.040 --> 03:31:13.830 align:start position:0% every verb on theist list but these are the<03:31:12.199> most<03:31:12.439> common<03:31:12.720> verbs<03:31:13.120> used<03:31:13.399> to<03:31:13.560> express 03:31:13.830 --> 03:31:13.840 align:start position:0% the most common verbs used to express 03:31:13.840 --> 03:31:15.510 align:start position:0% the most common verbs used to express the<03:31:14.000> subjunctive<03:31:14.560> if<03:31:14.640> you<03:31:14.720> see<03:31:14.920> a<03:31:15.040> sentence 03:31:15.510 --> 03:31:15.520 align:start position:0% the subjunctive if you see a sentence 03:31:15.520 --> 03:31:17.110 align:start position:0% the subjunctive if you see a sentence starting<03:31:15.920> with<03:31:16.080> any<03:31:16.239> of<03:31:16.399> these<03:31:16.560> verbs<03:31:16.960> and 03:31:17.110 --> 03:31:17.120 align:start position:0% starting with any of these verbs and 03:31:17.120 --> 03:31:19.070 align:start position:0% starting with any of these verbs and with<03:31:17.319> any<03:31:17.600> subject<03:31:18.080> the<03:31:18.199> sentence<03:31:18.560> will<03:31:18.720> be<03:31:18.920> in 03:31:19.070 --> 03:31:19.080 align:start position:0% with any subject the sentence will be in 03:31:19.080 --> 03:31:20.710 align:start position:0% with any subject the sentence will be in the<03:31:19.199> subjunctive<03:31:19.760> if<03:31:19.840> you<03:31:19.920> see<03:31:20.120> a<03:31:20.239> sentence 03:31:20.710 --> 03:31:20.720 align:start position:0% the subjunctive if you see a sentence 03:31:20.720 --> 03:31:22.070 align:start position:0% the subjunctive if you see a sentence that<03:31:20.880> doesn't<03:31:21.120> start<03:31:21.439> with<03:31:21.600> any<03:31:21.760> of<03:31:21.920> these 03:31:22.070 --> 03:31:22.080 align:start position:0% that doesn't start with any of these 03:31:22.080 --> 03:31:23.870 align:start position:0% that doesn't start with any of these verbs<03:31:22.399> or<03:31:22.560> from<03:31:22.800> verbs<03:31:23.160> that<03:31:23.279> don't<03:31:23.520> come<03:31:23.680> from 03:31:23.870 --> 03:31:23.880 align:start position:0% verbs or from verbs that don't come from 03:31:23.880 --> 03:31:26.150 align:start position:0% verbs or from verbs that don't come from weird<03:31:24.359> it<03:31:24.439> will<03:31:24.680> not<03:31:25.040> be<03:31:25.239> in<03:31:25.399> the<03:31:25.520> subjunctive 03:31:26.150 --> 03:31:26.160 align:start position:0% weird it will not be in the subjunctive 03:31:26.160 --> 03:31:27.429 align:start position:0% weird it will not be in the subjunctive that's<03:31:26.359> the<03:31:26.479> first<03:31:26.640> thing<03:31:26.760> you<03:31:26.840> should<03:31:27.120> know 03:31:27.429 --> 03:31:27.439 align:start position:0% that's the first thing you should know 03:31:27.439 --> 03:31:28.990 align:start position:0% that's the first thing you should know about<03:31:27.640> the<03:31:27.760> subjunctive<03:31:28.279> in<03:31:28.439> Spanish<03:31:28.920> the 03:31:28.990 --> 03:31:29.000 align:start position:0% about the subjunctive in Spanish the 03:31:29.000 --> 03:31:30.070 align:start position:0% about the subjunctive in Spanish the second<03:31:29.239> thing<03:31:29.359> you<03:31:29.439> should<03:31:29.600> know<03:31:29.760> about<03:31:29.920> the 03:31:30.070 --> 03:31:30.080 align:start position:0% second thing you should know about the 03:31:30.080 --> 03:31:31.670 align:start position:0% second thing you should know about the subjunctive<03:31:30.640> is<03:31:30.800> something<03:31:31.080> that<03:31:31.199> is<03:31:31.359> related 03:31:31.670 --> 03:31:31.680 align:start position:0% subjunctive is something that is related 03:31:31.680 --> 03:31:33.630 align:start position:0% subjunctive is something that is related to<03:31:31.800> the<03:31:31.920> construction<03:31:32.600> subject<03:31:32.960> verb<03:31:33.319> K 03:31:33.630 --> 03:31:33.640 align:start position:0% to the construction subject verb K 03:31:33.640 --> 03:31:35.550 align:start position:0% to the construction subject verb K subject<03:31:34.000> verb<03:31:34.319> in<03:31:34.479> this<03:31:34.640> typical<03:31:35.040> phrase<03:31:35.439> the 03:31:35.550 --> 03:31:35.560 align:start position:0% subject verb in this typical phrase the 03:31:35.560 --> 03:31:38.150 align:start position:0% subject verb in this typical phrase the second<03:31:35.840> verb<03:31:36.239> must<03:31:36.479> be<03:31:36.680> modified<03:31:37.359> in<03:31:37.600> the<03:31:37.800> most 03:31:38.150 --> 03:31:38.160 align:start position:0% second verb must be modified in the most 03:31:38.160 --> 03:31:40.229 align:start position:0% second verb must be modified in the most irregular<03:31:38.720> way<03:31:38.960> possible<03:31:39.560> especially<03:31:39.960> in<03:31:40.080> the 03:31:40.229 --> 03:31:40.239 align:start position:0% irregular way possible especially in the 03:31:40.239 --> 03:31:42.150 align:start position:0% irregular way possible especially in the present<03:31:40.520> and<03:31:40.680> past<03:31:40.960> subjunctive<03:31:41.560> considering 03:31:42.150 --> 03:31:42.160 align:start position:0% present and past subjunctive considering 03:31:42.160 --> 03:31:43.950 align:start position:0% present and past subjunctive considering that<03:31:42.319> the<03:31:42.439> first<03:31:42.720> verb<03:31:43.040> comes<03:31:43.239> from<03:31:43.479> weird 03:31:43.950 --> 03:31:43.960 align:start position:0% that the first verb comes from weird 03:31:43.960 --> 03:31:45.590 align:start position:0% that the first verb comes from weird which<03:31:44.199> activates<03:31:44.640> the<03:31:44.800> subjunctive<03:31:45.479> the 03:31:45.590 --> 03:31:45.600 align:start position:0% which activates the subjunctive the 03:31:45.600 --> 03:31:47.309 align:start position:0% which activates the subjunctive the second<03:31:45.920> verb<03:31:46.199> in<03:31:46.359> the<03:31:46.520> sentence<03:31:47.040> has<03:31:47.160> to 03:31:47.309 --> 03:31:47.319 align:start position:0% second verb in the sentence has to 03:31:47.319 --> 03:31:49.030 align:start position:0% second verb in the sentence has to change<03:31:47.720> in<03:31:47.840> a<03:31:47.960> completely<03:31:48.399> different<03:31:48.680> way 03:31:49.030 --> 03:31:49.040 align:start position:0% change in a completely different way 03:31:49.040 --> 03:31:50.990 align:start position:0% change in a completely different way unlike<03:31:49.439> any<03:31:49.680> other<03:31:49.920> way<03:31:50.199> that<03:31:50.319> I've<03:31:50.479> shown<03:31:50.800> on 03:31:50.990 --> 03:31:51.000 align:start position:0% unlike any other way that I've shown on 03:31:51.000 --> 03:31:52.830 align:start position:0% unlike any other way that I've shown on this<03:31:51.160> channel<03:31:51.720> however<03:31:52.040> I<03:31:52.120> will<03:31:52.279> not<03:31:52.479> present 03:31:52.830 --> 03:31:52.840 align:start position:0% this channel however I will not present 03:31:52.840 --> 03:31:54.590 align:start position:0% this channel however I will not present this<03:31:53.040> way<03:31:53.319> in<03:31:53.479> this<03:31:53.640> video<03:31:53.960> I'll<03:31:54.160> present<03:31:54.439> it 03:31:54.590 --> 03:31:54.600 align:start position:0% this way in this video I'll present it 03:31:54.600 --> 03:31:56.550 align:start position:0% this way in this video I'll present it in<03:31:54.760> the<03:31:54.880> videos<03:31:55.279> after<03:31:55.600> this<03:31:55.720> one<03:31:56.120> considering 03:31:56.550 --> 03:31:56.560 align:start position:0% in the videos after this one considering 03:31:56.560 --> 03:31:57.990 align:start position:0% in the videos after this one considering that<03:31:56.680> there<03:31:56.800> are<03:31:57.000> four<03:31:57.239> tenses<03:31:57.760> of<03:31:57.880> the 03:31:57.990 --> 03:31:58.000 align:start position:0% that there are four tenses of the 03:31:58.000 --> 03:31:59.910 align:start position:0% that there are four tenses of the subjunctive<03:31:58.520> to<03:31:58.600> begin<03:31:58.880> with<03:31:59.199> additionally 03:31:59.910 --> 03:31:59.920 align:start position:0% subjunctive to begin with additionally 03:31:59.920 --> 03:32:01.550 align:start position:0% subjunctive to begin with additionally this<03:32:00.080> part<03:32:00.239> of<03:32:00.359> the<03:32:00.479> phrase<03:32:00.920> can<03:32:01.080> literally 03:32:01.550 --> 03:32:01.560 align:start position:0% this part of the phrase can literally 03:32:01.560 --> 03:32:03.550 align:start position:0% this part of the phrase can literally consist<03:32:01.880> of<03:32:02.080> any<03:32:02.359> subject<03:32:02.800> and<03:32:02.960> any<03:32:03.199> verb 03:32:03.550 --> 03:32:03.560 align:start position:0% consist of any subject and any verb 03:32:03.560 --> 03:32:04.910 align:start position:0% consist of any subject and any verb considering<03:32:04.000> that<03:32:04.120> I<03:32:04.239> said<03:32:04.399> that<03:32:04.520> the<03:32:04.600> second 03:32:04.910 --> 03:32:04.920 align:start position:0% considering that I said that the second 03:32:04.920 --> 03:32:06.630 align:start position:0% considering that I said that the second verb<03:32:05.160> has<03:32:05.279> to<03:32:05.399> get<03:32:05.560> modified<03:32:06.080> in<03:32:06.239> the<03:32:06.399> most 03:32:06.630 --> 03:32:06.640 align:start position:0% verb has to get modified in the most 03:32:06.640 --> 03:32:08.429 align:start position:0% verb has to get modified in the most irregular<03:32:07.199> way<03:32:07.560> this<03:32:07.680> means<03:32:08.080> that<03:32:08.160> you<03:32:08.279> will 03:32:08.429 --> 03:32:08.439 align:start position:0% irregular way this means that you will 03:32:08.439 --> 03:32:09.950 align:start position:0% irregular way this means that you will have<03:32:08.560> to<03:32:08.720> not<03:32:08.880> only<03:32:09.160> memorize<03:32:09.760> every 03:32:09.950 --> 03:32:09.960 align:start position:0% have to not only memorize every 03:32:09.960 --> 03:32:11.550 align:start position:0% have to not only memorize every conjugation<03:32:10.439> of<03:32:10.560> every<03:32:10.920> verb<03:32:11.199> but<03:32:11.279> you<03:32:11.359> will 03:32:11.550 --> 03:32:11.560 align:start position:0% conjugation of every verb but you will 03:32:11.560 --> 03:32:12.950 align:start position:0% conjugation of every verb but you will also<03:32:11.760> have<03:32:11.880> to<03:32:12.319> understand<03:32:12.560> how<03:32:12.720> stem 03:32:12.950 --> 03:32:12.960 align:start position:0% also have to understand how stem 03:32:12.960 --> 03:32:15.150 align:start position:0% also have to understand how stem changing<03:32:13.439> and<03:32:13.640> irregular<03:32:14.199> verbs<03:32:14.560> are<03:32:14.720> used<03:32:15.040> in 03:32:15.150 --> 03:32:15.160 align:start position:0% changing and irregular verbs are used in 03:32:15.160 --> 03:32:16.630 align:start position:0% changing and irregular verbs are used in the<03:32:15.279> second<03:32:15.520> part<03:32:15.680> of<03:32:15.800> the<03:32:15.880> phrase<03:32:16.319> within 03:32:16.630 --> 03:32:16.640 align:start position:0% the second part of the phrase within 03:32:16.640 --> 03:32:18.229 align:start position:0% the second part of the phrase within every<03:32:16.920> tense<03:32:17.359> the<03:32:17.479> pattern<03:32:17.840> completely 03:32:18.229 --> 03:32:18.239 align:start position:0% every tense the pattern completely 03:32:18.239 --> 03:32:19.950 align:start position:0% every tense the pattern completely changes<03:32:18.720> in<03:32:18.880> the<03:32:19.000> present<03:32:19.279> subjunctive<03:32:19.880> which 03:32:19.950 --> 03:32:19.960 align:start position:0% changes in the present subjunctive which 03:32:19.960 --> 03:32:21.389 align:start position:0% changes in the present subjunctive which is<03:32:20.120> different<03:32:20.359> from<03:32:20.479> the<03:32:20.640> past<03:32:20.840> subjunctive 03:32:21.389 --> 03:32:21.399 align:start position:0% is different from the past subjunctive 03:32:21.399 --> 03:32:23.070 align:start position:0% is different from the past subjunctive and<03:32:21.520> so<03:32:21.680> on<03:32:22.120> this<03:32:22.399> is<03:32:22.560> what<03:32:22.720> makes<03:32:22.960> the 03:32:23.070 --> 03:32:23.080 align:start position:0% and so on this is what makes the 03:32:23.080 --> 03:32:25.070 align:start position:0% and so on this is what makes the subjunctive<03:32:23.720> the<03:32:23.920> most<03:32:24.359> difficult<03:32:24.640> Concept 03:32:25.070 --> 03:32:25.080 align:start position:0% subjunctive the most difficult Concept 03:32:25.080 --> 03:32:26.510 align:start position:0% subjunctive the most difficult Concept in<03:32:25.199> Spanish<03:32:25.720> considering<03:32:26.120> that<03:32:26.199> you<03:32:26.319> have<03:32:26.399> a 03:32:26.510 --> 03:32:26.520 align:start position:0% in Spanish considering that you have a 03:32:26.520 --> 03:32:28.389 align:start position:0% in Spanish considering that you have a subjunctive<03:32:27.040> phrase<03:32:27.520> mainly<03:32:27.880> consisting<03:32:28.279> of 03:32:28.389 --> 03:32:28.399 align:start position:0% subjunctive phrase mainly consisting of 03:32:28.399 --> 03:32:30.550 align:start position:0% subjunctive phrase mainly consisting of a<03:32:28.520> subject<03:32:28.800> verb<03:32:29.120> K<03:32:29.479> subject<03:32:29.840> verb<03:32:30.160> the<03:32:30.279> second 03:32:30.550 --> 03:32:30.560 align:start position:0% a subject verb K subject verb the second 03:32:30.560 --> 03:32:32.349 align:start position:0% a subject verb K subject verb the second part<03:32:30.760> of<03:32:30.880> the<03:32:31.000> phrase<03:32:31.439> can<03:32:31.600> literally<03:32:32.040> begin 03:32:32.349 --> 03:32:32.359 align:start position:0% part of the phrase can literally begin 03:32:32.359 --> 03:32:34.349 align:start position:0% part of the phrase can literally begin with<03:32:32.560> any<03:32:32.880> subject<03:32:33.359> and<03:32:33.520> any<03:32:33.760> verb<03:32:34.120> that<03:32:34.239> has 03:32:34.349 --> 03:32:34.359 align:start position:0% with any subject and any verb that has 03:32:34.359 --> 03:32:36.110 align:start position:0% with any subject and any verb that has to<03:32:34.520> not<03:32:34.680> only<03:32:34.960> correspond<03:32:35.399> to<03:32:35.520> the<03:32:35.680> subject 03:32:36.110 --> 03:32:36.120 align:start position:0% to not only correspond to the subject 03:32:36.120 --> 03:32:38.030 align:start position:0% to not only correspond to the subject but<03:32:36.279> also<03:32:36.520> be<03:32:36.720> modified<03:32:37.319> in<03:32:37.439> a<03:32:37.600> completely 03:32:38.030 --> 03:32:38.040 align:start position:0% but also be modified in a completely 03:32:38.040 --> 03:32:39.550 align:start position:0% but also be modified in a completely different<03:32:38.319> way<03:32:38.600> if<03:32:38.680> you<03:32:38.800> think<03:32:39.000> about<03:32:39.199> it<03:32:39.439> then 03:32:39.550 --> 03:32:39.560 align:start position:0% different way if you think about it then 03:32:39.560 --> 03:32:41.830 align:start position:0% different way if you think about it then you<03:32:39.680> have<03:32:39.800> stem<03:32:40.040> changing<03:32:40.439> IR<03:32:41.080> yo<03:32:41.279> verbs<03:32:41.640> and 03:32:41.830 --> 03:32:41.840 align:start position:0% you have stem changing IR yo verbs and 03:32:41.840 --> 03:32:43.870 align:start position:0% you have stem changing IR yo verbs and irregular<03:32:42.399> verbs<03:32:42.680> in<03:32:42.800> general<03:32:43.239> and<03:32:43.399> on<03:32:43.560> top<03:32:43.720> of 03:32:43.870 --> 03:32:43.880 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in general and on top of 03:32:43.880 --> 03:32:45.670 align:start position:0% irregular verbs in general and on top of all<03:32:44.000> of<03:32:44.199> that<03:32:44.439> you<03:32:44.600> have<03:32:44.760> four<03:32:45.000> tenses<03:32:45.560> that 03:32:45.670 --> 03:32:45.680 align:start position:0% all of that you have four tenses that 03:32:45.680 --> 03:32:47.550 align:start position:0% all of that you have four tenses that change<03:32:46.000> each<03:32:46.199> verb<03:32:46.479> in<03:32:46.560> a<03:32:46.720> different<03:32:47.000> way<03:32:47.359> I 03:32:47.550 --> 03:32:47.560 align:start position:0% change each verb in a different way I 03:32:47.560 --> 03:32:49.590 align:start position:0% change each verb in a different way I apologize<03:32:48.160> if<03:32:48.279> it<03:32:48.359> sounds<03:32:48.640> too<03:32:48.920> confusing<03:32:49.479> but 03:32:49.590 --> 03:32:49.600 align:start position:0% apologize if it sounds too confusing but 03:32:49.600 --> 03:32:51.070 align:start position:0% apologize if it sounds too confusing but that's<03:32:49.760> the<03:32:49.920> best<03:32:50.160> way<03:32:50.359> that<03:32:50.479> I<03:32:50.600> can<03:32:50.720> describe 03:32:51.070 --> 03:32:51.080 align:start position:0% that's the best way that I can describe 03:32:51.080 --> 03:32:52.870 align:start position:0% that's the best way that I can describe the<03:32:51.160> subjunctive<03:32:51.680> there<03:32:51.800> are<03:32:51.960> no<03:32:52.239> examples<03:32:52.720> in 03:32:52.870 --> 03:32:52.880 align:start position:0% the subjunctive there are no examples in 03:32:52.880 --> 03:32:54.550 align:start position:0% the subjunctive there are no examples in this<03:32:53.080> video<03:32:53.479> because<03:32:53.680> I'm<03:32:53.800> simply<03:32:54.080> going<03:32:54.319> over 03:32:54.550 --> 03:32:54.560 align:start position:0% this video because I'm simply going over 03:32:54.560 --> 03:32:56.150 align:start position:0% this video because I'm simply going over the<03:32:54.720> principles<03:32:55.199> of<03:32:55.319> the<03:32:55.439> subjunctive<03:32:55.960> but<03:32:56.080> I 03:32:56.150 --> 03:32:56.160 align:start position:0% the principles of the subjunctive but I 03:32:56.160 --> 03:32:57.950 align:start position:0% the principles of the subjunctive but I will<03:32:56.319> provide<03:32:56.600> many<03:32:56.880> useful<03:32:57.199> phrases<03:32:57.680> in<03:32:57.840> the 03:32:57.950 --> 03:32:57.960 align:start position:0% will provide many useful phrases in the 03:32:57.960 --> 03:33:00.070 align:start position:0% will provide many useful phrases in the videos<03:32:58.359> after<03:32:58.640> this<03:32:58.800> one<03:32:59.120> mainly<03:32:59.520> consisting 03:33:00.070 --> 03:33:00.080 align:start position:0% videos after this one mainly consisting 03:33:00.080 --> 03:33:02.349 align:start position:0% videos after this one mainly consisting of<03:33:00.239> one<03:33:00.399> useful<03:33:00.800> verb<03:33:01.120> from<03:33:01.359> each<03:33:01.640> category<03:33:02.160> of 03:33:02.349 --> 03:33:02.359 align:start position:0% of one useful verb from each category of 03:33:02.359 --> 03:33:04.349 align:start position:0% of one useful verb from each category of weird<03:33:02.840> moreover<03:33:03.439> there's<03:33:03.600> a<03:33:03.760> third<03:33:04.000> concept 03:33:04.349 --> 03:33:04.359 align:start position:0% weird moreover there's a third concept 03:33:04.359 --> 03:33:05.830 align:start position:0% weird moreover there's a third concept you<03:33:04.439> should<03:33:04.600> know<03:33:04.800> in<03:33:04.920> the<03:33:05.080> subjunctive<03:33:05.720> and 03:33:05.830 --> 03:33:05.840 align:start position:0% you should know in the subjunctive and 03:33:05.840 --> 03:33:07.710 align:start position:0% you should know in the subjunctive and that<03:33:05.960> is<03:33:06.120> separate<03:33:06.479> phrases<03:33:07.040> that<03:33:07.160> can<03:33:07.319> still 03:33:07.710 --> 03:33:07.720 align:start position:0% that is separate phrases that can still 03:33:07.720 --> 03:33:09.309 align:start position:0% that is separate phrases that can still activate<03:33:08.199> the<03:33:08.359> subjunctive<03:33:09.000> which<03:33:09.120> is 03:33:09.309 --> 03:33:09.319 align:start position:0% activate the subjunctive which is 03:33:09.319 --> 03:33:11.389 align:start position:0% activate the subjunctive which is different<03:33:09.760> than<03:33:09.960> subject<03:33:10.279> verb<03:33:10.560> k<03:33:11.040> subject 03:33:11.389 --> 03:33:11.399 align:start position:0% different than subject verb k subject 03:33:11.399 --> 03:33:13.150 align:start position:0% different than subject verb k subject verb<03:33:11.720> like<03:33:11.840> I<03:33:11.960> said<03:33:12.199> previously<03:33:12.800> just<03:33:12.960> because 03:33:13.150 --> 03:33:13.160 align:start position:0% verb like I said previously just because 03:33:13.160 --> 03:33:15.110 align:start position:0% verb like I said previously just because the<03:33:13.319> phrase<03:33:13.560> begins<03:33:13.880> with<03:33:14.000> a<03:33:14.160> subject<03:33:14.479> verb<03:33:14.800> K 03:33:15.110 --> 03:33:15.120 align:start position:0% the phrase begins with a subject verb K 03:33:15.120 --> 03:33:16.750 align:start position:0% the phrase begins with a subject verb K subject<03:33:15.439> verb<03:33:15.760> it<03:33:15.880> doesn't<03:33:16.199> automatically 03:33:16.750 --> 03:33:16.760 align:start position:0% subject verb it doesn't automatically 03:33:16.760 --> 03:33:18.550 align:start position:0% subject verb it doesn't automatically mean<03:33:17.080> that<03:33:17.199> the<03:33:17.319> phrase<03:33:17.600> is<03:33:17.760> subjunctive 03:33:18.550 --> 03:33:18.560 align:start position:0% mean that the phrase is subjunctive 03:33:18.560 --> 03:33:20.309 align:start position:0% mean that the phrase is subjunctive sometimes<03:33:19.000> we<03:33:19.080> can<03:33:19.199> have<03:33:19.359> phrases<03:33:19.880> that<03:33:20.040> begin 03:33:20.309 --> 03:33:20.319 align:start position:0% sometimes we can have phrases that begin 03:33:20.319 --> 03:33:21.950 align:start position:0% sometimes we can have phrases that begin with<03:33:20.439> a<03:33:20.520> main<03:33:20.760> clause<03:33:21.199> and<03:33:21.359> end<03:33:21.680> with<03:33:21.800> a 03:33:21.950 --> 03:33:21.960 align:start position:0% with a main clause and end with a 03:33:21.960 --> 03:33:24.070 align:start position:0% with a main clause and end with a subordinate<03:33:22.479> clause<03:33:22.920> in<03:33:23.040> order<03:33:23.279> to<03:33:23.479> indicate 03:33:24.070 --> 03:33:24.080 align:start position:0% subordinate clause in order to indicate 03:33:24.080 --> 03:33:25.750 align:start position:0% subordinate clause in order to indicate what<03:33:24.319> activates<03:33:24.800> the<03:33:24.920> subjunctive<03:33:25.439> and<03:33:25.600> these 03:33:25.750 --> 03:33:25.760 align:start position:0% what activates the subjunctive and these 03:33:25.760 --> 03:33:28.429 align:start position:0% what activates the subjunctive and these phrases<03:33:26.279> can<03:33:26.439> be<03:33:26.800> S<03:33:27.040> necessar<03:33:27.920> Plus<03:33:28.080> subject 03:33:28.429 --> 03:33:28.439 align:start position:0% phrases can be S necessar Plus subject 03:33:28.439 --> 03:33:30.990 align:start position:0% phrases can be S necessar Plus subject verb<03:33:28.800> s<03:33:29.080> important<03:33:30.040> plus<03:33:30.239> subject<03:33:30.520> verb<03:33:30.880> and 03:33:30.990 --> 03:33:31.000 align:start position:0% verb s important plus subject verb and 03:33:31.000 --> 03:33:33.110 align:start position:0% verb s important plus subject verb and so<03:33:31.160> on<03:33:31.520> obviously<03:33:32.080> there<03:33:32.199> are<03:33:32.399> more<03:33:32.600> sentences 03:33:33.110 --> 03:33:33.120 align:start position:0% so on obviously there are more sentences 03:33:33.120 --> 03:33:34.630 align:start position:0% so on obviously there are more sentences that<03:33:33.319> activate<03:33:33.680> the<03:33:33.800> subjunctive<03:33:34.359> using 03:33:34.630 --> 03:33:34.640 align:start position:0% that activate the subjunctive using 03:33:34.640 --> 03:33:36.750 align:start position:0% that activate the subjunctive using other<03:33:35.000> Expressions<03:33:35.600> conjunctions<03:33:36.319> and<03:33:36.479> even 03:33:36.750 --> 03:33:36.760 align:start position:0% other Expressions conjunctions and even 03:33:36.760 --> 03:33:38.389 align:start position:0% other Expressions conjunctions and even adjective<03:33:37.160> Clauses<03:33:37.680> but<03:33:37.840> I<03:33:37.920> will<03:33:38.040> not<03:33:38.199> talk 03:33:38.389 --> 03:33:38.399 align:start position:0% adjective Clauses but I will not talk 03:33:38.399 --> 03:33:39.990 align:start position:0% adjective Clauses but I will not talk about<03:33:38.600> them<03:33:38.800> in<03:33:38.960> this<03:33:39.120> video<03:33:39.479> and<03:33:39.640> future 03:33:39.990 --> 03:33:40.000 align:start position:0% about them in this video and future 03:33:40.000 --> 03:33:41.630 align:start position:0% about them in this video and future videos<03:33:40.399> because<03:33:40.600> it's<03:33:40.800> simply<03:33:41.000> too<03:33:41.199> excessive 03:33:41.630 --> 03:33:41.640 align:start position:0% videos because it's simply too excessive 03:33:41.640 --> 03:33:43.469 align:start position:0% videos because it's simply too excessive and<03:33:41.840> impractical<03:33:42.560> what<03:33:42.680> you<03:33:42.800> should<03:33:43.040> know<03:33:43.279> are 03:33:43.469 --> 03:33:43.479 align:start position:0% and impractical what you should know are 03:33:43.479 --> 03:33:45.150 align:start position:0% and impractical what you should know are the<03:33:43.600> most<03:33:43.840> utilized<03:33:44.359> expressions<03:33:44.880> in<03:33:45.000> the 03:33:45.150 --> 03:33:45.160 align:start position:0% the most utilized expressions in the 03:33:45.160 --> 03:33:46.790 align:start position:0% the most utilized expressions in the subjunctive<03:33:45.680> just<03:33:45.800> to<03:33:46.239> understand<03:33:46.520> how<03:33:46.640> the 03:33:46.790 --> 03:33:46.800 align:start position:0% subjunctive just to understand how the 03:33:46.800 --> 03:33:48.469 align:start position:0% subjunctive just to understand how the subjunctive<03:33:47.319> functions<03:33:47.880> and<03:33:48.040> of<03:33:48.160> course 03:33:48.469 --> 03:33:48.479 align:start position:0% subjunctive functions and of course 03:33:48.479 --> 03:33:50.269 align:start position:0% subjunctive functions and of course there<03:33:48.640> are<03:33:48.920> sentences<03:33:49.560> similar<03:33:49.880> to<03:33:50.040> these 03:33:50.269 --> 03:33:50.279 align:start position:0% there are sentences similar to these 03:33:50.279 --> 03:33:51.990 align:start position:0% there are sentences similar to these Expressions<03:33:50.880> that<03:33:51.000> do<03:33:51.160> not<03:33:51.479> activate<03:33:51.840> the 03:33:51.990 --> 03:33:52.000 align:start position:0% Expressions that do not activate the 03:33:52.000 --> 03:33:55.150 align:start position:0% Expressions that do not activate the subjunctive<03:33:52.680> like<03:33:53.000> it's<03:33:53.080> a<03:33:53.319> fact<03:33:53.720> that<03:33:53.840> you 03:33:55.150 --> 03:33:55.160 align:start position:0% subjunctive like it's a fact that you 03:33:55.160 --> 03:33:57.710 align:start position:0% subjunctive like it's a fact that you ate<03:33:56.160> this<03:33:56.279> sentence<03:33:56.840> looks<03:33:57.120> like<03:33:57.399> it's<03:33:57.560> going 03:33:57.710 --> 03:33:57.720 align:start position:0% ate this sentence looks like it's going 03:33:57.720 --> 03:33:59.309 align:start position:0% ate this sentence looks like it's going to<03:33:57.960> activate<03:33:58.319> the<03:33:58.439> subjunctive<03:33:59.040> but<03:33:59.160> it's 03:33:59.309 --> 03:33:59.319 align:start position:0% to activate the subjunctive but it's 03:33:59.319 --> 03:34:01.070 align:start position:0% to activate the subjunctive but it's really<03:33:59.560> not<03:33:59.880> so<03:34:00.080> make<03:34:00.239> sure<03:34:00.600> that<03:34:00.720> you<03:34:00.880> watch 03:34:01.070 --> 03:34:01.080 align:start position:0% really not so make sure that you watch 03:34:01.080 --> 03:34:03.110 align:start position:0% really not so make sure that you watch out<03:34:01.279> for<03:34:01.560> these<03:34:01.760> ideas<03:34:02.199> and<03:34:02.319> so<03:34:02.520> finally<03:34:03.040> this 03:34:03.110 --> 03:34:03.120 align:start position:0% out for these ideas and so finally this 03:34:03.120 --> 03:34:04.950 align:start position:0% out for these ideas and so finally this is<03:34:03.359> everything<03:34:03.800> you<03:34:03.920> should<03:34:04.160> know<03:34:04.439> and 03:34:04.950 --> 03:34:04.960 align:start position:0% is everything you should know and 03:34:04.960 --> 03:34:06.349 align:start position:0% is everything you should know and understand<03:34:05.279> about<03:34:05.479> the<03:34:05.640> subjunctive<03:34:06.239> in 03:34:06.349 --> 03:34:06.359 align:start position:0% understand about the subjunctive in 03:34:06.359 --> 03:34:08.309 align:start position:0% understand about the subjunctive in Spanish<03:34:06.880> and<03:34:07.000> this<03:34:07.120> is<03:34:07.279> why<03:34:07.479> it's<03:34:07.720> the<03:34:07.880> most 03:34:08.309 --> 03:34:08.319 align:start position:0% Spanish and this is why it's the most 03:34:08.319 --> 03:34:10.229 align:start position:0% Spanish and this is why it's the most difficult<03:34:08.520> Concept<03:34:08.960> in<03:34:09.120> Spanish<03:34:09.680> at<03:34:09.840> first<03:34:10.160> in 03:34:10.229 --> 03:34:10.239 align:start position:0% difficult Concept in Spanish at first in 03:34:10.239 --> 03:34:11.950 align:start position:0% difficult Concept in Spanish at first in order<03:34:10.479> to<03:34:10.840> activate<03:34:11.160> the<03:34:11.279> subjunctive<03:34:11.840> you 03:34:11.950 --> 03:34:11.960 align:start position:0% order to activate the subjunctive you 03:34:11.960 --> 03:34:13.349 align:start position:0% order to activate the subjunctive you need<03:34:12.080> to<03:34:12.239> have<03:34:12.359> a<03:34:12.520> sentence<03:34:12.960> that<03:34:13.080> has<03:34:13.199> a 03:34:13.349 --> 03:34:13.359 align:start position:0% need to have a sentence that has a 03:34:13.359 --> 03:34:15.469 align:start position:0% need to have a sentence that has a subject<03:34:13.720> verb<03:34:14.160> can<03:34:14.520> subject<03:34:14.880> verb<03:34:15.199> or<03:34:15.359> a 03:34:15.469 --> 03:34:15.479 align:start position:0% subject verb can subject verb or a 03:34:15.479 --> 03:34:17.429 align:start position:0% subject verb can subject verb or a general<03:34:15.840> main<03:34:16.120> Clause<03:34:16.600> that<03:34:16.760> supports<03:34:17.279> a 03:34:17.429 --> 03:34:17.439 align:start position:0% general main Clause that supports a 03:34:17.439 --> 03:34:19.910 align:start position:0% general main Clause that supports a subordinate<03:34:17.960> clause<03:34:18.479> like<03:34:18.800> s<03:34:19.000> necess<03:34:19.520> okay 03:34:19.910 --> 03:34:19.920 align:start position:0% subordinate clause like s necess okay 03:34:19.920 --> 03:34:21.910 align:start position:0% subordinate clause like s necess okay subject<03:34:20.279> verb<03:34:20.760> secondly<03:34:21.279> if<03:34:21.399> you<03:34:21.479> were<03:34:21.640> to<03:34:21.760> use 03:34:21.910 --> 03:34:21.920 align:start position:0% subject verb secondly if you were to use 03:34:21.920 --> 03:34:23.389 align:start position:0% subject verb secondly if you were to use the<03:34:22.040> first<03:34:22.279> construction<03:34:22.920> then<03:34:23.040> the<03:34:23.160> first 03:34:23.389 --> 03:34:23.399 align:start position:0% the first construction then the first 03:34:23.399 --> 03:34:25.110 align:start position:0% the first construction then the first verb<03:34:23.680> in<03:34:23.800> the<03:34:23.960> sentence<03:34:24.439> would<03:34:24.640> have<03:34:24.760> to<03:34:24.880> be<03:34:25.000> a 03:34:25.110 --> 03:34:25.120 align:start position:0% verb in the sentence would have to be a 03:34:25.120 --> 03:34:27.189 align:start position:0% verb in the sentence would have to be a verb<03:34:25.359> of<03:34:25.560> will<03:34:25.960> emotion<03:34:26.479> influence 03:34:27.189 --> 03:34:27.199 align:start position:0% verb of will emotion influence 03:34:27.199 --> 03:34:29.269 align:start position:0% verb of will emotion influence recommendation<03:34:27.960> or<03:34:28.160> doubt<03:34:28.600> disbelief<03:34:29.080> and 03:34:29.269 --> 03:34:29.279 align:start position:0% recommendation or doubt disbelief and 03:34:29.279 --> 03:34:31.389 align:start position:0% recommendation or doubt disbelief and denial<03:34:29.840> also<03:34:30.040> known<03:34:30.279> as<03:34:30.399> weird<03:34:30.800> if<03:34:30.920> a<03:34:31.080> verb 03:34:31.389 --> 03:34:31.399 align:start position:0% denial also known as weird if a verb 03:34:31.399 --> 03:34:33.349 align:start position:0% denial also known as weird if a verb does<03:34:31.600> not<03:34:31.800> come<03:34:31.960> from<03:34:32.160> weird<03:34:32.560> the<03:34:32.760> subjunctive 03:34:33.349 --> 03:34:33.359 align:start position:0% does not come from weird the subjunctive 03:34:33.359 --> 03:34:35.349 align:start position:0% does not come from weird the subjunctive is<03:34:33.520> not<03:34:33.840> activated<03:34:34.520> however<03:34:34.880> if<03:34:35.000> it<03:34:35.120> is 03:34:35.349 --> 03:34:35.359 align:start position:0% is not activated however if it is 03:34:35.359 --> 03:34:36.950 align:start position:0% is not activated however if it is activated<03:34:35.960> the<03:34:36.120> second<03:34:36.359> verb<03:34:36.680> of<03:34:36.800> the 03:34:36.950 --> 03:34:36.960 align:start position:0% activated the second verb of the 03:34:36.960 --> 03:34:39.510 align:start position:0% activated the second verb of the sentence<03:34:37.600> absolutely<03:34:38.359> must<03:34:38.640> be<03:34:38.800> modified<03:34:39.399> in 03:34:39.510 --> 03:34:39.520 align:start position:0% sentence absolutely must be modified in 03:34:39.520 --> 03:34:41.510 align:start position:0% sentence absolutely must be modified in the<03:34:39.640> oddest<03:34:40.040> way<03:34:40.279> possible<03:34:40.840> depending<03:34:41.199> on<03:34:41.359> the 03:34:41.510 --> 03:34:41.520 align:start position:0% the oddest way possible depending on the 03:34:41.520 --> 03:34:42.790 align:start position:0% the oddest way possible depending on the tense<03:34:41.760> that<03:34:41.840> you<03:34:41.920> want<03:34:42.040> to<03:34:42.160> utilize<03:34:42.680> the 03:34:42.790 --> 03:34:42.800 align:start position:0% tense that you want to utilize the 03:34:42.800 --> 03:34:44.830 align:start position:0% tense that you want to utilize the second<03:34:43.080> part<03:34:43.239> of<03:34:43.399> either<03:34:43.680> phrase<03:34:44.120> can<03:34:44.319> consist 03:34:44.830 --> 03:34:44.840 align:start position:0% second part of either phrase can consist 03:34:44.840 --> 03:34:46.990 align:start position:0% second part of either phrase can consist of<03:34:45.040> literally<03:34:45.520> any<03:34:45.800> subject<03:34:46.199> and<03:34:46.399> any<03:34:46.640> verb 03:34:46.990 --> 03:34:47.000 align:start position:0% of literally any subject and any verb 03:34:47.000 --> 03:34:48.990 align:start position:0% of literally any subject and any verb and<03:34:47.120> the<03:34:47.239> verb<03:34:47.680> must<03:34:47.960> be<03:34:48.120> conjugated<03:34:48.840> the 03:34:48.990 --> 03:34:49.000 align:start position:0% and the verb must be conjugated the 03:34:49.000 --> 03:34:50.830 align:start position:0% and the verb must be conjugated the proper<03:34:49.279> way<03:34:49.640> depending<03:34:50.000> on<03:34:50.120> the<03:34:50.279> subject<03:34:50.680> and 03:34:50.830 --> 03:34:50.840 align:start position:0% proper way depending on the subject and 03:34:50.840 --> 03:34:52.510 align:start position:0% proper way depending on the subject and the<03:34:50.960> tense<03:34:51.359> whether<03:34:51.600> it's<03:34:51.760> in<03:34:51.880> the<03:34:52.040> present 03:34:52.510 --> 03:34:52.520 align:start position:0% the tense whether it's in the present 03:34:52.520 --> 03:34:54.590 align:start position:0% the tense whether it's in the present past<03:34:52.880> present<03:34:53.199> perfect<03:34:53.560> or<03:34:53.800> past<03:34:54.040> perfect<03:34:54.439> to 03:34:54.590 --> 03:34:54.600 align:start position:0% past present perfect or past perfect to 03:34:54.600 --> 03:34:56.349 align:start position:0% past present perfect or past perfect to recap<03:34:54.920> what<03:34:55.040> I've<03:34:55.199> just<03:34:55.359> said<03:34:55.800> this<03:34:56.040> is<03:34:56.199> the 03:34:56.349 --> 03:34:56.359 align:start position:0% recap what I've just said this is the 03:34:56.359 --> 03:34:58.590 align:start position:0% recap what I've just said this is the reason<03:34:56.880> why<03:34:57.040> the<03:34:57.160> subjunctive<03:34:57.720> in<03:34:57.880> Spanish<03:34:58.399> is 03:34:58.590 --> 03:34:58.600 align:start position:0% reason why the subjunctive in Spanish is 03:34:58.600 --> 03:35:00.670 align:start position:0% reason why the subjunctive in Spanish is the<03:34:58.760> most<03:34:59.199> difficult<03:34:59.399> concept<03:34:59.880> hands<03:35:00.239> down<03:35:00.520> it 03:35:00.670 --> 03:35:00.680 align:start position:0% the most difficult concept hands down it 03:35:00.680 --> 03:35:02.469 align:start position:0% the most difficult concept hands down it has<03:35:00.840> four<03:35:01.080> tenses<03:35:01.600> it<03:35:01.720> must<03:35:01.960> have<03:35:02.080> a<03:35:02.199> verb 03:35:02.469 --> 03:35:02.479 align:start position:0% has four tenses it must have a verb 03:35:02.479 --> 03:35:04.070 align:start position:0% has four tenses it must have a verb coming<03:35:02.680> from<03:35:02.880> weird<03:35:03.199> or<03:35:03.359> a<03:35:03.479> general<03:35:03.800> main 03:35:04.070 --> 03:35:04.080 align:start position:0% coming from weird or a general main 03:35:04.080 --> 03:35:05.990 align:start position:0% coming from weird or a general main Clause<03:35:04.479> the<03:35:04.640> second<03:35:04.960> part<03:35:05.239> can<03:35:05.439> consist<03:35:05.760> of 03:35:05.990 --> 03:35:06.000 align:start position:0% Clause the second part can consist of 03:35:06.000 --> 03:35:07.870 align:start position:0% Clause the second part can consist of any<03:35:06.239> subject<03:35:06.640> and<03:35:06.800> any<03:35:07.040> verb<03:35:07.359> and<03:35:07.479> the<03:35:07.600> second 03:35:07.870 --> 03:35:07.880 align:start position:0% any subject and any verb and the second 03:35:07.880 --> 03:35:09.830 align:start position:0% any subject and any verb and the second verb<03:35:08.199> has<03:35:08.319> to<03:35:08.479> get<03:35:08.680> conjugated<03:35:09.319> depending<03:35:09.680> on 03:35:09.830 --> 03:35:09.840 align:start position:0% verb has to get conjugated depending on 03:35:09.840 --> 03:35:11.630 align:start position:0% verb has to get conjugated depending on the<03:35:09.960> tense<03:35:10.439> this<03:35:10.880> is<03:35:11.080> everything<03:35:11.399> that<03:35:11.520> you 03:35:11.630 --> 03:35:11.640 align:start position:0% the tense this is everything that you 03:35:11.640 --> 03:35:13.189 align:start position:0% the tense this is everything that you should<03:35:11.840> know<03:35:12.160> about<03:35:12.359> the<03:35:12.520> subjunctive<03:35:13.040> in 03:35:13.189 --> 03:35:13.199 align:start position:0% should know about the subjunctive in 03:35:13.199 --> 03:35:15.070 align:start position:0% should know about the subjunctive in Spanish<03:35:13.680> and<03:35:13.800> in<03:35:13.920> the<03:35:14.040> videos<03:35:14.399> after<03:35:14.680> this<03:35:14.800> one 03:35:15.070 --> 03:35:15.080 align:start position:0% Spanish and in the videos after this one 03:35:15.080 --> 03:35:16.630 align:start position:0% Spanish and in the videos after this one I'll<03:35:15.239> go<03:35:15.399> in<03:35:15.560> depth<03:35:15.840> and<03:35:16.000> explain<03:35:16.399> each 03:35:16.630 --> 03:35:16.640 align:start position:0% I'll go in depth and explain each 03:35:16.640 --> 03:35:18.950 align:start position:0% I'll go in depth and explain each variation<03:35:17.399> as<03:35:17.520> easily<03:35:17.920> as<03:35:18.040> I<03:35:18.199> can<03:35:18.439> in<03:35:18.560> order<03:35:18.840> to 03:35:18.950 --> 03:35:18.960 align:start position:0% variation as easily as I can in order to 03:35:18.960 --> 03:35:21.229 align:start position:0% variation as easily as I can in order to make<03:35:19.120> your<03:35:19.279> learning<03:35:19.840> as<03:35:20.040> easy<03:35:20.399> as<03:35:20.640> possible 03:35:21.229 --> 03:35:21.239 align:start position:0% make your learning as easy as possible 03:35:21.239 --> 03:35:23.309 align:start position:0% make your learning as easy as possible in<03:35:21.399> this<03:35:21.600> video<03:35:22.000> I'll<03:35:22.239> explain<03:35:22.720> how<03:35:22.920> all<03:35:23.120> types 03:35:23.309 --> 03:35:23.319 align:start position:0% in this video I'll explain how all types 03:35:23.319 --> 03:35:25.269 align:start position:0% in this video I'll explain how all types of<03:35:23.479> verbs<03:35:23.840> work<03:35:24.080> in<03:35:24.199> the<03:35:24.359> present<03:35:24.640> subjunctive 03:35:25.269 --> 03:35:25.279 align:start position:0% of verbs work in the present subjunctive 03:35:25.279 --> 03:35:27.309 align:start position:0% of verbs work in the present subjunctive in<03:35:25.439> Spanish<03:35:26.040> which<03:35:26.120> is<03:35:26.239> a<03:35:26.359> continuation<03:35:27.160> from 03:35:27.309 --> 03:35:27.319 align:start position:0% in Spanish which is a continuation from 03:35:27.319 --> 03:35:28.830 align:start position:0% in Spanish which is a continuation from the<03:35:27.479> previous<03:35:27.840> video<03:35:28.199> where<03:35:28.319> I<03:35:28.439> talked<03:35:28.680> about 03:35:28.830 --> 03:35:28.840 align:start position:0% the previous video where I talked about 03:35:28.840 --> 03:35:30.750 align:start position:0% the previous video where I talked about the<03:35:28.960> principles<03:35:29.359> of<03:35:29.520> the<03:35:29.640> subjunctive<03:35:30.239> and 03:35:30.750 --> 03:35:30.760 align:start position:0% the principles of the subjunctive and 03:35:30.760 --> 03:35:32.429 align:start position:0% the principles of the subjunctive and understanding<03:35:31.199> how<03:35:31.359> it<03:35:31.479> functions<03:35:32.080> in<03:35:32.239> these 03:35:32.429 --> 03:35:32.439 align:start position:0% understanding how it functions in these 03:35:32.439 --> 03:35:34.150 align:start position:0% understanding how it functions in these upcoming<03:35:32.880> videos<03:35:33.319> I'll<03:35:33.439> be<03:35:33.560> covering<03:35:33.960> each 03:35:34.150 --> 03:35:34.160 align:start position:0% upcoming videos I'll be covering each 03:35:34.160 --> 03:35:35.950 align:start position:0% upcoming videos I'll be covering each tense<03:35:34.560> of<03:35:34.720> the<03:35:34.840> subjunctive<03:35:35.439> starting<03:35:35.760> from 03:35:35.950 --> 03:35:35.960 align:start position:0% tense of the subjunctive starting from 03:35:35.960 --> 03:35:37.469 align:start position:0% tense of the subjunctive starting from the<03:35:36.120> present<03:35:36.600> all<03:35:36.720> the<03:35:36.800> way<03:35:36.920> to<03:35:37.040> the<03:35:37.239> Past 03:35:37.469 --> 03:35:37.479 align:start position:0% the present all the way to the Past 03:35:37.479 --> 03:35:39.510 align:start position:0% the present all the way to the Past Perfect<03:35:38.000> while<03:35:38.160> showing<03:35:38.520> useful<03:35:38.920> sentences 03:35:39.510 --> 03:35:39.520 align:start position:0% Perfect while showing useful sentences 03:35:39.520 --> 03:35:41.510 align:start position:0% Perfect while showing useful sentences and<03:35:39.640> explaining<03:35:40.040> the<03:35:40.199> concept<03:35:40.760> of<03:35:40.920> each<03:35:41.120> tense 03:35:41.510 --> 03:35:41.520 align:start position:0% and explaining the concept of each tense 03:35:41.520 --> 03:35:43.110 align:start position:0% and explaining the concept of each tense the<03:35:41.640> present<03:35:41.960> subjunctive<03:35:42.560> is<03:35:42.680> the<03:35:42.840> first 03:35:43.110 --> 03:35:43.120 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive is the first 03:35:43.120 --> 03:35:44.990 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive is the first tense<03:35:43.479> that<03:35:43.600> is<03:35:43.720> learned<03:35:44.120> conceptually<03:35:44.880> but 03:35:44.990 --> 03:35:45.000 align:start position:0% tense that is learned conceptually but 03:35:45.000 --> 03:35:46.469 align:start position:0% tense that is learned conceptually but it's<03:35:45.239> actually<03:35:45.720> one<03:35:45.840> of<03:35:45.960> the<03:35:46.080> hardest 03:35:46.469 --> 03:35:46.479 align:start position:0% it's actually one of the hardest 03:35:46.479 --> 03:35:48.349 align:start position:0% it's actually one of the hardest concepts<03:35:47.040> of<03:35:47.160> the<03:35:47.279> subjunctive<03:35:48.000> mainly 03:35:48.349 --> 03:35:48.359 align:start position:0% concepts of the subjunctive mainly 03:35:48.359 --> 03:35:50.469 align:start position:0% concepts of the subjunctive mainly because<03:35:48.840> it<03:35:48.960> has<03:35:49.120> a<03:35:49.199> lot<03:35:49.319> of<03:35:49.479> irregular<03:35:50.040> verbs 03:35:50.469 --> 03:35:50.479 align:start position:0% because it has a lot of irregular verbs 03:35:50.479 --> 03:35:52.510 align:start position:0% because it has a lot of irregular verbs including<03:35:50.920> irregular<03:35:51.439> y<03:35:51.640> verbs<03:35:52.000> verbs<03:35:52.239> ending 03:35:52.510 --> 03:35:52.520 align:start position:0% including irregular y verbs verbs ending 03:35:52.520 --> 03:35:55.349 align:start position:0% including irregular y verbs verbs ending in<03:35:52.720> k<03:35:53.120> g<03:35:53.359> and<03:35:53.520> S<03:35:53.880> stem<03:35:54.160> changing<03:35:54.640> and<03:35:54.800> irregular 03:35:55.349 --> 03:35:55.359 align:start position:0% in k g and S stem changing and irregular 03:35:55.359 --> 03:35:56.710 align:start position:0% in k g and S stem changing and irregular verbs<03:35:55.600> in<03:35:55.760> general<03:35:56.160> like<03:35:56.279> I<03:35:56.359> said<03:35:56.479> in<03:35:56.640> the 03:35:56.710 --> 03:35:56.720 align:start position:0% verbs in general like I said in the 03:35:56.720 --> 03:35:58.750 align:start position:0% verbs in general like I said in the previous<03:35:57.080> video<03:35:57.479> you<03:35:57.600> will<03:35:57.840> have<03:35:57.960> to<03:35:58.120> memorize 03:35:58.750 --> 03:35:58.760 align:start position:0% previous video you will have to memorize 03:35:58.760 --> 03:36:00.710 align:start position:0% previous video you will have to memorize every<03:35:59.000> conjugation<03:35:59.680> of<03:35:59.880> every<03:36:00.120> verb<03:36:00.479> because 03:36:00.710 --> 03:36:00.720 align:start position:0% every conjugation of every verb because 03:36:00.720 --> 03:36:02.389 align:start position:0% every conjugation of every verb because the<03:36:00.840> second<03:36:01.160> part<03:36:01.319> of<03:36:01.439> the<03:36:01.560> phrase<03:36:02.040> subject 03:36:02.389 --> 03:36:02.399 align:start position:0% the second part of the phrase subject 03:36:02.399 --> 03:36:04.750 align:start position:0% the second part of the phrase subject verb<03:36:02.720> K<03:36:02.960> subject<03:36:03.279> verb<03:36:03.600> can<03:36:03.760> have<03:36:04.000> any<03:36:04.239> pronoun 03:36:04.750 --> 03:36:04.760 align:start position:0% verb K subject verb can have any pronoun 03:36:04.760 --> 03:36:06.469 align:start position:0% verb K subject verb can have any pronoun and<03:36:04.960> any<03:36:05.160> verb<03:36:05.640> however<03:36:05.920> in<03:36:06.040> order<03:36:06.279> to 03:36:06.469 --> 03:36:06.479 align:start position:0% and any verb however in order to 03:36:06.479 --> 03:36:08.309 align:start position:0% and any verb however in order to activate<03:36:06.840> the<03:36:06.960> subjunctive<03:36:07.600> the<03:36:07.720> first<03:36:08.000> verb 03:36:08.309 --> 03:36:08.319 align:start position:0% activate the subjunctive the first verb 03:36:08.319 --> 03:36:10.030 align:start position:0% activate the subjunctive the first verb in<03:36:08.439> the<03:36:08.600> sentence<03:36:09.120> would<03:36:09.279> have<03:36:09.399> to<03:36:09.520> be<03:36:09.640> a<03:36:09.760> verb 03:36:10.030 --> 03:36:10.040 align:start position:0% in the sentence would have to be a verb 03:36:10.040 --> 03:36:11.790 align:start position:0% in the sentence would have to be a verb coming<03:36:10.279> from<03:36:10.560> weird<03:36:10.880> which<03:36:11.040> I<03:36:11.160> showed<03:36:11.560> in<03:36:11.640> the 03:36:11.790 --> 03:36:11.800 align:start position:0% coming from weird which I showed in the 03:36:11.800 --> 03:36:13.670 align:start position:0% coming from weird which I showed in the previous<03:36:12.120> video<03:36:12.479> before<03:36:12.720> showing<03:36:13.080> sentences 03:36:13.670 --> 03:36:13.680 align:start position:0% previous video before showing sentences 03:36:13.680 --> 03:36:15.429 align:start position:0% previous video before showing sentences in<03:36:13.760> the<03:36:13.880> present<03:36:14.160> subjunctive<03:36:14.760> we<03:36:14.880> need<03:36:15.000> to 03:36:15.429 --> 03:36:15.439 align:start position:0% in the present subjunctive we need to 03:36:15.439 --> 03:36:16.830 align:start position:0% in the present subjunctive we need to understand<03:36:15.720> how<03:36:15.960> every<03:36:16.239> type<03:36:16.399> of<03:36:16.560> verb 03:36:16.830 --> 03:36:16.840 align:start position:0% understand how every type of verb 03:36:16.840 --> 03:36:18.389 align:start position:0% understand how every type of verb functions<03:36:17.279> in<03:36:17.399> the<03:36:17.520> present<03:36:17.800> subjunctive<03:36:18.279> in 03:36:18.389 --> 03:36:18.399 align:start position:0% functions in the present subjunctive in 03:36:18.399 --> 03:36:19.590 align:start position:0% functions in the present subjunctive in the<03:36:18.520> second<03:36:18.800> part<03:36:18.920> of<03:36:19.040> the<03:36:19.160> sentence 03:36:19.590 --> 03:36:19.600 align:start position:0% the second part of the sentence 03:36:19.600 --> 03:36:22.469 align:start position:0% the second part of the sentence beginning<03:36:19.960> with<03:36:20.160> regular<03:36:20.800> a<03:36:20.960> r<03:36:21.319> e<03:36:21.520> r<03:36:21.800> and<03:36:22.040> i 03:36:22.469 --> 03:36:22.479 align:start position:0% beginning with regular a r e r and i 03:36:22.479 --> 03:36:24.630 align:start position:0% beginning with regular a r e r and i verbs<03:36:22.840> all<03:36:23.000> the<03:36:23.120> way<03:36:23.359> to<03:36:23.560> irregular<03:36:24.120> verbs<03:36:24.479> in 03:36:24.630 --> 03:36:24.640 align:start position:0% verbs all the way to irregular verbs in 03:36:24.640 --> 03:36:27.910 align:start position:0% verbs all the way to irregular verbs in general<03:36:25.120> regular<03:36:25.600> a<03:36:25.800> r<03:36:26.160> e<03:36:26.359> r<03:36:26.720> and<03:36:26.960> i<03:36:27.399> verbs<03:36:27.800> in 03:36:27.910 --> 03:36:27.920 align:start position:0% general regular a r e r and i verbs in 03:36:27.920 --> 03:36:29.670 align:start position:0% general regular a r e r and i verbs in the<03:36:28.040> present<03:36:28.319> subjunctive<03:36:28.920> are<03:36:29.120> conjugated 03:36:29.670 --> 03:36:29.680 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive are conjugated 03:36:29.680 --> 03:36:31.630 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive are conjugated similarly<03:36:30.239> to<03:36:30.399> negative<03:36:30.720> two<03:36:30.960> commands<03:36:31.520> by 03:36:31.630 --> 03:36:31.640 align:start position:0% similarly to negative two commands by 03:36:31.640 --> 03:36:33.510 align:start position:0% similarly to negative two commands by changing<03:36:32.000> the<03:36:32.120> ending<03:36:32.479> to<03:36:32.640> the<03:36:32.840> opposite<03:36:33.239> type 03:36:33.510 --> 03:36:33.520 align:start position:0% changing the ending to the opposite type 03:36:33.520 --> 03:36:35.910 align:start position:0% changing the ending to the opposite type of<03:36:33.680> the<03:36:33.800> verb<03:36:34.080> itself<03:36:34.520> for<03:36:34.720> regular<03:36:35.080> a<03:36:35.520> verbs 03:36:35.910 --> 03:36:35.920 align:start position:0% of the verb itself for regular a verbs 03:36:35.920 --> 03:36:37.750 align:start position:0% of the verb itself for regular a verbs you<03:36:36.040> keep<03:36:36.279> the<03:36:36.399> same<03:36:36.640> ending<03:36:37.199> as<03:36:37.319> you<03:36:37.439> would<03:36:37.640> in 03:36:37.750 --> 03:36:37.760 align:start position:0% you keep the same ending as you would in 03:36:37.760 --> 03:36:39.389 align:start position:0% you keep the same ending as you would in the<03:36:37.920> present<03:36:38.239> simple<03:36:38.680> but<03:36:38.800> instead<03:36:39.080> of<03:36:39.199> having 03:36:39.389 --> 03:36:39.399 align:start position:0% the present simple but instead of having 03:36:39.399 --> 03:36:41.429 align:start position:0% the present simple but instead of having an<03:36:39.600> A<03:36:39.880> in<03:36:40.000> every<03:36:40.479> conjugation<03:36:41.040> you<03:36:41.160> need<03:36:41.279> to 03:36:41.429 --> 03:36:41.439 align:start position:0% an A in every conjugation you need to 03:36:41.439 --> 03:36:44.070 align:start position:0% an A in every conjugation you need to change<03:36:41.680> it<03:36:41.960> to<03:36:42.359> e<03:36:42.640> taking<03:36:42.880> the<03:36:43.000> verb<03:36:43.279> abl<03:36:43.800> as<03:36:43.920> an 03:36:44.070 --> 03:36:44.080 align:start position:0% change it to e taking the verb abl as an 03:36:44.080 --> 03:36:45.910 align:start position:0% change it to e taking the verb abl as an example<03:36:44.600> instead<03:36:44.840> of<03:36:45.000> keeping<03:36:45.279> its<03:36:45.439> form<03:36:45.800> in 03:36:45.910 --> 03:36:45.920 align:start position:0% example instead of keeping its form in 03:36:45.920 --> 03:36:47.590 align:start position:0% example instead of keeping its form in the<03:36:46.080> present<03:36:46.359> simple<03:36:46.840> we<03:36:46.960> have<03:36:47.080> to<03:36:47.239> change 03:36:47.590 --> 03:36:47.600 align:start position:0% the present simple we have to change 03:36:47.600 --> 03:36:49.389 align:start position:0% the present simple we have to change only<03:36:47.880> one<03:36:48.120> vowel<03:36:48.600> so<03:36:48.720> that<03:36:48.840> it<03:36:48.960> matches<03:36:49.279> the 03:36:49.389 --> 03:36:49.399 align:start position:0% only one vowel so that it matches the 03:36:49.399 --> 03:36:52.389 align:start position:0% only one vowel so that it matches the present<03:36:49.680> subjunctive<03:36:50.359> y<03:36:51.239> means<03:36:51.720> I<03:36:51.880> speak<03:36:52.279> in 03:36:52.389 --> 03:36:52.399 align:start position:0% present subjunctive y means I speak in 03:36:52.399 --> 03:36:55.030 align:start position:0% present subjunctive y means I speak in the<03:36:52.520> present<03:36:52.800> subjunctive<03:36:53.479> to<03:36:53.840> AES<03:36:54.479> means<03:36:54.800> you 03:36:55.030 --> 03:36:55.040 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive to AES means you 03:36:55.040 --> 03:36:58.030 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive to AES means you speak<03:36:55.560> El<03:36:56.439> means<03:36:56.720> he<03:36:56.920> speaks<03:36:57.399> and<03:36:57.520> so<03:36:57.680> on 03:36:58.030 --> 03:36:58.040 align:start position:0% speak El means he speaks and so on 03:36:58.040 --> 03:37:00.110 align:start position:0% speak El means he speaks and so on that's<03:36:58.199> how<03:36:58.399> regular<03:36:58.800> a<03:36:59.279> verbs<03:36:59.640> work<03:36:59.880> in<03:37:00.000> the 03:37:00.110 --> 03:37:00.120 align:start position:0% that's how regular a verbs work in the 03:37:00.120 --> 03:37:02.550 align:start position:0% that's how regular a verbs work in the present<03:37:00.399> subjunctive<03:37:00.960> for<03:37:01.199> regular<03:37:01.640> eer<03:37:02.279> and 03:37:02.550 --> 03:37:02.560 align:start position:0% present subjunctive for regular eer and 03:37:02.560 --> 03:37:04.830 align:start position:0% present subjunctive for regular eer and I<03:37:03.000> verbs<03:37:03.359> you<03:37:03.479> keep<03:37:03.680> the<03:37:03.800> same<03:37:04.040> ending<03:37:04.600> as<03:37:04.680> you 03:37:04.830 --> 03:37:04.840 align:start position:0% I verbs you keep the same ending as you 03:37:04.840 --> 03:37:06.389 align:start position:0% I verbs you keep the same ending as you would<03:37:05.000> in<03:37:05.120> the<03:37:05.279> present<03:37:05.560> simple<03:37:06.000> but<03:37:06.160> instead 03:37:06.389 --> 03:37:06.399 align:start position:0% would in the present simple but instead 03:37:06.399 --> 03:37:08.670 align:start position:0% would in the present simple but instead of<03:37:06.520> having<03:37:06.720> an<03:37:06.960> e<03:37:07.319> or<03:37:07.600> E<03:37:08.000> we<03:37:08.120> need<03:37:08.279> to<03:37:08.399> change 03:37:08.670 --> 03:37:08.680 align:start position:0% of having an e or E we need to change 03:37:08.680 --> 03:37:11.070 align:start position:0% of having an e or E we need to change the<03:37:08.840> vowel<03:37:09.279> to<03:37:09.600> a<03:37:09.880> taking<03:37:10.120> the<03:37:10.199> ver 03:37:11.070 --> 03:37:11.080 align:start position:0% the vowel to a taking the ver 03:37:11.080 --> 03:37:12.910 align:start position:0% the vowel to a taking the ver and<03:37:11.239> VI<03:37:11.640> in<03:37:11.760> the<03:37:11.880> present<03:37:12.160> subjunctive<03:37:12.800> we 03:37:12.910 --> 03:37:12.920 align:start position:0% and VI in the present subjunctive we 03:37:12.920 --> 03:37:16.030 align:start position:0% and VI in the present subjunctive we have<03:37:13.040> to<03:37:13.199> change<03:37:13.640> only<03:37:13.920> one<03:37:14.199> vowel<03:37:14.680> yoa<03:37:15.479> or<03:37:15.800> Y 03:37:16.030 --> 03:37:16.040 align:start position:0% have to change only one vowel yoa or Y 03:37:16.040 --> 03:37:19.870 align:start position:0% have to change only one vowel yoa or Y via<03:37:16.600> means<03:37:17.080> I<03:37:17.239> eat<03:37:17.640> or<03:37:17.920> I<03:37:18.080> live<03:37:18.439> toas<03:37:19.319> or<03:37:19.560> to 03:37:19.870 --> 03:37:19.880 align:start position:0% via means I eat or I live toas or to 03:37:19.880 --> 03:37:22.269 align:start position:0% via means I eat or I live toas or to Vivas<03:37:20.359> means<03:37:20.680> you<03:37:20.840> eat<03:37:21.160> or<03:37:21.359> you<03:37:21.560> live<03:37:22.000> and<03:37:22.120> so 03:37:22.269 --> 03:37:22.279 align:start position:0% Vivas means you eat or you live and so 03:37:22.279 --> 03:37:25.030 align:start position:0% Vivas means you eat or you live and so on<03:37:22.600> that's<03:37:22.760> how<03:37:22.960> regular<03:37:23.399> eer<03:37:23.920> and<03:37:24.199> I<03:37:24.680> verbs 03:37:25.030 --> 03:37:25.040 align:start position:0% on that's how regular eer and I verbs 03:37:25.040 --> 03:37:26.550 align:start position:0% on that's how regular eer and I verbs work<03:37:25.279> in<03:37:25.399> the<03:37:25.520> present<03:37:25.800> subjunctive<03:37:26.279> and<03:37:26.439> if 03:37:26.550 --> 03:37:26.560 align:start position:0% work in the present subjunctive and if 03:37:26.560 --> 03:37:28.590 align:start position:0% work in the present subjunctive and if you<03:37:26.720> take<03:37:27.000> a<03:37:27.160> closer<03:37:27.600> look<03:37:27.920> you<03:37:28.000> can<03:37:28.239> probably 03:37:28.590 --> 03:37:28.600 align:start position:0% you take a closer look you can probably 03:37:28.600 --> 03:37:30.469 align:start position:0% you take a closer look you can probably tell<03:37:28.960> that<03:37:29.120> only<03:37:29.359> one<03:37:29.560> letter<03:37:29.840> changes<03:37:30.319> in 03:37:30.469 --> 03:37:30.479 align:start position:0% tell that only one letter changes in 03:37:30.479 --> 03:37:32.229 align:start position:0% tell that only one letter changes in these<03:37:30.720> verbs<03:37:31.080> so<03:37:31.199> it's<03:37:31.359> basically<03:37:31.720> a<03:37:31.840> switch 03:37:32.229 --> 03:37:32.239 align:start position:0% these verbs so it's basically a switch 03:37:32.239 --> 03:37:33.790 align:start position:0% these verbs so it's basically a switch between<03:37:32.520> the<03:37:32.680> types<03:37:32.880> of<03:37:33.040> verbs<03:37:33.479> that's<03:37:33.600> how 03:37:33.790 --> 03:37:33.800 align:start position:0% between the types of verbs that's how 03:37:33.800 --> 03:37:35.469 align:start position:0% between the types of verbs that's how regular<03:37:34.160> verbs<03:37:34.560> function<03:37:34.960> in<03:37:35.080> the<03:37:35.199> present 03:37:35.469 --> 03:37:35.479 align:start position:0% regular verbs function in the present 03:37:35.479 --> 03:37:37.229 align:start position:0% regular verbs function in the present subjunctive<03:37:36.160> specifically<03:37:36.720> in<03:37:36.840> the<03:37:36.960> second 03:37:37.229 --> 03:37:37.239 align:start position:0% subjunctive specifically in the second 03:37:37.239 --> 03:37:39.070 align:start position:0% subjunctive specifically in the second part<03:37:37.399> of<03:37:37.520> the<03:37:37.640> phrase<03:37:38.080> subject<03:37:38.439> verb<03:37:38.760> K 03:37:39.070 --> 03:37:39.080 align:start position:0% part of the phrase subject verb K 03:37:39.080 --> 03:37:41.110 align:start position:0% part of the phrase subject verb K subject<03:37:39.479> verb<03:37:39.760> or<03:37:39.920> a<03:37:40.040> main<03:37:40.399> Clause<03:37:40.840> plus 03:37:41.110 --> 03:37:41.120 align:start position:0% subject verb or a main Clause plus 03:37:41.120 --> 03:37:42.670 align:start position:0% subject verb or a main Clause plus subject<03:37:41.439> verb<03:37:41.760> now<03:37:41.920> that<03:37:42.040> I<03:37:42.160> showed<03:37:42.520> how 03:37:42.670 --> 03:37:42.680 align:start position:0% subject verb now that I showed how 03:37:42.680 --> 03:37:44.150 align:start position:0% subject verb now that I showed how regular<03:37:43.040> verbs<03:37:43.439> work<03:37:43.640> in<03:37:43.760> the<03:37:43.880> present 03:37:44.150 --> 03:37:44.160 align:start position:0% regular verbs work in the present 03:37:44.160 --> 03:37:45.990 align:start position:0% regular verbs work in the present subjunctive<03:37:44.760> you'll<03:37:44.960> have<03:37:45.080> to<03:37:45.199> memorize<03:37:45.800> this 03:37:45.990 --> 03:37:46.000 align:start position:0% subjunctive you'll have to memorize this 03:37:46.000 --> 03:37:47.510 align:start position:0% subjunctive you'll have to memorize this pattern<03:37:46.439> because<03:37:46.640> you<03:37:46.720> will<03:37:46.920> have<03:37:47.000> to<03:37:47.120> use<03:37:47.319> it 03:37:47.510 --> 03:37:47.520 align:start position:0% pattern because you will have to use it 03:37:47.520 --> 03:37:49.110 align:start position:0% pattern because you will have to use it all<03:37:47.680> the<03:37:47.880> time<03:37:48.120> whenever<03:37:48.479> you<03:37:48.560> want<03:37:48.680> to<03:37:48.800> say<03:37:49.000> a 03:37:49.110 --> 03:37:49.120 align:start position:0% all the time whenever you want to say a 03:37:49.120 --> 03:37:50.750 align:start position:0% all the time whenever you want to say a sentence<03:37:49.600> in<03:37:49.720> the<03:37:49.840> present<03:37:50.160> subjunctive 03:37:50.750 --> 03:37:50.760 align:start position:0% sentence in the present subjunctive 03:37:50.760 --> 03:37:53.990 align:start position:0% sentence in the present subjunctive using<03:37:51.160> any<03:37:51.399> pronoun<03:37:51.920> and<03:37:52.120> any<03:37:52.359> regular<03:37:52.920> a<03:37:53.479> eer 03:37:53.990 --> 03:37:54.000 align:start position:0% using any pronoun and any regular a eer 03:37:54.000 --> 03:37:56.269 align:start position:0% using any pronoun and any regular a eer or<03:37:54.319> IR<03:37:54.720> verb<03:37:55.040> that's<03:37:55.199> the<03:37:55.359> first<03:37:55.680> concept<03:37:56.120> of 03:37:56.269 --> 03:37:56.279 align:start position:0% or IR verb that's the first concept of 03:37:56.279 --> 03:37:57.790 align:start position:0% or IR verb that's the first concept of the<03:37:56.439> present<03:37:56.680> subjunctive<03:37:57.319> the<03:37:57.439> second 03:37:57.790 --> 03:37:57.800 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive the second 03:37:57.800 --> 03:37:59.550 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive the second concept<03:37:58.199> of<03:37:58.319> the<03:37:58.479> present<03:37:58.760> subjunctive<03:37:59.359> is 03:37:59.550 --> 03:37:59.560 align:start position:0% concept of the present subjunctive is 03:37:59.560 --> 03:38:01.870 align:start position:0% concept of the present subjunctive is irregular<03:38:00.239> yo<03:38:00.520> verbs<03:38:00.960> which<03:38:01.080> are<03:38:01.319> similar<03:38:01.680> to 03:38:01.870 --> 03:38:01.880 align:start position:0% irregular yo verbs which are similar to 03:38:01.880 --> 03:38:04.150 align:start position:0% irregular yo verbs which are similar to nootro<03:38:02.399> commands<03:38:02.920> obviously<03:38:03.520> I<03:38:03.600> will<03:38:03.760> not<03:38:03.920> put 03:38:04.150 --> 03:38:04.160 align:start position:0% nootro commands obviously I will not put 03:38:04.160 --> 03:38:06.229 align:start position:0% nootro commands obviously I will not put every<03:38:04.520> irregular<03:38:05.040> yo<03:38:05.279> verb<03:38:05.560> on<03:38:05.720> the<03:38:05.920> list 03:38:06.229 --> 03:38:06.239 align:start position:0% every irregular yo verb on the list 03:38:06.239 --> 03:38:07.429 align:start position:0% every irregular yo verb on the list because<03:38:06.399> you<03:38:06.520> don't<03:38:06.640> need<03:38:06.880> all<03:38:07.000> of<03:38:07.160> them 03:38:07.429 --> 03:38:07.439 align:start position:0% because you don't need all of them 03:38:07.439 --> 03:38:09.269 align:start position:0% because you don't need all of them instead<03:38:07.800> I'll<03:38:08.000> give<03:38:08.120> the<03:38:08.239> most<03:38:08.439> useful<03:38:08.800> verbs 03:38:09.269 --> 03:38:09.279 align:start position:0% instead I'll give the most useful verbs 03:38:09.279 --> 03:38:14.269 align:start position:0% instead I'll give the most useful verbs which<03:38:09.399> include<03:38:09.960> cond 03:38:14.269 --> 03:38:14.279 align:start position:0% 03:38:14.279 --> 03:38:16.309 align:start position:0% and<03:38:14.800> of<03:38:14.920> course<03:38:15.279> there's<03:38:15.560> other<03:38:15.800> verbs<03:38:16.239> that 03:38:16.309 --> 03:38:16.319 align:start position:0% and of course there's other verbs that 03:38:16.319 --> 03:38:18.150 align:start position:0% and of course there's other verbs that will<03:38:16.479> follow<03:38:16.800> these<03:38:17.040> irregular<03:38:17.600> patterns<03:38:18.040> but 03:38:18.150 --> 03:38:18.160 align:start position:0% will follow these irregular patterns but 03:38:18.160 --> 03:38:19.550 align:start position:0% will follow these irregular patterns but you<03:38:18.239> don't<03:38:18.399> need<03:38:18.560> to<03:38:18.640> know<03:38:18.800> them<03:38:19.080> what<03:38:19.279> makes 03:38:19.550 --> 03:38:19.560 align:start position:0% you don't need to know them what makes 03:38:19.560 --> 03:38:21.670 align:start position:0% you don't need to know them what makes irregular<03:38:20.120> y<03:38:20.359> verbs<03:38:20.760> more<03:38:21.239> difficult<03:38:21.479> than 03:38:21.670 --> 03:38:21.680 align:start position:0% irregular y verbs more difficult than 03:38:21.680 --> 03:38:23.070 align:start position:0% irregular y verbs more difficult than regular<03:38:22.080> verbs<03:38:22.479> is<03:38:22.640> the<03:38:22.720> way<03:38:22.880> they're 03:38:23.070 --> 03:38:23.080 align:start position:0% regular verbs is the way they're 03:38:23.080 --> 03:38:24.990 align:start position:0% regular verbs is the way they're conjugated<03:38:23.600> for<03:38:23.840> every<03:38:24.120> pronoun<03:38:24.600> and<03:38:24.760> the<03:38:24.840> way 03:38:24.990 --> 03:38:25.000 align:start position:0% conjugated for every pronoun and the way 03:38:25.000 --> 03:38:26.429 align:start position:0% conjugated for every pronoun and the way that<03:38:25.080> you<03:38:25.199> have<03:38:25.319> to<03:38:25.439> memorize<03:38:25.840> their<03:38:26.000> pattern 03:38:26.429 --> 03:38:26.439 align:start position:0% that you have to memorize their pattern 03:38:26.439 --> 03:38:28.550 align:start position:0% that you have to memorize their pattern typically<03:38:27.000> irregular<03:38:27.479> yo<03:38:27.720> verbs<03:38:28.040> are<03:38:28.199> only 03:38:28.550 --> 03:38:28.560 align:start position:0% typically irregular yo verbs are only 03:38:28.560 --> 03:38:30.349 align:start position:0% typically irregular yo verbs are only irregular<03:38:29.199> in<03:38:29.319> the<03:38:29.439> yo<03:38:29.680> pronoun<03:38:30.080> in<03:38:30.199> the 03:38:30.349 --> 03:38:30.359 align:start position:0% irregular in the yo pronoun in the 03:38:30.359 --> 03:38:32.309 align:start position:0% irregular in the yo pronoun in the present<03:38:30.640> simple<03:38:31.000> taking<03:38:31.199> the<03:38:31.319> verb<03:38:31.600> conduc<03:38:32.239> in 03:38:32.309 --> 03:38:32.319 align:start position:0% present simple taking the verb conduc in 03:38:32.319 --> 03:38:34.110 align:start position:0% present simple taking the verb conduc in the<03:38:32.479> present<03:38:32.800> simple<03:38:33.319> every<03:38:33.600> word<03:38:33.960> is 03:38:34.110 --> 03:38:34.120 align:start position:0% the present simple every word is 03:38:34.120 --> 03:38:36.070 align:start position:0% the present simple every word is conjugated<03:38:34.680> normally<03:38:35.279> except<03:38:35.600> in<03:38:35.720> the<03:38:35.880> yo 03:38:36.070 --> 03:38:36.080 align:start position:0% conjugated normally except in the yo 03:38:36.080 --> 03:38:37.990 align:start position:0% conjugated normally except in the yo pronoun<03:38:36.560> yo<03:38:36.840> condus<03:38:37.479> in<03:38:37.560> the<03:38:37.680> present 03:38:37.990 --> 03:38:38.000 align:start position:0% pronoun yo condus in the present 03:38:38.000 --> 03:38:39.469 align:start position:0% pronoun yo condus in the present subjunctive<03:38:38.640> however<03:38:38.920> you<03:38:39.000> will<03:38:39.199> have<03:38:39.319> to 03:38:39.469 --> 03:38:39.479 align:start position:0% subjunctive however you will have to 03:38:39.479 --> 03:38:41.269 align:start position:0% subjunctive however you will have to take<03:38:39.640> the<03:38:39.760> ending<03:38:40.120> of<03:38:40.319> of<03:38:40.439> the<03:38:40.520> conjugation<03:38:41.120> of 03:38:41.269 --> 03:38:41.279 align:start position:0% take the ending of of the conjugation of 03:38:41.279 --> 03:38:43.630 align:start position:0% take the ending of of the conjugation of the<03:38:41.479> yo<03:38:41.680> pronoun<03:38:42.120> and<03:38:42.319> repeated<03:38:42.960> across<03:38:43.359> every 03:38:43.630 --> 03:38:43.640 align:start position:0% the yo pronoun and repeated across every 03:38:43.640 --> 03:38:46.189 align:start position:0% the yo pronoun and repeated across every pronoun<03:38:44.160> additionally<03:38:44.840> because<03:38:45.239> cond<03:38:45.880> is<03:38:45.960> an 03:38:46.189 --> 03:38:46.199 align:start position:0% pronoun additionally because cond is an 03:38:46.199 --> 03:38:48.030 align:start position:0% pronoun additionally because cond is an IR<03:38:46.600> verb<03:38:46.960> we<03:38:47.120> have<03:38:47.199> to<03:38:47.359> put<03:38:47.560> the<03:38:47.720> opposite 03:38:48.030 --> 03:38:48.040 align:start position:0% IR verb we have to put the opposite 03:38:48.040 --> 03:38:50.990 align:start position:0% IR verb we have to put the opposite ending<03:38:48.680> from<03:38:49.000> A<03:38:49.279> and<03:38:49.560> E<03:38:49.880> to<03:38:50.199> a<03:38:50.560> so<03:38:50.720> that<03:38:50.840> it 03:38:50.990 --> 03:38:51.000 align:start position:0% ending from A and E to a so that it 03:38:51.000 --> 03:38:52.630 align:start position:0% ending from A and E to a so that it corresponds<03:38:51.600> to<03:38:51.800> every<03:38:52.040> pronoun<03:38:52.439> in<03:38:52.520> the 03:38:52.630 --> 03:38:52.640 align:start position:0% corresponds to every pronoun in the 03:38:52.640 --> 03:38:54.710 align:start position:0% corresponds to every pronoun in the present<03:38:52.960> subjunctive<03:38:53.640> conduc<03:38:54.319> will<03:38:54.520> look 03:38:54.710 --> 03:38:54.720 align:start position:0% present subjunctive conduc will look 03:38:54.720 --> 03:39:00.189 align:start position:0% present subjunctive conduc will look like<03:38:54.960> this<03:38:55.600> Y<03:38:55.920> cond<03:38:57.319> toas<03:38:58.479> elusa<03:38:59.479> and<03:38:59.600> so<03:38:59.760> on<03:39:00.120> as 03:39:00.189 --> 03:39:00.199 align:start position:0% like this Y cond toas elusa and so on as 03:39:00.199 --> 03:39:01.830 align:start position:0% like this Y cond toas elusa and so on as you<03:39:00.319> can<03:39:00.479> see<03:39:00.800> we<03:39:00.920> took<03:39:01.080> the<03:39:01.239> irregular 03:39:01.830 --> 03:39:01.840 align:start position:0% you can see we took the irregular 03:39:01.840 --> 03:39:03.510 align:start position:0% you can see we took the irregular conjugation<03:39:02.359> of<03:39:02.520> the<03:39:02.680> Y<03:39:02.880> pronoun<03:39:03.239> from<03:39:03.399> the 03:39:03.510 --> 03:39:03.520 align:start position:0% conjugation of the Y pronoun from the 03:39:03.520 --> 03:39:05.630 align:start position:0% conjugation of the Y pronoun from the present<03:39:03.840> simple<03:39:04.279> and<03:39:04.439> put<03:39:04.600> it<03:39:04.800> at<03:39:04.960> the<03:39:05.080> end<03:39:05.439> of 03:39:05.630 --> 03:39:05.640 align:start position:0% present simple and put it at the end of 03:39:05.640 --> 03:39:07.030 align:start position:0% present simple and put it at the end of every<03:39:05.880> conjugation<03:39:06.520> in<03:39:06.600> the<03:39:06.760> present 03:39:07.030 --> 03:39:07.040 align:start position:0% every conjugation in the present 03:39:07.040 --> 03:39:08.990 align:start position:0% every conjugation in the present subjunctive<03:39:07.640> additionally<03:39:08.279> we<03:39:08.439> also<03:39:08.680> change 03:39:08.990 --> 03:39:09.000 align:start position:0% subjunctive additionally we also change 03:39:09.000 --> 03:39:11.309 align:start position:0% subjunctive additionally we also change the<03:39:09.120> vowel<03:39:09.520> in<03:39:09.680> the<03:39:09.800> end<03:39:10.040> from<03:39:10.319> from<03:39:10.520> A<03:39:10.840> and<03:39:11.080> E 03:39:11.309 --> 03:39:11.319 align:start position:0% the vowel in the end from from A and E 03:39:11.319 --> 03:39:13.349 align:start position:0% the vowel in the end from from A and E to<03:39:11.560> a<03:39:11.920> in<03:39:12.000> order<03:39:12.239> to<03:39:12.399> maintain<03:39:12.880> the<03:39:13.080> proper 03:39:13.349 --> 03:39:13.359 align:start position:0% to a in order to maintain the proper 03:39:13.359 --> 03:39:15.429 align:start position:0% to a in order to maintain the proper conjugation<03:39:14.000> of<03:39:14.199> every<03:39:14.439> pronoun<03:39:15.040> that's<03:39:15.239> the 03:39:15.429 --> 03:39:15.439 align:start position:0% conjugation of every pronoun that's the 03:39:15.439 --> 03:39:17.750 align:start position:0% conjugation of every pronoun that's the system<03:39:15.880> of<03:39:16.080> conjugating<03:39:16.640> irregular<03:39:17.160> y<03:39:17.399> verbs 03:39:17.750 --> 03:39:17.760 align:start position:0% system of conjugating irregular y verbs 03:39:17.760 --> 03:39:19.309 align:start position:0% system of conjugating irregular y verbs in<03:39:17.840> the<03:39:17.960> present<03:39:18.279> subjunctive<03:39:18.800> and<03:39:18.960> as<03:39:19.040> I<03:39:19.160> said 03:39:19.309 --> 03:39:19.319 align:start position:0% in the present subjunctive and as I said 03:39:19.319 --> 03:39:20.830 align:start position:0% in the present subjunctive and as I said in<03:39:19.439> the<03:39:19.560> previous<03:39:19.920> video<03:39:20.279> you<03:39:20.399> will<03:39:20.600> have<03:39:20.720> to 03:39:20.830 --> 03:39:20.840 align:start position:0% in the previous video you will have to 03:39:20.840 --> 03:39:22.830 align:start position:0% in the previous video you will have to memorize<03:39:21.439> every<03:39:21.680> conjugation<03:39:22.399> of<03:39:22.600> every 03:39:22.830 --> 03:39:22.840 align:start position:0% memorize every conjugation of every 03:39:22.840 --> 03:39:24.910 align:start position:0% memorize every conjugation of every pronoun<03:39:23.359> because<03:39:23.680> any<03:39:23.920> pronoun<03:39:24.479> aside<03:39:24.720> from 03:39:24.910 --> 03:39:24.920 align:start position:0% pronoun because any pronoun aside from 03:39:24.920 --> 03:39:26.750 align:start position:0% pronoun because any pronoun aside from votos<03:39:25.600> can<03:39:25.760> be<03:39:25.880> used<03:39:26.279> in<03:39:26.399> the<03:39:26.520> present 03:39:26.750 --> 03:39:26.760 align:start position:0% votos can be used in the present 03:39:26.760 --> 03:39:28.229 align:start position:0% votos can be used in the present subjunctive<03:39:27.279> now<03:39:27.399> that<03:39:27.520> you<03:39:27.640> hopefully 03:39:28.229 --> 03:39:28.239 align:start position:0% subjunctive now that you hopefully 03:39:28.239 --> 03:39:29.830 align:start position:0% subjunctive now that you hopefully understand<03:39:28.439> this<03:39:28.600> concept<03:39:29.080> let's<03:39:29.279> finish<03:39:29.720> the 03:39:29.830 --> 03:39:29.840 align:start position:0% understand this concept let's finish the 03:39:29.840 --> 03:39:31.590 align:start position:0% understand this concept let's finish the rest<03:39:30.000> of<03:39:30.120> the<03:39:30.279> irregular<03:39:30.800> y<03:39:31.040> verbs<03:39:31.359> in<03:39:31.479> the 03:39:31.590 --> 03:39:31.600 align:start position:0% rest of the irregular y verbs in the 03:39:31.600 --> 03:39:33.110 align:start position:0% rest of the irregular y verbs in the present<03:39:31.880> subjunctive<03:39:32.479> together<03:39:32.800> let's<03:39:32.960> take 03:39:33.110 --> 03:39:33.120 align:start position:0% present subjunctive together let's take 03:39:33.120 --> 03:39:35.150 align:start position:0% present subjunctive together let's take the<03:39:33.279> verb<03:39:33.960> from<03:39:34.080> what<03:39:34.279> have<03:39:34.399> shown<03:39:34.760> how<03:39:34.960> to 03:39:35.150 --> 03:39:35.160 align:start position:0% the verb from what have shown how to 03:39:35.160 --> 03:39:37.630 align:start position:0% the verb from what have shown how to conjugate<03:39:35.560> the<03:39:35.680> verb<03:39:35.960> the<03:39:36.319> in<03:39:36.399> the<03:39:36.520> present 03:39:37.630 --> 03:39:37.640 align:start position:0% conjugate the verb the in the present 03:39:37.640 --> 03:39:39.389 align:start position:0% conjugate the verb the in the present subjunctive<03:39:38.640> in<03:39:38.800> case<03:39:38.960> you're<03:39:39.160> having 03:39:39.389 --> 03:39:39.399 align:start position:0% subjunctive in case you're having 03:39:39.399 --> 03:39:40.590 align:start position:0% subjunctive in case you're having trouble<03:39:39.800> remember<03:39:40.080> to<03:39:40.239> to<03:39:40.319> take<03:39:40.479> the 03:39:40.590 --> 03:39:40.600 align:start position:0% trouble remember to to take the 03:39:40.600 --> 03:39:42.269 align:start position:0% trouble remember to to take the conjugation<03:39:41.120> of<03:39:41.239> the<03:39:41.399> yo<03:39:41.640> pronoun<03:39:42.000> from<03:39:42.160> the 03:39:42.269 --> 03:39:42.279 align:start position:0% conjugation of the yo pronoun from the 03:39:42.279 --> 03:39:44.389 align:start position:0% conjugation of the yo pronoun from the present<03:39:42.600> simple<03:39:43.080> apply<03:39:43.399> the<03:39:43.520> ending<03:39:43.960> to<03:39:44.160> every 03:39:44.389 --> 03:39:44.399 align:start position:0% present simple apply the ending to every 03:39:44.399 --> 03:39:46.349 align:start position:0% present simple apply the ending to every pronoun<03:39:44.880> and<03:39:45.000> change<03:39:45.319> the<03:39:45.439> vowel<03:39:45.840> at<03:39:45.960> the<03:39:46.080> end 03:39:46.349 --> 03:39:46.359 align:start position:0% pronoun and change the vowel at the end 03:39:46.359 --> 03:39:47.670 align:start position:0% pronoun and change the vowel at the end to<03:39:46.479> match<03:39:46.680> the<03:39:46.800> pronoun<03:39:47.199> in<03:39:47.319> the<03:39:47.439> present 03:39:47.670 --> 03:39:47.680 align:start position:0% to match the pronoun in the present 03:39:47.680 --> 03:39:51.750 align:start position:0% to match the pronoun in the present subjunctive<03:39:48.359> the<03:39:48.840> will<03:39:49.000> look<03:39:49.199> like<03:39:49.439> this 03:39:51.750 --> 03:39:51.760 align:start position:0% subjunctive the will look like this 03:39:51.760 --> 03:39:54.510 align:start position:0% subjunctive the will look like this Y<03:39:52.760> and<03:39:52.880> so<03:39:53.040> on<03:39:53.359> like<03:39:53.479> I<03:39:53.600> said<03:39:53.840> previously<03:39:54.399> you 03:39:54.510 --> 03:39:54.520 align:start position:0% Y and so on like I said previously you 03:39:54.520 --> 03:39:56.469 align:start position:0% Y and so on like I said previously you will<03:39:54.720> have<03:39:54.840> to<03:39:54.960> memorize<03:39:55.560> every<03:39:55.800> conjugation 03:39:56.469 --> 03:39:56.479 align:start position:0% will have to memorize every conjugation 03:39:56.479 --> 03:39:58.590 align:start position:0% will have to memorize every conjugation of<03:39:56.680> every<03:39:56.920> pronoun<03:39:57.439> after<03:39:57.760> the<03:39:58.199> we<03:39:58.319> have<03:39:58.479> the 03:39:58.590 --> 03:39:58.600 align:start position:0% of every pronoun after the we have the 03:39:58.600 --> 03:40:00.389 align:start position:0% of every pronoun after the we have the verb<03:39:59.239> how<03:39:59.319> would<03:39:59.439> you<03:39:59.560> conjugate<03:40:00.000> this<03:40:00.160> verb 03:40:00.389 --> 03:40:00.399 align:start position:0% verb how would you conjugate this verb 03:40:00.399 --> 03:40:02.830 align:start position:0% verb how would you conjugate this verb in<03:40:00.479> the<03:40:00.600> present 03:40:02.830 --> 03:40:02.840 align:start position:0% in the present 03:40:02.840 --> 03:40:04.630 align:start position:0% in the present subjunctive 03:40:04.630 --> 03:40:04.640 align:start position:0% subjunctive 03:40:04.640 --> 03:40:06.950 align:start position:0% subjunctive toas<03:40:05.640> and<03:40:05.800> so<03:40:05.960> on<03:40:06.279> now<03:40:06.560> how<03:40:06.640> would<03:40:06.800> you 03:40:06.950 --> 03:40:06.960 align:start position:0% toas and so on now how would you 03:40:06.960 --> 03:40:08.910 align:start position:0% toas and so on now how would you conjugate 03:40:08.910 --> 03:40:08.920 align:start position:0% conjugate 03:40:08.920 --> 03:40:12.070 align:start position:0% conjugate o<03:40:09.920> y<03:40:10.279> o 03:40:12.070 --> 03:40:12.080 align:start position:0% o y o 03:40:12.080 --> 03:40:16.870 align:start position:0% o y o to<03:40:13.080> and<03:40:13.199> so<03:40:13.359> on<03:40:13.640> how<03:40:13.720> do<03:40:13.840> you<03:40:13.960> conjugate<03:40:14.319> the 03:40:16.870 --> 03:40:16.880 align:start position:0% 03:40:16.880 --> 03:40:18.830 align:start position:0% verb 03:40:18.830 --> 03:40:18.840 align:start position:0% verb 03:40:18.840 --> 03:40:26.030 align:start position:0% verb to<03:40:19.840> and<03:40:20.000> so<03:40:20.160> on<03:40:20.399> how<03:40:20.520> do<03:40:20.600> you<03:40:20.720> conjugate<03:40:21.120> the 03:40:26.030 --> 03:40:26.040 align:start position:0% 03:40:26.040 --> 03:40:29.150 align:start position:0% verb<03:40:27.040> and<03:40:27.199> so<03:40:27.359> on<03:40:27.600> how<03:40:27.720> do<03:40:27.800> you<03:40:27.920> conjugate 03:40:29.150 --> 03:40:29.160 align:start position:0% verb and so on how do you conjugate 03:40:29.160 --> 03:40:30.950 align:start position:0% verb and so on how do you conjugate V 03:40:30.950 --> 03:40:30.960 align:start position:0% V 03:40:30.960 --> 03:40:34.349 align:start position:0% V Yas<03:40:31.960> Ela<03:40:32.760> and<03:40:32.920> so<03:40:33.080> on<03:40:33.399> and<03:40:33.560> finally<03:40:33.960> how<03:40:34.080> do<03:40:34.199> you 03:40:34.349 --> 03:40:34.359 align:start position:0% Yas Ela and so on and finally how do you 03:40:34.359 --> 03:40:37.990 align:start position:0% Yas Ela and so on and finally how do you conjugate 03:40:37.990 --> 03:40:38.000 align:start position:0% 03:40:38.000 --> 03:40:41.189 align:start position:0% ver<03:40:39.000> and<03:40:39.120> so<03:40:39.279> on<03:40:39.680> this<03:40:39.880> is<03:40:40.160> the<03:40:40.319> entire<03:40:40.720> concept 03:40:41.189 --> 03:40:41.199 align:start position:0% ver and so on this is the entire concept 03:40:41.199 --> 03:40:43.189 align:start position:0% ver and so on this is the entire concept of<03:40:41.319> how<03:40:41.520> irregular<03:40:42.040> y<03:40:42.279> verbs<03:40:42.640> function<03:40:43.000> in<03:40:43.080> the 03:40:43.189 --> 03:40:43.199 align:start position:0% of how irregular y verbs function in the 03:40:43.199 --> 03:40:44.710 align:start position:0% of how irregular y verbs function in the present<03:40:43.479> subjunctive<03:40:44.000> and<03:40:44.160> like<03:40:44.279> I<03:40:44.359> say<03:40:44.560> all 03:40:44.710 --> 03:40:44.720 align:start position:0% present subjunctive and like I say all 03:40:44.720 --> 03:40:46.469 align:start position:0% present subjunctive and like I say all the<03:40:44.880> time<03:40:45.160> you<03:40:45.279> need<03:40:45.439> to<03:40:45.600> memorize<03:40:46.160> all<03:40:46.319> of 03:40:46.469 --> 03:40:46.479 align:start position:0% the time you need to memorize all of 03:40:46.479 --> 03:40:48.630 align:start position:0% the time you need to memorize all of these<03:40:46.720> conjugations<03:40:47.520> because<03:40:47.800> any<03:40:48.120> pronoun 03:40:48.630 --> 03:40:48.640 align:start position:0% these conjugations because any pronoun 03:40:48.640 --> 03:40:50.429 align:start position:0% these conjugations because any pronoun can<03:40:48.800> be<03:40:48.960> used<03:40:49.359> in<03:40:49.439> the<03:40:49.560> present<03:40:49.840> subjunctive 03:40:50.429 --> 03:40:50.439 align:start position:0% can be used in the present subjunctive 03:40:50.439 --> 03:40:52.189 align:start position:0% can be used in the present subjunctive of<03:40:50.600> course<03:40:50.960> there's<03:40:51.199> other<03:40:51.479> irregular<03:40:51.960> y 03:40:52.189 --> 03:40:52.199 align:start position:0% of course there's other irregular y 03:40:52.199 --> 03:40:53.750 align:start position:0% of course there's other irregular y verbs<03:40:52.479> in<03:40:52.560> the<03:40:52.680> present<03:40:52.960> subjunctive<03:40:53.560> but<03:40:53.680> we 03:40:53.750 --> 03:40:53.760 align:start position:0% verbs in the present subjunctive but we 03:40:53.760 --> 03:40:55.189 align:start position:0% verbs in the present subjunctive but we don't<03:40:53.880> need<03:40:54.040> to<03:40:54.160> cover<03:40:54.439> all<03:40:54.600> of<03:40:54.720> them<03:40:55.000> that's 03:40:55.189 --> 03:40:55.199 align:start position:0% don't need to cover all of them that's 03:40:55.199 --> 03:40:56.630 align:start position:0% don't need to cover all of them that's the<03:40:55.359> second<03:40:55.680> concept<03:40:56.160> of<03:40:56.279> the<03:40:56.359> present 03:40:56.630 --> 03:40:56.640 align:start position:0% the second concept of the present 03:40:56.640 --> 03:40:58.269 align:start position:0% the second concept of the present subjunctive<03:40:57.199> the<03:40:57.319> third<03:40:57.640> concept<03:40:58.040> of<03:40:58.160> the 03:40:58.269 --> 03:40:58.279 align:start position:0% subjunctive the third concept of the 03:40:58.279 --> 03:41:00.189 align:start position:0% subjunctive the third concept of the present<03:40:58.560> subjunctive<03:40:59.199> is<03:40:59.359> verbs<03:40:59.640> that<03:40:59.800> end<03:41:00.000> in 03:41:00.189 --> 03:41:00.199 align:start position:0% present subjunctive is verbs that end in 03:41:00.199 --> 03:41:02.189 align:start position:0% present subjunctive is verbs that end in K<03:41:00.640> G<03:41:00.880> and<03:41:01.040> S<03:41:01.399> and<03:41:01.520> these<03:41:01.680> verbs<03:41:01.960> have<03:41:02.080> a 03:41:02.189 --> 03:41:02.199 align:start position:0% K G and S and these verbs have a 03:41:02.199 --> 03:41:03.950 align:start position:0% K G and S and these verbs have a spelling<03:41:02.479> change<03:41:02.800> in<03:41:02.960> every<03:41:03.199> conjugation<03:41:03.800> an 03:41:03.950 --> 03:41:03.960 align:start position:0% spelling change in every conjugation an 03:41:03.960 --> 03:41:05.710 align:start position:0% spelling change in every conjugation an easy<03:41:04.239> way<03:41:04.359> to<03:41:04.479> memorize<03:41:04.960> them<03:41:05.199> is<03:41:05.359> by<03:41:05.479> using 03:41:05.710 --> 03:41:05.720 align:start position:0% easy way to memorize them is by using 03:41:05.720 --> 03:41:07.590 align:start position:0% easy way to memorize them is by using the<03:41:05.880> irregular<03:41:06.439> conjugation<03:41:07.080> of<03:41:07.239> the<03:41:07.399> yo 03:41:07.590 --> 03:41:07.600 align:start position:0% the irregular conjugation of the yo 03:41:07.600 --> 03:41:09.150 align:start position:0% the irregular conjugation of the yo pronoun<03:41:08.040> from<03:41:08.160> the<03:41:08.319> past<03:41:08.560> simple<03:41:08.880> to<03:41:09.000> make 03:41:09.150 --> 03:41:09.160 align:start position:0% pronoun from the past simple to make 03:41:09.160 --> 03:41:10.950 align:start position:0% pronoun from the past simple to make your<03:41:09.279> learning<03:41:09.600> much<03:41:09.760> simp<03:41:10.399> I'm<03:41:10.520> going<03:41:10.600> to<03:41:10.760> use 03:41:10.950 --> 03:41:10.960 align:start position:0% your learning much simp I'm going to use 03:41:10.960 --> 03:41:12.990 align:start position:0% your learning much simp I'm going to use one<03:41:11.199> verb<03:41:11.479> from<03:41:11.680> each<03:41:11.920> category<03:41:12.479> to<03:41:12.560> show<03:41:12.840> how 03:41:12.990 --> 03:41:13.000 align:start position:0% one verb from each category to show how 03:41:13.000 --> 03:41:14.830 align:start position:0% one verb from each category to show how the<03:41:13.160> system<03:41:13.520> functions<03:41:14.120> let's<03:41:14.319> take<03:41:14.479> the<03:41:14.600> verb 03:41:14.830 --> 03:41:14.840 align:start position:0% the system functions let's take the verb 03:41:14.840 --> 03:41:16.670 align:start position:0% the system functions let's take the verb marar<03:41:15.319> in<03:41:15.399> order<03:41:15.640> to<03:41:15.800> put<03:41:16.000> this<03:41:16.160> verb<03:41:16.439> in<03:41:16.560> the 03:41:16.670 --> 03:41:16.680 align:start position:0% marar in order to put this verb in the 03:41:16.680 --> 03:41:18.229 align:start position:0% marar in order to put this verb in the present<03:41:16.960> subjunctive<03:41:17.560> we<03:41:17.640> have<03:41:17.760> to<03:41:17.880> take<03:41:18.080> its 03:41:18.229 --> 03:41:18.239 align:start position:0% present subjunctive we have to take its 03:41:18.239 --> 03:41:20.070 align:start position:0% present subjunctive we have to take its irregular<03:41:18.760> form<03:41:19.120> in<03:41:19.239> the<03:41:19.359> yo<03:41:19.600> pronoun<03:41:19.920> from 03:41:20.070 --> 03:41:20.080 align:start position:0% irregular form in the yo pronoun from 03:41:20.080 --> 03:41:22.189 align:start position:0% irregular form in the yo pronoun from the<03:41:20.239> past<03:41:20.439> simple<03:41:20.880> and<03:41:21.080> replicate<03:41:21.479> it<03:41:21.800> across 03:41:22.189 --> 03:41:22.199 align:start position:0% the past simple and replicate it across 03:41:22.199 --> 03:41:23.870 align:start position:0% the past simple and replicate it across every<03:41:22.439> pronoun<03:41:22.880> and<03:41:23.000> then<03:41:23.120> change<03:41:23.399> the<03:41:23.520> vowel 03:41:23.870 --> 03:41:23.880 align:start position:0% every pronoun and then change the vowel 03:41:23.880 --> 03:41:25.229 align:start position:0% every pronoun and then change the vowel at<03:41:24.040> the<03:41:24.120> end<03:41:24.399> so<03:41:24.560> that<03:41:24.640> it<03:41:24.800> matches<03:41:25.120> the 03:41:25.229 --> 03:41:25.239 align:start position:0% at the end so that it matches the 03:41:25.239 --> 03:41:27.469 align:start position:0% at the end so that it matches the pronoun<03:41:25.760> marar<03:41:26.319> in<03:41:26.399> the<03:41:26.520> present<03:41:26.800> subjunctive 03:41:27.469 --> 03:41:27.479 align:start position:0% pronoun marar in the present subjunctive 03:41:27.479 --> 03:41:28.269 align:start position:0% pronoun marar in the present subjunctive will 03:41:28.269 --> 03:41:28.279 align:start position:0% will 03:41:28.279 --> 03:41:30.389 align:start position:0% will be 03:41:30.389 --> 03:41:30.399 align:start position:0% be 03:41:30.399 --> 03:41:32.950 align:start position:0% be to<03:41:31.399> and<03:41:31.520> so<03:41:31.680> on<03:41:31.960> that's<03:41:32.120> the<03:41:32.239> spelling<03:41:32.560> change 03:41:32.950 --> 03:41:32.960 align:start position:0% to and so on that's the spelling change 03:41:32.960 --> 03:41:34.670 align:start position:0% to and so on that's the spelling change that<03:41:33.120> this<03:41:33.279> verb<03:41:33.560> has<03:41:33.840> along<03:41:34.159> with<03:41:34.279> the<03:41:34.439> vowel 03:41:34.670 --> 03:41:34.680 align:start position:0% that this verb has along with the vowel 03:41:34.680 --> 03:41:36.630 align:start position:0% that this verb has along with the vowel change<03:41:35.080> in<03:41:35.199> the<03:41:35.359> end<03:41:35.800> now<03:41:36.120> let's<03:41:36.359> take<03:41:36.520> the 03:41:36.630 --> 03:41:36.640 align:start position:0% change in the end now let's take the 03:41:36.640 --> 03:41:38.389 align:start position:0% change in the end now let's take the verb<03:41:37.000> pagar<03:41:37.439> how<03:41:37.560> would<03:41:37.680> you<03:41:37.800> conjugate<03:41:38.279> this 03:41:38.389 --> 03:41:38.399 align:start position:0% verb pagar how would you conjugate this 03:41:38.399 --> 03:41:43.349 align:start position:0% verb pagar how would you conjugate this verb<03:41:38.640> in<03:41:38.760> the<03:41:38.880> present<03:41:39.159> subjunctive 03:41:43.349 --> 03:41:43.359 align:start position:0% 03:41:43.359 --> 03:41:45.910 align:start position:0% Y<03:41:44.359> and<03:41:44.520> so<03:41:44.640> on<03:41:44.920> that's<03:41:45.080> the<03:41:45.239> spelling<03:41:45.560> change 03:41:45.910 --> 03:41:45.920 align:start position:0% Y and so on that's the spelling change 03:41:45.920 --> 03:41:47.750 align:start position:0% Y and so on that's the spelling change that<03:41:46.080> this<03:41:46.239> verb<03:41:46.520> has<03:41:46.880> at<03:41:47.080> last<03:41:47.399> let's<03:41:47.600> take 03:41:47.750 --> 03:41:47.760 align:start position:0% that this verb has at last let's take 03:41:47.760 --> 03:41:49.750 align:start position:0% that this verb has at last let's take the<03:41:47.840> verb<03:41:48.199> Oran<03:41:48.880> how<03:41:49.000> would<03:41:49.120> you<03:41:49.239> conjugate<03:41:49.640> it 03:41:49.750 --> 03:41:49.760 align:start position:0% the verb Oran how would you conjugate it 03:41:49.760 --> 03:41:51.269 align:start position:0% the verb Oran how would you conjugate it in<03:41:49.840> the<03:41:49.960> present 03:41:51.269 --> 03:41:51.279 align:start position:0% in the present 03:41:51.279 --> 03:41:56.149 align:start position:0% in the present subjunctive<03:41:52.439> or<03:41:53.680> Oran<03:41:54.680> Oran<03:41:55.560> and<03:41:55.680> so<03:41:55.840> on 03:41:56.149 --> 03:41:56.159 align:start position:0% subjunctive or Oran Oran and so on 03:41:56.159 --> 03:41:57.790 align:start position:0% subjunctive or Oran Oran and so on that's<03:41:56.359> the<03:41:56.479> third<03:41:56.840> concept<03:41:57.279> of<03:41:57.399> the<03:41:57.520> present 03:41:57.790 --> 03:41:57.800 align:start position:0% that's the third concept of the present 03:41:57.800 --> 03:41:59.670 align:start position:0% that's the third concept of the present subjunctive<03:41:58.439> the<03:41:58.560> fourth<03:41:58.920> concept<03:41:59.399> of<03:41:59.520> the 03:41:59.670 --> 03:41:59.680 align:start position:0% subjunctive the fourth concept of the 03:41:59.680 --> 03:42:01.269 align:start position:0% subjunctive the fourth concept of the present<03:41:59.960> subjunctive<03:42:00.560> is<03:42:00.680> stem<03:42:00.960> changing 03:42:01.269 --> 03:42:01.279 align:start position:0% present subjunctive is stem changing 03:42:01.279 --> 03:42:03.189 align:start position:0% present subjunctive is stem changing verbs<03:42:01.760> which<03:42:01.960> I<03:42:02.080> think<03:42:02.279> is<03:42:02.439> the<03:42:02.600> easiest 03:42:03.189 --> 03:42:03.199 align:start position:0% verbs which I think is the easiest 03:42:03.199 --> 03:42:04.389 align:start position:0% verbs which I think is the easiest mainly<03:42:03.520> because<03:42:03.760> they<03:42:03.880> have<03:42:04.080> the<03:42:04.199> same 03:42:04.389 --> 03:42:04.399 align:start position:0% mainly because they have the same 03:42:04.399 --> 03:42:06.550 align:start position:0% mainly because they have the same changes<03:42:05.000> as<03:42:05.159> they<03:42:05.279> do<03:42:05.560> in<03:42:05.680> the<03:42:05.840> present<03:42:06.120> simple 03:42:06.550 --> 03:42:06.560 align:start position:0% changes as they do in the present simple 03:42:06.560 --> 03:42:08.110 align:start position:0% changes as they do in the present simple except<03:42:06.840> when<03:42:07.000> changing<03:42:07.359> the<03:42:07.479> vowel<03:42:07.840> in<03:42:08.000> the 03:42:08.110 --> 03:42:08.120 align:start position:0% except when changing the vowel in the 03:42:08.120 --> 03:42:10.469 align:start position:0% except when changing the vowel in the end<03:42:08.439> taking<03:42:08.720> verbs<03:42:09.040> like<03:42:09.239> pensar<03:42:09.680> and 03:42:10.469 --> 03:42:10.479 align:start position:0% end taking verbs like pensar and 03:42:10.479 --> 03:42:12.229 align:start position:0% end taking verbs like pensar and the<03:42:10.560> only<03:42:10.880> difference<03:42:11.399> between<03:42:11.720> these<03:42:11.920> verbs 03:42:12.229 --> 03:42:12.239 align:start position:0% the only difference between these verbs 03:42:12.239 --> 03:42:13.710 align:start position:0% the only difference between these verbs in<03:42:12.319> the<03:42:12.479> present<03:42:12.800> simple<03:42:13.199> and<03:42:13.319> the<03:42:13.439> present 03:42:13.710 --> 03:42:13.720 align:start position:0% in the present simple and the present 03:42:13.720 --> 03:42:15.550 align:start position:0% in the present simple and the present subjunctive<03:42:14.359> is<03:42:14.479> the<03:42:14.600> ending<03:42:14.960> stem<03:42:15.239> changing 03:42:15.550 --> 03:42:15.560 align:start position:0% subjunctive is the ending stem changing 03:42:15.560 --> 03:42:17.429 align:start position:0% subjunctive is the ending stem changing verbs<03:42:15.920> function<03:42:16.279> the<03:42:16.399> same<03:42:16.680> way<03:42:17.000> as<03:42:17.159> in<03:42:17.319> the 03:42:17.429 --> 03:42:17.439 align:start position:0% verbs function the same way as in the 03:42:17.439 --> 03:42:19.189 align:start position:0% verbs function the same way as in the present<03:42:17.720> simple<03:42:18.279> except<03:42:18.600> with<03:42:18.720> the<03:42:18.920> vowel 03:42:19.189 --> 03:42:19.199 align:start position:0% present simple except with the vowel 03:42:19.199 --> 03:42:23.710 align:start position:0% present simple except with the vowel change<03:42:19.640> at<03:42:19.760> the<03:42:19.880> end<03:42:20.319> y<03:42:21.199> becomes<03:42:21.720> y<03:42:22.520> y<03:42:23.319> becomes 03:42:23.710 --> 03:42:23.720 align:start position:0% change at the end y becomes y y becomes 03:42:23.720 --> 03:42:26.149 align:start position:0% change at the end y becomes y y becomes Y<03:42:24.479> and<03:42:24.600> the<03:42:24.680> same<03:42:24.960> idea<03:42:25.439> applies<03:42:25.760> to<03:42:25.880> the<03:42:26.000> rest 03:42:26.149 --> 03:42:26.159 align:start position:0% Y and the same idea applies to the rest 03:42:26.159 --> 03:42:28.070 align:start position:0% Y and the same idea applies to the rest of<03:42:26.279> the<03:42:26.399> conjugations<03:42:27.120> into<03:42:27.279> to<03:42:27.479> any<03:42:27.720> other 03:42:28.070 --> 03:42:28.080 align:start position:0% of the conjugations into to any other 03:42:28.080 --> 03:42:29.910 align:start position:0% of the conjugations into to any other stem<03:42:28.359> changing<03:42:28.680> verb<03:42:29.239> however<03:42:29.520> there<03:42:29.640> are<03:42:29.800> a 03:42:29.910 --> 03:42:29.920 align:start position:0% stem changing verb however there are a 03:42:29.920 --> 03:42:32.070 align:start position:0% stem changing verb however there are a few<03:42:30.159> exceptions<03:42:30.800> involving<03:42:31.239> verbs<03:42:31.600> ending<03:42:31.880> in 03:42:32.070 --> 03:42:32.080 align:start position:0% few exceptions involving verbs ending in 03:42:32.080 --> 03:42:34.469 align:start position:0% few exceptions involving verbs ending in IR<03:42:32.600> that<03:42:32.760> change<03:42:33.040> their<03:42:33.199> stem<03:42:33.520> in<03:42:33.680> the<03:42:33.840> noos 03:42:34.469 --> 03:42:34.479 align:start position:0% IR that change their stem in the noos 03:42:34.479 --> 03:42:36.750 align:start position:0% IR that change their stem in the noos and<03:42:34.680> votos<03:42:35.199> pronouns<03:42:35.800> these<03:42:36.000> verbs<03:42:36.359> can<03:42:36.560> go 03:42:36.750 --> 03:42:36.760 align:start position:0% and votos pronouns these verbs can go 03:42:36.760 --> 03:42:41.030 align:start position:0% and votos pronouns these verbs can go from<03:42:37.040> E<03:42:37.319> to<03:42:37.600> e<03:42:38.000> like<03:42:38.279> ped<03:42:38.760> from<03:42:39.080> E<03:42:39.319> to<03:42:39.600> E<03:42:40.279> like 03:42:41.030 --> 03:42:41.040 align:start position:0% from E to e like ped from E to E like 03:42:41.040 --> 03:42:43.990 align:start position:0% from E to e like ped from E to E like and<03:42:41.199> from<03:42:41.479> o<03:42:41.760> to<03:42:42.600> like<03:42:43.279> there<03:42:43.399> could<03:42:43.560> be<03:42:43.760> other 03:42:43.990 --> 03:42:44.000 align:start position:0% and from o to like there could be other 03:42:44.000 --> 03:42:45.750 align:start position:0% and from o to like there could be other verbs<03:42:44.399> in<03:42:44.479> the<03:42:44.640> present<03:42:44.920> subjunctive<03:42:45.640> that 03:42:45.750 --> 03:42:45.760 align:start position:0% verbs in the present subjunctive that 03:42:45.760 --> 03:42:47.309 align:start position:0% verbs in the present subjunctive that follow<03:42:46.159> these<03:42:46.319> patterns<03:42:46.840> but<03:42:46.960> you<03:42:47.040> don't<03:42:47.159> need 03:42:47.309 --> 03:42:47.319 align:start position:0% follow these patterns but you don't need 03:42:47.319 --> 03:42:48.750 align:start position:0% follow these patterns but you don't need to<03:42:47.439> know<03:42:47.600> all<03:42:47.760> of<03:42:47.920> them<03:42:48.199> that's<03:42:48.359> how<03:42:48.479> stem 03:42:48.750 --> 03:42:48.760 align:start position:0% to know all of them that's how stem 03:42:48.760 --> 03:42:50.229 align:start position:0% to know all of them that's how stem changing<03:42:49.080> verbs<03:42:49.479> work<03:42:49.720> in<03:42:49.840> the<03:42:49.960> present 03:42:50.229 --> 03:42:50.239 align:start position:0% changing verbs work in the present 03:42:50.239 --> 03:42:52.269 align:start position:0% changing verbs work in the present subjunctive<03:42:50.800> and<03:42:50.920> now<03:42:51.279> we<03:42:51.399> get<03:42:51.520> to<03:42:51.720> irregular 03:42:52.269 --> 03:42:52.279 align:start position:0% subjunctive and now we get to irregular 03:42:52.279 --> 03:42:54.030 align:start position:0% subjunctive and now we get to irregular verbs<03:42:52.560> in<03:42:52.680> general<03:42:53.159> which<03:42:53.279> have<03:42:53.439> little<03:42:53.680> to<03:42:53.840> no 03:42:54.030 --> 03:42:54.040 align:start position:0% verbs in general which have little to no 03:42:54.040 --> 03:42:55.550 align:start position:0% verbs in general which have little to no pattern<03:42:54.319> to<03:42:54.439> follow<03:42:54.800> at<03:42:54.920> all<03:42:55.199> so<03:42:55.319> you<03:42:55.399> will 03:42:55.550 --> 03:42:55.560 align:start position:0% pattern to follow at all so you will 03:42:55.560 --> 03:42:57.389 align:start position:0% pattern to follow at all so you will have<03:42:55.640> to<03:42:55.840> remember<03:42:56.239> them<03:42:56.560> as<03:42:56.720> they<03:42:56.880> are<03:42:57.199> in 03:42:57.389 --> 03:42:57.399 align:start position:0% have to remember them as they are in 03:42:57.399 --> 03:43:00.630 align:start position:0% have to remember them as they are in this<03:42:57.600> category<03:42:58.120> there<03:42:58.279> are<03:42:58.520> only<03:42:58.840> five<03:42:59.040> verbs 03:43:00.630 --> 03:43:00.640 align:start position:0% this category there are only five verbs 03:43:00.640 --> 03:43:03.389 align:start position:0% this category there are only five verbs EST<03:43:01.640> and<03:43:02.159> in<03:43:02.279> the<03:43:02.399> present<03:43:02.680> subjunctive<03:43:03.319> the 03:43:03.389 --> 03:43:03.399 align:start position:0% EST and in the present subjunctive the 03:43:03.399 --> 03:43:08.269 align:start position:0% EST and in the present subjunctive the verb<03:43:03.760> EST<03:43:04.239> will<03:43:04.399> look<03:43:04.640> like<03:43:04.840> this<03:43:05.720> EST<03:43:06.720> EST<03:43:07.720> EST 03:43:08.269 --> 03:43:08.279 align:start position:0% verb EST will look like this EST EST EST 03:43:08.279 --> 03:43:10.710 align:start position:0% verb EST will look like this EST EST EST and<03:43:08.399> so<03:43:08.560> on<03:43:08.880> what<03:43:09.000> makes<03:43:09.359> EST<03:43:09.960> irregular<03:43:10.600> in 03:43:10.710 --> 03:43:10.720 align:start position:0% and so on what makes EST irregular in 03:43:10.720 --> 03:43:12.229 align:start position:0% and so on what makes EST irregular in the<03:43:10.840> present<03:43:11.120> subjunctive<03:43:11.720> is<03:43:11.840> the<03:43:11.960> presence 03:43:12.229 --> 03:43:12.239 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive is the presence 03:43:12.239 --> 03:43:14.670 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive is the presence of<03:43:12.520> accents<03:43:13.000> except<03:43:13.279> noos<03:43:13.920> nonetheless<03:43:14.560> it's 03:43:14.670 --> 03:43:14.680 align:start position:0% of accents except noos nonetheless it's 03:43:14.680 --> 03:43:16.990 align:start position:0% of accents except noos nonetheless it's a<03:43:14.800> simple<03:43:15.040> verb<03:43:15.239> to<03:43:15.359> memorize<03:43:16.000> after<03:43:16.359> estar<03:43:16.880> we 03:43:16.990 --> 03:43:17.000 align:start position:0% a simple verb to memorize after estar we 03:43:17.000 --> 03:43:20.389 align:start position:0% a simple verb to memorize after estar we have<03:43:17.159> the<03:43:17.279> verb<03:43:17.600> Dar<03:43:17.960> which<03:43:18.080> looks<03:43:18.319> like 03:43:20.389 --> 03:43:20.399 align:start position:0% have the verb Dar which looks like 03:43:20.399 --> 03:43:23.750 align:start position:0% have the verb Dar which looks like this<03:43:21.399> and<03:43:21.520> so<03:43:21.680> on<03:43:22.040> after<03:43:22.720> we<03:43:22.840> have<03:43:23.000> the<03:43:23.120> verb 03:43:23.750 --> 03:43:23.760 align:start position:0% this and so on after we have the verb 03:43:23.760 --> 03:43:25.349 align:start position:0% this and so on after we have the verb which<03:43:23.960> copies<03:43:24.279> the<03:43:24.399> same<03:43:24.640> pattern<03:43:25.080> as<03:43:25.239> the 03:43:25.349 --> 03:43:25.359 align:start position:0% which copies the same pattern as the 03:43:25.359 --> 03:43:27.910 align:start position:0% which copies the same pattern as the verb 03:43:27.910 --> 03:43:27.920 align:start position:0% 03:43:27.920 --> 03:43:31.429 align:start position:0% ver<03:43:28.920> and<03:43:29.080> so<03:43:29.199> on<03:43:29.520> after<03:43:30.279> we<03:43:30.399> have<03:43:30.560> the<03:43:30.680> verb 03:43:31.429 --> 03:43:31.439 align:start position:0% ver and so on after we have the verb 03:43:31.439 --> 03:43:33.269 align:start position:0% ver and so on after we have the verb which<03:43:31.600> has<03:43:31.680> a<03:43:31.880> pattern<03:43:32.359> similar<03:43:32.680> to<03:43:32.840> its<03:43:33.000> form 03:43:33.269 --> 03:43:33.279 align:start position:0% which has a pattern similar to its form 03:43:33.279 --> 03:43:36.349 align:start position:0% which has a pattern similar to its form in<03:43:33.399> the<03:43:33.560> past<03:43:33.760> simple<03:43:34.359> y 03:43:36.349 --> 03:43:36.359 align:start position:0% in the past simple y 03:43:36.359 --> 03:43:38.950 align:start position:0% in the past simple y to<03:43:37.359> and<03:43:37.520> so<03:43:37.680> on<03:43:37.960> and<03:43:38.120> finally<03:43:38.560> we<03:43:38.680> have<03:43:38.840> the 03:43:38.950 --> 03:43:38.960 align:start position:0% to and so on and finally we have the 03:43:38.960 --> 03:43:41.149 align:start position:0% to and so on and finally we have the verb<03:43:39.560> which<03:43:39.760> by<03:43:39.920> by<03:43:40.080> far<03:43:40.399> is<03:43:40.640> the<03:43:40.840> most 03:43:41.149 --> 03:43:41.159 align:start position:0% verb which by by far is the most 03:43:41.159 --> 03:43:42.510 align:start position:0% verb which by by far is the most irregular<03:43:41.720> verb<03:43:42.000> in<03:43:42.120> the<03:43:42.239> present 03:43:42.510 --> 03:43:42.520 align:start position:0% irregular verb in the present 03:43:42.520 --> 03:43:46.990 align:start position:0% irregular verb in the present subjunctive<03:43:43.279> y<03:43:44.399> to<03:43:45.399> El<03:43:46.120> and<03:43:46.239> so<03:43:46.399> on<03:43:46.760> even 03:43:46.990 --> 03:43:47.000 align:start position:0% subjunctive y to El and so on even 03:43:47.000 --> 03:43:48.349 align:start position:0% subjunctive y to El and so on even though<03:43:47.279> you<03:43:47.359> can<03:43:47.520> technically<03:43:48.000> find<03:43:48.199> a 03:43:48.349 --> 03:43:48.359 align:start position:0% though you can technically find a 03:43:48.359 --> 03:43:49.950 align:start position:0% though you can technically find a pattern<03:43:48.720> in<03:43:48.880> some<03:43:49.040> of<03:43:49.199> these<03:43:49.359> verbs<03:43:49.800> I 03:43:49.950 --> 03:43:49.960 align:start position:0% pattern in some of these verbs I 03:43:49.960 --> 03:43:51.870 align:start position:0% pattern in some of these verbs I recommend<03:43:50.520> just<03:43:50.720> memorizing<03:43:51.279> them<03:43:51.520> in<03:43:51.640> one 03:43:51.870 --> 03:43:51.880 align:start position:0% recommend just memorizing them in one 03:43:51.880 --> 03:43:53.950 align:start position:0% recommend just memorizing them in one motion<03:43:52.319> and<03:43:52.520> right<03:43:52.720> now<03:43:53.000> I<03:43:53.159> covered<03:43:53.479> the<03:43:53.640> fifth 03:43:53.950 --> 03:43:53.960 align:start position:0% motion and right now I covered the fifth 03:43:53.960 --> 03:43:55.469 align:start position:0% motion and right now I covered the fifth and<03:43:54.159> final<03:43:54.520> concept<03:43:55.000> of<03:43:55.120> the<03:43:55.239> present 03:43:55.469 --> 03:43:55.479 align:start position:0% and final concept of the present 03:43:55.479 --> 03:43:57.349 align:start position:0% and final concept of the present subjunctive<03:43:56.080> in<03:43:56.199> this<03:43:56.399> video<03:43:56.760> in<03:43:56.920> the<03:43:57.080> video 03:43:57.349 --> 03:43:57.359 align:start position:0% subjunctive in this video in the video 03:43:57.359 --> 03:43:59.269 align:start position:0% subjunctive in this video in the video before<03:43:57.720> this<03:43:57.840> one<03:43:58.239> I<03:43:58.399> explained<03:43:58.960> how<03:43:59.080> the 03:43:59.269 --> 03:43:59.279 align:start position:0% before this one I explained how the 03:43:59.279 --> 03:44:01.309 align:start position:0% before this one I explained how the subjunctive<03:43:59.920> Works<03:44:00.199> in<03:44:00.359> Spanish<03:44:00.880> by<03:44:01.000> talking 03:44:01.309 --> 03:44:01.319 align:start position:0% subjunctive Works in Spanish by talking 03:44:01.319 --> 03:44:03.469 align:start position:0% subjunctive Works in Spanish by talking about<03:44:01.520> its<03:44:01.680> tenses<03:44:02.199> verbs<03:44:02.600> and<03:44:02.800> conjugations 03:44:03.469 --> 03:44:03.479 align:start position:0% about its tenses verbs and conjugations 03:44:03.479 --> 03:44:05.229 align:start position:0% about its tenses verbs and conjugations that<03:44:03.600> you<03:44:03.720> all<03:44:03.960> have<03:44:04.080> to<03:44:04.199> know<03:44:04.840> understand<03:44:05.080> and 03:44:05.229 --> 03:44:05.239 align:start position:0% that you all have to know understand and 03:44:05.239 --> 03:44:07.229 align:start position:0% that you all have to know understand and memorize<03:44:05.920> even<03:44:06.159> though<03:44:06.399> I<03:44:06.520> did<03:44:06.640> not<03:44:06.880> present 03:44:07.229 --> 03:44:07.239 align:start position:0% memorize even though I did not present 03:44:07.239 --> 03:44:09.349 align:start position:0% memorize even though I did not present any<03:44:07.439> sentences<03:44:08.040> in<03:44:08.199> this<03:44:08.399> video<03:44:08.840> I<03:44:08.920> did<03:44:09.120> give<03:44:09.239> a 03:44:09.349 --> 03:44:09.359 align:start position:0% any sentences in this video I did give a 03:44:09.359 --> 03:44:10.950 align:start position:0% any sentences in this video I did give a sufficient<03:44:09.840> amount<03:44:10.040> of<03:44:10.199> information<03:44:10.840> in 03:44:10.950 --> 03:44:10.960 align:start position:0% sufficient amount of information in 03:44:10.960 --> 03:44:12.510 align:start position:0% sufficient amount of information in order<03:44:11.199> to<03:44:11.640> understand<03:44:11.960> how<03:44:12.080> the<03:44:12.239> present 03:44:12.510 --> 03:44:12.520 align:start position:0% order to understand how the present 03:44:12.520 --> 03:44:14.429 align:start position:0% order to understand how the present subjunctive<03:44:13.080> works<03:44:13.479> and<03:44:13.640> how<03:44:13.840> all<03:44:14.080> types<03:44:14.279> of 03:44:14.429 --> 03:44:14.439 align:start position:0% subjunctive works and how all types of 03:44:14.439 --> 03:44:16.670 align:start position:0% subjunctive works and how all types of verbs<03:44:14.840> function<03:44:15.239> in<03:44:15.399> it<03:44:15.720> in<03:44:15.800> the<03:44:16.000> next<03:44:16.239> video 03:44:16.670 --> 03:44:16.680 align:start position:0% verbs function in it in the next video 03:44:16.680 --> 03:44:18.790 align:start position:0% verbs function in it in the next video I'll<03:44:16.880> only<03:44:17.080> show<03:44:17.319> phrases<03:44:17.880> and<03:44:18.080> sentences<03:44:18.680> in 03:44:18.790 --> 03:44:18.800 align:start position:0% I'll only show phrases and sentences in 03:44:18.800 --> 03:44:20.630 align:start position:0% I'll only show phrases and sentences in order<03:44:19.000> to<03:44:19.159> fully<03:44:19.399> finish<03:44:19.760> the<03:44:19.960> concept<03:44:20.399> of<03:44:20.479> the 03:44:20.630 --> 03:44:20.640 align:start position:0% order to fully finish the concept of the 03:44:20.640 --> 03:44:22.550 align:start position:0% order to fully finish the concept of the present<03:44:20.920> subjunctive<03:44:21.439> for<03:44:21.600> your<03:44:21.880> information 03:44:22.550 --> 03:44:22.560 align:start position:0% present subjunctive for your information 03:44:22.560 --> 03:44:24.149 align:start position:0% present subjunctive for your information there<03:44:22.680> will<03:44:22.840> not<03:44:23.040> be<03:44:23.279> any<03:44:23.479> sentences 03:44:24.149 --> 03:44:24.159 align:start position:0% there will not be any sentences 03:44:24.159 --> 03:44:26.149 align:start position:0% there will not be any sentences involving<03:44:24.640> negatives<03:44:25.080> and<03:44:25.279> reflexive<03:44:25.800> verbs 03:44:26.149 --> 03:44:26.159 align:start position:0% involving negatives and reflexive verbs 03:44:26.159 --> 03:44:27.950 align:start position:0% involving negatives and reflexive verbs mainly<03:44:26.560> because<03:44:26.920> they're<03:44:27.120> not<03:44:27.319> that<03:44:27.479> useful 03:44:27.950 --> 03:44:27.960 align:start position:0% mainly because they're not that useful 03:44:27.960 --> 03:44:29.790 align:start position:0% mainly because they're not that useful in<03:44:28.080> the<03:44:28.199> present<03:44:28.520> subjunctive<03:44:29.159> and<03:44:29.359> also 03:44:29.790 --> 03:44:29.800 align:start position:0% in the present subjunctive and also 03:44:29.800 --> 03:44:31.870 align:start position:0% in the present subjunctive and also because<03:44:30.080> there<03:44:30.279> is<03:44:30.520> no<03:44:30.800> irregular<03:44:31.359> concept 03:44:31.870 --> 03:44:31.880 align:start position:0% because there is no irregular concept 03:44:31.880 --> 03:44:34.030 align:start position:0% because there is no irregular concept with<03:44:32.080> them<03:44:32.359> so<03:44:32.600> that's<03:44:32.800> it<03:44:33.319> in<03:44:33.479> this<03:44:33.600> video 03:44:34.030 --> 03:44:34.040 align:start position:0% with them so that's it in this video 03:44:34.040 --> 03:44:35.750 align:start position:0% with them so that's it in this video I'll<03:44:34.159> be<03:44:34.359> presenting<03:44:34.760> sentences<03:44:35.439> that<03:44:35.560> are 03:44:35.750 --> 03:44:35.760 align:start position:0% I'll be presenting sentences that are 03:44:35.760 --> 03:44:37.349 align:start position:0% I'll be presenting sentences that are only<03:44:36.000> in<03:44:36.120> the<03:44:36.279> present<03:44:36.560> subjunctive<03:44:37.120> in<03:44:37.239> my 03:44:37.349 --> 03:44:37.359 align:start position:0% only in the present subjunctive in my 03:44:37.359 --> 03:44:38.910 align:start position:0% only in the present subjunctive in my two<03:44:37.560> previous<03:44:37.880> videos<03:44:38.319> I<03:44:38.439> explained<03:44:38.800> the 03:44:38.910 --> 03:44:38.920 align:start position:0% two previous videos I explained the 03:44:38.920 --> 03:44:40.429 align:start position:0% two previous videos I explained the subjunctive<03:44:39.319> in<03:44:39.439> Spanish<03:44:40.000> along<03:44:40.239> with<03:44:40.359> the 03:44:40.429 --> 03:44:40.439 align:start position:0% subjunctive in Spanish along with the 03:44:40.439 --> 03:44:41.950 align:start position:0% subjunctive in Spanish along with the types<03:44:40.680> of<03:44:40.800> verbs<03:44:41.159> that<03:44:41.279> are<03:44:41.399> used<03:44:41.760> in<03:44:41.840> the 03:44:41.950 --> 03:44:41.960 align:start position:0% types of verbs that are used in the 03:44:41.960 --> 03:44:43.309 align:start position:0% types of verbs that are used in the present<03:44:42.239> subjunctive<03:44:42.760> in<03:44:42.880> case<03:44:43.040> you<03:44:43.120> don't 03:44:43.309 --> 03:44:43.319 align:start position:0% present subjunctive in case you don't 03:44:43.319 --> 03:44:45.469 align:start position:0% present subjunctive in case you don't remember<03:44:43.800> the<03:44:43.920> construction<03:44:44.479> subject<03:44:44.840> verb<03:44:45.159> K 03:44:45.469 --> 03:44:45.479 align:start position:0% remember the construction subject verb K 03:44:45.479 --> 03:44:47.710 align:start position:0% remember the construction subject verb K subject<03:44:45.840> verb<03:44:46.080> or<03:44:46.199> a<03:44:46.359> main<03:44:46.600> Clause<03:44:47.080> K<03:44:47.359> subject 03:44:47.710 --> 03:44:47.720 align:start position:0% subject verb or a main Clause K subject 03:44:47.720 --> 03:44:49.510 align:start position:0% subject verb or a main Clause K subject verb<03:44:48.040> is<03:44:48.159> the<03:44:48.319> typical<03:44:48.680> phrase<03:44:49.120> that<03:44:49.239> you<03:44:49.359> will 03:44:49.510 --> 03:44:49.520 align:start position:0% verb is the typical phrase that you will 03:44:49.520 --> 03:44:51.269 align:start position:0% verb is the typical phrase that you will see<03:44:49.800> in<03:44:49.920> the<03:44:50.040> subjunctive<03:44:50.760> however<03:44:51.080> to 03:44:51.269 --> 03:44:51.279 align:start position:0% see in the subjunctive however to 03:44:51.279 --> 03:44:53.189 align:start position:0% see in the subjunctive however to activate<03:44:51.640> the<03:44:51.760> subjunctive<03:44:52.399> the<03:44:52.520> first<03:44:52.800> verb 03:44:53.189 --> 03:44:53.199 align:start position:0% activate the subjunctive the first verb 03:44:53.199 --> 03:44:55.269 align:start position:0% activate the subjunctive the first verb must<03:44:53.439> come<03:44:53.640> from<03:44:53.840> weird<03:44:54.319> and<03:44:54.560> these<03:44:54.880> are<03:44:55.120> the 03:44:55.269 --> 03:44:55.279 align:start position:0% must come from weird and these are the 03:44:55.279 --> 03:44:57.189 align:start position:0% must come from weird and these are the most<03:44:55.520> common<03:44:55.840> weird<03:44:56.159> verbs<03:44:56.600> which<03:44:56.720> I've<03:44:56.880> shown 03:44:57.189 --> 03:44:57.199 align:start position:0% most common weird verbs which I've shown 03:44:57.199 --> 03:44:58.950 align:start position:0% most common weird verbs which I've shown in<03:44:57.319> the<03:44:57.439> previous<03:44:57.760> videos<03:44:58.239> instead<03:44:58.479> of<03:44:58.600> using 03:44:58.950 --> 03:44:58.960 align:start position:0% in the previous videos instead of using 03:44:58.960 --> 03:45:00.630 align:start position:0% in the previous videos instead of using every<03:44:59.239> verb<03:44:59.560> I'll<03:44:59.720> be<03:44:59.800> showing<03:45:00.080> one<03:45:00.239> useful 03:45:00.630 --> 03:45:00.640 align:start position:0% every verb I'll be showing one useful 03:45:00.640 --> 03:45:02.469 align:start position:0% every verb I'll be showing one useful sentence<03:45:01.120> using<03:45:01.399> a<03:45:01.520> different<03:45:01.800> pronoun<03:45:02.319> and 03:45:02.469 --> 03:45:02.479 align:start position:0% sentence using a different pronoun and 03:45:02.479 --> 03:45:04.110 align:start position:0% sentence using a different pronoun and one<03:45:02.680> verb<03:45:02.920> from<03:45:03.159> each<03:45:03.359> category<03:45:03.960> to 03:45:04.110 --> 03:45:04.120 align:start position:0% one verb from each category to 03:45:04.120 --> 03:45:05.670 align:start position:0% one verb from each category to demonstrate<03:45:04.640> sentences<03:45:05.159> in<03:45:05.279> the<03:45:05.399> present 03:45:05.670 --> 03:45:05.680 align:start position:0% demonstrate sentences in the present 03:45:05.680 --> 03:45:07.070 align:start position:0% demonstrate sentences in the present subjunctive<03:45:06.239> let's<03:45:06.439> take<03:45:06.600> the<03:45:06.720> following 03:45:07.070 --> 03:45:07.080 align:start position:0% subjunctive let's take the following 03:45:07.080 --> 03:45:10.750 align:start position:0% subjunctive let's take the following phrases<03:45:07.720> y<03:45:08.680> subject<03:45:09.040> verb<03:45:09.319> to 03:45:10.750 --> 03:45:10.760 align:start position:0% phrases y subject verb to 03:45:10.760 --> 03:45:12.750 align:start position:0% phrases y subject verb to subject 03:45:12.750 --> 03:45:12.760 align:start position:0% subject 03:45:12.760 --> 03:45:16.550 align:start position:0% subject verb<03:45:14.239> and<03:45:15.239> these<03:45:15.479> are<03:45:15.680> the<03:45:15.840> sentences<03:45:16.439> that 03:45:16.550 --> 03:45:16.560 align:start position:0% verb and these are the sentences that 03:45:16.560 --> 03:45:18.349 align:start position:0% verb and these are the sentences that I'll<03:45:16.800> utilize<03:45:17.399> throughout<03:45:17.760> the<03:45:17.880> video<03:45:18.239> the 03:45:18.349 --> 03:45:18.359 align:start position:0% I'll utilize throughout the video the 03:45:18.359 --> 03:45:20.830 align:start position:0% I'll utilize throughout the video the first<03:45:18.640> verbs<03:45:19.040> in<03:45:19.199> these<03:45:19.439> cases<03:45:19.920> all<03:45:20.279> activate 03:45:20.830 --> 03:45:20.840 align:start position:0% first verbs in these cases all activate 03:45:20.840 --> 03:45:22.389 align:start position:0% first verbs in these cases all activate the<03:45:21.000> present<03:45:21.279> subjunctive<03:45:21.880> and<03:45:22.000> match<03:45:22.239> their 03:45:22.389 --> 03:45:22.399 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive and match their 03:45:22.399 --> 03:45:24.510 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive and match their pronouns<03:45:23.000> the<03:45:23.120> second<03:45:23.399> part<03:45:23.760> however<03:45:24.080> is<03:45:24.279> any 03:45:24.510 --> 03:45:24.520 align:start position:0% pronouns the second part however is any 03:45:24.520 --> 03:45:26.429 align:start position:0% pronouns the second part however is any form<03:45:24.880> of<03:45:25.000> the<03:45:25.159> subjunctive<03:45:25.840> consisting<03:45:26.239> of 03:45:26.429 --> 03:45:26.439 align:start position:0% form of the subjunctive consisting of 03:45:26.439 --> 03:45:28.149 align:start position:0% form of the subjunctive consisting of any<03:45:26.640> subject<03:45:26.960> and<03:45:27.159> any<03:45:27.359> verb<03:45:27.680> but<03:45:27.800> in<03:45:28.000> this 03:45:28.149 --> 03:45:28.159 align:start position:0% any subject and any verb but in this 03:45:28.159 --> 03:45:29.910 align:start position:0% any subject and any verb but in this case<03:45:28.479> it's<03:45:28.640> in<03:45:28.760> the<03:45:28.920> present<03:45:29.359> just<03:45:29.479> to<03:45:29.640> let<03:45:29.800> you 03:45:29.910 --> 03:45:29.920 align:start position:0% case it's in the present just to let you 03:45:29.920 --> 03:45:31.110 align:start position:0% case it's in the present just to let you know<03:45:30.199> when<03:45:30.359> I'll<03:45:30.479> be<03:45:30.600> showing<03:45:30.920> these 03:45:31.110 --> 03:45:31.120 align:start position:0% know when I'll be showing these 03:45:31.120 --> 03:45:33.189 align:start position:0% know when I'll be showing these sentences<03:45:31.640> in<03:45:31.880> context<03:45:32.439> I'll<03:45:32.600> use<03:45:32.800> the<03:45:32.920> system 03:45:33.189 --> 03:45:33.199 align:start position:0% sentences in context I'll use the system 03:45:33.199 --> 03:45:35.229 align:start position:0% sentences in context I'll use the system of<03:45:33.359> conjugation<03:45:34.120> for<03:45:34.359> every<03:45:34.600> type<03:45:34.800> of<03:45:34.920> verb 03:45:35.229 --> 03:45:35.239 align:start position:0% of conjugation for every type of verb 03:45:35.239 --> 03:45:36.710 align:start position:0% of conjugation for every type of verb that<03:45:35.319> I<03:45:35.439> showed<03:45:35.720> in<03:45:35.840> the<03:45:35.960> previous<03:45:36.279> video 03:45:36.710 --> 03:45:36.720 align:start position:0% that I showed in the previous video 03:45:36.720 --> 03:45:38.349 align:start position:0% that I showed in the previous video without<03:45:37.159> actually<03:45:37.479> saying<03:45:37.960> what<03:45:38.120> type<03:45:38.279> of 03:45:38.349 --> 03:45:38.359 align:start position:0% without actually saying what type of 03:45:38.359 --> 03:45:40.030 align:start position:0% without actually saying what type of verb<03:45:38.560> I'm<03:45:38.720> using<03:45:39.080> to<03:45:39.199> make<03:45:39.399> practice<03:45:39.880> more 03:45:40.030 --> 03:45:40.040 align:start position:0% verb I'm using to make practice more 03:45:40.040 --> 03:45:41.710 align:start position:0% verb I'm using to make practice more legit<03:45:40.399> in<03:45:40.520> case<03:45:40.680> you<03:45:40.760> don't<03:45:41.000> remember<03:45:41.439> you<03:45:41.520> can 03:45:41.710 --> 03:45:41.720 align:start position:0% legit in case you don't remember you can 03:45:41.720 --> 03:45:43.309 align:start position:0% legit in case you don't remember you can always<03:45:41.960> watch<03:45:42.159> the<03:45:42.319> previous<03:45:42.640> video<03:45:42.920> and<03:45:43.080> one 03:45:43.309 --> 03:45:43.319 align:start position:0% always watch the previous video and one 03:45:43.319 --> 03:45:44.950 align:start position:0% always watch the previous video and one last<03:45:43.520> thing<03:45:43.680> that<03:45:43.840> I<03:45:43.960> can<03:45:44.159> add<03:45:44.439> is<03:45:44.560> that 03:45:44.950 --> 03:45:44.960 align:start position:0% last thing that I can add is that 03:45:44.960 --> 03:45:46.590 align:start position:0% last thing that I can add is that sometimes<03:45:45.359> I'll<03:45:45.520> be<03:45:45.680> implementing<03:45:46.359> other 03:45:46.590 --> 03:45:46.600 align:start position:0% sometimes I'll be implementing other 03:45:46.600 --> 03:45:48.670 align:start position:0% sometimes I'll be implementing other Spanish<03:45:47.040> Concepts<03:45:47.520> in<03:45:47.640> a<03:45:47.760> few<03:45:47.920> main<03:45:48.120> Clauses 03:45:48.670 --> 03:45:48.680 align:start position:0% Spanish Concepts in a few main Clauses 03:45:48.680 --> 03:45:50.349 align:start position:0% Spanish Concepts in a few main Clauses just<03:45:48.800> to<03:45:48.960> make<03:45:49.159> practice<03:45:49.520> more<03:45:49.720> beneficial 03:45:50.349 --> 03:45:50.359 align:start position:0% just to make practice more beneficial 03:45:50.359 --> 03:45:51.670 align:start position:0% just to make practice more beneficial now<03:45:50.640> let's<03:45:50.840> begin<03:45:51.120> with<03:45:51.239> the<03:45:51.359> following 03:45:51.670 --> 03:45:51.680 align:start position:0% now let's begin with the following 03:45:51.680 --> 03:45:53.590 align:start position:0% now let's begin with the following phrases<03:45:52.159> and<03:45:52.319> work<03:45:52.600> backwards<03:45:53.199> take<03:45:53.319> a<03:45:53.439> look 03:45:53.590 --> 03:45:53.600 align:start position:0% phrases and work backwards take a look 03:45:53.600 --> 03:45:57.149 align:start position:0% phrases and work backwards take a look at<03:45:53.720> this<03:45:53.880> phrase<03:45:54.680> y<03:45:55.680> Estus<03:45:56.359> espanol<03:45:57.040> this 03:45:57.149 --> 03:45:57.159 align:start position:0% at this phrase y Estus espanol this 03:45:57.159 --> 03:45:59.429 align:start position:0% at this phrase y Estus espanol this phrase<03:45:57.560> is<03:45:57.720> already<03:45:58.120> in<03:45:58.319> Spanish<03:45:58.920> with<03:45:59.080> two 03:45:59.429 --> 03:45:59.439 align:start position:0% phrase is already in Spanish with two 03:45:59.439 --> 03:46:01.830 align:start position:0% phrase is already in Spanish with two Estus<03:46:00.199> being<03:46:00.439> the<03:46:00.640> subject<03:46:01.080> and<03:46:01.199> the<03:46:01.359> verb<03:46:01.720> and 03:46:01.830 --> 03:46:01.840 align:start position:0% Estus being the subject and the verb and 03:46:01.840 --> 03:46:03.990 align:start position:0% Estus being the subject and the verb and with<03:46:02.040> estud<03:46:02.680> being<03:46:02.880> an<03:46:03.040> AR<03:46:03.399> verb<03:46:03.760> that<03:46:03.840> is 03:46:03.990 --> 03:46:04.000 align:start position:0% with estud being an AR verb that is 03:46:04.000 --> 03:46:05.830 align:start position:0% with estud being an AR verb that is conjugated<03:46:04.479> for<03:46:04.640> the<03:46:04.800> two<03:46:05.080> pronoun<03:46:05.600> in<03:46:05.720> the 03:46:05.830 --> 03:46:05.840 align:start position:0% conjugated for the two pronoun in the 03:46:05.840 --> 03:46:07.189 align:start position:0% conjugated for the two pronoun in the present<03:46:06.120> subjunctive<03:46:06.680> how<03:46:06.800> would<03:46:06.920> you<03:46:07.000> say 03:46:07.189 --> 03:46:07.199 align:start position:0% present subjunctive how would you say 03:46:07.199 --> 03:46:08.590 align:start position:0% present subjunctive how would you say this<03:46:07.359> phrase<03:46:07.600> in 03:46:08.590 --> 03:46:08.600 align:start position:0% this phrase in 03:46:08.600 --> 03:46:11.590 align:start position:0% this phrase in English<03:46:09.960> now<03:46:10.199> here<03:46:10.479> we<03:46:10.600> have<03:46:10.760> two<03:46:11.000> options 03:46:11.590 --> 03:46:11.600 align:start position:0% English now here we have two options 03:46:11.600 --> 03:46:13.189 align:start position:0% English now here we have two options first<03:46:12.000> if<03:46:12.080> you<03:46:12.159> want<03:46:12.279> to<03:46:12.399> visually<03:46:12.800> translate 03:46:13.189 --> 03:46:13.199 align:start position:0% first if you want to visually translate 03:46:13.199 --> 03:46:15.110 align:start position:0% first if you want to visually translate the<03:46:13.359> sentence<03:46:13.840> then<03:46:13.960> you<03:46:14.040> can<03:46:14.239> say<03:46:14.600> I<03:46:14.760> want 03:46:15.110 --> 03:46:15.120 align:start position:0% the sentence then you can say I want 03:46:15.120 --> 03:46:16.630 align:start position:0% the sentence then you can say I want that<03:46:15.239> you<03:46:15.399> study<03:46:15.760> Spanish<03:46:16.199> but<03:46:16.319> it<03:46:16.399> doesn't 03:46:16.630 --> 03:46:16.640 align:start position:0% that you study Spanish but it doesn't 03:46:16.640 --> 03:46:18.110 align:start position:0% that you study Spanish but it doesn't really<03:46:16.840> make<03:46:17.040> sense<03:46:17.279> to<03:46:17.399> say<03:46:17.680> that<03:46:17.960> even 03:46:18.110 --> 03:46:18.120 align:start position:0% really make sense to say that even 03:46:18.120 --> 03:46:19.630 align:start position:0% really make sense to say that even though<03:46:18.239> it<03:46:18.359> technically<03:46:18.760> works<03:46:19.199> on<03:46:19.319> the<03:46:19.439> other 03:46:19.630 --> 03:46:19.640 align:start position:0% though it technically works on the other 03:46:19.640 --> 03:46:21.590 align:start position:0% though it technically works on the other hand<03:46:19.960> the<03:46:20.120> second<03:46:20.439> option<03:46:20.800> is<03:46:20.920> more<03:46:21.159> logical 03:46:21.590 --> 03:46:21.600 align:start position:0% hand the second option is more logical 03:46:21.600 --> 03:46:23.349 align:start position:0% hand the second option is more logical in<03:46:21.760> English<03:46:22.199> but<03:46:22.319> it<03:46:22.439> doesn't<03:46:22.720> work<03:46:23.000> visually 03:46:23.349 --> 03:46:23.359 align:start position:0% in English but it doesn't work visually 03:46:23.359 --> 03:46:25.670 align:start position:0% in English but it doesn't work visually in<03:46:23.479> Spanish<03:46:24.080> I<03:46:24.199> want<03:46:24.399> you<03:46:24.680> to<03:46:24.840> study<03:46:25.159> Spanish 03:46:25.670 --> 03:46:25.680 align:start position:0% in Spanish I want you to study Spanish 03:46:25.680 --> 03:46:27.510 align:start position:0% in Spanish I want you to study Spanish using<03:46:25.920> a<03:46:26.040> complete<03:46:26.399> infinitive<03:46:26.920> to<03:46:27.080> study 03:46:27.510 --> 03:46:27.520 align:start position:0% using a complete infinitive to study 03:46:27.520 --> 03:46:29.110 align:start position:0% using a complete infinitive to study while<03:46:27.680> it<03:46:27.800> doesn't<03:46:28.120> matter<03:46:28.520> which<03:46:28.680> phrase<03:46:28.960> you 03:46:29.110 --> 03:46:29.120 align:start position:0% while it doesn't matter which phrase you 03:46:29.120 --> 03:46:31.189 align:start position:0% while it doesn't matter which phrase you say<03:46:29.479> because<03:46:29.800> both<03:46:29.960> are<03:46:30.199> correct<03:46:30.640> I'll<03:46:30.840> focus 03:46:31.189 --> 03:46:31.199 align:start position:0% say because both are correct I'll focus 03:46:31.199 --> 03:46:32.910 align:start position:0% say because both are correct I'll focus on<03:46:31.439> both<03:46:31.600> of<03:46:31.760> them<03:46:32.040> because<03:46:32.239> we'll<03:46:32.640> sometimes 03:46:32.910 --> 03:46:32.920 align:start position:0% on both of them because we'll sometimes 03:46:32.920 --> 03:46:34.830 align:start position:0% on both of them because we'll sometimes have<03:46:33.159> cases<03:46:33.640> when<03:46:33.760> the<03:46:33.840> two<03:46:34.000> sentences<03:46:34.560> can<03:46:34.680> be 03:46:34.830 --> 03:46:34.840 align:start position:0% have cases when the two sentences can be 03:46:34.840 --> 03:46:36.830 align:start position:0% have cases when the two sentences can be applied<03:46:35.239> making<03:46:35.479> it<03:46:35.640> logical<03:46:36.080> and<03:46:36.279> practical 03:46:36.830 --> 03:46:36.840 align:start position:0% applied making it logical and practical 03:46:36.840 --> 03:46:38.590 align:start position:0% applied making it logical and practical how<03:46:36.960> would<03:46:37.080> you<03:46:37.199> say<03:46:37.479> this<03:46:37.640> phrase<03:46:38.040> I<03:46:38.159> want<03:46:38.399> him 03:46:38.590 --> 03:46:38.600 align:start position:0% how would you say this phrase I want him 03:46:38.600 --> 03:46:43.550 align:start position:0% how would you say this phrase I want him to<03:46:38.760> use<03:46:38.960> it 03:46:43.550 --> 03:46:43.560 align:start position:0% 03:46:43.560 --> 03:46:45.349 align:start position:0% and<03:46:43.640> the<03:46:43.760> other<03:46:43.920> way<03:46:44.040> to<03:46:44.199> write<03:46:44.479> this<03:46:44.840> is<03:46:45.199> I 03:46:45.349 --> 03:46:45.359 align:start position:0% and the other way to write this is I 03:46:45.359 --> 03:46:47.269 align:start position:0% and the other way to write this is I want<03:46:45.760> that<03:46:45.920> he<03:46:46.040> uses<03:46:46.359> it<03:46:46.640> how<03:46:46.760> would<03:46:46.880> you<03:46:47.000> say 03:46:47.269 --> 03:46:47.279 align:start position:0% want that he uses it how would you say 03:46:47.279 --> 03:46:52.510 align:start position:0% want that he uses it how would you say one<03:46:47.399> of<03:46:47.600> these 03:46:52.510 --> 03:46:52.520 align:start position:0% 03:46:52.520 --> 03:46:58.990 align:start position:0% phrases<03:46:53.520> how<03:46:53.600> would<03:46:53.720> you<03:46:53.800> say<03:46:54.040> this 03:46:58.990 --> 03:46:59.000 align:start position:0% 03:46:59.000 --> 03:47:01.309 align:start position:0% phrase<03:47:00.000> this<03:47:00.159> sentence<03:47:00.640> visually<03:47:01.040> makes 03:47:01.309 --> 03:47:01.319 align:start position:0% phrase this sentence visually makes 03:47:01.319 --> 03:47:03.269 align:start position:0% phrase this sentence visually makes sense<03:47:01.680> both<03:47:01.880> in<03:47:02.040> English<03:47:02.439> and<03:47:02.640> Spanish<03:47:03.199> how 03:47:03.269 --> 03:47:03.279 align:start position:0% sense both in English and Spanish how 03:47:03.279 --> 03:47:08.070 align:start position:0% sense both in English and Spanish how would<03:47:03.399> you<03:47:03.560> say<03:47:03.760> this 03:47:08.070 --> 03:47:08.080 align:start position:0% 03:47:08.080 --> 03:47:14.670 align:start position:0% phrase<03:47:09.080> how<03:47:09.159> would<03:47:09.279> you<03:47:09.359> say 03:47:14.670 --> 03:47:14.680 align:start position:0% 03:47:14.680 --> 03:47:21.309 align:start position:0% this<03:47:15.680> now<03:47:15.960> how<03:47:16.080> do<03:47:16.159> you<03:47:16.279> say<03:47:16.520> this 03:47:21.309 --> 03:47:21.319 align:start position:0% 03:47:21.319 --> 03:47:27.670 align:start position:0% phrase<03:47:22.319> how<03:47:22.399> would<03:47:22.520> you<03:47:22.640> say<03:47:22.880> this 03:47:27.670 --> 03:47:27.680 align:start position:0% 03:47:27.680 --> 03:47:30.349 align:start position:0% phrase<03:47:28.680> now<03:47:28.960> let's<03:47:29.159> get<03:47:29.279> a<03:47:29.399> bit<03:47:29.560> more<03:47:29.760> complex 03:47:30.349 --> 03:47:30.359 align:start position:0% phrase now let's get a bit more complex 03:47:30.359 --> 03:47:36.269 align:start position:0% phrase now let's get a bit more complex how<03:47:30.439> do<03:47:30.560> you<03:47:30.680> say<03:47:30.880> one<03:47:31.000> of<03:47:31.159> these 03:47:36.269 --> 03:47:36.279 align:start position:0% 03:47:36.279 --> 03:47:38.670 align:start position:0% phrases<03:47:37.279> this<03:47:37.439> phrase<03:47:37.840> was<03:47:37.960> a<03:47:38.080> bit<03:47:38.279> hard 03:47:38.670 --> 03:47:38.680 align:start position:0% phrases this phrase was a bit hard 03:47:38.680 --> 03:47:40.030 align:start position:0% phrases this phrase was a bit hard because<03:47:38.840> we<03:47:38.960> had<03:47:39.080> to<03:47:39.159> put<03:47:39.239> a<03:47:39.520> direct<03:47:39.760> object 03:47:40.030 --> 03:47:40.040 align:start position:0% because we had to put a direct object 03:47:40.040 --> 03:47:41.710 align:start position:0% because we had to put a direct object pronoun<03:47:40.479> in<03:47:40.560> the<03:47:40.720> beginning<03:47:41.199> along<03:47:41.439> with<03:47:41.560> an 03:47:41.710 --> 03:47:41.720 align:start position:0% pronoun in the beginning along with an 03:47:41.720 --> 03:47:43.269 align:start position:0% pronoun in the beginning along with an irregular<03:47:42.279> y<03:47:42.520> verb<03:47:42.800> in<03:47:42.880> the<03:47:43.000> present 03:47:43.269 --> 03:47:43.279 align:start position:0% irregular y verb in the present 03:47:43.279 --> 03:47:44.550 align:start position:0% irregular y verb in the present subjunctive<03:47:43.840> how<03:47:43.920> would<03:47:44.040> you<03:47:44.120> say<03:47:44.279> one<03:47:44.399> of 03:47:44.550 --> 03:47:44.560 align:start position:0% subjunctive how would you say one of 03:47:44.560 --> 03:47:50.670 align:start position:0% subjunctive how would you say one of these 03:47:50.670 --> 03:47:50.680 align:start position:0% 03:47:50.680 --> 03:47:56.389 align:start position:0% phrases<03:47:51.680> how<03:47:51.760> do<03:47:51.880> you<03:47:52.000> say<03:47:52.199> this 03:47:56.389 --> 03:47:56.399 align:start position:0% 03:47:56.399 --> 03:47:58.750 align:start position:0% phrase<03:47:57.399> this<03:47:57.560> sentence<03:47:58.080> visually<03:47:58.479> makes 03:47:58.750 --> 03:47:58.760 align:start position:0% phrase this sentence visually makes 03:47:58.760 --> 03:48:03.990 align:start position:0% phrase this sentence visually makes sense<03:47:59.199> how<03:47:59.319> would<03:47:59.439> you<03:47:59.560> say 03:48:03.990 --> 03:48:04.000 align:start position:0% 03:48:04.000 --> 03:48:08.429 align:start position:0% this<03:48:05.000> how<03:48:05.120> do<03:48:05.199> you<03:48:05.359> say 03:48:08.429 --> 03:48:08.439 align:start position:0% 03:48:08.439 --> 03:48:09.950 align:start position:0% this 03:48:09.950 --> 03:48:09.960 align:start position:0% this 03:48:09.960 --> 03:48:15.429 align:start position:0% this how<03:48:10.040> would<03:48:10.199> you<03:48:10.319> say 03:48:15.429 --> 03:48:15.439 align:start position:0% 03:48:15.439 --> 03:48:21.950 align:start position:0% this<03:48:16.439> how<03:48:16.560> about<03:48:16.840> this 03:48:21.950 --> 03:48:21.960 align:start position:0% 03:48:21.960 --> 03:48:27.030 align:start position:0% phrase<03:48:22.960> what<03:48:23.080> about<03:48:23.359> this 03:48:27.030 --> 03:48:27.040 align:start position:0% 03:48:27.040 --> 03:48:32.790 align:start position:0% one<03:48:28.040> how<03:48:28.159> would<03:48:28.279> you<03:48:28.399> say 03:48:32.790 --> 03:48:32.800 align:start position:0% 03:48:32.800 --> 03:48:37.710 align:start position:0% this<03:48:33.800> what<03:48:33.920> about 03:48:37.710 --> 03:48:37.720 align:start position:0% 03:48:37.720 --> 03:48:43.710 align:start position:0% this<03:48:38.720> how<03:48:38.840> about<03:48:39.080> this<03:48:39.199> one 03:48:43.710 --> 03:48:43.720 align:start position:0% 03:48:43.720 --> 03:48:47.830 align:start position:0% what<03:48:43.840> about 03:48:47.830 --> 03:48:47.840 align:start position:0% 03:48:47.840 --> 03:48:50.469 align:start position:0% this<03:48:48.840> now<03:48:49.159> let's<03:48:49.359> get<03:48:49.520> more<03:48:49.760> complex<03:48:50.279> how<03:48:50.399> do 03:48:50.469 --> 03:48:50.479 align:start position:0% this now let's get more complex how do 03:48:50.479 --> 03:48:56.070 align:start position:0% this now let's get more complex how do you<03:48:50.560> say<03:48:50.760> one<03:48:50.880> of<03:48:51.040> these 03:48:56.070 --> 03:48:56.080 align:start position:0% 03:48:56.080 --> 03:49:03.670 align:start position:0% phrases<03:48:57.080> and<03:48:57.239> now<03:48:57.479> how<03:48:57.560> would<03:48:57.680> you<03:48:57.760> say<03:48:57.960> one<03:48:58.080> of 03:49:03.670 --> 03:49:03.680 align:start position:0% 03:49:03.680 --> 03:49:08.309 align:start position:0% these<03:49:04.680> how<03:49:04.800> would<03:49:04.920> you<03:49:05.000> say<03:49:05.239> one<03:49:05.359> of 03:49:08.309 --> 03:49:08.319 align:start position:0% 03:49:08.319 --> 03:49:12.550 align:start position:0% these 03:49:12.550 --> 03:49:12.560 align:start position:0% 03:49:12.560 --> 03:49:16.830 align:start position:0% how<03:49:12.680> about 03:49:16.830 --> 03:49:16.840 align:start position:0% 03:49:16.840 --> 03:49:23.110 align:start position:0% this<03:49:17.840> solos<03:49:18.479> how<03:49:18.600> about<03:49:18.880> this 03:49:23.110 --> 03:49:23.120 align:start position:0% 03:49:23.120 --> 03:49:28.830 align:start position:0% one<03:49:24.120> what<03:49:24.239> about 03:49:28.830 --> 03:49:28.840 align:start position:0% 03:49:28.840 --> 03:49:31.309 align:start position:0% this<03:49:29.840> in<03:49:29.960> this<03:49:30.120> case<03:49:30.479> if<03:49:30.560> you<03:49:30.720> wanted<03:49:30.960> to<03:49:31.199> you 03:49:31.309 --> 03:49:31.319 align:start position:0% this in this case if you wanted to you 03:49:31.319 --> 03:49:32.910 align:start position:0% this in this case if you wanted to you could<03:49:31.439> have<03:49:31.560> put<03:49:31.760> the<03:49:31.880> direct<03:49:32.159> object<03:49:32.439> pronoun 03:49:32.910 --> 03:49:32.920 align:start position:0% could have put the direct object pronoun 03:49:32.920 --> 03:49:34.670 align:start position:0% could have put the direct object pronoun before<03:49:33.159> the<03:49:33.359> conjugated<03:49:33.880> verb<03:49:34.279> what<03:49:34.399> about 03:49:34.670 --> 03:49:34.680 align:start position:0% before the conjugated verb what about 03:49:34.680 --> 03:49:38.309 align:start position:0% before the conjugated verb what about this 03:49:38.309 --> 03:49:38.319 align:start position:0% 03:49:38.319 --> 03:49:45.110 align:start position:0% phrase<03:49:39.760> Ando<03:49:40.720> how<03:49:40.880> about<03:49:41.120> this 03:49:45.110 --> 03:49:45.120 align:start position:0% 03:49:45.120 --> 03:49:51.389 align:start position:0% phrase<03:49:46.120> and<03:49:46.279> what<03:49:46.359> about<03:49:46.640> this 03:49:51.389 --> 03:49:51.399 align:start position:0% 03:49:51.399 --> 03:49:53.870 align:start position:0% one<03:49:52.399> for<03:49:52.560> the<03:49:52.680> final<03:49:53.000> sentences<03:49:53.640> this<03:49:53.720> is 03:49:53.870 --> 03:49:53.880 align:start position:0% one for the final sentences this is 03:49:53.880 --> 03:49:55.389 align:start position:0% one for the final sentences this is where<03:49:54.040> I'll<03:49:54.199> show<03:49:54.560> some<03:49:54.800> general<03:49:55.120> main 03:49:55.389 --> 03:49:55.399 align:start position:0% where I'll show some general main 03:49:55.399 --> 03:49:57.229 align:start position:0% where I'll show some general main Clauses<03:49:55.960> that<03:49:56.080> have<03:49:56.199> a<03:49:56.359> subject<03:49:56.720> and<03:49:56.840> a<03:49:56.960> verb 03:49:57.229 --> 03:49:57.239 align:start position:0% Clauses that have a subject and a verb 03:49:57.239 --> 03:50:01.990 align:start position:0% Clauses that have a subject and a verb after<03:49:57.680> how<03:49:57.760> would<03:49:57.920> you<03:49:58.000> say<03:49:58.239> this 03:50:01.990 --> 03:50:02.000 align:start position:0% 03:50:02.000 --> 03:50:07.630 align:start position:0% phrase<03:50:03.000> what<03:50:03.080> about<03:50:03.399> this 03:50:07.630 --> 03:50:07.640 align:start position:0% 03:50:07.640 --> 03:50:13.309 align:start position:0% phrase<03:50:08.640> how<03:50:08.760> about<03:50:09.000> this<03:50:09.080> one 03:50:13.309 --> 03:50:13.319 align:start position:0% 03:50:13.319 --> 03:50:17.030 align:start position:0% what<03:50:13.439> about 03:50:17.030 --> 03:50:17.040 align:start position:0% 03:50:17.040 --> 03:50:19.790 align:start position:0% this<03:50:18.040> and<03:50:18.159> the<03:50:18.279> final<03:50:18.600> example<03:50:19.080> in<03:50:19.239> this<03:50:19.439> video 03:50:19.790 --> 03:50:19.800 align:start position:0% this and the final example in this video 03:50:19.800 --> 03:50:24.469 align:start position:0% this and the final example in this video is<03:50:20.000> this 03:50:24.469 --> 03:50:24.479 align:start position:0% 03:50:24.479 --> 03:50:27.349 align:start position:0% one<03:50:26.040> and<03:50:26.239> here<03:50:26.520> this<03:50:26.640> is<03:50:26.800> where<03:50:27.040> every 03:50:27.349 --> 03:50:27.359 align:start position:0% one and here this is where every 03:50:27.359 --> 03:50:29.149 align:start position:0% one and here this is where every concept<03:50:27.800> of<03:50:27.960> the<03:50:28.080> present<03:50:28.359> subjunctive<03:50:28.960> comes 03:50:29.149 --> 03:50:29.159 align:start position:0% concept of the present subjunctive comes 03:50:29.159 --> 03:50:30.790 align:start position:0% concept of the present subjunctive comes to<03:50:29.279> an<03:50:29.399> end<03:50:29.800> even<03:50:30.000> though<03:50:30.159> the<03:50:30.239> phrases<03:50:30.640> in 03:50:30.790 --> 03:50:30.800 align:start position:0% to an end even though the phrases in 03:50:30.800 --> 03:50:32.630 align:start position:0% to an end even though the phrases in this<03:50:31.000> video<03:50:31.319> were<03:50:31.520> sort<03:50:31.680> of<03:50:31.840> one-dimensional 03:50:32.630 --> 03:50:32.640 align:start position:0% this video were sort of one-dimensional 03:50:32.640 --> 03:50:34.870 align:start position:0% this video were sort of one-dimensional and<03:50:32.960> sometimes<03:50:33.279> not<03:50:33.439> that<03:50:33.640> relevant<03:50:34.239> my<03:50:34.479> goal 03:50:34.870 --> 03:50:34.880 align:start position:0% and sometimes not that relevant my goal 03:50:34.880 --> 03:50:36.469 align:start position:0% and sometimes not that relevant my goal was<03:50:35.040> just<03:50:35.159> to<03:50:35.359> present<03:50:35.640> the<03:50:35.800> system<03:50:36.239> of<03:50:36.359> the 03:50:36.469 --> 03:50:36.479 align:start position:0% was just to present the system of the 03:50:36.479 --> 03:50:37.950 align:start position:0% was just to present the system of the present<03:50:36.760> subjunctive<03:50:37.359> at<03:50:37.479> the<03:50:37.560> end<03:50:37.680> of<03:50:37.800> the 03:50:37.950 --> 03:50:37.960 align:start position:0% present subjunctive at the end of the 03:50:37.960 --> 03:50:39.550 align:start position:0% present subjunctive at the end of the day<03:50:38.199> it's<03:50:38.399> up<03:50:38.560> to<03:50:38.680> you<03:50:38.880> to<03:50:39.000> make<03:50:39.239> make<03:50:39.399> any 03:50:39.550 --> 03:50:39.560 align:start position:0% day it's up to you to make make any 03:50:39.560 --> 03:50:41.630 align:start position:0% day it's up to you to make make any sentence<03:50:40.080> that<03:50:40.159> you<03:50:40.319> want<03:50:40.640> using<03:50:41.000> any<03:50:41.239> subject 03:50:41.630 --> 03:50:41.640 align:start position:0% sentence that you want using any subject 03:50:41.640 --> 03:50:43.189 align:start position:0% sentence that you want using any subject and<03:50:41.840> any<03:50:42.000> verb<03:50:42.359> because<03:50:42.600> this<03:50:42.720> is<03:50:42.840> how<03:50:42.960> you're 03:50:43.189 --> 03:50:43.199 align:start position:0% and any verb because this is how you're 03:50:43.199 --> 03:50:44.790 align:start position:0% and any verb because this is how you're supposed<03:50:43.520> to<03:50:43.680> think<03:50:43.960> whenever<03:50:44.239> you<03:50:44.319> learn<03:50:44.600> new 03:50:44.790 --> 03:50:44.800 align:start position:0% supposed to think whenever you learn new 03:50:44.800 --> 03:50:46.309 align:start position:0% supposed to think whenever you learn new language<03:50:45.159> Concepts<03:50:45.720> even<03:50:45.960> though<03:50:46.120> some 03:50:46.309 --> 03:50:46.319 align:start position:0% language Concepts even though some 03:50:46.319 --> 03:50:48.469 align:start position:0% language Concepts even though some sentences<03:50:46.800> did<03:50:46.920> not<03:50:47.120> make<03:50:47.399> sense<03:50:47.800> my<03:50:48.000> goal<03:50:48.359> was 03:50:48.469 --> 03:50:48.479 align:start position:0% sentences did not make sense my goal was 03:50:48.479 --> 03:50:50.030 align:start position:0% sentences did not make sense my goal was to<03:50:48.640> give<03:50:48.800> the<03:50:49.040> idea<03:50:49.479> of<03:50:49.600> the<03:50:49.720> present 03:50:50.030 --> 03:50:50.040 align:start position:0% to give the idea of the present 03:50:50.040 --> 03:50:51.510 align:start position:0% to give the idea of the present subjunctive<03:50:50.640> and<03:50:50.760> from<03:50:51.000> there<03:50:51.279> you<03:50:51.399> could 03:50:51.510 --> 03:50:51.520 align:start position:0% subjunctive and from there you could 03:50:51.520 --> 03:50:52.950 align:start position:0% subjunctive and from there you could have<03:50:51.640> said<03:50:52.000> anything<03:50:52.279> that<03:50:52.399> you<03:50:52.520> wanted<03:50:52.880> and 03:50:52.950 --> 03:50:52.960 align:start position:0% have said anything that you wanted and 03:50:52.960 --> 03:50:54.670 align:start position:0% have said anything that you wanted and it<03:50:53.080> will<03:50:53.239> be<03:50:53.399> the<03:50:53.520> same<03:50:53.760> idea<03:50:54.120> for<03:50:54.319> the<03:50:54.439> next 03:50:54.670 --> 03:50:54.680 align:start position:0% it will be the same idea for the next 03:50:54.680 --> 03:50:56.389 align:start position:0% it will be the same idea for the next tenses<03:50:55.199> of<03:50:55.319> the<03:50:55.439> subjunctive<03:50:56.080> I<03:50:56.159> could<03:50:56.279> have 03:50:56.389 --> 03:50:56.399 align:start position:0% tenses of the subjunctive I could have 03:50:56.399 --> 03:50:58.070 align:start position:0% tenses of the subjunctive I could have extended<03:50:56.800> the<03:50:56.960> video<03:50:57.319> by<03:50:57.479> talking<03:50:57.760> about<03:50:57.960> the 03:50:58.070 --> 03:50:58.080 align:start position:0% extended the video by talking about the 03:50:58.080 --> 03:50:59.590 align:start position:0% extended the video by talking about the present<03:50:58.399> subjunctive<03:50:58.960> using<03:50:59.279> different 03:50:59.590 --> 03:50:59.600 align:start position:0% present subjunctive using different 03:50:59.600 --> 03:51:01.349 align:start position:0% present subjunctive using different Expressions<03:51:00.199> conjunctions<03:51:00.800> and<03:51:00.960> adjective 03:51:01.349 --> 03:51:01.359 align:start position:0% Expressions conjunctions and adjective 03:51:01.359 --> 03:51:03.269 align:start position:0% Expressions conjunctions and adjective Clauses<03:51:01.920> but<03:51:02.040> I<03:51:02.120> chose<03:51:02.399> not<03:51:02.600> to<03:51:02.920> because<03:51:03.120> it's 03:51:03.269 --> 03:51:03.279 align:start position:0% Clauses but I chose not to because it's 03:51:03.279 --> 03:51:04.910 align:start position:0% Clauses but I chose not to because it's an<03:51:03.439> even<03:51:03.600> trickier<03:51:04.159> topic<03:51:04.560> that<03:51:04.680> will 03:51:04.910 --> 03:51:04.920 align:start position:0% an even trickier topic that will 03:51:04.920 --> 03:51:06.870 align:start position:0% an even trickier topic that will probably<03:51:05.279> confuse<03:51:05.640> you<03:51:05.880> even<03:51:06.080> more<03:51:06.399> so<03:51:06.640> that's 03:51:06.870 --> 03:51:06.880 align:start position:0% probably confuse you even more so that's 03:51:06.880 --> 03:51:08.590 align:start position:0% probably confuse you even more so that's that<03:51:07.120> the<03:51:07.279> past<03:51:07.479> subjunctive<03:51:07.960> in<03:51:08.120> Spanish 03:51:08.590 --> 03:51:08.600 align:start position:0% that the past subjunctive in Spanish 03:51:08.600 --> 03:51:10.189 align:start position:0% that the past subjunctive in Spanish also<03:51:08.800> known<03:51:09.000> as<03:51:09.239> the<03:51:09.319> imperfect<03:51:09.680> subjunctive 03:51:10.189 --> 03:51:10.199 align:start position:0% also known as the imperfect subjunctive 03:51:10.199 --> 03:51:11.950 align:start position:0% also known as the imperfect subjunctive speaks<03:51:10.439> of<03:51:10.560> multiple<03:51:10.920> Clause<03:51:11.199> sentences<03:51:11.840> that 03:51:11.950 --> 03:51:11.960 align:start position:0% speaks of multiple Clause sentences that 03:51:11.960 --> 03:51:13.309 align:start position:0% speaks of multiple Clause sentences that Express<03:51:12.279> States<03:51:12.520> and<03:51:12.840> conditions 03:51:13.309 --> 03:51:13.319 align:start position:0% Express States and conditions 03:51:13.319 --> 03:51:14.550 align:start position:0% Express States and conditions considering<03:51:13.720> that<03:51:13.800> you<03:51:13.880> need<03:51:14.040> a<03:51:14.159> verb<03:51:14.359> coming 03:51:14.550 --> 03:51:14.560 align:start position:0% considering that you need a verb coming 03:51:14.560 --> 03:51:16.510 align:start position:0% considering that you need a verb coming from<03:51:14.760> weird<03:51:15.120> in<03:51:15.239> order<03:51:15.479> to<03:51:15.640> activate<03:51:15.960> it<03:51:16.199> in<03:51:16.359> my 03:51:16.510 --> 03:51:16.520 align:start position:0% from weird in order to activate it in my 03:51:16.520 --> 03:51:18.189 align:start position:0% from weird in order to activate it in my opinion<03:51:16.960> the<03:51:17.199> past<03:51:17.359> subjunctive<03:51:17.960> is<03:51:18.080> the 03:51:18.189 --> 03:51:18.199 align:start position:0% opinion the past subjunctive is the 03:51:18.199 --> 03:51:20.110 align:start position:0% opinion the past subjunctive is the second<03:51:18.479> hardest<03:51:18.840> topic<03:51:19.239> of<03:51:19.359> the<03:51:19.520> subjunctive 03:51:20.110 --> 03:51:20.120 align:start position:0% second hardest topic of the subjunctive 03:51:20.120 --> 03:51:21.870 align:start position:0% second hardest topic of the subjunctive mainly<03:51:20.479> because<03:51:20.880> it<03:51:21.040> has<03:51:21.159> two<03:51:21.359> conjugation 03:51:21.870 --> 03:51:21.880 align:start position:0% mainly because it has two conjugation 03:51:21.880 --> 03:51:23.870 align:start position:0% mainly because it has two conjugation patterns<03:51:22.359> and<03:51:22.479> a<03:51:22.600> big<03:51:22.800> list<03:51:23.159> with<03:51:23.399> exceptions 03:51:23.870 --> 03:51:23.880 align:start position:0% patterns and a big list with exceptions 03:51:23.880 --> 03:51:25.750 align:start position:0% patterns and a big list with exceptions that<03:51:24.000> are<03:51:24.159> irregular<03:51:24.800> the<03:51:24.920> past<03:51:25.199> subjunctive 03:51:25.750 --> 03:51:25.760 align:start position:0% that are irregular the past subjunctive 03:51:25.760 --> 03:51:27.349 align:start position:0% that are irregular the past subjunctive works<03:51:26.120> the<03:51:26.239> same<03:51:26.479> way<03:51:26.800> as<03:51:26.920> the<03:51:27.080> present 03:51:27.349 --> 03:51:27.359 align:start position:0% works the same way as the present 03:51:27.359 --> 03:51:28.910 align:start position:0% works the same way as the present subjunctive<03:51:27.960> which<03:51:28.120> I<03:51:28.239> explained<03:51:28.680> in<03:51:28.760> the 03:51:28.910 --> 03:51:28.920 align:start position:0% subjunctive which I explained in the 03:51:28.920 --> 03:51:30.750 align:start position:0% subjunctive which I explained in the previous<03:51:29.239> videos<03:51:29.760> but<03:51:29.960> this<03:51:30.120> time<03:51:30.439> it's<03:51:30.600> in 03:51:30.750 --> 03:51:30.760 align:start position:0% previous videos but this time it's in 03:51:30.760 --> 03:51:33.030 align:start position:0% previous videos but this time it's in the<03:51:30.960> past<03:51:31.239> or<03:51:31.439> predate<03:51:31.920> tense<03:51:32.319> in<03:51:32.439> the<03:51:32.560> video<03:51:32.960> I 03:51:33.030 --> 03:51:33.040 align:start position:0% the past or predate tense in the video I 03:51:33.040 --> 03:51:34.830 align:start position:0% the past or predate tense in the video I will<03:51:33.319> cover<03:51:33.680> every<03:51:33.960> concept<03:51:34.439> along<03:51:34.680> with 03:51:34.830 --> 03:51:34.840 align:start position:0% will cover every concept along with 03:51:34.840 --> 03:51:36.910 align:start position:0% will cover every concept along with multiple<03:51:35.199> phrases<03:51:35.720> in<03:51:35.880> the<03:51:36.000> end<03:51:36.319> for<03:51:36.520> regular 03:51:36.910 --> 03:51:36.920 align:start position:0% multiple phrases in the end for regular 03:51:36.920 --> 03:51:38.950 align:start position:0% multiple phrases in the end for regular ar<03:51:37.359> verbs<03:51:37.720> you<03:51:37.880> drop<03:51:38.120> the<03:51:38.239> ending<03:51:38.479> of<03:51:38.600> the<03:51:38.720> verb 03:51:38.950 --> 03:51:38.960 align:start position:0% ar verbs you drop the ending of the verb 03:51:38.960 --> 03:51:41.550 align:start position:0% ar verbs you drop the ending of the verb and<03:51:39.239> add<03:51:39.399> the<03:51:39.479> following<03:51:39.800> endings 03:51:41.550 --> 03:51:41.560 align:start position:0% and add the following endings 03:51:41.560 --> 03:51:44.349 align:start position:0% and add the following endings Aras<03:51:42.560> aramos<03:51:43.159> being<03:51:43.399> the<03:51:43.520> only<03:51:43.760> conjugation 03:51:44.349 --> 03:51:44.359 align:start position:0% Aras aramos being the only conjugation 03:51:44.359 --> 03:51:46.790 align:start position:0% Aras aramos being the only conjugation with<03:51:44.479> an<03:51:44.720> accent<03:51:45.279> AR<03:51:45.920> and<03:51:46.120> Aran<03:51:46.520> let's<03:51:46.680> take 03:51:46.790 --> 03:51:46.800 align:start position:0% with an accent AR and Aran let's take 03:51:46.800 --> 03:51:49.030 align:start position:0% with an accent AR and Aran let's take the<03:51:46.880> verb<03:51:47.199> a<03:51:47.600> which<03:51:47.680> is<03:51:47.760> a<03:51:47.920> regular<03:51:48.279> AR<03:51:48.680> verb 03:51:49.030 --> 03:51:49.040 align:start position:0% the verb a which is a regular AR verb 03:51:49.040 --> 03:51:50.750 align:start position:0% the verb a which is a regular AR verb how<03:51:49.120> would<03:51:49.239> you<03:51:49.399> conjugate<03:51:49.840> a<03:51:50.279> in<03:51:50.399> the<03:51:50.520> past 03:51:50.750 --> 03:51:50.760 align:start position:0% how would you conjugate a in the past 03:51:50.760 --> 03:51:54.030 align:start position:0% how would you conjugate a in the past subjunctive 03:51:54.030 --> 03:51:54.040 align:start position:0% 03:51:54.040 --> 03:51:56.950 align:start position:0% Yas 03:51:56.950 --> 03:51:56.960 align:start position:0% Yas 03:51:56.960 --> 03:51:59.670 align:start position:0% Yas noos<03:51:57.960> and<03:51:58.159> AOS<03:51:59.040> in<03:51:59.120> case<03:51:59.279> you<03:51:59.359> need<03:51:59.520> to 03:51:59.670 --> 03:51:59.680 align:start position:0% noos and AOS in case you need to 03:51:59.680 --> 03:52:01.830 align:start position:0% noos and AOS in case you need to conjugate<03:52:00.159> any<03:52:00.399> other<03:52:00.680> regular<03:52:01.040> AR<03:52:01.439> verb<03:52:01.760> in 03:52:01.830 --> 03:52:01.840 align:start position:0% conjugate any other regular AR verb in 03:52:01.840 --> 03:52:03.670 align:start position:0% conjugate any other regular AR verb in the<03:52:02.000> past<03:52:02.239> subjunctive<03:52:02.800> now<03:52:02.920> you<03:52:03.120> know<03:52:03.279> how 03:52:03.670 --> 03:52:03.680 align:start position:0% the past subjunctive now you know how 03:52:03.680 --> 03:52:06.429 align:start position:0% the past subjunctive now you know how now<03:52:04.000> we<03:52:04.120> have<03:52:04.319> regular<03:52:04.800> e<03:52:05.000> r<03:52:05.319> and<03:52:05.640> ir<03:52:06.040> verbs 03:52:06.429 --> 03:52:06.439 align:start position:0% now we have regular e r and ir verbs 03:52:06.439 --> 03:52:07.630 align:start position:0% now we have regular e r and ir verbs which<03:52:06.560> follow<03:52:06.840> the<03:52:06.960> same<03:52:07.159> conjugation 03:52:07.630 --> 03:52:07.640 align:start position:0% which follow the same conjugation 03:52:07.640 --> 03:52:09.469 align:start position:0% which follow the same conjugation pattern<03:52:07.960> you<03:52:08.080> drop<03:52:08.359> the<03:52:08.439> ending<03:52:08.760> of<03:52:08.920> the<03:52:09.159> verbs 03:52:09.469 --> 03:52:09.479 align:start position:0% pattern you drop the ending of the verbs 03:52:09.479 --> 03:52:13.110 align:start position:0% pattern you drop the ending of the verbs and<03:52:09.600> put<03:52:09.800> the<03:52:09.920> following 03:52:13.110 --> 03:52:13.120 align:start position:0% 03:52:13.120 --> 03:52:14.950 align:start position:0% endings<03:52:14.120> again<03:52:14.279> making<03:52:14.479> it<03:52:14.640> the<03:52:14.720> only 03:52:14.950 --> 03:52:14.960 align:start position:0% endings again making it the only 03:52:14.960 --> 03:52:18.030 align:start position:0% endings again making it the only conjugation<03:52:15.479> with<03:52:15.600> an<03:52:16.199> accent<03:52:17.199> and<03:52:17.880> let's 03:52:18.030 --> 03:52:18.040 align:start position:0% conjugation with an accent and let's 03:52:18.040 --> 03:52:19.870 align:start position:0% conjugation with an accent and let's take<03:52:18.159> the<03:52:18.239> verbs<03:52:19.000> and<03:52:19.520> how<03:52:19.600> would<03:52:19.720> you 03:52:19.870 --> 03:52:19.880 align:start position:0% take the verbs and how would you 03:52:19.880 --> 03:52:24.110 align:start position:0% take the verbs and how would you conjugate<03:52:20.319> them<03:52:20.520> in<03:52:20.600> the<03:52:20.760> past<03:52:20.960> subjunctive<03:52:21.720> Y 03:52:24.110 --> 03:52:24.120 align:start position:0% conjugate them in the past subjunctive Y 03:52:24.120 --> 03:52:28.469 align:start position:0% conjugate them in the past subjunctive Y andas<03:52:25.120> and<03:52:25.399> two<03:52:25.640> vivieras<03:52:26.479> elier<03:52:27.399> and<03:52:27.640> El<03:52:27.840> VI 03:52:28.469 --> 03:52:28.479 align:start position:0% andas and two vivieras elier and El VI 03:52:28.479 --> 03:52:30.189 align:start position:0% andas and two vivieras elier and El VI and<03:52:28.600> so<03:52:28.760> on<03:52:29.040> in<03:52:29.159> case<03:52:29.319> you<03:52:29.399> need<03:52:29.520> to<03:52:29.680> conjugate 03:52:30.189 --> 03:52:30.199 align:start position:0% and so on in case you need to conjugate 03:52:30.199 --> 03:52:32.910 align:start position:0% and so on in case you need to conjugate any<03:52:30.439> other<03:52:30.760> regular<03:52:31.239> e<03:52:31.760> or<03:52:32.040> IR<03:52:32.439> verb<03:52:32.720> in<03:52:32.800> the 03:52:32.910 --> 03:52:32.920 align:start position:0% any other regular e or IR verb in the 03:52:32.920 --> 03:52:34.670 align:start position:0% any other regular e or IR verb in the past<03:52:33.159> subjunctive<03:52:33.800> now<03:52:33.920> you<03:52:34.040> know<03:52:34.239> how 03:52:34.670 --> 03:52:34.680 align:start position:0% past subjunctive now you know how 03:52:34.680 --> 03:52:36.269 align:start position:0% past subjunctive now you know how however<03:52:35.000> now<03:52:35.159> comes<03:52:35.399> the<03:52:35.560> big<03:52:35.760> list<03:52:36.080> that<03:52:36.199> is 03:52:36.269 --> 03:52:36.279 align:start position:0% however now comes the big list that is 03:52:36.279 --> 03:52:37.830 align:start position:0% however now comes the big list that is full<03:52:36.479> of<03:52:36.640> exceptions<03:52:37.239> which<03:52:37.359> are<03:52:37.560> both 03:52:37.830 --> 03:52:37.840 align:start position:0% full of exceptions which are both 03:52:37.840 --> 03:52:39.910 align:start position:0% full of exceptions which are both irregular<03:52:38.439> and<03:52:38.560> stem<03:52:38.800> Chang<03:52:39.159> in<03:52:39.439> especially 03:52:39.910 --> 03:52:39.920 align:start position:0% irregular and stem Chang in especially 03:52:39.920 --> 03:52:42.070 align:start position:0% irregular and stem Chang in especially ir<03:52:40.319> verbs<03:52:40.800> of<03:52:40.960> course<03:52:41.319> I<03:52:41.399> will<03:52:41.520> not<03:52:41.680> include 03:52:42.070 --> 03:52:42.080 align:start position:0% ir verbs of course I will not include 03:52:42.080 --> 03:52:43.550 align:start position:0% ir verbs of course I will not include every<03:52:42.319> verb<03:52:42.600> on<03:52:42.720> the<03:52:42.880> list<03:52:43.159> because<03:52:43.319> you<03:52:43.399> don't 03:52:43.550 --> 03:52:43.560 align:start position:0% every verb on the list because you don't 03:52:43.560 --> 03:52:45.269 align:start position:0% every verb on the list because you don't need<03:52:43.800> all<03:52:43.920> of<03:52:44.080> them<03:52:44.359> but<03:52:44.479> it<03:52:44.560> is<03:52:44.720> significant 03:52:45.269 --> 03:52:45.279 align:start position:0% need all of them but it is significant 03:52:45.279 --> 03:52:46.910 align:start position:0% need all of them but it is significant to<03:52:45.399> know<03:52:45.600> the<03:52:45.720> most<03:52:45.920> useful<03:52:46.279> ones<03:52:46.680> because 03:52:46.910 --> 03:52:46.920 align:start position:0% to know the most useful ones because 03:52:46.920 --> 03:52:48.389 align:start position:0% to know the most useful ones because there<03:52:47.120> is<03:52:47.239> no<03:52:47.439> conjugation<03:52:47.960> pattern<03:52:48.239> to 03:52:48.389 --> 03:52:48.399 align:start position:0% there is no conjugation pattern to 03:52:48.399 --> 03:52:50.429 align:start position:0% there is no conjugation pattern to follow<03:52:48.840> I<03:52:48.960> recommend<03:52:49.359> just<03:52:49.520> memorizing<03:52:50.080> them 03:52:50.429 --> 03:52:50.439 align:start position:0% follow I recommend just memorizing them 03:52:50.439 --> 03:52:52.269 align:start position:0% follow I recommend just memorizing them as<03:52:50.640> they<03:52:50.760> are<03:52:51.120> in<03:52:51.239> the<03:52:51.359> list<03:52:51.680> you<03:52:51.800> have<03:52:51.960> verbs 03:52:52.269 --> 03:52:52.279 align:start position:0% as they are in the list you have verbs 03:52:52.279 --> 03:52:54.630 align:start position:0% as they are in the list you have verbs like<03:52:52.520> Dar<03:52:52.880> meaning<03:52:53.159> to<03:52:53.399> give<03:52:53.800> the<03:52:54.239> meaning<03:52:54.479> to 03:52:54.630 --> 03:52:54.640 align:start position:0% like Dar meaning to give the meaning to 03:52:54.640 --> 03:52:57.670 align:start position:0% like Dar meaning to give the meaning to say<03:52:55.000> or<03:52:55.159> to<03:52:55.319> tell<03:52:55.800> AAR<03:52:56.359> meaning<03:52:56.640> to<03:52:56.840> be<03:52:57.239> a 03:52:57.670 --> 03:52:57.680 align:start position:0% say or to tell AAR meaning to be a 03:52:57.680 --> 03:52:59.950 align:start position:0% say or to tell AAR meaning to be a meaning<03:52:57.960> to<03:52:58.120> do<03:52:58.359> or<03:52:58.560> to<03:52:58.760> make<03:52:59.159> e<03:52:59.439> and<03:52:59.600> said 03:52:59.950 --> 03:52:59.960 align:start position:0% meaning to do or to make e and said 03:52:59.960 --> 03:53:01.790 align:start position:0% meaning to do or to make e and said meaning<03:53:00.199> to<03:53:00.399> go<03:53:00.600> and<03:53:00.760> to<03:53:00.960> be<03:53:01.279> and<03:53:01.479> as<03:53:01.560> you<03:53:01.680> can 03:53:01.790 --> 03:53:01.800 align:start position:0% meaning to go and to be and as you can 03:53:01.800 --> 03:53:03.510 align:start position:0% meaning to go and to be and as you can see<03:53:02.159> they<03:53:02.279> follow<03:53:02.560> the<03:53:02.640> same<03:53:02.880> pattern<03:53:03.359> because 03:53:03.510 --> 03:53:03.520 align:start position:0% see they follow the same pattern because 03:53:03.520 --> 03:53:05.630 align:start position:0% see they follow the same pattern because in<03:53:03.680> case<03:53:03.840> you<03:53:03.960> don't<03:53:04.199> remember<03:53:04.720> ir<03:53:04.960> and<03:53:05.159> s<03:53:05.520> in 03:53:05.630 --> 03:53:05.640 align:start position:0% in case you don't remember ir and s in 03:53:05.640 --> 03:53:07.269 align:start position:0% in case you don't remember ir and s in the<03:53:05.800> past<03:53:06.000> simple<03:53:06.279> tense<03:53:06.640> follow<03:53:06.960> the<03:53:07.080> same 03:53:07.269 --> 03:53:07.279 align:start position:0% the past simple tense follow the same 03:53:07.279 --> 03:53:09.149 align:start position:0% the past simple tense follow the same pattern<03:53:07.680> in<03:53:07.800> the<03:53:07.920> past<03:53:08.120> subjunctive<03:53:08.760> however 03:53:09.149 --> 03:53:09.159 align:start position:0% pattern in the past subjunctive however 03:53:09.159 --> 03:53:11.070 align:start position:0% pattern in the past subjunctive however the<03:53:09.279> pattern<03:53:09.600> is<03:53:09.760> somewhat<03:53:10.080> similar<03:53:10.600> next<03:53:10.960> we 03:53:11.070 --> 03:53:11.080 align:start position:0% the pattern is somewhat similar next we 03:53:11.080 --> 03:53:14.110 align:start position:0% the pattern is somewhat similar next we have<03:53:11.359> P<03:53:11.840> meaning<03:53:12.120> to<03:53:12.319> can<03:53:12.760> p<03:53:13.239> meaning<03:53:13.520> to<03:53:13.720> put 03:53:14.110 --> 03:53:14.120 align:start position:0% have P meaning to can p meaning to put 03:53:14.120 --> 03:53:16.790 align:start position:0% have P meaning to can p meaning to put sa<03:53:14.640> meaning<03:53:14.880> to<03:53:15.080> know<03:53:15.520> ten<03:53:15.960> meaning<03:53:16.239> to<03:53:16.479> have 03:53:16.790 --> 03:53:16.800 align:start position:0% sa meaning to know ten meaning to have 03:53:16.800 --> 03:53:18.590 align:start position:0% sa meaning to know ten meaning to have and<03:53:17.120> ven<03:53:17.479> meaning<03:53:17.760> to<03:53:17.960> come<03:53:18.279> after<03:53:18.479> you 03:53:18.590 --> 03:53:18.600 align:start position:0% and ven meaning to come after you 03:53:18.600 --> 03:53:20.309 align:start position:0% and ven meaning to come after you memorize<03:53:19.120> these<03:53:19.319> verbs<03:53:19.720> there<03:53:19.840> are<03:53:20.040> stem 03:53:20.309 --> 03:53:20.319 align:start position:0% memorize these verbs there are stem 03:53:20.319 --> 03:53:22.389 align:start position:0% memorize these verbs there are stem changing<03:53:20.760> ir<03:53:21.120> verbs<03:53:21.520> that<03:53:21.680> have<03:53:21.880> irregular 03:53:22.389 --> 03:53:22.399 align:start position:0% changing ir verbs that have irregular 03:53:22.399 --> 03:53:24.269 align:start position:0% changing ir verbs that have irregular stem<03:53:22.640> changing<03:53:23.040> patterns<03:53:23.520> but<03:53:23.680> I'm<03:53:23.880> obviously 03:53:24.269 --> 03:53:24.279 align:start position:0% stem changing patterns but I'm obviously 03:53:24.279 --> 03:53:26.309 align:start position:0% stem changing patterns but I'm obviously not<03:53:24.439> including<03:53:25.000> every<03:53:25.239> verb<03:53:25.600> in<03:53:25.760> this<03:53:25.960> list 03:53:26.309 --> 03:53:26.319 align:start position:0% not including every verb in this list 03:53:26.319 --> 03:53:28.269 align:start position:0% not including every verb in this list you<03:53:26.439> have<03:53:26.600> verbs<03:53:26.960> like<03:53:27.239> pref<03:53:27.840> meaning<03:53:28.080> to 03:53:28.269 --> 03:53:28.279 align:start position:0% you have verbs like pref meaning to 03:53:28.279 --> 03:53:31.349 align:start position:0% you have verbs like pref meaning to prefer<03:53:28.840> D<03:53:29.359> meaning<03:53:29.600> to<03:53:29.840> sleep<03:53:30.840> meaning<03:53:31.120> to 03:53:31.349 --> 03:53:31.359 align:start position:0% prefer D meaning to sleep meaning to 03:53:31.359 --> 03:53:34.309 align:start position:0% prefer D meaning to sleep meaning to drive<03:53:32.359> meaning<03:53:32.560> to<03:53:32.760> believe<03:53:33.239> and<03:53:33.880> meaning<03:53:34.120> to 03:53:34.309 --> 03:53:34.319 align:start position:0% drive meaning to believe and meaning to 03:53:34.319 --> 03:53:36.189 align:start position:0% drive meaning to believe and meaning to hear<03:53:34.720> these<03:53:34.960> are<03:53:35.159> all<03:53:35.319> the<03:53:35.479> types<03:53:35.680> of<03:53:35.840> verbs 03:53:36.189 --> 03:53:36.199 align:start position:0% hear these are all the types of verbs 03:53:36.199 --> 03:53:37.790 align:start position:0% hear these are all the types of verbs that<03:53:36.279> you<03:53:36.439> have<03:53:36.560> to<03:53:36.680> know<03:53:37.359> understand<03:53:37.640> and 03:53:37.790 --> 03:53:37.800 align:start position:0% that you have to know understand and 03:53:37.800 --> 03:53:39.469 align:start position:0% that you have to know understand and memorize<03:53:38.399> with<03:53:38.520> every<03:53:38.960> pronoun<03:53:39.279> and 03:53:39.469 --> 03:53:39.479 align:start position:0% memorize with every pronoun and 03:53:39.479 --> 03:53:41.149 align:start position:0% memorize with every pronoun and conjugation<03:53:40.159> before<03:53:40.399> making<03:53:40.800> actual 03:53:41.149 --> 03:53:41.159 align:start position:0% conjugation before making actual 03:53:41.159 --> 03:53:42.990 align:start position:0% conjugation before making actual sentences<03:53:41.760> we<03:53:41.880> have<03:53:42.000> to<03:53:42.439> understand<03:53:42.720> that<03:53:42.880> the 03:53:42.990 --> 03:53:43.000 align:start position:0% sentences we have to understand that the 03:53:43.000 --> 03:53:45.070 align:start position:0% sentences we have to understand that the past<03:53:43.239> subjunctive<03:53:43.840> is<03:53:43.960> used<03:53:44.279> the<03:53:44.399> same<03:53:44.640> way<03:53:44.960> as 03:53:45.070 --> 03:53:45.080 align:start position:0% past subjunctive is used the same way as 03:53:45.080 --> 03:53:46.910 align:start position:0% past subjunctive is used the same way as the<03:53:45.239> present<03:53:45.520> subjunctive<03:53:46.239> except<03:53:46.640> that<03:53:46.760> it 03:53:46.910 --> 03:53:46.920 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive except that it 03:53:46.920 --> 03:53:49.349 align:start position:0% the present subjunctive except that it talks<03:53:47.159> about<03:53:47.479> actions<03:53:48.040> events<03:53:48.479> or<03:53:48.920> conditions 03:53:49.349 --> 03:53:49.359 align:start position:0% talks about actions events or conditions 03:53:49.359 --> 03:53:51.229 align:start position:0% talks about actions events or conditions that<03:53:49.560> already<03:53:49.960> happened<03:53:50.359> in<03:53:50.520> the<03:53:50.680> past<03:53:51.120> this 03:53:51.229 --> 03:53:51.239 align:start position:0% that already happened in the past this 03:53:51.239 --> 03:53:52.830 align:start position:0% that already happened in the past this means<03:53:51.640> that<03:53:51.760> whenever<03:53:52.080> we<03:53:52.199> speak<03:53:52.359> of<03:53:52.520> the<03:53:52.640> past 03:53:52.830 --> 03:53:52.840 align:start position:0% means that whenever we speak of the past 03:53:52.840 --> 03:53:54.950 align:start position:0% means that whenever we speak of the past subjunctive<03:53:53.479> the<03:53:53.640> entire<03:53:54.080> phrase<03:53:54.520> needs<03:53:54.760> to 03:53:54.950 --> 03:53:54.960 align:start position:0% subjunctive the entire phrase needs to 03:53:54.960 --> 03:53:57.110 align:start position:0% subjunctive the entire phrase needs to be<03:53:55.159> in<03:53:55.239> the<03:53:55.439> past<03:53:55.640> simple<03:53:56.120> or<03:53:56.319> past<03:53:56.560> imperfect 03:53:57.110 --> 03:53:57.120 align:start position:0% be in the past simple or past imperfect 03:53:57.120 --> 03:53:58.750 align:start position:0% be in the past simple or past imperfect in<03:53:57.239> order<03:53:57.479> to<03:53:57.680> activate<03:53:58.040> it<03:53:58.239> just<03:53:58.399> like<03:53:58.520> in<03:53:58.640> the 03:53:58.750 --> 03:53:58.760 align:start position:0% in order to activate it just like in the 03:53:58.760 --> 03:54:00.510 align:start position:0% in order to activate it just like in the present<03:53:59.000> subjunctive<03:53:59.640> the<03:53:59.760> whole<03:54:00.000> sentence 03:54:00.510 --> 03:54:00.520 align:start position:0% present subjunctive the whole sentence 03:54:00.520 --> 03:54:01.910 align:start position:0% present subjunctive the whole sentence is<03:54:00.640> in<03:54:00.760> the<03:54:00.920> present<03:54:01.199> simple<03:54:01.560> and<03:54:01.680> it's<03:54:01.840> the 03:54:01.910 --> 03:54:01.920 align:start position:0% is in the present simple and it's the 03:54:01.920 --> 03:54:04.030 align:start position:0% is in the present simple and it's the same<03:54:02.159> idea<03:54:02.600> with<03:54:02.720> the<03:54:02.960> past<03:54:03.359> every<03:54:03.640> sentence 03:54:04.030 --> 03:54:04.040 align:start position:0% same idea with the past every sentence 03:54:04.040 --> 03:54:06.110 align:start position:0% same idea with the past every sentence in<03:54:04.159> the<03:54:04.319> past<03:54:04.520> subjunctive<03:54:05.159> must<03:54:05.399> fully<03:54:05.760> be<03:54:06.040> in 03:54:06.110 --> 03:54:06.120 align:start position:0% in the past subjunctive must fully be in 03:54:06.120 --> 03:54:08.110 align:start position:0% in the past subjunctive must fully be in the<03:54:06.279> past<03:54:06.520> simple<03:54:06.880> or<03:54:07.120> past<03:54:07.359> imperfect<03:54:07.960> so 03:54:08.110 --> 03:54:08.120 align:start position:0% the past simple or past imperfect so 03:54:08.120 --> 03:54:09.910 align:start position:0% the past simple or past imperfect so make<03:54:08.319> sure<03:54:08.600> that<03:54:08.720> you<03:54:09.000> pay<03:54:09.159> attention<03:54:09.520> to<03:54:09.720> each 03:54:09.910 --> 03:54:09.920 align:start position:0% make sure that you pay attention to each 03:54:09.920 --> 03:54:12.149 align:start position:0% make sure that you pay attention to each phrase<03:54:10.439> now<03:54:10.720> I<03:54:10.800> can<03:54:10.960> show<03:54:11.159> you<03:54:11.359> a<03:54:11.439> few<03:54:11.680> phrases 03:54:12.149 --> 03:54:12.159 align:start position:0% phrase now I can show you a few phrases 03:54:12.159 --> 03:54:13.830 align:start position:0% phrase now I can show you a few phrases and<03:54:12.319> after<03:54:12.520> you<03:54:12.680> get<03:54:12.840> the<03:54:13.000> idea<03:54:13.479> then<03:54:13.600> you<03:54:13.680> can 03:54:13.830 --> 03:54:13.840 align:start position:0% and after you get the idea then you can 03:54:13.840 --> 03:54:15.550 align:start position:0% and after you get the idea then you can make<03:54:14.040> any<03:54:14.239> sentence<03:54:14.680> that<03:54:14.800> you<03:54:14.920> want<03:54:15.319> take<03:54:15.439> a 03:54:15.550 --> 03:54:15.560 align:start position:0% make any sentence that you want take a 03:54:15.560 --> 03:54:17.830 align:start position:0% make any sentence that you want take a look<03:54:15.680> at<03:54:15.840> this<03:54:16.000> phrase 03:54:17.830 --> 03:54:17.840 align:start position:0% look at this phrase 03:54:17.840 --> 03:54:20.710 align:start position:0% look at this phrase Y<03:54:18.840> how<03:54:18.920> would<03:54:19.040> you<03:54:19.159> say<03:54:19.399> this<03:54:19.560> phrase<03:54:19.880> in 03:54:20.710 --> 03:54:20.720 align:start position:0% Y how would you say this phrase in 03:54:20.720 --> 03:54:22.550 align:start position:0% Y how would you say this phrase in English<03:54:21.720> just<03:54:21.880> like<03:54:22.040> in<03:54:22.120> the<03:54:22.279> present 03:54:22.550 --> 03:54:22.560 align:start position:0% English just like in the present 03:54:22.560 --> 03:54:24.550 align:start position:0% English just like in the present subjunctive<03:54:23.159> there's<03:54:23.399> two<03:54:23.600> options<03:54:24.199> first 03:54:24.550 --> 03:54:24.560 align:start position:0% subjunctive there's two options first 03:54:24.560 --> 03:54:26.269 align:start position:0% subjunctive there's two options first you<03:54:24.680> can<03:54:24.920> visually<03:54:25.239> translate<03:54:25.640> the<03:54:25.800> sentence 03:54:26.269 --> 03:54:26.279 align:start position:0% you can visually translate the sentence 03:54:26.279 --> 03:54:28.510 align:start position:0% you can visually translate the sentence and<03:54:26.439> say<03:54:26.840> I<03:54:27.000> wanted<03:54:27.520> that<03:54:27.640> you<03:54:27.800> speak<03:54:28.080> with<03:54:28.239> me 03:54:28.510 --> 03:54:28.520 align:start position:0% and say I wanted that you speak with me 03:54:28.520 --> 03:54:29.910 align:start position:0% and say I wanted that you speak with me but<03:54:28.600> if<03:54:28.680> you<03:54:28.760> want<03:54:28.880> to<03:54:29.000> sound<03:54:29.279> logical<03:54:29.800> then 03:54:29.910 --> 03:54:29.920 align:start position:0% but if you want to sound logical then 03:54:29.920 --> 03:54:31.750 align:start position:0% but if you want to sound logical then you<03:54:30.000> can<03:54:30.199> say<03:54:30.560> I<03:54:30.680> wanted<03:54:31.000> you<03:54:31.239> to<03:54:31.399> speak<03:54:31.640> with 03:54:31.750 --> 03:54:31.760 align:start position:0% you can say I wanted you to speak with 03:54:31.760 --> 03:54:33.550 align:start position:0% you can say I wanted you to speak with me<03:54:31.960> unlike<03:54:32.239> the<03:54:32.359> present<03:54:32.640> subjunctive<03:54:33.319> both 03:54:33.550 --> 03:54:33.560 align:start position:0% me unlike the present subjunctive both 03:54:33.560 --> 03:54:35.510 align:start position:0% me unlike the present subjunctive both phrases<03:54:34.120> have<03:54:34.319> the<03:54:34.439> same<03:54:34.640> form<03:54:34.920> of<03:54:35.040> the<03:54:35.159> verb 03:54:35.510 --> 03:54:35.520 align:start position:0% phrases have the same form of the verb 03:54:35.520 --> 03:54:37.110 align:start position:0% phrases have the same form of the verb which<03:54:35.640> is<03:54:35.880> actually<03:54:36.199> in<03:54:36.399> the<03:54:36.600> past<03:54:36.920> because 03:54:37.110 --> 03:54:37.120 align:start position:0% which is actually in the past because 03:54:37.120 --> 03:54:39.389 align:start position:0% which is actually in the past because the<03:54:37.239> two<03:54:37.399> phrases<03:54:37.960> begin<03:54:38.319> in<03:54:38.479> the<03:54:38.600> past<03:54:39.199> this 03:54:39.389 --> 03:54:39.399 align:start position:0% the two phrases begin in the past this 03:54:39.399 --> 03:54:40.990 align:start position:0% the two phrases begin in the past this is<03:54:39.560> why<03:54:39.720> the<03:54:39.880> past<03:54:40.080> subjunctive<03:54:40.640> is<03:54:40.760> one<03:54:40.880> of 03:54:40.990 --> 03:54:41.000 align:start position:0% is why the past subjunctive is one of 03:54:41.000 --> 03:54:42.550 align:start position:0% is why the past subjunctive is one of the<03:54:41.080> hardest<03:54:41.439> Concepts<03:54:41.800> to<03:54:42.239> understand 03:54:42.550 --> 03:54:42.560 align:start position:0% the hardest Concepts to understand 03:54:42.560 --> 03:54:44.389 align:start position:0% the hardest Concepts to understand because<03:54:42.760> in<03:54:42.920> Spanish<03:54:43.399> you<03:54:43.560> have<03:54:43.760> one<03:54:43.960> form<03:54:44.239> of 03:54:44.389 --> 03:54:44.399 align:start position:0% because in Spanish you have one form of 03:54:44.399 --> 03:54:46.389 align:start position:0% because in Spanish you have one form of the<03:54:44.560> sentence<03:54:45.080> with<03:54:45.199> a<03:54:45.359> very<03:54:45.560> odd<03:54:45.920> conjugated 03:54:46.389 --> 03:54:46.399 align:start position:0% the sentence with a very odd conjugated 03:54:46.399 --> 03:54:48.149 align:start position:0% the sentence with a very odd conjugated verb<03:54:46.680> but<03:54:46.840> in<03:54:47.040> English<03:54:47.479> there<03:54:47.600> are<03:54:47.760> multiple 03:54:48.149 --> 03:54:48.159 align:start position:0% verb but in English there are multiple 03:54:48.159 --> 03:54:49.429 align:start position:0% verb but in English there are multiple options<03:54:48.640> just<03:54:48.760> like<03:54:48.920> in<03:54:49.000> the<03:54:49.159> present 03:54:49.429 --> 03:54:49.439 align:start position:0% options just like in the present 03:54:49.439 --> 03:54:51.550 align:start position:0% options just like in the present subjunctive<03:54:50.080> I<03:54:50.159> will<03:54:50.319> focus<03:54:50.600> on<03:54:50.800> both<03:54:51.040> phrases 03:54:51.550 --> 03:54:51.560 align:start position:0% subjunctive I will focus on both phrases 03:54:51.560 --> 03:54:53.189 align:start position:0% subjunctive I will focus on both phrases because<03:54:51.760> the<03:54:51.880> two<03:54:52.040> sentences<03:54:52.600> can<03:54:52.720> be<03:54:52.880> applied 03:54:53.189 --> 03:54:53.199 align:start position:0% because the two sentences can be applied 03:54:53.199 --> 03:54:58.389 align:start position:0% because the two sentences can be applied similarly<03:54:53.760> how<03:54:53.880> would<03:54:54.000> you<03:54:54.080> say<03:54:54.319> this 03:54:58.389 --> 03:54:58.399 align:start position:0% 03:54:58.399 --> 03:55:00.590 align:start position:0% phrase<03:54:59.399> as<03:54:59.520> a<03:54:59.640> reminder<03:55:00.199> because<03:55:00.399> we're 03:55:00.590 --> 03:55:00.600 align:start position:0% phrase as a reminder because we're 03:55:00.600 --> 03:55:02.229 align:start position:0% phrase as a reminder because we're working<03:55:00.880> in<03:55:01.000> the<03:55:01.199> past<03:55:01.439> tense<03:55:01.800> we<03:55:01.880> can<03:55:02.040> have 03:55:02.229 --> 03:55:02.239 align:start position:0% working in the past tense we can have 03:55:02.239 --> 03:55:03.830 align:start position:0% working in the past tense we can have sentences<03:55:02.840> that<03:55:02.920> are<03:55:03.120> either<03:55:03.359> in<03:55:03.479> the<03:55:03.640> past 03:55:03.830 --> 03:55:03.840 align:start position:0% sentences that are either in the past 03:55:03.840 --> 03:55:05.630 align:start position:0% sentences that are either in the past simple<03:55:04.239> or<03:55:04.439> past<03:55:04.720> imperfect<03:55:05.279> which<03:55:05.399> is<03:55:05.520> why 03:55:05.630 --> 03:55:05.640 align:start position:0% simple or past imperfect which is why 03:55:05.640 --> 03:55:07.030 align:start position:0% simple or past imperfect which is why you<03:55:05.720> see<03:55:05.920> the<03:55:06.040> sentence<03:55:06.479> starting<03:55:06.800> with<03:55:06.920> a 03:55:07.030 --> 03:55:07.040 align:start position:0% you see the sentence starting with a 03:55:07.040 --> 03:55:08.910 align:start position:0% you see the sentence starting with a verb<03:55:07.359> coming<03:55:07.560> from<03:55:07.760> weird<03:55:08.159> being<03:55:08.399> in<03:55:08.520> the 03:55:08.910 --> 03:55:08.920 align:start position:0% verb coming from weird being in the 03:55:08.920 --> 03:55:10.990 align:start position:0% verb coming from weird being in the perfect<03:55:09.199> tense<03:55:09.920> sometimes<03:55:10.319> we<03:55:10.439> have<03:55:10.600> the<03:55:10.760> past 03:55:10.990 --> 03:55:11.000 align:start position:0% perfect tense sometimes we have the past 03:55:11.000 --> 03:55:12.590 align:start position:0% perfect tense sometimes we have the past simple<03:55:11.399> and<03:55:11.680> sometimes<03:55:11.920> the<03:55:12.040> imperfect<03:55:12.520> and 03:55:12.590 --> 03:55:12.600 align:start position:0% simple and sometimes the imperfect and 03:55:12.600 --> 03:55:14.550 align:start position:0% simple and sometimes the imperfect and it's<03:55:12.760> up<03:55:12.920> to<03:55:13.040> you<03:55:13.239> to<03:55:13.479> decide<03:55:13.840> which<03:55:14.040> tense<03:55:14.399> is 03:55:14.550 --> 03:55:14.560 align:start position:0% it's up to you to decide which tense is 03:55:14.560 --> 03:55:20.830 align:start position:0% it's up to you to decide which tense is correct<03:55:14.840> to<03:55:15.000> use<03:55:15.359> how<03:55:15.520> would<03:55:15.640> you<03:55:15.760> say<03:55:16.120> this 03:55:20.830 --> 03:55:20.840 align:start position:0% 03:55:20.840 --> 03:55:26.910 align:start position:0% sentence<03:55:21.840> how<03:55:21.960> would<03:55:22.080> you<03:55:22.199> say 03:55:26.910 --> 03:55:26.920 align:start position:0% 03:55:26.920 --> 03:55:32.630 align:start position:0% this<03:55:27.920> how<03:55:28.000> do<03:55:28.120> you<03:55:28.239> say<03:55:28.399> one<03:55:28.520> of 03:55:32.630 --> 03:55:32.640 align:start position:0% 03:55:32.640 --> 03:55:37.790 align:start position:0% these<03:55:33.640> how<03:55:33.720> do<03:55:33.840> you<03:55:34.000> say 03:55:37.790 --> 03:55:37.800 align:start position:0% 03:55:37.800 --> 03:55:39.429 align:start position:0% this 03:55:39.429 --> 03:55:39.439 align:start position:0% this 03:55:39.439 --> 03:55:40.950 align:start position:0% this now<03:55:39.720> let's<03:55:39.920> try<03:55:40.080> to<03:55:40.239> use<03:55:40.560> some<03:55:40.680> of<03:55:40.800> the 03:55:40.950 --> 03:55:40.960 align:start position:0% now let's try to use some of the 03:55:40.960 --> 03:55:46.790 align:start position:0% now let's try to use some of the irregular<03:55:41.479> verbs<03:55:41.880> how<03:55:41.960> would<03:55:42.080> you<03:55:42.199> say<03:55:42.479> this 03:55:46.790 --> 03:55:46.800 align:start position:0% 03:55:46.800 --> 03:55:52.670 align:start position:0% phrase<03:55:47.800> how<03:55:47.880> would<03:55:48.000> you<03:55:48.159> say 03:55:52.670 --> 03:55:52.680 align:start position:0% 03:55:52.680 --> 03:55:57.510 align:start position:0% this<03:55:53.680> how<03:55:53.800> about<03:55:54.040> this 03:55:57.510 --> 03:55:57.520 align:start position:0% 03:55:57.520 --> 03:56:00.149 align:start position:0% one<03:55:58.520> this<03:55:58.680> sentence<03:55:59.080> was<03:55:59.239> a<03:55:59.359> bit<03:55:59.560> hard<03:55:59.960> because 03:56:00.149 --> 03:56:00.159 align:start position:0% one this sentence was a bit hard because 03:56:00.159 --> 03:56:02.389 align:start position:0% one this sentence was a bit hard because we<03:56:00.279> had<03:56:00.439> the<03:56:00.520> word<03:56:00.760> dud<03:56:01.399> which<03:56:01.520> means<03:56:01.880> we<03:56:02.080> doubt 03:56:02.389 --> 03:56:02.399 align:start position:0% we had the word dud which means we doubt 03:56:02.399 --> 03:56:03.830 align:start position:0% we had the word dud which means we doubt and<03:56:02.560> we<03:56:02.760> doubted<03:56:03.279> and<03:56:03.359> so<03:56:03.520> the<03:56:03.600> meaning 03:56:03.830 --> 03:56:03.840 align:start position:0% and we doubted and so the meaning 03:56:03.840 --> 03:56:05.630 align:start position:0% and we doubted and so the meaning changes<03:56:04.199> in<03:56:04.399> context<03:56:04.920> and<03:56:05.080> also<03:56:05.319> because<03:56:05.520> we 03:56:05.630 --> 03:56:05.640 align:start position:0% changes in context and also because we 03:56:05.640 --> 03:56:07.389 align:start position:0% changes in context and also because we use<03:56:05.880> the<03:56:06.000> progressive<03:56:06.479> tense<03:56:06.920> that<03:56:07.040> is<03:56:07.239> you 03:56:07.389 --> 03:56:07.399 align:start position:0% use the progressive tense that is you 03:56:07.399 --> 03:56:09.830 align:start position:0% use the progressive tense that is you were<03:56:07.640> speaking<03:56:08.120> which<03:56:08.279> uses<03:56:08.760> the<03:56:08.880> verb<03:56:09.560> in<03:56:09.680> the 03:56:09.830 --> 03:56:09.840 align:start position:0% were speaking which uses the verb in the 03:56:09.840 --> 03:56:14.790 align:start position:0% were speaking which uses the verb in the past<03:56:10.199> how<03:56:10.319> about<03:56:10.520> one<03:56:10.640> of 03:56:14.790 --> 03:56:14.800 align:start position:0% 03:56:14.800 --> 03:56:21.389 align:start position:0% these<03:56:15.800> how<03:56:15.920> about<03:56:16.159> this 03:56:21.389 --> 03:56:21.399 align:start position:0% 03:56:21.399 --> 03:56:24.469 align:start position:0% one<03:56:22.399> in<03:56:22.560> this<03:56:22.680> sentence<03:56:23.159> we<03:56:23.319> have<03:56:24.120> which<03:56:24.239> comes 03:56:24.469 --> 03:56:24.479 align:start position:0% one in this sentence we have which comes 03:56:24.479 --> 03:56:26.950 align:start position:0% one in this sentence we have which comes from<03:56:25.000> and<03:56:25.560> but<03:56:25.680> in<03:56:25.840> this<03:56:26.000> case<03:56:26.319> we<03:56:26.439> can<03:56:26.640> tell 03:56:26.950 --> 03:56:26.960 align:start position:0% from and but in this case we can tell 03:56:26.960 --> 03:56:30.950 align:start position:0% from and but in this case we can tell that<03:56:27.080> it's<03:56:27.319> ear<03:56:27.680> now<03:56:27.880> how<03:56:28.000> about<03:56:28.279> this 03:56:30.950 --> 03:56:30.960 align:start position:0% 03:56:30.960 --> 03:56:34.349 align:start position:0% one<03:56:31.960> in<03:56:32.120> this<03:56:32.279> casea<03:56:33.239> is<03:56:33.399> derived<03:56:33.760> from<03:56:34.000> said 03:56:34.349 --> 03:56:34.359 align:start position:0% one in this casea is derived from said 03:56:34.359 --> 03:56:35.870 align:start position:0% one in this casea is derived from said because<03:56:34.479> it<03:56:34.600> speaks<03:56:34.840> of<03:56:34.920> a<03:56:35.040> permanent<03:56:35.359> feeling 03:56:35.870 --> 03:56:35.880 align:start position:0% because it speaks of a permanent feeling 03:56:35.880 --> 03:56:37.229 align:start position:0% because it speaks of a permanent feeling even<03:56:36.080> though<03:56:36.199> the<03:56:36.319> sentence<03:56:36.600> in<03:56:36.800> English 03:56:37.229 --> 03:56:37.239 align:start position:0% even though the sentence in English 03:56:37.239 --> 03:56:38.429 align:start position:0% even though the sentence in English doesn't<03:56:37.520> really<03:56:37.720> make<03:56:37.920> sense<03:56:38.239> when<03:56:38.319> you 03:56:38.429 --> 03:56:38.439 align:start position:0% doesn't really make sense when you 03:56:38.439 --> 03:56:40.229 align:start position:0% doesn't really make sense when you visually<03:56:38.640> usually<03:56:38.920> translated<03:56:39.479> into<03:56:39.720> Spanish 03:56:40.229 --> 03:56:40.239 align:start position:0% visually usually translated into Spanish 03:56:40.239 --> 03:56:44.550 align:start position:0% visually usually translated into Spanish how<03:56:40.359> about<03:56:40.600> this 03:56:44.550 --> 03:56:44.560 align:start position:0% 03:56:44.560 --> 03:56:47.030 align:start position:0% one<03:56:45.560> if<03:56:45.640> you<03:56:45.800> wanted<03:56:46.199> you<03:56:46.319> could<03:56:46.439> have<03:56:46.640> placed 03:56:47.030 --> 03:56:47.040 align:start position:0% one if you wanted you could have placed 03:56:47.040 --> 03:56:48.910 align:start position:0% one if you wanted you could have placed the<03:56:47.159> object<03:56:47.479> pronoun<03:56:48.000> before<03:56:48.279> the<03:56:48.399> conjugated 03:56:48.910 --> 03:56:48.920 align:start position:0% the object pronoun before the conjugated 03:56:48.920 --> 03:56:53.710 align:start position:0% the object pronoun before the conjugated verb<03:56:49.239> how<03:56:49.359> about<03:56:49.560> one<03:56:49.680> of 03:56:53.710 --> 03:56:53.720 align:start position:0% 03:56:53.720 --> 03:56:59.590 align:start position:0% these<03:56:54.720> how<03:56:54.840> about<03:56:55.080> this 03:56:59.590 --> 03:56:59.600 align:start position:0% 03:56:59.600 --> 03:57:04.950 align:start position:0% one<03:57:00.600> what<03:57:00.720> about 03:57:04.950 --> 03:57:04.960 align:start position:0% 03:57:04.960 --> 03:57:07.590 align:start position:0% this<03:57:05.960> what<03:57:06.080> about<03:57:06.279> one<03:57:06.399> of 03:57:07.590 --> 03:57:07.600 align:start position:0% this what about one of 03:57:07.600 --> 03:57:11.670 align:start position:0% this what about one of these 03:57:11.670 --> 03:57:11.680 align:start position:0% 03:57:11.680 --> 03:57:13.349 align:start position:0% now<03:57:12.000> let's<03:57:12.159> finish<03:57:12.439> the<03:57:12.560> past<03:57:12.760> subjunctive 03:57:13.349 --> 03:57:13.359 align:start position:0% now let's finish the past subjunctive 03:57:13.359 --> 03:57:15.229 align:start position:0% now let's finish the past subjunctive with<03:57:13.560> irregular<03:57:14.000> stem<03:57:14.279> changing<03:57:14.600> verbs<03:57:15.000> along 03:57:15.229 --> 03:57:15.239 align:start position:0% with irregular stem changing verbs along 03:57:15.239 --> 03:57:17.030 align:start position:0% with irregular stem changing verbs along with<03:57:15.359> a<03:57:15.439> few<03:57:15.640> General<03:57:15.960> main<03:57:16.199> Clauses<03:57:16.720> in<03:57:16.840> the 03:57:17.030 --> 03:57:17.040 align:start position:0% with a few General main Clauses in the 03:57:17.040 --> 03:57:22.070 align:start position:0% with a few General main Clauses in the past<03:57:17.399> how<03:57:17.520> would<03:57:17.640> you<03:57:17.760> say 03:57:22.070 --> 03:57:22.080 align:start position:0% 03:57:22.080 --> 03:57:24.269 align:start position:0% this<03:57:23.080> this<03:57:23.239> sentence<03:57:23.680> doesn't<03:57:23.960> really<03:57:24.120> make 03:57:24.269 --> 03:57:24.279 align:start position:0% this this sentence doesn't really make 03:57:24.279 --> 03:57:25.990 align:start position:0% this this sentence doesn't really make sense<03:57:24.520> to<03:57:24.720> say<03:57:25.000> but<03:57:25.080> I'm<03:57:25.199> showing<03:57:25.479> it<03:57:25.760> just<03:57:25.880> so 03:57:25.990 --> 03:57:26.000 align:start position:0% sense to say but I'm showing it just so 03:57:26.000 --> 03:57:27.830 align:start position:0% sense to say but I'm showing it just so you<03:57:26.120> can<03:57:26.560> understand<03:57:26.840> irregular<03:57:27.359> verbs<03:57:27.720> in 03:57:27.830 --> 03:57:27.840 align:start position:0% you can understand irregular verbs in 03:57:27.840 --> 03:57:32.510 align:start position:0% you can understand irregular verbs in the<03:57:27.960> past<03:57:28.199> subjunctive<03:57:28.800> how<03:57:28.880> do<03:57:29.000> you<03:57:29.159> say 03:57:32.510 --> 03:57:32.520 align:start position:0% 03:57:32.520 --> 03:57:37.590 align:start position:0% this<03:57:33.520> how<03:57:33.640> about<03:57:33.840> one<03:57:33.960> of 03:57:37.590 --> 03:57:37.600 align:start position:0% 03:57:37.600 --> 03:57:39.469 align:start position:0% these 03:57:39.469 --> 03:57:39.479 align:start position:0% these 03:57:39.479 --> 03:57:43.349 align:start position:0% these how<03:57:39.640> about 03:57:43.349 --> 03:57:43.359 align:start position:0% 03:57:43.359 --> 03:57:48.670 align:start position:0% this<03:57:44.359> me<03:57:44.680> what<03:57:44.800> about 03:57:48.670 --> 03:57:48.680 align:start position:0% 03:57:48.680 --> 03:57:50.990 align:start position:0% this<03:57:49.680> at<03:57:49.880> last<03:57:50.159> let's<03:57:50.359> finish<03:57:50.640> with<03:57:50.800> three 03:57:50.990 --> 03:57:51.000 align:start position:0% this at last let's finish with three 03:57:51.000 --> 03:57:56.229 align:start position:0% this at last let's finish with three main<03:57:51.239> Clauses<03:57:51.840> how<03:57:51.920> do<03:57:52.040> you<03:57:52.199> say 03:57:56.229 --> 03:57:56.239 align:start position:0% 03:57:56.239 --> 03:58:01.550 align:start position:0% this<03:57:57.239> how<03:57:57.359> about 03:58:01.550 --> 03:58:01.560 align:start position:0% 03:58:01.560 --> 03:58:07.510 align:start position:0% this<03:58:02.560> the<03:58:02.680> last<03:58:02.880> one<03:58:03.239> how<03:58:03.359> would<03:58:03.520> you<03:58:03.600> say 03:58:07.510 --> 03:58:07.520 align:start position:0% 03:58:07.520 --> 03:58:10.790 align:start position:0% this<03:58:08.880> pya<03:58:09.399> finally<03:58:10.000> this<03:58:10.080> is<03:58:10.239> where<03:58:10.479> every 03:58:10.790 --> 03:58:10.800 align:start position:0% this pya finally this is where every 03:58:10.800 --> 03:58:12.510 align:start position:0% this pya finally this is where every concept<03:58:11.199> of<03:58:11.319> the<03:58:11.479> past<03:58:11.720> subjunctive<03:58:12.239> comes<03:58:12.399> to 03:58:12.510 --> 03:58:12.520 align:start position:0% concept of the past subjunctive comes to 03:58:12.520 --> 03:58:14.030 align:start position:0% concept of the past subjunctive comes to an<03:58:12.640> end<03:58:12.960> just<03:58:13.120> like<03:58:13.239> I<03:58:13.319> said<03:58:13.479> in<03:58:13.600> the<03:58:13.720> previous 03:58:14.030 --> 03:58:14.040 align:start position:0% an end just like I said in the previous 03:58:14.040 --> 03:58:15.630 align:start position:0% an end just like I said in the previous videos<03:58:14.479> even<03:58:14.680> though<03:58:14.840> some<03:58:15.000> phrases<03:58:15.359> didn't 03:58:15.630 --> 03:58:15.640 align:start position:0% videos even though some phrases didn't 03:58:15.640 --> 03:58:17.590 align:start position:0% videos even though some phrases didn't make<03:58:15.800> sense<03:58:16.040> to<03:58:16.199> say<03:58:16.560> my<03:58:16.800> goal<03:58:17.120> was<03:58:17.279> just<03:58:17.399> to 03:58:17.590 --> 03:58:17.600 align:start position:0% make sense to say my goal was just to 03:58:17.600 --> 03:58:18.990 align:start position:0% make sense to say my goal was just to present<03:58:17.840> the<03:58:18.040> system<03:58:18.520> of<03:58:18.640> the<03:58:18.800> past 03:58:18.990 --> 03:58:19.000 align:start position:0% present the system of the past 03:58:19.000 --> 03:58:20.750 align:start position:0% present the system of the past subjunctive<03:58:19.600> at<03:58:19.720> the<03:58:19.800> end<03:58:19.960> of<03:58:20.080> the<03:58:20.199> day<03:58:20.560> after 03:58:20.750 --> 03:58:20.760 align:start position:0% subjunctive at the end of the day after 03:58:20.760 --> 03:58:22.670 align:start position:0% subjunctive at the end of the day after you<03:58:21.159> understand<03:58:21.319> the<03:58:21.520> idea<03:58:22.000> it's<03:58:22.159> up<03:58:22.319> to<03:58:22.479> you 03:58:22.670 --> 03:58:22.680 align:start position:0% you understand the idea it's up to you 03:58:22.680 --> 03:58:24.550 align:start position:0% you understand the idea it's up to you to<03:58:22.840> make<03:58:23.040> any<03:58:23.239> sentence<03:58:23.640> that<03:58:23.760> you<03:58:23.880> want<03:58:24.159> using 03:58:24.550 --> 03:58:24.560 align:start position:0% to make any sentence that you want using 03:58:24.560 --> 03:58:26.349 align:start position:0% to make any sentence that you want using any<03:58:24.800> subject<03:58:25.159> and<03:58:25.319> any<03:58:25.560> verb<03:58:25.840> in<03:58:26.000> the<03:58:26.159> past 03:58:26.349 --> 03:58:26.359 align:start position:0% any subject and any verb in the past 03:58:26.359 --> 03:58:28.189 align:start position:0% any subject and any verb in the past subjunctive<03:58:27.040> not<03:58:27.159> to<03:58:27.319> mention<03:58:27.760> that<03:58:27.880> the<03:58:28.040> past 03:58:28.189 --> 03:58:28.199 align:start position:0% subjunctive not to mention that the past 03:58:28.199 --> 03:58:30.149 align:start position:0% subjunctive not to mention that the past subjunctive<03:58:28.680> in<03:58:28.800> Spanish<03:58:29.279> is<03:58:29.399> a<03:58:29.600> concept<03:58:30.040> that 03:58:30.149 --> 03:58:30.159 align:start position:0% subjunctive in Spanish is a concept that 03:58:30.159 --> 03:58:31.710 align:start position:0% subjunctive in Spanish is a concept that is<03:58:30.279> useful<03:58:30.560> to<03:58:30.960> understand<03:58:31.199> and<03:58:31.319> useful<03:58:31.600> to 03:58:31.710 --> 03:58:31.720 align:start position:0% is useful to understand and useful to 03:58:31.720 --> 03:58:33.349 align:start position:0% is useful to understand and useful to utilize<03:58:32.279> so<03:58:32.439> that's<03:58:32.720> that<03:58:32.920> the<03:58:33.040> present 03:58:33.349 --> 03:58:33.359 align:start position:0% utilize so that's that the present 03:58:33.359 --> 03:58:35.189 align:start position:0% utilize so that's that the present perfect<03:58:33.640> subjunctive<03:58:34.279> in<03:58:34.439> Spanish<03:58:34.960> talks 03:58:35.189 --> 03:58:35.199 align:start position:0% perfect subjunctive in Spanish talks 03:58:35.199 --> 03:58:36.990 align:start position:0% perfect subjunctive in Spanish talks about<03:58:35.439> what<03:58:35.560> someone<03:58:35.840> has<03:58:36.000> done<03:58:36.319> or<03:58:36.560> what<03:58:36.760> has 03:58:36.990 --> 03:58:37.000 align:start position:0% about what someone has done or what has 03:58:37.000 --> 03:58:38.469 align:start position:0% about what someone has done or what has happened<03:58:37.359> in<03:58:37.479> the<03:58:37.600> subjunctive<03:58:38.080> form<03:58:38.319> just 03:58:38.469 --> 03:58:38.479 align:start position:0% happened in the subjunctive form just 03:58:38.479 --> 03:58:39.990 align:start position:0% happened in the subjunctive form just just<03:58:38.600> like<03:58:38.720> the<03:58:38.840> regular<03:58:39.159> present<03:58:39.520> perfect 03:58:39.990 --> 03:58:40.000 align:start position:0% just like the regular present perfect 03:58:40.000 --> 03:58:41.469 align:start position:0% just like the regular present perfect the<03:58:40.159> present<03:58:40.439> perfect<03:58:40.720> subjunctive<03:58:41.359> is 03:58:41.469 --> 03:58:41.479 align:start position:0% the present perfect subjunctive is 03:58:41.479 --> 03:58:43.349 align:start position:0% the present perfect subjunctive is formed<03:58:41.840> using<03:58:42.080> the<03:58:42.199> verb<03:58:42.479> a<03:58:42.840> and<03:58:42.960> the<03:58:43.159> past 03:58:43.349 --> 03:58:43.359 align:start position:0% formed using the verb a and the past 03:58:43.359 --> 03:58:45.229 align:start position:0% formed using the verb a and the past participle<03:58:44.000> expressing<03:58:44.399> an<03:58:44.640> action<03:58:45.080> that 03:58:45.229 --> 03:58:45.239 align:start position:0% participle expressing an action that 03:58:45.239 --> 03:58:46.870 align:start position:0% participle expressing an action that recently<03:58:45.680> has<03:58:45.840> happened<03:58:46.199> despite<03:58:46.520> being<03:58:46.720> part 03:58:46.870 --> 03:58:46.880 align:start position:0% recently has happened despite being part 03:58:46.880 --> 03:58:48.670 align:start position:0% recently has happened despite being part of<03:58:46.960> the<03:58:47.120> subjunctives<03:58:47.760> in<03:58:47.880> my<03:58:48.080> opinion<03:58:48.560> the 03:58:48.670 --> 03:58:48.680 align:start position:0% of the subjunctives in my opinion the 03:58:48.680 --> 03:58:50.189 align:start position:0% of the subjunctives in my opinion the present<03:58:48.960> perfect<03:58:49.279> subjunctive<03:58:49.880> is<03:58:50.000> one<03:58:50.080> of 03:58:50.189 --> 03:58:50.199 align:start position:0% present perfect subjunctive is one of 03:58:50.199 --> 03:58:51.990 align:start position:0% present perfect subjunctive is one of the<03:58:50.359> easiest<03:58:50.760> topics<03:58:51.040> to<03:58:51.479> understand<03:58:51.760> because 03:58:51.990 --> 03:58:52.000 align:start position:0% the easiest topics to understand because 03:58:52.000 --> 03:58:54.070 align:start position:0% the easiest topics to understand because the<03:58:52.120> same<03:58:52.520> conditions<03:58:53.000> activated<03:58:53.640> as<03:58:53.800> in<03:58:53.960> the 03:58:54.070 --> 03:58:54.080 align:start position:0% the same conditions activated as in the 03:58:54.080 --> 03:58:55.710 align:start position:0% the same conditions activated as in the normal<03:58:54.479> present<03:58:54.800> perfect<03:58:55.239> unlike<03:58:55.560> the 03:58:55.710 --> 03:58:55.720 align:start position:0% normal present perfect unlike the 03:58:55.720 --> 03:58:57.910 align:start position:0% normal present perfect unlike the present<03:58:56.040> perfect<03:58:56.479> the<03:58:56.600> verb<03:58:56.880> a<03:58:57.279> in<03:58:57.439> this<03:58:57.640> case 03:58:57.910 --> 03:58:57.920 align:start position:0% present perfect the verb a in this case 03:58:57.920 --> 03:58:59.590 align:start position:0% present perfect the verb a in this case needs<03:58:58.120> to<03:58:58.239> be<03:58:58.399> conjugated<03:58:58.960> differently<03:58:59.479> in 03:58:59.590 --> 03:58:59.600 align:start position:0% needs to be conjugated differently in 03:58:59.600 --> 03:59:01.149 align:start position:0% needs to be conjugated differently in the<03:58:59.760> present<03:59:00.040> perfect<03:59:00.319> subjunctive<03:59:00.920> instead 03:59:01.149 --> 03:59:01.159 align:start position:0% the present perfect subjunctive instead 03:59:01.159 --> 03:59:02.750 align:start position:0% the present perfect subjunctive instead of<03:59:01.319> these<03:59:01.520> conjugations<03:59:02.159> you<03:59:02.319> have<03:59:02.560> these 03:59:02.750 --> 03:59:02.760 align:start position:0% of these conjugations you have these 03:59:02.760 --> 03:59:04.830 align:start position:0% of these conjugations you have these ones<03:59:03.199> yo<03:59:03.600> a<03:59:04.040> in<03:59:04.120> the<03:59:04.279> present<03:59:04.560> perfect 03:59:04.830 --> 03:59:04.840 align:start position:0% ones yo a in the present perfect 03:59:04.840 --> 03:59:07.110 align:start position:0% ones yo a in the present perfect subjunctive<03:59:05.439> would<03:59:05.600> mean<03:59:06.159> I<03:59:06.359> have<03:59:06.680> and<03:59:06.800> then<03:59:06.920> a 03:59:07.110 --> 03:59:07.120 align:start position:0% subjunctive would mean I have and then a 03:59:07.120 --> 03:59:10.229 align:start position:0% subjunctive would mean I have and then a past<03:59:07.359> participle<03:59:07.960> to<03:59:08.560> a<03:59:09.040> would<03:59:09.159> mean<03:59:09.520> you<03:59:09.760> have 03:59:10.229 --> 03:59:10.239 align:start position:0% past participle to a would mean you have 03:59:10.239 --> 03:59:16.070 align:start position:0% past participle to a would mean you have El<03:59:11.159> he<03:59:11.439> has<03:59:12.359> noos<03:59:13.359> we<03:59:13.600> have<03:59:14.040> Vos<03:59:14.680> a<03:59:15.439> y'all<03:59:15.760> have 03:59:16.070 --> 03:59:16.080 align:start position:0% El he has noos we have Vos a y'all have 03:59:16.080 --> 03:59:18.189 align:start position:0% El he has noos we have Vos a y'all have and<03:59:16.279> AOS<03:59:16.800> aan<03:59:17.279> they<03:59:17.439> have<03:59:17.720> in<03:59:17.800> the<03:59:17.920> present 03:59:18.189 --> 03:59:18.199 align:start position:0% and AOS aan they have in the present 03:59:18.199 --> 03:59:20.030 align:start position:0% and AOS aan they have in the present perfect<03:59:18.520> subjunctive<03:59:19.120> I<03:59:19.279> recommend<03:59:19.680> focusing 03:59:20.030 --> 03:59:20.040 align:start position:0% perfect subjunctive I recommend focusing 03:59:20.040 --> 03:59:22.229 align:start position:0% perfect subjunctive I recommend focusing on<03:59:20.199> all<03:59:20.439> pronouns<03:59:21.080> except<03:59:21.399> votos<03:59:22.080> because 03:59:22.229 --> 03:59:22.239 align:start position:0% on all pronouns except votos because 03:59:22.239 --> 03:59:23.790 align:start position:0% on all pronouns except votos because they're<03:59:22.399> very<03:59:22.600> useful<03:59:22.880> to<03:59:23.000> know<03:59:23.159> in<03:59:23.319> Spanish 03:59:23.790 --> 03:59:23.800 align:start position:0% they're very useful to know in Spanish 03:59:23.800 --> 03:59:25.590 align:start position:0% they're very useful to know in Spanish just<03:59:23.960> like<03:59:24.120> the<03:59:24.239> normal<03:59:24.600> present<03:59:24.920> subjunctive 03:59:25.590 --> 03:59:25.600 align:start position:0% just like the normal present subjunctive 03:59:25.600 --> 03:59:26.990 align:start position:0% just like the normal present subjunctive sentences<03:59:26.120> in<03:59:26.239> the<03:59:26.359> present<03:59:26.680> perfect 03:59:26.990 --> 03:59:27.000 align:start position:0% sentences in the present perfect 03:59:27.000 --> 03:59:29.429 align:start position:0% sentences in the present perfect subjunctive<03:59:27.680> must<03:59:28.040> all<03:59:28.239> be<03:59:28.479> in<03:59:28.640> some<03:59:28.880> form<03:59:29.279> of 03:59:29.429 --> 03:59:29.439 align:start position:0% subjunctive must all be in some form of 03:59:29.439 --> 03:59:30.870 align:start position:0% subjunctive must all be in some form of the<03:59:29.600> present<03:59:30.080> because<03:59:30.319> the<03:59:30.520> action<03:59:30.760> is 03:59:30.870 --> 03:59:30.880 align:start position:0% the present because the action is 03:59:30.880 --> 03:59:32.349 align:start position:0% the present because the action is occurring<03:59:31.239> before<03:59:31.479> it's<03:59:31.680> expressed<03:59:32.159> in<03:59:32.239> the 03:59:32.349 --> 03:59:32.359 align:start position:0% occurring before it's expressed in the 03:59:32.359 --> 03:59:34.429 align:start position:0% occurring before it's expressed in the main<03:59:32.640> clause<03:59:33.040> in<03:59:33.199> other<03:59:33.399> words<03:59:33.840> every<03:59:34.120> verb 03:59:34.429 --> 03:59:34.439 align:start position:0% main clause in other words every verb 03:59:34.439 --> 03:59:36.429 align:start position:0% main clause in other words every verb within<03:59:34.640> a<03:59:34.800> phrase<03:59:35.319> has<03:59:35.439> to<03:59:35.600> be<03:59:35.880> in<03:59:36.000> the<03:59:36.120> present 03:59:36.429 --> 03:59:36.439 align:start position:0% within a phrase has to be in the present 03:59:36.439 --> 03:59:38.030 align:start position:0% within a phrase has to be in the present form<03:59:36.760> and<03:59:36.920> here's<03:59:37.159> what<03:59:37.279> I<03:59:37.359> mean<03:59:37.680> let's<03:59:37.880> take 03:59:38.030 --> 03:59:38.040 align:start position:0% form and here's what I mean let's take 03:59:38.040 --> 03:59:39.910 align:start position:0% form and here's what I mean let's take the<03:59:38.159> sentence<03:59:38.840> I<03:59:38.960> hope<03:59:39.199> that<03:59:39.319> you<03:59:39.439> have<03:59:39.560> slept 03:59:39.910 --> 03:59:39.920 align:start position:0% the sentence I hope that you have slept 03:59:39.920 --> 03:59:44.990 align:start position:0% the sentence I hope that you have slept well<03:59:40.199> how<03:59:40.319> would<03:59:40.399> you<03:59:40.520> say<03:59:40.640> it<03:59:40.760> in 03:59:44.990 --> 03:59:45.000 align:start position:0% 03:59:45.000 --> 03:59:48.110 align:start position:0% Spanish<03:59:46.000> with<03:59:46.800> being<03:59:46.960> a<03:59:47.080> weird<03:59:47.359> verb<03:59:47.760> ASAS 03:59:48.110 --> 03:59:48.120 align:start position:0% Spanish with being a weird verb ASAS 03:59:48.120 --> 03:59:50.550 align:start position:0% Spanish with being a weird verb ASAS being<03:59:48.319> a<03:59:48.479> conjugation<03:59:49.000> of<03:59:49.279> a<03:59:49.680> and<03:59:49.840> Doro<03:59:50.359> being 03:59:50.550 --> 03:59:50.560 align:start position:0% being a conjugation of a and Doro being 03:59:50.560 --> 03:59:52.349 align:start position:0% being a conjugation of a and Doro being the<03:59:50.720> past<03:59:50.960> participle<03:59:51.439> the<03:59:51.600> convenient<03:59:52.080> part 03:59:52.349 --> 03:59:52.359 align:start position:0% the past participle the convenient part 03:59:52.359 --> 03:59:53.910 align:start position:0% the past participle the convenient part is<03:59:52.479> that<03:59:52.640> unlike<03:59:52.960> the<03:59:53.120> previous<03:59:53.399> subjunctives 03:59:53.910 --> 03:59:53.920 align:start position:0% is that unlike the previous subjunctives 03:59:53.920 --> 03:59:55.349 align:start position:0% is that unlike the previous subjunctives that<03:59:54.040> I've<03:59:54.159> shown<03:59:54.520> both<03:59:54.720> in<03:59:54.880> English<03:59:55.159> and 03:59:55.349 --> 03:59:55.359 align:start position:0% that I've shown both in English and 03:59:55.359 --> 03:59:57.189 align:start position:0% that I've shown both in English and Spanish<03:59:55.840> there's<03:59:56.040> only<03:59:56.319> one<03:59:56.560> way<03:59:56.720> to<03:59:56.880> express 03:59:57.189 --> 03:59:57.199 align:start position:0% Spanish there's only one way to express 03:59:57.199 --> 03:59:59.030 align:start position:0% Spanish there's only one way to express the<03:59:57.319> two<03:59:57.479> sentences<03:59:58.080> because<03:59:58.359> all<03:59:58.600> verbs<03:59:58.920> in 03:59:59.030 --> 03:59:59.040 align:start position:0% the two sentences because all verbs in 03:59:59.040 --> 04:00:00.750 align:start position:0% the two sentences because all verbs in the<03:59:59.159> two<03:59:59.319> phrases<03:59:59.760> are<03:59:59.960> in<04:00:00.080> the<04:00:00.239> present<04:00:00.640> and 04:00:00.750 --> 04:00:00.760 align:start position:0% the two phrases are in the present and 04:00:00.760 --> 04:00:02.550 align:start position:0% the two phrases are in the present and they<04:00:00.840> all<04:00:01.040> have<04:00:01.159> to<04:00:01.439> remain<04:00:01.760> as<04:00:01.920> they<04:00:02.040> do<04:00:02.399> in 04:00:02.550 --> 04:00:02.560 align:start position:0% they all have to remain as they do in 04:00:02.560 --> 04:00:04.510 align:start position:0% they all have to remain as they do in English<04:00:03.040> you<04:00:03.159> can<04:00:03.319> technically<04:00:03.800> say<04:00:04.159> I<04:00:04.279> hope 04:00:04.510 --> 04:00:04.520 align:start position:0% English you can technically say I hope 04:00:04.520 --> 04:00:05.870 align:start position:0% English you can technically say I hope that<04:00:04.640> you<04:00:04.760> slept<04:00:05.120> well<04:00:05.359> but<04:00:05.520> when<04:00:05.600> you<04:00:05.720> put 04:00:05.870 --> 04:00:05.880 align:start position:0% that you slept well but when you put 04:00:05.880 --> 04:00:07.630 align:start position:0% that you slept well but when you put this<04:00:06.040> phrase<04:00:06.239> in<04:00:06.399> Spanish<04:00:06.960> it<04:00:07.080> will<04:00:07.279> not 04:00:07.630 --> 04:00:07.640 align:start position:0% this phrase in Spanish it will not 04:00:07.640 --> 04:00:09.269 align:start position:0% this phrase in Spanish it will not activate<04:00:08.080> the<04:00:08.399> subjunctive<04:00:08.960> because<04:00:09.159> you 04:00:09.269 --> 04:00:09.279 align:start position:0% activate the subjunctive because you 04:00:09.279 --> 04:00:11.110 align:start position:0% activate the subjunctive because you have<04:00:09.399> two<04:00:09.560> different<04:00:09.840> tenses<04:00:10.359> I<04:00:10.520> hope<04:00:10.840> is<04:00:10.960> in 04:00:11.110 --> 04:00:11.120 align:start position:0% have two different tenses I hope is in 04:00:11.120 --> 04:00:13.229 align:start position:0% have two different tenses I hope is in the<04:00:11.319> present<04:00:11.760> and<04:00:11.880> you<04:00:12.040> slept<04:00:12.479> is<04:00:12.600> in<04:00:12.760> the<04:00:12.920> past 04:00:13.229 --> 04:00:13.239 align:start position:0% the present and you slept is in the past 04:00:13.239 --> 04:00:14.990 align:start position:0% the present and you slept is in the past and<04:00:13.399> these<04:00:13.520> two<04:00:13.720> forms<04:00:14.159> do<04:00:14.319> not<04:00:14.560> allow<04:00:14.880> the 04:00:14.990 --> 04:00:15.000 align:start position:0% and these two forms do not allow the 04:00:15.000 --> 04:00:16.790 align:start position:0% and these two forms do not allow the subjunctive<04:00:15.560> to<04:00:15.680> be<04:00:15.840> activated<04:00:16.439> which<04:00:16.560> is<04:00:16.680> why 04:00:16.790 --> 04:00:16.800 align:start position:0% subjunctive to be activated which is why 04:00:16.800 --> 04:00:18.550 align:start position:0% subjunctive to be activated which is why we<04:00:16.960> have<04:00:17.040> to<04:00:17.199> include<04:00:17.640> the<04:00:17.760> present<04:00:18.080> perfect 04:00:18.550 --> 04:00:18.560 align:start position:0% we have to include the present perfect 04:00:18.560 --> 04:00:20.630 align:start position:0% we have to include the present perfect you<04:00:18.760> have<04:00:18.960> slept<04:00:19.520> now<04:00:19.800> the<04:00:19.920> sentence<04:00:20.279> has<04:00:20.439> one 04:00:20.630 --> 04:00:20.640 align:start position:0% you have slept now the sentence has one 04:00:20.640 --> 04:00:24.070 align:start position:0% you have slept now the sentence has one whole<04:00:20.920> tense<04:00:21.359> which<04:00:21.560> allows<04:00:22.000> for<04:00:22.199> the 04:00:24.070 --> 04:00:24.080 align:start position:0% whole tense which allows for the 04:00:24.080 --> 04:00:26.269 align:start position:0% whole tense which allows for the subjunctive<04:00:25.080> unlike<04:00:25.399> the<04:00:25.520> previous<04:00:25.840> videos 04:00:26.269 --> 04:00:26.279 align:start position:0% subjunctive unlike the previous videos 04:00:26.279 --> 04:00:27.870 align:start position:0% subjunctive unlike the previous videos that<04:00:26.399> I've<04:00:26.520> done<04:00:26.720> about<04:00:26.920> the<04:00:27.080> subjunctive<04:00:27.720> in 04:00:27.870 --> 04:00:27.880 align:start position:0% that I've done about the subjunctive in 04:00:27.880 --> 04:00:29.550 align:start position:0% that I've done about the subjunctive in this<04:00:28.080> video<04:00:28.479> I<04:00:28.560> will<04:00:28.680> not<04:00:28.880> present<04:00:29.199> too<04:00:29.359> many 04:00:29.550 --> 04:00:29.560 align:start position:0% this video I will not present too many 04:00:29.560 --> 04:00:31.070 align:start position:0% this video I will not present too many phrases<04:00:30.120> because<04:00:30.319> the<04:00:30.479> present<04:00:30.760> perfect 04:00:31.070 --> 04:00:31.080 align:start position:0% phrases because the present perfect 04:00:31.080 --> 04:00:32.590 align:start position:0% phrases because the present perfect subjunctive<04:00:31.640> is<04:00:31.720> one<04:00:31.840> of<04:00:31.960> the<04:00:32.040> least<04:00:32.359> used 04:00:32.590 --> 04:00:32.600 align:start position:0% subjunctive is one of the least used 04:00:32.600 --> 04:00:34.389 align:start position:0% subjunctive is one of the least used Topics<04:00:32.920> in<04:00:33.080> Spanish<04:00:33.560> some<04:00:33.680> of<04:00:33.800> the<04:00:33.920> sentences 04:00:34.389 --> 04:00:34.399 align:start position:0% Topics in Spanish some of the sentences 04:00:34.399 --> 04:00:36.110 align:start position:0% Topics in Spanish some of the sentences that<04:00:34.479> you<04:00:34.600> will<04:00:34.760> see<04:00:35.040> will<04:00:35.239> randomly<04:00:35.680> be<04:00:35.840> made 04:00:36.110 --> 04:00:36.120 align:start position:0% that you will see will randomly be made 04:00:36.120 --> 04:00:37.590 align:start position:0% that you will see will randomly be made with<04:00:36.239> verbs<04:00:36.520> that<04:00:36.680> come<04:00:36.800> from<04:00:37.000> weird<04:00:37.359> and<04:00:37.479> with 04:00:37.590 --> 04:00:37.600 align:start position:0% with verbs that come from weird and with 04:00:37.600 --> 04:00:39.269 align:start position:0% with verbs that come from weird and with a<04:00:37.680> few<04:00:37.840> phrases<04:00:38.399> having<04:00:38.600> a<04:00:38.720> general<04:00:39.000> main 04:00:39.269 --> 04:00:39.279 align:start position:0% a few phrases having a general main 04:00:39.279 --> 04:00:40.870 align:start position:0% a few phrases having a general main Clause<04:00:39.640> so<04:00:39.800> watch<04:00:39.960> out<04:00:40.159> for<04:00:40.399> that<04:00:40.640> how<04:00:40.760> would 04:00:40.870 --> 04:00:40.880 align:start position:0% Clause so watch out for that how would 04:00:40.880 --> 04:00:45.710 align:start position:0% Clause so watch out for that how would you<04:00:40.960> say<04:00:41.199> this 04:00:45.710 --> 04:00:45.720 align:start position:0% 04:00:45.720 --> 04:00:50.750 align:start position:0% phrase<04:00:46.720> how<04:00:46.840> about<04:00:47.080> this 04:00:50.750 --> 04:00:50.760 align:start position:0% 04:00:50.760 --> 04:00:56.590 align:start position:0% phrase<04:00:51.760> what<04:00:51.880> about<04:00:52.120> this 04:00:56.590 --> 04:00:56.600 align:start position:0% 04:00:56.600 --> 04:01:02.950 align:start position:0% one<04:00:57.600> how<04:00:57.760> about 04:01:02.950 --> 04:01:02.960 align:start position:0% 04:01:02.960 --> 04:01:07.229 align:start position:0% this<04:01:03.960> what<04:01:04.080> about 04:01:07.229 --> 04:01:07.239 align:start position:0% 04:01:07.239 --> 04:01:10.710 align:start position:0% this 04:01:10.710 --> 04:01:10.720 align:start position:0% 04:01:10.720 --> 04:01:16.670 align:start position:0% how<04:01:10.840> would<04:01:10.960> you<04:01:11.080> say 04:01:16.670 --> 04:01:16.680 align:start position:0% 04:01:16.680 --> 04:01:21.990 align:start position:0% this<04:01:17.680> how<04:01:17.800> about 04:01:21.990 --> 04:01:22.000 align:start position:0% 04:01:22.000 --> 04:01:24.389 align:start position:0% this<04:01:23.000> this<04:01:23.120> sentence<04:01:23.520> was<04:01:23.680> a<04:01:23.760> bit<04:01:23.920> tricky 04:01:24.389 --> 04:01:24.399 align:start position:0% this this sentence was a bit tricky 04:01:24.399 --> 04:01:25.630 align:start position:0% this this sentence was a bit tricky because<04:01:24.600> there's<04:01:24.800> a<04:01:24.960> negative<04:01:25.359> and<04:01:25.479> the 04:01:25.630 --> 04:01:25.640 align:start position:0% because there's a negative and the 04:01:25.640 --> 04:01:27.269 align:start position:0% because there's a negative and the direct<04:01:25.960> object<04:01:26.239> pronoun<04:01:26.760> which<04:01:26.840> are<04:01:27.040> both 04:01:27.269 --> 04:01:27.279 align:start position:0% direct object pronoun which are both 04:01:27.279 --> 04:01:29.110 align:start position:0% direct object pronoun which are both placed<04:01:27.720> before<04:01:27.960> the<04:01:28.120> conjugated<04:01:28.600> verbs<04:01:29.000> in 04:01:29.110 --> 04:01:29.120 align:start position:0% placed before the conjugated verbs in 04:01:29.120 --> 04:01:30.510 align:start position:0% placed before the conjugated verbs in case<04:01:29.279> you<04:01:29.399> don't<04:01:29.640> remember<04:01:30.080> the<04:01:30.199> present 04:01:30.510 --> 04:01:30.520 align:start position:0% case you don't remember the present 04:01:30.520 --> 04:01:32.269 align:start position:0% case you don't remember the present perfect<04:01:30.800> subjunctive<04:01:31.399> functions<04:01:31.920> the<04:01:32.000> same 04:01:32.269 --> 04:01:32.279 align:start position:0% perfect subjunctive functions the same 04:01:32.279 --> 04:01:34.189 align:start position:0% perfect subjunctive functions the same way<04:01:32.600> as<04:01:32.720> the<04:01:32.920> regular<04:01:33.319> present<04:01:33.680> perfect<04:01:34.120> which 04:01:34.189 --> 04:01:34.199 align:start position:0% way as the regular present perfect which 04:01:34.199 --> 04:01:36.070 align:start position:0% way as the regular present perfect which means<04:01:34.439> that<04:01:34.560> the<04:01:34.680> phrase<04:01:35.040> a<04:01:35.479> plus<04:01:35.640> a<04:01:35.840> past 04:01:36.070 --> 04:01:36.080 align:start position:0% means that the phrase a plus a past 04:01:36.080 --> 04:01:38.269 align:start position:0% means that the phrase a plus a past participle<04:01:36.680> cannot<04:01:37.000> be<04:01:37.120> split<04:01:37.479> apart<04:01:37.920> this<04:01:38.080> is 04:01:38.269 --> 04:01:38.279 align:start position:0% participle cannot be split apart this is 04:01:38.279 --> 04:01:40.149 align:start position:0% participle cannot be split apart this is is<04:01:38.399> the<04:01:38.560> reason<04:01:39.000> why<04:01:39.199> negatives<04:01:39.680> and<04:01:39.840> object 04:01:40.149 --> 04:01:40.159 align:start position:0% is the reason why negatives and object 04:01:40.159 --> 04:01:42.309 align:start position:0% is the reason why negatives and object pronouns<04:01:40.720> are<04:01:40.960> always<04:01:41.319> placed<04:01:41.840> before<04:01:42.120> this 04:01:42.309 --> 04:01:42.319 align:start position:0% pronouns are always placed before this 04:01:42.319 --> 04:01:48.670 align:start position:0% pronouns are always placed before this construction<04:01:43.000> how<04:01:43.080> would<04:01:43.239> you<04:01:43.319> say 04:01:48.670 --> 04:01:48.680 align:start position:0% 04:01:48.680 --> 04:01:54.590 align:start position:0% this<04:01:49.680> how<04:01:49.760> about<04:01:50.000> this 04:01:54.590 --> 04:01:54.600 align:start position:0% 04:01:54.600 --> 04:01:56.750 align:start position:0% phrase<04:01:55.600> once<04:01:55.840> again<04:01:56.080> we<04:01:56.199> have<04:01:56.319> a<04:01:56.439> direct 04:01:56.750 --> 04:01:56.760 align:start position:0% phrase once again we have a direct 04:01:56.760 --> 04:01:58.110 align:start position:0% phrase once again we have a direct object<04:01:57.040> pronoun<04:01:57.439> coming<04:01:57.760> before<04:01:58.000> the 04:01:58.110 --> 04:01:58.120 align:start position:0% object pronoun coming before the 04:01:58.120 --> 04:01:59.750 align:start position:0% object pronoun coming before the conjugated<04:01:58.640> verb<04:01:58.960> here's<04:01:59.159> the<04:01:59.319> last<04:01:59.520> phrase 04:01:59.750 --> 04:01:59.760 align:start position:0% conjugated verb here's the last phrase 04:01:59.760 --> 04:02:04.870 align:start position:0% conjugated verb here's the last phrase for<04:01:59.920> the<04:02:00.080> video<04:02:00.439> how<04:02:00.560> would<04:02:00.680> you<04:02:00.800> say 04:02:04.870 --> 04:02:04.880 align:start position:0% 04:02:04.880 --> 04:02:07.429 align:start position:0% it<04:02:05.880> this<04:02:06.000> sentence<04:02:06.479> was<04:02:06.680> the<04:02:06.800> trickiest 04:02:07.429 --> 04:02:07.439 align:start position:0% it this sentence was the trickiest 04:02:07.439 --> 04:02:09.110 align:start position:0% it this sentence was the trickiest because<04:02:07.600> it<04:02:07.680> had<04:02:07.800> a<04:02:07.880> negative<04:02:08.439> and<04:02:08.560> two<04:02:08.800> object 04:02:09.110 --> 04:02:09.120 align:start position:0% because it had a negative and two object 04:02:09.120 --> 04:02:10.790 align:start position:0% because it had a negative and two object pronouns<04:02:09.640> which<04:02:09.760> were<04:02:09.920> all<04:02:10.120> put<04:02:10.439> before<04:02:10.680> the 04:02:10.790 --> 04:02:10.800 align:start position:0% pronouns which were all put before the 04:02:10.800 --> 04:02:12.590 align:start position:0% pronouns which were all put before the conjugative<04:02:11.279> verb<04:02:11.600> conversationally<04:02:12.479> it 04:02:12.590 --> 04:02:12.600 align:start position:0% conjugative verb conversationally it 04:02:12.600 --> 04:02:14.710 align:start position:0% conjugative verb conversationally it will<04:02:12.760> not<04:02:13.000> be<04:02:13.239> as<04:02:13.640> difficult<04:02:13.920> as<04:02:14.120> this<04:02:14.399> so<04:02:14.640> this 04:02:14.710 --> 04:02:14.720 align:start position:0% will not be as difficult as this so this 04:02:14.720 --> 04:02:16.590 align:start position:0% will not be as difficult as this so this is<04:02:14.920> the<04:02:15.040> most<04:02:15.359> that<04:02:15.479> you<04:02:15.600> have<04:02:15.720> to<04:02:15.840> know<04:02:16.120> and 04:02:16.590 --> 04:02:16.600 align:start position:0% is the most that you have to know and 04:02:16.600 --> 04:02:17.670 align:start position:0% is the most that you have to know and understand<04:02:16.840> with<04:02:17.000> the<04:02:17.120> present<04:02:17.399> perfect 04:02:17.670 --> 04:02:17.680 align:start position:0% understand with the present perfect 04:02:17.680 --> 04:02:18.710 align:start position:0% understand with the present perfect subjunctive<04:02:18.199> even<04:02:18.399> though<04:02:18.520> it's<04:02:18.600> a 04:02:18.710 --> 04:02:18.720 align:start position:0% subjunctive even though it's a 04:02:18.720 --> 04:02:20.590 align:start position:0% subjunctive even though it's a subjunctive<04:02:19.279> the<04:02:19.439> present<04:02:19.760> perfect<04:02:20.159> has<04:02:20.399> very 04:02:20.590 --> 04:02:20.600 align:start position:0% subjunctive the present perfect has very 04:02:20.600 --> 04:02:22.670 align:start position:0% subjunctive the present perfect has very minimal<04:02:21.000> use<04:02:21.359> in<04:02:21.479> the<04:02:21.640> subjunctive<04:02:22.199> itself 04:02:22.670 --> 04:02:22.680 align:start position:0% minimal use in the subjunctive itself 04:02:22.680 --> 04:02:24.550 align:start position:0% minimal use in the subjunctive itself mainly<04:02:23.040> because<04:02:23.399> it's<04:02:23.560> not<04:02:23.720> used<04:02:23.960> that<04:02:24.199> often 04:02:24.550 --> 04:02:24.560 align:start position:0% mainly because it's not used that often 04:02:24.560 --> 04:02:26.469 align:start position:0% mainly because it's not used that often and<04:02:24.720> like<04:02:24.880> I<04:02:25.040> always<04:02:25.359> say<04:02:25.720> it's<04:02:25.840> a<04:02:26.040> concept 04:02:26.469 --> 04:02:26.479 align:start position:0% and like I always say it's a concept 04:02:26.479 --> 04:02:28.269 align:start position:0% and like I always say it's a concept that<04:02:26.600> is<04:02:26.720> more<04:02:26.880> useful<04:02:27.199> to<04:02:27.359> Know<04:02:27.640> Than<04:02:27.800> to<04:02:27.920> use 04:02:28.269 --> 04:02:28.279 align:start position:0% that is more useful to Know Than to use 04:02:28.279 --> 04:02:29.670 align:start position:0% that is more useful to Know Than to use so<04:02:28.479> that's<04:02:28.720> that<04:02:29.000> the<04:02:29.159> past<04:02:29.399> perfect 04:02:29.670 --> 04:02:29.680 align:start position:0% so that's that the past perfect 04:02:29.680 --> 04:02:31.469 align:start position:0% so that's that the past perfect subjunctive<04:02:30.159> in<04:02:30.279> Spanish<04:02:30.760> speaks<04:02:31.080> about<04:02:31.359> what 04:02:31.469 --> 04:02:31.479 align:start position:0% subjunctive in Spanish speaks about what 04:02:31.479 --> 04:02:33.349 align:start position:0% subjunctive in Spanish speaks about what someone<04:02:31.760> had<04:02:31.920> done<04:02:32.239> or<04:02:32.439> what<04:02:32.640> had<04:02:32.840> happened<04:02:33.239> in 04:02:33.349 --> 04:02:33.359 align:start position:0% someone had done or what had happened in 04:02:33.359 --> 04:02:34.870 align:start position:0% someone had done or what had happened in the<04:02:33.479> subjunctive<04:02:33.920> form<04:02:34.279> like<04:02:34.439> the<04:02:34.560> present 04:02:34.870 --> 04:02:34.880 align:start position:0% the subjunctive form like the present 04:02:34.880 --> 04:02:36.429 align:start position:0% the subjunctive form like the present perfect<04:02:35.159> subjunctive<04:02:35.760> the<04:02:35.920> past<04:02:36.159> perfect 04:02:36.429 --> 04:02:36.439 align:start position:0% perfect subjunctive the past perfect 04:02:36.439 --> 04:02:38.590 align:start position:0% perfect subjunctive the past perfect subjunctive<04:02:37.000> also<04:02:37.199> uses<04:02:37.520> the<04:02:37.640> construction<04:02:38.239> a 04:02:38.590 --> 04:02:38.600 align:start position:0% subjunctive also uses the construction a 04:02:38.600 --> 04:02:40.590 align:start position:0% subjunctive also uses the construction a plus<04:02:38.760> a<04:02:38.960> past<04:02:39.199> participle<04:02:39.800> but<04:02:39.920> in<04:02:40.080> this<04:02:40.239> case 04:02:40.590 --> 04:02:40.600 align:start position:0% plus a past participle but in this case 04:02:40.600 --> 04:02:42.389 align:start position:0% plus a past participle but in this case the<04:02:40.760> verb<04:02:41.040> a<04:02:41.479> has<04:02:41.600> to<04:02:41.720> be<04:02:41.880> conjugated 04:02:42.389 --> 04:02:42.399 align:start position:0% the verb a has to be conjugated 04:02:42.399 --> 04:02:43.790 align:start position:0% the verb a has to be conjugated differently<04:02:42.920> because<04:02:43.120> the<04:02:43.279> past<04:02:43.520> perfect 04:02:43.790 --> 04:02:43.800 align:start position:0% differently because the past perfect 04:02:43.800 --> 04:02:45.710 align:start position:0% differently because the past perfect subjunctive<04:02:44.399> speaks<04:02:44.680> of<04:02:44.800> the<04:02:44.960> imperfect<04:02:45.479> past 04:02:45.710 --> 04:02:45.720 align:start position:0% subjunctive speaks of the imperfect past 04:02:45.720 --> 04:02:47.910 align:start position:0% subjunctive speaks of the imperfect past tense<04:02:46.279> y<04:02:46.479> UA<04:02:47.159> in<04:02:47.239> the<04:02:47.399> past<04:02:47.600> perfect 04:02:47.910 --> 04:02:47.920 align:start position:0% tense y UA in the past perfect 04:02:47.920 --> 04:02:50.070 align:start position:0% tense y UA in the past perfect subjunctive<04:02:48.520> would<04:02:48.680> mean<04:02:49.120> I<04:02:49.319> had<04:02:49.640> and<04:02:49.760> then<04:02:49.880> a 04:02:50.070 --> 04:02:50.080 align:start position:0% subjunctive would mean I had and then a 04:02:50.080 --> 04:02:53.910 align:start position:0% subjunctive would mean I had and then a past<04:02:50.319> participle<04:02:50.920> to<04:02:51.199> uas<04:02:52.080> you<04:02:52.319> had<04:02:52.720> El<04:02:53.000> U<04:02:53.720> he 04:02:53.910 --> 04:02:53.920 align:start position:0% past participle to uas you had El U he 04:02:53.920 --> 04:02:54.990 align:start position:0% past participle to uas you had El U he had 04:02:54.990 --> 04:02:55.000 align:start position:0% had 04:02:55.000 --> 04:02:57.189 align:start position:0% had noos<04:02:56.000> we 04:02:57.189 --> 04:02:57.199 align:start position:0% noos we 04:02:57.199 --> 04:03:00.870 align:start position:0% noos we had<04:02:58.199> y'all<04:02:58.520> had<04:02:59.040> andos<04:03:00.040> they<04:03:00.199> had<04:03:00.439> in<04:03:00.520> the<04:03:00.680> past 04:03:00.870 --> 04:03:00.880 align:start position:0% had y'all had andos they had in the past 04:03:00.880 --> 04:03:02.469 align:start position:0% had y'all had andos they had in the past perfect<04:03:01.199> subjunctive<04:03:01.760> I<04:03:01.880> recommend<04:03:02.319> not 04:03:02.469 --> 04:03:02.479 align:start position:0% perfect subjunctive I recommend not 04:03:02.479 --> 04:03:03.990 align:start position:0% perfect subjunctive I recommend not focusing<04:03:02.840> on<04:03:03.040> these<04:03:03.239> pronouns<04:03:03.800> because 04:03:03.990 --> 04:03:04.000 align:start position:0% focusing on these pronouns because 04:03:04.000 --> 04:03:05.590 align:start position:0% focusing on these pronouns because they're<04:03:04.159> not<04:03:04.359> that<04:03:04.479> useful<04:03:04.800> in<04:03:04.960> conversation 04:03:05.590 --> 04:03:05.600 align:start position:0% they're not that useful in conversation 04:03:05.600 --> 04:03:07.269 align:start position:0% they're not that useful in conversation just<04:03:05.760> like<04:03:05.880> the<04:03:06.040> regular<04:03:06.439> past<04:03:06.720> perfect<04:03:07.120> the 04:03:07.269 --> 04:03:07.279 align:start position:0% just like the regular past perfect the 04:03:07.279 --> 04:03:09.510 align:start position:0% just like the regular past perfect the past<04:03:07.439> perfect<04:03:07.720> subun<04:03:08.479> indicates<04:03:09.000> actions 04:03:09.510 --> 04:03:09.520 align:start position:0% past perfect subun indicates actions 04:03:09.520 --> 04:03:11.389 align:start position:0% past perfect subun indicates actions that<04:03:09.720> had<04:03:09.920> taken<04:03:10.279> place<04:03:10.640> before<04:03:10.960> another 04:03:11.389 --> 04:03:11.399 align:start position:0% that had taken place before another 04:03:11.399 --> 04:03:13.110 align:start position:0% that had taken place before another action<04:03:11.760> in<04:03:11.920> the<04:03:12.080> past<04:03:12.479> additionally 04:03:13.110 --> 04:03:13.120 align:start position:0% action in the past additionally 04:03:13.120 --> 04:03:14.349 align:start position:0% action in the past additionally sentences<04:03:13.600> in<04:03:13.680> the<04:03:13.840> past<04:03:14.080> perfect 04:03:14.349 --> 04:03:14.359 align:start position:0% sentences in the past perfect 04:03:14.359 --> 04:03:16.710 align:start position:0% sentences in the past perfect subjunctive<04:03:15.000> must<04:03:15.279> all<04:03:15.560> be<04:03:15.880> in<04:03:16.120> some<04:03:16.279> form<04:03:16.600> of 04:03:16.710 --> 04:03:16.720 align:start position:0% subjunctive must all be in some form of 04:03:16.720 --> 04:03:18.429 align:start position:0% subjunctive must all be in some form of the<04:03:16.920> past<04:03:17.279> because<04:03:17.520> the<04:03:17.680> action<04:03:17.960> occurred 04:03:18.429 --> 04:03:18.439 align:start position:0% the past because the action occurred 04:03:18.439 --> 04:03:19.950 align:start position:0% the past because the action occurred before<04:03:18.680> being<04:03:19.000> expressed<04:03:19.520> in<04:03:19.640> the<04:03:19.720> main 04:03:19.950 --> 04:03:19.960 align:start position:0% before being expressed in the main 04:03:19.960 --> 04:03:22.030 align:start position:0% before being expressed in the main clause<04:03:20.399> in<04:03:20.560> other<04:03:20.760> words<04:03:21.199> every<04:03:21.439> verb<04:03:21.800> within 04:03:22.030 --> 04:03:22.040 align:start position:0% clause in other words every verb within 04:03:22.040 --> 04:03:24.110 align:start position:0% clause in other words every verb within a<04:03:22.159> phrase<04:03:22.640> has<04:03:22.800> to<04:03:22.920> be<04:03:23.080> in<04:03:23.199> the<04:03:23.359> imperfect<04:03:23.800> form 04:03:24.110 --> 04:03:24.120 align:start position:0% a phrase has to be in the imperfect form 04:03:24.120 --> 04:03:25.429 align:start position:0% a phrase has to be in the imperfect form which<04:03:24.239> is<04:03:24.319> similar<04:03:24.600> to<04:03:24.720> the<04:03:24.840> present<04:03:25.159> perfect 04:03:25.429 --> 04:03:25.439 align:start position:0% which is similar to the present perfect 04:03:25.439 --> 04:03:27.189 align:start position:0% which is similar to the present perfect subjunctive<04:03:26.040> where<04:03:26.239> every<04:03:26.520> verb<04:03:26.840> within<04:03:27.080> a 04:03:27.189 --> 04:03:27.199 align:start position:0% subjunctive where every verb within a 04:03:27.199 --> 04:03:28.950 align:start position:0% subjunctive where every verb within a phrase<04:03:27.560> is<04:03:27.680> in<04:03:27.800> the<04:03:27.960> present<04:03:28.399> in<04:03:28.560> this<04:03:28.720> case 04:03:28.950 --> 04:03:28.960 align:start position:0% phrase is in the present in this case 04:03:28.960 --> 04:03:30.469 align:start position:0% phrase is in the present in this case we're<04:03:29.159> working<04:03:29.439> in<04:03:29.560> the<04:03:29.760> past<04:03:30.080> and<04:03:30.239> because 04:03:30.469 --> 04:03:30.479 align:start position:0% we're working in the past and because 04:03:30.479 --> 04:03:32.030 align:start position:0% we're working in the past and because the<04:03:30.600> past<04:03:30.840> perfect<04:03:31.120> subjunctive<04:03:31.680> is<04:03:31.800> one<04:03:31.920> of 04:03:32.030 --> 04:03:32.040 align:start position:0% the past perfect subjunctive is one of 04:03:32.040 --> 04:03:33.750 align:start position:0% the past perfect subjunctive is one of the<04:03:32.159> least<04:03:32.359> used<04:03:32.680> Topics<04:03:32.960> in<04:03:33.120> Spanish<04:03:33.600> and 04:03:33.750 --> 04:03:33.760 align:start position:0% the least used Topics in Spanish and 04:03:33.760 --> 04:03:35.189 align:start position:0% the least used Topics in Spanish and also<04:03:34.000> because<04:03:34.199> it's<04:03:34.359> the<04:03:34.520> final<04:03:34.800> Spanish 04:03:35.189 --> 04:03:35.199 align:start position:0% also because it's the final Spanish 04:03:35.199 --> 04:03:37.229 align:start position:0% also because it's the final Spanish concept<04:03:35.600> that<04:03:35.720> I<04:03:35.840> will<04:03:36.040> cover<04:03:36.479> I<04:03:36.560> will<04:03:36.840> present 04:03:37.229 --> 04:03:37.239 align:start position:0% concept that I will cover I will present 04:03:37.239 --> 04:03:38.950 align:start position:0% concept that I will cover I will present just<04:03:37.399> a<04:03:37.479> few<04:03:37.640> sentences<04:03:38.239> in<04:03:38.359> this<04:03:38.520> video<04:03:38.840> the 04:03:38.950 --> 04:03:38.960 align:start position:0% just a few sentences in this video the 04:03:38.960 --> 04:03:40.229 align:start position:0% just a few sentences in this video the sentences<04:03:39.399> that<04:03:39.479> you<04:03:39.600> will<04:03:39.720> see<04:03:40.040> will 04:03:40.229 --> 04:03:40.239 align:start position:0% sentences that you will see will 04:03:40.239 --> 04:03:41.910 align:start position:0% sentences that you will see will randomly<04:03:40.680> be<04:03:40.840> made<04:03:41.159> with<04:03:41.319> verbs<04:03:41.640> that<04:03:41.760> come 04:03:41.910 --> 04:03:41.920 align:start position:0% randomly be made with verbs that come 04:03:41.920 --> 04:03:43.710 align:start position:0% randomly be made with verbs that come from<04:03:42.080> weird<04:03:42.479> and<04:03:42.600> with<04:03:42.720> a<04:03:42.840> few<04:03:43.040> phrases<04:03:43.520> having 04:03:43.710 --> 04:03:43.720 align:start position:0% from weird and with a few phrases having 04:03:43.720 --> 04:03:45.429 align:start position:0% from weird and with a few phrases having a<04:03:43.840> general<04:03:44.159> main<04:03:44.439> Clause<04:03:44.880> how<04:03:44.960> would<04:03:45.120> you<04:03:45.199> say 04:03:45.429 --> 04:03:45.439 align:start position:0% a general main Clause how would you say 04:03:45.439 --> 04:03:48.830 align:start position:0% a general main Clause how would you say this 04:03:48.830 --> 04:03:48.840 align:start position:0% 04:03:48.840 --> 04:03:55.229 align:start position:0% phrase<04:03:49.840> how<04:03:49.960> about<04:03:50.159> this 04:03:55.229 --> 04:03:55.239 align:start position:0% 04:03:55.239 --> 04:04:00.630 align:start position:0% phrase<04:03:56.239> what<04:03:56.359> about<04:03:56.600> this 04:04:00.630 --> 04:04:00.640 align:start position:0% 04:04:00.640 --> 04:04:02.990 align:start position:0% one<04:04:01.640> this<04:04:01.760> sentence<04:04:02.199> was<04:04:02.319> a<04:04:02.399> bit<04:04:02.560> tricky 04:04:02.990 --> 04:04:03.000 align:start position:0% one this sentence was a bit tricky 04:04:03.000 --> 04:04:04.670 align:start position:0% one this sentence was a bit tricky because<04:04:03.199> it's<04:04:03.359> put<04:04:03.520> in<04:04:03.680> question<04:04:04.000> form<04:04:04.439> along 04:04:04.670 --> 04:04:04.680 align:start position:0% because it's put in question form along 04:04:04.680 --> 04:04:06.870 align:start position:0% because it's put in question form along with<04:04:04.800> using<04:04:05.199> ABIA<04:04:05.720> as<04:04:05.840> the<04:04:06.000> phrase<04:04:06.399> there<04:04:06.600> was 04:04:06.870 --> 04:04:06.880 align:start position:0% with using ABIA as the phrase there was 04:04:06.880 --> 04:04:08.469 align:start position:0% with using ABIA as the phrase there was in<04:04:07.000> the<04:04:07.120> imperfect<04:04:07.560> tense<04:04:08.040> how<04:04:08.120> would<04:04:08.199> you<04:04:08.319> say 04:04:08.469 --> 04:04:08.479 align:start position:0% in the imperfect tense how would you say 04:04:08.479 --> 04:04:11.630 align:start position:0% in the imperfect tense how would you say this 04:04:11.630 --> 04:04:11.640 align:start position:0% 04:04:11.640 --> 04:04:13.870 align:start position:0% phrase 04:04:13.870 --> 04:04:13.880 align:start position:0% phrase 04:04:13.880 --> 04:04:16.269 align:start position:0% phrase no<04:04:14.880> this<04:04:15.000> sentence<04:04:15.399> was<04:04:15.520> a<04:04:15.640> bit<04:04:15.800> hard<04:04:16.120> because 04:04:16.269 --> 04:04:16.279 align:start position:0% no this sentence was a bit hard because 04:04:16.279 --> 04:04:17.590 align:start position:0% no this sentence was a bit hard because we<04:04:16.399> had<04:04:16.520> to<04:04:16.600> use<04:04:16.800> double<04:04:17.080> negatives<04:04:17.439> in 04:04:17.590 --> 04:04:17.600 align:start position:0% we had to use double negatives in 04:04:17.600 --> 04:04:19.389 align:start position:0% we had to use double negatives in Spanish<04:04:18.080> and<04:04:18.199> also<04:04:18.439> because<04:04:18.640> it<04:04:18.760> wasn't<04:04:19.080> clear 04:04:19.389 --> 04:04:19.399 align:start position:0% Spanish and also because it wasn't clear 04:04:19.399 --> 04:04:21.269 align:start position:0% Spanish and also because it wasn't clear who<04:04:19.560> the<04:04:19.680> subject<04:04:20.080> was<04:04:20.359> in<04:04:20.479> the<04:04:20.640> phrase<04:04:21.080> here's 04:04:21.269 --> 04:04:21.279 align:start position:0% who the subject was in the phrase here's 04:04:21.279 --> 04:04:22.830 align:start position:0% who the subject was in the phrase here's the<04:04:21.479> last<04:04:21.720> example<04:04:22.040> for<04:04:22.279> this<04:04:22.439> video<04:04:22.760> how 04:04:22.830 --> 04:04:22.840 align:start position:0% the last example for this video how 04:04:22.840 --> 04:04:28.630 align:start position:0% the last example for this video how would<04:04:22.960> you<04:04:23.080> say<04:04:23.199> it<04:04:23.279> in 04:04:28.630 --> 04:04:28.640 align:start position:0% 04:04:28.640 --> 04:04:30.870 align:start position:0% Spanish<04:04:29.640> this<04:04:29.760> sentence<04:04:30.199> was<04:04:30.359> also<04:04:30.560> a<04:04:30.680> bit 04:04:30.870 --> 04:04:30.880 align:start position:0% Spanish this sentence was also a bit 04:04:30.880 --> 04:04:32.750 align:start position:0% Spanish this sentence was also a bit hard<04:04:31.199> because<04:04:31.399> we<04:04:31.520> had<04:04:31.640> to<04:04:31.760> use<04:04:32.080> era<04:04:32.479> as<04:04:32.600> the 04:04:32.750 --> 04:04:32.760 align:start position:0% hard because we had to use era as the 04:04:32.760 --> 04:04:34.469 align:start position:0% hard because we had to use era as the imperfect<04:04:33.159> tense<04:04:33.359> of<04:04:33.600> was<04:04:33.920> and<04:04:34.040> also<04:04:34.279> because 04:04:34.469 --> 04:04:34.479 align:start position:0% imperfect tense of was and also because 04:04:34.479 --> 04:04:36.389 align:start position:0% imperfect tense of was and also because we<04:04:34.600> had<04:04:34.680> a<04:04:34.840> direct<04:04:35.159> object<04:04:35.439> pronoun<04:04:35.800> L<04:04:36.120> coming 04:04:36.389 --> 04:04:36.399 align:start position:0% we had a direct object pronoun L coming 04:04:36.399 --> 04:04:38.429 align:start position:0% we had a direct object pronoun L coming before<04:04:36.640> the<04:04:36.800> construction<04:04:37.479> a<04:04:37.960> plus<04:04:38.120> a<04:04:38.239> past 04:04:38.429 --> 04:04:38.439 align:start position:0% before the construction a plus a past 04:04:38.439 --> 04:04:40.389 align:start position:0% before the construction a plus a past participle<04:04:39.000> conversationally<04:04:39.920> it<04:04:40.040> will<04:04:40.199> not 04:04:40.389 --> 04:04:40.399 align:start position:0% participle conversationally it will not 04:04:40.399 --> 04:04:42.309 align:start position:0% participle conversationally it will not be<04:04:40.640> as<04:04:41.040> difficult<04:04:41.359> as<04:04:41.600> this<04:04:41.880> so<04:04:42.040> it's<04:04:42.159> a 04:04:42.309 --> 04:04:42.319 align:start position:0% be as difficult as this so it's a 04:04:42.319 --> 04:04:44.030 align:start position:0% be as difficult as this so it's a concept<04:04:42.800> that<04:04:42.880> is<04:04:43.000> more<04:04:43.159> useful<04:04:43.479> to<04:04:43.600> Know<04:04:43.880> Than 04:04:44.030 --> 04:04:44.040 align:start position:0% concept that is more useful to Know Than 04:04:44.040 --> 04:04:46.030 align:start position:0% concept that is more useful to Know Than to<04:04:44.199> use<04:04:44.560> so<04:04:44.800> that's<04:04:45.040> that<04:04:45.279> and<04:04:45.479> here<04:04:45.720> this<04:04:45.920> is 04:04:46.030 --> 04:04:46.040 align:start position:0% to use so that's that and here this is 04:04:46.040 --> 04:04:47.710 align:start position:0% to use so that's that and here this is where<04:04:46.199> the<04:04:46.319> final<04:04:46.640> Spanish<04:04:47.080> concept<04:04:47.479> and<04:04:47.600> all 04:04:47.710 --> 04:04:47.720 align:start position:0% where the final Spanish concept and all 04:04:47.720 --> 04:04:49.389 align:start position:0% where the final Spanish concept and all of<04:04:47.840> its<04:04:48.000> fundamentals<04:04:48.720> come<04:04:48.880> to<04:04:49.000> an<04:04:49.120> end 04:04:49.389 --> 04:04:49.399 align:start position:0% of its fundamentals come to an end 04:04:49.399 --> 04:04:50.870 align:start position:0% of its fundamentals come to an end throughout<04:04:49.760> all<04:04:49.880> of<04:04:50.000> the<04:04:50.159> videos<04:04:50.600> that<04:04:50.720> I've 04:04:50.870 --> 04:04:50.880 align:start position:0% throughout all of the videos that I've 04:04:50.880 --> 04:04:52.750 align:start position:0% throughout all of the videos that I've done<04:04:51.080> for<04:04:51.279> the<04:04:51.399> past<04:04:51.600> few<04:04:51.800> months<04:04:52.239> I<04:04:52.399> basically 04:04:52.750 --> 04:04:52.760 align:start position:0% done for the past few months I basically 04:04:52.760 --> 04:04:54.429 align:start position:0% done for the past few months I basically covered<04:04:53.159> every<04:04:53.359> Spanish<04:04:53.720> principle<04:04:54.199> and 04:04:54.429 --> 04:04:54.439 align:start position:0% covered every Spanish principle and 04:04:54.439 --> 04:04:55.910 align:start position:0% covered every Spanish principle and concept<04:04:54.880> that<04:04:55.040> one<04:04:55.239> has<04:04:55.359> to<04:04:55.520> know<04:04:55.760> when 04:04:55.910 --> 04:04:55.920 align:start position:0% concept that one has to know when 04:04:55.920 --> 04:04:57.269 align:start position:0% concept that one has to know when learning<04:04:56.239> Spanish<04:04:56.720> beginning<04:04:57.040> with<04:04:57.159> my 04:04:57.269 --> 04:04:57.279 align:start position:0% learning Spanish beginning with my 04:04:57.279 --> 04:04:58.910 align:start position:0% learning Spanish beginning with my Spanish<04:04:57.600> fundamentals<04:04:58.239> video<04:04:58.560> all<04:04:58.680> the<04:04:58.800> way 04:04:58.910 --> 04:04:58.920 align:start position:0% Spanish fundamentals video all the way 04:04:58.920 --> 04:05:01.149 align:start position:0% Spanish fundamentals video all the way to<04:04:59.080> now<04:04:59.439> I<04:04:59.600> demonstrated<04:05:00.319> what<04:05:00.439> is<04:05:00.560> it<04:05:00.760> like<04:05:01.040> to 04:05:01.149 --> 04:05:01.159 align:start position:0% to now I demonstrated what is it like to 04:05:01.159 --> 04:05:03.189 align:start position:0% to now I demonstrated what is it like to learn<04:05:01.399> the<04:05:01.520> basis<04:05:01.960> of<04:05:02.159> any<04:05:02.399> language<04:05:02.840> before 04:05:03.189 --> 04:05:03.199 align:start position:0% learn the basis of any language before 04:05:03.199 --> 04:05:04.830 align:start position:0% learn the basis of any language before actively<04:05:03.560> speaking<04:05:03.880> it<04:05:04.159> in<04:05:04.319> this<04:05:04.520> case 04:05:04.830 --> 04:05:04.840 align:start position:0% actively speaking it in this case 04:05:04.840 --> 04:05:06.830 align:start position:0% actively speaking it in this case Spanish<04:05:05.439> like<04:05:05.560> I've<04:05:05.760> always<04:05:06.040> said<04:05:06.319> previously 04:05:06.830 --> 04:05:06.840 align:start position:0% Spanish like I've always said previously 04:05:06.840 --> 04:05:08.590 align:start position:0% Spanish like I've always said previously before<04:05:07.080> learning<04:05:07.359> to<04:05:07.479> speak<04:05:07.960> any<04:05:08.120> language 04:05:08.590 --> 04:05:08.600 align:start position:0% before learning to speak any language 04:05:08.600 --> 04:05:10.630 align:start position:0% before learning to speak any language everyone<04:05:09.159> has<04:05:09.279> to<04:05:09.439> know<04:05:09.720> and<04:05:10.239> understand<04:05:10.479> the 04:05:10.630 --> 04:05:10.640 align:start position:0% everyone has to know and understand the 04:05:10.640 --> 04:05:12.550 align:start position:0% everyone has to know and understand the fundamentals<04:05:11.439> of<04:05:11.600> the<04:05:11.760> language<04:05:12.199> and<04:05:12.319> that's 04:05:12.550 --> 04:05:12.560 align:start position:0% fundamentals of the language and that's 04:05:12.560 --> 04:05:14.429 align:start position:0% fundamentals of the language and that's exactly<04:05:13.040> what<04:05:13.120> I've<04:05:13.279> shown<04:05:13.600> over<04:05:13.880> time<04:05:14.199> all<04:05:14.319> of 04:05:14.429 --> 04:05:14.439 align:start position:0% exactly what I've shown over time all of 04:05:14.439 --> 04:05:16.510 align:start position:0% exactly what I've shown over time all of my<04:05:14.600> previous<04:05:14.960> videos<04:05:15.399> include<04:05:15.840> every<04:05:16.120> Spanish 04:05:16.510 --> 04:05:16.520 align:start position:0% my previous videos include every Spanish 04:05:16.520 --> 04:05:18.550 align:start position:0% my previous videos include every Spanish idea<04:05:16.960> in<04:05:17.080> order<04:05:17.319> to<04:05:17.760> understand<04:05:18.040> how<04:05:18.199> Spanish 04:05:18.550 --> 04:05:18.560 align:start position:0% idea in order to understand how Spanish 04:05:18.560 --> 04:05:20.229 align:start position:0% idea in order to understand how Spanish fully<04:05:18.840> works<04:05:19.239> as<04:05:19.359> a<04:05:19.520> language<04:05:19.960> and<04:05:20.080> once 04:05:20.229 --> 04:05:20.239 align:start position:0% fully works as a language and once 04:05:20.239 --> 04:05:21.910 align:start position:0% fully works as a language and once you've<04:05:20.479> understood<04:05:21.000> how<04:05:21.120> to<04:05:21.279> utilize<04:05:21.760> these 04:05:21.910 --> 04:05:21.920 align:start position:0% you've understood how to utilize these 04:05:21.920 --> 04:05:23.750 align:start position:0% you've understood how to utilize these ideas<04:05:22.399> you<04:05:22.479> can<04:05:22.600> speak<04:05:22.840> the<04:05:23.000> language<04:05:23.439> any<04:05:23.600> way 04:05:23.750 --> 04:05:23.760 align:start position:0% ideas you can speak the language any way 04:05:23.760 --> 04:05:25.429 align:start position:0% ideas you can speak the language any way you<04:05:23.920> want<04:05:24.239> once<04:05:24.399> you<04:05:24.840> understand<04:05:25.159> what<04:05:25.319> you 04:05:25.429 --> 04:05:25.439 align:start position:0% you want once you understand what you 04:05:25.439 --> 04:05:27.510 align:start position:0% you want once you understand what you know<04:05:25.800> you<04:05:25.880> can<04:05:26.080> then<04:05:26.239> focus<04:05:26.720> on<04:05:26.920> mastering<04:05:27.399> the 04:05:27.510 --> 04:05:27.520 align:start position:0% know you can then focus on mastering the 04:05:27.520 --> 04:05:30.309 align:start position:0% know you can then focus on mastering the language<04:05:27.960> using<04:05:28.279> the<04:05:28.439> method<04:05:28.800> that<04:05:28.960> fits<04:05:29.319> you 04:05:30.309 --> 04:05:30.319 align:start position:0% language using the method that fits you 04:05:30.319 --> 04:05:32.149 align:start position:0% language using the method that fits you now<04:05:30.479> that<04:05:30.640> this<04:05:30.800> long<04:05:31.080> video<04:05:31.319> is<04:05:31.520> over<04:05:31.920> I<04:05:32.040> want 04:05:32.149 --> 04:05:32.159 align:start position:0% now that this long video is over I want 04:05:32.159 --> 04:05:33.830 align:start position:0% now that this long video is over I want to<04:05:32.279> take<04:05:32.399> a<04:05:32.520> few<04:05:32.760> seconds<04:05:33.159> to<04:05:33.359> explain<04:05:33.720> what 04:05:33.830 --> 04:05:33.840 align:start position:0% to take a few seconds to explain what 04:05:33.840 --> 04:05:35.269 align:start position:0% to take a few seconds to explain what I've<04:05:33.960> shown<04:05:34.399> as<04:05:34.520> someone<04:05:34.720> who<04:05:34.880> teaches 04:05:35.269 --> 04:05:35.279 align:start position:0% I've shown as someone who teaches 04:05:35.279 --> 04:05:36.910 align:start position:0% I've shown as someone who teaches themselves<04:05:35.600> languages<04:05:36.159> I've<04:05:36.319> had<04:05:36.520> my<04:05:36.680> own 04:05:36.910 --> 04:05:36.920 align:start position:0% themselves languages I've had my own 04:05:36.920 --> 04:05:38.990 align:start position:0% themselves languages I've had my own ways<04:05:37.239> of<04:05:37.399> explaining<04:05:37.920> information<04:05:38.319> to<04:05:38.520> myself 04:05:38.990 --> 04:05:39.000 align:start position:0% ways of explaining information to myself 04:05:39.000 --> 04:05:40.469 align:start position:0% ways of explaining information to myself which<04:05:39.120> a<04:05:39.199> lot<04:05:39.359> of<04:05:39.479> people<04:05:39.680> don't<04:05:39.960> really 04:05:40.469 --> 04:05:40.479 align:start position:0% which a lot of people don't really 04:05:40.479 --> 04:05:41.990 align:start position:0% which a lot of people don't really understand<04:05:40.800> the<04:05:40.920> whole<04:05:41.159> point<04:05:41.479> of<04:05:41.720> every 04:05:41.990 --> 04:05:42.000 align:start position:0% understand the whole point of every 04:05:42.000 --> 04:05:43.950 align:start position:0% understand the whole point of every video<04:05:42.399> that<04:05:42.600> I've<04:05:42.760> done<04:05:43.120> including<04:05:43.560> this<04:05:43.720> long 04:05:43.950 --> 04:05:43.960 align:start position:0% video that I've done including this long 04:05:43.960 --> 04:05:46.229 align:start position:0% video that I've done including this long video<04:05:44.199> too<04:05:44.640> is<04:05:44.720> to<04:05:44.920> explain<04:05:45.439> the<04:05:45.600> system<04:05:46.120> of 04:05:46.229 --> 04:05:46.239 align:start position:0% video too is to explain the system of 04:05:46.239 --> 04:05:48.110 align:start position:0% video too is to explain the system of how<04:05:46.359> to<04:05:46.560> think<04:05:46.880> when<04:05:47.000> learning<04:05:47.359> new<04:05:47.560> languages 04:05:48.110 --> 04:05:48.120 align:start position:0% how to think when learning new languages 04:05:48.120 --> 04:05:49.750 align:start position:0% how to think when learning new languages I<04:05:48.239> completely<04:05:48.920> understand<04:05:49.199> that<04:05:49.399> everyone 04:05:49.750 --> 04:05:49.760 align:start position:0% I completely understand that everyone 04:05:49.760 --> 04:05:51.309 align:start position:0% I completely understand that everyone has<04:05:49.920> their<04:05:50.080> own<04:05:50.279> way<04:05:50.439> of<04:05:50.560> learning<04:05:51.000> but<04:05:51.159> like 04:05:51.309 --> 04:05:51.319 align:start position:0% has their own way of learning but like 04:05:51.319 --> 04:05:53.229 align:start position:0% has their own way of learning but like I've<04:05:51.479> always<04:05:51.760> said<04:05:52.120> everyone<04:05:52.600> has<04:05:52.720> to<04:05:52.920> know 04:05:53.229 --> 04:05:53.239 align:start position:0% I've always said everyone has to know 04:05:53.239 --> 04:05:55.630 align:start position:0% I've always said everyone has to know and<04:05:53.720> understand<04:05:54.080> the<04:05:54.239> basis<04:05:54.720> of<04:05:54.880> any<04:05:55.120> language 04:05:55.630 --> 04:05:55.640 align:start position:0% and understand the basis of any language 04:05:55.640 --> 04:05:57.229 align:start position:0% and understand the basis of any language my<04:05:55.840> goal<04:05:56.159> wasn't<04:05:56.439> to<04:05:56.560> teach<04:05:56.760> how<04:05:56.880> to<04:05:57.000> speak 04:05:57.229 --> 04:05:57.239 align:start position:0% my goal wasn't to teach how to speak 04:05:57.239 --> 04:05:58.870 align:start position:0% my goal wasn't to teach how to speak Spanish<04:05:57.760> because<04:05:57.960> you<04:05:58.040> can<04:05:58.199> do<04:05:58.359> so<04:05:58.560> on<04:05:58.720> your 04:05:58.870 --> 04:05:58.880 align:start position:0% Spanish because you can do so on your 04:05:58.880 --> 04:06:01.110 align:start position:0% Spanish because you can do so on your own<04:05:59.239> but<04:05:59.439> rather<04:05:59.880> how<04:06:00.040> to<04:06:00.239> think<04:06:00.600> in<04:06:00.760> terms<04:06:01.000> of 04:06:01.110 --> 04:06:01.120 align:start position:0% own but rather how to think in terms of 04:06:01.120 --> 04:06:02.870 align:start position:0% own but rather how to think in terms of speaking<04:06:01.600> this<04:06:01.760> video<04:06:02.239> had<04:06:02.479> everything<04:06:02.800> that 04:06:02.870 --> 04:06:02.880 align:start position:0% speaking this video had everything that 04:06:02.880 --> 04:06:04.870 align:start position:0% speaking this video had everything that you<04:06:03.000> needed<04:06:03.399> to<04:06:03.560> start<04:06:03.800> to<04:06:03.960> think<04:06:04.120> in<04:06:04.279> Spanish 04:06:04.870 --> 04:06:04.880 align:start position:0% you needed to start to think in Spanish 04:06:04.880 --> 04:06:06.830 align:start position:0% you needed to start to think in Spanish that<04:06:05.000> is<04:06:05.319> if<04:06:05.399> it<04:06:05.560> was<04:06:05.720> your<04:06:05.920> goal<04:06:06.239> unlike<04:06:06.600> other 04:06:06.830 --> 04:06:06.840 align:start position:0% that is if it was your goal unlike other 04:06:06.840 --> 04:06:08.630 align:start position:0% that is if it was your goal unlike other Educators<04:06:07.359> that<04:06:07.479> teach<04:06:07.840> Spanish<04:06:08.159> differently 04:06:08.630 --> 04:06:08.640 align:start position:0% Educators that teach Spanish differently 04:06:08.640 --> 04:06:10.510 align:start position:0% Educators that teach Spanish differently I<04:06:08.720> chose<04:06:08.960> to<04:06:09.120> go<04:06:09.279> with<04:06:09.479> this<04:06:09.640> format<04:06:10.159> in<04:06:10.279> order 04:06:10.510 --> 04:06:10.520 align:start position:0% I chose to go with this format in order 04:06:10.520 --> 04:06:12.590 align:start position:0% I chose to go with this format in order to<04:06:10.640> not<04:06:10.840> waste<04:06:11.159> anyone's<04:06:11.640> Time<04:06:12.000> Each<04:06:12.239> video 04:06:12.590 --> 04:06:12.600 align:start position:0% to not waste anyone's Time Each video 04:06:12.600 --> 04:06:14.710 align:start position:0% to not waste anyone's Time Each video was<04:06:12.720> an<04:06:12.960> explanation<04:06:13.560> of<04:06:13.680> a<04:06:13.800> Spanish<04:06:14.199> concept 04:06:14.710 --> 04:06:14.720 align:start position:0% was an explanation of a Spanish concept 04:06:14.720 --> 04:06:16.269 align:start position:0% was an explanation of a Spanish concept without<04:06:15.040> any<04:06:15.279> additional<04:06:15.680> information 04:06:16.269 --> 04:06:16.279 align:start position:0% without any additional information 04:06:16.279 --> 04:06:18.429 align:start position:0% without any additional information before<04:06:16.640> or<04:06:16.880> after<04:06:17.319> I<04:06:17.439> completely<04:06:18.159> understand 04:06:18.429 --> 04:06:18.439 align:start position:0% before or after I completely understand 04:06:18.439 --> 04:06:20.670 align:start position:0% before or after I completely understand that<04:06:18.600> some<04:06:18.840> formats<04:06:19.319> were<04:06:19.560> very<04:06:19.840> fast<04:06:20.279> and 04:06:20.670 --> 04:06:20.680 align:start position:0% that some formats were very fast and 04:06:20.680 --> 04:06:22.429 align:start position:0% that some formats were very fast and sometimes<04:06:21.080> it<04:06:21.199> was<04:06:21.399> impossible<04:06:21.840> to<04:06:22.000> follow 04:06:22.429 --> 04:06:22.439 align:start position:0% sometimes it was impossible to follow 04:06:22.439 --> 04:06:24.389 align:start position:0% sometimes it was impossible to follow what<04:06:22.600> I<04:06:22.680> was<04:06:22.840> saying<04:06:23.199> but<04:06:23.319> this<04:06:23.479> was<04:06:23.640> my<04:06:23.960> way<04:06:24.239> of 04:06:24.389 --> 04:06:24.399 align:start position:0% what I was saying but this was my way of 04:06:24.399 --> 04:06:26.269 align:start position:0% what I was saying but this was my way of explaining<04:06:24.880> things<04:06:25.279> without<04:06:25.560> wasting<04:06:25.960> time 04:06:26.269 --> 04:06:26.279 align:start position:0% explaining things without wasting time 04:06:26.279 --> 04:06:28.110 align:start position:0% explaining things without wasting time and<04:06:26.399> I<04:06:26.479> do<04:06:26.680> really<04:06:27.000> apologize<04:06:27.479> for<04:06:27.720> that<04:06:27.920> for 04:06:28.110 --> 04:06:28.120 align:start position:0% and I do really apologize for that for 04:06:28.120 --> 04:06:30.030 align:start position:0% and I do really apologize for that for many<04:06:28.399> people<04:06:28.720> learning<04:06:29.120> language<04:06:29.520> Concepts 04:06:30.030 --> 04:06:30.040 align:start position:0% many people learning language Concepts 04:06:30.040 --> 04:06:32.229 align:start position:0% many people learning language Concepts very<04:06:30.319> fast<04:06:30.640> is<04:06:30.840> unfitting<04:06:31.479> annoying<04:06:32.080> and 04:06:32.229 --> 04:06:32.239 align:start position:0% very fast is unfitting annoying and 04:06:32.239 --> 04:06:34.149 align:start position:0% very fast is unfitting annoying and potentially<04:06:32.720> irritating<04:06:33.319> and<04:06:33.399> I<04:06:33.520> completely 04:06:34.149 --> 04:06:34.159 align:start position:0% potentially irritating and I completely 04:06:34.159 --> 04:06:35.630 align:start position:0% potentially irritating and I completely understand<04:06:34.359> that<04:06:34.800> however<04:06:35.080> because<04:06:35.359> I<04:06:35.439> tend 04:06:35.630 --> 04:06:35.640 align:start position:0% understand that however because I tend 04:06:35.640 --> 04:06:37.870 align:start position:0% understand that however because I tend to<04:06:35.760> learn<04:06:36.040> languages<04:06:36.560> as<04:06:36.680> a<04:06:36.840> polyglot<04:06:37.479> iend 04:06:37.870 --> 04:06:37.880 align:start position:0% to learn languages as a polyglot iend 04:06:37.880 --> 04:06:39.710 align:start position:0% to learn languages as a polyglot iend end<04:06:38.000> up<04:06:38.120> teaching<04:06:38.439> them<04:06:38.680> as<04:06:38.800> a<04:06:38.960> polyg<04:06:39.479> and<04:06:39.560> it's 04:06:39.710 --> 04:06:39.720 align:start position:0% end up teaching them as a polyg and it's 04:06:39.720 --> 04:06:41.189 align:start position:0% end up teaching them as a polyg and it's something<04:06:40.000> that's<04:06:40.159> very<04:06:40.359> unfitting<04:06:40.800> for<04:06:41.000> many 04:06:41.189 --> 04:06:41.199 align:start position:0% something that's very unfitting for many 04:06:41.199 --> 04:06:42.910 align:start position:0% something that's very unfitting for many people<04:06:41.560> and<04:06:41.680> I'm<04:06:41.840> really<04:06:42.040> sorry<04:06:42.439> if<04:06:42.560> I<04:06:42.680> went 04:06:42.910 --> 04:06:42.920 align:start position:0% people and I'm really sorry if I went 04:06:42.920 --> 04:06:45.269 align:start position:0% people and I'm really sorry if I went too<04:06:43.199> fast<04:06:43.520> in<04:06:43.640> some<04:06:43.960> Concepts<04:06:44.600> anyhow<04:06:45.120> thank 04:06:45.269 --> 04:06:45.279 align:start position:0% too fast in some Concepts anyhow thank 04:06:45.279 --> 04:06:46.870 align:start position:0% too fast in some Concepts anyhow thank you<04:06:45.359> for<04:06:45.560> watching<04:06:46.040> and<04:06:46.159> I<04:06:46.319> hope<04:06:46.560> that<04:06:46.680> your 04:06:46.870 --> 04:06:46.880 align:start position:0% you for watching and I hope that your 04:06:46.880 --> 04:06:49.429 align:start position:0% you for watching and I hope that your learning<04:06:47.479> became<04:06:47.920> the<04:06:48.080> simplest<04:06:48.640> it<04:06:48.760> can<04:06:48.960> be 04:06:49.429 --> 04:06:49.439 align:start position:0% learning became the simplest it can be 04:06:49.439 --> 04:06:51.920 align:start position:0% learning became the simplest it can be thank<04:06:49.600> you